HomeMy WebLinkAboutHousing & Redevelopment Authority Packet 08-25-1992PLYMOUTH
HRA
REPORTS
MEETING
OF
AUGUST 25, 1992
AGENDA
PLYMOUTH I'OUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AUGUST 25, 1992 at 6:30 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes from July 21, 1992 meeting
3. Interview with Walker Management Senior Citizen Housing Coordinator
4. 1993 NRA Budget
S. Section 8 Annual Contributions Contract
6. Comprehensive Housing Assistance Strategy (CHAS) for 1993
7. Status Report on First Time Homebuyer Program
8. Availability of more Section 8 Certificates and Vouchers
9. Reschedule HRA Meeting for September
10. Information Items
a. Section 8 -Statistical Report for July 31, 1992
b. Section 8 Financial Report for Period 7/1/91 - 6/30/92
c. Section 8 Waiting List Statistical Report
d. Letter from Kristin Larson Rieser of Stuart Corporation, 8,!18/92
1.1. Other Business
12. Adjournment
hra/agenda/8-25)
0
3+
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: August 21, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of
August 25, 1992
TO: HRA Comaissione
FROM: Charles E. Dil a xecutive Director
SUBJECT: SELECTION OF SENIOR CITIZEN'S PROJECT DEVELOPMENT/MANAGENENT
CONSULTANT
I have been advised by Walker Management, Inc. that they have selected a •lead
person" for the Plymouth HRA project who will join us the evening of August 25
to Weet the HRA Board and address any additional questions the Board may have
in this regard.
Following the additional interviewing activity with Walker it is n
understanding the Board intends to either make a recommendation to the City
Council that Walker Management be hired as the HRA Senior Housing
Consultant/Manager; or, the Board will select another of the firms previously
submitting proposals and interviewing; or, the Board will direct staff to
contact one or more of the previously interviewed firms for additional
interview activity with the Board and/or additional information.
I have attached a draft resolution for consideration by the Board, with Balker
Management inserted, based on the progress in this regard to date. Obviously, the resolution may be modified or not adopted in any form based on the Board s
desires at the August 25 meeting.
If it is the intent of the HRA to recommend'to the City Council that Walker be
hired it is important to at least define a broad scope of what Walker's
activities will be (including, or not including, architecture, for instance)
and a maximum not -to -exceed fee for whatever those services may be. I have
attached a copy of the °Service, Fees and Terms' section of the original
Walker proposal where Walker has proposed, for "development, financial, and
marketing services during development phase' same optional methods to address
of the issue of fees.
On a percentage of project cost basis they are suggesting a fee in the ran gge
of 5-6% of total project cost, inclusive of architectural fees. If it is ti:
desire of the HRA to excludearchrtecture from this contract - which I
understand it may be - but retain the concept of a percentage of project costs
as the developmental services fee (but continuing to include marketing within
that fee) it will be necessary, on August 25, fix the fee for inclusion in the
recommendation to the City Council.
Walker Management has advised me that they will be prepared to discuss this
item, and present a written proposal in that regard on August 25.
hra/senior/8-25)
SERVICE FEES ANL• TERMS
Walker Management, Inc. proposes the above-mentiona: services and the following choice of fee
structures and terms.
A. Development, Financial, and Mintatiog Services dariog.Derdopment Phase
Payment may be made one of three ways:
An hourly fee basis;
2. A flat fee basis, or
3. A percentage of total project cost.
Typically, development fees are in the range of 5-6% of total project costs. That fee
covers all aspects of development from design concept through certificate of occupancy and
is inclusive of architectural fees. Development fee, however calculated are upon on a
schedule over the life of the development process. In addition, sponsor agreed-upon out-
of-pocket expenses for travel, meals and lodging are reimbursed on a monthly basis 10 days
after submission of an invoice and back-up receipts.
Walker Management, Inc. desire to negotiate with HRA the fee and terms for the
developmental process at such a time as we can discuss and review the hard and soft costs
for the project.
L Interim Management (Start-up)
Walker Management, Inc. proposes a total of S 3,000.00 monthly, plus reimbursement of
client agreed-upon out-of-pocket expenses for travel, lodging, searching, screening and
recruiting staff for the period prior to the date of occupancy.
C. Full Service Management
Walker Management, Inc. proposes a monthly fee equal to S% of the monthly gross
receipts (paid or payable) collated from operations or S 3,000.00 whichever is greater.
Out-of-pocket expenses are reimbursed to Walker Management, Inc. by the project.
A Teem
Walker Management, Inc. proposes a management agreement of three (3) years (includes
6 month of start-up period) with an option for an additional three (3) years. (See Exhibit
OW for sample Managmtent Contract)
t0
HRA RESOLUTION 92-08
WHEREAS, the Plymouth City Council. by Resolution 92-305, has authorized and
directed the Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) to prepare a
Request For Proposal for consultant/advisor services to be rendered to the HRA
regarding development of Senior Housing; and,
WHEREAS, the HRA has published a Request For Proposal for such services in
three newspapers of general circulation and received 11 consultant proposals
responsive thereto; and.
WHEREAS, the HRA has reviewed all proposals submitted and interviewed five of
the firms submitting proposals, as components of the selection process.
NOW. -THEREFORE, BE IT hereby reso'•ed by the Board of Commissioners of the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Plymouth that it should and hereby doesrecommendthatacontractbeenteredintobetweentheHRAandWalker
Management, Inc. for the provision of development coordination, marketing, andprojectmanagementservicesupontermsandconditionstobeincorporatedina
contract document to be specificallyy ap roved by the Housing and RedevelopmentAuthorityBoardpriortoexecutionbytheExecutiveDirector.
FURTHER that the Chairman and the Executive Director, upon concurrence by theCityCounciltothisresolution, are hereby authorized and directed to prepare
the necessary contract documents and negotiate the terms and conditions
thereof for final acceptance by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Board.
Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority August 25, 1992.
res/hra/consul)
MEND
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: August 21, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of
August 25, 1992
TO: NRA Comn rs
FROM: Charles rud, Executive Director
00
SUBJECT: BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993
The City (including the HRA) is currently in the early stages of the 1993
budget cycle. The City Council has discussed strategies for the 1993 budget
involving salaries/personnel, and they have been introduced informally to the
new money° -:;jests from most departments. Although no formal budget
hearings have, as yet, taken place, nor has the City Manager (Acting City
Manager Boyles) presented his budget to the City Council for consideration, it
is time for the HRA to, itself, consider the 1993 budget - at least with
respect to any major considerations that may be necessary to be included by
the Executive Director in the budget proposal he makes to the Acting City
Manager. I anticipate bringing a Tine item budget to the NRA for review and
cm 1 t prior to actual adoption by the City Council.
The portion of the City budget that has historically been a concern of the HRA
is perhaps the most difficult portion of the budget to handle in the specified
municipal budgeting context. Municipal budgets (including those of the HRA)
must be approved prior to the beginning of the fiscal year, and thereafter may
not be amended, except in the most basic fashion (between lines items). That
sort of inflexibility for budgeted line items is incompatible with on oing
COBG activities that are not responsive to the beginning and end of fiscal
years; and,. HUD Section 8 ACC contracting periods that end June 30 and begin
July 1. For instance, we really have no idea at this point what our 1993 CDBG
allocation will be, .but we do know that we will not have expended our 1992
allocation (or even portions of 1990 and 1991 allocations that arrived in bulk
with the transition from Urban County to Entitlement City). On'top of—th—ar.
we can only jjLess as to what our Section 8 administrative fee receivables will
be since we do not know where the °top' is with respect to portability units
that we will be administering during1993. The result of all this 'criss-
cross' of fiscal years and federallocal programs is that the HRA budgets
often become a basic structure with either large surpluses or large deficits
appearing on many of the line items at year-end, depending on the various
outside factors that control both revenues and expenditures.
Nevertheless, we must continue to Lry to make HRA budgeting correspond with
municipal budgeting context.
I have attached for the consideration of the HRA a printout from the CityBudgetaryTrackingSystemshowingbudgetedamountsforthe1992fiscalyear
and the amount expended through July 31, 1992. There is not a great deal of
value in th"s report except that certain line items of a less volatile nature
may suggest a trend that should be anticipated in 1993 budgeting. More
important, at this point., are opinions and recommendations the HRA Board mayhaveregardingbudgetingstrateovfortheHRAinM. Some examples (which I
have already informaliy presented to the Acting City Manager from the
prospective of a department head) include the following:
1. Conversion the temporary (intern) Section 8 assistant to a permanent
full-time position exClusively assisting with Section 8 processing. I have recommended that this position be entitled something likeSection8Assistant' with a scale in the 'clerk/typist' range. That
will result in a salary in the 518,000420,000 per year range with a
total cost of carrying the employee of approximately $26,000 per
year.
2. We were clearly not anticipating the continued growth of the
portability featureof Section 8 in our previous year's budgetingwithrespecttooperationallineitems (such as postage, and office
supplies For 1993 and thereafter we will have to proportionatelyincreasetheseaccountstoaccommodatewhatwillsoonbeadoublin
of. the Section 8 Program with respect to our adminfisTrative
responsibility. This also applies to record retention and housinginspectionlineitemsoftheSection8portionoftheHRAbudget.
