The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHousing & Redevelopment Authority Packet 05-19-1992PLYMOUTH HRA REPORTS MEETING OF MAY 199 1992 y AGENDA PLYMOUTH FUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY May 19, 1992 at 6:30 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes. for April 16, 1992 Meeting 3. Public Hearing on Grantee Performance Report (CDBG Program) 4. Section 8 Program - Final Report on June 1991 Management Findings 5. Section 8 Program - Annual Contributions Contract 6. Request for CHAS Certification - Community Involvement Program 7. Senior Housing Project - Next Step 8. CDBG Program - Definition of Substantial Change 9. Scattered Site Homeownership Program - Progress Report 10. Information: a. U.S. Poverty Programs Log Mixed, Surprising Record b. America Needs a New Agenda For Ending Poverty c. Section 8 Summary Statistics Report, 4/30/92 d. Section 8 Financial Report for Period 7/1/91 - 3/31/92 (Balance Sheet and Operating Statement) 11. Other Business 12. Adjournment hra/agenda.5-19) 0 J. MEND CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: May 12, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of May 19, 1992 TO: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director FROM: Housing Specialist Milt Dale / N SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARIAC: ON GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT (CDBG PROGRAM) ACTION REQUESTED: A public hearing is required to allow for public comment on progress the City has made as to use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds received from the federal government. This is the first time that the City has been required to complete a Grantee Performance Report (GPR) for the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD) since the City became an Entitlement City almost two years ago. This r*port will be required on an annual basis hereafter and will be reviewed by HUD personnel to determine our compliance with the various requirements of the Program. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The local HUD office is required to monitor our accomplishments and status of the various activities utilizing CDBG funds. A HUD fano #4949.2 titled Grantee Performance Report" outlines expenditures and accomplishments/status by project. The City has not yet expended significant funds due to the change over of the City from a sub -recipient of Urban Hennepin County to that of an Entitlement City. CONCLUSIONS AND RECDMNENNDATIONS: After the Housing Authority holds its public hearing, they should pass a motion that the City Council accept the Grantee Performance Report along with any comments received from thepublic. The report should then be forwarded to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in Minneapolis. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Grantee Performance Report hra/md/grantee.5-19) Jl I Y.S. DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND URBAN DBVELONERT INANE OF GRANTEE I PAGE 1 OF i I COIMINITY OEYELOPNEMT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM I I — I GRANTEE PERFOBWICE REPORT - 1 IGRANT NIBIBER IPERIOD COVERED 01/01/91 TO O4125/g2 I ACTIVITY DAMY 18-91-NC-27.0008 (TEAR XVII I I I I TEAR/II I I I I I I ING ILISIUI COBG AMIAT I I IACTIVITVI LOCATION. ACTIVITY. ON. I INIBIR ACT- I I M/NIER I AMD DESCRIPTION TACT- I I INIEXK41 ESDI TOTAL I UN- I W IIVITV I ACCONOLISNNEKTS / STATUS I I IIVITTI I I I THIS IEKPOMI LIQUID-1 OBLIGA-ICODES I I I. IFUMD-I I I I REPORT-1 TO DATE ATED I TED I I I I IED I I I I ING I I OBLIGA-1 SALARMI I I I I IIII PERIOD I I TIOWI I I 1 I A 1 B 1 C IOIEIFI G I M I I I J I K I L II—emeaaaaaasaaaaaaasasaaaaassaaasa.I I I I I I l I 1 I IPA M-CHILD CARE SERVICES I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I IIaaa¢a.u.me...aaaaaasaaaauaaaa°t1 13.1 ICITYWIOE DAY CARE 191/031e1 I 1 01 01 01 1S000IA ISulm fpient did net Request I• Funds Greater Minneapolis Child I IIII I I I I .[Funding During 1991 Due to I I Care "recipient. 1 [ I I I I I I I IClasing Out of Prior Urban 1 10 Provides Child Care Grants to 1 [ X I I 1 1 I I ICanty Grant Activity. I I L/N Fannies I IIII I I I I I I 1111 I I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I IIsaacaasaaansaaaaaaasaasmaaasaaaaaal I I I I I I 1 IREMAS-BINGLE FAMILY RESIDEOTL I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I Ieasaa aaaaaeaaaaataeataasaaeeaaaaaal I I I I I I I I 11.1 ICITYMIOE 191/03IhI I I JI 01 01 529061A Igo 1991 Pro3ram seer fads com I I• Deferred Loan for LIN Noerorre e 1 1 I [ l 1 1 I I Imited do to need to close out 1 10 Program Year-1991 Increment [' I I I I I 1 [ I Ifunding for same program under It of Units to be Rehab: 8 1 I I I I I I 1 1 [earlier Urban County ASraement I IB: of Lam-Mad Units: e I IIII I I I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I IIaasasaaaaaaaaaaaaasesaaaasaaataaaaal I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I ISPECL ACT - INCOME SUBSIDY I IIII ( I I I I IIaaaaaaasaasaaaaa;gm ....uauau•I I I I I I I I I 12.1 ICITYMIOE FIRST MUYER 191/031h1 I I GI 01 01 933071A IGnly Program Design Completed I [• Deferred Loans to L/N Families I` I 1 I I i I i I IDuring 1991. MID Rules sere I ( Assist in Purchase of First Mame I I I I I I I I I (Clarified No to Eligibility of I 1• Assistance to $15,000 for DP. Clol I I I I I I I I Ithis Program Design late in I sing a:d first. Hart. Reduction. I I I I I I I I I Ithe Year. All Closings Not be 1 10 of Units to be Rehab: 10 I I I I I I I 1 1 Ihy 9/30/92. I. IB of Lou-Nod Units: 10 I IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1111 I I I I I I. IIII I I I I I I 1111 I I I I i I I I I I I I I IPM I I I I11 DI 1 DI 1 1 I ITotaLs I I I I I I 1 01 1 1612131 1 I ANMS 2.12 FORM NIR[-4949.2 (4.86 November 1989 ref. MandbooM 6510. Report date: 12/31/1 I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF NOIIING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT I CUDRMNITV DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM I GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT ACTIVITY SUMMARY IRA! OF GRANTEE I PAGE 2 OF 3 IGRART MU MBER - IPER10o COVERW 01/01/91 TO 04/25/92 I0 -91 -NC -27.0006 (YEAR NV11 ) 1 I' I IY/IIII I I I I MNG ILISIUI ON AMOUNT I I IACTIVITVI LOCATION, ACTIVITY, NAME, 1 INISIR ACT- I I RUUER I AND DESCRIPTION lam- I I IMIENPEMDEDI TOTAL I U I UN- IIVITV I ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS I I IIVITVI I I I TNIS IEIIPEMOnI LIWID-I ORLIGA-ICOOES I I I IF= -I I I I REPORT -1 TO DATEI ATM I TED I I I I IED I I I I ING I I OBLIGA-1 BALANCEI I I I I I I I I PERIOD I I TIONS I I I I A 1 6 1 C IDIEIFI G I N I I I+ I K I L I I1••s••••••o••••••••••u••...... I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I IPLARNING I IIII I I i I I I1•••axe•••••s•suss•a•••••••s••as••I I I I I I 1 I I 1 15.1 INNING ASSISTANCE PLAN 191/031 1 1 1 SBOOI SBOOI OI OIC IAII.Activity Complete. I I• Ra Aired MSD Report on Condition I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I of Nausing Stock and Areas of I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I Mousing Assistance Naad I IIII I I I I I I I I• Prepared by a Consultant to The 1 I I city I IIII I I IIII I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I: 0.2 I I IIII IN= OAERSNIP STRATEGY 191/031 1 1 1 I 01 I 01 1 I 01 47001A I I IPrparstion of the RFP and 1 I I• Consultant Prepared Document I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ICansultant Solicitation was 1 1 I• Stop-by-Stp,•Cookbook For The 1 I I I. I I I I I linittated. Mo Expmxlitures 1 I I 1992 First Time Namebuyer Programl I I I I I I I I I I I I• Alternstive Namob yer Program I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I Strategies for After 10/1/92 HUD I III .I I I I I I I I I I Aute Changes I IIII I I IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I 15.3 I i I I i l IRENAB TRACKING SYSTEM 191/031 1 1 1 I 01 I 01 I I 01 57871A I i Igo Activity or Expenditures i I I• System Analysis of Current Wahl I I I I I I I I I I I I Processing/Monitoring Activities I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I• Sptm Design fo Efficiency I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I• Sofewre Development for Coputerl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Automation I IIII I I IIII I I IIII I' I IIII I I 1111 I I I I I I I I I I I i I i 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1111 I I 1111 I I 1 1 1 1 I I IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i IPow I I I I I I SMI 1 01 1 1 i ITotats I 1 I I I I I see01 I 104671 1 I AMUS 2.12 FOAM MUD -4949.2 (4.88) November 1989 ref. Handbook 6510.2 Report date: 12/31/1997 I U.S. DEPART16T OF MOUSING AND tUM DEVELOPMENT INANE OF GRANTEE I VALE 3 W 3 1 CONRINITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM I I - I GRANTEE PERFORMABLE REPORT I -- I IGRANT NUMBER IPERIOO COVERED 01/01/91 to 06/25/92 1 ACTIVITY SUMMARY I0 -91 -NC -27 -Om (TEAR xVil ) I I I IYEwR/IIII I I I I IND ILIBIUI WHO ARMY I I IACTIVITTI LOCATION, ACTIVITY. NAME. I INIBIR ACT- I I NUMBER I AMD DESCRIPTION IACT- I I INIEKPEWEDI TOTAL I RM- I ill- IIVITY I ACOONPLISN ENTS / STATUS I I IIVITYI I I I TBI$ IERPENDEDI L)OUID-1 OBLIGA41CMES I 1 1 IL-1 I I I REPORT -1 TO DATEI ATED I TED I I I I Im I I I I ING I OLICA-I SALucEJ I I I I I I I I PERIOD I I TIONS I I I I. A I'' B I C IDIEIFI G I N 1. 