HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet 11-22-19917A
9D
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: November 22, 1991
TO: Planning Commissioners
FROM: Chuck Dillerud, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REQUESTED ON PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
Per your request from the November 13, 1991 Planning Commission meeting,
please find the attached for the above referenced:
1. PUD Summaries and Matrix
2. Woodcreek Subdivision Unit Project
3. Glen Echo Ponds Mixed Planned Unit Development
4. Heritage Ridge Residential Planned Unit Development
5. Harbor Place Residential Planned Unit Development
6. Location Map of Unplatted LA -1 and LA -2 Guided Property
pc /cd /pc.pud)
PUD SUMMARIES
Eden Prairie
The Eden Prairie Planned Unit Development regulation contains specific
development standards for the creation of a Planned Unit Development as
identified on the attached matrix. In addition, the PUD regulations contain
specific application requirements such as the timing of Public Hearings on the
project and a requirement that the developer submit a financial guarantee
deposit to defray City costs involved in reviewing the proposal. Any money
left over after the review process has been completed is refunded to the
developer. The regulations also require that the developer provide a source
and type of financing that will be used for the proposed project. The
regulations do contain a purpose section of which the PUD's should relate to.
These include:
1. To encourage a more creative and efficient approach to the use of land in
the city;
2. To allow variety in the types of environment available to people in the
city;
3. To encourage a more efficient allocation and maintenance of privately
controlled common open space through the distribution of overall density,
population and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable
and feasible; and,
4. Provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility and environmental
design than is provided under the strict application of the provisions of
the Zoning Ordinance.
Eagan
The Eagan Planned Development District section does not contain any specific
design standards for Planned Developments (Planned Unit Developments). The
only guidance provided by the ordinance is in the purpose section. Planned
Developments are permitted after a determination by the Planning Commission
and City Council that the Planned Development will:
1. Better adapt itself to its physical and aesthetic settings of that of
surrounding lands than does development of the underlying zoning district;
and,
2. Be feasible for the owner and developer economically to complete according
to proposed plans; and,
3. Benefit the community at large to a greater degree than would development
of the underlying zoning district.
Maple Grove
The Maple Grove Planned Unit Development regulations contain specific
development standards for the creation of a Planned Unit Development as
identified on the attached matrix. Several of the standards are similar to
Plymouth's Planned Unit Development ordinance regulations. The Maple Grove
ordinance lists ten items that PUD's are intended to encourage such as:
1-
1. Innovations in residential development to the end that the growing demands
for housing at all economic levels may be met by greater variety in `
tenure, type, design, and siting of dwellings and by the conservation and
more efficient use of land in such developments;
2. Higher standards of site and building design through the use of drained
and experienced land planners, architects and landscape architects;
3. More convenience in location of accessory commercial and service areas;
4. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as
natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil
erosion;
5. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a
phased and orderly transition of land from rural to urban uses;
6. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and
streets and thereby lower housing costs and public investments;
7. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Maple Grove
Comprehensive Plan;
8. A more desirable environment than would be possible through the strict
application of zoning and subdivision regulations of the City;
9. Reasonable assurance to the landowner and developer of ultimate approval
before expending complete design monies, while providing City officials
with assurances that the project will retain the character envisioned at
the time of concurrence; and,
10. PUD is also intended to allow variation from the strict literal provisions
of this ordinance including, but not limited to, requirements relating to
setbacks, height, lot area, width, depth, yards, minimum floor space
requirements, and uses.
The Maple Grove ordinance also specifically requires open space in the plan.
In addition, the open space must be tied to any phasing plan that is approved.
The open space in a PUD cannot be left to the final phase of the project. The
open space must be phased correspondingly to the rest of development. The
Maple Grove ordinance also contains specific application guidelines including
specific timing standards for the review process of the proposal.
Brooklyn Park
The Brooklyn Park Planned Unit Development regulations contains specific
development standards for the creation of a Planned Unit Development.
Residential PUD standards are identified on the attached matrix. Brooklyn
Park's ordinance separates specific standards for residential, business, and
industrial Planned Unit Developments. _
In addition to PUD's, the Brooklyn Park ordinance also contains provisions for
Planned Development Areas for residential districts that "have unusual
building characteristics due to subsurface conditions, elevations of water
table, or other natural features, relative location, or shape of the parcel
may require more unique platting techniques ". Specific standards have also
2 -
table, or other natural features, relative location, or shape of the parcel
may require more unique platting techniques ". Specific standards have also
been set forth for these planned development areas including a minimum of 10
acres, the possibility of variances from the subdivision ordinance regulations
and minimum lot frontage on public streets for lots.
sr:pc /jk /pud:jw)
3 -
PUD COMPARISONS
November
PLYMOUTH EDEN PRAIRIE EAGAN MAPLE GROVE BROOKLYN PARK
QUANTITATIVE
MINIMUM 40 acres 15 acres NONE NONE RESIDENTIAL: PARCEL SIZE Not less than
one acre; NOR
less than MY
ft frontage on
public street.
BUSINESS: Not
less than 2
acres; NOR less
than 206Tt
street frontage
INDUSTRIAL: Not
less than 5 acr
BONUS /PENALTY YES NO NO NO NOFORPARCELSIZE?
OPEN SPACE To preserve / NO NO Required by all NOREQUIRED? enhance worth- developments.
while, natural Residential PUDs
terrain charac require common
teristics A not recreational
force intense areas in addtn
development park dedication
be at least 104
shall be so at
each stage of
development.
SETBACKS
SPECIFIED?
NO NO NO Front & Side No bldg nearer
must = those for than its hght
that district. to rear or
No bldg < 15' curb side line of
of internal street Resid. dist.
