HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 07-24-2001CITY OF PLYMOUTH
AGENDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 24, 2001, 7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLYMOUTH FORUMIndividuals may address the Council about any item not contained
on the regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full 15
minutes are not needed for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the agenda. The
City Council will take no official action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of
referral to staff or Commission for future report.
4. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION ANNOUNCEMENTS
4_1 Proclamation Declaring August 7 as "National Night Out", Public Safety Education
Specialist Sara Cwayna
5. APPROVE AGENDA—Councilmembers may add items to the agenda including items
contained in the Council Information Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction
only. The Council will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda.
6. CONSENT AGENDA—These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen
so requests, in which event the item will be removedfrom the Consent Agenda and placed
elsewhere on the agenda.
6.01 Approve proposed City Council Minutes
6.02 Approve Disbursements (Res2001-305)
6.03 Approval of Deer Management Program (Res2001-306)
6.04 Approve Tobacco License For Paradise Coffee & Grocery, 10 Nathan Lane (Res2001-
307)
Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
July 24, 2001
Page 2
6.05 Approve final plat for Toni Sikes Addition (formerly known as Killian Addition) for
five lots located south of 6th Avenue and west of Pineview Lane. Terranova. (99062 —
Res2001-308)
6.06 Declare costs and set public hearing for 2001 delinquent water, sewer, recycling and
street lighting charges (Res2001-309 & Res2001-310)
6.07 Approve site plan amendment to install a 9,000 gallon propane tank for a propane
standby system for Plymouth Creek Center located at 14800 34th Avenue North. City
of Plymouth. (2001057 — Res2001-311)
6.08 Award contract for energy cost reduction at the Plymouth Creek Activity
Center/Fieldhouse (Res2001-312)
6.09 Approve Plans and Specifications and order Advertisement of Bids for Plymouth
Boulevard parking bays and bituminous overlay (1002 — Res2001-313)
6.10 Award Contract for City Center Area Street Lighting (9020 — Res2001-314)
6.11 Approve Change Order No. 4 for Lift Station No. 2 (8030) — Res2001-315)
6.12 Approve Change Order No. 1 for NC -15 Trunk Sewer and Water Improvement (9914
Res2001-316)
6.13 Approve Reductions of Financial Guarantees:
6.13.1 Holly Creek Second Addition (93096 — Res2001-317)
6.13.2 Holly Creek Third Addition (94124 — Res2001-318)
6.13.3 Holly Creek Fourth Addition (95027 — Res2001-319)
6.13.4 Holly Creek Fifth Addition (96005 — Res2001-320)
6.14 Authorize conveyance of right-of-way easements to Hennepin County for CSAH 101
Improvement and CSAH 24 to Highway 55 Improvement (City Project No. 9005;
County Project No. 8911) (Res2001-321)
6.15 Approve addition of position in the Protective Inspections division of Community
Development (Res2001-322)
6.16 Approve donations to Parks department (Res2001-323)
Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
July 24, 2001
Page 3
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7_1 Plymouth Marketplace Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (Res2001-324)
Amended Resolution Additional material
8. GENERAL BUSINESS
8.1 Adopt ordinance amending the City rental dwelling license code to add a section
relating to conduct on licensed premises (Ord2001-24)
8.2 Receive report on Hydraulic and Hydrology Study for the 2020 Urban Expansion Area
9926) Staff Report Study Appendices
9. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
9.1 County Road 47 (Councilmember Black)
10. ADJOURNMENT
Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
DATE: July 20, 2001
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Summary of Agenda Items for July 24, 2001
6.07 and 6.08. Addition of propane tanks to Plymouth Creek Center. One of the
main budget costs for the field house is natural gas. The City can receive a significantly
lower energy cost by agreeing to have interruptible service. This can be done by having
propane tanks as a reserve fuel source. Analysis shows that the payback is about five
years. The tank would be 38' long and to the north of the field house area.
6.15. Create new position in inspection Division. This position is the Fire Protection
Inspector which is in the budget and was proposed in the Fire Department report
presented to the Council late last year. The person will help staff the Fire Department's
Duty Crew for three hours per day and work on fire inspection, prevention, and pre-
planning at other times.
7.1 Plymouth Marketplace Senior Housing Revenue Bonds. The proposal is for the
City to sell $22.5 million multi -family housing revenue bonds to support the 120 unit
senior facility next to Lund's. The bonds would not obligate the City, but would provide
below market rate financing for the project by 1.5 to 2.0 percent. The bond term would
be 40 years. The project would contain a minimum of 10% (twelve) affordable housing
units. The development would be run by a charitable, non-profit organization.
The interest rate break is a substantial benefit to the project, and calculates to a range of
280,000 to $393,000 per year, depending on the market assumptions used. Staff
discussed whether or not this is an excessive subsidy for 12 affordable housing units.
However, the following considerations cause us to recommend approval.
Fhe project is to be run by a charitable, non-profit organization and therefore, there is
no incentive to charge any more rent than needed for the bonds and the operating
expenses. Therefore, the bonds will likely help hold down the cost of all the rents in
the project.
The developers are representing that they will actively support participation in other
government programs designed to allow seniors to live and age in place, regardless of
changing circumstances.
The project will provide affordable housing at no cost or obligation to Plymouth
taxpayers.
The project will be an asset to the overall City Center area.
The project Iikely will not be built in its present form without the bond issuance.
The project does not compare directly to other affordable housing projects because it
has a substantial health care component to it.
e The project was a part of an overall extensive public process with the neighbors in the
area, and its demise would leave the City back at square one in this important
transition zone between City Center and the neighborhood.
The project provides an important housing component for a specific need in
Plymouth, since seniors doubled in number in the last 10 years in Plymouth and is our
fastest growing age group.
8.1 Amendment to rental housing license code. The City has licensed and inspected
rental units throughout the City for the last 7-8 years. Until now, the only criteria for
reissuance of a license has been compliance with codes. The new ordinance would also
allow consideration of certain criminal behaviors in license renewals. Several other area
cities have such ordinances. Warning and notification to landlords would be required.
Apartment owners have had input through two general meetings and the ordinance has
generally been met with favorable review, with one exception that we know of. Their
main issue seemed to be to get adequate notice of any emerging problems to be able to
handle them.
8.2 Report on hydraulic/hydrology study for northwest Plymouth. The study
provides the necessary data and recommendations to implement water quality guidelines
for new developments in northwest Plymouth. We have been using the recommendations
of the draft report already in reviewing such developments as The Reserve, but formal
inclusion into the City's Comprehensive Plan should be done after a hearing by the
Planning Commission.
4
PROCLAMATION
NATIONAL
Mmw-= EAU.
M MAM-
WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NATV) is sponsoring a unique, nationwide-
crime ationwidecrimepreventionandcommunitysafetyprogramonAugust7, 2001 entitled "National Night Out";
and
WHEREAS, the "18`i' Annual National Night Out" provides a valuable opportunity for the City of
Plymouth to join forces with thousands of other communities nation-wide to promote crime
prevention and community safety; and
WHEREAS, residents and businesses play a vital role in assisting the Plymouth Police Department
and the City with joint crime prevention and safety initiatives and come together to host "National
Night Out 2001" locally; and
WHEREAS, city/community partnerships promoting crime prevention and neighborhood safety,
are important themes of the "National Night Out" program;
WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of Plymouth be aware of the importance of crime
prevention and life safety programs and the impact that their participation in them has on reducing
crime and enhancing livability in the City; and
NOW, THEREFORE I, Mayor Joy Tierney, do hereby call upon the citizens of Plymouth to Join
the City and the National Association of Town Watch in supporting the "18`h Annual National
Night Out" on August 7, 2001.
FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT I, MAYOR TIERNEY, do hereby proclaim
Tuesday, August 7, 2001 as "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" in Plymouth.
Mayor Joy Tierney
City Clerk
Date
Date
Proposed Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
July 10, 2001
A Regular Meeting of the Plymouth City Council was called to order by Mayor Tierney
at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on
July 10, 2001.
COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Tierney, Councilmembers Hewitt, Johnson, Slavik, Stein,
Black, and Harstad.
ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Johnson, Assistant City Manager Ahrens, Acting
Police Chief Twaddle, Fire Captain Hun, Finance Director Hahn, Community
Development Director Hurlburt, Park and Recreation Director Blank, Superintendent of
Parks Peterson, Director of Public Works Faulkner, City Attorney Knutson, and City
Clerk Paulson.
Plymouth Forum
No one was present to address the Council.
Presentations and Public Information Announcements
4.1) Announcement of League of Minnesota Cities Achievement Awards
Mayor Tierney reported that the City is the recipient of two achievement awards at the
recent League of Minnesota Cities Conference. She stated the first award was for
innovation and excellence in communications that recognized the City's ReConnect (on-
line registration for park and recreation programs). She noted that the City was the first
city in the State and among the first in the country to offer on-line registration for park
and recreation programs. The second award was for innovation and excellence in citizen,
community, and youth involvement. This award recognized the City's Youth Advisory
Council.
4.2) Presentation of Awards of Excellence
Jan Ficken, from the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association, reported the City's
Park and Recreation Department is the recipient of three Awards of Excellence. The first
award was in the facility category, and it's recognizing the Plymouth Creek Center and
Fieldhouse. She complimented the Council on the planning process utilized for the
construction of facility. She noted the elegant features of the facility, the varied events
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 2 of 13
that are conducted at the facility, and the artificial turf at the fieldhouse that provides year
around activities.
She stated the second award is in the programming and events category, and the City is
being recognized for the Chocolate Sampler event that was held in conjunction with the
Millennium Garden project.
She stated the third award is in the technology category, and the City is being recognized
for the ReConnect program that provides on-line registration for the City's park and
recreation programs.
The Council commended the Park and Recreation Department for receiving these awards.
4.3) Recognition of Youth Advisory Council Town Forum Subcommittee Members
Councilmember Johnson recognized Paul Lenhardt and Eric Jungles from the Youth
Advisory Council who were present at the meeting. She noted that over 60 youth
delegates throughout the State attended the League of Minnesota Cities Conference.
Councilmember Johnson reported on Youth Advisory Council's sub -committee that
organized the Youth Town Forum. She, as well as Mr. Lenhardt and Mr. Jungles,
presented certificates of appreciation to Archana Balas, Supriya Gandham, and Ifna
Ejebe. They noted that Nwamaka Ejebe was unable to attend this evening to receive her
certificate.
4.4) Recognition of High School Students
Councilmember Johnson reported that Jameson Johnson and Shea Hess, students at
Wayzata High School and members of the school's SkillsUSA team, placed first at the
National SkillsUSA competition in the television/video production category. She
thanked Jennifer Polz and Will Endsley, who are the school advisors.
4.5) Announcement that Plymouth Community Band would be performing at the
Orchestra Hall
Martin Frank, 11525 52nd Avenue North, President of the Plymouth Community Band,
reported that the band would be performing at Minnesota Orchestra Hall on July 14 at
11:00 a.m. He stated the band was started three years ago with the assistance of the City,
and they have grown from 45 members to its 60 current members. He thanked the
Council for their support.
Darin Kragenbring, 15600 24"' Avenue North, stated that they perform at Parkers Lake
for the summer concerts, Plymouth on Parade, Primavera Arts Festival, History Fest,
Music in Plymouth, Plymouth Fun Run, and at Wayzata High School. He also thanked
the Council for their support the past three years.
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 3 of 13
Mayor Tierney thanked the band for their contribution to the community and
congratulated them on the honor of performing at the Minnesota Orchestra Hall.
Approval of Agenda
Mayor Tierney added reports on the City's water supply and Music in Plymouth as item
No's. 9.1 and 9.2 respectively under Reports and Staff Recommendations.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson,
to approve the amended agenda. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
Consent Agenda
City Manager Johnson reported that bids were opened on July 9 for item No. 6.12, and
staff has provided a revised staff report outlining the bids received as well as the
recommendation to approve the lowest qualified bidder.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson,
to approve the Consent Agenda which included the followingitems: ems:
6.01) Minutes from Special Council Meeting of June 26 and Regular Council Meeting
of June 26.
6.02) Resolution Approving Disbursements for the Period Ending June 29, 2001
Res2001-286).
6.03) Resolution Approving Land Use Guide Plan Amendments for the City of
Plymouth for Several Properties located throughout the City to Achieve Consistency
between the Land Use Guide Plan and the Zoning Ordinance Map (2001042 — Res2001-
287), an Ordinance Amending Chapter 21 of the City Code to Classify Certain Land
Consistent with the Guide Plan Classification in the Comprehensive Plan (2001042 —
Ord2001-23), and a Resolution Approving Findings of Fact for Rezoning of Certain Land
Consistent with the Guide Plan Classification in the Comprehensive Plan (2001042 —
Res2001-288).
6.04) Resolution Approving 2001 Tobacco License for Abe's Tobacco, 16605 County
Road 24, #103 (Res2001-289).
6.05) Resolution Approving Final Plat and Development Contract for Rottlund Homes
for Phase 1 of "The Reserve" for Property located West of I-494 and North of the
Canadian Pacific Railroad (20092-F — Res2001-290).
6.06) Resolution Adopting a Multi -Family Housing Revenue Bond Financing Policy
Res2001-291).
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 4 of 13
6.07) Resolution Approving a Variance for Impervious Surface Coverage in the
Shoreland Management Overlay District and a Variance to the Side Yard Setback to
Permit the Construction of a Garage and Living Space Addition for Nancy Mack on
Property located at 10140 26`
h Avenue North (2001045 — Res2001-292).
6.08) Resolution Approving a Variance to allow a 6.1 -foot Side Yard Setback to
Rebuild an Existing Garage on Property located at 1450 Larch Lane North (2001050-
Res2001-293).
6.09) Resolution Approving a Lot Division for Ted Kemna/Schoell & Madson, Inc. to
create Two Lots from Lot 1, Block 2, Walnut Grove Pond, 3380 Troy Lane North
2001058 — Res2001-294).
6.10) Approval of expenditure of $109,658.04 by the I-494 Corridor Commission for
services from LJR, Inc. for calendar year 2001 and a Resolution Approving I-494
Corridor Commission Dues Increase (Res2001-295).
6.11) Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a Service
Agreement with North Hennepin Mediation Program Inc. for 2001 (Res2001-296).
6.12) Resolution Awarding Bid for 2001 Major Street Mill and Overlay Improvements
1020 — Res2001-297).
6.13.1) Resolution Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Preparation of Report
for Street Lighting in the Plum Tree East 6th Addition (Res2001-298), and a Resolution
Receiving Report and Ordering project for Street Lighting in the Plum Tree East
6th
Addition (Res2001-299).
6.13.2) Resolution Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Preparation of Report
for Street Lighting in the Parkers Lake Shores (Res2001-300), and a Resolution
Receiving Report and Ordering project for Street Lighting in the Parkers Lake Shores
Res2001-301).
6.13.3) Resolution Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Preparation of Report
for Street Lighting for The Reserve (Res2001-302), and a Resolution Receiving Report
and Ordering project for Street Lighting for The Reserve (Res2001-303).
Councilmember Black registered a no vote for item No. 6.07.
Councilmember Slavik asked why the Engineer's estimate changed on the revised staff
report for item No. 6.12. Public Works Director Faulkner replied the engineer's estimate
was modified due to incorporating additional field inspection costs.
With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 5 of 13
Public Hearinjs
There were no Public Hearings scheduled.
General Business
8.1) Installation of Children's Playground on Environmental Park Property
Park and Recreation Director Blank reported on a proposed playground on the
Environmental Park Property. The Environmental Park serves the neighborhood
bounded by County Road 9 on the south, Schmidt Lake Road on the north, Fernbrook
Lane on the west, and I-494 on the east. He stated this property was acquired by the City
as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan in 1984. The Council previously authorized staff
to identify a new location for a park which would replace two previous parks. Currently,
the closest playground to this site is more than six blocks away, but with construction of a
new playground, there would only be a three -block walk for residents. He stated staff
sent letters to adjacent neighborhoods to this site for their comments, and they were
invited to Park and Recreation Advisory Commission's (PRAC) meetings where this item
was discussed. Based on their comments, the residents were invited to a March PRAC
meeting. Due to inclement weather, they tabled action until the May meeting so they
could review and walk the site. He explained that PRAC considered three options which
were to not construct a playground at this time, proceed with the recommended site, or
consider more of a northern or southern site. After reviewing the site, PRAC
recommends constructing the playground at the proposed location.
Park and Recreation Director Blank illustrated the areas more to the north and south and
explained why those areas aren't recommended due to the removal of trees that would be
necessary as well as being secluded and away from residential neighborhoods.
Councilmember Harstad asked what is the coverage area goal for a neighborhood park.
Park and Recreation Director Blank replied neighborhood parks are intended to be
walked to or biked to, usually within a six -block area. He added no trees would need to
be removed for the proposed
location of the playground, and the playground would be located approximately 310'
away from the closest Fernbrook Manor townhome. He noted that the proposed location
of the playground would be located on property that was dedicated by the Fernbrook
Townhome development.
Mayor Tierney noticed the steep slope leading down to the location and asked if that
could be flattened out. Park and Recreation Director Blank replied there would be
controlled berming around the play area, and the play area itself would be flattened out.
In addition, the proposed trails leading to the play area would be graded and handicap
accessible.
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 6 of 13
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated there could be a future application for
a residential development that would be located north of the proposed location for the
playground, and more than likely, there would also be a trail access from that
development to the playground.
Superintendent of Parks Peterson stated there is an existing road from the Fluidyne
property north of this site that would be utilized for the trail. He also stated that very few
trees would need to be removed.
Park and Recreation Director Blank reported there would be a satellite bathroom facility
at this playground similar to other neighborhood parks. However, there wouldn't be any
parking facilities for the proposed site which is the situation for the majority of the City's
neighborhood parks.
Shirley Galvin, 14000 44`h Place North, Unit 2, representing Fernbrook Manor
Homeowners Association, stated the residents of their development are opposed to the
proposed location of the playground. This playground would affect the wildlife in the
area, reduce their property values, and create more noise in the area. She explained that
when they purchased their homes, the builder stated that this area would be left in its
natural state and not be developed. The end units even paid more for their units in order
to be closer to the wildlife area. They've always felt very fortunate to be in such close
proximity to a natural/wildlife area, and they would support improving the trail system in
order that other residents could see the area. She stated the proposed playground would
be of no benefit to their development as no one has children. Therefore, she suggested
locating the playground closer to the Savannah Development who would utilize the park.
She asked how close the trail would be from their end buildings on the east.
Superintendent of Parks Peterson replied that they are unable to determine the exact
location of the trail until a surveyor reviews the area. Upon preliminary review by staff,
it appears that the trail would be located approximately 40 feet from the closest
townhome building.
Mayor Tierney asked what type of trail would be constructed from the Savannah
development to the playground. Superintendent of Parks Peterson replied staff proposes
a bituminous trail from their development to the swamp. Park and Recreation Director
Blank added that the
trails to the playground would either be bituminous or contain crushed rock so residents
with bikes and strollers could access the park.
Councilmember Johnson asked what type of housing surrounds Turtle Lake Park.
Superintendent of Parks Peterson replied the majority of the homes are townhomes, and
there have been no issues for these units regarding their close proximity to the
neighborhood park.
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 7 of 13
Sara Seltz, 4800 Cheshire Lane North, representing Savannah neighborhood, stated this
park is very important to their neighborhood. She explained there are 46 homes in their
development with 60 children, and 50 of those children are less than 13 years old. She
stated there is no park that their development can easily access within the six -block goal
of the City. Currently, their neighborhood utilizes Turtle Lake Park, Gateway Park, and
Nanterre Park which is a long distance for small children. In order to access these parks,
residents are forced to cross Fembrook which can be very difficult and dangerous due to
the traffic. She stated the majority of the homeowners in their development were told
that when they were considering purchasing lots, there would be a neighborhood park
near this location. She noted that over two years ago at a neighborhood Halloween Party,
residents signed a petition requesting the construction of a neighborhood park. She
disagrees with the residents of the Fembrook Manor development that the location of this
playground would affect the wildlife. She also noted that out of the 102 units at the
Fembrook Manor development, only three of those units would back up to the
playground area.
Kerry Laman, 4715 Empire Lane North, stated when they considered relocating to the
City over two years ago, they liked the City's neighborhood park concept. He indicated
that the developer also conveyed to them that there would be a neighborhood park in this
vicinity. He stated this playground would add value to the community.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Harstad,
to adopt a Resolution Approving Site for Playground in Environmental Park (Res2001-
304).
Councilmember Harstad stated neighborhood parks provide the opportunity for
interaction with neighborhoods and building a sense of community. He stated this park
would be well utilized, and there would also be a future housing development in this area
to utilize the park. Therefore, he supports the proposed playground.
Councilmember Hewitt asked if playgrounds decrease the value of adjacent properties.
Park and Recreation Director Blank replied no, and usually adjacent properties have
higher property values.
Councilmember Hewitt stated she agrees with Councilmember Harstad, and she stated
that she does not want to remove trees in order to relocate it to another area.
Councilmember Johnson stated that when the trails are constructed leading to the
playground, there could be concerns of adjacent residents on the increased usage of the
trails. Therefore, she asked if there are any options to provide buffering, additional tree
plantings, split fencing, etc. Park and Recreation Director Blank replied these options
would be discussed with the adjacent residents, and he stated the City typically utilizes
split rail fencing and shrubs to define the trails.
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 8 of 13
There being no further discussion and with all members voting in favor, the motion
carried.
8.2) Conditional Use Permit and Variance for a 125 -Foot High Monopole Antenna
Tower and Related Equipment Shelter at the Hamel VFW, 19020 Hamel Road
2001046)
Community Development Director Hurlburt reported on the request of Ulteig Engineers
for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance for the installation of a 125 -foot high
monopole antenna tower and related equipment shelter at the Hamel VFW, 19020 Hamel
Road. The property would be leased from the Hamel VFW for this purpose. She
illustrated the proposed location and stated that six personal wireless service antennas
would be mounted at the top of the monopole with the purpose to fill in a weak coverage
area along Highway 55 in the AT&T Wireless Service system. A Conditional Use Permit
is required to allow the installation of the tower and related equipment while the Variance
is required to allow the monopole to be 125 feet high, where 75 feet is the maximum
height specified by the Zoning Ordinance. She noted that the City of Medina is opposed
to the installation of this tower, and a copy of their Resolution has been provided in the
Council packet.
Councilmember Stein stated one of the City of Medina's concerns is that with the
construction of this tower, it would make this property more difficult to redevelop.
Therefore, why wouldn't the tower be located further back into the corner of the lot?
Community Development Director Hurlburt replied the proposed location shouldn't
affect the redevelopment of the property. She noted that there also needs to be ample
setback from Highway 55 and where it wouldn't inhibit the current use of the property.
Councilmember Black stated with the proposed 125 -foot tower, there doesn't seem to be
that large of gain in the area coverage. Therefore, she is not convinced that granting the
approvals would be beneficial. She asked what the City's legal options are with respect
to whether the requests are approved.
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated the Council has until September 15 to
act on the application.
Julie Townsend, from Ulteig Engineers and also representing AT & T Services, stated
they have provided the analysis, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, to the Council.
Councilmember Stein asked what the normal coverage area is for a tower. Ms.
Townsend replied for an AT&T System, with a relatively flat topography, the signal
could be projected two to four miles for a 75 -foot tower. Based on their drive test
analysis, a 125 -foot tower is the minimum height needed. AT&T typically couldn't
utilize a 75 -foot tower.
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 9 of 13
Councilmember Johnson asked if other sites were explored to fill in the gap of the
coverage area. Ms. Townsend stated they considered the City's water tower, the Wayzata
High School site, and another site north of Highway 55. They also considered sites in
Medina, which included the City's water tower, and the Hamel playfield. However, the
City of Medina had a moratorium for the placement of towers.
Councilmember Harstad asked if the tower could be camouflaged. Community
Development Director Hurlburt replied the proposed location of the tower is the least
visually intrusive, and other than the color of the structure itself, the City would require a
gray finish.
Councilmember Black asked if they considered the Hennepin County Public Works
Facility. Community Development Director Hurlburt replied that facility is two miles
outside the City and would be even further to the west than the Medina water tower.
Councilmember Stein asked if the Medina playfield would be a better site than the VFW
site. Ms. Townsend replied no, and she noted that not all the testing was completed on
that site due to the moratorium.
James Lane, a Councilmember from the City of Medina, stated the City of Medina
requested that the Council deny the application. He stated the proposed tower and
structure would have an enormous impact on uptown Hamel — an area which Medina is
trying to redevelop that consists of light commercial and residential use. He stated the
current use of the VFW is non -conforming, and with the addition of a tower, it would
only intensify and expand upon that non -conforming use which could make it difficult to
recover the intended conforming use of that property. He stated the city's second
concern is the height of the tower. The City of Plymouth's requirement is 75 feet which
is why the Variance is necessary in order to increase the height to 125 feet. He has not
been convinced that AT&T has totally analyzed what the coverage could be off of the
City of Plymouth's water tower which is a mile east of the proposed site or the City of
Medina's water tower located a mile west of the proposed site. Therefore, he requested
the applicant analyze all possible sites. He acknowledged that it's presumptuous for the
City of Medina to instruct the City of Plymouth on how to conduct its affairs, but there
could be good exchange of ideas and good will between the two cities. He stated the City
of Medina permits these kinds of structures only in commercial and industrial areas. He
stated their water tower is located in an industrial area that is on the edge of the existing
coverage, and the City of Medina has a 75 -foot height requirement. He noted that the
City of Medina's moratorium has been lifted.
Ms. Townsend explained that a radio frequency engineer studies the entire area, reviews
the "dead spots," and makes a recommendation on the ultimate location to fill in the gaps
of coverage. She defined their search ring in relation to this application, and she stated
their search ring didn't go any further than the Hamel playfield. All possible sites were
reviewed, and the VFW site was determined to the best site. She noted that per the City's
ordinance, they have to review high mile distance, or supply analysis from other sites.
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 10 of 13
The City of Medina's moratorium didn't exclude the possibility of considering sites in
the city, but it swayed them more to review the VFW location. She stated they have a
lease agreement with the VFW.
Mayor Tierney asked what the City's legal parameters are for towers. City Attorney
Knutson replied there are two different sets of regulations, which are the City's
ordinances and the Federal Telecommunications Act. Under the Telecommunications
Act, the City couldn't enact an ordinance to prevent reasonable coverage. However, the
City doesn't have to allow the applicant to locate the tower in the most economical way.
The City also can't discriminate amongst the providers. The applicant needs to comply
with the City's requirements for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance. He stated
regarding the non -conforming use issue, the tower wouldn't be an expansion of a non-
conforming use on the VFW property assuming that it was approved.
Councilmember Johnson asked if there could be a plan to utilize both cities' water towers
with 75 -foot antennas on each, as she is very concerned about the proposed height of the
tower.
City Attorney Knutson stated if the Council desired to consider an alternate plan, the City
would need to hire their own radio frequency engineer to determine if two 75 -foot towers
would be more feasible than one 125 -foot tower.
Councilmember Johnson stated these towers are not attractive, and she is concerned that
an alternate site could be recommended, which she wouldn't support, that could impact
the development further into Plymouth. An alternate location could impact single family
neighborhoods.
City Attorney Knutson stated it may be difficult to retain a radio frequency engineer to
study this, and the study could take from a few weeks up to a six months to complete
with an approximate cost of $2,000.
Councilmember Harstad reiterated that the application is for the VFW site, and there is a
proposed lease agreement with AT&T for this site. He suggested that the Council vote
on the application, and if the motion fails, hire a radio frequency engineer to prepare an
analysis. He noted that if the height is reduced to 75 feet, there could be a second site
identified.
Motion was made by Councilmember Harstad and seconded by Mayor Tierney, to adopt
a Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit and Variance to allow Installation of a
Monopole Antenna Tower and Related Equipment Shelter for Wireless Communication
Services at the Hamel VFW 19020 Hamel Road (2001046).
Councilmember Slavik asked if there could be a restriction and/or condition placed on the
height of the tower. Ms. Townsend replied the recommended 125 -foot tower wasn't
selected arbitrarily, but that is the minimum required for the coverage area.
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 11 of 13
Councilmember Slavik stated that she is not convinced that this would be a good location
for this size of a tower. She asked if it has been proven that two 75 -foot towers wouldn't
accomplish their goal to fill in the coverage area.
Ms. Townsend stated that two 75 -foot towers wouldn't comply with the City's Zoning
Ordinance. Two 75 -foot towers also wouldn't allow for co -location like a 125 -foot tower
would.
Councilmember Harstad asked if AT&T is compensated by co -locators. Ms. Townsend
stated it depends on the agreements, and sometimes there is a reciprocal sharing of towers
with other carriers.
Councilmember Black asked if the Council is able to consider the plans for the
redevelopment of uptown Hamel. City Attorney Knutson replied the Council could take
them into consideration.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black and seconded by Councilmember Slavik, to
amend the main motion to limit the height of the tower to 75 feet.
Councilmember Johnson reiterated that an alternate plan could be identified that may
intrude into the western edge of Plymouth with a 75 -foot tower which she may not
support.
Mayor Tierney stated she wouldn't support a 75 -foot tower, as she believes it wouldn't
be effective.
There being no further discussion, and with all members voting against the motion but
Black, the motion failed.
Councilmember Johnson asked since the Council has until September 15 to act on this
application, are there any options to review sites in the City of Medina now that they
have lifted their moratorium.
Ms. Townsend stated AT&T would not be pleased with that decision as they have met all
the conditions of the City's ordinance and provided all the required documentation. She
explained it
would be at least another six months to engineer another site, and more than likely, they
would be presenting the same proposal before the Council.
Mayor Tierney wondered if there are any structures or locations in the City of Medina
that the applicant could utilize since their water tower wouldn't be feasible. She asked
Mr. Lane what other area would be available between the City of Medina's water tower
and the City of Plymouth's water tower, which the applicant could utilize.
Mr. Lane reiterated that he isn't convinced that their water tower was fully analyzed.
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 12 of 13
Mayor Tierney asked if AT&T could review the water tower site. Ms. Townsend replied
it would be very difficult with a deadline of September 15. She also stated that the City
of Medina's height requirement is 75 feet. If it was determined that a 150 -foot tower
would be needed at the playfield, the City of Medina probably wouldn't approve it.
Motion was made by Councilmember Johnson and seconded by Councilmember Black,
to postpone this item to August 28 in order to provide opportunities for the City of
Medina AT&T and the City of Plymouth to review other options.
Councilmember Hewitt asked what would be accomplished by postponing this issue. She
stated the City couldn't require AT&T to perform further studies. Community
Development Director Hurlburt stated there is background information that the radio
frequency engineer prepared which could be assembled for the Council for their review.
In addition, the City of Medina's zoning map could be reviewed for possible alternate
sites.
Councilmember Stein suggested that the Council might want to review its ordinance at a
Study Session regarding the 75 -foot height requirement and the basis for that. He asked
if the City of Medina would work with AT&T in determining a suitable location.
Mr. Lane replied that wouldn't occur on the City of Medina's own initiative as that is
AT&T's responsibility to prepare an application for submittal to the city.
Councilmember Stein asked if the City of Medina could assist in locating a site and/or
suggest a site for AT&T. Mr. Lane stated that he couldn't represent the City of Medina.
However, he would be willing to communicate to their staff what is being requested.
Councilmember Harstad stated that he supports the motion and allowing extra time for
the City of Medina to work with Plymouth and AT&T.
Ms. Townsend reiterated that their search ring for coverage included Medina and
Plymouth, and she asked how is it any different for her to request a 125 -foot tower from
the City of Medina.
Motion was made by Councilmember Slavik and seconded by Councilmember Stein, to
call the question. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
The Council then voted on the motion to postpone the item to August 28. With all
members voting in favor, the motion carried.
Proposed City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001
Page 13 of 13
Reports and Recommendations
9.1) City's Water Supply
Public Works Director Faulkner stated that due to the dry conditions, the City could be
experiencing a water shortage. Therefore, staff is in the process of distributing a flier to
all residents explaining the odd/even water restriction in the City. He stated the odd/even
water restriction is a standard procedure that is in effect from May through September.
He indicated that the City is not in a critical situation, but it is a major concern. He noted
that there are two watermain connections to the City of Maple Grove at Quinwood Lane
and near Lake Camelot Estates which have been opened.
Councilmember Harstad asked if the odd/even water restriction actually saves water or
levels out the demand. Public Works Director Faulkner replied it levels out the critical
peaks.
Councilmember Hewitt asked how staff addresses those businesses who have
underground sprinkling systems, and they are sprinkling the streets quite a bit of the time.
Public Works Director Faulkner stated staff contacts the managers of those businesses
and request that they adhere to the odd/even water restriction and adjust their sprinkler
heads.
9.2) Music in Plymouth
Mayor Tierney commended staff, the Plymouth Civic League and the Jim Willis family
for an excellent Music in Plymouth event this year. She requested that letters be sent on
behalf of the Council to everyone who was involved in organizing this year's event.
Adiournment
Motion was made by Councilmember Slavik and seconded by Councilmember Black, to
adjourn the meeting at 10:13 p.m. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
Sandra R. Paulson, City Clerk
Agenda Number: CO -OA
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Dale E. Hahn, Director of Finance & Information Technology
SUBJECT: Disbursements
DATE: July 16, 2001 for the City Council Meeting July 24, 2001
1. PROPOSED MOTION: To adopt the attached resolution approving the disbursements
for the period ending July 13, 2001.
2. DISCUSSION: Shown below is a listing of disbursements for the various funds for the
period ending July 13, 2001:
Anchor Bank
General & Special Revenue
Construction & Debt Service
Enterprise & Internal Service
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS
323,814.74
321,364.55
303,857.45
156,226.00
1,105,262.74
3. RECOMMENDATION: I hereby approve the attached listing of disbursements and
recommend same for payment.
Dw' -h D. Jo son
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO: 2001 -
APPROVING DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD
ENDING July 13, 2001
WHEREAS, a list of disbursements for the period ending as presented to the City Council for
approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the payment of the list of disbursements of the
following funds is approved:
Anchor Bank
General & Special Revenue 323,814.74
Construction & Debt Service 321,364.55
Enterprise & Internal Service 303,857.45
Housing & Redevelopment Authority 156,226.00
GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS $1,105,262.74
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
Invoice Expense Distribution for Period Ended 07/13/01
FUND 101 General Fund
201 Recreation Fund
203 Transit System Fund
204 Community Development Fund
205 Diasaster Donation Manage Grant
207 Economic Development Fund
220 Comm Dev Block Grant Fund
250 HRA Section 8 Fund
251 HRA General Fund
401 General Capital Projects Fund
402 Minnesota State Aid Fund
404 Building & Equipment Rev. Fund
406 Park Replacement Fund
407 Infrasturcture Replacement Fund
408 Project Administration Fund
409 City & Community Parks
410 Neighborhood Parks
421 Utility Trunk Fund
422 Unfinanced Imp Construction
425 Shenandoah Housing Imp. Area
426 Shenandoah Administration
428 Activity Center/Fieldhouse
470 TIF # 7-1 (Const)
471 TIF # 7-2 O.S. (Const)
472 TIF # 7-3 P.O.S. (Const)
473 TIF #74 P.T.P (Const)
474 TIF Dev. Exp. Bonds 95 (Const)
475 TIF # 7-5 Rottlund (Const)
476 TIF #7-6 Continental (Const)
501 Water Fund
502 Sewer Fund
503 Solid Waste Management Fund
504 Recreation Facility Fund
505 Water Resources Fund
506 Activity Center Fund
507 Field House Fund
601 Central Services Fund
602 Central Equipment Fund
603 Risk Management Fund
604 Design Engineering Fund
605 Employee Benefits Fund
606 Information Technology Fund
607 Public Facilities Fund
720 Senior Housing Bond Trustee
730 1494 Corridor Commission
122,062.27
38, 999.82
138, 817.98
0.00
0.00
4,833.20
6,447.66
156,226.00
0.00
6,271.84
0.00
16,001.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
78,226.99
220, 864.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
66, 368.08
2,573.31
134.03
2,895.27
673.72
0.00
334.34
1,508.54
50,411.30
15, 728.00
0.00
74,070.11
55,643.61
33,517.14
0.00
12,653.81
Total Invoice Expense Distribution: $ 1,105,262.74
Check Register
Date: 7/16/01
Time: 9:37:40 AM
COUNCIL REPORT - CHECK REGISTER
6/30/2001 Through 7/13/2001
Page 1 of 22
Vendor Name/
Invoice Amount Check # Check Amount
Invoice Description
1st Line Beverage
Concessions food resupply $118.00 38585 $262.51
Concession food resupply $144.51
A-1 Outdoor Power Inc
Echo backpack lonoise blower $732.19 38441 $789.67
095X -fire line,shldr harness $57.48
ABM Equipment & Supply, Inc.
25 90gl trash carts 1,597.50 38442 30,922.50
Rear loader trash compactor 29,325.00
ACT Electronics Inc
2 Traffic counter padlocks 24.48 38586 24.48
Abel, Bill
6-26 Parking U of M Concession 8.00 38459 21.80
6-26 40 Mileage to U of MN 13.80
Acclaim Service Inc
CC Freezer repair 252.50 38587 252.50
Aetna Life Ins & Annuity Inc
Payroll Generated Invoice 30.00 38444 1,819.62
Payroll Generated Invoice 50.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 451.93
Payroll Generated Invoice 273.84
Payroll Generated Invoice 110.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 50.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 200.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 326.93
Payroll Generated Invoice 326.92
Ahrens, Laurie
Costco/Snacks for var meetings 190.46 38508 190.46
Allied Blacktop
963.7gl Road Oil 1,642.14 38445 1,642.14
American CPR & First Aid Inc
6-3/6-13 Blood Borne Pathogens 140.00 38446 140.00
American Institute of CPA's
01'Jacobson Membership 125.00 38443 125.00
American Red Cross Assoc.
8 Swim/Diving,5 pocket mask 249.48 38447 531.70
40 Inf/Preschl aqua parent gd 63.90
12 Manikin rentals,CPR video 218.32
American Red Cross Assoc.
1-13/3-10 Water sfty profider 98.00 38588 98.00
American Supply Group Inc
4cs ppr plates,forks,knives,sp 152.16 38448 152.16
Ameripride
Public Works Uniform Rntl 411.51 38449 411.51
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 2 of 22
Ameripride
Public Works Uniform Rntl 416.99 38589 416.99
Anderson, Charles & Helen
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 367.00 38405 367.00
Aramark
AC 5 reg,4 decaf coffee 199.50 38451 199.50
Arch Wireless
6-26/7-25PD4 1,Adm I pager mtl 336.72 38452 336.72
Arena Systems
20 5gl pails white rink seal 547.77 38591 547.77
Aspen Environmental
01'Plym creek extra service 20.00 38592 20.00
At the Lake Apartments
Jul01 Section 8 Rent 15,608.00 38400 15,608.00
Auberge Du Vieux - Port
Conf#5376 J Olsson Govern User 780.00 38453 1,560.00
J Hohenstein/Govem User Conf 780.00
Auto Electric Specialists
Unit 553 Drive,brush set,rprs 64.62 38593 64.62
BCA/Training & Development
J Christianson/"Abduction Resp 60.00 38454 60.00
BCA/Training & Development
M Evans/Intoxilyzer 5000 40.00 38594 120.00
S Kroeger/Intoxilyzer 5000 40.00
L Way/Intoxilyzer 5000 40.00
Bachman's Inc
Jul01 AC Plant Lease 137.17 38595 137.17
Barton Sand & Gravel Co.
6-1/6-15 508.421n Asphalt 3,357.08 38456 3,357.08
Bass Lake Hills Townhomes LTD
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 2,874.00 38401 2,874.00
Baton Corporation
A94158 R50217 Erosion dep ref 5,950.00 38457 5,950.00
Bedor, Chris
Park and Rec Refund 325.00 38596 325.00
Bertelson Bros. Inc.
Jumbo markers 38.69 38458 665.67
5-Highlighter/start set 23.49
4 -glue stic 3.56
5-pointer/steno book/scale 57.07
3 -Core disp/tap disp 6.11
Ibx krt env/5-mg binder 37.41
10 -steno book/3-markers/org 51.31
1 bx laminating sheets/tap disp 26.49
lbx laser labels 17.99
Organizer 7.50
3 -pen refill 7.07
12 -mending tape/2-steno book 30.61
12 -File storage/ribbon printer 135.19
file 4.60
24pk page/label lbx 79.91
Ibx xerox label 72.03
12 -Super film 66.64
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 3 of 22
Bertelson Bros. Inc.
Folding table/oubound cm 281.96 38597 $606.82
3bx report covers 34.25
lbx fastener base/pencil mech 19.89
2 -batteries 3.37
Procell battery/super film 128.22
6 -Report cover/3 hole punch 42.73
Clipboard/wedgy board 13.17
lbx trans film/compound 25.52
note pads/perf pads/pens/steno 57.71
Bevins, Mark W
Jun01 FSS Section 8 escrow prg 1,752.00 38602 $1,752.00
6-25 Gas/background investig 10.00 38519 10.00
Bjorklund Compensation Consult
13.78
3225 Co Rd 1014-1/5-31 25.78
PW Envir Educ Coordinator 100.00 38555 100.00
Blank, Eric
6-2/7-2 219 Mileage Reimb 75.56 38476 75.56
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik
May01 Well 3&11 File 7000104 750.87 38598 30,312.04
May01 Proj1023 FS 20/22 upgrad 1,012.56
May01 Projl024 File 7001000 100.00
38612 31.46
May01 Wells 5,10,13 repair 867.78
May01 Prcj8030 File 7098800 1,894.27
38599 150.00
May01 Proj9914 File 7000102 14,786.92
May01 Proj9007 File 70983009 182.01
38463 27.00
May01 Prcj6007 File 7098303 320.00
May01 PVT General 954.26
38600 27.00
May01 Proj9914 File PR7000102 3,575.99
May01 Proj1003 File 7001105 5,867.38
38601 308.85
Bryan Rock Products Inc
Jun01 FSS Section 8 escrow prg 1,752.00 38602 $1,752.00
6-13 118.04tn 3/4 minus 691.42 38460 691.42
California Contractors Supply
13.78
3225 Co Rd 1014-1/5-31 25.78
12 yellow rainsuits 238.80 38461 238.80
Campbell Group
63 Day camp T's 408.45 38462 408.45
Capital Property Management
Jul01 Section 8 Rent 446.00 38417 446.00
Carlson, Dan
Target/Pop for reserves at Mus 31.46 38612 31.46
Cass County Sheriffs Dept
WN#6762 Fine Rcpt 108310 150.00 38599 150.00
Chen, Li Chen
Park and Rec Refund 27.00 38463 27.00
Chen, Li Chen
Park and Rec Refund 27.00 38600 27.00
City Signs
200 Lawn signs 308.85 38601 308.85
City of Plymouth / Misc
Workers Comp trust acct 12 15,000.00 38464 15,000.00
City of Plymouth HRA/FSS
Jun01 FSS Section 8 escrow prg 1,752.00 38602 $1,752.00
City of Plymouth/Sewer & Water
17915 Co Rd 24 4-1/5-31 23.73 38603 $83.82
17920 30th PI 4-1/5-31 13.78
3225 Co Rd 1014-1/5-31 25.78
17915 30th PI 4.1/5-31 13.78
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 4 of 22
17825 Co Rd 24 4-30/5-31 6.75
Coachman Trail Apts
25.00
Jul01 Section 8 Rent 542.00 38406 $542.00
Colt 45
1,056.71
7-10-01 Concert performance 500.00 38465 $500.00
Comm Tech Electrical Contr.Inc
CC rpr/diagnose cable between $371.25 38604 $371.25
Computer System Products Inc.
50 -blue network cables $276.20 38605 $276.20
Corporate Card
Hahn/Target,Office Maxcalcula 266.21 38606 $1,684.92
Gerdes/Late charge to be remov 25.00
Blank/Sheldon Auditorium..Sr p 337.00
Ahrens/Davannis,Duluth lodging 1,056.71
Crohn, Aaron
Jul01 Section 8 Rent 375.00 38399 $375.00
Cronatron Welding Systems Inc
4 Flex flap disc Z $95.88 38607 $204.17
Drill/tap,2 flex flap disc Z $108.29
Crown Marking, Inc.
4 Stamps/Job site plan,approve $137.01 38466 $137.01
Cub Foods /3550 Vicksburg
Jun01 Food Charges $1,091.69 38608 $1,091.69
Cummins North Central
Service call on the truck #327 $390.55 38609 $390.55
Cy's Uniforms
B Couser pant 71.06 38610 $237.42
Lou Starr pant 47.65
G Hendrickson pant 47.65
B causer pant 71.06
D M J Corporation
CC/FS3 asphalt work 3,900.00 38467 $3,900.00
D P C Industries Inc/PO 200129
6000lbs Chlorine $1,178.58 38611 $1,178.58
Dahl, Joel
Class D exam/Certificate $55.00 38468 $55.00
Danko Emergency Equip/PO 248
4-Streamlight $19.01 38613 $319.01
Oxygen sensor $186.46
Freight for helmet transport $12.00
Repair replace seven 111 cutte $101.54
Data Recognition Corporation
Jun01 UB Postage 2,651.88 38470 2,651.88
Dave Perkins Contracting Inc
Storm sewer 5,550.00 38471 5,550.00
Davy, Ann
6-7/6-30 168 Mileage Reimb 57.96 38590 57.96
Drackert Design
5-3/5-4 Watercolor instr 692.00 38658 692.00
http://plyiis/asp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 5 of 22
Dufner's
May-Jun01 Food charges 230.90 38472 230.90
E H Renner & Sons
Well 5 pump repairs 19,857.00 38616 54,317.00
Well 5 redevelop bore hole to 34,460.00
ESS Bros.
489.90 38624 489.90
5 -Pete stock 468.60 38473 468.60
Earl F. Andersen, Inc.
275.50 38480 275.50
4 18x24 custom sign 146.33 38474 774.50
Crosswalk signs 377.54
Bolt link w/bolt-25 250.63
Earl F. Andersen, Inc.
6" street sign plate 41.54 38617 41.54
Eckman, Janet
Park and Rec Refund 50.00 38618 50.00
Electric Service Co
Fembrook siren repairs 400.99 38619 400.99
Electrical Installation & Mnt
May01 Signal repairs 860.00 38620 860.00
Elliott, David
Gas to Pierce Apparatus 30.00 38614 30.00
Enquist, Lynne
Park and Rec Refund 105.00 38475 105.00
Express Messenger
6-18/6-25 Attorney PIU 36.40 38621 36.40
Farmers Mill & Elevator Inc
10 Roundup,8gt reward 634.75 38477 634.75
Farris, Roberta Lynn
Payroll Generated Invoice 443.54 38556 443.54
Faulkner, Daniel L
3-5/5-31224 Mileage Reimb 77.28 38469 77.28
Ferguson Enterprises Inc
30-1 1/4 galv wrot stl coup 111.51 38622 111.51
Fireside Corner
4820 Cheshire Ln Refund 200125 22.95 38478 22.95
Forestry Suppliers, Inc.
Head Pole,flat spray nozzle,dr 81.82 38623 81.82
Four Seasons Estates
JUI01 Section 8 Rent 15,388.00 38411 15,388.00
Four Seasons Villa
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 248.00 38412 248.00
Frank Plumbing Sales
PM Kohler toilet 239.63 38479 239.63
Freeway Radiator Service
Unit 259 recore radiator 489.90 38624 489.90
Friend of the Court
Payroll Generated Invoice 275.50 38480 275.50
http://plyiis/asp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 6 of 22
Frumkin, Eugene
Jul01 Section 8 Rent $400.00 38410 $400.00
G C Bentley Assoc /14292 Golf
6-18/7-1 99.25hr Syst Mgmnt $3,970.00 38481 $3,970.00
General Binding Corp.
54/5-30 178 Mileage Reimb 61.41 38654 $158.01
18MM white coil 60.45 38482 60.45
Georgi, Donald K
44.00 38433 $44.00
Hamel Building Center
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 492.00 38409 492.00
Goers, William
569.55
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 17.19
Jul01 Section 8 Rent 353.00 38440 353.00
Gottstein, Jeremy
143.80
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 3.14
01-39 Overspray w/paint damage 202.84 38650 202.84
Government Finance Off. Assoc.
6.15
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 18.64
3 Registr/7-23/7-24 Ecker,Kohn 840.00 38483 840.00
Greater Mpls. Day Care Assoc.
Jun01 Day Care program $919.20 38625 $919.20
Greupner, Karol J
Cub/snacks for meeting $6.18 38501 $6.18
Greupner, Karol J
54/5-30 178 Mileage Reimb 61.41 38654 $158.01
64/6-29 280 Mileage Reimb 96.60
Hadley, Stephaniee
Ju101 Utility Reimbursement 44.00 38433 $44.00
Hamel Building Center
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 20.75 38627 $4,686.02
Jun01 Hardware Supplies Credit 186.77)
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 569.55
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 17.19
JUn01 Hardware Supplies 1.66
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 86.64
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 143.80
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 3.14
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 6.65
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 37.46
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 6.15
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 18.64
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 87.56
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 8.34
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 2,507.02
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 7.92
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 9.36
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 364.59
Jun01 Hardware supplies 12.94
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 5.62
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 9.29
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 133.44
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 134.51
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 7.48
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 7.31
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 36.89
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 50.15
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 2.35
Jun01 Hardware supplies 3.12
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 80.26
Jun01 Hardware supplies 11.24
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 28.13
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 114.00
Jun01 Hardware supplies 303.22
Jun01 Hardware supplies 7.62
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 28.80
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 7 of 22
Hanson, Dennis and Natalie
01-43 pothole damage $192.95 38679 $192.95
Harold E Day & Son Inc
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00 38485 $56.85
Pavilion rplc water closet 372.00 38484 372.00
Harrell, Denine
1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Ju101 Utility Reimbursement 46.00 38408 46.00
Hartland Fuel Products, LLC
1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
8500gl Super 89 @ .9473 9,759.28 38628 9,759.28
Hasty, Bud
2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Park and Rec Refund 200.00 38629 200.00
Haugen Building Maintenance
Jun01 Janitorial Servicd 7,966.20 38630 7,966.20
Hawkins Water Treatment
92161b Hydrof,27001b G9 $3,088.38 38631 $3,088.38
Healthfund of Minnesota
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00 38485 $56.85
Payroll Generated Invoice 3.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 24.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 9.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 3.85
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Hedberg Aggregate
Weigh vehicle 5.33 38632 $693.28
1 Aqua clearer 11.66
Weigh Vehicle 5.33
2 Stuccosil coat,prime 316.31
54 Anch Dia Pro St 345.06
2 PL Premium 9.59
Hennepin County Recorder
3649 Quaker La N repay agrmnt $19.50 38633 $19.50
Hennepin County Sheriff/Radio
6 -I4 -0I PD Radio repairs $272.00 38634 $272.00
Hennepin County Treas/Waste Hl
Jun01 8.31tn Waste Mgmnt fee $46.99 38635 $46.99
Herzog Construction LLC
IC install 2 clutch locks on 1 $460.00 38636 $460.00
Hewlett Packard
6-23/6-22-02 HP DesignerJet $252.00 38637 $252.00
Highway 55 Rental
12bg cement,fiber mesh,etc $143.55 38486 $143.55
Hill, Barb
Park and Rec Refund $6.00 38487 $6.00
Hirshfield's
40 5gl White field paint $719.94 38488 $719.94
Hohenstein, Jeffrey A
4-17/4-19 Cayenta user conf $86.35 38494 $86.35
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001 &sToDate=7%2F 13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 8 of 22
Holmgren, Larisa
Park and Rec Refund $44.00 38489 $44.00
Holt Motors Inc
Sender as/indicator $73.72 38638 $105.29
Pdl Asy $31.57
Holtze, Steven
Reimb overpymnt Oakwood Pet Cl 68.78 38724 68.78
Home Depot
964.70
Howard R Green Company
Jun01 Hardware Charges 2,355.63 38639 2,355.63
Hopkins Parts Co.