1 I J I K I L II••••tt...•as..aa..aaae..:••..sasu• I IIII I I I I I I IPGM.ADN-GEN NGNT.OVRSGBT,S000R I III I I I I I I I......... •••••••a••••o•s• I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 14.1 ICITTNIDE 191/031 1 1 1 01 01 0I 245MIA IiSHIe Extensive Activity we 1 1• gall 090 Management, Plalningl I I I ! I I I I jUndertaken, These Funds May he I I. and Monitoring by City I I I I I I I I I IReprogrammed Since BUD I I Camminity Dovelapmnt Deportment I 11 .1 1 1 1 1 I !Specified Accenting System I I I IIII I I I I IUere Not In Place During 1991. I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I I 1 I I I IIII I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I I_ I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I IIII I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I III ! I I ! I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I IIII 1 I I I I I I I I !III I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I 1 I I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I I I Pais I I 1111 DI 1 DI 1 1 I ITotals I I I I I I 1 01 1 245001 1 1 Lr IGrand I I 11I I NMI 1 DI 1 1 1 ITotals I I I I I.I I SEOOI I I%M1 I I ANIS 2.12 FORM NW -4949.2 (4.0) ref. Handbook 6510.2 Report date: 12/31/1997 DATE: MEND CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 May 12, 1992 For dousing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting tf May 19, 1992 TO: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director FROM: Housing Specialist Milt Dale Wr SUBJECT: SECTION 8 PROGRAM - FINAL REPORT ON JUNE, 1991 MANAGEMENT FINDINGS ACTION REQUESTED: Information item. Two HUD personnel will be attending the meeting. They are Patti Hannay and Kaye Pistilli both Housing Program Administrators with the Minneapolis -St. Paul HUD Office. On June 26 and 27th of 1991, the Minneapolis -St. Paul HUD Office had HUD employees Patti Hannay and Kaye Pistilli do a Section 8 Management Review to cover the period from its last review in 1987. After the review, Ms. HannayandMs. Pistilli discussed in general terms, their review findings. In early September, a letter came from Mr. Thomas Feeney, Manager of the Minneapolis -St. Paul HUD Office outlining the findings and expected action to be taken by the Plymouth Housing Authority to comply with the findings. On September 23, 1991 we provided a letter to Mr. Feeney outlining the actions we were taking to comply with the findings. On October 7, 1991, we sent a second letter to Mr. Fenney following up onhisletterofSeptember4, 1991 relative to four specific findings. On October 18, 1991 we provided more detailed information to Mr. Fenney astothefilereviewsectionofthetheirfindings. On November 14, 1991, a letter from Mr. Fenney cleared several of thefindings. Later in November, as a result of a follow-up review conducted by Ms. Hannay and Ms. Pistilli, a letter came to us from the HUD Office on January 29, 1992. This letter requested an additional response from us. On February 12, 1992 and again on April 4, 1992 we responded to the HUD letter of January 29, 1992. On April 30, 1992 we were informed all findings were closed. This letter is attached. (Please refer to your April HRA agenda packet for the other correspondence.) PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The HUD Office has found our responses to their management findings acceptable. While some of the Issues were serious, they felt the corrective action taken was adequate to comply with their directives. One of HUD's primary concerns was allowing over 20% of our Section 8 allocation going over Fair Market Rent. We have corrected that deficiency and at the present time have granted no approvals over Fair Market Rent. This situation has been helped considerably by the significant increase in Fair Markets Rents on October 1, 1991. We are, with our computer program, monitoring Fair Market Rents closely. Another important issue related to maintaining the waiting list current and updated. We updated the waiting last fall and are continuing to maintain the waiting list in an orderly fashion. On April 8, 9, and 10, 1992, Denise Hutt and myself attended several HUD sponsored workshops for Section 8 program administrators. We also have maintained close contact with our HUD staff liaison Patti Hannay. As well, I have been attending the Section 8 portability meetings held in St. Paul on a quarterly basis. CONCLUSIONS AIN) RECOMffI1DATIONS: Since this is basically an information memo, I feel that Commissioners should avail themselves of the opportunity to discuss program particulars with the staff or the two HUD personnel at the meeting on May 19, 1992. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter from Thomas Feeney, 4-30-92 hra/md/4-16.0) APIA so I* Me. David Crass, Chaisparsew Hawslieg and Redevelopment Authority of. plymoatb 13200 38th Avasale earth P17000th, MlnaaeOta 55441 Dear Mr. Craims eobjecte Clearance of section 8 Menagessat Review ABY 366 so P.T. M* Yoe for Your letters dated February 12, 1992. and April 3. 1992. In Which YOU provided raspaases for the remaining two open findings of the section 6 Mamagamest Review. Once again, we appreciate Your pimp! attention and thoroegb responses. Based en your responses and supportiag documentation we have clewed Finding i1 sad Finding 19. All other findings were cleared in our letter tl Yaws office distad January 29. 1992. Our January letter stated that Finding 09 would resale open until we could do a follow-up review in the Gyring. We have decided to forge the follow -cep review and am consider all findings closed. It is evident by the documentation received in oar, office that the Booties 8 Plymouth staff has made noticeable Improvements in the area of &asset files. In addition, the staff has partioipated in training sessions in our office and more recently at the Borehwest zm. If at say ties further training is needed please contact our office to set up a session. In response to your request for members of our staff to appear at the OW 16. 1993. Housing Authority Board Meeting, lis, Patti Hannay and Ms. Kaye PLUM will be attending. If yaw have any questions. or seed further assistance. picnic contest Ms.pattl "sOMMY of ower Public Housing Division at (612) 370-3212. vary alaoeraly Yours. dimes 2. Feeney, S.9M 68 M901t Review File Manger drsoative Director S.9ps Reader 5-gHM2BawwaYskcc:04/30/92 sMi:HARMAY JJsLOG S. NEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: May S. 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of May 19, 1992 T0: Charles E.. Dillerud, Executive Director FROM: Housing Specialist Milt Dale qKft SUBJECT: ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS CONTRACT FOR SECTION 8 PROGRAM ACTION REQUESTED: Increase in contract authority for the current Section 8 Program allowing for contract to go through July 31, 1997. BACHGROW: Earlier this year, the Housing Authority approved an Annual Contributions Contract to extene the program's funding through October 11, 1993. A copy of that contract has been signed and returned by HUD. As stated in the letter from Roger Olson, Deputy Nanager from the local HUD Office, the purpose of this new contract is to provide replacement funding for our Section 8 Program and to provide a new increment number to designate our program, i.e. MN 46-E170-006. CONCLUSIONS AND RECONNENDATIONS: Enclosed is a copy of the proposed Annual Contributions Contract and the letter from HUD. I recommend that the Housing Authority approve this Annual Contributions Contract and direct the Chairman to execute the Contract. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 92- 2. Letter From Roger C. Olson of HUD dated 4/21/92 3. Copy of Annual Contributions Contract with Exhibits I and II hra/md/acc.5-19) HRA RESOLUTION 92 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS CONTRACT WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Plymouth, Minnesota herein called the "PHA") proposes to enter into an Annual Contributions Contract (herein called the "Contract") with the United States of America herein called the "Government"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT resolved by the PHA as follows: Section 1. The Contract, substantially in the form of the contract hereto attached and marked "Exhibit A", is hereby approved and accepted both as to form and substance and the Chairman is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Contract in triplicate on behalf of the Local Authority, and the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to impress and attest the official seal of the Local Authority on each such counterpart and to forward said executed counterparts, or any of them, to the Government together with such other documents evidencing the approval and authorizing the execution thereof as may be required by the Government. Section 2. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to file with the Government from time to time, as monies are required, requisitions together with the necessary supporting documents requesting advances to be made on account of the contribution provided in the Contract. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect mediately. Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority on May 19, 1992. res/hra/acc) Yi Oq 1 etm M Ibs1y s4 Y:Ms Owutmrmmm 1°: FAONV April 21, 1992 HE ((V„ n n DLoc. Charles E. Pb-ler d V ftecutive Director Raining PlymotithPledeve1cp° ent Authority APR PP 1982 3400 Plymouth Boulevard CITY OF PLYMOUTHPlymouth, M 55441 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Dear Mr. Dillerud: SiSJWr: Existing Housing Certificate Program Project No. M46-E17"06 Via gave enclosed four ao,urtesparts of the proposed Annual contributions Contract No. C-407CE and supporting documents for your Section 8 &&sting Bmwirlg Certificate Program, together with a supply of blank forms. There is also included a sheet of instructions regarding execution and return of the documents. The purpose of this new Part I is to provide replacement fundin for Bausing Certificate increment W96-E170-001 with a new increment number 14946-E170-006. Exhibit I reflects the termination of increment 001 and Exhibit II shays the new increment 006 with an i. creaw in contract Authority. If you have any questions regarding the awm*icn and return of the daaments, Please call Allen Candler at (612) 370-3011. ACC Part I Number; C-40708 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECTION 8 EXISTING Y= : I l k 1 Y; = y_ • h SMV; : 4 1.1 DEFINITIONS. A. ACC. As used in Part I of this CACC, "ACC" means the Annual Contributions Contract for each project. As used in Part II of this CACC, "ACCO means the CACC. B. Budget Authority., The maximum aggregate amount which may be paid by HUD for each project in the Program over the duration of the CACC. Budget Authority is reserved by HUD from amounts authorized aKd appropriated by theCongress. (Exhibit II lists budget authority for projects funded with amounts appropriated in Federal Fiscal Year 1988 and later years.) C. CACI. Consolidated Annual Contributions Contract. D. Contract Authority- The amount of contract authorityforeachprojectislistedinExhibitIorExhibitII of this CACC Part I (subject to reduction in accordance with section 1.4.D. and section 2.3 of this CACC). E. Cost Amendment. An amendment to the CACC which provides additional contract or budget authority to cover increased Program Expenditures to maintain the Program at the number of units originally approved byHUD. F. Fiscal Year. The PHA Fiscal Year. G. ZED, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. H. Maximum A*+*iL+al Contribution Commitment See section 1.4.C.i.b. of this CACC. ACC Part I: Page 1 of 6 pages HUD 52520 B (August 1988) I. EQ.. Public Housing Agency. J. Prooram. The PHA's Housing Certificate Program under the CAM R. P=Sr M Receiots-, Amounts paid by HUD to the PHA for the Housing Certificate Program, and any other amounts received by the PHA in connection with the Program. L. Program Haenditures. Amounts which may be charged against Program Receipts in accordance with the CACC and HUD requirements. M. Project. A funding increment for the Program. (The project may be for additional units or for a cost amendment.) zip A. Projects in Program. 1. List of Projects. The Projects in the Program are listed in Exhibit I and Exhibit II of this CACC Part I. 2. Exhibit I: Bxhi—t I lists projects funded with amounts appropriated before Federal Fiscal Year 1988. 3. Exhibit Ii. Exhibit II lists projects funded with amounts appropriated in Federal Fiscal Year 1988 and later years. B. Number of Units ft GUMbar of bedrogM) To the maximum extent feasible, the PHA shall enter into contracts for housing assistance payments for units under the Program in accordance with the unit distribution stated in this section. No substantial deviation, as determined by HUD, from this unit distribution is allowed without prior HUD approval. Number of bedroom 0 Number of Unite 0 1 17 2 67 3 3 4 0 87 ACC Part is Page 2 of 6 pages HUD 52520 B (August 1988) 1.3 C. PHA Fiscal Year. 1. The first fiscal year for the Program shall begin on __ August 12. 1977 (Enter the effective date for the first project listed in Exhibit I of Part I of the CACC. If this date is not entered before the CACC is signed by the PHA, the date may be entered subsequently by HUD, upon written notice by HOD to the PHA.) The firet Fiscal Year for the Program shall end on the last day of the PHA Fiscal Year which ends not less than 12 .months, or more than 23 months, after this date. Z. Thereafter, the fiscal year for the Program shall be the 12 month period ending June 30 of each calendar year. (Enter the day and month used as the Fiscal Year ending date for other section 8 assistance administered by the PITA under an Annual Contributions Contract with HOD.) A. Exhibit I Projects- For all Projects listed in Exhibit I, the term of the CACC shall end on octgher 11. 199 Insert last date of CACC term for all Exhibit I projects. If this date is not entered before the CACCissignedbythePHA, the date may be entered subsequently by HOD, upon written notice by HOD to the B. Exhibit II Projects- For each project listed in Exhibit II: I. Exhibit II states the first date and last date of the ACC term for the project. 2. The first date of the ACC term for the project shall be the first day of the month when HOD signs the CACC which adds the project to the Program, or another date as determined by HOD. 3. If the first or last date of the ACC term for the project is not entered before the CACC is signed by the PHA, the date may be entered subsequentlybyHOD, upon written notice by HUD to the PHA. 4. HUD may revise Exhibit II at any time, upon written notice by HUD to the PHA (a) to add a cost amendment project, or (b) to remove a project for which the ACC term has expired. ACC Part I: Page 3 of 6 pages HOD 52520 B (August 1988) LVL=;1 0u0h• Iry = r • A. nt. HUD shall pay the PHA annual contributions for the Program in accordance with HUD regulations and. requirements. r. 3_ r• - - t • i- r 1. The annual contribution for the Program shall be the amount approved by HUD for each Fiscal Year to cover: a. The amount of housing assistance payments bythePHA. b. The amount of PHA fees for Program administration. 