No bldg nearer No bldg nearer
another than 1/2 another than
sum two heights. 1/2 sum of
two heights.
No bldg < 15'
from curb of
internal steet
DENSITY
FLEX?
Bonus Points NO NO As per Comp. Plan. YES for PLANNED
as per LA No stage when DEVELOPMENT
category in averaged w /others AREAS. The #
Comp. Plan. completed can of units can't
125% density. exceed the
total i
permitted under
the use dist.
for the land.
MISC.
TOWNHOUSES: ROAD WIDTHS:
None have more Business &
than 8 units. Residential
Min. lot frontage must be > 25'
SPECIFIED
not less than 201. Industrial Dist
UA LIT IVE
must be > 36'
CHARACTERISTICS
ARCHITECTURE? YES NO NO Encouraged NO
NATURAL RESOURCE YES NO NO YES NO
PRESERVATION?
PUD ATTRIBUTES YES NO NO PUD is to NO
THAT THE PLAN encourage unique
MUST ADDRESS? development.
OTHER Private
STANDARDS roadways are
REQUIREMENTS? permitted. pc /pud.11 -20)
w -L*4,*M
LUNDGREN BROTHERS
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION UNIT PROJECT
1972
i
m
E]
VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH
W COD r
A -SOS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting
of the Village Council of the Village of Plymouth, Minnesota, was
held on the 10th day of'July, 1972. The following members were
present: Mayor Hilde, Councilmen Hunt, Seibold and Spaeth. The
following members were absent: Councilman Neils.
Councilman Seibold introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 72 -231
WHEREAS, Lundgren Brothers Construction Company has requested
Preliminary Plat approval for "Wood Creek" under the Village Sub-
division Regulations, and
WHEREAS, the Village Planning Commission and Village Park
and Recreation Advisory Commission have reviewed the Preliminary
Plat,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH that the Preliminary Plat for "Wood Creek" be
approved subject ;.o the following conditions:
1. That the maximum number of lots not exceed f-Ifty -nine
59) in number assuming the present gross area of the
site to be 31.88 acres, and that if the area is found
to be significantly changed after being surveyed that
the number of lots will be altered accordingly.
2. That Outlots A and B, as shown on Exhibit As be donated
to the Village as a fulfillment of the Village park
donation requirement.
3. That thi outlot between Lot 2, Block 3 and Lot 3, Block
6 be eliminated.
4. That Outlot C be extended easterly to 33rd Avenue with
a twenty (20) foot wide strip of land thence providing
pedestrian access to Outlot C.
S. That a Homeowners' Association be established with
adequate documents submitted prior to final plat approval
6. That the Homeowners' Association be given title to Out -
lot C and Outlot D and changed with the maintenance and
development of said outlots.
7. That the developer and Homeowners' Association be en-
couraged to work with the Park and Recreation Depart-
ment in the development and maintenance of Outlots A
and B.
Woop
A--30S
1
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing99 Resolution was
i
duly seconded by Councilman Hunt, and upon vote being taken there -I
on, the following voted 1n favor trereof: Mayor Hilde, Council-
men Hunt, Seibold and Spaeth. The following vcted against: None.1
t Whereupon the Resolution was declarsd duly passed and adopted.
r
STATE OF MINNESOTA
1 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN SS.
VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and actingijClerkoftheVillageofPlymotith, Minnesota, hereby certify that
have carefully compared the Foregoing extract of the minuteslI
of a regular meeting of the Village Council of said Village held
on July 10, 1972 with the original thereof on file in my office
and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom.
Wi'NESS, My hand officially as such clerk and the corporate
11 seal of the Village this 21st day of July, 1912.
i
j Sandra L. Haugen
j Village Clerk
1 Village of Plymouth, Minnesota
i
i`
iji
i
i
it
if
M
i
li I
iin,. -
th.
E LOCATION MAPot
t 3 e o AKE RD. 491
i 5CHM1
OF
MINNEAPOLIS , ;H'
o WOOD CREEK T N
LAESTADIAN Av z T T
HURaIiT T
IN ; A -305 1 IN
L
toN
E. J
S 16 N wrE p
1 z
z ' i
W
1. _
STN AVE. . -__v_
AVE •er« AVE 451
ISTM AVE .. •fir
T" So 4TH PL i . .. —._ PILGRIM
UNITED ••ra . t
o
J •
r« METHODIST
ZACHARY NELA
8 AVE • , CHURCH i
ELEM SCHOOL z
Ir a'
w
r
Q f
d EN " <
I
p J
41
A
ROCKFORO R
a
LOS% Z
ISt wiJas
p• q 4 O a LAKE Y
E
5 Np4 C
rl" 1Q W 40
l• 91 N
O AVE NO.
MT. OLIVET T q 4 't
LOTH. CH. p. 40 39
4 <
78 H z
ST
I.t
JOSEPH
zo c tH 4
ti
ACE
C
p WAY 39 TH a J
o fF F ti 0PILGRIIf d
v 7TH .
1sh N /Y /ETON E FRENCH v H
s c
C
37 TH t.
P
REGIONAL Fo tc t z "15. `' 36
AVE. 3 th .t
PL NORTH' j J
o PAR." < MOUTH 35PLY
fr« Av
ARMSTRONC
JR
MO
r
y
SR HIGH
4
AVE NO z
Y
W '
1 J
33 D
C- 0 34 THAVE.
I J
fo :
ASSI -
IFREE _
2• - -. - 31
y, 2.3- - - - LUT 'RA 'RANCH. .
A , ]
C0
A 2
foT«
31St •
q Q. •• Q
I i 9ia Y 29TH AVE.'
