HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 12-06-1996Vot
DECEMBER 6, 1996
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS
1. COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE.
DECEMBER 11 5:30 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
Public Safety Training Room
Council Orientation
DECEMBER 11 7:00 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
Council Chambers
Zoning Ordinance
DECEMBER 18 7:00 P.M. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Council Chambers
2. PLANNING COMMISSION, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 7:00 P.M., Council Chambers.
Agenda is attached. (M-2)
3. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 7:00 P.M.,
Hadley Lake Room.
4. PACT, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER]], 7:00 P.M., Hadley Lake Room.
5. PRAC, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 12, 7:00 P.M., Council Chambers.
6. BOARD AND COMMISSIONAPPLICANT INTERVIEWS, MONDAY, DECEMBER 16,
7:00 P.M., Employee Lunchroom.
7. PLANNING COMMISSION, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 7:00 P.M., Council Chambers.
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO
December 6, 1996
Page 2
8. SUB -COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY POLICING, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 18,
5:30 P.M., Medicine Lake Room.
9. HRA, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 7.•00 P.M., Council Chambers.
10. MEETING CALENDARS — December and January meeting calendars are attached. (M-9)
ON
�-° , `,,
R
1. COUNCIL MEETING DRAFTAGENDA
The draft agenda for the Regular Council Meeting of December 18 is attached. (I-1)
2. MEETING MINUTES
a. Planning Commission meeting of November 19. (I -2a)
b. Planning Commission meeting of November 26. (I -2b)
3. NEWSARTICLES, RELEASES, PUBLICATIONS, ETC.
a. Minnesota Cities November, 1996 article by Communications Coordinator Helen
LaFave and Volunteer Coordinator Nancy Anderson about the volunteer program in
Plymouth. (I -3a)
b. December 4, 1996 Star Tribune article about Hennepin County population growth. (I -
3b)
4. CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONS POLICY- CORRESPONDENCE
a. Letter to Dr. Hana Tomasek from Planning Supervisor Barb Senness, responding to
comments about TOPAZ Trucking noise issues. Dr. Tomasek's original correspondence
is attached. (I -4a)
b. Internet Correspondence between George Wilson and Housing Supervisor Ed
Goldsmith regarding parking at Plymouth Towne Square. (I -4b)
c. Internet Correspondence between Building Official Joe Ryan and a resident identified as
"Jim" concerning regulation of outdoor holiday lighting on apartment balconies. (1--4c)
d. Internet Correspondence between Public Works Director Fred Moore and Scott A.
Rollins regarding old city maps. (I -4d)
0 .,
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO
December 6, 1996
Page 3
e. Letter from Thomas Johnson of the Hennepin County Public Works Department to
Public Works Director Fred Moore responding to comments by resident Dan
Witkowski. Witkowski's original letter is attached. (I -4e)
f. Letter to the Mayor from Elmer Otto with comments about suburban Metro traffic
problems. The Letter has been forwarded to Public Safety Director Craig Gerdes for a
response. (I -4f
g. Letter to the Mayor from Thomas Hearn regarding snowplowing on City streets. The
letter has been forwarded to Public Works Director Fred Moore for a response. (I -4g)
h. Letter to the Mayor from Wendy Fasching about Fire Department equipment. The letter
has been forwarded to Public Safety Director Craig Gerdes for a response. (I -4h
i. Letter to Roger Redmond from Public Works Director Fred Moore regarding comments
about property located at 4270 Norwood Lane. Redmond's original letter is attached. (1-
41)
A status report on the most recent correspondence is attached. (1-4)
6. CORRESPONDENCE
a. Letter to the Mayor from State Department of Corrections Coordinator Paul Foreman
regarding the inspection of Plymouth Public Safety facilities. (I -5a)
b. Letter to City Clerk Laurie Ahrens from Precinct 8 Election Judge Supervisor Jeanne
Ettinger with comments about the administration of the November 5 General Election.
(I --Sb)
c. Letter form the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Brian Constans of the
Robbinsdale School District with notification of closure of a petroleum release site
file on Plymouth Middle School. (I -5c)
rri PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1996
WHERE: Plymouth City Center
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless
a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed
from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda.
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. PUBLIC FORUM
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
5. *CONSENT AGENDA
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Veijo Tarnanen. Variance to encroach 2.5 feet into the required 6 -foot side yard
setback for a 12 -foot by 20 -foot garden tool shed for property located at 20 Balsam
Lane. (96164)
B. Dahlstrom, Peterson, Eiden, Partnership. Preliminary Plat for seven new single
family lots and replat of one existing lot for property located north of Rockford Road
and west of Berkshire Lane. (96173)
7. OLD BUSINESS
A. Town and County Homes, Inc. Land Use Guide Plan Amendment from CS
(Commercial Service)/C (Commercial) to LA -3 (High -Medium Density
Residential/Living Area 3) and Sketch Plan for a 159 -unit townhome community
located in the northwest quadrant of Highway 55 and Dunkirk Lane. (96161)
(Continued from November 26 Meeting) (Applicant has requested continuation to
January 14, 1997.)
8. NEW BUSINESS
9. ADJOURNMENT
H
V
a
U
00PTO
PTO
O
A
fn_ to
00
II'd
N
V1
{L
C^NNf
�F
n�Nr°Oi
Cd
_..
V
n T N
z _-
U
laC'dd
IIS
�+
()'"
zuj�
Uc
o
F"'
I'�"U
r
'.x
z
IF0a
Fyi.
d
C
mar-m=Nr
C/i �
=,MW
$NN
P
I O U
Y
K
00
a
4
i
d
F a
U
I�gSU
y w
-gfu
I�
02
z 0
'�Oz
H
L
J
e
0
u
z
ICd
'U
zz
z 0t2
�+
z _gq
U s
L3.OU,
a`
c�q
USI
o U'u $�
Q
O z z U
it
t\
^
[\ I
N
b
M
O
^+
L
N
M
o
F
as z O,
qaq, O a
0
O��E
~
00
N
N
M, 16
0
C�
Un
i
C�
rd
"d
O
L—'
..,
4,
00
h
~
N
N
v
A
N
"Cl
Ix
W
N O
O A O
I�
00
iO3lu
_�
r�<�r
OUB
OUB
m3
rvaH
�ozOU!
ozOUI
09
c -
U
.�
rn
i2
IgNf;
�v
Nrs��
�E.. {nrvaN
-
ti
ti
N
T�
V 1 I
J
-I
DRAFT
12/06/96
9:42 AM
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
AGENDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
DECEMBER 18, 1996
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLYMOUTH FORUM - Individuals may address the Council
about any item not contained on the regular agenda. A maximum
of IS minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full IS minutes are
not needed for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the
agenda. The City Council will take no official action on items
discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff or
commission for future report.
4. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION
ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Crime Free Multi -Housing Recognition -
Summerplace Apartments
B. Wayzata Hockey Check Presentation
C. Recognition of Councilmembers Anderson, Granath, and
Lymangood
5. APPROVE AGENDA - Councilmembers may add items to the
agenda including items contained in the Council Information
Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The
Council will not normally take official action on items added to the
agenda.
* Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
December 18, 1996
Page 2
6. CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so
requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve City Council Minutes
B. Approve Disbursements
C. Establish 1997 Regular Council Meeting Dates
*D. Approve Capital Improvements Program for 1997-2001.
City of Plymouth (96151)
E. Approve Proposed Changes to Fire Relief Association Bylaws
F. Approve changes to License and Permit Fees
G. Approve Renewal of Licenses for 1996:
1.
Tobacco
2.
Gasoline Service Stations
3.
Kennel
4.
Amusement
5.
Trap Shoot and Target
H. Approve Change Orders for Elm Creek Project
I. Receive Open Space Committee Report
J. Amend Park Dedication Fees
K. Adopt Policy on City Contributions to Playgrounds
L. Approve Mutual Aid Agreements with Maple Grove and
Wayzata
M. Approve changes to Personnel Policy
* Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
Z' 1
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
December 18, 1996
Page 3
N. Approve Compensation Adjustments
O. Approve an Ordinance changing the City Code providing for the
number of dogs allowed to be kept without a kennel. City of
Plymouth. (96175)
*P. Approve Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance for
construction of a Residential Care Facility on property located
at 14230 Rockford Road. Leonard, Street and Dienard (96129)
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Vacation of Trail Easement within Outlots A and B, Ponderosa
Woods 2' Addition
B. Vacation of portion of 45' Avenue street right-of-way within
Lot 1, Block 3, Golfview Estates Addition
8. GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Adopt 1997 Tax Levies and Budgets
9. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Report from City Center Subcommittee
10. ADJOURNMENT
* Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19,1996
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Mike Stulberg, Commissioners Allen Ribbe,
John Stoebner, Tim Bildsoe, Jeff Thompson, Roger
Berkowitz and Saundra Spigner
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT: Director Anne Hurlburt, Planning Supervisor Barbara
Senness, Planner Shawn Drill, and Clerical Supervisor
Denise Hutt
1. Call to Order:
2. Public Forum:
3. Approval of Agenda:
4. Approval of Minutes: None.
5. Consent Agenda: No items.
6. Public Hearings:
A. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (95100)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by the City of Plymouth for adoption of
Chapter 21 of the Plymouth City Code to establish a new Zoning Ordinance for the City
of Plymouth, including adoption of a new map of zoning districts, repealing in its entirety
Ordinance No. 80-9 and all amendments thereto. (Continuation of public hearing).
Director Hurlburt gave an overview of the background and history stating that this is the
first major update since 1980. Staff has been working on the zoning ordinance for the
last 18 months. The zoning ordinance must change as market and land uses change.
Director Hurlburt stated that it is expected that there will be more technical corrections
and changes to the ordinance. Director Hurlburt stated that after testimony is heard, the
Commission may close the hearing and take action on the Ordinance. As of yet, there has
not been a definite date for the ordinance to go before the City Council.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1996
Page #280
Pertaining to the ordinance text, Director Hurlburt stated that sign regulations, antenna
regulations, city center districts, environmental districts (shoreland, floodplain and
wetland regulations) have not changed. Every piece of property in the city has a new
district and there have been a number of text changes since September. The City Council
ordered some changes and suggested alternatives for the Commission to consider.
Director Hurlburt gave an overview of new changes since the November 12th meeting:
Changes include: administrative permits for transient merchants were removed from the
R Districts; commercial recreation, indoor was added as a conditional use permit in the
Industrial Districts; and, up to 50% office by right in existing buildings in the I-2 District,
which carries over in the I-3 District (can go over that limit by Conditional Use Permit).
Director Hurlburt stated that state law dictates that if less than a year has passed on a
preliminary plat and less than two years has passed on a final plat, you are prohibited
from changing the zoning. Until that time period has passed, the owner has the right to
proceed under the old ordinance.
Director Hurlburt gave an overview of additional letters and testimony pertaining to map
changes. All four lots for Plymouth Ponds Industrial Park (Site #4) have received final
plat approval, and staff recommends that it be placed in the I-1 District. After the time
period has passed, they will have to abide by the I-1 District requirements.
Staff received a letter dated November 19, 1996 from Linda Fisher representing Hans
Hagen Homes pertaining to Seven Ponds (Site #5). Ms. Fisher requested that the City
retain the current PUD designation for the site. Director Hurlburt noted that the property
is guided CS (Service Business) now and that the property fits into a number of
classifications that are compatible. Staff recommends the PUD designation be retained.
If the Land Use Guide Plan classification of this site is changed, a rezoning would follow
in a separate action. Since the last meeting, staff received a request from one of the
Commissioners to reguide the property. This has to take place separate from the Zoning
Ordinance, as it needs a public hearing.
The owner of the Lakepoint Distribution Center (Site #6) finds the I-1 classification
unacceptable. They have a couple of lots that received final plat approval less than two
years ago. Staff has changed the recommendation to leave property in the PUD for the
entire industrial portion of the Parkers Lake MPUD 83-1. This recommendation is based
in part on the fact that none of the traffic for the industrial shares with the residential area,
so the PUD could be maintained.
Director Hurlburt recommended that the Commission make decisions on the text and map
changes.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1996
Page #281
T-2 a
Commissioner Thompson asked if the Commission can act on Commissioner Bildsoe's
request pertaining to Seven Ponds and the Zoning Ordinance in tandem. Director
Hurlburt explained that the Seven Ponds issue requires a public hearing, which would not
take place until January. The Zoning Ordinance can go ahead independently, and should
be considered as a separate action.
