HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 02-11-1998 SpecialCOUNCIL STUDY SESSION
FEBRUARY 11, 1998
7:00 PM
Public Safety Training Room
I. Financial Funds Analysis
II. Water Quality Plan
III. 1997-1998 Council Goals and Priorities
s
DATE: February 3, 1998
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
41.4
FROM: Dale Hahn, inane Director
SUBJECT: Reserve Fund Analysis
1. BACKGROUND: At the December 5`' study session, I presented reserve fund
analyses for five of the City's replacement plans. Two of the reserves show
substantial deficits will be developing within the next ten to fifteen years, and the
other reserves will be adequately funded with minor adjustments. The two
reserves with the largest deficits were the Park Replacement Fund and the Public
Facilities Fund. The current projections as presented in December for the Park
Replacement Fund (Attachment A) will first have a deficit balance in 2008 of
286,731 and grow to $-25,134,393 by the year 2032. The Public Facilities Fund
Attachment B) will first have a deficit of $-6,280,271 in the year 2012, and grow
to $-9,100,455 by the year 2017.
2. DISCUSSION: Attached are three scenarios for plans to fund the projected
deficits in the Park Replacement and Public Facilities Funds:
Park Replacement Fund- The first scenario (A-1) proposes to have annual
increases of 19 % for the first ten years and 5 % thereafter. The second scenario
A-2) proposes to make annual contributions of $100,000 to the Park
Replacement Fund, and have annual increases of 5 %. The third scenario (A-3)
proposes to transfer $3,200,000 to the Park Replacement Fund in 1998, and to
have annual increases of 5%.
Public Facilities Fund -The first scenario (B-1) proposes to have annual
increases of 8% for the next 20 years. The second scenario (B-2) proposes to
make annual contributions of $100,000 to the Public Facilities Fund, and have
annual increases of 5%. The third scenario (B-3) proposes to transfer
1,800,000 to the Public Facilities Fund, and to have annual increases of 5%.
These projections provide full funding for maintenance and replacement. I believe
scenarios A-1 and B-1 are the most viable. In years when the General Fund has
surpluses, transfers to these reserve funds can relieve the future burden
considerably. These projections do not include any provisions for the Ice Arena.
City Council may wish to discuss the philosophy for the funding level desired in
each of these reserves. I believe our goal should be to provide full funding,
However, Council may wish to provide partial funding and plan to get voter
approval for the balance.
The City Council should also discuss the adoption of additional policies to further
solidify their intentions for the ongoing fiscal solvency of these funds. These
policies may include items such as:
The first dollars of any annual surplus goes toward maintaining the General
Fund's 40% fund balance of the current years budget
The next $200,000-$400,000 of surplus goes toward funding deficits in
reserve funds
Within two years after new facilities come on-line, budgeting shall include
plans for replacement
Certain funds such as Community improvement Fund shall not be allowed to
go below $5,000,000, Project Administration shall not be allowed to go
below $1,000,000 etc.
Any voter approved referendums for public facilities shall include disclosure
of the annual operating costs
3. RECOMMENDATION: Financial Analyst, Mike Kohn and I will be at the
meeting to discuss the attached scenarios, and provide additional information. City
Council should review the scenarios, and give staff direction for the desired plans
for funding.
Park Replacement Fund Projection
Transfer In" Constant In Current Dollars
Interest Rate % Increase
6.00% 3.00%
Park Replacment Fund Projection.xls 12/3/97
Beginning Interest Ending
Balance Expenditure Income Transfer In Balance
1997 3,044,752 59,652 183,104 73,600 3,241,804
1998 3,241,804 354,201 186,156 75,808 3,149,568
1999 3,149,568 877,739 164,984 78,082 2,514,896
2000 2,514,896 589,498 135,622 80,425 2,141,444
2001 2,141,444 401,566 118,925 82,837 1,941,640
2002 1,941,640 610,251 100,751 85,323 1,517,462
2003 1,517,462 323,884 83,968 87,882 1,365,428
2004 1,365,428 382,586 73,164 90,519 1,146,525
2005 1,146,525 414,285 59,160 93,234 884,634
2006 884,634 353,917 45,341 96,031 672,090
2007 672,090 690,741 22,571 98,912 102,831
2008 102,831 486,086 5,356 101,880 286,731
2009 286,731 991,615 43,804 104,936 1,217,214
2010 1,217,214 430,001 82,690 108,084 1,621,822
2011 1,621,822 978,401 123,322 111,327 2,612,218
2012 2,612,218 1,366,832 194,298 114,666 4,058,682
2013 4,058,682 1,120,502 273,593 118,106 5,334,670
2014 5,334,670 284,625 324,969 121,650 5,822,615
2015 5,822,615 577,050 362,909 125,299 6,637,275
2016 6,637,275 209,200 400,641 129,058 7,118,058
2017 7,118,058 376,930 434,403 132,930 7,796,462
2018 7,796,462 111,618 467,029 136,918 8,238,190
2019 8,238,190 306,577 499,258 141,025 8,902,999
2020 8,902,999 1,286,302 568,411 145,256 10,612,457
2021 10,612,457 589,510 649,944 149,614 11,702,298
2022 11,702,298 721,101 719,148 154,102 12,988,444
2023 12,988,444 345,055 784,897 158,725 13,959,670
2024 13,959,670 328,777 842,539 163,487 14,967,498
2025 14,967,498 183,034 898,489 168,391 15,880,630
2026 15,880,630 282,788 956,118 173,443 16,946,093
2027 16,946,093 36,409 1,012,498 178,647 17,816,354
2028 17,816,354 917,319 1,090,981 184,006 19,640,648
2029 19,640,648 0 1,172,753 189,526 20,623,875
2030 20,623,875 0 1,231,576 195,212 21,660,239
2031 21,660,239 0 1,293,582 201,068 22,752,753
2032 22,752,753 1,193,969 1,394,771 207,100 25,134,393
Park Replacment Fund Projection.xls 12/3/97
Park Replacement Fund Projection
Transfer -In Adjusted in 1998
Rate of Increase Adjusted As Necessary
1998-2008 2009-2032
Interest Rate % Increase % Increase
6.00% 19.00% 5.00%
AVERAGE 505,056
Park Replacment Fund Projection.xls 1 2/3/98
Beginning Interest Ending
Balance Expenditure Income Transfer In Balance
1997 3,044,752 59,652 183,104 73,600 3,241,804
1998 3,241,804 354,201 186,510 87,584 3,161,697
1999 3,161,697 877,739 166,496 104,225 2,554,680
2000 2,554,680 589,498 139,317 124,028 2,228,526
2001 2,228,526 401,566 126,092 147,593 2,100,645
2002 2,100,645 610,251 113,000 175,636 1,779,030
2003 1,779,030 323,884 103,295 209,006 1,767,448
2004 1,767,448 382,586 102,031 248,718 1,735,611
2005 1,735,611 414,285 100,587 295,974 1,717,887
2006 1,717,887 353,917 103,022 352,209 1,819,201
2007 1,819,201 690,741 101,004 419,129 1,648,592
2008 1,648,592 486,086 99,296 498,763 1,760,566
2009 1,760,566 991,615 90,474 486,294 1,345,719
2010 1,345,719 430,001 82,077 474,448 1,472,243
2011 1,472,243 978,401 72,880 463,257 1,029,979
2012 1,029,979 1,366,832 34,376 452,754 150,277
2013 150,277 1,120,502 11,309 442,972 538,562
2014 538,562 284,625 27,834 433,948 417,073
2015 417,073 577,050 29,564 425,719 597,968
2016 597,968 209,200 29,604 418,327 418,446
2017 418,446 376,930 24,060 411,811 407,625
2018 407,625 111,618 15,620 406,216 128,646
2019 128,646 306,577 4,120 426,527 12,815
2020 12,815 1,286,302 25,922 447,854 877,186
2021 877,186 589,510 56,209 470,246 1,052,659
2022 1,052,659 721,101 69,980 493,758 1,349,981
2023 1,349,981 345,055 75,797 518,446 1,252,386
2024 1,252,386 328,777 68,675 544,369 1,105,469
2025 1,105,469 183,034 54,672 571,587 771,588
2026 771,588 282,788 36,774 600,167 490,983
2027 490,983 36,409 11,646 630,175 91,137
2028 91,137 917,319 2,201 661,684 166,700
2029 166,700 0 10,841 694,768 538,909
2030 538,909 0 54,220 729,506 1,322,635
2031 1,322,635 0 102,338 765,981 2,190,954
2032 2,190,954 1,193,969 119,767 804,281 1,921,032
AVERAGE 505,056
Park Replacment Fund Projection.xls 1 2/3/98
Park Replacement Fund Projection
Transfer -In Adjusted in 1998
Rate of Increase Adjusted As Necessary
J
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In Annually 100,000
Park Replacment Fund Projection.xls 1 2/3/98
1998-2008 2009-2032
Interest Rate Increase Increase
6.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Beginning Interest Annual Ending
Balance Expenditure Income Transfer In Transfer In Balance
1997 3,044,752 59,652 183,104 73,600 3,241,804
1998 3,241,804 354,201 192,201 77,280 100,000 3,257,084
1999 3,257,084 877,739 177,527 81,144 100,000 2,738,016
2000 2,738,016 589,498 155,152 85,201 100,000 2,488,872
2001 2,488,872 401,566 145,969 89,461 100,000 2,422,736
2002 2,422,736 610,251 135,875 93,934 100,000 2,142,294
2003 2,142,294 323,884 127,780 98,631 100,000 2,144,821
2004 2,144,821 382,586 126,319 103,563 100,000 2,092,116
2005 2,092,116 414,285 122,361 108,741 100,000 2,008,932
2006 2,008,932 353,917 119,344 114,178 100,000 1,988,537
2007 1,988,537 690,741 108,187 119,887 100,000 1,625,870
2008 1,625,870 486,086 92,746 125,881 100,000 1,458,411
2009 1,458,411 991,615 67,438 122,734 100,000 756,968
2010 756,968 430,001 42,110 119,744 100,000 588,821
2011 588,821 978,401 15,485 116,920 100,000 157,175
2012 157,175 1,366,832 41,007 114,269 100,000 1,350,746
2013 1,350,746 1,120,502 105,306 111,800 100,000 2,364,754
2014 2,364,754 284,625 141,138 109,522 100,000 2,580,995
2015 2,580,995 577,050 162,948 107,446 100,000 3,113,547
2016 3,113,547 209,200 183,921 105,580 100,000 3,301,088
2017 3,301,088 376,930 200,255 103,935 100,000 3,674,337
2018 3,674,337 111,618 214,733 102,523 100,000 3,798,165
2019 3,798,165 306,577 227,858 107,650 100,000 4,124,949
2020 4,124,949 1,286,302 276,695 113,032 100,000 5,474,914
2021 5,474,914 589,510 336,620 118,684 100,000 6,182,360
2022 6,182,360 721,101 382,836 124,618 100,000 7,061,679
2023 7,061,679 345,055 424,127 130,849 100,000 7,600,012
2024 7,600,012 328,777 455,742 137,391 100,000 8,147,140
2025 8,147,140 183,034 483,992 144,261 100,000 8,569,905
2026 8,569,905 282,788 512,134 151,474 100,000 9,113,352
2027 9,113,352 36,409 537,122 159,047 100,000 9,427,836
2028 9,427,836 917,319 582,180 167,000 100,000 10,660,335
2029 10,660,335 0 628,360 175,350 100,000 11,013,345
2030 11,013,345 0 649,277 184,117 100,000 11,378,505
2031 11,378,505 0 670,911 193,323 100,000 11,756,092
2032 11,756,092 1,193,969 729,095 202,989 100,000 13,376,167
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In Annually 100,000
Park Replacment Fund Projection.xls 1 2/3/98
Park Replacement Fund Projection
Transfer -In Adjusted in 1998
Rate of Increase Adjusted As Necessary
AVERAGE 505,056
Upfront Infusion 3,200,000
h.,3
Parc Replacment Fund Projection.xls 1 2/3/98
1998-2008 2009-2032
Interest Rate Increase Increase
6.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Beginning Interest One -Time Ending
Balance Expenditure Income Transfer In Transfer In Balance
1997 3,044,752 59,652 183,104 73,600 3,241,804
1998 3,241,804 354,201 378,201 77,280 3,200,000 6,543,084
1999 6,543,084 877,739 368,687 81,144 6,115,176
2000 6,115,176 589,498 351,782 85,201 5,962,661
2001 5,962,661 401,566 348,397 89,461 5,998,953
2002 5,998,953 610,251 344,448 93,934 5,827,084
2003 5,827,084 323,884 342,867 98,631 5,944,699
2004 5,944,699 382,586 348,311 103,563 6,013,987
2005 6,013,987 414,285 351,673 108,741 6,060,115
2006 6,060,115 353,917 356,415 114,178 6,176,791
2007 6,176,791 690,741 353,482 119,887 5,959,418
2008 5,959,418 486,086 346,759 125,881 5,945,972
2009 5,945,972 991,615 330,692 122,734 5,407,783
2010 5,407,783 430,001 315,159 119,744 5,412,685
2011 5,412,685 978,401 298,917 116,920 4,850,120
2012 4,850,120 1,366,832 253,430 114,269 3,850,987
2013 3,850,987 1,120,502 200,798 111,800 3,043,084
2014 3,043,084 284,625 177,332 109,522 3,045,313
2015 3,045,313 577,050 168,631 107,446 2,744,340
2016 2,744,340 209,200 161,552 105,580 2,802,271
2017 2,802,271 376,930 159,946 103,935 2,689,223
2018 2,689,223 111,618 161,081 102,523 2,841,210
2019 2,841,210 306,577 164,505 107,650 2,806,788
2020 2,806,788 1,286,302 133,209 113,032 1,766,727
2021 1,766,727 589,510 91,879 118,684 1,387,779
2022 1,387,779 721,101 65,372 124,618 856,669
2023 856,669 345,055 44,974 130,849 687,437
2024 687,437 328,777 35,505 137,391 531,556
2025 531,556 183,034 30,730 144,261 523,513
2026 523,513 282,788 27,471 151,474 419,670
2027 419,670 36,409 28,859 159,047 571,168
2028 571,168 917,319 11,761 167,000 167,391
2029 167,391 0 4,783 175,350 3,176
2030 3,176 0 5,714 184,117 193,008
2031 193,008 0 17,380 193,323 403,711
2032 403,711 1,193,969 5,507 202,989 592,776
AVERAGE 505,056
Upfront Infusion 3,200,000
h.,3
Parc Replacment Fund Projection.xls 1 2/3/98
0
w cn v, w
w 00 '0
N to
J N wW O DO J
N 01 N
J 00 N
w11 N Oo 0o
w J 00 O tli O
O\ 00 N 00
00 v, Oo Do ww v 00
W
cA v o
0 0, N
A lA J tJ w O
O
a1 00
a,
N 00 O
w J O A N N
1 00 00 01 O
N lA CA
wGJON
O O 00 N J O
w 00 '0
00
AkA
J
N 01 N
J 00 N
w11 N Oo 0o N
D 0 A lJ O
A Do0 0o v 00 O
DD W
w 0 0, N
IJ IJ O c O
a, ao
w rn a rn
w o
4 v, wONw O
00 0 o rn CN
1i J -j w
O u N o
00 G V1 cA N
A N OtAowCNAJ
w 00 J
D1 00 VA N O
O Q\ 00 00 NwWQ\ w A O
J W •P to O
O J w
W Cly 01
vi W oo O N
N ON to J .P
O O LA W O
O 00D\ O
O
In N
00 O O cA .A N
0, i.A 00 .- O
J
00 lA Cl -+
O w CA 0 F* N
N N A 1 C o
1 t.A LA 4 +
oo W O N
J w 00 00 IJ
N 00 00 A O N
Oo A LA w N O
N a1 N W
J
00 J
D1 J J J
J 00 Cl cn A A
00 ? D1 W W 110 00
w oo VO cn -- N
w oo cn rn rn +
v -r 0\ o\ J Ul
P A O '0 00
N J O N CN
N ] N w N
O
w
O
N00
O N N
LA 00 00 A J
CD
CD
CD
L
w
CD
I
n
W
n
CD CD
CD a 'CD c aro
p" (IQo.C. CD ry R
QW1 H
CD
UQ
00 C
CD
CDC
IQ
IQ
w t.AtA w
W opo v J1
CD N N D1
4 N w O 00 -1
O w 111 w
w W
W J 00 O tQ I D
4 00
r-+
CIi lJi O
W Q
N p Oo O
00 D
tli C% O\ W
0o vD O p N N
CINO\ - W W IO
O 00 W D\ O
A In O N
00
A V1 O oo Oo
w 00 00 C. vim.. IO
o CN w lJ
00 J
00W 0
A
A 00 w A
IJ W D jpa w O
w
w D oo to o0
J O 00 W N
J w O w w I W
00 ON 00 ON
v N 41 w J N
AP O "A. N J I A
N
N 0 0 00
N N
w w (3 o O
N N
tAi w
v.
Np, w N
N J O w tJ O
00 W 00 O
1 ON w A J
W r N
VAi N
00 O (A J0 1000
N Vii p J 00
rA+ .
gyp. w W J
IN
O
ON 00 A N
W r-+ W
I'D N D N in
ON O O
110 ON A w ? ( O
w O O O1 O
A w
O1 N 00 N
W O W N
w ON D O
00 00 . A J +
In O D to D +
00 1D w O,
w 000 (21 00 W
r 00 lli 00 (z
O ON
O J 00 J Cn N
i
A O 00 OAO w
J N 00 p W N
Obi VAi ONi I W
i
J w w A v N
ID O N D O
N A —1 00 Imo+
Cn ON O -1 0*1 A
O N W A
Cn 4 p O l NOJQ\ W D O
CN Cn to ON N f+
ON O 00 N
w O w O
l! N l cn lli N
O w A 00 CN 0+
O O\ W O\
C, CS w w O IO
In W — W 0 v
J
G
Q'
N 00 Cn O A
0 o0 O•AO N O 0 O Vii I O
A N DD J O W
O -+ '00 O N
O J 00 N O 00 O
N N
w w A 0 0 P
p,0, vA O O NwNClJOtDO
A O ? A
N N
N U110 w O w
Vii OQ 0=0 J O
0O
0
N N
p O\ -4 O
Vp to VP O O J N
A A O N O LA O
w N
w -j 00 p
W 00 N O O
1" to O p NwD\ O tJ C to O
Un J
w w
N O LA00 00 O w
00 V , O V 1
D1 v O W O to 100
W w
J N O 00 — C\
00 W 1 O N
00 00 Pp O 00 N
DO J p O O O
w to w w 0 C1 O
LA J •A J O Q\ t0
P w
00 N p O 00
00 W t.li 00
w N J vp O oo
in N 1 p O 00
to O O Vi O to O
A J
Cn N 00 to — O
w LA all O` O 00
00 ? O :-+ O W NInO p 00 O lJ O
W •P W O l +
N J -- P
N ON a, O O w
p to t!1 O 00 NONll1AO\ C U I O
N
N N
00 C
O 0o ON tp Cl A W
N
J .-• W p O N
N O\ W o O W
O00JOO
WW 00 J O "p +
p tp O O O O A
N 0000oUoO
oD C lJ O C J I O
O\ tp
trl Cn bC55 5 5H
uu
mid
w oo
e
CA
I-
C.
w a
yJ
o
s
0
W N)tQ
JQ N
J J W •P O D
O 1 O -• O W h+
w l Oo O O to tD
00 11 00 W O l 00
O VO O VD O O 91 F,
t1 tl .• w
to 00 O o O W
o N m LA O L O
A Q\ O O O OI
to
tp O 00 O U
A O O 00 O PONin00OO %0
In w O\ N O to
IO
O
N w M O to
N 00 Cn O A
0 o0 O•AO N O 0 O Vii I O
A N DD J O W
O -+ '00 O N
O J 00 N O 00 O
N N
w w A 0 0 P
p,0, vA O O NwNClJOtDO
A O ? A
N N
N U110 w O w
Vii OQ 0=0 J O
0O
0
N N
p O\ -4 O
Vp to VP O O J N
A A O N O LA O
w N
w -j 00 p
W 00 N O O
1" to O p NwD\ O tJ C to O
Un J
w w
N O LA00 00 O w
00 V , O V 1
D1 v O W O to 100
W w
J N O 00 — C\
00 W 1 O N
00 00 PpO 00 N
DO J p O O O
w to w w 0 C1 O
LA J •A J O Q\ t0
P w
00 N p O 00
00 W t.li 00
w N J vp O oo
in N 1 p O 00
to O O Vi O to O
A J
Cn N 00 to — O
w LA all O` O 00
00 ? O :-+ O W NInO p 00 O lJ O
W •P W O l +
N J -- P
N ON a, O O w
p to t!1 O 00 NONll1AO\ C U I O
N
N N
00 C
O 0o ON tp Cl A W
N
J .-• W p O N
N O\ W o O W
O00JOO
WW 00 J O "p +
p tp O O O O A
N 0000oUoO
oD C lJ O C J I O
O\ tp
uu
mid
e
I-
C. We
yJMw
Q.