H
2 T
J
a V •
1JJ J E AVE. •
8 TH A <
28 H <
Q it O J J OCpt1T. PL i u ; _
2mj> MEDICINE
V ZoLH c a s 26 a • 2f
CN. X'o z
4 ~
I2ytMAVE
TN AVE a o , . LAKE i
i
u •. I
VI I23NTR4LL .a
K BLVD. ' > C
p4 K
9 •
7 i
t 4
OICIN
a
LATER 26 ° - 25-
vo -TECH 1 > G
IR Y WORD OF .LIFE 1v 5 ; a \ I •
b 0 CM. AV L4 i i. •1 n .•. f
n
0
1 r
0
r
j•x
Av,30mC=n
yw ••• M
v
CA
4A t
Y v
N 11E W.76N LA N SC4
200 NDIZ315ye 0
1 Nom• o-
r 41713
I"•
V
v
13,Soo ---- ' - - - - --
IS
tv
i —Oki
Oa g M
v 7
1 w A1631
1
1 z w N•
cr am
k
C i x .. ..
u — •'
41 + v
136 ..
p 7 ,t
UNION TER
cp
Sw ~
I0cip
w cp
Sm Iwo 1A
AR OA -n ''
Le
tr t ts.
V
1 `
M 11'0't 10• It't!
b
s 000 I` ;
a. -.1 f91,r» 0 . i • » C1 i _... • 2612.
1
GLEN ECHO PONDS
CONSTRUCTION MORTGAGE INVESTMENT
GONYEA INVESTMENT CO.
MIXED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
tj.
3
MEWS
CITY OF PLVWJTH
Tin
Cr le n Echo 6
MOW
Pursuant is due mall Mind 00088 that to a r't ulit tin0 of tie City Council Of
the City st Pl)outh. Minnesotalp ass meld as tai, a — -F, day et A2rJ1 -
The f Uowisq m sh +r 6 acre pmm tt Mayor Dayenoort. r unci l mem e s linen . Me _ s .
Schneider and Crain .
rte
TW on ap members were absents
0"
Ma
spa
Councilmember Schneider introduced the tolloetng Resolution and now its
pt ons
RESOLUTION NO. 64- 218
APPROVAL S C pLpNJpLAT9 AND
INVESTMENT
CONSTRUCTION
MORTGACE INVESTORS ONPARY, INC $ AM CONYEA COIPANY (MPU(% 04 1) WOOS)
WHEREAS, Construction Mortgage Investors Company, Inc., and Gonyea Investment Company
have requested approval of MPUD Preliminary Plan /Plat, Rezoning, and Conditional Use
Permit for a development of aaproximately 27.5 acres located south of 15th Avenue
North, north of 11th Avenue North, and west of Pinev.lew Lanes and,
wF*:REAS, the Planning Commission has considered the request following a duly scheduled
Public Fearing and has recommended approvall
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMnH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the MPUD Preliminary Plat /Plan,
and Conditional Use Permit for a development of approximately 27.5 acres located south
of 15th Avenue North, north of 11th Avenue North, and west of Pineview Lane, subject to
the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the ps•operty at the owner's expense.
j. No Building Per Its shall be issued until a contract has been awarded for
municipal sewer and water.
4. Payment of ,perk dedication
of
dedication In
Final Plat.
accordance with the
Dedication Policy i effect at the time
S. Provisions for a 15 -ft. wide trail easement per Comprehensive Park Plan, as
verified by the Parks and Engineering Departments, with submittal of detailed
plans as to construction of the trail per City standards, and that the trail
be located on the east side of. the industrial parcel, allowing access to the
rail spur. The trail construction shall be included in the first phase of
development.
6. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System.
PLEkSE SEE PACE Two
CA
N" xr j [ . +i•1
r .
t /.:4 rl i ff '.' r .•'
r' •
r• •_ c r' r. 1 • •;
A 91400'a
u' •
Ail '•
Q +
X
4 ,page 'Avo
k; Msoluttan No. d -218
7. Cooplianos with Policy Resolution No. 79 -d0 regarding minimum floor elevations
for new structures in subdivisions adjacent to or Containing any open storm
water drainage facility.
9. Rezoning shall be finalized with filing of the Final Plat.
9. No building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded
with Hennepin County.
10. Yard setbacks for the t-esidentlel units are 25 h. front yards 10 ft. side
yard$ and 20 ft. rear yard. The industrial area shall be subject to Ordinance
setbacks, pending required site plan approval.
11. Appropriate legal documents regarding Homeowner Association covenants and
restrictions a3 approved by the City Attorneyq shall be filed with the Final'
Plat, to include covenants which would preclude any type of attached housing.
12. The density shall be 38 units. One lot shall be eliminated from south of 12th
Avenue in Block 3. The other lot shall be eliminated from north of 12th
Avenue and along the east side of Sycamore Lane with the balance of land split
among the rest of the lots.
13. The Final Plat shall reflect a right -of -way dedication for 13th Avenue which
complies with the graphic dated April 16j 1964 prepared by the City relative
to 13th Avenue right -of -way, including a cul -de -sac south of Sycamore Lane
which would be contiguous to the north property line.
14. Approval is contingent upon an executed Development Contract.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
C m ffber Moen . and upw: vote being taken t ereon, t e
ow ng voted In favor the ceo IWor venport_ Councilmeffbe c Wen, Neils,_
Schneider and Crain
W following vot aga nst or obstalnedt
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly !m •
dsk$ -A
risfas - Is
jf WIIRI
Iq
P.7
IMP
r 11'1 '
NId
I-
r: fh-
Y
y
ai'.
f"
n.
99 tq"qqq
j u :aaj
8 x:11111!
