HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 02-16-1999 SpecialCOUNCIL STUDY SESSION
FEBRUARY 16, 1999
5:30 PM
Public Safety Training Room
1. Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District Proposal for Eagle Lake Regional
Park
Agenda Number:
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Eagle Lake Park Proposal
DATE: February 11, 1999, for City Council meeting of February 16, 1999
Attached is the information staff has received regarding the possible development of
Eagle Lake Regional Park, proposed by the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District.
Doug Bryant, Park District Superintendent, and Margie Oslund, Director of Special
Services, will attend the meeting to present the proposal and answer questions.
HENNEPIN
PARIS
SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
12615 County Road 9 Plymouth, Minnesota 55441-1299
Telephone (612)559-9000 TDD (612) 559-6719 FAX 559-3287
An Equal Opportunity Employer
December 1998
0
DEC 16 1998 ' 1
1L;
T_Of PLYMOUTH Tia I.
Dear Park Neighbor: COMMA un OEYELC'MMEMT pEPAR
The Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District (Hennepin Parks) is considering Phase I
Development of. Eagle Lake Regional Park and has scheduled Public Information Open Houses
on January 11 and January 23 to answer questions and accept comments about the proposed
developmentplans.
Enclosed for your review, is a Background Information Sheet and a copy of the Development
Concept Plan for the entire park; however, please keep in mind when viewing the concept plan
that it includes proposed facilities for both Phase I Development as well as future development.
As'the Background Information Sheet indicates, most of the Phase I Development is proposed to
occur within the designated special recreation use area located in the southern portion of the
regional park.
Hennepin Parks acquired much of the 230 -acre Eagle Lake Park property in the late 1970s, with
the intent of developing it for active recreation as part of the Metropolitan Regional Park System.
To date, the only development that has occurred has been an eight -foot wide trail between Eagle
and Pike Lakes. The close proximity of Eagle Lake Regional Park to other regional.park facilities
enables the Park District to approach development in a comprehensive way aimed at addressing
the needs of our regional constituents. Hennepin Parks operates several enterprise facilities that
provide outdoor recreation activities; not only as a means of meeting demand for certain types of
services and programs, but also to generate non -tax revenue. Enterprise facilities are considered
in light of their ability to pay operating costs, provide future revenue to the Park District, and
fund their own capital improvement costs. Many of the proposed improvements for the southern
portion of Eagle Lake Regional Park meet these objectives and will provide operational funding
for more typical regional park amenities.
A public meeting notice with comment form is enclosed. Any written communications about the
project received through February 5 will be submitted to the Hennepin Parks Board of
Commissioners in February or March, 1999, for consideration.
Sincerely,
Douglas F. Bryant
Superintendent and
Secretary to the Board
RECYCLED PAPER -Conserving our Resources
Contains 50% total recycled fiber. 10% Post -consumer fiber
Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District
Background Information Sheet
December 1998
Proposed Development of Eagle Lake Regional Park
The Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District, also known as Hennepin Parks, is considering Phase I Development of Eagle
Lake Regional Park. Hennepin Parks acquired most of the 230 -acre park property in the 1970s, with the intent of developing it
for active recreation as part of the Metropolitan Regional Park System. The park is located in the cities of Maple Grove and
Plymouth. The following questions and answers were prepared to address public inquiries about the park and its proposed
facilities.
Q. What does Phase I Development include and where within the park will it occur?
With the exception of trails, development will be within the 100 -acre designated special recreation use area in the
southern portion of the regional park. The special recreation use area is identified in the parks' Master Plan as an area
designated to serve regional recreation needs. Phase I Development is proposed to feature:
2.3 miles of paved bike/hike trail linked to existing trails in Maple Grove and Plymouth
Golf Practice Center consisting of: a nine -hole executive course, nine -hole pitch and putt course (holes less than
100 yards), driving range with approximately 50 stations, and practice area for chipping, pitching, sand play and
putting
Sheltered reservation picnic areas
Lawn games area featuring croquet courts
Clubhouse and maintenance buildings
Roads and parking areas
As part of Phase I Development, year-round use is proposed, including a lighted sliding hill and beginner cross-
country ski trails. The park's Master Plan also identifies plans for future Phase II Development, including facilities for
boating, fishing access and picnicking. This development is not proposed to occur in the near future.
Q. What are the goals of the Phase I Development project?
To provide expanded outdoor recreation and public golf opportunities
To provide a future non -tax source of revenue for regional park services that are not self-supporting
To develop the proposed facilities in a manner that is respectful of, and enhanced by, the natural park
environment. Hennepin Parks is a natural resources based Park District created by the State Legislature in 1957,
whose mission includes environmental stewardship and provision of outdoor recreation services.
Q. Why is the proposed golf facility unique within the metro area?
While Eagle Lake Golf Center will be attractive to all levels of players -- from the beginner to the experienced golfer
its primary purpose is to serve as a learning facility for adults, juniors and golfers with disabilities. An important
focus of this proposed facility is to create more accessible and affordable golf opportunities for youth and beginner
golfers. It is envisioned that this facility will serve as an introductory area, encouraging golf as a life-long activity and
providing participants the skills and confidence to move on to more challenging private and public golf courses.
Hennepin Parks is under consideration by the World Golf Foundation as a possible site for a "First Tee" program,
which would provide extraordinary assistance from World Golf Foundation members ( PGA, LPGA, USGA, etc.) in
an effort to increase golf opportunities for youth and, in particular, youth from socio-economic backgrounds currently
underrepresented as golfers.
Q. Is it appropriate for a unit of government to operate a golf course?
Yes. Local units of government operate approximately 50 percent of the public golf courses in the metropolitan area.
Public and privately—owned golf facilities have positively co -existed throughout the history of the game. Both types
of golf courses are necessary to meet demands for a variety of play experiences and affordability of play, particularly
within the youth market. There are several benefits to government-owned and operated golf courses:
Specific control over land planning and envirorunental issues
Facilities are typically integrated into existing parkland, eliminating the need for additional land acquisition
costs and resulting in affordable development
Facilities are operated with a public interest perspective rather than a solely profit orientation
Public access and affordable public fees are primary considerations
Facilities generate revenue that can offset costs of other recreation programs/services
The Park District currently operates Baker National Golf Course, Glen Lake Golf & Practice Center and Cleary
Lake Golf Course.
Q. How has Hennepin Parks Environmental Stewardship Mission been considered?
Both the Master Plan and Phase I Development Plan for Eagle Lake Regional Park reflect Hennepin Parks' desire to
maintain the significant natural features of the site. Much of the site under consideration for Phase I Development
was formerly old farm fields. The Park District uses environmentally sensitive maintenance practices in its golf
course management. These practices include:
Consideration of natural features in the siting and routing of golf holes and other amenities
Management of conservation areas to promote wildlife habitat and development of natural buffers around
amenities
Implementation of Integrated Pest Management Program (IPM) guidelines, which require close evaluation of
pest problems to minimize use of chemicals
Use of soil testing and cultural practices to maintain healthy turf and efficiently use fertilizers Computerized
irrigation system to use water resource efficiently and effectively
Q. What is the time frame for the proposed Phase I Development of Eagle Lake Regional Park?
The project is currently in the preliminary proposal stage. Hennepin Parks will solicit comments from citizens and
public officials for review by the Park District's Board of Commissioners. Upon conclusion of the public
information process, it is proposed that Hennepin Parks will work with consultants to prepare design/development
plans and cost estimates for Phase I Development. It is estimated that design/development plans and cost estimates
may be presented to the Hennepin Parks Board of Commissioners in the spring/summer of 1999 for consideration of
project approval and authorization to proceed with construction.
Q. If the project moves ahead, how will it be funded?
No tax dollars are proposed to be allocated for the development of the golf enterprise facilities and supporting
buildings. Revenue bond financing will be proposed and the area operated as an enterprise facility, with proceeds
paying all operating and debt service costs. It also is proposed that segments of the planned trails and other
recreation amenities within the special recreation use area will be rolled into the revenue bond and be paid for by the
enterprise facility.
Q. Will there be an opportunity for public input regarding the proposed development?
Yes. Public Information Open Houses are scheduled for 7-9 p.m. on January 11 and January 28, 1999, in the Board
Room of the Park District's Headquarters building in French Regional Park at 12615 County Road 9, Plymouth.
Written public comments will be accepted through February 5, 1999. All written public comments will be submitted
to the Hennepin Parks Board of Commissioners in February or March 1999.
For additional information about the project, the public may write or call:
Margie Ostlund, Director of Special Services
Hennepin Parks, 12615 County Road 9, Plymouth, MN 55411-1248
559-9000 or 559-6719 (TDD)
Recrikiew
Use Areas
EAGLE LAKE
EAGLE LAKE-REMONAL PARK-
SPECIAI
21 -
10 (BASS LAKE ROAD)
EAGLE_LAKE-_REMONAL_PARK-
SPECIAL RECREATION -AREA
Development P_lam
Hennepin Parks November 1"8
J
D
NORTH
600
e-
we Shop
Calf Course-
POK-Course.
rem
Chipping Area
ourts.
tanve-
1. Practice Tee
I Picnic Area & Shelter
K._ _Boat_LaundL
J._ -Fishing Pieas.
M. Fisting-Fived-Mr"
N. Proposed PkLved Trail
D___ Proposed. Unpaved _Trail
F Parking
C
O cor
c
Z v Z'
d a e- N
CO) Q m
2 CN
pc
n
cc
N
LL
L a o c t 3
V t0 V- O• U. N tL N
CD
O U V
m
c
of
3 N p
N c 0
Y
N N
E LL
C N
V-
NN
c a
Q
Z gp N N U o
m O d m ca 3 0
0 c E
0 N V p
0
C
V L ra 0 U)
co rn
c
c€
c m
4c)
g pc
c V co rn, c
N
c d
4Ep r -a cE
E 32 a
B r 0tvE
VC
3
o
C a6U
N
G
C0a
m a
m N
C0a
LL 0 N N N LL C ti N
O`
a
E N-_. t C co N a
o a o 3 a 0 c 0 d o c
rn uJ0oN3
c
0 m 0- rn N c y o N a Z'
m0c
p
t vi 0) o c
O c p 3
ai a0C
Mm
E
a ami
E 3
pc N
N
a
E
E N a
y
10 N
c C
r w p 0a C 0
Y
N>
p
m N J vUi N Up
a C co
0
O
0
p N N
0 N d
o m rn c c o 4) 0 N
a 0) o
O c¢
a
E
co a 0
o
c r 0 CL
m
c m 4) DEci
O
L
o
3
o c
m
m
c
m
c p
c
cu p
t
l0 E O C
m
N
e
0) Q
a
c
N
U a u. u. U n. cn F- U m 2 m x U
O
m
c c
Os
Z
30 o
m
a 5
x m Y
o a aci c CL
e- voi rn m c
3
0 C cC
0 c
LCLv ts
w o 0 c o'
O 0. a
m
n' U)
N U
m
75
O co C7cc
M 0 m
c
m aNi IXaci
N 3
voi d Y
m v U
Z• o aLi O
c
3 cu
t
x 0
cc
o.
N
o
E
L
U m a wwQNwLL
I— I N M d to 1101 1 f- I 00 O O
r
DATE: February 12, 1999
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Summary of Events
Absence from the City. I will be out of town Saturday through Monday in Omaha.
Kathy will be back in town on Sunday evening. Fred Moore will be Acting City
Manager on Saturday and Sunday while Kathy and I are gone. City Hall will be closed
Monday for President's Day.
Activity Center Manager. Rick Busch, a long time employee in Parks and Recreation,
has been appointed manager of the new activity center/field house complex. Rick has
been a recreation program manager, dealing with scheduling of fields and facilities and
managing our relationship with our various athletic associations (with almost no
complaints!). This will be a very nice new challenge for Rick and he is ready to take on
the big job of opening a new multi-million dollar facility. .
Begin Golf Course. Staff held a meeting with the Judy Begin on her golf course
proposal this week. As reported to you Tuesday evening, there appear to be no
insurmountable problems in accommodating the golf course and Fernbrook Lane to each
other. On other issues, they believe they can provide a full buffer for the wetland
surrounding Mud Lake and staff agreed to access from Yucca Lane, partially because
Fernbrook will not be done in that area in time. There was also general agreement on
such issues as lighting and landscaping needs.
