The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHousing & Redevelopment Authority Packet 11-17-1992PLYMOUTH HRA REPORTS MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 1992 AGENDA PLVNOUTM ROUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT ANTNORITY Il"RMER 17, 1992 at 6:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes from October 27, 1992 3. 1993 MRA Budget 4. Resolution Establishing Bate of Hearing for Senior Citizen Rousing S. Item 05 -- Pulled from Agenda 6. Status of Child Care Contract with Greater Minneapolis Bay Care Association 7. Status Report on First Time I'm d uyer Program S. Information Item a. Section 8 Statistical Report for October 31, 1992 b. Section 8 Financial Report for 7/1/92 - 9/30/92 9.. Other Business 10. Adjournment hra/agenda/11-17) 6 NEIIIIIIIIII PLYMOiMI ®DAG AND AUI DWff OC'I OBR A 19n A meetlog of the Plymomh Housing and Redevelopment Andoft was called es order by Chairman Dante Crain on oetabes 27,1992, at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT: Maiemm Crain, Comankdiometd Echos and Miloer ABSENT: caaanduk mer Bloc STAFF PRESENT: Executive Dteaetor DIINrnd. Housing Specialist Dde,. and Senior Chrk/Jjrpist Holt. A107M by Commissioner Edson, seconded by Commissioner Miller to approve do September 29. 1992 minutes. Vote. 3 Ayes. MGIM areied mumbsously. jMA812.(aM Chsirman Crain opened and dowd ft public hearing as dna was no toe peaaem m speak on the issue. Chairman Crain voiced his concern whh ft proposed dhodon of hoods for do Planning and Admioisvmion of Programs. He stated that lbs $41,200 is essweelve for the $206.000 d CDBG allocated foods. Chairman Crain stated That he would have a problem with taking away funding allocation from the Greater Minoespolis Day Cara Association (GMDCA), on she line item noted ad Child Caro Ataiat m% to fund a potaoWl Had Start Program. Commissioner Edson connomte I that GMDCA and Had Suet a:e two different types of programs. and be alio would be beeitam to tyke away from GMDCA to fund Had Suet. Ckkm cab adtaed if the allombn far Rahebilitsdon of Private Dwellings could be reduced by 520.000._ Homing Specialist Dale responded that the proposed allocation is S63.9110 ad That 550.000 should be adequate to cover the Rehabilitation Program. be: $43.900 would not be su liclem. W. Jim Nicholls of GMDCA gaud that dmk orgenizedua has recalved an bdoz of hdwd hadiog which hes reduced dm* waiting list. He I IOeme I the Commissioners dist GMDCA has bees slow to draw down an the foodisg from the City a that' try to match up heir dime wih hderd funding tical. He did state do dere ttW is a used for City bonding sow. Director DBWW commmud that ff the City Conseil decides to pursue dhs Had Suet Program, the Commissioners could look at ralheaft foods at do tine. Commissioner Edson bgWmd if Thee ate do ody flmds available for The Had Sees Peogam. Director Dillaud replied that for dm Hoodag Amborhy to Wed ma Had Swart P9am, it would have to some horn The $306.000 allocetd far CDBG Year 19. Chairman Crain meed be believed due odor aveaoes Dodd be explored throhyb Ineefail6 Outreach or'HdjM For Hamaany to expand The CDBG Wads is a moss sou e96ctive msoo r with those mn-r.ofita eaeeyiog ont the peojem. MOTION by Chairman Crain. saoaaded by Comminbner Echos to recommend epp wd of kite Year 19 Commu ty Development Block Groot Pbods with a reduction is The planning and Administration d Frgp to 621.200. ad add The $30.000 to Satteed She Noosing line item. Commissioner Ed000 asked how this would impea tm overall Community Development Depaebeent budpx. Director Dil erod tooled That it would not have any significant ellen on it at this time. He ueeeed to do Commiubras That CDBG Wads were originally founded for a wide nage of activities, and be advocatad that more Wads should gg towe+d: PlansWg activities. Chairman Crain mud be does not want dollen set aside who there is m specie prajea daipumd. Chairman Crain cummemd that be would like to look at a moior movicas planning program Wkb the $30.000. Commissioner Edsoa concurred that due soior services planning Program would be a worthwhile activity. MORTON by Chairman Craig, seconded by Commissioner Edson to amend who proviods motion to atabliah an allocation of $30.000 Year 19 CDBG Wins for Senior Services planning for $20.000. Vote on amndment. 3 Aye. MOTION aerie' unanimously. Vote on Main Motion. 3 Ayes. MORIA retried medmeusly. DirocI Dillaud ioI ' who Commhdo that we do mt have a dp ed contract with Washer Management a d yet. T hero have been meq+ drub kite have pane through Walker Management, staff. Chairman Craiu and The City Attorney. He mrd he hoped to have do base contract signed by the and of the wok. and aro continuing working on The bmg-was management contract. Direeoor Dhillamd med that he will be meeting nest weak with Cathy Abe of SpdggmW to discuss bonding, and to am the Fmmdd Fuaction Bond dmWino. Maur DMwW Save m cvwviow of the WOW 23. 1992 memo avdft the Un-by4ioo dbconion of the HRA budpts are peodigt completion of the Pkd lfaewiek work wdh egaed to the acoonaft program. He will bmp Montes iofoemed of the psopsss. JAM Hoaft Speoidist Dale Oiled dot the dosing was bald an Fddry. Ormober 23. 