U , stt ,
tt•tttu
i:c sat
i2.a33:3i
t4+!l44t? 1
1!!•tusst
cstcescts3i
I
I Z
I 7MV1 C0042SOM
LLJ
3MV1 3MORTZAS OILA" ±
r-
LL,
Lai
A ••N'U
dt ,
ME7Jd
a:r.ch as . tti,a
1
LE N mo
loot y
ills —`—
t
1 t ;
i'
M O % 3x7`
14 /
J
It
A ••N'U
dt ,
ME7Jd
a:r.ch as . tti,a
1
I
1
milli,il,tkt11
c "Viltus,
iiiil iiiiC atiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
t ? ?s ?.pp' })sst!!?stet.. sctstu is?
111 ilia 'tllil_ll:i iiii iiliiiiitll
n= a'aa!_t?lii5illil!!slttl:
1
ti
1
N
v • u ,
N '
W Iz OA
W
v I
l
a
1a 1i
r•lfSeYt CtITtIMSi 't`w
I •t
s-
og
sy4
W
r as
is
Jtfp... 1 O
w w
w
Wei
a
1a 1i
r•lfSeYt CtITtIMSi 't`w
HERITAGE RIDGE
IMAGE HOMES
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
1987
CIFY of PLYMOUTH g q 03
s
1 ,Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a _regular meeting of the City Council of the
Cit of Plyeouth Minnesota, was held on theZ d day of FebruarYy , 1987. The
following members were presents Mayor Schneider Zeouncilmexnbers Craing 51sk, Vasiliou
and titur Me—
following itembers were sent: none
Cot fsr wtr
Councilmember titur introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoptions
RESOLUTION NO. 87 -66
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN, PRELIMINARY PLAN /PLAT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR IMAGE HOMES FOR HERITAGE RIDGE (86087)
WHEREAS, Image Homes has requested approval of a Residential Planned Unit Development
Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan /Plat, Rezoning, and Conditional Use Permit for the
development of 74 single family residential lots on approximately 41.67 acres located
northwest and southeast of Northwest Blvd., at West Medicine Lake Drive; and,
MEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public
Informational Hearing and at a subsequent regular meeting;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Residential Planned Unit Development
Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan /Plat and Conditional Use Permit for Image Homes for a
development to be known as Heritage Ridge, consisting of 74 single family residential
lots on approximately 41.67 acres located northwest and southeast of Northwest Blvd.,
at West Medicine Lake Drive, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense.
3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for sewer
and water.
4. Park dedication shall be satisfied with land dedication in accordance with memo-
randum dated November 79 1986 from the Director of Parks and Recreation.
S. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System.
6. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79 -80 regarding minimum floor elevations for
new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm water
drainage facility.
7. Rezoning shall be finalized with tiling of the Final Plat.
8. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat Is filed and recorded
with Hennepin Coupty.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
g 103 fo
r '
Page two
Resolution No. 87 -66
9. No yard setback modifications are granted or implied, and shall comply with Ordin-
ance standards for the R -1A and R -2 Districts.
10. Access shall be limited to internal public roads and restricted from Northwest
Boulevard and West Medicine Lake Drive.
11. Final Plat mylars shall refer to PUD No. 8_ 7 2
12. Appropriate legal documents regarding Homeowner Association documents, covenants
and restrictions as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final
Plat. These shall include ownership and maintenance responsibilities for protect
signs, fencing, landscaping and private open space (Outlot A).
13. Easements shall be provided over all affected lots for the construction and loca-
tion of the project signs, fencing and landscaping. Appropriate legal documents
shall be provided for the City Attorney's approval with the Final Plan /Plat appli-
cation, and to be recorded with the Final Plat. No building permits shall be
Issued for the affected lots prior to evidence being submitted that the easements
and Homeowner's Association documents have been recorded at Hennepin County.
14. Maximum lot coverage by structures shall be 20 percent, for all lots.
15. Maximum density shall be 1.8 units per acre for the land at or above the estab-
lished high water elevation per the adopted City Storm Water Drainage Plan as
verified by the City Engineer. The maximum number of units is 74. No bonus
points are assigned.
16. The Storm Water Drainage ditch along the north boundary in the park area shall be
designed as an open drainageway where possible, to be verified by the City
Engineer as part of the Final Plan /Plat application.
17. The final landscaping shall include the plantings as represented by the amended
plan probided by the developer at the City Council meeting and dated February 2,
1987. A revised plan shall be submitted with the Final Plat /Plan.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Sisk , and upon vote being taken thereon, the follo w ng
voted in favor t ereo : Mayor 5chneldert Councilmembers Crain Sisk Vasiliou and
titur 1he roilowLng
voted against or abstained: none Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
r
r
Sus :call," and notice thereot,'.44
ty*+outh; Minnesota, was held on
Xeebers were presents Ma or
eider_ and Vasiliou
members were absents none
fi
111 .
tc.- +x_•r
4 V 1. T1 'j. ! f. - .' 7 I r:.i s 1t7.1;ii.' , • X77
meeting of the City Council or ,
pia day of .1111 4, 19Me
Dort= Couneilmembers Crain.
guar
4 CounCilRiember Neils introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adopt on:
RESOLUTION N0. •85- 549
Mme- `tAPPROVINC RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN, PRELIMINARY PLAN /PLAT
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 30HN KAROS FOR HERITAGE KNOLL (RPUD 65 -3) (85041)
V
WHEREAS, 3ohn Karos has requested approval for a Residential Planned Unit Development
Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan /Plat, Rezoning, and Conditional use permit for
Heritage Knoll for 23 single family residential lots and one outlot on approximately
19 acres located southeast of Northwest Boulevard at West Medicine Lake Drive; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing
on 3une 199 1985; reconsidered the application at a regularly scheduled meeting on
3uly 9, 1985; and, recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYHOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Residential Planned Unit
Development, Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan /Plat and Conditional Use Permit for 3ohn
Karns for Heritage Knoll located southeast of Northwest Boulevard at west Medicine
Lake Drive, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense.