The biggest problem for which staff sees no obvious solution is that a trail access around
Mud Lake appears to be incompatible with the golf course design. A trail should be 100
yards from any active golfing area to be safe from stray balls, and the land for the course
does not appear large enough to accommodate this much of a safety buffer, unless
perhaps a forest of trees is clear cut. We may have to decide between the open green area
of a golf course with no trail vs. a housing development with a trail someday. We cannot
require the dedication of a trail to the City with the golf course application because no
subdivision of land is being proposed.
Kathy Lueckert
4445 Kirkwood Lane North
Plymouth, Minnesota 55442
February 16, 1999
Dwight D. Johnson
City Manager
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Dwight,
I am resigning as Assistant City Manager in Plymouth. March 19 will be my last
day. As you know, I have accepted a position at the national headquarters of the
Presbyterian Church (USA), where I will be Deputy Executive Director. It is an amazing
opportunity for me.
I have enjoyed my years in Plymouth and have learned much. I am grateful to you
for the experiences I have had. I hope that I have contributed in some small way to the
city's success.
Plymouth is a wonderful city that serves its citizens well and has an exceptional
city council. I particularly want to express my appreciation for the great city staff—their
dedication to their work and their professionalism are second to none. As you and the city
face the challenges ahead, I know that the staff will continue to be one of Plymouth's best
assets.
My best wishes for the future. Thank you, and I will miss you all.
Sincerely,
N -
cc: Jeanette Sobania
DATE: February 12, 1999
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Summary of Agenda Items for February 16, 1999
6.03 Liquor ordinance change -operating managers. Current ordinance states that the
City must investigate all operating managers in addition to the official licensee. Council
member Spigner has pointed out that this is an unnecessarily intrusive requirement, since
our ordinances hold the license holder responsible for everything. The revised ordinance
allows the City to continue to investigate the proposed operating manager for a fee if we
are requested to do so, but also allows the license holder to conduct this check directly.
While the current ordinance on some occasions may give us information we should know
about an operating manager, it more often seems to provide us with information we
should not know and is not directly relevant to being an operating manager. Staff
therefore can recommend the change in the ordinance.
6.12. City health insurance. It is proposed to change from Health Partners to Blue
Cross/Blue Shield. This change will save the City over $30,000 per year and the
employees over $100,000, because the new plan has significantly lower rates for
equivalent coverage. Health Partners was proposing a 13% increase in rates. The new
insurance is available from a consortium of school and local governments and requires us
to approve a joint powers contract with them, which the City can terminate after one year.
7.1 and 7.2. Assessment hearings for weed eradication and diseased tree removal. Each
year, the City requires removal of weeds or diseased trees. A few do not pay and must
have their property assessed. We do not know of any objections to the proposed
assessments at this writing.
7.3, 7.4, and 7.5. Hearings for civil penalties for liquor law violations. Three more
cases are before us. Italianni's was scheduled for this meeting, but the official notice to
them came back to the City, and they will be re -scheduled. In general, the Council
should consider only the information before it at the hearing, and not any reports of other
pending violations.
8.1 Consultants for Comprehensive Planning. The proposal for SRF consultants is
still being fine-tuned but amounts to about $250,000 at this writing, but staff recommends
that an overall fund of $275,000 be established to provide for contingencies. The report
also recommends that four joint meeting dates be established with the Planning
Commission over the next six months to review various phases of the work. The first
meeting is proposed to be March 31". While the consultant contract may seem like a
high amount, the individual plans such as parks, transportation, etc. are major plans in
their own right and have not been updated in many years. Various staff members have
reviewed the work program and are trimming it where possible.
8.2 Activity Center/Field House site plan and conditional use permits. The Planning
Commission recommended approval unanimously and only two residents appeared at the
hearing. One inquired about future traffic signals in thearea and one spoke in support of
the plans. The plan has not changed significantly since the Council reviewed it at a study
session. If the plans are approved, bidding will occur in March and award of bids in
April
9.1 Legislative Issues. Mayor Tierney requested this item on the agenda in case there
are late developments in legislation affecting the City that should be discussed.
41
SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Comment Response Report
Eagle Lake Regional Park Development Proposal
February 11, 1999
140
Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District
Comment Response Report
Eagle Lake Regional Park Development Proposal
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction....................................................................................................................................1-2
Classification/Purpose of Eagle Lake Parkland................................................................................ 3
EnvironmentalImpacts................................................................................................................ 4-12
Water Quality
Wildlife/Habitat
Goose Control
Pesticide/Fertilizer Use
Forestry
Forest Vegetation History
Forest Management
Anticipated Park Use & Comparison To Other Park Activities.................................................12-14
Public Demand For Proposed Golf Facilities..............................................................................14-20
Golf as a Hennepin Parks System Outdoor
Why Golf at this Regional Park
Uniqueness of Proposed Facilities
The First Tee Program
Documented User Demand for Golf as an Outdoor Recreation Activity
Relationship to Existing/Proposed Golf Facilities in the Area
Cost/Tax Impact and Economic Feasibility .................................................................................21-22
Attachments
Attachment A — Other Correspondence
Attachment B — Petition Solicitation Literature
Attachment C — Action Alerts
Sierra Club
Audubon Chapter of Minneapolis
Attachment D — Comment Summary, Codes, Frequencies and Percentages
Attachment E — Pesticide and Fertilizer Policy Statement
Attachment F — Eagle Lake Phase I Use Estimates
Attachment G — Summary of Park District Outdoor Recreation Use Activity
i
Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District
COMMENT RESPONSE REPORT
Eagle Lake Regional Park Development Proposal
INTRODUCTION
February 11, 1999
The Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District, commonly referred to as Hennepin
Parks, used a variety of methods to solicit public comments about the proposed Phase I
development of Eagle Lake Regional Park. Two public open houses were conducted to
provide information regarding the proposed development within Eagle Lake Regional
Park, as well as to answer questions, and solicit public input. Fact sheets, open house
notices, comment forms and site maps were submitted to area newspapers, mailed to over
2,000 neighbors and park constituents, and discussed on the local cable television
channel. The comment period opened in Mid -December and remained open through
February 5, 1999. From the initial notice to closing, the comment period was open for
approximately 55 days.
A total of 104 different citizens attended the Open Houses, 55 citizens attended the
January 11`x'
meeting and 57 attended the January 28h Open House, with 8 of the 57 also
having attended the January I I th Open House.
Staff also participated in other informal meetings and numerous phone conversations
during the comment period. The Park District received 153 written comments submitted
to the record, a petition opposing the development containing 108 signatures, of which 13
of the signers also submitted comment forms and six letters from various organizations
See Attachment A - Letter Summary). Copies of the literature used to solicit petition
signing are attached. (See Attachment B). These promotional pieces have presented
misleading and inaccurate information about the proposed project's environmental
impacts, use, and economic feasibility, which will be addressed in this Comment
Response Report.
In addition, upon request of interested parties, the local chapters of the Sierra Club and
Audubon Society sent alerts to members, again based on inaccurate information about the
environmental effects of the proposed project. (See Attachment Q. Hennepin Parks was
not contacted by either organization seeking information about the project. This
Comment Response Report will address the statements presented by these groups, which
are similar to the comments received from many opposing citizens.
Attachment D is the summary of written comments submitted by individuals during the
comment period, including categorization of comments by codes and percentages.
Comment REsponse Eagle for 2-18
Diverse written comment was received, from overall support for the development
including golf facilities (44%) to opposition to development and/or golf facilities (55%)
and combinations within. Comments were certainly not one-sided. There were only a
few seeking no development of the property (M). When looking at the place of
residence there was also balance. Whether supporting or opposing the project, just under
a quarter (23% and 25% respectively) lived within Ya mile of the Eagle Lake Regional
Park. From greater than'/2 mile, 22% of the comments were supporting the project and
31% were opposing.
Significant numbers of both those who support the golf development and those who do
not had concerns for the environmental impact of the project (59% of written comments
had environmental concerns). Some (26%) of those supporting the proposal, including
golf amenities, recognized the commitment, responsibility and mission of Hennepin
Parks to environmental stewardship, the stewardship commitment at Baker National Golf
Course and were confident that this project would proceed within appropriate
environmental parameters.
Suggestions for amenities that should be considered as part of the regional park
development were numerous whether supporting or opposing the golf components of the
project. Some had suggestions for traditional park and trail development in lieu of golf
35%); and, others suggested similar traditional developments in addition to golfing and
encouraged Hennepin Parks to provide for diversity of individuals and activities (20%).
A few of those opposing the golf development stated that they believed it was
inappropriate for an organization such as Hennepin Parks to encourage youth to
participate in a sport that does not protect the environment (8%), and that such an effort
was merely justification for professional golf associations to further their initiatives.
Conversely, 18% supported the course to provide for youth, seniors and women who
need access to such facilities to develop their game.
There were comments questioning and promoting the need for the proposed golf
facilities. Comments included those who felt there were plenty of such courses nearby
28%) some indicating that public sector should not compete with the private sector
4.7%), the cost of such a development, and those taxes should be used to protect the land
18%). Conversely (14%) felt there should be more golf facilities as proposed within the
community and that they supported government seeking ways to make it affordable and
to use golf enterprise operations as a revenue source to off -set taxes (13%).
A few comments (12%) were received with regards to Phase II development of Eagle
Lake Regional Park; those primarily related to lake access issues, the channel between
Eagle and Pike Lakes and development of the island. Phase II development issues are not
addressed in this Comment Response Report. A small, but critical, parcel of land located
in the Phase II development area is in private ownership. It is only after this property is
acquired that Phase II development will occur, contingent upon available financial
resources and need.
COMMENT RESPONSES
CLASSIFICATION/PURPOSE OF EAGLE LAKE PARKLAND
The Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District, commonly referenced as Hennepin
Parks, ownes and manages over 26,000 acres of parkland. Of this amount, over 23,000 is
restored, managed and preserved in a natural state, consistent with the master plan for the
particular park facility. Less than 10% of Park District property is developed for active
recreation uses. The Park District currently serves approximately 2.5 million park guests
per year. The Park District's parkland classification system includes Regional Park
Reserves, Regional Parks, Regional Trail Corridors and Regional Special Recreation
Features. The Regional Park Reserve is the key element in the system; these areas ensure
the preservation of natural resources for the enjoyment of present and future generations.
Park Reserves are managed under an 80/20 Policy, whereby 80% of the land base is
restored, managed, and preserved in a natural state and 20% can be developed for active
recreation. Regional Parks, trails, and special recreation features serve to protect the
Regional Park Reserves by providing areas for active and special recreation uses.
Hennepin Parks' Eagle Lake property was acquired in the late 1970s,as authorized by the
City of Plymouth, for Regional Park purposes and totals 230 acres. The southern portion,
designated as a Special Recreation Use Area, was the site of two farmsteads. The Park
District's classification system establishes a Regional Park as a site which "provides a
diversity of resources and is contiguous to or includes water resources that can
accommodate a wide variety of compatible outdoor recreation uses." The minimum site
size of a Regional Park is 100 acres of land, with a preferable site size of 200 or more
acres of land. Active recreation areas in Regional Parks should be developed in a manner
that maintains sufficient natural areas to ensure quality outdoor recreation experiences.
As a Regional Park, many active recreation uses are appropriate and are referenced in the
Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District - Policy Statement, as discussed in a
following section of this report.
Citizens opposed to the proposed project most often cite a desire to leave the land as it is
today; contrary to the intent for which it was acquired. Hennepin Parks has a major
commitment to the preservation of parklands as exhibited in the 23,000 acres of land that
is preserved and managed exclusively for natural resource management purposes. It
appears that many of the citizens commenting in this area are not aware of the differences
between the acquisition and development purposes of a Regional Park and a Park
Reserve and have a personal preference for the type of resource management of a Park
Reserve. It has not been uncommon for parkland to be purchased many years before it is
developed. People get use to parkland in its current state and foresee change as
threatening to the way they use the parkland. Some citizens commented that they hike
and exercise their dogs in this area, even though the area is not yet open for public use.