2,260.55 38643
Jun01 Equip Repair 29.84 38641 2,370.88
Jun01 Equip Repair 53.29
1 1' Meter
Jun01 Equip Repair 48.90
800.64
Jun01 Equip Repair 117.16
Jun01 Equip Repair 12.76
497.53
Jun01 Equip Repair 12.33
IAAO
Jun01 Equip Repair 15.36
Jun01 Equip Repair 20.21
38491
Jun01 Equip Repair 16.19
Jun01 Equip Repair 58.37)
Olsson Fla conference
Jun01 Equip Repair 34.18
435.00
Jun01 Equip Repair 56.86
Jun01 Equip Repair 71.40
275.00
Jun01 Equip Repair 107.32
Jun01 EQuip Repair 35.33
Jun01 Equip Repair 5.47
Jun01 Equip Repair 35.33
Jun01 Equip Repair 26.71
Jun01 Equip Repair 32.67
Jun01 Equip Repair 55.56)
Jun01 Equip Repair 343.20
Jun01 Equip Repair 22.89
Jun01 Equip Repair 148.04
Jun01 Equip Repair 7.19
Jun01 Equip Repair 38.32
Jun01 EQuip Repair 203.31
Jun01 Equip Repair 35.53
Jun01 Equip Repair 157.69
Jun01 Equip Repair 27.46
Jun01 Equip Repair 32.25
Jun01 Equip Repair 29.95
Jun01 Equip Repair 52.14
Jun01 Equip Repair 148.04
Jun01 Equip Repair 148.04
Jun01 Equip Repair 4.88
Jun01 Equip Repair 21.04
Jun01 Equip Repair 261.87
Jun01 Equip Repair 71.66
Hotsy Equipment of MN
160g1 carbonate soap/degreaser 964.70 38642 964.70
Howard R Green Company
End5-25Proj9024 2,260.55 38643 2,260.55
Hydro Supply Co.
1 1' Meter 121.14 38490 800.64
2 M70 Chamber&disc assy comp) 181.97
1000 1/2"lead seal,wire,chambe 497.53
IAAO
N Bye/Miami Beach Con19-9/9-12 435.00 38491 435.00
IAAO
Olsson Fla conference 435.00 38645 435.00
I F M A / Ck Address
01'Mark Jones Membership 275.00 38492 275.00
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 9 of 22
Ind School Dist 281/CK Address
May01 Ballet/Tap recital tech 213.75 38646 213.75
Intl Assoc Fire Chiefs/CK ADR
R Kline/New Orleans Conf8-24/8 390.00 38647 390.00
Interstate Detroit Diesel
I Kohler 30KW gas generator 12,338.03 38648 12,338.03
Itasca County Sheriff's Dept
WN#W0100419 Fine R108307 245.00 38649 245.00
JobMark.Com
SW Supervisor job posting 90.00 38496 90.00
Johnson, Janet
Park and Rec Refund 50.00 38651 50.00
Johnson, Laura
Jul01 Utility Reimbursement 13.00 38420 13.00
Johnson, Rick
Juno 1 Deer calls 165.00 38706 165.00
Johnstone Supply
IC AC Fan motor 167.94 38652 167.94
Just Hanging Around Photograph
7-5 Music in Plymouth photog 75.00 38653 75.00
K M T Communications
64/6-22-01 Mrktng communic 3,798.84 38498 3,798.84
Kamida Inc
Colored concrete/traffic contr 15,000.00 38499 15,000.00
Kartak, Jason
Park and Rec Refund 100.00 38502 100.00
Kenigsberg, Sergey
Jul01 Section 8 Rent 485.00 38431 485.00
Kleist, Scott
Home Depot/P pr K-9 equip 100.50 38712 100.50
Kline, Richard
Paul Conway/Helmet front 47.00 38705 47.00
Kriss Premium Products Inc
IC 30 Cooling treatment 498.42 38655 498.42
Krovitz & Edina Realty Title
13480 60th Pl/purchase house 5,000.00 38500 5,000.00
LJR Inc
Jun01 1494 6-8/6-28 meal expn 9,461.74 38656 9,461.74
Laidlaw Transit Services Inc
May01 Dial/Metrolink transit 122,164.82 38504 131,049.14
May01 Flyer Transit 8,884.32
Lakeview Commons
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 30,075.00 38414 30,075.00
Lan Dar Inc
12cy Pulv black dirt 139.30 38505 139.30
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/flnance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 10 of 22
Lancaster Village Apartments
JUI01 Section 8 Rent 17,148.00 38419 17,148.00
Lancaster Village Apartments
Jul01 HAP 979.00 38506 979.00
Laplant
6-7 PW sery 30yd roll off 373.00 38507 579.00
4-19 10 yard roll -off 206.00
Law Enforce Labor Serv./Union
Payroll Generated Invoice 214.50 38509 770.58
Payroll Generated Invoice 11.58
Payroll Generated Invoice 33.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 511.50
Lawn King, Inc.
13.08
Jun01 Sod Charges 290.49 38657 290.49
League of Mn Human Rights Comm
190.97
L Ahrens 9-22-01 conference 45.00 38510 45.00
Levin, Gert
Julol Section 8 Rent $481.00 38413 $481.00
Lorenz Bus Service Inc
1-I3-02&2-24-02 Spirit Mtn ski 210.00 38659 210.00
Lukken, Jessica
Target/prog 223 snacks 10.48 38495 10.48
M R Sign Co, Inc
30 3000 Stop face high intens 717.80 38511 2,527.36
2381 Hydro stripping 1,809.56
MN AFSCME Council #14
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.08 38513 1,724.60
Payroll Generated Invoice 31.53
Payroll Generated Invoice 91.56
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.51
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.08
Payroll Generated Invoice 11.95
Payroll Generated Invoice 190.97
Payroll Generated Invoice 39.24
Payroll Generated Invoice 235.04
Payroll Generated Invoice 11.95
Payroll Generated Invoice 57.15
Payroll Generated Invoice 130.80
Payroll Generated Invoice 9.81
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.51
Payroll Generated Invoice 65.40
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.08
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.51
Payroll Generated Invoice 39.24
Payroll Generated Invoice 26.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.08
Payroll Generated Invoice 14.69
Payroll Generated Invoice 78.48
Payroll Generated Invoice 21.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 65.40
Payroll Generated Invoice 65.40
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.51
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.51
Payroll Generated Invoice 26.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 7.89
Payroll Generated Invoice 233.43
Payroll Generated Invoice 29.38
Payroll Generated Invoice 26.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 14.69
Payroll Generated Invoice 9.81
Payroll Generated Invoice 39.24
Payroll Generated Invoice 21.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.08
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.08
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 11 of 22
MN AFSCME Council #14
Payroll Generated Invoice 9.81 38660 195.57
Payroll Generated Invoice 11.95
Payroll Generated Invoice 7.89
Payroll Generated Invoice 9.81
Payroll Generated Invoice 117.52
Payroll Generated Invoice 23.90
Payroll Generated Invoice 14.69
MN Child Support Payment Ctr
Payroll Generated Invoice 383.79 38514 2,258.48
Payroll Generated Invoice 242.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 261.19
Payroll Generated Invoice 178.58
Payroll Generated Invoice 327.18
Payroll Generated Invoice 413.47
Payroll Generated Invoice 451.77
MN Child Support Payment Ctr
Payroll Generated Invoice 184.58 38661 184.58
MN Dept of Trade/Economic Dev
CDAP960033HFY97 Ju101 ValueRx 4,833.20 38515 4,833.20
MN Environmental Fund
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00 38516 23.73
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.73
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 4.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.00
MN Recreation & Park/CK ADDR
01'14 berths Sftbl Tourn 1,750.00 38517 1,750.00
MN Shredding LLC
25min 64.80 38527 64.80
MN Vikings Food Service Inc
6-201494 meeting expenses 42.07 38662 42.07
MN Visiting Nurse Agency
58 Cholesterol tests 1,334.00 38663 1,334.00
MTI Distributing Inc
Screw blade 6.48 38518 108.26
Castor fork 101.78
Madison National Life
Ju101 LTD/Term Life Ins 7,005.15 38664 7,005.15
Marvin H Anderson Constr Co
A98093 R199813162 ref deposit 12,516.00 38520 12,516.00
Mason, Ruth
Park and Rec Refund 30.00 38666 30.00
McGreevy, Edmond
Park and Rec Refund 33.00 38521 33.00
Meadowvale Construction Inc
Proj9914 #3 NC -15 Trunk Sanita 56,957.25 38522 56,957.25
Medina, Cassandra
Ju101 Utility Reimbursement 32.00 38404 32.00
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 12 of 22
Menards / 6800 Wayzata Blvd
Pressure washer,car wash conce $172.50 38523 $172.50
Metro Athletic Supply
Dz incrediballs/baseballs/bat $151.07 38667 $151.07
Metro Erosion Inc.
38675 32.00
Millennium garden silt fence 509.63 38668 509.63
Metro Fire
10 Faceshields,helmet,fronts 590.22 38669 590.22
Metro Garage Door Co.
1,044.00 38676 1,044.00
FS3 door repairs 221.39 38670 221.39
Metro Sales Inc
166.50
38524 260.00PW6-01/6-02 Ricoh fax machine 260.00
38677 200.00
Metro Water Conditioning Inc.
200.00
IC 49 bags pellet plus 245.27 38671 245.27
Midwave Corporation
177.86 38678 177.86
Hewlett Packard 2way server 48,853.50 38672 53,173.50
6-6/6-20 24hrs Integration 4,320.00
38421 8.00
Midwest Asphalt Co.
8.00
6-19/6-22 35.92tn Fine Mix 1,124.22 38525 1,124.22
Midwest Asphalt Co.
89.30
38673 2,160.456-25/6-29 69.03m Fine Mix 2,160.45
Midwest Coca-Cola
80.14
38674 106.50
Pavilion concession pop 106.50
Miller, Laddie
38675 32.00ParkandRecRefund32.00
Minn NCPERS Group Life Ins
Ju101 Empl Life Ins 1,044.00 38676 1,044.00
Minnesota Conway 38526 166.50
5 20#ABC recharge dry chemical 166.50
Mower County Sheriffs Dept 38677 200.00WN#16405 Bail Rcpt 108308 200.00
Mpls Area Assoc of Realtors
Jul-DecOI Multiple listing 177.86 38678 177.86
NAT W, Inc.
173 NNO T's,10 twill caps 1,023.23 38528 1,023.23
Nemshon, Leonid
38421 8.00Ju101UtilityReimbursement8.00
Northern Automotive
38531 561.38Fuelfilter/af element/rkr sps 89.30
Oil filter -12 60.56
Spin on/filter/fuel filte 80.14
Spark plug -8 47.85
PCV valve 3.31
Ignition/filter tr/spin on 120.31
12 -Spin on/filter tr/afelemen 159.91
Northern Safety Technology 38532 1,093.10
1 Traffic advisor 658.17
2 Strobes,mag,lens,responder 434.93
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 13 of 22
Northern Tool & Equipment
fuel nozzle/farm hose tank $170.36 38530 $170.36
Northstar Repro Products, Inc.
1 Yellow ink $89.09 38533 $436.28
1 Black value pak, l No 80black $347.19
Northstar Repro Products, Inc.
color bond $139.53 38682 $139.53
Northwest Metro Mpls SAFE Kids
Payroll Generated Invoice 255.75 38543 $511.50
5-22/6-22 330 Bike helmets 2,640.00 38534 2,640.00
OPR Limited Partnership
454.48 38542 $54,734.14
Payroll Generated Invoice 220.42
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 22,179.00 38424 22,179.00
OPR Limited Partnership
72.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 801.22
Jul01 HAP 125.00 38535 125.00
Oakwood Apartments
447.33
Payroll Generated Invoice 447.33
Jul01 Section 8 Rent 674.00 38402 674.00
Oakwood Pet Clinic
804.32
Payroll Generated Invoice 804.32
6-8/6-13 stray impounded anima 68.75 38536 68.75
Omni Travel Agency/18344 Mtka
H LaFave San Antonio Conf 9-4/ $351.00 38537 $351.00
Omni Travel Agency/18344 Mtka
Hohenstein/Montreal 8-18/8-22 $305.18 38683 $1,250.72
3 Flights to Montreal8-18/8-22 $945.54
Otis Elevator Co.
Jul-Sep01 CC Elevator Sery $407.28 38684 $407.28
Owens Services Inc.
Jul-Sep01 Preventive maint $4,477.00 38538 $6,562.90
WTP2 rplc exhaust fan asmbly,P $1,815.90
Jul-Sep01 Dome service contrac $270.00
Owens Services Inc.
PS A/C #I rpr leak in hot gas $386.49 38685 $496.29
CC ck source of noise in finan $109.80
P E R A / Council
Payroll Generated Invoice 255.75 38543 $511.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 255.75
P E R A / Payroll
Payroll Generated Invoice 454.48 38542 $54,734.14
Payroll Generated Invoice 220.42
Payroll Generated Invoice 178.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 19.95
Payroll Generated Invoice 72.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 801.22
Payroll Generated Invoice 801.22
Payroll Generated Invoice 40.47
Payroll Generated Invoice 447.33
Payroll Generated Invoice 447.33
Payroll Generated Invoice 64.98
Payroll Generated Invoice 718.05
Payroll Generated Invoice 804.32
Payroll Generated Invoice 804.32
Payroll Generated Invoice 16.11
Payroll Generated Invoice 178.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 178.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 62.06
Payroll Generated Invoice 685.73
Payroll Generated Invoice 685.73
Payroll Generated Invoice 718.05
Payroll Generated Invoice 117.08
Payroll Generated Invoice 1,293.84
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register
Payroll Generated Invoice 1,293.84
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.84
Payroll Generated Invoice 152.99
Payroll Generated Invoice 152.99
Payroll Generated Invoice 16.11
Payroll Generated Invoice 429.58
Payroll Generated Invoice 9.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 104.95
Payroll Generated Invoice 104.95
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.56
Payroll Generated Invoice 149.86
Payroll Generated Invoice 149.86
Payroll Generated Invoice 72.79
Payroll Generated Invoice 1,562.41
Payroll Generated Invoice 1,562.41
Payroll Generated Invoice 36.48
Payroll Generated Invoice 403.27
Payroll Generated Invoice 403.27
Payroll Generated Invoice 16.11
Payroll Generated Invoice 178.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 178.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 7,730.73
Payroll Generated Invoice 5,153.74
Payroll Generated Invoice 14.43
Payroll Generated Invoice 3,059.57
Payroll Generated Invoice 2,092.84
Payroll Generated Invoice 712.81
Payroll Generated Invoice 475.19
Payroll Generated Invoice 348.55
Payroll Generated Invoice 1,374.01
Payroll Generated Invoice 1,374.01
Payroll Generated Invoice 47.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 521.31
Payroll Generated Invoice 521.31
Payroll Generated Invoice 129.36
Payroll Generated Invoice 1,429.52
Payroll Generated Invoice 1,429.52
Payroll Generated Invoice 14.20
Payroll Generated Invoice 156.97
Payroll Generated Invoice 156.97
Payroll Generated Invoice 44.48
Payroll Generated Invoice 145.25
Payroll Generated Invoice 145.25
Payroll Generated Invoice 106.07
Payroll Generated Invoice 1,172.34
Payroll Generated Invoice 1,172.34
Payroll Generated Invoice 18.42
Payroll Generated Invoice 203.63
Payroll Generated Invoice 203.63
Payroll Generated Invoice 124.33
Payroll Generated Invoice 16.11
Payroll Generated Invoice 178.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 178.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 60.71
Payroll Generated Invoice 671.I6
Payroll Generated Invoice 671.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 711.01
Payroll Generated Invoice 474,00
Payroll Generated Invoice 232.37
Payroll Generated Invoice 34.51
Payroll Generated Invoice 381.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 381.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 65.60
Payroll Generated Invoice 724.96
Payroll Generated Invoice 724.96
Payroll Generated Invoice 141.38
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.95
Payroll Generated Invoice 154.I3
Payroll Generated Invoice 154.13
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.88
Payroll Generated Invoice 64.95
Payroll Generated Invoice 64.95
Payroll Generated Invoice 38.87
Payroll Generated Invoice 429.58
Payroll Generated Invoice 178.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 220.42
Payroll Generated Invoice 454.48
Payroll Generated Invoice 179.24
Payroll Generated Invoice 16.22
Payroll Generated Invoice 179.24
Payroll Generated Invoice 41.11
Page 14 of 22
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 15 of 22
P E R A / Payroll
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.94 38686 1,416.27
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 27.79
Payroll Generated Invoice 27.79
Payroll Generated Invoice 9.79
Payroll Generated Invoice I08.34
Payroll Generated Invoice 108.34
Payroll Generated Invoice 32.46
Payroll Generated Invoice 399.66
Payroll Generated Invoice 399.66
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.93
Payroll Generated Invoice 32.75
Payroll Generated Invoice 32.75
Payroll Generated Invoice 3.49
Payroll Generated Invoice 38.59
Payroll Generated Invoice 0.17
Payroll Generated Invoice 70.22
Payroll Generated Invoice 70.22
Payroll Generated Invoice 38.59
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.35
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.94
Pacyga, Genevieve
Park and Rec Refund 18.00 38687 18.00
Panera Bread Plymouth
5-12/6-28-01 Food Charges 224.72 38688 224.72
Paper Direct
Told seals teamwork,grand,stat 77.92 38689 77.92
Paper Warehouse
5-24/6-5-01 Charges 89.96 38544 89.96
Park Nicollet Health Source
J Sobania/Headache seminar 20.00 38690 20.00
Park Place Apartments
JUI01 Section 8 Rent 2,958.00 38425 2,958.00
Parkside At Medicine Lake
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 447.00 38426 447.00
Paulsen & Stacy Kuelbelbeck, R
01-12 Fence damage 28.21 38709 28.21
Paulson, Sandy
5-19/5-25 Sandy/Heide Kansas C 209.65 38558 209.65
Pearson, Roberta
Park and Rec Refund 38.56 38691 38.56
Pekay, Juanita
JUIOI Section 8 Rent 673.00 38418 673.00
Performance Kennels Inc
5-29 2 401b food,Niko boarding 130.54 38692 130.54
Peterson, Mark S
6-12/6-29 259 Mileage Reimb 89.36 38665 89.36
Pintozzi, Robin
Park and Rec Refund 2.00 38545 2.00
Place Apartments, The
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 656.00 38435 656.00
Planet Spirit Inc
http://plyiis/asp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 16 of 22
7-9/7-12 Cheer/Dance Camp $1,837.50 38693 $1,837.50
Plymouth Automotive Inc.
Veh #002 Fuel pump rplcmnt 433.53 38694 1,001.53
6-14/74-01 Tow/Impounds 568.00
Plymouth Colony Apartments 38428 16,290.00JulOISection8Rent16,290.00
Plymouth Colony Apartments
Ju101 HAP 1,153.00 38695 1,153.00
Plymouth Ponds Apartments
JulOI Section 8 Rent 1,007.00 38429 1,007.00
Plymouth Terrace Realty, LLP
Jul01 Section 8 Rent 610.00 38430 610.00
Pope, Delores
Ju101 Utility Reimbursement 13.00 38407 13.00
Postmaster / Window D-12
SpringO V Leasure Times pstg 7,000.00 38696 79000.00
Power Process Equipment
1511 roll 1/2",15ft roll 3/8" 260.87 38697 260.87
Prairie Restoration
Spot sprayed canada thistle,bi 432.70 38546 432.70
Precision Business Systems,Inc
Repair 4 dictation recorders 348.93 38547 348.93
Pregler, Kevin
6-25 USPCA Field Trial Rochest 31.53 38503 31.53
Printers Service Inc
3-77" ice knife sharp 48.00 38548 48.00
Prior Lake Water Ski Assoc
7-24-01 Bal water ski show 800.00 38549 800.00
Proex Photo
4-23/6-27-01 Photo charges 475.92 38749 475.92
Public Risk Management Assoc
OPPemberton Membership 295.00 38698 295.00
Qwest
Jun01 Med Lk Beach 69.48 38550 213.86
Jun01 Zachary auto dialer 107.30
Jun01 Bass lk plyfld 37.08
Qwest
Jun01 Elm Creek plyfld 56.81 38699 39117.20
Jul01 City Center 2,512.32
Jul01 PD to Sheriff 93.99
Jul01 Zachary Computer Line 139.78
Jun01 Elm Creek plyfld 71.42
Jul01 Digital Trunks 242.88
R & R Specialties/ Somerset WI
Wtr pump switch,sending unitki 233.47 38700 233.47
R C Johnson Construction
A94159B R47389 French Ridge Pa 1,000.00 38701 1,000.00
Randy's Sanitation Inc
http://plyiis/asp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 17 of 22
JunOI PW Rubbish Removal 593.55 38702 822.66
Jun01 CC Rubbish Removal 229.11
38711 31,273.07
Rapit Printing Company
4,084.10
2 5mil laminate 51.12 38703 51.12
Ray O'Herron
970.38
2 tail light flashers 64.30 38552 64.30
Reliable Hockey
2,611.87
10 Grind wheel, 10 Diamond dres 248.67 38553 248.67
Reliant Energy/Minnegasco
672.00
17915 30th PI/5-22/6-20 Anders 8.84 38704 49.28
17915 CR24/5 22/6-20 Porter 11.65
38557 635.56
17920 30th PI/5-22/6-20 Phad 10.95
3950 CR 101/5-27/620 11.81
38713 27,969.46
3225 CR 101/ 5-21/6-20 Vicary 6.03
Road Runner
6-14 Disign Write 27.08 38554 27.08
Road Runner
6-19 & 6-20 Design/6-21 City S 91.02 38707 91.02
Robichon's In -Line Skate Schl
6-7/6-14 In line skate instr 400.00 38681 400.00
Ross, Patricia
Jul01 Utility Reimbursement 15.00 38427 15.00
Roytelman, Ilya
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 399.00 38415 399.00
S M Hentges & Sons Inc
Proj9024 #2 Holly Lane Str 173,692.01 38710 173,692.01
SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
May01 Proj1020 File 14206,07 9,514.12 38711 31,273.07
May01 Proj9006 File 0003923 4,084.10
May01 Proj5019 File 3829/3830 1,075.44
May01 Proj9006 File 0014134 970.38
May01 Proj1013 File 0014169 6,582.95
May01 Proj9919 File 0003934 2,611.87
May01 Proj8015 File 0003850 5,762.21
May01 Proj5012 File 0983139 672.00
Safety Systems Corporation
1 1211 combo ladder 635.56 38557 635.56
Senior Community Services
2060 C Shenandoah sml rpr grnt 508.96 38713 27,969.46
O1'2nd 1/2 Sr Citz Serv,Rocker 27,460.50
Senness, Barbara
4-6/6-22 196 Mileage Reimb 67.62 38455 67.62
Shenandoah Woods
Jul01 Section 8 Rent $15,600.00 38432 $15,600.00
Shevchenko, Valentina
Ju101 Section 8 Rent $490.00 38437 $490.00
Short -Elliott -Hendrickson
May01 Proj 1014 Nathan Ln $3,773.24 38715 $4,860.54
May01 Proj5030 Zachary In $1,087.30
Showpro Corporation
7-17-01 Concert performance $550.00 38716 $550.00
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2Fl3%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 18 of 22
Signs Unlimited
AC various bldg signs 533.78 38559 533.78
Signs by Northland
150.70
301157 cubical nameplates 92.57 38717 92.57
Simplex Time Recorder Co
118.06
6-15 PS bad power strip 103.00 38718 103.00
Smith, Jeanna Vonier
68.59 38725 566.26
Alternative landscape grant 200.00 38493 200.00
Snap-On Tools
430.26
Rivet tool kit 47.21 38719 47.21
Sokkia Measuring Systems
67.69 38563 67.69
192 var colors marking paint 592.99 38720 592.99
Solem, Randy
26.01 38726 26.01
6-12 Problem managing Cisco500 187.50 38551 187.50
Solstad, Lorraine
95.85) 38727 2,032.54
Park and Rec Refund 61.00 38721 61.00
Soto, Carol
39.15
Ju101 Utility Reimbursement 109.00 38403 109.00
St Croix Recreation Co.
357.67
12 6'benches,plate covers 6,825.42 38560 6,825.42
Star Tribune
212.36
Civil Engineer ad 583.00 38722 583.00
State of Minnesota/EMSOCS
May01 AC Janitorial 137.39 38644 156.03
May01 IC Janitorial 18.64
Stearns County Sheriffs Dept
WN#T0013757 Bail Rcpt 108309 500.00 38723 500.00
Stotts, Donald
Park and Rec Refund 43.00 38561 43.00
Streicher's Prof.Police Equip.
3 med,3 Irg gun case 233.84 38562 528.00
1 General duty helmet 150.70
Polish liquid 25.40
dOME UPPER OUTBOARD 118.06
Streicher's Prof.Police Equip.
55watt uck replacement 68.59 38725 566.26
3 Name tag/Johnson/Kroeger 67.41
4 Badges, #'s 83&84 430.26
Suburban Propane
1001b cyl 67.69 38563 67.69
Suburban Propane
133# cylinder 26.01 38726 26.01
Suburban Tire, Inc.
Casing credit 95.85) 38727 2,032.54
4 LT255/70R16 tires 272.90
2 Turf guide,2 tube 39.15
4 LT235/85R16E tires 509.33
2 11 R22 5 tires 357.67
10 P225/60R16 tires 465.19
4 P215/75R15 tires 212.36
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 19 of 22
4 LT225/75R16 tires $271.79
Summer Creek Apts
1 Opaque brights bucket beads 24.24 38570 $137.66
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 2,681.00 38434 2,681.00
Sun Newspapers/Notices
72.96 38734 $72.96
Trugreen Chemlawn
Major street improvement # 102 139.42 38564 139.42
Sun Newspapers/Notices
324.83
Ord 2001-15 100.10 38728 432.57
Ord 2001-18 42.90
Group Dental Ins 21.45
Street Lighting 135.85
Ord 2001-19 42.90
Ord 2001-16 89.37
Superior Ford, Inc.
Unit 400 fuel filter,sender,pu 367.37 38565 367.37
Superior Ford, Inc.
Unit 143 pressure test,leak 64.42 38729 64.42
Svetc, Nadine
Park and Recreation refund 76.00 38529 76.00
System Control Services, Inc.
On site service 398.81 38730 398.81
Tamarkin, Ellen
Park and Rec Refund 50.00 38731 50.00
Taylor Appraisal Company,The
6010 Troy la appraisal 400.00 38566 400.00
Thorfinnson Jr, Ross
Jun01 1494 Consultant 3,150.00 38708 3,150.00
ThyssenKrupp Elevator
Jul0I PS Elevator Service 96.79 38567 96.79
Tierney Bros. Inc.
3 tape/engineering 75.87 38732 75.87
Tierney, Joy
6-20/6-21 Duluth lodging LMC c 189.84 38497 189.84
Tillman, Tina
Ju101 Utility Reimbursement 59.00 38436 59.00
Toll Company
Nickel 1/8 elect 14.63 38568 14.63
Tri -K Services, Inc.
Jun01 49yds Black Dirt 404.43 38733 404.43
Tri-State Pump & Control, Inc.
6-12 Schmit Garden lift start 122.55 38569 122.55
Triarco Arts & Crafts
1 Opaque brights bucket beads 24.24 38570 $137.66
Var art supplies Prog 223 113.42
Triarco Arts & Crafts
Various art supplies 72.96 38734 $72.96
Trugreen Chemlawn
01'#2 FS2 Fertilize 90.53 38735 $3,381.40
01'#2 W Med Lk Park fertilize 223.65
01'#2 Lifetime fertilize 324.83
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 20 of 22
01'#2 PW Fertilize 228.98
Payroll Generated Invoice 15.00 38575 $151.48
01'#2 Parkers Ik park fertiliz 372.75
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.00
01'#2 Plym Creek comm center 724.20
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.00
01'#2 City Hall fertilize 213.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 8.00
01'#2 Vicksburg to Plym blvd 95.85
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.00
O1'#2 Liond Park fertilize 218.33
Payroll Generated Invoice 7.00
01'#2 W Lutheran High fertiliz 244.95
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.73
01'#2 FS3 Fertilize 143.78
Payroll Generated Invoice 22.00
01'#2 Elm Crk plyfld fertilize 500.55
Tucker, Angie
Target,PPR Whrse--prog 011 24.99 38450 24.99
Turovskaya, Irina
Ju101 Section 8 Rent 401.00 38416 401.00
Twin City Spec Contracting Inc
FS 3 recaulk windows 2,900.00 38736 2,900.00
TwinSource
20cs 38x58 1.5mil liner 487.77 38571 487.77
U S Filter/WaterPro /15801West
Bell jt clamp/westem repair 466.I6 38572 466.16
U S Filter/WaterPro /15801West
1 1/2 chamber cmpt $195.16 38737 $484.38
Ball curb/union ctsxcts $125.42
Repair clamp $163.80
USSI/Home Theater Electronics
AC Dream vision/camera work $95.45 38738 $95.45
Uniforms Unlimited Inc.
S Whiteford Reserve uniform $55.90 38739 $55.90
United Rentals
2 -shovel stinger fiberglass $52.08 38740 $52.08
United Rentals/Prec Pavement
PW parking lot pavement mark $110.00 38573 $8,863.40
6-10/6-16 Pavement marking $8,753.40
United Rentals/Prec Pavement
6-17/6-23 Pavement marking $545.00 38741 $545.00
United Water & Sewer Co
Pineview&52nd storm sewer rpr $3,265.00 38574 $3,265.00
United Way of Mpls
Payroll Generated Invoice 15.00 38575 $151.48
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 7.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 15.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 8.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.75
Payroll Generated Invoice 7.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.73
Payroll Generated Invoice 4.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 22.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 20.00
Usset, Nicole
6-19/6-28 108.6 Mileage Reimb $37.47 38680 $37.47
Verizon Wireless
Jun01 FD Pool Vehicle $8.21 38742 $447.16
http://plyiis/asp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 21 of 22
Jun01 Warren Kulesa 27.44
JunOI Dave Mickelson 13.35
Jun01 P&R Prog 011 5.28
Jun01 Rescue Vehicle 11 14.58
Jun01 Engine 11 8.21
Jun01 Rescue 11 Fax 8.58
Jun01 280.5879,790.1160 34.32
Jun01 Karleen Lutter 27.44
Jun01 Mark Peterson 33.66
Jun01 Chief Gerdes final 37.43
Jun01 Mark Jones 90.09
Jun01 Rescue 11 cell 8.42
Jun01 Utility 12 Blazer 13.33
Jun01 Engine 31 8.21
Jun01 Aerial 21 8.21
Jun01 P&R Prog 011 1.45
Jun01 Aquatics 8.42
Jun01 Erik Noraas 27.44
Jun01 Arnie Rasmusson 27.44
Jun01 Dan Heitke 8.21
Jun01 Stan Scofield 27.44
Vickerman, Shelly
Petty Cash Daycamp 50.00 38714 50.00
Videotronix Inc.
Rpr video syst in CSO office 115.00 38743 115.00
Viking Safety Products
25 28"Reflective flow cone 339.47 38576 1,018.41
25 28"Reflective flow cone 339.47
25 28"Reflective flow cone 339.47
Voson Plumbing, Inc.
4-25-01 PS drain/flush 2 100gl 234.00 38744 234.00
WCMAP
O1'Bowman Membership 5.00 38745 5.00
W W Grainger Inc
6 White mark paint,I lens 21.93 38577 416.51
2 -Shackle 26.11
72 IC pleat filters 317.45
10-120v lamp 24.10
2 1x10' ratchet hugger 26.92
W W Grainger Inc
Innerside truck box 273.00 38746 591.10
18V battery charger 108.15
Lanyard pk25 3.08
12-18" polycord/8-24" polycord 46.69
Steel funnel 19.28
Floor Fan 140.90
Wagers, Inc.
7-3/10-2-01 Eng Toshiba+copy 860.73 38578 860.73
Walker, Christopher
Park and Rec Refund 8.00 38579 8.00
Wasgatt. Debby
5-3I/6-29 230 Mileage Reimb 79.35 38615 79.35
Waste Management Services
Jul01 AC Rubbish Removal 257.35 38747 257.35
Water Control Corporation
AC water softener sery call 85.00 38580 85.00
Wellington Apartments
Jul01 Section 8 Rent 1,280.00 38439 1,280.00
http://plyiis/asp/asp reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Check Register Page 22 of 22
Westburne Supply Inc.
Rep kit complt 28.96 38748 28.96
Westside Equipment Inc.
50 Fleetkey 323.96 38581 323.96
Wilson, Victoria
12,285.22
Jul01 Section 8 Rent 218.00 38438 218.00
Woody's Hardware
5.13 38752 42.18
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 2.20 38750 24.59
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 2.66
Jun01 Hardware Supplies 19.73
Workplace 2000, Inc.
CD change panel 217.25 38582 217.25
Workplace 2000, Inc.
2 -Knob & coat hanger set 160.82 38751 160.82
Xcel Energy
Jun01 City Parks 4,236.66 38583 16,521.88
Jun01 City Buildings 12,285.22
Xcel Energy
17915 30th P1/5-17/6-18 Anders 5.13 38752 42.18
17915 CR 24/5-17/6.18 Porter 12.29
17920 30th P1/5-18/6-22 Phad 7.28
3225 Hwy 101/5-17/6-18 Vicary 17.48
Xpect First Aid
PW Medical supplies 58.15 38753 58.15
Zavoral, Mary
Ju101 Utility Reimbursement 33.00 38422 33.00
Zep Manufacturing/PO BxCH10697
2Zep45,1 Acclaim,I Reach $393.94 38584 $393.94
TOTAL AMOUNT: $1,105,262.74
http://plyiislasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=6%2F30%2F2001&sToDate=7%2F13%2F20 7/16/2001
Agenda Number: - .J
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Mike Goldstein, Patrol Special Operations LieutenantTHROUGH: Dan Twaddle, Acting Police Chief
SUBJECT: DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
DATE: July 9, 2001 for the July 24, 2001 Council meeting
1. ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council authorize the deer management program for
2001.
2. BACKGROUND: The City continues to experience problems with the over population of
deer. In an effort to address this problem the City has participated in the metro bow hunt in
the Northwest corner of the City every fall since 1992. This has been determined by the
DNR to be an effective method of population control. The Northwest corner of the City is the
only area with large enough lots of property to allow safe bow hunting.
The City Ordinance states that each year, on or before August 1, the City Manager shall
determine and report to the Council if the public safety and conservation interests justify
allowing a bow deer hunting season for the up coming season. The City Council will then
make a determination whether the City is authorized to issue permits for the up coming
season.
3. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative is not to participate in the metro bow deer hunt this
season.
4. DISCUSSION: The Police Department believes the hunts in the past several years have
been successful in assisting with the control of the deer population. Information obtained
back in 1993 from Larry Gillette with Hennepin County is that a city the size of Plymouth
with our make up should have a herd population of 200 or less. Current conversations with
them indicate that with the continued development of Plymouth, this number should actually
be much less than 200. An aerial survey was conducted this past winter with a count of 322.
Information we have received from the DNR is that they recommend us staying with the
program, as even sitting out one year could set back the progress that has taken several years
to obtain. Our program has been one of the least controversial and most successful in the
metro areas.
We still are experiencing a problem of small deer herds causing damage in areas of the City
outside the designated hunt area. The City did obtain a special permit to trap deer in an
attempt to address this problem. We have been successful in the past with this project also.
We would like to continue the trapping practice under the following conditions:
All residents in the effected area would be notified of the problem, request for trapping
and agree to be in support of the project.
The Park Superintendent would survey the area and determine if trapping could be safely
done.
The Park Superintendent would work with the DNR to assure compliance with their
special permit.
5. BUDGET IMPACT: There is no budget impact. Permits are issued at $10 each to cover
costs.
6. RECOMMENDATION: The Police Department recommends authorization to coordinate
the deer management program for 2001 to include participation in the metro deer bow hunt
and special trapping as outlined above.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
AERIAL DEER SURVEYS
i i u,:. a
ul,
li.11 k i li
YEAR OF DEER
1984 195
1988 255
1991 261
1992 477
1993 478
1994 361
1996 320
1997 258
1998 180
1999 174
2000 211
2001 322
OF DEER
600
500
400
300
200
100 -
0 _ I
Agenda Number:
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager'
FROM: Sandra Paulson, City Clerk, through` aurie Ahrens, Asst. City Manager
SUBJECT: TOBACCO LICENSE APPROVAL FOR PARADISE COFFEE &
GROCERY, 10 NATHAN LANE
DATE: July 9, 2001, for City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution approving a tobacco license for
Paradise Coffee & Grocery, 10 Nathan Lane.
2. BACKGROUND: The City has received an application for a tobacco license from
Linda Mason for Paradise Coffee & Grocery, 10 Nathan Lane. This is a change of ownership.
All proofs of insurance have been provided and fees paid.
3. ALTERNATIVES: The Council could deny the license request.
4. BUDGET IMPACT: Pro—rated license fees for the license have been received.
5. RECOMMENDATION: The attached resolution approving the license request is
recommended for adoption.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
APPROVING 2001 TOBACCO LICENSE
PARADISE COFFEE & GROCERY,
10 NATHAN LANE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth that a tobacco license is issued
for 2001, Linda Mason for Paradise Coffee & Grocery, 10 Nathan Lane, for the period through
December 31, 2001.
Adopted by the Plymouth City Council on July 24, 2001.
l
pAgendaNumber: t ., C --.)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Shawn Drill, Senior Planner, through Anne'Alurlburt, Community
Development Director
SUBJECT: Terranova. Final Plat and Development Contract for "Toni Sikes
Addition" (formerly known as Killian Addition) for property located south
of 6th Avenue and west of Pineview Lane (99062-F)
REVIEW DEADLINE: August 14, 2001
DATE: July 13, 2001 for the City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move the attached resolution approving the final plat and development contract for Toni Sikes
Addition.
The applicant has executed and returned the development contract that staff prepared.
Approval of a final plat and development contract requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2. BACKGROUND:
On September 7, 1999, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for Killian Addition, a
plat of five single-family residential lots. Although the overall site contains 8.9 acres, the net
area of the site is reduced to 3.5 acres after deducting the area covered by Cavanaugh Lake.
Under the plan, the existing single family home would be removed from the site.
This plat was called Killian Addition during the preliminary plat review. The new landowner
changed the name of the plat from Killian Addition to Toni Sikes Addition. The proposed final
plat complies with the approved preliminary plat, and meets all standards for development in the
RSF-1 zoning district where it is located.
This site lies within the Shoreland District for Cavanaugh Lake. As a result, all structures must
be set back at least 75 feet from the lake. In addition, all the lots within this subdivision would
File 99062 -FP
Page 2
be limited to a maximum impervious surface coverage of 25 percent. The approving resolution
requires the purchase agreements for each home site, as well as any marketing materials for this
development, to state that the maximum impervious surface coverage is 25 percent of the lot
area.
A portion of an exceptional quality wetland lies adjacent to the shoreline of the lake. No wetland
impacts are proposed. The site is subject to the Wetland Protection Ordinance, requiring
buffering of wetlands and placement of permanent wetland buffer monument signs. The
applicant is required to provide a 75 foot wide (average) buffer strip adjacent to the wetland, as
well as a 15 foot structure setback to the wetland buffer. This matter is addressed in the
approving resolution.
During the preliminary plat review, staff identified a potential building issue related to the
shallow lot depth of Lots 1 and 2. The buildable depth of those two lots would be as little as 45
and 40 feet, respectively, once all the applicable building and wetland buffer setbacks are
applied. This may require the builders to custom design the homes for these lots to fit within the
developable area. The approving resolution addresses this matter.
The Development Review Committee has found this final plat application to be in substantial
conformance with the approved preliminary plat, and the provisions of City Council Resolution
83-125 regarding the review of final plats.
3. RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution
approving the final plat and development contract for Toni Sikes Addition, consistent with the
recommendation of the Development Review Committee.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving Final Plat and Development Contract
2. Development Contract & Engineer's Memo
3. Applicant's Narrative
4. Location Map
5. Final Plat
6. Approved Preliminary Plat
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2001 -
APPROVING A FINAL PLAT FOR TERRANOVA FOR "TONI SIKES ADDITION" FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF 6TH AVENUE AND WEST OF PINEVIEW LANE
99062-F)
WHEREAS, Terranova has requested approval of a final plat to allow the creation of five single-
family lots on roughly 8.9 acres (3.5 net acres) located south of 6th Avenue and west of Pineview
Lane; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for this site on September 7, 1999
under the name "Killian Addition"; and
WHEREAS, the property is legally described as Tract A, R.L.S. 1551, Hennepin County,
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City staff has prepared a development contract covering the improvements
related to said plat.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the final plat for Toni
Sikes Addition; and
FURTHER, that the development contract for said plat be approved, and that the Mayor and City
Manager be authorized to execute the development contract on behalf of the City; and
FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to recording of, and related to said plat:
1. The final plat is for five single-family lots, in accordance with the plans received by the City
on June 14, 2001, except as amended by this Resolution.
Resolution 2001-
99062-F)
Page 2
2. Prior to recording the final plat, the developer shall pay the park dedication fees in lieu of
land dedication, pursuant to the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of recording the final
plat, for five new dwelling units.
3. Compliance with the City's tree preservation regulations, in accordance with the approved
preliminary plat.
4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with all
erosion control ordinances and policies, as well as the approved tree preservation plan.
5. Any signage shall comply with the Sign Ordinance.
6. Development standards shall be as required by the RSF-1 district. No Zoning Ordinance
variances are granted or implied.
7. The builders may be required to custom design the homes for Lots 1 and 2 lots, so that the
homes fit within the developable area of the lots after all the applicable building and wetland
buffer setbacks are applied.
8. Because this site lies within the Shoreland District for Cavanaugh Lake, all the lots within
this subdivision are limited to a maximum impervious surface coverage of 25 percent, or as
may be amended in the future.
9. The purchase agreements for each of the lots, as well as any marketing materials for this
development, shall clearly state that the maximum impervious surface coverage, including
swimming pools, shall be limited to 25 percent of the lot area or as may be amended in the
future.
10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, permanent wetland buffer monuments shall be
installed in accordance with Section 21670.07 of the Zoning Ordinance.
11. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the developer shall provide a financial guarantee
and Site Improvement Performance Agreement. The Site Improvement Performance
Agreement shall include, but not be limited to, installation of the required permanent wetland
buffer monuments.
12. Uncovered decks and patios may encroach up to six feet into the required wetland setback
pursuant to Section 21670.09 of the Zoning Ordinance.
13. Private driveway access shall be restricted from the lot at 525 Pineview Lane (Tract D, RLS
1391) to Quinwood Lane.
0
Resolution 2001-
99062-F)
Page 3
14. Standard Conditions:
a. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
b. Removal of all hazardous trees from the property at the owner's expense.
c. No building permits shall be issued until a contract has been awarded for sewer and
water.
d. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System.
e. Compliance with Policy Resolution 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new
structures on sites adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage facility.
f. No building permits shall be issued until the final plat is filed and recorded with
Hennepin County.
g. Location and number of fire hydrants shall be approved by the Fire Division.
h. Submittal of fire flow data with the final plat.
i. Private driveway access to this five -lot subdivision shall be limited to Quinwood Lane.
Private driveway access shall be restricted from 6th Avenue.
j. A pond maintenance agreement is required between the developer and the City for the
water quality pond.
k. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from
claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting
from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its
officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may
pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on , 2001, with the original thereof on file in
my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
FOR
SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
1. SCOPE OF WORK
The Developer shall provide the City with plans and specifications for the construction
of the following for the plat of Toni Sikes Addition
1. Streets
2. Sanitary Sewer
3. Watermain
4. Storm Drainage Facilities (pipe, water, ponds, etc.)
5. Grading and Erosion Control
6. Miscellaneous Facilities
1.2 Said plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer
subject to review and written approval by the City Engineer. They shall be prepared in
accordance with the most current "City of Plymouth Engineering Guidelines, City of
Plymouth Engineering Department." This manual outlines City standard materials,
drawings and procedures which shall be adhered to for the above mentioned plat.
1.3 Changes in plans for the purpose of saving trees and other desirable features on private
property and on streets will be permitted, providing revised plans and specifications
are submitted and approved in writing by the City Engineer prior to the making of any
contemplated change. In the event changes are made which affect occupied
residences, such changes shall be discussed with the affected owner and their approval
secured in writing.
2. STREETS
2.1 General
The following streets are to be constructed by the Developer to City Standards
including concrete curb and gutter:
a. Residential Streets
Twenty Eight feet (28') wide back to back of curb, seven ton design with
concrete curb and gutter design Standard Surmountable in conformance with
City Standard Plate No. STRT-1 .
Quinwood Lane North
W/
C1
N:\pw\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\1999\99062\Docmts\RI _99062.doc
2. STREETS (continued)
b. Collector and/or Thoroughfare Streets
feet wide face to face curb, nine ton design with concrete curb and
gutter design B-618 in conformance with Standard Plate No. STRT-1
None
2.2. Sub rgade
Unsuitable soil shall be excavated within three feet (3') of sub -grade.
The Developer shall furnish a complete soils report which shall include
recommendations as to the subgrade correction, etc.
2.3. Subbase
Shall be constructed in accordance with the typical section shown on the approved
plans.
2.4. Base
Shall be constructed in accordance with the typical section shown on the approved
plans.
2.5. Surfacing
Shall be constructed in accordance with the typical section shown on the approved
plans.
3. UTILITIES
3.1. Sanitary Sewer
Shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and the
Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan adopted August 2000.
3.2. Storm Sewer
Storm sewer as well as all drainage ways and ponds shall be constructed in accordance
with the approved plans and specifications and shall conform to the City of Plymouth
Water Resources Management Plan adopted February 15, 2000, Resolution 2000-107,
and the appropriate watershed district requirements where applicable.
8
N:\pw\Engineering\DEVLNfNTS\1999\99062\Docmts\RI _99062. doc
I
3.3. Watermains
Watermains shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and the Water Supply and Distribution Plan adopted 2000.
3.4. Private Utilities
The developer shall be responsible for the installation of telephone, electrical and
natural gas service. The required utilities shall not be installed until the boulevard or
utility easements have been graded. All such utilities shall be installed underground.
4. MISCELLANEOUS
4.1. Street signs shall be required at each street intersection at the cost of the Developer.
The City will furnish and install said signs and bill the Developer for said work.
4.2. The Developer shall furnish all Engineering services as outlined in the "City of
Plymouth Engineering Guidelines, City of Plymouth Engineering Department.
4.3. Engineering services furnished by the City: The City will not exercise direct
supervision and inspection of the work during the construction operations. The City
Engineer or his representative will make periodic inspection of the work and will
consult with the Developer's Engineer in regard to engineering problems concerning
the work and observe all tests and conduct the final inspection as outlined in the "City
of Plymouth Engineering Guidelines, City of Plymouth Engineering Department.
The Developer shall pay to the City Treasurer upon execution of this Contract *Five
Thousand One Hundred Sixty Six and 00/100 ---Dollars ($5,166) to cover all City
administration cost required in preparing and administering this Contract. * $206,638
x 2.5% = $5,166.
4.4. The Developer shall do all site grading, including building sites, common greenway
and open space areas, ponds, and surface drainage ways, and all private streets in
accordance with the approved grading, drainage and site plan. The plan shall indicate,
by arrows, how the drainage will be directed on the site.
The Developer shall submit an erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with
the City Ordinances dealing with Erosion and Sediment Control, Ordinance No's
95-17 and 95-18 or its latest revision. The Developer shall be responsible for
maintaining this plan and to assure his compliance with said plan and to provide for
the cleaning of storm sewer, ditches, ponds, etc., necessitated by erosion from said
land development, the Developer's bond will include said maintenance costs as shown
in Paragraph 8.1, Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. After all
permanent vegetation is established all silt fence shall be removed.
4.5. All boulevards shall be sodded by September 1, 2003.
9
ply_nt\Ntdisk l \pw\Engineering\DE V LMNTS\ 1999\99062\Docents\R I _99062. doc
cJ
5. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments
The City is allowing delayed monumentation for up to one year after filing of the plat
subject to the following conditions:
Building permits will not be allowed on a lot within the plat until
monuments have been placed in the ground on that lot according to
State Statute specifications and certified to by a land surveyor.
2. The City is requiring that durable iron monuments be set at all angle
and curve points on the outside boundary lines of the plat and also at all
block corners and at all intermediate points on the block lines
indicating changes of direction in the lines. These boundaries will be
monumented before recording the plat. This will allow for survey
control of the developing subdivision. The adjacent land owners will
know the limits of the development and if another land surveyor is
hired to set monumentation on one or more lots within the plat, the
necessary survey control will be in place.
3. If all of the monuments are not shown on the plat and being set, the
developer shall submit a financial guarantee to ensure that all iron
monuments are set before the end of the one year period. The financial
guarantee shall be submitted before the first building permit is issued.
6. Guarantee of Performance by Developer
6.1 In the event the Developer requires building permits prior to completion of all
improvements as listed in Paragraph 8, he shall furnish a certified check, certificate of
deposit, or irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $206,638 as shown in
Paragraph 8, or a surety bond in the amount of $309,957, which is 150% of the cost
requirement in Paragraph 8.
6.2 Reduction in cash escrow or surety bond guarantee may be granted upon written
request by the Developer based upon the value of the completed improvements at the
time of the requested reduction. The amount of the reduction will be submitted to the
City Council for action.
6.3 The cash escrow or surety bond shall not be reduced to less than 20% (twenty percent)
until all sewer, watermain, drainage systems and streets and other work covered by this
contract are completed and approved by the City.
10
N:\pw\Engineering\DEV LMNTS\1999\99062\Docnrts\R1_99062.doc
6.4 Prior to commencing any grading, a cash deposit in the amount of $1,000 and an
irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $3,000 as shown in Paragraph 8. 1, shall be
furnished by the developer.
7. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance
The Developer shall furnish the City of Plymouth comprehensive general liability
insurance in the amount of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) combined
single limits bodily injury/property damage. These insurance policies shall accompany
the contract for its execution by the Developer and the City of Plymouth. These
insurance policies shall be in full force and effect during the life of this contract.