1992 for the prapeety at County Road 9 and Faeobrook Laos. He w0l be makhe a mb mum of two bids in demolishing of the bulbft pI I a off vMk m. Qmigi and medigt me aloe. Manor.Dillaned added Imt tis lot will be om*b eC whh me Cky owned psapeety to the Wm and taplamed. Housing Spoddhu Dale rimed 00 thane will be dheae move dodup In do am umd dry% libely comple ft the program for this year. COmmimbmea eaodvad a copy of the Slow Homing Nmdamw. ft wm decided the Nowsh mer would be seat to peeams anrmtly ao the hslaroet list. Addkkmd aopim would be available at the feint beform dm counter ad Slum to Raveely AMma in Pok and Recr adoo fico her so distribume to tmIr orpubWbr 3• MBO CITY OF PLVN0VTN 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: November 13, 1992 for Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of November 17, 1992 TO: Housing v opment Authority Commissioners FROM: Charle E. rud, Executive Director SUBJECT: 1993 BUDGETS I have enclosed the line item budgets for the NRA accounts as currently proposed by the Acting City Manager. The recommendations of the HRA board regarding these line item budgets will be an important component of the City Council's consideration at budget study sessions and public hearings which will begin next week. I have not at this time presented an updated version of Appendix A to the City/HRA agreement that supposedly controls the relationship between the City and t HRA regarding budgets. Once the HRA/City audit firm, Peat Marwick, completes the •Indirect Cost Allocation Plan• acquired by NO, It will be necessary to redefine the relationship between the NRA and the City as reflected in Appendix A to coincide with the Indirect Cost Allocation Plan that HUD finally approves. While the mathematics will not change, the manner In which we express the relationships will - for consistency with federal regulations. A new Appendix A to the City/HRA agreement will be presented to the HRA board at such time as Peat Marwick has completed work on it and HIED has approved it. The significant changes in the HRA line item budgets are as follow: 1. The CDBG budget is *self supporting'. Note thatno levy revenue is anticipated, as has been the case in previous years. 2. The Section 8 budget shows an increase in revenues as well as an Increase in *regular salaries° to reflect the addition of a Section 8 Clerk. The City Council has so far reviewed proposed personnel additions to the overall City budget, including the Section 8 Clerk, and no action has been taken to remove that position. I believe, therefore, that if the HRA concurs in the addition of the position, the City Council will approve it. The various support accounts to the newposition including insurances and various payroll related expenses have been increased accordingly. 3. The °Senior Housing• account (where all levy proceeds now reside) has bean broadened to address general HRA expanses. TAeseare expenses related to HRA activity not attributable to Section 8 or COBS. For the mst part, these are senior housing related items, but also include expenses related to the unallocated general activities of the HRA - such as agenda activity and the like. This amount equals that which was previously levied in the COBS budget, which is now self supporting. hra/cd/budget.11-17) 11/06/92 32,816 186,067 City of Plymouth 166,500 68,700 68,310 RRA PDND.- CD80 SOMMART OF RBVRWM 0 0 0 POR Tam 1993 0 517.00 Some Imp grant - CDBe 50,660 1990 1991 1992 1992 1993 1993 1993 521.00 Day Care Support - CDW Actual Actual Adopted Ratmtd Betmtd Managers Adopted 22,500 Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue TAXES RSCBIVASLB 401.00 Property Taves 24,588 26,086 23,400 23,400 24,600 0 NOTAL TAXBS RNCR IVASLR OTHER REVBMORS 24,588 26,086 23,400 23,400 24,600 0 0 517.02 CDW Program Admin 11,450 32,101 38,000 38,000 36,400 39,680 TOTAL O'lM RBVBNORS 11,450 32,101 38,000 36,000 36,400 39,680 0 Program Pass 520.00 Scattered Site Mousing 32,816 186,067 80,000 166,500 68,700 68,310 517.01 Runaways 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 517.00 Some Imp grant - CDBe 50,660 61,424 46,400 62,100 38,400 S7,510 521.00 Day Care Support - CDW 24,470 21,414 17,600 16,800 22.500 22,500 517.03 Senior Sere Planning 0 20,000 20,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 113,046 288,905 164,000 265,400 147,600 166,320 M 0 INTRRBST BARNBD 1,278 1,491 1,000 1,000 1,000 S00 ' TOTAL OTM RBVENOBS 1,278 1,491 1 000 1 000 m- 1,000 500 0 POND TOTALS 150,362 348,583 226.400 327,800 209,600 206,500 0 aaaaasasa asaaaaaaa aasaan.an asaaaaaaa asaaaaaaa oaaaaaas Now =a= 074 11/06/92 City of Plymouth NOOSING AND ROMNLOPI OPERATING BUDGE! - CDBG FOR YEAR 1993 1990 1991 1992 1992 1993 1993 1993 Actual Actual Adopted Estmtd Regstd Managers Adopted Bspdtre Bapdtre Budget Eupdtrs Budget Budget Budget PERSONAL SERVICES 601.00 Regular salaries.... 20,960 18,945 21,000 20,020 20,700 602.00 Temporary salaries... 0 1,155 500 1,538 1,000 603.00 Overtime............ 1,377 1,843 100 1,979 2,380 TMAL PERSOINIL SERVICES 22,337 21,943 21,600 23,537 24,080 0 0 701.00 Office supplies..... 305 591 500 400 500 702.00 Print a publishing.. 0 534 100 400 500 703.00 Postage ............. 289 714 700 700 800 704.00 Photo copying....... 696 696 700 700 S00 751.00 Photography......... 75 36 100 100 100 TOM MATERIALS i SUPPLIES 1,365 2,571 2,100 2,300 2,700 0 0 COIRRIWMAL SERVICES 802.00 legal fess.......... 1,079 S,210 1,200 1,200 1,300 803.00 Audit and acctg..... 300 300 300 400 S00 810.00 Senior sere planning 0 8,400 20,000 3,800 18,000 810.20 Record retention.... 900 0 16000 0 0 810.31 Noss improv. grant.. 39,878 85,137 46,400 62,100 S7,S10 810.33 Scattered site boos. 29,922 189,621 80,000 168,500 68,310 810.34 Day care support.... 27,298 23,793 17,600 16,800 22,500 810.47 Runaways............ 5,000 0 0 0 0 811.00 Emp a BRA training.. 218 174 500 100 600 812.00 Conferences/seminars 0 90 500 100 600 816.00 Subscrip/memberships S1 29 100 100 100 075 11/06/92 824.00 Fire A liability ins 825.00 Grp life insurance.. 826.00 Grp hoop insurance.. 827.00 Urkre camp/wage disc 828.00 FBM ................ 