2. The amount of the HUD annual contribution may be reduced, as determined by HUD, by the amount of Program Receipts (such as interest income) other than the HUD annual contribution. I. Annual Limit on 24=nts for 1? dram a. Except for payments from the CACC reserve account as provided in section 1.4.8. of this CACC, the HUD annual contribution for the program under section 1.4.8. during the Fiscal Year shall not be more than the Maximum Annual Contribution Commitment for the Program. b. The Maximum Annual Contribution Commitment for the Program for each PHA Fiscal Year shall be equal to the sum of the contract authority amounts reserved by HUD for the projects in the Program. The amount of contract authority reserved for each project in the Program is stated in Exhibit I and II of this CACC Part I (subject to reduction in accordance with section 1.4.D. and section 2.3 of this CACC). If the first Fiscal Year for the Program is more than 12 months, the Maximum Annual Contribution Commitment for the Program for the first Fiscal Year may be adjusted in an amount as determined by HUD by the addition of the pro rata amount applicable to the period in excess of 12 months. ACC Part is Page 4 of 6 pages HUD 52520 8 (August 1988) 1.5 2. emit on Total Pa=nts for PrQgX=. The sum of HUD payments under section 1.4.B. for the Program over the duration of the CACC (including any payments from the CACC reserve accoun as provided in section 1.4.8.) shall not be more than the sum of the budget authority amounts reserved by HUD for the projects in the ProVam from amounts authorized and appropriated by theCongress. D. Reduction of AMMMt Paya le HUD may reduce the amount payable by RUD for any project or for the Program, and may reduce the amount of the contract authority or budget authority forany project, by giving the PHA written notice of reduction in accordance with section 2.3 of this CAM The notice by HUD may include a revision of Exhibit I or II to state the reduction to the amount of contract authority or budget authorityforaproject. 8. CACC Reserve Ano +nt. A CACC reserve account shall be established and maintained by HUD, in an amount as determined by HUD consistent with its responsibilities under section 8(c.)(6) of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937. The CACC reserve account may be used by HUD for payment of any portion of the payment approved by HUD under section 1.4.B. for the Fiscal Year. F. Separate ACC_ HUD's commitment to make payments for each project listed in Exhibit ii shall constitute a separate ACC. A. The CACC consists of this CACC Part I (includingExhibitIand1I) and the form ACC Part lI prescribed by HUD for the Housing Certificate Program and HousingVoucherProgram, designated as form HUD 52520 E, and dated January, 1990. These documents constitute the whole CACC for the Program. ACC Part I: Page 5 of 6 pages HUD 52520 B (August 1988) B. This CACC supersedes any previous Annual Contributions Contract for the projects or Program. Matters relating to operation of the projects or Program under a previous Annual Contributions Contract shall be governed by this CACC.. Signatures: By Signature Date signed or type name and official title of sianatory '-- By Signature Date signed Minneapolis -St. Paul Office Print or type name and official title of signatory ACC Part I: Page 6 of 6 pages HW 52520 B (August 1988) ACC Part I Number: C-4070E PROJECT ACC LIST CONTRACT PROJECT ACC NEWER NUMBER AUTHORITY EFFECTIVE DATE M46-8170-001 C-78-209 123,648.00 08/12/77 NN46rE170-002 C-78-5878 76.,416.00 10/12/78 M46-8170-003 C-85-457 81,180.00 09/30/85 NN46-9170-001 C-78-209 123,.648.00) 08/12/77 April 21. 1992 Date signed Exhibit is Page I of —1_ pages HUD 52520 H (August 1988) ACC Part.I Number: C-40705. EXHIBIT II Projects A=Xonriated in Federal Fiscal Year +988 and Later Years Abbreviation: CA a Contract authority. z.4 v Budget authority. PROJECT CA BA FIRST DATE. LAST DATE UNIT NUMBER OF TERM OF TERM EMMK- BUlmCK M46-8170-901 $ 55,808.00 W46-8170-902 45,826.00 18146-6170-903 99,723.00 16146-6170-904 268,019.00 66-6170-901 (55,808.00) 6146-8170.902 (45,826.00) 46-8170-903 (99,723.00) 111,616.0009/21/88 06/30/90 91,652.00 09/21/88 06/30/90 299,169.00 06/01/89 06/30/91 268,019.00 07/01/91 06/30/92 111,616.00) 09/21/88 06/30/90 91,652.00) 09/21/88 06/30/90 . 299,169.00) 06/01/89 06/30/91 Date signed Exhibit II: Page _j_ of -a- pages HUD 52520 B (August 1988) ACC Part I Number: C-40708. EXHIBIT II Projects Ann opriated in Federal Fiscal Year 1988 and Later Years Abbreviation: CA a Contract authority. BA Budget authority. PROJECT CA BA FIRST DATE LAST DATE UNIT. NUMBER OF TERM OF TERM DM33m- B MW RRRNLB - 86 X 0194• 46-8170-006 304,767.00 1,523,935.00 08/01/92 07/32/97 1 8R Renewal) 2 BA ji 3 BR -, Date signed Exhibit II: Page _a_ of 2 pages HUD 52520 B (August 1988) 1" NEND CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: May 15, 1992 TO: HousingPFORPROPOSAL evelopment Authority Commission FROM: Charl d, Executive Director SUBJECT: REQUE - SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING CONSULTANT Even though the City Council has not acted on the HRA recommendation regardingmovingforwardwiththeSeniorCitizensPr:ject as of the. time this is dictated I have begun work on a "Request For Proposal" for the hiring of suchaconsultant. Dan Nelson of the City Attorney's office has supplied me an RFP format used for other Purposes but at least providing me the outline of sections o e RFP that typ ca ly used in situaTe similar to this (in facttheRFPformatthatIwassuppliedwasforwhatappearedtobea developer/turnkey proposal). I have modified the RFP - particularly the "Purpose" and "Required Services" sections - to fit what I perceive to be our needs. As you can see I have provided the consultant a rather limited time frame in which to provide responses. If this time frame is maintained we could be in a position tointerviewthefinalthreefirmsinJune. I am here anticipating that on JuneU-15at-the Authority would cut the field to three and likely schedule a special meeting very soon thereafter to do the interviews of the final three. As of yet this is simply a draft - with little or any pride of authorship - so I encourage the Commissioners to "have at it" to fit your needs and desires. hra/md/commission.5-18) R EST FOR PROPOSALS PLYIDUTH HOUSIMA W MDTVMGPMff AUTHORITY SENIOR HOUSING 1. PURPOSE The Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is requesting proposals from qualified firms to undertake consulting services to the HRA staff regarding the design, construction, and management of City - owned senior housing on a City -owned site in Plymouth. This site is located at the northeast corner of 37th Avenue North and Plymouth Boulevard. The roll of the consultant will be to act as an extension of the HRA staff to, under the direction of the Executive Director, undertake all necessary activities for the expedient and cost-efficient design, construction, and management of a senior citizen's housing facility ofatleast100unitsonthedesignatedsite. The consultant must be skilled and experienced in project coordination, project finance, construction design, constructionmanagement, and project operations management. The firm selected will serve as the initial project operations manager for at least two years followingcompletionoftheprojectconstruction. It is the intention of the NRA in hiring a consultant to augment existing staff resources specifically to bring in the necessary expertise and experience in design construction and management of a publicly financed senior citizens project.. All relationships with design and construction vendors will be strictly "arms -length" with regard to the consultant. This does not constitute a "design build" or turnkey venture and all relationships between the consultant retained by the HRA and vendors for design or construction services must be strictly "arms -length". 11. REQUIRED SERVICES The HRA anticipates the following broad outline of services will be required: I. Initial delineation of all steps and critical path from the current status to project move -in. A detailed project scheduling exerciseisrequired, with clear time line and critical path 5;aphirs against which to measure project performance. 2. Early project costing activity to establish financial requirements and enable early bonding activities in a favorable market. 3. Expedient project design to benefit from a favorable construction cost market. 4. Early and focussed project marketing and admission standards establishment to assure initial and continued occupancy by seniorsnowresidinginPlymouth. III. SUBMISSIOi1 REQUIREMERTS The following items must be submitted with all proposals: A. Firm Background 1. Brief history of the firm, size, expertise in various fields, and organization of owners and employees. B. Qualifications 1. State the firm's experience with multifamily housing, specifically senior housing. Describe the size, scope, and buaget/cost per unit, of similar projects previously completedandidentifytheownerandwhentheprojectswerecompleted. 