8. Estimated Cost Subdivision Development
The following items shall be the responsibility of the Developer and shall be covered
by an escrow guarantee (bond, cash, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, etc.) as
specified:
N:\pw\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\1999\99062\Docnits\RI _99062. doc
8 CONT.)
ITEM
Street Construction
Sanitary Sewer System
Watermain System
Storm Sewer System
Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod
Pond construction
Mitigation Pond Construction
NURP Pond Construction
Street Signs (200)
Park Trail Improvements
Site Grading & Drainage Imp.*
Setting Iron Monuments
SUB -TOTAL:
Design, Admin., Insp., As-Builts (12%)
Total:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Public (1) Private (2) Total
37,768 0 375768
23,365 0 23,365
15,760 0 15,760
28,395 0 28,395
0 1,500 1,500
0 0 0
0 0 0
2,500 0 2,500
200 0 200
0 0 0
0 74,510 74,510
0 500 500
107,988 76,510 184,498
12,959 9,181 22,140
120,947 85,691 206,638
1) Public - city to own and/or maintain after development completed.
2) Private - Property owner and/or property owner's association to maintain after
development is completed.
8.1 Installation and
Maintenance of Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan
Street Sweeping and
Storm Sewer Cleaning
Letter of
Cash Credit
1,000 $3,000
Total
4,000
Note: If a grading permit was issued and the financial guarantee released and/or
expired, these monies may be used for the required maintenance of the
erosion and sediment control plan.
12-
8.2. The water and sanitary sewer area type assessments for this development are as
follows:
None
The Developer understands and agrees to these charges, and hereby waives his right to
a public hearing with respect to them.
The water and sanitary sewer Residential Equivalent Connection (REC) charges for
the lots to be developed shall be computed at the time of connection to the municipal
utility system. The Developer understands that the aforementioned REC charges shall
be paid for each dwelling unit prior to the issuance of a building or plumbing permit
for the dwelling unit.
9. Street Maintenance During Construction
The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the streets are
accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets
to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If and
when streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the
event residences are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain
a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage. The developer shall be
responsible for keeping streets within and without the subdivision swept clean of dirt
and debris that may spill or wash onto the street from his operation. The developer
may request, in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the winter months by
plowing snow from said streets prior to final acceptance of said streets. The City shall
not be responsible for reshaping said streets because of snow plowing operations, and
if they are requested and providing snow plowing service, it does not constitute final
acceptance of said streets.
9.1. The developer shall contract for street cleaning within and immediately adjacent to the
development. A copy of this contract shall be approved by the City before grading is
started.
13
ply_nt\Ntdiskl\pw\Engineering\DEV LNINTS\1999\99062\Docmts\Rl _99062.doc
12
10. Acceptance of Subdivision in Units
The City of Plymouth will accept complete in units of one (1) block which have been
completed in accordance with the provisions of this contract. The Developer shall
furnish a progress schedule for the construction of streets in the subdivision.
Requests for acceptance of streets shall be made in writing by the Developer. The
Developer shall furnish certificates of completion as outlined in Paragraph 11.1 herein
for each unit completed, certifying that work has been completed in accordance with
the terms of this contract, and shall also furnish mylar "as -built" reproducibles for all
phases of construction included in this contract.
11.0. Acceptance of Completed Subdivision
11.1. Prior to acceptance of the completed subdivision by City Council, it will be necessary
to furnish the following affidavits:
a. Contractor's Certificate
b. Engineer's Certificate
C. Land Surveyor's Certificate
d. Developer's Certificate
certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of the
contract.
11.2. All necessary forms will be furnished by the City of Plymouth.
11.3. Upon receipt of affidavits (Paragraph 11.1 above) and recommendation by the City
Engineer that completed work be accepted, the City Council will be requested to
accept the completed public improvements. Acceptance will be by formal Resolution
of the City Council.
12. Plat Approval
12.1 Preliminary Plat was approved by Resolution No. 99-350 by the City Council on
September 7, 1999 subject to ten 10 conditions.
12.2 Final Plat and Development Contract were approved by Resolution No. by the City
Council on
13. Land Dedicated for Public Use. Parks and Private Recreation Area:
13.1. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedication
Policy in effect at the time of filing the Final Plat with Hennepin County.
14. Other Requirements
14.1. Compliance with the City Engineer's memorandum.
14
L:\pw\Engineering\DEVLMNrS\1999\99062\DOcmts\R1 _99062. doc
I3
14.2. Removal of all hazardous trees from the property at the owner's expense.
14.3. No building permits shall be issued until a contract has been awarded for sewer and water,
and the MPCA Permit issued.
14.4. No building permits shall be issued until the Final Plat has been filed and recorded at
Hennepin County.
14.5. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new
structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage facility.
14.6. Prior to issuance of building permits, wetland buffer monuments shall be placed in
accordance with Section 21670.07 of the Zoning Ordinance. The monument design shall be
approved by the Community Development Department.
14.7. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System.
14.8. Minimum building setbacks shall be specified by the RSF-1 zoning district. No variances are
granted or implied.
14.9. Private driveway access to this five -lot subdivision shall be limited to Quinwood Lane and
shall be restricted from 6th Avenue.
14.10. Submission of the required Financial Guarantee and Site Performance prior to issuance of
building permits, for completion of site improvements within twelve months of the date of the
resolution. The agreement shall include, but not be limited to the required wetland buffer
monumentation.
14.11. Uncovered decks and patios may encroach up to six feet into the required wetland setback
pursuant to Section 21670.09 of the Zoning Ordinance.
14.12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with all
erosion control ordinances and policies, as well as the approved tree preservation plan.
14.13. Because this site lies within the Shoreland District for Cavanaugh Lake, all lots within this
subdivision are limited to a maximum impervious surface coverage of 25 percent, or as may
be amended in the future.
14.14. The purchase agreements for each of the lots, as well as any marketing materials for this
development, shall clearly state that the maximum impervious surface coverage, including
swimming pools, shall be limited to 25 percent of the lot area.
14.15. Private driveway access shall be restricted from the lot at 525 Pineview Lane (Tract D, RLS
1391) to Quinwood Lane.
14.16. A ponding easement is required to the 100 year high water elevation.
14.17. A pond maintenance agreement is required between the developer and the City for the water
quality pond.
14.18. Location and number of fire hydrants shall be approved by the Fire Division.
14.19. Prior to release of the final plat mylars, the applicant shall submit fire flow data for review
and approval by the Fire Inspector.
15
L: \pw\Engineering\DE VLMNTS\ 1999\99062\Docmts\R 1 _99062. doc
14
15. Tree Preservation
15.1 The Developer shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance.
16
N:\pw\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\1999\99062\Docnits\R1 _99062. do c
5
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ENGINEERS MEMO
to
Planning Commission & City Council
DATE: July 5, 2001
FILE NO.: 99062
PETITIONER: Mark Sikes
Groundbreaking Development LLC
17200 11th Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55447
FINAL PLAT: TONI SIKES ADDITION
LOCATION: South of 6th Ave., West of Pineview Lane in the Southeast 1/4
of Section 34.
1. AREA ASSESSMENTS:
a) Watermain: None
b) Sanitary sewer: None
2. OTHER ASSESSMENTS:
a) Sanitary sewer lateral: None
b) Water lateral: None
C) Street and storm sewer lateral: None
3. LEGAL/EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT REQUIREMENTS:
a) Provide standard utility and drainage easements: The drainage easement
for ponding on Lot 5 shall include "drainage and utility easement and drainage
easement for ponding".
b) Provide standard easements for construction: Dimension the drainage and
utility easement over Lots 1 and 2 for the storm sewer. Additional drainage
and utility easements will be required over Lot 5 drainage ditch.
ply_nt\Ntdisk I\pw\Engineering\DE VLMNTS\I999\99062\Docnns\FINALPLAT. doc
TONI SIKES ADDITION (99062)
FINAL PLAT
Page 2
C) Provide ponding easement: The wording and "drainage easement for
ponding shall be included for Lake Cavanaugh.
d) Vacate unnecessary easements: N/A
e) Provide a Maintenance Agreement for Water Quality Pond: A
maintenance agreement is required.
f) Provide necessary street right of way: Complies
g) Provide Owners Duplicate Title if property is Torrens:
h) Provide correct street names: To be determined by the building department.
4. NECESSARY PERMITS:
a) DNR (If any work takes place below the OHW)
b) MPCA
C) Wetland Conservation Act
d) Bassett Creek
e) NPDES
5. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS:
a. Provide acceleration/deceleration lanes: N/A
b. Indicate whether the City or the developer will construct the street and
utilities : The Developer.
c. Provide the following revisions to the street and utility plans: None
d. The Contractor shall contact Sewer and Water Supervisor, Greg Cook at 763-
509-5992 24 hours prior to any public sewer/watermain connection:
e. The Contractor shall contact Street Supervisor Gary Smith at 763-509-5993
24 hours prior to any construction activity within City right-of-way and/or
easements:
f. Provide the following erosion control measure on the grading plan: Shall
comply with Bassett Creek requirements.
6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS:
ply_nt\Ntdisk l \pw\Engineering\DE VLMNTS\1999\99062\Docmts\FINALPLAT.doc
TONI SIKES ADDITION (99062)
FINAL PLAT
Page 3
Provide construction plans that comply with the:
a) Thoroughfare Guide Plan
b) Water Distribution Plan
C) Sanitary Sewer Plan
7. APPLICATION INDICATES COMPLIANCE WITH WATER RESOURCE
PLAN POLICIES:
Constructed detention ponds should be relied upon to limit runoff to
pre -development rates and to control downstream flooding where
feasible; natural basins may also be utilized: Subject to Bassett Creek
approval
Increased volumes of runoff due to development should be minimized
by limiting impervious cover and encouraging infiltration of storm
water where soil conditions are appropriate: Submit a description on
how this is being done
The City encourages the use of alternative landscape techniques and
materials to reduce rates and volumes of runoff: Submit a description
on how this is being done
Proposed developments must identify all reasonable steps to avoid water
quality impacts and mitigate with appropriate best management practices
BMPs), to prevent water quality in receiving waters from falling below
established standards: Submit a description on how this is being done
8. OTHER REOUIREMENTS:
a) Minimum floor elevations: Lots 2 and 3, 958.0 and lot 5, 971.0.
9. SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
a) Detailed grading plans will be required for each lot and shall include erosion
control measures and retaining walls if necessary. These must be approved by
the City Engineer before a building permit is issued.
b) Sawcut 6th Avenue prior to making the sanitary sewer and water connection
and repair 6th Avenue to match the existing roadway section.
C) Provide a traffic plan for review and approval to be used during the watermain
and sanitary sewer work in 6th Ave.
ply_nt\Ntdisk l \pw\Engineering\DEV LMNTS\ 1999\99062\Docents\FINALPLAT. doc
TONI SIKES ADDITION (99062)
FINAL PLAT
Page 4
d) On the grading plan show the 75 foot buffer setback all along the wetland
basin, show the 15 foot setback from the buffer line and show the buffer
monuments.
e) Show an emergency overflow for Quinwood Lane and the NURP Pond.
Submitted by:
Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E.
City Engineer
ply_nt\Ntdisk 1 \pw\Engineering\DEV LMNTS\ 1999\99062\Docmts\FINALPLAT. doc
June 14, 2001
Schoell & Madson, Inc.
Engineering • Surveying • Planning
Soil Testing • Environmental Services
www.schoellmadson.com
Mr. Shawn Drill
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd
Plymouth, MN 55447
RE: Toni Sikes Addition
Killian's Addition)
Dear Shawn:
The proposed Toni Sikes Addition is in compliance with the 5 lot preliminary plat
approval. Please note, at the time of the preliminary plat approval, the site was
named Killian's Addition.
Sincerely,
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC
Doug Stahl
Affirmative Action Equal Opportunity Employer
10580 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 1 • Minnetonka, MN 55305-1525
Office (952) 546-7601 • Fax (952) 546-9065
J
e
JUN 2001
i
CIS,' GF PLYM0U?N
NirY DFVF10PRVFNT
ON
RUE
Location Map - 99062
Terranova / Toni Sikes Addition
12795 6th Avenue North
Request for a Final Plat
rW NE
City of S
Plymouth, Minnesota
ilk
Land Use Guide Plan
C, Commercial
CC, City Center
CO, Commercial Office
IP, Planned Industrial
LA -1, Living Area 1
0 LA -2, Living Area 2
0 LA -3, Living Area 3
LA -4, Living Area 4
0 LAR, Living Area- Rural
P -I, Public/Semi-Public/Institutional
6TH AVENUEAVENUE NORTH . s
a
u99'45'31 E •
N89°24'26'E rvo
N131.5. n
235.98
f\ O
25' O
n _ a6NE .
TSS'
IO
6s rg Js W
25zow • -
n /
3 y 3 / \ 5•
0 0 -
h' an
1
pa - •`
6.20'05
GH x6.99
589°2'0S"
I
I
I I
I
la
Fil
PRELIMINARY PLAT/SITE PLAN
KILLIAN ADDITION
6TH AVENUE _ NORTH =_
4q ,
Q
I
d
nie""'IY1 . ,'.
1. `1 m..e0..
x•r..\w+
wwema2DD 300
XI
x°Ie ir, Feet
R ISIONs CERTIFICATION SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. CLIENT
TORR N.uES tir eearea ansa
mn'
teHoern
IN 6UFVEYORS RIAHNERS
hsIDHS Rom a l:cmxed Land Snry oder the _ _ SOR TESTING ENVIRONUENTAE SE -CES
0580 WA—TA B°°L` ND 5011E ' DENNIS S. KILLIANw <,
b/% 1 J. e
a oI jnn<xe1o.
uNHEfoNKA. M ss3os
L/Z_
fY (
fit2) Sa6-)601 Al 5.6-9065
eeo ore emno
7W6
wwe.ecnaellma eancam
VICINITY MAP
sec.. J4. 1. n6 H, R. 22 W
Mw 1/a NE 1/a
SITE -41
rw
sW 1/4
i
NO— NG 6CNE
A
SD It 50 1 W 150
scale in Feet
A. OESCRR, L. ract A. RLS. 1551. NenneRin Counly. HinneaotR
MFA—ItE FEET ACRES
Lol 33 460 0.5366
Lol 2 24)792 5661.
1 2 - Lona `I 433 0.7216
Lot 39 9JJ So
1113 - 1-19.386 0.6146
Lol 4 19.651 0.4511
lot 5 27,937 0.6413
Ri ht-ol-w 21,632 04966
Gross 390.039 6.9540
G.oea - Lond 153.497 3.5236
BUILDING SEIHACKS
Front - 25 I1.
RearF- ;Sorawe ho Butie r - 15 I, ram lokea r JS ft.
N.I. 25S --i— area oe Int.
G,— 'M1Ue Ut ty Eosemenlx ore
o 6`- - an
1--J L -i
NG srnlE
The d—mg thenueh ec Meda tl
re ewe 6 firy n! BOOK- 57e
R GE:
M
96-09)
LOCATION
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
SHEET 1 OF 4 S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 63238-001
u99'45'31 E •
N131.5. n
I25
2
6fi
2 If\ O
25' O
GH x6.99
589°2'0S"
I
I
I I
I
la
Fil
PRELIMINARY PLAT/SITE PLAN
KILLIAN ADDITION
6TH AVENUE _ NORTH =_
4q ,
Q
I
d
nie""'IY1 . ,'.
1. `1 m..e0..
x•r..\w+
wwema2DD 300
XI
x°Ie ir, Feet
R ISIONs CERTIFICATION SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. CLIENT
TORR N.uES tir eearea ansa
mn'
teHoern
IN 6UFVEYORS RIAHNERS
hsIDHS Rom a l:cmxed Land Snry oder the _ _ SOR TESTING ENVIRONUENTAE SE -CES
0580 WA—TA B°°L` ND 5011E ' DENNIS S. KILLIANw <,
b/% 1 J. e
a oI jnn<xe1o.
uNHEfoNKA. M ss3os
L/Z_
fY (
fit2) Sa6-)601 Al 5.6-9065
eeo ore emno
7W6
wwe.ecnaellma eancam
VICINITY MAP
sec.. J4. 1. n6 H, R. 22 W
Mw 1/a NE 1/a
SITE -41
rw
sW 1/4
i
NO— NG 6CNE
A
SD It 50 1 W 150
scale in Feet
A. OESCRR, L. ract A. RLS. 1551. NenneRin Counly. HinneaotR
MFA—ItE FEET ACRES
Lol 33 460 0.5366
Lol 2 24)792 5661.
1 2 - Lona `I 433 0.7216
Lot 39 9JJ So
1113 - 1-19.386 0.6146
Lol 4 19.651 0.4511
lot 5 27,937 0.6413
Ri ht-ol-w 21,632 04966
Gross 390.039 6.9540
G.oea - Lond 153.497 3.5236
BUILDING SEIHACKS
Front - 25 I1.
RearF- ;Sorawe ho Butie r - 15 I, ram lokea r JS ft.
N.I. 25S --i— area oe Int.
G,— 'M1Ue Ut ty Eosemenlx ore
o 6`- - an
1--J L -i
NG srnlE
The d—mg thenueh ec Meda tl
re ewe 6 firy n! BOOK- 57e
R GE:
M
96-09)
LOCATION
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
SHEET 1 OF 4 S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 63238-001
MIN TONI SIKES ADDITION
r.
Qr-
NoRTtt
nv
4
Rood. oew e.>a.x
SCHOELL d MADSON, INC.
ENGINEERSSURVF.YURS - PLANNERS w•a•• ..*- ^-a --.'
f j TESTING ENVIRONMENTAL ; 1. RVICES
IDECSC OW1E
I
2001
L-
T ITY-01F PLYMOUTH
Oh MJNITY DEVELOPMENTLN T^. '
4
k
q
IDECSC OW1E
I
2001
L-
T ITY-01F PLYMOUTH
Oh MJNITY DEVELOPMENTLN T^. '
Agenda Number: . () 6
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Jackie Foss, Accounting Technician, through Dale E. Hahn, Finance
Director
SUBJECT: DECLARING COST AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR 2001
DELINQUENT WATER, SEWER, RECYCLING AND STREET
LIGHTING SERVICE CHARGES.
DATE: July 16, 2001 for City Council Meeting July 24, 2001
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolutions declaring the cost to be assessed
and ordering the preparation of the assessment rolls and the necessary resolutions setting
September 11, 2001 for the Public Hearing for 2001 Delinquent Water, Sewer, Recycling and
Street Lighting.
2. BACKGROUND: The City Code provides that: Annually all delinquent accounts shall be
certified to the City Manager who shall prepare assessment rolls providing for assessment of
the delinquent amounts against the respective properties served. The assessment rolls shall
be delivered to the City Council. The total 2001 cost is $121,847.95 for Delinquent Utilities.
The total 2001 cost to be assessed is for 423 properties.
3 RECOMMENDATION: Attached is the resolution declaring the cost to be assessed and
ordering the preparation of the assessment roll. The resolution sets September 11, 2001 for
the Public Hearing for Delinquent Water, Sewer, Recycling and Street Lighting. It is
recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR DELINQUENT WATER, SEWER, RECYCLING AND
STREET LIGHTING SERVICE CHARGES
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provision of Minnesota Statutes Sections 444.075, 429.101, and
443.015 and Plymouth City Code Sections 715.03, 720.16, 730.13, and 600.25 a determination
has been made that certain charges for delinquent water, sewer, recycling and street lighting
service charges have not been paid as provided by law, and the total amount of such charges is
121,847.95.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. The amount of delinquent utilities to be specially assessed is hereby declared
to be $121,847.95.
2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the Director of Finance, shall forthwith
calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed as provided by law; and
the clerk shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office of the City
Clerk for public inspection.
3. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the
Council thereof.
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
DELINQUENT WATER, SEWER, RECYCLING AND STREET
LIGHTING SERVICE CHARGES
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on July 24, 2001, the City Clerk was directed
to prepare a proposed assessment for certain charges for the delinquent water, sewer, recycling
and street lighting service charges as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
A public hearing shall be held on the 11th day of September, 2001 in the City
Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard,
Plymouth, Minnesota at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and
at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such charges
will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least
two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total amount of
the assessment. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the
owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll.
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
Agenda Number , D '
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Rebecca Stoen, Planner (509-5453), through Annd flurlburt, Community
Development Director
SUBJECT: City of Plymouth. Site Plan Amendment to install a propane standby
system for Plymouth Creek Activity Center and Field House (2001057)
REVIEW PERIOD DEADLINE: September 28, 2001
DATE: July 19, 2001 for the City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move to adopt the attached resolution approving a Site Plan Amendment to install a propane
standby system for Plymouth Creek Activity Center and Field House, as recommended by the
Planning Commission.
Approval of a Site Plan Amendment requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The City of Plymouth is requesting a site plan amendment to install a 9,000 -gallon propane tank
for a propane standby system for the Plymouth Creek Activity Center and Fieldhouse. The tank
would be approximately 7.5 feet high by 38 feet long. The propane standby system would allow
significant energy savings due to a rate reduction from Minnegasco in exchange for service
interruption during peak energy demands. Currently Plymouth Creek Center has "firm" natural
gas rates from Minnegasco. Under this substantially higher rate, Minnegasco will not shut off
supply during peak demand. In exchange for significant savings, the standby system would allow
the Plymouth Creek Center and Fieldhouse to operate on liquid propane during any interruption
of service.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING:
At their July 18, 2001 meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend
approval of the site plan amendment to install a propane standby system for Plymouth Creek
Activity Center and Fieldhouse. This item was on the Planning Commission consent agenda.
Notice of the public meeting held at the Planning Commission on July 18, 2001 was mailed to all
property owners within 200 feet.
File 2001057
Page 2
4. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan amendment is limited to whether or not
the proposal meets the measurable standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these
measurable standards, the City must then approve the site plan amendment.
5. CONTEXT:
A. Surrounding Land Uses
The site is located within Plymouth Creek Park. Plymouth Creek and a large wetland are located
to the north. Beyond this area, the land is guided LA -2 and LA -3, zoned RSF-3 and RMF -1 and
developed with single family homes and Creekside of Plymouth townhomes. Land to the east
and southeast is guided LA -4, zoned RMF -4 and developed with Park Place Apartments. Land
directly east across Fernbrook Lane is guided LA -2, zoned RSF-2 and developed with single
family homes. Land to the south is guided P -I and RSF-1, zoned RSF-1 and includes City -owned
open space and single family homes. The City Hall/amphitheater/LifeTime Fitness/Ice Center
complex is located west of the site.
B. Previous Actions Affecting Site
On May 19, 1998, the City held a referendum regarding construction of an activity center and
fieldhouse. The referendum passed with voters agreeing to bond $4.5 million for the joint
facility. On September 28, 1998, the Council approved the location of Plymouth Creek Center.
The final plat and site plan were approved by the Council on February 16, 1999. Construction
began in spring 1999 and Plymouth Creek Center opened in April 2000.
6. ANALYSIS OF SITE PLAN AMENDMENT:
The Zoning Ordinance contains specific standards for approval of a site plan amendment and for
development in the P -I zoning district. Staff used these standards to review this application. The
specific standards that apply are as follows.
Landscaping and Screening
Section 21130.03, Subd. L(b)(1) of the Zoning Ordinance requires any non-residential use that
abuts property zoned for residential use to provide screening along the common boundary to a
height of six feet. The propane tank will be screened from the adjacent properties by a large
wooded area of trees and landscaping. The property to the south is located roughly 13 feet lower
than the activity center and parking lot. In addition, the closest residential properties to the north
and south are located more than 1,000 feet from the site. The closest building in the adjacent
apartment complex is located roughly 360 feet away. Staff finds that the combination of
landscaping, grade changes, existing vegetation and distance would provide screening consistent
with ordinance requirements.
The tank would be surrounded by a chain link fence in order to meet the Fire Code and allow
water penetration. If additional screening is desired, inserts can be added to the fence side facing
File 2001057
Page 3
the residential area, to add screening while allowing water penetration through the remaining
three sides. Staff finds that the inserts will not be necessary to screen from the adjacent
residential areas due to the existing wooded area, however inserts may be added in the future if a
need is determined. Although it is not required by the Zoning Ordinance, staff would
recommend for aesthetic purposes, the City consider planting additional landscaping to the south
to screen the tank from the parking lot with careful attention to allowing access for fire
protection.
Setbacks
The proposed propane tank would be located 90 feet from the edge of the fieldhouse and roughly
360 feet from the nearest residential building. The location of the system would exceed the
setback requirements for an accessory use of the property. The fill station would be located south
of the fieldhouse, adjacent to the existing parking lot. The meters and mixer would be installed
between the tank and the fieldhouse and would also be surrounded by a fence. The City Fire
Inspector has reviewed the plans for compliance with the Fire Code and finds the proposed
location would comply with all applicable requirements.
Other Standards
There are no changes proposed to the existing buildings, lighting, drainage, or parking. The
propane tank will be serviced by the existing parking lot through underground piping.
7. CONCLUSION:
Staff has concluded that the application meets or exceeds all the applicable provisions and
general standards of the ordinance.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the attached resolution
approving a site plan amendment to install a propane standby system for Plymouth Creek
Activity Center and Field House, subject to the conditions in the attached resolution as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving Site Plan Amendment
2. Minutes from July 18, 2001 Planning Commission
3. Location Map
4. Site Graphics
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2001 -
APPROVING A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT TO INSTALL A PROPANE STANDBY
SYSTEM FOR PLYMOUTH CREEK ACTIVITY CENTER AND FIELD HOUSE
2001057)
WHEREAS, The City of Plymouth has requested a site plan amendment to install a 9,000
gallon propane tank for a propane standby system for Plymouth Creek Activity Center
and Field House on property legally described as follows:
Southwest quarter of the southeast quarter and that part of the southeast quarter of the
southeast quarter described as beginning at point on the south line thereof then north 8
rods then east to west line of road then north to southeast corner of Outlot B, Cedar Ridge
then westerly and northwesterly along south line of said Outlot B to northwest corner of
southeast quarter of southeast quarter then south to southwest corner thereof then east to
beginning of Section 16, Township 118, Range 22; also,
That part of Outlot A, Park Place, according to the recorded plat thereof and situate in
Hennepin County, Minnesota lying westerly of the northeasterly extension of the
northwesterly line of Lot 3, Block 1 said Park Place.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public
meeting and recommends approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the
request by The City of Plymouth for a site plan amendment, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The site plan amendment is for installation of a 9,000 gallon propane tank for a
propane standby system for Plymouth Creek Activity Center and Field House, as
shown on plans received on June 1, 2001, except as amended by this resolution.
0
Resolution 2001-
2001057)
Page 2 of 2
2. A tank permit is required prior to beginning construction of the propane backup
system.
3. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals
per Ordinance provisions.
4. This approval shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property
owner or applicant has substantially started construction of the project, or unless the
landowner or applicant has received prior approval from the City to extend the
expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under Section 21045.09 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of
Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a
meeting of the Plymouth City Council on July 24, 2001, with the original thereof on file
in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
Draft Minutes
City of Plymouth
Planning Commission Meeting
July 18, 2001
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Mike Stulberg, Commissioners Peggy Larson, David
Gaither, Kapila Bobra, Sarah Reinhardt, and Karl Neset
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Roger Berkowitz
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Anne Hurlburt, Planning Manager
Barb Senness, Senior Planner Shawn Drill, Planner Rebecca Stoen, Associate Planner Josh Doty
and Office Services Supervisor Denise Hutt
1 CALL TO ORDER
2 PUBLIC FORUM
3 APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Reinhardt, seconded by Commissioner Bobra to approve the June
20, 2001 Planning Commission Minutes. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously.
5 CONSENT AGENDA
A CITY OF PLYMOUTH (2001057)
MOTION by Commissioner Bobra, seconded by Commissioner Reinhardt recommending
approval of a site plan amendment to install a propane standby system for Plymouth Creek
Activity Center and field house. canopy signage for fuel station pump islands. Vote. 6 Ayes.
MOTION approved unanimously.
6 PUBLIC HEARINGS
A RAINBOW FOODS (2001056)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by 11ainbow Foods for a site plan amendment and
conditional use permit to allow construction of a center at Rainbow Foods, 4190 Vinewood
Lane North, and a zoning ordinance text amendment to ddress.
Chairman Stulberg turned the meeting over to Commissioner nhardt noting that he has a
conflict of interest.
Location Map - 2001057
City of Plymouth /
Propane Standby System
14800 34th Avenue North
Request for a Site Plan Amendment
N
W E
City of S
Plymouth, Minnesota
Land Use Guide Plan
MM C, Commercial
CC, City Center
CO, Commercial Office
IP, Planned Industrial
LA -1, Living Area 1
LA -2, Living Area 2
LA -3, Living Area 3
LA -4, Living Area 4
LAR, Living Area- Rural
P -I, Public/Semi-Public/Institutional
s
I c1.
Agenda Number: t p ,
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Mark Jones, Property Management Coordinator through Dale E. Hahn, Finance
Director
SUBJECT: AWARD CONTRACT FOR ENERGY COST REDUCTION -
PLYMOUTH CREEK ACTIVITY CENTER/FIELD HOUSE
DATE: July 19, 2001 for City Council meeting July 24, 2001
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution awarding a contract to Palen/Kimball Company
in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 471.345 Subd. 13 for design, purchase and installation of liquid
propane (LP) standby system for Plymouth Creek Activity Center/Field House.
2. BACKGROUND: The Plymouth Creek Activity Center/Field House is presently on "Firm" natural gas
rates from Minnegasco. This means that Minnegasco may not shut off the supply of natural gas to the
Plymouth Creek Activity Center/Field House. Since Minnegasco cannot shut off the supply during peak
demands, their rate is substantially higher than it would be if the gas supply could be interrupted.
3. DISCUSSION: The City has received a proposal from Palen/Kimball in conjunction with Honeywell for
the installation of a propane system which will allow Minnegasco to shut off the supply of natural gas
during peak energy demands, while the Plymouth Creek Activity Center/Field House runs on LP. By
allowing Minnegasco to interrupt the supply, they will give the Plymouth Creek Activity Center/ Field
House a discounted rate for all natural gas usage, which results in significant savings. The proposal
guarantees savings that will provide a 4.07 year pay back, and is provided in accordance with Minnesota
Statute No. 471-345 Subd. 13, which states that no additional proposals need to be obtained as long as the
proposal guarantees savings as outlined below. Even when you consider the cost of money (Net Present
Value), the pay back is under 5 years at 6 %.
THERMS FIRM GAS COSTS INTERRUPTIBLE GAS COSTS
120,654 $101,713 $76,011
Potential (NET) Savings Firm to Interruptible backed up with Propane
Backup Propane System Project Costs/payback Estimated Project Cost +or- 10% Payback (Years)
Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
July 19, 2001
Page Two
The City awarded a similar contract to Palen Kimball in 1998 for a system at the Ice Center. The
realized savings have been in line with the Palen Kimball proposal.
The proposed propane tank, which is planned to be 9,000 gallons, will be installed at the northwest area
of the Field House and within an aesthetically pleasing enclosure.
4. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative is to continue serving the facility on firm natural gas and not
achieving the savings.
5. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Funds are available in the Plymouth Creek Activity Center/Field House
Reserve and savings earned shall be returned to the Plymouth Creek Activity Center/Field House reserves
upon payback of the project.
6. RECONVgENDATION: I recommend the City Council award the contract to Palen/Kimball Company
for the Energy Cost Reduction Project for $107,000 plus or minus 10%.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
AWARDING CONTRACT TO PALEN/KIMBALL FOR ENERGY COST REDUCTION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City has received a proposal from Palen/Kimball for an "Energy Cost Reduction Project"
at the Plymouth Creek Activity Center/Field House which will guarantee cost savings, and
WHEREAS, a simple pay back analysis has been performed which provides guarantees in compliance with
Minnesota statutes 1997 471-345 Subd. 13, and
WHEREAS, the proposal has been published in compliance with the Minnesota Statute.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the energy cost reduction project for the Ice Center be awarded to
Palen/Kimball Company in the amount of $107,000 plus or minus 10%.
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
Agenda Number:
DATE: July 16, 2001 for the City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager through
0 Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Director of Public Works
FROM: Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E., City Engineer
SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD
PARKING BAYS AND BITUMINOUS OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 1002
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving final
plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids for Plymouth Boulevard
parking bays and bituminous overlay improvements.
BACKGROUND: The City Council previously authorized this improvement based upon
the implementation of the City's new overlay program and the need for additional parking
and traffic calming along Plymouth Boulevard. Plymouth Boulevard will be milled and
overlayed from 36th Avenue to County Road 9. In addition to the mill and overlay the
outside through lane of Plymouth Boulevard will be converted to parking from the
intersection of 34th Avenue and the north City Hall parking lot entrance to 371h Avenue.
The proposed schedule for this project anticipates completion of all the work under this
contract by November 15, 2001.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend that the City Council
adopt the attached resolution approving plans and specifications and ordering
advertisement for bids with bids to be received August 22, 2001.
Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E.
City Engineer
attachment: Resolution
N:\pw\Engineering\PROJECTS\2000 - 2009\1002\Memos\ParkingBays_PlymBlvd_CCMem.doc
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD
PARKING BAYS AND BITUMINOUS OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 1002
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on April 24, 2001 the City
Engineer, has prepared plans and specifications for Plymouth Boulevard which includes
the resurfacing and construction of parking bays on Plymouth Boulevard from 34'
Avenue to County Road 9 by the installation of bituminous pavement, concrete curb
and gutter, and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, copies of which are on file in the City
Engineer's Office and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
paper and in The Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the
making of such improvement under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, shall specify
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City
Clerk until 10:00 a.m. on August 22, 2001 at which time they will be
publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center
building at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota, by the City
Manager and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with
the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid
bond or certified check payable to the City Clerk for five percent of the
amount of such bid.
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
N:\pw\Engineering\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\1002\Resolutions\ApprPlan_Spe s_Res_1002.dm
p, /6
STH
CITY COUN-1 AGENDA REPORT
DATE: July 1.6, 2001 for the City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager through
0 Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E., City Engineer
SUBJECT: AWARD CONTRACT
CITY CENTER AREA STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 9020
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution awarding the
contract for the construction of the above project.
BACKGROUND: Bids were received for the construction of the City Center area street
lighting improvements project on Tuesday, July 10, 2001. Xcel Energy of Minneapolis,
MN was the only contractor to submit a bid with a bid of $308,000. Xcel Energy's bid is
14,818 under the engineer's estimate of $322,818. The bidder was also required to
submit an estimated cost for maintenance of each lighting fixture on a monthly basis for a
25 year term. The final terms of the maintenance agreement will be drawn up in an
owner/contractor document separate from this construction contract. Xcel Energy's
estimate on a per fixture basis per month was $3.65.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I hereby recommend that the City
Council adopt the attached resolution awarding the contract for City Project No. 9020, City
Center area street lighting improvements to the lone bidder, Xcel Energy, in the amount of
308,000.
Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E.
City Engineer
attachment: Resolution
N:\pw\Engineering\PROJECTS\1990- 1999\9020\Memos\AwdS[LI_9020_CCMem.doc
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
RESOLUTION AWARDING BID
CITY CENTER AREA STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 9020
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for City Center Area Street Lighting
Improvements, and all necessary appurtenances, bids were received, opened and tabulated
according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
COMPANY
Xcel Energy
TOTAL BID
308,000
WHEREAS, it appears that Xcel Energy of Minneapolis, MN is the lowest responsible bidder,
complying with the minimum specifications.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the contract with
Xcel Energy of Minneapolis, MN in the name of the City of Plymouth for the construction of
the City Center Area Street Lighting Improvements according to the plans and specifications
therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk in the amount
of $308,000.
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
NApw\EngineeringTROJECTS\1990 - 1999\9020\Reso1WwdBd_CityCntr_StLtg_9020_Res.doc
Agenda Number: 61//
DATE: July 16, 2001 for the City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
TO: ,,(Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager through
41 Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E. City Engineer
SUBJECT: LIFT STATION NO. 2 RENOVATION
CHANGE ORDER NO.4
CITY PROJECT NO. 8030
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving
Change Order No. 4 to Rice Lake Contracting Inc. for the Lift Station No. 2 (Mission
Farms) Renovation Project.
BACKGROUND: Attached is Change Order No. 4 to Rice Lake Contracting Inc. for the
Lift Station No. 2 (Mission Farms) Renovation Project, City Project No. 8030. Change
Order No. 4 provides for compensation to the contractor for additional contract items that
exceeded the original bid quantities. These items include:
1. Additional bituminous removal on East Medicine Lake Blvd. due to
forcemain and watermain construction.
2. Additional concrete curb removal due to forcemain, sanitary sewer and
watermain construction.
3. Additional bituminous sawing due to utility construction.
4. Additional 16 -inch megalugs on forcemain — more fittings used to avoid
existing utilities.
5. Install two additional precast manholes due to changes in the sanitary
sewer alignment.
6. Additional select granular borrow material was used under the parking
lot and in open cut sections of East Medicine Lake Blvd. due to poor
subgrade soils.
7. Additional geotextile fabric was used where poor subgrade soils were
encountered in the street.
N:\pw\Engineering\PROJECTS\1990 - 1999\8030\Memos\CC_LftSta_C04.doc
SUBJECT: LIFT STATION NO. 2 RENOVATION
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
CITY PROJECT NO. 8030
Page 2
8. Additional aggregate and bituminous base material were used, due to
larger excavations in East Medicine Lake Blvd.
9. An additional section of storm sewer pipe had to be salvaged and
replaced due to sanitary sewer construction.
The total cost of all the above items is $41,259.00 and the City's consulting engineer
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Assoc., Inc. is recommending approval of these
additional costs.
BUDGET IMPACT: With Change Order No. 4, the total amount of change order work is
221,833, which is a 19% increase in the original contract amount. This is a substantial
increase and due to the many unforeseen conditions with this difficult project such as much
poorer soil conditions than expected, building requirements for the pump house and
underground utility line conflicts. Additional funding for this project will be from the
Utility Trunk Fund.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I hereby recommend that the City
Council adopt the attached resolution approving Change Order No. 4 to Rice Lake
Contracting Inc., City Project No. 8030 in the amount of $41,259.00.
Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E.
attachments: Resolution
Change Order No. 4
Letter
Wpw\Engineering\PROJECTS\1990 - 1999\8030\Memos\CC_LftSta_C04.doc
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO.4
LIFT STATION NO.2 RENOVATION
CITY PROJECT NO. 8030
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 4 has been prepared providing extra compensation to the contractor for
the following:
1. Additional bituminous removal on East Medicine Lake Blvd.
2. Additional concrete curb and gutter.
3. Additional bituminous sawing.
4. Additional 16 -inch megalugs on forcemain to avoid existing utilities.
5. Install two additional precast manholes due to changes in the sanitary sewer
alignment.
6. Additional select granular borrow material due to poor subgrade soils.
7. Additional geotextile fabric due to poor subgrade soils.
8. Additional aggregate and bituminous base material.
9. An additional section of storm sewer pipe had to be salvaged and replaced.
AND WHEREAS, Change Order No. 4 for Lift Station No. 2 Renovation, City Project No. 8030, is
recommended for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That Change Order No. 4 to Rice Lake Contracting Inc. for Lift Station
No. 2 Renovation, City Project No. 8030, by adding $41,259.00 is approved:
Original Contract Amount $1,164,400.00
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS - Add $ 180,574.00
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 - Add $ 41,259.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $1,386,233.00
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001
ply_nt\Ntdiskl\pw\Engineering\PROJECTS\1990 - 1999\8030\Resol\App_Chng0rd_4.doc
BONESTR00 ROSENE ANDERLiK R T 6516361311 07/15/01 09:44 [5 :01/01 NO:554
Bonestroo. Roane, Anderllk and Atfoclatos, Inc. If an Affirmafeve Action/Equal Opperfunlfy
Bonestroo EMptoyar and Employee Owned
Principals: Oatu G. Bonestroo. OF. • AAaf —) L. S—ala, RE - fic• n R. Co.*,, PL.
Rosene RtlUerl (i. Sr hunichy, P.E. a Jerry A. Bourdon. PF
n . Anderlik & Senior Consultants: Rouen W Roscoe, PL • .101011h C And ruk. PL. • Richarn E lr.trnar, RE
Stnan M Encrlln, C PA,
Associates Assoclate Prineipala: Howard A. Sanford, 1'F • Keiln A. GulCt+n. PE - Ronert R Pfrfferle, P.E.
Rlcnard W. Foster, F.F. • Oa.ld O. Loskuta, PE. • Ronarl C Rrr»ek, A.I A. • Mrrk A bi:Intnn, PE.
Engineers & Architects Micndel T. Rautmann, RF, • Ted K.held. P.L • Kenneth P Annerwn PE • Man R Rolf%. PE, -
David A, Bonesitoo, M,HA • SkIntry P. Willianisutl, PE„ L,S. • Acine% M. Riity. M.B.A. • Allan Rick S('1'11nldl, PE.
Olflcec St. Feul, Ss. Cloud. Rocnestcr and Wilimm, MN • Milwol.,Ivee WI
iiapsite: wwwhoneHaoo.coft,
July 16, 2001
Mr. Dan Campbell
City of Plymouth
1400 Plymouth Blvd,
Plymouth, MN 554478-1448
Re: Lift Station #2 Renovation
City Project No. 8030
Bonestroo File No, 74-98-800
Dear [fan:
Attached is Change Order No. 4 for Lift Station No, 2 Renovation Project. We recommend.
payment in the amount of $41.259.00 to Rice Lake Contracting.
This Change Order is for various street repair items along East. Medicine Lake Boulevard that
exceeded the original estimate, Also, two more sanitary manholes had to he utilized and extra
fittings on the 16 -inch force main required 11 extra mega lugs.
Please call me at 651-104-4868 with any questions.
Yours very truly,
HONESTROO ROSENE ANDL-RL1K & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Thomas W. Peterson
TWP:erw
Enclosures
2335 West Highway 36 a St. Paul, MN 55113 a 651-636-4600 a Fax: 6S1-636-1311
BONESTR00 ROSENE ANDERLIK R f 6516361311
onestroo
Rosene
AnderliN &
Associates
fi„t14-e„ &A f. 111t a 11
N
1t wr City u1 Plyrnnuth, 3-100 Plymouth Dlvd.. Plymouth, MN 55447 -_Y F «
pate July 11. 200
MIMIC 101 (rota I•akc Contrntin, Ibic., _County Road 12, Dwwood, MN 1644,1
io,ml Company: Dond No:
CHANGE ORDER NO. 4
LIFT STATION NO.2 RENOVATION
CLIENT PROJECT NO.9030
BRA FILE NO. 70.98-800
De.)criptlop of Work
I Additional hinnninou-; rcnunval on Fast Medicine Lake Blvd. due to force main anis water maid construction.
2 Additional concrele curb removal due tet fruccmain, sanitary sewer and water main constriction.
1, Addiut nal bituminous sawing due to utility construction.
4. Additional Ili" niegalugs on forccmain - more fittings used to avoid existing utilities.
5 Install two additional precast manholts due to changes in the sanitary sewer alignment.
n. Additional select granular burrow material was used under the parking lot and in open cut scetions of East Medicine Lake
1410„ due u loony subgrade soils.
7. Addinonal geotexule labrie was used where poor subgrade soils were encountered in the street.
9/9 Additional aggregate and bituminous base material were used, due to larger excavations in Cast Medicine Lake Blvd..
jo ),I. An additional .wetir,n of stomi sewer pipe had to be salvaged and replaced due to sanitary sewer construction.
ChAlls'. order N-1 KK
Contract Unit Total
No. Iron Unit QuaMgty Price Amoont
CHANGE ORDER NO.4
1 Rctno%,c bituminous pavement SY 674 4.00 52,6%.00
Rcmu%•c Concrete curb LF 286 S6.00 1,716.00
3 Saw Bituminous Pavement LF 455 52.00 910.00
4 11)" Megalug EA 1 I 5350.00 53,850.00
t 4' Diameter Nlanholc EA 2 52,600.00 S5,200.00
n Select Grunutar Borrow CY 903 512.00 510,836.00
7 Geniemile fabric SY 674 S1.50 1,011.00
h Aggregate base, Class 5 TN 388 15.00 55,820.00
t> Ditununous Daic. TN 63 560.00 53.780.00
10 H618 concrete curb and gutter LF 216 15.00 53,240.00
11 5alvugc 18" RCP storm pipe Ls 1 2.200.00 2.100.00
Total CHANGE OkOER NO. 4: 541,299.00
ChAlls'. order N-1 KK
BONESTR00 ROSENE ANDERLIK R T 6516361311
6glillal (..onllat.;l A111U11111
PrcVlous (:'lu ilge Orders
This Change Order
Revised Cor tr;lct Amount (Mcludinb this charge order)
Recommended Cor Approval by:
11ONVSTROO, R(USF:NE. ANDF:RUK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Approved by Contractor:
RICE, LAKE; CONTRACTING INC.
Dery
cc, Owner
I IondIng( *oTTIp 1ny
Ilulieslroo & Assuc,
1 hanµc Ordri 0-1 rl; Date:
07/
12/01 14:36 5 :07/07 NO:535 S
1,164,400.00 S
1$0,574.00 41,
2.50.00 1,
386,233.00 Approved.
by Owner-. CITY
OF PLYMOUTH Date
iz
DATE: July 16, 2001 for the City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
TO:,%Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager through
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E., City Engineer
SUBJECT: NORTH CENTRAL — 15 TRUNK SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
CITY PROJECT NO. 9914
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving Change
Order No. 1 to Meadowvale Construction, Inc. for the above project.
BACKGROUND: Attached is Change Order No. 1 to Meadowvale Construction, Inc. for the
North Central 15 Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Project, City Project No. 9914. Change
Order No. 1. provides for compensation to the contractor for additional work including hydrant
extension, connection to a 12 -inch reinforced concrete pipe, excavation of miscellaneous material
encountered south of the railroad tracks, additional eight -inch watermain and additional eight -inch
gate valve and box. It also includes deductions for 24 -inch ductile iron pipe in lieu of 28 -inch high
density polyethylene pipe and wood spacers in the jack casing in lieu of plastic spacers. The total
additions and deductions amount to an additional $2,643.63. The City's consulting engineer
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Assoc., Inc. is recommending approval of this additional cost.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I hereby recommend that the City Council
adopt the attached resolution approving Change Order No. 1 to Meadowvale Construction, Inc.,
City Project No. 9914 in the amount of $2,643.63.
Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E.
City Engineer
attachments: Resolution
Change Order No. 1
Letter
Q:Apw\EngineeringAPR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\9914\MemosVCC_Ch=ge0rd_1.doc
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO.1
NC -15 TRUNK SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN
CITY PROJECT NO. 9914
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 has been prepared providing extra compensation to the
contractor for the following:
2 Hydrant Extensions, Connect to 12" RCP, Excavate miscellaneous material, 26
linear feet of 8" DIP Watermain, 1-8" Gate Valve & Box.
AND WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 for NC -15 Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain, City
Project No. 9914, is recommended for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That Change Order No. 1 to Meadowvale
Construction for NC -15 Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain, City Project No. 9914, by
adding $2,643.63 is approved:
Original Contract Amount
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001
351,149.00
Add $ 2,643.63
353,792.63
N:\pw\Engineering\PROJECTS\2000 - 2009\9914\Resol\Chge_Ord_l.doc
BONESTR00 ROSENE ANDERLIK R
Bonestroo
0 Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
July 16, 2001
Mr. Dan Campbell
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd,
Plymouth, MN 554478-1448
0 6516361311 07/15/01 09:46 [5 :01/05 NO:555
Soneffroo, Rosana, Anderllk And Assoclales, Inc. Is an Affirmative Actlon/Squat OpportunityEmployerandEfnploytteOwned
rinelpals: Otto G. Bonattrati, er, . Marvin L. Snrvala, P} - r:q.rar R ('pok. P.E
kooertG. Srhunicht. P.C...Jerry A. Rourdun, P(
Settlor ConfDltar[if: RODerI W ROtenr.. PE • Jusaph l And,fiit, Pf . Rlcharrl t Turner, P.E.
Susan M. Eberlln, C PA.
Atroclate Printipals: Howard A. Santnrd. PI:: Kelm A, C101dwl. 1'F'. • Robert R, Prelfarle, PE.
Richard W Forter, P.E. • David O. Lolkota. PE. . Raprrt t, Rlnirk. A I,A, • Mark A Hanson. PE
Mlrhael i. Rnutmann, PE.. lkd K,Freld. NE • Kenneth P Amlrrxon, P.E. • Mdrk ft polls, PB..
Csavld A. BOnattMO, M.B.A.. Sidney P 11/illlarrnson. PE... L S. • Ailnes M. Ring, M.H A.. Allen Rick Schmidt, RE.
Officer St, Paul, St, cloud. Rochester and Willmar. MN • Milwaukee, WI
1fbDslte: wwwAonestrao,com
Re: NC 15 Trunk Utilities
City Project No. 9914
Bonestroo File No. 70-(X)-102
Dear Dan:
Attached is Change Order No. I for North Central Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Water Main
Improvements. We recommend payment in the amount of $2,643,63 to Meadowvale
Construction.
A description of the work and associated costs of "additions" and "deducts" etre shown on page I
of the change order. Also enclosed is back up information on some cif the items, to further
describe the change.
Please call me at 651-604-4868 with any questions.
Yours very truly,
HONESTROO ROSENE ANDERIAK & ASSOCIATES, INC.'.
74aui 40
Thomas W. Peterson
TWII:crw
Enclosures
2335 West Highway 36 a St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 Fax: 651-636-1311
Bonestroo
0 Rosene
Ownt
Cont, Anderlik
Associates
service line to the property on the east side.
Engineers E. Architects Bond
of
UUN 9 MAL; I UM LoUrY
12669 Meadowvale Rd, Elk River, MN. 55330-291
r: Givens & Associates, Inc., 7900 Xerxes Ave S., Ste. 959
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
NC -15 TRUNK SANITARY AND WATERMAIN
CLIENT PROJECT NO.9914
BRA FILE NO. 70-00-102
Description of Work
1. Install 36" hydrant extensions on 2 hydrants, due to extra depth of water main.
Date 12, 2001
MN 55431 Bond No: SSB -308471
2. Additional work with "connect to 12 -inch RCP" sanitary sewer. Record plans showed a 12", but 15" diameter pipe was
encountered. This is compensation for a 15x12 reducer, downtime and equipment.
3. During trunk water main installation, rubbish was encountered in the excavation just south of the railroad tracks. This is
compensation for extra labor and equipment time to remove old cables, straps, and miscellaneous metals.