CD F3, e co
cD a.
o w
cntz
00 C
w CD
On
UQ
tz
1 N W O 0000IJ
w v w \p O U \D
O a\ 4 O N t0
w to 00 w O '1 100
W N
00 to (A O
O N J - OHO I1 p
W W
LA LA
w 00 O OwLit00t.A
W N
N 000 00 \C N I O
W W
O\ N to O\ w
w N O pw13
O 00 O w l0
O J w 000 N
w W
ON
W O v 0 O IN
W W
tO N
w
O\ J
to N oo
V? ;P o0 A A N
V=, 4000 N tQ I O
A O\ O T w W
P w
N N ON -1 O
tN O 4
VOLA
i
O O O lJ
to I O
W ? A
A ?
tQ
J W lV W N
O
00
00000 J w Ul
J N O\ J
N O A O N
v N ON twig O O
O\ — O to O O
L
ON A N N
J O O N all -4
Lh U-1
00
ON
000 w N w l 0
D 10 O W —1 00
N N w J Vii
N N 00 V O 00
t!A J ON O
t! tli
J O N N
O O O Lh I O
w w 00
00 LA O\ ON N
O oo O
cn w "O 00 wI O
00 o w OA
0 0-1
v • rn
O ONLA O O N
A O\ to O
ILA
N N 00 w
O IN
N 00 0 A
J ••ID (o O
G00 t N
LA (.A ONi O N W
i %0 O N
W 000 O O A
t11
N D\ VO O p
J J N 00 t.A IMO+
00 CO O r .
N N
J w CN N ON I O
W + lJ1 00
O V O 00 00 N
CO
0 w 4 J IO
rw
J
mow
N
ONEW
J
DATE: February 5, 1998 for the City Council Meeting of February 11, 1998
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager through ---
Fred G. Moore, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Shane Missaghi, Water Resources Engineer
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PLYMOUTH WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN
GOALS AND POLICIES COMPILATION.
ACTION REQUESTED: To review the enclosed Goals and Policies compilation of
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan and give direction to staff on any changes.
BACKGROUND:
Plan Development. In August of 1995 the City of Plymouth began developing the Water
Resources Management Plan. The two main purposes of the plan are to update the 1980
Storm Drainage Plan and to address water quality issues. As the plan evolved our focus
shifted more toward City-wide water quality management. The 1980 Storm Drainage Plan
was found satisfactory for drainage systems and quantity of water for most of the City. The
four Watershed Management Organizations (WMO) require the local (city) plan be completed
in conformance with their regional (watershed) plans. In addition, the Metropolitan Council
requires that the plan be included as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The goal was to
meet the minimum standard of all agencies with one City-wide uniform plan.
The plan includes an inventory of water resources, giving us a clear view of existing
conditions. The management activities of the plan are prioritized by a watershed and lake
qualitative ranking system. The plan identifies 8 major lakes and over 900 ponds and wetlands
within the City. Each of these 8 lakes are evaluated and ranked based on 12 criteria in three
categories: contributing watershed, in -lake characteristics, and public use (Table 1). These
lakes are then given a low, medium, or high priority ranking (Table 2). Next, the lake
ranking is used as one of three criteria to prioritize the 38 sub -watersheds in the City. The
other two criteria include potential of land use changes and the extent of existing and potential
stormwater treatment in existing ponds and wetlands. Utilizing the three criteria, each of the
sub -watersheds is ranked from high priority to low, as a guide to future management
decisions.
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PLYMOUTH WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN
GOALS AND POLICIES COMPILATION.
Page 2
The lake ranking system considers each lake first on it own merit, then compares it to other
lakes in Plymouth as well as the North Central Hardwoods Forest Ecoregion. The ranking
integrates the City of Plymouth wetland classification while recognizing plan goals and
regional initiatives that involve the Watershed Management Organizations (WMO),
Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Hennepin Parks, Metropolitan Council, and the
public at large.
The Goals & Policies Compilation. This compilation was put together in order to provide a
quick review of the Water Resources Management Plan's objectives. It includes all of the
goals, policies, and implementation activity items. However, implementation time table and
program cost projections are not included yet, these items will be established after the activity
items are finalized. Also, much of the goals and policies are discussed in depth in the body of
the plan. The document was put together by our consultant, SEH Inc., after an extensive
study and review by Environmental Quality Committee members and the Engineering staff.
The completion of the rest of the plan will be based on the goals and policies. The following
is the schedule for completing the Water Resources Management Plan:
Shane issaghi,
Water Resources Engineer
attachment : Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan; Goals & Policies Section
ply_nt\ntdisk I\pw\Engineering\WTRRESRC\W PLAN\ 1998\WPIan2118.doc
Tasks Dates
Special Council Meeting, Goals & Policies Feb. 11, 1998
Begin work on final document Feb. 12, 1998
Legislative draft of document available for staff review Aril 30, 1198
Staff / SEH review meetings May -June 1998
Re -draft complete plan per review comments July 1998
EQC Meetings to review and comment July -August 1998
Re -draft final plan. Establish public input process September 1998
Go to Council with full Plan Sept. 16, 1998
Public Review and Comment October 1998
Submit to Watershed for formal review Nov. 4, 1998
Receive Watershed Comments January 4, 1998
Finalize Plan Jan. -Feb. 1999
Shane issaghi,
Water Resources Engineer
attachment : Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan; Goals & Policies Section
ply_nt\ntdisk I\pw\Engineering\WTRRESRC\W PLAN\ 1998\WPIan2118.doc
3 n 3 v o r b w
o :
C
00 00
o a
O.
to
y
o y
b
c
c
W
N
N
00
w
00 N
O
u
00 00
N W W W W N
o
a m
n
f
A
rrxxr
C
O
3 n 3 v o r b w
n
0
vN..
O J O 00 (J ., a
It
o :
o a
y
o y
v o
a m
C
01 d1 Ch Cli 01 Ol 01 Ol C "
e
n
00 00 O',
A
i 1 00 00 00 00 1 00 b S t9
air
O O oo fD
o o
00 00
oco
0
euj
r
N O cn O ffl
e
r-
0000 J 00 b
r-
y
C
n
0
vN..
O J O 00 (J ., a
It
PLYMOUTH WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ROM'S JJ4( WAJ(-P. k?
GOALS AND POLICIES
Minnesota Rules 8410 - Surface Water Management (BWSR,1992) requires the
establishment of Goals and Policies for the effective management of water
resources. The italic passages which follow come directly from the 8410 rules
to illustrate the consistency between the letter of the law and the City's
philosophy.
8410.0080 - Establishment of Goals and Policies
Subpart 1. Plan Contents. Each plan must contain specific goal statements and
corresponding policies relating to the overall purposes specified in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 103B.201. The goals and policies of the Watershed Management Organization
shall attempt to avoid conflict with County, regional, or state goals and policies. The
goals must be outlined in sufficient detail to provide direction regarding what the
policies should accomplish, provide direction to the organization's board, and allow for
the success or failure of the goals and policies to be quantified. The goals and policies
should recognize the fundamental relationship between water quality and land use.
Development of goals and policies must, at a minimum, address the issues in Subparts
2 to 9.(BWSR, 1992).
Goals
Agoal is a desired end toward which water management efforts are directed.
This section of the plan identifies ten goals for water resources planning and
management functions. The goals of this plan were established in accordance
with the purposes of the water management programs required by Sections
103B.201 to 103B.251 and in conformance with the goals of the watershed
management organizations having jurisdiction in Plymouth including the Elm
Creek, Shingle Creek and Bassett Creek WMOs and the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District.
In addition, goals have been established for each of the eight major lakes and
Elm Creek, including an overall ranking and intended use analysis. The goals
are not neccessarily listed in any order of priority.
Policies
Each goal has several corresponding policies. A policy is a governing principle
that provides the means for achieving established goals.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 1
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Action Plans
Specific Actions Plans have been developed for each of the eight major lakes and
Elm Creek. The Action Plans identify problems related to achieving the stated
goal and solution for addressing the problems.
Implementation Plans
For each of the goals, a related Implementation Plan has been established. The
Implementation Plan corresponds directly to the stated goal and policies, and
to the solutions identified for each of the eight major lakes and Elm Creek. The
Implementation Plans include specific activity steps, available resources, means
of measuring the completion of the activity step, a target date for completion
and an estimated budget. The combination of these Implementation Plans will
formulate the overall strategy for implementing the Water Resources
Management Plan.
Standards
Standards are an extension of the policies. They provide specific, detailed
guidance regarding water management practices. Plan standards are included
in the Appendix of the Water Resources Management Plan.
Techniques and Strategies
Techniques are specific methods or means to meet the standards. Strategies are
the combination of multiple techniques. Techniques and strategies for meeting
City goals are included in the "Approach" chapter of the Water Resources
Management Plan.
Summary
There are nineteen major goals established for the Water Resources Management
Plan. For each of the first ten goals which apply uniformly across the City,
corresponding policies have been developed. The ten goals that follow include
subwatershed-specific action plans that apply the City-wide goals and policies
and are geared towards water resource management activities necessary to
achieve established objectives for each of the eight major lakes and Elm Creek.
The Implementation Plan that follows each City-wide goals and subwatershed-
specific action plans describes program costs and priorities. A summary of the
plan goals is shown below.
City-wide Goals
1. Water Quantity, i.e., Flood Control
Control flooding and minimize related public capital and maintenance
expenditure necessary to control excessive volumes and rates of
runoff.
Page 2 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
0
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
2. Water Quality
Achieve water quality standards in lakes, streams, and wetlands
consistent with intended use and classification.
3. Erosion Control
Minimize soil erosion through increased education and enforcement
4. Wetlands
Maintain the amount of wetland acreage and, where feasible, increase
the wetland values within the City:
5. Public Participation, Information and Education
Increase public participation and knowledge in management of the
water resources.
6. Monitoring
Implement a comprehensive water resources monitoring program.
7. Maintenance and Inspection
Preserve the function of water resource facilities through routine
inspection and regular maintenance activities.
8. Recreation, Fish and Wildlife
Manage water recreation activities and improve fish and wildlife
habitat.
9. Groundwater
Prevent contamination of the aquifers and promote ground water
recharge.
10. Finance
Establish funding sources to finance water resources management
activities.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 3
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Waterbody Goals
11. Elm Creek 4 temhed
Maintain the existing (1997) quality and rate of runoff in the Elm Creek.
12. Pomerleau Lake
Maintain existing (1997) quality of Pomerleau Lake
13. Schmidt Lake
Maintain and improve lake quality and reduce existing phosphorus loadings
to Schmidt Lake.
14. Bass Lake
Reduce total phosphorus and chlorophyll a levels in Bass Lake to fall within
Ecoregion range.
15. Pike Lake
Reduce sediment and phosphorus loadings to Pike Lake by controlling
erosion and retrofit storm sewer with detention ponds, where feasible.
16. Parkers Lake
Reduce phosphorus loadings at storm water inlet points and work towards an
in -lake average total phosphorus concentration of 38pg/l
17. Medicine Lake
Increase clarity and reduce total phosphorus and chlorophyll A concentrations,
working toward the 1998 goal for total phosphorus established by the Bassett
Creek Watershed Management Commission
18. Gleason Lake
Manage the Gleason Lake watershed to maintain and improve lake water
quality levels consistent with its lake ranking
19. Mooney Lake
Manage Mooney Lake and the contributing watershed to maintain or improve
water quality to a level consistent with its current ranking.
Page 4 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Goal No. 1 - Water Quanti
Subpart 2. Water Quantity. Each plan must outline goals and policies describing how
storm water runoff will be managed. The maximum allowable peak runoff must be
established for appropriate subwatersheds to the extent necessary to assure that the goals
and policies of the organization will be met and address how runofffrom developments
creating more than one -acre of new impervious surface will be managed with respect to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B.3365. The plan must describe the criteria used for
defining "appropriate subwatersheds".
Control flooding and minimize related public capital and
maintenance expenditure necessary to control excessive
volumes and rates of runoff.
Water Quantity Policies
Policy 1.1: Constructed detention ponds should be relied upon to limit
runoff to pre -development rates and to control downstream
flooding where feasible; natural basins may also be utilized.
Policy 1.2: The City encourages regional detention areas, whenever
practical.
Policy 1.3: Emergency overflows, outlets to drainage systems or other
provisions shall be provided if the available storm water storage
capacity is inadequate to prevent flooding of adjacent structures.
Policy 1.4: Encroachment into the storage capacity (volume) below
designated 100 -year flood levels shall be prohibited without
mitigating action that will preserve the storage capacity.
Policy 1.5: The minimum building elevation (lowest floor elevation) for all
structures must be above the established 100 year levels in
accordance with Plymouth Engineering Guidelines and the
standards of the Water Resources Management Plan.
Policy 1.6: Increased volumes of runoff due to development should be
minimized by limiting impervious cover and encouraging
infiltration of storm water where soil conditions are appropriate.
Policy 1.7: The City encourages the use of alternative landscape techniques
and materials to reduce rates and volumes of runoff.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 5
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Water Quantity Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Revise Plymouth Research available information Updated
engineering guidelines to engineering
address both peak runoff guidelines
rates and runoff volumes
2 Expand and Update Developer's engineer files Model
hydrologic models for Elm City's consulting engineer design files Technical
Creek and Shingle Creek State/County/WMO design files memo and
Watersheds for the Contour maps revised data
subwatershed areas outside Land use maps tables
of the MUSA, concurrent Soils maps
with the development of the 1980 Comprehensive Drainage Plan
land use plan to minimize Hennepin Conservation District TR -20 Model
increases in peak flow Elm Creek WMO
3 Identify known flooding City maintenance staff Map of
and drainage problem areas Field review problem areas
using GIS Reports of resident complaints
4 Finance water quantity Plan Goal 10 See Plan Goal
related activities 10
5 Develop a model site to Available Alternative landscape resources Site acquired
establish, promote and See Goals 2 and 9 Site
monitor the effectiveness of developed
alternative landscape Monitoring
features. data
Page 6 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Goal No. 2 - Water Quality
Subpart 3. Water Quality. Each plan must outline specific water quality goals and
policies for natural surface water storage and retention systems within the organization.
Goals should be related to parameters or quantities that can be measured. The
relationship of land use to water quality should be considered when developing goals and
policies. The goals and policies should be developed to strive for compliance with
applicable water quality standards and be suitable for the intended uses of natural
surface water storage and retention
Achieve water quality standards in lakes, streams, and
wetlands consistent with intended use and classification.
Water Quality Policies
Policy 2.1: Any activity that creates more than one acre of impervious area shall
limit or control phosphorus and total suspended solids in runoff to
meet, at a minimumum, National Urban Runoff program (NURP)
standards.
Policy 2.2: For development that creates less than one acre of impervious area, the
City will encourage water quality treatment that will, at a minimum,
meet National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards.
Policy 2.3: Proposed developments must identify all reasonable steps to avoid
water quality impacts and mitigate with appropriate best management
practices (BMPs), to prevent water quality in receiving waters from
falling below establishd standards.
Policy 2.4: The City shall maintain a response plan to minimize the impact of
hazardous spills.
Policy 2.5: The City will take an active role in developing regional water quality
ponds whenever practical.
Policy 2.6: The City shall supplement its regulatory approach with an education -
based approach to achieve proper yard care measures that will reduce
nutrient loadings to lakes, creeks and wetlands and to reduce the
impacts of animal waste.
Policy 2.7: The City shall promote the reduction or minimization of hard surfaced
areas.
Policy 2.8: The City will balance protection of wetlands, utilization of wetlands to
protect the water quality of other water resources (i.e., wetland, lake,
stream) and use of wetlands to provide flood control.
Policy 2.9: The City encourages the use of alternative landscape techniques and
materials to reduce water quality impacts.
Policy 2.10 The City will manage its' properties in accordance with the appropriate
best management practices
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 7
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Water Quality Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Enhance the composting and Available information Informed public
yard care education program.
2 Expand existing City Goose Minnesota DNR o Approved City policy
Management Program by: Home owners and budget
Available programs from other
A Prepare goose population communities
assessments Minnesota DNR
B Continue water quality Home owners
monitoring Home owners
3 Develop and implement a Priority list of subwatersheds Documentation and
program to investigate the GIs database (see Appendix F) database revision
physical characteristics of
ponds on a prioritized
subwatershed basis
4 Finance water quality related Plan Goal 10 See Plan Goal 10
activities
5 Develop a model site to Available Alternative landscape resources Site acquired
establish, promote and monitor See Goals 1 and 9 Site developed
the effectiveness of alternative Monitoring data
landscape features.
Page 8 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Goal No. 3 - Erosion Control
Subpart 9. Erosion. Each plan must identify specific goals and policies that will control
soil erosion consistent with the goals and policies outlined in this part.
Minimize soil erosion through increased education and
enforcement
Erosion Control Policies
Policy 3.1: Erosion control plans shall be required for grading activities
Policy 3.2: The City shall continue implementing erosion control
enforcement program
Policy 3.3: The City shall use regulatory measures to control erosion and
sediment to extend the effective life of water resources facilities
and reduce pollutant loadings
Policy 3.4 The City shall develop proactive measures such as education,
incentives and recognition to prevent soil erosion.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 9
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Erosion Control Implementation Plan
Revised 01/29/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Expand the erosion 0 Existing City Code Updated code
control ordinance to 0 Plymouth engineering
address single home guidelines
site erosion control
and maintenance of
erosion control
devices.
2 Modify erosion control Developer guidelines Revised erosion
ordinance to address Appendix D) control
routine maintenance of ordinance
erosion control devices
3 Include an erosion and Inspection and maintenance Annual
sedimentation program (see plan goal 7) inspection
component to the process
inspection and
maintenance program
4 Finance erosion Plan Goal 10 See Plan Goal
control related 10
activities
Page 10 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Goal No. 4 - Wetlands
Subpart 8. Wetlands. Each plan must outline specific goals and policies regarding the
management of wetlands within the organization and identify high priority areas for
wetland preservation, restoration, and establishment. Wetland management goals and
policies should address utilization, protection and preservation, and the enhancement
or restoration of wetlands identified in the organization. Each plan must also evaluate
the need to establish wetland banking system.
Maintain the amount of wetland acreage and, where feasible, increase the
wetland values within the City.
Wetland Policies
Policy 4.1: The City shall administer wetland protection and mitigation in
accordance with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act and
the City's Wetland Ordinance.
Policy 4.2: Water quality treatment for development which creates more
than one acre of impervious surface must be provided prior to
discharge to wetlands; a portion of a multi -cell water quality
treatment system may be within a wetland..
Policy 4.3: The City will encourage treatment of storm water runoff prior to
discharge to wetlands on sites where formal treatment of storm
water is not specifically required.