829.00 FICA ................ 631.00 Long term disability 832.00 Dental insurance.... 838.00 Rent City equipment. 839.00 City Center allcc... 847.00 Data processing alto 848.00 Admin allocation.... 881.00 Beal Notate Tax..... 882.00 Spec Usessmoata.... 883.00 Interest Bxpesse.... DNPART7 TOTALS City of Plymouth HOUSING AND REMMAWMENT OPBMTING 80008? - CDBG FOR TRAR 1993 1990 1991 1992 1992 1993 1993 1993 Actual Actual Adopted Botmtd Rogatd Managers Adopted Rq dtrs- 6xpdtre Budget 8xpdtre Budget Budget Budget 4,400 0 4,900 0 0 96 96 100 100 100 1,704 1,800 1,900 1,800 1,900 300 300 300 300 300 976 779 10000 800 800 1,633 1,661 1,600 1,800 1,90 300 300 300 300 300 300 396 400 400 400 996 1,104 1,200 1,100 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,300 1,200 1,200 1,900 2,004 2,100 2,000 2,100 0 0 20,000 20,000 0 0 2,194 0 2,300 0 0 206 0 100 100 0 49 0 0 0 118,451 321,843 202,700 285,300 179,720 0 0 142,1S3 346,357 226,400 311,137 206,600 0 0 076 11/06/92 City of Plymouth BWRING AND REDEVELOPHOW OPMTIAO a000" - asman 8 FOR YOU 1993 SOMCBS 802.00 Legal fees.......... 803.00 1990 1991 1992 1992 1993 1993 1993 811.00 Actual Actual Adopted Eetmtd Ragatd Managers Adopted 824.00 Rspdtrs a I- Ce Midget Rspdrs Budget Budget Budget231--aU 829.00 PICA ................ PW"a"L affmcas 0 0 S00 S0O 500 s'kd!F Regular salaries.... 21,196 25,085 29,000 29,000 49,000 602.00 Temporary salaries.. 0 781 S00 S00 500 603.00 Overtime............ 477 885 700 700 700 TOTAL PERSONAL B WICES 21,673 26,751 30,200 30,200 50,200 0 0 701.00 Office supplies..... 34 411 100 100 100 703.00 Postage ............. 351 1,046 400 11100 1,100 704.00 Plato Copying....... 696 804 800 800 800 751.00 Photography......... 0 0 100 100 100 TOTAL MATERIALS 6 SUPPLIES 11081 2,261 1,400 2,100 2,100 0 M 0 SOMCBS 802.00 Legal fees.......... 803.00 Audit and aectq..... 810.20 Record retention.... 810.67 Massing inspect..... 811.00 Emp a BRA training.. 812.00 Conferences/seminars 816.00 8ubwrip/maaberehipa 824.00 Fire 6 liability ine 825.00 Grp life insurance.. 826.00 Grp hosp insurance.. 827.00 Nrkre comp/wage disc 828.00 PERA................ 829.00 PICA ................ 149 99 S00 S00 S00 1,431 1,931 1,600 1,600 1,700 100 0 100 100 200 0 0 0 2,000 2,200 0 SO9 1,500 400 11500 0 0 S00 S0O 500 0 50 100 100 100 11100 0 1000 1,300 1,400 96 96 100 100 200 2,196 2,700 2,800 2,800 5,800 396 396 400 400 600 1,082 1,069 1,400 11400 2,.300 1,616 1,946 2,300 2,300 3,900 078 11/06/92 City of Plysoutb HOUSING AND RSOMBLOPNENT LATINO BODOET - SIMION e FOR YEAR 1993 1990 1991 1992 1992 1993 1993 1993 Actual Actual Adopted Eetmtd Regstd Managersb Supatre updtre Budget Rxpdrs Budget Budget Midget 233-233 PERbomm SBRVICES 831=00 Long term dieability 396 504 S00 500 1,000 832.00 Dental insurance.... 396 600 600 600 1,200 837.00 Rental assist/Sec 8. 378,450 443,507 490,000 490,000 504,000 838.00 Rent My equipment. 1,104 1,104 1,200 1,200 1,300 839.00 City Center allot... 1,200 1,200 11300 1,300 1,400 847.00 Data processing &Ila 2,900 2,904 3,100 3,000 3,100 899.00 Reserve ............. 0 0 12,900 0 2,800 TOnL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 392,812 458,615 522,200 S10,100 535,700 0 0 DEPARTMENT !TOTALS 415,566 487,627 553,800 542,400 598,000 0 0 mw.. .m M. mates mamma mm o. m 079 11/06/92 city of Plymouth aml loMD - MICR NOOSING SO1SUM OP RE, HE FOR YEAR 1993 1990 1991 1992 1992 1993 1993 Actual Actual Adopted astlow Eetmtd Managers Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue RevYOme 401.00 P+'qM y Taxes 0 307,420 334,010 3' 910 366,700 366,700 TOTAL TABS RMIVNKA 0 307,420 334,010 134,010 366,700 366,700 r0 GALS 0 307,420 334,010 334,010 366,700 366,700 ep a sisa .a ria d se awwft w as MMM s 080 11/06/92 City of Plymouth HOUSING AND ROMMULOPRONT OPOR1TIN0 BOD08?'- NRA GUUMRL AND SBMIOR HDOSINS M TORR 1993 1990 1991 1992 1992 1993 1993 1993 Actual Actual Adopted Betmtd Rsgetd Managers Adopted Nepdtrs Bxpdtrs Budget Rapdtrs Budget Budget Budget MR29RIALS AND SOPPLISS 702.00 Print 6 Publish...... 0 0 0 S00 . 11000 1,000 0 703.00 Postage 0 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 PORAL NRTZRIAL a SUPPLIES 0 0 0 S00 2 000 2 000 0 mm rRAC10AL BMMCNS 802.00 Legal hes........... 0 0 0 4,000 24,000 24,000 810.00 Besior Housing....... 0 257,532 334,010 334,010 335,700 335,700 810.00 Contract eerviws.... 0 0 0 0 5,000 5,000 TOTAL CCHlRALTM& SIUMCRS 0 257,532 !34,010 338,010 364,700 364,700 0 MUORnmr TOTALS SMO 257,532 334,010 338,510 366,700 366,700 0 081 NBD CITY OF PLYNOUTN 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLTIDUTN, NINNESOTA SS447 DATE: November 13, 1992 for Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of November 17, 1992 TO: HousiUl erud, velopsent Authority Commissioners FRON: - Charl Executive Director SUBJECT: ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR THE PLYIDUTH SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT NRA Attorney Dan Nelson has advised me that it is necessary for the HRA to set hearing date at which the concept of a senior housing project for Plymouth will be reviewed and discussed. This hearing is responsive to the rules and statutes of the State regarding the issuance of Essential Function Nousing. Bonds. This is one alternative for financing that we may wish to pursue, and therefore, is inc:ent upon us to follow the guidelines of the program, which include.a public hearing. It is oy recommendation that the public hearing be set for Tues1q. Decemberis, 1992, which is our regular meeting day for the month of Oscember an I will hand carry the appropriate fora of resolution for adoption by the HRA on the evening of November 17, 1992. bra/cd/public) THE ADJACENT DOCUMENT WAS SUPPLIED BY AGENCY NAMED BELOW. DURING THE REGULAR COURSE OF BUSINESS, TO BE FILMED BY ACSIIS ACCORDING TO NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS QirntteRRlywfTc o/e An r •.r n ..nn- ITEM #5 PULLED FROM AGENDA 4• MEND CITY OF PLYIDUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: November 10, 1992 for Housing and Redevelopment n.