3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for sewer
and water.
4. Provisions for a 30 ft. wide trail easement and outlot per Comprhensive Park
Plan, as verified by the Parks and Engineering Departments, with submittal of
retailed plans as to construction of the trail per City standards.
S. Payment of Park Dedication tees -in -lieu of dedication with appropriate credits
In an amount determined according to verified acreage and paving costs and ac-
cording to the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of tiling the Final Plat
with Hennepin County.
6. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System.
7. Rezoning shall be finalized with tiling of the Final Plat.
8. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is tiled and recorded
with Hennepin County.
PLEASE SEE PACE TWO
A:-
Platting.
14. ,_Two access points to Lot It Block 3, one to Northwest Boulevards and one to west
Medicine Lake Drive will be considered at the time the Site Plan is xubmitted.
15. Access to Lot 1, Block 49 shall be directed to 30th Avenue North only.
16. Access to Lot It Block 19 and Lot It Block 2 shall be directed to 32nd Avenue
North only.
17. Setbacks for the residential Blocks (1, 2, and 4) are a mintmum 35 ft. front
yard; 10 ft. side yard and, 25 ft. rear yard.
18. Maximum lot coverage by structures for Blocks 1s 2. and 4 is 20% per Ordinance
provisions.
19. Maximum number of units shall be 23 single family detached dwellings; maximum
density shall be 1.7 units per acre for the land at or above the established
high water elevation per the adopted City Storm Mater Drainage Plan as verified
by the City Engineer. Density bonus points arejassessed as follows:
as One bonus point for affirmative design.
20. Approval includes a waiver of the PUD size sequirement on the basis that natur-
al features of the site are retained and the land to the south was developed
under similar provisions of previous Ordinance provisions.
21. This does not constitute approval of a conditional use permit9 site plan, or
concept plant for a church or subsequent residential development on the proposed
Lot 19 Block 3.' Revised concept plans for development of this property shall be
responsive to concerns expressed by the City Council,
22. An analysis shall be made by the petitioner of the front yard setbacks for Lots
89 9, 10, lip 139 and 14g Block 1 and Lot P., Block 2. Such analysis to include
protection of natural treed area in back of those lots. To save the trees for
buffering$' it may be appropriate to consider a 25 ft. rather than a 35 ft. mini -
wA front yard setback.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seoonde0 by
and upon vote bet" taken therean, the
s followlrcg.yoted In favor thereo $ Ma,ynt Davennert. Counrtlmmbers Crain.
11ni1. t{,neider snA Wcilinu
0 ow vo aga ns or a s :
Wreupon the Resolution was declared duly
i"'1 aG TS j
F
j ,rte
ry4±GG ti,t «r . a ::_ -a.; - r...: ,.+' s •td:a etdlw iii••;.. _ ... .. .. , !' ......r- ..._,. _. .. .. ...
i
3
LOC MAP
HERI • ... IDGE
36
0 :.: .
0.0.0.0.•.•.•.•.•
0.0.0.0.•.•.•.•.•.•.
00 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0:::::
0.0.0.0.
owl
E
PRO
Zoo
HE
i
3
LOC MAP
HERI • ... IDGE
36
0 :.: .
0.0.0.0.•.•.•.•.•
0.0.0.0.•.•.•.•.•.•.
00 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0:::::
0.0.0.0.
owl
Heir: a
oCA 1 A AAb SR6-
1
rte
100
1 ;
t
i /
i 4
1 L , i Ole
S
wo
IF
i • 1 1
k `" ' f
vf't = \ 'f
CL
Q • : I: " U i ' i r- -jar _ ' y 1 Garr'
4
If CD
TED
0
Tow
La
NNN
1, ' . '. a , <
jf' i •• ' r , : '
NN ci. •`
I • t t t \• I :t •`:P4 .
tom
qy ,
tiWDa r . :; i
of _
LLJ
fir. `' . • " "!
t•
2 , • .:
s .
wit
1 fr• a, /.%tom • `r• /
W ° r1 r•erN
t
s all W
J 0.1 `m • .
i : .
HANS HAGEN
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Karbor Qloce.
r; -•
9-7/aLl
t
CITY Or PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the TtT day of March , 1988. The
following members were presents Mayor SchneT r wncII era as ou Ricer
Zitur and Sisk '" e
0 ow ng members were a sent: None
to too 000
Councileember Vasiliou introduced the following Resolution and moved its
e Opt —on:
RESOLUTION NO. 86 -157
APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN FOR HANS HAGEN, HANS HAGEN HOMES
87124) •
WHEREAS, Hans Hagen, Hans Hagen Howes, has requestg0 approval for a Planned Unit
Development Concept Plan for the development of sl!igle family lotst and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the request following a duly scheduled
public hearing=
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY Or PLYMQUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Planned Unit Development Concept
Plan for Hans Hagen, Hans Hagen homes for the proposed development of single family
lots to be located northeast of harbor Lane and Gleason Lake Drive, subject to the.
follnwing:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
21. Staging of the development shall be In accordance with utility availability as
approved by the City Engineer.
3. Moxlmum density shall be 2.4 units pet acre based upon LA -2 guiding, for the land
at or above the established high Water Elevation per the adopted City Storm water
Drainage Plan as verified by the City Engineer. Density bonus points are assessed
as follows:
a) -5 for prcject size,
b) +2 for affirmative design, for a net of
c) -3 density points.
4. Appropriate leg,l documents such as Homeowner Assortation bylaws and draft
restrictive covenants for the private open areas shall to submitted with
preliminary plat /plan application.