Policy 4.4: The artificial water level fluctuation (bounce) in wetlands
resulting from storm water runoff shall be managed in
accordance with the City's wetland classifications.
Policy 4.5: Where open water areas are permitted to be excavated in
wetlands for the purpose of creating habitat diversity, the
excavation shall be done in conformance with DNR regulations
and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 11
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Wetland Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date Date
1 Continue to act as LGU and Water resource division budget Annual reports to
administer the Wetland BWSR
Conservation Act
2 Complete and implement BWSR Grant Completed plan
wetland management plan City wetland inventory Applicable revisions
A Determine the extent to to Water Resources
which water quality Management Plan
treatment is necessary
to protect a wetland.
B Determine if a wetland
can serve a water
quality function.
C Develop a strategy to
protect existing
functions and values
D Provide specific
management guidance
for ecologically or
hydrologically sensitive
wetlands
E Develop a process to
integrate wetland
resources into other
related comprehensive
plans
F Investigate a means to
control storm water
impacts on highest
valued wetlands
G Establish reference
wetlands monitoring
program by identifying
representative wetlands
in each of the
classifications
H Identify priority
wetlands based on
ranking and/or
monitoring data that
warrant preservation
and/or special action to
manage or protect
3 Finance wetland Plan Goal 10 See Plan Goal 10
management activities
Page 12 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Goal No. 5 - Public Participation,
Information and Education
Subpart 5. Enhancement of Public Participation; Information and Education. Each
plan must outline goals and policies describing who will participate and when public
participation will be encouraged. Goals and policies must at least address the creation
and purposes of advisory committees and public information programs.
Increase public participation and knowledge in management
of the water resources.
Public Involvement Policies
Policy 5.1: The City will use a public involvement process in resource
management decision-making.
Policy 5.2: The City will use a variety of media, including newsletters, local
cable television and the City's Website, to inform the community
about water resource issues.
Policy 5.3 Work with existing public and private resources to increase
public participation in water resources management.
Policy 5.4 Establish model interpretive sites for public education.
Policy 5.5 The City will initiate a public education program including
alternative landscapes, phosphorus free fertilizer, aquatic plant
management, etc.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 13
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Public Participation, Information, and Education Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Conduct Public Education 0 City staff Completed meetings
Program to develop an 0 Lake association members
understanding of issues and Environmental Quality Fairs
concerns and to encourage
participation in
implementation of the Water
Resources Management Plan
2 Conduct public education Lake associations Completed meetings
programs regarding lake City staff Response to
water quality and the lake Water resources management feedback
ranking systems presented plan Lake plan revisions
in this plan Hennepin Parks Nature Center
3 Prepare articles and videos City newsletter City newsletter
regarding the Water Local Paper
Resource Management Plan Minneapolis Star & Tribune
WRMP)
4 Involve civic, neighborhood City staff Completed
groups, business, industry City display presentation
and schools to promote Schools Presentation
activities which improve Existing stenciling program evaluations
water quality Newsletter
Phosphorus free fertilizer
ordinance
5 Expand the City's Web Site, City Staff Complete home
describing citizen page
involvement opportunities System support and
update
6 Continue to publicize and City newsletter Published articles
support the existing EQC Annual Plan Published plan
Environmental Quality City Council Presentation
Committee
7 Establish a budget specific Water Resource Division budget Final budget
to public participation
8 Pursue education related List of applicable programs Completed
grants Grant applications applications
Grant award
9 Develop citizen program to Plan Goal No. 6
assist in watershed
monitoring
10 Finance public participation, Plan Goal No. 10 See Plan Goal 10
information and education
activities
Page 14 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Goal No. 6 - Monitoring
No reference to or requirement for monitoring is made in Minnesota Rules 8410
BWSR,1992)
Implement a comprehensive water resources monitoring
program.
Monitoring Policies
Policy 5.1: The City will conduct monitoring programs to develop baseline
and long-term water quality records.
Policy 5.2: The City will. cooperate with all public agencies to conduct
monitoring projects.
Policy 5.3: The City will establish citizen monitoring programs.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 15
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Monitoring Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Develop and implement Water Resources Management Completed plan
water resource monitoring Plan Annual monitoring
plan for the City to track Water Resources Division report
water quality trends and budget
monitor the effectiveness of WMOs
water quality management Metropolitan Council
programs. City staff
Lake Associations
Hennepin Conservation District
Schools
2 Establish citizen assisted Newsletter Formation of and
water resource monitoring Neighborhood meetings active monitoring by
programs Agency support citizen groups
City staff Monitoring reports
Lake associations
3 Maintain GIS database Monitoring reports Electronic map -
City GIS access to monitoring
data
4 Establish a process for Existing Filing System Adopted process
collection and retrieval of GIS Records Management Data acquisition
water quality data on GIS model
5 Finance monitoring Plan Goal No. 10 See Plan Goal 10
activities
Page 16 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Goal No. 7 - Maintenance and Inspection
No reference to or requirement for maintenance and inspection is made in
Minnesota Rules 8410 (BWSR,1992)
Preserve the function of water resource facilities through
routine inspection and regular maintenance activities.
Maintenance and Inspection Policies
Policy 7.1: The City will develop and implement an annual inspection and
maintenance plan for water resource facilities.
Policy 7.2: The City shall require maintenance of privately -constructed
water quality treatment ponds.
Policy 7.3: The City shall require adequate maintenance -related access for
public and private water resources facilities (i.e., ponds, etc.).
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 17
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Maintenance and Inspection Implementation Plan
Revised 06/09/97
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Develop and implement annual Intern(s) Completed annual
inspection program for City staff inspection report
documentation of the condition specialized equipment Photo documentation
of ponds and drainage system List of required
easements
2 Develop and implement an Annual inspection report Prioritization of work
annual work program for Follow-up field investigation program tasks
system maintenance identified Public works staff Written work orders
by annual inspections Documentation of
improvements
Equipment acquisition
3 Acquire and preserve easements Documentation from annual Written easement
for the purpose of maintenance inspection reports descriptions
Property records Executed easements
4 Develop a prioritized plan for GIs Written street -
street -sweeping areas directly Utility base maps sweeping program
contributing to sensitive water Maintenance staff Annual post -sweeping
bodies Equipment field review
Ice control practices
Page 18 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Goal No. 8 - Recreation, Fish and Wildlife
Subpart 4. Recreation and Fish and Wildlife. Each plan must outline how water
resource based recreational activities and wildlife interests will be protected or improved
through the implementation of the plan. In consideration of these issues, the plan must
determine whether there is need to classify or prioritize individual water resources for
management purposes.
Manage water recreation activities and improve fish and
wildlife habitat.
Recreation, Fish and Wildlife Policies
Policy 8.1: Natural areas and wildlife habitat intended for preservation shall
be protected during construction by appropriate BMPs.
Policy 8.2: Preserve vegetative buffers around ponds and wetlands to
provide habitat for wildlife.
Policy 8.3: The City shall support programs for controlling exotic and
invasive species of plants and animals
Policy 8.4: Design and construct lake outlets to provide a barrier to
upstream migration of rough fish whenever practical.
Policy 8.5: The City recognizes the need to balance water recreational
activity with water quality and habitat issues.
Policy 8.6 The City will explore new opportunities to integrate water
resources based recreation activities and wildlife interests within
wildlife corridors.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 19
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Recreation, Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Identify appropriate public Park staff Feasibility study
access for water bodies and DNR Public Involvement
pursue acquisition of Neighborhood groups Agency participation
feasible sites Homeowner associations Improved Access
Public process
2 Develop partnership with City Water Resources Staff Identification of
DNR to manage Purple DNR representatives infestation areas
Loosestrife DNR policies Policy and financing
Available research Control and reduction
Volunteers for identification of problem area measured on the basis
Public Process of annually observed
areas
3 Develop partnership with City Water Resources Staff Identification of
DNR and Hennepin Parks to DNR representatives infestation areas
manage Eurasian DNR policies Policy and financing
watermilfoil Available research Annual measurement
Volunteers for identification of problem area of observed areas
Current efforts at Parkers Lake
Experiences of Lake Minnetonka
University of Minnesota
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Public process
4 Develop a partnership with City Water Resources Staff Identification of
DNR to manage invasive DNR representatives infestation areas
plant and animal species DNR policies Policy and financing
Available research Control and reduction
Volunteers for identification of problem area measured on the basis
Public process of annually observed
areas
Page 20 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Goal No. 9 - Groundwater
Subpart 7. Groundwater. If County groundwater plan has not commenced at the time
the plan or plan amendment is initiated, the organization shall assess the need and
degree of involvement the organization has in groundwater management and establish
appropriate goals and policies.
Prevent contamination of the aquifers and promote ground
water recharge.
Groundwater Protection Policies
Policy 9.1: The City shall develop and implement controls to protect
identified wellhead areas.
Policy 9.2: The City shall promote proper well abandonment.
Policy 9.3: The City will consider alternatives to conventional storm water
detention to enhance groundwater recharge through infiltration.
Policy 9.4: Design and installation of on-site wastewater systems shall be in
accordance with the standards set forth in Minnesota Rules,
Chapter 7080 and the Individual Sewage Treatment System
ISTS) Act.
Policy 9.5: The City will implement and enforce the existing Water
Conservation Plan.
Policy 9.6: The City shall encourage the use of alternative landscape
techniques and materials to reduce dependency on groundwater
supplies.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 21
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Groundwater Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Prepare wellhead Minnesota Department of Health Rules Completed
protection plan (WHPP) Emergency Water Supply and plan
in accordance with the Conservation Plan
Minnesota Department of Groundwater Framework - Appendix E
Health rules of WRMP
GIS data
2 Update private well and Hennepin Conservation District Complete
individual sewage MPCA data record
treatment system data Private well driller records via GIS
GIS
3 Develop and implement a Private well data Monitoring
private well sampling Monitoring standards data base
program Lab records
4 Inventory areas of ground GIS Completed
water discharge City staff data records
in GIS
5 Include available Available Alternative landscape Completed
alternative landscape resources City packet
design guidelines in for re-
developer packets and as distribution
part of grading plan
review
6 Develop a model site to Available Alternative landscape Site acquired
establish, promote and resources Site
monitor the effectiveness See Goals 1 and 2 developed
of alternative landscape Monitoring
features. data
7 Revisit water Water Conservation plan Report to city
conservation plans to staff
verify current practices regarding
are in accordance with differences in
plan plan and
current
practices
Page 22 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Goal No. 10 - Finance
No reference to finance is made in Minnesota Rules 8410 (BWSR,1992)
Establish funding sources to finance water resources
management activities.
Finance Policies
Policy 10.1: The City shall identify and implement possible funding sources for
water resources management.
Policy 10.2: The City will actively pursue grants, donations, and in-kind
contributions to help fund water resources management.
Policy 10.3 The City shall assist citizens and businesses in their efforts to improve
water quality, decrease water quantity and/or upgrade wetlands.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 23
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Finance Implementation Plan
Revised 05/13/97
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target
Date
Budget
1 Prepare study regarding Water resources management Completed study
methods for financing plan Council Approval
water resources Implementation strategy (of this
management activities plan)
Current City budget process and
assessment policy
2 Implement financing Finance study Completed policy
strategies of water Public Involvement Plan Ordinance
resource management Bench marking with other
activities communities
Page 24 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 55 - Elm Creek Action Plan
Subject:
V Elm Creek Watershed - within Plymouth City Limits
Purpose:
V To control runoff impacts to Elm Creek.
Goal:
V Maintain the existing (1997) quality and rate of runoff in Elm Creek
Problems > Solutions
1 Differences exist between 1980 storm drainage > 1 After completion of the land use plan for Northwest
plan proposed ponding, flood plain ordinance, Plymouth, revise the 1980 storm drainage plan,
the wetland conservation act and the 1983 beginning with the 1983 flood insurance TR -20 model
flood insurance study for Elm Creek. for Elm Creek, to establish future conditions and a
revised ponding plan that is consistent with current
laws, rules, ordinances and goals.
2 Minimal water quality data (in -stream or > 2 Establish a joint monitoring program with the Elm
discharge) exists for Elm Creek within the City Creek WMO to establish baseline conditions and total
of Plymouth. annual pollutant loading guidelines.
3 Future development, even with treatment to > 3 Pursue creative water resources management options
NURP standards, could increase the pollutant to minimize development -related water quality
loadings to the creek. impacts.
4 Treatment deficiencies in selected drainage > 4 Prepare a study to identify treatment options for
areas could result in excessive pollutant EC10, EC11 and MLL
loadings to wetlands.
5 Future peak flows rates and volumes will > 5 Pursue creative water resources management options
continue to threaten the creek, causing to minimize development -related water quantity
excessive stream bank erosion and bottom impacts
scour.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 25
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 56
Elm Creek Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target
Date
Budget
1 Prepare studies related to 1980 Plan Complete land use
the land use plan for Elm Creek TR -20 model plan for
Northwest Plymouth Wetland Classification Northwest
pending study) which Federal, State and local wetland Plymouth
consider both water level regulations Completed
fluctuation and pollutant Available Topography Studies
loading impacts of Elm Creek WMO
potential future approval
development and flood Council Approval
control and water quality
treatment requirements
2 Control runoff from Watershed studies (see Activity Engineering
future development to Step 1) review of future
minimize downstream Alternative Landscape Guidelines development
flooding. Creative development options proposals
Best Management Practices Public acquisition
Regional Ponding sites of regional
ponding sites
Page 26 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
Cll
E
PVT Pt Lu Y c -
76v c CD
CD
cCS
CD 2-1or
F-—vc
WRA
3: m
2
CL
0
Ll-
CT3
12
clo cl)
z
C\j
0 CL
CD D CL OL
CD czcD
CD c)
C.\j
Cll
E
PVT Pt Lu Y c -
76v c CD
CD
cCS
CD 2-1or
F-—vc
WRA
3: m
2
Cll
E
PVT Pt Lu Y c -
76v c CD
CD
cCS
CD 2-1orCL
WRA
a
CT3
12
clo cl)
z
C\j
0 CL
CDD CL OL
CD czcD
CD c)
C.\j
Lo v.) M co M
cc '4- cO rn F= 2
M 0
cm 'D(d7 - CL
ca. 0
Enof
as -,e C'o
cu L ;: C) M —i CL C)
CL
R
z
1– !E Or
M 4U)
az 0
CIO U. C-- wEcowccEl07ct00 -2 Q.) (j
L.) ::i C-.') Lu ZM C/3 _3
p 4
C%. V N
co
C M— C
N (Q C1 d N11 6
LM
m o civ E
N -p O O cv N d OrcvQC3o C/7
s
O
Q'
maNi c
EL
oO..
N C3
C wK
U d1
R ti N ai R
o
rn m
a pNcv o r r
C
ua
r
r•a -,
m Q. C Oc c a o o U C'' m C ''
L) N E
UJ @O U C1. d Y
N QS
R
N
OL] .0 LLE QS N p j
c0
d~ E V
C1 @ E yCNC'OO c N M-
cv U N U
5 a3 W d N
R E N o a
T m Z o
F J cCcv
Q d
N Y
O d
VJ
T
V) -CD c-' .T U a c H r
u7 R L
MvO O CU UN D1 a y mCAUQJUdNcaUNCD
V m
u. cv Y L O = C_ C O' a .O O O
H C`J
CI7
cv m CD .D _
cv m -C:3 _
cz
3 Rac.3 C,3
JO CD c C c0 CU a N C QCD-
N C1 O R7 E
C -O
C',C t
R
N
O U
m
N O OCLUE
VS O
72 E Q
O Y
o a
L C Cls O ca O -C Cp C Cv C a
d
G.l cn E E cm .' v L cv J E CO
n m
EE CU mQS N @ CS N _ C3. Ln O O
Y W _ N
J
QE N cC5 N
m n
N i
@ N O Cv Oi L 'cd
cI J c' o ave ai o v C N E N -
N ccv -) v E 4! o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0
a U
E `c N o . .- o . r co r m u7 a M N
o a o a a L N- ti asuepungV 4si j ani;eJaa
Kd
NO
N
U
N
O
C N
a
m a:,R E oE o E o
a A L
c
OC
LO a r
ai
U- E' x
EaQccy
a)
C3
Q cQ
co
OCD cc CDR6l a
L O.
w
dCL
N
ca U N
N CU
c6 U C
N p
cl
of0yCl)
O
O OO
Cv
LOC3Ili CL3N%O
fOO''
CD
R3Oc Q1 6D
C
CD
r OCA cm
A
C
Cll CUcvQ C C
s T co
n
n o p
cv L a > o a
C Cl) fC N CCI E (U C6
d
C\1
lf') L C U C FE - cY6 •_-' '
D
d pdC oN In C
R
p O ,j
CID)
CT •-.
ZSC7cuL
cin
a
cm O O
3 QJ C O CO
p -c
U d co N NMw
C N vOi 01 O
Q
E N
n c N n NN R
x
U C
E Q a
cs
N >i
a W v
aofEO
a,
O N
N cdO O N0N E J ca
C O J
R
O
y c3
c
d
M
v cn m
C O C O N
o a' cc E cOVa
3 M
d Qi CD
O aJ
L T
Ov Q,
R
C*
E a o
d In
N O d CD CCS C
R Lf) NCO
L cls
O C Cg. dd M y O H f O Cn U as Q) CnO m
ti
cn-
CD 00 E
No
amNm 0
J CU R CC _ a
cn E E J
CD ' N co cv
CAC40
co
3
N OU?
CL
O
Oa 3
O
N x N
E
E
E m
Q N
UsooUNR
ON
u N P—A
u
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 62 - Pomerleau Lake Action Plan
Subject:
V Pomerleau Lake Management Plan
Purpose:
V Manage Pomerleau Lake consistent with its ranking.
Goal:
V Maintain existing (1997) quality of Pomerleau Lake.
City Ranking:
V Low
Intended Use:
V Fishing, aesthetics and runoff management; clarity marginally supportive of swimming
Problems Solutions
1 WMO classification as 'Recreation Group" 1 Adopt, as a minimum, the revised classification of
does not provide enough direction relative to Medium Quality, as presented in Appendix A of the
lake management efforts. Water Resources Management Plan.
2 Storm water input continues to degrade water 2 Storm water discharges require adequate pretreatment
quality. meeting NURP removal standards consistent with
Policies 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3.
3 Limited monitoring data is available from 3 Supplement existing monitoring data with additional
which to develop a long term trends analysis. volunteer and City Sponsored monitoring programs,
consistent with the Monitoring Goal of this plan.
4 Limited Public Access opportunity prevents 4 Investigate and evaluate appropriate public uses and
lake from being ranking as High Quality (see public access.
Appendix A).
5 Lake is dominated by Black Crappie and Black 5 Develop and implement a fisheries management and
Bullhead, species that are typically more stocking program consistent with the Pomerleau Lake
dominant in turbid, poorer quality water. Atlas.
6 Very limited storm water treatment available to 6 Identify storm water treatment options before or
protect the lake and exceptional wetlands. concurrent with any future development.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 29
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 63
Pomerleau Lake Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target
Date
Budget
1 Prepare studies related to 1980 Plan Complete
the land use plan for Wetland Classification Northwest
Northwest Federal, State and local wetland Plymouth Plan
Plymouth(pending study) regulations Completed Studies
which consider both Available Topography WMO approval
water level fluctuation Council Approval
and pollutant loading
impacts of potential
future development and
flood control and water
quality treatment
requirements
2 Investigate and evaluate Field inventory Completed public
appropriate public uses Homeowner input use plan
and public access DNR Implemented
Planning/ Engineering department public use plan
Page 30 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
CL
0
CL
oC, 0
l.•
C.
coLo
C)
CL
M
CD
I L
2m x077
I
BUCK U JC
E
IN
mi
LL
Cl.