4. On Cheshire Lane, an 8 -inch water service was extended to property owned by the City of Plymouth.
ChangeOrderill
5. On Cheshire Lane, an 8 -inch gate valve was installed on the service line to the property on the east side.
6. The original plan called for installing 28" HDPE water main pipe in the poor soil area south of the railroad
Instead, 24" DIP was used. This resulted in a deduct'
7. At the two jackings under the railroad tracks, specifications called for special spacers around the carrier pipe. Wood
spacers were used instead. This resulted in a deduct
Contract' Unit Total
No Item Unit Quantity Price ' " ` Amount'
CHANGE ORDER NO.1 t R
Additions
1 Hydrant extension EA 2 5750.00 S1,5 00 lk,
2 Connect to 12" RCP LS 1 31,496.35 S1,4
3 Excavate misc: material LS 1 51,337.19 1,337 19
4 8" DIP watermain LF 26 530.00 5780.00
5 8" gate valve & box EA 1 5650.00 5650.00`
Total Additions 5,763.54
Deductions
6 24" DIP in lieu of 28" HDPE LS -1 51,019.91 51,019.91)
7 Wood spacers in lieu of plastic LS -1 52,100.00 52,100.00)
Total Deductions 3,119.91)
Total Additions 5,763.54
Total Deductions 3,119.91)
Total CHANGE ORDER NO. 1: 2,643.63
ChangeOrderill
Original Contract Amount $351,149.00
Previous Change Orders $0.00
This Change Order $2,643.63
Revised Contract Amount (including this change order) $353,792.63
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Date:
7 f}`
C I Y IZ O
Approved by Contractor: Approved by Owner:
MEADO CONST INC CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Date Date
X'
a
cc. Owner l
Contractor ry
Bonding Company
Bonestroo & Assoc.
Changeorder#I
i
MOUTH
CITY COUNCIL AA SNDA. REPORT
DATE: July 16, 2001 for Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
TO:wight D. Johnson, City Manager, throughWanielL. Faulkner, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E., City Engineer
SUBJECT: REDUCTION IN REQUIRED FINANCIAL GUARANTEE
ACTION REQUESTED: We have received requests from developers for a reduction
in the required financial guarantees to reflect completed work in their developments. The
City has made inspections of the work and I recommend that the attached resolutions be
adopted. The developments are:
1. Holly Creek 211' Addition
2. Holly Creek 3'
d Addition
3. Holly Creek 4th Addition
4. Holly Creek 5th Addition
Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E.,
City Engineer
attachment: Resolutions
93096)
94124)
95027)
96005)
N: \pw\Engineering\GENERAL\MEMOS\RON\Fg-2001 \FG7-24-01. doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
REDUCING REQUIRED FINANCIAL GUARANTEE
HOLLY CREEK 2ND ADDITION (93096)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the development contract dated September 20, 1993, Scherber Partnership
Properties, developer of Holly Creek 2nd Addition (93096), has agreed to install certain improvements for
said development; and
WHEREAS, the developer has completed a portion of the street, utility and site grading as noted below; and
WHEREAS, the developer has requested a reduction of the required financial guarantee to reflect the
completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA; that the financial guarantee requirements are reduced as follows:
ITEM ORIGINAL NEW
AMOUNT AMOUNT
Street Construction 37,455 0-
Sanitary Sewer 53,220 0-
Watermain 52,519 0-
Storm Sewer 28,327 0-
Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod 6,000 0-
Mitigation Pond Construction 39,600 0-
Street Signs (2 x 200) 400 0-
Site Grading and Drainage Improvements 132,610 0-
Park and Trail Improvements 13,260 0-
Setting Iron Monuments 2,500 0-
Design, Administration, Inspection, As-Builts 43,907 0-
TOTAL 409,798 0-
That the required financial guarantee for the above items be reduced as detailed above from $10,322 to $0
zero) to reflect the completed work. Letter of Credit No. 624460 may be reduced accordingly and will be
released by the Finance Department.
ply_nt\Ntdiskl\pw\Engineering\DEV LMNTS\1993\93096\RESOL\BR-93096B. doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
HOLLY CREEK 2ND ADDITION (93096)
Page Two
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the financial guarantee requirements for the following items per Section
8.1 of the approved development contract remain as follows:
ITEM
Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment
Control Plan, Street Sweeping, and Storm
Sewer Cleaning
Cash:
Letter of Credit No. 624478:
ORIGINAL NEW
AMOUNT AMOUNT
1,000 $1,000
13,744 $13,744
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the street construction is accepted for continual maintenance as of
July 24, 2001.
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
piy_nt\Ntdisk 1 \pw\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\ 1 993\93 096\RESOL\B R-93 096B. doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
REDUCING REQUIRED FINANCIAL GUARANTEE
HOLLY CREEK 3RD ADDITION (94124)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the development contract dated November 7, 1994, Scherber Partnership
Properties, developer of Holly Creek 3rd Addition (94124), has agreed to install certain improvements for
said development; and
WHEREAS, the developer has completed a portion of the street, utility and site grading as noted below; and
WHEREAS, the developer has requested a reduction of the required financial guarantee to reflect the
completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA; that the financial guarantee requirements are reduced as follows:
ITEM ORIGINAL NEW
AMOUNT AMOUNT
Street Construction 70,778 0-
Sanitary Sewer 54,284 0-
Watermain 48,490 0-
Storm Sewer 39,935 0-
Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod 4,800 0-
Mitigation Pond Construction 0- 0-
Sediment Pond Construction 0- 0-
Street Signs (2 x 200) 400 0-
Site Grading and Drainage Improvements 64,690 0-
Park and Trail Improvements 6,750 0-
Setting Iron Monuments 2,400 0-
Design, Administration, Inspection, As-Builts 35,103 0-
TOTAL 327,630 0-
That the required financial guarantee for the above items be reduced as detailed above from $33,496 to $0
zero) to reflect the completed work. Letter of Credit No. 624486 may be reduced accordingly and will be
released by the Finance Department.
N:\pw\Engineering\DEV LMNTS\1994\94124\RESOL\BR94124B. dm
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
HOLLY CREEK 3RD ADDITION (94124)
Page Two
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the financial guarantee requirements for the following items per Section
8.1 of the approved development contract remain as follows:
ITEM
Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment
Control Plan, Street Sweeping, and Storm
Sewer Cleaning
Cash:
Letter of Credit No. 624494:
ORIGINAL NEW
AMOUNT AMOUNT
1,000 $1,000
9,500 $9,500
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain construction is
accepted for continual maintenance as of July 24, 2001.
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
N. \pw\Engineering\DEV LMNTS\ 1994\94124\RESOL\BR94124B. doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
REDUCING REQUIRED FINANCIAL GUARANTEE
HOLLY CREEK 4TH ADDITION (95027)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the development contract dated November 21, 1995, Scherber Partnership
Properties, developer of Holly Creek 4`h Addition (95027), has agreed to install certain improvements for
said development; and
WHEREAS, the developer has completed a portion of the street, utility and site grading as noted below; and
WHEREAS, the developer has requested a reduction of the required financial guarantee to reflect the
completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA; that the financial guarantee requirements are reduced as follows:
That the required financial guarantee for the above items be reduced as detailed above from $22,029 to
4,256 to reflect the completed work. Letter of Credit No. 626234 may be reduced accordingly.
N:\pw\Engineering\DEV LMNTS\1995\95027\RESOL\FG_95027.doc
ORIGINAL NEW
ITEM AMOUNT AMOUNT
Street Construction 17,009 0-
Sanitary Sewer 9,583 0-
Watermain 11,106 0-
Storm Sewer 2,846 0-
Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod 1,800 0-
Mitigation Pond Construction 3,800 3,800
NURP Pond Construction 0- 0-
Street Signs (1 x 200) 200 0-
Site Grading and Drainage Improvements 26,028 0-
Park and Trail Improvements 5,060 0-
Setting Iron Monuments 900 0-
Design, Administration, Inspection, As-Builts 9,400 456
TOTAL 87,731 4,256
That the required financial guarantee for the above items be reduced as detailed above from $22,029 to
4,256 to reflect the completed work. Letter of Credit No. 626234 may be reduced accordingly.
N:\pw\Engineering\DEV LMNTS\1995\95027\RESOL\FG_95027.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
HOLLY CREEK 4TH ADDITION (95027)
Page Two
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the financial guarantee requirements for the following items per Section
8.1 of the approved development contract remain as follows:
ITEM
Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment
Control Plan, Street Sweeping, and Storm
Sewer Cleaning
Cash:
Letter of Credit No. 624502:
ORIGINAL NEW
AMOUNT AMOUNT
1,000 $ 1,000
5,750 $ 5,750
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain construction is
accepted for continual maintenance as of July 24, 2001.
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
N:\pw\Engineering\DEV LMNTS\1995\95027\RESOL\FG_95027.doe
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
REDUCING REQUIRED FINANCIAL GUARANTEE
HOLLY CREEK 5'H ADDITION (96005)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the development contract dated April 1, 1997 Craig Scherber and
Associates, developer of Holly Creek 5' Addition (96005), has agreed to install certain improvements for
said development; and
WHEREAS, the developer has completed a portion of the street, utility and site grading as noted below;
and
WHEREAS, the developer has requested a reduction of the required financial guarantee to reflect the
completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA; that the financial guarantee requirements are reduced as follows:
That the required financial guarantee for the above items be reduced as detailed above from $93,202 to
4,256 to reflect the completed work. Letter of Credit No. 2041 may be reduced accordingly.
N:\pw\Engincering\DEVLMNTS\1996\96005\RESOL\FINGUAR5.doc
ORIGINAL NEW
ITEM AMOUNT AMOUNT
Street Construction 112,828 0-
Sanitary Sewer 54,656 0-
Watermain 76,811 0-
Storm Sewer 53,471 0-
Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod 7,800 1,000
Landscaping 12,500 0-
Wetland Buffer Monuments (42 x 20) 840 0-
NURP Pond Construction 3,723 0-
Street Signs (4 x 200) 800 0-
Mitigation Pond 2,800 2,800
Site Grading and Drainage Improvements 124,547 0-
Park and Trail Improvements 0- 0-
Setting Iron Monuments 3,400 0-
Design, Administration, Inspection, As-Builts 54,501 456
TOTAL 508,677 4,256
That the required financial guarantee for the above items be reduced as detailed above from $93,202 to
4,256 to reflect the completed work. Letter of Credit No. 2041 may be reduced accordingly.
N:\pw\Engincering\DEVLMNTS\1996\96005\RESOL\FINGUAR5.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
HOLLY CREEK 5THADDITION (96005)
Page Two
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the financial guarantee requirements for the following items per
Section 8.1 of the approved development contract remain as follows:
ITEM
Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment
Control Plan, Street Sweeping, and Storm
Sewer Cleaning
Cash:
Letter of Credit No. 623884:
ORIGINAL NEW
AMOUNT AMOUNT
1,000 $ 1,000
27,500 $ 27,500
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain construction is
accepted for continual maintenance as of July 24, 2001.
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
N:\pw\Engineering\DFVLMNTS\ 1996\96005\RESOL\FINGUAR5-doe
Agenda Number: 6 , / q
DATE: July 3, 2001 for the City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager through
C(
jr
Daniel L. Faulkner, Public Works Director
FROM: Steve Deuth, Sr. Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE CONVEYANCE OF RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENTS IN
FAVOR OF HENNEPIN COUNTY. CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT, CSAH 24 TO T.H. 55
City Project No. 9005 & County Project No. 8911
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing the
Mayor and City Manager to sign the easements running in favor of Hennepin County.
BACKGROUND: The City has purchased and currently owns seven homes and the eighth
and final home is scheduled to close in October 2001. These homes are located along or
adjacent to CSAH 101, and were acquired as a result of the CSAH 101 project. Per
Hennepin County Agreement No. PW 47-17-00, the City is granting right of way
easements, necessary for the four -lane divided roadway, over a portion of these parcels to
Hennepin County prior to the sale of these homes.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend that the City Council
adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to grant these right
of way easements over the above mentioned properties.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E., Public Works Director
attachment : Resolution
Map
I:\pw\Engineering\GENERAL\MISC\STEVED\Agenda for 9005, July 24.dm
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER
TO SIGN EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF HENNEPIN COUNTY (C.P. 8911)
FOR CITY OWNED PROPERTIES ACQUIRED WITH CITY PROJECT
9005
WHEREAS, the City owns property adjacent to the project area; and
WHEREAS, the City has purchased properties related to this project; and
WHEREAS, the City agrees to grant right of way easements over the properties owned by
the City in favor of Hennepin County for CSAH 101 project, as necessary for the new
four -lane divided roadway.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That the Mayor and City Manager are
authorized to execute the right of way easements running in favor of Hennepin County.
Adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2001.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of
Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a
meeting of the Plymouth City Council on , with the original
thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
ply_nt\ntdiskl\pw\Engineering\PROJECTS\1990 - 1999\9005\Resol\AuthSignEasements.doc
Closing ir
Oct. 2001
34TH
31 ST AVL
1
JIMID
i
mL'
F
RO 38THAAV-E_N _
IF
Peace
Lutheran Z
Greenwood
Elementary
Highlighted parcels
purchased for
CASH 101 project
FA
Agenda Number:&
4 1 --
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Jeanette Sobania, Human Resources Manager through Dwight Johnson,
City Manager
SUBJECT: ADDITION OF POSITION IN THE PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
DIVISION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: July 15, 2001
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adoption of the attached resolution approving a change to the
allocation of positions in the Protective Inspections Division adding the position of Fire
Protection Inspector.
2. BACKGROUND: The Fire Service Task Force recommended the creation of a position
which would be housed in the Community Development Department but which would give
considerable support to the Duty Crew program of the Fire Department. The
establishment of the Fire Protection Inspector is the response to this recommendation.
3. DISCUSSION: We are attempting to fill several needs with the creation of the position
of Fire Protection Inspector. One is the need to develop and maintain a program of routine
inspection of commercial and industrial buildings in the City to assure that they are
complying with the basic fire code requirements. The second is to provide a position that
will support the duty crew program by assuring that one full time employee will be
available to staff a three-hour shift each day. Certain shifts were chronically understaffed
at the time the Task Force made its recommendations.
Finally, the creation of this position will provide a person who can record information
regarding the site layout and the contents of existing buildings for fire suppression
personnel. This gathering of information about existing buildings is called the "pre-
planning process." Exterior site conditions such as the location of hydrants, fire
department connections, fire lanes, drive aisles and exit door locations are identified on a
sketch drawing. In addition, an incident plan is also developed that contains interior
building components such as its use, square footage, construction type, fire and alarm
systems and special hazards or features of the building.
4. BUDGET IMPACT: The contemplated position has been reviewed and classified as a Fire
Protection Inspector in grade 12. The position will be in the Clerical, Technical,
Professional unit and there is a grade and salary range established by contract. The
bargaining unit has indicated no interest in negotiating a different level for the position and
FIRE PROTECTION INSPECTOR POSITION ALLOCATION
July 15, 2001
Page 2
has signed a letter of agreement to effect the addition to the contract. Grade 12 has a range
from $17.32 to $23.51 per hour. The money was set aside in the 2001 budget to cover
this and other recommendations of the Task Force.
5. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to
proceed with the change.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO: -
APPROVING AN ADDITION TO THE ALLOCATION OF
POSITIONS IN THE PROTECTIVE INSPECTION DVISION
OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, the City Manager has authorized a study and concurs with the recommended
addition to the allocation of positions in the Protective Inspection Division of the Community
Development Department; and,
Whereas, the Clerical, Technical, Professional bargaining unit has agreed to the addition of the
position in the grade established by the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should, and hereby does:
1. Approve the recommended addition to the allocation of positions in the Protective
Inspection Division permitting the addition of a Fire Protection Inspector.
2. Direct the City Manager to enter into a letter of agreement with the AFSCME Clerical
Technical Professional bargaining unit to establish the position of Fire Protection
Inspector in grade 12 in the unit.
Adopted by the City Council on
Agenda Number: 6, 1
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Eric Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Donations to Parks Department
DATE: July 16, 2001, for Council Meeting of July 24
1. ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council should pass the attached motion accepting
gifts from the Plymouth Senior Club and from resident Judy Johnson.
2. BACKGROUND: The Plymouth Senior Club is donating $1,008 to purchase wooden
blinds for the Plymouth Creek Center Fireside Room. Judy Johnson and her family have
contributed a pool table with an estimated value of $3,000 to be used for future recreation
programs.
3. RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with state law, staff recommends the City Council
accept both gifts and acknowledge them with a written thank you letter.
EB/np
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2001 -
ACCEPTING DONATIONS
WHEREAS, donations have been contributed by the Plymouth Senior Club and by Judy
Johnson and her family,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLYMOUTH CITY COUNCIL that said
gifts are hereby accepted.
Adopted by the City Council on
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA
STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C; ADOPTING A HOUSING
PROGRAM; AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF
MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE BONDS
GNMA COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOAN —
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE PROJECT), SERIES 2001A,
TAXABLE MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE
BONDS (GNMA COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOAN —
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE PROJECT), SERIES 2001B
AND MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE BONDS
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE PROJECT) SUBORDINATE
SERIES 2001C AND 2001D; ESTABLISHING THE SECURITY
THEREFOR AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (the "City"),
as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. It has been proposed that the City finance a portion or all of the cost of a proposed
multifamily senior housing development under Minnesota Statutes 462C, amended (the "Act"),
on behalf of Plymouth Senior Housing, LLC, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the
Borrower"), consisting of the acquisition, construction and equipping of a 120 -unit multifamily
senior rental housing development to be owned by the Borrower and located at 16205 36`h
Avenue North in the City (the "Project").
1.02. Pursuant to the Act, the City is authorized to develop and administer programs of
multifamily housing developments under the circumstances and within the limitations set forth in
the Act. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.07 provides that such programs for multifamily
housing developments may be financed with revenue bonds issued by the City, following
adoption of a housing program, after a public hearing, and other proceedings conducted in
accordance with the requirements of the Act.
1.03. Section 462C.04, Subdivision 2 of the Act requires that prior to undertaking the
financing of the Project, the City must prepare and adopt a housing program after notice and
hearing and review given and held as provided therein. The City has prepared a multifamily
housing program for the Project, designated as the "Program for A Multifamily Housing
Development under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, Plymouth Senior Housing Project" (the
Housing Program"). The Housing Program authorizes the Project and the issuance of revenue
bonds by the City in an approximate principal amount not to exceed $22,500,000 to finance the
costs thereof.
1.04. On July 24, 2001, this Council held a public hearing on the adoption of the
Housing Program and issuance of revenue bonds after publication of the notice of hearing not
less than 15 days prior to the date thereof in a newspaper circulating generally in the City. A
copy of the draft of the Housing Program has been forwarded to the Metropolitan Council (the
Metropolitan Council") for review.
The public hearing was duly noticed and held in accordance with the Act and Section
147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. All parties who appeared at the
hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to adopt the
Housing Program and to undertake and finance the Project and interested persons were given the
opportunity to submit written comments to the City Administrator before the time of the hearing.
Representatives of the Metropolitan Council did submit comments of the Housing
Program at or prior to the public hearing.
1.05. It has been proposed that the City issue its Multifamily Senior Housing Revenue
Bonds (GNMA Collateralized Mortgage Loan — Plymouth Marketplace Project), Series 2001 A,
in the aggregate principal amount of $17,500,000 (the "Series 2001A Bonds"), and its Taxable
Multifamily Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (GNMA Collateralized Mortgage Loan — Plymouth
Marketplace Project), Series 2001B, in the aggregate principal amount of $600,000 (the "Series
2001B Bonds" and, together with the Series 2001A Bonds, the "Senior Bonds"), to provide
funds to finance a Mortgage Loan to the Borrower.
1.06. It has also been proposed that the City issue its Multifamily Senior Housing
Revenue Bonds (Plymouth Marketplace Project), Subordinate Series 2001C (the "Series 2001C
Bonds") and its Multifamily Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (Plymouth Marketplace Project),
Subordinate Series 2001 D (the "Series 2001 D Bonds" and together with the Series 2001 C
Bonds, the "Subordinate Bonds" and, together with the Senior Bonds, the "Bonds"), in an
aggregate principal amount of $2,290,000 and loan the proceeds to the Borrower.
1.07. The proceeds of the Mortgage Loan, together with the proceeds of the Subordinate
Bonds being issued concurrently with the Senior Bonds, will be used to finance the Project. The
Project will be subject to the terms and restrictions contained in the Regulatory Agreement (as
hereinafter defined).
1.08. The Senior Bonds will be secured by fully modified pass-through mortgage-backed
securities issued by the lender referenced in the Financing Agreement (as hereinafter defined)
and guaranteed as to timely payment of principal and interest by the Government National
Mortgage Association.
1.09. The City will grant a security interest in certain revenues and payments to be
received by the City under the Subordinate Loan Agreement (as hereinafter defined) to the
Trustee (as hereinafter defined). The Subordinate Bonds will be secured by the provisions of a
Subordinate Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement made
by the Borrower iii favor of the Trustee (the "Subordinate Mortgage").
2-
1. 10. Draft forms of the following documents relating to the Senior Bonds and the
Subordinate Bonds have been prepared and submitted to this Council and are hereby directed to
be filed with the City Clerk:
a) a Financing Agreement (the "Financing Agreement"), proposed to be
entered into by the City, the Borrower, Reilly Mortgage Group, Inc., as lender (the
Mortgage Lender") and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the
Trustee");
b) an Indenture of Trust (the "Senior Indenture"), proposed to be entered into
by the City and the Trustee, relating to the Senior Bonds;
c) a Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement"), proposed
to be entered into by the City, the Borrower and Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. (the
Underwriter"), relating to the Senior Bonds;
d) a Subordinate Loan Agreement (the "Subordinate Loan Agreement"),
proposed to be entered into by the City and the Borrower;
e) a Subordinate Indenture of Trust (the "Subordinate Indenture"), proposed
to be entered into by the City and the Trustee, relating to the Subordinate Bonds;
f) the Subordinate Mortgage
g) a Regulatory Agreement, (the "Regulatory Agreement"), proposed to be
entered into by the City and the Borrower in respect of the Project; and
h) an Official Statement (the "Official Statement"), in the form of a
Preliminary Official Statement (the "Preliminary Official Statement"), to be used in
connection with the offer and sale of the Senior Bonds by the Underwriter.
Section 2. Findings.
It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
a) The financing of the Project and the issuance and sale of the Bonds would further the
housing policies and goals set forth in the Comprehensive Plan of the City and the Housing
Program herein adopted by the City in connection with the issuance of the Senior Bonds and the
Subordinate Bonds.
b) The execution and delivery of the Financing Agreement, the Senior Indenture, the
Regulatory Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Senior Bond Documents") and
all other acts and things required under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to
make the Senior Bond Documents and the Senior Bonds valid and binding special, limited
obligations in accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act.
3-
c) It is desirable that the Senior Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in
this resolution and the Senior Indenture, under the provisions of which the City grants to the
Trustee under the Senior Indenture a security interest in certain revenues and payments to be
received by the City under the Financing Agreement as security for the payment of the principal
of, premium, if any, and interest on the Senior Bonds.
d) The payments required to be made to the Trustee pursuant to the Financing
Agreement are fixed, and are required to be revised from time to time as necessary, so as to
produce income and revenue sufficient to provide for prompt payment of principal of and interest
on all Bonds issued under the Senior Indenture when due; and the Financing Agreement also
provides that the Borrower is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of
the Project, including but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against
all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and
special assessments levied upon or with respect to the site of the Project and payable during the
term of the Financing Agreement.
e) The execution and delivery of the Subordinate Loan Agreement, the Subordinate
Indenture and the Subordinate Mortgage (the "Subordinate Bond Documents" and, together with
the Senior Bond Documents, the "Bond Documents") and all other acts and things required
under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Subordinate Bond
Documents and the Subordinate Bonds valid and binding special, limited obligations in
accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act.
f) It is also desirable that the Subordinate Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms
set forth in this resolution and the Subordinate Indenture, under the provisions of which the City
grants to the Trustee under the Subordinate Indenture a security interest in certain revenues and
payments to be received by the City under the Subordinate Loan Agreement as security for the
payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Subordinate Bonds.
g) The payments required to be made to the Trustee pursuant to the Subordinate Loan
Agreement are fixed, and are required to be revised from time to time as necessary, so as to
produce income and revenue sufficient to provide for prompt payment of principal of and interest
on all Subordinate Bonds issued under the Subordinate Indenture when due; and the Subordinate
Loan Agreement also provides that the Borrower is required to pay all expenses of the operation
and maintenance of the Project, including but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and
insurance against all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof,
and all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the site of the Project and
payable during the term of the Subordinate Loan Agreement.
h) All acts and things required under the Constitution and the laws of the State of
Minnesota to make the Bond Documents and the Bonds valid and binding special, limited
obligations of the City in accordance with their terms will have been done upon adoption of this
Resolution and execution of the Bond Documents.
0
Section 3. Adoption of Housing Program. Based on the public hearing, such written
comments (if any) and such other facts and circumstances as this Council deems relevant, it is
hereby found, determined and declared:
a) the Project would assist in providing needed senior housing units in
the City; and
b) the Housing Program is hereby approved and adopted in the form
presently on file with the City.
Section 4. Authorization and Approval of Senior Bond Documents. The City is
hereby authorized to issue the Senior Bonds to provide funds, to be used, with other available
funds, to finance certain costs of the Project and pay costs of issuance of the Bonds, and to
pledge and assign the Financing Agreement and the loan repayments due thereunder, all as
provided in the Financing Agreement and the Senior Indenture. It is acknowledged that the
purchase price of the Senior Bonds, the principal amount of the Bonds, the initial reoffering
prices of the Senior Bonds, the maturity schedule of the Senior Bonds, the provisions for
redemption of the Senior Bonds and the interest rates on the Senior Bonds have not been
determined as of the date of adoption of this resolution and are not reflected in the Senior
Indenture, the Financing Agreement or the Bond Purchase Agreement. The Mayor and the City
Manager are hereby authorized to approve: (1) the purchase price of the Senior Bonds; (2) the
principal amount of the Senior Bonds (as hereinafter defined); provided that the aggregate
principal amount of the Senior Bonds is not in excess of $19,000,000; and provided further that
said principal amount shall be allocated between the Series 2001A Bonds and the Series 2001B
Bonds in amounts approved by the Borrower; (3) the initial reoffering prices of the Senior
Bonds; (4) the maturity schedule of the Senior Bonds; provided that the Senior Bonds mature at
any time or times in such amount or amounts no later than December 20, 2043; (5) the provisions
for redemption of the Senior Bonds; and (6) the interest rates on the Senior Bonds; provided that
the weighted average interest rate on the Series 2001A Bonds shall not exceed 6.90% per annum
and on the Series 2001B Bonds shall not exceed 8.00% per annum. The approval of such
officers of the terms of the Senior Bonds shall be conclusively presumed by the execution of the
Bond Purchase Agreement by said officers.
The forms of the Senior Bond Documents and the Senior Bonds referred to in Section
1.10 are approved, subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the
Mayor and City Manager, within the limitations provided in the immediately preceding
paragraph, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by execution of the Senior Bond
Documents by the Mayor and the City Manager. The Bond Purchase Agreement as so approved
is directed to be executed forthwith in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the
City Manager following the execution thereof by the Borrower and the Underwriter. The
Financing Agreement and the Regulatory Agreement as so approved are directed to be executed
in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and City Manager upon execution thereof by
the Borrower. The Senior Indenture as so approvect is directed to be executed in the name and
on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the City Manager and delivered to the Trustee. Copies of
5-
all the documents shall be delivered, filed or recorded as provided therein. The Mayor, the City
Manager and the City Clerk are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as
may be required to give effect to the transactions herein contemplated.
Section 5. Authorization and Approval of Subordinate Bond Documents. The City is
hereby authorized to issue the Subordinate Bonds to provide funds, to be used, with other
available funds, to finance certain costs of the Project and pay costs of issuance of the
Subordinate Bonds, and to pledge and assign the Subordinate Loan Agreement and the loan
repayments due thereunder, all as provided in the Subordinate Loan Agreement and the
Subordinate Indenture. It is acknowledged that the purchase price of the Subordinate Bonds, the
principal amount of the Subordinate Bonds, the maturity schedule of the Subordinate Bonds, the
provisions for redemption of the Subordinate Bonds and the interest rates on the Subordinate
Bonds have not been determined as of the date of adoption of this resolution and are not reflected
in the Subordinate Indenture or the Subordinate Loan Agreement. The Mayor and the City
Manager are hereby authorized to approve: (1) the purchase price of the Subordinate Bonds; (2)
the principal amount of the Subordinate Bonds (as hereinafter defined); provided that the
aggregate principal amount of the Subordinate Bonds is not in excess of $3,500,000; and
provided further that the Subordinate Indenture, as finally executed, shall allocate such principal
amount between the Series 2001 C Bonds and the Series 2001 D Bonds in amounts approved by
the Borrower; (3) the maturity schedule of the Subordinate Bonds; provided that the Subordinate
Bonds mature at any time or times in such amount or amounts no later than December 20, 2043;
4) the provisions for redemption of the Subordinate Bonds; and (5) the interest rates on the
Subordinate Bonds; provided that the weighted average interest rate on the Subordinate Bonds
shall not exceed 10% per annum. The approval of such officers of the terms of the Subordinate
Bonds shall be conclusively presumed by their execution of the Subordinate Indenture.
The forms of the Subordinate Bond Documents and the Subordinate Bonds referred to in
Section 1.10 are approved, subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and
approved by the Mayor and City Manager, within the limitations provided in the immediately
preceding paragraph, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by execution of the
Subordinate Bond Documents by the Mayor and the City Manager. The Subordinate Loan
Agreement as so approved is directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the
Mayor and City Manager upon execution thereof by the Borrower. The Subordinate Indenture as
so approved is directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and
the City Manager and delivered to the Trustee. Copies of all the documents shall be delivered,
filed or recorded as provided therein. The Mayor, the City Manager and the City Clerk are also
authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the
transactions herein contemplated.
Section 6. Official Statement. The City hereby consents to the use of the Preliminary
Official Statement by the Underwriter in connection with the offer and sale of the Senior Bonds
to potential investors, and consents to the preparation and use of a final Official Statement, in
substantially the form of the Preliminary Official. The City has consented to the distribution of
the Official Statement, but did not prepare the Official Statement, and has not reviewed the
W
financial disclosures of the Borrower or approved any information or statements contained in the
Official Statement or the Appendices thereto and assumes no responsibility for the sufficiency,
completeness or accuracy of the same. The City Manager is authorized to deem the Preliminary
Official Statement "final" as of its date for purposes of SEC Rule 15c2-12.
Section 7. The Bonds.
7.01. In anticipation of the receipt of the loan repayments from the Borrower, the City
shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds in four series to be designated "Multifamily Senior
Housing Revenue Bonds (GNMA Collateralized Mortgage Loan — Plymouth Marketplace
Project), Series 2001A", "Taxable Multifamily Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (GNMA
Collateralized Mortgage Loan — Plymouth Marketplace Project), Series 200113", "Multifamily
Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (Plymouth Marketplace Project), Series 2001 C" and
Multifamily Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (Plymouth Marketplace Project), Series 2001D",
respectively, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Senior Indenture, in the case of the
Series A Bonds and the Series B Bonds, and in the form and upon the terms set forth in the
Subordinate Indenture, in the case of the Series C Bonds and the Series D Bonds, or established
pursuant to this resolution.
7.02. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized and directed to prepare and
execute the Bonds as prescribed herein and in the Senior Indenture and the Subordinate
Indenture, as applicable, and to deliver them to the Trustee, together with a certified copy of this
resolution, the other documents required in each of the Senior Indenture and the Subordinate
Indenture, and such other certificates, documents and instruments as may be appropriate to effect
the transactions herein contemplated. The Trustee is hereby appointed authenticating agent for
the Bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1.
Section 8. Absence of Officers. In the absence or disability of the Mayor, any of the
documents authorized by this resolution to be approved and executed by the Mayor may be so
approved and executed by the acting Mayor. In the absence or disability of the City Manager,
any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be approved and executed by the City
Manager may be so approved and executed by the person designated as acting City Manager or
by such other officer of the City who, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may execute such
documents.
Section 9. Authentication of Proceedings. The Mayor, the City Manager, the City Clerk
and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to furnish to the Underwriter and bond
counsel certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such
other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and
marketability of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers'
custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and
affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to
the truth of all statements of fact contained therein.
7-
Section 10. Limitations of the City's Obligations. Notwithstanding anything contained
in the Bonds or the Bond Documents, the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the
meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation, and shall not be payable from nor shall
constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any funds or any property of
the City other than the revenues specifically pledged to the payment thereof pursuant to the Bond
Documents, and no holder of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the
taxing power of the City to pay the Bonds or the premium, if any, or interest thereon, or to
enforce payment thereof against any property of the City other than those rights and interests of
the City which have been pledged to the payment thereof pursuant to the Bond Documents. The
agreement of the City to perform the covenants and other provisions contained in this resolution
or the Bonds or the Bond Documents shall be subject at all times to the availability of the
revenues furnished by the Borrower sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the
enforcement thereof, and the City shall not be subject to any personal or pecuniary liability
thereon.
Attest:
Passed this 24th day of July, 2001.
City Clerk
Mayor
CERTIFICATE AS TO RESOLUTION AND ADOPTING VOTE
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota (the "City"), hereby certify that the attached resolution is a
true copy of Resolution No. , entitled: "RESOLUTION RELATING TO A
PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA
STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C; ADOPTING A HOUSING PROGRAM;
AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY SENIOR
HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (GNMA COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOAN —
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE PROJECT), SERIES 2001A, TAXABLE
MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (GNMA
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOAN — PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE
PROJECT), SERIES 2001B AND MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE
BONDS (PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE PROJECT) SUBORDINATE SERIES 2001 C
AND 2001 D; ESTABLISHING THE SECURITY THEREFOR AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS" (the "Resolution"), on file in the original
records of the City in my legal custody; that the Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City at a meeting on July 24, 2001, and that the meeting was duly held by
the City Council and was attended throughout by a quorum, pursuant to call and notice of
such meeting given as required by law; and that the Resolution has not as of the date
hereof been amended or repealed.
I further certify that upon vote being taken on the Resolution at said meeting, the
following Councilmembers voted in favor thereof: _
and the following voted against the same:
and the following abstained from voting thereon or were absent:
WITNESS my hand officially this _ day of July, 2001.
City Clerk
Agenda Number:
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
FROM: AnneCommunity Development Director
SUBJECT: Public Hearing, Adoption of Housing Program and Authorization of Sale
and Issuance of Taxable and Tax-exempt Multi -family Housing Revenue
Bonds not to Exceed $22,500,000 on Behalf of Plymouth Senior
Housing, LLC for Senior Apartments at Plymouth Marketplace
DATE: July 18, 2001 for the City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
1. PROPOSED MOTION
After holding a public hearing, the City Council should move to approve the attached
resolution adopting a housing program and authorizing the sale and issuance of taxable and
tax-exempt multi -family housing revenue bonds, in an amount not to exceed $22,500,000 on
behalf of Plymouth Senior Housing, LLC for senior apartments at Plymouth Marketplace.
2. BACKGROUND
Plymouth Senior Housing, LLC has proposed to develop the Plymouth Continuing Care
Community, a senior housing apartment project to be located in Plymouth Marketplace. The site
is north of the new Lund's grocery store, at 16205 36`h Avenue North. The project consists of the
acquisition, construction, and furnishing of a combined 120 unit multifamily rental housing and
health care facility. The project would have approximately 68 independent living units, 28
assisted living units and 24 memory care units. The project is part of the Planned Unit
Development (PUD) approved for the site in August of 2000, and consistent with a PUD
amendment for this site approved at the June 12 City Council meeting. Also on June 12, the
Council adopted a resolution calling for the July 24 public hearing on tax exempt bonds for the
project.
Plymouth Senior Housing, LLC (the "Borrower"), is a Minnesota limited liability company
whose sole member is proposed to be the Wedum Foundation of St. Paul, a nonprofit corporation
and experienced Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. The Wedum Foundation owns six
developments with another eight in planning in the Twin Cities area including University
Village, a $25,000,000 housing development, located in Minneapolis and Lincoln Parc, a
31,000,000 mixed use housing development currently under construction in Eden Prairie. Twin
City Christian Homes (TCCH) will operate and manage the Senior Apartments. TCCH is
currently managing nine senior housing developments in the Twin Cities, which include assisted
living, independent senior and congregate care facilities.
The Borrower has requested that the City issue multi -family housing revenue bonds, in one or
more series, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended and Section 145 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to finance all or a portion of the cost of the Project
in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $22,500,000. The bonds will be backed by the
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) and HUD FHA 232 mortgage insurance.
The current cost projection for the project is $20,390,000. This number is subject to change as
final bids are received and HUD reviews the project. The projected interest rate for the tax
exempt bonds is 5.50% to 6.15%. (Without the tax exemption, the comparable interest rate
would be 1.5 to 2% higher.) The term of the bond would be approximately 40 years. A portion
of the bonds (current estimate $600,000) would be issued as taxable bonds to finance costs
related to the project not qualifying for tax exempt financing (issuance costs over a certain limit
or "private use" areas such as space that might be leased to a small service provider such as a
beautician or barber.)
3. DISCUSSION
The City is under no obligation to issue the bonds for this development. However, the project
is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and it does meet the city's Multi -Family
Housing Revenue Bond Policy, adopted on July 10, 2001, as applicable to non-profit, non-
traditional housing developments. The project promotes life -cycle and housing diversity in the
City and will contribute toward the City's affordable housing goals. Specifically the developer
has agreed that 10% of the entry level units in the development will be affordable to and
occupied by households with incomes up to 50% of the metropolitan area median income as
defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). These income
limits will ensure affordability for one-person households with incomes of $26,800 per year or
less and two -person households with incomes of $29,900 per year or less. The affordability
requirement must be met for 15 years from the date a certificate of occupancy is issued by the
City, or the period during which any tax-exempt bonds remain outstanding, whichever is
longer.
The structure of this project as a nonprofit with a charitable mission and using tax exempt
financing will encourage long-term affordability. The HUD insurance imposes a restriction on
the non-profit owner with respect to cash flow distribution, removing an incentive to raise
rents in excess of that sufficient to support debt service and operating costs. The developer
has indicated that having units available for seniors regardless of income is consistent with the
purpose of the development, and to the extent possible they will seek to provide affordability
which significantly exceeds the required 10% component. They are planning to pursue a
contract with Hennepin County to offer assisted living for persons who are eligible for Group
Residential Housing and Elderly Waiver Assisted Living Plus Services. These programs can
provide approximately $2,200 (including $633 for shelter) in assistance for Medicaid -eligible
seniors at risk for nursing home placement if they do not find a supervised housing unit. Any
of the assisted living units would be available to persons eligible for the programs when they
2
enter the development. The Wedum Foundation has further committed to making up any
difference between the county contracts and the fees charge for the various levels of living,
providing an internal subsidy to assure residents that they will be able to "age in place" in the
development.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
Under Federal Tax Law, cities that issue no more than $10 million of tax-exempt obligations
in a calendar year can have these obligations classified as "bank qualified". Such obligations
qualify to be purchased by financial institutions with a deduction from income for federal
income tax purposes of expenses allocable to carrying and acquiring the tax-exempt obligations
that cannot normally be deducted. As such, issues that are "bank qualified" typically receive
lower interest rates than issues that are not "bank qualified". Because the proposed tax-exempt
housing revenue bond issue exceeds $10 million, any obligations issued by the City this year
that would have otherwise been "bank qualified" would have to be "non-bank qualified".
The City currently intends to issue $2 million in general obligation improvement bonds for this
year, with the possibility of an additional $3 million for a water revenue issue. But for, the
proposed housing revenue bonds for Plymouth Senior Housing, the City's bonds would be
issued as "bank qualified" and eligible for a lower interest rate. Springsted, the City's
financial advisor, has calculated the present value of the additional interest cost of a "non-bank
qualified" $2 million ten-year term City improvement bond issue, based upon an approximate
10 basis point reduction, to be $10,584. For a $3 million fifteen -year term water revenue
bond issue the present value of the additional interest cost is calculated to be $21,964. As part
of this housing revenue bond transaction, the developer has agreed to compensate the City for
the present value of the additional interest cost for these City bonds, if issued this year. This
agreement will be incorporated into the appropriate bond documents by the City's bond
counsel.
The applicant pays all costs of the bond issue. The City also receives an application fee and a
bond fee of 1/8 of 1 percent of the bond amount at closing. This fee will help reimburse the
City for the expense of monitoring the project annually to ensure that the affordability
requirements are being met.
As with other housing or industrial revenue bonds, there would be no other financial impact or
liability for the City. However, the City's good name and reputation would be connected to
this issuance.
5. RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the City Council, after holding a public hearing, approve the attached
resolution adopting a housing program and authorizing the sale and issuance of taxable and
tax-exempt multi -family housing revenue bonds, in an amount not to exceed $22,500,000.00
on behalf of Plymouth Senior Housing, LLC for senior apartments at Plymouth Marketplace.
3
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Site Location Map
2. Draft Council Resolution
3. Housing Program, Plymouth Senior Housing Project
4. Description of the Wedum Foundation
5. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Building Elevations
cd\housing\hra\staffrep\cc\2001\c01724 PSH rb public hearing.doc
4
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA
STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C; ADOPTING A HOUSING
PROGRAM; AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF
MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE BONDS
GNMA COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOAN —
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE PROJECT), SERIES 2001A,
TAXABLE MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE
BONDS (GNMA COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOAN —
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE PROJECT), SERIES 2001 B
AND MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE BONDS
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE PROJECT) SUBORDINATE
SERIES 2001 C AND 2001 D; ESTABLISHING THE SECURITY
THEREFOR AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (the "City"),
as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. It has been proposed that the City finance a portion or all of the cost of a proposed
multifamily senior housing development under Minnesota Statutes 462C, amended (the "Act"),
on behalf of Plymouth Senior Housing, LLC, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the
Borrower"), consisting of the acquisition, construction and equipping of a 120 -unit multifamily
senior rental housing development to be owned by the Borrower and located at 16205
361'
Avenue North in the City (the "Project").
1.02. Pursuant to the Act, the City is authorized to develop and administer programs of
multifamily housing developments under the circumstances and within the limitations set forth in
the Act. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.07 provides that such programs for multifamily
housing developments may be financed with revenue bonds issued by the City, following
adoption of a housing program, after a public hearing, and other proceedings conducted in
accordance with the requirements of the Act.
1.03. Section 462C.04, Subdivision 2 of the Act requires that prior to undertaking the
financing of the Project, the City must prepare and adopt a housing program after notice and
hearing and review given and held as provided therein. The City has prepared a multifamily
housing program for the Project, designated as the "Program for A Multifamily Housing
Development under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, Plymouth Senior Housing Project" (the
Housing Program"). The Housing Program authorizes the Project and the issuance of revenue
bonds by the City in an approximate principal amount not to exceed $22,500,000 to finance the
costs thereof.
1.04. On July 24, 2001, this Council held a public hearing on the adoption of the
Housing Program and issuance of revenue bonds after publication of the notice of hearing not
less than 15 days prior to the date thereof in a newspaper circulating generally in the City. A
copy of the draft of the Housing Program has been forwarded to the Metropolitan Council (the
Metropolitan Council") for review.
The public hearing was duly noticed and held in accordance with the Act and Section
147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. All parties who appeared at the
hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to adopt the
Housing Program and to undertake and finance the Project and interested persons were given the
opportunity to submit written comments to the City Administrator before the time of the hearing.
Representatives of the Metropolitan Council did [not] submit comments of the Housing
Program at or prior to the public hearing.
1.05. It has been proposed that the City issue its Multifamily Senior Housing Revenue
Bonds (GNMA Collateralized Mortgage Loan — Plymouth Marketplace Project), Series 2001A,
in the aggregate principal amount of $17,500,000 (the "Series 2001A Bonds"), and its Taxable
Multifamily Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (GNMA Collateralized Mortgage Loan — Plymouth
Marketplace Project), Series 2001B, in the aggregate principal amount of $600,000 (the "Series
2001 B Bonds" and, together with the Series 2001 A Bonds, the "Senior Bonds"), to provide
funds to finance a Mortgage Loan to the Borrower.
1.06. It has also been proposed that the City issue its Multifamily Senior Housing
Revenue Bonds (Plymouth Marketplace Project), Subordinate Series 2001 C (the "Series 2001 C
Bonds") and its Multifamily Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (Plymouth Marketplace Project),
Subordinate Series 2001 D (the "Series 2001 D Bonds" and together with the Series 2001 C
Bonds, the "Subordinate Bonds" and, together with the Senior Bonds, the "Bonds"), in an
aggregate principal amount of $2,290,000 and loan the proceeds to the Borrower.
1.07. The proceeds of the Mortgage Loan, together with the proceeds of the Subordinate
Bonds being issued concurrently with the Senior Bonds, will be used to finance the Project. The
Project will be subject to the terms and restrictions contained in the Regulatory Agreement (as
hereinafter defined).
1.08. The Senior Bonds will be secured by fully modified pass-through mortgage-backed
securities issued by the lender referenced in the Financing Agreement (as hereinafter defined)
and guaranteed as to timely payment of principal and interest by the Government National
Mortgage Association.
1.09. The City will grant a security interest in certain revenues and payments to be
received by the City under the Subordinate Loan Agreement (as hereinafter defined) to the
Trustee (as hereinafter defined). The Subordinate Bonds will be secured by the provisions of a
Subordinate Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement made
by the Borrower in favor of the Trustee (the "Subordinate Mortgage").
2-
1. 10. Draft forms of the following documents relating to the Senior Bonds and the
Subordinate Bonds have been prepared and submitted to this Council and are hereby directed to
be filed with the City Clerk:
a) a Financing Agreement (the "Financing Agreement"), proposed to be
entered into by the City, the Borrower, Reilly Mortgage Group, Inc., as lender (the
Mortgage Lender") and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the
Trustee");
b) an Indenture of Trust (the "Senior Indenture"), proposed to be entered into
by the City and the Trustee, relating to the Senior Bonds;
c) a Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement"), proposed
to be entered into by the City, the Borrower and Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. (the
Underwriter"), relating to the Senior Bonds;
d) a Subordinate Loan Agreement (the "Subordinate Loan Agreement"),
proposed to be entered into by the City and the Borrower;
e) a Subordinate Indenture of Trust (the "Subordinate Indenture"), proposed
to be entered into by the City and the Trustee, relating to the Subordinate Bonds;
f) the Subordinate Mortgage
g) a Regulatory Agreement (the "Regulatory Agreement"), proposed to be
entered into by the City and the Borrower in respect of the Project; and
h) an Official Statement (the "Official Statement"), in the form of a
Preliminary Official Statement (the "Preliminary Official Statement"), to be used in
connection with the offer and sale of the Senior Bonds by the Underwriter.
Section 2. Findings.
It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
a) The financing of the Project and the issuance and sale of the Bonds would further the
housing policies and goals set forth in the Comprehensive Plan of the City and the Housing
Program herein adopted by the City in connection with the issuance of the Senior Bonds and the
Subordinate Bonds.
b) The execution and delivery of the Financing Agreement, the Senior Indenture, the
Regulatory Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Senior Bond Documents") and
all other acts and things required under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to
make the Senior Bond Documents and the Senior Bonds valid and binding special, limited
obligations in accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act.
3-
c) It is desirable that the Senior Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in
this resolution and the Senior Indenture, under the provisions of which the City grants to the
Trustee under the Senior Indenture a security interest in certain revenues and payments to be
received by the City under the Financing Agreement as security for the payment of the principal
of, premium, if any, and interest on the Senior Bonds.
d) The payments required to be made to the Trustee pursuant to the Financing
Agreement are fixed, and are required to be revised from time to time as necessary, so as to
produce income and revenue sufficient to provide for prompt payment of principal of and interest
on all Bonds issued under the Senior Indenture when due; and the Financing Agreement also
provides that the Borrower is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of
the Project, including but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against
all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and
special assessments levied upon or with respect to the site of the Project and payable during the
term of the Financing Agreement.
e) The execution and delivery of the Subordinate Loan Agreement, the Subordinate
Indenture and the Subordinate Mortgage (the "Subordinate Bond Documents" and, together with
the Senior Bond Documents, the "Bond Documents") and all other acts and things required
under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Subordinate Bond
Documents and the Subordinate Bonds valid and binding special, limited obligations in
accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act.
f) It is also desirable that the Subordinate Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms
set forth in this resolution and the Subordinate Indenture, under the provisions of which the City
grants to the Trustee under the Subordinate Indenture a security interest in certain revenues and
payments to be received by the City under the Subordinate Loan Agreement as security for the
payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Subordinate Bonds.
g) The payments required to be made to the Trustee pursuant to the Subordinate Loan
Agreement are fixed, and are required to be revised from time to time as necessary, so as to
produce income and revenue sufficient to provide for prompt payment of principal of and interest
on all Subordinate Bonds issued under the Subordinate Indenture when due; and the Subordinate
Loan Agreement also provides that the Borrower is required to pay all expenses of the operation
and maintenance of the Project, including but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and
insurance against all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof,
and all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the site of the Project and
payable during the term of the Subordinate Loan Agreement.
h) All acts and things required under the Constitution and the laws of the State of
Minnesota to make the Bond Documents and the Bonds valid and binding special, limited
obligations of the City in accordance with their terms will have been done upon adoption of this
Resolution and execution of the Bond Documents.
10
Section 3. Adoption of Housing Program. Based on the public hearing, such written
comments (if any) and such other facts and circumstances as this Council deems relevant, it is
hereby found, determined and declared:
a) the Project would assist in providing needed senior housing units in
the City; and
b) the Housing Program is hereby approved and adopted in the form
presently on file with the City.
Section 4. Authorization and Approval of Senior Bond Documents. The City is
hereby authorized to issue the Senior Bonds to provide funds, to be used, with other available
funds, to finance certain costs of the Project and pay costs of issuance of the Bonds, and to
pledge and assign the Financing Agreement and the loan repayments due thereunder, all as
provided in the Financing Agreement and the Senior Indenture. It is acknowledged that the
purchase price of the Senior Bonds, the principal amount of the Bonds, the initial reoffering
prices of the Senior Bonds, the maturity schedule of the Senior Bonds, the provisions for
redemption of the Senior Bonds and the interest rates on the Senior Bonds have not been
determined as of the date of adoption of this resolution and are not reflected in the Senior
Indenture, the Financing Agreement or the Bond Purchase Agreement. The Mayor and the City
Manager are hereby authorized to approve: (1) the purchase price of the Senior Bonds; (2) the
principal amount of the Senior Bonds (as hereinafter defined); provided that the aggregate
principal amount of the Senior Bonds is not in excess of $19,000,000; and provided further that
said principal amount shall be allocated between the Series 2001A Bonds and the Series 2001B
Bonds in amounts approved by the Borrower; (3) the initial reoffering prices of the Senior
Bonds; (4) the maturity schedule of the Senior Bonds; provided that the Senior Bonds mature at
any time or times in such amount or amounts no later than March 20, 2043; (5) the provisions for
redemption of the Senior Bonds; and (6) the interest rates on the Senior Bonds; provided that the
weighted average interest rate on the Series 2001A Bonds shall not exceed % per annum
and on the Series 2001B Bonds shall not exceed % per annum. The approval of such
officers of the terms of the Senior Bonds shall be conclusively presumed by the execution of the
Bond Purchase Agreement by said officers.