Eagle Lake parkland is classified as a Regional Park and is proposed to be used for active
outdoor recreation purposes.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Questions and concerns regarding environmental impacts of the proposed development in
the Special Recreation Use Area, in particular the golf related facilities, were the most
frequently expressed area of citizen comment. Environmental impacts were also the
issues that staff observed being most misrepresented by persons organizing campaigns to
oppose development and oppose the golf facilities. Many citizens who commented or
signed petitions did so after reading or listening to misleading, incorrect and often
unsubstantiated information.
Any recreational development will have an environmental impact, some negative and
some positive. As previously explained, Regional Parks are acquired for active
development to provide outdoor recreation activities for the public which helps protect
the integrity of Park Reserves by limiting recreational development in these larger tracts
of parkland. The Park District has many internal policies and guidelines that are
designed to promote environmental stewardship, even when pursuing active recreation
development in a Regional Park. The results of these policies are evident when observing
and experiencing outdoor recreation facilities in existing developed Regional Parks, i. e.
Fish Lake, French, Bryant Lake, Cleary Lake as well as at the Baker National Golf
Course and Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center.
The following information will address the various environmental questions raised by
commentors.
Water Ouality
Concerns about the impact of the proposed project on water quality were cited in 15.7%
of the comments. In addition, an organized group opposing the project distributed
literature to citizens erroneously stating that "The proposal will negatively impact water
quality for Pike and Eagle Lakes as well as the Shingle Creek Watershed." An action
alert from the Audubon Chapter of Minneapolis encouraging members to oppose the
proposed development, also mislead members through their opposition statement, "initial
negative environmental impacts of developing the site (loss of trees, wildlife, erosion and
water quality.)"
Hennepin Parks has a policy mandating "non -degradation of water resources" by park
development and operations. The Park District's "Water Quality Management Plan"
establishes goals, based on anticipated use, quality and characteristics of the resource, for
every water body within or adjacent to Hennepin Parks properties. The design and layout
of the proposed facilities, even in the conceptual phase, are done in consideration of this
policy and these goals. John Barten, Hennepin Parks Water Quality Manager and well-
respected limnologist, was consulted in the conceptual design planning and has
subsequently performed scientific water quality modeling on the proposed area and
project. The conceptual plan identifies water quality management features designed to
protect water resources. The modeling results show that an overall reduction of nutrient
loading would occur if the water management features proposed and identified for the
project, were added to the site compared to the nutrient loading that exists today, without
development.
According to the Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Technical Release
TR55) model, the runoff curve number for the site will increase from 58 to 61 as a result of
golf course construction. Therefore, the quantity of runoff will increase by approximately 20
percent, mainly as a result of the impervious area created by the parking lot and buildings.
This runoff will be captured in a stormwater detention basin adjacent to the building site.
The basin outlet will be sized to maintain the pre -development discharge rate to Pike Lake.
The NRCS TR5 5 model will be. used to estimate pre -development runoff rates for various
storm events, and used to size the detention basin and outlet structure. Water captured in the
basin will be used to supplement the golf course irrigation system. Therefore, the total
volume of water discharged to Pike Lake will be less than estimated by the TR55 model.
The Walker PONDNET model estimated the pre -development phosphorus export at 45
pounds/year from the proposed golf course site. Following development, the phosphorus
export rate will increase to an estimated 66 pounds/year. The Walker model estimates that if
runoff water from buildings and parking lots is treated in a basin with 2 acre feet of storage,
designed according to NURP (Nation -Wide Urban Run Off Program) standards, before it is
discharged to Pike Lake, the phosphorus export rate to the lake will be 35 lbs/year. Hennepin
Parks will construct a basin designed according to NURP criteria to treat runoff from the
parking lot and building. An LCMR funded study of Golf course runoff showed that the
nutrient export rate from properly managed golf courses was equal to the export rate from
open areas, including old agricultural fields, similar to the Eagle -Pike Lake site. One of the
study sites was Baker National Golf Course in Baker Park Reserve. This facility is operated
by Hennepin Parks. The proposed Eagle Lake Golf Course facility will be operated and
managed in a similar fashion, resulting in low nutrient export from the turf areas.
Nevertheless, runoff from approximately 30 percent of the golf course turf areas will also be
captured and treated in NURP basins prior to discharge to Pike Lake. Therefore, the nutrient -
loading rate to Pike Lake will be reduced as a result of the project.
Excess runoff water will flow north into Pike Lake. Currently, most of the proposed golf
course site drains into the lake through three small drainage channels. Presumably as a result
of the agricultural use of the site, these channels are currently unstable, with steep side slopes
and minimum vegetation in the bottom. Following construction, runoff from the site will be
captured in detention ponds and discharged through culverts into the drainage channels.
During site grading, the channels will be reshaped and vegetated to transport the runoff water
without eroding. The NRCS National Engineering Handbook will be used to design the
channels.
The nutrient loading to Pike Lake will not increase following development of the golf course
facility. Therefore, the quality of Pike Lake will not be affected by the development. The
Walker PONDNET model was used to confirm that pre and post development nutrient
loading rates are comparable.
6
Wildlife/Habitat
Concerns over the impact of wildlife were expressed in 25.4% of the comment forms. It
should be noted that misleading statements were given to citizens by the Save Eagle Lake
Park Committee, "habitat for deer, birds, plant life will be destroyed", the Sierra Club,
this plan will ..... result in the loss of wildlife habitat," and the Audubon Society, "will
damage or destroy habitat."
Hennepin Parks studies the possible affects on wildlife as part of all development
planning. As previously mentioned, Regional Parks are acquired and developed
primarily for active recreation and major natural resource and wildlife management
efforts are concentrated in Park Reserves: however, recreation developments, where
possible, are designed to minimize negative affects on wildlife and enhance the outdoor
recreation experience by providing wildlife habitat consistent with the development.
Previously developed Regional Parks represent models of this commitment by the Park
District.
Golf courses facilities provide many opportunities for integration of wildlife habitat and
enhancement of the golfer's experience by the presence of wildlife. More than 70% of
most golf courses are rough and non -play areas including natural grasses, trees and
shrubs. Baker National Golf Course is a Hennepin Parks example of environmental
stewardship and provision of wildlife habitat. Since construction in 1988, over 16,000
native trees and shrubs have been planted for reforestation purposes and to improve
wildlife habitat. Baker National provides habitat for deer that browse woodland edges,
waterfowl that frequent wetland areas, songbirds that nest and feed throughout the area,
and other animal species. In 1995, the New York State Audubon Society certified Baker
National as the first public course in Minnesota as a Cooperative Audubon Sanctuary. In
1996, Baker National received the Best of Golf Award form Links Magazine for
significant achievement in natural resource preservation and wildlife conservation.
Through design, planning and management, golf courses can benefit wildlife and people.
Multi-purpose trails are included in the proposed project to provide on-going public
access to non -golfers to continue observation of wildlife and their habitats as well as
recreational pursuits.
Hennepin Parks Wildlife Manager Larry Gillette prepared the following information for
inclusion in a voluntary Environmental Assessment Worksheet that has been prepared for
the proposed project.
The wildlife resource on or near the site falls into two categories; wildlife of the old fields
and woods that cover the upland area to be used for recreational and golf facilities, and
the wildlife that lives in the marshes that are between the proposed construction site and
Pike Lake. The wildlife in the wetlands should not be affected by the proposed
improvements, because the wetlands will not be altered, and the existing strip of woods
will be left between the recreational/golf enhancements and the marsh as a buffer from
human activity.
The wildlife living on the uplands will be affected as the site is converted from old fields
to open space and fairways. The species found on this site are "edge" species. They are
species that are commonly found in fragmented habitats. The woods are not large
enough to support true woodland species, and the fields are too small for true open site
species. Instead, this area supports species that are found in brushy areas with scattered
small woodlots and open meadows. Typical bird species include the American robin,
American goldfinch, black -capped chickadee, white -breasted nuthatch, blue jay, common
crow, downy woodpecker, red -bellied woodpecker, northern cardinal, common
yellowthroat, yellow warbler, house wren, gray catbird, red -winged blackbird, common
grackle and American kestrel. Typical mammals would include meadow vole, cotton -
tailed rabbit, gray squirrel, raccoon, red fox and white-tailed deer. All of these birds and
mammals are common throughout the western half of Hennepin County.
Most of the woodlands along the lake and the larger woodlot in the center of the park will
be saved. However, most of the old fields will be converted to open space, fairways and
greens, which will be less attractive to most of the species listed above. While few if any
of the species will be eliminated from the site by construction of the golf course and other
amenities, numbers of most species will decline during and after construction.
A few species of wildlife will find the golf course more attractive than the pre-existing
condition. Canada geese, common grackles and European starlings will likely increase in
numbers. Bluebirds, tree swallows and house wrens may also increase if nest boxes are
provided. Robins, catbirds and a few other species may also increase if shrubs are
planted along the fairways.
Fish in Pike Lake should not be affected by the recreational development. Pike Lake is
relatively shallow, and probably suffers from occasional winterkill. It is restocked
naturally through its connection to Eagle Lake.
Goose Control
A few citizens expressed concern over the possible increase in goose population as a
result of the large turf areas within the open space and golf features and questioned how
Hennepin Parks intended to handle geese.
Hennepin Parks Goose Management Plan offers a number of strategies directed at the
problems of too many geese and resulting nuisance and safety issues. The use of a dog to
harass geese is a common and effective means of goose control on golf courses and is
frequently used in the metropolitan area. The time when goose control begins on new
turf areas is a key factor in the overall and long term effectiveness of control. Also, some
design elements, in terms of landscaping, can be instituted that may make portions of the
area less desirable habitat. Once the area is seeded/sodded and new turf takes hold, a dog
would be used to displace interested geese. Displaced geese are not harmed, but will
look for large open turf/field with water habitat and will move to sites throughout the
metropolitan area, not just the neighborhood. This early use of the dog may reduce the
need for a dog as part of annual operations, but regular use would be dependent upon the
goose population. Also, removal of flightless geese may be considered, as used at Baker
National. A goose management public hunt is also conducted at Baker National, but
probably would not be desirable at this location.
Pesticide/Fertilizer Use
Concerns over pesticide/fertilizer use on golf facilities was expressed in 13.7% of the
comment forms. Staff also noted that inaccurate information about Hennepin Parks use
of pesticides and fertilizers in golf facilities is contained in literature distributed to
citizens and environmental organizations by an organized group opposing the golf related
facilities. One comment letter cited excerpts of selective studies pertaining to pesticides,
pesticide use on lawns, and one directly referencing a golf industry related study.
Pesticides and fertilizers are used by the Park District for turf management, under highly
regulated and restricted circumstances. All park properties, including golf courses, abide
by Hennepin Parks Pesticide and Fertilizer Use Policy (See Attachment E). Golf
facilities are designed and turf grass varieties selected to retain disease resistance, further
minimizing the need for pesticides.
Pesticides help limit the damage that can be caused by insects, weeds and plant diseases
and are used very selectively to protect the health of turf, trees and other living things on
parkland. Fertilizers provide needed nutrition for the course's plant life, but again are
only used when needed and soil test results dictate. Bob Mugass, Executive Director of
the Minnesota Turf and Grounds Foundation, explained in a letter to the Hennepin Parks
Board of Commissioners, "Favorable plant health and grass plant density are the best
allies a turf manager has in combating weed invasion that does not depend on the use of
herbicides. A healthy turf area also recovers more quickly from pest or mechanical
damage thereby providing less opportunity for weeds to invade and become established."
Within Hennepin Parks golf facilities, pesticide use is typically restricted to greens in the
treatment of diseases that would significantly affect the health of turf and playing
conditions. Many insects are not treated for and golfers are informed that playing
conditions will reflect a commitment to environmental stewardship, often at the expense
of optimum golf playing conditions. For example, in a typical year, pesticides are used
about five times and herbicide used for treatment of weeds is applied as needed, which is
less than an annual application. Hennepin Parks has an Integrated Pest Management Plan
for treatment of insect related disease. Most spraying, except for snowmold treatment, is
only done on a curative basis when disease reaches a designated threshold. Maintaining
proper turf varieties in healthy condition promotes disease resistance.