2. State the firm's experience in working with various housing regulatory agencies on subsidized family housing developments. HUD, MHFA, FHA, other HRA' etc.) C. Personnel 1. State who will be in charge of this project and how the firm will perform the work internally and how the firm would propose to service the NRA. 2. Submit complete, up to date, resumes of the personnel. 3. Submit photos of the housing projects described in the firms experience. D. References 1. Submit a list of references/owners for whom the firm has performed a service and include telephone numbers. E. Time Frame - Commitment of Personnel I. State whether or not the firm is capable of assigning the above personnel to the project and proceeding immediately to meet favorable bonding and construction conditions. F. Deadline Two copies of a proposal for consulting services including all items listed in this section must be submitted to the following by4:30 p.m. on June 12, 1992: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority 3400 Plymouth Boulevard 612) 550 505055441 IV. SELECTION PROCESS The HRA will review proposals based upon the qualifications and references submitted. The HRA will then select a minimum of three firms for a further interview. The interview will include a general fee proposal. V. CONTRACT The HRA will select a firm from those interviewed and enter into a contract for consulting services for the Plymouth Senior Project. The construction project would be publicly bid or a negotiated contract. VII.INITIAL SELECTION CRITERIA A. Capability and capacity of the firm to meet HRA requirements and deadlines. B. Past experience; specifically subsidized senior housing. C. References; good references from previous clients and photos. D. Innovativeness in previous completed projects. VIIIJINAL SELECTION CRITERIA The final selection criteria will include the above items in addition to fee proposal. We will also consider ability to manage a project which, when bid, comes in within budget and allocated timing. conv:hra/rfp.sen) A NEW CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441 DATE: May 12, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of May 19, 1992 TO: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director FROM: Milt Dale; Housing Specialist "P SUBJECT: COBG PROGRAM - DEFINITION OF SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a resolution recommending to the Plymouth City Council of the definition of substantial change for the Community Development Block Grant (COBG) Program Activities. BACKGROUND: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires Entitlement ommunities to determine what they consider to be a "substantial change" in transferring funds by program activity during midyear of a Community Development Block Grant (COBG) Program cycle. This definition is to include a reference to the amount of funds or percent of the budget that would constitute a "substantial change". We have discussed this issue with HUD personnel but haveyet to ask for a recommendation from the Housing Authority prior to bringing the matter before the Plymouth City Council. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: In our previous experience with the CDBG Program, it is not every year that changes occur, but it is inevitable that some changes will be necessary from time -to -time depending upon demand and other factors. Normally such changes, if of a minor nature, could be transacted by staff. As example, during a program year it may appear that the City has more rehabilitation clients than it anticipated, but not a big demand for first-time homebuyer assistance. In that scenario, staff could transfer a limited amount of funding from the first-time homebuyer program to the rehab program. For these purposes, I would recommend that such a transaction be no more than 25,000. Should staff foresee that it be over that amount, there would be public notice; a recommendation would go to the Plymouth HRA; and, final approval by the City Council for the transfer of funds to another activity. In anycase, whenever there is a need to add or delete a Pmpram activit , action must be taken by the Plymouth City Council basedon tne HRA Commissioners recommendation. CONCLUSIONS AND RECONIO]IDATIONS: I recommend, for the purposes of the CDBG Program, the following definition of substantial change: For the purpose of transferring funds, a substantial change will be & fined as "addition or subtraction of more than $25,000. Substantial change would also occur if a new program activity is added or an approved program activity is d0eted." ATTACINENTS: I. Resolution to the HRA hra/md/cdbg.5-19) NRA RESOLUTION 92 - RESOLUTION recommended to the City Council a Definition of Substantial Change for use in the City's Community Development Block Grant Program WHEREAS, the Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority is ware of the need to transfer funds from one Community Development Block Grant (COBG) activitytoanotherbasedondemand, federal government rule changes, and/or other factors: and, WHEREAS, it is necessary that City staff be given guidelines as to what constitutes a substantial change in a program activity and would require apublichearingforsuchachange; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the Housing AuthorityrecommendsthePlymouthCityCounciiadoptthefollowingdefinitionforuse the potential transfer of CDBG funds from one program actvity to another: "A substantial change is the addition or subtraction of more than $25,000. Substantial change would also occur if a new program activity is added or an approved program activity deleted." Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority May 19, 1992. res/hra/cdbg) U MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: May 7, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of May 19, 1992 TO: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director FROM: Housing Specialist Milt Dale N f1 SUBJECT: SCATTERED SITE HOMEOWNERSHIP PROGRAM - PROGRESS REPORT ACTION REQUESTED: Information and status report on this program. BACKGROUND: At its last meeting in April, Commissioners were informed in an information memo that the Scattered Site First Time Homebuyer Program was in process. I indicated that First Time Homebuyer orientation meetings were to be held later that month to acquaint the first chosen applicants with the program. As of this writing, there have been a total of four First Time Homebuyer orientation meetings. The orientation meeting consists of a video showing prepared by our consultant based on previous videos developed by a realtor and a mortgage insurance agency. The video is approximately one hour long and the production, i.e. splicing and adding of titles and an introduction, was performed in-house through our Communications Coordinator. Along with the video showing, I explain to the first time homebuyers the various steps involved in the program taking them through a packet each one receives at the meeting. To date 30 families/individuals have attended an orientation workshop. The first group of 20 were required to obtain pre -mortgage approval by April 30, 1992. 19 of the 20 did meet that deadline, with cne family dropping out when they failed to attend an orientation workshop. Of the remaining 19, nine were disqualified due to a variety of reasons. Some disqualified themselves as they felt they could not purchase a house, even with City assistance, in the price range they desired. Others were disqualified by the mortgage lender because of too many debts. Two others were disqualified for incomes exceeding the income limits. To offset the loss of 10 C.f the initial 20 candidates, two More workshops were held to acquaint prospects with the program. Those prospects were taken from the next highest numbers picked in the drawing and are part ofthe "standby group". A total of 30 more applicants were provided certificates. Since that time another five applicants have either voluntarily removed themselves or failed to attend a workshop. The next deadline for the .first group will be on June 5, 1992, .when those persons will have to have executed a Purchase Agreement. The last date for closing on a property for this group is July 10, 1992. I will inform Commissioners at subsequent meetings on the progress of this program. hre/md/scat.5-19) 0- MEND o- MEND CITY OF PLYNDUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: May 14, 1992 TO: Hnusing and Redevelopment Authority Commissioners FROM: Milt Dale, Housing Specialist/W SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 11,,,, The following items are included for the Commissioners attention: a. U.S. Poverty PM9rams Log Mixed Surprising Record. Star Tribune articleofMay5. 