S. The private trails shall e a miniemre of 6 ft. in width and constructed to the same
standards as the City trails.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: a or Scheielder, Councilmembers Vasiliou Ricker
Zitur and Sisk The following
otea against or abstained: None Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
harber Place
g iaN
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the ?2ncU&y of August
19_8,$_ The following members were presentz. Mayor Schneider,
The following members were absent
Councilmember Ricker introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
lk
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -SOS
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN /PLAT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HANS HAGEN HOMES FOR HARBOR PLACE (87124)
WHEREAS, Hans Hagen Homes has requested approval for a Residential Planned
Unit Development Preliminary Plan /Plat and Conditional Use Permit for Harbor
Place for 36 single family lots on 15.18 acres located east of Harbor Lane at
4th Avenue North.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called
Public Hearing and recommends approval:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Residential
Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan /Plat and Conditional Use Permit for
Hans Hagen Homes for Harbor Place located east of Harbor Lane at 4th Avenue
North, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum, except with regard to
Item 24.C. The City will order a public improvement hearing to improve
this portion of Harbor lane, with the developer to pay half the cost and
the other half to be assessed to the abutting properties, which
assessment will be deferred until the north section is improved.
2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's
expense.
3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for
sewer and water.
4. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with
the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of filing the Final Plat.
S. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System.
6. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79 -80 regarding minimum floor
elevations for new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing
any open storm water drainage facility.
7. Rezoning shall be finalized with filing of the Final Plat.
8. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and
recorded with Hennepin County.
Resolution `lo. 88 -SO5
Page 2
Harbor Place-
71ay
9. Staggingg of the development shall be in accordance with utility
availrbility as approved by the City Engineer.
10. Approved structure setbacks shall be:
a. Front yard - 35 feet minimum except Glacier Lane shall be 30
foot minimum.
b. Side yard - 10 feet minimum.
Appropriate legal documents, a roved by the City Attorney, shall be
filed with the final plat establishing a covenant specifying the minimum
yard setbacks for each lot per the approved final Manned Unit
Development plan.
11. Lot coverage maximum shall be 20 %, and may be exceeded only upon approval
by the City Council, on a lot -by -lot basis, after mass grading has been
completed. The request for ground coverage in excess of 20% must
demonstrate the merits of the request in terms of preservation of natural
amenities.
12. The final plit /Planned Unit Development Plan shall include detailed plans
for screening lots 5, 6 and 7, Block 1 from the impact of the County Road
15 exit ramp from 1 -494. Use of existing natural site features is
acceptable, but detailed plans depicting such use are required.
13. The final plat /Planned Unit Development Plan shall include detail plans
for delineating the common open space area from the rear yards of Lots 7
and 8, Block 3 and Lots 7 and 8, Block 2.
14. The final plat /Planned Unit Development Plan shall include construction
plans for a private trail constructed to a width of 6 feet and to City
specifications within the Outlot between Lot 7, Block 3 and Lot 8, Block
2. Construction of this trail shall be complete prior to issuance of
Building Permits for Lot 7, Block 3 and Lot 8, Block 2.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
reuncilmember ?;tur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof: YAvnr srhnpider, roundImembers Ynsiliou,
The fol owing voted a ainst or abstained :w L.
the Resoluti
one
on was declared duly passed an adopted.
vim•" • • • • • ,• • • •,•, • -.
t-
o
7UCITY
ak•• • ..
t' r ' } °':f.'• ; a •. •• • 'Y vvs a ! w.> 1 • i,; `t fig' (s }.:e?'ti .L'L. f,'•Ly !. '.t`; •' • • , • '
45) -(47)
e
Zoo +
j
8) u 453.71 3 'GCQ
Z, 12 ( 46) 3 A 4arbor P
12) 200
1 1 1
PEAT I (4 4) –
126.1 63.
LOT 9 40 I 2'M C o 9Vy
1°1357
a(4 2)
5 (45
P0R19 ®R g )
G I ''•
6 OUTLOT
HARBOR
i ° . - 43.(08
I) °'
ft
200
OOC NO 52.1376 '
i
e 110. 13 —
1Q1
171555 (48),- 9 •2s •31.13 5 R Q
iJ •ii• :35.84(40) C
F 1 260. 26) = 1
1 1
9 te. 9 t -
s 4— (21) (49i S,0 (39) o
1
5 197 119.91
01 35 W ."
10(50 c -7 $00
r+l A, L s .8119. 4 2 S
o (25) N 11 ac 2 (
N
23) ° e N (37) Q ,.
C- --------- - - - - --
a
IIMA
1 (24)
53) 13 ,. so *59'36Q _ 143.09 70 65 142• 12 t •' t:
20 ( 60) (57) (56) ,, 11 40.32 4i 1 ( /,
I 1t 1.96 %0 t6
o (54) ,2 6i•.
53 f- 17
Of
ti
140.82QOis e
58) e
05 1
1
4h 124.38
4 N 569.50.4V' ss . 4.6** i
377.3 EAST ; °• 1(34) O
4 S (32) ^a 6' o
89) — — (33) (28) 2 os
ST-9W SE R I j 1
138.6
1
61
62.