Pesticides are highly regulated by the EPA and tested for human and environmental
safety before allowed on the market. Hennepin Parks places signs in the clubhouse and
on the first tee on any day which pesticides are applied to notify the public. A 1994 study
conducted in Florida by Drs. George Sndyer and John Cisar simulated an 18 hole round
of golf immediately after a pesticide application. "The results of the exposure work, in
the worst case scenario of playing everyday for 70 years on recently treated turf, were
fascinating. Simply, the calculated exposure was one-third of the Chronic Reference
Dose (RfD) exposure limit. A golfer is more likely to be hit by a ball than be affected by
pesticides."
A public statement prepared by the Golf Course Superintendent's Association of
America, based on conducting and reviewing scientific research, answers the question if
golfers are at risk as follows: "No. There is not scientific evidence that golfers face any
chronic health risks from the pesticides used to maintain courses. Once a liquid product
is applied and the turfgrass is dry or the product has been watered in, there is very little
chance of exposure to golfers or others who enter the area. It is worth noting that a small
percentage of people may be allergic to a particular product, just as some people are
allergic to household cleaners, soaps or perfumes."
Golf course workers are required to wear protective gear because they are exposed more
often and are working with the liquid product in concentrated dosage. Protective gear is
worn just as x-ray technicians wear protective gear because of frequency of exposure.
The letter that was submitted to the Board referencing various pesticide related studies,
stated that "abnormally high rates of death due to cancer of the brain, large intestine and
prostate" were found in a study of golf course superintendents. This research was taken
out of context, the results of the study established "no cause and effect relationship
between pesticide use and the cancers in superintendents; however, did reflect a
relationship to lifestyle choices such as smoking, dieting, and stress. As a result of the
study, smoking cessation programs were considered for Golf Course Superintendent's
educational programs.
A statement issued by the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation responds to the
question of whether exposure to pesticides, like those sprayed on golf course features,
increases a women's risk of breast cancer. The Foundation's statement reports on the
results of a 1996 Scientific American study, "evidence to support a pesticide -related
breast cancer risk is "scant" and the potency of suspect estrogen -like compounds is much
weaker than that of natural estrogen. The Foundation further states that the National
Cancer institute is funding several studies into environmental risks for breast cancer,
including exposure to pesticides.
Fertilizer use on Park District lands including golf courses, is also controlled by policy.
No fertilizers are applied within 20 feet of a water body. Soil is tested annually to
determine necessity for fertilizers, where fertilizers may be needed, and amount of
fertilizer to be used. Hennepin Parks has participated in studies to determine if fertilizers
leach into the groundwater or if there were significant amounts of surface runoff. Study
results showed that leachate was negligible and that runoff was minimal, much less than
experienced from an average lawn. The water quality section of this report discusses
scientific data and modeling used to project water resource impacts.
Forestry
Concern for trees was mentioned in 24.8% of the comment forms. Statements sent out by
the Sierra Club, Audubon Society, and Save the Eagle Lake organized opposition
committee distributed misleading information to the public regarding impact on trees and
the forest resources currently available within the site. Concerns over loss of habitat due
to destruction of trees was stated and accusations that the Park District would, in a
wholesale manner, destroy 50 year old trees over 6" in diameter.
10
Although a final routing plan has not yet been done, the conceptual plan has taken tree
resources into consideration. As environmental stewards, Hennepin Parks carefully plans
developments considering existing tree resources and desired reforestation plans for sites.
The City of Plymouth Tree Preservation Ordinance is much more lenient in permitting
tree removal for development than the Park District would ever consider for this project.
The entire project site is approximately 149 acres of which approximately 93 acres would
remain undisturbed and in the disturbed acres, tree resources will be used to enhance the
recreation features either through preservation of existing trees or replacement and
upgrading of tree resources. Recent examples of Hennepin Parks commitment to tree
preservation and reforestation after recreational development can be seen at Fish Lake,
French, Lake Minnetonka, Bryant Lake Regional Parks and Baker National Golf Course.
The following information, as provided by Hennepin Parks Forestry Manager, Tom
Jahnke, describes the history of the Eagle Lake forestry resource and forestry
management plan for the proposed project.
Forest Vegetation History
This portion of Minnesota contained rich forests classified as Northern Hardwoods
Forest. The dominant native overstory species prior to alteration by human settlers in late
1800's would have been as follows:
Northern Red Oak
Bur Oak
Green Ash
Quaking Aspen
Paper Birch
American Elm
American Basswood
Black Cherry
Bigtooth Aspen
Bitternut Hickory
Red Elm
Sugar Maple
Common Hackberry
Butternut
Rock Elm
In addition to these species, lowland overstory species would have included:
Cottonwood Boxelder
Willow species Black Ash
Silver Maple
Since occupation by European settlers, most of the native vegetation has been removed or
severely altered. The majority of upland sites within this regional park were deforested
to convert the use of soils to agriculture purposes. The forest remnants remaining were
logged successively to harvest the most valuable timber resources. The primary wooded
block (woodlot) within the southern section of the park was heavily grazed by cattle for
many decades. This particular woodlot contains some wonderful ancient growth native
trees, but it lacks the diversity of the native forests circa 1850. Grazing causes
considerable soil compaction, which kills sensitive tree species and prohibits the
reproduction of certain native species. Most noteworthy is the shortage or lack of sugar
maple and American basswood within this woodlot.
ii
The remaining woods on the north -facing slope of this portion of the park were also
grazed by farm animals, but to a lesser extent - due to the steepness of the grades. This
small patch of woods contains more diverse species than the above-described woodlot.
The few parcels containing good-sized trees at old homesites within the park lack any
similarity to the native forests. These sites are dominated by pioneering tree species,
which are suited to "recapturing" disturbed soils. These old homesites are represented by
woods of low diversity and lack regeneration of the more desirable upland native species.
The pioneering species are predominately lowland or exotic species; they are considered
short-lived; and they are considered weaker than the native upland species. The
commonly found tree species at these formerly disturbed sites are boxelder, cottonwood,
elm, and willow.
Since agricultural practices ceased on this property in the 1960's and 1970's, natural
ecological succession back to forest has been occurring at a moderate to rapid rate. One
portion in the southeast corner of the park was utilized as recently as the 1980's for the
purposes of manufacturing compost from leaves collected within Hennepin County. This
parcel contains minimal natural succession. In abandoned agriculture areas, natural
succession has best been occurring next to mature trees containing suitable seed sources.
The more remote (from woodlot edges) open areas contain the least amount of
succeeding woody vegetation.
Past reforestation attempts in the early 1980's were less than successful. The tree and
shrub plants utilized for these reforestation plantings were not native to this site, nor were
they propagated from local seed sources. Some of these former plantings contain an
abundance of Siberian peashrub, which is now considered to be an aggressive exotic
plant - worthy of being eliminated or at least contained.
Some large oaks within the southern woodlot have been killed by oak wilt disease within
the past fifteen years. Oak wilt disease control efforts appear to have this problem
checked" and no further tree losses are expected - short of another invasion from outside
the park.
Forest Management
For the proposed development in this regional park, best possible land uses would be
accommodated in the more open areas and those sites dominated by less -desirable
species. The least amount of incursion would be recommended to occur within the
existing woodlands dominated by native upland species. If possible, development would
be minimized in a few sites where natural forest succession is occurring which will result
in desired species.
Exotic tree and shrub species would be controlled as much as possible from areas to be
maintained forest or to be reforested. European buckthorn and Siberian peashrub are the
most prevalent non-native aggressive species.
12
Management efforts would be continued to control oak wilt disease. All forested areas
would continue to be monitored for serious pest problems - including the possible
invasion by gypsy moth. Existing woodlands would be managed to sustain themselves
with reproduction of native species.
Sites of former homesteads are identified as areas for development. The existing forest
resources in these areas are not of desirable species. Forest resources that are not
disturbed should be recaptured. Species management should occur which will effect the
eventual conversion from the currently existing less desirable tree species to those species
indigenous to those upland sites. Where feasible, soils should be improved to better
support the desired forest components.
Active reforestation efforts would occur on sites slated to become "forest". These efforts
would include "no management needed" sites where natural succession is now occurring
which will result in the desired forest species components. In open areas or areas
succeeding with less than desirable species, reforestation should be accelerated by
planting native trees and shrubs to enrich the species mix. These plant materials should
be propagated from indigenous seed sources and grown locally.
If this portion of Eagle Lake Regional Park were to be developed into a golf course, a
master landscape -planting plan would be devised. The perimeter of the course would
receive plantings to create buffers or screenings and the interior of the course would
receive some large group plantings to represent native forests and to enhance the
appearance of the overall landscape. These plantings would occur utilizing native plant
materials averaging 6to 8' in size. The scope of these plantings will range between
4,000 to 6,000 plants.
Larger (2" caliper and up) trees would be planted in association with physical features of
the development. Approximately 400 to 700 of these native plants will be planted to
provide the needed shade trees for the course.
Hennepin Parks has an inventory of the species of trees by location within Eagle Lake
Park Property. In those areas conceptually identified for development, that may affect
forested areas, individual marking of trees has been done with a global positioning
system and data entered into maps for route planning purposes. It is the intent of the
development to minimize impacts on quality trees of desirable species and to increase
amount of forested park area while improving quality of plant materials.
ANTICIPATED PARK USE AND COMPARISON TO OTHER PARK
ACTIVITIES
Within the system of parks, Hennepin Parks provides facilities for a variety of outdoor
recreation uses such as hiking, biking, cross-country skiing, mountain biking, golf,
downhill skiing, snowmobiling, swimming, picnicking, creative play, fishing, boating,
etc. Facilities are placed within appropriate properties as defined by parkland
classification. Facilities are geographically located throughout the Park District to serve
13
citizens in recognition of the regional intent of the park facilities, resource, and demand.
Balance and variety of outdoor recreation facilities are planning considerations. Some of
the comments expressed concern about loss of trail use, off -leash dog exercise
opportunities, and bird watching. The Save Eagle Lake Park Committee has suggested
that more use would occur in the park by creating a leashless pet park and offering
unpaved trails for running, fitness course, mountain biking and cross country skiing than
would be generated from the Phase I development of the Eagle Lake Regional Park
Special Recreation Use Area, as proposed.
Currently, there is not authorized use of Eagle Lake parkland for neighbors or others,
except shore fishing on Eagle Lake and use of the Maple Grove trail segment in the
eastern edge of the parkland. Hennepin Parks Ordinance restricts use to designated areas.
Typically, undeveloped lands are not authorized or promoted for recreation use. Natural
resource stewardship occurs, but on a smaller scale than in developed Regional Parks or
Park Reserves. Staff recognizes that neighbors have created trails within the property and
have been seen running dogs off leash. Public Safety staff have not taken a hard line in
regards to this unauthorized use, unless motor vehicle intrusion or other illegal activity
has occurred.
In past years, other enterprise operations have been considered for Eagle Lake Regional
Park such as a fair grounds, reservation picnic ground for businesses, water park, and
model airplane flying runway.
The proposed plan for the Special Recreation Use Area, in addition to the recreational
golf amenities, provides for trail activity, bird watching, reservation picnicking, a croquet
court, and winter activities including a lighted sliding hill and beginner
cross country ski trails. Phase II development is proposed to add the recreation uses of
fishing, boating, additional picnicking, and creative play area use.
A February 2, 1999 article appearing in the Plymouth Sun Newspaper quoted Save Eagle
Lake Committee, Sam Garst, as saying that only 3,400 golfers will use the proposed
facilities. Hennepin Parks projected use would be similar to the Glen Lake Golf and
Practice Center, with additional use generated by the pitch and putt course, for a total
estimated use of 100,000/annually from the golf related features. Additional use
estimated from the other park features is addressed below.