Chairman Stulberg continued the public hearing. Chairman Stulberg introduced a letter
dated November 19, 1996 from Gerald Kennedy of GEM Enterprises. Mr. Kennedy,
owner of the Plymouth Shopping Center on Highway 55 and adjacent vacant land, was
concerned that the proposed C-2 zoning did not allow for all uses currently allowed by
the current B-2 zoning of the property. He indicated that he is particularly concerned
about fast food restaurants, which are not allowed in the C-2 but are allowed in the
current B-2 zone by conditional use permit. Chairman Stulberg introduced a letter dated
November 19, 1996, from Jeffrey Minea of Welsh Companies. Mr. Minea stated his
concern about how existing development would be affected by the new ordinance, and
whether or not there were specific "grandfather clauses" in the ordinance for existing
residential and business properties. Chairman Stulberg introduced a letter dated
November 13, 1996, from Matt Van Slooten of Carlson Real Estate Company. Mr. Van
Slooten reiterated some of the concerns he expressed verbally at the hearing on
November 12. These concerns related to the percentage of office uses in the I-2 district,
as well as the uses allowed in the B -C (Business Campus) zoning district.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Hans Hagen of 941 NE Hillwind Road, Minneapolis. Mr.
Hagen stated that he purchased the property at Highway 55 and County Road 24 15 years
ago and applied for a PUD, which was required to follow the Land Use Guide Plan Map
under the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Hagen stated that people were told when they
bought property that the surrounding area was zoned commercial. Mr. Hagen stated that
he has been paying assessments at the commercial/industrial rates for the property. Mr.
Hagen encouraged the Commission to retain the PUD designation. He stated that he
would like to work with the Commission, Council and residents to mitigate the impact of
the commercial property.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Jerry Kennedy of 5334 Nathan Lane North #2. Mr.
Kennedy stated that he has owned the Plymouth Shopping Center since 1979. Mr.
Kennedy reiterated his concerns that he expressed in his letter dated November 19. Mr.
Kennedy was concerned that the proposed C-2 zoning did not allow for all uses currently
allowed by the current B-2 zoning of the property. He indicated that he is particularly
concerned about fast food restaurants, which are not allowed in the C-2 but are allowed in
the current B-2 zone by conditional use permit.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Rick Martens of 2955 Regent Avenue North, Golden
Valley. Mr. Martens stated that he represents United Properties (Site #6) and supports the
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1996
Page #282
f -2a
recommendation by staff to retain the PUD designation for the entire industrial portion of
the Parker Lake MPUD 83-1.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Leroy Reinke of 14411 County Road 6. Mr. Reinke
questioned how the allowable area of residential accessory building would be calculated;
specifically, how is 30% of the required rear yard calculated. Mr. Reinke stated that he
would like to see the word "required" taken out of the rear yard.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Harvey Schiebe of 1215 Goldenrod Lane. Mr. Schiebe,
owner of the "Wheel Center" building at 11110 Highway 55, questioned the proposed C-
3 zoning of his property, indicating that he preferred C-2 or C-4.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Lou Suski of 1018 Twelve Oaks Center. Mr. Suski, stated
he is an industrial broker currently .leasing Carlson Business Center. He questioned the
limitation of office uses in the I-2 and I-3 districts to 25% of the principle structure. He
requested that the Commission increase it to 50% by right to reflect the requirements of
the existing zoning under which all existing buildings were constructed.
Chairman Stulberg introduced David Weigman of Carlson Real Estate Companies. Mr.
Weigman suggested flexibility in the C-2 zoning to allow some uses that are proposed to
be allowed in the C-4 district if they were smaller in size.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Jeff Minea of 18805-37`h Avenue North. Mr. Minea
questioned how existing development would be affected by the new ordinance, and
whether or not there were specific "grandfather clauses" in the ordinance for existing
residential and business properties.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Darcy Winter, real estate broker currently working for
GEM Enterprises. Ms. Winter was concerned that the proposed C-2 zoning did not allow
for all uses currently allowed by the current B-2 zoning of the property. She stated her
preference for C-3 zoning.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Don Smith of 10215-31' Avenue North. Mr. Smith
expressed thanks to staff for all their help.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Bruce Johnson of 820 Shenandoah Lane. Mr. Johnson
questioned where the grandfather clauses are in the proposed zoning ordinance. Mr.
Johnson asked how the Hennepin County Adult Correction Facility will be affected by
the proposed new ordinance. Mr. Johnson asked why only residents are allowed to sell
items at garage sales in residential areas. He asked about non-resident family members.
Mr. Johnson stated that the penalty clause is too severe.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1996
Page #283
MOTION by Commissioner Spigner, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to keep the
public hearing open until November 26, 1996. Commissioner Spigner stated she would
like to leave the hearing open for an additional week because of the number of changes to
allow people the opportunity to look over the changes.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked when the City Council is scheduled to consider the
proposed new ordinance. Director Hurlburt replied that the Council may schedule a
special meeting for December 11 to consider the proposed new ordinance.
Discussion took place regarding whether to continue the public hearing. Commissioner
Spigner stated that residents have the right for an opportunity to look over and absorb the
changes, and to make any comments they deem appropriate. Commissioner Berkowitz
commented that this hearing was the second opportunity for residents to state their
concerns. He stated that he would be happy to close hearing, and asked if the
Commission is bound to take action at this meeting. Chairman Stulberg replied
negatively. Commissioner Thompson stated that the public may have more comments to
make. Commissioner Ribbe asked what else would be coming from staff pertaining to
the new ordinance. Director Hurlburt replied that as the hearing remains open, more
questions and comments are received each day. She stated that the Commission can use
the following 90 -day period for additional changes for clean up and corrections, and that
there is a certain point to stop and adopt.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION by Commissioner Berkowitz to keep hearing open to allow
for comments from Mike Leuer. MOTION failed due to lack of a second.
Chairman Stulberg stated that he will not support the motion, as the Commission can start
to take action. There have been many city meetings and hearings pertaining to the
proposed ordinance, with an appropriate time for input. Commissioner Ribbe agreed
with Chairman Stulberg, stating that it is time to move forward with the proposed
ordinance.
Roll Call Vote. 2 Ayes. (Chairman Stulberg, Commissioners Stoebner, Bildsoe,
Berkowitz, and Ribbe voted Nay. MOTION failed on a 2-5 Vote.
Chairman Stulberg closed the public hearing.
In response to Mr. Kennedy's question pertaining to uses allowed in the C-2 and C-3
zoning districts, Director Hurlburt replied that most uses fit into the C-2 district except
for fast food. The process for rezoning and conditional use permits takes about the same
amount of time. Mr. Licht stated that the basic issue staff addressed when revising the
current ordinance was the lack of control or certainty of the districts. There are several
options available that one could rezone one or two parcels into a C-3 district or request a
PUD zoning district.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1996 Z _2 a
- Page #284
Mr. Licht stated that in terms of flexibility pertaining to Mr. Lis' letter of November 19,
the proposed ordinance will have to change as marketing changes. If there are activities
coming forth that are changing in respect to their mode in dealing with the public, staff
needs to be able to look at the request instead of giving a blanket approval.
Chairman Stulberg asked that staff continue working with Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Schiebe
in regards to the zoning for their properties, and to keep Ms. Winter informed also.
In response to Mr. Johnson's and Mr. Minea's question pertaining to the grandfather
clause, Mr. Licht stated that Pages 96 through 100 of the draft ordinance contain
provisions for "grandfathering" non -conforming uses, structures and lots. Single family
dwellings are exempt as long as they don't intensify the situation any further.
Mr. Licht stated that Pages 102 and 103 of the proposed ordinance state that the traffic
view at intersections can not be obstructed because of safety purposes. There are some
restrictions to tree size, and the zoning administrator can have trees removed if there is a
safety hazard.
Mr. Licht stated that while criminal penalties for violation of a zoning ordinance are rare,
this is the current penalty for all city code violations and is prescribed by state law for
misdemeanor offenses. Mr. Licht stated that the 96 -hour period is from City Code as it
exists today.
Pertaining to the Hennepin County Adult Correctional Facility (ACF), Mr. Licht stated
that the ACF will be in the P -I (Public Institutional) zoning district, where it will continue
to be a conditional use as it is today. All existing standards have been carried over into
the new ordinance.
In response to Mr. Johnson's question regarding garage sales in residential areas, Director
Hurlburt stated that the provisions regarding garage sales in residential were stricken
from the ordinance by the Commission.
In response to Mr. Reinke's request to drop the word "required", Planning Supervisor
Senness stated that the intent is to keep the proportion appropriate with the lot. Director
Hurlburt stated that if you took "required" out, you allow too much building.
In response to Mr. Suski's concerns, Director Hurlburt stated that staff has recommended
a change to the I-2 zoning district to 50% office for permits pulled by the end of the year.
A property owner could request a conditional use permit for anything greater. Mr. Licht
commented that if we start lumping everything together, then we are back to one district.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked if staff's recommendation of the office use permitted is
identical for the I-2 and I-1 districts. Director Hurlburt replied negatively. In the I-2
Planning Commission Minutes a
November 19, 1996 'Z
Page #285
district, 50% is allowed by right for permits issued this year, more if by conditional use.
New buildings in the I-1 district would be allowed 50% by right and the I-2 district after
this year, 25% by right.
In response to Mr. Minea's questions, Director Hurlburt stated that Pages 96 through 100
of the draft ordinance contain provisions for "grandfathering" non -conforming uses,
structure and lots. Furthermore, if less than one year has passed since approval of a
preliminary plat, or less than two years have passed since approval of a final plat, no
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or zoning ordinance may apply to or affect the
use of the property. This is a requirement of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 462.358 Subd.
3c.
MOTION by Chairman Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Ribbe to take action on the
proposed zoning ordinance. Commissioner Thompson asked if the motion is to move
forward on individual items. Chairman Stulberg replied affirmatively. Roll Call Vote. 7
Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
MOTION by Chairman Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Thompson recommending
not to delete the paragraph requiring that except in the FRD District, residential accessory
structures over 120 sq. ft be constructed with a design consistent with the general
character of the principal structure on the lot on Page 108 Section 2115.03 Subd. 2(a.).
Commissioner Thompson asked if that is in reference to aesthetic designs. Director
Hurlburt replied that it is to try and stop something that is so totally out of character for
the neighborhood, such as a metal pole building with a dirt floor in a residential area.
Commissioner Spigner stated that she thought she heard staff say previously that you
could build whatever you want in the back yard. Director Hurlburt replied that the size of
buildings is not the issue, rather the type of construction is the issue. This is to try to
protect property values. Commissioner Thompson stated that he did not see a lesser
restrictive alternative. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
MOTION by Chairman Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to leave the
minimum lot width requirement at 100 feet on Page 201, Section 21355.13 for Table of
Area Requirements and Construction Limitations. Commissioner Spigner asked what
was the reason behind the Council suggesting a change to 110 feet. Director Hurlburt
replied that the minimum lot width requirement in the existing ordinance is 110 feet.
Chairman Stulberg stated his preference for 100 feet. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried
unanimously.
Chairman Stulberg called a recess at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:15 p.m.
MOTION by Commissioner Spigner, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner
recommending approval of text changes #5 through #23 and changes #77 through #79.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1996
- Page #286
"Zz
MOTION to Amend by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner
Thompson to remove item #11. Director Hurlburt stated that the draft had a length and
weight limit for trucks, and staff is recommending removal of the weight limit. She
stated that this only applies to residential. Chairman Stulberg stated that the change is
saying to leave as it is in the current ordinance. Commissioner Berkowitz commented
that this would make it too hard to enforce. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried
unanimously.
MOTION to Amend by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner Ribbe to
delete everything after the word "District" in item #23 and delete everything after "I-2
district" in item #79. Director Hurlburt stated that #79 modifies #23. Commissioner
Berkowitz commented that the motion goes beyond that. Chairman Stulberg asked about
permitted uses. Commissioner Berkowitz stated the intent is to allow 50% office by right
in the I-1 district. Commissioner Spigner commented that it is an opportunity to clean up
an area that we were not able to before for bakery and wholesale. Vote. 5 Ayes.