3. The Personnei Services of Section 8 and COBS expenditures may take adifferentforminthe1993budgetthattheyhavetakeninprevious
years. The Finance Director and City's/MRA's audit Mu are
reviewing our current accounting methods for compliance with HUD
rules and expected procedures particularly with respect to CDBGEntitlementfunctions). The result. of this investigation may be anIndirectCostAllocationPlan' that will appear very similar to the
agreement between the HRA and the City regarding administrative
services. The features of that plan may very well substitute forsomeofthe 'Personal Services' line items that appear in both.theSection8andtheCDBGbudgets (and have for many years). Rather
than having the several employees that deal with HRA functions on mystaffbespecificallypaideachpaperiodpartlyoutoftheNRA
account, there may be an annualized charge between the City budgetandtheHRAaccountsinthespiritoftheoperatingagreementformat.
4. I have received the opinion of our Finance Director regarding the HRASection8reserveaccountwhichnowisover $100,000 in size. We
nay, in mid budget year, allocate funds from that account to e:cpend
on eligible activities joust be housing related) without anticipatingthoseexpendituresinthebudgetpreparationprocesstheprevious
ear. It would be more appropriate, however, to now be thinking ofhowwewouldpotentiallyexpendthosefundsoraportionthereofin
1993 for inclusion in our 1993 budget.
Should there be other policy and strategy related commentary from the HRABoardthatIshouldbeincludinginmybudget -submissions to the Acting CityManageratthistime, .I would appreciate you sharing those with me at ourmeetingofAugust25. Somewhat later in the budget process (at your Septembermeetinginalllikelihood) I will share with you the line item proposals madeforNRAbudgetingthatareproposedforpresentationtotheCityCouncil. Yourcoments and recommendations with regard to those budgets will at thattimebeformalizedforsubmissiontotheCityCouncil.
hra/budget/8-25)
CITY OF P6mum
8' OF ,EXPECTIUM, AMID ERMIMMM
AS OF 07/31/92
zlmMT YM JoHNINM
PM 232
WA m mL Fm
PBR8o181L SBRVIM
601.00 1®oI m ShiMi S
602.00 im SAtARIBS
603.00 OVER181 FAY
605.00 BMAIM :
606.00 101 WIM FAY
608.00 00JIM OFF N/PAY
610.00 81mom law
611.00 PICOMING ilMJM
615.00 smoswr IFAVS
616.01 19m DWM
21,000 12,037 0 8,963 8,116
500 1,024 0 524- 109
100 1,086 0 986- 701
0 333 0 333- 413
0 487 0 487- 758
0 324 0 324- 0
0 133 0 133- 258
0 0 0 0 82
0 0 0 0 9
0 3 0 3- 93
616..02.MM UM MM 0 0 0 0 601
lam PAW. SBRVICBS 21,600. 15,427 0 6,173 11,140
WASKM AMID SOpmm
701.00 Cn= SOppLms
702.00 PR W i P116Z.ISEi
703.00
704.00 FAMM'OpMc
X51.00 Plf
Wm mmmiAIB M Smin
RV 232
im Gomm Pw
ACI[AL SBitVIQBS
102.00 IAI811, PUBS
103.00 AtM
110.00 PROF 88RV
500 60 0 440 21
100 16 0 84 24
700 492 0 208 517
700 406 0 294 406
100 16 0 84 36
2,100 990 0 1,110 1,004
1,200 933 0 267 1,084
300 300 0 0 30020,000 10 0 19,990 0
r
R
CITY Cr P67 IM
AS OF 07/31/92.
IrmACOMifTDMCPJPrZONl3UXAT IRD
310.20 R iD RESHr N 1,000 0 0 1,000 0 R
r`^ 110.31 I1@RON IRAN 46,400 5,405 0 40,995 23,871
310.32 SR lQ613G ASST 0 68118 0 6,118- 0
110.33 SCilfi H= 80,000 113,699 0 33,699- 138,296
110.34 011Y Glia SOPPOIiT 17,600 0 0 17,600 0
111.00 MSTD B TRAIN 500 0 0 500 77
112.00 OW a 500 0 0 500 0
116.00 gimERupfzm loo 105 0 5- 90
1.00 I.iAB3i.ITY aS 4,900 0 0 4,900 0
125.00 GROUP LVE 11G 100 56 0 44 56
326.00 Glp BOW 3114 1,900 1,106 0 794 1,050
127.001 O@0? IIB 300 17S 0 125 175
128.00 OM 1,000 393 0 607 463
329.00 omm S8C{Hi= 1,600 1,216 0 382 810
X31.00 I DZM 300 175 0 125 175
132.00 I = 400 231 0 169 231
138.00 RBS' Cfff OT 1,200 700 0 500 644
339.00 CM OR AU= 1,300 756 0 544 700
147.0010®1 PWC JUM 2,100 1,225 0 875 1,169
X48.00 AGyIN Auncnl 20,000 0 0 20,000 0
a. 981.00 EM 8OMM TAX 0 1,056 0 1,058- 1,097
982.00 SW ASIA'S 0 0 0 0 103
983.00 INUM 8T ZOE= 0 0 0 0 10
BM CMIB WRM SIMC$ 202,700 133,663 0 69,037 170,401
q'
F 91PITAi.OLMM
MOL CJIPML OII m 0 0 0 0 0
ML NM GIMWilb Fl3!>D 226,400 150,080 0 76,320 162,545
6'3
R
CITY OF PL]9DUD! ^+
8 OF APPEDPRIAQ'IONB, 8P11dIB$,
OF
AND
AS 07/31/92
AOOMW 06SCRIPTZCM BDDGE'1' M 810l R6NAIIiIIBs LGD'
UD 232
U1 GAi. FUND
zoom BMvlc>;s
01.00 NEAR SAiARIES 21,000 12,037 0 6,963 8,116
02.00 MW SALWM 500 1,024 0 524- 109
03.00 OVERPIME PAY 100 1,086 0 986- 701
05.00 Hmmw 0 333 0 333- 413
06.00 VACATION PAY 0 467 0 487- 758
08.00 000-TDZ OFF W/9AY 0 324 0 324- 0
10.00 ENKOM 2MIN 0 133 0 133- 258
11.00 PLOWIM ! MMU 0 0 0 0 82
15.00 0 ffcm= LEAVE 0 0 r 0 0 9
16.01 SHORT IEW .DISM 0 3 0 3- 93
16.02 !IID MM DISH 0 0 0 0 700
ML PBH9aNa1L SE.RVICffi 36,200 17,356 0 18,84w 13,005
9ffMtW6 AND SUPPLIES
01.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100 211 24 135- 34103.0 FOMW,E 400 656 0 258- 775a•oo PiDR00imp 800 469 0 331 46951.00 PIDTOl RIW 100 0 0 100 0
WL NEZRIAL i SOPBL.IES
i
1,400 1,338 24 38 1,585UW233
RA S8'PION 8 pum
OIfMIRCI , SERVICES
02.00 Lmm PEES 500 175 0 325 003.00 AUM 1,600 835 0 765 83510.20ReaDr R8'1U8n. 100 0 0 100 010.67 H=n II49pWrG 0 4,692 0 4,692- 0
crrrcr PLYNOM$
as? rn,REs, JM
AS C! 07/31/92
Am= aeSOUPr1CN evDc;Er R1WwnmW z®
11.00 ' RRM 1,500 60 0 1,440 509
112.00 OW i 80ONARS 500 0 0 500 0
116.00 -1 00 45 0 55 45
124.00 LiOJOLrf r m 1,300 0 0 1,300 0
125.00 (1O= LIM IRS 100 56 0 44 56
126.00 QMF HMV W 2,800 1,631 0 11169 1,575
127.0010 IN 6 CM 116 400 231 0 169 231
128.00 am 1,400 603 0 797 614
129.00 80= SKMRITY 2,300 1,324 0 976 1,073
131.00 =Q1Crni DIM 500 294 0 206 294
1.12.00 COML M 600 350 0 250 350
137.00 Fmr PRIV PROP 490,000 346,613 0 143,387 240,037
138.00 FAM CITY 8Wr 1,200 700 0 500 644
139.00 CITY CM AUM 1,300 756 0 544 700
147.00 P= M= 3,100 1,806 0 1,294 1,694
199.00 RB®tVE 61900 0 0 6,900 0 -
am1L amffivLvm SI MCE 516,200 360,171 0 156,029 248,657
ML CIIPI'El1L ov= 0 0 0 00
MOL 8811 SBCPICII 6 PRID 553,600 378,865 24 174,911 263,247
S.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: August 20, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority MeetingofAugust25, 1992
TO: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director
FROM. Housing Specialist Milt Dale * k—
SUBJECT: SECTION 8 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS CONTRACT
A letter dated July 28, 1992 from the HUD Office requests the HousingAuthoritytosignanewACCwhichwillextend. the term of our projectsrecelvinSection8money. Since HUD oust maintain financial records on
each project by total funds allocated, the Housing Authority needs to signnewACCswhennewfundingisprovidedorwhentermsareextended.