CL)
CL. m
m
cc E Lo
m m
cw
L
cz
0, L.,
E E U 0 0
O
R
cr
cz
co > 94 (1)
E
C/)2
a=c)
a
W CD
Iz
ox
C. -O
E
LLI a- Lu
M
i Co m m
CDLC3 L, s E
C)
N cc
oC, 0
l.•
C.
coLo
C)
CL
M
CD
I L
2m x077
I
BUCK U JC
E
IN
mi
LL
Cl.
CL)
m
cc E Lo
cc It
E cz
0, L.,
E E U 0 0
O
R
cr
cz
co > 94 (1)
E
C/)2
a=c)
a
W CD
Iz
ox
C. -O
E
LLI a- Lu G i Co m m
CDLC3 L, s E
C)
N cc
co
CE C-3
m u
a- Ln
Ln
6 M
cz
CD
m
C-Ij
c:,- ccxC=, C',j W- CL C=,
VIUM
4z m
N RIin
E
O 0 'CDM C2p> 3 C5 t 0. CIO a0
NC
CL C)
oC, 0
l.•
C.
coLo
C)
CL
M
CD
I L
2m x077
I
BUCK U JC
E
IN
mi
Cl.
cc E Lo
cc It
0, L.,
21
m
O
R
cr
cz
cp
E
C/)2
a=c)
a
Iz
ox
C5 C-)
LLI a- Lu G i Co m m
cc E Lo
cc It
0, L., cc;
a) ym90167
a3
N C
2 1°
0
Ln
CD
r
N
M
9
L Gi CU "— O
CL 3Nd
V) CO C) a) U c
V Y
a c oNcoN
o -c a, N Y_
CCS10 C
c c
o "o, " N O O
N Z
CD ou
U m L
O NL '
N ` C
d O
C6 [6 .
L O
O , . U N C
cc7 C
C', N m CT
N L C
C=: "
a) =
3 '3O
o E CQ. N CU
E
C', _
N O
C t? J Y
N C —
a o
c oCT
C N C,
Q
N
N co CCS
CCS m U
cm o L
C C C
S Y c N
Q d c
EN a
ca vJ s
O
0
V
M
N
O
CDco
f-
Y
O
MC, _
CD N a -
cn
h c m -
w C°
m
C o
O } a m
L _
c
E
L Y
p v
z
m2n
N
G G
N
C:
ON
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
co 1— O 1n V' m N
aauepungy qsi j anileIaa
C)
L C d2ft
E E c
Z
CO C)
O
C O OC" w E a CC
ivcoN
a
a) c <v
m adoao (:)- ca CCML
o n.
Lmn
N w L U o
N U CCS N Y Z
C1)
a
L
N
C
N N E L YC1 m
m Cl.
w c
CU > CCS
Cc
N
Q 7 N
CC7 Cll
coo CD 3 L o
L a' w
U
o o CCs c
L L d E,
R a)
V -Cl
CU
V O) N C!J cO Em
p a .
y a) C1) No cCCS cn
Y CU C1JcLLscE— Ca
L-..
0 E 3:N co
R N CD
W CD- 3 L n
Fes-
L
N
C C O
N
CD
co E E 2
i. N CC7 C T cn
O o .3 c 2
W n.
a
y U NO OC N
C7 U O Q) L m CU c:,Cp oC U
d coy
c
cn a) — °)
m V
U m- ct7 c4 Q) C1 CD
CCS w d
C1 LN @ m
N 5 d U N
oo n ca C
Nn
io N T
C,
C N Tcw... G y N a mc
Z »_
@ p a.-
OC
N
O
L O ` O
i N E
Q0 Ccn a _n ov
CZ
M U p a)
aa,,
O L C3 L U Ca C -C-- C, C'6
N N L C U
i L C
C3 =`, CCD
Co
C7) U C) -C3O
c
C/)cn cz o Cl r- E E
a) ym90167
a3
N C
2 1°
0
Ln
CD
r
N
M
9
L Gi CU "— O
CL 3Nd
V) CO C) a) U c
V Y
a c oNcoN
o -c a, N Y_
CCS10 C
c c
o "o, " N O O
N Z
CD ou
U m L
O NL '
N ` C
d O
C6 [6 .
L O
O , . U N C
cc7 C
C', N m CT
N L C
C=: "
a) =
3 '3O
o E CQ. N CU
E
C', _
N O
C t? J Y
N C —
a o
c oCT
C N C,
Q
N
N co CCS
CCS m U
cm o L
C C C
S Y c N
Q d c
EN a
ca vJ s
O
0
V
M
N
O
CDco
f-
Y
O
MC, _
CD N a -
cn
h c m -
w C°
m
C o
O } a m
L _
c
E
L Y
p v
z
m2n
N
G G
N
C:
ON
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
co 1— O 1n V' m N
aauepungy qsi j anileIaa
m N C
E Y >
C
UG
OC t? N OdN N
C
N
o Ca
O
cQ c1 'E
O U
N
o E E c
Z
O T r C C
CL o m N o
R
a) o
a o
o n.
Lmn
O Q
Y O=3
R
a
L
M
OO w c
CU > CCS
Cc
Q 7 N
CC7 Cll
coo CD 3 L o
A O C
MCDNV -Cl
cm CT O CCS Nc —
leiRa . C
4i ....r O rL-..
75 U Cd v
N C N
C C O
N R co E E 2
x In E
Cov
O o .3 c 2
C
C N Cp
In C7 O a C 4] Cti
03 rt. R 1MCll 'D O
io Eo, -a
o d coy
c
cn a) — °)
m V cv c(3 N awL
CA
CCS w d
C1 LN @ m
m OGI c) n a) oooncaC
O
O CQ
E
C
N
O LE - ; c
M Q0 Ccn a _n ov
m N C
E Y >
C
UG
OC t? N OdN N
C
N
o Ca
O
cQ c1 'E
O U
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 73 - Schmidt Lake Action Plan
Subject:
V Schmidt Lake Management Plan
Purpose:
V Manage Schmidt Lake consistent with its City ranking and water quality goal.
Goal:
V Maintain and improve lake quality and reduce existing phosphorus loadings to Schmidt
Lake.
City Ranking:
V Medium
Intended Use:
V Full use - swimming, boating, fishing, aesthetics and runoff management; clarity supportive
of swimming
Problems Solutions
1 Numerous (eight) inlets feed Storm water directly 1 Perform visual inspection of each inlet to identify the degree
into Schmidt Lake without the benefit of of sedimentation, accessability for maintenance equipment
pretreatment. and constraints for developing treatment solutions.
2 Few areas exist within the contributing 2 Determine treatment capacity of existing ponds and the
subwatershed where NLJRP ponds could be opportunities to increase treatment potential beyond current
developed without costly property acquisition. performance.
3 Due to the fully developed nature of the 3 Prepare a feasibility study to discuss the desired level of
subwatershed, improvements may be difficult and treatment, treatment options, costs and impacts on
costly. homeowners.
4 Modular Storm water treatment systems, which 4 Install a modular Storm water treatment system at
may be recommended in the feasibility study do discharge points to the lake as part of a pilot project to
not have a long performance record to rely on. determine overall effectiveness of treatment, maintenance
and overall applicability to other parts of the City.
5 Limited Public Access opportunity prevents lake 5 Investigate and evaluate appropriate public uses and public
from being ranking as High Quality (see Appendix access.
A).
6 Power boating use may have a negative effect on 6 Work with lake association to discuss boating restrictions as
overall water quality. one part of an overall lake improvement strategy.
7 Phosphorus -based fertilizer use within the 7 Work with public to adopt a voluntary phosphorus -free
contributing subwatershed may contribute to the fertilizer policy for all properties, not just commercial
loading problems to the lake. applicators.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 33
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 74
Schmidt Lake Implementation Plan
Revised 06/09/97
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Prepare feasibility study Engineering staff Feasibility Report
regarding storm water Citizen
treatment options WMO staff
Available Monitoring Data
2 Investigate and evaluate Field inventory Completed public
appropriate public uses Homeowner input use plan
and public access DNR Implemented
Planning, Engineering and Parks public use plan
Departments
3 Evaluate water quality Available literature Documentation of
impacts of power boating Public meetings with lake findings and
association recommendations
4 Implement a phosphorus- Property owners Monitoring
free fertilizer plan for Commercial applicators discharge points to
subwatershed Lake association the lake
Stenciling
Page 34 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
0
0CD
T
O
4*- Z
N d
Y
Y N N n n U T
a M, m n nm
a>
ca
y in L U U 2
O
Fn
J
O
4*- Z
Y
CO
cu
O
h
EImEaEnro
Na> C
laC m L m
m
N O M
Y y
co
is w T
o d = ca Ud N c ro g
MA o C/3c Y c Q o cn a=
m q c
ii E ' = a`
c
c c
o I w
wa c ami r
o Z E
a
E
o
G J cc UO c
G. U R2 1- Lo a I
r 'CZ) L
pp
d
c.D
cn DC n
c a I
cv
c co
r '
C,3yN
J Ow- C o'
au U .O - co
O O v M Q a
O Q cC O a J a a
R
E; t
c r Q LO c*) a°'i > co
N *-
O iii `° cz Q a` a' io N aue
a m id m E > co ict Q 6angs a n
o c
o
CL a
E C:)- C) M t 0yweXCa` <n
Y z t` Y
O c cz C cn -f—cn
a
O -
J J d U Q U U m} J LLA Z
Vi
LOCD
O- 0
co yd
3 u:l
d C
CO
Ln
tn
2-01 O O l!'1
R y
O
Q v
L T
O. C,
R LCI
3
Cl)
O
N
Cl)
R
J CD
LONNy
m ON
N
C
2
Ca
M C
O O C1 'C
ms _O
C Q
o — c:- O cv
DC C
O
Ow = c
Q ` o E
Q
a p _N
L `—a
J O L C
N a L
N cC C
m _
LM
d QUI
73
nI
CD o- Q
m c--
Q83 I QI >.
c`cs =
a.
U d O 2 Z
aI co Z U Qc
Y dJ
co E U
D O mCO
aNcvCDc
L «J U Cd N
Q cci O
QI O E
O =
L)
cv
N
Ca
L Cn m ca
QI
LN O
V
U
@
L QI
U
yOM
@
E LO .?
T FG
L
C O I
N C37 Q
R L c mO
O
C
ccv
Q
72
C
R
G C 3 o T
M2
QI
N m O
N N CnN OQC1I
C3
M
N C1I
O Q C3 Cll N
L N N d co
O w E 3
R
NCVLcax a
w O U N
o
N
m
L N
LO
3
3
LlN
C, p O CXI
Q] T
CD O
a o
C I— E
R N (U
Ca -
U C
C N E C QI `
IcC
L N CT U_. CZ
w C Cli C
CV
Q
0Hn2
O
o
LO`]
Y O N ,N
y cO U U N MOUc" L
CM- Y m
CO,_=
U
o
TT E
J o civ c
y n
cm
CJ L C L C
R C m
o
N 2
N y LN
N C
Q O
H Y =o'DO
F
o OONa
J ECD U CT m
LCI
N CD) L CU
cnrn R
V) aI
LOCD
O- 0
co yd
3 u:l
d C
CO
Ln
tn
2-01 O O l!'1
R y
O
Q v
L T
O. C,
R LCI
3
Cl)
O
N
Cl)
R
J CD
LONNy
m ON
N
C
2
Ca
M C
O O C1 'C
ms _O
C Q
o — c:- O cv
DC C
O
Ow = c
Q ` o E
Q
a p _N
L `—a
J O L C
N a L
N cC C
m _
LM
d QUI
73
nI
CD o- Q
m c--
Q83I QI >.
c`cs =
a.
U d O 2 Z
aI co Z U Qc
Y dJ
co E U
D O mCO
aNcvCDc
L «J U Cd N
Q cci O
QI O E
O =
L)
cv
N
Ca
L Cn m ca
L 0 CC=)C C
N N N
QI Cn Z:)
U C N CU
cd O QJ 3
C1I m j 7 a3
ED 3
N p O L
U NC L QUMC
L = N U L U
aI = vi o
y N N N
m N
O
c c
CD
CZ O J Z
O C O
Q C
E
C C
0O
QI N Q
T O
cn
cN
Cr 'o a . C U
U C Q
MN c N5cMQ
m C/)
6 a
O Y a CD
CZE R :E
ECc 3o
tQ0
O a
cCDV
OO
r
0Cb
coCD
OT '
0M
CDN
O
M
N
0
R
V5
OOD Or COD Ul) M N r
aauepungV gsij anilelaa
OO
0
Lo
o
Y
t0
Z
caco
V
d
I C
CD
r) M
w
c C.
0
M
N
O
CDN
N
V
d
y OMELO .?
T FG
L
CD
G-
R a O j N
N
O
C
ccv
Q
C
R
r
c0
N O Q j
ndN
m
OCTC N
aI -E c
caCO M
N C1I
cmO
L_
Q
3
OI
srI
0N O
N
N 00
OJ O
C CD m N
cm 3 _
N
m
Q T F- Co _
LO
3
O O N O TOCiV
L 0 CC=)C C
N N N
QI Cn Z:)
U C N CU
cd O QJ 3
C1I m j 7 a3
ED 3
N p O L
U NC L QUMC
L = N U L U
aI = vi o
y N N N
m N
O
c c
CD
CZ O J Z
O C O
Q C
E
C C
0O
QI N Q
T O
cn
cN
Cr 'o a . C U
U C Q
MN c N5cMQ
m C/)
6 a
O Y a CD
CZE R :E
ECc 3o
tQ0
O a
cCDV
OO
r
0Cb
coCD
OT '
0M
CDN
O
M
N
0
R
V5
OOD Or COD Ul) M N r
aauepungV gsij anilelaa
OO
0
Lo
o
Y
t0
Z
caco
V
d
I C
CD
r) M
w
c C.
0
M
N
O
CDN
N
G C Q QI N
yOMELO .?
T FG
L Ln —
N C
G-
R a O j N
c aFp
ccv
ccI
U R d
Ln N O Q j
aI -E c
N C1I
O U O cm
l
o
C CD m N
cm 3 _
Q T F- Co _
OLCI i.
O O N O TOCiV
siC C, p O CXI
Q] T
CD O
C rcuC 'O
N
Otm O
Co O E
OM C
iL-+
C
C3 =
U
Q) N CT C
C N E C QI `
IcC
Cf)ca
N 3 R C E Q
4, x N 2 E Y
CV
7
C
O 117
p UC]
LO`]
Ev
7 Qi CU O CO d L C.D
R
N
o ca E Cls m o
CO,_= iv c
o
Lcocm
CJ L C L C
OML
CD
C1I U - C1I V
E o y
F
o OONaYLCJ
LCI
o O
cnrn R vJ ^ N = C L
mN O E O
M com
N c
N ` O
Cll Q1 '
LL E _ Q
a v Q
OC) d L3V,
aI
C
aNi
C O -
ID
O O N
L O
O F- •X
L O C
O M
C Q QI
C C
3 3 -c°
co
o
O C
aI Es
CD Co
N
N
co v
ac,
Q =
O T
ca 3
E Q`I
N
C_ CU 0
cVJ @
Cr
C c6
ON O Nd; N
Q U Y
C J
L NN
3 o m
c O c
cm .E, :p
Q aI .
E C5U
O N
U aUI a
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 84 - Bass Lake Action Plan
Subject:
V Bass Lake Management Plan
Purpose:
V Manage Bass Lake consistent with its City ranking and water quality goal.
Goal:
V Reduce total phosphorus and chlorophyll a levels in Bass Lake to fall within Ecoregion
range.
City Ranking:
V Medium
Intended Use:
V Full use - swimming, boating, fishing, aesthetics and runoff management; clarity marginally
supportive of swimming
Problems Solutions
1 Total Phosphorus and chlorophyll a levels 1 Prepare preliminary annual nutrient budget for the
exceed Ecoregion ranges. There is not enough lake to identify target removal goals and account for
long-term monitoring data to evaluate the internal loading.
in -lake component of nutrient loading.
2 There is a lack of storm water treatment in 2 Study treatment deficiencies within the subwatershed
many drainage areas. by documenting depth and volume of ponds below
the run out elevation.
3 Water quality marginally supports 3 Study the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing
homeowner's desire to swim. alum treatment to stabilize nutrients on the bottom
sediments, including citizen education elements that
may be required.
4 Several storm drainage systems discharge 4 Conduct field review of storm water inlet and conduct
directly into the lake without pretreatment. inlet monitoring to quantify the loadings to the lake.
5 Fishery is out of balance, in favor of fish that 5 Investigate the merits of stocking Bass or Northern
thrive in turbid waters. Pike in the lake.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 37
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 85
Bass Lake Implementation Plan
Revised 06/09/97
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Complete study of Engineering staff Documentation of
internal lake loading Existing Monitoring Data internal loading
2 Prepare feasibility study Engineering staff Feasibility Report
regarding storm water Citizen (access)
treatment options WMO staff
3 Develop and implement a Existing fishery data Long-term
fishery management plan DNR stocking guideline changes in fishery,
Lake association indicating better
water quality
based on
Appendix A.
4 Study impacts of land use Completed land use plan for Revised feasibility
changes in Northwest Northwest Plymouth study
Plymouth on Bass Lake Completed Bass Lake Feasibility
Study
Page 38 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
I
CL
CL
z
H
LL
fl C
r
7
d N d QJ L 41
d C m N
f` a.
O d E L A N
wZO m
Ei
J
C) 0cs
T
d
OO
N
0
Lo
Z
t I
1
R
C C Y U ( h ti a> y h
O O J C I U C Y ct p
yy+
EO
R O d y O V W
a D07 N c C O C c p o o nd- R cn .... V O O N I b a>
N -p O >. _ V c m R y N o ro
S O a' o s` _
o Q
C Q i H ro o C c 4 a> ct c c= saOQ' Qi rn c iY2a ii >, C E y N v a a>
n N o o n O a' _ a c Y coisQ, K Z
y
v C5o o a w o
Z L L m} WCL C O Q. U C d 2 to
i
oI 'N OURI
o I VOIWOH
ccsm o :9
Q a d
ole
cn
m CDNc
O O C
T UJ r yJ O_ Q.
C7 Q Q00 a
CCLNnwN Ri a -_
0 66byIn
m m>
Q U) m
CcwnCu
ccs Q 03 E U a o "u'
E .- -- m V) c vo cncn c i
eYa z c cct t L A S:
F
O a'
fi,a oo o c
ox
C.) :FC -J, 7
ar ru r
xCD
d
CO
Z
O —
O ~ aO
a) o H
019 dy
y C2@
0
t r-y.w1r.._
LOto
O 9
R y) d
3 C.0
0d -0
ca 1O
Ln
O
r In
N
D • C
U
U d Q]
C6
c a Z ca76O
M O O C..) Q
O
Y
c 6 _
CM U C ma)
n a) m CD
ti 3 a C, oY3c,a) E
cc7 Q,
Y D m M
cv N I— mca cvJ=
CA
o d 'c
n •
o
O
o w Z5 CD a
m aUi o v
O
OD
O)
co .-
cv o E
a) ca LD N
CD-
U C -a)
C fl Y
O O U CC — 0 CD
C:),N Q.
M D
L 7 a) C
to t ca
O z T p
Q 00
Co
O
CM
U
d Y OOmdN
CL
II
a
C
M
N
0
K
CD
d
R
y
V
C.
O
r
GO
N
CD
V
R
Q
V!