(Chairman Stulberg and Commissioner Thompson voted Nay). MOTION carried on a 5-
2 Vote.
MOTION to Amend by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner
to delete item #8. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
Vote on Main Motion as Amended. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
MOTION by Chairman Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner to approve items
#24 through 76 and #80 through #84 of the text changes. Vote 7 Ayes. MOTION
approved unanimously.
MOTION by Commissioner Bildsoe, seconded by Commissioner Spigner to approve the
Item #I through #7 of the zoning map changes.
MOTION to Amend by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner
Thompson to delete #3 (Plymouth Technology Park). 7 Ayes. MOTION carried
unanimously.
Vote on MAIN MOTION. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
Commissioner Berkowitz stated that the Commission heard the property owner's desire
to use the property as a distribution center under the I-1 district. He stated that since there
are no plans for an interchange near the property, he doesn't see it being a conducive
location for a distribution center. He stated that the property would be better served
remaining in an I-1 classification.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1996
Page #287
MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner to approve
the change for one lot from I-1 to I-2 for Item #3 (Plymouth Technology Park).
Chairman Stulberg stated that a distribution center is not the only use for I-2. Vote. 6
Ayes. (Commissioner Berkowitz voted Nay.) MOTION carried on a 6-1 Vote.
MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe recommending
approval of Items #8 through #15 on the zoning map changes. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION
carried unanimously.
MOTION by Chairman Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe to adopt the
proposed zoning ordinance. Commissioner Thompson commented that he would like to
see the proposed zoning ordinance one more time before it goes to the City Council.
Commissioners Bildsoe and Berkowitz concurred. Roll Call Vote. 3 Ayes. MOTION
failed on a 3-4 Vote. Commissioners Bildsoe, Thompson, Berkowitz and Spigner voted
Nay.)
MOTION by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe directing
staff to prepare analysis and recommendation on two properties (Plymouth Shopping
Center and Wheel Center). Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. (Commissioner Stoebner and
Chairman Stulberg voted Nay.) MOTION carried on 5-2 Vote.
MOTION by Commissioner Spigner, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to adjourn.
Vote. 7 Ayes. Meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
�, 2a
SUGGESTED MOTIONS
A. Decide on the Commission's recommendation on the two text
changes (changes # 3 and #4 in November 8 staff report) that
were alternatives suggested by Council members.
You may wish to combine these into one motion or separate them into two separate
motions:
No: Page/Section: Description:
3 108/21115.03 Subd. 2 (a); delete paragraph requiring that except in the FRD District,
residential accessory structures over 120 sq. ft. be constructed with a
design consistent with the general character of the principal structure on
the lot.
Staff recommendation: do not approve change.
4 201/21355.13 Table of Area Requirements and Construction Limitations, RSF-1
district; minimum lot width; change from 100 feet to 110 feet.
Staff recommendation: do not approve change.
B: Decide on the major changes to the proposed Zoning
Ordinance text (items 5 through 23 and 77 through 79)
You may wish to combine these into one motion or separate them into individual
motions:
No: Page/Section: Description:
5 25b/21005.02 Definitions: revise definition of "distribution center" to clarify that the limit
of 50,000 sq. ft. on distribution uses does not include office, laboratory
or production space, and applies to an individual tenant or occupant and
is not cumulative for a multi -tenant building.
1
�r Za
No: Page/Section: Description:
6 26/21005.02 Definitions: revise "dog kennel" definition to delete the reference to
three or more dogs, replacing it with a reference to Chapter 915 of the
City Code which sets the standard for dog licensing. This means that if
the City Council wishes to change the number of dogs that may be kept
without a kennel license and CUP, they may do so by changing Chapter
915 and not also need to change the Zoning Ordinance.
7 50/21005.02 Definitions: revise definition of "storage, outside (exterior)" by
substituting 96 hours for 72 hours in the provision that excludes parking
or storage of less than a certain time period from the definition of outside
storage to be consistent with existing code and with changes
recommended to item 9 (p.103) and to item 12 (p. 130), below.
8 96/21100.02 Subd 2 (b); retain existing planned unit developments MPUD 81-1
(Northwest Business Campus) and MPUD 91-1 (Seven Ponds, only the
commercial property east of County Road 24 and north of Medina
Road.)
See the staff report on the recommended map changes for a complete
explanation. These text changes would be consistent with and
necessary to the map amendments recommended by staff.
9 103/21105.11 Subd. 1 (a); exterior storage/display. Change from 72 to 96 hours the
period of time for inoperative vehicles to be parked outside; corresponds
with existing City Code. Per City Council 11/6/96.
10 117-118/ Delete section on Sales in Residential Areas (Accessory Use).
21120.09 & Renumber following section 21120.10 accordingly.
21120.10
This language is similar to the existing City Code (section 1160.01)
which governs the sale of secondhand goods. There has been a
concern that the limitations on the number and type of sales permitted
should be reviewed because as written they may be too restrictive. The
existing code should also be included in this review. Given that we have
not had time to undertake a review, the sections should be deleted at
this time. Per City Council, 11/6/96.
11 130/21135.06 Subd. 2 (new Subd. 1); delete restriction on parking of trucks greater
than 30 feet in length. Current ordinance has a weight limit, but not a
length limit. Per City Council 11/6/96.
12 130/21135.06 Subd. 3 (new Subd. 2) Change from 72 to 96 hours the period of time
for inoperative vehicles to be parked outside; corresponds with existing
City Code
7
Z -2a
No: Page/Section: Description:
13 130/21135.07 Parking Area Design, Subd. 1 (a); exempt the RSF-1 and RSF-2
districts from the requirement that all exposed parking areas and
driveways shall be surfaced with material such as asphalt or concrete.
This would cant' over the current exemption (which applies to the R -1A
& R-1 B Districts.) Per City Council 11/6/96
14 133a -133b/ Parking Area Design, Subd. 5. (e), Dimensional Requirements; add
21135.07 separate front and side/rear parking setbacks to correspond with current
practice. Reduce parking and driveway setback for residential uses (1 &
2 Family) from 6 to 3 feet. Also enlarged diagram and table so they
would be easier to read.
This change reflects current practice and corrects an inconsistency in
the existing code, which could be interpreted to require a 6 foot setback.
15 216/21390.13 Table of Area Requirements and Construction Limitations, RMF -4
district; change lot area per unit requirement from 2,500 to 2,200.
This decrease is necessary in order to be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. RMF -4 and O -R are the only districts in which the
maximum residential density of 20 units per acre may be reached, and a
2,200 sq. ft. per unit requirement is necessary to allow that to happen.
16 220/21450.13 Table of Area Requirements and Construction Limitations, O -R district;
change lot area per unit requirement from 2,500 to 2,200 (see item 15,
above.)
17 228/21460.03 Permitted Uses, C-2, Neighborhood Commercial District; delete Subd. 8,
"Boat, marine, snowmobile sales, enclosed" from list of permitted uses.
Rest of section renumbered as needed.
This use is community wide in character, and not compatible with
neighborhood scale shopping centers. Should be permitted use in C-4,
Community Commercial District.
18 236/21470.03 Permitted Uses, C-4 District: add Subd. 4 "Boat, marine, snowmobile
sales, enclosed". Rest of section renumbered as needed.
Must be added to list of permitted uses if deleted from the uses in the C-
2 District. See item 17, above.
3
No: Page/Section: Description:
19 236/21470.03 Permitted Uses, C-4 District: add Subd. 6, "Building supply sales within
the principal structure". Rest of section renumbered as needed.
Discount stores in C-4 (such as Target, Home Depot) carry building
supplies inside; outside lumber yards would require C -W zoning.
20 252/21550.03 Permitted Uses in C -W District; revise Subd. 13 to add motor vehicle,
farm implement, and recreation equipment "leasing and rental."
This activity was not listed as a permitted use in any district. It is
appropriate to include it in the same district that allows for the sale and
service of the same items.
21 259/21560.03 Subd. 10, Permitted Uses in 1-1 District. Allow up to fifty (50) percent
office by right.
This is consistent with the current ordinance requirement, and consistent
with purposes of 1-1 District. Responds to comments at public meetings.
22 260/21560.07 Subd. 3, Conditional Uses in 1-1 District. Allow more than 50 percent
office by CUP to reflect change in item 21, above.
23 264/21565.03 Permitted Uses in 1-2 District; add two uses not provided for elsewhere
("bakery, wholesale" and "food processing".) These uses currently exist
on parcels proposed to be zoned 1-2.
Also add offices up to 25 percent as permitted uses (needed because of
change in 1-1 district in item 21, above.) Renumber section as needed.
77 200/21355.11 Delete Subd. 4 which allows administrative permits for transient
merchants in the RSF-1 district and all other RSF and RMF zoning
districts.
78 262/21560.07 Add Subd. 10 to allow "recreation, commercial (indoor)" as a conditional
use in the 1-1 (and 1-2 and 1-3) zoning districts. This change will ensure
that a number of existing uses (such as The Gym, the Dance Shoppe
and Planet Spirit) will not become non -conforming.
79 264/21565.03 Subd. 5: add provision to allow up to 50 percent office by right in the 1-2
district in buildings for which permits are issued prior to January 1, 1997.
4
C: Decide on the minor changes to the zoning ordinance text
(items 24 through 76 and 80 through 84)
These changes are minor technical corrections that we believe will not require separate
discussion by the Commission. We suggest that you combine these into one motion,
unless there are items that you wish to discuss individually. If you wish to discuss an
individual item, we suggest that you make a separate motion to change those items first,
then act on the entire list. See the November 8 and November 15 staff reports for a
complete list of these changes.
D: Decide on the major changes to the draft zoning map (items 1
through 7)
You may wish to combine these into one motion or separate them into individual
motions:
No. Site:
1 Bass Creek Business Park
2 Peterson Property
3 Plymouth Technology Park
4 Plymouth Ponds Industrial Park
5 Seven Ponds PUD Commercial Site
6 Lakepoint Distribution Center
7 Carlson Business Center
5
Staff Recommendation:
Change from 1-1 to 1-2
Change from C-1 to FRD
Change one lot from 1-1 to 1-2
No Change: 1-1 zoning for entire project
Change from C-3 to PUD
Change entire Parkers Lake Corporate
Center (industrial portion of MPUD 83-1)
from 1-1 to PUD
Change from 1-1 to 1-2
E: Decide on Minor Zoning Map Changes (items 8 through 15)
These changes are minor change that we believe will not require separate discussion by
the Commission. We suggest that you combine these into one motion, unless there are
items that you wish to discuss individually.
No.
Site:
Staff Recommendation:
8
Conor Meadows
Change from FRD to LA -2
9
Wolf Property
Change from FRD to RSF-2
10
SW corner of Fernbrook & TH 55
Change from 1-1 to 1-2
11
Northwest Business Campus
Change from 1-1 and B -C to PUD
12
Roger's Body Shop
Change from B-3 to C -W
13
Upsher Smith Property
Change from 1-1 to 1-2
14
Beyer Property
Change from FRD to RSF-2
15
Bass Lake Rd. & Nathan Lane
Change from C-3 to C-2
Commercial Sites
F: Move to recommend that the City Council adopt the new
Zoning Ordinance and Map, as amended.
95100mo
-2b
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 26, 1996
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Mike Stulberg, Commissioners Allen Ribbe,
Tim Bildsoe, Jeffrey Thompson and Roger Berkowitz
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners John Stoebner and Saundra Spigner
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Anne Hurlburt,
Planning Supervisor Barbara Senness, Planner Shawn
Drill, Assistant City Manager Kathy Lueckert, City
Engineer Dan Faulkner, Public Works Director Fred
Moore, Park and Recreation Director Eric Blank, and
Clerical Supervisor Denise Hutt
1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
2. PUBLIC FORUM:
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe to approve the
November 12, 1996 Planning Commission Minutes Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried
unanimously.
5. CONSENT AGENDA:
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (96151)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by the City of Plymouth for the 1997-2001
Capital Improvements Program.
Assistant City Manager Lueckert gave an overview of the November 22, 1996 staff
report. Assistant City Manager Lueckert stated that no capital improvements are
proposed for northwest Plymouth at this time. She gave an overview of the key
projects in the first two years of the 1997-2001 CIP as listed in the staff report.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996
Page #289
T'Zb
Chairman Stulberg asked if the Planning Commission were to make any decisions on
northwest Plymouth, how could they get something put back on the Capital
Improvements Program. Assistant City Manager Lueckert replied that the Capital
Improvements Program is revised each year and they will begin making
revisions/additions next summer.
