HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 11-22-1996NOVEMBER 22, 1996
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS
1. COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
DECEMBER 4 6:00 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
Medicine Lake Room
Consider City Manager Salary
DECEMBER 4 7:00 P.M. TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
Council Chambers
DECEMBER 4 7:00 P.M. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Council Chambers
PLANNING COMMISSION, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 7:00 P.M., Council Chambers.
Agenda is attached. (M-2)
CITY COUNCIL COMPUTER SUB -COMMITTEE, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 27,
NOON, Medicine Lake Room.
THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY, THURSDAY & FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 28-29. City Offices
will be closed.
OPEN SPA CE SUB -COMMITTEE, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 5:30 P. M., Mooney Lake
Room.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, THURSDAY, DECEMBER S, 7:30 P.M., Medicine
Lake Room.
MEETING CALENDARS — The November, December, and January meeting calendars
are attached. (M-7)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO
November 22, 1996
Page 2
FOR YOUR INFORMATION....
1. CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT AGENDA —Attached is the draft agenda for the
regular Council meeting scheduled for December 4.
2. NEW COUNCIL ORIENTATION
The first orientation session for new Councilmembers will take place Monday, November
25, at 4:00 p.m. in the Medicine Lake Room. Temporary voice mail assignments are being
given to new Councilmembers. Until January the following voice mail numbers will be
available: Tim Bildsoe, 509-5010, Saundra Spigner, 509-5009, and Judy Johnson, 509-
5011.
3. COUNCIL LIBRARY CHECKOUT
Items in the Administration library are available for checkout by members of the Council.
Please use the forms in the notebook labeled "Library Checkout."
4. MEETING MINUTES
a. Planning Commission Meeting of November, 12, 1996. (I -4a)
b. Charter Commission Meeting of November 13, 1996. (unapproved) (I -4b)
5. STAFF REPORTS
a. Plymouth Metrolink Transit System Status Report. (I -5a)
b. Report from Public Safety Director Craig Gerdes on the research project inquiring about
changing squad car colors. (I -5b)
6. NEWSARTICLES, RELEASES, PUBLICATIONS, ETC.
a. Third quarter report on Plymouth use of the West Suburban Mediation Center. (I -6a)
7. CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONS POLICY- CORRESPONDENCE
a. Letter from Dr. Hana Tomasek regarding overnight truck noise at the Topaz Trucking
Company. The letter has been forwarded to Community Development Director Ann
Hurlburt for a response. (1--7a)
b. Internet correspondence from Dr. R. David Dexter requesting an estimate of property
tax due on his property. The item has been forwarded to City Assessor Nancy Bye for a
response. (1--7b)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO
November 22, 1996
Page 3
c. Internet correspondence from Tom Lyngdal commenting on damage done by plowing
of his street. The item has been forwarded to Streets Supervisor Roger Wenner for a
response. (I -7c)
d. Postcard from Allen and Sally Webb supporting residential zoning for land around the
water tower near Heather Run. The note has been forwarded to Community
Development Director Anne Hurlburt for a response. (I -7d)
A status report on the most recent correspondence is attached. (I--7)
8. CORRESPONDENCE
a. Letter to Public Safety Director Craig Gerdes from the State Department of Public
Safety with notification of the City's successful compliance with the State in its
Emergency Operations Plan. (I -8a)
b. Letter to Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Chair Peter Enck from Golden
Valley Mayor Mary Anderson with a request for a Citizen Advisory Committee
representing the cities in the Water Management District. (I -8b)
c. Letter to Public Safety Director Craig Gerdes from Ostbye & Anderson/Ultrablue
Manufacturing President Jack McBean praising The Plymouth Police Department and
Officer Chris Kuklok for performance at the factory site during an attempted burglary
on November 17. (I -8c)
rp)
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 1996
WHERE: Plymouth City Center
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will
be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner,
citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in normal sequence on the agenda.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC FORUM
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
5. *CONSENT AGENDA
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7:00 P.M.
A. City of Plymouth. Approve Capital Improvements Program for 1997-2001. (96151)
B. The Community Home Program Company. Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance
to allow construction of a two-family dwelling for use as a Residential Care Facility on
property located at 14230 Rockford Road. (96129)
C. Town & Country Homes, Inc. Land Use Guide Plan Amendment from CS (Commercial
Service)/C (Commercial) to LA -3 (High -Medium Density Residential/Living Area 3) and
Sketch Plan for a 159 -unit townhome community located in the northwest quadrant of Highway
55 and Dunkirk Lane. (96161)
7. OLD BUSINESS
A. City of Plymouth. Adoption of Chapter 21 of the Plymouth City Code to establish a new
ordinance for the City of Plymouth, including Adoption of a new map of zoning districts,
repealing in its entirety Ordinance No. 80-9 and all amendments thereto. (95100)
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. City of Plymouth. Consider Initiating Amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the
Comprehensive Plan to Reclassify Property from CS (Commercial Service)/C (Commercial) to
CL (Limited Business)/CO (Commercial Office) for Seven Ponds Commercial Site located at
the southeast corner of Highway 55 and County Road 24. (96181)
B. City of Plymouth. Response to Public Forum issue on keeping dogs. (96175)
9. ADJOURNMENT
m-�
—I
N
a
':
�3
cl
^+
00
h
N
•�
ADW
r
Oo
Imo!
'z�•�
�
�:
CCS
Q G n
�0 p
�
UlI
J H
I
U L.
QL�
IQtli
yip
�r EI
2=c)
0.0
Cp
G O
1
�M 8 G
N
'OZU
�E^ rrm�ziu
ii
�� E
job Ou
y.-x.n rvN
_�-si
�I
p0700
oUa a
'aZZ 4071
op
igz
h
oo
oaQ
p
IvUU
zz
�
W> z
zz
Z O) p b
Ct1 Z¢
Iz`n—
•�
�c
C
a z'
U W
17
.G z 4 U
l
OV U a
:
G
0.c
j •C
II'
i (D u Ir O
10 c
,�� 0. .G
II
O z Q I
NTN
^I
I-�
Oo
NN
iZ
0
OFra„NA
°°_ern
cl
M+7
QU
M
00
C�
I�
�I
b
M
O
l�
PFna.eN o„
-nn
:1
H n ry
—
$-4
�
1�
2.2
V
Tv -
J
O)
CIO
U,�
U`u
QUI
OfIU
o
U.:
f J
'C Ci
y
aUV,a
il��!guidl
i3 _i
o^pZlSz�
I$
Imo_
rc
Z IQ
z �
`
W
Q'9
z
_
L
cc
�.. L cti Gt1
a�UI'i�'
0
aUU'
oQ_'�ap
oUslgul
cz4U
I
^+
N
M
C;s
7d
O
00
h
N
C�
..O
C/1
QU
M
d
ti
0
c�
cIS
b
n'n
,
N
M
v�
oU,
oU
00
C/1
a C
5
:Iz,
u
O�
Z
ci
o0
�
N
zz
�I0`U�''
�OU�;
ppz0U
A3 rva�
i ozpU
N� rT.oN
en
O
"
4
� V I
SOI
`o u
'
ScE
�Ct
:
Alhvry
',
cnryN
,L
DRAFT
11/22/96
8:47 AM
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
AGENDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
DECEMBER 4, 1996
TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING 7:00 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLYMOUTH FORUM - Individuals may address the Council
about any item not contained on the regular agenda. A maximum
of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full 15 minutes are
not needed for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the
agenda. The City Council will take no official action on items
discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff or
commission for future report.
4. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION
ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Crime Free Multi -Housing Recognition -
Summerplace Apartments
5. APPROVE AGENDA - Councilmembers may add items to the
agenda including items contained in the Council Information
Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The
Council will not normally take official action on items added to the
agenda.
6. CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so
requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
* Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 'r
December 4, 1996 `J
Page 2
A. Approve City Council Minutes
B. Approve Disbursements
*C. Approve Planned Unit Development Amendment and Conditional
Use Permit to allow outside storage of roofing materials for
property located at 705 Highway 169 North. Westurn Cedar
Supply (96135)
*D. Approve a Shoreland Management Variance for a 20 -foot setback
into the required 100 -foot setback for construction of a new single
family dwelling and inground swimming pool located at 205 Black
Oaks Lane. Steiner & Koppelman, Inc. (96162)
E. Amend License and Permit Fees
F. Approve 1997-2001 Capital Improvement Program
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements in Outlot A,
Parkers Lake Corporate Center 7' Addition
B. Vacation of Larch Lane right-of-way at southeast corner of
24`h Avenue and Larch Lane
8. GENERAL BUSINESS
*A. Approve Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for Ferndale Place
Addition located at 1220 Ferndale Road. Henry Lazniarz
(96038)
B. Approve 1996-1997 Dues Payment to League of Minnesota
Cities
C. Approve payment of Insurance Deductible for Defense Costs
D. Appoint sub -committee to consider assessment policy
* Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
December 4, 1996
Page 3
for Street Reconstruction
E. Appoint sub -committee for Board and Commission appointment
process
9. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
10. ADJOURNMENT
* Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
T - �-a
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 12, 1996
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Mike Stulberg, Commissioners Allen Ribbe
(arrived at 7:08 p.m.), John Stoebner, Tim Bildsoe,
Saundra Spigner, and Roger Berkowitz
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Jeffrey Thompson
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Anne Hurlburt, Planning
Supervisor Barbara Senness, Planner Shawn Drill, and
Clerical Supervisor Denise Hutt
1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
2. PUBLIC FORUM:
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
MOTION by Commissioner Spigner, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner to
recommend approval of the October 22, 1996 Planning Commission Minutes. Vote. 5
Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
5. CONSENT AGENDA:
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY (96135)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Westurn Cedar Supply for a Planned Unit
Development Amendment and Conditional Use Permit to allow outside storage of
roofing supplies for property located at 705 Highway 169 North.
Planner Drill gave an overview of the November 4, 1996 staff report. Planner Drill
presented pictures of the site depicting the stacks of shingles, vegetation, and views of
the site from different angles. Planner Drill stated that he talked with the person that
registered the complaint. The complaint was registered because of rubbish and junk
vehicles on the site. The complainant indicated that the site has been cleaned up since
the complaint was filed. The complainant also stated their satisfaction with the
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #267
the complaint was filed. The complainant also stated their satisfaction with the
proposed fence. Planner Drill indicated that the applicant is proposing to extend the
fence around to fill the void from all views. Planner Drill noted that the resolution
contains an added Condition #5 as to when the fence would have to be in place (May
15, 1997).
Chairman Stulberg introduced John Crotteau of 705 N. Highway 169, the petitioner.
Crotteau stated that he concurs with the staff report. Mr. Crotteau added that if the
fencing needs to be extended further on the west side beyond the tree line, they are
willing to do that.
Chairman Stulberg continued and closed the public hearing as there was no one present
to speak on the issue.
MOTION by Chairman Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe recommending
approval of a Planned Unit Development Amendment and Conditional Use Permit for
outside storage at Westurn Cedar Supply, 705 Highway 169 North.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the applicant is allowed to have storage over the fence
line. Planner Drill replied negatively. He added that the storage stacks measure just
under six feet, and the proposed fence will be seven feet in height.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried on a 5-0 Vote. (Commissioner Ribbe
abstained due to missing part of the presentation.)
B. NORTHERN STATES POWER (96152)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Northern States Power for a Site Plan
Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, and Variances to install a 30 -foot high, 750 -foot
long salt barrier between the Parkers Lake substation and I-494 to prevent the power
from going out in the winter.
Planning Supervisor Senness gave an overview of the November 7, 1996 staff report.
Planning Supervisor Senness presented a sample of the material that will be used for the
barrier.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the barrier would be in place year round. Planning
Supervisor Senness replied affirmatively. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if Northern
States Power will be paying for all three projects that are required. Planning
Supervisor Senness replied affirmatively.
Chairman Stulberg introduced John Theis of Northern States Power, the petitioner.
Mr. Theis stated that after the winter problems incurred in 1991 and 1996, Nothern
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #268
States Power decided to make provisions to prevent future power outages. They
concluded that no single project will totally resolve the problem, rather a combination
of three projects is required. They include 1) recoating the insulators with a silicone
product to protect them from the salt at a cost of $250,000, 2) reconfiguring the
substation, adding circuit breakers so they can run major functions with large parts of
the substation out of service at a cost of $1.5 million and 3) constructing the salt barrier
for reducing the influx of contaminant to the substation at a cost of $560,000.
Chairman Stulberg opened and closed the public hearing as there was no one present to
speak on the issue.
MOTION by Commissioner Spigner, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe
recommending approval of a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional use Permit and
Variances for Northern States Power for property located at 1235 Berkshire Lane.
Commissioner Bildsoe commended Northern States Power for spending the money to
save the residents aggravation of power outages. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION
carried unanimously.
C. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. (96160)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Sprint Spectrum, L.P. for a Site Plan
Amendment and Conditional Use Permit to place a 140 feet telecomunications tower
and ground build cell phone equipment at Hampton Hills Golf Course located at 5313
Juneau Lane North.
Planner Drill gave an overview of the November 5, 1996 staff report. Planner Drill
stated that the tower will be galvanized, which meets the zoning ordinance criteria. He
also presented pictures depicting what the tower, monopole and platform would look
like.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the applicant intends to place antennas on the three
water towers in Plymouth in conjunction with this application. Planner Drill replied
that the applicant has also applied for approval to place antennas on the three towers.
Director Hurlburt added that their lease has not yet been approved by the City Council.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked if can they provide more than one carrier on the
monopole. Planner Drill replied affirmatively.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked if there is a water tower planned for this particular area
of the City. Director Hurlburt replied that there is a water tower planned near the
Nanterre project, but it may be a year or more before it is completed.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #269
Commissioner Spigner asked if there is an agreement between the Hampton Hills Golf
Course and Sprint Spectrum. Director Hurlburt replied affirmatively.
Commissioner Spigner voiced her concern over placing a tower in this particular
location due to the fact that some day this may be developed as residential. She asked
if the tower had to built now, or could it wait until the water tower is completed.
Commissioner Spigner wanted to know if there is a way to get rid of a
telecommunication tower once it has been approved. Planner Drill replied that if a
violation of the Conditional Use Permit occurs, it could be revoked.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked if Sprint is proposing to lease from the owner of the
golf course. If so, he wanted to know what would happen to the lease if the golf course
is sold.