Use of the proposed 2.2 miles of paved trail is estimated to generate 16,600 visits
annually. Proposed winter facilities would generate approximately 8,000 uses and
reservation picnicking 1,500 visits (See Attachment F). The addition of the golf
facilities would result in this Regional Park serving more citizens than Bryant Lake, Fish
Lake or Lake Minnetonka Regional Parks served in 1997. French Regional Park serves
more because of the play area and Lake Minnetonka use will increase with addition of a
play area. The Phase II development of Eagle Lake Regional Park will include a play
area. The use projection that appears in Attachment F, does not include Phase II
amenities. The Eagle Lake Regional Park Conceptual Plan is designed to provide for a
14
high level of park use with a regional draw, rather than primarily neighborhood focus.
The alternate activities, as proposed by the Save Eagle Lake Committee, based on current
Hennepin Parks activity use data, would not generate anywhere near the use as would be
realized with the currently proposed park plan. In addition, nearby Hennepin Parks
facilities can accommodate these proposed alternative uses. Current Hennepin Parks
trails and dog exercise areas have a great deal of capacity available.
A few comments addressed traffic concerns. The golf related facilities are estimated to
generate approximately 300 cars per day. The use is dispersed throughout the day and
would not affect peak traffic periods. Traffic direction is predicted to be concentrated on
Co. Rd. 10, with an even directional split, with some traffic entering and exiting from
Zachary Lane. Traffic impact has been included in the EAW and does not indicate
problems. The park entrance off Zachary Lane was planned for as part of the County
Road 10 upgrade. The entrance serving future Phase H developments would occur off
63`d Ave.
PUBLIC DEMAND FOR PROPOSED GOLF FACILITIES
Golf as a Hennepin Parks System Outdoor Recreation Activity
The Mission of Hennepin Parks is to promote environmental stewardship through
recreation and education in a natural resources -based park system. Golf is an
outdoor recreation experience that is chosen by many people for their enjoyment. The
Mission Statement does not set the objectives of environmental stewardship and outdoor
recreation activities as mutually exclusive. The intent is to provide for both. Hennepin
Parks currently operates three golf courses, which include 42 holes of golf and three
driving ranges, with a fourth to open at the Hyland Ski & Snowboard Area enterprise
facility in Bloomington.
Hennepin Parks Policy Statement recognizes golf as a system activity. Park District
Policies describe system outdoor recreation activities as those that, "take place in a
natural setting, has broad general appeal, is participant oriented, is self-directed, is of
wholesome character and is not offensive to the general public." In fact, golf accounts
for a significant number of Hennepin Parks annual visits, ranking 7t' out of the 19 system
activities for which Hennepin Parks tracks visitor occasions, with 207,000 in 1998 (See
Attachment G — Hennepin Parks System Activity Visitor Occasions.)
Outdoor recreation facilities are to be included in a "balanced system" which is described
as " an endeavor to create an equitable distribution of park resources and facilities
designed to serve the outdoor recreation needs and interests of its constituents."
Considering the inability of Hennepin Parks current golf facilities to meet the growing
interests of youth and beginning golfers, golf facilities as proposed for this site, are a
deficit in public recreation systems and Hennepin Parks. Policies go on to state that the
planning, acquisition, development and operations of the Park District shall reflect the
15
changing outdoor recreation needs and interests of the people balanced with the need to
protect and preserve natural resources.
Another important factor to consider is that golfing is a very self-sufficient system
activity in terms of individual participation and in consideration of the cost to the public
to provide for the activity. Golf has proven to be a financial contributor to the system
when most all activities are tax dependent. Golf is a life-long outdoor recreation activity
that can even be maintained by persons with some mobility impairments by using regular
or modified motorized carts. Golf facilities as designed and operated by Hennepin Parks
are sensitive to and enhanced by natural resources.
Why golf at this Regional Park
Hennepin Parks maintains a Master Plan for a System of Parks. The planning process,
resulting in this document, takes a look at the Mission of the Park District, parkland
classification, balanced system objectives, natural resource management objectives,
outdoor recreation needs and interests, physical site qualities, geographic location and
economic considerations. Eagle Lake Regional Park was acquired for active recreation
and is geographically positioned, in close proximity, to Elm Creek Park Reserve, French
and Fish Lake Regional Parks. It is not the intent of the Park District to create the same
type of facilities or implement the same natural resources management objectives at
every parkland. Eagle Lake is 230 acres and is naturally divided by its lakes. The
southern portion of the park is designated as a "Special Recreation Use Area," which is
suitable for development of enterprise facilities and those activities considered "other
system activities" such as golf.
Uniqueness of Proposed Facilities
The proposed golf features are aimed at the beginning, youth, and recreational golfers
with practice opportunities for golfers of all abilities. The intent is not to create a
facility to primarily serve "golf enthusiasts". Recreational golf related facilities include:
a driving range with teaching tee, practice area and green, pitch and putt course, and
executive length nine -hole golf course. The Program Statement reflects the following
objectives:
Provide a range of golf related outdoor recreation activities while minimizing the impact on existing
natural features. Efforts will be made to protect woodlands, wetlands, and water quality. As with
other Hennepin Parks activities, opportunities to promote environmental stewardship through outdoor
education messages and activities will be incorporated into the programming, literature, and
management of the enterprise facility.
Provide access to youth from a variety of socio-economic backgrounds and provide progressive youth
golfer development. Pro -active efforts will be made through programming and marketing, to
encourage youth participation. Through special marketing strategies, encourage participation by those
under -represented as golf participants, such as girls and minorities.
Provide golf features that encourage social recreation by families, individuals, groups, etc. It is
recognized that golf will be an important component of the experience, but that many participants are
also seeking a social recreation outing in this scenic environment.
16
For those who acquire advanced golf skills, provide opportunity for regular skill practice and serve as
a feeder facility to other more challenging public and private golf courses.
Provide a full range of instructional programs from youth beginners through private advanced golf
instruction. The course will feature opportunities for the use of new techniques in instructional
programs.
Provide affordable golf opportunities for the public. This facility will be a public enterprise; however,
pricing will be considerate of providing reasonable priced golf opportunities, particularly for youth
Provide golf enterprise activities that generate sufficient revenues to cover development, and operating
costs, provide for future rehabilitation and improvements, and financially contribute to the Park
District.
Provide comfortable, accessible golf opportunities for seniors and persons with restricted mobility or
stamina, who wish to walk the course for exercise, and provide carts to further enable accessibility.
Provide golf features for a variety of interests from practicing, playing, and recreational enjoyment.
Coordinate land -use planning with future non -golf Regional Paris recreation uses i.e. bicycle and
hiking path alignments.
The First Tee Program
The First Tee Program was initiated as a program of the World Golf Foundation in mid-
1997. It was introduced in the golf community in the late fall. The First Tee Board of
Directors is made up of representatives from the PGA, LPGA, USGA, PGA Tour and
Augusta National Golf Club. Other supporters include: the US Conference of Mayors,
National League of Cities, National Association of County Officials, National Recreation
and Park Association, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Bureau
of Land Management, National Golf Foundation, Golf Course Superintendents Association
of America, American Society of Golf Course Architects, Tiger Woods Foundation,
American Junior Golf Association, National Minority Golf Foundation, and National
Association of Junior Golfers.
The major premise of First Tee is to make the game of golf accessible for people from all
walks of life, with a strong emphasis on introducing kids of all races and economic
backgrounds to golf. The First Tee has identified as a goal, the selection of 100 sites
across the country by the year 2000 that would increase the availability of these types of
golf facilities. The First Tee is receiving commitments from golf organizations and
businesses to support this effort financially and programmatically in order that those
agencies can develop and operate the facilities affordably, resulting in affordable prices for
participants. The program has the following objectives:
Improve the game's accessibility, thereby making golf more available to people of
all social strata, particularly children.
Provide every child, regardless of race and economic background, the opportunity to
learn and play golf.
17
Instill the game's inherently positive values, such as honesty, integrity,
sportsmanship and self-discipline.
Teach children that dedication, sound values and education are keys to success.
Develop in participant's greater self-esteem, civic responsibility and confidence to
broaden their goals in life.
Develop a teaching curriculum that makes learning golf fun.
As Hennepin Parks staff was developing the Eagle Lake Project, inquiries were made to
The First Tee because their objectives were consistent with the Park District's Program
for the Eagle Lake golf facilities. The First Tee has expressed a strong interest in Eagle
Lake as a First Tee program location, contingent upon project approval. Hennepin Parks
would operate the facilities as it does its other recreational/enterprise facilities. The First
Tee association would bring numerous financial, programmatic and promotional
benefits to the facility.
Documented User Demand for Golf as an Outdoor Recreation Activity
Over 700,000 Minnesota residents played the game of golf in 1997. National Golf
Foundation (NGF) research shows that nearly 19 percent of Minnesota residents over the
age of 12 participate in golf. Minnesota's golf participation rate is the highest of any
state in the USA, reflecting golf's high level of popularity in Minnesota. NGF research
shows that all age groups, genders, and occupations enjoy golf in Minnesota. The
Minnesota Golf Association (MGF) notes that "golf s broad appeal is a particularly good
fit for the young population of Minnesota."
Nationally, golf is showing increases in popularity in the number of rounds golfed by
moderate golfers and in beginner and junior golfers. Results of a 1997 NGF survey
showed that beginner golfer participation increased 33% from 1996, with a compound
annual growth rate of 9.3% since 1993. Junior golfer participation increased 22% from
1996 to 1997 and exhibited a 6% compound annual growth rate since 1993. A January
29,1999 report in the publication Golf World discussed the need for affordable and
accessible golf opportunities. "Specifically, the biggest challenge is to make the game
more accessible to juniors, women and beginners. The game is hard enough — the
atmosphere shouldn't make it worse. Rounds of golf also need to be faster and cheaper."
In a recent survey, 52% of the women polled said they would like to learn the game in a
non -embarrassing environment. The report further states that this is even truer for kids
and that girls currently represent only 13 % of junior players.
Joseph Betide, President of the National Golf Foundation challenges golf courses; "We
need to teach more than just the golf swing. We need to teach more broadly the game —
the etiquette, history, and rules..... What would your level of enjoyment be if the
experience were based entirely on how you hit the ball? That's what we ask beginners to
do. But there is so much more to it. There is playing with your buddies, the history, the
18
tradition of the game." In a 1992 NGF Summit, the leading action recommendations for
the future included:
Emphasize Fun, Fitness and Family, and that golf is a game for all
Do a better job of retaining beginners by creating education and development
programs that are geared to beginners and that are fun and designed to
minimize embarrassment and intimidation.
The Industry should rethink the traditional 18 -hole or 9 -hole concept and
begin considering smaller parcels of land. The type of facilities most
mentioned were golf ranges par -3 and executive courses.
Hennepin Parks is also seeing increased demand for its golf facilities. Mote and more
young golfers and beginners are observed at driving ranges and on existing executive
courses, some participating at levels beyond their abilities and slowing play. The Glen
Lake Golf and Practice Center, which experienced its first full year of operation in 1998,
exceeded projections for rounds of play, driving range use and net revenue significantly.
It is difficult to find desirable tee -times at Hennepin Parks golf facilities and current
facilities are not addressing the increased demands of beginner and youth golfers.
The Junior Golf League at Baker National has grown rapidly from just 35 juniors in 1988
to its full capacity at 200 players by 1994. Overflow of junior golfers from Baker
National resulted in the neighboring Orono Municipal Golf Course to start a program. In
its first year, the Glen Lake golf and Practice Center Jr. League was designed for 120
participants, but immediately expanded to 150 to accommodate demand. In 1999, junior
golf program participants will be selected by a lottery system for the first time to ensure
equal opportunity, but many hopeful youth golfers will not be served.
Relationship to Existina/Proaosed Golf Facilities in the Area
Some of the comment forms referenced a concern over the relationship of this facility to
the "10 courses that can be found in a 10 -mile radius of the property." Concern is
expressed over whether there is a need for this project because of the presence of these
other facilities and if the proposed facility is economically sound, in light of the
competition. Some comments also raised the question of whether the public should
provide golf facilities when there are private entrepreneurs operating facilities, and
whether this project would negatively affect private business.