Commissioner Ribbe asked how firm the dates are for certain projects, such as Zachary
Lane, as it was originally scheduled for 1996. Director Moore replied that the Zachary
Lane project was delayed because of other projects, such as County Road 9 and
Fernbrook Lane, Schmidt Lake Road and Peony Lane. Director Moore added that the
Zachary Lane construction project should begin next summer, taking two construction
seasons.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked where the tenth playfield will go. Director Blank
replied that they are considering the south intersection of Vicksburg Lane and 47'
Avenue. Staff has had communications with the school district and the fire district to
see if there is a need for another elementary school and fire station. This site is big
enough for a school, fire station and playfield.
Chairman Stulberg opened and closed the public hearing as there was no one present to
speak on the issue.
MOTION by Chairman Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe recommending
approval of the 1997-2001 Capital Improvements Program for the City of Plymouth.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
B. THE COMMUNITY HOME PROGRAM COMPANY (96129)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by The Community Home Program Company
for a Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance to allow construction of a two-
family dwelling for use as a Residential Care Facility on property located at 14230
Rockford Road.
Planner Drill gave an overview of the November 18, 1996 staff report. Planner Drill
stated that staff has received questions as to whether the City could attach a condition to
a conditional use permit for the Community Home Program Company that limits the
residents to individuals with traumatic brain injuries. He stated that staff received a
letter from the City Attorney indicating that the City can't do that. Attaching a
condition to the conditional use permit limiting the type of resident would be "more
restrictive than those imposed on other conditional users." The City doesn't dictate
who can or cannot live in any other multi -family housing, so the City can't put such a
restriction on the proposal. The character, quality, or type of person residing in a
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996
Page #290
T -2b
home is not something that is subject to land use regulations. Planner Drill noted that
the design of the home is geared toward fully handicapped residents.
Chairman Stulberg commented that if the applicant applied after the proposed zoning
ordinance is in effect, they would not have had to apply for a variance, and the only
issue would be the conditional use permit for the Commission to consider. Planner
Drill replied affirmatively. .
Chairman Stulberg introduced Ginger Rudberg, representing the petitioner. Ms.
Rudberg stated that she concurs with the staff report. Ms. Rudberg stated that the
people they intend to serve have degenerative diseases, and use wheelchairs. They will
operate as an adult foster care program providing 24-hour supervision, room and board
for residents ages 18 to 60.
Commissioner Ribbe asked if they serve clients that are remanded to them by the
courts, and if this is their first operation. Ms. Rudberg replied that they are not
mandated by the court to accept residents, and can choose to accept or deny residents.
She stated that this would be their first facility.
Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Pearl Brown of 4150 Empire Lane. Ms. Brown stated
that since she was not within 500 feet of the site, she was not notified of the hearing.
Ms. Brown wanted to know more about the long range plan for the facility, and is
concerned about the chemical dependency phrase in the ordinance. Ms. Brown
questioned how much additional traffic would take place in and out of the facility since
accessibility would be from the Plymouth Oaks residential area, and asked why they
can't access off of Rockford Road since that is their address.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Scott Johnson of 14100 -41st Avenue North. Mr.
Johnson declined to speak.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Scott Nelson of 4170 Empire Lane. Mr. Nelson wanted
clarification of where the ingress/egress would be to the site. Mr. Nelson stated that
when he purchased his home, he understood that the site would be for a potential
medical care facility. Mr. Nelson stated that his concern stems from the quick review
of the legal opinion and definition of a residential facility in the ordinance. Mr. Nelson
asked what happens if this facility doesn't work out, and what could go in next. Mr.
Nelson asked what are the conditions of a conditional use permit, and if you could
have a specific zoning code for thislacility that would comply with standards.
Chairman Stulberg closed the public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996
Page #291
T-zb
Chairman Stulberg read the conditions of the conditional use permit. Planner Drill
stated that traffic would access from the 41" Avenue cul-de-sac which leads to Empire
Lane. No access is allowed from Fembrook Lane or Rockford Road due to the
proximity of the signalized intersection at that corner. Director Hurlburt stated that
one condition of the conditional use permit is that the address will be changed to 41 S`
Avenue.
Planner Drill stated that a conditional use permit runs with the property, however the
licensing would not. This is a specialized housing and there is a demand for it. The
uses within the home could change, but given the handicapped accessible design, it
would likely stay the same. Director Hurlburt stated that the City Attorney's letter
states that you can't single out a specific zoning district for this facility. State law says
you have to allow for certain uses in a residential area. Planner Drill stated that the
traffic impact from the home would be barely noticable.
Ms. Rudberg stated that their long range plan is to run the facility for as long as
possible. The nature of the design of the house would allow it to go back to single
family dwellings for a family of handicapped individuals or elderly housing if the
facility didn't work out for some reason. Ms. Rudberg stated that they are
conscientious of property values also.
Chairman Stulberg asked if their care givers are licensed to handle residents with
chemical dependency. Ms. Rudberg replied negatively. She added that she can't say
that a resident won't have a chemical problem, but they will require the resident to get
treatment elsewhere. Ms. Rudberg indicated that they are a non-profit agency. They
contract out for the care and programs for the residents. They would operate three
shifts with personnel working 40 hours per week. Not many residents will have cars so
the staff could use the garage and driveway spaces for their vehicles. Several residents
could be involved in a day program so they may have an accessible van. Guests and
family members are allowed to come and go as they please.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked if a resident could have a vehicle. Ms. Rudberg replied
affirmatively. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if there is enough room on the driveway
pad for cars. Planner Drill replied that there is room for two in front of each garage.
MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Commissioner Thompson
recommending approval of the Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance for The
Community Home Program Company for property located in the northeast quadrant of
Rockford Road and Fembrook Lane. Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried
unanimously.
C. TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES, INC. (96161)
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996
Page #292
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Town and Country Homes, Inc. for a
Land Use Guide Plan Amendment from CS (Commercial Service)/C (Commercial) to
LA -3 (High Medium Density Residential/Living Area 3) and Sketch Plan for a 159 -unit
townhome community located in the northwest quadrant of Highway 55 and Dunkirk
Lane.
Planner Drill gave an overview of the November 20, 1996 staff report. Director
Hurlburt asked Planner Drill to explain what other steps there are if the Land Use
Guide Plan is approved. Planner Drill explained that this is the initial stage, and if
approved, the applicant would come back to staff with a Rezoning, Site Plan, and
Preliminary Plat application, at which time there would be an in-depth analysis of
drainage, streets, etc. The first step is to see if the site will be established as
residential. Chairman Stulberg commented that the Commission is only reviewing the
Land Use Guide Plan request.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Al Block, representing the petitioner. Mr. Block stated
that Town & Country Homes began building in Minnesota in 1993 and is owned by the
Ryan family from Chicago. They have built single family dwellings in Maple Grove
and Woodbury. They completed townhome communities in Burnsville and Eagan last
March. Mr. Block presented photos of model units. The purchase prices range from
$80,000 to $125,00 with the average being $113,000. Their target market is empty
nesters, or people moving down to lower maintenance units. The units are sold as
permanent residences not as rentals. On occasion they will have an investor buy one or
two units and rent out. Mr. Block stated that ten to twelve percent of the total units
could have children with a total projected at 16 to 20. He stated that they will have
some cars outside, but it will be manageable and they will work with staff on offstreet
parking spaces if the application is approved. Mr. Block stated that recent data pulled
for 1995 and 1996 show townhomes appreciate at the same rate as single family
dwellings. The average time on the market was within two days of each other. Mr.
Block stated that they have extensive deed restrictions with their homeowners
association and that they hire professional management companies to oversee the
association rules.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Bob Smith, representing the petitioner. Mr. Smith
stated that he is available for questions.
Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Jerry Mossmann of 4085 Everest Lane. Mr. Mossmann
stated that he is a resident of Holly Creek, and was not invited to the meeting. Mr.
Mossmann asked what the proposal will do to their property values and the traffic flow.
He stated that the homes in Holly Creek are of substantial size and there is quite a
contrast of transition to this proposal.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996
Page #293
Chairman Stulberg introduced Alan Napier of 16520 -39th Avenue North. Mr. Napier
stated he is a resident of Westbranch and shares the same concerns as residents of Holly
Creek with respect to the transition of the low density of Holly Creek and Westbranch
to this proposal of high density, especially with only one road to serve the area. Mr.
Napier stated that he agrees the parcel should be zoned residential, but questioned why
the density has to be so high. He asked why it couldn't be LA -1 or LA -2. Mr. Napier
stated that he was advised of a meeting with Town and Country a few days in advance,
with nothing to the residents before hand. He stated that it seemed the meeting was just
a way for Town and County to find out what concerns the residents would have with
the proposal. Mr. Napier stated that he asked questions about the Town and Country
organization and was told that they would fax information to him, but he never received
it. Mr. Napier commented that he would like the item tabled so that the residents can
obtain additional information. Mr. Napier stated that there will be other applications in
the future for this property, and it should be rezoned for less density or not changed at
all. Mr. Napier did not agree with Mr. Block's reference to the projected number of
children, as the Wayzata School District states .68 per dwelling which would be 116
children. He added that Kimberly Lane is already at 80% capacity.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Randy Ridings of 16500 -39th Avenue North. Mr.
Ridings stated that he was concerned with congestion and traffic on the road.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Therese Stover of 16620 -39th Avenue North. Ms.
Stover stated that her main concern is traffic on 39' Avenue and Dunkirk Lane. It has
the potential of very. hazardous intersection, as there is a bus stop there. She stated that
there is more traffic going on Highway 55 and there will be a need for a barrier at the
taxpayer's expense. Ms. Stover stated that Town and Country is not the only one that
is willing to buy the land. She questioned why it has to be zoned LA -3.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Jerry Theis of 16800 Highway 55. Mr. Theis, owner of
the property stated that the project would be a very good transition of the adjoining land
uses.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Susan Path of 16815 -40th Place North. Ms. Path stated
that most of the residents in Holly Creek are opposed to 159 units so close to their
homes. When they purchased their home, the commercial part was being used to grow
pumpkins. She questioned why it can't be zoned LA -1. Ms. Path was concerned with
additional traffic. Ms. Path thought a better plan could have been made for transition.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Dr. Thomas Franke of 16635 -39th Place North. Mr.
Franke was concerned with additional traffic and the habitat and wetlands. Mr. Franke
stated that they should make this a low density residential area.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996
Page #294
t -Z6
Chairman Stulberg introduced John Byers of 3895 Comstock Lane North. Mr. Byers
stated that he would like the item postponed as residents have not been made aware of
proposal. Holly Creek residents were not notified since they are not within 500 feet of
the proposal, and many individuals could not attend the meeting because of it being a
holiday week.
Chairman Stulberg closed the public hearing.
Chairman Stulberg stated that the meeting that was held by Town and Country was not
sponsored or run by the City. The City can not require a developer to have a meeting
or who to invite to their meeting. Chairman Stulberg stated that it is the job of the
Planning Commission to support the comprehensive plan, which allows the resident or
developer to come before the Commission to request any change they want. That is
why the Commission is looking at LA -3 guiding. The City can't tell the applicant that
the City is going to wait until someone else wants to request LA -1 guiding.
Pertaining to traffic issues/concerns, City Engineer Faulkner stated that Dunkirk Lane
is a major collector and is designed to handle a fairly large amount of traffic and
provides a through movement. The proposal will produce less traffic than a
commercial development and disburse traffic more evenly over time. He did not
project any congestion problem at the 39' Avenue intersection. He was not aware of a
bus stop at the intersection, but that is not unique, and traffic has to stop in both
directions for the bus. City Engineer Faulkner stated that Highway 55 is a state
highway and they are responsible for any noise barriers. There are none to date and a
request would have to be made to the Minnesota Department of Transportation to
receive one. Chairman Stulberg asked if there were any other residential areas close to
a major highway. City Engineer Faulkner replied that residents along Highway 169
were promoting a noise barrier through MnDot, but the request did not go very far as it
is a big expense. Direct Hurlburt stated that there are residential areas in closer
proximity to Interstate 494 and Highway 169 than this proposal is to Highway 55.
Chairman Stulberg asked about plans for Highway 55 going to a limited access
freeway. City Engineer Faulkner replied that he was not aware of any plans for that.