Commissioner Ribbe wanted to know if the telecommunications tower would interfere
with residential cable television.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Anna Marie Solberg, representing the petitioner. In
response to questions raised by Commissioners, Ms. Solberg stated that Sprint will
enter into a 25 -year lease with the owner of the Hampton Hills Golf Course. The lease
is an initial five-year term, with four five-year renewable terms. The lease will be
transferrable and will be binding to a new owner if the golf course is sold. Ms. Solberg
stated that the site is necessary for the entire suburban area, and without it, there would
be a "dead zone". Ms. Solberg stated that the telecommunications tower operates on a
microwave frequency (existing frequency that is just used in another way), and would
not interfere with residential television reception. Ms. Solberg added that they would
run a study to make sure it does not interfere with any other users.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked Ms. Solberg if they had looked at the site for the
proposed water tower. Ms. Solberg replied negatively, as they need something in place
soon.
Chairman Stulberg asked how far from the proposed site they can place the tower. Ms.
Solberg explained that the towers need to be able to see each other in the air. Ms.
Solberg stated that they chose this particular location because of the minimal impact on
the surrounding area. Commissioner Spigner asked if there was any possibility of
putting up a temporary antenna until the water tower is in place. Ms. Solberg replied
that she would have to look into what type of temporary tower would work and look at
the site proposed for the water tower. Commissioner Spigner stated that since
Northwest Plymouth will be an issue for the Commission to start discussing next year,
that perhaps this is not the best alternative, as it could possibly hinder future residential
development. Ms. Solberg stated that they chose the site on golf course because it's not
likely to be developed and it is tucked in and away from sight. Commissioner Ribbe
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #270
asked if they would have sufficient height for a temporary tower. Ms. Solberg stated
that she couldn't technically say for sure, but there are semi -trucks with towers on them
to operate from. She stated that a truck would take up more space and be more visually
displeasing.
Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing. Chairman Stulberg introduced Bruce
Banister of 5340 Vicksburg Lane North. Mr. Bannister stated his opposition to the
tower. Mr. Bannister stated that the area zoned industrial across the street would be a
more appropriate site for the tower.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Ray Carlson of 5360 Vicksburg Lane North. Mr.
Carlson stated that he is not necessarily opposed to the idea of a tower, but that there
are other places that could be considered for the site. Mr. Carlson stated that the water
tower that will be on the Nanterre project would be a more suitable location.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Roger Schroeder of 5565 Juneau Lane North. Mr.
Schroeder stated that it is difficult to believe that a 140 -foot tower can be tucked away.
Mr. Schroeder asked if the tower will have guy wires and a blinking strobe light. Mr.
Schroeder stated that he vehemently objects to this proposal.
Chairman Stulberg closed the public hearing.
In response to questions raised, Planner Drill stated that there will not be a warning
light on top of the tower. Director Hurlburt asked if the applicant contacted the
Metropolitan Airports Commission on their proposal. Ms. Solberg replied that they
follow the FAA requirements, and received a letter from them that states the tower does
not require lighting or striping. Ms. Solberg stated that there will not be any guy wires
on the monopole, as it is a self-supporting structure. The tower is a tubular pole that
extends from the ground and is aesthetically pleasing. Ms. Solber commented that they
chose this part of the golf course as it is the least obtrusive for the golf course, golfers,
and residents.
Chairman Stulberg asked if there are any plans for the property across County Road
101 that was owned by the County for a future helicopter pad site. Planning Supervisor
Senness commented that the property was sold.
Commissioner Berkowitz stated that he shares the same concerns that were raised by
Commissioner Spigner and surrounding residents. He stated that the tower would be
more adequately suited for placement on the water tower after it is in place.
MOTION by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner Spigner to table
the request by Sprint Spectrum to give the applicant time to investigate the feasibility of
a temporary tower and the placement of a permanent structure on the new water tower.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page ##271
Z- la
The request needs to be brought back to the Planning Commission before the February
8, 1997 deadline. Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried on a 5-1 Vote.
(Chairman Stulberg voted nay.) Chairman Stulberg stated that his reason for voting
nay was because he thought the item could of handled either up or down.
D. STEINER & KOPPELMAN, INC. (96162)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Steiner & Koppelman, Inc. for a
Shoreland Management Variance for a 22 -foot encroachment into the required 100 -foot
setback for construction of a new single family dwelling and inground swimming pool
located at 205 Black Oak Lane.
Building Official Ryan gave an overview of the November 4, 1996.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Richard Lang, the petitioner. Mr. Lang commented that
only the screen porch and garage would encroach on the 100 -foot setback line. Mr.
Lang stated that he concurs with the staff report.
Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing. Chairman Stulberg introduced Dave
Baudhuin of 235 Black Oaks Lane who declined to speak. Chairman Stulberg closed
the public hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Stoebner, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe
recommending approval of a Variance to allow a Shoreland Management setback of 88
feet for the construction of a new single family dwelling and inground swimming pool
for Richard Lang at 205 Black Oaks Lane. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION
carried unanimously.
Chairman Stulberg called a recess at 7:57 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:12
p.m.
E. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (95100)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by the City of Plymouth for adoption of
Chapter 21 of the Plymouth City Code to establish a new Zoning Ordinance for the
City of Plymouth, including adoption of a new map of zoning districts, repealing in its
entirety Ordinance No. 80-9 and all amendments thereto.
Planning Supervisor Senness stated that the City is looking at doing a new ordinance
because the current ordinance was done almost 17 years ago and has 56 amendments.
The current ordinance is not user friendly. In the Summer of 1995, the City Council
directed staff to revise the ordinance. The City hired Northwest Associated Consultants
in August 1995. The ordinance text was drafted from September 1995 to June 1996.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #272
T- da
Staff review and mapping took place from July to August 1996. The working draft of
the ordinance was made available for public comment in September 1996. Six public
meetings were held in October 1996. Public hearings on the ordinance will take place
in November and then to the City Council for adoption in December 1996. If that
schedule is followed, the new ordinance would take effect January 1, 1997. There will
be future amendments to the ordinance. Planning Supervisor Senness stated that in this
past year the City adopted new regulations pertaining to antennas, wetlands, loading
docks, and city center zoning districts.
David Licht, consultant, discussed the text aspects of the ordinance. He stated that
what has not changed is sign regulations, antenna regulations, city center zoning
districts, and environmental districts (shoreland, floodplain and wetland protection).
Sign regulations changed only in the form of relating to the new ordinance. There were
only minimal changes relating to cross references. Mr. Licht stated that this process is
modernizing what exists today. The theme of the new ordinance is flexibility, which
gives the City more discretion. Staff has tried to simplify the ordinance and make it
more user friendly. The structure of the ordinance is Administration, Performance
Standards, and District Requirements.
Administration. Under this section interim use is introduced. The environmental
review process is outlined. The variance procedure has been simplified. Procedures
were clarified to an extent that does not exist today and the process is now clearly
outlined for various procedures. Most of the procedures are not new, but are now
stated in the policy. The enforcement section was not changed. There was a lack of
understanding how the ordinance is enforced. The City of Plymouth does not have
someone patrolling the City pertaining to code compliance. It is on a complaint basis,
in which the City receives a complaint and will then inspect the site. A letter is then
sent to owner to correct the issue or given alternatives to correct the issue. A citation is
usually only issued if the City and a owner reach an impasse after about a year to 18
months.