+thority Neeting ofNovember17, 1992 TO: Housing and Redevelopment -Authority C issioners FROM: Nilt Dale, Housing Specialist SUBJECT: STATUS OF CHILD CARE CONTRACT WITH GREATER NINNEAPOLIS DAY CARE ASSOCIATION At its October meeting, Commissioners recooendad, and Eire City Council laterapprovedonNovember2, $25,000 for the Child Care Assistance Program for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Year 19 (1993). Contracts have been signed for funding years 1990 and 1991. The most current contract (1992) is still to be signed. With GNDCA's submission of their Cost Allocatic Plan and other infonsation requested earlier, this document will soon be siwaed. (No payments were made to GMDCA until the earlier contracts were signed, and no reimbursement to GMDCA for the 1992 funding year will be made until the contract has been executed.)' Currently, the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association (GNOCA) has requested reimbursement for all of its funding allocation for 1991 in addition to 3,482.21 of their 1992 allocation. Their average monthly spending rate sinceDecember1, 1992 has been only $1,810 including administrative costs. DuringtheperiodofJuly1 - October 31, 1992 (4 months) the average spending ratehasgoneupconsiderablyandisat $2,463 not including administrative costs. However, this rate will have to increase s nificantly if the remaining 1992 allocation of over $21,500 is to be drawn down in a timely fashion. Yet care must be taken not to bring too many applicants on the program due to our funding limitations. To GNOCA's credit, their expenditure rate in previous years has kept nearly even with their annual allocations. The October 22, 1992 letter from Jim Nicholie of GNDCA explains the funding process and the reasons why requests for the City's allocation sometimes getsdelayed. We will continue to monitor GiDCA's spending rate and appraiseCommissionersfromtime -to -time. Attachments: 1. OKA Billings for Period 7/1/91 through 10/31/92 by Activity, 11/10/922. GNOCA Billings for Period 7/1/91 through 10/31/92 by Program Year, 11/10/92 3. Letter from Jim Nicholie, 10/22/92 4. GNOCA Cost Allocation Plan sr:bra/md/child) MBO CITY OF PLYMDUIN 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: November 10, 1992 TO:. Charles E. Di.11erud, Executive Director/HRA FROM: Milt Dale, Housing Specialist A& SUBJECT: OKA Billings for Period 7/1/91 thru 10/31/92 by Activity BILLING PERIOD: ACTIVITY: AMOUNT: 1/1/91 thru 3/31/92 staff time + postage i supplies 906.03 4/1/92 thru 6/30/92 staff time + postage a supplies 677.28 Month of Dec. 1991 child care provider charges 1.879.80 Month of Jan. 1992 child care provider charges 1.173.60 Month of Feb. 1992 child care provider charges 1,500.67 Month of Mar. 1992 child care provider charges one Month of Apr. 1992 child care provider charges 1,374.40 Month of May 1992 child care provider charges 1.180.00 Month of June 1992 child care provider charges 1,478.40 Month of July 1992 child care provider charges 4,057.78 Month of Aug. 1992 child care provider charges 2,736.20 Month of Sep. 1992 child care provider charges 2.391.05 Month of Oct. 1992 child care provider charges 669.00 Total f20 MEND CITY OF PLYIDUTN 3400 PLYMDUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, NINNESOTA 55447 DATE: November 10, 1992 TO: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director/NRA FROM: Nilt Dale, Housing Specialist *N& SUBJECT: GNDCA Billings for Period 7/1/91 thru 10/31/92 by Program Year Based on the billings I have received from Greater Ninneapolis Day Care Association (GNDCA) as of this date, there are a total of $20,024.21 in approved charges for the period 7/1/91 thru 10/31/92.. GNM has been re- imbursed for $10.,170.18 in September, thereby expending all of their remain- ing 1990 funding allocation of $1,554.00 plus $8,626.18 of their 1991 funding allocation of $15,000.00. QKA's current billing total for the period 7/1/92 thru 10/31/92 is for $9,854..03 and is for child care provider charges only. After payment by the City of the $9,854.03 billing, all of their remaining 1991 allocation would be expended plus $3,482.21 of their 1992 allocation. Remaining funding allocations by year would be as follows: 1992 Funding Allocation $25,000.00 Billings as of 11/10/92 9,854.03 1992 Funding Allocation Remaining 21,517.79 1993 Funding Allocation 25,000.00 10/22/92 Milt Dale CitYf plth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Milt: Enclosed an the materials we discussed in our September meeting. all of the money is pae Spending under id to Can providdw deers dmenn of Plymouth parents 24 Nearly program The parent pays a co-paymoat based on their moome and family an (see enclosed scale). and the program pays de rest up to a maximum no established at the 75th percentile Of raw for Woe service. The average cat of child care in H _ 1i County an range from $425.00 per month for a presdool age child to over 3625.00 for an infant. Thea. . V subsid per child per mouthhasbeenrunningabout $233.00 and GMDCA'a cost of administering the program has been about 9% of the subsidies*par out. The number of months we serve each family will vary with the family need and alrgidbility. Some families stay on the program for a number of months while they complete school, or maintain their family on a modaloncome. other families use only a couple mouths of subsidy and then are switched to another funding a =, or no longer need the help for one reason or another. For a $25,000 investment we an help Plymouth families with approximately 100 •child month:• of subsidized care on the slidingfereprogram. I hope that the above information is what is needed In response to your qquestions about why spending vet; the Plymouth child cave sliding fee pro.gram is behind ac We even when we have 9•: t '::ts for the subsidies, then are a two mala factors that have cone into play. 1) New Federal Child Care funds sad our policy a. ,.:b families use any State and Federal child are funds before we subsidize thein with yc.