0
S S EWER— 0I T NO Z 2 '
n 340.08•x• 130E
v_
b•0 21
12 W0 NO 3 260
I 5) a
83 "7 – - -- tiro "3 - - - --
14)
17 DOC NOe
r
R N
L
LOCATION AND APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
OF UNPLATTED LA -1 AND LA -2 GUIDED PROPERTY
rpr,T
N
Y OF
w P E
scut a riot
PIYMOUTR
Et i! -'I t!•' !it ' F•t !; :II =(!, !!E ! r• '1pi(( fq,` !'
t !!{ ! it
till till !!t!!!!!!!!!!!!!t!!!!!t!!!! i!t!!t!!i!!!!!!t!!!t!!!!!!t!!! t ltilt!!1!!!!!! ;il1!!!!1!!!t!!!t
LA -1 ACREAGE -- 612
LA -2 ACREAGE - 215'
TOTAL ACREAGE - 827
STREET MAP
NUMBERS REPRESENT APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
1
110-ft
IT
A F., "Ir'N
LA
iww
LA -1 ACREAGE -- 612
LA -2 ACREAGE - 215'
TOTAL ACREAGE - 827
STREET MAP
NUMBERS REPRESENT APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
70 F)
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: November 21, 1991
TO: Planning
PANCSECOPROVISIONS
n
FROM: Chuck D lle mmunity Development Director
SUBJECT: ZONING ORD FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
At your last meeting I provided you a copy of an ordinance establishing a
moratorium on the issuance of sign permits for outdoor advertising in the City
of Plymouth that has been adopted by the City Council. The purpose of the
moratorium is to allow the City to study the current Zoning Ordinance
provisions regarding outdoor advertising and to adopt changes in the Zoning
Ordinance (if any) regarding this subject.
Since November 13, 1991 my staff has assembled ordinances regulating outdoor
advertising from four communities of a size and development level similar to
that of Plymouth. In addition, each of the four communities surveyed is the
host to both interstate and other state /federal major arterial roadways. By
the attached matrix we have endeavored to provide the Planning Commission a
somewhat cryptic) summary of the efforts of our sister communities to
regulate the outdoor advertising industry. There appears to be substantial
difference in the approaches taken by the various communities ranging from the
total prohibition of outdoor advertising in the City of Maple Grove to the
special "advertising sign zone" that exists in the Eden Prairie ordinance. It
appears that our current ordinance is at least as restrictive as all of the
other communities reviewed, except of course, Maple Grove.
Commissioners may recall reading of or hearing about efforts by the City of
Bloomington to also prohibit outdoor advertising within that community. Those
efforts were not successful, at least to date: The prohibition of outdoor
advertising is not a concept that is so radical as to preclude consideration
by the City of Plymouth. A clear question can be raised with respect to the
positive value of outdoor advertising to our community. On the other hand,
outdoor advertising is a business function.
I have requested a review by the City Attorney of such elements of the
Minnesota Outdoor Advertising Act and issues related to first amendment
freedom of speech considerations that should enter into our deliberations
concerning the regulation of outdoor advertising. I am hoping to have the
City Attorney's response available to us at our November 27, 1991 meeting.
pc /cd /adver:jw)
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPARISONS
November, 1991
SETBACKS
MISC.
reports)
pc /out.ad
As per Zone
Dist sign is
located in.
If sign face is
missing or
In I -1 can be unpainted more
in Setback area than 30 days a
if meet other yr. it becomes
conditions a Nuisance.
Billboards
require a
license tag on
sign.
EAGAN B.PARK
250 sq ft
PLYMOUTH EDEN PR.
SIZE 300 sq ft OR, 700 eq ft
SHALL NOT be less than
hwy, then CC
EXCEED: 110 sq ft Width:
including 55 sq ft
extensions. including
extensions
If visible from
I.H. it may not
exceed 750 eq
ft. (may be
increased by
10% for cut-
outs)
MAX 36 ft above 25 ft above
HEIGHT grade ground exclud.
SHALL NOT extensions.
EXCEED: Higher signs
may be
permitted if <
25' above road
grade.
LOCATION Only if > 200 Only in an
ALLOWED ft from: urban Advertising
res. dist, Sign Zone"
parks, schools, determined by
playgrounds, CC if it
churchs, on achieves: i)
same side of objectives of
street or zone dist.,
intersectionOR ii)no visual
200 ft from interference
structures w /in w /streets or
SFD significant
scenery.) * **
Not w /in 500 ft
LOCATION Only w /in B -3 of Limited
RESTRIC- and Industrial Access Hwy. I-
TIONS Districts. sections, lane
change, ramps,
etc., OR w /in
200' for other
road types.
2,000' 61 -70
1500' 55 mph mph roadways
SPACING 1400' 50 mph
1300' 45 mph 1,000' all
1100' 40 mph others.
SETBACKS
MISC.
reports)
pc /out.ad
As per Zone
Dist sign is
located in.
If sign face is
missing or
In I -1 can be unpainted more
in Setback area than 30 days a
if meet other yr. it becomes
conditions a Nuisance.
Billboards
require a
license tag on
sign.
EAGAN B.PARK
250 sq ft 1 eq ft for
except when each ft of
adjacent to street
limited access frontage; NOR
hwy, then CC more than 300
determines) ft on any side.
40 ft at lot or
roadway level,
or as
determined by
CC for
visibility.
25 ft above
grade
MIN HEIGHT - 12
ft from grade
to sign bottom.
Only in I -1 &
1 -2 districts
by CUP & be
t /PRINCIPLE USE
Only if > 1000 on lot located.
ft from any
other advertse
sign on same
side of street,
OR if > 300 ft
on opp side
Not w /in 300 ft
of any
Residential
Not w /in 200 ft Dist.
of Residential
Zone (either Not w /in 1,320
side of street) ft radius of
other
billboards.
See Above)
50 ft front
50 ft rear
Not Mentioned 25 ft side
Sign
Illumination
per Code.
M. GROVE .
BILLBOARDS
ARE TOTALLY
PROHIBITED.
Currently
they have 2
or 3
billboards
which were
grandfathered
in. They are
looking at
the
possibility
of
amoritizing
them.
Regular Council Meeting
October 7, 1991
Page 396
by Councilmember Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION
NO. 91 -612 REDUCING DEVELOPMENT BOND, CURTIS LAKE
ADDITION (90105).