Performance Standards. This section contains regulations that address the
community. The Nonconforming uses are defined. There is now more flexibility
introduced relating to single family dwellings and accessory buildings. Under parking
and loading, there are now compact parking provisions. The parking requirements
have been reduced in many cases. This section also addresses model homes, animals,
landfills, and antennas. This section now also provides for regulations pertaining to
sexually oriented businesses. The City is legally bound to provide opportunities, but is
also trying to protect areas where minors are.
District Requirements. The districts are mapped. Each district is structured in a
uniform fashion with permitted uses, accessory uses (secondary that can automatically
occur), Conditional Uses (allowed provided certain criteria is met), Interim Uses
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #273
--r' 4 a
r
(similar to Conditional Uses), Administrative Permits, and area requirements and
construction standards. Mr. Licht gave -an overview of the districts that are proposed.
The new ordinance contains more districts that are more narrowly defined. The FRD
district stayed the same. Planned Unit Developments have been eliminated except for a
few unique ones. The O -R (Office -Residential) district is intended as a transitional
zone. The B -C district is for business offices and wholesale showrooms in an
environment with a high level of amenitites. The current B-2 district is now divided
into three districts: C-1 (convenience, personal services), C-2 (strip shopping centers)
and C-4 (regional/community shopping) The current B-3 district in now split into two
districts: C-3 (highway commercial like the area near Highway 55 & I-494) and C -W
for high volume high storage uses. There were no changes to the City Center districts.
The current I-1 district has been expanded to three districts: I-1 which is a transitional
zone (allows more office space, restricts truck traffic), I-2 which also allows
distribution centers, and I-3 for heavy industry such as steel manufacturing. Planned
Unit Development is now a district. There are no changes to the environmental
districts. There is now a P -I district for public institutional uses.
Director Hurlburt stated that revising the ordinance is a regulatory process, not a
planning process. By the end of 1998, the City has to update its Comprehensive Plan
in its entirety. Properties were put into a new zoning district as close as possible to
their current zoning and land use. FRD parcels remain as FRD. The new ordinance
will mean less red tape for property owners. Director Hurlburt stated that some
changes were made in the text as a result of the public meetings. Topics that generated
discussion at the public meetings were recreational vehicles, differences between I-1
and I-2 Districts, changes in procedures, relationship between zoning and the
Comprehensive Plan, concerns about the process, and the timing of the new ordinance.
There are 70 recommended text changes in all - some initiated by the City Council
(recreational vehicles), Council suggested alternatives, major text changes
(substantive), and minor changes/technical corrections. The City Council changes
pertaining to recreational vehicles was ordered at their special meeting of October 29.
The Council directed staff to eliminate all restrictions on parking of recreational
vehicles and equipment in residential districts. The changes were made to pages 104
and 130. Council suggested alternatives include: 1) elimination of the requirement that
the design of residential accessory buildings over 120 square feet (except in FRD) be
compatible with their surroundings, and 2) consider action for keeping the minimum lot
width in the RSF-1 District at 110 feet. Staff recommended reduction to 100 feet.
Staff has reviewed the issue and feels that the 100 -foot width will minimize
nonconformities and the need for Variances.
Director Hurlburt described the proposed text changes. Definition changes are
proposed to: distribution center (over 50,000 square feet); dog kennel - change to
reference the City Code, as administration handles the licensing of kennels; outside
storage - changing from 72 hours to 96 hours; sales in residential areas, garage sales
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #274
Z -4a
and auto sales - change to reference the City Code. Major text changes proposed
pertain to parking in residential areas (vehicle length, time change from 72 to 96 hours,
paved parking areas (same as it is today); setbacks - changed to three feet. RMF -4
and O -R Districts Lot Area - minimum lot area had 2,500 square feet and now
proposed to lower to 2,200 square feet. The ordinance needed to be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. Permitted uses such as boat, marine & snowmobile sales was
moved from the C-2 district and placed in the C-4 district. Inside building supplies
were added to the C-4 district. Vehicle leasing & rental were added to the C -W
district. Offices in the I-1 district were increased to up to 50% by right. Bakery,
wholesale and food processing uses were added to the I-2 district.
Director Hurlburt gave an overview of the proposed map changes as listed in the
November 8, 1996 staff report. She noted that two additional map changes were
brought forward at the meeting, and are listed as #14 - Beyer Property and #15 -Bass
Lake Road and Nathan Lane Commercial Sites. Director Hurlburt suggested that the
map changes be acted on individually before the ordinance goes forward to the City
Council.
Director Hurlburt stated that the public hearing will be continued to November 19,
1996.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked why some PUDs were kept. Director Hurlburt explained
that some of the PUDs that were approved are unique and do not fit well into the new
classifications, such as the Northwest Business Campus, as it has an Indirect Source
Permit.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked for an explanation regarding changes to the parking
regulations. Director Hurlburt replied that uses were added to the list and in many
cases, the number of required spaces was reduced. The changes also include provision
for shared parking and compact parking spaces. Director Hurlburt stated that there is a
chart available showing the existing and proposed parking standards.
Commissioner Spigner stated that she was concerned with additional uses that could be
administratively approved by staff without having to come before the Planning
Commission. Director Hurlburt explained that the administrative authority has not
been expanded for commercial and industrial uses. The main difference will impact
single family dwelling owners. The changes were made to have more equity among
property owners. Currently, if a property is in a PUD, an owner would have to go
through the Planning Commission to apply for a deck permit, while an owner across the
street whose property is not in a PUD just applies for a deck permit through the
building department. Commissioner Spigner stated that she would like to see a
comparison of the existing and proposed changes for administrative permits.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #275
T-443
Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing. Chairman Stulberg introduced letters
received from Kenneth and Sandra Solom of 3295 Garland Lane, David and Kelli
Slavik of 3325 Everest Court North, and Randy and Susan Schaefer of 3330 Everest
Court stating their opposition of zoning Site #5 - (Seven Ponds Commercial Site) C-3.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Matt Van Slooten, representing Carlson Real Estate
Company. Mr. Van Slooten stated that he supports the proposed change to the I-2
district for Carlson Business Center, but that office space should not be limited to 25 %.
If the change is made to 25 %, they would like to be grandfathered in. Their application
has already been approved, and they were intending to use up to 50% for office space.
Mr. Van Slooten stated that looking at the commercial matrix of uses, he noted that tile
sales should be allowed as an accessory use, florists should be allowed in the I-1 district
and delicatessen and coffee shops should be a conditional use. Mr. Van Slooten stated
that he will follow up with a memo to staff on his concerns/questions.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Sandra Solum of 3295 Garland Lane. Ms. Solum stated
that she did not want to have gas stations or fast food restaurants on the Seven Ponds
PUD Commercial Site because of increased noise, traffic, and crime. Ms. Solum was
concerned about the proximity of commercial and residential.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Kelli Slavik of 3325 Everest Court. Ms. Slavik stated
that she was told by a City Councilmember that property could not be rezoned at
Highway 55 and County Road 24. Ms. Slavik asked that the business area be restricted
for the Seven Ponds PUD Commercial Site. Ms. Slavik stated that she did extensive
research as to whether a City can change zoning. Ms. Slavik stated that the character
of property has changed since the original zoning took place, and the zoning will have
an adverse affect on their residential property.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Richard Schmidt of 14310-13' Avenue North. Mr.