&r in's C. DBG pmaram. The new Federal funds called the Child Cue and De Mt ornent Block Grant CCDBG) have been targeted for non -AFDC fw •Mes wlio are working or in school. The funds have beim releasediin since dw r emr of 1990-91. u has meant that avesomefamiliesthathban served by Plymouth: CDBG funds were We to be switched to the new funding Others who have come up on the waiting lists were able to access the new funding and did not need the city funds. In addition, the State of Minnesota added a new category of funding in July of 1992 celled ACCESS for AFCD families who are not STRIDE eligible but who have an appom d Employment Development Plan (EDP) and me attandiog school. This program will serve 500 additional families in Hennepin County, some of whom are Plymouth residents. Again, we work m be sen that this funding source is tapped where appropriate before we sign an individual family up for Plymouth CDBG fiords. Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association Constance C. Bell. Executive Director • 1628 Elliot Avenue South • Minneapolis. MN 55404 612) 341-1177 • Fax (612) 341-4356 • An Equal Opportunity Empkuyer Following these policies has the effect of maAmi-I thePlymouth puts into Child Can and assn ing that the additional morynwill mean additional child care subsidy for Plymouth residents. u also mesas dist Is such transition times die spending is slow while die potential for other rimft is pursued with each family. 2) Waida Usti have been bWldin$ for several yam and process of oontscting families has ban d2fiiult and time consuming. Many of die families NOW" child are assistance have been on waiting lieu for one to two years. We ire committed to cern people in the order they dgmd up for die program. Oft, when we contact families their Yves have changed or trey new time to assess drdr opaons sow drat they have ehdd can srpport. U parentsneed to to school, for example, it may be a few months before the neat aemesoer or term when they an 0& school. Giving each family some reasonable time to respond to da d - an stbady opportunity means that waftq through the waiting list on be a dow process. We we concemW about die time it is aft to :raw down the CDHG funds. Our Staff haS Wm measures to speod up the p ocess of contsc . families from die waiting list. MW fruits Of time effortswill not show up is additional pex arditures for a few months. We Sdll have a waiting list of Plymouth families who have celled our office in need of ddU are assistance. We also honor die waiting He maintained by Hennepin County which has a number of Plymouth families on it. I hope that this letter and the enclosures will meet die needs of the City of Plymouth for information. Plow let me know as fuNier questions develop from City staff or others in the community. Sincerely, 1 7 rrm Nichola Associate Director GNDCA, Can ALLOCILTIOd MAR Agency hide Cost sharing: aeint Alleentnd ltireet Qesta: Program costs or wages and benefits for agency wide expenses which cannot be attributed to one funding source. These include the time spent on activities which are necessary to operate OMDCA as an agency, and contribute to the accomplishment of tasks for multiple sources of funding. Examples are receptionist's time, financial manager's time, or executive director's time which are not spent in support of a particular program activity, but support the agency operation as a whole. Ilan -wage and benefits examples include agency audit, payroll service, or equipment that is shared by all staff. The distribution of Joint Allocated Direct Costs among the funding sources is based on time sheets filled out daily by all staff. Staff show their work time each day as either I. ULWA - time attributable directly to a funding source or 2• A&= - time spent in activities that benefit all programs. Brom these time sheets and payroll we calculate the Percentage of wages and benefits each funding source contributes to the total dixwz wages and benefits for the agency. The cost for the feint wages and benefits are charged to all funding sources based on their percentage of the total direct wages and benefits. Other joint expenses such as agency audit, payroll service, phone service, etc. are also be charged based on this percentage. Oeeun ner SnA D=00,Costs for building depreciation, utilities, maintenance, etc. Depreciation on the Building and occupancy expenses are charged to the various funding sources based on the square footage of office space used. We calculate the total amount of usable office space excluding tket eammon areas such as the staff lounge, hallways, conference rooms etc. We then calculate the percentage of usable ofi:e space used for each project or funding source. Mach source pays that percentage of depreciation and oecuparr7 costa. Cost sharing within Departments: While most departments or projects within OMDC11 have one fundingsourceandbudget, both the Child Care Into rmstion