Planner Drill pointed out on the commercial and LA -1 guided property for the area on
the 1993 comprehensive plan. He indicated that there is a small triangular piece in the
northeast comer that is LA -1 and the rest is guided CS. The property has been guided
commercial since 1989 or before. Director Hurlburt stated that the City is updating the
comprehensive plan map and has been through the public process to realign the
boundary areas to the property lines.
Chairman Stulberg asked what the uses are under CS guiding. Planner Drill replied
some uses are banks, restaurants, auto uses, and gas stations.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996 6
Page #295
Chairman Stulberg stated that he hoped Mr. Block heard the concerns of the residents.
Mr. Block stated that he will fax the information to Mr. Napier that he requested. Mr.
Block stated that these townhomes are not family oriented. They base the anticipated
number of kids within the development on the demographics of who they market to and
who is buying this type of housing.
Chairman Stulberg asked the applicant what they 'envision for transition such as
landscaping. Mr. Block replied that along the eastern boundary which is Dunkirk
Lane, they will place intense landscaping corridor trees that produce screening. They
do have some NURP ponds that create a buffer. Planner Drill showed a plan depicting
the wetland where the applicant proposed to fill a small area of wetland to get the road
through.
Chairman Stulberg asked how the wetland ordinance protects the habitat. Planner Drill
stated that the ordinance requires a buffer. As the project moves forward, staff would
review the necessary requirements. He added that there will be more public hearings
on the rezoning, and platting of the property and that the developer would submit a site
plan responding to any comments made tonight.
Commissioner Bildsoe asked for clarification of the notification procedure. Planner
Drill replied that a legal notice was published in the Sun -Sailor and a sign was placed
on Dunkirk Lane. Property notices were mailed to all residents within 500 feet of the
site.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked if there was any other areas of LA -1 adjacent to LA -3.
Planner Drill replied affirmatively, citing County Road 47 and Interstate 494, the
Parkers Lake Development off of Vicksburg and Rockford Road and Zachary Lane.
Commissioner Bildsoe commented that by seeing the sketch plan, it influences his vote.
He stated that he might agree with reclassification, but disagrees with the sketch plan.
He asked if they are to evaluate the proposal on the guiding only and not the sketch
plan. Director Hurlburt stated that the Commission should evaluate the guide plan
change on the -overall criteria, and should merely give comments to the applicant on the
sketch plan. She stated that the developer should take into account any comments made
before they go to the next step, but are not bound to make changes. She added that the
guiding would stay LA -3 if approved. Commissioner Bildsoe didn't think that
commercial zoning is appropriate.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked if it could be developed with LA -2 guiding. Director
Hurlburt stated that the main difference is the density. Townhomes could be built in
LA -2 but it would not allow as many units.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996
Page #296
i
Commissioner Thompson stated that if it is changed to LA -3, a lot of control is given
up. Director Hurlburt stated that the reguiding process is the highest level of discretion
the City has. Commissioner Bildsoe stated that if it is left as is, someone could propose
a commercial development. Director Hurlburt concurred and the City would have a
hard time denying a commercial development application since the site is already
guided commercial and such a development would be compatible with the
comprehensive plan.
MOTION by Chairman Stulberg seconded by Bildsoe recommending approval of the
Land Use Guide Plan Amendment for Town and Country Homes, Inc. for property
located in the northwest quadrant of Highway 55 and Dunkirk Lane.
Commissioner Thompson stated that he is troubled with high density housing next to
low density housing, and that this is the last position for discretion. Commissioner
Bildsoe stated that if they don't change the guiding it could be commercial and there's
not much we can do. Commissioner Bildsoe stated that commercial is less appropriate
than LA -3, and that LA -3 gives better transition than commercial. He stated that he
doesn't like the density, but if you vote against you are opening it up to commercial.
Commissioner Berkowitz stated that he concurs with Commissioner Thompson. He
stated he was concerned with the variability of density of the site. LA -3 has a wide
range of uses and densities, and low density would be better. He stated his concern
with potential shared residential traffic, and LA -2 would be more appropriate.
Commissioner Ribbe asked if their choice is to leave it as is or change to LA -3.
Chairman Stulberg stated that they could also table the item. Commissioner Bildsoe
stated that the Commission could initiate a change to LA -2. Commissioner Thompson
stated that he didn't think commercial is a realistic problem in the near future. He
agreed that they could initiate an action to change to LA -2. Planner Drill stated that
under LA -2 they would be allowed three to six units per acre. Director Hurlburt stated
that a request for LA -2 would not meet the goals under the Livable Communities Act.
MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to table the
item to the December 10, 1996 Planning Commission Meeting. Chairman Stulberg
commented that the public hearing has been closed on this proposal. Roll Call Vote. 3
Ayes. MOTION carried on a 3-2 Vote. (Chairman Stulberg and Commissioner
Berkowitz voted Nay.)
Chairman Stulberg called a recess at 9:07 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:18
p.m.
7. OLD BUSINESS
A. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (95100)
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996
Page #297
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by the City of Plymouth for Adoption of
Chapter 21 of the Plymouth City Code to establish a new ordinance for the City of
Plymouth, including adoption of a new map of zoning districts, repealing in its entirety
Ordinance No. 80-9 and all amendments thereto.
Director Hurlburt stated that public hearings were held on November 12 and 19'. The
item was tabled for a final look at this meeting. The Commission should take action on
final changes to the text and the map. The next step would be to send it to City Council
for adoption of the new ordinance and map, as amended. If approved by the Planning
Commission at this meeting, the City Council will consider the zoning ordinance at a
special meeting on December 11, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. The ordinance becomes effective
upon adoption. Director Hurlburt gave an overview of changes for the Planning
Commission to consider since their last meeting. There is one additional text change
(#85) which affects Page 115 of the ordinance. There are three additional changes to
the draft zoning map: 1) Plymouth Shopping Center (GEM Enterprises) #16 -
recommend change from C-2 to C-3; 2) Wheel Center (Schiebe) located at 11110
Highway 55 #17 - recommend change from C-3 to C-2; and, 3) Soo Line East,
Lundgren Bros. #18, recommend change from RSF-2 to PUD.
Chairman Stulberg reviewed a letter dated November 20, 1996 from Shirley Ye of 85
Kingsview Lane. Ms. Ye stated in her letter that she was concerned about the deletion
of so much of the proposed ordinance controlling the storing of recreational vehicles.
She stated that recreational items should not be stored in a person's front yard during
the off season but having to build fences and buildings to hide them is not only
expensive, but probably an impossibility in some areas. She stated that the City of
Plymouth must being to pay attention to the older areas in the City to prevent suburban
blight.
MOTION by Chairman Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Thompson
recommending approval of text change #85 to Page 115, Section 21120.01, Subd. 4. to
make it clear that accessory buildings include detached garages, and that accessory
buildings may occupy more than thirty (30) percent of the area of the required rear yard
if a conditional use permit is issued and to delete Subd. 5 in its entirety. Vote. 5
Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
MOTION by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to
recommend approval of map changes #16 for Plymouth Shopping Center from C-2 to
C-3; #17 for the Wheel Center to recommend a change from C-3 to C-2; and #18 for
Soo Line East to retain the PUD.
MOTION to Amend by Commissioner Bildsoe, seconded by Commissioner Thompson
to delete #18. Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Minutes b
November 26, 1996
Page #298
Vote on Main MOTION. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
MOTION by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to
recommend approval of map change #18 for Soo Line East from RSF-2 to PUD. Vote.
4 ayes. (Commissioner Bildsoe abstained.)
MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Ribbe to
recommend a typographical correction to Page 190, Section 21195.01, Subd. 5 "an"
should be "a". Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe to
recommend approval of adoption of the new zoning ordinance and map as amended.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
Chairman Stulberg expressed his thanks to consultant David Licht, city staff, Planning
Commissioners, City Attorney and the residents for all the hard work and numerous
hours that they put in on the proposed zoning ordinance.
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (96181)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Planning Commissioner Timothy Bildsoe
for the Planning Commission to consider changing the land use guide plan classification
of the Seven Ponds commercial site to "CO", Commercial Office.
Director Hurlburt gave an overview of the November 20, 1996 staff report. She stated
that staff recommends that a hearing be set for the second regular meeting of January,
1997. Commissioner Bildsoe commented that this area needs to be evaluated and that it
is good for the Planning Commission to be proactive. He stated that he recommends
reguiding and then rezoning to O -R, which provides harmonious mix with residential.
Chairman Stulberg introduced David Slavik of 3325 Everest Court. Mr. Slavik
expressed his thanks for consideration of the concerns/issues of the surrounding
residents. He indicated that he started a petition for the neighborhood and has obtained
70 signatures thus far. Mr. Slavik stated that he would like the zoning to be O -R, as he
doesn't feel that the current zoning is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
He stated that the residents are concerned with noise, odors, light and sound from the
property. He added that the current zoning will have an adverse affect on their
property values and enjoyment of their propery.
MOTION by Commissioner Bildsoe, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to hold a
public hearing at their second regular meeting of January, 1997. Chairman Stulberg
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996
Page #299
-Zb
commented that there will be a different Planning Commission in January, as two
Commissioners were elected to the City Council. He stated that he will vote in favor
of the motion to take a look at it, but will not say whether he is for and against it until
all the research has been done. Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
B. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (96175)
Chairman Stulberg introduced request by the City of Plymouth to consider changes to
the City Code providing for the number of dogs allowed to be kept without a kennel
license.
Planning Supervisor Senness gave an overview of the November 21, 1996 staff report.
Chairman Stulberg asked if dogs still have to be licensed. Planning Supervisor Senness
replied affirmatively. Commissioner Ribbe asked what the provisions are for restraints.
Director Hurlburt read from the City Code that dogs must be under restraints at all
times while outdoors.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked if Option #2 exists anywhere else. Planning Supervisor
Senness replied that Option #2 was suggested by the Carons who brought this matter to
the Planning Commission. Director Hurlburt stated Commissioner Spigner called her
to say that she is in favor of increasing the limit to three dogs.
MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Ribbe to
recommend that the City Code be changed to allow three dogs by right. Commissioner
Berkowitz stated that looking at the City of Edina, they have a public hearing process to
request an exception to the Code, and perhaps that would be the best alternative.
Director Hurlburt stated that the City Council can amend the City Code without holding
a formal hearing. Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Ribbe to set a
public hearing for the second regular meeting of January, 1997 to initiate a reguiding
from CS to LA -2 for the northwest quadrant of Highway 55 and Dunkirk Lane. Vote.
4 Ayes. MOTION carried on a 4-1 Vote. (Chairman Stulberg voted Nay.)
Chairman Stulberg stated that he will not be able to attend the Planning Commission
meetings of December 10th and lTh.
Consultant David Licht thanked the Commissioners for the opportunity to work with
them and commended them on their participation in the zoning ordinance process.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 26, 1996
Page #300
�f .0-2, 17
Commissioner Berkowitz asked when the Council will meet to appoint new
Commissioners. Director Hurlburt stated that the terms run through January and no
meeting has been set yet.
Commissioner Berkowitz stated that he may have a conflict with the meetings in
December. Commissioner Thompson stated that he may not make the December 17
meeting.
MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Commissioner Berkowitz to adjourn.
Vote. 5 Ayes. The meeting was adjourned at 10:07 p.m.
T,,-tne,,
-t the ccu�.n m-1,7jalak iy
NANCY ANDERSON
HELEN L.AFAVE
With most cities facing tough budget choices, few are able to add
new positions to keep up with demands for municipal services.
One city, Plymouth, has found a way to add thousands of produc-
�a
tive hours a year at a minimal cost. In doing so, Plymouth has also built
bridges between citizens and the city.
Plymouth's not -so -secret strategy is a
unique volunteer program that has
evolved into:
,$, A valuable aid to staff members;
C An informal network of goodwill
ambassadors throughout the commu-
nity; and,
An excellent opportunity for citizens
to gain job skills, socialize, and learn
about local government.
Just three years after its formaliza-
tion, Plymouth's volunteer program has
exceeded expectations. In 1995, nearly
700 volunteers contributed 10,361 hours
of non -paid service to the city. Using the
Minnesota Office on Citizenship and
Volunteer Services' value of $12.13 per
hour for volunteer service, these hours
amount to nearly $126,000 of value-
added service gained through the
volunteer program.