The forms of the Senior Bond Documents and the Senior Bonds referred to in Section
1.10 are approved, subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the
Mayor and City Manager, within the limitations provided in the immediately preceding
paragraph, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by execution of the Senior Bond
Documents by the Mayor and the City Manager. The Bond Purchase Agreement as so approved
is directed to be executed forthwith in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the
City Manager following the execution thereof by the Borrower and the Underwriter. The
Financing Agreement and the Regulatory Agreement as so approved are directed to be executed
in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and City Manager upon execution thereof by
the Borrower. The Senior Indenture as so approved is directed to be executed in the name and
on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the City Manager and delivered to the Trustee. Copies of
5-
all the documents shall be delivered, filed or recorded as provided therein. The Mayor, the City
Manager and the City Clerk are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as
may be required to give effect to the transactions herein contemplated.
Section 4. Authorization and Approval of Subordinate Bond Documents. The City is
hereby authorized to issue the Subordinate Bonds to provide funds, to be used, with other
available funds, to finance certain costs of the Project and pay costs of issuance of the
Subordinate Bonds, and to pledge and assign the Subordinate Loan Agreement and the loan
repayments due thereunder, all as provided in the Subordinate Loan Agreement and the
Subordinate Indenture. It is acknowledged that the purchase price of the Subordinate Bonds, the
principal amount of the Subordinate Bonds, the maturity schedule of the Subordinate Bonds, the
provisions for redemption of the Subordinate Bonds and the interest rates on the Subordinate
Bonds have not been determined as of the date of adoption of this resolution and are not reflected
in the Subordinate Indenture or the Subordinate Loan Agreement. The Mayor and the City
Manager are hereby authorized to approve: (1) the purchase price of the Subordinate Bonds; (2)
the principal amount of the Subordinate Bonds (as hereinafter defined); provided that the
aggregate principal amount of the Subordinate Bonds is not in excess of $3,500,000; and
provided further that the Subordinate Indenture, as finally executed, shall allocate such principal
amount between the Series 2001 C Bonds and the Series 2001 D Bonds in amounts approved by
the Borrower; (3) the maturity schedule of the Subordinate Bonds; provided that the Subordinate
Bonds mature at any time or times in such amount or amounts no later than March 20, 2043; (4)
the provisions for redemption of the Subordinate Bonds; and (5) the interest rates on the
Subordinate Bonds; provided that the weighted average interest rate on the Subordinate Bonds
shall not exceed % per annum. The approval of such officers of the terms of the
Subordinate Bonds shall be conclusively presumed by their execution of the Subordinate
Indenture.
The forms of the Subordinate Bond Documents and the Subordinate Bonds referred to in
Section 1.10 are approved, subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and
approved by the Mayor and City Manager, within the limitations provided in the immediately
preceding paragraph, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by execution of the
Subordinate Bond Documents by the Mayor and the City Manager. The Subordinate Loan
Agreement as so approved is directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the
Mayor and City Manager upon execution thereof by the Borrower. The Subordinate Indenture as
so approved is directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and
the City Manager and delivered to the Trustee. Copies of all the documents shall be delivered,
filed or recorded as provided therein. The Mayor, the City Manager and the City Clerk are also
authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the
transactions herein contemplated.
Section 5. Official Statement. The City hereby consents to the use of the Preliminary
Official Statement by the Underwriter in connection with the offer and sale of the Senior Bonds
to potential investors, and consents to the preparation and use of a final Official Statement, in
substantially the form of the Preliminary Official. The City has consented to the distribution of
In
the Official Statement, but did not prepare the Official Statement, and has not reviewed the
financial disclosures of the Borrower or approved any information or statements contained in the
Official Statement or the Appendices thereto and assumes no responsibility for the sufficiency,
completeness or accuracy of the same. The City Manager is authorized to deem the Preliminary
Official Statement "final" as of its date for purposes of SEC Rule 15c2-12.
Section 6. The Bonds.
6.01. In anticipation of the receipt of the loan repayments from the Borrower, the City
shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds in four series to be designated "Multifamily Senior
Housing Revenue Bonds (GNMA Collateralized Mortgage Loan — Plymouth Marketplace
Project), Series 2001A", "Taxable Multifamily Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (GNMA
Collateralized Mortgage Loan — Plymouth Marketplace Project), Series 2001 B", "Multifamily
Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (Plymouth Marketplace Project), Series 2001C" and
Multifamily Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (Plymouth Marketplace Project), Series 2001D",
respectively, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Senior Indenture, in the case of the
Series A Bonds and the Series B Bonds, and in the form and upon the terms set forth in the
Subordinate Indenture, in the case of the Series C Bonds and the Series D Bonds, or established
pursuant to this resolution.
6.02. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized and directed to prepare and
execute the Bonds as prescribed herein and in the Senior Indenture and the Subordinate
Indenture, as applicable, and to deliver them to the Trustee, together with a certified copy of this
resolution, the other documents required in each of the Senior Indenture and the Subordinate
Indenture, and such other certificates, documents and instruments as may be appropriate to effect
the transactions herein contemplated. The Trustee is hereby appointed authenticating agent for
the Bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1.
Section 7. Absence of Officers. In the absence or disability of the Mayor, any of the
documents authorized by this resolution to be approved and executed by the Mayor may be so
approved and executed by the acting Mayor. In the absence or disability of the City Manager,
any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be approved and executed by the City
Manager may be so approved and executed by the person designated as acting City Manager or
by such other officer of the City who, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may execute such
documents.
Section 8. Authentication of Proceedings. The Mayor, the City Manager, the City Clerk
and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to furnish to the Underwriter and bond
counsel certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such
other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and
marketability of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers'
custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and
affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to
the truth of all statements of fact contained therein.
7-
Section 9. Limitations of the City's Obligations. Notwithstanding anything contained in
the Bonds or the Bond Documents, the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the
meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation, and shall not be payable from nor shall
constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any funds or any property of
the City other than the revenues specifically pledged to the payment thereof pursuant to the Bond
Documents, and no holder of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the
taxing power of the City to pay the Bonds or the premium, if any, or interest thereon, or to
enforce payment thereof against any property of the City other than those rights and interests of
the City which have been pledged to the payment thereof pursuant to the Bond Documents. The
agreement of the City to perform the covenants and other provisions contained in this resolution
or the Bonds or the Bond Documents shall be subject at all times to the availability of the
revenues furnished by the Borrower sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the
enforcement thereof, and the City shall not be subject to any personal or pecuniary liability
thereon.
Attest:
Passed this 24th day of July, 2001.
City Clerk
Mayor
CERTIFICATE AS TO RESOLUTION AND ADOPTING VOTE
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota (the "City"), hereby certify that the attached resolution is a
true copy of Resolution No. , entitled: "RESOLUTION RELATING TO A
PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA
STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C; ADOPTING A HOUSING PROGRAM;
AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY SENIOR
HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (GNMA COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOAN —
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE PROJECT), SERIES 2001A, TAXABLE
MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (GNMA
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOAN — PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE
PROJECT), SERIES 2001B AND MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE
BONDS (PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE PROJECT) SUBORDINATE SERIES 2001C
AND 2001D; ESTABLISHING THE SECURITY THEREFOR AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS" (the "Resolution"), on file in the original
records of the City in my legal custody; that the Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City at a meeting on July 24, 2001, and that the meeting was duly held by
the City Council and was attended throughout by a quorum, pursuant to call and notice of
such meeting given as required by law; and that the Resolution has not as of the date
hereof been amended or repealed.
I further certify that upon vote being taken on the Resolution at said meeting, the
following Councilmembers voted in favor thereof. _
and the following voted against the same:
and the following abstained from voting thereon or were absent:
WITNESS my hand officially this _ day of July, 2001.
City Clerk
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C
PLYMOUTH SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT
General Program
The City believes, based upon the data contained in its Housing Plan and other sources,
that a need exists to increase housing options available to seniors within the City and
surrounding area. To meet the elderly housing needs, the City plans to encourage the
development in the City of multifamily housing particularly adapted to the needs of elderly
residents. As a secondary benefit, to the extent elderly residents can be relocated into suitable
multifamily units, additional single family detached units may become available for sale to
families of younger residents. A major method available to the City to facilitate construction of
multifamily housing is the issuance of tax-exempt bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
462C, and Sections 142(d) or 145, as appropriate, of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. The specific development described in this Housing Program will be undertaken to
further the policies and goals stated in the City's Housing Plan, including particularly the goal of
providing life -cycle housing in the City. The development will address the special housing needs
of the elderly and will provide a continuum of care ranging from housing and services for
independent seniors to housing for those requiring special assistance and memory care.
Description of the Development To Be Financed
Plymouth Senior Housing LLC (the Owner), whose sole member will be the Wedum
Foundation, a corporation exempt from tax pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (the Code), proposes to construct and equip a multifamily housing development
the Project) consisting of approximately 24 memory loss units, 28 assisted living units and 68
congregate care units designed and intended for occupancy by elderly persons (the "Project").
The Project will be located at 16205 36`h
Avenue North in the City.
Reference is made to Exhibit A attached hereto for a description of the building, units,
building amenities, construction timetable and other attributes of the Project.
Acquisition and construction of the Project will be carried out in accordance with
applicable land use and development restrictions, and construction of the Project is subject to
applicable state and local building codes. The Project is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The owner of the Project will be required to operate the Project in
accordance with state and local anti -discrimination laws and ordinances.
Revenue Bond Financing
The Owner proposes that the City finance the Project by issuing revenue bonds (the
Bonds) in an amount not to exceed $22,500,000, the revenue bonds to be issued pursuant to the
authority of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 462C.05, subdivisions land 4 and 462C.07,
subdivision 1.
The Bonds will be issued in one or more series of senior and subordinate bonds. The
underwriter of the Bonds will be Miller & Schroeder Financial Inc. The Bond sale is expected to
be completed by the end of August, 2001. Attached as Exhibit B is a Sources and Uses
Summary showing, on a preliminary basis, the Bonds to be issued and the costs to be paid. It is
likely that the final sources and uses will vary from this Exhibit — but the aggregate principal
amount of Bonds to be issued will not exceed the figure above.
It is anticipated that most of the Bonds will be issued on a tax-exempt basis as "qualified
501(c)(3) bonds" pursuant to Section 145 of the Code. A small portion of the Bonds may be
issued as taxable bonds to finance costs related to the Project not qualifying for tax-exempt
financing under the foregoing Code section and applicable Income Tax Regulations.
The Bonds will not be general obligations of the City, but will be secured only by the
revenues and property specifically pledged to the payment thereof pursuant to the revenue
agreement(s) and the trust indenture(s) pursuant to which the Bonds will be issued. Substantially
all of the net proceeds of the Bonds (the initial principal amount thereof, less amounts deposited
in a reasonably required reserve, if any, or paid out as costs of issuance of the Bonds) will be
used to pay the costs of the Project, including any functionally related and subordinate facilities.
Meeting Needs of Low and Moderate Income Persons
It should be noted that pursuant to Section 462C.05, subdivision 4, no statutory income
limits are applicable to the Project because the Project is designed for rental primarily to elderly
persons. Further, Section 145 of the Code imposes no income or rent limits on developments
financed with "qualified 501(c)(3) bonds" pursuant to said Section.
Nevertheless, as a condition for providing financing for the Project, the City is requiring
that the Owner enter into a Regulatory Agreement with the City wherein the City will require
that the Project have 10% of the units (most likely from the congregate care units) set aside for
rental to persons and families with incomes not exceeding 50% of the area median, adjusted for
family size. Annual real estate rentals for the lower-income units (exclusive of any separately
purchased services) will not exceed 30% of the income limits applicable to the lower-income
tenants. Tenants participating in certain governmental programs, such as the Elderly Waiver and
Alternative Care Programs of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, will be deemed in
compliance with the foregoing income restrictions. Rental rates for the lower-income units will
be submitted to the City from time to time for approval. The income and rent restrictions will
remain in force for the longer of (i) 15 years from the date a certificate of occupancy is issued by
the City for the Project or (ii) the period during which any tax-exempt Bonds remain outstanding.
2-
Bond Allocation.
Since it is anticipated that the Bonds issued on a tax-exempt basis will be issued as
qualified 501(c)(3) bonds" pursuant to Section 145 of the Code, no allocation of bonding
authority is required pursuant to the provisions of Section 146 of the Code.
Monitoring Methods
No special monitoring by the City is anticipated to be necessary in connection with the
construction of the Project. Proceeds of the Bonds proposed to be issued to finance the
development will be held and disbursed by a trustee bank during construction, and it is believed
the oversight exercised by the trustee bank, FHA and certain other parties, will be adequate to
insure the Project as presented is in fact carried out. After construction, the Project must be
operated by the Owner in accordance with various operating covenants (relating to such things as
maintenance, insurance, etc.) to be contained in the revenue agreement(s) and related mortgage
loan documents to be entered into by the City, the Owner and certain other parties, which
revenue agreement(s) and mortgage loan documents will be assigned by the City, to the extent of
the City's interests, to the trustee bank as security for the Bondholders.
The City will be required to monitor compliance with the income and rent restrictions set
forth in the Regulatory Agreement and will require regular reporting from the Owner as to the
incomes of tenants occupying the lower-income units and the rental rates for such units. The City
believes its existing community development and HRA staff can satisfactorily monitor such
compliance.
All costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project will be paid by the Owner.
The Owner will pay an up -front issuance fee of 1/8`
h of 1% of the total principal amount of the
Bonds to defray ongoing administrative costs to be incurred by the City.
Housing Program Dated July 2, 2001
Public Hearing To Be Held July 24, 2001
3-
Exhibit A
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE SENIOR HOUSING
LOCATION
Vicksburg Lane/Highway 55
Plymouth, MN
AREA DESCRIPTION
The site is part of the mixed-use Plymouth Market Center development_ A Cub Foods Store and Mann
Theatre are located directly across Vicksburg Lane. The Plymouth -Lifetime Fitness Health facility and
Plymouth Library are also located in the general area. Plymouth Market Place Senior Housing is part of a
PUD consisting of a bank, restaurants, retail, offices and a Lunds Grocery Store. Walking paths to selected
facilities will be constructed from the senior building.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The Hartford Group is working with the City of Plymouth to create an affordable housing component.
BUILDING
Three Story Wood Frame
Stucco Exterior
Underground Parking
Separate Wings for each Housing Type
BUILDING AMENITIES
Three Dining Rooms with Meal Services
Lounge overlooking dedicated wetland areas
Activity Rooms including Exercise Wellness Center
Billiard and Card Room
Media Room and Library
First Floor Main Street Concept
Gardens, picnic and walking areas overlooking wetlands
RESIDENT SERVICES
Housekeeping, Laundry and Linen Service
Nursing Staff (24 Hours)
Meal Services
Shuttle Transportation
UNIT ANALYSIS
See the Attached Excel Unit Mix Analysis. The Assisted Living Units can be operated as
Independent Units based on market demand.
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
6/2000 Municipal Approvals
5/2001 Amended PUD Approvals
6/1/01 HUD Submission
8/1/01 Construction Commencement
DEVELOPER/ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
Hartford Group, Inc.
1500 McAndrews Road West
Burnsville, MN 55337
962 -892 -8417 -Telephone
www.hartfordcompanies.com
PLYMOUTH SENIOR CAMPUS
FEATURES AND SPECIFICATIONS
ITEM CONGREGATE ASSISTED MEMORY
Construction Start 8/2001 8/2001 8/2001
First Occupant 6/2002 6/2002 6/2002
Square Footage Range 819-1,094 609-901 345-419
Entry Two Story Two Story Two Story
Range Electric Electric Electric
Dishwasher -Disposal Yes Yes Yes
Microwave Yes Yes Yes
Fireplace Yes Yes No
Air Conditioning Magic Pak Magic Pak Magic Pak
Window Blinds Yes Yes Yes
Elevator Yes -Four in Building Yes -Four in Building Yes -Four in Building
Balcony Yes
Balcony with Screen Optional
Patio No No No
Underground Garage Available @ $50 PM Available @ $50 PM NA
Washer -Dryer In Unit Yes Yes No
Building Sprinkler System Yes Yes Yes
Libra -Exercise-Crafts Room Yes Yes Yes
Picnic -Gardening Area Yes Yes Yes
Beauty Shop Yes Yes Yes
General Store Yes Yes Yes
Storage Area Per Unit Yes Yes Yes
Swimming Pool No No No
Meals Per Day 1 3 3
Soundproofing Yes-Gyperete Floors Yes-Gyperete Floors Yes-Gyperete Floors
Utilities in Rent Sewer and Water Sewer and Water Sewer and Water
Location Plymouth Plymouth Plymouth
Age Completed in 2001 Completed in 2001 Completed in 2001
Quality of Construction Wood Frame Wood Frame Wood Frame
Style 3 Story Apartment 3 Story Apartment 3 Story Apartment
Exterior Stucco Stucco Stucco
Transportation Available Yes Yes Yes
Housekeeping Available Yes Yes Yes
Emergency Response System Yes Yes Yes
SPECIAL FEATURES
Grocery Store Adjacent Adjacent Adjacent
Bank Within PUD Within PUD Within PUD
Views Wetland Wetland Wetland
Two Dining Rooms Wetland Views Wetland Views Wetland Views
Exhibit B
MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL, INC.
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE
SOURCES & USES OF FUNDS SUMMARY
BONDS FHA MORTGAGE
SOURCES SOURCES
Series 2001 A Tax -Exempt "Aaa" GNMA Bonds 16,985,000 Mortgage Loan
Series 2001 B Taxable "Aaa" GNMA Bonds 125,000 Equity - Land Value
Series 2001 C Tax -Exempt Non -Rated Subordinate Bonds 1,800,000 Equity - Frana Credit
Series 2001 D Tax -Exempt Non -Rated Subordinate Bonds 490,000
TOTALSOURCES
USES
Purchase of GNMA CLC's & PLC
Deferred Developer Fee
Asset Management Fee
TOTAL USES
19,400,000 TOTAL SOURCES
USES
17,110,000 Bond Counsel
1,800,000 Underwriter's Counsel
490,000 Non -Profit Counsel
Developer's Counsel
19,400,000 Issuers Counsel
Trustee Fee
Printing Fee
Rating Agency
Underwriter's Fee
Taxes During Construction
Builder's Risk Insurance
FHA Mortgage Insurance Premium
FHA Examination Fee
FHA Inspection Fee
Financing Fee
Legal & Organization
Ginnie Mae Placement Fee
Cost Certification Audit Fee
Title & Recording
Land Acquisition
Land Improvements
Main Buildings
General Requirements
Builder's General Overhead
Builder's Profit
Performance Bonds
Other Municipal Fees
Architect's Fee - Design
Architect's Fee - Inspection
Major Moveable Equipment - FF&E
Working Capital 12%1 - NPDF
Premarketing
Absorption Period Shortfalls
Initial Operating Deficit - NPDF
Absorption Period Shortfalls
Capitalized Interest
Rating Agency Lags (ea)
Negative Arbitrage (est.)
TOTAL USES
5/15/01
17,110,000
660,000
88,658
17,858,658
50,000
45,000
40,000
40,000
10,000
10,000
500
16,000
171,100
25,000
46,000
171,100
51,330
85,550
171,100
75,000
85,550
15,000
62,000
2,400,000
739,423
9,120,000
395,640
196,313
588,938
53,004
786,600
457,620
114,405
300,000
342,200
300,000
744,285
120,000
30,000
17,858,658
RESUME - WEDUM FOUNDATON
The Wedum Foundation was established by the Wedum Family of Alexandria, Minnesota
in the 1950's. Incorporated in 1959 as a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, the Wedum
Foundation has been fulfilling its charter through the awarding of grants and scholarships, as
well as through the development of housing for special populations in need of its charitable
support. Over the years, the Wedum Foundation has also expended significant resources in
partnership with the Citizens Scholarship Foundation of America to build Dollars for Scholars
chapters throughout the United States; assist in the creation of a public school in a low income
minority area in Martin County, Florida; provide financial support for several elderly care
facilities; and assist in the development of three drug and alcohol treatment facilities in the rural
areas throughout Minnesota.
The principal office of the Wedum Foundation is located at 3191 Shorewood Drive, St.
Paul, Minnesota, 55112.
The Board of Directors and Officers include several individuals with extensive legal,
development and real estate experience:
John Wedum, Chairman
James K. Cooper, President
Gary Slette, Governor
Frank Starke, Governor
Dale Vesledahl, Governor
Beth Wedum, Director
Shawn Beus, Vice President — Development, Marketing, Senior Care
Elizabeth West, Secretary/Treasurer — Finance, Organizational, Management
All Wedum Foundation housing projects are wholly owned Limited Liability Companies
except where noted. Current projects, completed and under development, are listed on the
following page.
Completed Projects:
Entity/Location Financing Unit Mix Rough Project Cost
Wedum University Village HUD 221 d3 Student Housing 199 units, approx. 22 million
Univ. of Minnesota 600 beds,
Wedum Shorewood Campus HUD 232 155 Congregate, 74 Assisted Living 26 million
Rochester, MN
homes
Mississippi Shores Joint venture with 49 Congregate 5 million
Monticello, MN Presbyterian Homes
program from revenue
Redwood Terrace Tax-exempt, non- 54 Senior Independent 6 million
Coon Rapids, MN rated bonds
15 Memory Care (subject to change)
Banfill Crossing Tax-exempt, non- 110 Senior Independent 12 million
Fridley, MN rated bonds
Lincoln Parc Apartments HUD 221d3 186 Affordable, market rate apts., 27 million
Eden Prairie, MN currently under construction
Projects Under Development/Preparing for HUD submittal:
Entitv/Location Financine Unit Mix Tentative Submittal
Chaska Points West Apts. HUD 221 176 Affordable and market rate June 2001
Chaska, MN apts.
Wyngate Townhomes HUD 221 50 Affordable and market rate Town May 2001
Eden Prairie, MN homes
Parking at II"' & Harmon Tax-exempt, 600 Parking stalls, scholarship July 2001
Minneapolis, MN non -rated bonds program from revenue
Champlin Senior Housing HUD 232 80 Congregate, 35 Assisted Living, July 2001
Champlin, MN 15 Memory Care (subject to change)
Orono Senior Housing HUD 221 62 Senior Independent July 2001
Orono, MN
Plymouth Senior Housing HUD 232 66 Congregate, 36 Assisted Living, Summer 2001
Plymouth, MN 18 Memory Care
Boulder Senior Living, HUD 221 94 Senior Independent Fall 2001
White Bear Lake, MN
Burnsville Senior Housing HUD 232 72 Congregate, 43 Assisted Living, Fall 2001
Burnsville, MN 20 Memory Care (subject to change)
PLYMOUTH MARKETPLACE SENIOR HOUSING
LOCATION
Vicksburg Lane/Highway 55
Plymouth, MN
AREA DESCRIPTION
The site is part of the mixed-use Plymouth Market Center development. A Cub Foods Store and Mann
Theatre are located directly across Vicksburg Lane. The Plymouth -Lifetime Fitness Health facility and
Plymouth Library are also located in the general area. Plymouth Market Place Senior Housing is part of a
PUD consisting of a bank, restaurants, retail, offices and a Lunds Grocery Store. Walking paths to selected
facilities will be constructed from the senior building.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The Hartford Group is working with the City of Plymouth to create an affordable housing component.
Financial tools that may be used include Tax Increment Financing, Community Development Block Action
Grant and multi, -family housing revenue bonds.
BUILDING
Three Story Wood Frame
Stucco Exterior
Underground Parking
Separate Wings for each Housing Type
BUILDING AMENITIES
Three Dining Rooms with Meal Services
Lounge overlooking dedicated wetland areas
Activity Rooms including Exercise Wellness Center
Billiard and Card Room
Media Room and Library
First Floor Main Street Concept
Gardens, picnic and walking areas overlooking wetlands
RESIDENT SERVICES
Housekeeping, Laundry and Linen Service
Nursing Staff (24 Hours)
Meal Services
Shuttle Transportation
UNIT ANALYSIS
See the Attached Excel Unit Mix Analysis. The Assisted Living Units can be operated as
Independent Units based on market demand.
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
6/2000 Municipal Approvals
5/2001 Amended PUD Approvals
6/1/01 HUD Submission
8/1/01 Construction Commencement
DEVELOPER/ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
Hartford Group, Inc.
1500 McAndrews Road West
Burnsville, MN 55337
962 -892 -8417 -Telephone
www.hartfordcompanies.com
PLYMOUTH CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY
UNIT MIX ANALYSIS
DESIGNATION TYPE TYPE FLOOR FLOOR FLOOR TOTAL SQUARE PERCENT FIREPLACE
1 2 3 UNITS FEET
A MEMORY STUDIO 23 0 0 23 345 19.17% NO
A-1 MEMORY STUDIO 1 0 0 1 419 0.83% NO
B ASSISTED/INDEPENDENT 1 BR 0 2 2 4 609 3.33% NO
C ASSISTED/INDEPENDENT 1 BR 0 9 9 18 711 15.00% YES
C-1 ASSISTED/INDEPENDENT 2BR 0 1 1 2 901 1.67% YES
D ASSISTED/INDEPENDENT 2 BR 0 2 2 4 896 3.33% YES
E INDEPENDENT i BR -DEN 11 13 13 37 819 30.83% YES
E-1 INDEPENDENT 1 BR -DEN 0 1 1 2 871 1.67% YES
F INDEPENDENT 2 BR 1 1 1 3 1,079 2.50% YES
F-1 INDEPENDENT 2 BR 2 2 2 6 950 5.00% YES
G INDEPENDENT 1 BR -DEN 2 2 2 6 832 5.00% YES
H INDEPENDENT 2 BR 4 4 4 12 1,028 10.00% YES
H-1 INDEPENDENT 2 BR Q 0 2 2 1,094 1.67% YES
44 37 37 120 100.00%
UNIT MIX SUMMARY
MEMORYCARE 24 20.00%
ASSISTED/INDEPENDENT 28 23.33%
INDEPENDENT U 5667%
TOTAL 120 100.00%
PARKING ANALYSIS BEDROOM ANALYSIS: ASSISTED AND INDEPENDENT
72 UNDERGROUND NUMBER PERCENT BEDROOMS
1.06 RATIO: .UNDERGROUNDTOINDFPFNDENT 22 18R 22.92%
45 1 BR -DEN 46.88%
DUAL USAGE ANALYSIS 7Z2 28R 30.21%
28 ASSISTED/INDEPENDENT UNITS 96 100.00%
8 INDEPENDENT UNITS
96 TOTAL
BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE
42,249 LOWER LEVEL: PARKING/ACTIVITIES
FIRST FLOOR
SECOND FLOOR
THIRD FLOOR
ASSISTED/INDEPENDENT UNITS
Assisted Independent units can be operated as either an Assisted Living units or Independent units based on market demand.
DEVELOPER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
HARTFORD GROUP, INC. HARTFORD GROUP, LLC.
1 S00 MCANDREWS ROAD WEST 1500 MCANDREWS ROAD WEST
BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 BURNSVILLE, MN SS337
612 -892 -8422 -TELEPHONE 612-892-8420-TELPH 0 N E
Contact: Jack Brandt Contact: Hal Pierce/Jon Lennander
41?
CLW)RACR BNAL CALL'
GOPHERSTATE ONE CALL
1B NRS PRIOR R) LpV51AUC RCN
IYIN CI REB A31 -000T
GRAPHIC ScaLL
r
PLANT SCHEUL HE
I` / - ` \\\`
NOTES,
VI
G
r
Brodsho
Consulting
693 N. bndpp Cour)
Ea an, YM SSI IS
OWNER
Plymouth Continuing,
Care Community
moo Yoene .. Rom w
BumMIa,YM 5333>
PROJECT
NUO PROJECT Y YBCR:
Plymouth
Continuing
Care
Community
Phm9 N. Y n.ol.
SSUE
L REV r ET
O NO Rcv. THISSHEETT
SHEET TITLE.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
L1.0
A
ARCHI TECTIE NEI NEER
DEVELOPER
HARTFORD
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
OWNER
Plymouthth Senior
Housing, L.L.C.
PROJECT
HUD 11—S
Plymouth
Marketplace
Senior
Housing
ISSUE
1711E SE7
REV. TY.S SHEET
0 No P11 - S SHEET
LOWER LEVEL
PLAN
SHEET NUMBER.
IL Al -0
r
I_: E U: 1
7'.e 7 7i
51 b F
M
1311 5
GE\ERAL NC
I I5
z
16
APARTYIEN- LLN:T 'ABl1LP'IGN - F'RST FLOC¢
PAR-ITION SCHEDULE
d ',
c xrew+ r a
vne. r„N o a ro .,ed ne
3 - - T.ow.o av
e•
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
oevELOPER
H.aRT'F'ORU
0
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
C m1 I
OWNER
Plymouth Senior
Housing, L.L.C.
PROJEC
NJRNUOPR.C EER
Plymouth
Marketplace
Senior
Housing
ISSUE.
ORE '-S SHEET
ONO REQ THIS SHEET
SHEET T T_E:
OVERALL FIRST !'
FLOOR PLAN
I
SHEET h.,Y BER.
Al 1
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
DEVELOPER
HAR"FFORD
23
EI
STRUCTURAL ENG 1_ R
E ,
Tp
ti
C -
o
zz 8• o e ii III
E P
c
Q
O OWNER
l
c
6 Q
E Plymouth Senior
O
E Q Housing, L.L C.
Q e
I
QE
GI E9
HUD AC7
RC
Plymouthh
Marketplacee
Senior
Housing
FI
I
e
O 14 IS U n
ISSUE
III
7 74B [- ON 5 GO\D GC¢
r
1—
I
SHEET TITLE:
OVERALL
SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
SHEET NUMBER jl
A1.2
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
DEVELOPER
ti ®
HARTFORD
0 o c c C,
m
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
TI IIB cL i
O ..-
o B
A9 OWNER
Oa (< G
E
ry
i
iIIIy
m Plymouth Senior
E
O
Q Housing, L.L.C. I
v E
0
ES
E
E2 E E II i-
E O
PROJECT
1
w). ?1-jfF O HUO = CT NUM9ER:
H E,
l
I
PlymouthE
Marketplace
E _U E 1,-MITE i Senior
iHousing4—
FERAL 'E5
h
1 11H
nn ISSUE
3, i
EN- J^lIT -4B LATION - TI-IiR FLOOR
R'I*IpN RE: -115 SHEET
O NC ?-V. THIS SHEET
SHEE"TITLEe.
OVER ALL
THIRD FLOOR
PLAN
BHEE-\JMBER.
A1.3
LLE—ST ELEVATION
RBAR IAL NOR—,H ELEVATION
FMCH1C11ENGINEI
Housi Ing, L.L.C.
PROJECT
Plymouth
Marketplace
Senior
Housing
I—- I N
ISSUE
T ET L -91a
I
j771Tr1i
P,,;RTI SC-- =—EV4,— ON r."T T —TL,
Oe VELOPER
GROUP
STRUCTURAL_ ENGINE
OWNER
PIYMC Uth Senic
Housi Ing, L.L.C.
PROJECT
Plymouth
Marketplace
Senior
Housing
I—- I N
ISSUE
T ET L -91a
I
j771Tr1i
P,,;RTI SC-- =—EV4,— ON r."T T —TL,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Anne Hurlburt
Community Development Director
City of Plymouth
FROM: Melissa N. Starkey
DATE: July 23, 2001
RE: Plymouth Senior Housing Project
The purpose of this Memorandum is to describe the low and moderate income rental
restrictions and the application of surplus cash from the Plymouth Senior Housing Project (the
Project") proposed by Plymouth Senior Housing, LLC (the "Borrower"). The Borrower is a
Minnesota limited liability company whose sole member is the Wedum Foundation, a Minnesota
nonprofit corporation and a Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization ("Wedum").
I. Rental Income Restrictions
Restrictions on the rental of the Project are found in two agreements: a Regulatory
Agreement (the "Regulatory Agreement") between the City of Plymouth and the Borrower, and a
Management Agreement (the "Management Agreement") between the Borrower and Twin City
Christian Homes, Inc., a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Manager").
The Regulatory Agreement requires, pursuant to the City's own requirements, that
Lower -Income Tenants" occupy at least 10% of the completed residential units. Such tenants'
annual rent (exclusive of meals and services) may not exceed 30% of the income limits
applicable from time to time to the Lower -Income Tenants occupying such units. The
Regulatory Agreement defines Lower -Income Tenants and describes the method of determining
an adjusted rent for Lower -Income Tenants. The term of the Regulatory Agreement, subject to
certain exceptions, is the longer of 15 years from the date a certificate of occupancy is issued by
the City for the Project or until such date as no bonds issued with respect to the Project remain
outstanding.
The Management Agreement also provides additional low and moderate income
restrictions on the rental of the Project: (i) at least 75% of the Project units must be occupied by
residents that qualify as low-income and, as part of the 75% requirement, (ii) either at least 20%
of the units must be occupied by residents that also meet the very low-income limit for the area,
or 40% of the units must be occupied by residents that also do not exceed 120% of the very low-
income limits for the area. The Management Agreement identifies low-income families and very
low-income families in accordance with the income limits computed and published by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD. "Very low-income" is defined as 50
percent of the area's median income, and "low-income" is defined as 80 percent of the area's
median income, each as determined and adjusted by HUD and adjusted for family size. (These
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
requirements would not be in addition to the requirements under the City's Regulatory
Agreement; qualifying Lower -Income Tenants under the City's Regulatory Agreement could
also be applied to the limits under the Management Agreement.)
The Management Agreement's term is one year, subject to termination pursuant to the
terms thereof. However, in order to operate the Project in furtherance of its exempt purposes
and thus avoid taxation on its income therefrom as unrelated trade or business income) and to
preserve the tax-exempt status of interest on the bonds (a covenant that the Borrower will make
in the loan documentation), we understand that Wedum intends to continue these restrictions or
substantially similar restrictions in the event that the Management Agreement with the initial
Manager is terminated or not extended.
II. Surplus Cash Restrictions
As you know, the mortgage funded with the Senior Bonds is to be FHA -insured. HUD
imposes substantial restrictions on the use of revenues from the Project, requiring that those
revenues be applied to costs of operation of the Project or reserves therefor and applying
additional restrictions on the use of surplus cash derived from the Project. The financing is
structured so that the Subordinate Bonds are payable from such surplus cash (less a retention
amount for the Borrower to be approved by HUD, estimated at $38,000 per year). Under the
Subordinate Bond loan documentation, the Borrower is required to deposit all such surplus cash
with the Trustee for the payment or redemption of the Subordinate Bonds. Thus, until the
Subordinate Bonds are retired, it is expected that no amount other than the retention amount of
38,000 will be available to the Borrower for its own purposes.
III. Additional Fee Payments to the Borrower
It is proposed that Wedum and Hartford will enter into a Development Agreement,
pursuant to which Hartford will agree to pay Wedum consulting fees of approximately $100,000
per year (less the amount of the retention amount approved by HUD and described above). We
understand that Hartford would make such payments from the principal and interest it would
receive as the holder of the Subordinate Bonds.
IV. Conclusion
Based on the proposed structure, it is expected that the Borrower or Wedum will not
receive more than approximately $100,000 annually as its return on ownership of the Project so
long as the Bonds are outstanding, and from that amount it must pay its own costs and expenses
relating to the Project, such as auditing fees. To the extent that surplus cash is derived from the
Project, such cash must be remitted to the Trustee for the Subordinate Bonds and applied to the
payment or redemption of the Subordinate Bonds.
0)
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
Agenda Number: i
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Jooee yan, Building Official through Anne Hurlburt, Community
Development Director
SUBJECT: An Ordinance amending the City Rental Dwelling License Code
DATE: June 27, 2001 for the City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
1. ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt the attached Ordinance amending City Code Section 410 (Housing and Redevelopment)
by adding a new provision relative to conduct on licensed premises.
2. BACKGROUND:
Approximately one year ago the Plymouth City Council became aware of a neighborhood
situation involving conduct at a single family rental property. Because our Police and
Community Development departments had responded to numerous complaints filed against this
property, the City Council directed staff to explore options on how to effectively deal with
issues involving undesirable conduct at rental properties.
Upon research, City Staff discovered several municipalities within the metro area had adopted
ordinance provisions relating to conduct on licensed premises. Those model ordinance
provisions were used during the preparation and design of our proposed ordinance. The
contents and requirements contained in our proposed code sections are similar to those we
reviewed.
On January 29, 2001 we mailed a letter to rental property owners within the City advising
them of the City's intent to adopt a conduct on licensed premises ordinance, and invited them
to attend an informational meeting on February 7, 2001 to discuss ideas related to the
development of this ordinance. Approximately 25 individuals attended this meeting, after
which a draft ordinance was prepared.
On May 31, 2001 a subsequent letter was mailed to rental property owners, once again inviting
them to attend an informational meeting to discuss the contents of the draft ordinance which
was provided to them. Prior to the meeting the City received one letter from a rental property
owner who expressed concerns of the proposed ordinance. Approximately 25 individuals
attended the meeting which was well received. Only two minor revisions of the draft
ordinance were requested, both of which have been addressed.
The proposed ordinance establishes a process whereby when certain types of behavior occurs
at a rental licensed property, the enforcement steps are taken to eventually eliminate such
activity. The behaviors are gambling, prostitution, possession or sale of drugs, unlawful sale
of alcoholic beverages, unlawful possession, transportation sale or use of a weapon, noisy
assemblies and certain acts of disorderly conduct.
If one of these activities were to occur at a licensed rental dwelling and be documented, a
certified letter would be issued to the rental dwelling license holder notifying them of the
violation and directing the license holder to take appropriate action to prevent such further
violations. If a second such incident were to occur within 3 months of the first incident, a
second letter would be sent to the license holder and a written response would be required as to
the actions taken by the license holder to eliminate such behavior from occurring at the
property. If a third incident were to occur within 3 months of the second incident, then the
license to operate the property as a rental unit could then be suspended, revoked or placed on
probation.
3. DISCUSSION:
Our City Attorney has reviewed the ordinance and is comfortable with the provisions set forth.
The Police will be the primary department responsible for the administration and enforcement
of this ordinance, with some assistance provided by the Community Development Department.
The City Council should be aware that the City may only suspend or revoke a rental property
license based upon the series of the pre -defined criminal law and City Code violations provided
for in the ordinance. The City cannot revoke or suspend a rental license based upon the
number of Police calls to a residence, or other forms of City Code/Zoning Ordinance
violations.
4. RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend the City Council adopt the attached Ordinance amending Section 410 of the
Plymouth City Code relative to conduct on licensed premises.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft ordinance
2. Letter to rental property owners dated January 29, 2001
3. Letter to rental property owners dated May 31, 2001
4. Letter dated June 4, 2001 from Lee Beecher
Plan/staffrep/ord/200 1 /rental dwelling license code
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER IV,
SECTION 410 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE
CONCERNING HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The Plymouth City Code is amended by adding Section 410.42 to read:
CHAPTER IV.
SECTION 410- Housing and Redevelopment
410.42. Rental dwelling licenses: Conduct on licensed premises. Subd. 1. It shall be the
responsibility of the rental license holder to take appropriate action, with the assistance of the
City, to prevent conduct by tenants or their guests on the licensed premises which is hereby
deemed to be disorderly, in violation of any of the following statutes or ordinances:
a) Minnesota Statutes, Sections 609.75 through 609.76, which prohibit gambling;
b) Minnesota Statutes, Section 609.321 through 609.324, which prohibits
prostitution and acts relating thereto;
c) Minnesota Statutes, Sections 152.01 through 152.025, and Section 152.027,
Subdivisions 1 and 2, which prohibit the unlawful sale or possession of controlled
substances;
d) Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.401, which prohibits the unlawful sale of
alcoholic beverages;
e) Section 2025 of this Code, which prohibits noise and noisy assemblies;
f) Minnesota Statutes, Sections 9713.021, 9713.045, 609.66 through 609.67 and
624.712 through 624.716, and Section 930 of this Code, which prohibit the unlawful
possession, transportation, sale or use of a weapon; or
g) Minnesota Statutes, Section 609.72, which prohibits disorderly conduct, when the
violation disturbs the peace and quiet of the occupants of at least one unit on the licensed
90752.04
RNK:r06/27/2001
premises or other premises, other than the unit occupied by the person(s) committing the
violation.
Subd. 2. A determination that the licensed premises have been used in a disorderly
manner as described in Subdivision 1 shall be made upon substantial evidence to support such a
determination. It shall not be necessary that criminal charges are brought to support a
determination of disorderly use, nor shall the fact of dismissal or acquittal of such a criminal
charge operate as a bar to adverse license action under this section.
Subd. 3. Upon determination by the Compliance Official utilizing established
procedures, that a licensed premises was used in a disorderly manner, as described in
Subdivision 1, the City shall notify the licensee by certified mail of the violation and direct the
licensee to take appropriate action with the assistance of the City to prevent further violations.
Subd. 4. If another instance of disorderly use of the licensed premises at the same
specific dwelling or unit occurs within twelve (12) months of an incident for which a notice in
Subdivision 3 was given, the City shall notify the licensee by certified mail of the violation and
shall also require the licensee to submit a written report of the actions taken, and proposed to be
taken, by the licensee to prevent further disorderly use of the premises. This written report shall
be submitted to the City within seven (7) days of receipt of the notice (excluding holidays) of
disorderly use of the premises and shall detail all actions taken by the licensee in response to all
notices of disorderly use of the premises within the preceding twelve (12) months.
Subd. 5. If another instance of disorderly use of the licensed premises at the same
specific dwelling or unit occurs within twelve (12) months after the second of any two (2)
previous instances of disorderly use for which notices were sent to the licensee pursuant to this
section, the rental dwelling license for the premises may be denied, revoked, suspended, placed
on probation, or not renewed. An action to deny, revoke, suspend, place on probation, or not
renew a license under this section shall be initiated by the City in the manner described in
Section 410.45, and shall proceed according to the procedures established in Sections 410.45 and
410.50.
Subd. 6. No adverse license action shall be imposed where the instance of disorderly use
of the licensed premises occurred during the pendency of eviction proceedings (unlawful
detainer) or within thirty (30) days after a notice is given by the licensee to a tenant to vacate the
premises, where the disorderly use was related to conduct by that tenant or the tenant's guests.
Eviction proceedings shall not be a bar to adverse license action, however, unless the licensee
diligently pursues them. A notice to vacate shall not be a bar to adverse license action unless a
copy of the notice is submitted to the City within ten (10) days of receipt of the violation notice.
Further, an action to deny, revoke, suspend, place on probation, or not renew a license based
upon violations of this section may be postponed or discontinued by the Compliance Official at
any time if it appears that the licensee has taken appropriate action to prevent further instances of
disorderly use.
90752.04
RNK:r06/27/2001
A-
SECTION 2. Section 410.45 of the Plymouth City Code is amended to read:
410.45. Revocation, -e; Suspension, or Probation. Subd. 1. Every license or permit issued
under this ordinance is subject to the right, which is hereby expressly reserved, to suspend, -e;
revoke, or place on probation the same should the license holder or their agents, employees,
representatives, or lessees directly or indirectly operate or maintain rental dwellings contrary to
the provisions of this ordinance or any other ordinance of the City or any special permit issued
by the City or the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Subd. 2. The license may be suspended, -e; revoked, or placed in a probation status by
the City Council after a written notice is sent to the license holder specifying the ordinance or
law violations with which they are charged. This notice shall also specify the date for hearing
before the City Council, which shall not be less than 10 days from the date of the notice.
Subd. 3 At such hearing before the City Council, the license holder or their attorneys
may submit and present witnesses on their behalf.
Subd. 4. After a hearing the City Council may suspend, -e; revoke, or place on probation
the license if they deem it necessary to protect the public health, safety, or general welfare.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
ADOPTED by the City Council this day of , 2001.
Joycelyn Tierney, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sandra Paulson, City Clerk
90752.04
RNK:r06/27/2001
January 29, 2001
CITY OF
PLYMOUTR
ManFirstName» «ManLastName», Manager
ComplexNamen
ManagerSiteAddress» aManagerStreetName»
ManCityu « ManStateu « ManZip»
SUBJECT: Conduct on Licensed Premises Ordinance
Dear Property Owner/Manager:
City Staff has been directed to prepare an ordinance to regulate activities in licensed rental dwellings when
such activities result in calls for service to City Staff. Such an ordinance is commonly known as a "conduct
on licensed premise" ordinance. This type of ordinance has been adopted by several cities within the Twin
City metro area. A "Conduct on Licensed Premise" ordinance establishes a process whereby when
undesirable behavior occurs within a licensed property, the City may use the ordinance as an enforcement
tool to eliminate such activity.
As an example, one such activity may be the possession or sale of drugs. Should this occur in a licensed
rental dwelling and be documented, a letter would be issued to the rental dwelling license holder notifying
them of the violation and directing the license holder to take appropriate action to prevent such further
violations. If a second such incident were to occur within three (3) months of the first incident, a second
letter would be sent to the license holder and a written response would be required as to the actions taken
by the license holder to eliminate such behavior from occurring at the property. If a third incident were to
occur within three (3) months of the second incident, then the license to operate the property as a rental unit
could be suspended or revoked. All such ordinances contain a provision which suspends any action by the
City should the license holder be in the process of evicting or removing the tenants from the property.
At this time the City is seeking your input related to the development and implementation of such an
ordinance. The City will be hosting an information meeting where staff members from both the Public Safety
and Community Development Departments will be present to hear your concerns as well as to discuss ideas
related to the development of this ordinance.
The informational meeting will be held on February 7, 2001, at 9:30 a.m. in the Plymouth City Council
Chambers at Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. If you have any questions concerning this
matter, please contact Officer Scott Streachek at 763-509-5147 or me at 763-509-5445.
Sincerely,
Warren Kulesa
Housing Inspector
CC: Officer Scott Streachek, Public Safety
Joe Ryan, Building Official
CITY OF
May 31, 2001 PLYMOUTR
SUBJECT: Conduct on Licensed Premises Ordinance
Dear Property Owner/Manager:
On February 7, 2001, City Staff members met with rental property owners and managers
to discuss the development and implementation of a conduct on licensed premises
ordinance as a means to receive input as well as to discuss ideas related to the
development of the ordinance provisions.
As a result of that meeting, we have completed a draft version of the ordinance (enclosed)
which we are seeking your input on. The City will be hosting an informational meeting
where staff members from both the Public Safety and Community Development
Departments will be present to hear your concerns as well as to discuss the contents of
this draft ordinance.
The informational meeting will be held on Wednesday, June 13, 2001, at 9:00 a.m. in the
Plymouth City Council Chambers, at Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. If
you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at 763-509-5445.
Sincerely,
Warren Kulesa
Housing Inspector
WK:jb
CC: Joe Ryan, Building Official
Dan Twaddle, Lieutenant
Enclosure
theA5445\rcntalo rdinancc5-24-01
Lee H. Beecher e
7574 Mariner Point
Maple Grove, MN 55311-2617
I ,qq. Telephone (612) 420-4250 (6E2435=tf687
June 4, 2001
Joycelyn Tierney, Mayor
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447-1482
RE: Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter IV, Section 410 of the
Plymouth City Code Concerning Housing and Redevelopment
Dear Mayor Tierney:
I am writing to express my deep concern for this proposed ordinance (attached).
It is virtually impossible for landlords to be responsible for the behavior of their tenants.
Renting (leasing) property to an American citizen should not make the owner of that
property responsible for the behavior of the resident. This proposed ordinance goes much
too far in this direction.
It is totally inappropriate for the City of Plymouth to be involved in the contract between
landlord and tenant. For example, the proposed ordinance would provide relief from the
regluatory oversight and penalties if the tenant was in the process of being evicted from
the property. This is rank paternalism and totally inappropriate for a city government.
Concerning the present inspections and licensure for rental properties in Plymouth, I have
a few comments. The good news is that landlords are expected to keep up their property
and promote the Public Safety thereby. However, in my experience, the citations have
been nitpicky and the process is not friendly to either landlords or tenants. Furthermore,
inspecting rental properties for a compliance with city codes overlooks the fact that -.
property owners in the same multihousing complex often do not meet city codes. Overall,
however, I don't have a strong quarrel with the city doing inspections on rental properties.
It would be nice to see the city, however, working to increase the stock of affordable
housing and stopping harassment of landlords.
I am concerned about the constitutional issues for the city taking a paternalistic
g
Joycelyn Tierney, Mayor, June 4, 2001, Page 2
attitude toward renters and the unenforceability of such inappropriate government
oversight.
I look forward to hearing from you about this.
Sincerely,
Lee Beecher, M.D.
Owner, 16100 18th Place North, Plymouth, MN 55447
LHB/ks
Enclosure
q
June 11, 2001
Mr. Lee H. Beecher
7574 Mariner Point
Maple Grove MN 55311-2617
Dear Mr. Beecher:
Thank you for your letter dated June 4, 2001, to Mayor Joy Tierney regarding your concern of
the City's attempt to adopt a proposed ordinance relative to conduct on licensed rental
properties.
As you know, City Staff members will be meeting with rental property owners and managers
on Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at Plymouth City Hall to discuss the development
and implementation of the ordinance, as well as to receive input and discuss ideas relative to
the proposed ordinance provisions.
Your letter will become part of our official record as we continue to proceed throughout this
process.
Thank you for your suggestions, we encourage you to attend our informational meeting.
If you have any questions or if I may be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact
me at (763) 509-5431.
Sincerely,
Joe Ryan
Building Official
cc: Mayor Joy Tierney
File
Ibc/jr/rental lic info
Agenda Number: r. ')
QTY OF PLYMOUTH,
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: July 19, 2001 for the City Council Meeting of July 24, 2001
TO:, ,Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager throughTO: -,
L. Faulkner, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Ronald Quanbeck, City Engineer
SUBJECT: WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC (H & H) STUDY FOR THE
2020 URBAN EXPANSION AREA
CITY PROJECT NO. 9926
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to receive the draft Hydrologic and Hydraulic Study
for the 2020 Urban Expansion Area and direct the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing
at their September 4, 2001 meeting to incorporate this study into the Plymouth Comprehensive
Plan.
BACKGROUND: In the process of reviewing the City's Water Resources Management Plan,
the City Council directed the Staff to investigate the potential water quality impacts due to new
developments in northwest Plymouth. On August 25, 2000, the City Engineering Department
sent out a request for proposal to five engineering firms. After, reviewing the proposals and Staff
interviews with three firms, the City Council designated Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik &
Associates (BRA) to conduct the study.
This study is now complete and its recommendations supersede all previous stormwater plans for
the H & H Study area including the 1999 Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP) and the
1980 Storm Drainage Plan. Therefore, the Plymouth Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended.
If acceptable to the Council, the H & H Study could be presented to the Planning Commission on
September 4, 2001 for public hearing. The Planning Commission could forward their
recommendation to the City Council as early as the September 25, 2001 Council meeting.
Council approval would be contingent on review and approval by the appropriate agencies.
The goals of this study are to establish the area's existing hydrologic and hydraulic
characteristics, assess the potential impact of new development, and recommend appropriate
management and corrective measures. The H & H Study analyzed the surface water system for
the study area which is comprised of 1,780 acres, of which 1,325 acres are considered
developable. The study provides quantitative goals and standards for managing surface water.
L:\pw\Engineering\ WTRRESRC\ WPLAN\2001 \H_HCouncilAccept.doc
HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC STUDY FOR THE
2020 URBAN EXPANSION AREA
Page 2
These standards include design data such as pond normal and high water levels, pond storage
volumes, allowable peak flow rates, and phosphorus removal efficiencies.