Network (COIN) and the 811ding Pee Program have multiple funding sources for the same type of activities. The most accurate method of attributing costs in these departments is based on a unit of service performed. sliding Pee Pregr= WA a= Costs include wages, benefits and program costs for the operation of the sliding tee programs. Not included here are the direct subsidy amounts paid to providers. we calculate the unit of aarviee attributable to each funding source. A unit of service is a child subsidised for all or part of a month. These units ofservice are based on monthly provider billings for subsidised care. We calculate the percentage of the total units of service attributable to oath funding source. Stpenses for operating the sliding tee department are distributed to the funding sources based on these percentages. COIN has several sources of funding for child care referral and counseling services. The fee for this service is determined in a contract negotiation process with Hennepin County and various employers throughout the metropolitan area. COIN also provides this service to the general public on a tee for service basis. CDSG funds are used to subsidise part of the general public referrals for Minneapolis residents when families are not covered by an employer. COIN uses a sliding fee schedule which establishes the amount parents at various income levels pay for general public referrals. CDBG funds are used to subsidise the difference between the tee for the referral service and the amount paid by parents. The cost for a child care referral for 1992-93 is $50.00. I. CITY OF KVNDUTN. 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: November 12, 1992 for Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting ofNovember17, 1992 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority Commissioners FROM: Milt gale, Housing Specialist /Nk SUBJECT: STATUS OF THE FIRST TIME NOAEBUYER PROGRAM At its last meeting in October, I provided the Commissioners with a listing offirsttimehomebuyerswhohavebeenassistedatthistime. In as much as we still have additional funding of approximately $75,000, with 15 preference applicants and 44 non -preference applicants, we will continue the present program until our total funding is expended or until all applicants aro given an opportunity. The preference applicants will be contacted first and then the non -preference applicants in order of the number drawn. I anticipate the need. for two or three more First Time Homebuyer workshops involving theseapplicants. Based on the •fall -out' rate of applicants as of this date, i.e. about an 80% rate, it is possible that all the remaining 59 applicants wouldbegivenanopportunityforfinancialassistance. The next First Time Homebuyer's workshopp will be held in either late November or early December. Commissioners will be appraised of the progress at future meetings. hra/ed/fthb.11-17) A M WARY STATISTICS REPORT 8 Q. DATE: 10/30/92 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL TENAlPPB 11Bit8 INCLUDE I- HEAD OF HOUSEVOLD COMPOSITION. Or OF ALL HEADS IS X15 PARffin=Bg) A- THERE ARE 154 HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD- (MAY BE MORS THAN 1 IN A UNIT.) THERE ARE 154 HOUSEHOLDS. E. AGB: UNDER 30 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80(+) NO: 50 72 12 2 4 e 6 PCT: 32.5 46.8 7.8 1.3 2.6 5.2 3.9AVEMBAGE: 36.7 C. SEE: MALE: 18 ( 11.7) FEMALE: 136 ( 88.3) D. SINGLE PARENT HBAD-OF-HOUSEHOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED: MALE: 1 ( 0.6) FENUM: 115 ( 74.7) B- ELDERLY HEAD -OF -HOUSEHOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED: OBR ISR 2BR 3BR 4BR 5+SR NO: 0 23 12 0 0 0 FCR': 0.0 14.9 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 F. NOH-ZLDBRLY HBAD-OF-HOUSBHOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED: OBR 1SR 2BR 3ER 4BR 5+ER NO: 0 O 100 19 0 0 PCP: 0.0 0.0 64.9 12.3 0.0 0.0 G. RACB/BTHNICITY: NHITE: BLACK: AM IND/ALASEAN NATIVE: ASIAN/PACIF ISLANDER: OTHER: HISPANIC: 1 (• 0.6) H. MISCELLANBOUS: 62 YRS OR OLDER: HANDICAPPED: DISABLE): FULL-TIMS STUDENT (18 +): NONE OF THE ADM: 127 82.5) 21 13.6) 4 2.6) 1 0.6) 1 0.6) NON -HISPANIC: 153 ( 99.4) 18 ( 11.7) 12 ( 7.8) 5 ( 3.2) 1 ( 0.6) 120 ( 77.9) PEA Mawger 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth SUl0ARY STATISTICS REPORT (Cont) Date: 10/30/92 Page: 2 II. ALL WNlBRS CQNPOSITION: (PCT 18 PCT OF ALL MWERS) A. THERE ARS 390 MWERS. S. AGB: 77.2) 70 ( 17.9) 0-12 13-17 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69' 70-79 80(x) 195 18 60 81 14 2. 4 9 7 50.0 4.6 15.4 20.8 3.6 0.5 1.0 2.3 1.8 AVBRAGE AGB: 20.2 C. 888: ALL - XhLB: 135 34.6) PZNRLS: 255 ( 65.4) ADUiNS - . N!OALB: 31 7.9) PRIUM: 146 ( 37.4) 18 0 D. RACE/BTENICITY: WHIM: BLACK: ANER IND/ALASKAN NATIVE: ASIAN/PACIF ISLANDER: OTHER: HISPANIC: 3 ( 0.8) E. MISCELLANEOUS: 62 YRS OR OLDER: HANDICAPPED: DISABLED: FULL -TIM STUDENT (18 0: NONB OF THE ABOVE: 301 ( 77.2) 70 ( 17.9) 13 ( 3.3) 3 ( 0.8) 3 ( 0.8) NW -HISPANIC: 387 ( 99.2) 20 ( 5.1) 13 ( 3.3) 5 ( 1.3) 1 ( 0.3) 353 ( 90.5) P. FMIILY SIZE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 30 11(+) NO: 25 53 53 16 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 PCT: 16.2 34.4 34.4 10.4 3.9 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE: 2.5 G. RELATIONiSHIP CODE: (AVG I8 AVG PER HOUSEHOLD) HEAD SPOUSE ADULT DEPEN FOSTER LIVE-IN OTHER NO: 154 13 8 210 0 1 4 AVG: 1.00 0.08 0.05 1.36 0.00 0.01 0.03 PH.Kaaager 3.40 (086-91 t City Of Plymouth SMIGRY 821TISTi0.6 REPORT (cont): Date: 10/30/92 Page: 3 III. INCONS/EXPENSES: A. INCOME BRB+dmONN: (INCOME 88POR8 ADJUE7NOr 8) UNDER 2500- 5000- 7500- 10000- 12500- 15000- 2500 4999 