HomeMy WebLinkAboutHousing & Redevelopment Authority Packet 07-21-1992PLYMOUTH
HRA
REPORTS
MEETING
OF
JULY 219 1992
AGENDA
PLYMOUTH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
July 21, 1992 at 6:30 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes from June 16, 1992 meeting
3. Interview of Consultants for Senior Citizen Housing Project
a. Stuart Corporation at 6:30 p.m.
b. Walker Management, Inc. at 7:15 p.m.
c. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. at 8:00 p.m.
4. Information Items
a. Section 8 Statistical Report for June 30, 1992
b. Section 8 Financial Report for Period 7/1/91 - 5/31/92
s 5. Other Business
6. Adjournment
hra/agenda.7-21)
0
11
MBBO
CITY OF PLYN DTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: July 16, 1992
TO: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director
FROM:. Milt Dale, Housing Specialist /Mrs
SUBJECT: INTERVIEW. OF THREE CONSULTING FIRMS PROPOSING TO COORDINATE
DEVELOPNENT OF SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING IN PLYMOUTH
At its meeting of July 14, 1992, HRA Commissioners agreed to interview three
consulting firms listed below:
1. 6:30 p.m. - Stuart Corporation, represnted by Kristen Larson Rieser
2. 7:15 p.m. - Walker Management, Inc., represented by Janet Lindbo or
David Grant
3. 8:00 p.m. - Westwood Professional Services, Inc., represented by Dick
Krier
Representatives of these three firms have all been contacted and told the time
and place of the meeting. I encourage all Commissioners to attend this
important meeting.
Commissioners wanted the presentation portion for each consultant to be 30
minutes. The remainder of the time could be held open for questions and
answers. It is my suggestion that several basic questions be asked of all
consultants to form a consistent frame of reference. Suggested questions are
as follows:
1. What do you foresee as the biggest challenge in developing seniorhousinginPlymouth?
2. List the next several steps you would take should you be chosen as
the consultant for this project.
3. What innovations would you bring to this project?
Commissioners discussed at their last meeting that if there was no strong
consensus among the Co®issioners for a specific firs, some of the other firms
would be invited to a future. interview.
Attachments:
1. Letter to Three Finalists
2. Letter to Remaining Consulting Fires
hra/md/sencons)
July 15: 1992 bcwo
Mr. Richard Krier
PLYMOM
Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
14180 Trunk Hwy 5
Eden Prairie. HN 55344
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. PLYIOUTH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR SENIOR HOUSING
Hr. Krier:
I am pleased to advise you that at its meeting July 14, 1992 the,Plymou•.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority selected your fias one of three ,
are invited to participate in a presentation/
Intco
presentation/Interview before the Houslai and
Redevelopment Authority at their meeting of July 21, 1992. The three firms
that will make presentations to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority were
chosen .rom a group of 11 that had submitted proposals. Both the staff and
the HRA observed that all 11 proposals wereexcellent and that the three
selected --yours among them --presented the most complete response to the RFP as
recemmermded by the staff based on the quantitative analysis conducted
Independently by two staff members.
The presentation/interviews with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority will
begin at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 21, 1992..The interviews/presentations
will be at 45 minute intervals. The HRA expects no more than a 30 minute
presentation, thereby allowing at 15 minutes for questions and answers from
the Authority and/or staff. The interviews/presentations will be scheduled in
alphabetical order of the firms selected, as follow:
1. Stuart
2. Walker Management
3. Westwood
In its evaluation of the it proposals presented staff made a number of
observations to the HRA with regard to the responsiveness of those proposals
to the RFP. Of particular note, and to guide you in your presentations an
July 21, were the following observations:
1. While the Plymouth HRA has no staff of its own it does contract with the
City of Plymouth. for staff services through the Community Development
Department. The Camnity Developmmint Director also serves as the
Executive Director of the HRA.