1992gives an interesting overview or now well federally fundedprogramshavemetneedsofthepoor. b. America Needs a New Aaenda for Ending Poverty. Star Tribune CommentarypiecebyJackKemp, Secretary of HUD, g veshis program for endingpoverty. Unfortunately some programs have penalized people who want to work their way off welfare. c. Section 8 Summary Statistics Report 4/30/92 d. Section 8 Financial_ Report for Period 1/1/92 - 3/31/92 (Balance Sheet andOOperatingStatement. bra/md/info.5-19) 18A /May Bn992/NW TMh p Q • U.S. poverty programs log mixed, sy Art plea IasAogdaTistna Peru tut it has boostd their incng stamderds — by surprising recordWald. dandme Crary BuNe, a Brookings Institu- almost as etet lAt D.. The question Olay agar after last ewise could nm buy. To the contrary, government figures cask's riotiog in I.a Arngdet Has cbmevatira, on the other hand. the federal government tae enough D Ou tAe Aup ouWy of federal w combat poverty in toner ektles7 helped hurt? money, the govemmenfa programs 611HaveineRmuorstill shot of sewing all orim at:ninneedanddonmrealtya libe ds contend that the rima show provi I the economic ia=uves chat pro{mms have Elko behintd. needed — and the changes in indi- sed may doomed aha the povem• vidua4 behavior — to securejabs in mot launch a new "domestic Mar- inow4 ty areas dmg PWp anaul rbc president. W1 me for avher programs is Worm WW. it peoQemto Crary BuNe, a Brookings Institu- almost as etet lAt lain i 1y rai0mu oveneome eoomomte ggbt tion ee impact diders that assess ipnego theemimpsct fa derd1 foonlurverty To the contrary, government figures II be 7 37 ptsmnt: earned cbmevatira, on the other hand. hest `Most propama Poicasedr the pooventure at show that while spedin$ on poverty puma did tape off m the mid t9 it has soared during the inompe •k, up 37 percent: Lyng astnstanee, cep SS percent: that psa ams are s waste of moaay ad mete the shantiom worse achieve their ver so nt hast a limited deree add mit week. pastorayearsTheUnitedStatesspends cod other inoomeiavriry prueam26percaetTheHudStart 4 by 6reog people to stay on me dole cod by imtbolag them with a - el6ee None of (them) aehieres spectacular r wku — but speetaadar results an. about 5210 billion on poverty pro- gum; up sena 23 percent from the ta up 127 peramt. menWity" thnt emBooteg the bresk- ofena ne, eUflintlt Bo a hieve." levels offixa61989. Just how well these programa have up d familia cod a pub totrand marc crime The effort is substantial. The United Pan of -the reason :tem: from the worked is a mutter of perspauve. Conservatives contend that the digi- Sma mole than 5240 bil- eaestion, which lase left more peoplewithoutjobsandmadethemeligible bility rules in ttte welfare programButsCloserlookatthefaIgov- mro es dbift in recent yeah lion in grants and ober subsidies under 73 pngmms, nq ft from food a live welfare and other aid. the breakup of familiesC = 12 of L ofwad shows s enticed end a this, surprises M o16 a ash payments Bo sumps end Medtioni I ning. cid foedam- Sipa President John Kennedy talked W. and dt rage liberalsf about a rising tide lilting all boats. successors has held jobs. t hes attuleast put brad Wbik wee n oe the slowed wbpaoWlly in the mid-1980s, it Iwo Perhaps the most widely known — thethe bcshsis poverty is a on the table far the needy. smell cpm in the past few yam — and criticized — is the welfare syr economy. almostehrivimogeawre, tlteeconomyhn doneanym Crines y there we Borne serious paNybecau ofpsopamssoeoushst the epacv of We reoe ine, but ebo tam, y Aid to Familia with t Ckildrem (AFDC). It pro, under Bush than under any usher president sirtoe World War 11. Bair in perms. The gponvRm'ng AFDC, for ample, limit bi of amt n ling and congrea- rides rash payments, mainly wain. fedenl welfare pp eymenuIer I Blood action to incase the number dpeopk coved gk wusen with low incomes who alto save as bads of bourhdd. In his first three years in the White male heads of hoosehoW and oykemr programs arch n Medicaid are patty Despite the to about ceding AIBo providing acus income an the House. the economy grew only 1.8 percent afltr =% for inflation linked to AFDC. SocietytheGreatSoeiey programs of the Farmed Ionone Tix Credit wh(eh Even if the dmtinismalion s forecastforsgrowththisyear. 2.3 percent As s result Rohan MDR t. BrownI%ik the r Cutbacks over the pest 12 yen bwe involved only a proridn a ash payment to woekiog Emilia with chhiiWircn, and thein= with tyoan out m be serrate. the four- Umivenity poverty speetslistpointslist. out am on ylaY6wtwoomem6m - programs workinall ddes i°0deethe 0111)W% additional be far amd away ft t sinee benefits,andtiveevimg: publiooerv doing fir the di!abled. u'u few6quuailify for o d l tttimtne payments egad will food stamps or Medicaid. ore u o eve unusual actino grants. The mrmwftofjob appohmitia in loner do in recent yea has bed am to do with Uta maadanmmne 40ir e>omhat poverty. Altholib same polieia, such in dWbiUty woks for wd6re peyroedt dearly dswurap job hoWiag e 5mih eolesiveaep, aoalysu y teat ded programs lure attiievd their limited scab — that is. they have emh. orreos with did A second category plans ria prom people with voxhesa btry goods or wiles — such as food sump! for gromMea, Medicaid to pay vphystcnan and hospital biW, and hosting and energy aid AB. such as AFDC, are limited to the poor. There Oho arc a half-dameo programa m Help fluence education end mein- ieg for children from poor families rico Had art for preschool youngsters ro faderol aid for ekmeo- tory aM high school ptnp,b sod ed loans for oolkAe st-udena One of the myth about spending for antipoverty efforts is the suggestion that a has ban cut back arerely Wbik $Mlmdm thew the the fad• from the Great Society days and that eel elrot h mm (maasd the in- ntgjor Dcrmotrnk prgnm all have comes of the poor significantly, m been grated either by Congress or the Looked imereated at mother way, the number ofjobs by only theca -teems of I paif can from the Bose Bush became peesident throgh MarCA. Even the ecamoeny pidn up this year. the tatal Dumber of anted ren his tam will be less than half the wont previous bur year vert. But much of the spending ineresse also rclkeu anion by Congress and the courts, which have extended benefits to more people than quali- fied before. Ftq'r published yeaer- day by the Olfwe of Management and Budget show that overall assis- tance for low-income families will have soared by 82 percent between fiscal 1989 and 1993 — with Medi- caid spending up 144 percent, welfare payments up 82 percent and outlays for food stamps up li4 percent. At the same time, most analysts agree that federal programs designed to I pnpsrc poor people for the job maker here bad a ranted elect. providiap some marginal help in the as of aogle women, but — ionpli. cably — little for inner-city men. Thin report Ioeldo hdbrmtm 60 the New York T7mea Convnentary Todq oar .udlore pnwiAas wu! • M3 6, Iqq Z in . of Ametaas ante just Oman aa16 to beep their beds hors Star TribKW>r ' 'ab—s PV-va ta . homa' se°°s OWEMS ilimour- et awok h America needsIL subd- t ai0a iooealivcs acrd a8haea the a neve a coda we amg1 m for ending povertyAir*= `== Bir those peapb arho verb, asve and avast !Cour rmerell,i"as Rad" Most oto the poo1ang haohn- W Aatericaos tewi- AM last wed, l vu by the We') in the strops of los 7W 11111 thing 1 did was to aIT l os Mayor Tom HeVa "Now maybe Copperas ' n pass the enmpriso-zome bin and get some jobs Tato the inner dry.~ Enerpile tots alone aro not the whole Cure But Bradley's statement struck the theme for the deeper enwmesssle emelsiog Som the streets of s miner cities. When ppeopppl lack jobs. opporomity and ovine -P ofproperty. they have little or no Make m thnr commumtles. This is recitely who undermines respect the law and eouroges dia.