The system maintains existing drainage patterns to the greatest extent possible. Significant
regional ponding is proposed to provide the necessary storage required to retain high intensity
stormwater runoff peaks and reduce the possibility of flooding or erosion downstream.
The H & H Study approach to stormwater quality is "to require mitigation for new development
as necessary so that there is minimal increase in the exported load of phosphorus to priority
water resources under the developed condition compared to the existing condition. This
mitigation goal is termed a "non -degradation objective" and, if applied successfully, would
ensure that development within the study area will not degrade the quality of these receiving
waters (i.e., increase the phosphorus concentration within the waterbody)."
BUDGET IMPACT: The H & H study proposes a $1.7 million budget to implement the
recommended water quantity and quality facilities in the study area. The recommendations not
constructed as part of development as it occurs could be funded through a combination of the
City's General Fund, Stormwater Utility Fee, area charges, flood reduction grants and
stormwater quality grants.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend that the City Council receive
the attached H & H Study and direct the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing to amend
the Comprehensive Plan at their September 4, 2001 meeting.
Ronald Quanbeck, P.E.
City Engineer
attachment: The P Draft of H & H Study
L:\pwEngineering\WTRF-ESRC\WPLAN\2001\H_ HCouncilAccep[.doc
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3rd Draft Hydrologic & Hydraulic Study
Plymouth, Minnesota
July, 2001
File No. 70-00-103
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
List of Figures and Maps
List of Tables
Executive Summary
1. Introduction
2. Physical Environment Characteristics
2.1 Topography
2.2 Watersheds and Drainage Patterns
2.3 Land Use
3. Watershed and Agency Requirements
3.1 Watershed Requirements
3.2 Agency Requirements
3.2.1 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR)
3.2.2 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE)
3.2.3 Board of water and Soil Resources (BWSR)
3.2.4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
4. Methodology
4.1 Stormwater Quantity
4.1.1 Background
4.1.2 Computer Modeling
4.1.3 Design Criteria
4.1.3.1 General
4.1.3.2 Precipitation
4.1.3.3 Runoff Curve Numbers
4.1.3.4 Stormwater Conveyance Requirements
4.1.3.5 Stormwater Detention Basin Requirements
4.2 Stormwater Quality
4.2.1 Protection and Management of Priority Resources
4.2.2 Quality Goals
4.2.3 Computer Modeling
City of Plymouth
3 -Draft Hydrologic d Hydraulic Study
1
3
4
5
1-1
2-1
2-1
2-1
2-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-4
3-4
3-4
4-1
4-1
4-1
4-2
4-2
4-2
4-3
4-4
4-5
4-S
4-9
4-9
4-13
4-14
5. Recommended Stormwater System 5-1
5.1 Overview of Modeling Results 5-1
Trunk Storm Sewer Data
5.1.1 Stormwater Quantity 5-1
Appendix D
5.1.2 Stormwater Quality 5-1
5.2 Elm Creek District 5-2
Appendix G
5.2.1 Stormwater Quantity 5-2
5.2.2 Stormwater Quality 5-4
5.3 Shingle Creek District 5-7
5.3.1 Stormwater Quantity 5-7
5.3.2 Stormwater Quality 5-10
5.4 Mud Lake District 5-14
5.4.1 Stormwater Quantity 5-14
5.4.2 Stormwater Quality 5-14
5.5 Cost Estimates 5-17
6. Stormwater System Management 6-1
6.1 Construction Activities 6-1
6.1.1 Requirements for New Development and Redevelopment 6-1
6.1.2 Best Management Practices 6-1
6.1.3 Conservation Practices 6-3
6.2 City Operations and Maintenance 6-4
6.2.1 Stormwater Basins 6-4
6.2.2 Open Channels 6-6
6.2.3 Piping System 6-6
6.2.4 -De-Icing Practices 6-6
6.2.5 Street Sweeping 6-7
6.2.6 Detection of Illicit Connections and Dumping 6-7
Glossary
Appendices
Appendix A Subdistrict Drainage Areas
Appendix B Trunk Storm Sewer Data
Appendix C Proposed Pond Data
Appendix D 1980 Plan Data, Wetland Susceptibility, and Existing Conditions
Appendix E Wetland Protection Standards
Appendix F Water Quality Monitoring Data
Appendix G Cost Estimates
City of Plymouth 2
3- Draft Hydrologic 6 Hydraulic Study
LIST OF FIGURES AND MAPS
Figure 1-1 Location Map
Figure 2-1 Relief. Map
Figure 3-1 Public Waters: Water Basin
Figure 3-2 Public Waters: Water Course
Figure 5-1 Water Quality Treatment Performance
Criteria for New Development
Map 1 Proposed Surface Water System
Map 2 Design Land Use
1-2
2-3
3-2
3-3
5-6
Back of Report
Back of Report
City of Plymouth 3
3id Draft Hydrologic 6 Hydraulic Study
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4-1 Runoff Curve Numbers 4-5
Table 4-2 Priority Water Resource Summary 4-10
Table 4-3 Lake Water Quality Report Card Grade Ranges 4-11
Table 4-4 Water Quality Grades for Selected Plymouth Lakes 4-12
Table 4-5 Water Quality Goals for Priority Waterbodies 4-14
Table 4-6 Phosphorus Loading Rates for Study Area 4-17
Table 5-1 Summary of Loadings by Major Drainage District -
Northwest Expansion Area 5-2
Table 5-2 Summary of Loadings Elm Creek Drainage District -
Northwest Expansion Area 5-5
Table 5-3 Summary of Loadings for Shingle Creek Drainage District -
Northwest Expansion Area 5-11
Table 5-4 Summary of Water Quality Modeling Results - Existing
Watershed Conditions (Pomerleau Lake) 5-12
Table 5-5 Summary of Water Quality Modeling Results - Ultimate
Watershed Conditions (Pomerleau Lake) 5-12
Table 5-6 Summary of Loadings for Mud Lake Drainage District -
Northwest Expansion Area 5-15
Table 5-7 Summary of Water Quality Modeling Results - Existing
Watershed Conditions (Mud Lake) 5-16
Table 5-8 Summary of Water Quality Modeling Results - Ultimate
Watershed Conditions (Mud Lake) 5-16
Table 6-1 Construction BMPs 6-2
City of Plymouth 4
3id Or&t Hydrologic 6 Hydrou6c Study
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
hGENERAL
The Watershed Hydrologic and Hydraulic Study (H/H Study)
presents recommendations for surface water management in the
MUSA expansion area in the northwestern portion of Plymouth (see
Map 1). The H/H Study builds upon the City's 1999 Water
Resources Management Plan (WRMP) and recommends a surface
water system to collect, store, treat, and convey surface water
throughout the study area under ultimate development conditions.
The H&H Study supersedes all previous plans for the study area
including the 1999 WRMP and the 1980 Storm Drainage Plan.
The H/H Study analyzed the surface water system for the study
area shown on Map 1. In addition, any areas tributary to, but
outside of, the study area were also included in the analysis. The
study provides quantitative goals and standards for managing
surface water in the study area. These standards include design
data such as pond normal and high water levels, pond storage
volumes, allowable peak flow rates, and phosphorus removal
efficiencies.
cLAND USE
The study area comprises 1,780 acres, of which 1,325 acres are
considered developable. The remaining 455 acres consist of open
water, wetlands, and street and railroad right-of-way. Of the
developable land, approximately 85% is residential, with the
remainder split among commercial, industrial, and public.
The design land use in the study area is shown on Map 2. Shown
graphically on the map is the City's planned 2020 land use. As
noted in the map's legend, several adjustments have been made
to estimate and model ultimate conditions in the study area.
These are as follows:
1. The Begin Oaks Golf Course was modeled as residential land
use at 3 units per acre.
2. The Hampton Hills Golf Course was modeled as a mix of LA -1.
LA -2, and LA -3 residential land uses.
3. Rural residential land (LAR) was modeled as residential land use
at 3 units per acre.
4. Development plans for Providence Academy were
incorporated into the model (shown as LA -1 on Map 2). This
City of Plymouth 5
Y- Draft Hydrologic d Hydrourc Study
area was modeled based on its planned pervious and
impervious surfaces.
These adjustments account for the possibility that the City could at
some point in the future allow for lot splits or redevelopment of rural
residential areas or golf courses.
rASTORMWATER QUANTITY
A recommended system of ponds, storm sewers, and overland
conveyance facilities was developed and is presented in this
report. These are presented on Map 1, and design details are
provided in Appendices A-E. The system maintains existing
drainage patterns to the greatest extent possible. Significant
regional ponding is proposed to provide the necessary storage
required to retain high intensity stormwater runoff peaks and
reduce the possibility of flooding downstream. The reduction in
peak rates due to ponding will result in smaller downstream storm
sewers, reduced overland flow, and a more cost-effective system
overall. Incorporating regional ponding areas as recommended in
this plan is important to maintaining the stability of creeks and
natural corridors. Ponding areas can also be integrated into the
City's park and trail system to maximize developable acreage and
create park/wildlife corridors.
The following list presents the suggested steps and design criteria
for the final design of the quantity portion of stormwater facilities.
Site-specific details must be considered at the time of final design.
1. Consult with City Staff and this plan for planned peak
discharge rates at the proposed pond location in relation to
the overall ultimate drainage system plan.
2. Model the 1-, 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events
to calculate the high water level (HWL) and peak outflow rate
of the pond. When designing local water quality and quantity
ponds, the proposed 100 -year peak discharge rate should be
maintained less than or equal to existing conditions.
3. When designing local water quality and quantity ponds, if
there is downstream erosion potential prior to the next pond,
then the proposed 2 -year peak discharge rate should be less
than or equal to pre -agriculture conditions (CN=58).
4. Maintain a minimum of two feet above the 100 -year HWL for
the lowest floor elevations of structures adjacent to basins.
City of Plymouth 6
3idDraft Hydrologic 6 Hydraulic Study
5. Provide an emergency overflow outlet a minimum of one foot
below the lowest floor elevation of adjacent structures.
6. Limit the maximum side slopes leading to the normal water
level to 3:1.
7. Provide a minimum aquatic bench of 10 feet (width) at a 10:1
slope below the normal water level.
8. Over -excavate ponds during construction to allow for
sedimentation during development.
9. Design erosion control or energy dissipaters at pond inlets and
the outfalls of pond outlet pipes or weirs.
10. Provide skimming at all outlet structures.
11. Check that the proposed pond elevation will provide for the
outlet of possible upstream landlocked areas.
12. Provide a 12 -foot wide open access area at a maximum grade
of 15 percent to the normal water level of all basins. Access
must be provided to the basin outlet structure, all inlets to the
basin, and to the first cell of a multi -cell basin.
13. Include other design parameters as required by regulatory
agencies.
14. Basin design must include the method and schedule for
stabilizing adjacent slopes and consideration of wetland
plantings around the perimeter.
15. Provide overflow routes for added protection against flooding
and local erosion.
ABSTORMWATER QUALITY
The City's primary goal for water quality management within the
study area is to require mitigation for new development as
necessary so that there is minimal increase in the exported load of
phosphorus to priority water resources under the developed
condition compared to the existing condition. This mitigation goal
is termed a "non -degradation objective" and, if applied
successfully, would ensure that development within the study area
will not degrade the quality of these receiving waters (i.e., increase
the phosphorus concentration within the waterbody).
In some cases, the existing quality of the waterbody meets or
exceeds these numerical quality measures; application of the non -
degradation objective for watershed loadings under future
City of Plymouth
31d Draft Hydrologic & Hydraulic Study
development conditions would help preserve this condition and
obviate the need for further management actions.
In other cases, the receiving water does not meet the current
numerical limits; application of the non -degradation standard for
new development in the study area would preserve the existing
quality of the resource. However, additional management actions
within the waterbody itself or in other portions of the watershed
outside the study area - would be needed to meet the numerical
phosphorus limits. Identifying these measures and their effects for
resources beyond the study area boundary (i.e., Bass Lake and Elm
Creek) is beyond the scope of this study.
Two scenarios were modeled to bracket existing loading
conditions. The first assumed all agricultural land was in row crop
which resulted in higher baseline loads), and the second assumed
all agricultural land was in grass hay. In any given year, it is likely
that actual use of agricultural land within the study areas lies
between these two extremes.
The following minimum removal efficiency performance standards
using detention basins should be applied to ensure that the City's
water quality goals are met:
Shingle Creek Drainage District (Watershed Outlet Nos. 1, :2, 3,
and 4): 65%.
Mud Lake Drainage District (Watershed Outlet No. 5): 60%.
Elm Creek Drainage District to Maple Grove (Watershed Outlet
Nos. 6 and 7): 60%.
Remainder of Elm Creek Drainage District (Watershed Outlet
Nos. 8 and 9): 65%.
ACCOST ESTIMATE
The total estimated cost for trunk surface water quantity and
quality facilities in the study area is approximately $1.7 Million.
These stormwater system improvements could be funded through
the City's general fund, a stormwater utility, area charges, flood
reduction grants, stormwater quality grants, or combinations
thereof.
City of Plymouth 8
311 Graf Hydr ftL- 3 HydrouSc Study
1. INTRODUCTION
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc., was retained by the
City of Plymouth to complete surface water planning for the MUSA
Metropolitan Urban Service Area) expansion area in the
northwestern portion of the City. This Watershed Hydrologic and
Hydraulic Study (H/H Study) contains the results of our analysis and
recommendations for surface water management in this area.
The City of Plymouth is located in the central portion of Hennepin
County in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (see Figure 1-1). The
study area is located in the northern portion of the City (see Map
1). It was identified as a MUSA expansion area in the City's
recently updated Comprehensive Plan. There is strong
development pressure in the area, with a number of proposed
development plans submitted to the City in recent months, and
the City has need for the appropriate tools to manage the
increased stormwater expected to be generated by the new
development.
The H/H Study builds upon the City's 1999 Water Resources
Management Plan (WRMP) and provides quantitative goals and
standards for managing surface water in the study area. These
standards include design data such as pond normal and high
water levels, pond storage volumes, allowable peak flow rates,
and phosphorus removal efficiencies. The H&H Study supersedes
all previous plans for the study area including the 1999 WRMP and
the 1980 Storm Drainage Plan.
The report is organized as follows:
E3 Section 2 contains a description of the physical and hydrologic
characteristics of the study area.
o Section 3 lists public agency requirements affecting surface
water management in the study area.
o Section 4 describes the methodology used in the study area for
both the stormwater quantity and quality analysis.
o Section S presents the recommended stormwater system.
o Section 6 discusses various issues pertaining to construction and
management of the stormwater system, including requirements
of development and maintenance of the system.
o The appendices contain detailed technical data as well as
planning -level cost estimates.
o Map 1 presents the recommended system, including regional
ponds and trunk conveyance facilities.
City of Plymouth 1-1
3id Draft Hydrologic 6 Hydraulic Study
LOCATION MAP fj
Ronestroo
Rosene
0 Ander-lik &
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1-1 Associates
HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC STUDY
7D0D1D3W01.DWG 7-9-01 COMM. 7000103
F— ST. FRANCS BER'a
1 1
LINWOOD
EAST KYrn
WURNS OAR DROVE
1 ANOKA COUNTY
RAYSEY CDIUM&A
ANDOVER NAM LAKE FORESTNEW SCANOIA
FOREST LAKE
AN
H
ki
yyH
DAYTON COON RAPDS
LINO LAKES
CC iER1ALI.E
00}aS ONAYPlR1
BLAINE
R!
YAlf
LmNOTON CIRCLE PTEs WASHINGTON COUNT)'
PLYMOUTH A„ MAPLE GROVE OSSEO YDUN S VowGEDIFILD
BROOKLYN PARK
MEIN OAAKTN TE SILLSIAIER
0CKFORD ENNEPIN OUNTY L
CENTER
FROM
YAow
GRANT
HEIGHTS
aj
LDIf M
a
6'wA
INGEPEN-
I
MI DNA LITTLE
TN
LAPIS PIAN
ROSEVLL[ L P A.
LAKE WA
GOLDEN YAPlEW00D
VALLEY
RAMSEY COUNTYAT
NIpE1ONKA SANT PAULwA1ERlOMIMINEIRISTA
AIDLan
D MWWAPNIS
MOLLYr0o0 RNTERTOwN D AVpH RODOIRlRY SL CPGN
TEST
L BONIF FDNA ST. PAUL AFTON
Nf RYANE
MER RMyiEID AWN LENDOTA FISH
S.
PHEIGHTS
t CANCER wACONA
NCTORIA
LAKETOVN EDEN PRAIRIE PAUL
MILDOMINGP
NETSCARVERCOUNTYCHASKAEADAN COTTAGE GROVE DENMARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
m
YOUNGt
SNARE
BURNSVILLE
aWIREODD pAN.pIpL SAVAGE
YD,,,,D"
b
YH
APPLE RD5E1101NT NNNf>E]T
ASnMGS
LDIRSYLLE
NANCOCL
LAM FRANCISCO COATM
VENA
SAID GEEK SPRING PARK CREDIT LAKevRu EMPIRE
VERMILLION
O MARSHAN 1
RIVER VENIRUON
SCOTT COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCI dIRmAR F
GELE PLANE
NEW MARKET Er
HAMPTON
W WAR
IL
WLAKO" NELLEE PL HEIENA Com LAKE EINIELLA CASTLE ROLL
J•J
tl
HAMPTON DOL7E
NEw
am
I GREENVALE WARMRO 1
I OTA
LOCATION MAP fj
Ronestroo
Rosene
0 Ander-lik &
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1-1 Associates
HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC STUDY
7D0D1D3W01.DWG 7-9-01 COMM. 7000103
2. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
CHARACTERISTICS
J2.1 TOPOGRAPHY
Glacial activity that occurred about 11,000 years ago is largely
responsible for the current topography of the study area and the
configuration of the subwatersheds within the area. The study area
can be characterized as rolling to hilly with poorly drained
depressions supporting wetlands and ponds along with areas of
defined drainage networks.
Many of the depressions were formed as a result of ice blocks
deposited within the glacial drift that underlies much of the area.
The steep slopes that exist are most concentrated along the well-
defined drainage areas including the DNR protected drainageway
running from SC -A 1.3 to SC -A 14.2 (see Map 1), Pomerleau Lake
and its surrounding wetlands, and the northwest portion of the
study area.
Elevations vary from about 922 feet in the northwest outlet of the
study area to approximately 1,046 feet just east of Pomerieau Lake.
A relief map has been created to visually represent the elevation
differences found within the study area, as shown in Figure 2-1.
2 WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE
PATTERNS
Three primary drainage districts have been defined within the
study area, the Mud Lake District, the Elm Creek District, and the
Shingle Creek District. The Elm Creek and Shingle Creek Districts
are simply upstream portions of their respective watersheds. The
Mud Lake District ultimately flows to Elm Creek and is within the Elm
Creek Watershed.
Each of these districts has been further subdivided into subdistricts,
which are identified first by the abbreviation for the watershed in
which they reside, followed by an 'A' (for Area), followed by a
number. The numbering system generally starts at the upstream
end of the district and numerically increases downstream. The
areas for these drainage subdistricts are presented in Appendix A,
while their boundaries can be seen on Map 1.
z2.3 LAND USE
The study area comprises 1,780 acres, of which 1,325 acres are
considered developable. The remaining 455 acres consist of open
water, wetlands, and street and railroad right-of-way. Of the
City of Plymouth 2-1
V Draft Hydrobgrc d Hydraulic Study
developable land, approximately 85% is residential, with the
remainder split among commercial, industrial, and public.
The design land use in the study area is shown on Map 2. Shown
graphically on the map is the City's planned 2020 land use. As
noted in the map's legend, several adjustments have been made
to estimate and model ultimate conditions in the study area.
These are as follows:
1. The Begin Oaks Golf Course was modeled as residential land
use at 3 units per acre.
2. The Hampton Hills Golf Course was modeled as a mix of LA -1,
LA -2, and LA -3 residential land uses.
3. Rural residential land (LAR) was modeled as residential land use
at 3 units per acre.
4. Development plans for Providence Academy were
incorporated into the model (shown as LA -1 on Map 2). This
area was modeled based on its planned pervious and
impervious surfaces.
These adjustments account for the possibility that the City could at
some point in the future allow for lot splits or redevelopment of rural
residential areas or golf courses.
City of Plymouth 2-2
3" d Draft Hydrologic d Hydraulic Study
Pnnleri'eau Late
J — L
iw
a-
Abd Ike
i
a
A
i
CLAW
City of Plymouth
RELIEF MAS'
Hydrologic &
Hydraulic Study
Figure 2-1
Legend
0 Study Area
Q Lakes & Wetlands
City Limits
Elevation Flange
899 -910
910 - 920
920 - 930
930 -940
Q 940 - 950
950-960
960-970
970-980
0 980-990
990-1000
1000- 1010
Q 1010- 1020
1020- 1030
Q 1030 - 1040
1040- 1050
N
W E
S
1000 0 1000 Feel
fjBonestroo
July, 2001 Rosene
d Anderlik &
Assoclates
Engheers S Arcl)Xec[s
i 17017000103%cad1avprgecilrelialmap.apr
3. WATERSHED AND AGENCY REQUIREMENTS
c& 1. WATERSHED REQUIREMENTS
The study area is located within two different watersheds, the Elm
Creek WMO and the Shingle Creek WMO. The City's 1999 Water
Resources Management Plan describes in detail the goals, plans,
and requirements of the WMOs in the City, and that information is
not repeated here. This H/H Study was prepared in conformance
with the rules and requirements of the WMOs.
oc, 3.2. AGENCY REQUIREMENTS
Water resource and wetland regulations continue to evolve, and
the trend is toward more restrictive regulations. This section of the
report presents a synopsis of the current agency requirements
while acknowledging the existence of other requirements that may
be applicable. The City of Plymouth is committed to the
preservation and enhancement of its wetlands and water
resources through full compliance with local, state and federal
wetland regulations. A summary of agency regulations is depicted
in Figures 3-1 and 3-2.
3.2.1. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
MnDNR)
The MnDNR regulates public waters, streams, and wetlands of
types 3, 4, and 5 (as defined in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife's Circular
No. 39). Minimum sizes for MnDNR jurisdiction over wetlands are 2.5
acres in incorporated areas and 10 acres in unincorporated areas.
Wetland mitigation is allowed when the impact is justifiable, such
as the construction of roadway fills. In these cases, the protected
waters permits must include provisions to compensate for the
detrimental aspects of the impact.
Wetlands may be pastured or cropped during dry periods if no
dikes, ditches, the lines, or buildings are constructed, and if the
agricultural use does not result in drainage of the wetland. Filling a
wetland to accommodate wheeled booms on irrigation devices is
allowed if the fill does not impede natural drainage.
City of Plymouth 3-1
3- Draft Hydrobgic d Hydrou6c Study
MINNESOTA STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER "WATERS"
CORPS/MPCA
I •
C IRPS/ i
I
SEC.
CWA4/
1I SE
CWA
1401
DNR
1 LGU/BWSR I WSR
W I I WCA 1
I
I 1 I ZWETLAND
i I I
I I I
1 I PUBLIC WATERS WATER BASIN I I
I
I I
I WATERS OF THE U.S. (WETLANDS)
JURIWSDELAND duttlSWETIAND
DELINEATION DELINEATION
DNR
OHWL
BASED ON ELEVATION
ETERMINED BY DNR)
DNR PROTECTED WATERBODY
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
THE CORPS HAS JURISDICTION ON
WETLANDS THAT ARE PART OF, OR
CONNECTED BY TRIBUTARY, TO A
NAVIGABLE WATER.
PUBLIC WATERS: WATER BASIN
CORPS/MPCA
SEC.
C4
4/401
LGU / BWSR— WCA
L It
WATERS OF THE U.S
WETLANDS)
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND
DELINEATION
1
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND
DELINEATION
NON—DNR PROTECTED WATERBODY
LAW
CWA = CLEAN WATER ACT
WCA = MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
AGENCY
CORPS = U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
BWSR MINNESOTA BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES
DNR = MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
LGU = LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNIT
MPCA = MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3-1
HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC STUDY
VOV000103\CAD\DWG\70001003w03.DWG 7-9-01 HDG
kiSonestroo
1100 Rosene
A -J --I:1. D
hl IUC(IIK 0
Associates
MINNESOTA STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER "WATERS"
EPA / CORPS — CWA, SECTION 404
CORPS — RHA, SECTION 10
I IFLOODPLAIN
I
I MPGA — CWA, SECTION 401
I
I
LGU 81NSR— I
MnoNR •
0_ / I
WCA
I I
I WATERS OF
NON , _ THE U.S. I WATERS OF THE U.S.
WETLANDS I (WETLANDS) I "
I
PUBLIC WATERS I
WATER COURSECWA - CLEAN WATER ACT
I IRHA = RIVERS AND HARBORS ACT OF 1899
WCA — MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1991 FEDERAL
AGENCY 01
EPA - U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CORPS = U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
BWSR MINNESOTA BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES
MnDNR = MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
LGU — LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNIT
MPCA = MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
PUBLIC WATERS: WATER COURSE
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC STUDY
7000103WO2.DWG 7-9-01 HDG
THIS LINE COULD CHANGE ELEVATION
AT ANY GIVEN X—SECTION. CONSEQUENTLY
THE JURISDICTION CHANGES
FIGURE 3-2
LlBonestroo
0 Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
3.2.2 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE)
The USCOE defines wetlands as those areas that are inundated or
saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration
sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support,
a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically adapted for life
in saturated soil conditions. Wetland Types 1 through 8 are
included without any size limitations.
Before filling within a wetland can occur, the proposal must be
submitted to the USCOE to determine if it is within their jurisdiction.
If it is within USCOE jurisdiction, then a Combined Project
Application Form filled out for the Wetland Conservation Act must
also be submitted to the USCOE. In that case, the sequencing
analysis described in Section 3.2.3 for the Wetland Conservation
Act also applies for the USCOE.
Farming of wetlands is allowed as long as the activity does not
change the course, current, or cross-section of a wetland basin.
3.2.3 Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR)
Under State law, BWSR is responsible for the implementation of the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). The 1987 Federal
Manual for Identifying and Delineating Wetlands is used to identify
and delineate wetlands. All wetlands that meet the criteria of the
Act, regardless of type and size, are under BWSR jurisdiction,
except the public waters of the state regulated by the MnDNR.
The City of Plymouth acts as the local governmental unit (LGU;I
administering WCA within the study area.
Drainage or fill of wetlands, wholly or partially, is not allowed unless
the appropriate sequencing analysis is performed. The proposal
must first look at avoiding the wetland altogether. If that is not
feasible then impacts must be minimized. Finally, any wetland fill
must be mitigated. Filling a wetland requires a permit, and
compensatory mitigation is required. The mitigation may be
accomplished by restoring drained wetlands or by converting
upland areas into wetlands. The principle of "no net loss of
wetlands" is followed.
3.2.4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
Wetlands are defined as all waters of the state that are transitional
between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table; is
usually at or near the surface of the land, or the land is covered
with shallow water. Wetlands must also have the three attributes of
soils, vegetation, and hydrology. All wetland types are covered
without size restrictions.
City of Plymouth 3-4
3id Oroft Hydrologic & Hydraulic Study
A wetland compensation program requiring sequencing must be
followed when the physical alteration of a wetland results in the
pollution of that wetland. Such activities are permitted through
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The Section 401 Water Quality
Certification is issued based on the water quality criteria set forth in
Section 301 of the Clean Water Act.
Under current United States Environmental Protection Agency
USEPA) rules, there are no exemptions for agricultural land uses.
MPCA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permits apply to construction sites disturbing five or more acres.
New requirements are currently being implemented for Phase II of
the NPDES program. The effect these revisions will have on the City
of Plymouth is indeterminate at this time.
City of Plymouth 3-5
Yd Droll Hydrologic b Hydraulic Study
4. METHODOLOGY
f4.1 STORMWATER QUANTITY
4.1.1 Background
The H/H Study analyzed the surface water system for the study
area shown on Map 1. In addition, any areas tributary to, but
outside of, the study area were also included in the analysis. The
study recommends a surface water system to collect, store, treat,
and convey surface water throughout the study area under
ultimate development conditions.
Hydrologic/hydraulic computer modeling was used to develop
and evaluate system alternatives. These included ponds, storm
sewers, and overland conveyance facilities to manage the surface
water. Only trunk facilities are included in the study. Trunk facilities
are defined as regional detention ponds and any conveyance
facilities downstream of regional ponds.
A recommended system of ponds, storm sewers, and overland
conveyance facilities was developed and is presented in this
report. The system maintains existing drainage patterns to the
greatest extent possible. Significant regional ponding is proposed
to reduce peak runoff rates. The reduction in peak rates due to
ponding will result in smaller downstream storm sewers, reduced
overland flow, and a more cost-effective system overall. Ponding
areas can also be integrated into a park and trail system to
maximize developable acreage and create park/wildlife corridors.
When possible, existing low areas were utilized for ponding
locations. This maintains existing drainage patterns and minimizes
excavation costs. If wetlands or waterbodies are located in areas
of proposed facilities, these were classified for susceptibility to
stormwater inputs based on field assessments conducted
previously by the City. The stormwater susceptibility of wetlands
within the study area is presented as Appendix D.
The classifications were used to develop standards of protection
for storm, bounce (water level variation) and duration of
inundation with stormwater. These wetland protection standards
are presented in Appendix E. The (outlet sizes and pond volumes)
system was then designed to conform to these protection
standards.
City of Plymouth 4-1
and Draft Hydrologic 6 Hydraulic Study
4.1.2 Computer Modeling
The computer modeling of stormwater quantity for the drainage
system was carried out using the computer software HydroCAD.
HydroCAD stormwater runoff hydrographs are calculated in
accordance with NRCS (formerly SCS) TR -20 methodology.
Hydrograph routing through channels and detention basins is
performed using the Storage -Indication Method. Various storm
distributions are allowed in the model, including the NRCS 24-hour
Type I, IA, 11, and III distributions.
4.1.3 Design Criteria
4.1.3.1 General
The study area was modeled assuming ultimate development
conditions (see Map 2). The 2 -year and 100 -year design storms
were used to model and design detention ponds for rate control.
The recommended system was designed in conformance with the
City's 1980 Storm Drainage Plan and 1999 Water Resources
Management Plan to the greatest extent possible. In particular,
where feasible, peak flows leaving the study area have been
designed to be less than or equal to the proposed peak flows listed
in the 1980 Plan. Design data from the 1980 Plan are presented in
Appendix D. The H&H Study supersedes all previous plans for -the
study area including the 1999 WRMP and the 1980 Storm Drainage
Plan.
The purpose of the 2 -year review was promotion of downstream
channel stability and protection of wetlands susceptible to
stormwater impacts. Significant reduction of the 2 -year peak:
discharge rate below existing conditions is recommended for all
ponds constructed in the study area. The rate control goal is -to
approach pre -agricultural conditions were feasible. A pre-
agricultural condition assumes a mixture of pasture, brush, and
woods (curve number 58). Stormwater bounce and duration of
inundation within wetlands were taken into consideration to
maintain wetland characteristics when using a wetland basin as a
regional ponding facility.
Intensive agricultural practices and urban development have
been observed to result in the following impacts to receiving
streams.
1. Increased frequency of flooding
2. Higher peak flows
3. Shorter time for complete drainage of the watershed
4. Decreased base flow
5. Increased sediment and nutrient loading
6. Changes in physical characteristics of channel (width and
depth)
City of Plymouth 4-2
3i° Draft Hydrologic d Hydrouric study
7. Increase in stream temperature
Some of the above impacts have occurred even with ponding in
upstream watersheds. For this reason, a focus on rate control for
the 2 -year event in addition to the 100 -year event is proposed in
this report. The significant reduction in runoff rates as proposed will
allow the City to restore its ditched stream channels.
Best management practices involving infiltration are encouraged
but not specifically incorporated into the regional system
presented in this report. The City's water quality goals can be
achieved through a combination of regional and local water
quality ponds. Some reasons for not considering the use of
infiltration basins on a regional basis are noted below.
1. The soils in the study area are dominated by silt and are not
generally suitable for infiltration on a regional basis.
2. None of the open channels in the study area support a Cold-
water fishery, and thermal (temperature) issues are therefore
not a major concern.
3. Many of the ponds in the recommended system include
significant reduction of peak runoff rates from small storm
events. This significant reduction in the runoff rates that
typically affect the bankfull discharge of stream systems will
likely negate any impacts from increases in runoff volume due
to development. The bankfull discharge is commonly
interpreted as the maximum flow that occurs on average every
1 to 2 years (assuming a stable stream system). Stable stream
systems have been observed to cope and naturally adjust to
inherently variable precipitation patterns (and resulting runoff
volumes) without loss of stability.
4. Infiltration basins are typically more difficult to design and
construct, occupy more land area, and require much more
frequent maintenance than detention ponds. In addition, they
have a history of high failure rates. It is hoped that new
management approaches (e.g., buffering, vegetative
management) will increase the performance and design life of
infiltration basins; however, these approaches are as yet
unproven over any length of time. Any testing of such
approaches should take place on a local rather than regional
basis, where the potential damages and costs of repair and
retrofitting will be significantly less.
4.1.3.2 Precipitation
The City of Plymouth uses the following design standards:
o Local storm sewers: 5 -year event
o Trunk storm sewers: 10 -year event
City of Plymouth 4-3
3id Draft Hydrobgic & Hydraulic Study
o Detention ponds: 100 -year, 24-hour rainfall (5.9 inches in 2.4
hours); overflow route provided for storms exceeding the '100 -
year, 24-hour rainfall.
For storm sewers, the Rational Method using MnDOT procedures is
used. Precipitation is taken from MnDOT's rainfall Intensity -
Duration -Frequency tables.
These design standards were used in the H/H Study. In addition, a
2 -year, 24-hour rainfall (2.8 inches in 24 hours) was used to evaluate
facilities in or upstream of erosion -prone ravines and
drainageways, as well as to evaluate impacts to wetlands.
It should be noted that a 100 -year, 24-hour rainfall has an
estimated 1 in 100 (i.e., I %) chance of occurring or being
exceeded in any given year. Complete protection against large,
infrequent storms with return intervals greater than 100 years are
typically justified only for very large flood control projects. For most
developing areas, the cost of constructing a large capacity storm
drainage system is much greater than the amount of property,
damage that would result from flooding caused by a storm which
a smaller capacity system could not accommodate.
The excess runoff caused by storms greater than that used for this
design must be accommodated by ponding in low spots in streets
for short periods of time and by providing emergency overflow
drainage routes. This short-term flooding and overland drainage
can minimize much of the damage to property that would occur if
those facilities were not provided. Stormwater pond designs
should include an emergency overflow to provide an outlet below
the lowest floor elevation of any adjacent structure for added
safety.
An NRCS 24-hour Type II storm distribution was used for the study.
The Type II distribution is the storm event recommended for the
upper -Midwest portion of the United States, which the NRCS has
determined from National Weather Service data.
4.1.3.3 Runoff Curve Numbers
The percentage of rainfall falling on an area that runs off and must
be collected by a storm sewer facility is dependent on watershed
variables such as soil perviousness, ground slope, vegetation,
surface depressions, type of development and antecedent rainfall.
These factors are taken into consideration when selecting a runoff
curve number (CN) for use in HydroCAD.
Runoff curve numbers typically vary from 58 for parks to 98 for
asphalt and concrete surfaces to 100 for open water. As areas
City of Plymouth 4-4
3b Draft Hydrologic & Hydraulic Study
develop, curve numbers generally increase, corresponding to the
amount of impervious surfaces caused by street surfacing, building
construction, and grading. The runoff curve numbers used for this
study are presented in Table 4-1.
The antecedent moisture condition (AMC) relates to the moisture
content of the soil prior to a given storm event. Curve numbers
based on land use can be adjusted based on an assumed
moisture condition. For this study, a normal antecedent moisture
condition (AMC 11) was assumed.
Curve numbers are dependent on the type of soil in a given
drainage area. Soil types are classified into four basic hydrologic
groups. Group A soils consist of deep sand and aggregated silts.
Group B consists of sandy loams. Group C soils are low in organic
content and made up of clay loams and soils high in clay. Group
D soils consist of heavy, plastic -type clay soils. Curve numbers that
were assumed in the development of the model were based on
the hydrologic soil group for each drainage area based on the
information contained in the Hennepin County Soil Survey.
Development plans should consider post -development site soil
conditions when choosing runoff curve numbers for final design.
Table 4-1 Runoff Curve Numbers
Land Use Type
Appropriate CN
Value*
Public, Institutional 58-65
LA -Rural 72
LA -1 72
LA -2 80
LA -3 85
LA -4 88
Industrial 88
Commercial 92
Should be adjusted for site-specific amount of impervious surface.
4.1.3.4 Stormwater Conveyance Requirements
Storm sewers are used to transport stormwater runoff. The
capacity of the storm sewer conduit is dependent on the pipe
slope, pipe diameter, and the roughness of the inner surface of the
City of Plymouth 4-5
Yd Draft Hydrologic a Hydraulic Study
pipe. A roughness coefficient (n) of 0.013 was used for concrete
storm sewer pipe and 0.024 for corrugated metal pipe.
Proper design of a storm sewer system requires that all sewer lines
be provided with access through manholes for maintenance and
repair operations. Spacing of manholes should be no greater than
400 feet for storm sewers 15 inches or less in diameter and 500, feet
for storm sewers 18 inches to 30 inches in diameter. Intervals on
larger diameter lines can be increased since the pipes are
sufficiently large for a person to physically enter the storm sewer
pipe itself for maintenance operations. Regardless of storm sewer
size, manholes should normally be provided at all junction points
and at points of abrupt alignment or grade changes.
Although local systems are designed for five-year storm events,
their performance must be analyzed for storms exceeding the
design storm. It should be anticipated that surcharging of the
system would occur when the design storm is exceeded. During
surcharging, the system works as a closed conduit and the pipe
network becomes pressurized with different pressure heads
throughout the system. Low areas that are commonly provided
with catch basins become small detention ponds often performing
like pressure relief valves (water rushing out in some locations). For
this reason, it is extremely important to ensure that these low areas
have an acceptable overland drainage route (emergency
overflow) with proper transfer capacity.
Ponding on streets must meet all of the requirements of the 100 -
year design criteria as a minimum. For safety reasons, the
maximum depth should not exceed three feet at the deepest
point and the lowest adjacent floor elevation should be at least
one foot above the high water overflow elevation. The high water
overflow elevation for temporary street ponding is defined as the
elevation to which water rises before overflowing through
adjacent overland routes.
All storm sewer facilities, especially those conveying large
quantities of water at high velocities, should be designed with
efficient hydraulic characteristics. Manholes and other structures
at points of transition should be designed and constructed to
provide gradual changes in alignment and grade. Pond outlet
control structures should be designed to allow water movement in
natural flow line patterns, minimize turbulence, provide good self-
cleaning characteristics, and prevent damage from erosion.
Adequate catch basins should be provided at all low points in
streets where stormwater collects and at points where overland
flow is to be intercepted. Inlet structures are of special
importance, since it is a poor investment to have an expensive
storm sewer line flowing partially full while the ground surface is
being flooded due to inadequate inlet capacity.
City of Plymouth 4-6
3i° Draft Hydrologic d Hydrouric Study
Inlets should be placed and located to eliminate overland flow in
excess of 400 feet or 3 cfs on streets, whichever is less restrictive.
Additionally, inlet grates must have the capacity to collect the
drainage from the 5 -year storm event for local sewers. Inlet grates
for trunk lines must have a 10 -year inlet capacity, which may
require multiple catch basins or the use of special high capacity
grates at some locations. Intake grates and openings should be of
self-cleaning design to minimize capacity reduction when clogged
with twigs, leaves and other debris.
The following recommendations must be considered when
designing storm sewers:
1. Inlet and outlet pipes of stormwater ponds should be extended
to the normal water level whenever possible. Riprap protection
recommended at all pipe outlets. Pipe outlet velocities should
not exceed 8 fps to ensure stability of riprap.
2. Pipes discharging to channels should have velocities less than 4
fps. Riprap protection around flared end sections is also
recommended.
3. Where outlet velocities exceed 8 fps, the design should be
based on the unique site conditions present. Submergence of
the outlet or installation of a stilling basin approved by the City
should be required when excessive outlet velocities are
experienced.
4. Riprap should be placed to a thickness at least 2.5 times the
mean rock diameter so as to ensure that it will not be
undermined or rendered ineffective by displacement. Where
protection of overland drainage routes is desired (e.g.
emergency overflow), cable concrete, grouted riprap or
permanent turf reinforcement are recommended based on
specific site conditions.
Open channels are recommended in areas where open channel
type drainage will enhance infiltration or the aesthetic or wildlife
qualities of an area. A minimum slope of 1 percent should be
maintained in unlined open channels and 2 percent in overland
drainage routes or swales in developed areas. Slopes of less than
1.5 percent are difficult to construct and maintain and can create
problems with pocketing of water; therefore, an underdrain system
may be required. Side slopes should be a minimum of 3:1
horizontal to vertical) with gentler slopes being very desirable.
Rock riprap must be provided at all points of juncture between two
open channels and where storm sewer pipes discharge into a
channel. The design velocity of an open channel should be
sufficiently low to prevent erosion of the bottom. Riprap or
permanent turf reinforcement mats should be provided in areas
where high velocities cannot be avoided.
City of Plymouth 4-7
V Draft Hydmbgic d Hydraulic study
Both storm drainage facilities and trunk sanitary sewer lines are
designed to take advantage of natural draws and usually folllow
existing drainage routes. As more area develops in the City, the
total runoff in natural drainageways may increase, and
correspondingly the water level may rise. In certain areas, water
could enter the sanitary sewer system, causing capacity problems
and added costs for treatment of stormwater. For this reason,
sanitary sewer manholes that could be subject to temporary
inundation should be equipped with watertight castings and
added precautions should be taken in construction of these
manholes to prevent the entrance of stormwater.
Sanitary manholes located near ponding areas should be raised 1 -
foot above the 100 -year high water level and the adjacent areas
filled when access is required at all times. If access is not required,
watertight castings should be installed. Future storm drainage.
construction should include provisions for improving the
watertightness of nearby sanitary sewer manholes. All newly
constructed sanitary manholes in the vicinity of ponding areas and
open channels described in this report should be waterproof.
4.1.3.5 Stormwater Detention Basin Requirements
Incorporating regional ponding areas as recommended in this
plan is important to maintaining the stability of creeks and natural
corridors. Ponding areas also provide the necessary storage
required to retain high intensity stormwater runoff peaks and
reduce the possibility of flooding downstream.
The storage requirements established for each pond must be
maintained to prevent flooding of property. The discharge flow
rates computed for each ponding area must also be maintained
to ensure that the storage volume provided is used and
downstream flows are not exceeded. The peak flows indicated in
the plan for proposed basins occur at the high water level, usually
under pressurized conditions.
The minimum elevation for the lowest floor of buildings adjacent to
ponds or drainage channels must be two feet above the 100 -year
high water level. The City may require additional freeboard for
landlocked areas or ponds where emergency overflows cannot be
provided. Overland flow routes should be incorporated into the
design for ponds and maintained during development. The lowest
floor of structures that are adjacent to ponds should be indicated
on the site grading plans to ensure adequate freeboard.
The following list presents the suggested steps and design criteria
for the final design of the quantity portion of stormwater facilities.
Site-specific details must be considered at the time of final design.
1. Consult with City Staff and this plan for planned peak
discharge rates at the proposed pond location in relation to
the overall ultimate drainage system plan.
City of Plymouth 4-8
314 Draft Hydmb& 6 Hydrauk study
2. Model the 1-, 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events
to calculate the high water level (HWL) and peak outflow rate
of the pond. When designing local water quality and quantity
ponds, the proposed 100 -year peak discharge rate should be
maintained less than or equal to existing conditions.
3. When designing local water quality and quantity ponds, if
there is downstream erosion potential prior to the next pond,
then the proposed 2 -year peak discharge rate should be less
than or equal to pre -agriculture conditions (CN=58).
4. Maintain a minimum of two feet above the 100 -year HWL for
the lowest floor elevations of structures adjacent to basins.
5. Provide an emergency overflow outlet a minimum of one foot
below the lowest floor elevation of adjacent structures.
6. Limit the maximum side slopes leading to the normal water
level to 3:1.
7. Provide a minimum aquatic bench of 10 feet (width) at a 10:1
slope below the normal water level.
8. Overexcavate ponds during construction to allow for
sedimentation during development.
9. Design erosion control or energy dissipaters at pond inlets and
the outfalls of pond outlet pipes or weirs.
10. Provide skimming at all outlet structures.
11. Check that the proposed pond elevation will provide for the
outlet of possible upstream landlocked areas.
12. Provide a 12 -foot wide maintenance access at a maximum
grade of 15 percent to the normal water level of all basins.
Access must be provided to the basin outlet structure, all inlets
to the basin, and to the first cell of a multi -cell basin.
13. Include other design parameters as required by regulatory
agencies.
14. Basin design must include the method and schedule for
stabilizing adjacent slopes and consideration of wetland
plantings around the perimeter.
15. Provide overflow routes for added protection against flooding
and local erosion.
A4.2 STORMWATER QUALITY
4.2.1 Protection and Management of Priority
Resources
The primary issues driving the City's interest in water quality
management and mitigation activities within the study area are
City of Plymouth 4-9
3- Droft Hydrologic d Hydrouk Study
the protection of priority water resources both within and
downstream of the study area. The resources of highest priority are
Bass Lake, Pomerieau Lake, Mud Lake, and Elm Creek. Pomerleau
Lake and Mud Lake are located within the study area in the
central and northeast sections, respectively, of the area. Bass Lake
and Elm Creek are located outside the study area but receive
runoff from it. Bass Lake is located approximately 0.6 miles east of
the eastern boundary of the study area in the Shingle Creek
watershed, while the main stem of Elm Creek lies several hundred
feet west of the western boundary of the study area.
Key information for each of these resources is summarized in 'fable
4-2.
Table 4-2 - Priority Water Resource Summary
Located outside (downstream) of study area
2Located within study area
3For Elm Creek, watershed area given is that of the creek as it crosses the
Plymouth/Maple Grove boundary (2,600 acres lie within City of Plymouth)
Protection of wetland quality is also of importance to the City. The
City of Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan prohibits the
use of most wetlands for primary stormwater treatment.
Protecting water quality in Bass Lake and Pomerieau Lake is a
primary objective of the water quality management plan outlined
in this document. Mud Lake is considered a deep water wetland
because of its shallow depth. Of particular concern is trying to
control and reduce the amount of phosphorus that reaches Bass
and Pomerleau Lakes. Control of phosphorus is important because
the availability of this nutrient often controls the amount of algal
growth in a lake ecosystem.
City of Plymouth 4-10
3'Dr0ft Hydrologic a Hydrouric study
Bass lake' Pomerleau lake2 Mud lake2 Elm
Creek's
MnDNR I.D. 98P 100P 99W N/A
Surface Area (ac.) 174 30 23 N/A
Maximum depth (ft.) 31 28 5 N/A
Watershed Area (ac.) 3,100 250 77 6,60D3
Watershed/Lake Area
Ratio
18:1 8:1 3.3:1 N/A
Watershed Area within
Study Area
42% 100% 100% 7%
Located outside (downstream) of study area
2Located within study area
3For Elm Creek, watershed area given is that of the creek as it crosses the
Plymouth/Maple Grove boundary (2,600 acres lie within City of Plymouth)
Protection of wetland quality is also of importance to the City. The
City of Plymouth Water Resources Management Plan prohibits the
use of most wetlands for primary stormwater treatment.
Protecting water quality in Bass Lake and Pomerieau Lake is a
primary objective of the water quality management plan outlined
in this document. Mud Lake is considered a deep water wetland
because of its shallow depth. Of particular concern is trying to
control and reduce the amount of phosphorus that reaches Bass
and Pomerleau Lakes. Control of phosphorus is important because
the availability of this nutrient often controls the amount of algal
growth in a lake ecosystem.
City of Plymouth 4-10
3'Dr0ft Hydrologic a Hydrouric study
The amount of algal growth (expressed as chlorophyll "a"
concentration) strongly influences the clarity of the water. Water
clarity is in turn a key physical parameter affecting user
perceptions of the suitability of a lake for recreation and aesthetic
enjoyment. In general, higher phosphorus concentrations cause
more algal growth, which decreases water clarity. As water clarity
decreases, human perceptions of the suitability of the lake for
recreational use and aesthetic enjoyment also drop.
A lake water quality report card has been developed by staff of
the Met Council to grade water quality in lakes in the Metro area
based on summertime (May -September) average values for
several key parameters, including total phosphorus. The grades
and phosphorus ranges to which they apply are shown in Table 4-
3. Based on recent data, the grades for Bass Lake and Pomerieau
Lake are presented in Table 4-4.
Water quality monitoring data for the study area are provided in
Appendix F. The data for Pomeriau Lake are from the Met
Council's CAMP (Citizen Assisted Monitoring Program) program.
Elm Creek and Shingle Creek data were collected by the City of
Plymouth.
Table 4-3 - Lake Water Quality Report Card Grade
Ranges'
City of Plymouth 4-11
31d Draft Hydrologk 6 Hydraulic Study
Total
Grad Phosphorusz Chlorophyll "a"2 Water Comment/Explanatio
e NO) NO) Clarlty2 n
meters)
Exceptional quality;
no recreational use
A 23 10 3.0 impairment
Very good quality:
minor recreational
B 23-32 10-20 2.2-3.0 impairment, often in
late summer.
Average quality for
this region; moderate
C 33-68 20-48 1'2-2'2 impairment for
recreational use,
often in the later half
of the summer.
Poor quality;
recreational use
D 69-152 48-77 7-.2 severely impaired.
City of Plymouth 4-11
31d Draft Hydrologk 6 Hydraulic Study
Grades characterize open -water quality of lakes. Other potential nuisances, such as excessive
aquatic plant growth, are not accounted for.
2Mean values for May -September period.
Source: Twin Cities Metropolitan Council, St. Paul, MN
Table 4-4 - Water Quality Grades for Selected
Plymouth Lakes'
Waterbody Data
Year
Total Phosphorus
Value (ug/1)
Grade
Extremely poor
1991-95 67 C
Pomerleau
quality; noF152777
recreational use
1999 91
possible.
Grades characterize open -water quality of lakes. Other potential nuisances, such as excessive
aquatic plant growth, are not accounted for.
2Mean values for May -September period.
Source: Twin Cities Metropolitan Council, St. Paul, MN
Table 4-4 - Water Quality Grades for Selected
Plymouth Lakes'
Waterbody Data
Year
Total Phosphorus
Value (ug/1)
Grade
Bass Lake 1991-95 67 C
Pomerleau 1996 61 C
Lake
1999 91 D
Based on mean recreation season values for total phosphorus
In general, both deepwater wetlands like Mud Lake and flowing
water like Elm Creek can support somewhat higher phosphorus
concentrations than lakes before showing signs of eutrophication-
related degradation. However, enrichment of these systems is also
a concern because of more subtle ecological changes and
because each passes water that eventually reaches downstream
lakes some distance outside the study area.