In addition to supplementing the
work of city staff, the volunteer program
has proven to be an ideal way to expand
citizen involvement in local govern-
ment. With volunteers working side-by-
side with city staff members, it puts a
human face on city government and
promotes an understanding of what it
takes to provide diverse city services.
From the volunteers' perspective, the
program offers opportunities for
personal, professional and social
growth.
�.�t 1ptl2lai.:'S1''.%:,€!,udn'sprograla
Ci €'i ferellt?
Plymouth benefited from the
informal use of volunteers prior to the
City Council's creation of a half-time
volunteer coordinator position in 1993.
Since then, volunteer opportunities
have expanded greatly. Volunteer
positions now range from the routine to
the sophisticated. Busy city staff have
been pleasantly surprised by the
program's results. Staff have benefited
from the commitment of citizens—many
of whom have a high level of technical
expertise.
H' ovti does the program
v park?
Part of the success of the program
lies in matching the right person to the
appropriate position. The idea for most
volunteer positions originates from staff
at all levels. The volunteer coordinator
and staff person identify the need for a
specific volunteer job, as well as the
qualities required to successfully handle
the position. From there, they develop a
job description. Then, the position is
publicized in the city's monthly newslet-
ter.
The volunteer coordinator serves as
the contact person. Interested individu-
als complete an application and interest
inventory. Next, city staff and the
coordinator interview prospective
volunteers (except for people working at
a one time special event). Volunteers
working with the Public Safety Depart-
ment also undergo a criminal back-
ground check.
Once the match has been made, a
city staff person supervises the work of
"In addition to supplementing the work of city staff, the
volunteer program has proven to be an ideal way to expand
citizen involvement in local government."
31�e%4.tc -_;� � g
`6 fs} e� '� �5".Fy�`�4 3 y71��"W'� �' '�r}'+m ��ex �'� ,c4 -a,r+!•.-� .'r^TYa"`v -
the volunteer. The volunteer coordina-
tor periodically checks with the supervi-
sor and volunteer to ensure that both
persons' needs are being met.
types of people volunteer?
Volunteers come from varying
backgrounds and professions. City staff
members have been pleased with
volunteers' high caliber of skills and
dedication. Volunteers include retirees,
college students seeking job experience,
stay-at-home parents who want to keep
skills sharp, and professionals who
simply want to give back to their
community.
The positions filled by volunteers are
as wide and varied as their ages, 14 to 80
years old. Typically, positions fall into
three general categories:
I One time or special events;
2 Time limited projects; and,
i Ongoing projects.
Special even Is oi-one-time oppor: ll•
pities might include—working a shift at
a city -sponsored festival, helping at a
tree planting, assisting at a special
recycling day, or providing language
interpretation.
Time Iimited volunteeropport unities
vary considerably in length, but they all
have one thing in common—a definite
ending date. Some positions in this
category are teen recreation aides, data
entry, event planners, firearm safety
instructors, and gardeners.
T- 3d
011goin % o I a 1) t ce rc usually sign on
for a minimum of six months. They
typically volunteer once a week. This
category includes the following posi-
tions:
0 Three volunteers have worked for
two years as emergency management
coordinators. They revised and
updated the city's emergency plan
and set up the emergency operations
center.
* Another public safety volunteer
devised a special computer program
to generate crime reports which are
distributed to crime watch captains.
* An individual who worked weekly for
two years helped staff prepare to
move into the use of Geographical
Information Systems (G.I.S.).
D Two volunteers produced a video
promoting the city's volunteer
program. The video is used for
recruitment and public relations
purposes.
0 For the past year, two retirees have
worked weekly in the engineering
department on a variety of tasks,
including working with maps and
drawings.
0 Several volunteers work with the
senior citizen coordinator. One edits
the seniors' newsletter, another
handles filing, one serves as the
drama coach of a readers' theater,
and another coordinates the senior
job exchange.
® The administrative department has
a volunteer who is truly all-purpose.
She comes in several times a week to
do filing, assemble new resident
packets, and organize election
materials.
Plymouth is proud to have estab-
lished a strong partnership with the
people who live and work in the com-
munity. This arrangement has en-
hanced the quality of life in Plymouth,
augmented city services and enriched
the lives of citizens by providing
meaningful volunteer experiences. Ir
NancyAnderson is volunteer coordi-
natorwiththecityofPlymouth. Helen
LaFave is communications coordinator
with the city of Plymouth.
16
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 4.1996 Metro/State _
Hennepin County's growth
;has come and gone
Th' k h S T 'b 78 000
u wee , t e tar rr une
will publish brief profiles of the
Twin Cities metropolitan area's
t seven core counties, showing
where growth is expected to
10 occur. The Metropolitan
4 Council is expected to vote later
this month on a strategy to
t guide the area's growth into the
next century.
By Mike Kaszube
Star Tribune Staff Writer
Most of Hennepin County
- the Twin Cities area's most
populated county - will sim-
ply watch as people head for
the metropolitan area's outer
reaches during the next quarter
century.
Although a few of its cities
will grow significantly, most of
the county's growth has
already come and gone.
Maple Grove will be one ex-
ception, where a 65 percent
lump in population, to 73,000
residents, is expected by 2020.
Another will be Brooklyn
Park, already one of the Twin
Cities' largest suburbs, where
building in the city's large,
remaining bloc of undeveloped
land is anticipated to boost its
population from nearly 60,000
LO
And, befitting a mature
metro area, some cities will
be stagnant. Minnetonka,
with 50,927 residents, will
increase slightly to 51,000
people by 2020, according
to estimates.
As the Metropolitan
Council discusses its
growth options strategy,
much of the talk from city
and county officials in I
Hennepin County has been
to remind the agency not
to forget Minneapolis.
Peter McLaughlin, the
Hennepin County Board `-
chairman, has talked of the
need for light-rail transit.
Paul Farmer, Minneapolis'
planning director, has under-
scored the need to redevelop
the city's many "brownfields"
- property in the city that is
not being redeveloped because
of industrial pollution.
With federal highway fund-
ing drying up and with the
baby -boom generation aging,
Farmer wondered whether
continued sprawl in the Twin
Cities area is a faulty assump-
tion.
"We don't believe we will be
facing 90-10 highway funding,"
Minnetonka Beach I
Shorewood
To
Bay
Excelsior
Greenwood
Deephaven
Woodland
said Farmer, alluding to the
federal government's policy of
paying for 90 percent of new
highways.
"Clearly, the baby -boom
generation had an effect," he
said of the area's growth. "[But]
those baby boomers, in large
numbers ... are expected to
downsize."
Population (estimated)
City 1995 2020 % change City
Bloomington
86,932
94,000
8
Brooklyn Center
28A83
30,500
7
Brooklyn Park
59,832
78,000
30
Champlin
19454
28,500
49
Corcoran
5,549
7,850
41
Crystal
23,661..
25.000
6'
Dayton*
4,927
7,050
43
Deep)
3�6153t-i:V.�
a -�
«
,,, Eden Prairie
46,310
601000
30
�+ fdha .
46,845 x,
49,500
6
II Excelsior
2,357
2,250
-5
s, Fort SneMg
93
1001111
13 `
�i Golden Valley
20,911
23,000
10
Greenfield
1,607,
1,700 ..,
6
Greenwood
672
610
-9
Hanover*
-� .341"
590
73
Hassan Twp.
2,419
3,750
55
Hopkins
36,573
x`17,800
= 7
Independence
3,017
3,150
4
Long lake
1,941
2,200
13
Loretto
520
800
54
Maple Grove
` 44,913 ,
.73,000 _,
; 65 .
Maple Plain
2,329
4,050
90
Medicine Lake
373
370
-0.8
"Excluding portions of the cities outside Hennepin County.
Z --3b
V
> Sunday: Anoka County.
> Monday: Carver County.
> Tuesday: Dakota County.
> Today: Hennepin County.
> Thursday: Ramsey County.
> Friday. Scott County.
> Saturday: Washington
County.
Population (estimated)
1995 2020 % change
Medina
3,493
6,300
80
Minneapolis
365,889.,
38SAW
6
Minnetonka
50,927
53,000
01
MinnetonkaBeacii ",
_ 577"
830
=8 .'
Minnestrista
3,831
7,500
96
9,584 :.
9,800.
2,
New Hope
21,646
24,000
11
Qr0r10 .e: , _r
.,7,476;`
Osseo
2,572
?,850
31
e68,960.,
72,500 ;29>'
Richfield
35,237
38,000
8
Robbinsdale ' . »�
18,800
- 18
Rockford'
449
630
40
Rogue ,, -
1,204
6,250
`419 ..,
St Anthony
5,743
6,500
13
StBonffadus,x...y.,>..<,•
"1,183
2,500
111 -=.
St Louis Park
43,568
49,000
12
784
7 ,900
7
Spring Park
1,777
1,850
4
Tonka'Bay i�
189 '.
1,400
..5
Wayrata
3,989
4,500
13
485
440
-9
Hennepin County
1,063,631
1,225,070
15
Metropolitan area`
2A48,967
3,097,130
26
I
Source: Metropolitan Council
Star Trine gree is Uy AM F IMM
November 26, 1996
Dr. Hana Tomasek
1024 South Shore Dr.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dear Dr. Tomasek:
A
ta
�, i.� •�
CITY OF
PUMOUTR
Thank you for recent letter. I have received a number of inquiries about TOPAZ Trucking over
the past month. As a consequence, I have had one of my employees checking on the activity
there to determine if they are violating any provisions of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance. To
date, we have not documented any Zoning Ordinance violations. However, from your letter and
conversations I have had with other neighbors, it does sound like TOPAZ Trucking may be
violating a City Code provision that restricts certain types of noise between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.
I understand that some of the neighbors are working to set up a meeting for the week of
December 2 to discuss the noise issues with TOPAZ Trucking. Representatives from the City
will attend that meeting. It is our hope that this meeting will be the first step toward resolving
the neighborhood's noise problem.
The City Council has had some recent discussions about noise issues generally, but has not
scheduled any firm date for continuing those discussions.
If I can answer any additional questions, please contact me at 509-5452.
It.
Sincerely,
Vwo,A 1Xnm1,717
Barbara G. Senness, AICP
Planning Supervisor
cc: Major Joy Tierney
Councilmember Ginny Black
PLYMOUTH A BeautifulPlaeeTo Live
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD • PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447-1482 f TELEPHONE (6121 509-5000
Innovative consulting Services, inn.
O 10024 South Shore Drive
190 16121546-0206
Minneapolis - MN 55441 - USA FAX 16121 546 8680)
November 14, 1996
Ms. Barbara Senness
Planning Supervisor
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482
Dear Ms. Senness :
I would appreciate your help in the following matter:
TOPAZ Trucking company has been parking their trucks
across the street from my house located on Medicine Lake at
the address above.
They run these trucks on and off the whole night. That is as
far as I know against the law. The noise is so loud that, it
wakes the whole neighborhood up. The value of our hollies goes
down as a result of the situation. If anyone decided to sell
their home, they would have a hard time. No one is going to
want to buy a home in such a noisy environment.
One of my neighbors has informed me that this issue will be
discussed in the Plymouth City Council meeting on December 18,
1.996.
I am seeking your support. The situation is really bad. It is
not only disturbing but unhealthy. It is against the law and
1
I hope this incident will be solved very soon.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
cj
Dr. Hana Tomasek
cc. Ms. Joy Tierney
Ms. Jinny Black
• /C,4-6
Jean Lyons
From:
Helen LaFave
Sent:
Wednesday, November 27, 1996 3:50 PM
To:
Jean Lyons
Subject:
FW: Parking @ Plymouth Towne Square
Importance:
High
Jean,
For CIM. Also, please update correspondence table.
Thanks,
Helen
From: Ed Goldsmith
To: 'georgewilson-opa@worldnet.att.net'
Cc: Helen LaFave
Subject: Parking @ Plymouth Towne Square
Date: Wednesday, November 27, 1996 2:05PM
Priority: High
Thank you for bringing your concern for the parking situation that occurred at Plymouth Towne Square on
November 23rd to our attention. The large number of guests at the building was due to the monthly pancake
breakfast sponsored by the Resident Council. I have discussed this with Melody Burnham, the building manager
and she will discuss the situation and possible remedies for similar situations in the future at the next Resident
Council meeting. Based upon her discussion at the Resident Council meeting, we will decide upon an appropriate
response. We will let you know what is decided by December 18th. Again, thank you.