7499 9999 12499 14999 17499 .17500(+) NO: 8 2 87 21 12 11 5 e PCT: 5.2 1.3 56.5 13.6 7.8 7.1 3.2 5.2 AVERAGE INCOME: $ 8038 AVmmz II=m Arm AwWT87WlW==: $ 6933 E. INCOME SOURCES: (AVG I8 AVERMI POR THAT n=) BXCBPTIONG: LONER INC FAMILIES REQUIRING LI EXCEPTIONS: 0 D. RENTS (Averages per Household, except for UIP) TOTAL TENERT PAYMENT: 173.4 THEM RBNT: 148.5 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS 380.6 UTILITY REINSUR8ENENT PAYMENT:********* (Avg for only Hehlde with URP) SECURITY DEPOSIT: 135.2 E. EXPENSES: (AVG IS AVG PER HOUSEHOLD WITH THAT ITEM) PUBLIC DBPEN WEI,p M®ICL MAGES ASSIST PENSION ASBBTS C'r= RENT BOWS WITH: 33 100 21 21 23 0 PERCENT: 21.4 64.9 13.6 13.6 14.9 0.0 AVG ANDUNT: 11695 6195 7219 177 3349 0 C. Ti V101 CATBGORIBS AT DOVE -IN: INCOME CATEGORIES AT REEXAM: VERY IAN INCOME: 76 49.4) VERY LOW INCOME: 98 63.6) LONER INCOME: 14 9.1) LONER INCOME: 4 2.6) OVER.INCOMB:. 0 0.0) OVER INCOME: 0 0.0) BXCBPTIONG: LONER INC FAMILIES REQUIRING LI EXCEPTIONS: 0 D. RENTS (Averages per Household, except for UIP) TOTAL TENERT PAYMENT: 173.4 THEM RBNT: 148.5 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS 380.6 UTILITY REINSUR8ENENT PAYMENT:********* (Avg for only Hehlde with URP) SECURITY DEPOSIT: 135.2 E. EXPENSES: (AVG IS AVG PER HOUSEHOLD WITH THAT ITEM) PHA Manager 3.40 (c)86-91 * City of Plymouth HANDCP DBPEN ELDERLY M®ICL CH CARE OTHER ASSIST DEDUC DEDUC HSLDB NITH: 20 17 1 0 117 34 PERCENT: 13,0 11.0 0.6 0.0 76.0 22.1 AVG AMOUNT: 1117 2250 660 0 821 400 PHA Manager 3.40 (c)86-91 * City of Plymouth S--MRY STATISTICS REPORT (cont)s Dates 10/30/91 .Page: IV. UNITS/CBRTIBICATSB/VOUCHUS (PGT is from units on file except where A. UNIT REPORT: (Calculated only if report includes a single project) UNITS ON PILE: 0 NODMNR PERCENT 700+I UNITS TOTAL ISSUBD/ OSR 18R 2SR 3BR 48R S+BR I. UNITS IN ACC: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 2. LEASED: 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 3. OUTSTANDING 0. 0 0 0 0 0 OR ZKTSNDED: 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 4. BALANCE (OVBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNDER ACC: 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) S. PROGRAM UTILIZATION: (Includes ALL units. Use Rpt •13 for more detail.)] C'. GROSS RENT UNDER 100 200-199 300-399 PCT OF NODMNR PERCENT 700+I UNITS TOTAL ISSUBD/ UTILI- 15 AVAIL. AVAIL. LEABED ZATION SECTION 8 CERT: 10 76.9 154 93.9 SECTION 6 MR: 0 0.0 0 0.0 VOUCHER: 3 23.1 0 0.0 PUBLIC HOUSING 0 0.0 0 0.0 TOTAL: 13 100.0 154 91.1 C'. GROSS RENT UNDER 100 200-199 300-399 400-499 500-599 600-699 700+INO: 7 0 0 8 107 15 17 PCT: 4.5 0.0 0.0 5.2 69.5 9.7 11.0 AVERAGE GROSS REST: 553.9 D. CONTRACT REST UNDER 200 200-299 300-399 400-499 500-599 600-699 700+ NO: 7 • 0 0 24 104 5 14 PCT: 4.5 0.0 0.0 15.6 67.5 3.2 9.1 AVERAGE CONTRACT REIT: 529.0 i E. UTILITY ALLOMNCE UNDBR 25 25-49 50-74 75-99 100-124 125-149 150+ NO: 90 60 1 1 2 0 0 PCTs 58.4 39..0 0.6 0.6 1.3 0.0 0.0 AVERAGE UTILITY ALLONANCE: 24.9 PEA Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth SUMMARY STATISTICS REPORT (Cont): V. LEASING IIiPORMATION: A. LBA38-IN-PLACB FAMILIES: TOTAL 1 Date: 10/30/92 Page ELDERLY NON -ELDERLY1 (100.0) 0 ( 0.0) E. CBRTIFICATB/VOUCESR SIZE VS ACTUAL, UNIT SIZE: C. EXCEPTION RENTS FOR CERTIFICATES: ORR ISR 23R CERTIF/ ISR: 0 23 0VOUClER2BR: SIZE: 35R: 1 0 0 0 111 4SR: 0 0 0 0S+BR: 0 0 0 C. EXCEPTION RENTS FOR CERTIFICATES: 100 EXCEPTION AUTHORIZED: OB0200EXCEPTIONAUTHORIZED: pAMiNUALAW. FACTOR APPLIED: 0 CURRENT GR OVER FDR: 0 1-100 OVER PIR: 0 10-200 OVER FPR: 0MORETHAN200OVERPlot: 0 D. COMPARISON OF GROSS RENT TO nW: CURRENT PMRS (AVG): OBE, O OR > 1.1xFlR: 0ORInc1.1XFlR: 0 OR s FMR: 0 GR > .9xm c FMR: 0 OR c .9. -in: 0 TOTAL: 0 ACTUAL SIZE: 35R 43R S+BR• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ISR 2BR 32E. 4BR 5+BR00000000000310001000010000000000000 IBR. 28E, 3BR 4BR 5+BR53563079800000000000012131005491600650200231121900 E.. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES NHOSB GROSS RENT OED 18R 28R EXCEEDS PAYMENT STD: VOUCHER: AVE 0 OVER PS : O 0 0 33R 4BR 5+BR 0 0 0 NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHOSE.RENT 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 BXCEEDB PAYMEli'P STD: 0 F. N MEER OF ASSI97SD FAMILIES MHO, SBCADSB THEIR 0=8 RENT IS LESSTHANPAYNWSTANDARD, RECEIVE A SAVINGS: VOUCHER: OED ISR. 2BR - 0 3BR 4BR 5+HR AVERAGE SAVINGS:O 0 NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES RECS .0 0.0 0 0 0 O'0 0.0 0.0SAVIN,8: PEA MRaager 3.40 (c)66-91 f City of Plymouth 804MARY STATISTICS REPORT (cont): Date: 10/30/92 Page: 6 0. UNIT TIM: TENANT UNDESIRABLE: SINGLE FAMILY: 5 3.2) DUPLEX: 1 0.6) 0.0) GARDEN: 146 94.8) HIGHRIBE: 1 0.6) TO1118OUSE: 1 0.6) H. HOUSING TYPES: LEASED NOT LEASED SUBSTANDARD HOUSING: IL® GROUP RESIDENCE: 0 0 CONGREGATE: 0 0 0 ( MOBILE HOME PAD: 0 0 SALE OF PROPERTY: SINGLE ROOM OCCUP: 0 0 SHARED HOUSING: 0 0 0 ( RENTAL REHAB: 0 0 OTHER: PROJ SELF SUFFIC: 0 0 OVERISSURD: 0 0 FLAGGED: 0 0 25 OTHER: 0 0 I. TURNOVER: CERT MOD REN VOUCHER PUB HOUS AVCS TIM USED/LRASED: 0.08 154 0.00 0.00 0.00 J. CANCELLATIONS OF CERT/VOUCHER: 5.31 OVERINCOME: 0 0.0) 80UBIN6 NOT LOCATED: 0 0.0) 0 NO LONGER INTERESTED: 4 100.0) 0.0) OTHER SUBSIDY: 0 0.0) OBLIGATION UNMET: 0 0.0) 0 TERMINATED BEFORE 60 DAYS: 0 0.0) 0.0) OTHER: 0 0.0) X. NAP/LEASE CANCELLATIONS: OVNSR UNCOOPERATIVE: 0 ( 0.0) TENANT UNDESIRABLE: 0 ( 0.0) TENANT DECEASED: O ( 0.0) NO LONGER IN JURISDICTION: 0 ( 0.0) NO LONGER INTEREST®: 2 (100.0) SUBSTANDARD HOUSING: 0 ( 0.0) NO LONGER ELIGIBLE: 0 ( 0.0) SALE OF PROPERTY: 0 ( 0.0) PER INITIATED: 0 ( 0.0) OTHER: 0 ( 0.0) L. ONER DATA: THIS REPORT ALL OWNERS ONNERB N/CONTRACTS: 25 29 FAMILIES UNDER LEASE: 154 154 AVG FAMILIES PER ONNER: 6.16 5.31 WRITE: 2 8.0) 2 6.9) BLACK: 0 0.0) 0 0.0) AMER IND/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0.0) 0 0.0) ASIAN/PACIF ISLANDER: 0 0.0) 0 0.0) OTHER: 3 12.0) 3 10.3) PER. Manager 3..40 (c)86-91 • City of Plvmouth sasO PLYMOUTH HRA SECTION 8 EX (6 INDICATES CREDIT AMOUNT) PAGE 1 UN DATE 10-13-92 (SEE ACCOUNTANTS COMPILATION REPORT) THREE MONTHS - 4EPTEMB4.R 309 1992 - DESCRIPTION PERIOD AMT TO OATE AMT BUDGET AMT OVER UN;)cR MAB A.1rc CaCST 2 ASSETS , 3 4 1111.1 GENERAL FUND CASH 369177.736 79343.39.00 79343.39 s 1117 PETTY CASH 6 00 00 00 00 t 7 6 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 9 1 1 10 1129 ACCOUNTS REC. OTHER 00 00 00 00 ' 11 TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 00 59878.70 000 59878.70 12 1 13 1162 GEN FUND 00 00 00 00 ' 14 : ria. 1s 'fi .11r i 16 1211 PREPAID INSURANCE 00 00 000 00 t7 129n OTHER DEFERRED CHARD IBTOTAL DEFERRED CHAlfifS 00 00 00 00 00 00, 00 on 6--EQNZI' •, 1 , 20 LAMP STRUCTURES zl 22 1475.7 AUTONOTIVE EQUIP. 00 00.00 00 23 TOTAL LAND, STRUCT t A 00 39219.97 00 39219.97 24 25 1690 UNOISTRIBUTED. DEBITS 00 00 00 00 26 27 16,442,0& 00 16,442.06 ze 29 30 31 32 33 e 34 35 36 t 37 de 39 a 41 42 080 PLTMOUTH MRA SECTION 8 EX (0 INDICATES CREDIT AMOUNT) PAG: 2 U 10-13-92 OUN ANTS COMPILATION REPORT) THREE MONTHS - SLPTEMBER 30p 1992 DESCRIPTION PERIOD ANT TO DATE AMT BUDGET ANT Ov:R UNDER LIABILITIES t SURPWIS 2111 VENDOR i CONTRACTORS 2117.1 FEDERAL INC TAX NN 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 21iT.3 STATE INC TAX:1101I 2117.4 HEALTH INS NN.' ;; 00 00 00 00.00 00 00 00 2117.8 RETIREMENT INN 2116 ACCOUNTS PATASLE HUD 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2119.1 ACCT PAT - CITY = ' :"t°'".: TOTAL ACCOUNTS PATABL!`e_,;.; ,;:' 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2210 PREPAID ANNUAL CONTR BTUPR apps 00 aa 699030.000 nn 00 fia. 699030.000 2660 UNOISTRIBUTRO C20IT.' OD' 00 00 00 2100 INC L EXP CLEARING 369177.73 159.193.26 4309298.00 2719104.740 SURPLUS 2810 UNRESERYEO SURPLUS 00 494479147.77 230157.00 494239990.77 2027 RES SURPLUS-PRUJ AN 2840 CUM. HUD CONTRIB. 00 00 29A9988.400 4.1519379.340 00 2980988.400 453455.000 396979.924.340 TOTAL LIAR, t SURPLUS 36.177.73 169442.060 04 169442.060 P;OOP 00 00 00 00 I 5030 RUN PLYMOUTH MRA SECTION 3 EX INDICAT S CAGIT AMOUNT) PAGE 3 MCNTMS - SEPTLMdER 309 1942 DESCRIPTION -------PERIOD------ ---YEAR TG DATE ---- -------BUDGET------ CHANG: I PUN AMOUNT PUN AlUUNT PUN AMOUNT 1 neenwtt..e TwfCYCYt J 3000 ESTIMATED ADMIN FEE 236.7T; 209598.?S* 47.35 129359.250 00 00 12.359.2533 z 5 OPERATING INCOME 5 7 3300 INT R D SURPLUS 99 86.13 + 1.44 374.jj_; 00 00 374,77-- 3301 ADMIN FEE INCOME 22.67 ' 1.972.523 21.78 596d4.630 00 00 59684.633 o 3610 INT GEN FUND INVEST 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3690 OTHER INCOME.10 25_000 00 00 L TOTAL OPERATING INCOME^ 23.66 2.158.653 23.31 0.034.403 00 00 69084.403 3 15 OPERATING EXPENSES S ADMINISTRATION- 7 e 4110 ADMIN. SALARIES•.' 1.96 5.040.89 44.36 119576.85 42.07 43.9926.00 329349.150 5 4130 LEGAL EYEENSE •.'.__'.' 00-.• 00 00 0 4140 STAFF TRAINING 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 21 xz 4150 TRAVEL 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3 i CCOUNTING 2.74 23d_Se 1,37 357.]5 00 j° 4171 AUDIT 400 00 00 00 48 x'0.00 610.003 5 4.160 OFFICE RENT 000 00 00 00 00 00 00 z7 ADMIN41941SUNDRY4e TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 7=.57 6.400.28 Sa.06 159153.04 42.73 449606.00 29.452.163 9 GENERAL ° PE 31 3x 4510 INSURANCE 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3J 4530 TERMINAL LEAVE PAY. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 5 MP 33 2.6979 9 36 4590 OTHER GENERAL EXP'. -N. 00 00 00 DO 00 00 00 3. 4591 ADMIN PORTA8ILITY 7.40 643.96 4.93 1.287.92 00 00 19287.92 39 TOTAL GENERAL EXPENSE 17.74 1.542.96 15.27 3.964.92 3.984.92 o Al HOUSING ASSIST. PAYMENTS 2 3 4715.1 MAP- CUPIED UNITS 590.00 S1.330.00 607.11 1580507.72 369.44 4 4115.2 MAP- CANT UNITS 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 5 5471S.3 MAP-OMG/UNPO RENT 00 30 OJ 00 00 00 00 414 lTLLiTY ALLOtlANCE 00 5_419___ 0'% 00 00490 50l471S.i MAP -PORTABILITY 241.80 2194136.863 41.57 109830.18: .00 .00 109850.183 TOTAL HOUSING ASSIST. PAT348.20 3092)3.14 565.74 1479657.54 369.44 3859692.00 2389034.463S152 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE 439.50 389236.33 039.07 1659796.30 412.16 4309298.00 2639501.703 5315. SSI bNtlO PLYMOUTH MRA SECTION d EX Cr INDICATES CREDIT AMOUNT) PAG° 4 RUN DATE 10-13-92 CSEE ACCOUNTANTS COMPILATION REPORT) THREE MC4THS - SEPTEMBER 399 1992 DESCRIPTION -------PIER IOD------ ---YEAR TO DATE---- ------- BUDZiT------ CHANGE PUN AMOUNT PUM AMOUNT PUM AMOUNT noC°eTTur. CTATerC.tT t 2 SURPLUS ADJUSTMENTS a -.t.'ra 6120 GAIW LOSS NONEXP EQ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 TOTAL SURPLUS ADJUSTMENTS 00 400 5.82 19518.64# 00 00 19513.t4r 6 PROVISION FOR RESERVES .. 7016 PROV FOR OPER RE SERV;; "•',`,.00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2I, MAL O TOTAL PROV. FOR RESERVES It 12 00 00 00 00 22.18 239157.00 23.151.006 7520 REPLACE NONEXP E4YIP.1'.:tie00'.• 00 00 00 00 00 00 s 7530 RECEIPT NONEXP, E0villio •:".... 00 ' 00 00 00 00 00 00 16 7590 CONTRA FOR ?SODS 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 17 TOTAL IB 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 19 7610 VANDALISM EXPEND., ,' 00•. 00 00 00 00 •• 00 00 dO CONTRIBUTIONS EARNED n 12 8027 ANNUAL CONTR-PR TR 00 400 400 00 00 00 00 1' TOTAL 00 00 00 00 434.34 453945S.00O 4539455.00 is 6 17 is M 71 12 17 19 15 1. 97 111 to IU t1 f2