At the outset of the proposed project planning, Hennepin Parks contracted with the
consulting firm Links Systems to conduct an economic feasibility study. Neighboring
golf facilities were considered and identified by distance from the proposed facility, type
of golf features offered and current use. The consultant was directed to be conservative in
estimates. Participation percentages used throughout the study are less than identified by
the National Golf Foundation and typically found in golf course economic feasibility
studies, while it is a documented fact that Minnesotans exceed national participation rates
and those rates within the metropolitan area are even higher than Minnesota, in general.
The marketing study included the following information with respect to neighboring golf
facilities:
19
In a 0-3 mile area, two facilities were identified, one par -3 and one 18 -hole
regulation, and no driving ranges. The marketing study projects that from this
market area, 22% of all golfer activity predicted, based on population
demographic characteristics, would occur at Eagle Lake facilities.
Within a 3-5 mile radius of the proposed facilities three golf facilities are
found, one 18 -hole and two executive nines, with only one having a small
driving range. Within this 3-5 mile radius, 10% of total golfer activity was
presumed for the Eagle Lake facilities.
A new driving range was opened in southern Plymouth at the Hennepin
County Adult Correction Facility, but was not known to the consultant at the
time of the study. The demand for practice/driving range facilities would not
be affected significantly if this facility were factored in. Participants don't
drive far for driving range use. Driving ranges are used out of convenience, as
a practice venue for a short period of time, for family recreation, as a date
activity and for warm-up prior to golf games. Neither Baker National or Glen
Lake driving ranges were impacted by the Parker's Lake facility.
Within a 5-7 mile radius, seven 18 -hole courses were identified, two executive
courses, one par -three, one pitch and putt, and two private country clubs.
Two of the 18 -hole and 9 -hole facilities are found at the same golf course.)
Within this radius, only 2% of the market share was identified for Eagle Lake.
It is important to note that the market share identified does not presume that these
participation percentages will come from existing courses. Based on the demographics,
new users will be generated. Location, convenience, type of facility, difficulty of facility,
etc. all dictate the number, type and frequency of use.
Due to the conservative direction given to the consultant, the use impact coming from
Opus Business Park employees was not factored in. Employee numbers are not
available; however, the property has over 3,000 employee parking stalls. As has been
exhibited at Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center, use generated from employees near a
facility is considerable and desirable because much of the use is off-peak from traditional
weekend and evening play. The location of employee groups and the type of practice and
beginner facilities proposed at Eagle Lake, will generate considerable recreation
participation and income for the Eagle Lake project.
Some of the comments questioned the impact of the proposed Begin Oaks facility which
would be located west of Hwy 494 and south of Co. Rd. 47 which is currently under
consideration and planning and will be submitted to the City of Plymouth for review. At
this time, their proposal includes a Par 34 nine -hole course, with a small driving range.
Staff has discussed the project with the proposer and her consultant and both parties
concur that the market can accommodate these facilities and in fact, the Eagle Lake
project will build golfer demand and participation for the more difficult courses.
20
The market study shows that the golf facilities are economically viable and could support
their development, operation and show future revenue for the Park District to be used to
reduce taxpayer costs for other recreation facilities or natural resource management
programs.
Some comment forms questioned public involvement in the provision of golf as an
outdoor recreation activity. There is a long, rich tradition of public golf courses in the
nation and Minnesota. Of the daily fee courses in Minnesota, approximately 32% are
government owned. Within the metropolitan area, 50% of golf courses are publicly
owned, with most of the privately owned daily fee courses being found on the fringe
areas of the Metropolitan Area, not the inner city or closer -in suburbs. There are both
economic and public recreation service reasons that public provision of golf facilities is
historical and continues to be valid and desirable in many communities.
Only public golf facilities can be found within the Highway 494/694 loop, other than a
few private country clubs. Many privately owned golf facilities were sold, as the land
value increased. Owners are looking for the maximum economic return for their property
and once development expanded to their property area, it became more valued for
development. The economic return in selling the property for housing, industrial,
business development versus providing public golf opportunities was much greater. An
example of some of the facilities lost to development in past years include Joyners in
Brooklyn Park, Fords on Highway 55, Scott Tees in Brooklyn Center, the Highline
Driving Range, Westwood Hills Golf Course in St. Louis Park, and the Hilltop Golf
Course in Columbia Heights. Other privately owned golf courses such as Normandale in
Bloomington, Brookview in Golden Valley, Orono Golf Course, and even the Medina
Golf Course, which is now Baker National, were sold to government agencies in order to
be retained for public recreation.
From a public recreation service perspective golf is a lifelong recreational pursuit that can
be participated in by many age groups and ability levels. The game of golf promotes
health, fitness, relaxation and socialization. It is an individual and team sport that can be
played together by players with varying abilities. Interest and participation rates rank
high when compared to other publicly provided recreation activities, such as Hennepin
Parks experience as reported on page 14.
Courses provide community green space and environmental stewardship while providing
outdoor recreation enjoyment. Citizens are willing to pay reasonable fees to participate
in golf, while many other recreation activities are subsidized by taxpayers. The prime
motivations in the provision of public courses are to encourage community participation,
introduce people to golf, golfer development, and affordable golf. Profit is not the
overriding objective, yet these facilities most typically result, overtime, in revenue to the
government entity. Public golf courses also make communities attractive places to live
for many people and have positive effects on property values.
21
COST, TAX IMPACT AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
Comments related to financial issues were mixed. A small number (1.3%) of the
comments questioned the cost of the project and the accuracy of financial projections.
Twenty-eight percent stated that more courses were not needed, while 13.7% said that
neighboring courses were near capacity and more were needed. Competition with private
courses was expressed in 4.6% of comments. Support for golf facilities to reduce taxes
and generate some profits appeared in 7.3% of the comments.
Organized opposition statements stated that taxpayers would subsidize the golf operations
and led citizens to believe that taxpayers would pay for the facilities, through tax dollars.
This is not true. The Hennepin Parks Board of Commissioners has considered the
proposed project, only from an enterprise fund basis with revenue bonds as the source of
capital development dollars. Enterprise operations are appropriate for the provision of
system outdoor recreation activities when, according to Hennepin Parks Policy
Statement, facilities can generate revenue to meet operating costs or revenues to exceed
operating costs.
For example, the financing for the Baker National Golf Course improvements in 1988-89
was provided through revenue bonds. Typically, golf operations take a few years to be in
a position to totally fund the debt service payment and operating costs. The projection
for Baker National was four years, however, Baker successfully achieved full debt
service and operating cost in two years. Baker pays for course improvements and
contributes cash to the Hennepin Parks general fund. The Glen Lake Golf and Practice
Center is also operated as an enterprise fund. Again, the financial projections for this
enterprise showed that it would take few years before revenues achieve both actual debt
service and operating costs. In its first full year of operation in 1998, this facility far
exceeded its financial and use projections. Net revenue was estimated at $7,000 but
actual net revenue achieved was over $210,000, enabling an increase in the debt payment.
Most government owned golf facilities are operated as enterprises and are able, over
time, to not only pay operating and improvement costs, but provide financial return to the
governmental unit. It is not uncommon in public recreation to have some activities that
make money to subsidize expenses of other activities. Also, some larger government
recreation agencies operate more than one golf facility (i.e. Hennepin Parks, Ramsey
County, and the Cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul, Bloomington) and are able to realize
economies in staffing, equipment and purchasing, resulting in lower operating costs.
The independent economic feasibility study prepared for Hennepin Parks has been
challenged by the Save Eagle Lake Park Committee. Hennepin Parks contracted with a
professional golf course consulting firm, Links Systems, to conduct the study. Standard
methods for golf course feasibility studies were used and as previously noted the
consultant was directed to be conservative. The consultant was also provided actual cost
data, based on Hennepin Parks operating costs, rather than using state or national
averages. The intent of the study was to determine if the proposed golf related facilities
identified in Hennepin Parks Program Statement, could meet the program objectives,
including affordable golf rates, while paying its operating and debt service, and in the
zz
future provide non -tax revenue to the Park District. Study results show that the facilities
proposed, combined with impact of their synergistic relationship (having the combination
of driving range, practice area, pitch and putt, and executive course all in one location),
will result in achieving financial objectives. Hennepin Parks will play a positive role in
golfer development and create future market strength for neighboring 9 and 18 -hole
courses.
The Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center marketing study identified eight 9 -hole courses,
seven 18 -hole course and 7 driving ranges within a 040 mile market radius. The Eagle
Lake marketing study identifies a similar number of facilities (adding in the Parker's
Lake Driving Range and proposed Begin Oaks Golf Course), with seven 9 -hole courses,
nine 18 -hole courses and seven driving ranges. The Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center
has been well received, experiencing 36,000 rounds of golf in its first. full year of
operation and over 50,000 driving range tokens sold, greatly exceeding financial
projections. The facilities, location and market of the proposed Eagle Lake facility are
equally strong, if not stronger.
For evaluation in the marketing study, a preliminary development cost of $3.1 million
dollars was used. This cost is consistent with recent development costs for similar golf
facilities, including Glen Lake, but a more complete estimate will be prepared upon
completion of course routing plans and environmental studies. Development costs would
be paid for with revenue bonds to be repaid by course revenues. The Park Districts
Board of Commissioners may also use revenue bond financing to fund the proposed
recreational trail and picnic facilities and expect golf facility revenues to pay for these
developments.
Attachment A
Eagle Lake Regional Park
Phase I Development
Other Correspondence
Minnesota Golf Assoc. Inc. Letter of support for the project. Believes that this
project will provide a good learning facility for young
golfers. It also assures the public that Hennepin Parks has
demonstrated sensitive environmental management in the
creation of other facilities.
Minnesota River Valley Letter of opposition with concerns about "cutting down
Audubon Chapter hundreds of trees".
The Fairway Foundation Letter of support for creating facilities for junior golfers.
Junior golfers are not allowed at many courses and only at
certain times at others.
Minnesota Turf & Grounds Letter of support stating the golf courses are community
Foundation assets. Many new golf courses can offer natural resource
awareness as well as offer community recreation. Offers
technical information on use of pesticides and fertilizers
on golf courses.
Audubon Chapter of Letter of opposition with concern that woodland and
Minneapolis prairie habitat will be destroyed and water quality
impacted negatively.
National Audubon Society Letter stating that resolution passed by their
Environmental Committee opposing the project.
Minnesota Section of the Expressing Priority for Junior Golf Program Expansion
PGA and desire to work with Eagle Lake Project
Save Pike/Eagle Lk Introduction & Summary Statement
Committee
Attachment B
PETITION SOLICITATION
LITERATURE
01-19-1999 10:09AM FRENCH PARK UC 6125509460 P.02
bi•.'.e;, ,,.x .. .•.. .."" .•.. st•' e.C.... ,^•;.. $. w's
Save the Pike/Eagle Lake Open S
The Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District has proposed a plan to develop the 230 acre Eagle Lake
property (which lies to the West of Eagle Lake north of Co. Rd. 10 between Plymouth and Maple Grove)
into a small 9 hole (par 31) golf course. If approved, this beautiful, wild uea will be forever lost.
We believe that the proposal is misguided, unnecessary, and fails to consider the many alternative uses
appropriate for this property. We urge you to become involved.
Need for a Golf Course: Currently, there are 10 golf courses within 10 miles of the property. We are not
convinced that the demand exists for another course within this area, particularly with an 11th, private
course planned for the area. It is unlikely that golfing enthusiasts will A, use this extremely short course.
Competition with Private Sector. A private developer has proposed to build a Begin Oaks, a 9 hole (par
34) golf course and driving range, within 4 miles of this property Gust west of I-494 and south of Hwy
47). This proposal is currently before the Plymouth City Council. At a minimum, prudence dictates that
the Parks Board not develop Pike/Eagle Lake until the demand for an additional golf course is
demonstrated by the economic success or failure of this private endeavour.
Impact Upon Water Quality: A successful golf course requires one of the highest application rates for
ferdli2cr and pesticides of all land uses (reducing the appeal for passive users of the property) The pro-
posal will negatively impact water quality for Pike & Eagle Lakes as well as the Shingle Creek Water shed.
There Are Alternate Uses: If the Parks Board is determined to develop Pike/Eagle Lake, the Board
should consider the following alternative, which would not preclude a golf course at some future date.