The primary source of increased pollutant loadings from the study
area in the future will be associated with the conversion of land
use from the relatively low intensity land uses that exist now (rural
residential, golf course, etc.) to higher density residential uses with
more impervious coverage.
Elevated loadings from higher density developed areas are in part
a consequence of more runoff volume as a result of coverage: by
impervious surfaces such as roads, buildings, parking lots, and
driveways. They are also a consequence of higher concentrations
of pollutants in runoff from urbanized areas. For example, major
sources of phosphorus in urban runoff include improperly applied
fertilizers containing phosphorus, vegetative material left on hard
surfaces, soil and dust particles, and animal waste. Municipal
storm drainage systems needed to prevent flooding provide an
efficient vehicle for delivery of these pollutants from their places of
origin to the receiving water.
City of Plymouth 4-12
31d Draft Mydrofopic a Nydrautic study
It is important to note that many of the best management
practices effective in reducing phosphorus loadings from urban
areas (detention basins, street sweeping, infiltration practices,
source controls) are also effective at reducing a wide range of
other common urban stormwater pollutants, including suspended
solids, BOD, nitrogen, and some heavy metals.
4.2.2 Quality Goals
The City's primary goal for water quality management within the
study area is to require mitigation for new development as
necessary so that there is minimal increase in the exported load of
phosphorus to priority water resources under the developed
condition compared to the existing condition. This mitigation goal
is termed a "non -degradation objective" and, if applied
successfully, would ensure that development within the study area
will not degrade the quality of these receiving waters (i.e., increase
the phosphorus concentration within the waterbody).
To guide future management activities for priority waterbodies, the
City has also identified the highest and best uses for several priority
waterbodies within and immediately downstream of the study
area. Numerical phosphorus limits have then been proposed to
support these uses.
In some cases, the existing quality of the waterbody meets or
exceeds these numerical quality measures; application of the non -
degradation objective for watershed loadings under future
development conditions would help preserve this condition and
obviate the need for further management actions. In other cases,
the receiving water does not meet the current numerical limits;
application of the non -degradation standard for new
development in the study area would preserve the existing quality
of the resource. However, additional management actions -
within the waterbody itself or in other portions of the watershed
outside the study area - would be needed to meet the numerical
phosphorus limits. Identifying these measures and their effects for
resources beyond the study area boundary (i.e., Bass Lake and Elm
Creek) is beyond the scope of this plan.
A summary of the water quality goals for the previously identified
priority resources is presented in Table 4-5. The information on
highest target use and in-lake/in-stream water quality goals is
based on information contained in the City's 1999 Water Resources
Management Plan.
City of Plymouth 4-13
3id Draft Hydrologic 3 Hydraulic Study
Table 4-5 - Water Quality Goals for Priority
Waterbodies
Priority Waterbody Highest Target Use(s) P Loading Goal for In-lake/In- Meets
Study Area stream [TP] Goal
Goa13 Now?
Within Study Area
Pomerleau Lake Non -contact Non-degradation2 75 ug/14 Yes
recreation'
Mud Lake Aesthetics/wildlife Non-degradation2 None N/A
habitat
Outside Study Area
Bass Lake Non -contact Non-degradation2 50 ug/I No
recreation
Elm Creek NIA? Non-degradation2 250 ug/I Unknown
Non -contact recreation means fishing and boating/canoeing
2Non-degradation means minimal increase in the exported load of phosphorus to
priority water resources under the developed condition compared to the existing
condition.
3Stated as May -September mean value
4Goal for Pomerieau Lake reflects the existing condition of the lake obtained by
averaging the mean summertime values for the two years for which monitoring
data is available (1996 - 61 ug/I; 1999 - 91 ug/Q.
4.2.3 Computer Modeling
Computer modeling can be an important aid in estimating the
impact of future development on water quality and how best to
mitigate that impact to achieve certain objectives. Two of the
biggest benefits of constructing a system -wide water quality model
are:
a It can provide the basis for a quantitative estimation of
pollutant loadings from specific data, even when little or no
data from the actual area is available.
a It provides a means of evaluating the impact of different water
quality mitigation options.
It is best to use good quality monitoring data to verify that the
model accurately represents the system analyzed. Even where this
monitoring data is not available, however, a technically sound
model based on regionally accepted input data still provides a
useful measure of the relative impact of land use changes and
effectiveness of certain management measures.
City of Plymouth 4-14
3- Draft Hydrologic d Hydraulic Study
A number of water quality computer models were evaluated for
use in this portion of the analysis. W.W. Walker's PONDNET model
was selected for this application. While there are a number of
more sophisticated urban and non -urban water quality models
available, PONDNET was selected for the following reasons:
PONDNET is capable of incorporating phosphorus loading
information from a wide range of land use intensities. Many of
the more sophisticated urban water quality models are
designed for application in environments where
buildup/washoff of pollutants from impervious coverage drives
the runoff volumes and pollutant loadings generated as output
by the model. These models often do not, however, do a
good job estimating loads from areas with little or no
impervious coverage. Likewise, many sophisticated agricultural
models can do a good job estimating runoff and pollutant
loadings from pervious areas - especially cropland- but fall
short in handling urban landscapes with substantial impervious
coverage. In this application, it was important to have a
model that could do both.
PONDNET can assess the influence of wetlands and existing
ponds on attenuation of phosphorus pollutant loads. Within the
study area, there are numerous existing ponds and wetlands
that affect the pollutant loads exported from within their
subwatersheds. Calculation of loads under both existing and
ultimate watershed development conditions is needed to
account for this effect.
PONDNET is user-friendly and relatively transparent. The model
itself is run in a spreadsheet format. In addition, key input data
phosphorus concentrations in runoff, runoff coefficients,
dissolved/total phosphorus ratios, etc.) that greatly influence
the model output values can be easily accessed, evaluated,
and changed if appropriate. Finally, it is relatively easy to
determine how the model is handling different variables, and
sensitivity analyses are straightforward.
Credible local values for model inputs are relatively easy to
obtain for this area. Much work has been done by various
parties (including Hennepin Parks staff, W.W. Walker, and
various local, regional, and state agencies) to generate
representative values for runoff quantity and quality from
various land uses in the Metro area.
As with any model, PONDNET also has limitations. These include:
City of Plymouth 415
3- Draft Hydrologic d Hydrouk Study
The focus of the model is on the availability of phosphorus. This
focus is well justified in that phosphorus is probably the highest
priority, runoff -associated pollutant in this region because of its
role in eutrophication (nutrient enrichment) of aquatic systems,
which in turn affects the suitability of those systems to support
desired uses. Nevertheless, the model does not directly
calculate loadings of other pollutants that may be of concern
such as total suspended solids, heavy metals, nitrogen, and
hydrocarbons.
The model is designed primarily to assess the impact of settling
basin networks on phosphorus loads. It does not account
mechanistically for the influence of other BMPs such as street
sweeping, infiltration, buffers, etc. on phosphorus pollutant
loads. However, settling ponds/detention basins are still
considered the most effective tool for attenuating a wide
range of pollutants in runoff (including those cited above),, so
this weakness is not considered severe.
The key assumptions that affect the loads generated by various
land uses are:
The annual volumetric runoff coefficient. This is an expression of
how much of the precipitation falling on an area leaves that
area as surface runoff over a year.
The mean concentration of total phosphorus in the runoff.
The fraction of the total phosphorus concentration that is
dissolved. This influences the susceptibility of the total
phosphorus load to removal by settling and other mechanisms.
The total annual precipitation. Average annual values are
generally used.
The values for the key variables on which the PONDNET model for
the study area was based are presented in Table 4-6.
City of Plymouth 4-16
3b Drop WM109k 6 Hydroudd Study
Table 4-6 - Phosphorus Loading Rates for Study Area
Land Use/Cover Density
Units/ac.)
Impervious
Fraction
Runoff
TP) (ug/1)
Dissolved/Total
Phosphorus
Fraction
Runoff
Coefficient
Loading Rate
Ibs./ac./yr.)1
Woodlands N/A N/A 200 6 08 1
Non-ponded
wetland
N/A N/A 200 6 08 1
Undeveloped open
land2 (including
agricultural grass
hay)
N/A N/A 400 6 15 4
Agricultural
cropland
N/A N/A 650 2 24 1.0
Golf course N/A 5% 550 7 12 4
LA -Rural 1 unit/20 ac. 5% 300 5 11 2
LA -1 3 units/ac. 30% 450 3 21 6
LA -2 6 units/ac. 52% 450 3 35 1.0
LA -3 12 units/ac. 70% 500 3 61 2.0
LA -4 20 units/ac.
stacked)
75% 500 3 68 2.2
Commercial N/A 75% 600 3 68 2.6
Industrial N/A 68% 600 3 55 2.1
Based on annual precipitation of 28.3 inches
2Values for parks and open space without buildings or parking lots are
equivalent to those for undeveloped open land
As part of the modeling effort, the pollutant removal performance
of existing ponding and wetland areas needed to be determined.
For constructed ponds, information on area and pond volume was
obtained from the grading plan for the development.
In the case of natural wetlands, the City's wetland inventory was
used as a reference to estimate the fraction of each wetland
covered by a permanent pool of standing water. That portion of a
wetland identified in the inventory as having no permanent open
water pool was assumed not to contribute to water quality
treatment and was instead assigned a small phosphorus export
rate (0.1 Ib./acre).
If the inventory did identify a proportion of the wetland as
supporting a permanent pool of standing water, an estimation of
the area and average depth of the permanent pool was made
City of Plymouth 4-17
Sed Draft Hydrologic 3 Hydrouk Study
using both the inventory information and aerial photos. In general,
mean depths were assigned to the ponded area of specific
wetland types as follows:
Types 1, 2, 6, and 7 - No standing water
Type 3 - Mean depth for ponded portion of wetland of .5 - 1 foot
Type 4 - Mean depth for ponded portion of wetland of 1 - 3 feet.
Type 5 - Mean depth for ponded portion of wetland of 3 - 6 feet.
If a natural pond or wetland had a maximum depth of 10' or more,
a lake response model was used to calculate the phosphorus
concentration in the outflow. This technique was only used for
Pomerleau Lake (maximum depth of 29 feet, average depth of 9
feet).
Under existing watershed conditions, about 34% of the study area
over 600 acres) is comprised of agricultural land. Information from
City staff as well as examination of aerial photos indicated that
much of this land may be rotated between agricultural row crop
and grass hay over a period of years. Two scenarios were
therefore modeled to bracket existing loading conditions. The first
assumed all agricultural land was in row crop (which resulted in
higher baseline loads), and the second assumed all agricultural
land was in grass hay. In any given year, it is likely that actual use
of agricultural land within the study areas lies between these two
extremes.
City of Plymouth 4-18
W Draft Hydrobgic d Hydrourc Study
5. RECOMMENDED STORMWATER SYSTEM
f5.1 OVERVIEW OF MODELING RESULTS
5.1.1 Stormwater Quantity
The proposed surface water management system is shown on Map
1. Map 1 contains ponding as well as locations and sizes of storm
sewers and open channels. Details for all trunk storm sewers are
summarized in Appendix B. The pipe sizes indicated in Appendix B
are based on a number of assumptions (ponding locations, normal
and high water levels, storm sewer routing, and density of
development). While the pipe size and grade can be changed in
the final design, the pipe capacity of each segment should only
be changed after additional analysis.
Pond data, including tributary area, pond surface area, normal
and high water levels for the 2 -year and 100 -year storms, peak
outflows, outlet details, and additional comments are presented in
Appendix C.
The system was designed to be in conformance with the City's
1980 Storm Drainage Plan to the greatest extent possible. 100 -year
peak flows leaving the study area are less than the corresponding
flows in the 1980 plan in all instances except one. The exception is
the peak flow discharging from Subdistrict EC -A25.4, which is
discussed further later in this section. A summary of 1980 plan data
is provided in Appendix D. The H&H Study supersedes all previous
plans for the study area including the 1999 WRMP and the 1980
Storm Drainage Plan.
5.1.2 Stormwater Quality
Results of water quality modeling for existing and ultimate
development land use under average precipitation conditions are
presented in Table 5-1. The results are shown as total phosphorus
loads exported from each of the three drainage districts at the
boundary of the expansion area (Map 1). Exported loads from the
Shingle Creek District travel through Nodes 1-4 exiting the eastern
boundary of the study area, and will eventually reach Bass Lake
downstream. Exported loads from the Mud Lake District leave the
study area through Node 5 along the northern border of the study
area. Exported loads from the Elm Creek District leave the study
area through Nodes 6-9 along the northwest and western
City of Plymouth 5-1
3•s Draft Hydrologic d Hydraulic Study
perimeter of the study area. These loads eventually reach Elm
Creek itself. The locations of all outflow nodes are shown on Map 1.
Table 5-1 - Summary of Loadings by Major Drainage
District- Northwest Expansion Area
Drainage Area Existing Conditions (lbs. TP / yr.)' Ultimate Ultimate
District ac.) Conditions Conditions w/
w/o recommended
mitigation' mitigations. 2
Ag as row Ag as grass
crop hay
Shingle 1,284 579 402 653 378
Creek
Mud Lake 210 45 32 57 39
Elm Creek 281 135 74 221 95
TOTAL 1,774 759 508 931 512
Based on average annual precipitation of 28.3"
2Mitigation standards are presented in the stormwater quality section of each of
the following drainage district narratives.
A more detailed explanation of the water quality modeling results
for each of the major districts as well as priority resources within
those districts is included in the following individual narratives for
each drainage district.
c5.2 ELM CREEK DISTRICT
5.2.1 Stormwater Quantity
Drainage Area: 281 acres
Number of Ponds: 10
DNR Protected Waters: EC -P13.4 (600W), EC -P25.3 (595W)
This district is divided within the study area by the Shingle Creek
District. The northern portion drains north through Nodes 6 and 7 to
Elm Creek within the City of Maple Grove. The southern portion
drains northwest through Nodes 8 and 9 to Elm Creek within
Plymouth. The two major stormwater quantity issues for this district
are:
o Erosion control
a Meeting the peak outflow rates in the 1980 Storm Drainage
Plan.
The majority of the southern portion of the district discharges at
Node 8 to a steep ravine, highly susceptible to erosion. Significant
City of Plymouth 5-2
310 Draft Hydrobprc 6 HydrauUc study
peak flow control is recommended to minimize erosion potential in
the ravine. The majority of the northern portion of the district
discharges at Node 6 to Maple Grove and does not meet the
peak outflow rates specified in the 1980 Storm Drainage Plan.
However, the recommended plan is consistent with Maple Grove's
1996 Stormwater Management Plan.
Specific design considerations and more details on the above
issues are provided below.
EC -P13.2 and EC -P13.4
These two wetlands are separated by Schmidt Lake Road but are
connected with two 30" culverts that allow them to act as one
pond during storm events. The south wetland (Pond EC -P13.2) lies
within the Nanterre development and drains north. The north
wetland (Pond EC -P 13.4) is bounded by the Soo Line Railroad on
the north and west, Schmidt Lake Road on the south, and the
proposed Townhomes at Nanterre development on the east. For
this analysis, the two wetlands were modeled as a single larger
pond.
The existing 24" outlet for Pond EC -P 13.4 (the downstream wetland)
is proposed to be reduced to a 12" culvert to aid in reducing peak
outflows for both large and small storm events. This outlet
discharges to Pond EC -P14.1 and then to a steep, erosion -prone
ravine farther downstream. Significant flow control of large and
small storm events is recommended so as to reduce the erosion
potential in the ravine. The ultimate 100 -yr HWL for this basin will
increase by 0.5' over existing conditions (from our calculations).
The increase in the HWL will not affect adjacent homes.
EC -P14.1
This pond also discharges to the erosion -prone ravine mentioned
above. The pond has been designed to be as large as feasibly
possible to minimize flows through the ravine. A 12" outlet is
recommended to restrict flows from the pond.
EC -P25.1, EC -P25.2, and EC -P25.3
Each of these ponding locations is proposed to have an outlet
structure with an orifice connected to existing outlet pipes. The
orifices are necessary to reduce flows as much as possible prior to
discharge to EC -A25.4 (Node 6), the ultimate discharge point prior
to entering Maple Grove.
EC -A25.4
The peak flow from this area into the City of Maple Grove exceeds
the rate proposed in the 1980 Storm Drainage Plan. Constructing a
pond could reduce the peak flow from this area; however, this
would require significant fill to construct a bermed outlet across an
existing wetland. Maple Grove's 1996 Stormwater Management
Plan calls for ponding shortly downstream from Subdistrict EC -
City of Plymouth 5-3
3b Dolt Hydrobpia d Hydrouk study
A25.4. This ponding is designed to store the unponded runoff from
EC -A25.4. For these reasons, no regional water quantity ponding is
proposed for EC -A25.4.
5.2.2 Stormwater Quality
As stated above, this district discharges through Nodes 6, 7, 8, and
9 as shown on Map 1. Discharges through Nodes 6 and 7 flow
through downstream wetlands before reaching the mainstem of
Elm Creek. Runoff through Nodes 8 and 9 discharges almost
directly to Elm Creek a short distance west of the study area
boundary. Minimizing the impact of discharges through Nodes 8
and 9 on Elm Creek is the primary water quality -related issue for this
drainage district.
The water quality modeling for the study area indicates that
estimated annual total phosphorus loadings through Nodes 6 and
7 under existing conditions range from about 36 lbs./year to about
68 lbs./year. Discharges through Nodes 8 and 9 under existing
conditions are estimated to be between 38 lbs./yr, and 67 lbs./yr.
The lower figures assume that all 127 acres of agricultural cropland
in this drainage district (almost one-half of the area of the drainage
district) are in grass hay (estimated export rate of .4 Ibs.TP/acre),
while the higher figures assume row crop for the agricultural land
export rate of 1 Ib. TP/ac.)
Without mitigation, the planned conversion to ultimate land use
would increase total phosphorus loads through Node 6 and 7 to
about 124 lbs./year, while loads through Nodes 8 and 9 would
increase to about 97 lbs./year. This represents increases of 82%
and 45%, respectively, above the existing condition assuming
agricultural land is in row crop. Similarly, it represents increases of
244% and 155%, respectively, from the existing condition assuming
agricultural land is in grass hay.
With recommended mitigation for all new development, modeling
suggests that exported phosphorus loads under ultimate
development conditions would drop to about 57 lbs./year for
Nodes 6 and 7 and about 38 lbs./year for Nodes 8 and 9. For
Nodes 6 and 7, the composite load lies between the two baseline
loading conditions. For Nodes 8 and 9, the ultimate development
condition load lies very near the estimated existing conditions load
assuming all agricultural land as grass hay.
Table 5-2 contains a summary of the estimated phosphorus loads
as well as runoff volumes exported through each of the nodes for
this drainage district.
City of Plymouth 5-4
Dmft *ftkl & d hwrouric Study
Table 5-2 - Summary of Loadings for Elm Creek
Drainage District - Northwest Expansion Area
Node Watershed Area Existing Conditions - Annual TP Ultimate Conditions - Annual TP
Acres) Load (Runoff Volume)' Load (Runoff Volume)'
Existin Ultimat Ag. as Row Ag. as Grass Without With
g e Crop Hay mitigation mitigation
6 126 129 54 lbs. (52 AF) 29 lbs. (40 AF) 101 lbs. (110 AF) 48 lbs. (110
AF)
7 24 24 14 lbs. (11 AF) 7 lbs. (8 AF) 23 lbs. (19 AF) 9 lbs. (19 AF)
Sub- 150 153 68 lbs. (63 AF) 36 lbs. (48 AF) 124 lbs. (129 AF) 57 lbs. (129
total AF)
8 104 108 52 lbs. (49 AF) 31 lbs. (41 AF) 75 lbs. (66 AF) 30 lbs. (66 AF)
9 23 23 15 lbs. (11 AF) 7 lbs. (8 AF) 22 lbs. (18 AF) 8 lbs. (18 AF)
Sub- 127 131 67 lbs. (60 AF) 38 lbs. (49 AF) 97 lbs. (84 AF) 38 lbs. (84 AF)
total
Grand 277 284 135 lbs. (123 74 lbs. (97 AF) 221 lbs. (213 AF) 95 lbs. (213
Total AF) AF)
Based on average annual precipitation of 28.3"
The mitigation performance standard necessary to achieve the
loading limits presented above for ultimate development
conditions is (see Figure 5-1) :
Cl removal of 60%b of the total phosphorus load for all new
development in the subwatersheds draining to Nodes 6 and 7.
Cl removal of 65%b of the total phosphorus load for all new
development in the subwatersheds draining to Nodes 8 and 9.
The 60% removal rate is toward the mid -point of the range of
removal rates that can be achieved for suburban runoff with
properly designed, single -cell or multi -cell detention basins. The
65% removal rate is toward the upper end of the range and will
require the routine use of well designed multi -cell detention basins.
The primary means of achieving this removal standard should be
installation of properly designed, off-line detention basins in upland
areas as development occurs. Off-line means that the detention
basin should receive only untreated runoff from the area it is
designed to serve: stormwater that has already been treated
should be routed around the detention basin when possible.
City of Plymouth 5-5
and Drott Hydroloplc d Hydraulic Study
Other management practices that decrease runoff volume and/or
decrease phosphorus concentrations in runoff can potentially be
used to achieve even further reductions, though the benefits may
be more difficult to quantify. These management practices
include:
Incorporation of features such as "rainwater gardens" to
enhance infiltration and decrease runoff volumes, especially
for small storms.
Strict adherence to the City of Plymouth's ordinance on
application of fertilizers containing phosphorus.
Use of natural landscaping emphasizing native perennial
grasses and forbs planted to intercept and filter runoff before it
reaches a paved surface, storm drain, open channel,
stormwater pond, or wetland.
Preservation of trees, especially large specimens that can
intercept rainfall before it has a chance to reach the ground
and be converted to surface runoff.
Increasing the wet volume of existing natural wetlands and
constructed ponds where desirable and allowed by the
Wetland Conservation Act.
For the subwatersheds draining through Nodes 6 and 7, uniform
application of a minimum 60% removal efficiency performance
standard using detention basins should ensure that post -
development total phosphorus loads will be between the baseline
loading conditions for agricultural land as row crop and grass hay,
respectively.
For the subwatersheds draining through Nodes 8 and 9, uniform
application of a minimum 65% removal efficiency performance
standard using detention basins should ensure that post -
development total phosphorus loads will be no greater than the
baseline loading conditions for agricultural land as grass hay.
u5.3 SHINGLE CREEK DISTRICT
5.3.1 Stormwater Quantity
Drainage Area: 1,284 acres
Number of Ponds: 35
DNR Protected Waters: SC -P1.3 (599W), Pomerieau Lake (100P), SC -
P12.2 (597W), the drainageway connecting SC -P1.3, SC -P2, SC -
P3.2, SC -P8, SC -P12.2, and SC -P14.2
This district comprises the majority of the study area. The district
drains east to Bass Lake at Nodes 1, 2, 3, and 4 along 1-494.
City of Plymouth 5-7
3" d Droft Hydrobgic 6 Hydrouk Study
Significant stormwater rate control is provided in two primary
locations:
In two large wetlands west of Vicksburg Lane (Ponds SC-PI.3
and SC -P2)
In Pomerieau Lake and its adjoining wetlands
The three major issues for this district are:
The stabilization of the steep ravine that flows through
Subdistrict SC -A8
The determination of how Pomerleau Lake reacts during storm
events
The control of the peak flow crossing under 1-494 adjacent to
and north of the Soo Line Railroad.
Specific design considerations and more details on the above
issues are provided below.
SC -P1.3
This is an important wetland for reducing peak stormwater flows
prior to reaching the ditch/ravine located in Subdistrict SC -A8. An
8" orifice is proposed to be attached to the existing 18" culvert
crossing under the field road. The orifice provides stormwater
attenuation for both the 2 -year and 100 -year storms.
The ultimate 100 -yr HWL for this basin will increase by 0.4' over
existing conditions (from our calculations). The increase in the HWL
will not affect the adjacent homes. The field road may need to be
raised to contain the 100 -yr HWL. Rate control provided by this
basin is not critical to the overall system until the downstream area
develops..
This pond is also important for reducing peak flows and protecting
the ravine located in Subdistrict SC -A8. An outlet is proposed for
this wetland that will raise the normal water level to 987 feet,
restoring the wetland to its predevelopment condition, while
restricting flows from a total of 121 acres.
SC -P7.3
This pond is proposed to be constructed with the Seven Greens
development. It is essential for controlling runoff and maintaining
the design high water level in the existing downstream Pond SC -
P7.6.2.
SC -P7.6.2
This is an existing pond that was created with the Silverthorne
development by berming the outlet. There is an 8" orifice located
City of Plymouth 5-8
3nd Draft Hydrologic d Hydraulic Study
within the outlet structure for this pond that needs to be removed
for the overall drainage to work properly.
This pond provides significant storage and peak flow reduction in
the system. At one time, Pond SC -P8 drained south under the Soo
Line Railroad to Pond SC -P9.4. Currently, it drains east to Pond SC-
P 12.2 via two 36" CMP culverts. The construction of these culverts
in the Hampton Hills Golf Course likely resulted in a lowering of the
ditch bottom upstream of the culverts.
In the future, it is proposed that the lower of the two 36" culverts be
abandoned and the other 36" CMP be replaced with a 24" RCP.
This will provide greater 100 -year rate control and will restore the
hydrology of the upstream wetland. The 100 -year HWL will not
change significantly due to rate control in future upstream ponds.
This abandonment should not be performed until all upstream
regional ponding is in place.
The ultimate I 00 -yr HWL for this basin will increase by 0.4' over
existing conditions (from our calculations). The increase in the HWL
will not affect the adjacent homes.
SC -P9.4
This pond currently drains north under the railroad through a 36"
CMP and 36" RCP. For additional rate control, the CMP culvert is
proposed to be abandoned.
The ultimate 100 -yr HWL for this basin will increase by 0.4' over
existing conditions (from our calculations). The increase in the HWL
will not affect the adjacent homes.
SC -P10.1 and SC -P10.2
These two ponds comprise a wetland that has been classified as
highly susceptible to stormwater impacts. The proposed normal
water level, high water level, and inundation period should not
vary from existing conditions for this wetland. Local upstream
water quality and quantity ponds will be relied upon to meet this
goal.
SC -P11 (Pomerleau Lake)
A steady flow from the outlet of Pomerleau Lake was observed
during the Fall of 2000. A field survey conducted in the Spring of
2001 as part of this project indicated that steady flow was observed
discharging from the outlet at this time as well. Based on these two
observations, a steady flow of 1 cfs was assumed for the lake, and
an outlet was designed to accommodate the flow. Using the
elevations obtained by the field survey, a 12" culvert is proposed to
be placed at the elevation of the existing 24" culvert (934.2). This
results in a 100 -year high water level of 936.5, 0.5' below the high
water level in the 1980 Storm Drainage Plan.
City of Plymouth 5-9
3- Draft Hydrologic 6 Hydrouk Study
The ultimate 100 -yr HWL for this basin will increase by 0.6' over
existing conditions (from our calculations). The increase in the HWL
will not affect the adjacent homes.
SC -P12.2
This is the last significant wetland proposed to attenuate flows prior
to discharge under 1-494. With the recent Cheshire Lane
construction, a 66" pipe with a weir wall was installed that conveys
flows from this area along the north side of the railroad. Runoff
from a total area of 1,105 acres is routed through this wetland and
attenuated by utilizing storage area from the wetland itself, plus
additional storage provided by wetland mitigation sites
constructed by the City and The Reserve development. This outlet
was constructed to reduce flows to meet the peak flow in the 1980
Storm Drainage Plan.
SC -P14.2
This is storage within the ditch prior to discharge under 1-494
through an 84" pipe. Runoff from a total of 1,162 acres is routed to
this point and has a 100 -year peak discharge of 163.4 cis,
approximately 60 cis lower than the peak flow in the 1980 Storm
Drainage Plan.
5.3.2 Stormwater Quality
This drainage district contains Pomedeau Lake and generates
runoff that reaches Bass Lake east of the study area. Protection of
the quality of these two priority resources are the most important
water quality -related issues associated with this district.
About 1,290 acres of the study area drains through Nodes 1-4 to
Bass Lake downstream. Bass Lake has a total watershed drainage
area of approximately 3,100 acres, thus about 42% of the Bass Lake
watershed lies within the study area. The water quality modeling for
the study area indicates that estimated annual total phosphorus
loadings through these nodes under existing conditions range from
about 400 lbs./year to about 580 lbs./year. The lower figure
assumes that all 300 acres of agricultural cropland in this drainage
district are in grass hay (estimated export rate of .4 Ibs.TP/acre),
while the higher figure assumes row crop for the agricultural land
export rate of 1 Ib. TP/ac.) Both account for the influence of
Pomelteau Lake on loads exported through Node 2.
Without mitigation, the planned conversion of ultimate land use
would increase total phosphorus loads through Nodes 1-4 to about
650 lbs./year. This represents a 13% increase above the existing
condition assuming agricultural land is in row crop and a 62%
increase from the existing condition assuming agricultural land is in
grass hay.
With recommended mitigation for all new development, modeling
suggests that exported phosphorus loads under ultimate
development conditions would drop to about 380 lbs./yr., just
City of Plymouth 5-10
31d Draft Hydrologic s HydreuRc study
under the estimated existing conditions load assuming all
agricultural land as grass hay.
Table 5-3 contains a summary of the estimated phosphorus loads
as well as runoff volumes exported through each of the nodes for
this drainage district.
Table 5-3 - Summary of Loadings for Shingle Creek
Drainage District - Northwest Expansion Area
Nod
e
Watershed Area
Acres)
Existing Conditions - Annual TP Load
Runoff Volume),
Ultimate Conditions - Annual TP
Load (Runoff Volume),
Existin
9
Ultimat
e
Ag. as Row Crop Ag. as Grass Hay Without
mitigation
With mitigation
1 47 44 59 lbs. (43 AF) 54 lbs. (41 AF) 44 lbs. (34 AF)2 44 lbs. (34 AF)
2 1155 1162 440 lbs. (451 AF) 308 lbs. (381 AF) 549 lbs. (670 AF) 303 lbs. (670
AF)
3 78 64 67 lbs. (40 AF) 27 lbs. (26 AF) 47 lbs. (43 AF) 18 lbs. (43 AF)
4 14 14 13 lbs. (1 1 AF) 13 lbs. (1 1 AF) 13 lbs. (11 AF) 2 13 lbs. (11 AF)
Total 1294 1284 579 lbs. (544 AF) 402 lbs. (460 AF) 653 lbs. (757 AF) 378 lbs. (757
AF)
Based on average annual precipitation of 28.3"
Numbers reflect mitigation measures in place under existing conditions
A similar analysis was conducted for the Pomerleau Lake
subwatershed, which comprises about 250 acres (about 20%) of
the Shingle Creek District. Output from the watershed loading
model was then coupled with a lake response model and
calibrated with existing monitoring data to estimate expected
recreation season mean in -lake phosphorus concentrations in
Pomerleau Lake. A summary of the existing conditions analysis for
Pomerleau Lake is shown in Table 5-4 while the ultimate watershed
development conditions analysis is shown in Table 5-5. These results
indicate that under the mitigation program proposed, the
objective of maintaining existing water quality in Pomerleau Lake
can be met under ultimate watershed development conditions.
City of Plymouth 5-11
3- Draft Hydrologic 3 Hydrouric Study
Table 5-4 - Summary of Water Quality Modeling
Results - Existing Watershed Conditions (Pomerleau
Lake)
Scenario # Description Watershed TP Lake Predicted In -
1 F Ultimate
Load Residence lake [TPJ in
development with
lbs./yr.)
Time ppbl.2
M mitigation
Years)
1 E Existing Conditions - 62 3.6 84-115
Agricultural land as
row crop
2E Existing Conditions - 55 3.9 67-98
Agricultural land as
half row crop, half
grass hay
3E Existing Conditions - 47 4.1 65-97
Agricultural land as
grass hay
11997 Mean [TP] - 61 ppb; 1999 Mean [TP) - 91 ppb (CAMP); City goal - maintain 75 ppb or
less
21n -lake [TP) are shown as a range predicted by Vollenweider's 1982 Response Model for
Shallow Lakes and Reservoirs (WILMS 3.0)
Table 5-5 - Summary of Water Quality Modeling Results -
Ultimate Watershed Conditions (Pomerleau Lake)
Scenario # Description Watershed TP Load
lbs/yr)
Lake
Residence
Time (Years)
Predicted In -Lake
TPj in ppb'
1 F Ultimate 122 2.1 87-106
development with
M mitigation
2F Ultimate 49 2.1 46-61
development with
enhanced
mitigation (65% TP
removal)2
In -lake [TP] are shown as a range predicted by Vollenweider's 1982 Response Model for
Shallow Lakes and Reservoirs (WILMS 3.0)
2Enhanced mitigation would include construction of multi -cell detention basins to achieve
the target removal rate.
City of Plymouth 5-12
Yd Draft Hydrobgic & Hydraulic study
The mitigation performance standard necessary to achieve the
loading limits presented above for ultimate development
conditions is removal of 65% of the total phosphorus load for all
new development (see Figure 5-1). Achieving this removal
standard will also meet the goals for protection of water quality in
Pomedeau Lake. This removal rate is toward the upper end of the
range of removal rates that can be achieved for suburban runoff
With properly designed, multi -cell detention basins.
The primary means of achieving this removal standard should be
installation of properly designed, off-line detention basins in upland
areas. Off-line means that the detention basin should receive only
untreated runoff from the area it is designed to serve; stormwater
that has already been treated should be routed around such a
detention basin when possible.
Other management practices that decrease runoff volume and/or
decrease phosphorus concentrations in runoff can potentially be
used to achieve even further reductions, though the benefits may
be more difficult to quantify. These management practices
include:
Incorporation of features such as "rainwater gardens" to
enhance infiltration and decrease runoff volumes, especially
for small storms.
Strict adherence to the City of Plymouth's ordinance on
application of fertilizers containing phosphorus.
Use of natural landscaping emphasizing native perennial
grasses and forbs planted to intercept and filter runoff before it
reaches a paved surface, storm drain, open channel,
stormwater pond, or wetland.
Preservation of trees, especially large specimens that can
intercept rainfall before it has a chance to reach the ground
and be converted to surface runoff.
Increasing the wet volume of existing natural wetlands and
constructed ponds where desirable and allowed by the
Wetland Conservation Act.
Uniform application of a minimum 65% removal efficiency
performance standard using detention basins should ensure that
post -development total phosphorus loading will be no higher than
the pre -development loadings, even based on the conservative
baseline scenario that all agricultural land is grass hay.
City of Plymouth 5-13
3id Draft Hydrolagic & Hydraulic Study
c5.4 MUD LAKE DISTRICT
5.4.1 Stormwater Quantity
Drainage Area: 210 acres
Number of Ponds: 8
DNR Protected Waters: Mud Lake (99W), the southern portion of
ML -P3.3 (596W)
The Mud Lake District drains north through Maple Grove at Node 5
and ultimately to Elm Creek. This area has two large ponding
areas, Mud Lake and a wetland (Pond ML -P2.1) downstream from
Mud Lake, that are very effective at attenuating peak stormwater
flows. North of County Road 47, several large wetlands exist that
will require the installation of outlets and berming prior to their use
as efficient ponding basins.
Specific design considerations are provided below.
ML -P1.4 (Mud Lake)
Mud Lake is a critical ponding area with a large storage volume to
manage 104 acres of drainage area. An existing 12" pipe is the
existing outlet for Mud Lake. No changes to the outlet are
necessary.
ML -P2.1
This is a large wetland, likely divided by the construction of County
Road 47. The wetland provides good stormwater attenuation to
manage 128 acres of upstream drainage area. The existing 27"
outlet is partially submerged due to higher ground elevations
upstream and downstream. The outlet is prone to sediment
accumulation. It is proposed to be replaced with an 18" culvert at
a higher elevation matching the downstream ground elevation
controlling the existing water level.
ML -P3.1, ML -P3.2, and ML -P3.3
These are the final three basins located within the Mud Lake
District. All three basins will require berming to store the 100 -year
runoff. The three wetlands will reduce the 100 -year peak outflow
at the Maple Grove boundary to 6 cubic feet per second (cfs)
from a total watershed area of 210 acres.
5.4.2 Stormwater Quality
This drainage district contains several large wetland complexes
including Mud Lake itself). Over 22% of the area of the district will
remain as wetland and open space/park, even under ultimate
development conditions. As stated above, the district discharges
through Node 5 to several large wetland complexes in Maple
Grove, whose discharges in tum eventually reach Elm Creek. The
City of Plymouth 5-14
Oft Hyaobj* & Hydrouk Study
protection of water quality in Mud Lake is the primary water
quality -related issue for this drainage district.
The water quality modeling for the study area indicates that
estimated annual total phosphorus loadings through Node 5 under
existing conditions range from about 32 lbs./year to about 45
lbs./year. The lower figure assumes that all 68 acres of agricultural
cropland in this drainage district (about one-third of the area of
the drainage district) are in grass hay (estimated export rate of .4
Ibs.TP/acre), while the higher figure assumes row crop for the
agricultural land (export rate of 1 Ib. TP/ac.)
Without mitigation, the planned conversion of ultimate land use
would increase total phosphorus loads through Node 5 to about 57
lbs./year. This represents a 277 increase above the existing
condition assuming agricultural land is in row crop and a 78%
increase from the existing condition assuming agricultural land is in
grass hay.
With recommended mitigation for all new development, modeling
suggests that exported phosphorus loads under ultimate
development conditions would drop to about 39 lbs./yr., about
midway between the estimated existing conditions load assuming
all agricultural land as row crop and grass hay.
Table 5-6 contains a summary of the estimated phosphorus loads
as well as runoff volumes exported through each of the nodes for
this drainage district.
Table 5-6 - Summary of Loadings for Mud Lake
Drainage District Northwest Expansion Area
Node Watershed Area Existing Conditions - Annual TP Ultimate Conditions - Annual TP
Load (Runoff Volume) I Load (Runoff Volume) I
Existing Ultimat Ag. as Row Ag. as Grass Without With
e Crop Hay mitigation mitigation
5 206 210 45 lbs. (79 AF) 32 lbs. (61 AF) 57 lbs. (100 AF) 39 lbs. (100
AF)
Based on average annual precipitation of 28.3"
A similar analysis was conducted for the Mud Lake subwatershed,
which comprises about 80 acres (over 38%) of the entire Mud Lake
District. Because there is no recent in -lake water quality monitoring
data for Mud Lake and because Mud Lake is really a deepwater
wetland whose quality is strongly influenced by the abundant
submergent and emergent vegetation within it, no lake response
modeling was conducted.
A summary of the existing conditions loading analysis for Mud Lake
is shown in Table 5-7, and the estimated loadings under ultimate
watershed development conditions are shown in Table 5-8. These
City of Plymouth 5-15
Y- Draft Hydrologic & Hydrouk Study
results indicate that under the mitigation program proposed, the
objective of preventing any further increase in phosphorus loading
to Mud Lake can be met under ultimate watershed conditions.
The numbers reflect the fact that much of the Mud Lake
subwatershed (approximately 37 acres or about 40% of the area of
the Mud Lake subwatershed) is already developed. That portion
that does not yet reflect ultimate development conditions (mostly
the Begin Oaks golf course) will not change the current loadings to
Mud Lake appreciably.
Table 5-7 - Summary of Water Quality Modeling
Results - Existing Watershed Conditions (Mud Lake)
Scenario # Description Watershed TP
Load
1 F Ultimate development with
lbs./yr.)'
1 E Existing Conditions - 36
2F
Agricultural land as cropland
25
2E Existing Conditions - 27
Agricultural land as grass hay
Based on average annual precipitation of 28.3"
Table 5-8 - Summary of Water Quality Modeling
Results - Ultimate Watershed Conditions (Mud -Lake)
Scenario # Description Watershed TP
Load (lbs/yr)l
1 F Ultimate development with 37
no mitigation
2F Ultimate development with 25
mitigation
Based on average annual precipitation of 28.3"
The mitigation performance standard necessary to achieve the
loading limits presented above for ultimate development
conditions is removal of 60% of the total phosphorus load for all
new development (see Figure 5-1). This removal rate is toward the
mid -point of the range of removal rates that can be achieved for
suburban runoff with properly designed, single -cell or multi -cell
detention basins.
The primary means of achieving this removal standard should be
installation of properly designed. off-line detention basins in upland
areas as development occurs. Off-line means that the detention
basin should receive only untreated runoff from the area it is
City of Plymouth 5-16
3' Doff Hydrob& d Hydrourrc Study
designed to serve; stormwater that has already been treated
should be routed around detention basins when possible.
Other management practices that decrease runoff volume and/or
decrease phosphorus concentrations in runoff can potentially be
used to achieve even further reductions, though the benefits may
be more difficult to quantify. These management practices
include:
Incorporation of features such as "rainwater gardens" to
enhance infiltration and decrease runoff volumes, especially
for small storms.
Strict adherence to the City of Plymouth's ordinance on
application of fertilizers containing phosphorus.
Use of natural landscaping emphasizing native perennial
grasses and forbs planted to intercept and filter runoff before it
reaches a paved surface, storm drain, open channel,
stormwater pond, or wetland.
Preservation of trees, especially large specimens that can
intercept rainfall before it has a chance to reach the ground
and be converted to surface runoff.
Increasing the wet volume of existing natural wetlands and
constructed ponds where desirable and allowed by the
Wetland Conservation Act.
Uniform application of a minimum 60% removal efficiency
performance standard using detention basins should ensure that
post -development total phosphorus loading into Mud Lake will be
no higher than the pre -development loadings, even based on the
conservative baseline scenario that all agricultural land is grass
hay.
5.5 Cost Estimates
Cost estimates for trunk storm sewers and ponds are presented in
Appendix G. Storm sewer costs include pipe and appurtenances
as well as erosion control and restoration. Pond costs include
excavation, as needed, and outlet structures. Engineering,
capitalized interest, administration, and contingencies are
included in the costs. Land and easement acquisition costs are
not included.
The total estimated cost for trunk surface water quantity and
quality facilities in the study area is approximately $1.7 Million.
These stormwater system improvements could be funded through
the City's general fund, a stormwater utility, area charges, flood
reduction grants, stormwater quality grants, or combinations
thereof.
City of Plymouth 5-17
Yd Draft Hydrologic & Hydroulic Study
6. STORMWATER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
c6. 1 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
6.1.1 Requirements for New Development and
Redevelopment
Greater impervious coverage associated with new development
or redevelopment activity places additional burdens on the storm
drainage system by increasing the rate and volume of runoff. This
in turn increases the amounts of pollutants exported from a
development site. Existing or expanded storm drainage systems
needed to serve the developed area provide an efficient means
of delivering these higher pollutant loads to downstream receiving
waters. Unless these pollutant loads are reduced, downstream
receiving waters will be degraded over time as a result of
development.
The City of Plymouth recognizes its responsibility to protect priority
water resources in the study area from adverse impacts due to
increases in land use intensity caused by development and
redevelopment activities. To minimize the impacts of
development on Plymouth's priority waterbodies, development
and redevelopment activity shall be subject to water quality
mitigation requirements.
On-site mitigation measures to reduce pollutant export will be the
preferred measure to treat stormwater. In general, mitigation
measures shall be required for future development and
redevelopment activity to achieve the following minimum
reductions in total phosphorus from the land parcel in the post -
development condition (see Figure 5-1):
Shingle Creek Drainage District (Watershed Outlet Nos. 1, 2, 3,
and 4): 65%
Mud Lake Drainage District (Watershed Outlet No. 5): 60%
Elm Creek Drainage District to Maple Grove (Watershed Outlet
Nos. 6 and 7): 60%
Remainder of Elm Creek Drainage District (Watershed Outlet
Nos. 8 and 9): 65%
6.1.2 Best Management Practices
The City recognizes that it is essential to promote, preserve, and
enhance the quality of the water resources in the study area, and
City of Plymouth 6-1
3id Draft Hydrologic d Hydraulic Study
to protect those resources from adverse effects caused by
changes in land use. To protect water quality in the study area,
erosion control measures are essential in limiting the loading of
sediments, phosphorus, and other pollutants and minimizing the
need for future restoration programs.
The implementation of erosion control is most important during the
construction phase of development when erosion rates can be 10
to 100 times the rate of undisturbed areas. In areas where
extensive development is taking place, stormwater discharging to
streams and wetlands frequently contains substantial quantities of
solids and other pollutants. Even with extensive erosion control
practices, sediment and airborne particulates enter the surface
waters of the City.
Table 6-1 indicates the standard stormwater best management
practices that must be considered during the preparation of all
development grading plans that are submitted to the City for
review. Grading plans shall indicate the location of the proposed
BMPs and provide a detail for the design and installation of the
practice, when applicable.
Information indicating when the BMP is to be installed or
completed must also be placed on the grading plan to avoid
disagreement between contractors, inspectors, and City Staff. In
addition to the BMPs listed in Table 6-1, City Staff may require
additional practices based on the specific conditions of a
particular grading site. The MPCA's Urban BMP Handbook provides
information on many more best management practices that are
available.
Table 6-1. Construction BMPs
Practice Intended Result
Temporary Sediment Basins Limit sedimentation rate during construction
Seeding Requirement / Schedule Stabilize soils soon after grading completion
Storm Sewer Inlet Protection Prevent sediment from entering storm sewer
Filter Fabric Fence Placement Limit sediment in overland flow
Fit Development to Existing Terrain Limit changes in topography and drainage
Limit Area of Disturbance Reduce the amount of exposed soils
Phasina of Earth Work Limit amount of soil exposed at one time
Stabilized Vehicle Exit Reduce amount of mud tracking onto streets
City of Plymouth 6-2
d Drop Hydrologic 6 Hydraurc Study
Even with the best and most expensive solids removal system,
contamination of ponds and lakes will occur unless careful
attention is given during the development phase and continued
use of the land. Contractors must utilize best management
practices to minimize erosion during home construction in addition
to the mass grading phase. Property owners must use care in the
development of their yards and sodding of bare areas. Debris is
frequently raked from lawn areas before and after sodding and
left in the street gutters which, if not cleaned up, will be washed
into the storm sewer, eventually reaching ponding areas.
Seeding and mulching is the most effective method of controlling
erosion at the point of inception. The establishment of turf and disk
anchoring of mulch stabilize the soil to help prevent erosion from
occurring. Disturbed areas should be seeded as soon as grading is
completed or if disturbed areas will be left for long periods of time.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation Specification Book
provides a detailed description of seed mixtures and placement
guidelines.
Temporary rock construction entrances provide an area where
mud from vehicle tires can be removed. This prevents tracking of
mud onto local streets where it can enter the storm sewer system
and be transported to downstream waterbodies. A major portion
of soil that is tracked onto streets occurs during the construction
phase of development. Once the foundation or basement of
structures is constructed and backfilled, a gravel base should be
placed in the driveway location to provide access to the site.
It is important that an inspection program and enforcement
procedures be developed for erosion control on construction sites.
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency reviews and enforces
erosion control for construction sites disturbing over five acres
through the NPDES program. However, a limited number of MPCA
staff are responsible for the entire state and are not likely to field
inspect a particular site unless a violation is reported. The
protection of local water resources is best served through regular
site erosion control inspections by the City.
The City requires that grading permit applications address the
manner in which soil erosion and sedimentation will be minimized
during site development. Conformance with erosion control plans
should be field checked during the early phases of mass grading
and periodically until turf has been established on the site.
6.1.3 Conservation Practices
Several conservation practices are essential in reducing the rate of
erosion and sedimentation. Conservation practices can
significantly preserve water quality downstream. The following list
highlights some of the more common conservation practices.
1. Implementation of regional stormwater basin approach -
Regional stormwater facilities can reduce discharge rates for
City of Plymouth 6-3
3- Droll MY&O109C d Hydrouk Study
large drainage areas when properly designed and located in
a watershed. Regional facilities are recommended and
described in Section 5.
2. Buffer Areas - The establishment of buffer areas along existing
and future drainageways and streams provides filtration of
sediments and pollutants in stormwater runoff and stabilizes
stream banks against erosion and stream meandering.
3. Top Soil - A minimum of four inches of top soil should be placed
over disturbed areas to aid in the establishment of vegetative
cover for soil stabilization. At the time the topsoil is placed, the
subsoil should be in a loose, friable condition.
4. Preservation of Existing Wetlands - Existing wetlands provide
natural water quality ponding for stormwater runoff. Wetland
impacts should be mitigated to provide replacement of water
quality functions.
5. Location of Development - Areas with existing steep slopes or
areas of highly erodible soils should be preserved to the
greatest extent possible. These areas should be identified for
protection.
6. Sedimentation Ponds - Areas with moderate to highly erodible
soils may require permanent on-site sedimentation ponds prior
to discharging runoff to downstream regional stormwater
facilities. Proposed development within areas containing
highly erosive soil units should include permanent BMPs to
minimize chronic erosion problems. Additional conservation
practices may be required at the discretion of City Staff.
7. Ravines and Stream Banks - An on-going program should be
developed to field identify ravine and stream bank stabilization
problem areas based on information collected on the geology
of the stream bed, soil conditions and anticipated land use.
8. Bioretention and Biofiltration - The use of bioretention
rainwater gardens, infiltration trenches, depressed medians
and parking lot islands) and biofiltration (grassed swales) should
be encouraged where site conditions are suitable. These
practices can provide treatment and some measure of volume
control of stormwater.
z6.2 CITY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
6.2.1 stormwater Basins
Stormwater basins represent a sizable investment in the City's
drainage system. General maintenance of these facilities can
help ensure proper performance and reduce the need for major
repairs. Periodic inspections should be performed to identify
possible problems in and around the basin. Water quality sampling
City of Plymouth 6-4
3w Dwft tydrok * a Hydrouk study
of the outflow can ensure that stormwater basins are operating
correctly and can detect abnormal pollutant discharges within the
watershed.
The most important part of the inspection of stormwater basins is to
ensure the outlet of the basin can perform at design capacity. The
area around the outlet should be free and clear of debris, litter,
and heavy vegetation. Trash guards should be installed and
maintained over all outlets to prevent clogging of the downstream
storm sewer. Trash guards must be inspected at least once a year,
preferably in early spring, to remove debris that may clog the
outlet. Emergency overflow outlets should be provided for all
ponds when possible. Emergency overflow outlets should be clear
of debris, equipment, or other materials and properly protected
against erosion.
Basin inlets should be inspected for erosion. In cases where erosion
occurs near an inlet, an energy dissipator or 6prap material may
be required. Sediment deposits or deltas may form at the inlet
from poor erosion control practices upstream. This may occur
during mass grading of sites within the drainage area. Large
sediment deposits may reduce the ability of water to discharge
from the storm sewer system during large storm events and may
cause surcharging upstream.
The side slopes of basins must be kept well vegetated to prevent
erosion and sediment deposition into the basin. Severe erosion
along side slopes can decrease the quality of water discharging
from the basin and require dredging of sediments from the basin.
Noxious weeds may need to be periodically removed from around
basins. Some basins in highly developed areas may require
mowing. If mowing is performed, a buffer strip adjacent to the
normal water level should be maintained to provide filtration of
runoff from side slopes and protection of wildlife habitat. A
minimum buffer strip of 20 feet is recommended adjacent to the
normal water level.
