Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Planning Commission Packet 02-15-2017
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY, February 15, 2017 WHERE: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Plymouth City Hall 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 CONSENT AGENDA All items listed on the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PUBLIC FORUM 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve the February 1, 2017 Planning Commission meeting minutes. B. Daikin Applied Americas. Approve a site plan amendment and variances for building and parking additions for property located at 13600 Industrial Park Boulevard. (2016101) C. Thomas and Elaine Chirhart. Approve a variance for impervious surface coverage for a home addition and driveway reconfiguration for property located at 2635 West Medicine Lake Drive. (2017002) D. Skyline Design. Approve a variance for impervious surface coverage for property located at 941 Zanzibar Lane. (2017005) 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Creekside Plymouth LLC. Rezoning and preliminary plat for "Creekside Woods Phase II" for property located at 17125 and 17135 Old Rockford Road. (2016098) (Continued from the February 1, 2017 meeting.) 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Election of Planning Commission Chair and Vice Chair for 2017. B. Accept the 2017 Work Program. C. Appointment of Planning Commissioner to serve as liaison to the Park and Recreation Advisory Committee. 8. ADJOURNMENT Proposed Minutes Planning Commission Meeting S� February 1, 2017 MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Chair Marc Anderson, Commissioners Donovan Saba, Jim Kovach, Julie Witt, Bryan Oakley, David Witte and Kira Vanderlan MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Planning Manager Barb Thomson, Senior Planner Marie Darling OTHERS PRESENT: Council Member Ned Carroll 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. 2. OATH OF OFFICE — Kira Vanderlan 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. PUBLIC FORUM 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION by Commissioner Oakley, seconded by Commissioner Witte, to approve the February 1, 2017 Planning Commission Agenda. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION approved. 6. CONSENT AGENDA A. APPROVAL OF THE JANUARY 18, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES B. MICHAEL STEINHAUSER (2016102) Approve a variance to the rear yard setback for an addition for property located at 10610 540' Avenue. MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Kovach, to approve the consent agenda. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION approved. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Proposed Minutes 1 of 3 Meeting of February 1, 2017 A. CREEKSIDE PLYMOUTH, LLC (2016098) Acting Chair Anderson introduced the request by Creekside Plymouth LLC for a rezoning and preliminary plat for "Creekside Woods Phase IP' for property located at 17125 and 17135 Old Rockford Road. Planning Manager Thomson stated that the applicant is continuing to work on revisions to the plat and has requested that the Planning Commission continue this matter to the February 15, 2017 meeting. Acting Chair Anderson continued the public hearing to the February 15, 2017 meeting. 8. NEW BUSINESS A. RICARDO AND CYNTHIA ARMIJO (2016100) Acting Chair Anderson introduced the request by Ricardo and Cynthia Armij o for variances to allow a carport in the front yard for property located at 1035 West Medicine Lake Drive. Senior Planner Darling gave an overview of the staff report. Commissioner Witte asked for more information on the roof design of the carport. Senior Planner Darling replied that staff finds that the roof pitch of the carport is not the same or similar to the roof design of the home. Commissioner Kovach asked for more information on why the variance would be detrimental to the public welfare. Senior Planner Darling replied that the concern would be that the carport is 50 percent larger than allowed, the contents could be visible to the adjacent property, and is not consistent with the ordinance and therefore could open the door for other property owners to undertake similar actions or discourage other property owners from investing in their property. Commissioner Oakley noted that the staff report states that the work began without a permit and asked for additional information. Senior Planner Darling stated that staff received a complaint and upon investigation found the carport under construction without the required permit. Acting Chair Anderson introduced Ricardo Armij o, the applicant, who stated that they have owned their property for approximately 16 years, noting that they tore down the old house to construct the new house. He stated that the driveway is very steep. He stated that they always want to keep the quality and appearance of their home to the best of their ability and constructed the carport for their boat to replace the canvas covered structure they had been using. He stated that the carport blends in with their property because of the matching red roofs. He noted that they will eventually be repairing the roof of their home and replacing the tiles with a metal roof to approximate the same pitch as the carport. He stated that the neighbor who called the city thought that they were on his property, and that is why he called. He noted that they were not Proposed Minutes 2 of 3 Meeting of February 1, 2017 aware that they would need a permit and have completed numerous improvements that did not require a permit. He stated that they chose the location for the carport in an attempt to avoid disruption of the neighbors. He stated that the materials are of quality workmanship, and they plan to put wood slats around the structure as well as plant shrubbery to screen the carport. Commissioner Oakley asked if the applicant spoke with his neighbor about the design decisions before construction. Mr. Armijo stated that they did not. He explained that they believed they were within their property lines and therefore did not discuss it. He explained that there was a shaky situation with one of the neighbors when he first moved in as they are a family and he is a single man. Acting Chair Anderson asked why they did not build a garage. Mr. Armijo replied that the cost was prohibitive, and they believed the carport would sufficiently protect the boat while enhancing the look of the property. Acting Chair Anderson asked if anyone wished to speak on this item. No one came forward. Commissioner Witte stated that he appreciates the design to provide an improved structure and wished that the applicant had followed the process but was pleased to see the applicant acknowledge that fact that they failed to obtain a building permit. Commissioner Oakley stated that there are several issues in question. He stated that he does not have any major concerns with the design of the carport. He stated that it appears that the applicant is not interested in putting in something that will detract from the appearance of the property. He noted that there are dozens of houses along Medicine Lake Road that have structures/carports in the front yard. He noted that the size of the carport gives him pause as it seems double the size that would be needed. He stated that he is most concerned with the setback from the neighbor's property. He noted that without the input of the neighbor, he would have a hard time supporting the request. Mr. Armijo replied that he spoke with the neighbors to the north and south, and they have commented that it is a nice structure, and they do not have issues with the placement. He noted that the initial concern from the neighbor was that the carport was on his property but after the surveyor came out, he was fine with the placement. MOTION by Commissioner Witte, seconded by Commissioner Vanderlan, to approve the request by Ricardo and Cynthia Armijo for variances to allow a carport in the front yard for property located at 1035 West Medicine Lake Drive with the added condition that the gables and eaves be finished with the same stucco look as the house. Vote. 5 Ayes, 2 Nays (Anderson and Saba voting nay). MOTION approved. 9. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Acting Chair Anderson, with no objection, to adjourn the meeting at 7:41 P.M. Proposed Minutes 3 of 3 Meeting of February 1, 2017 Agenda Number File 2016141 5 E) PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT TO: Plymouth Planning Commission FROM: Marie Darling, Sr. Planner (509-5457) through Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: February 15, 2017 APPLICANT: Daikin Applied Americas, Inc. PROPOSAL: Site plan amendment and variances for building and parking lot additions LOCATION: 13600 Industrial Park Blvd. GUIDING: IP (plaimed industrial) ZONING: I-2 (general industrial) REVIEW DEADLINE: May 10, 2017 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of the following to allow building and parking expansions: Site plan amendment to add 29,300 square feet to the building and 131 parking spaces and L- * Variances to allow 1) a building addition to be 15 feet from the front lot line along Annapolis Lane where the ordinance requires 50 feet and 2) a parking expansion to be 20 feet frons the front lot line along Annapolis Lane where the ordinance requires 25 feet. The applicant has also requested the city to remove the no parking designation on Annapolis Lane, That request would be reviewed by the City Council. 2016101 Page 2 Notice of the public meeting was mailed to all property owners within 200 feet of the site, A copy of the notification area map is attached. CONTEXT: Surrounding Land Uses Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zoning North, South, East, West I Industrial Buildings IP 1-2 Natural Characteristics of Si The site is located in the Bassett Creek drainage district. The site does not contain any land in a floodplain or shoreland overlay district, nor does the site contain wetlands. There are mature trees on the site, but the request is not subject to tree preservation. Previous Approvals The original building was constructed in 1965 and the city approved additions to the building in 1979 and 2008. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city's discretion in approving or denying a site plan amendn-ient is limited to whether or not the proposal complies with the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the site plan amendment. The city's discretion in approving or denying a variance is Iimited to whether or not the proposal meets the standards for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards for a variance. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: Daikin Applied Americas is a global provider of HVAC equipment. The property is 12.5 acres and is bordered by public streets on all sides. The applicant proposes to expand the building on both the east and west sides to add testing facilities, a new training center, a dock expansion and additional office space. They anticipate the expansions would create space for about 90 additional employees. SITE PLAN AMENDMENT The zoning ordinance contains specific standards for approval of development in the 1-2 zoning district. Staff' used these standards to review the proposal. The specific standards that apply are as indicated on the following table, 2016101 Page 3 Applicable Standards for Buildin s in the 1-2 District S eci red Proposed complies? Building Setbacks: --From Annapolis Lane --From Xenium Lane 50 ft. (min.) 50 ft, (min.) 15 ft. 50 ft. (min.) Noy` Yes Parking Setbacks: --From Annapolis Lane --From Xenium Lane --From 24oh Avenue _-From Building: 25 ft. (min.) 25 ft. (min.) 25 ft. (min.) 10 ft, (min.) 15-20 ft. (min,) 25 ft. (min.) 20 ft. (min.) 14 ft. (min.) No* Yes No** Yes On -Site Parking Spaces: 467 546 Yes Building Height: 45 ft, (max.) 32 ft. (max.) Yes Structural Covera e: 50% (max.) 36% Yes Landscaping: --Required for New Building --Replacements 30 34 54 trees (45 trees plus shrubs) N❑*** Lighting: --Height 30 ft. max.) 29 ft. (max.) Yes --Color-Rendering Index (CRI) 70 (min.) 70 Yes -- Correlated Color Tem CCT 4, l OOK max. 4,OOOK Yes --Backlight, U li ht, Glare(BUG) B4 -UO -G2 (max.) B2 -UO -G2 Yes * Variance requested **Discussion follows ***Condition included in the attached resolution. Parking To accommodate the on-site growth in employees and visitors, the applicant is proposing to add 131 parking spaces to the site. Although the majority of the stalls are proposed by expanding and reconfiguring the parking lot on the north and east sides of the site, the applicant also proposes a parking expansion in the southwest corner of the site. Section 21135.07 of the zoning ordinance requires all industrial parking spaces to be set back 25 feet from front property lines. The applicant's plans initially indicated the north parking lot would be 20 feet from the property lines along Annapolis Lane and 24th Avenue. The applicant has since submitted the attached exhibit (dated 21312017) that demonstrates they can meet the setback requirements for this lot. Staff included a condition in the attached resolution requiring the applicant to revise their plans consistent with the exhibit. The applicant has requested a variance to the required setback for the parking expansion in tite southwest corner of the site. The variance request is discussed further below. 2016101 Page 4 Pedestrian Circulalion The applicant proposes to use on -street parking on Annapolis Lane during periods of peal,- parking demand. If allowed by the City Council, staff notes that the applicant must provide safe access to the building entrances and as a result, has included a condition in the attached resolution that requires the applicant to install a five-foot sidewalk along Annapolis Lane. DesignlArchitectural Materials The applicant has proposed to use concrete panels for the testing facility and dock addition and a combination of glass and concrete panels for the office and training area. The applicant is also proposing to add two new metal canopies over building entrances and renovate the existing canopy at the south entrance with the same metal panels to further modernize the appearance of the building. To break up the appearance of the long expanse of the "Tech Center" (testing facility) addition, they have added a glass curtain wall section. The design and materials are consistent with city standards. Stornmater RunOT The city requires all projects to meet minimal impact design standards (MIDS). To meet the requirements for both rate and volume control, the applicant has proposed to use pervious pavement for about half of the north parking lot. The final construction plans would need to demonstrate compliance with city and watershed requirements. Staff included a condition to this effect in the attached resolution. VARIANCES Building Setback Section 21565.I3 of the zoning ordinance requires all buildings in the 1-2 district to be set back 50 feet from front property lines and 15 feet from side and rear property lines. As the existing building is surrounded by public streets, the required setback on all sides of the building is 50 feet. Currently, the building is located at least 50 feet from all property lines, however, the setback on the west side is at 50 feet. The applicant has indicated that they need to expand the Tech Center to the west. They based this need on the fact that: 1) the higher roof heights on the west side of the building can accommodate the higher roof height requirements of the Tech Center and 2) the loss of needed parking that would result if the Tech Center expanded to the east. Consequently, they propose to expand the Tech Center along the west side of the building, which will result in a 15 -foot setback to the west property line. Parking Setback Section 21135.07 of the zoning ordinance requires all industrial parking to be set back 25 feet from front property lines. The applicant proposes to expand the parking lot in the southwest corner of the property to maximize the amount of parking near the entrance to the training facility. Currently, the lot has only a single row of parking with I 1 spaces. The applicant proposes to 2416101 Page 5 expand the lot to 28 spaces. Staff Finds that because the parking lot is a relatively small area affecting about 15 percent of the street frontage on the west side of the property and because the parking lot would be further away from the property line than the building addition, its impact on the streetscape would be minimal. Variance Standards Staff used the attached variance standards to review the request and finds it would meet all of the applicable standards. Specifically, the requested variances; 1) would be consistent with the comprehensive plan; 2) are proposed to confront the unique, practical difficulty of having public streets on all four sides of the property; 3) would not be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood; 4) would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent properties, nor increase traffic congestion, endanger public safety, or impact property values; and 5) would be the minimum action required to address or alleviate the practical difficulties. RECOMMENDATION: Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the request for a site plan amendment and variances for Daikin Applied Americas, Inc, for building and parking additions for property located at 13644 Industrial Park Boulevard, subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: I . Draft Resolution Approving the Site Plan Amendment and Variances 2. Exhibit dated February 3, 2417 3. Vaz lance Standards 4, Location Map 5, Aerial Photo G. Notification Area Map 7. Applicant's Narrative & Site Graphics CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2017 - RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT AND VARIANCES FOR BUILDING AND PARKING LOT ADDITIONS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13600 INDUSTRIAL PARK BOULEVARD (201 b1 01 ) WHEREAS, Daikin Applied Americas, Inc. has requested approval of a site plan amendment and variances to allow construction of building and parking lot additions for the property presently legally described as Lot 1, Block 2, Minneapolis Industrial Park 2"d Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public meeting and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Daikin Applied Americas, Inc. for a site plan amendment and variances for building and parking additions for property located at 13600 Industrial Park Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: 1. A site plan amendment is approved to allow construction of 29,300 square foot building additions and related parking lot expansions, in accordance with the plans received by the city on December 22, 2015, January 10, 2017 and February 1, 2017, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Variances are approved to allow a building addition to be 15 feet from the front property line where 50 feet is required and a parking lot expansion to be 20 feet from the front property line where 25 feet is required, with the finding that the request complies with all applicable variance standards. 3. A separate building permit is required prior to commencement of the project. 4, Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall fulfill the requirements, submit the required information, and revise the plans as indicated below, consistent with the applicable city code, zoning ordinance, and engineering guidelines: a. Execute a site improvement performance agreement and submit the related financial guarantees and fees pursuant to section 21045.10 of the zoning ordinance. b. Obtain the required permit from the watershed district. c. Execute and record a maintenance agreement covering the porous pavement. d. Obtain city approval of final construction plans. e. Revise the plans as follows: i. Add a five-foot concrete sidewalk on Annapolis Lane connecting the street with the primary entrances. Pedestrian ramps shall be incorporated at driveways and corners and at the existing sidewalk/curb intersection. Revise the plans consistent with the exhibit dated February 3, 2017. Resolution 2017 File 2015101 Page 2 Ji. Revise the landscaping plan to add 10 additional overstory trees and increase the diversity of the tree species proposed on-site. iv. Identify where the fuel tanks currently located on the west side of the building would be relocated to and provide screening from public streets. v. Add and relocate hydrants to approved locations. vi. Provide additional turning radius information as directed and revise the plans to remove any contact between the apparatus and curbs or parked vehicles. vii. Remove or relocate the tree obstructing the fire department connection and add signage to identify both the existing and new connections. 5. The sidewalk along Annapolis Zane shall be maintained by the property owner. 5. Silt fence shall be installed prior to any construction on the site, 7. Fire lane signage shall be provided in locations to be field identified by the fire inspector. 8. Standard Conditions: a. No trees may be planted in the public right-of-way. b. Any rooftop/ground-mounted equipment shall be screened consistent with the requirements of section 21130.05 of the zoning ordinance to match the building. c. Compliance with the city's lighting regulations. d. Any signage shall comply with section 21155 of the zoning ordinance and shall receive sign permits if required. e. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per ordinance provisions. f. The site plan amendment and variances shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has started the project, or unless the applicant, with the consent of the property owner, has received prior approval from the city to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under sections 71045.09 and 21030.05, respectively, of the zoning ordinance. ADOPTED by the City Council on this xx day of xx, 2017. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on xx, 2017, with the origins[ thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this day of City Clerk City of Plymouth Adding Quahty to Life Community Development Department 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 (763)509-5450 FAX (763)509-5407 ZONING ORDINANCE VARIANCE STANDARDS The City Council or Zoning Administrator may approve a variance application (major or minor, respectively) only upon finding that all of the following criteria, as applicable, have been met: 1. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter, and would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2. The variance applicant has satisfactorily established that there are practical difficulties in complying with this Chapter. "Practical difficulties" means that: a. the applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter; b. the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property that were not created by the landowner; and c. the variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The variance request is not based exclusively upon economic considerations. 4. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would not be detrimental to the public welfare, nor would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. 5. The variance, and its resulting construction or project; would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it substantially increase traffic congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. 6. The variance requested is the minimum action required to address or alleviate the practical difficulties. Section 21034 -Plymouth Zoning Ordinance Forms: 2 Ova ri a n cestds. d ocx 0 z w Q U] W z INDUSTRIAL P J z w X Q J z W x 2016101 Legend ial Darken Applied Americas Inc. ® CC. City en ! CC, City Censer 13640 Industrial Park Blvd. ® Co commercialo(fce ® IP, Planned Industrial Request for a site Plan Amendment LA -1, Living Area 1 and Variances D L-3• Living Area 2 0 LAA -3, Living Area 3 ® LA -4, Living Area 4 350 175 0 350 700 ® LA -R1 Feet LA -R2 LA -R3 r;boty Of LA -RT Plymouth, Minnesota ® P -I, PuhlicISemi-Publlc/4nstitutional Ilsu!}f.1R•7![!{iptIF�lFi1f[Fa �rH. ! f�i r r , r r! ,. j'4i1Fttsslftifllf Al `4tfi'. M'lMsi ■ [ [[ - i Y!E 4T d i II FFi11 $ !! � �."• a- r r � .. � -� ! 1 � �:'f�ly ilk . i ! - — r Wj �f Fj 41 to M f rl;lFir W4F or 1wr['RTV11K . INDUS RIAL PARD BLVD 4 fit Fr in r r 3 Iff X. 2016101 - Aerial Photograph r;bcity 300 150 0 300 600 of Feet Plymouth, Minnesota X. 2016101 - Aerial Photograph r;bcity 300 150 0 300 600 of Feet Plymouth, Minnesota Notification Area Map Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map������ Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services pate: 12/13/2016 Buffer Size: 200 feet Map Comments: MC QUAY INC 13660 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55441 0 120 240 480 ft I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 For more information contact' Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis. i nfo@ hennepin.us 22-118-22-1)4 rJ v 22-118-22-43 T J n !- ,a U U !. Y 27-118-22 1 m 27-118-22-12 7 27 O - LL- 27- 18- 2. 1 � r r o - j2 -,L,4 lnii,,. .!! P,r-=�IiI-.7-118-22-13 d y L R] - -a 27-118-2 -24 27-118-22-13 - 1. 27-118-22-42` Buffer Size: 200 feet Map Comments: MC QUAY INC 13660 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55441 0 120 240 480 ft I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 For more information contact' Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis. i nfo@ hennepin.us Narrative for: Daikin Applied Americas Expansion and Site Improvements. 13600 Industrial Park Blvd. Plymouth, MN January 23, 2017 Updated February 01, 2017 I. BACKGROUND A. Company History The corporate headquarters for Daikin Applied Americas, formerly McQuay International, is located in the heart of Plymouth's industrial zoning district. Daikin Applied designs and manufactures technologically advanced commercial HVAC systems for customers around the world. McQuay built the original building on the site in 1965, which included corporate offices and a Technology Center for testing and developing new products. At the time, Plymouth's industrial park was just beginning to develop. An addition built in 1977 nearly doubled the size of the Technology Center and a two-level addition built in 1978 added office, storage, and support space. In 2006 McQuay was acquired by Daikin Industries, Ltd. and began what became a 10 -year, phased, interior remodeling and upgrade of the existing office areas. In 2008 a state-of-the-art Applied Development Centex (ADC) was constructed for continued research and development of industry leading chiller technology. Today, Daikin Industries, Ltd., the parent company of Daikin Applied Americas, is the largest HVAC equipment manufacturer in the world. B. Project Overview Additional office and technology space is recluired for Daikin to further expand its development of new HVAC technologies on the Plymouth car npus. This project will provide the additional space required, including: • Converting existing lower level storage space to approximately 80 new offices /workstations • Add approximately 130 on-site parking spaces and 35 street parking spaces • Dock / Warehouse addition, approximately 8,300 sq. ft. • Tech Center addition, approximately 8,000 sq. ft. • Learning Institute addition, approximately 8,600 sq. ft. with a Second Floor Office addition, approximately 5,100 sq. ft. The proposed additions will be of high quality building materials to match the 2008 ADC addition. This project aligns with the City's land use goal to "Encoun-age redevelopment of obsolete, underutilized and deteriorated uses." The owner has met with City staff to review the project and its unique hardships and the need for two setback variances to makc the proposed development viable. Narrative for Daikin Expansion and Site Improvements February 01, 2017 C. Project Team ■ Owner: Daikin Applied Americas, Inc. + Architect: Paul Meyer Architects, Inc. of Plymouth is providing planning and architectural design services. • Civil Engineer. Loucks, Inc. of Maple Grove is providing consulting civil engineering and landscape design sen>ices. II. City Approvals Requested A. Site Plan Review Request for site plan review for a project designed to comply with the 12 General Industrial zoning district. Section I above describes the background and project description for the requested site plan review, The site plan review includes a request For a building setback variance and a parking setback variance, which are described below. S. Variance Requests 1. Request to reduce the side yard building setback along the west property line (Annapolis Lace) to 15' from 50'. 2. Request to reduce the side yard parking setback on the west property line (Annapolis Lane) for the proposed parking lot expansion at the southwest corner of the site. We explored many options for adding onto the building. Here are the primary reasons for rile con Figuration of the proposed building additions and parking configuration: First, the current parking lot needs to be expanded. To keep up with management and development of nnv technologies, Daikin plans to add approximately 90 additional employees over the next 3-4 years. Also, the training programs being offered will bring up to 80 additional visitors to the site on an intermittent basis. The project requires maximizing the quantity of parking spaces and the only portion of the site available to significantly increase the parking capacity is to the east and north of the Tech Center. There is also an increased parking required for non-employee visitors coining to the facility for training. A second important consideration is the configuration of the existing building. The current Tech Center is closed in by the ADC to the north and the 1965 office building to the South. The Tech Center has a low -ceiling on the east side (original 1965 portion) and high -ceiling area on the west side (1977 addition). To accommodate the larger equipment being developed, the Tech Center addition needs to be a high -ceiling area — the new technology cannot be accommodated in the low -ceiling area. 2 2017 Page 2 of 4 Narrative for Daikin Expansion and Site Improvements February 01, 2017 • Third, a new (larger) loading dock is required with adequate-torage/staging space to acconuxiodate Daikin's expanding operations. The dock can be fully functional with the low -ceiling side of the building. To accommodate adequate parking expansion, the Dock addition needs to be on one side and the Tech Center on the other. In addition to matching Up to the high -ceiling arca, the Tech Center addition will improve the exterior that faces Annapolis, by matching the building materials used on the ADC. The Dock addition on the east also will improve truck traffic on the site, by moving the truck dock away from the employee entrance. It will provide an improved exterior that faces Xenium Lane, by also matching the building materials used on the ADC. ■ The Learning Center addition, because of all the restrictions mentioned above, fits best on the west side, just South of the Tech Center expansion. This location allows us to modernize the look of the facility and create a scpatate entrance for the global visitors that will visit Daikin's Corporate Headquarters for training and other events. An expansion of Clic existing parking lot on the southwest is needed to accommodate the additional visitors using the Learning Center entrance. We believe that the proposed project meets the City's variance criteria. 1, The variances and resulting construction project will he in harrnonv with the general purpose and intents of the zoning ordinance and will be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2. There are practical difficulties in meeting the required 50' building setback from Annapolis Lane and the 25' parking setback for the small southwest parking Int expansion. a. The proposed use is reasonable-, but not otherwise permitted without a variance to the 50' building setback and the 25' parking setback. b. There are constraints unique to this property that were not created by the property owner: i. The existing property is constrained, because the property is bound by streets on all four sides, which requires "front yard" setbacks on all sides (50' building Ind 25' parking). Having 50' building setbacks and 2S' parking setbacks ;around the entire property creates a hardship to development of the p1opert'• ii. In the 12 zoning district, the standard side yard building setback is 15' and the standard side yard parking setback is 20'. The 50' building and the 25' parking setback on all sides is more restrictive than other 12 properties with ❑nly one or two street frontages. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The additions comprise less than 30% of the street frontage along :Annapolis Lanc and the southwest parking lot less than 151)/o. The proposed exterior building matcrials will be of high quality materials that match the 2008 addition. 3. The variance requests :are based on practical and aesthetic considerations, not on economic considerations. 4. The difficulty and hardship in developing the land parcel has not been created by Daikin. Page 3 of 4 Nari^ative for Daikin Expansion and Site Improvctncnts February 01, 2017 5. Granting of the variations tivill not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. G. The proposed project, with the variances, «gill not impair an adequate supply of Light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 7. The variances requested are the tninximuin action required to address or alleviate the practical difficulties, III. Summary The proposed Expansion and Site Improvements vvU enable Daikin to continue their industry leading innovative solutions for their next -generation HVAC products. These products will incorporate government mandated improvements for climate -f iendly refrigerants and increased energy efficiencies. This project also supports the City'svision of "strengthening economic viability" with "high duality commercial development." Page 4 of 4 0. C^^1 Q :V O z 0 1JJ W ce CL •IE � �a j2�� I_ q s 222 22 � jH111 i �I;;lj3;{ 4� y {{ L ni j�il`.���1i!! s f��! �3 ��3d € c5da"aaae"s5s wIFAOPVB xffidItIp" 1 a09% 4N.R� I ] + 11!11 TNI I I{ i 4 s: a sG ��;4 a Ijqz z 1593- azza9 .s I p. vim Efl a °lea R' 1-09.z sz E F -Y z fir? apppp �� a eQaac Zy■■a 6.. I i I I I I I ay _�Ya F ❑ }�R M iA- T1s z5 3 ? ;gs"� F------------- ---------------- -- nYl�-i • u.na�aM �w.r..canTwn�rum. mn�rl nxrmn�� 4� y L A I i A 1 1 � i - - I Il � A I ; E5 E�3 ! I A _ 1 — 1 uill I � f - �4 A 114- _______________----- + 11!11 TNI I I{ i 4 s: a sG ��;4 a Ijqz z 1593- azza9 .s I p. vim Efl a °lea R' 1-09.z sz E F -Y z fir? apppp �� a eQaac Zy■■a 6.. I i I I I I I ay _�Ya F ❑ }�R M iA- T1s z5 3 ? ;gs"� F------------- ---------------- -- nYl�-i • u.na�aM �w.r..canTwn�rum. mn�rl nxrmn�� LU z ul x ❑AI0 )*idd ididlsn(]NI 'N 'AV HIVZ z UW §§;.q ogbR $p a.0 wla ULU z a� Z Z W a2 W ❑o wW a� EL m a - LU a m Z N Tr- Z E ❑ Q �a La� 0- 'N ' w z Z W x 1. ❑A18 x6vd ivwisnC)NI R VA 'N'AV HIvz x pyp 0.0.x'' zoo„Sl x � a S2 �g xo��� di�zc� HH ul awso x x T? ry % n z LUJ cn 0z 0- 0 0 TQ L.L LL S m O � R v Z L (L] Z ZZ LU a2 W LLJ ❑0 W Q� a_ IL W R Q [-- CO CO 3 LU z J 2 `z Lu x ❑A19 Addd idi�4isncm ------ ----�lllllltllL��kllillill Immi if 111111111111 I 'N 'AV HJ VZ �a f TlEkj7 L� �H-H k d iR-H P11 ' t rrrr3 , - HIM _ _ �� - CEEB iz L17TI E y , .... .... Ise � w - 7 i [ IN- Immi if 111111111111 I 'N 'AV HJ VZ �a .t ' t N O iz ©? Mo7laffil-JIT r� • •1 e w 0 J LL Z N 2 0 W U LL LL v inw Cl) n CL a Of 0 J U- V) N r W H H N N Z C) z 2 W J O W N a w CL dr— _o cl ❑ Cl) Q Z 0 J Cl) 0- o° CKo 0 -LL x aqt LL Ire, O N 43 LU U Q =w QQ� U0 ❑z LU 0z CL �C 00 a -o z ❑U) Z Qw CL2 w� ❑� � IL L Y CL Q � Y C, c5 ❑ 2 Q �d o N N cv a a W �Q WW W = fY � (1)o M W0 0z Cl Y 00 ro it 0 z o U, �� ZZ QW a� W� ❑0 uj IL uJ a Q G Q Z co ❑ Q �2 o C1 C M U 0 LU ►rl U) LU C� C U= Qo wCD oz n ao �o z 0 C �-)F- ZZ Qw a2 xw w> ❑0 wct as Y IL W a a Z U) 00 ZmE Q �a LU Q w W W ❑ CO W CO 0z 0- v 00 w0 n J z 0U) 7�- zz QW �:E w� in LU OL agm CL W a Q rn Z C/) } ar Q Z ❑ Q ra i SUM ill j �- I R r e!3 moo ......ep j........� 0 I 3] `i e I ►141f li:P ' }I s I �iE3!![ia?iii{if�f�4 I c: I �•' s i 1 i yyt � 9C s al e � ' _ x - 1 HI s - ; cs.y4 77 11•! TA g _ F•1`�g It all � I � _ x - Er u inqMD iii! �a 4�d'�e �5dc�63z?ri� r .y 8 . Sg �a z c 4 CC YL �t F e a �`� �'�• �r I 4 9 eL� �g F I o 1 I I' F 1 I I ! I vLn III" 1p I . I . , r] [I li I U im fin I 'ZIN fill, 1 11! M %. - jiW =e;q. catiff is Sq SM -1 PHI U F7-- – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – - M-7-7— 6N im fin I 'ZIN pi NMI M %. - jiW =e;q. catiff is Sq SM -1 PHI U F7-- – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – - M-7-7— :I!j°ggg Aja€ jjjNj�i 1`re �3'{ ! _4 d � `� 1f l3— R } 1 • Q ails 3 !� :Ei; i }} L p • ------------------ tv f —� • �(,�} aCnrsi.ai � II�1i}III��JlIFI t- I '� � ; `�� _i Ii��'f��►t,1;���1�i��i�€#�li:j{1���i ;�f Hill - �• —a r T a ae ea a G s I 1 ,r i $ s �� r - l===r_- jig Y BRAS i;iif l� t �i PW3 - HIM q =5 U n■ 3�el;?ijfi�3 � fr:R �a !$��� vdcsc3�e3:s§ Zi q =5 U =F N :i � 'M Sy: E;i�• / gffiAW / 41 § | yb- ! 999 5§ � M �im \§|` E $(4Q ©� ! • � � | CHI '/�---------�— 66---- -- ------ U2111 '21 Ei a q= Q! �� xF2��2Si �ai� J1 AS�■� KIM Sl+[i:�flf�� lis! 9! ga �a3�a33335's Ei a q= Q! �� xF2��2Si �ai� J1 AS�■� lieggill \))\ \ ƒ Sun M#M§)§ _ #.® , )i&� ■ ; ) |' pill f ) , )\ƒ� I $� � �� # �■ , I 6 fa?' jar] i I s � J 0 1 3 i ----- --- —-----------------------� p,nsnepiag Wgd M+70W I- (DO O kj C." c- ° 11111 W1 I I ! gg HL a £ I :13,1111 , IMN 1IMS 4- - - - - L — 1 ifuoN onvenY W., t Ut 311 Ifll y `o u - yyd ; i3tif. _ le i u r j YFFF �jj6 p-heinog HfBd -0 3 4- - - - - L — 1 ifuoN onvenY W., t y `o u 4�14� u n $Nog u YFFF �jj6 i Z - c YFFF �jj6 -0 3 tta3 �� Agenda Number File 2017002 5C." PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT TO: Plymouth Planning Commission FROM: Marie Darling, Senior Planner (509-5457) through Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: February 15, 2017 APPLICANT: Thomas and Elaine Chirhart PROPOSAL: Variance to impervious surface coverage for an addition and driveway reconfiguration LOCATION: 2535 Nest Medicine Lake Drive GUIDING: LA -I (living area 1) ZONING: RSF-2 (single family detached 2) REVIEW DEADLINE: May 13, 2017 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicants are requesting approval of a variance to allow an addition to the home that includes additional living area and an attached single -stall garage. With the new addition, the impervious surface coverage would be 29.6 percent where the zoning ordinance allows a maximum of 25 percent. Notice of the public meeting was mailed to all property owners within 200 feet of the site. A copy oftlie notification area map is attached. 2017002 Page 2 CONTEAT . Surrounding Land Uses Natural Characteristics of Site The lot is located in the Bassett Creek watershed and the Medicine Lake Shoreland Management Overlay district. The property contains no wetlands and is not located in a floodplain overlay district. Although the site contains mature trees, the request is not subject to tree preservation. Two trees would be lost for the addition (one cedar, one ash). The property has about 14 feet of elevation change between the two adjacent rights of way and the horse. Previous Actions Affecting Site The subject property was created in 1915 as part of the Elmhurst Lakeview subdivision. The home was built in 1946. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposal meets the standards for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards for a variance. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: The applicants request the variance to construct a two-story addition on the south side of their home. The 16 -foot by 23 -foot addition would contain a new master bedroom above a lower level garage. The applicants currently have a detached garage constructed at the front property line on West Medicine Lake Drive. They also have a parking pad on the south side of the home and a driveway from the parking area to West Medicine Lake Drive, The majority of the existing parking pad would be removed for the addition and new turnaround. Section 21655 of the zoning ordinance allows a maximum of 25 percent impervious surface coverage on all properties within 1,000 feet of a lake. The applicants' survey indicates that their Adjacent Land Use Guilling Zoning North, Vest Single-family homes LA -1 RSF-2 South Single-family homes LA -1 RSF-3 East Trail corridor Single-family homes P -I LA -1 RSF-1 Natural Characteristics of Site The lot is located in the Bassett Creek watershed and the Medicine Lake Shoreland Management Overlay district. The property contains no wetlands and is not located in a floodplain overlay district. Although the site contains mature trees, the request is not subject to tree preservation. Two trees would be lost for the addition (one cedar, one ash). The property has about 14 feet of elevation change between the two adjacent rights of way and the horse. Previous Actions Affecting Site The subject property was created in 1915 as part of the Elmhurst Lakeview subdivision. The home was built in 1946. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposal meets the standards for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards for a variance. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: The applicants request the variance to construct a two-story addition on the south side of their home. The 16 -foot by 23 -foot addition would contain a new master bedroom above a lower level garage. The applicants currently have a detached garage constructed at the front property line on West Medicine Lake Drive. They also have a parking pad on the south side of the home and a driveway from the parking area to West Medicine Lake Drive, The majority of the existing parking pad would be removed for the addition and new turnaround. Section 21655 of the zoning ordinance allows a maximum of 25 percent impervious surface coverage on all properties within 1,000 feet of a lake. The applicants' survey indicates that their 2017002 Page 3 property would contain 29.6 percent impervious surface coverage after the improvements are completed. Because of its length, the driveway contributes a similar amount of impervious surface to the property as the home. Staff and the applicant discussed reorienting the driveway to 260' Avenue to reduce the amount of impervious surface coverage, but this option is not feasible due to the existing grades, A driveway connecting the proposed garage to 26"' Avenue would have a grade of about 17 percent, while the grade between the proposed garage and West Medicine Lake Drive would be about 10 percent. The city's recommended maximum driveway grade is 10 percent, To offset the increase in impervious surface coverage. the applicants have proposed to landscape the south side of their property with shrubs and perennials to maximize water retention on-site. In 2013, they participated in a City of Plymouth project to improve water retention on the slopes of their property abutting West Medicine Lake Drive (photos attached) and they propose to similarly landscape the south side of the property after construction is completed (pian attached), Staff notes that the applicants have a shed and patio in the northwest corner of the lot. Removing these features would reduce the total impervious surface coverage from 29.6 percent to about 28.5 percent. Staff has included a condition in the attached resolution requiring the applicants to remove these features prior to issuance of a building permit. Staff reviewed the request according to the standards listed in section 21030 of the zoning ordinance and has made the following findings: 1. The request for the addition is consistent with the residential uses listed for this land use classification in the comprehensive plan. 2. Permitting the addition allows the property to be used in a reasonable manner. The applicants have established that the existing slopes on the property are a practical difficulty that is unique to this property. 