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded
by Councilmember Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION
NO. 91 -613 REDUCING DEVELOPMENT BOND, FAWN CREEK
ADDITION (90022).
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seco
by Councilmember Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTI
NO. 91 -614 REDUCING DEVELOPMENT BOND, OXBO/
2ND ADDITION (90077).
Motion carried on a roll call vote, fib ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Z' r, seconded
by Councilmember Vasiliou, to ado RESOLUTION
NO. 91 -615 REDUCING DEVELOPMENT ND, BOULDER
CREST ADDITION (90095).
Motion carried on a roll c401 vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Coun lmember Zitur, seconded
by Councilmember Vasi u, to adopt RESOLUTION
NO. 91 -616 REDUCING VELOPMENT BOND, CHURCHILL
FARMS ADDITION (90 9).
Motion carried A a roll call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was de by Councilmember Zitur, seconded
by VNNOE.Amlbll.
er Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION CHANGE ORDER NO.
NO. PPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, PRIME 1, PROJECT NO. 111
WESS PARK - SANITARY SEWER REBUILD, CITY Item *8 -DD
PRO
REDUCIN/
0105)
DEVELOPD,
CURTIS
ADDITIO
Item *8
DEVELOPMENT BOND,
WRIN CREEK
DITION (90022)
Item *8 -CC -2
RESOLUTION 91 -614
REDUCING
DEVELOPMENT BOND,
OXBOW RIDGE 2ND
ADDITION (90077)
Item *8 -CC -3
RESOLUTION 91 -615
REDUCING
DEVELOPMENT BOND,
BOULDER CREST
ADDITION (90095)
Item *8 -CC -4
RESOLUTION 91 -616
REDUCING
DEVELOPMENT BOND,
CHURCHILL FARMS
ADDITION (90009)
Item *8 -CC -5
Coordinator Dillerud stated a permit application
has been received for installation of two
advertising signs within the I- 1"Zoning District
for properties which are not adjacent to primary
or secondary arterials. It was staff's
understanding that the Zoning Ordinance would
Ordinance
establishing a
Moratorium on
Advertising Sign
Permits
Item 8 -EE
Regular Council Meeting
October 7, 1991
Page 397
limit the placement of such signs exclusively to
properties along State and Federal Highways (1-
494, Highway 55 and Highway 169). It appears
that the Zoning Ordinance does not accomplish
that. He recommended that the Council adopt an
interim ordinance for a period of six months to
permit a study to be conducted to determine the
appropriate method of regulating advertising
signs in the City.
John Bodger, 109 Bushaway Road, Wayzata,
represented Topline Outdoor Advertising. He
stated that he applied for a permit on May 22 for
installation on Xenium Lane at the railroad
crossing. He did not object to the moratorium,
but he has put considerable expense into the
permit process. He stated the property was
surveyed.at the request of the Building Official,
and he has leased property from the railroad
since June. Mr. Bodger asked that his money be
refunded or that the permit be processed and
approved. He estimated his cost for surveying at
about $2,000.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to refund the
fees paid to the City if the permit application
is withdrawn.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made by Councilmember
Ricker, to proceed with issuance of these two
permits and to establish the moratorium on all
other signs.
Substitute motion failed for lack of a second.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made by Councilmember
Vasiliou, seconded by Mayor Bergman, to refund
the permit fees paid to the City and to pay the
surveying fees up to $2,000 upon submittal of
bills by the applicant.
Councilmember Zitur stated he would not vote for
refunding the fees until he has received a
response from staff.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made by Councilmember
Zitur, seconded by Councilmember Helliwell, to
defer the consideration of permit fee and
Regular Council Meeting
October 7, 1991
Page 398
surveying cost refund until the amount is
requested by the applicant and staff provides a
response.
rried, five ayes.
1'1V i 1 VaV -. — - -
by Councilmember Helliwell, to adopt ORDINANCE
NO. 91 -31 INTERIM ORDINANCE FOR PURPOSE OF
PROTECTING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE HEALTH,
SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND
PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF ADVERTISING
SIGNS.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded
by Councilmember Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION
NO. 91 -618 DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT,
COUNTY ROAD 9 /COUNTY ROAD 101 TRUNK WATERMAIN,
CITY PROJECT NO. 012.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five a s.
INTERIM ORD ANC:r;
ESTABLISH
MORATORI ON
ISSUANC OF
PERMIT FOR
ADVE SING SIGNS
Ite -EE
N -
ECLARING COST TO
BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING
PREPARATION OF
ASSESSMENT,
PROJECT NO. 012
Item *8 -FF -1
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, conded RESOLUTION 91 -619_
by Councilmember Vasiliou, to adopt RE UTION SETTING HEARING ON
NO. 91 -619 FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED AS SSMENT, PROPOSED
COUNTY ROAD 9 /COUNTY ROAD 101 TRUNK TERMAIN, ASSESSMENT,
CITY PROJECT NO. 012. PROJECT 012
Item *8 -FF -1
Motion carried on a roll call v , five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilme r Zitur, seconded
Vasiliou, adopt RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION 91 -620
DECLARING COST TO
by Councilmember
NO. 91 -620 DECLARING COST BE ASSESSED AND BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF OPOSED ASSESSMENT, 1991 ORDERING
STREET RECONSTRUCTION GRAM - PHASE I, CITY ASSESSMENT. 102
PROJECT NO. 102..
Item *8 -FF -2
Motion carried on roll call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was mad y Councilmember Zitur, seconded
to adopt RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION 91 -621
SETTING ASSESSMENT
by Councilme r Vasiliou,
NO. 91 -621 R HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, HEARING ON PROJECT
1991 ST RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM - PHASE I, NO. 102
8 -FF -2
CITY CT NO. 102. Item