The Plymouth Section 8 Certificate program is comprised of three separatelyfundedprojects. These projects are as follows:
o The initial project contract was numbered MN 46-E170-001 and becameeffectiveAugust12, 1977. The contract was for 15 years, expiringAugust12, 1992. This project number is now MN 46-E1704006. The
or ginal contract called for a total of 50 Section 8 certificates. It
was later reduced to 47 certificates. with the following breakdown bybedroomsize:
One Bedroom 11 units
Two Bedroom 34 units
roomThreeBed2 units
o Project number MN 464170-002 went into effect on October 12, 1978, and will expire October 11, 1993. This contract calls for a total of25certificatesunderitsproject. This project allocation is asfollows:
One Bedroom 6 units
Two Bedroom 18 units
Three Bedroom 1 unit
o Project MN 46-E170-003 became effective on September 30, 1985 with atotalof15twobedroomcertificates.
By this ACC extension Project 001, now 006 (our initail 47 unit project),
has been renewed and the term of the Contract has been extended to 7/31/97. See page 2 of Exhibit II). The remaining two pro acts (see paragraph 1.3TERMonPage3ofACC) listed on Exhibit I (flour 1978 and our 1985contracts), have both been extended to 6/30/99 by the ACC.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECDINMDATIONSs
Enclosed is a copy of the proposed Annual Contributions Contract and theletterfromHUD. I recommend that the Housing Authority approve this AnnualContributionsContractanddirecttheChairmantoexecutetheContract.
Attachments:
I. Resolution 92-07
1. Letter from Roger C. Olson of HUD dated 7/26/92
2. Copy of Annual Contributions Contract with Exhibits I and II
hra/acc/8-25)
HRA RESOLUTION 92-07
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority' of Plymouth, Minnesota
herein called the PHA") proposes to enter into an Annual Contributions
Contract (herein called the 'Contract') with the United States of America
herein called the 'Government").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT resolved by the PHA as follows:
Section 1. The Contract, substantially In the form of the contract
hereto attached and marked 'Exhibit A', is hereby approved and accepted both
as to form and substance and the Chairman is hereby authorized and directed to
execute said Contract in triplicate on behalf of the Local Authority, and the
Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to impress and attest the official
seal of the Local Authority on each such counterpart and to forward said
executed counterparts, or any of them, to the Government together with such
other..documents evidencing the approval and authorizing the execution thereof
as may be required by the Government.
Section 2. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to file with
the Government from time to time, as monies are required, requisitions
together with the necessary supporting documents requesting advances - to be
made on account of the contribution provided in the Contract..
Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. o
Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority on August 25, 1992.
res/hra/acc)
R/
v en.,amn..r e+r ear ww. eaa l,s..r
July 28, 1992
Mt. Charles E. Dillermd
Executive Director
Housing and Reaevelcpment Authority
of Plymouth
3440 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, M 55441
Dear W. Dilleruds
w rAomv
JUL 81 1902
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
00 W UNRI OEVROPMENT DEPT
SUMEMs Section 8 Existing Housing Certificate Program
We have enclosed four counterparts of the proposed Amnal Contributions
Contract No. "070E and supporting daamwts for yaw Section 8 Existing
Housing Certificate Program. together with a supply of blank %aims. There is
also included a sheet of instructions regarding execution and return of the
documents.
zone purpose of this new Part i is to moue Project No. M46-E17U-002 from
Exhibit I to Exhibit II and to extend the term of all projects remaining an
Exhibit I to June 30, 1999.
If you have any questions regarding the execution and retua: of the
documents, please call Al Chandler at (612) 370-3011.
Vest pinoerely lours.
Olson
ACC Part I Number: C-a070E
U.S. DEPARTHM OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 8 EBISTING
CONSOLIDATED AMMTAL CONTRIHMIONS CONTRACT
PART -1
for
HOUSING CERTIFICATE PROGRAM.
1.1 DEFINITIONS.
A.
AS used in Part i of this CACC, "ACCO means the Annual
Contributions Contract for each project. '
As used in Part II of this CAM, •ACC• means the CACC.
B. Budget Authority. The maximum aggregate amount which
may be paid by HUD for each project is the Program over
the duration of the CACC. Budget Authority is reserved
by HUD from amounts authorised and appropriated by the
Congress. (Exhibit II lists budget authority for
projects funded with amounts appropriated in Federal
Fiscal Year 1988 and later years.)
C. CACC. Consolidated Annual Contributions Contract.
D. Contract Authority. The amount of contract authority
for each project ie listed -in Exhibit I or Exhibit II +
of this CACC Part I (subject to reduction in accordance
with section 1.4.D. and section 2.3 of this CACC).
E. Coat Amendment. An amendment to the CACC. which
provides additional contract or budget authority to
cover increased Program Expenditures to maintain the
Program at the number of units originally approved by
HUD.
F. Fiscal Year. The PHA Fiscal Year.
G. EM., U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
H. Maximum &Mal Contribution Commit*bat. See section
1.4.C.i:b. of this CAM
ACC Part I: Page i of 6 pages
HUD 52520 B (August 1988)
X. gra- Public Housing Agency.
J. P The PHAIa Housing Certificate Program under
the CACC.
R. Pegram Receipts. Amounts paid by HOD to the PER for
the Housing Certificate Program, and any other amounts
received by the PHA in connection with the Program.
L. Procram S mendituree_ Amounts which may be charged
against Program Receipts in a:cordance with the CACC
and HOD requirements.
M. Project. A funding increment for the Program. (The
project may be for additional units or for a cost
amendment.)
1.2 HOUSING CERTIFICATR PROGRAM.
A. Proi sets in Procrain.
1. List of Projects_ The Projects in the Program
are listed in Exhih4t I and Exhibit II of this
CACC Part I.
2. Exhibit I. Exhibit I lists projects funded with
amounts appropriated before Federal Fiscal Year
1988.
3. Exhibit II. Exhibit II lists drojecte funded
with amounts appropriated in Federal Fiscal Year
1988 and later years.
B. Number of Unita (bv number of bedrooms). To the
maximum extent feasible, the PHA shall enter into
contracts for housing assistance payments for units
under the Program in accordance with the unit
distribution stated is this section. No substantial
deviation, as determined by HOD, from this unit
distribution is allowed without prior HOD approval.
Number of bedrooms Number of Unite
0 L-
1 17
2 67
3 3
4 0
87
ACC Part I: Page 2 of 6 pages
HOD 52520 S (August 1988)
C. PHA Fiscal Year.
I. The first fiscal year for the Program shall begin
on - AuQuat 12. 1 77 (Eater the
effective date for the first project listed is
Exhibit I of Part I of the CACC. If this date is
not entered before the CACC is signed by the PEA,
the date may be entered subsequently by ROD, upon
written notice by um to the PEA.) The first
Fiscal Year for the Program shall end on the last
day of the PEA Fiscal Year which ends not less
than 12 months, or more than 23 months, after
this date.
2. Thereafter, the fiscal year for the Program shall
be the 12 math period ending aurae 30
of each calendar year. (Enter the day and math
used as the Fiscal Year ending date for other
section 8 assistance administered by the PER
under as Annual Contributions Contract with RM.)
1.3 TERM,
A. Exhibit I Proiecte. For all Projects listed is Exhibit
i, the term of the CACC shall end on re 30. goo
Insert last date of CACC term for all Exhibit I
projects. If this date is not entered before the CACC
is signed by the PEA, the date may be entered
subsequently by ROD, upon written notice by RM to the
B. Exhibit ti Proj M For each. project listed is
Exhibit II:
1. Exhibit II states the first date and last date of
the ACC term for the project.
2. The first date of the ACC term for the project
shall be the first day of the math when ROD
signs the CACC which adds the project to the
Program, or another date as determined by ROD.
3. If the first or last date of the ACC term for the
project is not entered before the CACC is signed
by the PEA, the date may be entered subsequentlybyRIS, upon written notice by RM to the PER.
4. RM may revise Exhibit ii at any time, upon
written notice by RM to the PRA (a) to add a
cost amendment project, or (b) to remove a
project for which the ACC term has expired.
ACC Part I: Page 3 of 6 pages
MM 52520 8 (August 1988)
l l M1 yY: =_ y •
A. payment. HM shall pay the Pith. annual contributions
for the Program in accordance with ROD regulations and
requirements.
1.. The annual contribution for the Program shall be
the amount approved by ROD for each Fiscal Year
to cover:
a. The amount of housing assistance payments bythePER.
b. The amount of PRA fees for Program
administration.
2. The amount of the HOD annual contribution may bereduced, as determined by HOD, by the amount ofProgramReceipts (such.as interest income) other
than the HOD annual contribution.