CD
R
y
co
N i
NU d
L
C
E 2
UOa ON
O O
0
EO
co N Q
R
InU
ld c
N co o
Q N WO
O
O
L M
3
O
N U N o ryr
R On V, O O_ 0
N N N O
CD N a) U c
O Q a)
R
N a]
C> c> _ ..
cn O N d wo
R.. 3 x a
R c O cu
v M o
O C E Z5 LL. a)
C oCM a o
N
o
E
R C/) a) 2& c
E-: c
L N N 01 a) @
ai
ca.. c
C
3 E
CO T M o O
LL- U C)
D N2
N aJ •—
No c
LnN
m Uco U M?
x E O
J d Q @
01 a viN oo E
to
cNYa
cv m
C)
cQO
y Y O
o U
O T
J E a w otm
o e N cp aaS E oc a
a) 01 On a)
Y N
xCD
d
CO
Z
O —
O ~ aO
a) o H
019dy
y C2@
0
t r-y.w1r.._
LOto
O 9
R y) d
3 C.0
0d -0
ca 1O
Ln
O
r In
N
D • C
U
U d Q]
C6
c a Z ca76O
M O O C..) Q
O
Y
c 6 _
CM U C ma)
n a) m CD
ti 3 a C, oY3c,a) E
cc7 Q,
Y D m M
cv N I— mca cvJ=
CA
o d 'c
n •
o
O
o w Z5 CD a
m aUi o v
O
OD
O)
co .-
cv o E
a) ca LD N
CD-
U C -a)
C fl Y
O O U CC — 0 CD
C:),N Q.
M D
L 7 a) C
to t ca
O z T p
Q 00
Co
O
CM
U
d Y OOmdN
CL
II
a
C
M
N
0
K
CD
d
R
y
V
C.
O
r
GO
N
CD
V
R
Q
V!
CD
R
y
co
N i
L
E 2
UOa ON0
EO T N O
Znd
C.
U Nldcoc >
T N > a) n O_
U A O C
Ln R) Q1 O R)
R Y a) -15) C> c> _ .. Cn 3 U Q 'Oawcn _
c2 N 9OUca [Q O00
cC a) N C
Q) =
cuO
U Ql
S, O wcz
v 0 R tv • E
o 3 E o
O O 5 U .
M
C
L C
D N2
N aJ •— N D
LnN 3 R n o E cxE O
N
aNi
td Q
N :...
LOC can C
to Z`C C)
UO
d N
t° C) x 'cv v cv
Q
C N E Y
o e N cp aaS E oc aUDaN
U L N 00
r y QN U r`
m o E o d
N
O cn-CF— N
N L_. Q
N
J V
JO
C 5,t -v
3 a'
a O Y E c
c, Z r N d S] OU
o .c
V
N Ua) Na)
O O C
N o
D N
O
3 E odcvaO
cd a.
L a
c0
N C
a) U _C3
O
Z t
CD F- o
C •
x
O E
OQ CD
N = a)
Y ig: U
0 0 0
N O
N -N CDcdo
E
a)
OnN Q) T C U
i, C
E
cu W
Q) Y U
M O
C Y YO
i T
O O O
a Na) m
c C,
C
D cn
N W
O Y
Q. C J
0ECZ3) Y
U a) d
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 95 - Pike Lake Action Plan
Subject:
V Pike Lake Management Plan
Purpose:
V Manage Pike Lake consistent with its City Ranking and water quality goal.
Goal:
V Reduce sediment and phosphorus loadings to Pike Lake by controlling erosion and retrofit
storm sewer with detention ponds, where feasible.
City Ranking:
V Medium
Intended Use:
V Boating, fishing, aesthetics and runoff management; clarity does not generally support
swimming
Problems Solutions
1 Feeder ditch along City's northerly border, 1 Perform reconnaissance study of tributary Watershed
which flows east into Pike Lake, carries an and identify management practices which will reduce
excessive sediment load, overwhelming the in- the sediment loading to the lake.
place, in-line sediment trap and discharging
into Pike Lake.
1A Maintain the in-line sediment trap on a regular
basis.
1B Complete a feasibility study for stabilizing the
ditch banks and bottom to reduce bed load and
ditch bank erosion, including bioengineering
solutions.
2 Very little monitoring data available for Pike. 2 Increase Monitoring efforts.
Lake itself, independent of Eagle Lake (in
Maple Grove).
3 Power boating use may have a negative effect 3 Continue to work with lake association to discuss
on overall water quality. boating restrictions as one part of an overall lake
improvement strategy.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 41
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 96
Pike Lake Implementation Plan
Revised 06/09/97
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Pursue a detailed Engineering department Completed study Done
subwatershed study with Public Works
the Shingle Creek Water Shingle Creek WMO staff
Management Commission
to identify and eliminate
the sources of erosion
2 Develop and implement a Existing data Completed plan
lake monitoring program Lake homeowners association Annual data
City staff analysis
3 Evaluate water quality Available literature Documentation of
impacts of power boating Public meetings with lake findings and
specific to Pike Lake association recommendations
4 Implement an erosion Shingle Creek WMO Study Implemented
reduction and channel City Engineering Staff improvement
stabilization project to fix
channel
erosion/ sedimentation
problem
Page 42 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
OOCD
z
N L N
V-
i O
N L N
cil chi o Z
cn OC > 9---
c CD c6
k
Y
au
0JOO
o .a' m o
o E
Q> >
is h c
E cn OUo
C p J C
N' U O
E2 tl- co L] QJlup ` V
UC
OJ
O ¢j E t N
70 CL)
CIJ
J
C. U aci S
FT
IE)
a m
V-
i O
1
C,
cil chi o Z
cn OC > 9---
c CD c6
k
Y
au
0JOO
o .a' m o
o E
Q> >
is h c
E cn OUo
C p J C
N' U O
E2 tl- co L] QJlup ` V
OJ
70 CL)
C. U aci S
FT
IE)
LUCCS Q
c
Y E
coT
J N vT
1
CC) N t co EL
4J
CZ 00 CO
N c c-, Q N RS
M tC m c ' l5 W
O) Q> = U = d
n. o
cn p
z ca a3
J M CD J G CL U
C. D
V fn 47
cn N
Q E O moi- '
C,3 cl- c0
U w d
C p > ONid1 t3
L) =3 C13
Q m U U
a m
1
cil chi o Z
cn OC > 9---
LUCCS Q
c
Y E
coT
J N vT
1
CC) N t co EL
4J
CZ 00 CO
N c c-, Q N RS
M tC m c ' l5 W
O) Q> = U = d
n. o
cn p
z ca a3
J M CD J G CL U
C. D
V fn 47
cn N
Q E O moi- '
C,3 cl- c0
U w d
C p > ONid1 t3
L) =3 C13
Q m U U
N
to
J3 Y
o .a' m o
4:,,, .
Q> > O
C%.
Pft
O U C
C 'C) cnNCo coo d a to 3
ca'.)
O a io to Ot d amO05NcaUG) ai
d
CD to
V "U
tv
D. d U Q CL t-
Y
COO
ca C. d 0
a .TC7
a C
C°
R E -
a a Q
3 -
L
o , -
a
CSQ
C', - o a a5
a) o
c`aaco m
Y o U is
a= o
a m Z OCDY
C F--- rC1a) a
to °
ai
N M d
Q, N m
N
to c is W
D
n too a Y Y o -oo U N y w
r0+
c U ca
v a' x o N C3 a E C. W io ami In E2
aJ
E
to O to Cc L. y 4> H
L.L3vi c o to X v t
c
in N Z .'-T' co
o a io c 0 m U m
to a ca
p = '(n
c v
T
U U y m o
N O tS O O
N C
m CM
c N CO 1
L
Ni m
c M CO c ca N
Ca 3 m
N 3 M E - O tea CW, O N V e d "' LL c' o
c a
o o ao -o to a cn cam C ca o r d m
V tri >,
o i } WC 1= Y ai
W
c N C7 a' o ca • c a = to C c a} a
Y n m O c C' c
to to ca
o 0tot O
E2
J
O __
a U U to c P a
co t Tmo_s E T oto a a
Q w o o as o
b- N c0 ca 0 _ d
c 32
CU J C-
M Z m
C
O
o
aJ
o c
C
E y
CL N
o C 3
a' `
n a
O
m
o
E
a3 m is .
O. W -o
a m o o to
n-
m o C,
O
O
t7 C7
o co
to 2r ai t ca o
C .--.
to m Z
C Co 3 ' oN
T aJ
C
p C NNN 0 C
OOr O O O O O O O
4J Q1 toO NDQCl-pU
OO i0 LO O M N
y Y L cz ML z E c o aauepungtl ysij aniJeJaay
x67
Cl) O
C
O
E
O
U co
C CD_ m
C t` NO -C3 Q
y C3
t O N O
v V O. t cv cn ra a
d. ' Cl
a` a
O.= o d p a v m c cc o f -
HV
cc 0aCL c .N
ca CM
co
ca c
0 o Fes- c av Rs - ca cd a ns
N H
00 caO O 2 CD ;o
to
a
Cl?
C:> O o
T
to L Q Ca N
a LOro n C 3 O ao o 3 Y (D)
cn 11O
CNC 000 R O CD L "
l= p O
o
C.
0
N ca
3 0 E c
L X
o a- . E
CD
c`Q'a o to z
V v 00
to to C, to =
C N
a toCD
N O
co
CVD`
3 m o CDto
c67 c S N CD ca p .O v
Y
caca .NCOaOirCC -O aJ
Z-
cn ti u? 5) E
o croiC. a ? a
AN N x a, t`o
E t? E Q'.
K O E
SIM
o '
lC o o
NCD
o cn O E 3Lr,
ao c is C x o a > "J aU c N °'
y U 2V U7r OiJ aJ dO 'O is QJ co
d
E Y
i.. c
M ai C N ca N-
v
v tv tC c`a E
R= 3 3 N c is cv QNr0cm
as _
C/7 f N 3 O C
t0 c` t`O V U C U N Nca O dN
y
67
v v co
co o c
cy@an
c`a c
O
to N
Q. O N U - d U
ad
CC Y Y 0 1 E O O N Yow
J OC13 m
S N c
i ox 3
CO2
t0 N
w
Y or Y m
ca 3 c o
toN
o_ L
u7
o 3 Q1 a a O CL
lC u liu O rn E o E Co to
G. oN
rs
3 CD_
O
CL - cn CL.- a
OX121•
Goals and Policies
Table 127 - Parkers Lake Action Plan
Subject:
V Parkers Lake Management Plan
Purpose:
V Protect and preserve Parkers Lake consistent with its City ranking and water quality
goal.
Goal:
V Reduce phosphorus loadings at storm water inlet points and work towards an in -
lake average total phosphorus concentration of 38pg/l
City Ranking:
V High
Intended Use:
V Full use - swimming, boating, fishing, aesthetics and runoff management; clarity
fully supportive of swimming
Problems > Solutions
1 No inlet water quality monitoring available 1 Complete monitoring program at each inlet to assess the degree
of load reduction necessary in contributing drainage area.
2 The report entitled Parkers Lake Watershed and Lake > 2 Based on watershed report and information presented in this
Management Plan prepared for the Bassett Creek plan, re -assess the options and present a feasibility study
Water Management Commission lacks the detail and regarding the altemative(s) - (i.e., options 1, 2, 3 and 5). See
accuracy related to identified Best Management Table 124.
Practices to move into implementation phase without
further study.
3 The 96 inch storm drain inlet on the lake's northeast > 3 Conduct a detailed study of options for managing the 96 inch
shore creates the majority of the lake's hydraulic and inlet, including a low -flow bypass and an in -lake treatment
pollutant loading, however, there is little opportunity basin within the shallow northeast bay.
for treatment solutions at the discharge point.
4 Subwatersheds have very little treatment potential. > 4 Determine treatment capacity of existing ponds and the
opportunities to increase treatment potential beyond current
performance.
5 Eurasian watermilfoil threatens recreation > 5 Continue to work with DNR to control the spread of Eurasian
opportunities on the lake watermilfoil
6 Power boating use may have a negative effect on > 6 Discuss boating restrictions with lake association and the DNR
overall water quality. as one part of an overall lake improvement strategy.
7 Non -prioritized street sweeping not as effective as a > 7 Develop and implement a sweeping program focused first on
planned, targeted strategy. all the direct contributing areas, including county and state
facilities.
8 Pond near boat launch needs to be regraded to > 8 Regrade pond to improve removal efficiency.
improve its sediment trapping capabilities.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 45
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 128
Parkers Lake Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Complete inlet monitoring Lake response model Monitoring results 1998
program to determine load Monitoring equipment
reduction needs for each Laboratory analysis Load reduction
subwatershed. Homeowners analysis 1998
2 Prepare BMP study to Barr report (1993) Completed 1998
address the details of As -built drawings feasibility study
implementing BUT options WRMP documentation Constructed 1999
1,2,3 and 5 for the Parkers Field surveys and data collection improvements
Lake Subwatershed, DNR Appropriate
including a more detailed Monitoring results numeric goals for
lake response model using total phosphorus,
Minlake or similar model. transparency and
Chlorophyl .a
3 Prepare project feasibility BMP study (Activity step 2) Completed Study 2001
Study of managing the Lake response model
discharge and pollutant as -built drawings
loading from 96" inlet DNR
Homeowners
Outside funding
4 Prepare project feasibility Engineering staff Feasibility Report 1998
study regarding Citizen (access)
improvement of existing WMO staff
storm water treatment
5 Support eurasian DNR Area of infestation, On-
watermilfoil program Aquatic herbicides estimated annually going
Homeowners Available budget
Available technology
Increased funding
6 Evaluate water quality Hennepin Parks Policy regarding 1998
impacts of power boating DNR boating use
Homeowners
7 Develop a prioritized street As -built drawings Map of priority 1998
sweeping program Public works staff streets
8 Regrade sediment trap near Lake response model Completed 1999
boat launch City parks staff feasibility study
As -built drawings
Field Surveys
Constructed
improvements 1999
Page 46 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
OOC7
z
O
o2
0
0
EZ
O W U M Q' .!? Q. a 'a
ca.ami
v_-
c o0 ¢ n v n CV R ami `'
EN . o y °' RS Q w c s
R m id m - ` Q 3 'O
C& U U E t O L C d_ C OC! C R Q NJ E.. - 0. O 'p _ U . d d
Y m Y 'cC X U O C. _ O= Op> R Z i X R L L Y CC O O cu
jMm in a-C. CL> C)acn
C =
cn
y to U U 3
E J2
m
O
J
C
O O d Ud
O p O
U ++
C Y d U U
J 'O
E a Y o v ° c m N
U
ccz C
2 = t U_ W --O
R y O wco
v co a E w a Y
fn J
CR d 7 C ...
V O'
a.. C •-.. O c j R 0 cC yW 2 G
OScViC C U Y 'OY
CO) R 17 C= p
RS U 03
2__j d. 2i
Ro w m a C.D .E cCD
E U CI N E
VC
C
R
R Y m Ln-- R
in
N O
ee s n
NO OCL E =O.
CL O
C
C_ O p U
Q c c H ` O c E m_
CJ
G
C3 d
a
aD
cv
W ca U
rz
C
o 3 CD
2 ED
W d W U
cCA
C Z J
O
O m m Z f/J C3
y
O
Q,
c
y
m
ca
Q a
cu04Lto
Bmgg3i m N suet
i! C)
v c
v hi CD
V-
G) 55 -0 d
R
O
o2
0
0
EZ
O W U M Q' .!? Q. a 'a
ca.ami
v_-
c o0 ¢ n v n CV R ami `'
EN . o y °' RS Q w c s
R m id m - ` Q 3 'O
C& U U E t O L C d_ C OC! C R Q NJ E.. - 0. O 'p _ U . d d
Y m Y 'cC X U O C. _ O= Op> R Z i X R L L Y CC O O cu
jMm in a-C. CL> C)acn
ON
p
Y
c0 C3
w _
cn
x N
C j L
Y L_
y c
v C° m m
O CL o
O } to
iH s — ai
c a >-
Eca` i U
y QI Y
cz oz 3 m
r N
6 O.
7 0
O O
C9 C7
ON
cm C2. CD CDcor- 40 L" -f m N O O
000epungy gsi j ani#elaa
N CL_
x
CD
O
C1 O d
cV Ci T C
O L CJ U
D m
d
Z N m
L a 3
o~ a 0,1L QI a
a `' cc v-C
cu
co
I
L L
3 h`
N N isGiIn
C. a) U .D ._-.
ca
C O
L O
EO
OY Ll
0
2R
t= M O
ONCMQLL
O
O,
N= QI E -o L J 2
Q1 O L c
O
aOi E
O O ft7
Yco co a) I,
J cOc0
c o CUN
0
O .0dLLCOcy-
O
C: O U N
Q3
CQ
rwr Q`5C=o 5
R a'c —M 3o w
w o' q 3 E aI N aI rn o N
C
c o o
QUI V N
N 03U Np M v, = L O C cmOco F— C
cCcc CD W G C1 3 m N
C
CD H: N
QI 'p N O O T CD 00
CIO
V
i n
C.7 G OC T CV
r 76 C3, O
O cV ,O
O O_ N
C) a
05
ii ca
cum
N N E c
O j,
QI m
CSD N—
as
w
H
O
M U
ca U 3 C C
G7 C.I O o
E o' m
A—
o ." M
nI
Q) r cv
Q,
A
Y
m NT QI N U cd 'O D' O ' Y
L m p aNi a`Iie
Q' ccv
DJOid
d c 3
Vi cVOOCF— r ?
QI t? N
E `OLcozNCLY3c Q
w N 'D U
McaCNCL
C13CZI -E =
L O
N
T C N Q
a
Q Cncd OCDCTp N O O U I.L
Y :Eca • N U
rQ)-
O O d Y E UN 'O CD
j, r
CD
A cv Cb 3 E aI NaXi cv a ._n G!
0 O
Y 0 QUI O OU O L N C
y.
d N o a Z m E n. V) y
ON
p
Y
c0 C3
w _
cn
x N
C j L
Y L_
y c
v C° m m
O CL o
O } to
iH s — ai
c a >-
Eca` i U
y QI Y
cz oz 3 m
r N
6 O.
7 0
O O
C9 C7
ON
cm C2. CD CDcor- 40 L" -f m N O O
000epungy gsi j ani#elaa
xd
O E T d QICLIQOcz
C aWoEc
CI C13> M
U- c0 d
CIO
V C.7 G OC T CV
r 76 C3, O
O cV ,O
O O_ N
r. h O d.
O dCD3dCD
CD ID
cn
O o V o a
C13
o- , _Z, a`I o
d v,
W j, r U L— M tQ p—
O N O O O C-. Q OM
cu
3 n
I
T Qi
O d
Y `O ip
d w -M
i—
CQ
N -p
d
co
L-
ND
O C c0
o CO LU N iI UO
O1 C
oc0 N L 3 Q, cCv
U EO C
Z o cca
a
U O O
cv
N ca O 01
0
O O L.._ cd .S
C
N
aCi O N .`O-c?O N
O
t0`
6 CO c0 cd N cQIO L-•' Q)
LO.
CD
N N3d
s
O
C V cd Q,
C T
U
Y C
to O O i.. C d N
Co
It
T.+„
C CO C 27 TC3 C
o
y0 f x o oM H a N D1 C `
cu U
d
C d C
G7
C N @QJ CV
C\j cli cocc
c0
L O
O
N N C
a 0— 3 ?. Co
C N L]
QJ
E Y cDcaO
lb Gone O V M
c0
C X CC:" d O C1CL C J Q
L Cn
C
Q O
caVC11
M Y CL) C if
cv
O U N
E o,
C\jsome CO
Bc` vI E2v O c m 3Rj cv
N O J
9 V Cl) N O t>O
y 0
C3A
Cl -O L cN@ C C CNU
d C
CQ
J
d F'-• U - N
m Eo Q -M
C U
oo`
iq aIW
F=
cn [7
N
o
3
c? 7:
3o
Com, <v
C co w? rI lQ c — U O
c cmo aa
n•
O 3 U E aI o a aI C)
N
C N
M Z CL 0. U N— :
11WLIM
Goals and Policies
Table 154 - Medicine Lake Action Plan
Subject:
V Medicine Lake Management Plan
Purpose:
V To improve the water quality of Medicine Lake.