4, The plight of the landowners is unique and not self-created. 5. The variance; ifgranted, would not alter the essential character of the locality. The neighborhood is fully developed. Additionally, the applicants propose to landscape the slopes to encourage storm -water infiltration and prevent erosion similar to a landscaping project they completed in 20I3. 6. The purpose for the variation is not based exclusively on economic considerations; but rather, the variance is requested to make improvements to the home to make it more livable for the current occupants. 7. Granting the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. Allowing the extra pavement near the garage 2017002 Page 4 to allow vehicles to drive forward to West Medicine Lake Drive improves visibility and safety. 8. The proposed addition would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it substantially increase congestion of public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 9. A variance for 28.5 percent impervious surface coverage would be the minimum action required to address or alleviate the practical difficulties. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested variance subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution Approving Variance 2. Variance Standards I Location Map 4. Aerial Photo 5. Notification EL•ca Map 6. Applicant's Narrative and Graphics P;%P1amin&App1l 1WwAi AzatAW 01rUn VAA�S7mm D"\5005e0ff Aepo UMU CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2017- A a17- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE TO ALLOW AN ADDITION AND DRIVEWAY RECONFiGURATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2635 WREST MEDICINE LAKE DRIVE (201 7002) WHEREAS, Thomas and Elaine Chirhart have requested approval of a variance for an addition to the south side of the home; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 1, Elmhurst Lakeview, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public meeting, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that itshouId and hereby does approve the request by Thomas and Elaine Chirhart for a variance for property located at 2635 West Medicine Lake Drive, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. The requested variance is hereby approved to allow 28.5 percent impervious surface coverage where a maximum of 25 percent is allowed, in accordance with the application received by the city on January 9, 13 and 20, 2017, except as may be amended by this resolution. a, The request for the addition is consistent with the residential uses listed for this land use classification in the comprehensive plan. b. Permitting the addition allows the property to be used in a reasonable manner. c. The applicants have established that the existing slopes on the property are a practical difficulty that is unique to this property. d. The plight of the landowners is unique and not self-created, e. The variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality. The neighborhood is fully developed. Additionally, the applicants propose to landscape the slopes to encourage storm -water infiltration and prevent erosion similarto a landscaping project they completed in 2013. f. The purpose for the variation is not based exclusively on economic considerations; but rather, the variance is requested to make improvements to the home to make it more livable for the current occupants. Resolution 2017- (2017002) Page 2 C. Granting the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. Atlowing the extra pavement near the garage to allow vehicles to drive forward to West Medicine Lake Drive improves visibility and safety, It. The proposed addition would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it substantially increase congestion of public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The variance requested is the minimum action required to address or alleviate the practical difficulties. 2. A building permit is required priorto construction of the addition and retaining walls over four feet. 3. Prior to issuance of the permit, the applicant shalt remove the shed and concrete patio from the property and call for an inspection, A. The applicant shall move the wooden deck that currently straddles the property line to a conforming location a minimum of six feet from the side and rear property lines. 5. A three-foot fence is required to be constructed on top of any retaining walls over four feet. 6. The turnaround and all walls shall be constructed on the applicants' property. No improvements may be installed in the public right-of-way. 7. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per ordinance provisions. 8. The variance shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the applicants have commenced the authorized improvement or use, or unless the applicants have received prior approval from the city to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under section 21030,05 of the zoning ordinance. ADOPTED by the City Council on xx, 2017. Resolution 2017- (2017002) Page 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on xx, 2017 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this day of City Clerk rp)Plymouth Adding Quality to Life Community Development Department 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, AKIN 5W7 (753)509-5450 FAX (753)509-5407 ZONING ORDINANCE VARIANCE STANDARDS The City Council or Zoning Administrator may approve a variance application (major or minor, respectively) only upon finding that all of the following criteria, as applicable, have been met: 1. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter; and would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2. The variance applicant has satisfactorily established that there are practical difficulties in complying with this Chapter. "Practical difficulties" means that: a. the applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter; b. the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property that were not created by the landowner; and c. the variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The variance request is not based exclusively upon economic considerations. 4. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would not be detrimental to the public welfare, nor would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. 5. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it substantially increase traffic congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. d. The variance requested is the minimum action required to address or alleviate the practical difficulties. Section 21030 -Plymouth Zoning Ordinance Farms: ZOvariancestds.docx 2017002 Thomas and Elaine C. Chirhart 2635 West Medicine Lake Drive Request for Variance 150 75 0 150 City of Plymouth, Minnesota 300 ii Feet 2017002 -- Aerial Photo riboty of Plymouth, Minnesota 150 75 0 150 300 Feet Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Provided By. Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 1/9/2017 L 23-118-22-34 [2a1 I�] rye} r�I W) 23-118- - - _ rf31 IW1 z3• 23-118-22-43 M A) n� s+� 23-118-12-43 rrs} '25] l�.�•. 1 ' [715j [Td 11V] 111: [7] [S} (I) {3j - 2b-11$- 26-118-22-21 [til rzs: [til i.2j: :20 2s, 12,1 f22r ,n: 1-2 2 26-118-22-21 26-118-22-12 671 Buffer Size: 200 feet Map Comments: PID 2311822340013 Owner: T J CHIRHART & E C CHIRHART Address: 2635 Medicine Lake Drive West Plymouth MN 55441 RECEIVED JAN 13 2017 City of Plymouth -immunity Ueve opm 0 60 120 240 ft For more information contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 g is. info@henne pi n. us 4A1 �do� Request for variance to the 25% hard cover provision of Section 21030 of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance Tom and Elaine Chirhart, homeowners of 2635 West Medicine Lake Drive in Plymouth, Minnesota are proposing to build a 15 by 22 foot addition on to our existing home. This proposed addition and driveway reconfigure increases the hardcover surface of our property from 25.4 to 29.6% Our property is located within 1000 feet of Medicine Lake. We propose to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. The variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance, and its resulting construction, would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter, and would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The general size of the lot situated on a hill requires limited use of its surface area. Reorienting the driveway approach to 25th Ave would be inhibitive because of the steepness of the hillside. The use of the proposed driveway approach would shorten the present driveway and decrease the impervious area. The use of the shortened driveway and turn around will create a safer entrance and exit from our home onto West Medicine Lake Drive. The proposed addition would consist of a master bedroom above a single car tuck under garage. We currently have a single car garage on the property on West Medicine Lake Drive. This garage is 26 steps down from our front door and is a hardship to us, especially in winter. Our proposed addition would include an entrance from the new garage into the house. The variance requested is the minimum action required to address or alleviate the practical difficulties. This addition would improve the safety, accessibility and functionality of our home for years to come. We currently use a side driveway to access the back of our home. The backing down this long driveway is a safety hazard as we back onto West Medicine Lake Drive. Our proposal for the driveway change would allow us to turn around at the garage and drive forward onto West Medicine Lake Drive_ The variance and its resulting construction would not be detrimental to the public welfare, or would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. JAN 13 ?017 The variance and its resulting construction, would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it substantially increase traffic congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. The variance request is not based exclusively upon economic considerations. This property has been in our family for over 70 years. We have lived in the home for the past 10 years making improvements over that time. We participated in a Plymouth Environmental project with the intent to curb run-off down our hilly lot. There are 2 tiered plantings of shrubs in the front and our plan for the addition is to landscape the area to minimize run-off and maximize water retention. Ilk. _ .,r ,��^' -. '-i • jig — •91 .,�.�'. ,� �i.i ,��`. �'" . 4, Flip r .5ipf.` .. -1 �-� s *fir` �i��7 �v •-': � � - `�F. - q s�_ ter• �'- 7 � je or p «r •�rJ t� +; • R� La� 'fs Y �t f •jA :-� . `-`• 1R 1yir; , +S r 4 r .LA a ! A wry_' —ti X�,` - --�, A i; - X54 ��. -Y - , . �.��. T. �. 's. _^A ' � ; `y��'. 1. _ - DPFRIY I LEGEND 1 x x FENCE vT OH>r OVERHEAD WIRES I DEM ELECTRIC METER NBT 3%•18"E A� ,-FENCE BIS 0.1 SW1l Of PnorERn I1KE CONIFEROUS TREE PR�rY"� 12$,$2 DECIDUOUS TREE CON ETE NE>E Q7 rt N ?CK rr, pyyH y i+r.J6 TREE TO BE REMOVED STONE PAVERS iV r7 <Dz=- BOULDER WALL 8 FOUND IRON MONUMENT ,-DECK CORNER ON PROPERTY NINE waoD bloc CONCRETE STEPS ^ R ITEMS TO BE REMOVED DECK CORNER Is-, vow _ PRFr• OVFR \ DEO[_- E. �. s,v . d ONE aTORY HOLfSE -sorer CARAaE RDaR ELEV01ON - 8511 In NO. 2635 qq (TO BE ANFIED BY BUILDER) M WOOD '1 DECK \ \ ---- r Z FA%t#S . \ \\ \''. \ C.L. '10.10 `-------- 48.6 ' .6.R LAIIDSCA 4IX ' �- 1 80.1 r. CCANER [� 1- r.& i 1 0-23 — E151 pF , {,p �' [j I PROPERTY LIRE CJ j8. 441 a � � gA�0�110H 8- x -9 3D' DNC �• n d CO19K ly 958,.58 x� -P � i Bw-BBBD7588�5 f CBL �j 252+'-- "�s _ fI .fa7mlNW aCEDAR R nw I -_24 a i� a a- cEDu2 cinW EXISTINIQ HARDCOVER ` - a�w-951 ......on on BUILDINGS = 1,534 SO. FT. CONCRETE AND PAVERS - 730 S4. FT.4°+r- GRAVEL DRIVE = 1,540 SO, FT. TOTAL HARDCOVER AREA - 3,854 SO. FT. (WOOD DECKS EXEMPTED) � 'sr LOT AREACF, 15,160 Sq. FT. PERCENT DF HARDCOVER AREA - 25,4 PERCENT PROPOSED MAR"QYER �6'— W BUILDINGS = 1,902 SO. FT. ?' CONCRETE AND PAVERS =BOO SO. FT. BENOWARK: TOP Nor aP--- TO AGRAV HAARDCOVER AREA DRIVE = 1.717 4= 4,499 SO. FT- H1'DnNR EI£YATDII 942-59h q (WOOD DECKS EXEMPTED) ✓L W LOT AREA - 15,160 SO. FT. PERCENT OF HARDCOVER AREA = 29.$ PERCENT { SURVEY FDR: THOMAS & ELAINE CHIRHART ` PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2635 Medicine Luka Or{ve West, Plymouth, Minnesota. � 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 y Lots 7, B and 9. Block 1, ELMHURST LAKENEK according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota CMTIFiCA71ON: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey "lam of the boundaries of the land above described and of the locution of all buildings, 1f any, thereon, and all visible encroachment,,, if any, from or on sold land. r: Dated: November 8, 2016 (Z Revised: December 194 2016 -] Andersen ins ing of M[rineso.19. LLC 0 20 40 JAN - y 201 br• Jock 9ollt SCALE IN FEET lnoesoto License No. 26261 NOTES, 1. The bearing system Is based on west line of Lots 7, 8, and 9. Block 1, which is assumed to have a bending of Norah 39 degrees 32 minutes 29 seconds West. 2, The Oreo of the properly described hereon is 15,160 las♦ Anderson En ineerin DTMlnnesola, LLC square feet or 0.3480 acres. � A N D E RS O N e g 136051sT Avenue Rnlhh 3. The vertical datum is NAVD 85. The primvey benchmark Is Sub 100 the top nut of the hydrant located near the southeast .ENGINEERING Spioulh, MN 55441 corner of Lot 9, elevation = 966.59 feet. EHGINURING a AfkCH11ECTURE r LANDSURVEYWG 7634124000}D) 763-412AC90M 11 B -5 ENUfRONIAENTAL SERVICES • L NID9CAPEARCHBECf17I1E WN'W.3e•f1111.Lr01 -r _tiaaa�d I f � (LP 5 I 70 r. AC �. — f nP.+C�g z LFII I i � r J-- -------- E[)ICINF LAKE ❑RNl WE5T k lr .,,, is a rn EM !Mt, a x 7.1rnS <7 a v ro �nZuuli 0m C Z rn 4 rn 73 `h i r1 rrBureNirgr In llir JrrdHr of Tom & EIaine ChirharL 2635 West WdiciFie Lake Dr - r-Plymouth, Ply month,hi\ 55441 lr .,,, is a rn EM !Mt, a x 7.1rnS <7 a v ro �nZuuli 0m C Z rn 4 rn 73 `h •iri;S tiyC'41na�ui�,� � _)CIalWl ZILIPTM ISa.m S z t{aPD auiui3 79 wol frr airiuq ay1 of wirm.xrual n r 8 -- LU W r w UP w V .e.ss .,�. ti..n�w+n y....em r,v. ua•��a«e '� 1M55 NN'4P-OLL lJ -lQ adv'] anu!W fC I�M�75}.'92 l � • 1 ] } 1 i H 32f b - ueuJND'Jule{g '7 W01 i �' C jn ilb�,ry alf7 w Wry?+AWL N 11 it'F•SS \W'4�nnut.S�� w 3 �p a�e-� aaia}WiV �saM SFAZ '� TEgatu) OUIR19 V UIOI. M fu "arra! Ivi n7 urgrnaua:r� n u: ----------- ---------- ----------------. LLJ z _ C. - OL --------------- .© i --------------------------------- � w 3 r ----------------- Agenda Number File 2017 005 5D PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT TO: PIymouth Planning Coirunission FROM: Shawn Drill, Senior Planner (509-5456) through Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: February 15, 2017 APPLICANT: Skyline Design, Inc. PROPOSAL: Variance for impervious surface coverage LOCATION: 941 Zanzibar Lane GUIDING: LA -2 (Living Area 2) ZONING: RSF-4 (Single and Two Family) REVIEW DEADLINE: May 12, 2017 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a variance to increase the impervious surface coverage from 45 percent to 48 percent in the shoreland district, where 25 percent is the maximum impervious surface coverage specified. Notice of the public meeting was mailed to all property owners within 200 feet of the site. A copy of the notification area map is attached. 2017005 Page 2 CONTEXT: Surrounding Land Uses Natural Characteristics of Site The site is located in the Minnehalia Creek drainage district, and in the shoreland district for Gleason Lake. The site is not located in a floodplain, and there are no wetlands on the site. Previous Actions Affecting Site The home was constructed in 1977 as part of the Cimarron Ponds development. Cimarron Ponds was approved as a planned unit development (PUD) in 1976. The PUD final plan identified the structure setbacks and impervious surface area coverage based on the approved building footprints. The City adopted shoreland regulations in 1982, which included an impervious surface limitation of 30 percent for all properties within a shoreland district. The City changed this standard from 30 percent to 25 percent in 1994. In 1996, the City adopted a new zoning ordinance and map, Many of the PUDs existing at that time were repealed, including the PUD for Cimarron Ponds. The Cimarron Ponds development was placed in the RSF-4 (single and two family) zoning district. Under the former PUD zoning, building additions required a PUD amendment. During the time that the Cimarron Ponds development was zoned PUD, the City Council reviewed and approved 30 PUD amendments to allow building additions. Since the Cimarron Ponds development was rezoned to RSF-4 in 1996, the City Council has reviewed and approved 19 shoreland variances to allow building additions. This is the 201h request for a shoreland variance. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposal meets the standards for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards for a variance. Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zonhi North, South, Two-family homes East, & West in Cimarron Ponds LA -2 RSF-4 Natural Characteristics of Site The site is located in the Minnehalia Creek drainage district, and in the shoreland district for Gleason Lake. The site is not located in a floodplain, and there are no wetlands on the site. Previous Actions Affecting Site The home was constructed in 1977 as part of the Cimarron Ponds development. Cimarron Ponds was approved as a planned unit development (PUD) in 1976. The PUD final plan identified the structure setbacks and impervious surface area coverage based on the approved building footprints. The City adopted shoreland regulations in 1982, which included an impervious surface limitation of 30 percent for all properties within a shoreland district. The City changed this standard from 30 percent to 25 percent in 1994. In 1996, the City adopted a new zoning ordinance and map, Many of the PUDs existing at that time were repealed, including the PUD for Cimarron Ponds. The Cimarron Ponds development was placed in the RSF-4 (single and two family) zoning district. Under the former PUD zoning, building additions required a PUD amendment. During the time that the Cimarron Ponds development was zoned PUD, the City Council reviewed and approved 30 PUD amendments to allow building additions. Since the Cimarron Ponds development was rezoned to RSF-4 in 1996, the City Council has reviewed and approved 19 shoreland variances to allow building additions. This is the 201h request for a shoreland variance. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposal meets the standards for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards for a variance. 2017005 Page 3 ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a shoreland variance to allow 48 percent impervious surface for the "unit lot" at 941 Zanzibar Lane. The zoning ordinance defines a `unit lot" as a lot created from the subdivision of a base lot for two-family homes, townhomes, or manor homes which have different minimum lot size requirements than conventional base lots within the zoning district. A base lot is the common open space lot that surrounds the individual unit Iots for an attached residential development. The subject unit lot contains roughly 4,338 square feet in area. The applicant would remove an existing 154 square -foot concrete patio on the north side of the home, and replace ii with a 235.5 square -foot room addition. The net increase in impervious surface coverage would be 85.5 square feet, or two percent of the unit lot area. The proposed addition would be finished to match the existing exterior of the home. The applicant states that the proposed addition would allow the homeowners to get more use out of a permanent room as opposed to the existing concrete patio that can only be used seasonally. The proposed addition would be set luck eight feet from the north side lot line, in comp]iance with minimum setback regulations. In the past, staff worked with the applicant to attempt to identify the total impervious surface coverage for the portion of the Cimarron Ponds development located within the shoreland overlay district for Gleason Lake (rougMy the western half). These numbers are estimated and are not based on a certified survey. Staff finds that substantial work and associated expense would be required for an overall certified survey for the development. The applicant calculated the estimated total impervious surface coverage by adding: 1) overall home and garage areas based on average unit size; 2) public streets and private drives; and 3) driveways and sidewalks. Those impervious area totals were estimated to be roughly 35.8 percent for that portion of the development within the shoreland district. However, that calculation does not include the abutting roughly 12.7 -acre natural/open space outlots to the west and south of the development (owned by the State of Minnesota) also located within the shoreland district. Those outlots serve as a protective buffer between the development and Gleason Lake. If the outlots are included in the calculations, the overall impervious surface coverage is roughly 2.4.8 percent. Based on the overall development size, each 150 square feet of added impervious surface coverage would increase the coverage of the overall development by .0001 percent. The net increase in impervious surface coverage for room additions within this development is typically less than 150 square feet because the room additions generally replace a previously -existing concrete patio. 