Sincerely,
Edward Goldsmith
HRA Supervisor
Page 1
Internet Contact
From:
George Wilson[SMTP:georgewilson-opa@worldnet.att.net]
Sent:
Saturday, November 23, 1996 4:22 PM
To:
contact
Subject:
Parking @ Plymouth Towne Square
This morning I went to see my mother who lives in PTS. The party room was
being used by a large group. Everyone of the parking spaces in front of
the building were taken. So many of the spots have been reserved for
residents and they were all empty. My mom pays rent there just like
everyone else but being 80 years old does not drive or have a car. I do
have a garage key but I can't park down there and its very difficult for
me in the winter to have to walk in from 37th Avenue, an now with the
construction going on parking there is limited also.
Its nice when residents can have party's at PTS but others need access to
the building also and just what are we to do when all the parking spaces
are taken?
Page 1
• J
Helen LaFave
From: Joe Ryan
To: 'jima@visi.com'
Cc: Anne Hurlburt; Helen LaFave
Subject: Christmas Lights
Date: Tuesday, November 26, 1996 11:19AM
Jim: In response to your inquiry, Christmas lights are allowed on balconies of multi -family buildings as long as the
lights are UL listed for outdoor use; are plugged directly into an exterior outlet without the use of an extension
cord,and are not permanetly fastened to the building.
Lights may not be linked together unless they are listed to do so,and do not exceed the approved number of
strings which may be linked together.
Live trees,wreaths, boughs and other combustible decorations are not allowed on balconies. Artificial, flame
retardant wreaths are allowed.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at 509-5431.
Sincerely, Joe Ryan ( Building Official).
Page 1
Internet Contact
From:
Jim[SMTP:jima@visi.com]
Sent:
Friday, November 22, 1996 5:49 PM
To:
contact
Subject:
Question on Christmas Lights
I live in an apartment in Plymouth and have been told by the apt.
management that due to a law in the city of Plymouth, I can not put
christmas lights on my balcony. Is this correct? I cannot imagine why
this would be against the law. Considering the time of year and the
average temperatures outside, there is little danger of something
catching fire; however, the alternative that I often see is people
hanging lights around the windows inside their apartments. This could
result in a fire hazard.
What I am wanting to do is hang a garland with small white lights along
the metal railing of my balcony. The lights will not contact any part
of the apt. building but only the metal railing. Would you please let
me know if this is indeed against the law or provide a name and number
of someone who could answer this question.
Thanks for your help.
Page 1
Internet Contact
From:
Internet Contact
Sent:
Wednesday, November 27, 1996 9:19 AM
To:
Helen LaFave
Subject:
FW: Old City Maps?
W9!
From: Fred Moore
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 1996 5:28 PM
To: Internet Contact
Subject: RE: Old City Maps?
Helen;
I talked with Scott Rollins today. He was trying to locate a pond behind his home. It is not on his 1964 photo. I
told him this pond was created when Schmidt Lake Road was constructed. It did not exist prior to the road
construction.
He is going to stop in and look at the construction and development plans next Tuesday to get more details. Fred
From: Internet Contact
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 1996 11:04 AM
To: Fred Moore
Cc: Helen LaFave
Subject: FW: Old City Maps?
Fred -
The following is a message received via our Web site. Kathy has asked me to handle e-mail from the Web
site in the same manner we handle other citizen inquiries. Consequently, I have acknowledged Mr. Rollins's
message via e-mail and have informed him that you or someone from your staff will get back to him by Friday,
Dec. 6.
Because we are tracking these e-mail inquiries like other inquiries, please be sure to copy me on your
response so that we may Include it in both the tracking table and Council Information Memorandum.
Thanks,
Helen LaFave
From: Scott A. Rollins[SMTP:srollins@isd.netl
Sent: Monday, November 25, 1996 11:33 PM
To: contact
Subject: Old City Maps?
I have an arial photo of the NE corner of Plymouth that is from 1964.
We're
trying to pinpoint where our house is on this old photo. Does the City
have
any old maps from around 1964 so we can try to match up the landmarks
from that photo with the current landmarks? According to the person we
got the photo from, Zachary Lane, County Road 18 (now 169) and the
railroad tracks are the landmarks he feels are present, but since the
other roads (what little there is) have changed since then, it would
be nice to have an old map for pinpointing our existing house.
Any information you can tell us would be helpfull.
Scott A. Rollins
10705 50th Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55442-3025
550.9940 - H
831-4455 - W
srollins@isd.net
Page 1
enne'Din
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Re: CSAH 73 (Zachary Lane) at Sunset Trail
Dear Fred:
ounryEmolover
November 20, 1996
In response to your letter of November 8, 1996 and the concerns of Mr. Witkowski,
a traffic study (to determine whether multiway stop and/or traffic signal
warrants are met at the referenced intersection) has been placed on our agenda
and will be completed as scheduling and weather permit.
We will also review the accident history at this intersection and have already
reviewed the traffic signage on Sunset Trail.
A field review of the signing on Sunset Trail found the appropriate signs to be
inplace. This signing included a STOP AHEAD sign and dual (left and right) STOP
signs. However, it was determined that the two stop signs would be replaced.
One, a 24" sign, was replaced with a new 36" sign to enhance visibility. The
other, a 36" sign which had been defaced, was also replaced with a new 36" sign.
As soon as the necessary data has been collected and evaluated, I will inform you
of the results.
Sincerely,
Thomas D. Johnson, P.E.
Transportation Planning Engineer
By:
Don Lundstrom
cc: Mr. Dan Witkowski
Department of Public Works
320 Washington Avenue South Recycled Paper
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8496
(612)930-2500 FAX:(612)930-2513 TDD:(612)930-2696
November 6, 1996
The Honorable Joy Tierney
Mayor
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mayor Tierney:
There is a severe problem at the intersection of County Road 73 and Sunset Trail in Plymouth that needs
the immediate attention of the Plymouth city officials. This three way intersection is in need of stop signs
or stop lights to control traffic. The curve of the road, and the lack of traffic direction makes this
intersection especially dangerous.
Last week I observed a driver who nearly had a head-on collision with cars that failed to stop before turning
onto County Road 73.
Simple stop signs at all three locations would drastically reduce the chances of an accident.
Furthermore, with the opening of the new mall at the intersection of County Road 73 and 394, traffic is
likely to increase substantially at this intersection, adding additional risks, If nothing is done.
The solution of adding stop signs at this intersection is a low cost answer to providing greater safety to our
neighborhood.. I urge you to bring this matter before the proper officials so we can have a properly marked
intersection before the first snowfall.
I look forward to your prompt response. My home address and telephone number are as follows:
405 Cottonwood Lane North
Plymouth, MN 55441
Telephone #: 591-7736
+� Sincerely,
2 an Witkows i
P.S. If you wish to observe the problem yourself, the hazardous intersection is to the side of the
Apostolic Lutheran Church at Country Road 73 and Sunset Trail (approximately one block south
of Highway 55).
=Phone: (612) 525-9833
Fax: (612) 525-9835
Internet: magiccom®mcimail.com
Interchange Tower
600 Hi,,hway 169 South
Suite 1225
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
USA
Z-�f
If you've been reading the newspaper articles about traffic accidents, you may have seen in almost all of
them the word "inattention". There seems to be more viciousness, too, one cause may be the increase of
stress.
In the September 22, 1996 Star Tribune, a front page article, "Pushing the Limit" has a picture of State
Trooper Russell Wicklund, who wrote 4,176 speeding tickets in 1995.
In the November 24, 1996 Star Tribune, a front page article, "Suburbanites can't escape the traffic", tells of
traffic problems in Edina, Burnsville, Richfield, Plymouth, Shoreview, Circle Pines, Lexington, Blaine.
Turn on WCCO Radio for the traffic report, and many times you will hear of a crash in the Eden Prairie area
of Hwy. 169, or at the intersection of Hwy. 5 and Prairie Center Drive.
Can you see that car patrolling today is outdated? There are just too many of us driving out there
Photo -radar would get driver attention. Wherever there is an installation, it is talked about. People are very
much aware of it. An owned system, rather than leased, would avoid a ticket quota. A stationary location,
well marked, would prevent speed -trap labeling. Two law changes are needed: The registered owner of the
vehicle to be responsible for the violation, and the citation to be delivered by mail, in addition to personal
presentation by an officer. Data privacy objections can be lessened by using a one -camera system, instead of
two, to take a rear -only photo. Financing to come from having the State Patrol only for emergencies. And,
two or more cities in the same county may share the cost of a mobile system.
My suggestion for a first test site: The intersection of Hwy. 5 and Prairie Center Drive at Eden Prairie. Red-
light installations are also possible.
I am looking forward to receiving your thoughts on photo -radar for traffic enforcement.
Sincerely,
Elmer J. Otto
1057 Eastview Circle
Shakopee, MN 55379
November 30, 1996
Mayor Joy Tierney
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Mayor Tierney;
Z-�f
If you've been reading the newspaper articles about traffic accidents, you may have seen in almost all of
them the word "inattention". There seems to be more viciousness, too, one cause may be the increase of
stress.
In the September 22, 1996 Star Tribune, a front page article, "Pushing the Limit" has a picture of State
Trooper Russell Wicklund, who wrote 4,176 speeding tickets in 1995.
In the November 24, 1996 Star Tribune, a front page article, "Suburbanites can't escape the traffic", tells of
traffic problems in Edina, Burnsville, Richfield, Plymouth, Shoreview, Circle Pines, Lexington, Blaine.
Turn on WCCO Radio for the traffic report, and many times you will hear of a crash in the Eden Prairie area
of Hwy. 169, or at the intersection of Hwy. 5 and Prairie Center Drive.
Can you see that car patrolling today is outdated? There are just too many of us driving out there
Photo -radar would get driver attention. Wherever there is an installation, it is talked about. People are very
much aware of it. An owned system, rather than leased, would avoid a ticket quota. A stationary location,
well marked, would prevent speed -trap labeling. Two law changes are needed: The registered owner of the
vehicle to be responsible for the violation, and the citation to be delivered by mail, in addition to personal
presentation by an officer. Data privacy objections can be lessened by using a one -camera system, instead of
two, to take a rear -only photo. Financing to come from having the State Patrol only for emergencies. And,
two or more cities in the same county may share the cost of a mobile system.
My suggestion for a first test site: The intersection of Hwy. 5 and Prairie Center Drive at Eden Prairie. Red-
light installations are also possible.
I am looking forward to receiving your thoughts on photo -radar for traffic enforcement.
Sincerely,
Elmer J. Otto
1057 Eastview Circle
Shakopee, MN 55379
THOMAS N. HEARN
4551 NIAQARA LANE
PLYMOUTH, MN 55446
December 2, 1996
Mayor, City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd
Plymouth, MN 55447-1482
Dear Mayor:
Yesterday, as I was getting our newspaper, I slipped on the ice ridges which resulted from a
lack of plowing of our street. A week ago last Sunday, after the snow storm, a plow made
one pass through our cul-de-sac. That was it. This past Saturday city plows were all over
pushing aside the slush and snow, everywhere but on our street. As a result, our street has
very rough spots with ridges of ice created when the slush froze. This situation causes
problems for many of us living in this area.
I am not young and spry, and having to negotiate this very treacherous situation to get the
mail and newspaper is concerning to someone my age. Most of the people in our immediate
area are elderly. I would expect that, being taxpayers, we should receive the same
consideration as those living along other normal side -streets. It would be nice if our street is
plowed when the others are plowed.
I am registering this complaint in the hopes that in the future, the city will take the necessary
steps to see that our cul-de-sac is plowed as often as the side -streets. Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
i
Thomas N. Hearn
December 3, 1996
Mayor Joy Tierney
3400 Plymouth Blvd
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mayor Tierney:
I am writing regarding Plymouths Fire Department.
On the news one night they had a special regarding helmets with the
new Infer Red Lights attached to them, I'm not exactly sure what
they are called, but they worked great.
I am wondering when the City of Plymouth will be purchasing one
helmet for our Fire Department? I understand one helmet is very
expensive but its not as expensive as a Life. If it saves people
that are trapped or our Firefighters it is well worth it.
We pay high taxes and I hope the City of Plymouth can find the
money and purchase this for our hard working Fire Department.
I would appreciate a response to this letter as soon as you have
time.