Goal:
V Increase clarity and reduce total phosphorus and chlorophyll a concentrations, working
toward the 1998 goal for total phosphorus established by the Bassett Creek Watershed
Management Commission
City Ranking:
V High
Intended Use:
V Full use - swimming, boating, fishing, aesthetics and runoff management; clarity not
generally supportive of swimming, except at County Beach
Problems > Solutions
1 Current water quality levels do not fully support > 1 Work jointly with the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission
desired use - phosphorus levels are too high and Hennepin Parks to assess the existing water quality
treatment capacity of upstream wetlands relative to the
existing wetland classifications; determine the required
reduction in phosphorus loading to achieve established goal
2 Numerous inlets feed storm water directly into > 2 Expand visual inspection of each outlet to identify the
Medicine Lake without pretreatment. degree of sedimentation, accessability for maintenance
equipment and constraints for developing treatment
solutions
3 Due to the fully developed nature of the > 3 Prepare a study to discuss the desired level of treatment,
subwatershed, improvements may be difficult and treatment options, costs and impacts on residents.
costly.
4 Modular Storm water treatment systems, which > 4 Install a modular Storm water treatment system at
may be recommended in the feasibility study do discharge points to the lake as part of a pilot project to
not have a long performance record to rely on. determine overall effectiveness of treatment, maintenance
and overall applicability to other parts of the City.
5 In -lake phosphorus levels may prevent the > 5 Develop a lake rehabilitation study to investigate chemical
attainment of the overall Total phosphorus goal, treatment options like alum dosing and other alternatives
even with significant in -watershed treatment. and implement if feasible.
6 Power boating use may have a negative effect on > 6 Work with lake association, DNR and Hennepin Parks to
overall water quality. discuss boating restrictions as one part of an overall lake
improvement strategy.
7 Non -prioritized street sweeping not as effective as > 7 Develop and implement a sweeping program focused first
a planned, targeted strategy. on all the direct contributing areas, including county and
state facilities.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 49
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 155
Medicine Lake Implementation Plan
Revised 01/12/98
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Complete Bassett Creek Bassett Creek Water Management Completed study 1998
Water Management Commission
Commission's Medicine State of Minnesota
Lake Water quality Hennepin Parks
project City staff
2 Visually inspect each inlet Storm sewer base map Written inspection 1998
point to the lake Bassett Creek study report and photo
documentation
3 Develop a detailed study Inspection report Detailed feasibility
of the most important Bassett Creek's Medicine Lake study Done
treatment facilities Study
As -built drawings
Neighborhood input
4 Implement s modular Appendix C Completed design 1999
storm water treatment Vendor Data Installation 1999
system as a pilot project Monitoring 2000
5 Develop a lake Bassett Creek Water Management Completed lake 1998
rehabilitation study Commission rehabilitation plan
targeted at meeting lake Hennepin Park
goals City staff
MPCA
MDNR
Lake homeowners
6 Evaluate water quality Available literature Documentation of 1998
impacts of power boating Public meeting with lake findings and
association recommendations
7 Develop and implement a City maintenance staff Develop plan map 1998
prioritized street of priority streets
sweeping program
8 Support eurasian DNR Area of infestation, On-
watermilfoil program Aquatic herbicides estimated annually going
Homeowners Available budget
Available technology
Increased funding
Page 50 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
0
OC'3
d L N Nd L d
Y_ N
O
d n U
CL m Q Q d w
Y_
6
ZT U
O
C
C JOta7
C
R U
E J
R
co) cDo
r
z cm
m
m
J
F
0
R
E
O .N
C CD
Y QJC
a z
C
c
O
i CT
co Y_
ZT U
O
C
C JOta7
C
R U
E J
R
co) cDo
C y F
2 cmcs
ct
U
MT
O m g` O
UUO
Com
C U
3o a m
Q C O
77 ro
00 r R o
O
o ea a) i%
n
o
a
C
U
Q
ccS O cc3
U U Z
Z L cC
JOU O
O Q m Q t SIJ O a
CV
C CV C
r
C1 CV C\1
N
co
O 0 cQ cm O U = o
z
oo
D cm J U
0
R
E
O .N
C CD
Y QJC
a z
c
C
C C
R W
ct
U v N O m g` O O R
Q C O R+ p 4
C cr O 0
O
o ea a) i% a m
C
ct5
Q U
ccS O cc3
U U Z
K O
W0-
Z L cC
Com. ti
0 - p C - c cv o
a' Q Q osN 1
R C! J v3 ca = o
O Q`5 - L; m acCD
o CD ca
aG'
c oN s
O
i
c p cvQi Q c a 3 Qcn C k
CD as L L O N Gi t4ic
C
p'P
R ccs cva cUv a c U'v CDcnE v _
N x
O
d is s .' E ,
C _. LU C as N N pQJ m CZC6
czO
W- = c C L c o o a` R `p
rR..
J c$ p
L N Co N O N d cn Z
Q— Q
L -JCy v,
cn N C Lca
6i L O
i
Z L m i
Ga a>
d N
rn
O@
CL
R
W
o Q O LC
C a N p 3 o a> N p C3' xas m
a 3 m m o °-' c i21 c ) L
3 :E c
ao.
os CA ci
VJ Q1
a, cn Q .0-, E N L N
o
J 0.
N N
b- CD 31 X O 30 Q
aT]
O 'U CL1 a H = m tLnOI— E Q O a .'_' O75
Q m
COD o m o E
V m
lig v LL-c q'
E 7•. c
Cc)
m o o a _
v
v
C
CL a s -aO > m
y cp c Q Y
c
Q c
E
v
R F= o c
CL1 CO .o a
N co
Goi cc oo c •E N
Y
Y
R
o
j L
a' Q E c@ 1-
c
co Q
N v o O
My7 d. N
C Q N
cn
N C Z~ .' cTl ca Q1 N N
Oy vcm y O n ca
L CO
M
Q -o os o
L
y
M 23 L co o LL co
Lo
M c .nQ'
O 5
O
V)o
R N CVcY0aOOQ= O
m c/> y J ami o CQ . w o0-
FL-
o 1---
c
J
a3 N (D
a Q
O > O O O O O O O O O OMiUOCQdQO00I- O Ln Q m N r
m
CD
e m u ti a uepun4y ysi j ani e amaN
xQi
y a C:) CD- C31'
p O C
C i s
G a
M
M.
N -CD
n
Ln.
oNR
R L
a E E 2 LO
c 0 Q
m
wo
CA
v
O CDC)
iv
y o
O
d
e,
c
c 3 0Oo
n a' CD -
p0 CD
CLO— R 6s E Os F
CL
pQ00rTNOJUU
@
A y M M Q C N
ea d O O Cl C'. Q> _Q
Q N O LO a cv U p 'n N N
3 Cu oZ3v 0
c Q O U O L Q> U00
s OUpQJL Z L X
O O
0
U > Q p
co
p
C.
CD co
m n M c0 6 C cv T O O
d V
c0 N
ID
O N 27CC .N @ Y
m v R co cs v
cncn 3 Qi
a os Q. L omcn
a r o o
C
a C-1
r M
m C
voi o
M d Lr m co
a M Q] C7of`O N 1 yrsN R c>v T
N C QJ R
E
QJ
R C O O CD .--. i--- C,
O L Oa. cn
O LL") C o N o c E cn
C
V
O
y Ci
Q M
V 7 C x N C O- c) S] Y UU3O' Dp
o _
C
E cv m
Q] C
R v 3 3 R..
a C-3 M
CO
lAM
CO0VQJ T
L ti
N G}
9 U0.2 m O
co CL
Q QJ O [6 N
R d N O F- QJ U E ON >y
JY
M oo
r
cY
o ti Qui N o' c` c vs
J J
O O O
cu
b--!
nCvcz
J d D1 ` AJ
Q
U)
NwLf)
o o R c c cc
E CDQ. o cO
3 CD c3 3` Coy
u
o O ccvv 1,
CD o E cz
o CD
N
cn u p
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 179 - Gleason Lake Action Plan
Subject:
V Gleason Lake Management Plan
Purpose:
V Maintain or improve the water quality conditions of Gleason Lake.
Goal:
V Manage the Gleason Lake watershed to maintain and improve lake water quality levels
consistent with its lake ranking
City Ranking:
V Low
Intended Use:
V Boating, fishing, aesthetics and runoff management; clarity not supportive of swimming
Problems Solutions
1 Limited opportunities exist for water 1 Work with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
quality improvement due to current lake District to develop and implement an overall
conditions and characteristics, and lake management strategy that recognizes the
constraints in the contributing physical constraints of the lake and the
subwatersheds. contributing subwatershed, as well as the
concerns of the residents.
2 Total phosphorus concentrations are very 2 Investigate the feasibility of Alum treatment and
high in comparison to other lakes in the rough fish control in an effort to rehabilitate the
Ecoregion and in the City, indicating that lake.
extreme measures would be necessary to
bring excessive nutrification under
control.
3 Cost of Lake Rehabilitation will likely out 3 Pursue outside funding from a Phase I
weigh the benefits when compared to Diagnostic Feasibility Study Grant and Phase II
what the City can afford. Implementation Grant through the MPCA Clean
Water Partnership program.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 53
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 180
Gleason Lake Implementation Plan
Revised 06/09/97
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Prepare Lake Minnehaha Creek Watershed Completed Plan
Management Plan District
Lake Homeowners
City Staff
A Prepare a Specific Lake Management Plan Completed
Feasibility Study to Minnehaha Creek Watershed Feasibility Study
Address Alum District
Treatment of the Lake Homeowners
Lake City Staff
B Apply for MPCA MCWD Grant Award
Clean Water Lake Homeowners
Partnership Grant Alum Feasibility Study
Lake Management Plan
C Study the potential Lake Management Plan Completed Study
of increasing MPCA Grant Funding
treatment in
drainage areas
GL40, GL46, and
GL41 (see
Watershed Map)
D Investigate Water Resources Management Completed
conditions of Plan Investigation
upstream ponds and Storm Sewer Base Map
perform routine Completed
maintenance, as Maintenance
needed.
Page 54 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
0m
A
O
p
N_
t0
C
w _
Cy a
cn `
d = =
u C ma E
cn
a>
Ln
y m
w ca =
m
3 y
CLnm
H Y o ai
M }
C 135 U
W Y
cn
Z m
r .i
cL
0
t7 U'
m
N
O O O O O O O O O
cc P- tD u7 Q m N
aouepungy gsij ani}eIaa
K
O P N
o c W a'E
a E E -, o °J
r R H ap E n.
CID o CD
as
v c -o E ;o
C G LZ: N
cv d
E a
o ~ ~
V ` ~ a >
iv =
cv
oCDcCn
co Q U
61 y N '- cv m X
cc O C t_
Q Lo
O N fl O caCD
l0 C 00 LC N d LO O'
L a]
r = o p' o o d v L '' o T Z~ c
CD
O 000 + a> (D) ID N C O C
Cb
70w
CD
UCD) CD co
f - a`'+ Wa coi _ coo cv T cv 3
3 d p O C V
C>6 O O d S) y N Uc3coNu' o >v c `v _o a c co - cm
iC O
r
N N rr ca CIO L
UO - +.•
CD
3 U T
c"
o
a>
o
m 3 'a @ cv as Q. ca -
cm
a
Sf II O c`6 N I- N 2 .
CIOdes.
L O N
N ." C N C O)
OI Lal m A C O N C ca C J O
C 'DC E co
N =
C Ni
Y C O O L as O cv
3 ... ca -o c) .o _ELomLO
n
CIJ
Jmc, c`o
N
t`O ci U U EC CTi aJ vUi p cC
cp
T > .
0 E ami
co M> C. o E c a c mNQJ
cC
C
O CRJm °D
a -o a> 131_ =:> o
aJ Y
O QS ct5asO ¢5 L. J= cv OS J C C
CDN
NT
LQ3 c ,E CUc a o Q
O O U4
CCC
II t2')
O
II C O_ 'O O E
N
d
L C
Na' L _U
aJ O E N U
N Q aJ
N CQ Y
LC O O r O C d O U d
3 m _ d p- N N O E
O Q c0 Q t
L
cNd cmc NC/3
O pm - cCC3 iC
Q: U N co N Y Z O N Z
N N E a m a3 Y ca
@ Q
as c >
a c/) W CYv civ
J
N o
O N >id N cCpm O- O — 2CDRr
N O QJ O U CCS N m .E y
L L 4] UZ O CO N w = 3 O Y N
o m a Va Q c o 3 C, coy o
v o os N m o c a S
C2
cu c is a — -o a)
aEi .^
as - v
d
OQcaL, L o c co r.
Y O cv
ti— 3 La .c O N n
N N m U7 ?i VJ
L C) Q (O
N CO T m30 a: cuc..i d W C O Q .0 C •
y U U O O E O
LL Lcv 0CD
U i O C cvQ O N OS O w
L m
o U o as _o CD
E T= as RNJ
ci
a vi
U C Cl
O O
inR' N
N
a
QS X C m
U a U O C ca CN
O_ N C ...... O) O C
N
J n
Ql cumLc:- E D
M N Q Tm C _O C O)
O)
Q
cu CD d _Q C Y
UOO4' 2 N OS n
Q N
pvc
aE
L
cOiS 3 a -E
aD -o L
0 N LL
a o
Y
as
5a o o L c
ca CO -Ma co Y N
J J O a]
@
O 3Mc
C13
C
CO O U L
Rom
J jO O aJ Q cu
2i V) civ o a cc cEv C7 2 E V) zcz h
0m
A
O
p
N_
t0
C
w _
Cy a
cn `
d = =
u C ma E
cn
a>
Ln
y m
w ca =
m
3 y
CLnm
H Y o ai
M }
C 135 U
W Y
cn
Z m
r .i
cL
0
t7 U'
m
N
O O O O O O O O O
cc P- tD u7 Q m N
aouepungy gsij ani}eIaa
K
O P N
o c W a'E
a E E -, o °J
r R H ap E n.
CID o CD
as
v c -o E ;o
C G LZ: N
cv d
E a
o ~ ~
V ` ~ a >
iv =
cv
oCDcCn
co Q U
61 y N '- cv m X
cc O C t_
Q Lo
O N fl O caCD
l0 C 00 LC N d LO O'
L a]
r = o p' o o d v L '' o T Z~ c
CD
O 000 + a> (D) ID N C O C
Cb
70w
CD
UCD) CD co
f - a`'+ Wa coi _ coo cv T cv 3
3 d p O C V
C>6 O O d S) y N Uc3coNu' o >v c `v _o a c co - cm
iC O
r
N N rr ca CIO L
UO - +.•
CD
3 U T
c"
o
a>
o
m 3 'a @ cv as Q. ca -
cm
a
Sf II O c`6 N I- N 2 .
CIOdes.
L O N
N ." C N C O)
OI Lal m A C O N C ca C J O
C 'DC E co
N =
C Ni
Y C O O L as O cv
3 ... ca -o c) .o _ELomLO
n
CIJ
Jmc, c`o
N
t`O ci U U EC CTi aJ vUi p cC
cp
T > .
0 E ami
co M> C. o E c a c mNQJ
cC
C
O CRJm °D
a -o a> 131_ =:> o
aJ Y
O QS ct5asO ¢5 L. J= cv OS J C C
CDN
NT
LQ3 c ,E CUc a o Q
O O U4
CCC
II t2')
O
II C O_ 'O O E
N
0
0c
T
is
4J
Y N
Nd
n n U T
c cam n n w
so ci L
E E
z _
CDcm
m
Fn
J
fCC OY N (Q
NN
is
mR
C v
E E c w
CDcm C CO
S
2
fCC OY N (Q
NN O R O L NyO
l (
C E-
L N C
p Q X O X pf O
A ,
U. p . a:
ca
C
ami Y
C c U
d
U:
7=
O R O O=
C Z n m O CL Z O. Z CG Ln
a
rop 'c a0
O
e
cx- ¢ c a
n
CDm
SOWcz
ON
N 00
R
rN
M Or Q QdCDU v R
6.
ti C00CN,
N M, r C) ' N_
m m E o m c
r fr: 3 in CD CM O U 1= Q- Ra cn C d
cc Q cu E n o v
Z i
a`>
J C:)M J m c i U U C/)U W Z
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 195 - Mooney Lake Action Plan
Subject:
V Mooney Lake Management Plan
Purpose:
V Maintain or improve the water quality of the lake.
Goal:
V Manage Mooney Lake and the contributing watershed to maintain or improve water
quality to a level consistent with its current ranking.
City Ranking:
V Low
Intended Use:
V Fishing, aesthetics and runoff management; clarity not supportive of swimming
Problems > Solutions
1 Poor water quality resulting from elevated > 1 Monitor quality of inflow to compare to the in -lake
Total Phosphorus levels limit the recreational quality. Based on comparison, complete feasibility
use of the lake. study of in -lake (chemical treatment) and in -
watershed (housekeeping) options.
2 Cost to improve water quality relative to > 2 Develop funding strategy with affected home owners
benefit to the public may be excessive. for recommended improvements.
3 On-site septic systems may have a negative > 3 Inspect existing septic systems, and develop a
effect on lake water quality. remedial action plan as necessary.
4 The lake has no outlet, causing high water > 4 Complete feasibility study to develop an outlet for the
levels, water level fluctuation and potential lake.
damage to surrounding vegetation and
related habitat.
5 Power boating use may have a negative effect > 5 Work with lake association to discuss boating
on overall water quality. restrictions as one part of an overall lake
improvement strategy.
Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan Page 57
02/04/98
Goals and Policies
Table 196
Mooney Lake Implementation Plan
Revised 01/31/97
Activity Steps Resources Measurement Target Budget
Date
1 Collaborate with Engineering staff from each In -lake
Medina, Orono and the government unit monitoring
Minnehaha Creek Lake Feasibility Study Lake response
Watershed District to Septic System remedial action model
develop a lake plan Completed plan
management plan. Watershed District
Cities' staff
2 Monitor the quality of City staff Monitoring
runoff at major inlets to Homeowners results
the lake
3 Complete a feasibility Lake morphology maps Completed
study of in -lake chemical Hydraulic and water quality feasibility study
treatment alternatives. loading
4 Inspect existing septic City staff Inspection report
systems and develop a Minnesota Department of Health for each on-site
remedial action plan for Homeowners system
each failed septic system, Septic system inspection report Completed
including connection to Lake Feasibility Study remedial action
the City's sanitary sewer. plan
Implemented
plan
5 Work with Minnehaha City staff Completed
Creek Watershed District Minnesota DNR feasibility study
to complete feasibility Lake Feasibility Study
study regarding the Watershed District
construction of an outlet Cities' staff
for the lake.
6 Evaluate water quality Available literature Documentation of
impacts of power Public meetings with lake findings and
boating association recommendations
Page 58 Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan
DATE: February 6, 1998
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kathy Lueckert, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Goals and Priorities Update
Attached is a report providing an update on our progress to date on the goals and
priorities you established about a year ago. These goals and priorities are for a two
year time frame, 1997 and 1998. We have made significant progress on many of the
goals and priorities, and expect to complete the others during the coming year.
We do not envision engaging in a new round of establishing goals and priorities at the
February 11 study session. The reasons for this are that there are no new
councilmembers this year (different from the last four years), and because the current
goals and priorities do cover a two year time horizon. You may want to consider if
there are any goals and priorities you wish to remove from the plan, or if there are any
goals you wish to add.
Staff will be happy to provide you with an update on any of the goals and priorities,
and to answer any questions you may have.
o T
rn N o o 3
VI 3 > C vi O y G T7 .0 b y U
8 >'
0. LO bb E 0. 0 0 0. Vi 0.
tU-.
N , cC. P- O•
C L
y N
O
OL %t u v=S i a. [a •9
bOA .L C L O O bn 'O U N U (i' pp
r0 .,
00 y N
N L.
6 0 0. w it G C O T
as o ba°i b Y
b 0 c j- O E
C N
Lr
it
O
C 'O81
R •" O y 3 O U cL3 O O
V
C
D -p >
1U
n
ice., "
CCFby0•E
E ¢u
C13acd
o c n a E 3
y a0i
U O a ¢ W v CO O =sN o
y Y j, aUi
O N O U O
C . N.'v .