2017005 Page 4 FINDINGS: In review of the request, staff finds that all of the applicable variance standards are met, as follows: 1} The requested variance, and its resulting construction, would be in hannony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance, and would be consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. 2) The applicant has demonstrated that there are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance regulations, because: a. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner.. b. The request is due to unique circumstances not created by the landowner. The platting of this development predates the shoreland regulations. If the area of the abutting natural/open space outlots were included, the proposal would comply with the impervious surface coverage regulation. c. The variance would not alter the essential character of the lot or neighborhood. 3) The requested variance is not based exclusively upon economic considerations, but rather, the applicant is requesting the variance in order to improve the livability of the home. 4) The variance, and its resulting construction, would not be detrimental to the public welfare, nor would it be injurious to other Iand or improvements in the neighborhood. The applicant would remove a concrete patio and construct the room addition in the same general area. The addition would be designed to blend in with the design of the Home, using similar materials and colors. Roughly 50 homes in the neighborhood have completed similar room addition improvements. 5) The variance, and its resulting construction, would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it increase traffic congestion or the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. The addition would comply with all other zoning ordinance requirements, and with all building code requirements. 6) The variance requested is the minimum action required to address or alleviate the practical difficulties. 2017005 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION: Community Development Department staff is recommending approval of the requested variance at 941 Zanzibar Lane, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution Approving Variance 2. Location Map 3. Aerial Photo 4. Notification Area Map 5. Applicant's Narrative 5. Variance Standards 7. Site Graphics P -Running Applicadoni?017/2017005 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A ROOM ADDITION BY SKYLINE DESIGN, INC, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 941 ZANZIBAR LAME (2017005) WHEREAS, Skyline Design, Inc. has requested approval of an impervious surface coverage variance to allow construction of a room addition onto the existing home located at 941 Zanzibar Lane; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Cimarron Ponds 2"o Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Skyline Design, Inc. for an impervious surface coverage variance to allow construction of a room addition for property located at 941 Zanzibar Lane, subject to the following: 1. A variance is approved to allow the impervious surface coverage on the unit lot to increase from 46 percent to 48 percent, in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on January 12, 2017, except as may be amended by this resolution. 2. The requested variance is approved based upon the following findings.: a, The variance, and its resulting construction, would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance, and would be consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. b. The applicant has demonstrated that there are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance regulations, because: The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. 2- The request is due to unique circumstances not created by the landowner. The platting of this development predates the shoreland regulations. If the area of the abutting natural open space outlots were included, the proposal would comply with the impervious surface coverage regulation. 1 The variance would not alter the essential character of the lot or neighborhood. Resolution 2017- (2017005) Page 2 c. The variance request is not based exclusively upon economic considerations, but rather, the applicant is requesting the variance in order to improve the livability of the home. d. The variance, and its resulting construction, would not he detrimental to the public welfare, nor would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. The applicant would remove a concrete patio and construct the room addition in the same general area. The addition would be designed to blend in with the design of the home, using similar materials and colors. Roughly 50 homes in the neighborhood have completed similar room addition improvements. e. The variance, and its resulting construction, would not impair an adequate supply of Iight and air to adjacent properties, nor would it increase traffic congestion or the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. The addition would comply with all other zoning ordinance requirements, and with all building code requirements. f. The requested variance is the minimum action required to address or alleviate the practical difficulties. 3, Prior to construction of the room addition, the applicant must: 1) obtain the required building permit; and 2) remove the existing concrete patio. Q. The roughly 12 -foot by 20 -foot room addition shall be constructed with a design, materials, and colors that are similar to the existing home. 5. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subjectto required reviews and approvals per ordinance provisions. 6. The variance shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has commenced the authorized improvement or use, or unless the applicant, with the consent of the property owner, has received prior approval from the City to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under section 21030.06 of the zoning ordinance. ADOPTED by the City Council this ** day of **** 2017. LA - 0i 2077005 Skyline Design, Inc. 947 Zanzibar Lane Request for a Variance LA -2 r;bcity Of Plymouth, Minnesota 200 100 0 200 400 rp)city 2017005 -� Aerial Photo of Plymouth, Minnesota 75 37.5 0 75 150 Feet NOTIFICATION AREA MAP Buffer Size: 200 feet 0 30 50 120 ft Map Comments: 941 Zanzibar Lane North Plymouth For more information contact' MN 55447 Hennepin County GIS Office 32-118 22-11-0131 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis. i nfo@ henne pi n. us Sky-finef Design,Inc. BUILDERS and REMDDELERS 7620 KALK ROAD - HAMEL, hUNNESOTA 55340 PHONE; 783-420-3177 January 4, 2017 Dear Plymouth Planning Commission, 0�� I am requesting a variance to construct a room addition to Dennis and Deanna Regan's townhouse, located at 941 Zanzibar Lane in the Cimarron Ponds Addition. The property is located within the 1000 foot setback from Gleason Lake. We feel that this addition will not have any impact on the lake because of buffers that are built within the development. The requested variance is for a change from 46% to 48% impervious lot coverage to enable the homeowners to construct a room addition. We will be removing the 150 sq.ft. concrete patio and replacing it with a 235.5 sq.ft. room addition. The room addition will enable the homeowners to enjoy the views and they will also get more use out of the permanent room addition than a temporary screened porch. The permanent room addition will be constructed of materials similar to the existing structure with brick exterior to make it compatible. We have constructed approximately 50 room additions in Cimarron Ponds and some of them are also located within the 1000 foot setback from Gleason Lake. Many of the room additions were constructed prior to the new ordinance going into effect, and they have not caused any problems for Gleason Lake or the surrounding neighbors. The granting of the requested variance will not be detrimental to the public or improvements in the neighborhood. As mentioned above, there are a few of these room additions within Cimarron Ponds already, and we have never been informed of any negative impacts that they have created in the neighborhood. The room additions are built to meet the standards of the Homeowner's Association. We try very hard to have these additions match as closely as possible to the existing exteriors. The following are answers/comments to the standards outlined in Section 21030.03 5ubd, 1 of the Zoning Ordinance, letters a -f: (a) The variance and its resulting construction would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter, and would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The uniqueness of this lot was that it was platted prior to the shoreland requirements. There are sufficient buffer areas in the development between the homes and the lake. The lot predates the shoreland district requirements. N This lot was created prior to the City's shoreland regulations, and was not required to comply with the impervious surface requirements. Cimarron Ponds Homeowner's Association owns and maintains five ponds, common grounds and other outlots. There is land that is owned by the State between Cimarron Ponds and Gleason Lake that also serves as a buffer. (c) The purpose of the variance request is to make an improvement to the home for the homeowners to enjoy. (d) Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. The applicants are proposing to finish the room addition with the same brick that currently exists on the exterior of the home. (e) The requested variance will not impair adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, will not increase traffic, will not increase the danger of fire or public safety, nor will it impair property values within the neighborhood. (f) The requested variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the hardship for this Property. I would like to thank you in advance for your time and your consideration of this variance request. If you have any further comments or questions, please feel free to contact me at (763) 370-4897 (cell) or (763) 420-33177 (home). Sincgqly, _ r� 6 �- S Ron Splett Skyline Design, Inc. rp)City of Plymouth Adding Quality to Life Community Development Department 3448 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 (763)509.5454 FAX 1763} 509-5407 ZONING ORDINANCE VARIANCE STANDARDS The City Council or Zoning Administrator may approve a variance application (major or minor, respectively) only upon finding that all of the following criteria, as applicable, have been met: 1. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter, and would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2. The variance applicant has satisfactorily established that there are practical difficulties in complying with this Chapter. "Practical difficulties" means that: a. the applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter; b. the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property that were not created by the landowner; and c. the variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The variance request is not based exclusively upon economic considerations. 4. The variance, and its resulting constnuction or project, would not be detrimental to the public welfare, nor would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. S. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it substantially increase traffic congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. 6. The variance requested is the minimum action required to address or alleviate the practical difficulties. Section 21030 -Plymouth Zoning Ordinance Forms: ZOvariancestds.dacx Bldg. 75 - 941 Zanibar Lane 8s� 3a. �S- /V T9aw J 1 5�baNO - iY15 rj�G � "6 P.�Rrrl�y,«". 2.9f6�� I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Lot 3, Block 2, CIMARRON PONDS 2ND ADDITION Hennepin County, Minnesota And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. This survey is made only in connection with a mortgage loan now being placed on the property and no liability is assumed except to the holder of such mortgage or any other interest acquired by the reason of such mortgage. It is understood and agreed no monuments have been placed for the purpose of establishing lot lines or Found ry corners. As surveyed by me this 13th dayof March 19_2$ Thomas S. Bergquist 14,11.1 Land Surveyor, Minn. Reg, No. 7725 COMBS-KNUTSON A • ssaClATEs.INC. CONSUM140 ENGINEERS 0 LAND SURVEYORS s SITE PLANNERS •!�{;•;.� :; �; - MINNEAPp415. HLITCHI NSON and MARSHA LL, MINNESOTA SCALE MORTGAGE SURVEY for CCNT[iRlON COMPANY � � * % w } i � § � a/\7 � § /» ® \L� / m)k§ f\§ to )� � ❑/)<k LUƒto m � 0- ■ 0 c < a/\7 § ±$E� ® / m)k§ a )� ❑/)<k LUƒto m � 0- 0 c < U) \ 0 f e m LO \ I <q &a / ƒ \ ±k8¢ f > $)§o g 0 s Lo 9 § \ /k§-§ §me§EL Ln 14 ji o- ftm x L u i ILJ Uju iu LU / �d o NOW7 \j& k� - �/\ a 2<m � CO� LU ��m I I I I I I I I �I i I I I C0 c� n a Lo n e, FF�a Q �d � Y LW A z � L— Ln C0 c� n a Lo n e, Q �d � Y LW A L) U) . U) 0 �_ o tin m t x v = L a� C E ',� .� .Q - a J 0 co ca L0 0rn '" �► "' C N S o ro m x M U m 0 c r N [A (1> r_ En - N 0 U) L 7 L 0 U 0 ,� E LO X r x p U X 0 p U Cay N co (y io N CO 1L + r CV r a n � % - s i2 W e L n ' =`ens O �^ SOW rjM r i (3 a ro OC U N rr N ii :r+ O L L • � U 0] a7 {� ) M C o cv na} N E L o aI— N E m O CO 0 OCL ren �?_� x a caN ro _ 0 00 N CV E_ i X r C [V H LO tit r N r CD t11 C] N (D +- Agenda Number r File 2016098 I PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT TO: Plymouth Planning Commission FROM: Kip Berglund PIanner (509-5453) through Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: February 15, 2017 APPLICANT: Creekside Plymouth, LLC PROPOSAL: Rezoning and preliminary plat for "Creekside Woods Phase If" LOCATION: 172I5 and 17135 Old Rockford Road GUIDING: LA -1 (Iiving area 1) CURRENT ZONING: FRD (future restricted development) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Wayzata School District (ISD 284) REVIEW DEADLINE: April I, 2017 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of the following: ■ a rezoning of the approximately 1.22 -acre site from FRD (future restricted development) to RSF-2 (single-family detached 2); and • a preliminary plat for "Creekside Woods Phase I1" to establish three single-family lots. The request also includes a portion of the recently approved Creekside Woods subdivision that received rezoning and preliminary plat approval in August, 2016. Outlot A, Creekside Woods, would become part of Creekside Woods Phase 11. With Outlot A, the total site area is 1.32 acres. Under the plan, the existing home would remain. On January 18, 2017, the Planning Commission opened and continued the public hearing. Notice of the original public hearing was published in the city's official newspaper and notice of the original and continued public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 750 feet of the site. File 2016098 Page 2 A copy of the notification area map is attached. Development signage has also been posted on the property. CONTEXT: Surrounding Land Uses Natural Characteristics of Site This site is located in the Bassett Creek watershed district. Plymouth Creek lies south of the site. The site contains mature trees and is subject to the city's tree preservation regulations. The site does not contain any wetlands and is not Iocated in a shoreland overlay district or flood plain. Previous Actions Affecting Site The existing property is not platted. The existing home was constructed in 1984 and would remain as part of a newly created lot within the subdivision. In August, 2016, the 4.7 acre property to the south and east received approval of a rezoning from FRS to RSF-2 and preliminary plat for Creekside Woods consisting of seven single-family lots. A final plat request is currently being reviewed for that property. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. This is because the rezoning of land is a "quasi -legislative" action (enactment of policy). The zoning ordinance and snap are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set by the comprehensive plan, The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The city's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations and zoning ordinance. This is because preliminary plat review is a "quasi-judicial" action (enforcement of established policy). If a preliminary plat application meets the standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zoning North (across Single-family home on large lot FRD Gid Rockford Single-family homes in "Plum Tree East" (NW) LA -1 PUD Road) Single-family homes in "Golfview Estates"(NE) RSF-I East Creekside Woods LA -1 RSF-2 South Creekside Woods and wetland LA -1 RSF-2 West Single-family homes in "Kimberly Woods" LA -1 RSF-2 RSF-1 Natural Characteristics of Site This site is located in the Bassett Creek watershed district. Plymouth Creek lies south of the site. The site contains mature trees and is subject to the city's tree preservation regulations. The site does not contain any wetlands and is not Iocated in a shoreland overlay district or flood plain. Previous Actions Affecting Site The existing property is not platted. The existing home was constructed in 1984 and would remain as part of a newly created lot within the subdivision. In August, 2016, the 4.7 acre property to the south and east received approval of a rezoning from FRS to RSF-2 and preliminary plat for Creekside Woods consisting of seven single-family lots. A final plat request is currently being reviewed for that property. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. This is because the rezoning of land is a "quasi -legislative" action (enactment of policy). The zoning ordinance and snap are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set by the comprehensive plan, The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The city's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations and zoning ordinance. This is because preliminary plat review is a "quasi-judicial" action (enforcement of established policy). If a preliminary plat application meets the standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. File 2016098 Page 3 ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: REZONING The applicant is requesting to rezone the site from FRD to RSF-2. The requested rezoning would accommodate the proposed single-family residential development for the site. The FRD zoning district serves as a "holding zone'' until property is developed, at which time it shall be rezoned in accordance with its land use guiding designation in the comprehensive plan. Any development of this site would require rezoning from the FAD classification. Cwnrprehensive Platz The site is guided LA -1 on the city's land use guide plan. The land use chapter of the comprehensive plan lists single-family homes as appropriate land uses in areas guided LA -1. The LA -1 designation specifies a minimum density goal of two dwelling units per acre and a maximum density of three dwelling units per acre for residential developments. Density is based on net acreage (excluding areas of wetlands and required wetland buffer strips, areas below the 1 00 -year flood elevation, areas below the ordinary high water level of lakes and streams, areas below the high water level of ponds, and areas of right-of-way for arterial roadways), consistent with the procedures established by the Metropolitan Council. Based on roughly 1.32 net acres, this site should accommodate 2 to 3 dwelling units. The proposal would include 3 dwelling units, for a density of 2.27 dwelling units per acre. Consequently, the proposal would be consistent with the density goal identified in the comprehensive plan. The RSF-2 district is listed as an appropriate corresponding zoning district for property that is guided LA -1. Single-family homes are allowable in the RSF-2 district as a permitted use. Consequently, the proposed development and requested RSF-2 zoning would be consistent with the LA -I guiding of the site. An excerpt of the LA -1 section of the comprehensive plan is attached. The surrounding properties to the south and east are zoned RSF-2 and are separated by wetlands and Plymouth Creek, The RSF-1 zone to the west contains a compatible single-family development with similar lot sizes. The properties to the northwest (PUD) and northeast (RSF-1) are developed with single-family homes and are separated by Old Rockford Road. The properties directly west and north are currently zoned FRD and would be rezoned to a compatible zoning district if and when developed. Staff finds that the requested rezoning from FRD to RSF-2 would be appropriate, based upon the following findings: 1. The requested single-family use of the site is consistent with the LA -1 guiding of the site. 2. The requested RSF-2 zoning would be consistent with the LA -1 guiding of the site. The proposed lot arrangement would comply with RSF-2 standards. 