Sinc/ n/ ,
/ 1J/
Wendy Faschi'ng
14405 18th Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55447
S
f "(
:f •
- jam,.
I am writing regarding Plymouths Fire Department.
On the news one night they had a special regarding helmets with the
new Infer Red Lights attached to them, I'm not exactly sure what
they are called, but they worked great.
I am wondering when the City of Plymouth will be purchasing one
helmet for our Fire Department? I understand one helmet is very
expensive but its not as expensive as a Life. If it saves people
that are trapped or our Firefighters it is well worth it.
We pay high taxes and I hope the City of Plymouth can find the
money and purchase this for our hard working Fire Department.
I would appreciate a response to this letter as soon as you have
time.
Sinc/ n/ ,
/ 1J/
Wendy Faschi'ng
14405 18th Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55447
Z.
December 3, 1996 CITY C
PLYMOUTR
Roger Redmond
4270 Norwood Lane N.
Plymouth, MN 55442
SUBJECT: LETTER OF NOVEMBER 14, 1996
Dear Roger:
I am responding to one of your statements in your letter dated November 14, 1996, to
Mayor Joy Tierney concerning the property at 4270 Norwood Lane. In that letter you
make reference to a City staff member who did not advise you of the restrictions on this
"lemon" lot. To that letter was attached an earlier narrative which you prepared dated
April 16, 1996, which you state contains the contents of your concerns.
I believe the summary of your letter to the Mayor is you feel that you were not informed
of the 20% maximum lot coverage restriction by the City of Plymouth. For your
information, this requirement is part of the City's Zoning Ordinance. In your letter you
state that you stopped at the Plymouth Engineering Department where you requested lot
size offset requirements and a partial plat map. You further state that Engineering data
was requested relative to soil conditions, but none was available. On soil conditions you
were informed correctly since the Engineering Department does not maintain any soils
information on private property.
Your letter also states that you asked the Plymouth employee "are there any other
restrictions on this lot." You further state that "her answer was no." You continue on
in your letter to state "she then referred me to the Building Department for other offset
questions." By offset information, I believe you were referring to the building setbacks
which are also required by the Zoning Ordinance. You were referred correctly to the
Building Department since the Building Official is responsible for administering the
Zoning Ordinance. The Engineering Department does not have information on the
Zoning Ordinance. As stated in your letter, the only information which you received
from the Engineering Department was a copy of a partial plat map. This would give you
the size of the lot and any easements shown on the plat.
PLYMOUTH ABeau tiyulPlace?o Live
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD • PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544' vol" ct Y11P�P6NOgBd4f
Roger Redmond
Page Two
I believe, as you state in your letter, the employee in the Engineering Department acted
correctly and responsively by referring you to the Building Department for restrictions
on the lot. It would have been an error on the employee's part if they attempted to give
you regulations contained within the Zoning Ordinance since they are not fully versed in
these regulations and they are administered by another department of the City.
Sincerely,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
cc: Anne Hurlburt, Director of Community Development
vthy Lueckert, Assistant City Manager (C/R File 96-60)
\\Cigyly\vol I\ENG\GENERAL\LTRS\FRED\REDMOND.da
A
r
r
i
Mayor Joy Tierney
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, M. 55447
Re: 4270
Dear Madam Mayor:
a
No ood-Lne-
T'4
November 14, 1996
I received a building permit for the above captioned on June 3, 1996 and a
final inspection on September 10, 1996, whereas in fact I applied for a permit
in late March which would have allowed final inspection approximately 6/15/96,
a point in time where the inavailability of framing carpenters, or their
advanced charges, would not have caused a problem.
Ycu may recall my letter to you in late March where I cited incompetance on
the part of city staff members for not advising me of restrictions on this lemon
lot before I paid for it in full. I have misplaced my copy of same and city
records do�ot show a copy of my letter in their *file. For your convenience in
understaning my.complaint, I am enclosing a copy of my narritive to the
planning commission as I applied for a variance which shgws the contents of my
original letter to you circled, such writing I think you will find self -
explanatory. The balance of that narritive is unrelated to this writing.
During the delay of waiting for the public hearing, I discovered that the home
immediately North of me exceeds the 20/ coverage as well as mine did. City
records show ..a building permit was issued on that property without a variance
requested or granted. I am of the opinion that this is another gross error by
city -staff as 'I do not believe the City would single me out to harrass.
I am also enclosing an itemized statement, for which I expect total reimburse -
pent, of the extra costs involved with this project; such charges I have
suffered because of staff incompetance. Again, let me tell you that I would
not have purchased the lot if I had been furnished with proper information as
requested. If necessary, I fully intend to commence a legal action against
the City to recover these losses. It is difficult to put a dollar value on the
necessity of working the entire summer whereas I should have enjoyed last
summer doing what other retired citizens do, so I will leave that portion blank.
If you or others have any questions, I may be reached at 559-9013.
Enc.
Best Regards,
R. B. Redmond
z-
�
a>
a
x
0
0
ai
O
U
QCd
�
Y
N M
\0
n
N =
n
O
\10
cK
N O
N
N
N¢
N
N
N
N
Q bbD
to
�to a�x
cd
:�,3
-' 'C
O
°zw
Cd
C*
r..
pox
U
bbD
x
Q o
o
-o
bas
03
o
o
x�
Q
ti
co x
F° .¢
ti
�c7
� o
v)
rn
O
O\
ON
rn
O*s
O\
ON
a1
a1
a\
N
N
ON
�o
�-°
�O
00
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
--
--
--
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
('V
O1
O1
O\
O1
ON
Q1
(ON
O1
Cl\
�
�
O1
00
O
O
O
N
kn
�%o
�
\0
N
It
It
O
O
O
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
N
N
N
O\
ON
ON
ON
O�
O1
ON
O\
ON
CIS
ON
(71
tn
N
M
kf)
N
M
M
O
O
O
N
N
N
O
C
N
.r
U
N>'
H
Cl.
O
�.
Q
�bA
bA
O
c
cd
-
cn
r.t"
c
vi
y
Q
°
o
w
•�'"
o
ocj
.°
4-4
Q,
O
bA
�'
Oto
bA
N
cd
O
O
O
b4
to
o
ani
ani >,
o
o
v
Q.
V
o
an
i
> O
�,
o
:2
O a"
m
ai
o
Q
0
CY
u
u x
a
+C�
C4
u
V)
z-
�
a>
a
x
0
0
ai
O
U
QCd
Y
�
cK
A a�
Fy
�
Q bbD
to
�to a�x
cd
:�,3
-' 'C
O
°zw
Cd
C*
r..
pox
U
bbD
x
Q o
o
-o
bas
03
o
o
x�
Q
ti
co x
F° .¢
ti
�c7
� o
v)
•--
N
M
z-
�
a>
a
x
0
0
ai
O
Y
�
�
r..
i.
U
O
x
x
x�
�
c�
�
O
•--
N
M
It
to
l-
00
(7,\
O
•--�
z-
�
a>
a
x
0
0
T, -5a
State of Minnesota
Minnesota Department of Correctio"_'
November 26, 1996
a:
The Honorable Joy Tierney
Mayor, City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447'
Dear Mayor Tierney:
I have reviewed the results of your inspection conducted by Allan Moran of the Hennepin
County Sheriff's Department and have found the report indicates the necessary compliance.
I would like to add my congratulations to you and your department for all the hard work and
effort taken to bring your facility into compliance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 2945, which
governs municipal facilities. Please remember to address any needed corrections noted or time
lines for responses that may have been noted in your inspection report.
Based on the findings of the inspection of your facility the Plymouth Municipal Lock-up is given
authorization by the Commissioner of Corrections to function as a Class III Municipal Holding
Facility. Your facility may provide detention services to adult prisoners for up to 16 hours, and
may detain delinquent juveniles for up to a 6 hour period providing proper sight and sound
separation can be maintained in accordance with Minnesota Statutes.
If you have any questions or concerns about the status of your facility, please contact me at:
612/642-0321.
Sincerely,
Paul Foreman, Coordinator
Inspection & Enforcement Unit
cc: Chief of Police Craig Gerdes
Facility Office Files
A:\MAYORLTR.WPD
1450 Energy Park Drive, Suite 200 • St. Pau[, Minnesota 55108-5219
Phone 612/642-0200 • TDD 612/643-3589
15545 17th Pttace N.
P.tymouth, MN 55447
November 7, 1996
Dews LauA i.e,
Ju,6t want to thank you and Kuri and Mango bor doing a tkuty
outstanding job o6 organizing and oveueeing the P.tymouth,
e tections . 1 am rea.tey amazed at the amount o b .6 k i,tt and
dedication you aU put .into youh job.6. It ha6 to be a
hercu,tean to k and you aU do it with .6uch enthu.6ia,6m and
endtuz patience when we judga goo6 and expect you to bait
u's out!
Our Precinct 8 group have been together bon a .tong time
and we have bun and work weft together, but it is wonder6utty
com6o&ti.ng to know that when and .i6 we have a prob.tem, you
are there .in an .instant to he.tp u.6.
Thank you 6or the .tong, hard howus you put .in to maize our
work easy and 6or your, un6a c ting good humor and graci,ou,6nes.6.
S.incere.ty,
Jeanne Ettinger and
the Precinct 8 Judg et
December 3, 1996
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Z_ 6G
Mr. Brian Constans
Robbinsdale School District
4148 Winnetka Avenue North
New Hope, Minnesota 55427 _
RE: Petroleum Tank Release Site File Closure
Site: Plymouth Middle School, 10011 36th Avenue North, Plymouth
Site ID#: LEAK00009363
Dear Mr. Constans:
We are pleased to let you know that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Tanks and
Emergency Response Sectidn (TERS) staff has determined that your investigation and/or cleanup
has adequately addressed the petroleum tank release at the site listed above. Based on the
information provided, the TERS staff has closed the release site file.
Closure of the file means that the TERS staff does not require any additional investigation and/or
cleanup work at this time or in the foreseeable future. Please be aware that file closure does not
necessarily mean that all petroleum contamination has been removed from this site. However,
the TERS staff has concluded that any remaining contamination, if present, does not appear to
pose a threat to public health or the environment.
The MPCA reserves the right to reopen this file and to require additional investigation and/or
cleanup work if new information or changing regulatory requirements make additional work
necessary. If you or other parties discover additional contamination (either petroleum or
nonpetroleum) that was not previously reported to the MPCA, Minnesota law requires that the
MPCA be immediately notified.
You should understand that this letter does not release any party from liability for the petroleum
contamination under Minn. Stat. ch. I I 5 (1994) or any other applicable state or federal law. In
addition, this letter does not release any party from liability for nonpetroleum contamination, if
present, under Minn. Stat. ch. 115B (1994), the Minnesota Superfund Law.
520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (612) 296-6300 (voice); (612) 282-5332 (TTY)
Regional Offices: Duluth • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Marshall • Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on recycled paper containing at least 10% fibers from paper recycled by consumers.
Mr. Brian Constans
December 3, 1996
Page 2
Because you performed the requested work, the state may reimburse you fox a major portion of
your costs. The Petroleum Tank Release Cleanup Act establishes a fund which may provide
partial reimbursement for petroleum tank release cleanup costs. This fund is administered by the
Department of Commerce Petro Board. Specific eligibility rules are available from the Petro
Board at 612/297-1119 or 612/297-4203.
If future development of this property or the surrounding area is planned, it should be assumed
that petroleum contamination may still be present. If petroleum contamination is encountered
during future development work, the MPCA staff should be notified immediately.
If vapors should ever be noticed, please inform us immediately.
For specific information regarding petroleum contamination that may remain at this leak site,
please call the TERS File Request Program at 612/297-8499. The "Leak/Spill and Underground
Storage Tank File Request Form" (TERS Fact Sheet #3.35) must be completed prior to arranging
a time for file review.
Thank you for your fesponse to this petroleum tank release and for your cooperation with the
MPCA to protect public health and the environment. If you have any questions regarding this
letter, please call me at 612/297-8591.
Sincerely,
Laura L. Hysjulien
Project Manager `
Cleanup Unit I
,Wanks and Emergency Response Section
LLH:smm
cc: Laurie Ahrens, Plymouth City Clerk
Richard Kline, Plymouth Fire Chief
Greg Lie, Hennepin County Solid Waste Officer
Richard Hansen, Braun Intertec Corporation
Minnesota Department of Commerce Petrofund Staff