The primary representative of the NRA to the consultant will be the
Executive Director (Plymouth Community Development Director). The
consultant will undoubtedly join the Executive Director at HRA meetings
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE 1612) 5505000
Page Two, Senior Housing
from tine to tine. It is important to realize that the consultant will
be dealing on a day-to-day basis, with the Executive Director. It is
important to understand that the consultant will be functioning as an
extension of the HRA staff as an alternative to the NRA (through its
contract with the City) bringing a staff person on board with experience
in senior housing.
2. The Request For Proposal specifically requested the consultant to specify
appropriate points in the project velopment process where the project
could be terminated or at least ut on hold for a period of time. Few of
the respondents did an adequate lob in addressing this wetter and you
should plan on advising the NRA as to how you would handle this concept
during your presentation on July 21.
Please feel free to contact Nilt Dale at 550-5056 or myself at . J-5059
arding the questions you y have cn csrning the upcoming
In erviews/
my
with the NRA. The presentation/interview will take
place in the City Council Chambers at the Plymouth City Nall. If you have
special audiovisual needs please contact us enough in advance so we can make
the proper arrangements.
Sincerely.
2045.40ergua'
Ceaunity Development Director
ag:hra/cd/sen.rfp.2:jw)
July 15, 1992
Mr. Nilliam S. Meyers
Elim Care, Inc.
3131 Fernbrook Lane N., 0100
Plymouth, MN 55447
SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REQUEST --REQUEST
FOR PROPOSALS FOR SENIOR HOUSING CONSULTING SERVICES
Dear Mr. Meyers:
At its meeting July 14, 1992 the Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority
considered the staff recommendations regarding the 11 proposals that had been
received by the City of Plymouth concerning the captioned, including one from
your firs. Both Mr. Dale of my staff and myself had independently evaluated
each of the 11 proposals for general responsiveness to the RFP plus the
factors of consideration that were mentioned in the RFP. Ilhile our
quantitative results were combined and presented to the HRA as a singular
recommendation, we believe it serves as a validation of our efforts that the
Individual evaluations were nearly identical as well.
Following the review of the staff recommendation, the Nousinp and
Redevelopment Authority suggested that three firms be invited to make
presentations to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its meeting July
21, 1992. as follow:
1. Malker Management
2. Stuart Corp.
3. Mestwood
The staff, in .making its recom mmiation to the Mousing and Redevelopoent
Authority, and the HRA in mmkirlg its determination as to who would be
Interviewed of the groups submitting proposals, both observed tbat all
proposals submitited wwggere of high quality from firms that likely would be
o. Interview three
of thee11 reallyresutted
ithe
n a logisticalddecison that only the very best of
any very good proposals should be considered further at this timet.
very
The INA did, however, direct staff to advise all 11 fires submitting proposals
that should, based on the interviews of next week, a firm is not found to be
acceptable from that roup, additional interviews with others submitting
proposals may be s uled in the future. I will obviously be in touch with
you again under that circumstance.
Thank you very much for your participation in the Plymouth NRA Request For
Proposal for Consultant Services for senior housing. If I can be of any
assistance to you in the future please feel free to contact me at 550-5059.
Sincerely,
Cha
Community Development Director (ag:hra/cd/sen.rfp:jw)
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 5505000
SUBWAY STATISTICS REPORT ---------------------------
DATE: 06/30/92
SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL TERANTS MERE INCLUDED
I. HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION. (0 OF ALL BEADS IS IN PARENTHESES)
A. THERE ARE 143 BRADS OF HOUSEHOLD. (MAY BE MORE THAN 1 IN A UNIT.)
THERE ARE 143 HOUSEHOLDS.
B. AGE: UNDER 30 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80(+)
NO: 53 62 11 2 4 5 6
PCT: 37.1 43.4 7.7 1.4 2.8 3.5 4.2
AVBRAGB AGE• 35.6
C. SEK: MALE: 15 ( 10.5) FEMALE: 126 ( 89.5)
D. SINGLB PARENT BRAD-OF-HOUSBBOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED:
MALA: 1 ( 0.7) FEMALE: 110 ( 76.9)
E. ELDERLY HEAD-OF-HOUSSHOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED:
OBR 2BR 2BR 3BR 4BR 9+BR
NO: 0 19 11 1 0 0
PCT: 0.0 13.3 7.7 0.7 0.0 0.0
F. NON -ELDERLY BEAD -OF -HOUSEHOLD FA111LIBS ASSIST®:
OBR IBR 2BR 3BR 48R 5+BR
NO: 0 0 95 17 0 0
PCT: 0.0 0.0 66.4 11.9 0.0 0.0
G. RACE/ETH111CITY:
KBITS: 118 ( 82.5)
BLACK: 20 ( 14.0)
AMR I1®/ALASKAN NATIVE: 3 ( 2..1)
ASIAN/PACIF ISLANDER: 1 ( 0.7)
OTBBR: 1 ( 0.7)
HISPANIC: 0 ( 0.0) NON -HISPANIC: 143 100.0)
H. MISCBLLANBOUS:
62 YRS OR OLDER: 15 ( 10.5)
HANDICAPPED: 14 ( 9.8)
DISABLED: 2 ( 1.4)
FULL-TIME STUDENT (18 +): 1 ( 0.7)
NONE OF THE ABOVE: 112 ( 78.3)
PHA NAwger 3.40 (086-91 • City of Plymouth
SUMMARY STATISTICS•REPORT (Cont): Date: 06/30/92 Page: 2
II. ALL MEMBERS COKPOSITION: (PCT IS PCP OF ALL !EMBERS)
A. THERE ARE 372 K3 BSRS.
B. AGB:
0-12 13-17 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
190 18 65 69 it 2
51.1 4.8 17.5 18.5 3.0 0.5
AVERAGE AGB: 19.4
C. SEB: ALL - MALB: 128 ( 34.4)
ADULTS - HUB: 30 ( 8.1)
18 0
D. RACE/BTBNXCITY:
WRITE:
BLACK:
AMER II®/ALASKAN NATIVE:
ASIAN/PACIF ISLANDBR:
OTHER:
HISPANIC: 0 ( 0.0)
S. MISCELLANEOUS:
62 YRS OR OLDER:
HANDICAPPED:
DISABLED:
FULL-TZMB STUDENT (18 0:
NONE OF THE ABOVE:
60-69 70-79 80(+)
4. 6 7
1.1 1.6 1.9
FEMUR: 244 ( 65.6)
FEMUR: 134 ( 36.0)
290 ( 78.0)
65 ( 17.5)
11 ( 3.0)
3 ( 0.8)
3 ( 0.8)
NON -HISPANIC: 372 (100.0)
17 ( 4.6)
14 ( 3.8)
2. ( 0.5)
1 ( 0.3)
339 ( 91.1)
F. FAMILY SI88:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 . 10 11(+)
NO: 20 50 49 16 7 1 0 0 0 0 0
PCT: 14.0 35.0 34.3 11..2 4.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
AVERAGE FAMILY SI88: 2.6
G. RELATIONSHIP CODE: (AVG IS AVG PER HOSSSHOLD)
HEAD SPOU88 ADULT DEPBN FOSTER LIVB-IIi OTHER
NO: 143 9 11 208 0 1 0
AVG: 1.00 0.06 0.08 1.45 0.00 0.01 0.00
PER Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth
SUNNARY STATISTICS REPORT (con*): Date: 06/30/92 Page: 3
III. INCOmME/88PBN088:
A. INCOME BREAZDOWN: (XNCOME WFORS ADJUOTNMgHTS)
UNDER 2500- 5000- 7500- 10000- 12500- 15000-
2500 4999 7499 9999 12499 14999 17499 17500(+)
NO: 13 5 71 21 11 11 6 5
PCT: 9.1 3.5 49.7 14.7 7.7 7.7 4.2 3.5
AVERAGE INCUDO;: $ 7766
AVERAGE INCONE AFTER ADJUSTMENTS: $ 6655
B. INCOMMB SOURCES: (AVG IS AVERAGE FOR THAT ITER)
PUBLIC NEW
Maass ASSIST PENSION ASSETS OTHER RENT
HOLDS WITH: 33 83 24 20 22 0
PERCENT: 23..1 58.0 16.8 14.0 15.4 0.0
AVG MOM: 11147 5934 7161 193 3381 0
C. INCOME CATEGORIES AT MOVE -IN: IINOOME CATEGORIES AT REBxAM:
VERY LOW INCOME: 72 ( 50.3) VERY LOW INCOME: 86 ( 60.1)
LOWER INCOME: 0 ( 0.0) LOWER INCOME.: 5 ( 3:.5)
OVER TVEXIM.: 0 ( 04) OVER INCOME: 0 ( 0.0)
EXCEPTIONS: LOWER INC FAMILIES REQUIRING LI EXCEPTIONS: 0
D. RENTS (Averages per Household, except for URP)
TOTAL TENENT PAYMENT: 166.5
TENANT RENT:. 142.1
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENT: 354.2
UTILITY RRIMEURSEM M PAYMENT:********* (Avg for only Hshids with URP)
SECURITY DEPOSIT: 119.1
E. EXPENSES: (AVG IS AVG PER HOUSEHOLD WITH THAT ITEM)
HANDCP DOPER ELDERLY
N®ICL CH CARE OTHER ASSIST DEDUC DEDUC
HOLDS WITH: 14 16 0 0 106 29
PERCENT: 9.8 11.2 0.0 0.0 74.1 20.3
AVG AMOUNT: 1119 2770 0 0 824 400
PER Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth
OLM MY STATISTICS REPORT (cont): Date: 06/30/92 Page. 4
IV.. UNITS/CERTIFICATES/VOUCHBRS (PCT is from unite on file except where noted)
A. UNIT REPORT: (Calculated only if report includes a single project)
UNITS ON FILE: 0
PERCENT
UNITS TOTAL ISSUED/ UTILI-
OSR ISR 2SR 3BR
LEASED
4BR S+SR
1. UNITS IN ACC: 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0
0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0)
2. LEASED: 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0)
3. OUTSTANDING 0. 0 0 0
UNDER 200
0 0
400-499
OR EXTENDED: ( 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0)
4. BALANCE (OVER 0 0 0 0
68.5
0 0
AVERAGE GROSS RENT:
UNDER ACC: ( 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0)
S. PROGRAM! UTILISATION: (in::ludes ALL units. Use Rpt (113 for more detail.)
PEA Manager 3.40 (086-91 + City of Plymouth
PCT OF NUMBER PERCENT
UNITS TOTAL ISSUED/ UTILI-
AVAIL.. AVAIL. LEASED ZATION
SECTION 8 CERT: 8 80.0 142 94.7
SECTION 8 MR: 0 0.0 0 0.0.
VOUCHERS 2 20.0 1 33.3
PUBLIC HOUSING 0 0.0 0 0.0
TOTAL: 10 100.0 143 93.5
C. GROSS RENT
UNDER 200 200-299 300-399 400-499 500-599 600-699 700+
NO: 11 0 O 10 98 14 9
PCT: 8.4 0.0 0.0 7.0 68.5 9.8 6.3
AVERAGE GROSS RENT: 520.7
D. CONTRACT RENT
UNDER 200 200-299 300-399 400-499 500-599 600-699 700+
NO: 12 0 0 18 102 4 7
PCT: 8.4 0.0 0.0 12.6 71.3 2.8 4.9
AVERAGE CONTRACT RENT: 496.4
E. UTILITY ALLOW21M
UNDER 25 25-49 50-74 75-99 100-124 125-149 150+
NO: 85 53 1 2 2 0 0
PCT: 59.4 37.1 0.7 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.0
AVERAGE UTILITY ALLOWANCE: 24.3
PEA Manager 3.40 (086-91 + City of Plymouth
WORRY •STATISTICS REPORT (Cont):
V. LEASING INFORMATION:
TOTAL
A..'LBASE-IN- PLUM FAMILIES: 1
Date: 06/30/92 Page: 5
ELDERLY NON -ELDERLY
1 (100.0) 0 ( 0.0)
B. CBRTIFICATB/VOUCHER SIZE VS ACTUAL UNIT SIZE: ACTUAL SIZE:
C. EXCEPTION RENTS FOR CERTIFICATES:
CBR 1BR 2BR 3BR 4BR 5+BR
OBR: 0 0 0 0 0 0
CERTIF/ IBR: 0 19 0 0 0 0
VOUCHER 2BR: 1 0 105 0 0 0
SIZE: 3BR: 0 0 0 18 0 0
4BR: 0 0 0 0 0 0
S+BR: 0 0 0 0 0 0
C. EXCEPTION RENTS FOR CERTIFICATES:
E. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES VMS GROSS REST SXCB®S PAYMENT STD:
OBR 18R 2BR 3BR 4BR S+BR
VOUCHER: 0 0 1 0 0 0
AVERAGE 8 OVER PS: 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NUMBBR OF ASSISTED FAMILIES MHOBS GROSS RENT EXCEEDS PAYMENT STD: 1
F. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHO, BECAUSE THEIR GROSS RENT IS LESS
THAN PAYMENT STANDARD, RECEIVE A SAVINGS:
OBR IBR 2BR 3BR 4BR S+BR
VOUCHER: 0 0 0 0 0 0
AVERAGE SAVINGS: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NUBSER.OF ASSISTED FAMILIES RECEIVING SAVINGS: 0
PEA Manager 3.40 (086-91 + City of Plymouth
OBR IBR 2BR 3BR 4BR S+BR
108 EXCEPTION AUTHORIZED: 0 0 0 0 0 0
208 EXCBPTION AUTHORIZED: 0 0 0 0 0 0
ANNUAL ADJ. FACTOR APPLIED: 0 0 3 1 0 0
CURRENT GR OVER PMR: 0 0 0 6 0 0
1-108 OVER PMR: 0 0 0 0 0 0
10-208 OVER PMR: 0 0 0 0 0 0
MORE THAN 208 OVER FMR: 0 0 0 0 0 0
D. COMPARISON OF GROSS RENT TO FNRS:
OBR IBR 2BR 3BR 4BR S+BR
CURRENT FMRS (AVG): 0 526 613 774 0 0
GR > 1.IxFM R: 0 0 1 0 0 0
OR a FMat < 1.1zPM R- 0 0 0 0 0 0
OR - Plat: 0 9 18 5 0 0
OR > .9xFM R< PMR: 0 4 38 4 0 0
OR < .9xPM R: 0 6 46 9 0 0
TOTAL: 0 19 105 18 0 0
E. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES VMS GROSS REST SXCB®S PAYMENT STD:
OBR 18R 2BR 3BR 4BR S+BR
VOUCHER: 0 0 1 0 0 0
AVERAGE 8 OVER PS: 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NUMBBR OF ASSISTED FAMILIES MHOBS GROSS RENT EXCEEDS PAYMENT STD: 1
F. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHO, BECAUSE THEIR GROSS RENT IS LESS
THAN PAYMENT STANDARD, RECEIVE A SAVINGS:
OBR IBR 2BR 3BR 4BR S+BR
VOUCHER: 0 0 0 0 0 0
AVERAGE SAVINGS: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NUBSER.OF ASSISTED FAMILIES RECEIVING SAVINGS: 0
PEA Manager 3.40 (086-91 + City of Plymouth
SUMMY STATISTICS REPORT (coat): Date: 06/30/92 Page: 6
G. UNIT TYPES:
PER Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth
SINGLE FAMILY: 5 ( 3.5)
DUPLEX: 3 ( 2.1)
GARDEN: 134 ( 93.7).
HIGHRISB: 1 ( 0.7)
TOM IfflnBE: O ( 0.0)
H. HOUSING TYPES: LEASED NOT LEASED
IND GROUP RESIDENCE: 0 0
CONGREGATE: 0 0
MOBILE HOME PAD: 0 0
SINGLE ROOM OCCUP: 0 0
8BARED HOUSING: 0 0
RENTAL REM: 0 0
PROD SELF SUFFIC: 0 0
OVBRISSUED: 0 0
FLAGGED: 0 0
OTHER: 0 0
I. TURNOVER: CERT MOD RED VGUCHBR PUB NOUS
AVG TIM USED/LBASED: 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
J. CANCELLATIONS OF CERT/VOUCMM:
OVBR?NCOMB: 0 ( 0.0)
HOUSING NOT LOCATED: 0 ( 0.0)
NO LONGER INTERESTED: 4 (100.0)
OTHER SUBSIDY: 0 ( 0.0)
OBLIGATION UNNET: 0 ( 0.0)
TEBIQNATBD BEFORE 60 DAYS: 0 ( 0.0)
OTHER: 0 ( 0.0)
K. BA9/LEASE CANCELLATIONS:
ON= UNCOOPERATIVE: 0 ( 0.0)
TENANT, UNDESIRABLE: 0 ( 0.0)
TMUM DECEASED: 0 ( 0.0)
NO LONGER IN JURISDICTION: 0 ( 0.0)
NO LONGER IN'PBRBSTED: 2 (100.0)
SUBSTANDARD HOUSING: 0 ( 0.0)
NO LONGER ELIGIBLE: 0 ( 0.0)
SALE OF PROPERTY: 0 ( 0.0)
PEA INITIATED: 0 ( 0.0)
OTHER: 0 ( 0.0)
L. ONNER DATA: THIS REPORT ALL ONNSRS
ONNBRS W/CONTRACTS: 25 26
FAMILIES UNDER LEASE: 143 142
AVO FAMILIES PER OMM: 5.72 5.46
WHIM: 2 8.0) 2 ( 7.7)
BLACK: g 0.0) 0 ( 0.0)
AMEN IND/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0.0) 0 ( 0.0)
ASIAN/PACiF ISLANDER: 0 0.0) 0 ( 0.0)
3.8)
PER Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth
YL(Mjuim nKA 4C61AUry a CR l+. LIvUA6"lca URLU11 N19y Y111/ •HVL L
2.. 06 -15 -VZ t ELEVEN MONTHS - 44AT 319 199
DESCRIPTION PERIOD AMT TO GATE AMT 3UOGT AMT OVER
BALANCE SHEET
UNDER
ASSETS
CASH
1111.1 GENERAL FUND CASH 369034.630 459055.16 00 4590.55.16 E1117PETTYCASH00000000
TOTAL CASH 36.034 63'' 45.055 16 e
9
ACCOUNTS RECEIVA04 1
1125 ACCOUNTS REC..: 00 00 : _ 00 00
1129 ACCOUNTS REC. OTHER 00 00 00.00TOTALACCOUNTSRECEIVABLE00000000 ,
1
1162 GEN FUND INVESi p fS 00 00 Soo 00 ' 1
DEFERRED CNARGES
1211 PREPAID INSURANCE 00 00 00 00
1290 OTHER DEFERRED CHARG 00 00 00 00
TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGES
LA NDS STRUCTURES L,•EQUIP.
1475.1 OFFICE FURN- kf9m ..' :. ' .•:,',:l 00 1.219-97
1475.7 AUTOMOTIVE EQUIP. 00 00 00' 00
TOTAL LANO9 STRUCT i EQ. 00 39219.97 00 39219.97
1690 UNDISTRIBUTED DEBITS 00 00 00 00
TOTAL ASSETS 36.034.630 48,275*13
DESCRIPTION PERIOD AMT TO DATE ANT BUDGET
Rai ANrc IMFFT
AMT OVER
UNDER
LIABILITIES 6 S#fPL.
ACCOUNTS PAY
111 VENDOR 6 CONTRACTORS 00 00 00 00
117.1 FEDERAL INC TAX WN 00 00 00 00 ;
117.2 SOCIAL SECURITY MN 00 00 00 00 e
117.3 STATE INC TAX. 00 00 900 00
117.4 HEALTH INS Y ' 00 00 pst" 00 00 ;0
117.5 INSURANCE. N11: r +.. 00 00 r • _ 00' 00 :
117.8 RETIREMENT MN 00 00 00 00 13
118 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE HUD 00 00 00 00
119 OTHER ACCOUNTS PAY. 00 00 00 00 e
119.1 ACCT PAT - GI ;, 000 00 00 00 17
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PA ; 00 00 r. r.` t X00
18
00
t..
V'7, 4
is
J
210 PREPAID ANNUAL CONTR 00 37890:1.00* 00 3789041.000 '
2
90 OTHER DEFERRED CRED. 00 00 00
3
00
690 UNDISTRIBUTED CR m T 00 00 a 600 00 °
FOO INC L EXP CLEARING 369034.63 4299154.78 4309298.00 19143.22* 9
0
2
SURPLUS 33
110 UNRESERVED SURPLVSS 00 398979884.44 23°157.00 398749727.44 °
126 RES SURPLUS-OPEMS$ r3 : ,'•.,, 00 169168.940 00 96 168.94* 3s
12 3 SURPLUS -PROD ACC 00 1639870.77* 00 1689870.77: 7
140 CUM. MUD CONTRIB. 00 3x7329233.64* 4539455.00* 392789778.64*
TOTAL SURPLUS 00 99938d.91* 4309298.00*
3s
3309909.09 o
TOTAL LIAR. L SURPLUS 369034.63 489275.13* 00 48.275.133 23
OOF 00 00 00 00 °
7
9
O
1
2
3
S
PLIMOOTH MRA SECTION 6 EXCY INU1CATcl C+ccU1i AMUUNIJ ,roc 3
ELEVZN N N n -. A 319 1992
DESCRIPTION-------PERI00------ ---YEAR TO DATE -----------dUCGET------ CHANGE
PUN AMOUNT PUN AMOUNT PUN AMOUNT
OPERATING STATEMENT
000 ESTIMATED ADMIN: ; 47.35 4,119.75 45.91 439939.59 00., 00 43.939.59
2
s
i0o• HER11 ACCT OFFS" +-ul 4,119-75* 45.91 439939.596. s
6
OPERATING INCLINE. 00 0000 00
7
INT R°SERVE) SURPLUS
FEE INCOME'• -"A
O
16.68
00
19451.523
00
10.84
00
109373.416 0.0 00 109373.41#
1301 ADMIN ..
610 INT GEN FUND IN
J
151.32? 2096 29831.906 oq: ld...
00 29831.906 1,,-, 2
169 0 .1 . li-... :..:
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME`
S
13.42 1,602.846 13.80 13920S.316 00 00 139205'.. 113.
e
LIPERATING EXPENSPS
e
ADMINISTRATION
i110 ADMIN• SALARIES "
Y•'-'!;'..!
28.20 2,453.70 32.99 319570.54 42..0.7" 43,42600 12,355.463
e
10 99 32 OA •= DO 32 Lc
1130 LEGAL EXPENSE :,
140 STAFF TRAINING
00•
00
00
00 00 00 Ot 00 00
60.00
z:
22
i150 TRAVEL 00 00 06 60.00 00 00
24
170 ACCOUNTING 1.17 119 25
00
1.37
1.57
3 S
19500.00 48 500.00 10000
ze
2E
171 AUDIT
180 OFFICE RENT
00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 z,
6190 SUNDRY ADMIN EX
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 31.19
40.74
29713.69
88
38.98
S
379299.45 42.73 449606.00 79306.SS3 43C
3+
3.
GENERAL EXPENSE3-
00 00 00 00 00 00 3,
x510 INSURANCE
4S30 TERMINAL LEAVE.PAT*
00
00 00 00 00 00 oo 00 3:
3+
6540 EMPLOYEE BEN.. CeirlN.' •. 10. 33 899.00 10.08 9 64
0 3
6590 OTHER GENERAL EXPEN.
PORTABILITY
00
3.05
00
65.15
00
2.92
00
29797.d7
00
00
00
00 29797.87
3+
3:
5591 ADMIN
TOTAL GENERAL EXPENSE13.38 19_154.16 13.01 12,446.87 00 00 12DA-17
HOUSING ASSIST. PAYMENTS
4715.1 MAP -OCCUPIED UNITS 573.06 499856.3E 511.34 4899350.34 369.44385,692.00 103 6S 634
4715.2 HAP -VACANT UNITS 00 00 00 00
336.50
00 00
00
00
333.60
4
4
4715.3 m1 P-DMGIUNPO RENT 00 00 35 00
00 00 00 i
4715.4 JTILITY ALLOWANCE.00
4715.5 MAP -PORTABILITY 185.02
07
169090.743
00
102.82
7
989397.173 00 00 989197.173 5
TOTAL MOUSING ASSIST. PAY388.04 33,759.62 40ttl.87 3919292.77 369.44 3859692.00 59600.77 s
TOTAL OP:RATING EXPENSE 432.61 379637.47 460.86 4419039.09 412.16 4300298.00 109741.09 s
s
PLIMOUTn 'S'ci.fLON a tX LY LNUA1.AIC3 I.XCUAI Anuugil/ rl.uc
C - FIAT J19
DESCRIPTION -------PERIOD------ ---TEAR TO DATE---- ------- BUDGET ------ CMANGC
PUN AMOUNT PUN AMOUNT PUN AMOUNT
nocaATTUi: :TATFMzldT
1
SURPLUS APJUSTMENT:S•' ""=`• `j z
030 PRIOR YEAR AOJ 1.38 19321.00
120 GAIN/LOSS NONEXP EO 00.00 00 00 00 00 00 6
TOTAL SURPLUS ADJUSTMENTS 00 00 1.38 10321.00 00 Oil 1,321.00
6
7
e
PROVISION FOP.
RES3fii",
9
016 PROV FOR OPER ., 00 00 0 00 O i=:: 700 00 ;°
027 PROV. FOR PROD 00 00 0 00 22. %l- 23 157:00 239157.00* 1.1
TOTAL PROV. FOR RESERVES 00 00 00 00 22.18 23,157.00 239157.003 13
IA
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES a
520 REPLACE NONEXP: wt, 00 00 00 00 00. 600
170017
S30 RECEIPT NONEXP' 00 00 00 00 00..;s:; 9:00 00 „
540 PROPERTY SET 9. V,'s00 00 00 00 F :, ,:.00.. 00 20
590 CONTRA FOR 75005 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 '
TOTAL 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3
61 VANDALISM EXPEN ..; Do 00 00 00 GO=': 00 00 3
CONTRIBUTIONS EARN! ' • r` •
6
1026 ANNUAL. CONTR-mC 21 '0•`4! .00. 00 00 00 434.;34 •;'. 453 453:000
7
453945S.00 6
1027 ANNUAL CONTR-PR YR 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 9
TOTAL 00 00 00 00 434.34 453,455.00# 4539455.00 ,
97
L 33
34
35
ti. 36
37
36
3 9
L
1
2
a
e
s1
s:
a
6