3. The density and RSF-2 zoning for the site would result in a development that would be compatible with the existing character and zoning of the adjacent properties. File 2016098 Page 4 4. Adequate infrastructure would be available to support RSF-2 zoning and the proposed development for the site. PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into three lots for single-family homes. Outlot A. Creekside Woods, would become part of the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Creekside Woods Phase I1. A portion of the property (southeast corner) would be right-of-way for the bulb of the cul-de- sac of the newly created public street from Old Rockford Road. The existing home would remain and become Lot 3, Block 1. Sewer mid water are proposed to be extended from Old Rockford Road along the new public street to serve the approved lots in the Creekside Woods subdivision. The proposed lots would all be served from the new public street. Utilities to proposed Lot 3 (the existing home), would come from the public street through Outlot B, Creekside Woods, Access to the proposed Lots 1 and 2 would come directly from the new street. At this time, the applicant proposes to keep the existing home on proposed Lot 3. However, the existing driveway from Old Rockford Road to the existing home would be removed and access to proposed Lot 3, would come from the new street through Outlot B, Creekside Woods. Outlot B. Creekside Woods, would become part of Lot 3, Block 1, Creekside Woods Phase II. Conditions are included in the attached resolution reflecting these. requirements. Lot-Irrangeinent The RSF-2 zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 12,500 square feet and a minimum lot width of 80 feet (as measured at the required fi-ont setback line). All proposed lots would meet or exceed the RSF-2 standards. The smallest lot would contain 12,5I0 square feet and the average lot size would be 19,205 square feet. Lot width would range from 80 feet to 150 feet. Tree PreseruationlLandveal-7ing This development is subject to the city's tree preservation regulations. Section 530 of the city code requires preservation of at least 50 percent of the caliper inches of significant trees for residential development sites, or reforestation and/or monetary restitution for any removal in excess of this threshold. A significant tree is defined as one being eight inches or larger its diameter for deciduous trees, and four inches or larger in diameter for conifers. The tree survey, consisting of both the Creekside Woods and Creekside Woods Phase 11 properties, indicates 5,517.5 caliper inches of eligible significant trees on the site. after deducting exempt trees located in the area of the water quality treatment pond. The applicant submitted a tree plan indicating that 2,607 inches of significant trees (47.2 percent) would be preserved, As a result, the applicant would need to plant 189.69 inches as restitution. The applicant's landscape/reforestation plan indicates 100 tree inches to be planted on both phases. Consequently, the applicant would be required to pay restitution for 89,69 tree inches in order to meet the city's requirements for tree preservation. A condition is included in the attached resolution requiring the tree restitution payment, which will be collected through the development contract for Creekside Woods. File 2016098 Page 5 DrcrinagelTrGycrtzzzent of Runaff- The city requires storm drainage systems to be designed so that the post -development rate of runoff from a site does not exceed the pre -development rate of runoff. Additionally, the city requires treatment of storm water runoff before it enters the drainage system. A water quality pond would be constructed in the southwest portion of the Creekside Woods subdivision to treat run-off and provide rate/volume control prior to discharge into the wetland to the south. The pond would be sized to treat runoff from both the Creekside Woods and Creekside Woods Phase II subdivisions. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant would be required to submit any necessary additional information. including drainage calculations, and address any needed changes to the proposed drainage system, so it complies with all city regulations regarding drainage and water quality. Praf•k Dedication The existing home was built in 1984 on the unplatted property. As a result, this site has never paid a park dedication fee. As part of platting three new Iots at this time, the applicant would be required to pay a cash fee in lieu of land dedication for three dwelling units, pursuant to section 528 of the city code. This matter is addressed in the attached resolution. 5id",alkslTrails The approved Creekside Woods subdivision will include a concrete sidewalk along the southeast side of the new public street in compliance with the subdivision regulations. The proposed sidewalk would connect with the existing sidewalk along the south side of Old Rockford Road. Tra f fit Old Rockford Road is classified as a major collector on the Roadway Functional Classification Map in the comprehensive plan. Collectors are designed to serve shorter trips that occur within the city and to provide access from neighborhoods to other collector roadways and the arterial system. The latest traffic count is attached from 2413 showing 5,200 trips along the segment of Old Rockford Load between Peony Lane and Dunkirk Lane. A single-family home generates an average of ten trips per day (a round trip constitutes two trips). If approved, there would be 14 total lots between the two Creekside Woods subdivisions where two originally existed. Based on that number, the eight additional lots would increase the traffic by a total of 80 average daily trips or a 1.5 percent increase. Staff finds that Old Rockford Road has adequate capacity to accommodate the additional traffic that would be generated by the proposed subdivisions. Conclusion on the Preliminary Plal Staff finds the proposed plat would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. and would comply with the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations and zoning ordinance. File 2016098 Page 6 11 taISITITIVA -4 �►Ik F I e ' A Community development department staff recommends approval of the following items for Creekside Woods: a) an ordinance approving the rezoning of the site from FRD to RSF-2; b) a resolution approving the findings of fact supporting the rezoning; and, c) a resolution approving the preliminary plat. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Ordinance Approving Rezoning 2. Draft Resolution Approving Findings of Fact for Rezoning 3. Draft Resolution Approving Preliminary PIat 4. Applicant's Narrative 5, LA -1 Excerpt (Comprehensive Plan) 6, 2013 Traffic Counts 7. Location Map 8. Aerial Photo 9. Notification Area Map 10. Site Graphics P)PI mung ApF4imUwuI3I1b%21PYAV 1 C -ysidr Wm1v Pl a 11 RZ AP�Cnp m D '\PC PeW dwr CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2017 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21(ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN! LAND LOCATED AT 17215 OLD ROCKFORD ROAD (2016098) THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of City Code. Chapter 21 of the City Code of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Plymouth Zoning Map from FRD (future restricted development) to R5F-2 (single family detached 2) with respect to the roughly 1.22 - acre site presently addressed as 17215 Ofd Rockford Road, and presently legally described as follows: That part of the following described property: The West 150 feet of the North 395 feet of that part of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 118, Range 22, described as commencing at the southeast corner of said West Half; thence North along the east line of said West Half 1334.59 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes West 449 feet; thence North parallel with said east line 582.09 feet to the center line of County Road No. 9 (aka Rockford Road); thence easterly along said center line to said east line; thence South to the point of beginning. Which lies southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of said property; thence northerly along the east line of said property 50.00 feet to the center of a 50.00 foot radius circle; thence continuing northerly along said east line 50.00 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence westerly 59.69 feet along said circle, having a central angle of fib degrees 23 minutes 39 seconds; thence westerly 104.09 feet more or less to a point on the west line of said property distant 53.39 feet north of the southwest corner of said property and there terminating. Ordinance 2015- 2016098 Page 2 Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect immediately upon its passage. ADOPTED by the Plymouth City Council this **** day of ******* Kelli 5iavik, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2017 - RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE REZONING OF LAND LOCATED AT 1 721 5 OLD ROCKFORD ROAD (2016098) WHEREAS, Creekside Plymouth, LLC, has requested reclassification of the zoning from FRD (future restricted development) to RSF-2 (single family detached 2) for the roughly 1.22 -acre site presently addressed as 17215 Old Rockford Road, and presently legally described as follows: That part of the following described property: The West 150 feet of the North 395 feet of that part of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 118, Range 22, described as commencing at the southeast corner of said West Half; thence North along the east line of said West Half 1334.59 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes West 449 feet; thence North parallel with said east line 582.09 feet to the center line of County Road No. 9 (aka Rockford Road); thence easterly along said center line to said east line; thence South to the point of beginning. Which lies southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of said property; thence northerly along the east line of said property 50.00 feet to the center of a 50.00 foot radius circle; thence continuing northerly along said east line 50.00 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence westerly 59.69 feet along said circle, having a central angle of 68 degrees 23 minutes 39 seconds; thence westerly 104.09 feet more or less to a point on the west line of said property distant 53.39 feet north of the southwest corner of said property and there terminating. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcel from FRD to RSF-2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for reclassification of the zoning from FRD to RSF-2 for the roughly 1.22 -acre site located at 17215 Old Rockford Road (as presently legally described above), based on the following findings: 1. The requested single-family use of the site is consistent with the LA -1 guiding of the site. 2. The requested RSF-2 zoning would be consistent with the LA -1 guiding of the site. The proposed lot arrangement would comply with RS F-2 standards. 3. The density and RS F-2 zoning for the site would result in a development that would be compatible with the existing character and zoning of the adjacent properties. Resolution 2017- (2016098) Page 2 d. Adequate infrastructure would be available to support RSF-2 zoning and the proposed development for the site. APPROVED by the City Council this * * * day of *******. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, Being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on ******* with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this day of City Clerk CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2017 - RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CREEKSIDE PLYMOUTH, LLC, FOR "CREEKSIDE WOODS PHASE I!" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17 21 5 AND 1713 5 OLD ROCKFORD ROAD (201 6098) WHEREAS, Creekside Plymouth, LLC, has requested approval of a preliminary plat for roughly 1.32 acres of land presently legally described as follows: That part of the following described property: The West 150 feet of the North 395 feet of that part of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 118, Range 22, described as commencing at the southeast corner of said West Half; thence North along the east line of said West Half 1334.59 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes West 449 feet; thence North parallel with said east line 582.09 feet to the center line of County Road No. 9 (aka Rockford Road); thence easterly along said center line to said east line; thence South to the point of beginning. Which lies southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of said property; thence northerly along the east line of said property 50.00 feet to the center of a 50.00 foot radius circle; thence continuing northerly along said east line 50.00 feet to the paint of beginning of said line to be described; thence westerly 59.59 feet along said circle, having a central angle of 58 degrees 23 minutes 39 seconds; thence westerly 104.09 feet more or less to a paint on the west line of said property distant 53.39 feet north of the southwest corner of said property and there terminating. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE lT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Creekside Woods, LLC, for a preliminary plat for Creekside Woods Phase II, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved for three single-family lots in accordance with the development plans received by the city on December 2, 2016, and additional information on January 17, 2017 and February 8, 2017, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval of the preliminary plat is contingent upon City Council approval of the rezoning of the site. 3. Prior to commencement of site development including grading operations, the developer shall: aj Install and request inspection of tree protection fencing and silt fencing. bj Obtain the necessary right-of-way permits from the City of Plymouth Engineering Division to allow work in the Old Rockford Road right-of-way. Res. 2017 - File 2016098 Page 2 c) Obtain the required NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permit, 4, Prior to recording the final plat, the developer shall: a) Remove the existing detached garage and other site features identified as being removed from the site. A demolition permit is required for removal of the existing detached garage. b) Receive city approval of final construction pians, c) Provide the required financial guarantees and fees. d) Pay the park dedication cash fee in lieu of land dedication for three new dwelling units, in accordance with the dedication ordinance in effect at the time of filing of the final plat. e) Pay the required tree restitution fee, fj Provide documentation deeding the remaining triangle area in the southeast corner of the site, south of the cul-de-sac right-of-way, to Lot 6, Block 1, Creekside Woods. g) Obtain Bassett Creek Watershed approval, h) Remove any retaining walls within a drainage and utility easement or obtain an encroachment agreement for retaining walls that would lie within a drainage and utility easement. i) Revise the plans to include drainage arrows. j) Revise the plans to show draintile extending from the catch basin planned with phase one to between Lots two and three to ensure proper drainage. Also to ensure the rearyard of Lot two will drain properly. k) Submit Fire Inspector approved fire flow calculations. 5. Upon submission of the final plat application, the developer shall submit homeowner's association documents or covenants for city review. The homeowner's association documents or covenants shall address: a) responsibilities for maintenance and repair of developer -installed retaining walls, wetlands, wetland buffers, buffer monuments, sidewalks, and any subdivision signage or other similar or common features; and b) prohibition of structures and clearing of native vegetation within wetland buffers. 6. Access to Lot 3, Block 1, Creekside Woods Phase II, shall come from Inland Lane through Outlot B, Creekside Woods, 0utlot B, Creekside Woods, shall become part of Lot 3, Block 1, Creekside Woods Phase II. When the existing driveway along Old Rockford Road is removed and access to Lot 3 comes from Inland Lane, the developer shall submit revised plans showing: 1) the addition of bituminous curb to Old Rockford Road in the area of the existing curb cut; 2) the removal of any existing mailboxes; and 3) the restoration of the trail along Old Rockford Road as necessary. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits on Lots 1 and 2, the developer shall: a) Provide documentation that Outlot 13, Creekside Woods, has been combined with Lot 3, Block 1, Creekside Woods Phase II. b) Remove the driveway on Old Rockford Road and provide access to Lot 3, Block 1, Creekside Woods Phase II from Inland Lane. c) Provide a certificate of survey indicating a minimum of two front yard trees to be preserved or planted on each lot. This condition also applies when Lot 3 redevelops. Res. 2017 - File 2016098 Page 3 Standard Conditions: a. No building permits, including those for a model home, shall be issued until the final plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County and the streets and utilities are installed. b. Development standards and setbacks for this plat shall comply with the RSF-2 zoning standards. No variances are granted or implied. c. Any signage shall require separate permits and shall comply with the city's sign regulations. d. Removal of all hazardous trees at the owner's expense. e. No trees shall be planted in the boulevard, f. This approval shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has applied for final plat approval, or unless the applicant, with the consent of the landowner, has received prior approval from the city to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under section 510 of city code. APPROVED by the Plymouth City Council this **** day of ******* STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on * * * * * * * with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this day of City Clerk Creekside Woods, LLC Plymouth, MN REZONING AND zv1&0q6 aIECEIVE DEC - 2 C:T:' OF PLYMOUTH COM V,un rrY DEV ELOPIVENI' DEPART -MEW PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "CREEKSIDE WOODS PHASE II" November 30, 2016 L A N D F 0 R M From Site to Finish INTRODUCTION On behalf of Creekside Woods, LLC and Bert and Mary Olson, Landform is pleased to submit this appllcation for rezoning and preliminary plat approval for a subdivision of the 1,22 acre parcel at 17215 Old Rockford Road (also referred to as the "Olson Property.") In addition to the Olson Property, the prelim+nary plat includes the 0.19 acre Outiot A of the Creekside Woods plat, for a total site area of 1.41 acres. The preliminary plat shows three parcels: two lots for new single family homes fronting on Inland Court (Lots 1 and 2) and a lot containing the existing single family home (Lot 3) with its current. access to Old Rockford Road. A portion of the right-of-way for Inland Court will be dedicated as part of his plat, completing the cul-de-sac turnaround platted in Creekside Woods. All infrastructure required for this development (streets, utilities and drainage improvements) will be constructed according to the approved plans for the Creekside Woods subdivision. REZONING We are requesting that the Olson Property be rezoned from FRD (Future Restricted Development) to RSF-2 (Single Family Detached 2). This is consistent with the Living Area 1 (LA -1) land use classification, which anticipates 2-3 units per acre. It is also consistent with the RSF-2 zoning approved for the Creekside Woods subdivision earlier this year. All surrounding properties are guided LA -1 _ The properties to the east and south are zoned RSF-2_ The adjacent properties to the west are zoned RSF-1. Properties to the north are zoned PUD (Plum Tree), FRD and RSF-1. Section 21910 of the Zoning Ordinance lists criteria that the Planning Commission and City Council must consider when reviewing a zoning map amendment. Our plan complies with the criteria, as noted below - f. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed rezoning meets the specific policies of Living Area 1 (LA -1) to create low density neighborhoods of single family detached homes at a minimum density of two units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the RSF-2 zoning district as appropriate zoning in the LA -1 land use category. It is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plan. KRZ160a2.OLS — Creekside Woods Phase II L A N D F ❑ R M November 18, 2016 Project Narrative 2 2. The proposed action meets the purpose and intent of this Ordinance or in the case of a map amendment if meets the purpose and intent of the individual district. The purpose of the Single Family Detached Dwelling District 2 {RSF-2} is to provide for new single family neighborhoods with a lot size that is smaller than the City's traditional single family lot size. The smaller lot size will make better use of the City's shrinking land supply and investment in public utilities and allow the City to better protect and preserve its natural resources such as wetlands and woodlands. In addition, the smaller lot size will help the City meet its two units per acre density goal for new single family homes. Properties to the south and east are also zoned RSF-2, so the proposed zoning would simply be an expansion of the zoning district area The Preliminary Plat includes approximately 1.41 acres. We are proposing three units, a density of 2.11 units per acre, meeting the goal of 2 units per acre provided by the LA -1 guiding. 3. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. A full range of public services and facilities are available to the site. The project will dedicate the remaining right-of-way needed to complete the new public street which will be constructed along with all other infrastructure as part of the final plat for Creekside Woods. 4. There is adequate buffer or transition provided between potentially incompatible districts. There is adequate buffer and transition provided between potentially incompatible districts. The surrounding properties to the south and east are also zoned RSF-2, with existing single family homes separated from the Creekside Woods development by an open space area and Plymouth Creek. Adjacent properties directly to the north are currently zoned FRD, and would be expected to be rezoned to a compatible district when and if they are subdivided. The areas to the northeast and northwest across Old Rockford Road are zoned RSF-1 and PUD, respectively. The right-of-way of Old Rockford Road provides a transition to the properties to the north. The nearby homes in these districts have their rear yards facing this Major Collector roadway. The RSF-1 zone to the west contains a compatible development of single family homes along Jewel Lane. Kimberly Lane Elementary School is located to the west of those properties and is adequately buffered from this site. PRELIMINARY PLAT We are requesting approval of a preliminary plat to allow for the creation of three new single family lots, one of which contains the existing home owned by Bert and Mary Olson. The proposed lot size and lot KRZ16002.aLS - Creekside Woods Phase li I_ A N D F O R M November 18, 2016 Project Narrative 3 widths meet or exceed the RSF-2 standards, which require lots a minimum of 80 feet wide and 12,500 square feet. Home sites on each lot will comply with all required setbacks. All infrastructure needed for this development will be provided by the adjacent Creekside Woods project. The final plat and required construction plans for the street, sanitary sewer, water, storm drainage and water quality improvements have been submitted to the City and are currently under review. Roadway Access The new street, Inland Court, will serve Lots 1 and 2. Lot 3, which contains the existing single family home, will continue to take access from Old Rockford Road_ The City generally prohibits individual driveways from Major Collector roadways such as Old Rockford Road. However, in this case the existing home and access will be preserved. It would be difficult to reconfigure the driveway access given the location and orientation of the home. The home is set back approximately 150 feet from Old Rockford Road. The existing driveway is configured so that vehicles may turn around on site and vehicles do not need to back onto the roadway, reducing safety concerns from traffic entering the roadway. Development Phasing The two property owners cooperating in this subdivision have agreed that Lot 1 would be owned by Creekside Woods, LLC and developed for a single family home consistent with the seven lots in the Creekside Woods project. Lots 2 and 3 would be retained by Bert and Mary Olson. The project would be final -platted in two phases. The first phase will be a final plat dedicating the remaining right-of-way for Inland Court and two lots; Lot 1, and a single parcel comprising Lots 2 and 3. We expect that this first phase will be submitted shortly after preliminary plat approval so that Lot 1 can be ready for construction in spring of 2017. The second phase would be the division of Lots 2 and 3, which would occur at such time as the Olsons wish to create the additional building site and separate it from the existing home. Utility stubs for Lot 2 will be provided as part of the Creekside Woods plat, and the existing home on Lot 3 will be connected to City sewer and water in phase 1, so no new public improvements would be needed. There is an existing detached garage that encroaches on the property line between the two lots, which would be removed when Lots 2 and 3 are divided. Plymouth City Code Chapter 510.01, Subd_ 8 states: "Unless the Council specifically approves a different time period, the approval of a preliminary plat shall expire one year from the date it was approved, unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat..." The 01 sons do not have immediate plans to divide Lots 2 and 3, and may not do so for some time into the future, We request that the City extend its approval of this preliminary plat and allow at least five years for the Oisons KRZI5002.OLS — Creekside Woods Phase 11 I. A N D F ❑ R M November 18, 2016 Project Narrative 4 to complete the division of Lots 2 and 3, This will save future costs for the Olsons as well as reduce any burden on the City from processing extension requests. Landscaping and Tree Preservation Lot 1 will be landscaped according to city requirements in the first phase of development. Lot 2 will be landscaped when it is subdivided in the second phase and a new home is constructed. No additional landscaping is proposed for the existing home on Lot 3. A portion of this site (the Inland Court right-of-way, Outlot A, and some additional area west of the cul-de- sac) was included in the tree preservation plan for the Creekside Woods subdivision_ Some trees identified for preservation would need to be removed to grade house pads for Lots 1 and 2 in this new plan. The two subdivisions are dependent upon each other and the land areas covered by the plans overlap. Therefore, we have submitted a new tree preservation plan that covers both the first Creekside Woods project and this new application. Another advantage of a single plan for the entire area is that there is more room for required replanting within the area of the first plat. The revised tree preservation plan that covers all ten lots of Creekside Woods and Creekside Woods Phase II shows removal of 51.7% of the total inches of significant trees. Replanting or restitution for 93.25 caliper inches will be required. Because there are no immediate plans for grading or construction on Lots 2 and 3, the final tree preservation plan will show the tree removals and restitution in two phases. The phasing will be negotiated between the two land owners. SUMMARY We respectfully request approval of the Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for this three lot subdivision to be known as "Creekside Woods Phase II" CONTACT INFORMATION This document was prepared by. Anne Hurlburt Landform 195 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Reid Schulz at rschulz[cb-landform.net or 612.6 38.026 1. KRZ16002.OLS — Creekside Woods Phase II L A N D F a R M November 18, 2016 Project Narrative 5 Guidelines and Criteria Minimum Density: Maximum Density: City Utilities: Corresponding Zoning Districts: Types of Development Location Criteria: 4 units per acre 6 units per acre Required for all RSF-? ' gle Family Detached 2) RSp,c (Single Family Detached 3) F-4 (Single and Two Family) RMF -1 (Multiple Family 1) RMF -2 (Multiple Family 2) FUD for cluster developments • Single family detached dwellings • Two-family dwellings • Townhomes • Churches, schools and private recreational facilities • Not appropriate adjacent to principal arterial interchanges • Near large parks or permanent open space ■ Near neighborhood shopping and service facilities E LIVING AREA 'I (LA -1) Living Area I (LA -1) identifies low density neighborhoods of single family detached homes and two-family homes, and directly related complementary uses such as churches, schools and recreational facilities. Lot sizes in areas guided LA -1 will reflect the City's goal to develop new homes at a minimum of two units per acre as well as make reasonable use of the City's investment in public utilities and the limited supply of available land. This means that lots in future LA -1 developments may be smaller than is the case in some LA -1 guided neighborhoods today, Because LA -1 guiding is characterized by large, individual lots that typically offer less opportunity to preserve significant natural resources on individual sites, the City may allow townhomes up to three units per acre on a case by case basis. The City may allow townhomes if a developer can demonstrate that townhomes could preserve a significant natural resource that would be lost through conventional development of single family homes. Page 4 of 16 Appendix 3C Plymouth Land Use Plan - Apn1 14, 2W 9 Guidelines and Criteria Minimum Density: 2 units per acre Maximum Density_ 3 units per acre City Utilities: Required for all areas Corresponding Zoning Districts: RSF-1 (Single Family Detached 1) RSF-2 (Single Family Detached 2) RSF-3 (Single Family Detached 3) RSF-4 (Single Family Two Family) Other zoning districts may be appropriate if the proposed development would sheet the density criteria of 2 to 3 units per acre. Types of Development: • Single -fatuity detached dwellings ■ Two-family dwellings • Townhomes if resource preservation criteria met Churches, schools, and private recreational facilities Desirable Facilities: 0 Neighborhood parks, school parks or mini parks within 1/2 mile watking distance 0 Defined trail system that connects the neighborhood to other services and facilities, including parks, schools, churches, and/or neighborhood shopping areas • Neighborhood stopping facilities within five minutes driving time from the neighborhood F LIVING AREA 2 (LA -2) Living Area 2 (LA -2) identifies areas for single and two-family homes and and directly related complementary uses such as churches, schools and facilities. The primary intent bid the LA -2 designation is to respond to a need for smaller homes on smaller lots. The ty needs to offer the opportunity for this type of housing alternative to expand Pp nities for families seeking more affordable single family home living and to respon changing demographics. As the population ages, there Gvill be a growing need fo Haller homes for empty nesters and for smaller families. LA -2 also offers the opportunity for townhomes, which provide ad t ' nal life cycle housing opportunities. Townhomes in LA -2 neighborhoods offer residents cousin option with less maintenance than a typical single family home, while still being located in a familiar residential setting. P:igc 5 cif 16 Appendix 3C Plymouth Land Use Plan — Apni 14.2004 apevi a -N I )IQIA 008CLs ,vi41 ! 0 ;OBJ .* I t r F _ Black ' �� 460 19 Zile Wli 06 —C;z 00 Rl "11 Wit= yl 0' 0 9 0 1 La %f 4 r.. ix ie Zile Wli 06 —C;z 00 Rl "11 Wit= yl 0' 0 9 0 1 La 2016098 Landform Professional Services, LLC Legend ® G, Comercia! ® CC, City Center 17215 Old Rockford Road Request for a Rezoning and Preliminary Plat ®Ca, Commercial Office IP, Pianned industrial =LA -1, Living Areal LA -2, Living Area 2 LA -3, Living Area 3 ® LA -4, Living Area 4 500 250 0 500 1,000 Feet '"City of Plymouth, Minnesota ® LA -R7 ® LA -82 ® LA -R3 LA -RT P -I, PuhlidSemi-Puhiicllnstitutlanal :, s' . - r ,� •r_-: }� r.' f - :"-.''- --------- s 2016098 - Aerial Photograph 100 50 0 100 200 rPity of Feet Plymouth, Minnesota .ry � r 2016098 - Aerial Photograph 100 50 0 100 200 rPity of Feet Plymouth, Minnesota Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date 12/2/2416 Buffer Size: 750 feet Map Comments: BERT & MARY OLSON TRUST 17215 Old Rockford Road Plymouth, MN 55446 0 126 240 480 ft I i I i I i i i I For more information contact: Hennepin County GIS Once 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis.info@hennepin.us 08-118-22-33 08-118-22-34 1 o 1 - 18- 2 2 = a w � n p � N 0:. ti - _ T 17-118-22-22 17-118-22- 1" 118-22- -118-22- �.... it ' i 4 •,�,�e w •- 17-11 22- - r [3 - 17-118-22-24 a 40th Place North Buffer Size: 750 feet Map Comments: BERT & MARY OLSON TRUST 17215 Old Rockford Road Plymouth, MN 55446 0 126 240 480 ft I i I i I i i i I For more information contact: Hennepin County GIS Once 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis.info@hennepin.us ZO C, r L.p v It 1H ii ._. [L3l 0 0 F, �Wit] LL n W 9 ` P �• Wf �gggy2�y w a— I � ' "Rid C) �' p■{ Y55E 11 # � 11J E CL G4iR •�• ZO C, r L.p v It 1H ii ._. [L3l 0 0 a o W�z W ?� g yy St g It a �gggy2�y W W a— i•51 � 33 C) i9 fg 1 1 Fy RE 1 t�3�a'3l .IOU All t ygY yq gg py y i # �_I+ I1�j1j1� I o [ ay T�,,�day 4.yh .a f Ai ; is kh FC+ Lg t P_ 6 A t4yM7yr=••` ct -7:]Ti]S:f2f2!lt�lCl°ie�4rFs"`°o�0¢��8�v....peZ:p[Ye�!$C�6G�����d�aEii[�dfMn�Fax���FRnnFn__...�_ aFs�aa~-, 42S}i4% a It 1H ii ._. a ?� g yy St g It a �gggy2�y e Sg i•51 � 33 p■{ Y55E 11 � G4iR •�• fg 1 1 Fy RE 1 t�3�a'3l .IOU All t ygY yq gg py y i # �_I+ I1�j1j1� I o [ ay T�,,�day 4.yh .a f Ai ; is kh FC+ Lg t P_ 6 A t4yM7yr=••` ct -7:]Ti]S:f2f2!lt�lCl°ie�4rFs"`°o�0¢��8�v....peZ:p[Ye�!$C�6G�����d�aEii[�dfMn�Fax���FRnnFn__...�_ aFs�aa~-, 42S}i4% - Y 4 lu LIJ MIN 1 lml � ,1, ° E w w r 94 I :s " a � v1s"I ;!�a{i�€ �C[�;! sR�7��' ° � g i.€ ep �g4 � �•Y �i❑❑� Iy��s^ � Q 6§ A � �--�� � p n �•jE I,_=•E� $ir`g e ; °a is t Ypg 93 '5 �'@ c r a '� � �' � 88 a �YA �i UPI {g3 gt� ]� 5e =53 }y'y 4 . �i o �A �y�F�rl i NEE. l � $� x� 5� a c? t I q° ''-�_?� a . � — 4 a 8��€;€1"�aP9_z vpg•B 'gip 9§+. as ? i� $ 6U rl�rr a av-clans � - i W11 4 ea ✓r ` lj _, L x_ aaa,.s II JJ it, I 7� —' � I ° .._.....: iv$••. ...' ;a .: .. .. .. ... � LLQ -- .. . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ----------- - ----`------ �re^p+nT J fir.¢ R r a ° m U III C) E �+(�+� z -Qto 'y ;[iN" _ w � I � f} �Irli! c$��,i33 x3��II 1 -7777 � Y`�gg°fa IIt Ell r� LLI v U LL a c� i {i �i}I �yj 4rcl • .. g $,ce �E• � ag AMp"n gg yE i 5 gg a x -I €lotg' 9$� �� ��$ a Y�a ■� n Ra a2 s-�8 s3 n a�° 2� I {{ 3i x'a + II ti if °gd I � I gh '�1�3 �� .._....... I • •-_--•.... �� I �;� f �R � `� � alga �Ju t I------- +Ej j' I I I --t. aye `_� � E❑ �I;a m E• i�� � � o uj r. a w�z�'�� ass a c s crj �li. 9 1co �d y if�, r IS Ili !I S row gx�a s 4 �x� gg :� 9x&x � f ± • $ i#; ' rf ? i`p�p IN I 1 g $ n 4 an r3 � �� En e � 11 nae 11± g1g1 S p ¢s' € g" N S� � Asa ; 1 a 5 iA h tri }p g^ 3s. ?e d $s a§ ? � ' i pi epi s -q i r1 s 4 1a@ Y eFs F 9 Ye p p y3 F¢ se �fz F - & p}Yp g sg" B Y fyf3s 5 e�g� Tis}E i F � ° x 5 3 a eg g6 y r giag63S�_, 'a x¢a ye $ , 3" 140 Q x d 5 � �� 'al 0? 9AAA g=� � F`�gSEk -- 5 aB "4 a i4 p tl� fe �� g CC6 i 2 3 KN ;E s g ° f&_ , R, ¢'S' 'aI'll slid F� � 37t"¢ 8 gg ? Of§5= 4 ;HFygiq'q�e -agxa a;fGg 2t °s a a = §Fp €:fH a¢ � ¢F ggy � 37 iz g° 3¢ a4 see � $S2�s di• "gi "' FFpAEEdgd gy s5}=es¢"-7p &5 i ¢ fl}�3a� �i °¢ _ 'd •y rrC� s 2 d�! ey ail Y�f §�fII� "e yi E �E-i ¢re¢ g E+ j; $Y, s Ia^aqp.i csa 3 ! � k f-. xa- �1# d�t`F IN 11 €11 A a �z� I-, ? i 211111 61,11, i ; Fr cd ; a qp 1 4 m �¢ * IaYg � p `-1 �¢ �i 4 t 2 g ¢9 i s wr M lij '^ i g0g9 � 'pRn k _ i S'r _¢ #9€ 3ga`[ Ck± •'[ ¢ ; 3- 4¢�-.fin d ,wp 'a} g f4 aq, e -y ! e r ey j�i 4t � }� s•.p_9r•s•�q 4S �Y. �_ 1 rEef��y as a ail" rf, ygg qgg pprkk qq r 3 s i F 2 a91� s SYr 4 5r 4YY@f r8i�aaS+' sr¢�$: Ed7e. 5 °�3G €Si¢o °�'t y Y§ { EE a " Sa' him -$-4 rhE IL � UJ 8 : Lit Y Q °4i1 1 rhE IL 8 k i INS. 1 Ld r^' N LU -18 ii' _{ yrs s . ❑ !i i �l.11issaaaa;!3 � � � •;�xa t'; ��•t 3 + �.�i, IU � � � f � � g a 3 e i 4 '% C` a F,=� U ;i fl7� P CIDW(w S a$�3$ •• � VJ E Ila] ii;s ~may ;iil t 2 ]p�:e7 - w W g i 'tile€iL) oil a 5 23664in F,=� g ;i o S a Ila] ii;s ~may ;iil t z s ty � tal, I B a� oil a 5 flO 8 A, ��A$ e � �� ie R� �� E� d� ! � �� f"3nF• es yg3 °F s{�{ e_#$�!$ ss A 4py� 9yayg I a S &iR a 8rk . 2 �� � ` �P H =L �a Y� a _a B a�S 33 �� x� _ ■3 pegS� ii a7E^tlYpS R - ill; iA e- i [ s $gam gE i tl ,�:saIa� xae '� g pia . yy3 !! 2i SIM e N p f Ex sg a --pf�i ga.g �3 3 is 6G 7 K fl i figg; to tis= qq r r a a cFr& 6/ xae " 'lie I§kr fail ��!.� �i�� $i ee Y 2s 3 8 t w f$ a z.i7 !T M iJN1 d Y6�A A �I---T—F1[r__— 4 � l I � f 1 t1 15i � L 1 I I I I i ii hyo I] ;i o ii;s ~may ;iil t z s tal, I B a� oil a 5 d Y6�A A �I---T—F1[r__— 4 � l I � f 1 t1 15i � L 1 I I I I i tal, I B a� oil a 5 a_6 tlkayy[ s3i5xE �u Cee a i8 9 d Nil, �ppA� x 1 I 1 1 I a 1 L kY Yn r =] t d Y6�A A �I---T—F1[r__— 4 � l I � f 1 t1 15i � L 1 I I I I i V) X: 0 C2 0 (D 0 �:t LU 0. LLJL z LLJ < 4 n q --1 �2 n My I PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 7B PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT TO: Plymouth PIanning Commission FROM: Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: February 15, 2017 SUBJECT: 2017 Planning Commission Work Program DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Attached for your review is a draft 2017 Planning Commission Werk Program. Please review it prior to the February 1 meeting. In the past, staff has also prepared a draft Planning Commission Annual Report. Based on changes city-wide, this is the sixth year we instead prepared an annual report of the Community Development Department. You will find the 2016 report includes much of the planning and building information from past annual reports, plus information about recent activities in the other two divisions within the department — housing and support services. A copy of the department's annual report is also attached. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the Planning Commission review the draft work program and suggest any additions or changes you would like to make. The cormrrission should then accept work program and forward it to the City Council. ATTACHMENT: Draft 2017 Work Program 2016 Community Development Annual Report M 2 a❑ v � C} � C7 Q} 3 ro m n 0 3 ro a v 0 Di 0 M N C� cc CO R] m CD �n 0 -a ro CD ❑7 c c- co C W CD Z; 7) Cn C CD R CL v N 0 n CD Z) N_ C CD 07 CD C_ CD a v 2 0 c r� CD 0 � ro _ v❑ C. CD �3 3 � lnm3- O C2 = FD CL � v 0 (a O' � ❑ 0 n ren m rn v N 7. ❑ n � 0 LC7 � ZI sv Q 71 7 n v 0 n :3 CD ro v M v 0 r� v WE C) m n 0 cD :E CD (D N Q CD CDQ. < ii =10 � 4 0 ❑ =7 (D 0 (C CSD N ro to N- 3 CD � w0- 0`< 3 v 0 m n 0 m �CD C DCCcn D� (D o Q {CD --3 C) 3 a Q Q CD W v Q O gni 0) LFD n' o m v ❑ C) [Q CZ `C w CD n� <�� ro C n 3 3 iv m v v Cl N 73 5' to w Q r -r 0 0 �. uo uo a 3 o 3 3 0 CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT City of Plymouth Community Devetopment Department 3400 Ptymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 (763)509-5400 January 20, 2017 CITY OF PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY DEVEOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Community Development Department is comprised of four divisions: planning, protective inspections (building), housing and redevelopment (housing) and support services. Department staff supports the work of the city's Planning Commission and Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The 2016 members of both are listed below along with a chart that shows the department organization. 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS Jun Davis, Chair (Ward 3) David Witte (Ward 1) from 4126 Marc Anderson, Vice -Chair (Ward 2) Bryan Oakley (Ward 3) until 2/17 Julie Witt (Ward 4) Donovan Saba (At -Large) Jim Kovach (At -Large) Gary Goldetsky (At -Large) Ned Carroll, Council Representative 2016 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS Jeff Kulaszewicz, Chair Michelle Soderberg Katie Black Kira Vanderlan Marty McCarthy Judy Johnson, Council Representative 2015 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION Conimunity Developmeni Director Support Services Housing Protective Inspections Planning Support Serikes HR.4 Manager Building DfjTlcial Planning Manager Manager Building Inspector (T) HRA Specialist (2) Conrmunity Electrical Inspector (1) Senior Planner (2) Deti,elopnient Planner (1) Dice Support Rep (4) Coordinator (1) Housing Inspector (1) Fire Inspector (2) 2 2016 PLANNING DIVISION The planning division supports both the long range and current planning activities of the city. Long range planning activities include preparation of updates to the city's comprehensive plan and annual updates to the city's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations. Current planning activities include coordination of the review of development applications as well as review of all building permits for conformity with planning and zoning requirements. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS In 2015, the city approved one comprehensive plan amendment to the land use guide plan. The amendment involved re -guiding the roughly 70 -acre former Begin Oaks golf course site between Cheshire Parkway and I-494 from P-1 {public/semi-public/institutional} to LA -2 (living area 2). The re -guiding and subsequent rezoning facilitated the platting of Camelot Nine at Begin PUD, consisting of 124 single family lots and 51 lots for rowhomes. The city also continued preliminary work related to the state -mandated update of the comprehensive plan, due by 2018. In Summer 2016, staff prepared the vision, goals and policies for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which were reviewed by the Platming Commission and subsequently accepted by the City Council for inclusion in the plan update. In Fall 2016, the City hosted an open house attended by more than 100 people to solicit comments on a draft land use plan. The Planning Commission and City Council subsequently accepted the draft land use plan for inclusion in the plan update. Staff expects to bring drafts of each of the individual chapters of the pian to the commission for review in 2017. AMENDMENTS TO ZONING AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS When the zoning ordinance was adopted in 1996, the city recognized it would be necessary to make additional adjustments and modifications. Many such changes have been made every year since, and updating the ordinance and the subdivision regulations has now become an annual activity. In 2016, in addition to the annual update, staff initiated work on two other changes to the zoning ordinance. The first involved opting out of the state law that allows temporary dwellings as transitional housing as the city already had accessory dwelling unit regulations. The second involved a major overhaul of the floodplain regulations in order to maintain compliance with FEMA requirements. PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS The city received or initiated a total of 110 new planning projects in 2016. Since many 20D projects required multiple Im applications, a total of 145 separate planning and zoning ,2V applications or studies were processed in 2016. The number M of applications and projects for 60 the last ten years is shown on the 40 chart. A detailed breakdown by 'D type of application for this same 0 time period is included as an attachment to this report. Planning and Zoning Applications and Projects In 2016, the Planning Commission held 38 public hearings during their 19 regular meetings. In 2016, 15 projects that the commission reviewed did not require public hearings and were either placed on the consent list for the commission's action as "routine" items or considered as new business without a public hearing. The overall number of reviews was higher than last year, reflecting the continuing availability of residential land in northwest Plymouth and the strong desire for new housing in the Wayzata school district. The majority of projects on which the Planning Commission made recommendations to the City Council were placed on the council's consent list. Many of the planning applications submitted were eligible for administrative approval by staff and did not require Planning Commission review. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS The city processed one application for a major project in 2016. The Planning Commission and City Council did not act on the application. for Agora, the redevelopment of the Four Seasons Mall site, until January 2017. Both bodies did review and act on an envirorunental assessment worksheet for the project in 2016. Since Agora is a mixed use project, the uses are summarized in a separate table below. Residential Preliminary Plat Ft Site Plan Applications 1500 1400 12M i Wtl . ■ ►lulliple A Family C ■ single 400 -- --- - -- ramily -100 0 h N N In The city's planning and zoning review of development plans precedes the final approval of building plans for construction by months or perhaps a year or more. However, the city is already seeing building plans for many of the plats approved in 2016. RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS The chart on the previous page shows there was very little residential development proposed between 2007 and 2009. While the economy played a role in the later years, the primary driver during these years was the lack of developable residential land. After the approval of Taryn Hills in 2005, the majority of the land in the urban service area at that time had development approvals. Since the expansion of the urban service area in 2009, the city has seen strong activity in residential platting. The majority of the land added in 2009 is guided for low density residential use, which is reflected in the chart on the previous page. 2016 PLANNING AND ZONfNG APPLICATIONS RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY PLAT/SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS In 2016, applications for commercial and industrial projects Begin Oaks (2016010) 124 new single family; 51 townhome Summerwood (2016012) 49 new single family Elm Creek Meadows (2016014) 59 townhome Lanewood Estates (2016040) 7 single family Creekside Woods (2016044) 7 single family SandslBartus Property (2016058) 67 single family Skrypec Addition (2016071) 1 new single farnity Creekside Woods Phase II (2016698) 2 new single family (pending) 367 TOTAL new lots COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS In 2016, applications for commercial and industrial projects totaled 37,263 square feet of '�''`�"' proposed building area. All of the �aa.oao projects were relatively small; three involved new construction. U. R c 200.0w f ob,nW 6 Commercial and Industrial Planning Applications 5 G G C ■ tioc aml ial ■ cu mmerctal 2016 PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS Project File -- Office building at 10810 Old County Road 15 (2016006) 5,400 Tri-State Drilling (addition) (2016027) 6,076 )electro -Mechanical Industries, Inc. (addition) (2016039) 2,500 New Horizon Academy (addition) (2016056) 1,663 Commercial building in Taryn Hills corn ercial area (2016063) 5,100 Ber er Financial Group, Inc. (addition) 2016065) 4,920 Retail building on Highway 55 frontage road west of South Shore Drive (2016088) 3,604 Dailcin Applied Americas, Inc. (addition) (20161Q1 8,000 37,263 TOTAL PUBLICANSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS The most significant proposed public/institutional projects in 2016 were the two senior housing facilities. 2016 PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS PUSLICANSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 2016 PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS MIXED USE PROJECT File Description Senior Living (2016008) 64 assisted living and independent apartments Pilgrim Lane Elementary School (2016018) Renovation plus 9,968 square foot expansion Armstrong High School (2016028) 109 square foot vestibule addition Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church (2416049) 24,000 square foot addition Wayzata Evangelical Free Church (2016076) 9,350 square foot addition Moments of Plymouth (2016088} 32 room memory care facility 2016 PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS MIXED USE PROJECT G7 Office (2016075) 19,860 square feet in two locations Hotel rooms (2016075) One 95 -room hotel, one 100 -room hotel Conference space (2016075) 8,000 square feet in the 100 -room hotel Retail buildings (2016075) 97,785 square feet in four buildings Bank 2016075) 2,116 square feet Senior housing (2016075) 139 units — 65 independent, 50 assisted living, 24 memory care Parking ramp (2016075) 339 parking spaces G7 2015 BUILDING DIVISION The building division is responsible for the issuance of building permits and for inspections during construction. Typically, building permit activity will rise and fall with the level and type of planning and zoning applications. Permits tend to lag behind planning applications by as much as a year or more as large projects may take several years to build out, Building permit numbers and values reflect the new construction and improvement of property, and ultimately the increase in property values and tax base, as a result of the planning efforts of the city and its property owners. The total number of all types of permits issued in 2016 was a third less than in 2015. The total value was about 40 percent less. Total permits include building permits and "other" permits that Number of Inspections Performed (Including Inspections without Permits) Number of Permits and Valuation mom Building Permits Excluding Other Types ISpN� 7AI0 S450J nmo Wo SanoApl.Onn S350AOd.000 5,000 Sig0.000�00 =FF dAOo 5?50,000.000 �Frrmits v 3AB 5?INI.MRI,1i011 SISOJ100,Ig0 �Vaivallun ,ADD SIW,UW,0o11 kDW SM ow" 0 w projects may take several years to build out, Building permit numbers and values reflect the new construction and improvement of property, and ultimately the increase in property values and tax base, as a result of the planning efforts of the city and its property owners. The total number of all types of permits issued in 2016 was a third less than in 2015. The total value was about 40 percent less. Total permits include building permits and "other" permits that Number of Inspections Performed (Including Inspections without Permits) Permit Fees 51i. -Rm 5 %Nk.D W—d» �n n rnn.r 5A•"om a6ufldieK szonol p so include plumbing, mechanical, electrical, sewer and water, sign permits, grading and moving permits and a few other miscellaneous types. The number of building pennits in 2016, excluding the "other" types, was less than the number issued in 2415, and the total value was about 40 percent less. A key factor in the lower nuinber and value in 2016, was the absence of any major weather events that result in increases in building repairs, notably roofs and siding. mom Ion Ion IMMM MEMO The chart above shows both the number of building permits issued and the value of permits (excluding "other" permits). Building permit value totaled roughly $223,370,701 million in 7 mom ISpN� In,Um n Permit Fees 51i. -Rm 5 %Nk.D W—d» �n n rnn.r 5A•"om a6ufldieK szonol p so include plumbing, mechanical, electrical, sewer and water, sign permits, grading and moving permits and a few other miscellaneous types. The number of building pennits in 2016, excluding the "other" types, was less than the number issued in 2415, and the total value was about 40 percent less. A key factor in the lower nuinber and value in 2016, was the absence of any major weather events that result in increases in building repairs, notably roofs and siding. mom Ion Ion IMMM MEMO The chart above shows both the number of building permits issued and the value of permits (excluding "other" permits). Building permit value totaled roughly $223,370,701 million in 7 2016, compared to a total of $386,229,840 million in 2015 and $249.6 million in 2014. Charts on the previous page show the number of building inspections performed annually since 2007 and the fees collected during the same period. RESIDENTIAL PERMITS the next cnan Average Permit Value, New Single Family Detached Homes shows the number of new $550,000 - - dwellings s500,000 permitted over $450,000 4 c = the last ten years. $400,000 - A During $350.000 Plymouth's highest period of $300,000 growth in the $as0,000 1980s, the city $200,000 averaged about s15000 800 new units per 31(16.000 a year. p Single family detached homes represented 96 percent of the units penmitted in 2016. The city did not issue any permits for multiple family housing in 2016. An increasing trend in the older parts of the city is teardowns of single family homes. In 2016, the city issued 29 demolition pen -nits for single family homes and subsequently issued building permits for new homes on the affected lots. The chart above shows the average permit value for new single family detached homes built in Plymouth in the last 10 years. The value does not include the price of land, only the residential structure. The average permit value for single family detached units in 2016 was $386,774, similar to the 2015 average. M The average permit value of townhome units, $277,909, was significantly less than for detached units, but substantially higher than the average permit value for townhome units in 2015. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PERMITS The adjacent chart shows the value of commercial and industrial permits for the last ten years. In 2016, the value of new permits (not including alterations to existing buildings) was $9,493,717, significantly less than in 2015, reflecting the lower amount of new cam m erci alli ndu stn'al construction. x..00.000 MONO x200 00 i150A00 S100,000 550,000 iup Average Permit: Value Per Unit All Multiple Family Units c c 6 c ry n v n w Al �i �Fi x, 15 ■Toxohooses •(]flier �1Wtiple Familr Commercial and Industrial Permit Values 590,000,000 ss0,000,00 S70,000,000 560,000,000 550.1*0,000 s40.0o0.000 530.[100.x00 5 i x.000.x00 so �r ry n n ry ryi r•i ri ry n ■Yew Cnnstruttinn 19 other Permits In 2016, similar to most of the preceding years shown, the value of "other" commercial and industrial pen -nits (for projects such as remodeling, additions and tenant finishes) was higher than the value of new construction, with permits issued valued at $33,354,733. 2096 HOUSING DIVISION The Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) administers a variety of programs including the Community Development Block Grant program (CDBG), independent senior rental communities, affordable housing assistance and Housing Choice Voucher program (Section 8). CDBG PROGRAM The CDBG program operates on a fiscal year from July 1 to June 30, so the most recent full year includes July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016. The table on the next page shows activities in the variety of programs offered through the CDBG program for the past 7'/2 years. During this period, funding for CDBG has varied from a high of $284,254 in 2010 to a low in 2012 of $230,998. Going forward, Plymouth may see further funding reductions as the federal government contends with balancing federal program funding requests. The HRA also receives program income (P1) 9 that varies from year to year, further impacting how much fi.lnding is available for assisting Plymouth residents. ]dote: Annual expenditures sometimes exceed Allocation + P. 1. due to carry-over funds frau prior year CDBG allocations and unspent P. 1. *P.I. = Program lnconrc/Repayments **Housing Services includes: Homeownership Training, Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention and Tenant Advocacy *** Year to date statistics AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACTIVITIES For several years, the HRA worked with the city to assist Quest Development with the construction of 157 mixed income apartments, 16 of which were proposed to be affordable to households earning at or below 60 percent of the area median income. At the beginning of 2015, a new developer took over the project. The building opened in December of 2016 and is currently leasing units. 10 First Ti - • ••Homebuye ::-rvices LRelabilitation Categor=ies Allocation P.I. Expenditures-. • . Loansof Loans Allocation **Housing- 314 2009 Senior- NIA 71112408- $263,199 $130,0001$211,1621 $54,1991 $15,000 $42,000 Youth -250 6/30/2010 P,I.$135,000 10 $99,62419 Transportation - 1,243 2010 **Housing - 284 71112010- $284,254 $85,5271 $85,5271 $30,000 $53,965 Senior- 23 6/30/2011 P.I. $11,249 $91,47715 $89,43516 Youth -427 Transportation - 565 ****2011 "Housing -285 7/l/2011- $238,411 $70,0001 $60,4001 $40,000 $35,815 Senior -39 6/30/2012 N.$32,183 $103,82615 $164,94817 Youth -338 Transportation - 479 2 **Housing - 284 7111220101 2- $230,998 $01 $150,4981 $15,400 $35,000 Senior -40 6/30/20 13 P.I. $47,712 $13,19411 $137,78115 Youth - 273 Trans ortation- 195 2013 **Housing- 306 71112013- $237,844 $56,000! $ I00,000/ $15,000 $38,400 Senior- 98 6/30/2014 P.1. $85,605 $40,91412 $141,44316 Youth -199 Transportation - 55 20 **Housing - 295 711122011 4- $236,820 $13,9761 $148,0001 $15,000 $46,351 Senior -45 fi13012015 P.I. $118,566 $55,30612 $191,83519 Youth -72 Transportation - nla 2 * *Housing - 263 7111220101 5- $233,760 $30,0001 $106,7601 $20,000 $42,400 Senior -45 6/30/2016 P.I. $82,703 $77,95614 $286,36211 i Youth -66 Transportation - nla ***2016 $232,890 71112016- P.I. $30,000516,43411 $120,0001 $20,000 $39,000 Current 6130120I7 $81,040 $158,019110 ***Housing - 2,114 7% Year $1,958,176 $415,5031 $824,984! Senior--29$ TOTAL P.[. $472,058 $610,269130 $1,269,447163 $170,000 $325,261 Youth -1,996 Transp. -- 3.529 ]dote: Annual expenditures sometimes exceed Allocation + P. 1. due to carry-over funds frau prior year CDBG allocations and unspent P. 1. *P.I. = Program lnconrc/Repayments **Housing Services includes: Homeownership Training, Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention and Tenant Advocacy *** Year to date statistics AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACTIVITIES For several years, the HRA worked with the city to assist Quest Development with the construction of 157 mixed income apartments, 16 of which were proposed to be affordable to households earning at or below 60 percent of the area median income. At the beginning of 2015, a new developer took over the project. The building opened in December of 2016 and is currently leasing units. 10 SENIOR HOUSING The HRA owns two independent living senior apartment buildings that are managed by Grace Management. Plymouth Towne Square (PTS), built in 1994 with 99 units, offers affordable rents to the residents based on each household's monthly income. The HRA continues to maintain a low vacancy rate of two percent even while experiencing 16 move out's/move in's (turns). Improvements to the building in 2016 included the addition of an outdoor }natio, replacement of common area and garage lighting; and replacement and painting of the stairwells. Vicksburg Crossing, built in 2005 with 97 units, offers affordable rents to low and moderate income residents. The HRA Board sets rents annually based on current market conditions. Improvements to the building in 2016 included crack repair and sealing the garage floor; replacing some deteriorating siding and landscape improvements. The occupancy for 2016 averaged 99 percent and the property had 18 move out's/move in's (tunas). SECTION 8 (Administered by Support Services Manager) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program The Section 8 housing choice voucher 200 program is a federal program to assist very low income families, the elderly 150 and the disabled to afford decent, safe and sanitary housing in the private°° market. The Plymouth HRA has 50 operated the housing choice voucher program since October 1976 when it 0 received its first 47 certificates to assist families with housiI7g costs. ff,�M0 MMII�Wmimimii Lr' Iv -M- m I M..iR. IM.. I 8....I -1 I I 2012 (401) 2013 (390) 2014 (377) 2015 (372) 2016 (362) ■ Mainstream ■ Enhanced a Port -Out ■ Housing Chaiee ■ Port -1n Through program changes and growth, on a monthly basis the HRA currently administers 225 allocated vouchers and over 140 port -in vouchers. Funding for the program, to cover both the housing vouchers and the cost to administer the program, comes from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The city is responsible for administering this program in Plymouth, which involves determining the eligibility of applicants, annual reexaminations, and performing inspections of units on at Ieast a biennial basis. Annual program funding is based on a set voucher allocation and housing assistance payment expenses incurred in the previous year. The tables show the program activity over the past five years. The increased difference between revenue and expenses is due to HUD's requirement that housing authorities spend down their net restricted assets that have been built up over the past several years. 11 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 600 500 400 300 2Da 100 a 2016 SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION The support services division is responsible for issuance of permits and rental licenses and scheduling and recording all inspections. The city inspects non -apartment rental units every third year (currently in the transition from biennial inspections) and 20 percent of the units in all apartment developments annually. The tables illustrate the activity in both areas over the past five years. Rental Inspections Performed 40,000 35.000 30,000 25,000 20,000 2012 2013 —2014 2015 2416 1$'900 10,000 5,000 0 Section 8 Inspections Performed 2012 2013 2014 _ 2015 2016 Support Services $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $(500,000) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Section 8 Finances r I n spections Scheduled & Recorded r Department Phone Calls Received 0Permits Issued ■ Rental Licenses Issued ■ Rental Dwelling Units � N n n a Revenue r Expenditures ATTACHMENTS Table: Planning and Zoning Applications, 2007 - 2016 List of 2016 Planning Application Files Table; Building Permits: Number of Permits, Fees and Valuations by Year 2007 - 2616 o -%CD ANNUAL REPQRTS,201G CD Annual Repos.doe 12 Difference Planning and Zoning Applications, 20072016 Type of Application 2007 2008 2004 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 7,015 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amend (CPA/ LUGPA/CPU) 2 1 1 4 ? 0 6 3 1 2 Rezoning (RZ) 5 4 4 10 9 5 11 13 8 11 Site Plan (SP, SP -AA) 6 4 0 3 0 4 3 2 6 4 Site Plan Amendment (SPA, SP -AA) 12 21 4 4 10 6 11 11 12 12 Site Plan Modification (SP MOD) 30 23 27 25 24 31 29 2.2 22 22 Lot Division (LD) 0 0 0 0 [} 0 0 0 0 0 Lot Consolidation (LC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minor Subdivision (M SUBD.)x 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Official Ma2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Preliminary Plat (PP) 8 4 6 11 10 6 l8 19 16 10 Final Plat (FP) 10 6 7 14 14 13 22 19 49 16 PUD Sketch Plan 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 {} PUO General Plan (PUD GPN) 1 2 1 3 3 0 0 2 4 4 PUD Final PIan (PUD FP) 2 1 2 3 5 3 4 1 1 1 PUD Amend (PUD A) 3 5 4 3 5 3 3 2 4 3 Conditional Use Penults & Amend (CUP) 16 8 7 10 10 11 12 10 14 I7 Interim Use Permit (IUP) 1 5 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 Variance (VAR) 31 23 18 8 6 15 13 17 22 13 Minor Variance (M VAR) 6 3 3 3 4 0 2 1 4 1 Administrative Permit (AP) 15 24 21 24 23 21 25 47 29 15 Nome Occupation (HOL) 2 2 1 3 2 3 6 3 0 2 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 l Sketch Review 3 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Zoning Text Amendment (ZOTA) 5 6 4 4 1 3 4 6 3 4 6 Capital Improvements Program (C1P) i 1 1 1 l 1 1 i I I Other 1 2 4 6 6 1 2 3 3 3 Total 1 134 148 113 145 134 129 1 174 179 170 145 *Minor Subdivision %vas a nmr application type in 2003; it was discontinued in 2009. 