•gard other people's property. There an be no excusing wanton knoe, lawlessness and dessrtuction df life and and the p CW dem has acteddeasivdy to end tb•: imare6y. He has empotreled a Bxkral 1!!d jury to investigate a potrntial lnncarnye of jussia in the beating of Radaey King Butotos pane Mdie violems: by arestored, we most addopt ng a am spuds for eadmS the poverty that keeps too may in. ner city latdents in hopdess- tuess and despair. 0.: can't perma- lendy rely on polio, troops and the fdational Guard to defend Commt2 tift when people have stake to is, ldse but the ehiAa otftbeir backs, to Elimirtatiag the tax onta pins n !aterprise ante would inner dtia with capita and help crate ownership, entrepreneurship and In the "State of Block America," John Jambe poims more than 14mmbonae a nationwide blacks own only about 450,000. Black Americans represent mora than 12 percent of the pop da - tion, yet Control only one-half of 1 percent of the nation's Capita sock. A zero capita saint rate for those who live, work and invest in inner Cities cannot by itself erase poverty, bot it cam crate opportunity acid prosperity w-6ere today ehero is virtttaly none. We cannot afford to resort to the bureaucratic, government redistribu- donist solutions that B kined Watts in the 19Wx. Instead, govesanent must break down the barriers to own- t:iship, job creation and esmeme. worship from East Harlem to est Las Angeles. Uldmaft it's not the amount of money ase spend, but bow we spend economicc not work. ers, savers and enaepleneuss. 1 was impressed to bar laiden lead, ell in some of the I.A. neigh- borhoods tell me tin ptuMic:- ing where residents are manasiasheirowncommunitiesandCaw stadins therewas no property detnage lisaI should orae as no smpnte Whin ople have a stabs in their they but lP Sinner the 1%5 Watts riots, we've w more than US Wine flod" CmW at all levels of government. the U10c to & is that ager urban riots pivamizod the Bat 'bar on poverty." tp° bas.go- homanwnnlhip dwindled, Crime. drop and Bundy breakup have inereated. cam tax credit. dirq. tae to rule often ta for recipientsr who join the work Bice. Repalio{ eke lair prohibits Y opw Moeoplpovertye wgakouldtk d s• limit to slow0w hr poor pen- pk wko m saving for a home. w send their ehildlea to College or to start a buooeas. Slap subsidWn family breakup acrd reward Bunnies that stay tCseth- er. Expandinghomestadins in ud m areas o embodied m the praidem's HOPE initiatiivey H People veryip- when HOPE would allow public housing residents to recapture the American Dream of homeownafhip by ata n -a their own Communities ultimatelyandowningtheirown We mast dsscard the arikd buran trade model Bu S htins and instead enpower uadivrfiaon- aul their fives through the power of property ownership and entrap% As a nation, we most make a Burda. menta ch=op in Course to basin to and bnug Amen oJack f 01 log arm Urban pthe j)n. menti wrote this artidtfa Me Wash- in" Jost. iob•I OSUMMAf .Y STATISTICS REPORT DATE.: .04./.30./9 SELECTION CRITERIAc ALL TENANTS WERE INCLUDED I. HEAD OF -HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION. (% OF ALL HEADS IS IN PARENTHESES) A.`THEPE ARE 127 HEADS'OF HOUSEHOLD. (MAYBE MORE THAN 1 IN A UNIT.) THERE ARE 127 HOUSEHOLDS. F. AGE. UNDER 30 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80(.+) NO: 45 54 13 1 3 6 5 PCT:. -.3S.4 42.5 10.2 0.8 2.4 4.7 3..9 AVERAGE AGE: 36..2 C. SEX: MALE.: 16 C 12.6) FEMALE: 111 C 97.4) D. srhGL= PARENT HEAD -OF -HOUSEHOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED: MALE:. 2 ( 1.6) FEMALE: 95 ( 74.8) E.,ELDERLY HEAD -OF -HOUSEHOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED: OBR 1BR 2BP. 38R 4BR 5+BR NOe 0 18 11 0 O 0 PCT: 0.0 14.2 8.7 0.0 0.0. 0.0 F. NON-EL,DE!•'.I_Y HEAD--CF--HOUSEHOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED: OBR IBR 2Br QBR 4BR S+Be NO: 0 4 Se 14 0 0 PCT: 0.0 0.0 69.3 7.9 0.0 0.0 e. RACE/ETHNICITY: WHITE: 107 C 84.3) BLACK: :;. 15 ( 11.6) AMER IND/ALASKAN NATIVE: 3 ( 2.4) ASIAN!PACIF ISLANDER:' 1 •( 0,87 OTHER: 1 C 0:8) c HISPANIC: 0 c. 0.0) NON -.HISPANIC: 127 (104.0)' H. MISCELLANEOUS: 62 YRS.OP OLDER: 14 ( 11.0) HANDICAPPED: 14 ('11.0) DISABLED:. 1 C 0.8) FULL: -TIME STUDENT (j8 +): T C O.8) NONE. OF THE ABOVE: 98 C 77.2) PHA Manager 3.40 (086-91 CITY OF PLYMOUTH c SUMMARY STATISTICS REPORT Ccnnt): Date: 04/30/72 Page: 2 11. ALL .MEMBERS CO'IPOSITION: CPC«T IS .PCT. ,OF -ALL MEMBERS) A. THERE ARE 318 MEMBERS. B. AGE: 0-12 13-17 18-29 30--39 40--49 50-59 60-69 70-79 .80(+) i55 18 55 60 13 1 3 7 6 48.7 5.7 17.3 10.9 4.1 0.3 019 2.2 1.9 AVERAGE AGE: 20:1 C. SEX: ALL - MALE: 112 C 35.2) ADULTS - MALE: 28 C 0.8) 18 +) FEMALE: 206 C 64.8) FEMALE: 117 C 36.8) D. RACE/ETHNICITY-- WHITE: 255 80.2) BLACK: 4C 14.5) AMER IND/ALASKAN NATIVE. 11• 3.5) ASIAN/PACIF ISLANDER:. 3C 0,9) OTHER: r 3 C 0.9) HISPANIC: 0 ( 0..0) NON -HISPANIC: 313 000.0) E. MISCELLANEOUS: 62 YR9 OR OLDER: IE C 5•.0) HANDICAPPED: 14 C 4.4) DISABLED: 1 0.3) 1FULL-TIME ST.a?DL.IiT ( 18 +) : 1 0. ^) NONE OF THE ABOVE: 287 90.3) F. FAMILY SIZE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 D 9 10 11 (+) NO: 19 49 40 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT: 15.0 38.6 31.5 11.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE: 2.5 G. RELATIONSHIP CODE: (AVG IS AVG PER HOUSEHOLD) HEAD SPOUSE ADULT DEPEN FOSTER LIVE-IN OTHER N0: 127 8 10 172 0 1 0 AVO.: 1..00 0.06 0.03 1.35 0.00 0.01 0.00 PHA Manager 3.40 (r)86-91 * CITY OF PLYMOUTH SUMMARY STATISTICS REPORT (cont): Date: 04/330/92 Page: III: INCOME/EXPENSES: A. INCOME BREAKDOWN: (INCOME BEFORE ADJUSTMENTS) UNDER 2500•• 50CD- 7500- 10000= 1 500- 15000- S '25oo 4999 7499 9999 12499 14999 174.99 17500(+) NO: e 7 61 20 9 13 5 4 PCT: 6.3 5.5 40.0 15.7 7.1 10.2 3.9 3.1 AVERAGE INCOME: $ 8029 AVERAGE INCOME AFTER ADJUSTMENT.;; $ 6901 B. INCOME SOURCES: (AVG IS AVERAGE FOR TRAT ITEM) PUBLIC WELF WAGES ASCF' IST CNSION ASSETS OTHER RENT LDS WITH: 31 71 25 18 18 0 PERCENT: 24.4 55.9 19.7 14.2 14.2 0.0 AVS AMOUNT: 11440 5819 6989 207 4072 0 C. INCOME CATEGORIES AT MOVE --IN:. INCOME CATEGORIES AT REEXAM: VERY LOW INCOME; 53 ( 41.7). VERY LOW INCOME: 80 ( 63.0) LOWER IPJ'ZQ.ME: 0 ( 0.0} LOWER INCOME: 3 ( ^.4) OVER INCOME.» 0 ( 0.0) r1U:R INCOME: 0 ( 0..0) EXCEPTIONS: LOWER INC_. FAMILTES REQUIRING LI EXCEPTIONS; 0 D. RENTS (Averages; per Household, except for URF; TOTAL TENENT PAYMENT; 172.9 TENANT RENT: 149.3 HOUSING A-SISTANCUE PAYMENT: 359.2 UTILITY RLIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT:********* (Avg for only Hshlds with URF) SECURITY DEPOSIT: 104.5 E. EXPENSES: (AVG IS AVG PER HOUSEHOLD WTTH THAT *TEM) FHA Manager 3.40 (c)86--91 * CITY OF PLYMOUTH HANDOP DEPEN ELDERLY MEDICL CHCARE OTHER ASSIST DEDUC DEDUCHSLDSWITH: 14 16 0 0 95 28 PERCENT: 11.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 74.0 22. n AVG AMOUNT: 1082 2_623 0 n 788 400 FHA Manager 3.40 (c)86--91 * CITY OF PLYMOUTH SUMMARY STATISTICS REPORT (cant): Dote: 04/30/91 Page: IV. UNITS/CERTIFICATESIVOUCHERS (PCT in from units. on file exc6pt where noted' A. UNIT REPORT: (Calculated only if report includes a single project) UNITS ON FILE: 0 OBR 1$R' _BP 3BR 4BR 5+8R 1. UNITS IN ACC: 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.0) C 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) 2. LEASED. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0..0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) r 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) 3. OUTSTANDING 0 0 0 0 .0 0 OR EXTENDED: ( 0.0) ( 4.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ! 0.0) C 0.0) 4. BALANCE (OVER 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNDER ACC:: ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0)' ( 0.0) B. PROGRAM UTILIZATION: (Inr_iudes ALL units. Use rpt #13 for more detail.) PCT OF NUMBER PERCENT UNITS TOTAL ISSUED/ UTIL.1- AVAIL. AVAIL. LEASED ZATION SECTION 3 CERT: a 89.9 125 94.0 SECTION a MR: '0 0.0 0 0.0 VOUCHER: 1 I1.? 2 GE.7 PUBLIC HOUSING 0 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL: 9 100.0 `7 93,4 C. GROSS RENT UNDER 200 200-2.39 300399 400-499 500-599 600-699 700+ NO: 7 0 0 10 96 7 7 PCT: 5.5 0.0 0.0 7.9 75.6 5.5 5.5 AVERAGE GROSS :SENT: 532.1 D. CONTRACT RENT. UNDER 200 200-299 300-099 400-499 500-599 600-699 700+ NO: 7 0 C 17 94 4 5 PCT: 5.5 0.0 1). 