1. Annual Limit on Pavmente for P=M
a. Except for payments from the CACC reserve
account as provided in section 1.4.E. of
this CACC, the HM annual contribution for
the program under section 1.4.H. during theFiscalYearshallnotbemorethanthe
Maximum Annual Contribution Commitment for
the Program.
b. The Maximum Annual Contribution. Commitment
for the Program for each PER Fiscal Year
shall be. equal to the sum of the contract
authority amounts reserved by HOD for the
projects in the Program. The amount of
contract authority reserved for each project
in the Program is stated in Exhibit I and II
Of this CACC Part I (subject to reduction in
accordance with section 1.4.D. and section2.3 of this CACC). If the first Fiscal Year
for the Program is more than 12 months, the
Maximum Annual Contribution Commitment for
the Program for the first Fiscal Year may be
adjusted in an amount as determined by HODbytheadditionoftheprorataamount
applicable to the period in excess of 12
months.
ACC Part I: Page 4 of 6 pages
ROD 52520 8 (August 1988 )
2. Limit on Total BLynntofor Pro, The sum of
HUD payments under section 1.4.8. for the Program
over the duration of the CACC (including anypaymentsfromtheCACCreserveaccountas
provided in section 1.4.8.) shall not be more
than the sum of the budget authority amounts
reserved by RM for the projects in the Program
from amounts authorised and appropriated by theCongress.
D. Reduction of Amount PAYAble.. HUD may reduce the amount
payable by HUD for any project or for the Program, and
may reduce the amount of the contract authority orbudgetauthorityforanyproject, by giving the PHA
written notice of reduction in accordance with section
2.3 of, this CACC. The notice by HUD may include a
revision of Exhibit I or Ii to state the reduction to
the amount of contract authority or budget authorityforaproject.
E. CaCC Reserve Acc +*+rte A CACC reserve account shall be
established and maintained by HUD, in an amount as
determined by HUD consistent with its responsibilities
under section 8(c)(6) of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937.
The CACC reserve account may be ;used by HUD for payment
of any portion of the payment approved by HUD under
section 1.4.E. for the Fiscal Year.
F. Seflarate ACC. HUD's commitment to make payments for
each project listed in Exhibit II shall constitute a
separate ACC.
1.5 CACC,
A. The CACC consists .lie CACC Part I (includingExhibitIandI?) an: form ACC Part II prescribed
by RM for the Rousin+ u:tificate Program and HousingVoucherProgram. desijnats.t as form HUD 52520 8, and
dated January, 1990. Thee documents constitute the
whole CACC for the Proprive.
ACC Part I: Page 5 of 6 pages
HUD 52520 8 (August 1988)
B. This CAM supersedes any previous Annual. Contributions
Contract for the projects or Program. Natters relatingtooperationoftheprojectsorProgram ;fader apreviousAnnualContributionsContractshallbe
governed by this CAM.
Signatures:
f:• ti Irl n ,• ;1/=, .• v;i M YV. • : 4Y • !v:• YV. • x!21' - •Y
Sy
Signature Date signed
Print or type name and official title of signatory -
By.
Signature Date signed
NinneanOlis-St. Paul Office
Print or type name and official title of signatory
ACC Part I: Page 6 of 6 pages
HOD 52520 H (August 1988)
ACC Part I Number: C-4o7og
PROJECT ACC LIST CONTRACT PROJECT ACC
NUMBER NUMBER AUTHORITY BFPSCTIVB
DATE
DNi46-8170-001 C-78-209 123,648.00 08/12/77
RN46-8170-002 C-78-587 76,416.00 10/12/78
NN46-8170-003 C-85-457 81,180.00 09/30/65
46-8170-001 C-78-209 123,648..00) 08/12/77
14846-8170-002 C-78-587 76,416.00) 10/12/78
r
Date signed
Exhibit is Page _J. of -2- pages .
HUD 52520 8 (August 1988)
ACC Part I Number: c-4o7o8
EXHIBIT II
Projects Annronriate I in FederalFiscal yesr 88 axed ter Years
Abbreviation: CA • Contract authority. BA . Budget authority.
PROJECT CA BA FIRST DATE LAST DATE UNITNUMBEROFTERMOFTERMDISw-
BUTION
ONGOING -
10A46-8170-002 $ 76,416.00 61,.146,240.00 10/12/78 10/11/93 1 BR _I
2 BR
3 BR 1
10146-8170-901 55,808.00 111,616.00 09/21/88 06/30/90
M546-8170-902 45,826.00 91,652.00 09/21/88 06/30/90
10146-8170-903 99,723.00 299,169..00 06/01/89 06/30/91
46-8170-904 268,019.00 268,019.00 07/01/91 06/30/92
10146-3170-901 55,808.00) 111,616.00) 09/21/88 06/30/90
46-8170-902 45,826.00) 91,652.00) 09/21/88 06/30/90
46-8170-903 99,723.00) 299,169.00) 06/01/89 06/30/91
10146-B170-904 268,019.00) 268,019.00) 07/01/91 06/30/92
Date signed
Exhibit II: Page 1, of _.a_ pages
HOD 52520 B (August 1999)
ACC Part I Number: C-40708
ERHIBIT II
Proiecte Annroeriated in Federal Faecal year +988 and Later Years
Abbreviation: CA - Contract authority. SA - Budget authority.
PROJECT CA BA FIRST DATE LAST DATE UNITNUMBEROFTERMOFTERMDISTRI-
BUTION
88 TAL8 - 86 % Oi94 -
NMG-8170-006 .$30 4,757.00 61,523,835.00 06/01/92 07/31/97 1 SR uMwwal) 2 BR
3 RR -a
Date signed
Exhibit II : Page _2_ of -2- pages
HUD 52520 S (August 1988)
be
MEND
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: August 20, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting
of August 25, 1992
TO: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director
FROM: Housing Specialist Milt Dale /M k
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING ASSISTANCE STRATEGY (CHAS) FOR 1993
Last month staff received a pwJwt of instructions on developing a
CoeVvelmiasive Housing Assistance Strategy for 1993. Thee requirements ars
similar to last year's, but the affiS mast be updated based on available 1990
omens data. An annual CHAS as it is I:ra, , is a HUD requisament for all
Sntitlamanut cosiandtles. Thia document basically outlines the Housing
Authority's plan for providing housing assistance to lanae and modeorets
income people during the upocmLng year. The plan establishes goals and
delineates resources within the comauuity Which may be used to achieve those
goals. The CHRS is to be developed relying an citizen input and the input
of community based housing advocacy groups.
Last year staff enape I the firm of 2bibsult Associates to dnaalt up the
City's 1992 CHAS. This firm had previous esperiewe the year I , 9, w 1 in
developing the City's lousing Assistance Plan (HAP). Staff is attsoQting to
obtain quotes from at least tmo consulting firms in -
Staff
the COS for
1993. Developing this document sequises a oenaomte . effort sold eonsidec+sble
time meeting with housing interest grvsps in the cammmity, preparing the
required tables, and deciphering HUD widelines and directives.
hoar/dhas/8-25)
1•
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: August 20, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of
August 25, 1992
TO: Charles E. Oillerud, Executive Director
FROM: Housing Specialist Milt Dale %M/V
SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON FIM>?T TIME HOMEBUYER PROGRAM
As of August 20, 1992 there are six individuals or families who have closed on
a house in Plymouth utilizing First Time Namebuyer financial assistance. The
amount of financial assistance has ranged from $3,000 to :15,000. I em
anticipating attending closings for five more families in the next month, and
we have now certified another eight families who will be attempting to go
through the pre -qualification process in the next 40 days.
There has been a considerable "fall -out" of First Time Homebuyer applicants.
As 1 have noted in an earlier memo to the Housing Authority, there have been a
variety of reasons for this "fall -out". Currently, five of six applicants do
not close on a property. Should this prorambe continued in 1993, the
guidelines must be revised to reduce this "fall -out" rate. Too many families
and individuals are taken through the process only to "come up short". This
requires a lot of time and effort on behalf of staff and also wasted effort on
the part of the family involved. In the next few months a more in depth
assessment will
will be developed.
be made of the current program and suggested modifications
For the six families who have -closed on houses or condominiums in the City,
the prices of the units have ranged from $48,900 to $78,900. Four of the
first time homebuyers have been single individdals, while the other two were
husband/wife with two or three children.
The deadline to complete this program is October I of this year. It does
appear that we will need to certify several more families on the program
within the next 40 days. I anticipate having a sixth First Time Homebuyer's
workshop for another group of interested families. He anticipate expending
the entire $237,000 available for this program activity should everything work
out.
bra/fthb/8-25)
MEND
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: August 20, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting ofAugust25, 1992
TO: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director
FROi: Housing Specialist Milt Dale ft&
SUBJECT: AVAILABILITY OF MORE SECTION 8 CERTIFICATES AND VOUCHERS
Last month we received a letter from HUD stating that Housing Authoritiescouldapplyforadditionalcertificatesand/or vouchers. The deadline to
apply was very short, i.e. 30 days from the issuance of the notice. This
would require that staff complete an application with supporting documentationtoHUDbytheendofthismonth.
Staff recommends that no application be made for additional certificates
and/or vouchers at this time. We make this recommendation based on thefollowing:
1. The growing number= of certificate holders entering the community nowduetoportability. He are receiving on the average four certificateholderseachmwt%, while losing only one per month for the last 12
months. The effect is we are gaining about three certificates each
month without asking application for additional certificates. we
will need to consider additional staffing should this same rate of
growth continue into 1993.