0:1PlanlAnnuW Reports12016 P4anniN Applications TaWa 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #/ DATE CDID # DEVELOPER/ APPLICANT ADDITION NAME/ DESCRIPTION APP. IS FOR 1/8/20I6 2016001 Aaron Blackwell SAC Wireless 540 W. Madison St„ 16th fl. Antenna upgrade at 19020 Admin Chicago, IL 60661 Hamel Road (312)809-8032 as ron , h l ac k we l lPq,sacw. c o nt 1/13/2016 2016002 Mark Pictig Pietig Bras. itzc. 10236 Xerxes Avenue S. Pieiig Berkshire Estates PP FP T3ioomin,ton, MN 55431 (763) 286-5461 pietigmark a yahoo.com 1/15/7016 2416003 Chad Onscard Pulte Croup 7500 Office Ridge Circle Aspen Hallow 2nd FP Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Addition (952) 729-0723 cltad.onsgard@pu l tegrotip.coizt 1120r_0 16 2016001 Chuck Hutchinson Silver King Refrigeration 1600 Xenium Lane Install back-up generator at Admin Plymouth, MN 55411 1600 Xenium Lane (763) 923-2500 huthinson Di,silverking.com 1/20/7016 2016005 Doran COW/City niPlymautit E\pansimi ofmalntenance SPA VAR facility 1/22/2016 2016006 Paul Humiston Paul Meyer Architects, Inc. 15650 36th Avenue #4170 New of building at Plymouth, MN 55446 CountySP 10810 Old County road 15 VAR 1763) 557-9081 phumistoit@pauluieyerarchitects.co m 1/72/2016 2016007 Jake Walesch Lawndale 47, LLC 10850 Old County Road 15 Maple Crtick Meadows 2nd FP Plymouth, MN 55441 Addition (763)546-2727 jake@jakewalesch.com Page 1 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #1 DEVELOPER/ DATLO CDID # APPLICANT 1125/2016 2016008 Dave Young United Properties 3600 American Boulevard W. Bloomington, MN 55431 {9521} 837-8667 dave.young@.upropertics.com 2/4/2016 2016009 Paul Heuer Pulte flames of Minnesota 7500 Office Ridge Circle 4325 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (952)229-0722 paul.heuera pultegroup.com 2/5/2016 2016010 Alise McGregor Nursing Values LLC 12325 State Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55441 2/8/2016 2016011 Aaron Blackwell SAC Wireless 540 W. Madison St., l6th floor Chicam IL 60661 (312)809-8032 aron.hlackwella sacw.com 2/8/2016 20151151I' .lake Walesch Villas at Coppet' Creek, Inc, 10550 Old County Road 15, Suite 204 Plymouth, MN 55441 (612) 749-1360 .lakerr jakewalesch.com 2111/3416 2016012 Casey Wollschlager Summergate Companies 17305 Cedar Avenue S. 0200 Lakeville, MN 55044 {953}898-3461 2112/2016 2016013 Carolyn Hauck Bodyteclttonics 17605 County Road 24 Plymouth, MN 55447 612-715-7352 ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOR Cherrywood Senior Living RZ SP CLIP Begin Oaks LUGPA 1 aZ PUD GP I P Building addition SPA Antenna upgrade at 3515 Admin. Highway 169 Villas at Copper Creek FP Summerwood RL PP I3odytectonics ROL Page 2 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #1 DEVELOPERI DATE CDID # APPLICANT 2/19/2016 2016014 Peter Jarvis The Jarvis Company 6117 Blue Circle Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 (612)325-0332 pejarvisCq)nie.com 212312016 ?016015 Dan Bovitx Hennepin County Emergency Management 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 (612)596-0249 daniel.buvitz@hentlepin.us 2/24/2016 2016016 Andy Thompson Kraus -Anderson 8625 Rendova Street NE Circle Pines, MN 55014 (612)618-2539 Andy, thompsonakrausanderson.co In 2'12612016 2016017 Kristy Couture Yellow Brick Road Child Care Inc. 16000 41 st Avenue Plymouth, MN 55446 (763)519-1675 krisiy.couttureo hotniail.corn 3/2/2016 2016018 Greg Defiler Wald Architects & Engineers 332 Minnesota Street, 4W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651)227-7773 gdehlerc?woldae.com 3/7/2016 2016049 Davi-on GaFurov 14050 33rd Avenue N. Unit B Plymouth, MN 55447 [7x331746-6666 davron@ liotniail,con, 3/10/2016 20160211 Eric Kube Lindus Construction Inc. 879 Highway 63 Baldwin, Wl 54002 (651) 303-9456 ektrbc e,lindusco.corn ADDITION NAME/ API'. IS DESCRIPTION FOR Ehn Creek Meadows RL PP ACF Weather Station Plan Modification Monument sign for new VAIN Wayzata elementary school Child care center at 3200 CUP Harbor Lane Renovation/expansion of Pilgrim Lune elementary CUP SPA school Auto sales in on industrial CUP district Convert deck to screen porch at 18250 39th Miner VAR Avenue Page 3 2016 PLANNING TILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE N DEVELOPER/ DATE COLD k APPLICANT ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOR 3/11/2016 2016021 Chad Onsgard Pulte Croup 7500 Office Midge Circle 4325 Enclave on the Greenway F1' Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Second Addition (952) 229-0723 chad.onsgard r,pultegroup.coni 3/15/2016 2016022 IOTA City Amendment addressing Cotte Barb Thomson/City of Plymouth conimunity residential care amendment facilities Witlutrar►'n 3/17/2016 2016023 Charlotte Banks SAC Wireless for AT&T 540 W. Mattison - 16th Floor Antenna upgrade at 10805 Admin Chicago, IL 60661 Old County Road 15 (312)809-8034 churl otte.ban ks(i-4sacw, corn 3/18/2016 2016024 Tim Oolinan Cargill 14800 28th Avenue N Perimter landscaping and , Plan Moll Plymouth, MN 55447 minor enients ape Admin (612)812-9076 in�pravernent tintoalmanrracargill.corn 3/28/2016 2016025 Antendrnents addressing Barb Thomson/City of Plymouth definition of family, home GOTH Occupations and residential care facilities 3/28/2016 2016026 Chad Ramler I4990 53rd Avenue N Plymouth, MN 55446 (612)834-8351 chuchachimmy Cwgrnail.cont l '3(1! it 2111 51 13F Blaine Waters Quest Development, Ine. 10700 Old County Road 15 Plymouth, MN 55441 (763) 593-9511 bwatcrsu!questdevelopment.aom 4/4/2016 2016027 Wayne Jeske Wayne A. ,leske Associates, Inc. 7024 Red Cedar Cove Excelsior, MN 55331 (952)939-9885 waj543?rt�aol.corn Denial of access to Jw}eau Lane The Preserve at Meadow EP Ridge Tri-State Drilling Addition PUDA Page 4 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #1 DEVELOPER/ DATE CDiD 4 APPLICANT 4/12/2016 2016028 Greg €7eliler Wald Architects & Engineers 332 Minnesota Street, #W2000 Saint Pau 1, MN 5510 f (651)227-7773 gdehlcr@woldae.com 4/13/7015 2016029 Chris Grenier Christopher and Banks 2400 Xenium Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 (763)218-7310 egrenie ri ehristopheraridbanks.co nr 4/13/2016 2016030 Tom Yang SAC Wireless for AT&T 4360 Market Point Drive, #250 Bloomington. MN 55435 (612)444-3279 tom.yang a sacw.com 4111/2016 20151141' Charlie Pfeffcr Estate Development Corporation 15250 Wayzata Bou lcvard # 101 Wayzata, MN 55391 (612) 990-0666 tomrr,landtnn.com 4119/2016 2016031 Patrick Busch Len Busch Roses 4045 County Road I01 Plymouth, MN 55446 (763)478-9329 4/20/2016 2016032 Erin G. Daugherty 2924 Anthony Lane #315 St, Anthony, MN 55418 (612) 703-6517 erinl34l42@4yahoo.com 4125/3416 2016033 Matthew Anderson Medivaters 14605 28th Ave N Plymouth, ]VIN 55447 (763) 553-3300 ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOR Small two-story masonry addition and related site improvenietnts at Armstrong High School Plan Modification Constrict 8 -foot fences CUP Antenna upgrade at 4425 Admin.Zachary Lane Dunkirk Gateway FP New paving and lighting flan Modification Floodplain and setback alterations icer new home at CUP VAR 2860 Evergreen Lane Picnic Shelter Page 5 Plan Modification 21016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #1 DEVELOPER) DATE CDID # APPLICANT 4/27/20161 2016034 Dean Hat -her Advanced Design Awnings & Signs 1600 29th Street Cloquet, MN 55720 (612)$39-4581 4/29/2016 2016035 Merlin Muhr Parkers Lake Baptist Church 14730 County Road 6 Plymouth, MN 55447 (763)x}73-3552 5!312016 3016036 Dale Eniter Duke Realty 1600 Utica Avenue S., 4250 St. Louis Park " 55416 (953) 543-2988 dale.emtera dukerealtyxorn 5/11/2016 2016037 Pastor Wayne Peterson St. Barnabas Lutheran Church 15600 Old Rockford Road Plymouth, MN 5446 (763) 553-1239 wpetctsonccstbarnabaslutltcran.org 5/18/3016 3016038 Barb Thornson/City of'Plynaoutlt 5/18/2016 2016039 Michelle Kindvall Electro -Mechanical Industries, Inc. 13360 6th Ave. N. Plymouth, MN 55441 (763)546-5998 mkindvall@e-m-i.cQm 51I9120I6 2016040 Fred Stolter/Greg Beckey Lanewood Estates, LLC 4900 W. Broadway Crystal, MN 55429 stelterfred@gmai l.com (612)325-7414 ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOR Metal Awning over Plan entrance for 60011wy 169 S Ste 1660 IVlodircatian Ligl}ting Replacement at Parkers Lake Baptist SPA Church Minor fagadc changess at Platt Waterford Innovation Modification Center .lordwl Crossing Hospice RZ PUD General Plan 2040 Comprehensive Phan CPA Office addition at EMI Plan Modification Lanewood Estates RZ PP Page 6 2415 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE N/ DEVELOPER/ ADDITION ]NAME/ APP. IS DATE CDID # APPLICANT DESCRIPTION FOR 5/19/2016 2016041 Randolf Kulzcr D.R. Morton 20860 Kenbridge Court Model home in Brynkvood Admin. Lakeville, MN 55044 2nd Addition (952)985-7815 rkulzera drhorton,com 5/19/2016 2016042 Brent Boelter Inspec,IIle. Soil removallreplacement 5501 Duluth Sheet and fencing at Armstrong [UP Golden Valley, M1N 55422 1I5 baseball field (763) 546-33434 bboetter@inspec.com 5/23/2016 201.6043 Allyson lustmann NORR Changes to exterior g 325 N. LaSalle Street, # 500 Plan Chicago, 1L 60654 lighting at Starbucks at Modification Vicksburg Marketplace (3 12) 873-1059 aliyson.justniann@norr.co3n 5/24/2016 2016044 Reid Schulz Landform Professional Services 105 S. Fifth Avenue, Ste 513 Creckside. Woods RZ PP Minneapolis, Mitt 55401 (612)391-4214 rschuiz em land form.nc°t 5/25/2016 2416045 W, Casey McGrath Adaptable Builders 3241 37th Avenue S. Re -build garage at 2425 W. Admin. Minneapolis, MN 55406 Medicine Lake Drive (612)655-4450 wcasey@adaptablebL1i ld ers.com 5/26/2016 2016046 Amanda Carr Imagination Play Park, Inc. Indoor commercial 10636 Tanglewood Court recreation in industrial CUP Champlin, MN 55316 district (763) 232-2813 lT[aaTscarr@gmajl.com 5/31/2016 1-016047 Barb Thomson/City of Plymouth Opt out of temporary ZOTA dwellings statute Page 7 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #/ DEVELOPER/ DATE CDID # APPLICANT 5/31/2016 ?016048 5/31/3016 2016049 6/l/2016 2016050 5/31/2016 2016051 5/31/2016 2016052 6!3!2016 2016053 Iden Gleason The Retrofit Companies 101 I•IolTman Dr. Suite A Owatonna, MN 55060 (507)455-2181 kgleason ci rets-ofitcotnpanies.coni aim I [ohnIund Beautiful Savioi- Lutheran Church 5005 Northwest Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55442 (763)550-1000 .j]iolmlund rz heautifitlsavior.org Bi andon Garnett/Brian Thompson Nelson Upper Midwest Operation Company, LLC/ Security Vault Works. Inc. 135 S. LaSalle Street Chicago, 1L 60603 hgau•netiu..nelsononline.com/ thompson(y)svwi nc,eom (3 12) 992-83661 (314)753-9915 Ken Gleason The Retrofit Companies 101 Hoffman Dr. Suitc A Owatonna, MN 55060 (507)455 -?181 kgleasonrr.).ren-ofitconipanies.com Ken Gleason The Retrofit Companies IQ 1 Hoffinan Dr. Suitc A Owatonna. MN 55064 (507) 455-2181 kgleasoii@retro fitcontpatiies.cotti David Link SoureeGronp, LLC 2399 Wayzata Blvd W. # 100 Long Lake, MN 55356 (952)476-8100 d 1 ink@sourcegroupl lc. cons ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOR Replace Outdoor lighting al Plan Plymouth Middle School Modilieation Addition at Beautiful SPA Savior Lutheran Church Install ATM in parking lot Plan at Plymouth Collection Modification Replace outdoor lighting al Plan Armstrong High School Modification Replace outdoor li=ghting at Plan Zachary Lane Elementary Modification School Minor exterior improvements for Marrie's Plan Automotive at 13300 15th Modification Avenue Page 8 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #/ DEVELOPER/ ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DATE CDID # APPLICANT DESCRIPTION FOR 6/3/2415 201009F Paul Heuer Pulte Homes of Minnesota 7500 Office Midge Circle #325 FP PUD linal Eiden Prairie, MN 55344 Camelot Nine at Begin � plan (952)279-0727 pauI.11euere pultegroup.com 6/712016 2016054 Svetlana Leopova North West Rhythmic LLC Sports and fitness facility 3 PC] Box 4456 2 in an industrial building at CUP Eden Prairie, 55344 151 Cheshire Lane (952) 237-3724 nwrizytlimic@yahoo.com 6/9/2016 2016055 Mike Remington Inspec, Inc. 5801 Duluth Street Parking lot reconiiguartion SPA Golden Valley, MN 55422 at Medivators ]nc. (763) 546-3434 i-nrcmlitgton Lif]lspee.conl 6/20/2016 2016056 A. Peter Hilger Rylaur, LLC Building addition at New l4 Pleasant Lane Pl1DA North Oaks, MN 55127 Horizon Academy (612)868-3636 6/73/2016 20160141- Peter Jarvis The .Iarvis Company 6117 Blue Circle Drive Elm Creek Meadows - now FP Minnetonka, MN 55343 Elm Creek Place (612) 325-0332 peii jarvis ie.conz 6/24/2016 2016057 Amanda Prosser ISG 7900 International Drive 4550 Zachary Playupgrades Pian Bloomington, MN 55425 Modification Modification (952)426-0699 Amanda.prossercr is-grp.com 6/24/2016 3016058 Justin Bannwarth Lakeview Development Co. LLC 10850 Old County Road 15 #200 Plymouth, MN 55441 (763) 205-3961 .Justin cc,gonyeacompany.com Sands/Bartus Property Page 9 RZ PP 2416 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE H1 DATE, CDID # DEVELOPER/ APPLICANT ADDITION NAME/ DESCRIPTION APP. IS FOR 6/24/2016 2016059 Bob Rehberg R & R Construction of Minneapolis with 14525 Highway 7, Suitc 265 Sands/Bartus Properly Minnetonka, MN 55345 1.0 X01 58 I+Z PP (612) 272-8472 bobrelzbergl Ggmailxom 512$12016 2016060 Joseph Hillesheim Hillesheim Construction Corp, flan 239261 Fillmore St. NE Dcck uddilion Modification East Bethel, MN 55005 (763)516-1468 7/13/2416 2016461 Robert Boyer Boyer Building Corp. 3435 County Road 101 Elevator at Sid I-Tartman's VAR Minnetrista, MN 55345 (952) 475-2097 bobb r Uyerbui lding.com 7/19/2016 2016062 Mark Eliot Crius Corp 1350 Budd Ave Noise Variance to allow Maple Plain, MN 55359 niglit time work Noise VAR (651)338-6621 Mark@criuscorp.net 7/20/2016 2416063 Dhivya Jegenathan Commercial tsuilding, PAL Associates LLC Outlot A. Taryn Hills GQfiS Zanzibar Lane N Commercial Second FP SP VAR Plymnudt, MN 55446 Addition - Shenandoah (763) 221-5290 Hills ills rr palassociatesmn gmail.com 811/2016 2016064 Jacqueline A. Evers Forever Counseling 3430 Merrimac Lane. Conduct psychotherapy l_4OL Plymouth. MN 554647 services (763)234-8618 jackicxvcrs@,outlook.com 5/1/2016 2016065 Brooke Jacobson CNH Architects Two -scary building, 7304 W. 147th Street #544 additionat 1695 State SP CUPApple Valley, MN 55124 Highway 1 G9 ( 952 j 431-4433 bjacobson@cnharch.com Page 10 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #/ DEVELOPER/ DATE CDID # APPLICANT 8/2/2016 20I6066 Barb Northway/City of Plymouth 8/3/2016 2016067 ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOIi Lighting Replacement at Plan I IiIde Performance Center Modification Amendmcnt to lighting regulations IOTA Construction of additional Plan parking at Twin City Modification Outdoor Services Amendments to floodplain ZOTA regulations Four Seasons trMiTie study Traffic Study Skrypec Addition PP FI' VAR Fretham 24th Second FP Addition Additional apartment building at Plymouth SPA CUP Commons Lanewood Estates FP Tree Preservation update Report Page 11 Barb Thomson/City of Plymouth 8/4/2016 2016068 Rich Byrne Twin City Outdoor- Services 14430 21 st Averrue Plymouth, MN 55447 (65 t) 2330-7962 rhyme ultcoscorp.com 8/4/21016 20I6{}69 Marie Darling/City of Plymouth 7/27/?016 2016070 Shawn Drill/City ot'Plyrnouth $/512016 2016071 David Pemberton Sathre-Bergquisl, Inc. 150 Broadway Wayzata. MN 55391 (952)476-6000 pcmbrrton .sathre.com S/10/2016 2016072 Curt Fretham Lake West Development, LLC 14525 Highway 7, 4265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 (952) 930-3000 curtf 1westdev.com 8/12/2016 2016073 Todd ONthun TCO Design 9330 Thomas Avenue N. Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 (952)994-8276 toddoteodesign.net 8/15/2016 2016040F Fred Steller/Greg Beckey Lanewood Estates, LLC 4900 W. Broadway Crystal, MN 55129 steIter(Ire d eiD�mai1.com (613)325-7414 8/16/2016 2016074 Shawn Drill/City of Plymouilt ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOIi Lighting Replacement at Plan I IiIde Performance Center Modification Amendmcnt to lighting regulations IOTA Construction of additional Plan parking at Twin City Modification Outdoor Services Amendments to floodplain ZOTA regulations Four Seasons trMiTie study Traffic Study Skrypec Addition PP FI' VAR Fretham 24th Second FP Addition Additional apartment building at Plymouth SPA CUP Commons Lanewood Estates FP Tree Preservation update Report Page 11 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #/ DEVELOPER/ DATE CD1D # APPLICANT 8/1612016 2016075 Niral Patel Rock Hill Management 875? Monticello Lane North Maple Grove, MN 55369 (612)940-2884 n iral[uroekhi ] lmgmt.cvm 8/22/20I6 2016076 Richard Stuerman BWBR Architects 380 St. Peter St. #600 St. Paul, MN 55102 (651) 815-2765 rstuerman@,bwbr.com 8/24/2016 2016077 Justin BannWarth North 47, LLC 10850 Old County Road 15 ##200 Plymouth, MN 55441 (763)205-3961 jusiinu.gonveacornpany.com 8/31/2016 ?016078 Craig and Anne Dye 12026 Sunset Trail Plymouth, MN 55441 (612)703-3239 edye [r minnair.cam 9/2/2AI6 2015037AII Jacqueline Fludson Lake Ventures, LLC -2650 Warrenville Road #700 Downers Grove, IL 64515 (970)337-0432 j hudson@11reshthyme.cotn 9/12/2016 2016079 Bryant Tauer Wright -Hennepin, CEA PO Box 330 Rockford, MN 55373 (763) 477-3056 btauer@wlie.org 9/12/201.6 2016080 Bryant Tauer Wright -Hennepin, CEA PO Batt 330 Rockford, MN 55373 (763) 477-3056 btauerCwwlic. org 9/13/2016 3016081 Doran Cote/City oi'Plytnouth AUDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOR Agora - Four Seasons Mall RZ PUD site General Plan Expansion at Wayzata Free SPA CUP Church The Fields at Meadow FP Ridge Room addilion with no Admin. additional encroachment Outdoor display at Fresh Admin. Thyme Install antenna and related equipineril on light poles near Schmidt Lake Road Admin. and Cheshire Parkway Install antenna and relates! equipment on light poles Admin. near Schmidt Lake Road and Cheshire Parkway 3017-2021 C1P CIP Page 12 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #/ DEVELOPER/ DATE CDID # APPLICANT 9/1312016 2016044F ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOIZ Creekside Woods FP Construct oversized garage CUP Exterior improvements to Wendy's at 14370 28th SPA Place Sports and fitness facility in an industrial building at CUP 2010 E. Center Circle Annual update IOTA Agora (Four Seasons Mall EAW site) EAW Signs on a residential PUDA building (The Axis) Moments ot'Plymouth and PUD General retail building plan Page 13 Reid Schulz Landfornt Professional Services 105 S. f'il'th Avenue, Ste 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612)381-4214 rschulz ullandform.nct 9/2612016 2016082 Thomas Switzer 133200 57th Avenue Plymouth, MN 55442 (612)685-6065 kimmer1c5208 gr,yahoo.cont 9/27/2016 2016083 Jerad Ducklow Wendy's Four Crown 434 Haile Avenue N. #160 Oakdale, MN 55128 (651) 714-0030 jeradd@wendysfourcrown.com 10/3/2016 2016084 Grant Norland Inspired Athletics LLC 72t0 Washington Avenue S. i'den Prairie, MN 55344 (952)322-7383 grant cc inspiredathetx.com 141/4/2016 2016085 Shawn Drill/City ol'Plymouth 10/70016 11/g/7419 Shawn Drill/City o1'Plymouth 10/10/2016 20160$7 Brian Johnson Kaxs Wilson Architects 1301 American Blvd. E #100 Bloomington, MN 55425 (612)395-4927 briani ::r,kmmvilson.cont 10/12/2016 '016088 Patrick: Sarver Civil Site Group 4931 W. 35th St. #200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (952)250-2003 psarver a civilsitegroug.conn ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOIZ Creekside Woods FP Construct oversized garage CUP Exterior improvements to Wendy's at 14370 28th SPA Place Sports and fitness facility in an industrial building at CUP 2010 E. Center Circle Annual update IOTA Agora (Four Seasons Mall EAW site) EAW Signs on a residential PUDA building (The Axis) Moments ot'Plymouth and PUD General retail building plan Page 13 2416 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #1 DATE CDID # DEVELOPER/ APPLICANT ADDITION NAME/ DESCRIPTION APP. IS FOR 10/14/2016 2016089 Wendy Sorter Sterling Fence Inc. 13480 Pioneer Trail Fence on an industrial flan Eden Prairie, MN 55347 property Modification (952) 888-6843 sterlingfenceu-aoI.com 10/14/2016 2016090 MiIce Derr Eureka Construction, Inc. Pavement markings for ?0141 Iecn ie Trail is Lane Noise VAR Lakeville, 55044Vicksburg Reconstruction Project (952) 469-5685 miked rt eurekaeonst.com 10/18/2016 2016091 Brandon Sandberg Mitch Bidleman The Carp Boot Camp, LLC Sports and fitness facility 809 Deer Trail Point in an industrial building at CLIP Mendota Heights, MN 55118 3650 Annapolis Lane (763)691-4660 sand bergyprrc grnail.com 10/20/2016 2010027P Mike Reiser Tri-State Drilling Remo Removal of tower on Plan 16940 State Highwayy 55 expansion plan Modification Plymouth, MN 55446 (612-810-2809 1012-7/2016 2016092 Gene-vieve Simonson Mid-America Real Estate -MN New location f'or PCI 5353 Wayzata Boulevard #650 Academy/building and SPA CUP Minneapolis, MN 55416 parking alteration at new VAR (952) 563-6667 site gs i m o ns onm id am er i s agrp.co m 1012,912016 2016093 Mack Essendrnd Medina Electric LLC 22510 State I lighway 55 Install LED lights in Plan Hamel, MN 55340 parking lot at Core -Mark Modification (763)'86-0287 markerr medinaelectric.net 11/1/2016 2016094 Joe jethoff Dakota Elnlimited, Inc. PIan 15953 Biscayne Avenue W. Install 6 -root high fence Modification Rosemount, MN 55068 (651) 423-3995 jog jerhol'fcr,dakotauntintited.c:om Page 14 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE #1 DEVELOPER/ DATE CDID # APPLICANT 11/2/2016 2016095 Brian Hansen Executive Leasing LLC 9700 63rd Avenue N. Maple Grove, MN 55369 (763)746-8585 6rian a.cxectitiveleasingllc.coni 11/9/21116 26160091' Aaron Maki Pulte Homes of Minnesota 7500 Office Ridge Circle 9325 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (612)978-5799 naron.makicr.�.pultegrnup.c0m 11/14/2016 2016096 Jerry Ricke Powerhouse 610 Hamel Road Medina, MN 55340 (952) 471-3039 11/23/2016 2016097 Tim Sullivan Wright Hennepin Coope:-ative PO Sox 330 Rockford, MN 55373-330 (763)477-3053 tsttliivan@W[-IE.org 12/212016 2016098 Jason Oslierg Creekside Plymouth LLC 1320 153rd Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 (612)205-1226 Jason c�,creati4•ecommtinitiesmn.w nt 1215120I6 2016099 David Vinje Attics to Baseineuts 18575 Lander Street Elk River, MN 55330 (763) 439-2513 1215124116 2016044F Reid Schulz Landfortt3 Professional Services 105 S. Firth Avenue, Ste 5I3 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612)381-4214 rschulz a landf'bmi.ne1 ADDITION NAME/ APP. IS DESCRIPTION FOR Limited motor vehicle leasing at 3650 Annapolis CUP Lane Sales center at Camelai Admin,. Ninc at Begin Relocate generator at 12755 State Ilighway 55 Admin. (Igor) Expand substation at 13700 SPA CLIP Schmidt Lake Road Creekside Woods Phase II R% PP Add 2nd story to garage with non -conforming Admin. setback Creekside Woods FP Page 15 2016 PLANNING FILES NUMERICAL INDEX A -FILE W DATE CDID # DEVELOPER/ APPLICANT ADDITION NAME/ DESCRIPTION APP. IS FOR 12/13/2016 2016100 Ricardo and Cynthia Armijo 1035 W. Medicine Lake Drive Maintain existing boat Plymouth, MN 55441 storage/carport in front VAR (763)541-1289 yard Arm i.j001a llmn.edu 12/22/2016 2016101 Bryan I'loFvman Daikin APplied Americas, Inc. 13600 industrial Park Blvd. Building and parking Plyn�oLith, MN 55441 SPA VAR addhi onx dd�li (763)553-5392 bryan.plowman cr daikinapplied.co In 12/23/2016 2016103 Michael Steinhauser 10610 54th Avenue Plymouth, MN 55442 Reduced rear yard setback VAR (612) 328-2441 for halve addition mikes@3bgi.coni Page 16 0 T z z z c a r m v 0 N 0 ❑7 CEI N m ^C LL I�M�rI��• VT 4 _3 Irt Ln Z C D" tD `D 3 rmD rY LA a C a o' cr N 0 0 4 N C) V' n- s p x 0 a c ti � n � � � � ' � � � �• 3 n 3 'm J 04 !• 4Ad v� 71 In o v 4 + o N a _ [a m `� 'al c• N IJ 74 Lti L �0 "� v in p .G y„ G j C t1 C a [J In '70 1.1 C rn to en y � y LO C r 14 in A aN I.:i y 6� W In •8 - ,r v Iv O N .� [w W [O JO G TJ Q a, NPz �O pp ,�. C W N LA y a rj T EA F/ Ve L4 'o WN '5' w N N oloa w a a w o h _ a IJ u, -i-4r. b IV c o � W C P -3 x 4 N 4 � N •JI N R � 4 a u 'C U P ^� ol N �' i• o. W C 9 'iso vp v7 cA N -- �'� VC rl G r - v �C vw N %/f - y Y W OC 1.� b 11 -4 !•.1 N� a a !`' cci v to ra w i`I o o !F _ c Iv w e in W w N tN+ a olae J b9 V lin J pP 1.1 J d W L pw. C O OC G Q, =a a oo w j i• is � w `c' � � a d N d o � ui v�c A a �' � i � 'v. i sem. rNwi - W 4 P 32A1 m ^C LL I�M�rI��• VT 4 _3 Irt Ln Z C D" tD `D 3 rmD rY LA a C a o' cr N 0 0 4 N C) V'