O O • O 'O N fl N c bn
L rn y 0. ca =' C 0.
U., .0
O O, N -O cC G bn Yo
E. . -a
it -p . •- C
y ° o o 8 E c N °Y' " _2 W Q > 0 3 a
G ° on a
r,
o o . ,, fl on , ce L .,
G, 'O O+
U ^' d i.. U t L +-' cC O
aU+
O Oa-
p , C
3 'o oc ' F_ E o a" i o 3
o M o0 0. F• u.
o rn
H CL ( C- Uu. > cn
r r r r cq to
o aaa a
u
o
V
L
r r bA b0 r r on
on r r r
bbC, Q\ D\ rn
on
c C
O
O U
a o
w
C
m
V1i
ca O V
N C„
a
U cli
Z V E ca a
O E p
n
p C aO
0
in ' N C C N a Cl. O 'O
rA n cU a
rn
Lta L C p O U
L
bD bq o • U
a v W W
yto
tz y
lul
cd C a m >L R V N R N C cC
U/ .
C o
C L U
M
W C a
i1
S to0a0GCLCCGCU >, V O cUC C • ^ O y ¢
4) ;bDn E b
bD CL
rn 5
O n cG U U iS
t
v
a
x rn
w
L
al
cl
v o
cn
c v
C
N 3
N U p
C
U
aq
W
C06
C,
O
i
C
o c
N
U O C
o u o
L+
m c.E
C
p c
UonoU
O
U C C
yo c U'
Nz
C1, L cn cd a2 •5 UoAU4_
ca y
LO
t:
v
a t
b
bD
U U O
tQ bb bb
b bi) bb
0 0 0
n 3 a
E '
U6
tQ
gL
U
E
O p
C
CID
C
o
C
C
C
0
oon
ca
E
caa
U o
C7
y
Lo N
uS
Nv
on
Q to a o
w biD w
0
0 0
0o
0
to
L to y L
w canG a . `
U+• C+
a T3 W
a E C by L7U
C to C CbO
U a
0
C
U
vL
0
U ca t
v
a
w
L
al
clcn
ca
N 3 U
C O
23oc
U O C C
r
b O ti
Y C
L+ O C
O
U °• yo c U'
Nz
E
pL]. •L3 IOJ to
b
C CO ' ca,
N
O.
Lt N
n 3 a
E '
U6
abw Y
a U u
U
U
O CC
op oon
a
E
U o U o
C
Nv
bb bJo
to w biD w
0 0 0 0
UO
U
a+ U
o a T3 W
U_
rnUQ
cl
EM
OCa
rn rn
0
a\ rn rn
U
a a a
QL
r- r-- r- o
E
a a aaaa
OU U
N N N R N N
UU
44 3 E
7
Opp c ccc o E
E
a
1
L
EQp a G
3
E oc
ca
y
a
O
w
U
O
U N
13
M
7
U
O N
L
3
a
U 3c
C •— Y
woyCU
y
O V U
E3 a w ci
a d c N
v v a
U
H W
U U ro bn
y
V
E
a
cn O rig W O C7
V
t
v
a
w
L
al
clcn
ca
N 3 U
O
23oc
U O C C
r
b O ti
Y C
L+ O C
O
cn • C,3 U Nz
E
pL]. •L3 IOJ to
C CO ' ca,
N
O.
Lt N
U
E '
U6
L-UU a U u
op oon oon opq
U o U o
C bb bJo
to w biD w
0 0 0 0
U_
OCa
0 0
bD
U
to N
L QL
E
OU U
6t
ti 3
44 3 E
7
Opp c ccc o E
E
a
1
EQp a G
3
E oc
ca
R O O U E O
U N
O
M
7U
3 7 U 3 Uc
C •— Y bn
y
t
v
a
k
C
O
A
10
C
ani c
1 O
T vz
ycqs
L
0
N
a
L
a
Y a3 U UC
iO
ti b fl,
U
c
Obn
y °
toU
CU
06C,
N
O
C
cbCd o
GU
cl
a C
U
DD C
03
U
Cbn G 2
O
U .
U
o-
UIIC v O
U M cd
a
UU
C OU
c
ccr
c as bon
ao
C7
0
U aci
C,
G
OU y G p> U
O, Qai
aC4 aaa
a as
M
cc a
3
a as
00 r--
0
c
3
a.
r
as
ca,
o
00 GObi
e
O,
b
a
bq
N
r
7 d N
N
0
0
U
L
V
a
cC
N
C
O
Vl
c o
U
b
w
ti
O
rV 3 -- R
U U
r
o U OLCt
7
ol
a
Q L bhb
UU v U
C
o a c
A v O U
T vz
a
L
N
L
bn
ti b fl,
U
c
Obn
y ° 06
CU
06C,
N Co
C CO b`A a Y GUO
a C
DD C
03
U
Cbn G 2
O O U
o-
N U M cd NC U
C OU
ccr M
V
w
b
C,
cl
a-
OU y G p> U
O, Qai
aC4 aaa
bn o O
ICU
U is cc a
3
00 r--
ca.
r
as
00 GObiQuiO,
a
bq
N N 7 d N
N
0
w U
L
c
cC
N
C
O
U
ti
c o
Uw
ti
oU
U M
d
V
M
7
ol
a
UUUvU
C
A v O U
Y r ti C
m p,
U
U U N 10-
jooricZ
0.
o a
y
R o a p U
to
L c p O
N o 3
u. U a > C cG
v
U a
L
N
L
y ° 06 C 06C,
ooh
a C
C* O U cCC U UCbn G 2
O O U
o-
w
a 3¢
C, O, Qai
aC4aaaM
0
3
ca.
r
O
a
w U
L
cC
N
C
O
U
tiUw
ti ti d
V
ol
ail
0
0 0 0
C+ ,c O
C's
N 'c N'cc N
b
s `Y sw
E
cn u
y U O U
y U ti N Y N
O
a.
isN
E N on
c .- U C
tbNooo
N
oU
on
c
ti U .0 0 0N
ccc0 a
E E E
a o,
c> Y
a a
to to
o, 00a,
a a
U_
T r t
M a N
CL Cloao
C 0.
o acq
O
za•
E >
U Q
o
00 00
01,o,
c
v
o
a a a
M a a N
U
O
c
U
0.
W
O O
U O
E >
y N
U Q
O
Ub
c0
b C
in.
ro C
Uv
r a
b
N
Zs o W c°
O
UU
U
c00 C C
y
ca c
0 0 0
0 0 0
CC's
N 'c N'cc Ns `Y sw
m
cn u x cx
y U ti N Y N
E E E
c> c c> Y c> as
to to
U_
T r t
t EEU_
T t t T.
CL Cloao00ocno acq
za•
o
00 00
01,o,
r- o
a a a
M a a N
c
U
C O O
E >
U Q
c0
in.
b
UX 0
U
c00 C C
y
ID
v
ro
N
b w
i a ocn
ti
cz
bD
A ub o
Q:DU Q
C
0
oa
0 I •
L
d
Cd
E O
w
t:
o 3
o
U N
M •3
O
N
Y U to w N
O
w c aci o
U
cad
C b W
O
pp O
O • C.
M
L
E ca 'b
NN
toC
O 4
c
a
E
ao
o
tU.
U
v
0 a
rn
o x a
O
M
cd L
as
M M
a
M
O
N
cd O O
U
U (03
ca
C, rn
as
00 00 00 00
a aaaa
R
C, C,
N
z o, z o, z
aaaaa
U O
L
a
a
ti
y
a
U
27
O N
c
0
L y
0
A aTi o O
L
3 w
a.
C
U
U
U
O
w
M
NU
O O
O U v
N
L
w
a w a
Ct cca o
a
Y p Clp O
cct
w
p O
O CI
UN
C U V U
OU
p
11+ u r,V
U
U C C
N
0
L
d
Cd
E O
w
t:
o 3
o
U N
O
Y U to w N
O
w c aci o
U
cad
C b W
O
pp O c
E ca 'b
NN
toC
O 4
c
a
E
ao
o
tU.
U
v
0 a
rn
as a
O
M
cd L
as
M M
a
M
O
N
cd O O
U
ca
C, rn
as
4
M M
R
C, C,
z o, z o, z
aaaaa
U O
SUM a
a
ti
y
a
U
27
O N
L y
A aTi o O
L
a.
CU U
M
NU
a
L
w L
w
Ct cca o
a
v cC
O CI
OU
p
CN
G UN
m 3 3 U
61
L
Cd
E O
w
t:
o 3
U N
Y U to w N
w c aci o
b cC U
cad
C b W
pp O c
E ca 'b
NN
toC
O 4aEN " V)4: o
tU.
U
00 r- rn
as a
M
as
M M
a
M
N
w
U
ca
CO4
R
U
U O
SUM a
a
y
TbA
U
27
O N
L y
A aTi o O
CU U
00
C3
CL.
N
cd a
ti V
b
v
a
EON
C
U •D
0
U
0 O
CC VJ •N
NN
K
C
a\
a
M
a\ rrn
as
U
U
oE
O U
U D
b
G
R
G0
N
s
0
U
byG
Z' GO
co
a•
O y
O o
U
cG
0 0
L" v3 a>i
Q.
U
b Q O
U LO C
Z a`
co
a
o rn
a
V M
Q
U
oo ocO, ooO, r- a, r- ON ooON r- a, r- a, docO, c
aooocas ooo r- C,
r- as aaa a a a a
Ra, N N M V• N V' M M M
a^
U
Q O
Q)
Q' O O O N
u M U Q a a u n
Ra
U
b tM
p
ca
41 T
O O
to
i
U o r V s
v on o
QI 4i C p, bGA
G C O C b
Ocad
W
O G c
ti U 3 ca
r ti tj 3 ani co o Chi
a
Zt R U aQa; L p O i
O c
tp
CQ n 4 Q a. i U Q U rx y w Q a 00
C3
CL.
N
cd a
ti V
v
a
EON
C
U •D
0
U
0 O
CC VJ •N
K
a\
a
M
a\ rrn
as
U
oE
O U
U D
b
G
G0
N
s
0
U
byG
Z' GO
co
a•
O y
O o
U
cG
00
C3
CL.
Park Replacement Fund Projection
Transfer -In Adjusted in 1998
Rate of Increase Adjusted As Necessary
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In 100,000
Park Replacment Fund ProjectionAs 1 219/96
1998-2008 2009-2032
Interest Rate Increase Increase
6.00% 19.00% 5.00%
Beginning Interest Annual Ending
Balance Expenditure Income Transfer In Transfer In Balance
1997 3,044,752 59,652 183,104 73,600 3,241,804
1998 3,241,804 354,201 192,510 87,584 100,000 3,267,697
1999 3,267,697 877,739 172,856 104,225 0 2,667,040
2000 2,667,040 589,498 146,058 124,028 0 2,347,628
2001 2,347,628 401,566 133,238 147,593 0 2,226,893
2002 2,226,893 610,251 120,575 175,636 0 1,912,853
2003 1,912,853 323,884 111,325 209,006 0 1,909,300
2004 1,909,300 382,586 110,542 248,718 0 1,885,974
2005 1,885,974 414,285 109,609 295,974 0 1,877,271
2006 1,877,271 353,917 112,585 352,209 0 1,988,149
2007 1,988,149 690,741 111,141 419,129 0 1,827,677
2008 1,827,677 486,086 110,041 498,763 0 1,950,395
2009 1,950,395 991,615 101,864 486,294 0 1,546,939
2010 1,546,939 430,001 94,150 474,448 0 1,685,536
2011 1,685,536 978,401 85,678 463,257 0 1,256,070
2012 1,256,070 1,366,832 47,942 452,754 0 389,933
2013 389,933 1,120,502 3,070 442,972 0 284,527
2014 284,527 284,625 12,592 433,948 0 147,796
2015 147,796 577,050 13,408 425,719 0 312,534
2016 312,534 209,200 12,478 418,327 0 115,886
2017 115,886 376,930 5,907 411,811 0 86,911
2018 86,911 111,618 3,623 406,216 0 211,311
2019 211,311 306,577 16,277 426,527 0 347,538
2020 347,538 1,286,302 4,301 447,854 0 495,211
2021 495,211 589,510 33,291 470,246 0 647,766
2022 647,766 721,101 45,686 493,758 0 920,794
2023 920,794 345,055 50,046 518,446 0 797,448
2024 797,448 328,777 41,379 544,369 0 623,235
2025 623,235 183,034 25,737 571,587 0 260,419
2026 260,419 282,788 6,104 600,167 0 50,856
2027 50,856 36,409 20,864 630,175 0 665,486
2028 665,486 917,319 32,260 661,684 0 442,110
2029 442,110 0 47,370 694,768 0 1,184,248
2030 1,184,248 0 92,940 729,506 0 2,006,694
2031 2,006,694 0 143,381 765,981 0 2,916,057
2032 2,916,057 1,193,969 163,273 804,281 0 2,689,641
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In 100,000
Park Replacment Fund ProjectionAs 1 219/96
Transfer In 100,000
Park Replacment Fund Projecbon.xls 1 2/9/98
Park Replacement Fund Projection
Transfer -In Adjusted in 1998
Rate of Increase Adjusted As Necessary
1998-2008 2009-2032
Interest Rate Increase Increase
6.00% 18.00% 5.00%
Beginning Interest Annual Ending
Balance Expenditure Income Transfer In Transfer In Balance
1997 3,044,752 59,652 183,104 73,600 3,241,804
1998 3,241,804 354,201 192,488 86,848 100,000 3,266,939
1999 3,266,939 877,739 172,759 102,481 0 2,664,439
2000 2,664,439 589,498 145,809 120,927 0 2,341,678
2001 2,341,678 401,566 132,734 142,694 0 2,215,540
2002 2,215,540 610,251 119,676 168,379 0 1,893,345
2003 1,893,345 323,884 109,845 198,687 0 1,877,993
2004 1,877,993 382,586 108,236 234,451 0 1,838,093
2005 1,838,093 414,285 106,157 276,652 0 1,806,616
2006 1,806,616 353,917 107,573 326,449 0 1,886,722
2007 1,886,722 690,741 104,037 385,210 0 1,685,229
2008 1,685,229 486,086 100,168 454,548 0 1,753,859
2009 1,753,859 991,615 88,779 443,184 0 1,294,207
2010 1,294,207 430,001 77,724 432,389 0 1,374,318
2011 1,374,318 978,401 65,773 422,190 0 883,880
2012 883,880 1,366,832 24,406 412,618 0 -45,928
2013 45,928 1,120,502 24,260 403,703 0 -786,987
2014 786,987 284,625 43,894 395,479 0 -720,027
2015 720,027 577,050 48,874 387,980 0 -957,971
2016 957,971 209,200 52,317 381,242 0 -838,246
2017 838,246 376,930 50,344 375,304 0 -890,215
2018 890,215 111,618 45,655 370,206 0 -677,283
2019 677,283 306,577 38,173 388,716 0 -633,316
2020 633,316 1,286,302 64,343 408,152 0 -1,575,810
2021 1,575,810 589,510 99,377 428,559 0 -1,836,138
2022 1,836,138 721,101 118,302 449,987 0 -2,225,553
2023 2,225,553 345,055 129,710 472,486 0 -2,227,831
2024 2,227,831 328,777 128,650 496,111 0 -2,189,147
2025 2,189,147 183,034 121,212 520,916 0 -1,972,477
2026 1,972,477 282,788 110,423 546,962 0 -1,818,726
2027 1,818,726 36,409 92,987 574,310 0 -1,373,812
2028 1,373,812 917,319 91,857 603,026 0 -1,779,962
2029 1,779,962 0 87,802 633,177 0 -1,234,588
2030 1,234,588 0 54,130 664,836 0 -623,882
2031 623,882 0 16,491 698,078 0 57,705
2032 57,705 1,193,969 10,367 732,982 0 413,650
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In 100,000
Park Replacment Fund Projecbon.xls 1 2/9/98
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In 200,000
Park Replacment Fund ProjectionAs 1 2/9/98
Park Replacement Fund Projection
Transfer -In Adjusted in 1998
Rate of Increase Adjusted As Necessary
00
1998-2008 2009-2032
Interest Rate Increase Increase
6.00% 19.00% 5.00%
Beginning Interest Annual Ending
Balance Expenditure Income Transfer In Transfer In Balance
1997 3,044,752 59,652 183,104 73,600 3,241,804
1998 3,241,804 354,201 198,510 87,584 200,000 3,373,697
1999 3,373,697 877,739 179,216 104,225 0 2,779,400
2000 2,779,400 589,498 152,800 124,028 0 2,466,729
2001 2,466,729 401,566 140,385 147,593 0 2,353,140
2002 2,353,140 610,251 128,150 175,636 0 2,046,675
2003 2,046,675 323,884 119,354 209,006 0 2,051,152
2004 2,051,152 382,586 119,053 248,718 0 2,036,337
2005 2,036,337 414,285 118,631 295,974 0 2,036,656
2006 2,036,656 353,917 122,148 352,209 0 2,157,097
2007 2,157,097 690,741 121,277 419,129 0 2,006,762
2008 2,006,762 486,086 120,786 498,763 0 2,140,225
2009 2,140,225 991,615 113,254 486,294 0 1,748,158
2010 1,748,158 430,001 106,223 474,448 0 1,898,828
2011 1,898,828 978,401 98,475 463,257 0 1,482,160
2012 1,482,160 1,366,832 61,507 452,754 0 629,589
2013 629,589 1,120,502 17,449 442,972 0 -30,492
2014 30,492 284,625 2,650 433,948 0 121,481
2015 121,481 577,050 2,749 425,719 0 -27,100
2016 27,100 209,200 4,648 418,327 0 186,674
2017 186,674 376,930 12,247 411,811 0 233,802
2018 233,802 111,618 22,866 406,216 0 551,267
2019 551,267 306,577 36,675 426,527 0 707,892
2020 707,892 1,286,302 17,320 447,854 0 -113,236
2021 113,236 589,510 10,372 470,246 0 -242,872
2022 242,872 721,101 21,393 493,758 0 -491,607
2023 491,607 345,055 24,295 518,446 0 -342,510
2024 342,510 328,777 14,083 544,369 0 -141,000
2025 141,000 183,034 3,197 571,587 0 250,749
2026 250,749 282,788 24,566 600,167 0 592,694
2027 592,694 36,409 53,375 630,175 0 1,239,835
2028 1,239,835 917,319 66,721 661,684 0 1,050,920
2029 1,050,920 0 83,898 694,768 0 1,829,586
2030 1,829,586 0 131,660 729,506 0 2,690,753
2031 2,690,753 0 184,425 765,981 0 3,641,159
2032 3,641,159 1,193,969 206,779 804,281 0 3,458,249
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In 200,000
Park Replacment Fund ProjectionAs 1 2/9/98
Park Replacement Fund Projection
Transfer -In Adjusted in 1998
Rate of Increase Adjusted As Necessary
J
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In 200,000
Park Replacment Fund ProjectionAs 1 2/9/98
1998-2008 2009-2032
Interest Rate Increase Increase
6.00% 18.00% 5.00%
Beginning Interest Annual Ending
Balance Expenditure Income Transfer In Transfer In Balance
1997 3,044,752 59,652 183,104 73,600 3,241,804
1998 3,241,804 354,201 198,488 86,848 200,000 3,372,939
1999 3,372,939 877,739 179,119 102,481 0 2,776,799
2000 2,776,799 589,498 152,551 120,927 0 2,460,779
2001 2,460,779 401,566 139,881 142,694 0 2,341,788
2002 2,341,788 610,251 127,251 168,379 0 2,027,167
2003 2,027,167 323,884 117,874 198,687 0 2,019,845
2004 2,019,845 382,586 116,747 234,451 0 1,988,456
2005 1,988,456 414,285 115,178 276,652 0 1,966,001
2006 1,966,001 353,917 117,136 326,449 0 2,055,670
2007 2,055,670 690,741 114,174 385,210 0 1,864,314
2008 1,864,314 486,086 110,913 454,548 0 1,943,688
2009 1,943,688 991,615 100,168 443,184 0 1,495,427
2010 1,495,427 430,001 89,797 432,389 0 1,587,611
2011 1,587,611 978,401 78,570 422,190 0 1,109,970
2012 1,109,970 1,366,832 37,972 412,618 0 193,728
2013 193,728 1,120,502 9,880 403,703 0 532,952
2014 532,952 284,625 28,652 395,479 0 450,750
2015 450,750 577,050 32,717 387,980 0 672,537
2016 672,537 209,200 35,191 381,242 0 535,686
2017 535,686 376,930 32,190 375,304 0 569,502
2018 569,502 111,618 26,412 370,206 0 337;326
2019 337,326 306,577 17,775 388,716 0 272,962
2020 272,962 1,286,302 42,722 408,152 0 1,193,835
2021 1,193,835 589,510 76,459 428,559 0 1,431,244
2022 1,431,244 721,101 94,008 449,987 0 1,796,366
2023 1,796,366 345,055 103,959 472,486 0 1,772,893
2024 1,772,893 328,777 101,354 496,111 0 1,706,912
2025 1,706,912 183,034 92,278 520,916 0 1,461,309
2026 1,461,309 282,788 79,753 546,962 0 1,276,888
2027 1,276,888 36,409 60,476 574,310 0 799,462
2028 799,462 917,319 57,397 603,026 0 1,171,152
2029 1,171,152 0 51,274 633,177 0 589,249
2030 589,249 0 15,410 664,836 0 60,177
2031 60,177 0 24,553 698,078 0 782,808
2032 782,808 1,193,969 33,139 732,982 0 354,959
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In 200,000
Park Replacment Fund ProjectionAs 1 2/9/98
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In 200,000
Park Replacment Fund Projection.As 1 2/9/98
Park Replacement Fund Projection
Transfer -In Adjusted in 1998