2. The short deadline (30 days from the announcement), would require a
maior effort on our part and in light of our past lack of success in
receiving funding consideration, it would probably be an effort for
naught. During the last three or four years, only those communities
who either have Family Self -Sufficiency Programs in place or ready tohavethemenacted, received funding. For a community as small asPlymouth, it would be a major undertaking to develop a Family Self - Sufficiency Program in addition to our normal Section 8 obligations.
3. Applying for funds for additional certificates seems somewhat
meaningless with the advent of portability. There is no guarantee
that the certificates issued in one community will stay in thatcommunityforanysignificantperiodoftime.
For these reasons, staff is recommending no application be made for additionalSection8certificates.
Attachment:
1. HUD Notice, 7/30/92 (bra/sec8/8-25)
N
U AIUM L
s H N Wrw e6 vsM omos. tlopon v
f!0
Inn
Bassi oaA
IBnnssoAL 81. W
CITY OF PLYMGUT
7
Special Attention of:
llianeapolie/St. Pahl Office Notice
All PH" Public Housing Division
NUMbe>•s 92-48 -
Issneds July 30, 1992
Subjects NOFA for Section 8 Certificates and Vouchers
Attached is the July 29, 1992 NOVA for Certificates and Vouchers.
Please note the short turnaround time !30 days) for submission of an
application.
It you have any questions, please contact your Housing Management
specialist. /
A//
Daniel R. Larson
Director, Public Housing Division
Attachment
am and OroGo" d0
saki oww- vents ro dw load MUD
iuOlo mporwq Olridpl ler dds od
seerrhYq arhtlna dsw salmis, e
nopsrdinp erY berdsn esialaw Of i
merr Oniew, ales d IMwmwion
b dw alai a iir"mon and
mon loan
l0O
t b bnmdon b esti - - w alwW o.e roar pw
OW mrintObrbq dw drlr rlredre, wd awnplsWb wed
r atpea d drs asleedwr d MwmaYon, bletlerp
end %Now. UAL Dsowwlwa d llourbn ow Udrr
amAm" Naamain (o.,
Iap M- - 1. 1 q dw I= br WA@Wft kWAWk lk
Iasbwbo dw ooftom d ftwalwL awd aomnaar
tar nsdu" " dds blydW% b do Fl@PM Mwaw
ridepoOoft
e. .
D.O. net"=and
Mr. MOS
lbwawnyCaalowrd tlorwwy°raea st
a'pronarF+wareotr.aOnYadotlenaw.ppelrsa _ — _ Ibe.ta,,.mr+oravrYrsaYstlpY: No r
a eramn a CwtllOnoN
x ... d aoadorl a VOIldrws9
Tift ofMAOnnramwrwdasoftotek0o PoswsMrlaw owdoson n
LaOYAwaaOpMOYn(walnwiW bFlMdsanlewerrnrogrMprbrwerYraCrwswq
A. prbraq AxWsj tmmwrridllr 15 Wbossd wdwabedrwre.
V Rb.rw srsd orAft IloOr
6. PlapoeMAeWId01w6plbdt0 Ibrrbard tOiar esbsewtira •
Ie IM _ - ttrrrdesOOsd INS - OuYq
Q pudtwilalwlrleAubtwroe. OrnsrrsYOWIMPONnI - inNsIp,iOrOnYarnarosNso
Ow OwbannsreadsorL=w•swoswFwft w.NMsbunwdWoeaFYn.OwftpgMWp MYw
aid OrftK* laWarApnMftdUwrimnsFmlwPWwftOrdftM.IwrrOP+sOsOW4610"Irrosb
wMainowoemmmv. (NamaWrprssallood.eddwpwawpOwd
2. Any ndw end mplddbas adopled or to be edepwd by Ow agency b eorwn do opwadoro
7. As -1 Osla dw pdAe Mowbq Aewoy CoanutROIW — -
Pours edlim who obbssW
dr ACC.
pop t d 2
lo^^ tl (M]
Mi. handbook 74202
fUrndd MN AAohtlwCapdmlr. O b rWsdebRNbrrOrN bl Y sdlrrp nnrrdpalydlrrbbi rmsr NWn
pwraap nlr brupnwnai N d er pgstlOeO n.
F.rwur om.agren ede.. Naitl debNrslMbMeu NO MBOidr0 b0 wONM wndbia/bnrMrtrlblO Ntlbpopbnwplyd
erOMrrNOeiuMlwAm blOgCrby4o pepr0. NSINWNrary.p/s/Y/en MO pd M nOM iL
O.WN ednOYM iaMO aaOe NWrAr ObtRw rdiMlbrlrr04Ma0MW/r1e0.
ILAYMPEWANVAOModkmm
9ldw I I -M I sen I seR I 6m I iee I odm
L AaBa. nuaw+o.are rr.a bnarrro a.r..r er
plvtlengder eMar si vad etnebreiw INerPlMwsw oC
I i I Wee I
orb
pop IdI
at
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIYM
a.anyOw an Imre M aoaeM b0erry MXM M pMa1M b 31 YSC im
flat MMI_ _ pdrla bai dbdoas l
LTMdM I IAdI M i .lY1Md/dN/ANM i ll1pM
0 a o L blp blM iYdll Wcospown
tea~ C. poen ed F-AMMiJI WG
R b0al6hwr 1ff
WZqEdIMalkmapmeIlaMatadAYaMdf+al lldlML rd fflliw •t Sdmm.+l.
O Fow O labawndaa
11a.,dkaeala
CIDA Nimben dppl a Gia
L ladedAad=N&mbm!f' 111 i A.dA.w;bd6a1a1
s
IL . Xr tadAddr dLmWW aanr.
11. Aaln l d pal.w rdue ddat pIPM1
s __ o aewd o p:M.e
is ro1MdA Mransk lrAn+IPPhh
O a sA1b
O b. brYlt padlp anuie
uniwwy Auk
fi TWd/gMMlreJl &fSUppbdl
O a nlaklal
o a 0004M laa
C a awwral
O a.
dafw
O 1. arkw; paoQl
a1 andtad Qalald d lalalea b dMq emke" nqbpda1
fi Cadrmdaa WaIW u„A+y1Mb Ora O w
16 ar. Ems wOr ft No a awMa ar 1/ me
aaaO aY aar•OlaAllaa waaar a+alarm
aO laal tart aaA na /ala r ral ar
aalal aOrO a Oaa laaOal/aaalOO Aby waw
11 4aC IIs ON aft r as r -mow O r b I a
arar a.llrrlaaar laaaa>..raar TMw
laaaOOY be aaasOeallaOAwO aOaO Oslo
IOOInI —swam$ rararaaY Tillpbaaalyl
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMMON OF SU LL. OISCLOSUM OF LOBBYING ACIIWM
This disclosure form shell be wmplated by the toporloga, wkWw a bawadte or prkm Federal mcipieee. d the
Initlattor a teeeW of a eowhed hderd acdom of a 11 clomp to a purser pwwam to title 7t u3 G
section 13Ss The fgbie of s farm N m*dred fo each payewd a &Wmmm to make ndw a
te
an
d br
in0uendrhe a atiarnptng ro Inlbruhw am CMV a am)"
r-Ogs i
any +pre1%
ensoloves of ComesL a an emeleyee e/ a aaembo d oe lo wromalen with a wv+rod Faded aalorc use the
SF-ILL,A Controu& n Sheet fa aad dlltland Information it the space on the fore Is InadmWate. Complete all itNea that
apply for both the Wild BEng and —Wd chanp roPmL Mks to the Impknuming guidance published by the 000 of -
Management and gudget for additlond lofaeea
1. Idandfy the type of CO' ma Fsdad action for which lobbying activity is OMW has bean teemed to kdro a the
orteeeu of s oaterod FedoW acftL
L Identify the dobe of 1110 cavef0 Federal ardor.
Identify the appeapdato dasiffudon of this mpor. ti this N e fa0awp report Cawed by a tmatafd cusp so IIIinforrutionpmvloesiyreported. enter Che year and auww in which the auras oomated. Enter the date d oke last
prarioasly suW dtesd faport by this reporting enaty for Chia covered Federal action.
a. Enter the hall narm address, dha state and sip Code of the entity. Include Congressional Dhtrict if
kthesa f]hede tla classification of dw eponbhg entity A it IL a 41ng41eb n ba a prinhe
Of
3bawdInc id
fy
teddtto rAconvacn
wbpthe
U&Fwmdg*. wnvad
awardsn
gr
b the ee eta.
s. 11 the orpNcadon mhq the teport In iters . checks -Subwn da•. than 41-111 the hall name address. city. date andsipcodeoftieprimeFederalrecipient. Include Conpassional Ohvkt 0 known
fl. Ener the nano of the Federal agency' nuking the award of len eonunitnu-1. Include d least ane aprds.tfothsllevelbelowapWname. If known. FN 41umot. Deparnnm of Tramponatwrc United Sten Cont Ward.
1. Enter the Federal parent rime of dasaiptiom to the covered /aloha utioo Otero 111. If known 1-1er the lyre
Ca" of Federal Domestic AnIstence ICFDM nweber for raft cooperative SWMn M fare. and an
comnetmentL
L Ener the most appropriate Federal Wendlying nw dm avaitable fit the Fed@ action idem ltheoot fit
Rlwpmet log Repold teyf7mnuber fnvteatian for Bid pentddm1r,
edd AM
pant or loan award mmbe apPkst r Od
1' der
prefixesI, e.g. .
A Per a covered Federal action where tore has berm an award of bon medebmt IST the Fsderal a anter the
Federal ameum of the awammsn comndvnen for the prim stuity id"Had in tum 4 or S.
t0. (dEner em hall name addfm city. state and alp wale of that lobbydng entity engem by the is S salty
kdentif ed in @em / to inkme the mwrod Nderd octan.
eb)Enter the full eamn of the trtdMdualfs) poiamring swvkAt and loeude hall address B dt(foaae ham 10 fay.
bw hist Name. Fist Name: and Middle MW (W)6
11. Enter the amount of txerrp41ntetloh Paid a roatenablp 41upsCsed robe paid by Che mporting endty ibtm A to the
Mbbft
an ban Mid ap Itdal am chimppmanter the CATAh
anamobars
bm made tactual) aiam P" 111- t on lh
to be made.
11
cp *
a appropriate
in4a of the 6iddrd holes
nt
d - n Pint ie made &W* as I- Lhd oanmlbuft%
I& Chace the apprepdero bocl@L% Check all been the appfy. it od t Wadfy native.
141. Ffovlde . 1patille amt daWed deaatptlom of Ch'
Indualvalle
slrvh 411 this the khbbytd has palonthe4 a w0 bee plpeaad es'
eskeri F41"d oohltla Fid@ sl a contacted orttdewb).
41mployal{al a MmnWs) ori Con"am slut were amadet
S. Chide whether or net a SF -ULA Confirmation shead le attadud.
16. The a ilk,, efgcld shall sign and don the form. palm Non her name, title. and taleplretr runhber
f41et rtpemY e Mader 111 data catsettsr N khforrutiae b etkeaW a wrap >0 eNaes On wapahee. Isdrdng tees fa rlviwhrykwshreiahwaaa,eNn{ edmq data wastes. whermE na egg the don rrldad ane aeplla{ and ww.haS tat abed= of
idamwte Sad te.uethe --me du bwdm erasuaa a s.1 odw eput of sullsvidons,
naeaoasL D.GfarmAmseridsMrdet a dr OlOteof saampsu-1 and k4ft ppvrwk
07/70/1992 786:18 292-110-6867 WiD =.ERAS
33608 Federal Register / Vol. 37. No. 140 / Wednesday. duly 29. 1982 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
office of the Assistant Secretary for
Public and Indian Housing
loosest Nun N-93-34714 FN -3116.M-011
NOPA for Rental Voucher Program and
Rental cartiflo ole Program
AoaNCT: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for public and Indian Hausing.
HUD.
AcTow. Notice of funding availability
for FY 1992 and procedures for
allocating funds and approving IHA/
PHA app fcationS.
muuunnr. The purpose of the Rental
Voucher and the Rental Certificate
Programs Is to assist eligible families to
pay the rent for decent. safe. and
sanitary housing. This notice icentifies
the amount of housing assistance budget
authority available for incmmer.taF
rental vouchers and rental certil:egtea
for each HUD Field Office Jurisdiction
durin Fiscal Year 1002. This notice also:
1)1nv1tes Public Housing Agencies
PHMI and Indian Housing Authorities
THAs). heroin referred to as housing
agencies (HAS). to submit applications
for housing assistance funds:
2) Provides Instructions to HAS
governing the Submission of
applications: and
3) Describes procedures for ratin&
ranking. and approving HA applications.
OATak Applications must be received in
the HUD Field Office/lndlon Programs
Office by 3 p.m. local time (I.e.. time at
the office when the application IS
submitted) on August 2L SNL
ADDE96MO The basic application. Fern
FTUD42513. may be obtained from. and
completed applications am to be
subrnthled to. the appropriate HUD Field
Office/ladisn Program Office for the
jurisdiction In which the appliesnl is
located (see Section D. Application
Process. of the NOFA). (Application
forms an also attached to this NOFA.)
Foil FYaTMSn IMPORMAnoN eONracr.
Gerald ). Bonalt. Director, Operations
Branch. Rental Assistance Division
Office of Public and Indian Housing.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development. 431 Seventh Street SW..
Washington. DC 204105000. tole hone
20217050477. Hearing- or speceh-
Impaired individuals may call HUD's
TDD number (20217084504. (These
telephone numbers are not loll -fee.)
sunlaauawrAav INroataATloN:
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
no information collection
requirements contained in this notice
have been approved by the Office of
Manapament and Budget (OMBI, under
section 35041hT of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1900 (44 U.S.C. 3SM-
35201, end havu been assigned OMB
control numlr.r 2502-0123.
1. Purpose and Substantive Description
A. Authority
The regulations governing the Rental
Certificate Program and the Rental
Voucher Program are published it 24
CFR parts Get and 6e7. The regulations
for &B -cation of housing assistance
budget authority under section 213(d) of
the Housing and Community .
Development Act of 1974 are published
at 24 CFR part 791. subpart D.
A Allocation Amounts
1) Housing needs formula.
Approximately $2 billion of budget
authority is available this fiscalyear for
the Rental Certificate and Rental
Voucher Programs for Incremental use.
Of this amount. approximately (lt.i
billion ii for rental certificates and
approximately 0924 million Is for rental
vouchers. Budget authority of
approximately UN million (S4W million
for rental certificates and $190 for renal
vouchers) is being allocated to HUD
Field Offices under this NOFA. using the
housing needs factors established In
accordance with 24 CFA 701.40L This is
in addition to the approximately $933
million of burst authority that was
made available "ir mri-71 vouchers and
rental certificates In connection with the
Family Self -Sufficiency Program under
NOFAs published at 50 FA 49512
September SILL i901) and 57 FR 312
oannary 3.198621.
2) lyeavpolitan—nonmetropolitan
mix. Separate housing needs factors
were develop* i for the metropolitan
and nonnletrvpolitan portions of each
Field Office jurisdiction. On a
nationwide bacis. ipproximstely 17
percent of the Fiscal Year 3022 budget
authority for the Rental Voucher
Program and Rental Certificate Program
Incremental units is designated for
nonmetropolitan areas. The
nonmetropolitan housing needs factors
were applied to the housing assistance
budget authority avall-10 (or use In
nonmetropolitan areas. and the
metropolitan housing need.% factors wan
applied to the housing assistance budget
authority available for use In
metropolitan areae.
The Department has determined that
metropolitan areas and nonmetropolitan
areas within each Field Office
jurisdiction ore the smallest practicable
areas to which budget authority can be
allocated. Given the limited amount of
FY 1002 budget authority. it is not
practicable to allocate budget authority
to smaller allocation areae and still
amum that funding Is sufficient to
support fusible programs and meet the
statutory obligation to provide sufficient
resources for rental rehabilitation needs.
NOVA aani nouramns the
alloe.
cation of
thio
housing assistance budget authority for
the Rental Voucher and Rental
Certificate Programs to each Field Office
based on the housing needs factors. The
allocation of housing assistance budget
authority to each Field Office. however.
is a total for both Programa. and
represents on approximate 20 porcent-
Rental Voucher Program/7t percent -
Rental Certificate Program mix. Field
Oelces are given flexibility to decide
whether to approve Rental Coniflcetes
or Rental Vouchers for any HA
application. regardless of which
pro am the HA requested in its
appliation. In order to use the budget
authority allocated for each program.
Jl.Is notice also provides. for each
Fuld Office. an eetfm is of the total
number of rental vouchers and rental
certificates that could be funded from
the housing assistance available In the
Fuld Offica. Theme estimates are based
on the average fair market rants for two-
bedroom units in the Field Office's
jurisdiction. The actual number of units
assisted will vary from these estimates
beasesa of differences in the actual
bedroom sire mix. among other factors.
4) Poeratia/ additional funding. In the
event additional rental voucher or rental
certificate funding becomes available
for incremental use during Meal Year
1$$L the Department plans to distribute
any additional Mnding to Field Offices
uabtg the same percentage distribution
as reflected In Attachment 5 to this
NOFA. Any additional funding will be_
aced to fund approvable HA
applications under the competitive
requirements in this NOPA.
C. Renta/ Rchobilitotion Program
obligations
1) Far low.income families living In
aNte wabllitated under the Rental
RehablUtotlen Program (24 CFR part
311). section a(u) of the United Sim too
Housing Act of 1037 provides that:
la1 Rental vouchers or rental
certificates shall be made available for
families who arm required to move out of
their units because of physical
rehabilitation activities or because of
overcrowding:
b) At The discretion of the FIA. rental
voadrere or rental cenifieatce may be
made available for families who would
have to pay mnre than 30 percent of
07/301!592 Uo:1C cut_ -000. -_-- -- •-•-•-
Federal Register / Vol. 37, No. 146 / Wednesday, July 2% 1002 / Notices 336,
adjusted Income for rent after
rehablMotlon whether they choose to
remain in or move from the project: and
c) IIUD shall allocate rental
certificates or rental vouchers to ensure
that sufficient resources are available to
address the physical or economic
diaplacemen:. or potential economic
displacement. of families living In rental
rehabilitation prolvets.
2) The HA application must specify
the number of rental vouchers and/or
rental certificates requested for families
living In rental rehabilitation projects for
which the HA does not have sufficient
rental vouchers or rental certificates
using unissued or turnover rental
vouchers or rental certificates).
31 Field Office/Indian Program Office
staff will rate and rank HA applications
that request rental vouchers and/or
rental certificates for ramllies living in
rental rehabilitation projects with all
other HA applications.
4) In determinI.1 the minimum
number of rental vouchers or rental
certificates to allocate to a HA. Field
Office/Indian Programs Office staff
must first determine the total number cf
rental vouchers and rental certificates
needed during calendar year 1902 for
families affected by rental rehabilitation
activities (as described in paragraph (7)
of this section I.Q. and the number of
rental vouchers and rental certificates
that are already available to the HA
without additional funding because
rental vouchers or rental certificates are
unissued or am expected to turn over. In
reviewing the amount of assistance
evallable to a HA for Nese families, the
Field Office/Indian Programa Office
staff must make crrtaln that the HA has
enough rental certificates for low.
Income families, but not very low.
Income families, Net are affected by
rental rehabilitation activities but are
not eligible for rental vouchers.
S) The Field Office/Indian Programa
Office will determine the minimum
amount of assistance to be provided to a
HA during Fiscal Year 1992 as follows.
a) The total number of olt'gfble
families affected by rental rehabilitation
activities will be determined as follows:
f) The Field Office/Indian Program
Office will Identify the rental
rehabilitation projects to be completed
by December 32. 1902 and Identify the
number of eligible familles living In
those proem that will be physically
displaced (i.e.. forced to vacate a unit
because of physical construction.
housing overcrowding, or a change in
use of the unit as a result of rental
rehabilitation activities) or whose rens
would be more than 30 percent of
Income as a result of rental
rehabilitation activities.
ii) Families whose Incomes are
between 30 percent and So percent of
median Income and whose rent after
rehabilitation would be more than 30
percent of their adjusted income. but
that are not physically displaced, are
ineligible for rental vouchers. Because
rental certificates trust be made
available for these low-income families.
the number of these families should be
separately identified.
b) From the total number of eligible
families af.ected by rental rehabilitaiiarr
activities. subtract:
i) The number of rental vouchers and
rental certificates under Annual
Contributions Contract (ACC) but not
issued to families (do not include in the
number of rental vouchers and rental
certificates under ACC any special
allocations of rental vouchers and rental
certificates that were provided by HUD
to be used for special purposes such as
opt•outc public housing demolition or
disposition. desegregation of public
housing projects. or rental certificates
approved by HUD for use In connection
with project -based assistance):
00 The number of rental vouchers and
rental certificates that are expected to
tum over (i.e.. those rental vouchers or
rental certificates that are expected to
be available for relesuance) In the HA
jurisdiction during calendar year 1902:
and
III) The number of rental certificates
and rental vouchers reserved for the HA
under the Family Self -Sufficiency
Program Incentive award NOFA.
c) The remainder. computed in
accordance with the above. equals the
minimum number of rental vouchers or
rental certificates that must be allocated
to the HA during Fiscal Year 1902.
D. Fusibility
All HAs are invited by this notice to
Submit applications for the Rental
Voucher Program (24 CFR part gel) and
the Rental Certificate Program (2e CFR
part 882).
E. Selection Criteria/'Ratins rnerars
1) Se/eetlorr Criterion 1: HA
Adminisn+ative Capability /3T points/—
la) Deseriptlon: Overall HA
adminfatraite ability in the Rental
Voucher. Rental Certificate, and
Moderate Rehabilitation Programs, as
evidenced by factors ouch as leasing
rates and correct administration of
housing quality sisndards (HQS).
compliance with Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity program requirements.
assistance payment compilation. and
rent reasonableness requirements. If s
IIA is not administering a Rental
Certificate. Rental Voucher. or Moderate
Rehabilitation Program, the Field
Office/Indian Programs Office will rase
1 to administration of the Public or
Indian Housing Program. For purposes
of this NOFA. a HA administering a
Rental Voucher. Rental Certificate, or
Muderate Rehabilitation Program will
not be rated on the edminisuation of is
Public or Indian Housing Program. If a
HA is not administering a Rental
Certificate. Rental Voucher. Moderate
Rehabilitation. Public Housing or India:
Housing Program.. the Field Office/
Indian Programs Office will assess the
administrative capability of the HA
based cn such factors as experience of
staff. support of the HA by the local
government. and the Mik's
administrative experience with non -
HUD housing programs.
b) Raring: 11142 poirrs. Field Office/
Indian Programs Office rates overall Hi
administration of the Rental Voucher.
Rental Certificate, and Moderate
Rehabilitation Programs (of public/
Indian :lousing or other housing
programs) as excellent: then is no
serious outstanding management
review, fair housing and equal
opportunity monitoring review, or
Inspector General audit findings; not
more than tS percent of the unite
inspected by the Field Office/lndian
Programs Office during the last
management review failed to meet HQS
at the time of the Field Office/Indian
Program Office inspection and also
failed to meet HQS at the time of the
previous HA inspection; and the leasing
rate for rental vouchers and rental
certificates (or occupancy rate for
publicAndlen housing unite) under
Annual Contributions Contract (ACC)
for one year or more was at least 95
percent as of September 30,1091;
1-I5po/ob. Field Office/lndlan
Program Office rates overall HA
administration of the Rentil Voucher.
Rental Certificate, and Modersti
Rehabilitation programa (or Public/
Indian Housing or other housing
programs) as good: any management
review, fair housing and equal
opportunity monitoring review. or
Inspector General audit findings are
being satisfactorily addressed. not more
than 25 percent of the units inspected by
the Field Office/Indian Programs Office
during the last management review
failed to meet NQS at the lime of the
Field Office/Indlan Programs Office
inspection and also failed to meet HQS
at the time of the previous HA
Inspection: and the leasing rate fcr
rental vouchers and rental certificates
or occupancy rate for Public/Indian
Itouving unite) under ACC for one year
or more was at least 88 percent as of
September 30.199t:
07/38/1992 03:18 202-410-6867 MOL REHAF
37608 Federal Register / Vol. 57. No. 140 / Wednesday. July 20. 1902 / Notices
o pointe. U none of the above
statements aply. assign 0 points.
c) Field Of%iee/lmllan Programs
Office Aisesameni In assigning point$
fur adminletrative capability for a State
or reliiona: HA application, the Field
Office/Indian Programs Office shall
determine the HA's leasing rate
separately for metropolitan areas and
for nownstropolitan areas and use the
applicable rata to scare points for
adralalstratiw capability.
2) Selection Criterion Z
Underfunding of Housl.V A4eds (zs
pointe).
a) Description: The degree to which
the housing needs of the area speclCod
in the HA's application from which the
HA draws families to assist (primary
Na) have previously been
derfundaif. relative to the need's of
other localities within the allocation
area. taking Into account such rattan as
the number of assisted housing unit$
and the number of vty low-income
renter households eligible for such
assistance. The Field Office will.
wherever practicable. consider needs
being mat by all federally aul$ted rental
housing pa. including the FmH A
Section 111 Rural Rental program. but
will. as a minimum. consider assistance
provided under the Rental Voucher
Program. the Rental Certificate Program.
other Bretton 6 Prognrata. and the Public
or Indian Housing Program.
In accordance with Notice PM 91-43
HUD), the Field Office will notify
FMHA of applications It receives and
ask that AnHA provide advisory
eooueents eoeteeroing the market for
additional assisted housing or the
teselble impact the proposed unitsmay
have on FmHA projects. Applications
for which FmHA has provided
comments awasshtg concerts about
market need or the continued Stability of
existing projeeta with which HUD
agroeS. Wig rraalva mo pointe.
b) Rodig and oesessmoat: The Field
Office will evaluate whether housing
needs in the primary aro@ specified in
the application have been underfunded
with respect to assisted housing
provided to other communities in the
i'llocetlm area. and will @salon one of
three point•valusa. as fallow$:
25 pains Housing needs in the area($)
specified In the application have been
severely mdarNnded.
12 polnu. Housing needs In the area(a)
specified In the application have been
moderately underfunded.
opointa Rousing needs in the area($)
specified In the application have
received a proportional@ share of
funding or have been overfunded.
3) Selection Criterion J: Homeless
Program (20 points).
a) Description: The percentage of the
units In the application that will be
targeted to homeless families. Points
will not be awarded under this criterion
for HA effcrts to assist families that are
doubled up in another family's home or
that aro living in subslandaid housing.
L) Acting: 71ae Field office/Indian
Program Office will assign one of four
polar -values es follows.