Schmidt stated his concern for limitations on an automobile parked in your yard for
more than 96 hours if it is not operating. He stated that if you are restoring a vehicle,
you can't get it done within that time limit. Mr. Schmidt stated that if he isn't allowed
to build another garage stall, the ordinance would be restricting what he can do on his
own property. He stated that the ordinance would be putting a hobbyist out of
business. Mr. Schmidt asked if there is a definition for race car. Mr. Schmidt was
concerned that satellite dishes can't be more than one meter in diameter. He stated that
two meters in diameter would be more appropriate. Mr. Schmidt questioned Section
21145.06 pertaining to inspections of residential homes. He stated that it was an
invasion of privacy. Director Hurlburt commented that Section 21145.06 pertains only
to homes that were issued a home occupation permit to operate a business out of their
home.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #276
T- 4a
Mr. Schmidt asked what the decision was on the Northern States Power item. He
stated that he lives next to the site and didn't receive a notice.
Director Hurlburt replied that staff will check to see if he was located within 500 feet of
the Northern States Power site. In response to other questions raised by Mr. Schmidt,
Director Hurlburt stated that the 96 hour limit for automobiles is a current code
requirement. She stated that there is more liberal square footage to allow accessory
buildings on the property should Mr. Schmidt choose to explore that option. Director
Hurlburt noted that the race car definition is listed under recreational vehicles.
Chairman Stulberg introduced LeRoy Reinecke of 14411 County Road 6. Mr.
Reinecke commented that the present ordinance is quite restrictive. Mr. Reinecke was
concerned that he would not be able to put an accessory building in his back yard under
the proposed ordinance without having to obtain a Conditional Use Permit. Mr.
Reinecke agreed that it would be better to have inside storage rather than outside
storage because it looks nicer and there would be less of a chance of vandalism. Mr.
Reinecke stated that the minimum lot size of 18,500 square feet for the RSF-1 district is
too large. He stated that public transit only works with smaller lots and that the
Planning Commission and City Council should consider that. Chairman Stulberg
commented that the city currently has many lot sizes. Director Hurlburt stated that if
Mr. Reinecke would like to come in and talk with City staff, they could take a look at
his individual property to see whether he could have an accessory building.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Gary Lally, representing Plymouth Technology Park -
Site #3. Mr. Lally presented a graphic and aerial photo of the site. He stated that he
supports the change to I-2.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Mike Johnson of 3345 Everest Court. Pertaining to the
Seven Ponds PUD Commercial Site, Mr. Johnson stated that changing it to C-3 would
be inappropriate. He stated that PUD does not go far enough to address some of the
problems. Mr. Johnson stated that nowhere else in the city can you find such a sharp
transition from residential to commercial properties. Mr. Johnson stated that there is
no underlying commercial need for this property to be zoned C-3. The only access is
through Garland Lane. Mr. Johnson stated that he has reviewed past court cases and
the Minnesota courts have endorsed cities changing zoning. Mr. Johnson stated that the
property can't be zoned C-3 because the only way to access the site is through a
residential area. Mr. Johnson stated that he would like to see it changed to O -R before
developmental work is done. Changing it to O -R would still give the owner the ability
to make it economically feasible.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Ted Hagen, representing Hans Hagen Homes. Mr.
Hagen stated that their site should retain the PUD designation. Mr. Hagen stated that if
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #277
the site retains the PUD designation, they are prepared to come before the City within
60 days with a development plan.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Ed Albro of 4105 Fernbrook Lane. Mr. Albro
commended the City Council on withdrawing the intrusive parts of the ordinance
pertaining to recreational vehicles. Mr. Albro stated that the outside storage did not go
far enough. He stated that all personal property covers a lot of ground other than
recreational vehicles. He asked if there was a list somewhere that is not in the
ordinance. He commented that the proposed ordinance is still intrusive in everyday
life. Chairman Stulberg stated that if you try to define everything you will most likely
leave something out. The more you list as yes or no, the more trouble you get yourself
into. Director Hurlburt explained that the way zoning law works is, if you don't list a
use as allowed, it is prohibited.
Mr. Albro stated that the proposed ordinance is very specific in some items, and not in
others. Mr. Albro thought that the Commission should reconsider the penalties, as they
are too harsh. Director Hurlburt replied that it is the standard penalty clause in the
City Code. Mr. Licht stated that the penalty clause was not in the first draft, and it
does not need to be in this draft, but the City Attorney recommended that it be
included. If something were to go to court, the City has the burden to show reasonable
violation.
Mr. Albro stated that he would like to see the hardship part of a Variance eliminated,
or eliminate Variances altogether. Director Hurlburt replied that under state law, a
Variance has to fall under hardship. She stated that Variances are a unique and special
privilege given. If the ordinance is not properly addressing a common policy, the
ordinance needs to be changed.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Don Smith of 10215-315` Avenue North. Mr. Smith
asked if the definition for regulatory flood protection and ordinary high water mean the
same thing. Director Hurlburt answered typically no and suggested that she address his
specific comment individually after the meeting.
Chairman Stulberg stated that staff needs to look at the letters submitted tonight and
give the Commission their recommendation. Director Hurlburt stated that staff will
review the comments and bring forward any recommended changes to the Commission
at their meeting on November 19. Director Hurlburt stated that information related to
Administrative Permits will be mailed out with the packet. Commissioner Spigner
stated that in regards to definitions, adult misdemeanor was left out.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the next meeting will be just a continuation of the
hearing. Director Hurlburt replied affirmatively. Chairman Stulberg asked staff to list
out any changes that the Commission needs to take action on individually.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page #278
T - 443
Director Hurlburt stated that the reports and maps will be updated to supplement the
current reports that the Commission received.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked staff to discuss the property listed as Site #5 (Seven
Ponds) in more detail in the report. Commissioner Berkowitz concurred that additional
background and analysis would be helpful. Commissioner Stoebner concurred and
asked for an expansion on the reasoning behind the limitations of the parcel. Director
Hurlburt stated that the City can and does change zoning. She complimented the
residents for their research on zoning law. She stated that the zoning must be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Director Hurlburt stated that the
Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended first, and that is not what we are doing
in this process.
MOTION by Commissioner Spigner, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe to adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:34 p.m.
Plymouth Charter Commission
November 13, 1996
Minutes
Present: Virgil Schneider, Jon Speck, Ellie Singer, Dave Pauba, Joy Tierney,
Ty Bujold, Dave Crain, Bob Sipkins, Kapila Bobra, Tim Peterson
Assistant City Manager Kathy Lueckert
Excused: Sandy Patterson, John Duntley
Absent: Pauline Milner
Call to Order
Virgil Schneider called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
Approval of Minutes
Tim Peterson made a correction to page five of the September 30 minutes, noting
that a sentence needed a verb. The minutes were approved as corrected.
Discussion of Proposed Supermajority Requirement
Virgil Schneider called the Charter Commission's attention to the City Council
minutes of October 2, 1996. He said that the Council had taken action, and asked Kathy
Lueckert to report. Kathy Lueckert stated that the City Council voted to place the
amendment requiring a supermajority vote for a tax rate increase on the ballot for the next
general election, in November 1998.
Virgil Schneider said that the Charter Commission could move to reconsider its
action to reject the proposed amendment. However, a member who voted on the
prevailing side would have to move to reconsider. Bob Sipkins stated that the Charter
Commission could also choose to propose an ordinance enabling a supermajority
requirement to the City Council, under Subdivision 7 of the statute. Virgil Schneider
stated his preference for the Charter Commission to go through its normal public process
in this instance.
Jon Speck asked if subdivision 7 required a vote by citizens. Subdivision 7 would
require the City Council to hold a public hearing on the proposed ordinance and to
publish it, but would not require a vote of the people. The proposed ordinance must be
approved by a unanimous vote of the council.
Ty Bujold said he has no interest in the supermajority proposal in any form.
Kapila Bobra suggested that the Charter Commission wait to see the level of
interest of the new council in the proposal.
Tim Peterson said that he was interested in taking advantage of the spirit of
compromise on this issue that came through in the council minutes. He said that some
members of the Charter Commission may no longer be members when the supermajority
issue is next considered. Because of the considerable history of this issue, he stated his
preference for the current Charter Commission to propose a compromise.
T 4b
Ty Bujold said that the real issue is whether or not the Charter Commission thinks
the supermajority proposal is a good idea.
Bob Sipkins said that no member of the Charter Commission believed that the
supermajority proposal was a good idea. However, members might not be opposed to
giving the council the option of imposing the restriction on themselves through the
ordinance option. He also stated that such an ordinance might be written with more
permissive language so that the supermajority requirement could be applied to other
issues besides tax rate increases. He stated that he would rather have the requirement in
an ordinance rather than in the charter.
Virgil Schneider stated his concern that citizens voting on the current proposed
amendment may not see the unintended consequences and not understand the question of
minority influence. He said that he would prefer the ordinance option rather than placing
the requirement directly in the charter.
Jon Speck asked what assurance the Charter Commission has that if the issue is
reopened and the commission proposes an alternative, that the council will not still
choose the original language for the ballot.
Virgil Schneider said that there are no assurances. He stated that if the Charter
Commission proposes an amendment, he would want to hold public hearings on the
proposal before sending it to the city council.
Tim Peterson asked Ty Bujold what he sees happening in 1998 when the
supermajority issue is on the ballot.
Ty Bujold said that even if the Charter Commission proposes an alternative, he
foresees the council placing the original amendment proposal on the ballot. He stated
that he is not in favor of allowing a supermajority vote by ordinance, and that he would
prefer that councils not change the rules governing their action.
Ellie Singer said that if someone presents valid evidence to the Charter
Commission indicating that a supermajority requirement is a good idea, she would
resurface the issue.
Bob Sipkins said that in times of fiscal stress councils need more flexibility rather
than more restrictions. He stated that the supermajority requirement could create
problems for the city. He would prefer a compromise in the form of an ordinance rather
than an amendment to the charter.
Ty Bujold said that the city council has the ultimate power on what is placed
before the voters.
Bob Sipkins said that he believes that the city council wants to compromise on
this issue, and that he believes it is unlikely that a compromise proposal will be rejected
by the council.
No formal motions were made on the topic of the supermajority vote, so Virgil
Schneider moved to the next agenda topic.
Charter Commission Terms of Office
Virgil Schneider called the commission's attention to the information distributed
on the terms of office. Kathy Lueckert stated that it appears that the best way of
correcting the terms is to introduce special legislation in the 1997 session.
::�:-46
Jon Speck moved, seconded by Ellie Singer, that the legislation be crafted so
that the terms of seven members be extended by two years, for a total of ten year
terms.
Kathy Lueckert stated that there has been controversy in previous years about
extending terms of office in Plymouth, and she would not recommend this as an option.
Ellie Singer withdrew her second of Speck's motion. No other seconds to the
motion were made, and the motion died.
Virgil Schneider moved, seconded by Ty Bujold, that the Charter
Commission request either a judge's order or special legislation to correct the terms
of office of charter commission members, and that no term extend beyond the eight
years permitted by law.
The motion was discussed. Virgil Schneider stated that his idea was to begin the
terms of the two currently vacant seats on July 1, 1997. He suggested that the Charter
Commission be polled and five volunteers sought who would vacate their seats on June
30, 1997. The judge or the legislature would appoint five new individuals to new terms
beginning on July 1, 1997. This would fulfill the intent of the statute.
Bob Sipkins said that he has known Judge Mabley for many years. He will talk
with him about signing an order to correct the terms, and avoid special legislation.
The motion passed unanimously.
Election of Vice Chairman
Virgil Schneider moved, seconded by Ty Bujold, that Bob Sipkins be
appointed vice chairman of the Charter Commission. The motion passed
unanimously.
Charter Commission members expressed their appreciation and thanks to Bob
Sipkins for his appearance before the city council on the supermajority issue.
December 2, 1996 Meeting
Virgil Schneider stated that the Charter Commission last year had scheduled its
annual meeting for December 2, 1996. He said that he does not feel this meeting is
necessary, given the number of times the Charter Commission has met during 1996. By
common consent, the December 2 meeting was canceled.
Next Meeting
The Charter Commission established January 6, 1997 as the next Charter
Commission meeting. The primary topic will be progress on resolving the terms of office
issue.
The meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
DATE: November 7, 1996 _
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager through Fred G. Moore, Director of Public
Works
F
FROM: John R. Sweeney, Transit Administrator ,�
SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH METROLINK TRANSIT STEM STATUS REPORT
During the past year we have completed a significant number of improvements to our
Metrolink system and it occurred to me that it would be appropriate to provide an update to the
existing ' and future City Council members at this time. The timing of this report may also
assist the Council in evaluating the 1997 Management Plan and budget which will be submitted
to them for review and approval in December 1996.
Background Information
Plymouth Metrolink is a replacement service or "opt -out" transit system providing service to
the City of Plymouth. Services provided by Plymouth Metrolink are morning and evening
express to and from downtown Minneapolis, morning and evening reverse commute from and
to downtown Minneapolis, and Dial -A -Ride within Plymouth making connections to
Ridgedale, Golden Valley Shopping Center, K -Mart in New Hope and downtown Wayzata.
Additionally, we have recently implemented a fixed route midday circulator providing more
opportunities to the Plymouth residents. Plymouth Metrolink was the first opt -out system in
operation in the state of Minnesota beginning service in 1984.
Over the past year Plymouth Metrolink has been conducting extensive planning and program
implementation designed to improve service delivery and service quality while at the same
time improving ridership. These improvements are also designed to enhance system efficiency
and effectiveness.
PLYMOUTH METROLINK TRANSIT SYSTEM STATUS REPORT �� a
Page 2
1. System Achievements
• Worked with contracted service provider to add thirteen new transit vehicles to replace
older service -worn vehicles (new vehicles went into service April 15, 1996).
• Operated a limited strike service in October, 1995 during the transit union strike
against MCTO. Service was well received by riders, much appreciated and operated
without any serious problems.
• Implemented a service monitoring program in 1996, for express, reverse commute and
dial -a -ride services. Program includes field checks, on time performance, safety
checks, driver checks, vehicle maintenance record inspection, vehicle inspections,
dispatch review, handling of complaints and accidents, passenger survey, financial
audit, dial -a -ride trip verification and many other program elements. This service
monitoring program is new for this sized system and can provide a basis for similar
programs in other systems.
• Applied for and received verification of award of a new Section 5310 transit vehicle
through MN Dot for use in providing enhanced senior, para -transit and general public
transportation in Plymouth. Vehicle will be delivered in 1997.
• Assembled business leaders in Plymouth to begin planning a reverse commute job fair
for Spring 1997. A steering committee made up of business representatives, NET
agency representatives, the transit system and the Twin West Chamber of Commerce
has begun meeting to begin planning the job fair.
• Coordinated and hosted a Plymouth transportation providers summit including all social
service providers, public transit operators, and Metro Mobility. This program is
intended to seek areas of service coordination and cooperation in Plymouth to enhance
service delivery and attempt to meet unfulfilled needs. Group will meet on a regular
basis (coordinated with NWHHSC Consolidation of Services program).
• Undertook an extensive facilities and service review to identify current and future
transit facilities needs and to consider potential service restructuring possibilities.
• Planning was undertaken for implementing a fixed route circulator that actually began
service on October 7, 1996.
• Maintained Metro Mobility service in Plymouth after Metropolitan Council proposed
service elimination, by reaching an agreement that includes sharing of Metro Mobility
costs between the region and Plymouth Metrolink. The new fixed route circulator will
require region to provide Metro Mobility service to Plymouth without cost sharing.
G AENGURANUMMAOSWATUSMOC
PLYMOUTH METROLINK TRANSIT SYSTEM STATUS REPORT a
Page 3
• Implemented expanded marketing program.
• Reorganized passenger counting measures to include passengers previously not counted.
• Applied for and received regional bond funding for park and ride lot improvements.
• Continued leadership role in the I-494 Corridor Commission, a TDM organization
made up of members from Maple Grove to Bloomington along the I-494 corridor.
2. Improved Service Efficiencies
• Improved Metrolink per passenger subsidy from $3.64 per passenger in 1995
(excluding strike service) to $3.20 per passenger through August 1996
• Maintained system ridership levels after strike and after fare increase.
• Increased Dial -A -Ride ridership for June -August from 8,843 in 1995 to 9,705 in 1996
through special summer marketing program.
• Implemented a fixed route circulator in October 1996 that will help reduce long dial -a -
ride trips and improve dial -a -ride efficiency.
• Working with Team Transit and MN Dot to implement shoulder by-pass lanes on
Trunk Highway 169 for Metrolink buses. Reconstruction of shoulder lanes by MN Dot
scheduled for Spring, 1997.
3. Safety
• Applied for and received regional capital funding to improve park and ride lots.
Improvements will include safer access, installation of lighting, improved shelter
facilities and the installation of telephones.
• Working closely with contracted service providers and local police department to
ensure ongoing passenger safety and facilities security.
GAENO\TRANSU NEMOSMATUSMOC
PLYMOUTH METROLINK TRANSIT SYSTEM STATUS REPORT
Page 4
4. Attachments
• Program Goals and Objectives and a Summary of the Status of Those Goals and
Objectives
• 1996 (January through June) monthly cost summaries displaying cost, ridership and
statistical data for the Plymouth Metrolink express and reverse commute route.
As you can see, 1996 has been an extremely busy and productive year for Plymouth Metrolink
and we will strive to continue providing excellent service to our residents during 1997 and
succeeding years.
attachment
G AENGWRANSMMEMOSWATUS.DOC
DATE: November 18, 1996
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
THROUGH: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Craig C. Gerdes, Director of Public Safety
"�e
SUBJECT: SQUAD CAR COLORS
Uniformed members of the Police Department completed a research project during 1996 showing
a significant amount of interest in change to "black and white" squad cars. Because the colors
of squad cars are highly visible within the community, we felt it was appropriate to get general
information on the project out to the community at large. The concept was first discussed at the
City Council Subcommittee on Community Policing at its September 18' meeting. The group
was presented information on the project including costs. The increased cost of a two-tone
vehicle is offset by the savings in after -market graphic costs. Our current graphics are very
detailed and require outsourcing. The new two-tone vehicles' additional graphics could be
handled by the City. The subcommittee agreed with the decision to develop public comment.
In October, information was put out in both the Plymouth News City Newsletter, and the Sun
Sailor Newspaper soliciting response by telephone, mail, and e-mail. Lt. Dan Twaddle, Patrol
Lieutenant, coordinated the responses. With the first printing, we received approximately 180
responses. Most callers primarily expressed concerns regarding the costs of repainting existing
vehicle with the new colors. The department had not intended to repaint existing, but only order
new vehicles in the new colors. A new clarification to the issue was printed in the November
Plymouth News and on Friday, November 15`'', a spot was taped for Cable 12 news. Since the
clarification, we have only received 35 responses from the public. We will continue to take
public response through the second week of December.
Support for the change with the patrol division is strong. Not only did members of the division
research and request the change, they conducted a survey of the 41 members of the uniformed
division. Of those surveyed, 37 responded and the majority, 30, were in favor of the change.
Both the Patrol Lieutenant and I have discussed the issue and support the change requested.
Unless the department receives a significant amount of additional comment from the public, the
department will begin the transition to the new colors for squads ordered after the first of the
year.
U WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER
1011 First Street South, Suite 200, Hopkins, MN 55343 (612) 933-0005 Fax: (612) 933-6046
1.
November 15, 1996
Mayor and City Council
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard'
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mayor and City Council:
Third quarter report, 1996, on closed cases for the residents, businesses and city
staff of Plymouth:
Juvenile theft, Operation de Novo (OdN) referral, mediated with signed
agreement
2. Juvenile theft, OdN referral, mediated with signed agreement
Several of the cities in our service area have been interested in increasing the usage
of mediation in disputes and have asked us to explain our services to city staff so they can
understand the process. We would be happy to do so for the staff in Plymouth. Please
call our office to schedule a convenient time.
Enclosed is a laminated card on steps to resolve a conflict which we hope to
widely distribute in our service area. Any ideas you might have on distribution in your city
would be welcomed.
Sincerely,
xx P-,,- _ -_h
Susan A. Nelson
Executive Director
enclosure
rmmm
co S Innovative Consulting services, inc.
10024 South Shore Drive 1612► 546 0206Minneapolis • MN 55441 •USA FAX 1612► 546 8686
November 14, 1996
Ms. Barbara Senness '
Planning Supervisor
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482
Dear Ms. Senness :
I would appreciate your help in the following matter:
TOPAZ Trucking company has been parking their trucks
across the street from my house located on Medicine Lake at
the address above.
They run these trucks on and off the whole night. That is as
far as 1 know against the law. The noise is so lou(i that, it
wakes the whole neighborhood up. The value of' ouI• hones goes
down as a result of the situation. If anyone decided to sr,1l
their home, they would have a hard time. No one is going to
want to buy a home in such a noisy environment.
One of my neighbors has informed me that this issue will be
discussed in the Plymouth City Council meeting on December lei,
1996.
I am seeking your support. The situation is really bad. It is
not only disturbing but unhealthy. it is against the law and
T hope this incident will be solved very soon.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Dr. Hana Tomasek
cc. Ms. Joy Tierney
Ms. J inny Black
%i
I
Internet Contact
From: R. David Dexter, M.D.[SMTP:pathman@minn.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 1996 11:35 PM
To: contact
Subject: Property Taxes
My wife and I are planning on building a home in the Swan Lake South
development near French Park in Plymouth, Minnesota. Our home is
estimated to have a mortgage between $450,000 and $550,00. We would
appreciate a "estimated" ball park figure of annual property tax due on
properties within this price range (to aid us in determining the exact
mortgage we can afford). Thanks.
Page 1
Internet Contact
From: TML4TML[SMTP:TML4TML@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 1996 9:49 AM
To: contact
Subject: Street Plowing - Yard Damage
For the last 4 years my lawn has been torn up by street plowers ...... I have
not
spoken up but just grinned and beared it. Just this past week with the first
snowfall
it happened again. I am getting tired of having to repair this every spring.
Do you have
any recommendations for me ? My address is 12220 60th Place North.
Thanks,
Tom Lyngdal
Page 1
Zed
//— lk-%G
HeA-
SFS
r es
ase •
�ece..�/� cvns�r�ca�e�(
o
b u t Lo'l
s� J
S; �ee�e/yam
Q,l.Co� a- •�-P.G�
V
a.
A �
0
U
A A
o
C)
--�
�
0
0
L
OOH
ON
O*N
O*,
OOH
L.
A
o
o
O
o
N
N
In. 'C
crs
0
U
u.
on
`0
U
O
N
o
to
u
0
04
p
a�
ioa�
N o
3
ri
Q
O F
►cz Q.
U
Q
cz
3
Cd
to
cd
�to
cl
8
on
o
E o
°?
z
0
Q
r�xHx¢
0
0
H
� cn
x
xa�x
a,
3
x
V
a.
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
EMERGENCY RESPONSE COMMISSION
B-5 State Capitol
75 Constitution Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1612
TTY(612)282-6555
FAX (612) 296-0459
Telephone: (612) 296-2233
November 1, 1996
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Craig Gerdes
Emergency Management Director
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Sir;
Regional Review Committee Seven (RRC 7), on behalf of the Minnesota
Emergency Response Commission, has completed the review of the City of
Plymouth Emergency Operations Plan. This was done in accordance with the four
year review cycle set forth by the State of Minnesota Division of Emergency
Management.
The Regional Review Committee 7 has determined your plan to be in compliance
with the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act planning information
requirements. On behalf of the RRC 7 we want to thank you for your cooperation
and a job well done. I hope you will extend this congratulations to the members of
your team who have contributed to this fine planning effort.
If the RRC 7 or any of its members can be of assistance in any future emergency
management planning activities, please contact us with your request. Call Kurt
Kramer at 520-1064 or Howard Strabala at 297-3942.
Since
Kurt G. Kramer
Chair, RRC -7
cc:
Joy Tierney, Mayor
Dwight Johnson, City Manager
Paul Aason, Director, Minnesota Emergency Response Commission
ANI Dnl 1A1 r-MW)DT1 wrn,,, rr fim nvrn
MINNESOTA
Public Safety
EMEAGENC
M,,NRGEMENr
CityHall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Go& V4 MN 55427.4588
(612) 593-8000
FAX (612) 593-8109
TDD (612) 593-3968
Mayor and Counal
593-8006
6ii Manager
593-8002
Public Safety
Porde 593-8079
Fire 593-8080
Fn 593-8098
Public Works
593-8030
:r S93-so92
Motor Vehicle
593.8101
Phnoing and Zoning
Firiana
593-8013
Asses"8
593-8020
Pack and Rmeation
200 Brookview hrkway
Gold6V4MV554261364
(612) 544-5218 -
FAX (612) 544-0398
TDD (612) 593-3%8
November 15, 1996
Mr. Peter Enck, Chair
Bassett Creek Water Management Commission
9000 47 1/2 Avenue North
New Hope, Minnesota 55428
Dear MrEtsck:
The Golden Valley City Council, at its November 6, 1996 meeting passed
the following motion:
MOVED by Micks, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously
to request the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission to form a
Citizen Advisory Committee that represents the Cities that are involved in
the Joint Powers Agreement.
We are asking that the Commission establish a Citizens Advisory
Committee. The Joint Powers Agreement dated September 7, 1993
provides for this in Article VI Powers and Duties of the Board.
Subdivision 25 states: "It shall establish a procedure for establishing
Citizen or Technical Advisory Committees and to provide other means for
public participation."
Our Council strongly supports this request. The Commission is
responsible for flood control and water quality. Particularly with the
addition of the water quality to your responsibilities it is important to
involve citizens to react to your proposed actions and give input, as well
as to provide a vehicle for communication to the Cities and their residents.
Z,g� X
Page 2
We also ask that after you have discussed this and have a proposal for
implementing, that the proposal be communicated to the member cities for
their review and comment before you formally adopt it.
Our Council also requests you to again consider the time and place of
your meetings. The current situation does not particularly encourage
citizen attendance and observation.
The Commission's work is critical to the quality of the creek and its future.
We are grateful for the dedication and work of the Commissioners. By
responding positively to these requests we feel you will be enhancing your
ability to carry out your mission.
Sincerely,
Mary E. Anderson
Mayor
cc: Mayors of Member Cities
bcc: City Manager, City Clerk and/or Director.of Public Works
November 19, 1996
Chief Craig Gerdes
Police Department
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Chief Gerdes:
As you are no doubt aware, in the early hours of Sunday, November 17, 1996, a
sophisticated and professional team of thieves attempted to break into our building with
the sole purpose of stealing inventory. Such an entrance could easily have been
devastating for us as it was for another jewelry company hit earlier in the evening.
Thanks to additional police coverage provided by the Plymouth Police Department after
learning that our security system was down, Office Chris Kuklok apprehended one of two
individuals outside our building attempting to make entry. His presence and actions
prevented any damage to our building or loss of inventory.
Too often, we take what we do too casually so this event has certainly been a reality
check for us. I would like to ask you, on my behalf, to commend all the officers and staff
involved for their responsiveness and efforts. I would also request that Office Kuklok be
especially commended for his actions and bravery in what was and could have been a
most dangerous situation.
I am grateful that we chose to build our factory in Plymouth.
Most grateful .
lack D. MacBean
President
cc: Mayor joy Tierney 4/
-\MOND IMPS
�n,X: - :.-
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
DATE: November 22, 1996
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Summary of Events
Movie Theater/City Center area. Anne, Roger, and I met with the Mann theater
group today. The following items emerged in the discussion:
• The raised their land offer from $2.25 per foot to $3.00. This would provide the
City with about $650,000 instead of the $3.50/foot and $750,000 proposed by
Frauenshuh. The Frauenshuh negotiations failed to conclude successfully, partly
because they assumed some City help in some phase of the project. Mann says no
assistance is needed with their offer.
• The Beard group is not a part of the team. They withdrew before we selected
Frauenshuh at the time that they raised their offer from $1.00 for the whole site to
$2.25 per foot. The Mann theaters will act as their own developers, and have done
so in a number of other locations.
• They are very confident of a close working relationship with Carlson and the
project would center upon the City and the Carlson property.
• The scope of the project would be a retail center on the Carlson property with no
fast food restaurants and the movie theater on the City land.
• They would like to build immediately and construction would take about eight
months.
• They plan to build a 12 screen theater if parking allows, but would agree to build a
10 screen theater otherwise. Their offer will not be contingent upon any relaxation
of the City's parking standards (1 space for every 4 seats).
• Their only business concern is if another movie theater would go in a Highway 55
and Medina Road on the Hans Hagen property. No theater is shown on the latest
sketch plans at that location, and that area would need PUD revision to allow a
movie theater.
• They plan to build a state of the art "stadium" theater wherein the seating
surrounds the screen. This provides better site lines. There are no other stadium
theaters in this area.
• They are prepared to meet with the subcommittee and the Council in December.
We thanked them for their interest and raising their offer. We did not represent that
the Council would approve the land sale price. There may yet be some creative ideas
for realizing a larger sale price on our land. One example might involve cooperating
with them on the required ponding (which we have to do for the Ice Arena anyway).
There may be other ideas.