Rate of Increase Adjusted As Necessary
1998-2008 2009-2032
Interest Rate Increase Increase
6.00% 17.00% 5.00%
Beginning Interest Annual Ending
Balance Expenditure Income Transfer In Transfer In Balance
1997 3,044,752 59,652 183,104 73,600 3,241,804
1998 3,241,804 354,201 198,466 86,112 200,000 3,372,181
1999 3,372,181 877,739 179,021 100,751 0 2,774,214
2000 2,774,214 589,498 152,304 117,879 0 2,454,899
2001 2,454,899 401,566 139,385 137,918 0 2,330,636
2002 2,330,636 610,251 126,372 161,364 0 2,008,121
2003 2,008,121 323,884 116,435 188,796 0 1,989,468
2004 1,989,468 382,586 114,517 220,891 0 1,942,290
2005 1,942,290 414,285 111,862 258,443 0 1,898,310
2006 1,898,310 353,917 112,352 302,378 0 1,959,124
2007 1,959,124 690,741 107,439 353,783 0 1,729,604
2008 1,729,604 486,086 101,611 413,926 0 1,759,055
2009 1,759,055 991,615 87,902 403,577 0 1,258,920
2010 1,258,920 430,001 74,448 393,747 0 1,297,113
2011 1,297,113 978,401 60,009 384,459 0 763,180
2012 763,180 1,366,832 16,058 375,742 0 -211,852
2013 211,852 1,120,502 35,297 367,624 0 -1,000,027
2014 1,000,027 284,625 57,736 360,135 0 -982,254
2015 982,254 577,050 65,648 353,306 0 -1,271,645
2016 1,271,645 209,200 72,160 347,171 0 -1,205,833
2017 1,205,833 376,930 73,405 341,764 0 -1,314,404
2018 1,314,404 111,618 72,099 337,121 0 -1,161,001
2019 1,161,001 306,577 68,238 353,977 0 -1,181,839
2020 1,181,839 1,286,302 98,349 371,675 0 -2,194,814
2021 2,194,814 589,510 137,666 390,259 0 -2,531,731
2022 2,531,731 721,101 161,244 409,772 0 -3,004,304
2023 3,004,304 345,055 177,702 430,261 0 -3,096,799
2024 3,096,799 328,777 182,118 451,774 0 -3,155,920
2025 3,155,920 183,034 180,615 474,363 0 -3,045,207
2026 3,045,207 282,788 176,254 498,081 0 -3,006,168
2027 3,006,168 36,409 165,773 522,985 0 -2,685,365
2028 2,685,365 917,319 172,167 549,134 0 -3,225,718
2029 3,225,718 0 176,245 576,591 0 -2,825,372
2030 2,825,372 0 151,360 605,420 0 -2,371,312
2031 2,371,312 0 123,208 635,691 0 -1,858,829
2032 1,858,829 1,193,969 127,325 667,476 0 -2,512,647
AVERAGE 505,056
Transfer In 200,000
Park Replacment Fund Projection.As 1 2/9/98
t
01
M x H w
a CD '0 c vo
co
N
N
Q
N
jam•
CDCD
w LA to w
W 00 J A
I
v N W O 000 J
10 tJi w
J J w A O 10
w oo o o LA
10 01 A N
Ito
O N
00 to 00 W O J 00
tJ Cn t.A
O
ONOCNtwig .A-+ O w o
w N 01 tJ
00 00 1.0 IJ O
r - O — W 1D OIW — 00 W O 01 O
U V1 0\ w
O U O ONO v N
wN to
as J v U
1p O A
N J O ON N
J a\ J 01
V O 00 00 V401 O
N- W ON IOO W
N
O 01 w 1
A r- .P O 1
1 W VO
O J O A OIANO110A
N N
t,J 00
CWn ? v D
VOAo
N
O- I0O1A000NO th
N N
d V.A 0o CWIi N
0000-4N O 000 O OO1
00
1
W N
wA W N
w Ow w
N00
A -+ 00 O O
00
o J
VON1
N N
VOp.-
j
N W O
O A O O N 000
W r-• W
O O W N O
W vl 00 J 00 N
W W W W O O
01 w A N O O 10
A W
00Wv N
Vw
N O1 O O O O1 O
A I-
0000 N 00 N
ON1%0 WO10 0 10 O1 N O
LLA 000 10 LA O N
a` w 00
W tin to P, Vp N
Iww00 —1 O LLA N
O i 00 A 01
WLA pW
VO
O
VO
O 01 N
LA LA
w IwONiOw W
i
w wgypopotAn N
oN o J ONo 01 I 0+
cc
10 O 00 N
vii O ON1 1 0 O 000 L"
O wwwwNO 00
V1 10 :1 v O N
W 101OJOA1OC.n
00
J 00 01 W
00 10 V1 N
1 00 O
v . w w o1 +
t
01
N
Q jam•
I
t
01
G
0
n
CD
CCD G
CD
b D.,
O b
o O
O CD00
N O
J
x
91. CD CD
av
w CD
CD
w tA LA w
J N W O 000 I —1
tl o
t0 ON A LA O N t0
w LA w W O -4 00
O 1100460
0 t o — 0 O 00 0
w LA O\ N
A - J IO
00 110 00 .0 O 00 O
to to 01 w
00 00 A O\
kAN W O 00 IIS+
LA —t a1 to
00 00 W N N
O O J w 0 U IN
O 00 J a
V0
0 LA pVNi 01
to
J OD a 0110tA0 N
000 000 ? 00 O %D I a
N '-+
r
WO,ONON N
4 ' 00 LA O 000 I (A
N N
P oo i rn w N
ON LA as w N O
O -1 ON
N N
A N
N001-4
O
00 .NN O O
N N
ID O VOi v O
o ON O
LO
O 1000
Q\ 4 O tO I -
W
tl r-+ O
O t0 In O
rte-.
I O
O N 0o to
v0 O O
N 00 1.0 w O
J Ot0 A O W +
pNj
J
A P ON A ujw
O A W ptQ I O
w 0 00 000 O J N
N p
W --00 w 0\
W t/" 00 N i--
ON -] to N_ w I O
a A ONi O O w W
N
O t0 A w
N W O 0\
00 l W to W N
O N O 0 1 O A 111
N
J
W O V O JI- 00 N
J W N O O I(A
000 00 O J
O oo J O w N
i
J
00 O NP
O\ N to = O
0 O w to - +
O1 J A O N J
N
0
r7
n
CD CDw
ITI
CD C
CD
O
O „d
O
CD
O
J
y
astz
do
L7
CD
r'3n
J CD
W U U W
O l N N -+
W 00 J A v +
v w 0000 v
to .O U N w
00 00 W A O o
N W O O W
W J 00 O C to b
0o U 00 W O J w
N w to to N
O tACN Vii - OU O 00 I
O 00 0\ - U
O w
P w 00 w O CT O
iT U O% A
N O OUO N
A 0000 w to O IH+
PN
O VO 00 w O N
OHO O
w to 0000 w NIO
O Cl O w 0 00 W
C., CO \O
00 O O w -•
W
00 LhOw N O 0 A
N N
J 00
T OHO N O D I f11
N N
O O 0o A N
00 .P ON A Vii I O
w N
W W A W O N
to 0000
UO
w 00 I O
O %0 `-+ 00 O O -1
to 00 C NJ
W t0O W O Vii O
O 0\ 00
O OW N %0
A Ww w w 0
0% 00 ? N O O O
LAJ ?_ W 00IO
W LA
U
N 00 N w
O W N
Obi O LLA O to
IO
W 00 tA O, a\
LAN
J00 00 v O OCi N
Oo . 00 ? W
O
V000
m all
N
Obi m P O J I W
N tO t.A 00
c w A
W U tJ %0 O
N O J O ON A
W -- J N
U Vp O VD N
N O 00 w
OVVA t A N
O W W O %DIO
tJ
O N
N 0 W O O to
all 00
66
e
uu
owe
W.
O
j
o
e
X
tn
O W O 0 VNi O N
0 0 OC O w I W
N
00
J VP P O O N
O —
kA kA W
O
i CN
N N
U 00 1.0 U O
N w 00 LA
N N
w owo A 0% N N
00 N O w
0 -9:1 Cl N ON
N N
00 O .A N I O
W VUi - NO 000 -O
W N
00 \O 00
W
W J IJ IN I O
O (A O W 000
5 5 5
LQ
H V
N O ow0 w
N . y CD
pCD
to 4 O
CD CD P•
I O
00 U 01 O O 00 W
W r-•
y
yy CD
w
ITI
N\
CD CD
C*, O
W
U
T O O O1 O
W
S co
i3 O
Vii N O O
CD P1
v N O wIV1
O O to
J J O P O
vO oOo
r-+
W U LA W
WPVii
C N
N to ON N O w
W 00 J? v
A
O00
U Zp w J " I c O O
J N w NO J o000
IJ O U N W
N W OWi O W
W ] Vi I p
00 U 00 W O J 00
N w to to N
wO p N
IO0000Vii .- O w o
cn a\ w
w N 0 'PCw N
00 w LA
j LA IOO00O O
4\ U ONON
00DOOO A W
C1 0 00 00 -1 O
W tAW O p
J J D\ ON
OJ 00 w
VOWO
4 tJ 1.0 0% ON O
ONW J W W IO N
O W O 0 VNi O N
0 0 OC O w I W
N
00
J VP P O O N
O —
kA kA W
O
i CN
N N
U 00 1.0 U O
N w 00 LA
N N
w owo A 0% N N
00 N O w
0 -9:1 Cl N ON
N N
00 O .A N I O
W VUi - NO 000 -O
W N
00 \O 00
W
W J IJ IN I O
O (A O W 000
O OLQ
O
N O ow0 w
W Wto4O I O
00 U 01 O O 00 W
W r-• W
4 N "O - w
Jt
O
N\
Iw
C*, O
W
U
T O O O1 O
W
00 4 \0 ?
WViiNOO
J
LAwv N O wIV1
O O to
J J O P O
vO oOo N
WPVii
VV
i N
N to ON N O w
WNA
O00
00 U 00 00 O -1 N
yj
i
rN
O W \0 N O
00 U 01 O O 00 W
N
A P -1 C*, O
W O O ON O 000 A
000 4 \0 ? N
J
LAwv N O wIV1
O O to
vO oOo N
N to ON N O w 0\
U r-+ 00LA tA00UUU 0.-1
N W A O N I
It
We J
It
0
ACTIVITY CENTER SUBCOMMITTEE
FEBRUARY 9,1998; 7:00 p.m.
PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING ROOM
Proposed Agenda
1. Review of latest site plan
2. Current cost estimates
3. Update on school participation in project
4. Status of Common Bond senior housing proposal
5. Bond issue projections and scenarios
6. Operating costs
7. Status of state tax reform legislation and levy limits
8. Scheduling options
9. Next Steps
10. Other items or questions
11. Adjourn
Plymouth Activity Center Study
Commission No. 9727.1
February 9, 1998
Budget Cost Estimate
Breakdown by Project and Allocation
Item School Ci1y Total
A. Activity Center $ 3,912,300
Site 350,000
Building 2,643,000
Contingency (10%) 299,300
Subtotal Construction Cost 3,292,300
Furnishing/Equipment 364,000
Soft Costs (Test and Design) 256,000
Subtotal 3,912,300
B. Family Center $ 3,218,500
Site 270,000
Building 2,405,000
Contingency (10%) 267,500
Subtotal Construction Cost 2,942,500
Furnishing/Equipment NIC
Soft Cost 276,000
Subtotal 3,218,500
C. Field House $ 3,276,300
Site 480,000
Building 2,763,000
Contingency (10%) 276,300
Subtotal Construction Cost 3,039,300
Furnishing/Equipment N/C
Soft Costs 237,000
Subtotal 3,276,300
Totals $3,218,500 $7,188,600 $10,407,100
9
Activity Center Financing Alternatives
Summary of Estimated 'Tax Impact
on a Residential Homestead Property with a Market Value of $190.300
Ten Year Issues
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
Fifteen Year Issues
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
General Obligation Bonds
Im act Based on Referendum Market Value
Average Dollars
Levy Tax Rate of Tax
at 100% Applied Increase
381,598 x:09% .062-6 17- 17"
508,742508,742 @,0t2'9/o .0 I t 1 23-
636,030 o - U 1 4'Z 29,
284,599 4 1-3--
379,377 8 -6- 1-7-
474,504 4 r' 0 6 22
Values for Calculation of Tex Impacts
Estimated Market Value of Homestead Residential property:
107,Referendum Market Value for the City of Plymouth:
8
27
1 90, 300
4-,4-60;483;953
ESTIMATED OPERATING COSTS
Senior/Activity Center
Does not include School Family Center)
Revenue:
Rentals $50,000
Expenditures:
Full time Director -Senior 30,000
Assistant Coordinator (1/2 Time) -Senior 13,000
Full time Director -Activity Center 30,000
Full time Clerk/Receptionist-Activity Center 25,000
Cook/food Handler 7,800
Fringe benefits (30%) 31,740
Office supplies 1,600
Printing 600
Postage 1,700
Photocopying 2,800
Rec supplies 3,700
Training 800
Mileage 600
Subscriptions 800
Data Processing 21,000
Facilities Management (Cleaning contract, utilities, insurance etc.) 76,650
Total expenses 247,790
Less current expenditure for Senior Programs 19,600
Net expenditures 228,190
Net revenue under expenditures -$178,190
Note -Numbers do not include depreciation which is estimated to be $100,000 per year
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
DATE: February 3, 1998.
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager through Dale Hahn, Finance Director
FROM: Jack Tabery, Property Management Coordinator
SUBJECT: ESTIMATED ANNUAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT COSTS FOR
PROPOSED ACTIVITY CENTER
The following estimates are based on several assumptions i.e., the type of construction will be
similar to City Center/Public Safety buildings, the facility will be in operation eight (8) to
sixteen (16) hours per day, seven days per week, and the building will be 20,000 square feet.
These costs are derived primarily from the actual present expenditures at the buildings
mentioned.
EXPENDITURE UNIT COST
Cleaning Costs 69 per square ft.
Maintenance Service On Equipment 11 per square ft.
Natural Gas 44 per square ft.
Water and Sewer 600 per year
Electricity 1.28 per square ft.
Elevator Contract 100 per month
Insurance Costs (including boiler & machinery) 5,000 per year
Miscellaneous supplies including de-icing salt,
softener salt, minor tools, equipment,
maintenance contracts on copiers, etc. 1,750 per year
Facility Management 2,500 per year
Toilet Tissue Paper Towels 40 per month
Refuse/Recycling 70 per month
Maintenance Salary Part Time (520 hours) 19.00 Per hr
Includes fringes
Lawn Maintenance and Snow Removal 4,000 per year
COST PER YEAR
13,800
2,200
8,800
600
25,600
1,200
5,000
1,750
2,500
480
840
9,880
4,000
Total Estimated Annual Operating Costs $76,650
IMPACT OF POSSIBLE TAX LEGISLATION ON PLYMOUTH
The State Revenue Forecast predicts a new surplus of $1.3 billion for the State.
Existing legislation passed in 1997 earmarks 60% of this amount toward additional
tax reform efforts.
Legislative discussion to date indicates Commercial/Industrial tax classifications
may be reduced from 4.0% to 3.5%. The top residential classification may be
reduced from 1.85 % to 1.75 % in 1999 and to 1.70 % in 2000.
These reductions, if they occurred, would have an impact on our 1999 City tax
rates similar to what we experienced for the current fiscal year. A modest tax rate
increase could occur for 1999, even with a restrained budget, although the actual
taxes paid by the average homeowner may be stable. If a bond issue is sold, most
of its impact will be felt by the City and the taxpayers in the year 2000. The City
would probably levy for only one interest payment in 1999. Therefore, even if
there is additional tax reform affecting our tax base for 1999, the bond issue would
not cause a large spike in the tax rate in 1999, and possibly not in 2000 either,
since the natural growth in our tax base could then help absorb it.
There is no current discussion of a major change in state aid distributions.
Levy limits are currently mandated for 1998 and 1999. There is some legislative
discussion to extend them through the year 2000 to "protect" the property tax
reforms being contemplated in this legislative session. The continuation of levy
limits in 1999 and 2000 would indicate a preference to phase in the operating costs
of an Activity Center over two or three years if possible. Even if some
construction starts this Fall, the building would not likely open before the end of
1999. This would give us the opportunity to begin levying for some of the
operating costs in 1999 and then step up the needed operating levy to the full
amount for 2000.
ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION TIMETABLES
May Election November Election
March Council approves referendum
April
May Referendum held
June Design
July
if
August it
September Bid site work Council approves referendum
October Begin_ site work
November Referendum held
December Design
January Bid buildings of
February Building construction it
March If
April If
May Bidding
June Begin construction
July
August
September
October
November
December. Building completed
January January 1, 2000 grand opening
February
March
April Building complete
May May 1, 2000 grand opening
June
Next Steps
1. Activity Center Subcommittee meeting on February 9' to review progress
2. Activity Center Subcommittee meeting in late February/early March to finalize
costs, consider the size of a bond issue, review the preliminary layout plan, and
consider any legislative developments. Make recommendations to full Council.
3. Council Study Session, if needed, in early March to review recommendation.
4. Council decides whether or not to place bond referendum on the ballot on March
18''.
5. Bond issue information brochure developed in late March and early April and
published in early May. Other public information developed for cable tv, web site,
newspapers, etc.
6. Election held in mid to late May, perhaps May 19`''.
pemA !1 !! t! ol
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U
o o 0
r00 0 00 t
rl A A A A A A
N N N N N N N
N o a w r r o fel
r
Ell v -tR"-?VA
Awa RECTS
i' \J- l
1A V -t
o-orlw7w w r1w
wwa s w way OA7! I
a aro sw.or
PLYMOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER STUDY II
34TH AVENUE SrrE PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA