Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 11-22-1996NOVEMBER 22, 1996 UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS 1. COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. DECEMBER 4 6:00 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Medicine Lake Room Consider City Manager Salary DECEMBER 4 7:00 P.M. TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING Council Chambers DECEMBER 4 7:00 P.M. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers PLANNING COMMISSION, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 7:00 P.M., Council Chambers. Agenda is attached. (M-2) CITY COUNCIL COMPUTER SUB -COMMITTEE, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, NOON, Medicine Lake Room. THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY, THURSDAY & FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 28-29. City Offices will be closed. OPEN SPA CE SUB -COMMITTEE, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 5:30 P. M., Mooney Lake Room. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, THURSDAY, DECEMBER S, 7:30 P.M., Medicine Lake Room. MEETING CALENDARS — The November, December, and January meeting calendars are attached. (M-7) CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO November 22, 1996 Page 2 FOR YOUR INFORMATION.... 1. CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT AGENDA —Attached is the draft agenda for the regular Council meeting scheduled for December 4. 2. NEW COUNCIL ORIENTATION The first orientation session for new Councilmembers will take place Monday, November 25, at 4:00 p.m. in the Medicine Lake Room. Temporary voice mail assignments are being given to new Councilmembers. Until January the following voice mail numbers will be available: Tim Bildsoe, 509-5010, Saundra Spigner, 509-5009, and Judy Johnson, 509- 5011. 3. COUNCIL LIBRARY CHECKOUT Items in the Administration library are available for checkout by members of the Council. Please use the forms in the notebook labeled "Library Checkout." 4. MEETING MINUTES a. Planning Commission Meeting of November, 12, 1996. (I -4a) b. Charter Commission Meeting of November 13, 1996. (unapproved) (I -4b) 5. STAFF REPORTS a. Plymouth Metrolink Transit System Status Report. (I -5a) b. Report from Public Safety Director Craig Gerdes on the research project inquiring about changing squad car colors. (I -5b) 6. NEWSARTICLES, RELEASES, PUBLICATIONS, ETC. a. Third quarter report on Plymouth use of the West Suburban Mediation Center. (I -6a) 7. CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONS POLICY- CORRESPONDENCE a. Letter from Dr. Hana Tomasek regarding overnight truck noise at the Topaz Trucking Company. The letter has been forwarded to Community Development Director Ann Hurlburt for a response. (1--7a) b. Internet correspondence from Dr. R. David Dexter requesting an estimate of property tax due on his property. The item has been forwarded to City Assessor Nancy Bye for a response. (1--7b) CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO November 22, 1996 Page 3 c. Internet correspondence from Tom Lyngdal commenting on damage done by plowing of his street. The item has been forwarded to Streets Supervisor Roger Wenner for a response. (I -7c) d. Postcard from Allen and Sally Webb supporting residential zoning for land around the water tower near Heather Run. The note has been forwarded to Community Development Director Anne Hurlburt for a response. (I -7d) A status report on the most recent correspondence is attached. (I--7) 8. CORRESPONDENCE a. Letter to Public Safety Director Craig Gerdes from the State Department of Public Safety with notification of the City's successful compliance with the State in its Emergency Operations Plan. (I -8a) b. Letter to Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Chair Peter Enck from Golden Valley Mayor Mary Anderson with a request for a Citizen Advisory Committee representing the cities in the Water Management District. (I -8b) c. Letter to Public Safety Director Craig Gerdes from Ostbye & Anderson/Ultrablue Manufacturing President Jack McBean praising The Plymouth Police Department and Officer Chris Kuklok for performance at the factory site during an attempted burglary on November 17. (I -8c) rp) PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 1996 WHERE: Plymouth City Center 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC FORUM 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5. *CONSENT AGENDA 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:00 P.M. A. City of Plymouth. Approve Capital Improvements Program for 1997-2001. (96151) B. The Community Home Program Company. Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance to allow construction of a two-family dwelling for use as a Residential Care Facility on property located at 14230 Rockford Road. (96129) C. Town & Country Homes, Inc. Land Use Guide Plan Amendment from CS (Commercial Service)/C (Commercial) to LA -3 (High -Medium Density Residential/Living Area 3) and Sketch Plan for a 159 -unit townhome community located in the northwest quadrant of Highway 55 and Dunkirk Lane. (96161) 7. OLD BUSINESS A. City of Plymouth. Adoption of Chapter 21 of the Plymouth City Code to establish a new ordinance for the City of Plymouth, including Adoption of a new map of zoning districts, repealing in its entirety Ordinance No. 80-9 and all amendments thereto. (95100) 8. NEW BUSINESS A. City of Plymouth. Consider Initiating Amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan to Reclassify Property from CS (Commercial Service)/C (Commercial) to CL (Limited Business)/CO (Commercial Office) for Seven Ponds Commercial Site located at the southeast corner of Highway 55 and County Road 24. (96181) B. City of Plymouth. Response to Public Forum issue on keeping dogs. (96175) 9. ADJOURNMENT m-� —I N a ': �3 cl ^+ 00 h N •� ADW r Oo Imo! 'z�•� � �: CCS Q G n �0 p � UlI J H I U L. QL� IQtli yip �r EI 2=c) 0.0 Cp G O 1 �M 8 G N 'OZU �E^ rrm�ziu ii �� E job Ou y.-x.n rvN _�-si �I p0700 oUa a 'aZZ 4071 op igz h oo oaQ p IvUU zz � W> z zz Z O) p b Ct1 Z¢ Iz`n— •� �c C a z' U W 17 .G z 4 U l OV U a : G 0.c j •C II' i (D u Ir O 10 c ,�� 0. .G II O z Q I NTN ^I I-� Oo NN iZ 0 OFra„NA °°_ern cl M+7 QU M 00 C� I� �I b M O l� PFna.eN o„ -nn :1 H n ry — $-4 � 1� 2.2 V Tv - J O) CIO U,� U`u QUI OfIU o U.: f J 'C Ci y aUV,a il��!guidl i3 _i o^pZlSz� I$ Imo_ rc Z IQ z � ` W Q'9 z _ L cc �.. L cti Gt1 a�UI'i�' 0 aUU' oQ_'�ap oUslgul cz4U I ^+ N M C;s 7d O 00 h N C� ..O C/1 QU M d ti 0 c� cIS b n'n , N M v� oU, oU 00 C/1 a C 5 :Iz, u O� Z ci o0 � N zz �I0`U�'' �OU�; ppz0U A3 rva� i ozpU N� rT.oN en O " 4 � V I SOI `o u ' ScE �Ct : Alhvry ', cnryN ,L DRAFT 11/22/96 8:47 AM CITY OF PLYMOUTH AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 4, 1996 TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLYMOUTH FORUM - Individuals may address the Council about any item not contained on the regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full 15 minutes are not needed for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the agenda. The City Council will take no official action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff or commission for future report. 4. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Crime Free Multi -Housing Recognition - Summerplace Apartments 5. APPROVE AGENDA - Councilmembers may add items to the agenda including items contained in the Council Information Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The Council will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda. 6. CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. * Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 'r December 4, 1996 `J Page 2 A. Approve City Council Minutes B. Approve Disbursements *C. Approve Planned Unit Development Amendment and Conditional Use Permit to allow outside storage of roofing materials for property located at 705 Highway 169 North. Westurn Cedar Supply (96135) *D. Approve a Shoreland Management Variance for a 20 -foot setback into the required 100 -foot setback for construction of a new single family dwelling and inground swimming pool located at 205 Black Oaks Lane. Steiner & Koppelman, Inc. (96162) E. Amend License and Permit Fees F. Approve 1997-2001 Capital Improvement Program 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements in Outlot A, Parkers Lake Corporate Center 7' Addition B. Vacation of Larch Lane right-of-way at southeast corner of 24`h Avenue and Larch Lane 8. GENERAL BUSINESS *A. Approve Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for Ferndale Place Addition located at 1220 Ferndale Road. Henry Lazniarz (96038) B. Approve 1996-1997 Dues Payment to League of Minnesota Cities C. Approve payment of Insurance Deductible for Defense Costs D. Appoint sub -committee to consider assessment policy * Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING December 4, 1996 Page 3 for Street Reconstruction E. Appoint sub -committee for Board and Commission appointment process 9. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 10. ADJOURNMENT * Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval. T - �-a CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 12, 1996 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Mike Stulberg, Commissioners Allen Ribbe (arrived at 7:08 p.m.), John Stoebner, Tim Bildsoe, Saundra Spigner, and Roger Berkowitz MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Jeffrey Thompson STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Anne Hurlburt, Planning Supervisor Barbara Senness, Planner Shawn Drill, and Clerical Supervisor Denise Hutt 1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. 2. PUBLIC FORUM: 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MOTION by Commissioner Spigner, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner to recommend approval of the October 22, 1996 Planning Commission Minutes. Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY (96135) Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Westurn Cedar Supply for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and Conditional Use Permit to allow outside storage of roofing supplies for property located at 705 Highway 169 North. Planner Drill gave an overview of the November 4, 1996 staff report. Planner Drill presented pictures of the site depicting the stacks of shingles, vegetation, and views of the site from different angles. Planner Drill stated that he talked with the person that registered the complaint. The complaint was registered because of rubbish and junk vehicles on the site. The complainant indicated that the site has been cleaned up since the complaint was filed. The complainant also stated their satisfaction with the Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #267 the complaint was filed. The complainant also stated their satisfaction with the proposed fence. Planner Drill indicated that the applicant is proposing to extend the fence around to fill the void from all views. Planner Drill noted that the resolution contains an added Condition #5 as to when the fence would have to be in place (May 15, 1997). Chairman Stulberg introduced John Crotteau of 705 N. Highway 169, the petitioner. Crotteau stated that he concurs with the staff report. Mr. Crotteau added that if the fencing needs to be extended further on the west side beyond the tree line, they are willing to do that. Chairman Stulberg continued and closed the public hearing as there was no one present to speak on the issue. MOTION by Chairman Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe recommending approval of a Planned Unit Development Amendment and Conditional Use Permit for outside storage at Westurn Cedar Supply, 705 Highway 169 North. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the applicant is allowed to have storage over the fence line. Planner Drill replied negatively. He added that the storage stacks measure just under six feet, and the proposed fence will be seven feet in height. Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried on a 5-0 Vote. (Commissioner Ribbe abstained due to missing part of the presentation.) B. NORTHERN STATES POWER (96152) Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Northern States Power for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, and Variances to install a 30 -foot high, 750 -foot long salt barrier between the Parkers Lake substation and I-494 to prevent the power from going out in the winter. Planning Supervisor Senness gave an overview of the November 7, 1996 staff report. Planning Supervisor Senness presented a sample of the material that will be used for the barrier. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the barrier would be in place year round. Planning Supervisor Senness replied affirmatively. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if Northern States Power will be paying for all three projects that are required. Planning Supervisor Senness replied affirmatively. Chairman Stulberg introduced John Theis of Northern States Power, the petitioner. Mr. Theis stated that after the winter problems incurred in 1991 and 1996, Nothern Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #268 States Power decided to make provisions to prevent future power outages. They concluded that no single project will totally resolve the problem, rather a combination of three projects is required. They include 1) recoating the insulators with a silicone product to protect them from the salt at a cost of $250,000, 2) reconfiguring the substation, adding circuit breakers so they can run major functions with large parts of the substation out of service at a cost of $1.5 million and 3) constructing the salt barrier for reducing the influx of contaminant to the substation at a cost of $560,000. Chairman Stulberg opened and closed the public hearing as there was no one present to speak on the issue. MOTION by Commissioner Spigner, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe recommending approval of a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional use Permit and Variances for Northern States Power for property located at 1235 Berkshire Lane. Commissioner Bildsoe commended Northern States Power for spending the money to save the residents aggravation of power outages. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. C. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. (96160) Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Sprint Spectrum, L.P. for a Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit to place a 140 feet telecomunications tower and ground build cell phone equipment at Hampton Hills Golf Course located at 5313 Juneau Lane North. Planner Drill gave an overview of the November 5, 1996 staff report. Planner Drill stated that the tower will be galvanized, which meets the zoning ordinance criteria. He also presented pictures depicting what the tower, monopole and platform would look like. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the applicant intends to place antennas on the three water towers in Plymouth in conjunction with this application. Planner Drill replied that the applicant has also applied for approval to place antennas on the three towers. Director Hurlburt added that their lease has not yet been approved by the City Council. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if can they provide more than one carrier on the monopole. Planner Drill replied affirmatively. Commissioner Berkowitz asked if there is a water tower planned for this particular area of the City. Director Hurlburt replied that there is a water tower planned near the Nanterre project, but it may be a year or more before it is completed. Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #269 Commissioner Spigner asked if there is an agreement between the Hampton Hills Golf Course and Sprint Spectrum. Director Hurlburt replied affirmatively. Commissioner Spigner voiced her concern over placing a tower in this particular location due to the fact that some day this may be developed as residential. She asked if the tower had to built now, or could it wait until the water tower is completed. Commissioner Spigner wanted to know if there is a way to get rid of a telecommunication tower once it has been approved. Planner Drill replied that if a violation of the Conditional Use Permit occurs, it could be revoked. Commissioner Berkowitz asked if Sprint is proposing to lease from the owner of the golf course. If so, he wanted to know what would happen to the lease if the golf course is sold. Commissioner Ribbe wanted to know if the telecommunications tower would interfere with residential cable television. Chairman Stulberg introduced Anna Marie Solberg, representing the petitioner. In response to questions raised by Commissioners, Ms. Solberg stated that Sprint will enter into a 25 -year lease with the owner of the Hampton Hills Golf Course. The lease is an initial five-year term, with four five-year renewable terms. The lease will be transferrable and will be binding to a new owner if the golf course is sold. Ms. Solberg stated that the site is necessary for the entire suburban area, and without it, there would be a "dead zone". Ms. Solberg stated that the telecommunications tower operates on a microwave frequency (existing frequency that is just used in another way), and would not interfere with residential television reception. Ms. Solberg added that they would run a study to make sure it does not interfere with any other users. Commissioner Berkowitz asked Ms. Solberg if they had looked at the site for the proposed water tower. Ms. Solberg replied negatively, as they need something in place soon. Chairman Stulberg asked how far from the proposed site they can place the tower. Ms. Solberg explained that the towers need to be able to see each other in the air. Ms. Solberg stated that they chose this particular location because of the minimal impact on the surrounding area. Commissioner Spigner asked if there was any possibility of putting up a temporary antenna until the water tower is in place. Ms. Solberg replied that she would have to look into what type of temporary tower would work and look at the site proposed for the water tower. Commissioner Spigner stated that since Northwest Plymouth will be an issue for the Commission to start discussing next year, that perhaps this is not the best alternative, as it could possibly hinder future residential development. Ms. Solberg stated that they chose the site on golf course because it's not likely to be developed and it is tucked in and away from sight. Commissioner Ribbe Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #270 asked if they would have sufficient height for a temporary tower. Ms. Solberg stated that she couldn't technically say for sure, but there are semi -trucks with towers on them to operate from. She stated that a truck would take up more space and be more visually displeasing. Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing. Chairman Stulberg introduced Bruce Banister of 5340 Vicksburg Lane North. Mr. Bannister stated his opposition to the tower. Mr. Bannister stated that the area zoned industrial across the street would be a more appropriate site for the tower. Chairman Stulberg introduced Ray Carlson of 5360 Vicksburg Lane North. Mr. Carlson stated that he is not necessarily opposed to the idea of a tower, but that there are other places that could be considered for the site. Mr. Carlson stated that the water tower that will be on the Nanterre project would be a more suitable location. Chairman Stulberg introduced Roger Schroeder of 5565 Juneau Lane North. Mr. Schroeder stated that it is difficult to believe that a 140 -foot tower can be tucked away. Mr. Schroeder asked if the tower will have guy wires and a blinking strobe light. Mr. Schroeder stated that he vehemently objects to this proposal. Chairman Stulberg closed the public hearing. In response to questions raised, Planner Drill stated that there will not be a warning light on top of the tower. Director Hurlburt asked if the applicant contacted the Metropolitan Airports Commission on their proposal. Ms. Solberg replied that they follow the FAA requirements, and received a letter from them that states the tower does not require lighting or striping. Ms. Solberg stated that there will not be any guy wires on the monopole, as it is a self-supporting structure. The tower is a tubular pole that extends from the ground and is aesthetically pleasing. Ms. Solber commented that they chose this part of the golf course as it is the least obtrusive for the golf course, golfers, and residents. Chairman Stulberg asked if there are any plans for the property across County Road 101 that was owned by the County for a future helicopter pad site. Planning Supervisor Senness commented that the property was sold. Commissioner Berkowitz stated that he shares the same concerns that were raised by Commissioner Spigner and surrounding residents. He stated that the tower would be more adequately suited for placement on the water tower after it is in place. MOTION by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner Spigner to table the request by Sprint Spectrum to give the applicant time to investigate the feasibility of a temporary tower and the placement of a permanent structure on the new water tower. Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page ##271 Z- la The request needs to be brought back to the Planning Commission before the February 8, 1997 deadline. Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried on a 5-1 Vote. (Chairman Stulberg voted nay.) Chairman Stulberg stated that his reason for voting nay was because he thought the item could of handled either up or down. D. STEINER & KOPPELMAN, INC. (96162) Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Steiner & Koppelman, Inc. for a Shoreland Management Variance for a 22 -foot encroachment into the required 100 -foot setback for construction of a new single family dwelling and inground swimming pool located at 205 Black Oak Lane. Building Official Ryan gave an overview of the November 4, 1996. Chairman Stulberg introduced Richard Lang, the petitioner. Mr. Lang commented that only the screen porch and garage would encroach on the 100 -foot setback line. Mr. Lang stated that he concurs with the staff report. Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing. Chairman Stulberg introduced Dave Baudhuin of 235 Black Oaks Lane who declined to speak. Chairman Stulberg closed the public hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Stoebner, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe recommending approval of a Variance to allow a Shoreland Management setback of 88 feet for the construction of a new single family dwelling and inground swimming pool for Richard Lang at 205 Black Oaks Lane. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. Chairman Stulberg called a recess at 7:57 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:12 p.m. E. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (95100) Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by the City of Plymouth for adoption of Chapter 21 of the Plymouth City Code to establish a new Zoning Ordinance for the City of Plymouth, including adoption of a new map of zoning districts, repealing in its entirety Ordinance No. 80-9 and all amendments thereto. Planning Supervisor Senness stated that the City is looking at doing a new ordinance because the current ordinance was done almost 17 years ago and has 56 amendments. The current ordinance is not user friendly. In the Summer of 1995, the City Council directed staff to revise the ordinance. The City hired Northwest Associated Consultants in August 1995. The ordinance text was drafted from September 1995 to June 1996. Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #272 T- da Staff review and mapping took place from July to August 1996. The working draft of the ordinance was made available for public comment in September 1996. Six public meetings were held in October 1996. Public hearings on the ordinance will take place in November and then to the City Council for adoption in December 1996. If that schedule is followed, the new ordinance would take effect January 1, 1997. There will be future amendments to the ordinance. Planning Supervisor Senness stated that in this past year the City adopted new regulations pertaining to antennas, wetlands, loading docks, and city center zoning districts. David Licht, consultant, discussed the text aspects of the ordinance. He stated that what has not changed is sign regulations, antenna regulations, city center zoning districts, and environmental districts (shoreland, floodplain and wetland protection). Sign regulations changed only in the form of relating to the new ordinance. There were only minimal changes relating to cross references. Mr. Licht stated that this process is modernizing what exists today. The theme of the new ordinance is flexibility, which gives the City more discretion. Staff has tried to simplify the ordinance and make it more user friendly. The structure of the ordinance is Administration, Performance Standards, and District Requirements. Administration. Under this section interim use is introduced. The environmental review process is outlined. The variance procedure has been simplified. Procedures were clarified to an extent that does not exist today and the process is now clearly outlined for various procedures. Most of the procedures are not new, but are now stated in the policy. The enforcement section was not changed. There was a lack of understanding how the ordinance is enforced. The City of Plymouth does not have someone patrolling the City pertaining to code compliance. It is on a complaint basis, in which the City receives a complaint and will then inspect the site. A letter is then sent to owner to correct the issue or given alternatives to correct the issue. A citation is usually only issued if the City and a owner reach an impasse after about a year to 18 months. Performance Standards. This section contains regulations that address the community. The Nonconforming uses are defined. There is now more flexibility introduced relating to single family dwellings and accessory buildings. Under parking and loading, there are now compact parking provisions. The parking requirements have been reduced in many cases. This section also addresses model homes, animals, landfills, and antennas. This section now also provides for regulations pertaining to sexually oriented businesses. The City is legally bound to provide opportunities, but is also trying to protect areas where minors are. District Requirements. The districts are mapped. Each district is structured in a uniform fashion with permitted uses, accessory uses (secondary that can automatically occur), Conditional Uses (allowed provided certain criteria is met), Interim Uses Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #273 --r' 4 a r (similar to Conditional Uses), Administrative Permits, and area requirements and construction standards. Mr. Licht gave -an overview of the districts that are proposed. The new ordinance contains more districts that are more narrowly defined. The FRD district stayed the same. Planned Unit Developments have been eliminated except for a few unique ones. The O -R (Office -Residential) district is intended as a transitional zone. The B -C district is for business offices and wholesale showrooms in an environment with a high level of amenitites. The current B-2 district is now divided into three districts: C-1 (convenience, personal services), C-2 (strip shopping centers) and C-4 (regional/community shopping) The current B-3 district in now split into two districts: C-3 (highway commercial like the area near Highway 55 & I-494) and C -W for high volume high storage uses. There were no changes to the City Center districts. The current I-1 district has been expanded to three districts: I-1 which is a transitional zone (allows more office space, restricts truck traffic), I-2 which also allows distribution centers, and I-3 for heavy industry such as steel manufacturing. Planned Unit Development is now a district. There are no changes to the environmental districts. There is now a P -I district for public institutional uses. Director Hurlburt stated that revising the ordinance is a regulatory process, not a planning process. By the end of 1998, the City has to update its Comprehensive Plan in its entirety. Properties were put into a new zoning district as close as possible to their current zoning and land use. FRD parcels remain as FRD. The new ordinance will mean less red tape for property owners. Director Hurlburt stated that some changes were made in the text as a result of the public meetings. Topics that generated discussion at the public meetings were recreational vehicles, differences between I-1 and I-2 Districts, changes in procedures, relationship between zoning and the Comprehensive Plan, concerns about the process, and the timing of the new ordinance. There are 70 recommended text changes in all - some initiated by the City Council (recreational vehicles), Council suggested alternatives, major text changes (substantive), and minor changes/technical corrections. The City Council changes pertaining to recreational vehicles was ordered at their special meeting of October 29. The Council directed staff to eliminate all restrictions on parking of recreational vehicles and equipment in residential districts. The changes were made to pages 104 and 130. Council suggested alternatives include: 1) elimination of the requirement that the design of residential accessory buildings over 120 square feet (except in FRD) be compatible with their surroundings, and 2) consider action for keeping the minimum lot width in the RSF-1 District at 110 feet. Staff recommended reduction to 100 feet. Staff has reviewed the issue and feels that the 100 -foot width will minimize nonconformities and the need for Variances. Director Hurlburt described the proposed text changes. Definition changes are proposed to: distribution center (over 50,000 square feet); dog kennel - change to reference the City Code, as administration handles the licensing of kennels; outside storage - changing from 72 hours to 96 hours; sales in residential areas, garage sales Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #274 Z -4a and auto sales - change to reference the City Code. Major text changes proposed pertain to parking in residential areas (vehicle length, time change from 72 to 96 hours, paved parking areas (same as it is today); setbacks - changed to three feet. RMF -4 and O -R Districts Lot Area - minimum lot area had 2,500 square feet and now proposed to lower to 2,200 square feet. The ordinance needed to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Permitted uses such as boat, marine & snowmobile sales was moved from the C-2 district and placed in the C-4 district. Inside building supplies were added to the C-4 district. Vehicle leasing & rental were added to the C -W district. Offices in the I-1 district were increased to up to 50% by right. Bakery, wholesale and food processing uses were added to the I-2 district. Director Hurlburt gave an overview of the proposed map changes as listed in the November 8, 1996 staff report. She noted that two additional map changes were brought forward at the meeting, and are listed as #14 - Beyer Property and #15 -Bass Lake Road and Nathan Lane Commercial Sites. Director Hurlburt suggested that the map changes be acted on individually before the ordinance goes forward to the City Council. Director Hurlburt stated that the public hearing will be continued to November 19, 1996. Commissioner Bildsoe asked why some PUDs were kept. Director Hurlburt explained that some of the PUDs that were approved are unique and do not fit well into the new classifications, such as the Northwest Business Campus, as it has an Indirect Source Permit. Commissioner Bildsoe asked for an explanation regarding changes to the parking regulations. Director Hurlburt replied that uses were added to the list and in many cases, the number of required spaces was reduced. The changes also include provision for shared parking and compact parking spaces. Director Hurlburt stated that there is a chart available showing the existing and proposed parking standards. Commissioner Spigner stated that she was concerned with additional uses that could be administratively approved by staff without having to come before the Planning Commission. Director Hurlburt explained that the administrative authority has not been expanded for commercial and industrial uses. The main difference will impact single family dwelling owners. The changes were made to have more equity among property owners. Currently, if a property is in a PUD, an owner would have to go through the Planning Commission to apply for a deck permit, while an owner across the street whose property is not in a PUD just applies for a deck permit through the building department. Commissioner Spigner stated that she would like to see a comparison of the existing and proposed changes for administrative permits. Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #275 T-443 Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing. Chairman Stulberg introduced letters received from Kenneth and Sandra Solom of 3295 Garland Lane, David and Kelli Slavik of 3325 Everest Court North, and Randy and Susan Schaefer of 3330 Everest Court stating their opposition of zoning Site #5 - (Seven Ponds Commercial Site) C-3. Chairman Stulberg introduced Matt Van Slooten, representing Carlson Real Estate Company. Mr. Van Slooten stated that he supports the proposed change to the I-2 district for Carlson Business Center, but that office space should not be limited to 25 %. If the change is made to 25 %, they would like to be grandfathered in. Their application has already been approved, and they were intending to use up to 50% for office space. Mr. Van Slooten stated that looking at the commercial matrix of uses, he noted that tile sales should be allowed as an accessory use, florists should be allowed in the I-1 district and delicatessen and coffee shops should be a conditional use. Mr. Van Slooten stated that he will follow up with a memo to staff on his concerns/questions. Chairman Stulberg introduced Sandra Solum of 3295 Garland Lane. Ms. Solum stated that she did not want to have gas stations or fast food restaurants on the Seven Ponds PUD Commercial Site because of increased noise, traffic, and crime. Ms. Solum was concerned about the proximity of commercial and residential. Chairman Stulberg introduced Kelli Slavik of 3325 Everest Court. Ms. Slavik stated that she was told by a City Councilmember that property could not be rezoned at Highway 55 and County Road 24. Ms. Slavik asked that the business area be restricted for the Seven Ponds PUD Commercial Site. Ms. Slavik stated that she did extensive research as to whether a City can change zoning. Ms. Slavik stated that the character of property has changed since the original zoning took place, and the zoning will have an adverse affect on their residential property. Chairman Stulberg introduced Richard Schmidt of 14310-13' Avenue North. Mr. Schmidt stated his concern for limitations on an automobile parked in your yard for more than 96 hours if it is not operating. He stated that if you are restoring a vehicle, you can't get it done within that time limit. Mr. Schmidt stated that if he isn't allowed to build another garage stall, the ordinance would be restricting what he can do on his own property. He stated that the ordinance would be putting a hobbyist out of business. Mr. Schmidt asked if there is a definition for race car. Mr. Schmidt was concerned that satellite dishes can't be more than one meter in diameter. He stated that two meters in diameter would be more appropriate. Mr. Schmidt questioned Section 21145.06 pertaining to inspections of residential homes. He stated that it was an invasion of privacy. Director Hurlburt commented that Section 21145.06 pertains only to homes that were issued a home occupation permit to operate a business out of their home. Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #276 T- 4a Mr. Schmidt asked what the decision was on the Northern States Power item. He stated that he lives next to the site and didn't receive a notice. Director Hurlburt replied that staff will check to see if he was located within 500 feet of the Northern States Power site. In response to other questions raised by Mr. Schmidt, Director Hurlburt stated that the 96 hour limit for automobiles is a current code requirement. She stated that there is more liberal square footage to allow accessory buildings on the property should Mr. Schmidt choose to explore that option. Director Hurlburt noted that the race car definition is listed under recreational vehicles. Chairman Stulberg introduced LeRoy Reinecke of 14411 County Road 6. Mr. Reinecke commented that the present ordinance is quite restrictive. Mr. Reinecke was concerned that he would not be able to put an accessory building in his back yard under the proposed ordinance without having to obtain a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Reinecke agreed that it would be better to have inside storage rather than outside storage because it looks nicer and there would be less of a chance of vandalism. Mr. Reinecke stated that the minimum lot size of 18,500 square feet for the RSF-1 district is too large. He stated that public transit only works with smaller lots and that the Planning Commission and City Council should consider that. Chairman Stulberg commented that the city currently has many lot sizes. Director Hurlburt stated that if Mr. Reinecke would like to come in and talk with City staff, they could take a look at his individual property to see whether he could have an accessory building. Chairman Stulberg introduced Gary Lally, representing Plymouth Technology Park - Site #3. Mr. Lally presented a graphic and aerial photo of the site. He stated that he supports the change to I-2. Chairman Stulberg introduced Mike Johnson of 3345 Everest Court. Pertaining to the Seven Ponds PUD Commercial Site, Mr. Johnson stated that changing it to C-3 would be inappropriate. He stated that PUD does not go far enough to address some of the problems. Mr. Johnson stated that nowhere else in the city can you find such a sharp transition from residential to commercial properties. Mr. Johnson stated that there is no underlying commercial need for this property to be zoned C-3. The only access is through Garland Lane. Mr. Johnson stated that he has reviewed past court cases and the Minnesota courts have endorsed cities changing zoning. Mr. Johnson stated that the property can't be zoned C-3 because the only way to access the site is through a residential area. Mr. Johnson stated that he would like to see it changed to O -R before developmental work is done. Changing it to O -R would still give the owner the ability to make it economically feasible. Chairman Stulberg introduced Ted Hagen, representing Hans Hagen Homes. Mr. Hagen stated that their site should retain the PUD designation. Mr. Hagen stated that if Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #277 the site retains the PUD designation, they are prepared to come before the City within 60 days with a development plan. Chairman Stulberg introduced Ed Albro of 4105 Fernbrook Lane. Mr. Albro commended the City Council on withdrawing the intrusive parts of the ordinance pertaining to recreational vehicles. Mr. Albro stated that the outside storage did not go far enough. He stated that all personal property covers a lot of ground other than recreational vehicles. He asked if there was a list somewhere that is not in the ordinance. He commented that the proposed ordinance is still intrusive in everyday life. Chairman Stulberg stated that if you try to define everything you will most likely leave something out. The more you list as yes or no, the more trouble you get yourself into. Director Hurlburt explained that the way zoning law works is, if you don't list a use as allowed, it is prohibited. Mr. Albro stated that the proposed ordinance is very specific in some items, and not in others. Mr. Albro thought that the Commission should reconsider the penalties, as they are too harsh. Director Hurlburt replied that it is the standard penalty clause in the City Code. Mr. Licht stated that the penalty clause was not in the first draft, and it does not need to be in this draft, but the City Attorney recommended that it be included. If something were to go to court, the City has the burden to show reasonable violation. Mr. Albro stated that he would like to see the hardship part of a Variance eliminated, or eliminate Variances altogether. Director Hurlburt replied that under state law, a Variance has to fall under hardship. She stated that Variances are a unique and special privilege given. If the ordinance is not properly addressing a common policy, the ordinance needs to be changed. Chairman Stulberg introduced Don Smith of 10215-315` Avenue North. Mr. Smith asked if the definition for regulatory flood protection and ordinary high water mean the same thing. Director Hurlburt answered typically no and suggested that she address his specific comment individually after the meeting. Chairman Stulberg stated that staff needs to look at the letters submitted tonight and give the Commission their recommendation. Director Hurlburt stated that staff will review the comments and bring forward any recommended changes to the Commission at their meeting on November 19. Director Hurlburt stated that information related to Administrative Permits will be mailed out with the packet. Commissioner Spigner stated that in regards to definitions, adult misdemeanor was left out. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the next meeting will be just a continuation of the hearing. Director Hurlburt replied affirmatively. Chairman Stulberg asked staff to list out any changes that the Commission needs to take action on individually. Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1996 Page #278 T - 443 Director Hurlburt stated that the reports and maps will be updated to supplement the current reports that the Commission received. Commissioner Bildsoe asked staff to discuss the property listed as Site #5 (Seven Ponds) in more detail in the report. Commissioner Berkowitz concurred that additional background and analysis would be helpful. Commissioner Stoebner concurred and asked for an expansion on the reasoning behind the limitations of the parcel. Director Hurlburt stated that the City can and does change zoning. She complimented the residents for their research on zoning law. She stated that the zoning must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Director Hurlburt stated that the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended first, and that is not what we are doing in this process. MOTION by Commissioner Spigner, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 10:34 p.m. Plymouth Charter Commission November 13, 1996 Minutes Present: Virgil Schneider, Jon Speck, Ellie Singer, Dave Pauba, Joy Tierney, Ty Bujold, Dave Crain, Bob Sipkins, Kapila Bobra, Tim Peterson Assistant City Manager Kathy Lueckert Excused: Sandy Patterson, John Duntley Absent: Pauline Milner Call to Order Virgil Schneider called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Approval of Minutes Tim Peterson made a correction to page five of the September 30 minutes, noting that a sentence needed a verb. The minutes were approved as corrected. Discussion of Proposed Supermajority Requirement Virgil Schneider called the Charter Commission's attention to the City Council minutes of October 2, 1996. He said that the Council had taken action, and asked Kathy Lueckert to report. Kathy Lueckert stated that the City Council voted to place the amendment requiring a supermajority vote for a tax rate increase on the ballot for the next general election, in November 1998. Virgil Schneider said that the Charter Commission could move to reconsider its action to reject the proposed amendment. However, a member who voted on the prevailing side would have to move to reconsider. Bob Sipkins stated that the Charter Commission could also choose to propose an ordinance enabling a supermajority requirement to the City Council, under Subdivision 7 of the statute. Virgil Schneider stated his preference for the Charter Commission to go through its normal public process in this instance. Jon Speck asked if subdivision 7 required a vote by citizens. Subdivision 7 would require the City Council to hold a public hearing on the proposed ordinance and to publish it, but would not require a vote of the people. The proposed ordinance must be approved by a unanimous vote of the council. Ty Bujold said he has no interest in the supermajority proposal in any form. Kapila Bobra suggested that the Charter Commission wait to see the level of interest of the new council in the proposal. Tim Peterson said that he was interested in taking advantage of the spirit of compromise on this issue that came through in the council minutes. He said that some members of the Charter Commission may no longer be members when the supermajority issue is next considered. Because of the considerable history of this issue, he stated his preference for the current Charter Commission to propose a compromise. T 4b Ty Bujold said that the real issue is whether or not the Charter Commission thinks the supermajority proposal is a good idea. Bob Sipkins said that no member of the Charter Commission believed that the supermajority proposal was a good idea. However, members might not be opposed to giving the council the option of imposing the restriction on themselves through the ordinance option. He also stated that such an ordinance might be written with more permissive language so that the supermajority requirement could be applied to other issues besides tax rate increases. He stated that he would rather have the requirement in an ordinance rather than in the charter. Virgil Schneider stated his concern that citizens voting on the current proposed amendment may not see the unintended consequences and not understand the question of minority influence. He said that he would prefer the ordinance option rather than placing the requirement directly in the charter. Jon Speck asked what assurance the Charter Commission has that if the issue is reopened and the commission proposes an alternative, that the council will not still choose the original language for the ballot. Virgil Schneider said that there are no assurances. He stated that if the Charter Commission proposes an amendment, he would want to hold public hearings on the proposal before sending it to the city council. Tim Peterson asked Ty Bujold what he sees happening in 1998 when the supermajority issue is on the ballot. Ty Bujold said that even if the Charter Commission proposes an alternative, he foresees the council placing the original amendment proposal on the ballot. He stated that he is not in favor of allowing a supermajority vote by ordinance, and that he would prefer that councils not change the rules governing their action. Ellie Singer said that if someone presents valid evidence to the Charter Commission indicating that a supermajority requirement is a good idea, she would resurface the issue. Bob Sipkins said that in times of fiscal stress councils need more flexibility rather than more restrictions. He stated that the supermajority requirement could create problems for the city. He would prefer a compromise in the form of an ordinance rather than an amendment to the charter. Ty Bujold said that the city council has the ultimate power on what is placed before the voters. Bob Sipkins said that he believes that the city council wants to compromise on this issue, and that he believes it is unlikely that a compromise proposal will be rejected by the council. No formal motions were made on the topic of the supermajority vote, so Virgil Schneider moved to the next agenda topic. Charter Commission Terms of Office Virgil Schneider called the commission's attention to the information distributed on the terms of office. Kathy Lueckert stated that it appears that the best way of correcting the terms is to introduce special legislation in the 1997 session. ::�:-46 Jon Speck moved, seconded by Ellie Singer, that the legislation be crafted so that the terms of seven members be extended by two years, for a total of ten year terms. Kathy Lueckert stated that there has been controversy in previous years about extending terms of office in Plymouth, and she would not recommend this as an option. Ellie Singer withdrew her second of Speck's motion. No other seconds to the motion were made, and the motion died. Virgil Schneider moved, seconded by Ty Bujold, that the Charter Commission request either a judge's order or special legislation to correct the terms of office of charter commission members, and that no term extend beyond the eight years permitted by law. The motion was discussed. Virgil Schneider stated that his idea was to begin the terms of the two currently vacant seats on July 1, 1997. He suggested that the Charter Commission be polled and five volunteers sought who would vacate their seats on June 30, 1997. The judge or the legislature would appoint five new individuals to new terms beginning on July 1, 1997. This would fulfill the intent of the statute. Bob Sipkins said that he has known Judge Mabley for many years. He will talk with him about signing an order to correct the terms, and avoid special legislation. The motion passed unanimously. Election of Vice Chairman Virgil Schneider moved, seconded by Ty Bujold, that Bob Sipkins be appointed vice chairman of the Charter Commission. The motion passed unanimously. Charter Commission members expressed their appreciation and thanks to Bob Sipkins for his appearance before the city council on the supermajority issue. December 2, 1996 Meeting Virgil Schneider stated that the Charter Commission last year had scheduled its annual meeting for December 2, 1996. He said that he does not feel this meeting is necessary, given the number of times the Charter Commission has met during 1996. By common consent, the December 2 meeting was canceled. Next Meeting The Charter Commission established January 6, 1997 as the next Charter Commission meeting. The primary topic will be progress on resolving the terms of office issue. The meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. DATE: November 7, 1996 _ TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager through Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works F FROM: John R. Sweeney, Transit Administrator ,� SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH METROLINK TRANSIT STEM STATUS REPORT During the past year we have completed a significant number of improvements to our Metrolink system and it occurred to me that it would be appropriate to provide an update to the existing ' and future City Council members at this time. The timing of this report may also assist the Council in evaluating the 1997 Management Plan and budget which will be submitted to them for review and approval in December 1996. Background Information Plymouth Metrolink is a replacement service or "opt -out" transit system providing service to the City of Plymouth. Services provided by Plymouth Metrolink are morning and evening express to and from downtown Minneapolis, morning and evening reverse commute from and to downtown Minneapolis, and Dial -A -Ride within Plymouth making connections to Ridgedale, Golden Valley Shopping Center, K -Mart in New Hope and downtown Wayzata. Additionally, we have recently implemented a fixed route midday circulator providing more opportunities to the Plymouth residents. Plymouth Metrolink was the first opt -out system in operation in the state of Minnesota beginning service in 1984. Over the past year Plymouth Metrolink has been conducting extensive planning and program implementation designed to improve service delivery and service quality while at the same time improving ridership. These improvements are also designed to enhance system efficiency and effectiveness. PLYMOUTH METROLINK TRANSIT SYSTEM STATUS REPORT �� a Page 2 1. System Achievements • Worked with contracted service provider to add thirteen new transit vehicles to replace older service -worn vehicles (new vehicles went into service April 15, 1996). • Operated a limited strike service in October, 1995 during the transit union strike against MCTO. Service was well received by riders, much appreciated and operated without any serious problems. • Implemented a service monitoring program in 1996, for express, reverse commute and dial -a -ride services. Program includes field checks, on time performance, safety checks, driver checks, vehicle maintenance record inspection, vehicle inspections, dispatch review, handling of complaints and accidents, passenger survey, financial audit, dial -a -ride trip verification and many other program elements. This service monitoring program is new for this sized system and can provide a basis for similar programs in other systems. • Applied for and received verification of award of a new Section 5310 transit vehicle through MN Dot for use in providing enhanced senior, para -transit and general public transportation in Plymouth. Vehicle will be delivered in 1997. • Assembled business leaders in Plymouth to begin planning a reverse commute job fair for Spring 1997. A steering committee made up of business representatives, NET agency representatives, the transit system and the Twin West Chamber of Commerce has begun meeting to begin planning the job fair. • Coordinated and hosted a Plymouth transportation providers summit including all social service providers, public transit operators, and Metro Mobility. This program is intended to seek areas of service coordination and cooperation in Plymouth to enhance service delivery and attempt to meet unfulfilled needs. Group will meet on a regular basis (coordinated with NWHHSC Consolidation of Services program). • Undertook an extensive facilities and service review to identify current and future transit facilities needs and to consider potential service restructuring possibilities. • Planning was undertaken for implementing a fixed route circulator that actually began service on October 7, 1996. • Maintained Metro Mobility service in Plymouth after Metropolitan Council proposed service elimination, by reaching an agreement that includes sharing of Metro Mobility costs between the region and Plymouth Metrolink. The new fixed route circulator will require region to provide Metro Mobility service to Plymouth without cost sharing. G AENGURANUMMAOSWATUSMOC PLYMOUTH METROLINK TRANSIT SYSTEM STATUS REPORT a Page 3 • Implemented expanded marketing program. • Reorganized passenger counting measures to include passengers previously not counted. • Applied for and received regional bond funding for park and ride lot improvements. • Continued leadership role in the I-494 Corridor Commission, a TDM organization made up of members from Maple Grove to Bloomington along the I-494 corridor. 2. Improved Service Efficiencies • Improved Metrolink per passenger subsidy from $3.64 per passenger in 1995 (excluding strike service) to $3.20 per passenger through August 1996 • Maintained system ridership levels after strike and after fare increase. • Increased Dial -A -Ride ridership for June -August from 8,843 in 1995 to 9,705 in 1996 through special summer marketing program. • Implemented a fixed route circulator in October 1996 that will help reduce long dial -a - ride trips and improve dial -a -ride efficiency. • Working with Team Transit and MN Dot to implement shoulder by-pass lanes on Trunk Highway 169 for Metrolink buses. Reconstruction of shoulder lanes by MN Dot scheduled for Spring, 1997. 3. Safety • Applied for and received regional capital funding to improve park and ride lots. Improvements will include safer access, installation of lighting, improved shelter facilities and the installation of telephones. • Working closely with contracted service providers and local police department to ensure ongoing passenger safety and facilities security. GAENO\TRANSU NEMOSMATUSMOC PLYMOUTH METROLINK TRANSIT SYSTEM STATUS REPORT Page 4 4. Attachments • Program Goals and Objectives and a Summary of the Status of Those Goals and Objectives • 1996 (January through June) monthly cost summaries displaying cost, ridership and statistical data for the Plymouth Metrolink express and reverse commute route. As you can see, 1996 has been an extremely busy and productive year for Plymouth Metrolink and we will strive to continue providing excellent service to our residents during 1997 and succeeding years. attachment G AENGWRANSMMEMOSWATUS.DOC DATE: November 18, 1996 TO: Mayor and City Council Members THROUGH: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager FROM: Craig C. Gerdes, Director of Public Safety "�e SUBJECT: SQUAD CAR COLORS Uniformed members of the Police Department completed a research project during 1996 showing a significant amount of interest in change to "black and white" squad cars. Because the colors of squad cars are highly visible within the community, we felt it was appropriate to get general information on the project out to the community at large. The concept was first discussed at the City Council Subcommittee on Community Policing at its September 18' meeting. The group was presented information on the project including costs. The increased cost of a two-tone vehicle is offset by the savings in after -market graphic costs. Our current graphics are very detailed and require outsourcing. The new two-tone vehicles' additional graphics could be handled by the City. The subcommittee agreed with the decision to develop public comment. In October, information was put out in both the Plymouth News City Newsletter, and the Sun Sailor Newspaper soliciting response by telephone, mail, and e-mail. Lt. Dan Twaddle, Patrol Lieutenant, coordinated the responses. With the first printing, we received approximately 180 responses. Most callers primarily expressed concerns regarding the costs of repainting existing vehicle with the new colors. The department had not intended to repaint existing, but only order new vehicles in the new colors. A new clarification to the issue was printed in the November Plymouth News and on Friday, November 15`'', a spot was taped for Cable 12 news. Since the clarification, we have only received 35 responses from the public. We will continue to take public response through the second week of December. Support for the change with the patrol division is strong. Not only did members of the division research and request the change, they conducted a survey of the 41 members of the uniformed division. Of those surveyed, 37 responded and the majority, 30, were in favor of the change. Both the Patrol Lieutenant and I have discussed the issue and support the change requested. Unless the department receives a significant amount of additional comment from the public, the department will begin the transition to the new colors for squads ordered after the first of the year. U WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER 1011 First Street South, Suite 200, Hopkins, MN 55343 (612) 933-0005 Fax: (612) 933-6046 1. November 15, 1996 Mayor and City Council City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard' Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Mayor and City Council: Third quarter report, 1996, on closed cases for the residents, businesses and city staff of Plymouth: Juvenile theft, Operation de Novo (OdN) referral, mediated with signed agreement 2. Juvenile theft, OdN referral, mediated with signed agreement Several of the cities in our service area have been interested in increasing the usage of mediation in disputes and have asked us to explain our services to city staff so they can understand the process. We would be happy to do so for the staff in Plymouth. Please call our office to schedule a convenient time. Enclosed is a laminated card on steps to resolve a conflict which we hope to widely distribute in our service area. Any ideas you might have on distribution in your city would be welcomed. Sincerely, xx P-,,- _ -_h Susan A. Nelson Executive Director enclosure rmmm co S Innovative Consulting services, inc. 10024 South Shore Drive 1612► 546 0206Minneapolis • MN 55441 •USA FAX 1612► 546 8686 November 14, 1996 Ms. Barbara Senness ' Planning Supervisor City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482 Dear Ms. Senness : I would appreciate your help in the following matter: TOPAZ Trucking company has been parking their trucks across the street from my house located on Medicine Lake at the address above. They run these trucks on and off the whole night. That is as far as 1 know against the law. The noise is so lou(i that, it wakes the whole neighborhood up. The value of' ouI• hones goes down as a result of the situation. If anyone decided to sr,1l their home, they would have a hard time. No one is going to want to buy a home in such a noisy environment. One of my neighbors has informed me that this issue will be discussed in the Plymouth City Council meeting on December lei, 1996. I am seeking your support. The situation is really bad. It is not only disturbing but unhealthy. it is against the law and T hope this incident will be solved very soon. Thank you. Sincerely, Dr. Hana Tomasek cc. Ms. Joy Tierney Ms. J inny Black %i I Internet Contact From: R. David Dexter, M.D.[SMTP:pathman@minn.net] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 1996 11:35 PM To: contact Subject: Property Taxes My wife and I are planning on building a home in the Swan Lake South development near French Park in Plymouth, Minnesota. Our home is estimated to have a mortgage between $450,000 and $550,00. We would appreciate a "estimated" ball park figure of annual property tax due on properties within this price range (to aid us in determining the exact mortgage we can afford). Thanks. Page 1 Internet Contact From: TML4TML[SMTP:TML4TML@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, November 17, 1996 9:49 AM To: contact Subject: Street Plowing - Yard Damage For the last 4 years my lawn has been torn up by street plowers ...... I have not spoken up but just grinned and beared it. Just this past week with the first snowfall it happened again. I am getting tired of having to repair this every spring. Do you have any recommendations for me ? My address is 12220 60th Place North. Thanks, Tom Lyngdal Page 1 Zed //— lk-%G HeA- SFS r es ase • �ece..�/� cvns�r�ca�e�( o b u t Lo'l s� J S; �ee�e/yam Q,l.Co� a- •�-P.G� V a. A � 0 U A A o C) --� � 0 0 L OOH ON O*N O*, OOH L. A o o O o N N In. 'C crs 0 U u. on `0 U O N o to u 0 04 p a� ioa� N o 3 ri Q O F ►cz Q. U Q cz 3 Cd to cd �to cl 8 on o E o °? z 0 Q r�xHx¢ 0 0 H � cn x xa�x a, 3 x V a. DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT EMERGENCY RESPONSE COMMISSION B-5 State Capitol 75 Constitution Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1612 TTY(612)282-6555 FAX (612) 296-0459 Telephone: (612) 296-2233 November 1, 1996 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Craig Gerdes Emergency Management Director City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Sir; Regional Review Committee Seven (RRC 7), on behalf of the Minnesota Emergency Response Commission, has completed the review of the City of Plymouth Emergency Operations Plan. This was done in accordance with the four year review cycle set forth by the State of Minnesota Division of Emergency Management. The Regional Review Committee 7 has determined your plan to be in compliance with the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act planning information requirements. On behalf of the RRC 7 we want to thank you for your cooperation and a job well done. I hope you will extend this congratulations to the members of your team who have contributed to this fine planning effort. If the RRC 7 or any of its members can be of assistance in any future emergency management planning activities, please contact us with your request. Call Kurt Kramer at 520-1064 or Howard Strabala at 297-3942. Since Kurt G. Kramer Chair, RRC -7 cc: Joy Tierney, Mayor Dwight Johnson, City Manager Paul Aason, Director, Minnesota Emergency Response Commission ANI Dnl 1A1 r-MW)DT1 wrn,,, rr fim nvrn MINNESOTA Public Safety EMEAGENC M,,NRGEMENr CityHall 7800 Golden Valley Road Go& V4 MN 55427.4588 (612) 593-8000 FAX (612) 593-8109 TDD (612) 593-3968 Mayor and Counal 593-8006 6ii Manager 593-8002 Public Safety Porde 593-8079 Fire 593-8080 Fn 593-8098 Public Works 593-8030 :r S93-so92 Motor Vehicle 593.8101 Phnoing and Zoning Firiana 593-8013 Asses"8 593-8020 Pack and Rmeation 200 Brookview hrkway Gold6V4MV554261364 (612) 544-5218 - FAX (612) 544-0398 TDD (612) 593-3%8 November 15, 1996 Mr. Peter Enck, Chair Bassett Creek Water Management Commission 9000 47 1/2 Avenue North New Hope, Minnesota 55428 Dear MrEtsck: The Golden Valley City Council, at its November 6, 1996 meeting passed the following motion: MOVED by Micks, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to request the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission to form a Citizen Advisory Committee that represents the Cities that are involved in the Joint Powers Agreement. We are asking that the Commission establish a Citizens Advisory Committee. The Joint Powers Agreement dated September 7, 1993 provides for this in Article VI Powers and Duties of the Board. Subdivision 25 states: "It shall establish a procedure for establishing Citizen or Technical Advisory Committees and to provide other means for public participation." Our Council strongly supports this request. The Commission is responsible for flood control and water quality. Particularly with the addition of the water quality to your responsibilities it is important to involve citizens to react to your proposed actions and give input, as well as to provide a vehicle for communication to the Cities and their residents. Z,g� X Page 2 We also ask that after you have discussed this and have a proposal for implementing, that the proposal be communicated to the member cities for their review and comment before you formally adopt it. Our Council also requests you to again consider the time and place of your meetings. The current situation does not particularly encourage citizen attendance and observation. The Commission's work is critical to the quality of the creek and its future. We are grateful for the dedication and work of the Commissioners. By responding positively to these requests we feel you will be enhancing your ability to carry out your mission. Sincerely, Mary E. Anderson Mayor cc: Mayors of Member Cities bcc: City Manager, City Clerk and/or Director.of Public Works November 19, 1996 Chief Craig Gerdes Police Department City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Chief Gerdes: As you are no doubt aware, in the early hours of Sunday, November 17, 1996, a sophisticated and professional team of thieves attempted to break into our building with the sole purpose of stealing inventory. Such an entrance could easily have been devastating for us as it was for another jewelry company hit earlier in the evening. Thanks to additional police coverage provided by the Plymouth Police Department after learning that our security system was down, Office Chris Kuklok apprehended one of two individuals outside our building attempting to make entry. His presence and actions prevented any damage to our building or loss of inventory. Too often, we take what we do too casually so this event has certainly been a reality check for us. I would like to ask you, on my behalf, to commend all the officers and staff involved for their responsiveness and efforts. I would also request that Office Kuklok be especially commended for his actions and bravery in what was and could have been a most dangerous situation. I am grateful that we chose to build our factory in Plymouth. Most grateful . lack D. MacBean President cc: Mayor joy Tierney 4/ -\MOND IMPS �n,X: - :.- MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 DATE: November 22, 1996 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager SUBJECT: Summary of Events Movie Theater/City Center area. Anne, Roger, and I met with the Mann theater group today. The following items emerged in the discussion: • The raised their land offer from $2.25 per foot to $3.00. This would provide the City with about $650,000 instead of the $3.50/foot and $750,000 proposed by Frauenshuh. The Frauenshuh negotiations failed to conclude successfully, partly because they assumed some City help in some phase of the project. Mann says no assistance is needed with their offer. • The Beard group is not a part of the team. They withdrew before we selected Frauenshuh at the time that they raised their offer from $1.00 for the whole site to $2.25 per foot. The Mann theaters will act as their own developers, and have done so in a number of other locations. • They are very confident of a close working relationship with Carlson and the project would center upon the City and the Carlson property. • The scope of the project would be a retail center on the Carlson property with no fast food restaurants and the movie theater on the City land. • They would like to build immediately and construction would take about eight months. • They plan to build a 12 screen theater if parking allows, but would agree to build a 10 screen theater otherwise. Their offer will not be contingent upon any relaxation of the City's parking standards (1 space for every 4 seats). • Their only business concern is if another movie theater would go in a Highway 55 and Medina Road on the Hans Hagen property. No theater is shown on the latest sketch plans at that location, and that area would need PUD revision to allow a movie theater. • They plan to build a state of the art "stadium" theater wherein the seating surrounds the screen. This provides better site lines. There are no other stadium theaters in this area. • They are prepared to meet with the subcommittee and the Council in December. We thanked them for their interest and raising their offer. We did not represent that the Council would approve the land sale price. There may yet be some creative ideas for realizing a larger sale price on our land. One example might involve cooperating with them on the required ponding (which we have to do for the Ice Arena anyway). There may be other ideas.