Periodic inspection of stormwater basins should include checking
for evidence of illicit dumping or discharges. The most common of
these is dumping of yard waste into the pond. Signs may need to
be posted prohibiting the dumping of yard waste in areas where
this occurs. Oil sheens can also be present in areas were waste
motor oil is dumped into upstream storm sewers. Skimmer devices
placed at outlets of basins can help prevent oil spills from being
transported downstream. Skimmer structures should be
periodically inspected for damage from freeze -thaw cycles.
Inspections performed during dry weather periods should check for
flows at basin inlets. Dry weather flows can indicate illicit dumping
or connections to the storm sewer system.
The removal of sediment deposits will likely be the most expensive
portion of maintenance for stormwater basins. The removal
efficiencies of basins for water quality treatment can be
City of Plymouth 6-5
3iO Draft Hyd ob& d Hydraulic Study
significantly reduced if sediment is allowed to accumulate to
excessive depths. As a general guideline for maintenance
scheduling, ponds will require dredging every 10 to 15 years to
remove accumulated sediments. Some basins will require shorter
or longer times between dredging based on the land use and rate
of erosion within the drainage area.
6.2.2 Open Channels
Overland flow routes constitute an important part of the surface
water drainage system. Open channels are typically vegetated
and occasionally lined with more substantial materials. The lined
channels typically require little or no maintenance. Vegetated
channels require periodic inspection and maintenance, as high
flows can create erosion within the channel. Eroded channels will
contribute to water quality problems in downstream waterbodies
as the soil is continually swept away. If not maintained, the erosion
of open channels will accelerate and the repair will become
increasingly more costly.
6.2.3 Piping System
The total storm sewer piping system constitutes a multimillion dollar
investment for the City. A comprehensive maintenance program is
recommended to maximize the life of the facilities and optimize
capital expenditures. To accomplish this, the following periodic
inspection and maintenance procedures are recommended.
o Inspect catch basin and manhole castings, clean and replace
as necessary.
o Inspect catch basin and manhole rings and replace and/or
regrout as necessary.
o Inspect catch basin and manhole structures and repair or
replace as needed. Check pipe inverts, benches, steps (verify
integrity for safety), and walls. Cracked, deteriorated, and
spalled areas need to be grouted, patched, or replaced.
o Inspect storm sewer piping either manually or by television to
assess pipe condition. Items to look for include root damage,
deteriorated joints, leaky joints, excessive spalling, and
sediment buildup. The piping system should then be
programmed for cleaning, repair, or replacement as needed
to ensure the integrity of the system.
6.2.4 De -Icing Practices
This area receives approximately 50 inches of snow during a typical
year. This requires a large amount of de-icing chemicals to be
applied to roads each winter. The main chemical used for de-
icing is salt, or sodium chloride. Minnesota applies approximately
225,500 tons of road salt and 328,000 tons of sand to its roads each
winter (Lakeside Minnesota 1997). Improper storage and overuse
of salt will increase the risk of high chloride concentrations in runoff
City of Plymouth 6-6
3'd DroR Fl MkVc d Hydrouic Study
and groundwater. High chloride concentrations can be toxic to
fish, wildlife, and vegetation.
Estimates indicate that 80 percent of the environmental damage
caused from de-icing chemicals is a result of inadequate storage
of the material (MPCA 1989). Therefore, proper storage of salt is
critical in reducing the amount of chloride that is transported to
the environment.
Practices should also be followed to reduce the amount of salt
that is applied to roads. One method is to limit the amount of salt
applied to low traffic areas and straight level areas. Streets should
be inspected for the need for de-icing prior to application.
Equipment should be maintained in good working order to evenly
distribute salt on roadways and should be properly calibrated to
prevent excessive application.
6.2.5 Street Sweeping
Street sweeping is an integral part of an effective surface water
management system. The City should continue to operate a
seasonal program to remove, to the greatest extent practicable,
sand, salt, leaves, litter, and other debris from all streets in the study
area. The objective of this program is to minimize impacts from
these materials on the surface waters of the City.
6.2.6 Detection of Illicit Connections and Dumping
In preparation for possible NPDES regulation changes, a program
to detect illicit connections to the City's drainage system should be
implemented. This program would involve the inspection of storm
sewer outfalls during dry weather periods to identify possible illegal
dumping or connections to the storm sewer system. Inspection
should be prioritized by focusing on industrial and commercial
areas, then extending to residential areas.
The location of all existing major outfalls should be identified in the
field and indicated on the City's storm sewer basemap. A major
outfall is defined as follows:
a Non -industrial Areas - a storm sewer pipe outlet with a
diameter greater than 36 inches or a conveyance structure
draining 50 or more acres.
a Industrial Areas - A pipe outlet with a diameter of 12 inches or
more, or a structure draining 2 or more acres.
If dry weather flows are detected and illicit connections could be
the source of the flow, a grab sample should be collected for
analysis to determine if pollutants are present. It is very important
that all data collected under this program be saved in an
organized fashion. The City's GIS system is well-suited for this
Purpose. This information will be valuable in future NPDES
permitting requirements for the City.
City of Plymouth 6-7
3'd Draft Hydrob& 3 HydouUc study
GLOSSARY
Acre -Foot: Volume of water that would cover an acre of land to a
depth of one foot (43,560 cubic feet).
Best Management Practices: Methods, measures, or practices to
prevent or reduce water pollution, including but not limited to
structural and non-structural controls, operation and maintenance
procedures, and scheduling of specific activities. Acronym is BMPs.
Bluegreen algae: A type of algae whose population often
increases dramatically at high nutrient concentrations in lakes.
They can form objectionable surface scums, cause taste and odor
problems, and secrete toxins poisonous to warm-blooded animals.
Bounce: The difference in elevation between the normal water
elevation and the peak water elevation of a pond for a given size
runoff event.
Buffer strip: A band of un -maintained, preferably native,
vegetation left along the edge of a stream, lake or wetland to filter
runoff and/or stabilize the shoreline.
Degradation: A decrease in quality.
Detention Pond: A pond designed to catch and temporarily store
runoff before discharging the water downstream. The volume of
the pool of standing water in the pond is important in determining
how effective the pond will be in treating the incoming
stormwater.
Dissolved Oxygen (D.O.): Oxygen that is dissolved in water. Fish
and other water organisms need oxygen for respiration to survive.
Depletion of oxygen from water can occur as a result of chemical
and biological processes, including decomposition of organic
matter.
Ecosystem: A community represented by interaction among
animals, plants, and microorganisms, and the physical, biological
and chemical environment in which they live.
Empirical: Based on experiment and observation; used to describe
water quality models which are developed from measured data.
Eutrophication: A natural process caused by the gradual
accumulation of nutrients and consequent increased biological
production, and resulting in the slow filling in of a basin with
accumulated sediments, silt, and organic matter. Man's activities
can increase the rate at which eutrophication occurs.
Flood Storage Volume: The volume of water that can be stored
between a pond's normal water level and its high water level. The
size of the flood storage volume strongly influences the
performance of the pond for floodwater management and rate
control.
City of Plymouth
V Draft Hydrobgic 6 Hydraulic Study
High Water level (HWL): The peak water surface elevation in a
ponding area as a result of a specific runoff event. Once the peak
is reached, the pond water elevation eventually returns to its
normal (standing) water level.
Hydrology: The science and study of water in nature, including its
circulation, distribution, and its interaction with the environment.
Impervious Surface: A surface that is impermeable to the
downward seepage of water; e.g., pavement and roof tops.
Loading: The amount of a pollutant or other substance delivered
to a lake, usually expressed as a weight per unit time (i.e. pounds
per year). The loading of a given constituent to a receiving water is
a function of the volume of incoming water and the concentration
of the constituent in the incoming water.
Model: A mathematical representation of an event or process.
Mitigation: Actions taken to reduce an impact. Water quality
mitigation measures can be non-structural (such as street
sweeping, regulation of fertilizer use, and creation/protection of
natural buffers to filter runoff) or structural (such as installation of
detention basins). Properly designed detention basins are among
the most effective and reliable measures for mitigating the water
quality impacts of urban developments.
Normal Water Level (NWL): The elevation of the surface of the
standing water pool within a pond or wetland. Generally, the NWL
is the elevation of the bottom of the primary outlet pipe or
overland flow channel.
Non -Point Source Pollution: Refers to pollution other than that
caused by discharge of pollutants through a pipe from a closed
system to a receiving water. Pollution caused by runoff from farm
fields or paved streets are examples of this non -point pollution.
NURP: Acronym for Nationwide Urban Runoff Program, an EPA
program aimed at characterizing the composition of stormwater
runoff and its impacts upon receiving waters as well as assessing
best management practices. The program was undertaken in 28
U.S. cities in the early 1980s.
Nutrient Trap: A type of pond or wetland that is effective at
removing nutrients from water.
Parts per billion (ppb): a unit of concentration, sometimes
expressed as micrograms per liter (ug/i).
Parts per miliion (ppm): a unit of concentration, sometimes
expressed as milligrams per liter (mg/1).
pH: A measure of the acidic or basic nature of the water, it is
defined as the logarithm of the reciprocal of the hydrogen -ion
concentration in moles/liter.
Phosphorus: A nutrient essential to plant growth. Phosphorus is the
nutrient most commonly limiting plant growth in lakes.
City of Plymouth 2
31d Draft Hydrologic & Hydraulic Study
Rate Control: A term that refers to controlling the rate at which
water is discharged from a watershed. Rate control is often
accomplished by creating ponds -either by excavation or berming-
to temporarily store runoff, then discharging the stored water at a
slower rate to downstream areas. Further reductions in the rate at
which water is released from a pond can be accomplished by
reducing the size of the outlet, such as through installation of a wall
in the outlet structure with a hole (orifice) through it.
Residence Time: The amount of time it takes for water flowing into
a lake to equal the lake volume. The shorter the residence time,
the more incoming water the lake is receiving relative to its
volume.
Suspended Solids: Particulate material which floats in or is carried
along in water (e.g., algae, soil particles).
Total Phosphorus: A measure of all of the different forms of
phosphorus in water. Includes phosphorus dissolved in the water,
suspended or incorporated in algae or other organisms.
Watershed: The area of land draining into a specific body of
water.
Wet Volume: The volume of water in a ponding area that lies
between the bottom of the ponding area and the normal
standing) water level. The size of the wet volume strongly
influences the water quality treatment performance of the
ponding area.
City of Plymouth 3
3id Droft Hydrologic d Hydrouric Study
Appendix A - Subdistrict Drainage Areas
Appendix A - Subdistrict Drainage Areas
Mud Lake District
Subdistrict Area
Name acres)
ML -A1.1 15
ML -A1.2 3
ML -A1.3 16
ML -A1.4 69
ML -A2.1 24
ML -A2.2 9
ML -A3.1 12
ML -A3.2 16
ML -A3.3 45
Total 210
Elm Creek District
Subdistrict Area
Name acres)
EC-Al2.1 20
EC -A13.1 6
EC -A13.2 15
EC -A13.3 19
EC -A13.4 13
EC -A14.1 55
EC -A23.1 24
EC -A24.1 13
EC -A25.1 26
EC -A25.2 22
EC -A25.3 48
EC -A25.4 21
Total
Shingle Creek District
Subdistrict Area
Name acres)
SC -A1.1 10
SC -A1.2 10
SC -A1.3 45 .
SC -A2 56
SC -A3.1 9
SC -A3.2 15
SC -A4 30
SC -A5 38
SC -A6 39
SC -A7.1 12
SC -A7.2 18
SC -A7.3.1 2
SC -A7.3.2 41
SC -A7.4 6
SC -A7.5 8
SC -A7.6.1 5
SC A7.6.2 7
SC -A7.7 8
SC -A7.8 4
SCAB 201
281
Subdistrict Area
Name acres)
SC -A9.1 14
SC -A9.2 11
SC -A9.3 63
SC -A9.4 40
SC -A10.1 107
SC -A10.2 36
SC -A11 123
SC-Al2.1 84
SC-Al2.2 66
SC -A13 33
SC -A14.1 13
SC -A14.2 11
SC -A15.1 22
SC -A15.2 16
SC -A15.3 14
SC -A15.4 12
SC -A17 33
SC -A20.1 11
SC -A25.1 6
SC -A25.2 4
SC -A25.3 3
Total 1258
Appendix B - Trunk Storm Sewer Data
Appendix B - Trunk Storm Sewer Data
ML -P1.1 ML -P1.2 12 150 Existing
ML -P1.2 1.3.1 21 200 Exisfin
1.3.1 1.3.2 18 140 Exisfina
1.3.2 ML-Pi.3 36 750 Existing
ML -P1.3 ML -P1.4 15 40 Exislina Outlet Control Structure with 3" Orifice
ML -PIA ML -P2.1 12 24 Exisfin
ML -P2.1 ML -P3.1 18 120 Proposed
ML -A2.21 ML -P3.3 18 98 Existina
ML -P3.1 ML -P3.3 18 500 Proposed
ML -P3.2 ML -P3.3 12 1 350 1 Proposed Outlet Control Structure with 6' Orifice
ML -P3.3 Outside S Area 15 1 160 1 Proposed
EC -P12.1 Outside Study Area 18 200 Proposed Outlet Control Structure with 12" Orifice; Connect to Existing Storn Sewer
EC -P13.1 EC -P13.2 30 150 Existina
EC -P13.2 EC -P13.4 2x30" 100 Exisfina
EC -P13.3 EC -P13.4 24 40 Existing Also Includes 2 x 30' each 40' in lenoth
EC -P13.4 EC -P14.1 12 16 Proposed Discharge to Swale
EC -P14.1 Outside Study Area 12 100 Proposed Discharge to Swale
EC -A23.1 Outside Study Area 27 84 Existing Discharge to Swale
EC -P25.1 EC -A25.4 1 361 24 Exists P Outlet Control Stricture with 6" Orifice
EC P25.2 EGP25.3 24 127 Exists POutlet Control Structure with 6" Orifice
EC -P25.3 EC -A25.4 12 100 P Outlet Structure with 8" Orifice
Appendix e • Trunk Storm Sewer Data
SC -P1.1 i 1.2.1 12 170 Proposed Must Provide a Manhole for Connection -toExisfing Pipe
1.2.1 SC -P1.2 27 100 Existing
SC -P1.2 SC -P1.3 15 250 Proposed Includes Overflow Weir
SC -P1.3
SC -P2
SC -P2
3.2.1
27
12
42
650
E)dsfina
Proposed Proposed Outlet Control Structure with 8" Orifice• Dischame to Overland Drain. geway
Outlet Control Structure with 8" Orifice
SC -P3.1 3.2.1 12 350 Proposed Outlet Control Structure with 8" Orifice
3.2.1 SC -P3.2 15 200 Proposed Manhole
SC -P3.2 SC -P8 12 450 Proposed utlet is a 27" Pi ; Dische to Swale
SC -P4 SC -P5 12 500 Prosed ntrol Structure with 6' Orifice
SC -P5 SC -P8 15 200 Prosed ntrol Structure with 8" Orifice• Dische to Swale
SC -P8 SC PB 12 ZO Eistin
lExisfina
ntrol SWclure with 10" Orifice Dische a to Overiand DrainagewaySC-A7.1 SC -P7.3 18 458 Existin to 30" Downstream
SC -P7.2 SC -P7.3 24 89 Exists to a Manhole Containin an 8" Orifice Restriction
SC -P7.2
SC -P7.3
SC -A7.8.1
7.3.2.1
24
12
244
100
Exists
Proposed
Outlet for SC -P7.2• Connects to a Manhole Where Flows from SC -P7.5 are Combined -
I Outlet Control Structure with 8" Orifice
7.3.2.1 SC -P7.6 27 400 Existl
SC -P7.4 SC -P7.5 12 90 Existina I Reverse slope skimmer outlet
SC -P7.5 7.5.1 12 16 Existi
7.5.1 7.5.2 24 140 Exists
7.5.2 1 SC -A7.8.1 30 1 950 E)dsfina I Combines with Flows from SC -P7.2
SC -A7.6.1 7.6.1.1 38 230 E)dstlno
7.6.1.1 SC -P7.6 24 5o0 Existina
SC -P7.6 SC -P7.8 12 105 E)dsUng Remove Downstream 8" Orifice Restriction
SC -P7.7 SC -P7.8 18 50 Eidstin
SC -P7.8 SC -P8 48 80 Existina Discharne to Overland Drainageway
SC -P8
SC -P9.1
SC -P12.2
SC419.4
24
18
570
1 150
Proposed
Existi
Existi36" CMP Should be Plugged, Existing 36' CMP Should be Re laced with 24" RCP
SC-A9.2 I SC -P9.4 18 180 Existina
SC -P9.3 I SC -P9.4 12 100 Existin
SC -P9.4 SC -P12.2 36 65 Existi A 36" RCP and 36" CMP exist, the 36' CMP should be abandoned
SC -P10.1 SC -P10.2 36 32 E)dsting
SC -P10.2 SC -P11 24 50 P sed Existing outlet is 2-18" CMP culverts
SC -1311 SC -P12.2 12 100 Proposed Existina outlet Is a 27" CMP culvert
SC -P12.1 SC -P12.2 30 60 E)dstinq Outlet Control Structure with 1' x 0.25' orifice
SC -P12.2 SC -P14.2 88 1 525 Existina Weir Located Upstream of Pipe Inlet, 1' Above Pipe Invert; Pipe Dische a to Ditch
SC -P13 SC -1314.2 30 65 Existina lOutlet Control Structure with 3.2' x 0.5' orifice
SC-P14A SC -P14.2 30 50 Existina 10utlet Control Structure with 1' x 0.25' orifice; Discharge to Ditch
SC -P14.2 Outside Study Area 84 325 Existina I Dischame to Ditch
SC -P15.1 SC -P15.2 12 825 Existin
SC -1315.2 SC -P15.4 27 350 Existina 10utlet Control Structure with 1.3'x 0.25' orifice
SC -P15.3 SC -P15.4 12 50 Existina Discharge to Ditch
SC -P15.4 Outside Study Area 36 1 560 Existi Dische a to Ditch
SC -P17 20.1.1 15 15 Existi Outlet Control Struclure with 6" orifice
20.1.1 20.1.2 300 Exists 36 1/4' Span Arch P-ipe
20.1.2 Outside Study Area 140 Existi 43 3/4" Span Arch Pf • Discharge to Stormwater Pond
SC -P25.1 SC -P25.2 12 40 Existin
SC -P25.2 SC -A25.3 12 100 Exists
SC -A25.3 Outside S Area 30 60 Existi
Appendix C - Proposed Pond Data
Appendix C - Proposed Pond Data
Tributary Area
Pond Previously
Outlet
Elev.
Pond Size 1 oar Storm Event 2 ear Storm Event
Outlet
a
Wv
989.4
At At 100yr HWL Dry Peak HWL Dry Peak
Direct Total
ID Ponded NWL NWL HWL
18
Volume Outflow
0.6
Volume Outflow
5.8
c
9 a Comments
acres) (acres) I (acres)
21"
it 0.
ML -P1.3
feet) acres) (acres) feet) ac -ft) cls) feet) ac -ft) I (ds)
Mud Lake District
ML -131.1 15 15 987.0 0.2 2.0 989.4 2.1 3.8 988.2 0.3 2.9 12" E
ML -P1.2 3 15 18 985.9 0.2 0.6 987.0 0.6 5.8 986.6 0.4 1 2.6 21" E
ML -P1.3 16 18 35 966.2 0.4 0.6 970.0 2.5 31.8 967.6 0.6 4.7 2 -stage E 2-sta a outlet W orifice 15"pipe)
ML -P1.4 69 35 104 965.4 22.9 24.0 966.6 28.0 3.8 965.8 9.6 0.7 12" E Mud Lake
ML -P2.1 24 104 128 963.0 7.7 9.2 963.9 8.4 3.6 963.3 3.9 0.6 18" P
ML -P3.1 12 128 140 961.7 2.0 2.1 962.7 2.8 3.9 962.1 0.9 0.7 18" P
ML -P3.2 16
3.4
16 967.0 2.8 4.2 968.1 4.0 0.9 967.3 1.2 0.3 2 -stage P 2 -stage outlet 6" orifice 12' '
ML -P3.3 54 156 210 960.0 1 2.5 1 14.4 961.7 1 14.3 6.1 960.5 i 4.3 1.2 15" P
EC -P12.1 ^ 20 20 980.0 0.3 0.6 983.0 1.5 12.9 1 981.4 0.6 4.0 2-sta e E 2 -stage outlet 12" orifice 18"DiDe
EC -P13.1 6 6 1006.5 0.7 0.9 1007.9 1.2 5.3 1 1006.8 0.3 0.5 30" E
EC -P13.2 15 6 21 1005.9 0.1 2.8 1007.9 2.6 13.3 1006.5 0.3 2.2 2-30" E
EC -P13.3 19 19 1005.7 0.4 0.7 1008.31 1.6 67.0 1007.0 0.6 7.0 24" & 2-30" E
EC -1313.4 13 40 53 1005.1 0.0 7.2 1007.9 10.4 5.7 1006.3 2.1 3.2 12" P Existing outlet is a 24" culvert
EC -P14.1 55 53 108 994.0 3.4 4.0 998.7 17.2 7.2 995.6 5.7 3.4 12" P
EC -P25.1 1 26 1 26 1 960.0 1 1.1 1 1.5 964.6 1 6.0 2.0 961.3 1 1 . I I . I -stage P 2 -stage outlet 6" orifice Ex. 36"'
EC -P25.2 22 22 946.0 0.6 2.1 949.5 4.5 1.8 947.0 1.0 0.8 2 -stage P 2-sta a outlet 6" orifice Ex. 24" '
EC -P25.3 48 22 70 940.0 7.9 9.4 941.9 16.5 2.1 940.7 6.1 1.0 2-sta e P 12 -stage outlet 8" orifice. 12" '
Appendix C - Proposed Pond Data
Pond
Tributary Area Outlet
Elev.
Pond Size 100-Year Storm Event 2 -year Storm Event
Outlet
a
v
o,
1.4
Direct Previously Total At At 100yr HWL Dry Peak HWL Dry Peak
ID Ponded NWL NWL HWL
1.5
Volume Outflow Volume Outflow
0.7
a Comments
P Overflow weir at 995.0 12" &2 at 992.0
SC -P1.3 45
acres) (acres) (acres) feet) acres) acres) feet)](ac-ft)
990.4
cfs) feet) (ac -ft) cfs)
6.1 0.7 2 -stage P
Shlnale Creek District
SC -P1.1 10 10 1013.5 0.6 1.0 1014.7 1.4 3.2 1013.9 0.3 0.8 12" P
SC -P1.2 10 10 20 995.0 0.7 1.5 995.9 2.0 7.0 995.3 0.7 2.2 12" P Overflow weir at 995.0 12" &2 at 992.0
SC -P1.3 45 20 65 989.0 8.5 16.6 990.4 19.3 1.8 989.5 6.1 0.7 2 -stage P 2-sta a outlet W orifice Ex. 27"pipe)
SC -P2 56 65 121 987.0 5.1 10.9 988.7 17.0 2.0 987.6 6.3 0.8 2 -stage P 2-sta a outlet W orifice 12'pipe)
SC -P3.1 9 9 992.0 0.7 1.3 993.4 1.4 1.0 992.4 0.3 0.3 2 -stage P 2 -stage outlet 6" orifice 12"pipe)
SC -P3.2 15 129 145 977.0 0.4 0.7 981.9 2.5 4.3 977.9 0.4 2.0 12" P Existing outlet is a 27" at 979.3'
SC -P4 30 30 966.0 0.7 1.1 970.6 3.9 6.6 967.3 1.0 1.0 2 -stage P 2 -stage outlet (6' orifice, 12" pipe); Existing outlet
is a 36" RCPA at 968.77
SC -P5 38 30 68 956.0 1.8 3.5 960.2 10.0 10.0 957.7 3.3 2.0 2 -stage P 2-sta a outlet W orifice 15'pipe)
SC -P6 39 39 978.0 0.4 1.4 982.7 6.0 6.6 979.0 2.0 2.7 10' orifice E Reverse slope skimmer outlet -12" connected to
24 under railroad
SC -P7.2 30 30 988.0 0.2 0.8 994.6 3.4 16.6 990.3 0.6 3.0 2-24" E 24" to the north is restricted downstream by 8"
orifice
SC -P7.3 41 30 70 984.0 0.9 4.3 988.5 12.0 3.5 985.8 3.7 2.1 2 -stage P 2-sta a outlet 8" orifice 12" pi
SC -P7.4 6 6 997.4 0.4 1 0.6 999.3 1.1 2.9 998.0 0.5 0.5 12" E Reverse slope skimmer outlet
SC -P7.5 8 6 13 997.0 0.7 1.2 998.5 1.3 3.8 997.5 0.4 0.8 12" E
SC -P7.6 5 84 89 964.0 0.0 1.2 973.8 3.4 10.5 967.3 0.1 5.5 12" P Remove downstream 8" orifice restriction
SC -P7.7 8 8 988.0 0.2 0.3 991.0 0.7 11.4 988.9 0.2 1.9 18" E
SC -P7.8 4 97 100 958.5 0.0 0.0 960A 0.1 27.4 959.5 0.0 8.0 48" E
SC -P8 201 352 553 935.4 0.6 27.9 941.4 46.9 20.6 938.7 7.8 15.0 24" p Replace existing 36" CMP and Plug Existing 36"
CMP
SC -P9.1 14 14 954.0 0.6 0.8 957.4 2.3 13.9 955.2 0.8 6.0 18' E
SC -P9.3 63 63 943.7 0.9 1.1 947.6 4.1 242.9 946.2 2.8 9.4 12' & weir E O and HWL are very sensitive to rainfall intensity
SC -P9.4 51 1 77 129 1 935.5 0.0 15.1 939.4 18.5 1 53.2 937.8 1 1.9 29.8 1 36" E 2-36" culverts exist proposed to abandon one
SC -P10.1 107 107 935.9 0.0 0.2 938.7 8.6 40.7 938.2 2.5 13.3 36" E
SC -P10.2 36 107 143 936.2 0.0 26.7 938.5 12.5 18.8 937.1 4.9 4.1 24" P Replace two existing 18' CMP culverts
SC -P11 123 143 265 934.2 27.0 43.6 936.5 76.5 5.1 935.3 30.7 2.8 12" P Exisfina outlet is a 24' CMP culvert
SC -P12.1 84 84 933.0 1.6 2.5 938.7 12.0 50.0 935.7 5.1 1.9 2 -stage E 1'x0.25' orifice & 30" culvert
SC -P12.2 66 1031 1097 932.3 2.0 18.7 935.5 34.5 84.9 934.1 7.4 39.3 2 -stage E Sharp Crested Weir and 66" culvert
SC -P13 33 33 936.8 0.5 1.1 942.3 7.2 66.5 939.4 4.4 6.6 2-sta E 30" pipe at 935.0 0.5' x 3.2' orifice at 936.8
SC -P14.1 13 1 13 1 934.0 0.7 0.8 936.7 2.0 27.5 935.4 1.0 2.9 2 -stage E II'x0.25' orifice & 30" culvert
SC -P14.2;
33
1143 1154 927.3 0.0 0.1 931.5 0.2 163.8 929.4 0.1 47.6 84" E
SC -P15.1 22 997.0 1.9 2.9 998.3 4.6 3.3 997.4 2.6 0.6 12" E
SC -P15.2 22 38 987.0 0.3 0.4 990.1 1.3 27.3 989.0 0.9 3.1 2 -stage E call described
orifice 8 27" culvert. A 2 -cell pond, last
cell described
SC -P15.3 14 998.0 0.6 0.8 1000.7 1.8 4.7 998.6 0.4 0.8 12' E
SC -P15.4 52 64 956.2 0.0 0.0 959.7 0.1 49.0 957.2 0.0 6.5 36" E
SC -P17 33 930.8 1.7 4.2 933.4 8.9 1.5 931.7 2.4 0.8 2-s e E 2-sta a outlet 6" orifice 15" iSC-P25.1 6 989.2 0.2 0.2 991.5 0.5 1 21.0 1 990.2 1 0.2 2.2 1 12" culvert I E I EOF is used for 100- ar even
SC -1325.2 1 4 1 6 10 976.0 0.1 0.3 981.0 1 1.0 1 6.3 1 977.2 1 0.2 1 2.7 1 12" culvert I E
Appendix D - 1980 Plan Data, Wetland
Susceptibility, and Existing Conditions
Appendix D -1980 Plan Data, Wetland Susceptibility, and Existing Conditions
H&H Study 1 1980 Plan I Wetland I Existing Conditlons
Pond 10 Pond/Node ID NWL HWL cis Wetland ID Susceptibility* NWL 2 -yr Comment
HWL I Inundation Period"hrs
ML -P1.4 Mud Lake ML -P1 966.0 967.5
4$N
rately
1005.2 1006.0 31.8
ML-P2,1I 331 351 3-41N Moderately 963.0 963.0 N/A 2T Outlet at 961.4 Is submerged
ML -133.2 10.4N d SfighV 967.0 1 967.2 N/A
ML -133.3 ML -P2 960.0 962.8 10 1.4N Moderately 960.0 960.2 N/A
EC -P13.4 357 98 4$N Slightly 1005.2 1006.0 31.8
Slightly
EC-P25A 376 55 194N Slightly 960.0 960.0 N/A
66" Riser at 960.0 with 42" outlet pipe at
955.8; Bounce restriction is exceeded by 0.3'
for regional rate control
EC -P25.2 164N Slightly 946.0 946.6 15.9
N/A
EC -P25.3 17.4N Slightly 940.0 940.5 26.1
EC -1325.4 EC -P10 1 940.0 941.7 2 184N slightly 926.0 926.4 N/A
237
SC -131.1 7-9N Slightly 1013.5 1013.0 N/A
SC -P1.3 SC -P1 989.0 990.2 2 3-8N Slightly 989.0 989.3 N/A
SC -P2 SC -P2 986.7 988.4 3
SC -P4 237 62
SC -P5 SC -P4 956.0 961.0 5 25-4S Slightly 956.0 956.6 13.2
Bounce restriction is exceeded by 0.1' for
regional rate control
SC -P6 SC -P7 976.0 979.0 3
SC -P7.3 SC -P3 980.0 984.0 3
SC -P7.6 SC -P6 960.0 963.0 5
SC -P8 279 90 2-9N Moderately 934.0 938.3 110.7
SC -P9.4 SC -P5 940.0 941.4 20 14-9N Moderately 935.5 937.3 29.4
SC -P10.1
SC -P10.2 283 115
14-4N
14-4S
Highly
Highly
937.9
936.2
938.1
936.9
N/A
40.2
Bounce restriction is exceeded by 0.1' and
0.2' for SC -1310.1 and SC -1310.2, respectively;
Upstream ponding must control rates to
maintain existing conditions
SC -P11 Pomerleau Lake SC-P4A 935.5 937.0 5 14S Slightly 934.7 935.1 N/A
SC -1312.2 285 146 14-10N Slightly 932.3 934.3 91.8
SC -P13 286 189
SC -P14.2 287 226
SC -P15.1 289 76 4-3S Slightly 997.0 997.4 N/A
SC -P15.4 290 125
SC -1317 SC -P9 1 931.0 1 934.0 1 1
riorai suscepsom y w swrmwacer Pounce ano munoason penou.
The Inundation period does not apply to wetlands with stomrwater bounce less than 0.5' (see the Inundation Period definition M Appendix E)
Appendix E - Wetland Protection Standards
Appendix E - Wetland Protection Standards
Susceptibility Maximum 2 -yr Storm Bounce Maximum Inundation Period
for 2 -yr Storm Event
Highly Existing' Existing
Moderately Existing plus 0.5' Existing plus 1 da
Slightly Existing plus 1.0' N/A'
Least No Limit N/A
Existing corresponds to existing hydrologic conditions. If there
have been recent significant changes in hydrologic conditions, the
hydrologic conditions that established the wetland should be used.
2 For wetlands classified as moderately and highly susceptible,
the inundation period begins with the storm event and ends when
the water level drains to 1/2 foot above the normal water level.
3 The city engineer may require an inundation period restriction for
slightly susceptible wetlands on a case-by-case basis.
Appendix F - Water Quality Monitoring
Data
Preliminary Laboratory Results for the City of Plymouth
Sample Sample TP SRP TN NH3 NO3 TSS TS pH Cond
10 Date ug/L ug/L mg -NIL mg -NIL ma -NIL mg/L mg/L
Parkers 1 4/21/00 320 1.68
Parkers 2 4121/00 95 1.05
Parkers 3 4121/00 95 1.75
Elm upstream 5/8/00 1.74 0.13
Parkers 1 5/9/00 4.11 0.52
Parkers 2 5/9/00 2.09 0.23
Shingle 519/00 1.09 0.06
Parkers 1 5/11/00 344 312 2.46 0.47 7.08
Elm Elm Road 5/12100 1.90
Elm ® Hamel Rd 5112100 270 1.76 0.15 7.88
Gleason 5/12100 194 108 1.36 0.07 7.38
Parkers 2 5112100 104 27 1.00 0.15 7.81
Parkers 3 5/12100 49 0 0.93 0.05 7.14
Shingle 5/12100 61 6 1.10 0.02 7.39
Elm @ Hamel Rd 5117/00 196 1.76 27.5
Parkers 1 5/17/00 89 39 1.87 63.5
Parkers 2 5/17/00 214 2.73 16.2
Elm C Elm Road 5/18/00 420 5.20 3.58 8.0 936
Elm C Hamel Rd 5/18/00 274 91 1.91 0.43 15.4 704
Parkers 1 5/18100 233 1.81 0.49 13.5 156
Parkers 2 5118/00 130 1.72 0.61 33 708
Parkers 3 5/18/00 39 0.98 0.60 25.8 412
Gleason 5119/00 271 1.47 0.27 10 532
Elm @ Elm Road 5/29/00 286 52 2.12 0.54 16.4 8.21
Elm @ Hamel Rd 5/29/00 474 20 2.26 0.43 0.49 12.9 7.97 0.636
Gleason 5/29/00 173 16 1.05 0.21 0.39 12.1 7.71 0.561
Parkers 1 5/29/00 416 141 2.64 0.24 1.11 36.9 248 7.34 0.151
Parkers 2 5/29/00 131 5 1.74 0.62 0.76 8.7 417 8.02 0.527
Parkers 3 5129/00 78 0 0.90 0.05 0.59 5.3 500 8.21 0.733
Shingle 5129/00 262 0 1.74 0.04 0.39 49.3 697 8.08
Elm Elm Road 5131/00 224 62 2.02 0.17 0.55 28 688 8.13 0.672
Elm Hamel Rd 5/31/00 370 103 2.14 0.13 0.73 20 430 8.05 0.556
Gleason 5131100 144 47 1.07 0.18 0.35 7.2 736 8.05 0.519
Parkers 1 5131/00 161 81 1.40 0.18 0.47 31.8 140 7.49 0.095
Parkers 2 5131100 144 25 1.43 0.24 0.58 50.4 352 7.95 0.352
Parkers 3 5/31100 67 13 0.81 0.10 0.53 14.9 450 8.26 0.732
Shingle 5131100 357 17 1.29 0.04 0.71 52 760 7.99 U35
Parkers 1 6/1100 210 1.82 73.2 230 7.95 0.296
Elm @ Elm Road 62/00 195 1.52 25.7 410 8.22 0.616
Elm @ Hamel Rd 612100 545 2.27 34 46.7 7.88 0.499
Gleason 62100 97 0.98 5.6 320 8.01 0.482
Parkers 2 62100 803 4.39 352 7.55 0.112
Parkers 3 62100 40 0.42 1.4 8.23 0.76
Shingle 62100 250 0.98 34.4 560 7.95 0.776
Elm C Elm Road 6/5/00 244 72 1.75 0.55 36.7 536 8.21
Elm ® Hamel Rd 615100 1046 759 7.60 0.60 64.7 564 7.92 0.533
Gleason 6/5/00 501 22 1.12 0.26 80.5 744 8.04 0.668
Parkers 1 6/5100 117 78 0.88 0.33 11 136 7.91 0.097
Parkes 2 615/00 91 28 1.30 0.43 12.2 484 8.09 0.363
Parkes 3 615/00 26 5 0.71 0.50 5.2 8.31 0.898
Shingle 6/5/00 114 21 1.06 0.24 8.1 380 8.08 0.46
Parkes 1 6115100 362 84 3.21 1.39
Parkes 3 6/15100 32 16 0.77 0.62 4.0 680 9.44 0.698
EM 11 Elm Road 6118100 179 1.51 2.8 716 9.31 0.657
Gleason 6116100 115 1.13 5.0 526 9.00 0.465
Parkers 1 6119100 143 96 1.23 0.09 0.58 5.2 148 0.083
Parkes 2 6119100 274 13 2.34 0.2 0.45 252 540
Parkes 3 6119100 56 0.91 0.01
Etre ® Hamel Rd 620100 315 89 0.11 0.45 9.0 636 0.535
Gleason 620/00 189 54 0.88 0.08 0.26 25.5 244 8.78 0.148
Parkes 1 6/20/00 327 85 1.21 0.06 0.24 85.3 324 8.84 0.059
Elm ® Hamel Rd 621/00 2.69 0.45
Parkes 2 621100 98 17 1.03 0.03 0.68 5.7 368 0.328
Parkes 3 6121100 59 0 0.75 0.01 0.29 628 0.623
Elm ® Hamel Rd 628!00 190 1.79 0.554
Gleason 626/00 107 1.21 6.0 423
Parkers 2 6126!00 126 1.47 5.1 363
Shingle 628!00 462 1.30 46.2 607
Parkers 1 713100 314 1.45 43.7 293 0.074
Parkers 2 7/3!00 81 1.01 3.5 303 0.387
Parkes 3 713/00 83 0.71 6.4 447 0.641
Shingle 713100 1054 0.77 184.5 087 0.650
Gleason 71=0 95 42 0.96 0.1 0.28 1.9 573 8.03 0.559
Dlvmevthwnr/afe vie Pana 1
Sample Sample TP SRP TN NH3 NO3 TSS TS pH Cond
ID Date ug/L ug/L mg -NIL mg -ML mg-N/L mg/L mg/L
Parkers 2 716100 74 43 0.86 0.02 0.22 3.7 310 8.13 0.386
Parkers 3 7/6/00 39 3 0.82 0.01 0.33 4.0 583 8.30 0.5a4
Shingle 7/6100 1259 43 0.05 0.22 212 773 8.02 0.737
Elm C Hamel Rd 7110100 304 121 2.04 0.63 11.6 360 7.97 0.422
Gleason 7110/00 197 77 1.58 0.29 18.88 260 7.80 0.317
Parkers 1 7/10/00 279 107 1.47 0.48 37.6 222 7.53 0.096
Parkers 2 7/10/00 134 63 1.28 0.41 16 222 7.97 0.245
Parkers 3 7/10/00 142 36 0.75 0.27 10.6 300 8.03 0.109
Shingle 7/10/00 313 97 1.16 0.12 26.5 280 7.79 0.292
Gleason 7/19/00 197 64 1.61 0.61 5.5 7.92 0.449
Parkers 1 7/19/00 271 162 2.21 1.43 10.7 7.58 0.118
Parkers 2 7/19/00 200 71 1.47 0.66 11 0.354
Parkers 1 7/25/00 355 55 5.14 0.95 138
Elm Q Hamel Rd 7126/00 289 92 0.66 1.07 13.5 553 0.75
Gleason 7/26/00 276 172 1.31 0.44 48 240 0.287
Elm Q Hamel Rd 8/1/00 60 0.61
Parkers 52 all/00 156 51 0.21 0.31
Parkers 02 8/8/00 134 52 0.21 0.46 28.3 550 0.711
Elm 10 Hamel Rd 8/8/00 467 273 0.53 0.61 48 247 0.198
Gleason 8/8/00 333 47 0.72 0.64 38 313 0.214
Elm Q Elm Road 8/17/00 563 1.57 0.7 145.6 823 0.526
Parkers 92 a/17/00 162 40 7.43 0.42 21.7 430 0.273
Parkers 83 8/17/00 162 0.71 0.39
Elm Q Hamel Rd 8/17/00 404 132 1.38 0.77 24.3 270 0.18a
Elm ® Elm Road 8128/00 110 15 0.27 0 0.64
Parkers O3 8/26/00 198 3 0.49 0.0a 0.77
Parkers 02 8128/00 94 5 0.36 0 0.31
Elm C Hamel Rd 8128/00 276 23 0.60 0.31 1.01
Elm Q Elm Road 9/6/00 107 69 0.52 0 0.46
Parkers t/2 915/00 95 17 0.37 0.34 0.41
Gleason 9/5/00 197 22 0.6a 0.45 0.77
Gleason 9/10/00 147 1.67 0.08 0.58
Total Samples
Collected 96 67 102 43 70 74 64 59 60
Source: City Of PlYMOuth
Pomedeau Lake 2000
I
Date Time Temp TP CLA
mCppbppb
6/13/99 1.520100
6/17/99 1630 22 120
6/30/99 1700 23 70
7/23/99 1540 29 80
8/3/99 2020 26 80
8/10/99 1945 26 80
8/24/99 1.52280
9/1/99 1.321100
9/29/99 1.318110
10/13/99 2.515100
Secchi TKN Phy. Cond Suit. Rec
m ppm 1 to 5 1 to 5
19 1.5 1.8 2 3
16 1.3 1.8 2 4
12 1.8 1.5 2 4
16 1.1 1.5 3 4
38 1 1:8 3 4
37 1 1.6 3 4
27 1.5 1.3 3
31 1.3 1.5 3
9.8 1.3 1.4 3
15 2.5 1.5 2
Source: Metropolitan Council Citizen Assisted Monitoring Program (Unpublished data).
Pomerleau Lake
Plymouth, .Hennepin Co.
Lake ID: 270100
VVMO: Shingle Creek
Volunteer: Jon Engstrom
Sampling site
Contours in meters
0 100 200 300
L
Meters
Data Table
Metropolitan Council quality check)
Dole Time d
Day
Surface
T.P. (C)
TP
agM
CLA
ugn)
Secchi
mete.)
Phys. Rea
Cond. Suit
5/3 1615 14.0 100 2.0 1.3 2 4
5117 1040 20.0 70 10.0 1.5 2 -
6122 1040 23.0 so 4.1 35 2 -
7/4 2000 28.0 so 46.0 1.2 3 -
7115 1730 28.5 so 22.0 1.3 3
one 1715 20.0 50 7.5 1.7 3 -
SW 1700 25.0 60 12.7 1.6 3 -
Ons 1430 2oA 40 2a0 1.5 3
Om 1600 16.0 50 220 1.5 3
Lake Water Quality Grades Based on Summertime Averages
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
tL•i1 fl fi•f>•i>•fi•a
Sources: Metropolitan Council and STORET data)
Surface TP (ug/Q
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
III
Surface TP
TP Quality Check
May June July Aug. Sept. Oct
Date
Secchl Depth (meters) Chlorophyll-a.(ug/1)
0
a..erl o.vw
0,5 o caA
al) Qupr Chet
1 CU O..fy Ch.&
1.5
2
0
a
M
0
U
tri
tIL
10
4
May June July Aug. Stpt. Oct.
Date
5-
4-
43213-
2-
I - Crystal Gear
2 - Some Algae Present
1 3 - Definite Algal Presence
4 - High Algal Calor
5 - Severe Algal Bloom
0
A' 4
0
May June July Aug. Sept. Oct.
Date
Data not available
1 - Beautiful
2 - Minor Aesthetic Problem
3 - Swimming Impaired
4 s No Swlmn*V: Boating OK
5 - No Aesthetics Possible
Ry June July Aug. Sept. O
Date
Pomerleau Lake (27-0100) Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission
Pomerleau Lake is a 35 -acre lake located within the City of Plymouth (Hennepin County). The maximum
and mean depths of the lake are 7.9 and 2.7 m (26 and 9 feet), respectively, and the approximate volume of
the lake is 450 ac -ft. Roughly half of the lake is considered littoral zone (the area of aquatic vegetation
dominance). The majority of the land within the 1,140 -acre watershed is undeveloped, and the watershed -
to -lake size ratio is 33:1.
1996 is the first year in which Pomerleau Lake has been involved in CAMP. In fact, a search through the
STORET nationwide water quality database for data on the lake came up empty. Thus 1996 is the only
year of available data. The lake was monitored nine times between early -May and late -September, 1996.
The nine dates included eight biweekly events by the volunteer(s), and one `quality check' by Council staff.
The resulting data and graphs appear on the next page.
The 1996 overall lake quality grade for Pomerleau Lake, calculated from the individual parameter grades,
is C. The 1996 summertime (May - September) mean TP concentration of 61.1 gg/1(minimum of 40.0
µg/l, maximum of 100.0 µg/1) corresponded to a lake water quality grade of C, while the CLA mean of
16.3 µg/1(minimum and maximum of 2.0 and 46.0 µg/1) resulted in a grade of B. Pomerleau Lake's mean
Secchi transparency of 1.7 m (minimum of 1.2 m and maximum of. 4.0 m) corresponds to a C for water
clarity. The lake's mean TKN concentration was 1.07 mg/I (minimum of 0.73 mg/I, maximum of 1.50
Ing/1)•
As mentioned earlier, there is no water quality data available for Pomerleau Lake other then the 1996
CAMP data. Therefore it is impossible to determine any long-term or short-term trends. To better
understand the lake's water quality and where it may be heading, more data are needed.
The first two graphs show exactly how TP, CLA, and Secchi transparency measurements varied
throughout the course of the monitoring season. In most lakes in the metro area when there are less nutrients
TP) available for algal growth (less algae = less CLA), Secchi transparencies (lake clarity) increases, and vice
versa. However, in this scenario was not as apparent in Pomerleau Lake in 1996. A look at the lake's
1996 data reveals that on certain monitoring dates a rise or fall in the lake's TP concentration did not
produce a similar rise or fall in CLA concentration, nor did the expected opposite reaction in the lake's
Secchi transparency occur.
The last two graphs show seasonal variation in the lake's perceived physical condition and recreational
suitability. The average user perception rankings, on a 1 -to -5 scale, were 2.6 for physical condition (which
fell between 2- "some algae present" and 3- "definite algal presence'), and 4.0 for recreational suitability
no swimming - boating ok"). However, since the lake is not really used recreationally, it may not be
necessary for it to sustain activities such as swimming.
If the reader is aware of any additional or missing information, please contact Randy Anhorn of the
Metropolitan Council at (612) 229-3267 or randy.anhorn@metc.state.mn.us.
112
Appendix G - Cost Estimates
Appendix G - Cost Estimates
ripe cost mauaes mannoses, erosion control, ana resiorauon
2 Outlet Structures include skimming
9 Excavation costs estimated at $4.50/yd3
4 Ravine Restoration costs estimated at $100/LF (includes grading, grade control, and seeding)
Jacking costs estimated at $250/1-F
Channel Restoration costs estimated at $501LF (includes grading, seeding, and planting)
Does not include easement acquisition or lateral costs
Subtotal
30% - Engineering, Interest, Administration
10% Contingencies
Total'
1,218,669
365,601
121,867
1,706,137
Pi Structures Other
From To Size
in.)
Length
ft.)
Cost
ft.) Flared Ends Flared End Cost Outlet Structure Description Quantity
3.4.5.6Cost)($)
Subtotal
ML -132.1 ML -P3.1 18 120 61 1 850 X N/A NIA N/A 12,670
ML -133.1 ML -133.3 18 500 61 1 850 X N/A N/A N/A 35,850
ML -P3.2 ML -P3.3 12 350 44 1 700 X N/A N/A N/A 20,600
ML -133.3 Outside Study Area 15 160 53 1 750 X N/A N/A NIA 13,730
EC -1313.4 EC -P14.1 12 16 44 1 700 X N/A N/A N/A 5,904
EC -1314.1 Outside Study Area 12 100 44 1 700 X Excavation
Ravine Restoration LF
36200
2140
162,900
214,000
386,500
EC -1225.1 EC -P25.4 36 124 Existing N/A N/A X Excavation 9680 43,560 48,060
EC -1325.2 EC -P25.3 24 127 Existing N/A N/A X N/A NIA NIA 4,500
EC -P25.3 EC -P25.4 12 100 44 1 700 X N/A N/A N/A 9,600
SC -131.2 SC -131.3 15 250 53 1 750 X N/A N/A N/A 18,500
SC -131.3 SC -132 30 42 Existing N/A N/A X N/A N/A N/A 4,500
SC -132 3.2.1 12 650 44 N/A N/A X NIA N/A N/A 33,100
SC -133.1 3.2.1 12 350 44 N/A N/A X N/A N/A N/A 19,900
3.2.1 SC -P3.2 15 200 53 1 750 X N/A N/A N/A 15,850
SC -133.2 SC -138 12 450 44 1 700 X
Excavation (
Jacking LF
Ravine Restoration LF
4030
60
1320
18,135
15,000
132,000
190,135
SC -134 SC -P5 12 500 44 1 700 X Jacking LF 60 15,000 42,200
SC -P5 SC -138 15 200 1 53 1 1 1 750 1 X NIA N/A N/A 15,850
SC -P8 N/A Channel Restoration LF 3600 180,000 180.005 -
SC -138 1 SC -P12.2 24 570 81 1 1 1,200 1 X N/A N/A N/A 51,870
SC -1310.2 SC -1311 24 50 81 1 1,200 X N/A N/A N/A 9,750
SC -1311 I SC -P12.2 12 100 44 1 700 X N/A N/A N/A 9,600.
SC -1212.2 N/A Channel Restoration (LF) 1800 90,000 90,000
ripe cost mauaes mannoses, erosion control, ana resiorauon
2 Outlet Structures include skimming
9 Excavation costs estimated at $4.50/yd3
4 Ravine Restoration costs estimated at $100/LF (includes grading, grade control, and seeding)
Jacking costs estimated at $250/1-F
Channel Restoration costs estimated at $501LF (includes grading, seeding, and planting)
Does not include easement acquisition or lateral costs
Subtotal
30% - Engineering, Interest, Administration
10% Contingencies
Total'
1,218,669
365,601
121,867
1,706,137
Maps
0
OMP-=tm
a
a
r;)
City of Plymouth
Future Land Use
Ultimate)
Plymouth H&H Study
Map 2
Legend
Outlet Areas wl Flow Direction
Study Boundary
N.,' Drainage Subdistrict Boundary
Drainage District Boundary
Parcels
Wetland & Open Water
Open Water
Wetland
Future Land Use (Year 2020)
0 C, Commercial
CC, City Center
CO, Commercial Office
IP, Planned Industrial
LA -1, Living Area 1
LA -2, Living Area 2
LA -3, Living Area 3
LA -4, Living Area 4
LAR, Living Area- Rural
PA Public/Semi-PublictIn
LA2-3, Living Area 213
LA1-2, Living Area 112
1100, 0 1100,
TjSonestroo
July, 2001 .L-
Anderl
e
ik &
Associates
6ngmccrt d Architects
iV017000103kad\avprcieclsVnWping.apr layou 11x17 Land Use