Leashless Pet Park There are more dog owners than there are golfers. Success with similar areas in
H&uWofn__ountyproves t erech 'is mage deman3 frompet owners: - ' • _
Unpaved Running Paths, Fitness Couree/Trail, Mountain Biking & Cross Country Siding:
The size and wild nature of the property makes these highly desirable uses, yet low cost alternatives
to a golf course. They will minimally impact the extensive wooded areas in the property.
Passive Uses such as Bird Watching, & Wilderness: This exceptionally beautiful area is ideal for
people who simply want to escape urban/suburban life and have a walk in the woods.
We are convinced that there is a tremendous demand for non -golf uses of this property, which will be
diminished if a golf course is built. We believe that he Parks Board has failed to consider alternative uses.
Minimal development will allow for the demand for these alternative uses to be proven, before a final
decision is made on the economic viability of a second 9 hole golf course in the area.
We favor development of parking and signage to let people know this property exists. The Parks Board is
interest in revenue generation. We believe that permitting some of the alternate uses, such as a leashless
Pet permit and access fees, provides a better cost benefit ratio for the Board.
Again, a golf course is not precluded by this alternative proposal.
Please Makeyour views knoxn to the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District by
attending the Public lnformatron Open House Jan. 28, 7-9.-00^ Hennepin Parks
Headquarters Offi.-4 French Creek Regional Park, 12611 Co. Road P. Ply»rout&
MNI1441, and send a letter outlinin our o osition with a gZft to us.
For more information contact: Sam Garst - 557-7174 Ken Wendinger & Liz Brannan- 497-2745
Tom & Phyllis Mahan - 558-5440 Charles Meyer - 546-7026 Jan Jorgens & Scott Linge - 525-5992
Bill Girnle - 553-2003 Paul Schupanitz - 557-9356 Ginny Black - 509-5004
TOTAL P.02
Jan 22nd,1999
A Petition to:
The Hennepin County Parks Commissioners
We, the undersigned residents of Plymouth, strongly object to
the proposed development of a golf course facility, in the
present wilderness area just South of Pike Lake, and just North
of County Rd. 10 (Bass Lake Rd.), at the intersection with
Zachary Lane.
A. We would like to see the wilderness look preserved.
B. Development of a golf course in that area would necessitate
the cutting down of thousands of trees, would interfere with
wildlife, and result in environmental damage through the
introduction of fertilizers & pesticides needed to develop&
and maintain a golf course facility.
C. We object to the use of pubic funds for the benefit of a few,
rather then a larger group of Hennepin County residents.
If the Commissioners in their wisdom feel that this area requires
development, let it be a 'Park Area', which would preserve the
natural wilderness look, be a bufferagainst the sprawling
Commercial Development immediately to the East of that 'site', and
benefit a much larger group of people. Let it be Walking Paths,
Bike Paths, Ski Trails and even a Picnic Area. Do not destroy the
quiet, natural, semi -rural look of that area.
Signatures of individuals who associate themselves with this
petition will appear on the attached sheet (s).
A GOLF, COURSE ON -THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAGLE
AND PIKE LAKES =,
The Hennepin County Park District wants
toR
build, s 9 hole golf course within an
undeveloped Hennepin County Park located north of Bass Lake Rd between TrentonandDeerwoodLanes.., .
SOUNDS. LIKE A GOOD IDEA. BUT CONSIDER THIS:
1. -Should a government agency compete against rivate citizens who
own and pay taxes on theirolf courses? g .:.:
r -^ as ,.
2. Hundreds of trees -will be }destroyed to build this golf course. Manyx -`f streesare6inchesmdiameterorIagerandover 50 ears old_
3. Habitat for deer, birds, plant life will be destroyed despite`the fact ,_
that citizens have yrepeatedly asked _to ° have''primitive wildlife areas
preserved for < o
everyone, not dust a
4. On 'a dawn to 'dusk `day about %,golfe, would use this coursefor
r> about 6 months`of the ear. If this ares were nsed exclusivel for icnics
hiking, basketball, croquet, `swings,: .pitch Viand? putt 'off course ahA-Ateachingichippingarea.- etc.} as, many as 500_people per day 4did,-use this _ area during those 6 'month's.
4. .. JOwners a local golf .course ,ai a proposed golfing fee will notpayforexpensesof -a "9 -.hole cows a kresul',
subsidizin a sport for
L ` " t, 7ttaxpayers -_will be'
S
ga few. The •Par Board_ says it will make a profitandsubsidizeother 'park activities` ` ` ` ' WhTwould the park destroy a wildlife
habitat in order to a for ' ro ramsLat teach;us toy' rotect our naturalPy _P g.P
resources • That seems like a contradiction to us ' ""'' ,
ti .^S,SIMIP''Y.: 'c yn0.:MR_,y,_ -
Our committee asks you to bring'5 people to voice their"objections to thisf, project on Monday, January 11 or 28,_ - PM at the French RegionalParkat12615CountyRd9, Plymouth, 55411" or submit t le 'written `comments
to Margie Ostlund before Feb. 5th. -
You tiom Ken Wendinger
PIYmo_ nth, MN (Committee Chairman)
Attachment C
Action Alerts
As distributed to local members by the
Sierra Club — North Star Chapter
Audubon Chapter of Minneapolis
JMri i J 9979
8RLP -'SAYS ZA6LZ_. AJfX-PAAaui•
The Suburban Hennepin Regional _ Park SBoard has proposed to build a 9 -
hole golf course with clubhouse and;other facilities in 'the Plymouth
r -
portion of Eagle Lake Regional Park (south cfPgce Lake). " This plan will
require the destruction of hundreds of , ftes end will result, in the loss
of wildlife habitat and recreation apportunittes, such ,as {hiking, skiing,
birdwatching, etc, w-.YEIiC- II .spian please plaq to
attend an open house hosted bX the.Pads' Board 'and -voice your •opinion:
r. ,•"a . .
ThursdaT, Jin. 280 X00 pm s
Hennepin Parks Office - 7renc6, Regional Part ,
12615 , CL Rd. %741et 7-
r
You can also submit wiritten oommmta tD 'the address
above or fax - them t 5Sr-328i. ` :ao , Attwdow. Dongla:`Bryaat)
wi': , - ":'•-
e ;',° ca -,'Fri-.•`
For more infarmahon, please call Meyer at 6.12-546-7026 _ar
Scott Liege ti t f 42 S 5991'", i tit
XA ` `sierra quo -JAN 1.9199 -- .>
Nort Star ter.
t313 5th S 3246
Minns'- MNUs.
2
y''-.+„-
9,99_9.. ''-'_ ...L
Mrd
23747871 2709 S 0499 0105 2914 1
Mr DouSlas Bryant
Hennepin Parks
126 15 Countyy Road 9
Plymouth, M! 55441-1248
IA
I i l..i.E,l l l I II I1 EJ 1 lI I II,I hIL i
i' ALERT• GOLF COURSE PBOPOSBD FOR EAGLE LASE PARK
f
AUDUBON CHAPTER OF MINNEAPOLIS
ACTION ALERT
January 21, 1999
Dear Auduboners:
The Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District, which includes parks such
as Murphy-Hanerhan, Cleary Lake, Baker, and Elm Creek, has proposed to
develop a significant portion of Eagle Lake Regional Park into a 9 hole
golf course. In addition, there will be a pitch and putt course, putting
greens, teaching/ chipping area, driving range, and practice tee
associated with the golf operations.
It must be noted that there will be two picnic area, 2.5 miles of trail
and a boat launch area providing access to Eagle Lake. However, these
activities are a very small part of the project.
The Audubon Chapter of Minneapolis, at its January Board meeting, passed
a resolution opposing the golf course. They opposed project because they
believe that there are recreational uses that would preserve more of the
natural characteristics of the area and serve a greater number of the
public. It should be made very clear that while the Audubon Chapter of
Minneapolis would prefer the property be left in as natural a state as
possible and is not opposing recreational use of the property.
A citizens group has formed to oppose the proposed golf. The group
consists of residents near the park area, as well as, Audubon and the
Sierra Club members. Their reasons for opposition are:
there are other recreational uses that would preserve the natural
characteristics of the park and provide recreational opportunities to a
larger number of people,
the ongoing negative environmental impacts of fertilizers and
pesticides used to maintain the golf course,
there are`10 golf courses within 10 miles of Eagle Park,
an 11th private course of the exact same type has been proposed less
than 2.5 miles to the west,
initial negative environmental impacts of developing the site (loss of
trees, wildlife, erosion and water quality),
golfing enthusiasts are unlikely to use such a short course, and
the appropriateness of the public sector providing private sector
services.
The uses that the citizen group have put forward are: 1) an enclosed area
for running dogs off leash, 2) unpaved running paths, .3) fitness
course/trail, 4) mountain biking, 5) cross country skiing, 6) more trails
for bird watching.
Both the _Audubon Chapter of Minneapolis and the Citizens Group have no
doubt that there is a .need for more golf courses.. However, we believe
that there is an equal or greater need non -golf uses. We urge you to
attend the Public Information Open House on January 28, 1999, at 7 PM,
French Regional Park, 12615 Co. Rd. 9, Plymouth, (general info. #.509-
9000) and write a letter outlining your opposition. Comment deadline is
February 5, 1999.
If you can not attend the meeting or write a letter we urge you to
contact your Hennepin Parks Commissioner and voice your opposition. On
the back are the names, phone numbers for each commissioner and areas
they serve.
For more information you can call Tom & Phyllis Mahan, 612-58-5440 (h) or
Ginny Black, 612-557-1367 (weekends only) or 651-215-0284 (days).
Attachment D
Eagle Lake
Comment Summary, Codes, Frequencies and Percentages
A total number of 153 comment forms or letters were received from individual citizens. All public
comments were reviewed and entered into a database. Common issues were identified and coded into 53
comment summary statements, then grouped into seven major catagories. The percentage figures reflect
the frequency the coded comments appear in the comment forms and letters.
Code % n Comment Summary
Negative
01 39.2 60 Against golf, opposed, object, outraged
02 2.6 4 Leave park undeveloped.
11 35.3 54 Use by trail, nature enjoyers, restricted by golf, not in a regional park facility,
how was demand determined, facilities for pet exercise, mtn. biking, traditional
park acitivities.
12 6.5 10 Patron, use all the parks
13 5.9 9 Against encouraging kids into golf, youth access to nature not golf, preserve for
future generations
14 2.6 4 How will you ensure access /transportation for "those youth", PGA LPGA<
USGA interested in their financial future, not youth, it is a crutch, youth won't
be served, how to generate revenue and make it affordable.
15 1.3 2 No lighted driving range
Support
16 19.6 30
17 17.6 27
18 31.5 48
19 2.0 3
20 4.6 7
21 1.3 2
22 0.6 1
23 0.6 1
Access for other activities good, add trail, trail along 63`x, beach, sledding, in-
line hockey, tennis, pet exercise, x.c. trails, play area
Youth/senior golf positive, not difficult, ensure access for youth, access for all
Support golf course, great plan, do it!, would be a great neighbor, good for
community
Add a driving range, putting/practice ok
Most of Hennepin Parks for hiking..., golf provides for diversity, regional park
to serve many
Champion length 9 rather than executive, do more make it 18 holes.
Bigger clubhouse, food
No pet exercise area
Development Ouestions/Issues
30 2.6 4 Concerned about traffic on roads, traffic management, provide access through
industrial park
31 2.6 4 How many parking spaces, include parking on 63rd, access from east
41 7.2 11 Lake access issues, need lake access, study current use,
42 1.3 2 Open channel between Eagle and Pike
43 0.6 1 Don't develop near lakes, keep shore natural
45 2.6 4 Don't use island, don't fill channel, concern for island habitat
48 0.6 1 Develop only south third
49 0.6 1 Is unaquired property a problem?
50 0.6 1 New Hope should offer their golf course for a regional park development
Environmental Concerns
51 47.0 72 Keep as a natural area, make a wilderness forever, preserve, Hennepin Parks is
to preserve, would cause damage/destruction to natural area, teach about
protection of natural resources, public access to environmental impact study,
MM
90
only public land is kept natural, long term environmental cost of development,
52 13.2 20 can't go back, open space is rare in developing area.