1) 13.4 74.0 2.1 3.9 AVERAGE CONTRACT RENT: 503.5 E. UTILITY ALLOWANCE UNDER 25 25-49 50-74 75-99 100-124 125-143 150+ NO: 75 50 0 2 .0 0 0PCT: 59.1 39.4• 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVERAGE UTILITY ALLOWANCE: 23.6 PHA Manager 3.40 (_)96-91 * CITY OF PLYMOUTH SUMMARY STATISTICS REPORT (cant): V. LEASING INFORMATION: TOTAL A. LEASE -IN-PLACE FAMILIES;, I Date: 04/20/92 Page.. ELDERLY NON-ELDEP.LY 1 (10010) 0 ( '0.0) B. CERTIFICATE/VJUCHER SIZE VS ACTUAL UNIT SIZE: ACTUAL SIZE: C. EXCEPTION RENTS FOR CERTIFICATES: OBp IRR 2BR 3BR 4BR S+BR OBR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 CERTIF/ IPR: 0 1e 0 0 0 0 VOUCHER 2BR: 0 0. 99 0 0 0 SIZE: 3BR: 0 0 0 10 0 0 4BR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 S+BPs 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. EXCEPTION RENTS FOR CERTIFICATES: D. COMPARISON OF GROSS RENT TO rMRS: OBR IBP BR 3BR 45R 5•: BP•. 10% EXCEPTION AUTHORIZED: 0 0 0 0 0 0 207 EXCEPTION AUTHORIZED: 0 0 0 0 0 0 ANNUAL ADJ. FACTOR APPLIED: 0 0 2 t 0 0 CUP.R'NT OR OVER FMRs 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-.0% OVER FMR. 0 0 C 0 0 0 10-20% OVEP FMR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 MORE THAN 20% OVER FMR! 0 0 0 0 0 0 D. COMPARISON OF GROSS RENT TO rMRS: E. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHOSE GrOSC RENT EXCEEDS PAYMENT STD: OBR IBP 2BR 3B;? 4BR 5+.BRVOUCHER: 0 0 2 0 0 n AVaRAGE % OVER PS: 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHOSE GROSS PENT EXCEEDS PAYMENT STD: 2 F. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHO, BECAUSE THEIR GROSS PENT IS LESS THAN PAYMENT STANDARD, RECEIVE A SAVINGS: OBR IBR 2BF. 3BR 4BR 5+BF. VOUCHER: 0 0 0 0 0 0 AVERAGE SAVINGS: 0.0 0.0 0.0 r.0 0.0 0.0 NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES RECEIVING SAVINCC: 0 PHA Manager 3.40 (05E-91 * CITY OF PLYMOUTH OBR IBP 2BR 3BR 49R 5+BP.. CURRENT FMRE (AVG): 1 5,2E 613 774 0 0 OR ? 1.1xFMR.. 0 0 1 0 0 0 GR ? FMR < 1..ixFMR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 OR = FMR: 0 9 11 3 0 0 OR ? .9xFMR < FMR: 0 4 38 4 0 0 OR { .9xFMR: 0 5 47 3 0 0 TOTAL: 0 a 97 10 0 0 E. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHOSE GrOSC RENT EXCEEDS PAYMENT STD: OBR IBP 2BR 3B;? 4BR 5+.BRVOUCHER: 0 0 2 0 0 n AVaRAGE % OVER PS: 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHOSE GROSS PENT EXCEEDS PAYMENT STD: 2 F. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHO, BECAUSE THEIR GROSS PENT IS LESS THAN PAYMENT STANDARD, RECEIVE A SAVINGS: OBR IBR 2BF. 3BR 4BR 5+BF. VOUCHER: 0 0 0 0 0 0 AVERAGE SAVINGS: 0.0 0.0 0.0 r.0 0.0 0.0 NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES RECEIVING SAVINCC: 0 PHA Manager 3.40 (05E-91 * CITY OF PLYMOUTH SUMMARY STATISTICS REPORT (cont): G. UNIT TYPES: SINGLE FAMILY: DUPLEX: GARDEN: HIGHRISE: TOWNHOUSE: H. HOUSING 'TYPES: LEACED IND GROUP PESInCNCE: 0 COfs :=?ATE: 0 MOBILE' HOME nAD: 0 SINGLE ROOM OCCUP: 0 SHAPED HOUSTMG: 0 RENTAL REHAB: 0 PROJ SELF SUFFIC: n OVER SSUED: 0 FLAGGED: 0 OTHER: 0 I: TURNOVER: r_xRT AVG TIMES USED/LEASED: 0.03 J. CANCELLATIONC OF CERT/VOUCHER. OVERINCOMEe HOUSING NOT LOCATED: NO LONGER INTERESTED: OTHER SUBSIDY: OBLIGATION UNMET: TERMINATED BEFORE 60 DAYC% OTHER: K. NAP/LEASE CANCELLATIONS: OWNER UNCOOPERATIVE: TENANT UNDESIRABLE: TENANT DECEASED: NO LONGER IRI JURISDICTION: NO LONGER INTERESTED: SUBSTANDARD HOUSING: NO LONGER ELIGIBLE: SALE OF PROPERTY: PHA INITIATED: OTHER: L. OWNER DATA: OWNERS W/CONTRACTS: FAMILIES UNDER LEASE: AVG FAMILIES PFR OWNER: WHITE: BLACK: AMER IND/AUASKAN NATIVE: ASIAN/PACIF ISLANDER: OTHEP- Date: 04/30/92 Page: 6 2 f. 1.6) 3 C, 2.4) 122 ( 96.1) 0 ( 0.0) 0 r, 0,0) h!nT I_CASfiU 0 0 0 1) 0 0 n 0 0 0 MOD REH VOUCHER PUB HOUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 ( 0.0) 0 ( 0.0) 4 (100.0) 0 ( 0.0) 0 C 0.0) 0 ( 0.0) 0 ( 0.0) 0 ( 0,0) 0 [. 0.0) 0 C ?.0) 0 ( 0.0) 2 (10n.0) 0 ( 0.0) 0 ( 0.0) 0 ( 0.0) 0 0.0) 0 ! 0.0) THIS REPOPT 23 127 5.52 0 ( 0. rl ) 0 ( 0.0) 0 ( 0.0) 0 ( 0.0) r, ( 0.0) ALL OWNERS 23 1.'x.7 0 ( 0.0) 0 ( 0.0) 0 ! 0.0) 0 ( 0.0) 0 ( 0.0) PHA Manager 3.40 (C)SG• 91 * CTTY OF P'. 'Y7!JTh1 JL 5080 PLYMOUTH NRA SECTIGN 6 elf C3 INDICATES CREDIT AMOUNT) PAGE 1 COMPILATION G NINE MONTHS - MARCH 319 1992 ,D A- DESCRIPTION PERIG3 ani T3 OAU AMT BUDGET AMT OVER KAI AU e epee• JNafR V, `'..ASSETS' _ 1111.1 GENERAL FUND CASH 1117 PETTY CASH TOTA 54.359.26# 00 81.577.30 00 a 00 00 t'19577.30 00 sa- LA `RECEIVABLE 1125 ACCOUNTS R 1129 ACCOUNTS REC. OTHER TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 01.1 39625.92* 00 GO 00 00 00 00 1162.GEN.FUNO INVESTMENTS 00 00 00 00 1211 PREPAID INSURANCE 1290 OTHER DEFERRED CHARD TOTAL DEFERRED AR 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 LAND, .STRUCtUiES & EQUIP. 1475.1.OFFICE F RN L EQ. 01) 3,219.97 1,219-07 1473.7 AUTOMOTIVE EQUIP. TOTAL LANDS STRUCT i EQ. J0 00 00 39213.97 00 00 00 39219.97 1690,.4NOISTRIBUTW OESITS TOTAL ASSETS 00 00 A4,717-27 00 aa 00 gLqZQj_27 DESCRIPTION BALANCE SHEET r<rnuuln "KA 4r_ fluN 5 X C* :NDICAT:S CREDIT AMOUN7) PA -3-2 2 e MONTHS - MARCH 519 .1992 PERI33 AMT TO OAT: AMT BUDGES AMT OVER UNDER F;°`:•,::LIABILI;fIESS: SURPLUS a i..:i,,CCb "•T ' F# A, 2111 VENDOR 6 CONTRACTORS 00 00 00 00 s s 2117.1 FEDERAL INC TAX YM 00 00 00 00 s 2117.2 SOCIAL SECURITY YM s 7 •211:7:..3 STATE-.INC;TAX WN. 00 00 00 00 s e .2117:4$=NEACTN.INS¢MN. 00 00 00 00 11 s 2 11.7:S INSURANC N' 12 102117.8 RETIREMENT YN 07 00 00 00 13 11 2118 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE MUD 00 00 00 00 .s t1: 2119 OTHER ACCOUNTS PAY. 30 1 I1a211.9.1':ACCT.PAT -:CITY 00 00 00 00 " 1• TOTAL -ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00 00 00 00 .s Its 2 ls 2210 PREPAID ANNUAL CONTR 2E9:JO.O i 3429819.006 00 34299:3 -JO* , 17 162290 OTHER DEFERRED GRED. OJ 000 00 23 00 20 2690 UNDISTRIBUTEO,CREOIT 00 00 00 zc 00 7 1' r: 2e 2700 INC 6 EXP CLEARING 8393'79.1+ 3579436.64 4309296.00 729691.36* ?' z. 32 s SURPLUS 33 z6Z840 UNR.ESERVED.SURPLUS 00 398919884.44 239157.00 396749727.44 3b 7 2826 =RES ;'SURPLUS -OPER RES 00 9 46 3G ze2827 RES SURPLUS-PROJ AGC 00 1659970.776 00 1689870.77* 37 zs 2840 CUR. MUD CONTRIB. 00 397329233.64:1 4539455.006 392789778.64* as TOTAL SURPLUS 00 99 3?6 9 6 430,29B4O0* o 1 TOTAL .LIAB..R SURPLUS 519799.19 d49797.2 76 00 849797.276 s PROOF 30 00 00 00 a 7 e 9 7. 3 1 s 4c...a..n . CA %. &mW&uAIci VA Yah A1YVNI/ r -Aur i MINE FROWTHS NAR M 319 1992 DESCRIPTION PERIZO------ TEAR TO ]ATE ---- BUDGET------ CHANGE OPERATINGSTATEMENT PUM AM9UNT PUN AMOUNT PUN AMOUNT x30:00-E3T+INA,TE0ADMIN .FEE 47.35 49119.T5 45.59. 359700.09 00 00 i z 359700.09 a AF 6 OPERATING INCOME 6 3300 INTER R s 3301_•RONIN F•EE •INCOME 1-7.86 19554.230 9.54 79467.916 00 00, 79467.916 3610.-INT,GEN PUND:INVEST 2.50 217.310 3.18 29490.510 00 00 29490.510 a 9 3690:OTM R, N OME 00 1. la TOTAL OPERATING INCOME 20.36 19771.340 12.72 9vl58.426 00 00 99958.423 La OPERATING EXPENSES.. a ADMINISTRATION. 110 ADMIN. SALARIES 52.63 49579.60 32.99 259633.08 42.07 439926.00 189092.920 .• 164 E 'EXPENSE 00 2-00 13 49.32 00 00 164140 STAFF TRAINING 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 174150 TRAVEL 00 0.3 00 00 00 00 00 a 104170 ACCOUNTING 00 0_122 SSa.00 eo ee 1641.71 AUDIT 17.24 19501.00 1.92 19500.00 48 00.00 19000.00 r, 4180 OFFICE'RENT.00 00 00 00 00 00 00 X4190 SUNDRY ADMIN EXPENSE 98 35 IA22Y91.65 17 140.00 771 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 70.35 69153.60 37.47 i9331b.05 42.7.3 4.9606.00 159267.350 GENERAL EXPENSE. a s4510.INSURANCE 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 `` 4530.TERNINAL-LEAVE PAY. 00 00 00.00 00 00 00 3 74540 EMPLOYEE BEM.'-CONTR 0. @4590 OTHER GENERAL EXPEN. 00 00 00.00 00 00 00 ' 64591 ADMIN PORTABILITY 16.15 19403.39 2.65 29078.15 00 00 29078.15 3 TOTAL GENERAL EXPENSE 26.S3 2.307.69 12.68 9.929.15 0a 00 99924-13 MOUSING ASSIST: -PAYMENTS 4715:1.HAP-OCCUPIED UNITS 943.80 82@110.d4 S 4715.2 NAP -VACANT UNITS 00 00 00 00 00 0000 4715.3 MAP-OMG/UNPO RENT 3.90 331.60 43 339.60 00 00 339..50 , 4715.4 UTILITY ALLOWANCE 00 00 0 00 00 0 4715.5 NAP-PaRTABILITY 60.36 59251.006 87.02 99134.706 00 00 689134.706 TOTAL MOUSING ASSIST. PAY687.3S 779199.44 417.34 32:9776.86 369.44 3859692.00 589915.140 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE 984.72 959670.72 467.49 3659044.06 412.16 4309298.00 649253.940 s