Chemical use, impact on aquatic plants
53 0.7 1
54 24.3 37
Air pollution from maintenance equipment
Protect wood lot, wood lot destruction, concerned for trees, don't cut trees5525.0 38 Wildlife concerns, birds, habitat, wildlife corridor
56 2.6 4 Meadow/prairie protection
57 4.6 7 Find a pasture to develop, use land that needs to be cleaned up, golf doesn't
93
need a scenic area
58 15.1 23 Water consumption, destruction, wetland concern, water quality, fish591.3 2 Geese control
Environmental Positive/Su¢aestien_s
Disappointed in Glen Lake
60 6.6 10
61 5.3 8 Environmental stewardship positive, environmentally sound, develop with care
62 0.7 1
Hennepin Parks/ ker utilize few chemicals, Audubon support
Use native grasses
63 0.7 1 Improve shore fishing
Cost/Fees/Taxes/Fees
abuse of land.
80 1.3 2 Cost of development a negative, financial projections not accurate814.6 7 Shouldn't compete with private courses, keep golf in private sector8227.6 42 Other courses are near by, under used courses, plenty of courses, who would be
served, we do not need more courses, not need for pitch and putt, want to see
market analysis
83 13.8 21 Most courses near capacity, more community access, more community courses,
convenient to many, need more courses
84 5.9 9 Affordable access, season membership?, discounts to locals, scholarships,
transportation for access
85 7.3 11 Support government and golf, reduce tax burden, profit, great investment
86 1.3 2 Charge access fees for trail use and other activities rather than develop for golf,
other activities have financial benefit without big cost8711.8 18 Don't reduce tax through golf, tax to protect land, no tax dollars to develop golf,
golf for profit not in Hennepin Parks mission, low development (trails ...) is low
cost, there will be increased taxes as a result of cause, taxes for water quality
not to pay for golf
88 0.7 1 Tax impact on locals need to be clear
89 1.3 2 Shouldn't be private developer
MM
90 1.3 2 Save the park/Eagle/Pike lake
91 0.7 1 Great foresight to purchase land
92 2.0 3 Commend Hennepin Parks, wonderful park system
93 2.6 4 Extend comment period, didn't like open house format
94 0.7 1 Disappointed in Glen Lake
95 2.6 4 How will you control drug use it is going on there now, comment on current
abuse of land.
99 0.7 1 Unknown
2/8/99
wp/mdlaglecode
Attachment E
HENNEPIN PARKS
PESTICIDE AND FERTILIZER POLICY STATEMENT
GOALS
Hennepin Parks will utilize pesticides and fertilizers in a manner that provides maximum
protection for its natural resources. All practices and procedures associated with the
procurement, handling, application, and storage of fertilizers and pesticides will reflect
environmentally sound principles and comply with Park District regulations and State and
Federal laws.
Park employee and park user safety will be inherent in all activities related to fertilizer and
pesticide use and an effective monitoring and evaluation program will be a component of all
applications.
OBMCTTVES
The following policy objectives enable Hennepin Parks to manage a pesticide and fertilizer
use program which meets all of its stated goals:
To minimize or eliminate the use of pesticides and fertilizers whenever feasiible to
promote good environmental stewardship
To implement Integrated Pest Management Programs including
Correctly analyzing all pest problems
Properly determining when pests are a serious threat to the resource or simply a
nuisance
Promoting the use of disease resistant plants and animals
To manage Park District turfgraMs areas at acceptable levels to provide healthy public
recreational opportunities without the excess use of fertilizers and pesticides and to
educate the public on the reasons for those management decisions.
To reduce the movement of pesticides and fertilizers "off. site" to protect:
Park users and employees
Surface and groundwater
Non -target species
To reduce public and a nployte exposure to pesticides by.
Minimizing the storage of pesticides and fertilizers on Park District properties
Reducing the generation of hazardous waste
Ensuring that applicators have proper training in pesticide use
To provide examples for public education of successful pest control practices without the
use of pesticides
Z_
ASSESSING THE NEED FOR PEST CONTROL OR FERTILIZATIO
Initiallv, an accurate evaluation must be completed to determine if a pest problem or
fertilization need actually exists. Pest control efforts or fertilizer applications shall not be
commenced until it is determined that a real pest problem or nutrient deficiency exists which
if not controlled will have a negative impact on the management of Hennepin Parks, lands or
waters.
after determining that a problem exists, the pest control program will employ Integrated Pest
Management (IPM) techniques. IPM uses biological, cultural, mechanical/physical, and
chemical practices to control pests, although priority is given to non -chemical management
alternatives. A "no action" alternative must also be considered. The control practices of
choice and the methods of application will be those that will effectively control the pest
species and minimize damage to non -target organisms and the environment. The use of
chemical control methods within integrated pest management will be limited and will be
strictly regulated.
PESTICIDE USE
When pesticides are used, the product selected must be the safest effective pesticide available
with respect to acute and chronic toxicity, environmental persistence and groundwater
contamination risk. All pesticides used in Hennepin Parks facilities must be registered for
the specified use by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Minnesota Department of
Agriculture (MDA). The safety of Park District employees, the public, non -target organisms
and the environment will be given primary consideration in the selection and use of anypesticide. Pesticides will only be applied by qualified applicators with appropriate
supervision by MDA licensed employees.
Park District employees must not use, store, handle, or dispose of a pesticide, rinsate,
pesticide container, or pesticide application equipment in a mantm that:
is inconsistent with labeling
endangers humans, food, livestock, fish, wildlife, or beneficial insects
causes unreasonable adverse effects on the environment
directs a pesticide beyond the boundaries of the target treatment site or results in
damage to adjacent property
results in pesticide application on a human
Park District employees s= mix or apply pesticides unless:
they are wearing appropriate clothing
they have received proper training in the safe use of the pesticide product(s) involved
they are a MDA licensed applicator or are working under the supervision of a MDA
licensed applicator
Treatment sites will be posted as the pesticide label or other ordinances require.
FERTILIZER USE
Appropriate soil tats will be taken to accurately determine mineral deficiencies and need for
fertilizer amendments. Application rates of fertilizers will not exceed recommendations of
the soil test results. Fertilizers inadvertently applied to hard surfaces such as sidewalks and
roadways will be removed. No fertilizers will be applied within 20 feet of a lake or stream.
The safety of Park District employees, the public, and the environment will be given primary
consideration in the selection and use of any fertilizer. The selection process will identify the
most appropriate organic or inorganic fertilizer product for each specific usage.
Fertilizer application will only occur after appropriate review of the proposed use by the
Water Quality Manager and Park Maintenance Manager. This review will consider location,
slope, intended use of the area, as well as soil test results.
ae11T4:
Hennepin Parks will procure only those pesticides which have been approved for use by the
Forestry Manager and in amounts necessary to meet defined pest control objectives.
Container size of requisitioned pesticides must be appropriate to project size to reduce the
need for excessive handling and storage of the product.
New pesticide products shall not be ordered and/or accepted for delivery until a Material
Safety Data Sheet for that product has been received by the Park District:. This information
will be provided to the applicators to comply with the Minnesota "Right to Know" Act.
Hennepin Parks will procure only those fertilizers which have been approved for use by the
Water Quality Manager and in amounts necessary to meet defined plant management
objectives.
HANDLING
Employees will receive .training on the proper handling of pesticides and fertilizers to ensure
that safety will be the top priority in handling these products. Park District employees who
procure, distribute, use, or store pesticides will utilize direct delivery, container size
limitations, reduced volumes, and other appropriate mechanism to minimize handling
requirements. Pesticides will be handled in accordance with specific label and Material
Safety Data Sheet instructions and suggestions.
STORAGE
All pesticides and fertilizers shall be stored in a secure manner that does not allow the
products to escape packaging or storage areas and endanger human health, contaminate
other products or harm the environment. Storage methods and areas shall be selected with
safety as the primary consideration.
4 -
Storage shall be in compliance with all directions listed on the manufacturer's labeling, and "a
in compliance with all pertinent laws, rules, regulations and local ordinances. Storage
buildings and areas shall have equipment to effectively and safely handle any emergenciesthatmightbereasonablyexpectedtooccur. Storage of pesticides is permitted only inapprovedstoragebuildingsorareas. Incompatible hazardous substances and pesticides willnotbestoredinthesamearea.
DISPOSAL
Disposal of pesticides and fertilizers and their containers will be done in accordance with
label instructions and applicable state and federal laws and regulations. All liquid pesticide
containers or other rinsable containers will be triple rinsed immediately when emptied and
the rinsate will be added to the sprayer tank for proper disposal. All employees involved in
applying pesticides and fertilizers will be trained in proper disposal practices.
SPILLS
Appropriate cleanup supplies and equipment shall be maintained to handle pesticide and
fertilizer spills incurred by Park District employees. All hazardous materials spills/releases
on Park District properties shall be reported immediately to the Minnesota Duty Officer and
appropriate Hennepin Parks staff and the materials spilled shall be disposed according to the
appropriate state agency's directive.
PESTICIDE USE BY OUTSIDE GROUPS ON HENNEPIN PARKS pgppEM
Any pesticide application done on Park District property by conwwrcial pesticide applicators
will be performed under contract with Hennepin Parks. Contractors must adhere to the
intent and meaning of Hennepin Parks Pesticide Use and Manageatent Policy.
Pesticides used by outside agencies for right-of-way maintenance or mosquito control
purposes on Park District properties must be approved for use by Hennepin Parks.
9hl /acfttz93xw/ 13.16
Memorandum
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJ:
Hennepin Parks
Margie Ostlund
Barbara Fisher
Attachment F
January 26, 1999
Eagle Lake Phase I Use Estimates, note these do not include Phase II development
Summer Trail Use — This will function as an internal park trail, not a segment
Occasions Visits
of the North Hennepin Trail Corridor.
2.2 miles of paved trail X 60* people per mile X 63 Weekend/holidays
X 2 (weekend use = weekday use). 13,600 noted in prior master plan. 16,600 16,600
Winter Facilities
2.8 miles of groomed x.c. trail X 30* people X 24 weekend days X
2 (weekend use = weekday use). Same use as reported in prior master
Plan 4,000 4,000
Based on use of other Hennepin Parks sliding areas, the fact that it will
be lighted and proximity to population base. 2,400 reported in prior
master plan for winter play including sledding. 4,000 4,000
Reservation Picnicking — Two shelters capacity of 60 each
60 people X 2 sites X no turn over X 33 holidays/weekends X
1.5 (weekend use more than weekday use). 150,900 occasions are
noted in the prior master plan with 50 acres of picnic developed 24
of which is reservation. 5,900 1,500
Golf and Pitch and Putt
Golf estimate from similar facility at Glen Lake 80,000 80,000
Pitch and putt (management estimate) 20,000 20.000
126,100 Total
Comuarison of Visits to other Regional Parks (1997)
Bryant Lake R. P. 58,800
Fish Lake R. P. 71,000
French R. P. 208,000
Lake Minnetonka R. P. 60,800
Factors from Metropolitan Councils Regional Park Infrastructure Study, 1989
FAUSERS\MR2\WP\Eag1e Use Estimate.doc
Attachment G
Summary Park District Outdoor Recreation Use Activity
Activity Tvoe Number of Visitor Occasions*
Picnicking 492
Swimming 439
Play Area 405
Bicycling 369
Hiking 234
General Use 215
Gong 207
Boating 190
Fishing 145
Downhill Skiing 129
Programming 106
Ski Touring 75
Skating 74
Public Camping 69
Group Camping 41
Snowmobiling 27
Sledding 8
Snowshoeing 4
Ski Jumping 2
Numbers approximate to closest 1,000. All use figures are 1997, except golf which show 1998 because a
new 1998 marked the first full year of the Glen Lake operation
Baker National 87,100 Cleary Lake 40,000 Glen Lake 80,400
Eagle Lake Regional Park
Special Recreation Use Area
MASTER\SYS\USERS\SH4\WP\EAGLELK.GLRSummary Park District Outdoor Recreation Use
Activity.doc