20 points. If 75.10014 of the units being
applied for will be used for the
h imelees.
IS points. If W-74% of the units being
applied for will be used for the
homeless.
io points. if 1-40% of the units being
applied for will be used for the
homeless.
0 points. Nor- ' the unite being
applied for w1' . i for the
homeless.
c) Field 6f#m11ndian "tome
Office Assessment The Field Office/
Office of Indian programs shall evaluate
the capacity of the HA to have e
homeless program operational within
Six months of ACC execution. if the
Field Office/Indian Programs Office
determines that the HA does not have
the opacity to coordinate the provision
of supportive services (If applicable) and
implemen a homeless program of the
slie Indict ted In The HA application. up
to one-half of the points assigned to the
HA under this critrrior may be
deducted.
4) Selection CIPOKon 4: Local
Initiatives (Jpolnts}—(e)Description. (1)
Extent to which HAS provide families
with greater housing opportunities (e.g..
State or regional HAS. or loco) HAS
participating In voluntary exchange
programs and tnterjuriadictional
mobility programs). (ii) Extent to which
HAS demonstrate locally initiated
efforts in support of their Rental
Voucher and Rental Certificate
Programs or comparable tenant -based
rental assistance programs. Evaluation
of a locality's contribution is measured
competitively by the extent to which a
locality is able to provide services or
cash contributions or demonstrate its
intention to provide this kind of support
in the future. as compared to services or
contributions provided by other
localities of like program else.
b) Rating: The Field Office/Indian
Program Office will assign one of three
point -values. as follows:
J points: HA is a Slate or regional IiA
or local HA participating In voluntary
mobility programs. and the State or
locality provides local suvoon le.a..
financial. manpower for inspection
services) to its Rental Voucher or Rental
Certificate Program.
PAGE 05
2 points: HA provides broad housing
choice. or the State or locality provides
support to the HA'S Rental Voucher or
Rental Certificate Program.
0 points: HA does not provide broad
housing choles. and the State or locality
does not provide support in the HA's
Rental Voucher or Rental Certificate
Program.
F. Unacceptable Applications
1) After the 14 -calender day technical
deficiencyeorrection period (refer to
Section IV. Corrections to Deficient
Applications, of lite NOFA), the Field
Officellttdlan Programs Office will
disapprove HA applications that it
determines aro not acceptable for
processing (refer to Section 111. Checklist
of Application Submission
Requirott4uM of this NOFA). The Field
Office/malar Programs Oma
notification of rejection letter must state
the basis for the decision.
2) Applications that fall Into any of
the following categories will not be
processed:
a) 71he Department of justice hes
brought a twit rights suit against the
applicant HA. and the suit is pending.
b)11 are ars outstanding findings of
noncompliant with civil rights statutes.
Executive Orden, or regulations. as a
result of formal administrative
proceedings. or the Sectary has Issued
a charge agelmt the applicant under the
Fair Housing ACL unless the applicant Is
operating under a condlietion or
compliance agrremeal designed to
correct the Inas of can -compliance.
c) HUD has denied application
processing under title Vl of the Clvjl
Rights Act of IM, the Attorney
General's Guidelines (28 CFR 50.31, and
the HUD title VI regulations (2s. CFR 1.111)
and procedures (HIED Handbook
ti010.1 1. or under section 001 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1977 and HUD
regulations (24 CFR $47).
d) The HA has Serious unaddressed.
outnandlng Impactor General audit
findings. fair housing and equal
opportunity monitoring review findings.
or Field Office/Indlan Programa Office
management review fundings for one or
more of Its Rental Voucher, Rental
Certificate. or Moderate Rehabilitation
Progrorm. or, to the ase at a HA that is
mol cummdy administering a Rental
Voucher. Rental Certificate. or Madera Ia
Rehabilitation Program. for its Public
Housing Program or Indian Housing
program
@I The leasing rate for rental
certificates and rental voutbete under
ACC for at least one year in less thin 75
percent, or. In the cue of a HA not
currently administering a Rental
07/30/1952 08:18 - 202-010-6867 taCil) F.EHcB atE 06
Federal Register / Vol. 37. Nn. 146 / Wednesday, July 29, 1992 / Notices 936,
Voucher or Rental Certificate Program.
the leasing rate for all units available fo
occupancy in the Public or Indian
Housing Program is lees than 73 percent.
For a State or regional HA. the Field
Office/Indian Programs Office shall
determine the HA'a leasing rete
separately for metropolitan and
nonmetropolitan areas, and shall use the
applicable rate in determining whether
to accept the application under this
paragraph.)
In The HA is involved In litigation
UDandHdetermines that the litigation
may seriously impede the ability of the
HA to adminiuer an additional
Increment of rental vouchers or rental
certificates.
C. Local Government Comments
Section 213 of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974
requires that.HUD independently
determine that there is need for the
housing assistance requested in
applications. gad solicit and consider
comments re .vent to this determination
from the chief executive officer of the
unit of local goverrimemt. The Field
Office/Indian Programs Office will
obtain Section 213 comments tram the
unit of general local government in
accordance with 14 CFR pert 791.
subpart C. Applications for Housing
Assistance in Areas Without Housing
Assistance Plans. Comments submitted
by the unit of general local government
must be considered before an
application can be approved
Section 213 comments submitted by
units of general local government that
have approved Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strartegles (C pis) should
address how the HA application for
rental voucher sad/or rental
certificates relates to the pdoridn for
assistance Identified in the loci
mgovernent's CHAS. and should include
comments on the household types [ie.
elderly, family. large•famlly) that the HA
proposes to serve.
For purposes of expediting the
application process, the HA should
encourage the chief executive officer of
the unit of general local government to
submit a latter with the HA application
commenting on the HA application In
accordance with Section 213. Since HIM
cannot approve an application until the
3o -day comment period to closed the
Section 213 letter should not -rely
comment on the application. but iSis
state that HUD may consider the letter
to be the final comments and that no
additional comments will be
forthcoming from the local unit of
government.
11. funding Applications
r (1) Alaximum funding allowed. The
Field Office/Office of Indian Programs
may not approve funding for a HA under
this NOFA for mare than the greater of
to percent of the HA rental voucher and
rental certificate units under reservation
or 30 units.
2) Minimum funding allowed. The
Field Office/Office cif Indian Programs
may not approve funding for a HA under
this NOFA for lose than 25 unite. unless:
i) The HA requests rawer than 23
units:
ii) The application Is being funded
only to meet rental rehabilitation
obligations: or
iii) The residual budget authority
after funding higher ranking applications
is insufficient to fund at least 23 units.
3) funding procedure. The Field
Office must develop a procedure far
approval of applications (including
applicatiocs rated by the Office of
Indian Programs) In rank order until all
the housing assistance budget authority
is used. The Field Office may elect to
approve 100 percent of the units
requested In all top ranked appllcatlons
or some lower percentage of the unite
requested in all cepppllatfons (inciuding
applications from lifAs) Nal senna
above a Fled ORlce-datetmined funding
cut-off. up to the maximum number of
units allowed. if apppllcatlons (Including
applications from Mal that @core above
a Field Offlce-determined funding cut.
orf are to be funded at lees than 20o
percent. the Field Office must apply the
some percentage reduction to the
number of units requested in each
application.
Alternatively, the Field Office nay
divide approvable applications Into two
categories: Those scoring over 40 points,
and those scoring 40 points or less. The
Field Office may choose to apply
different percentage reduction for each
zf the two ranking categories so that a
higher percentage of unite requested
would be approved for elf applications
In the higher category and a lower
percents$• of unite requested would be
approved for all applications in the
lower category. The Flald Office must
apply the acme percentage reduction to
each application within each of the two
ranking categories.
Where a Field Office funds
applications according to reek order.
only to find it has some number of udis
left. but not enough to fund the next
fundable application in its entirety or for
the minimum of 25 units, that
application can be funded to the extent
of the number of units available.
Ila I1 applies for a specific program
i.e.. rental vouchers or rental
certificates) and funding for the
specified program Is not available In d
metropolitan area or nonmaimpolltan
wee allocation. the Field Office will
sword the available form of assistance
even though not specifically requested
by the applicant.
The Field Office must promptly no6f-
the applicable Office of Ind!ao Program
as to the statue of any applications fror.
THAs and. !f applicable, the amcunt of
budget authority to be made available
for INA applications ibal were toted
high enougb to receive funding.
4) Ensuring funding for families
displaced from rental rehabilitation
projects. (a) When all applicatlons have
been rated and ranked. Field Offices
must determ!na whether all application:.
with Identified rental rehabilitation
needs will be approved. if not. propoaec
funding for all higher ranked
applications without rental
rehabilitation needs must be reduced by
the some percentage to provide funding
for all identified rental rehabilitation
needs In lower ranked spplicatlons.
Thus. rental rehabilitation needs
identified in applications that otherwise
I" below the funding cutoff must be
funded.
b) The Field Office will make Its
determination under paragraph (a) of
this subsect(on by identifying the
number of units in each application
needed for.
t) Families that will be physically
displaced Gore units to be rehabilitated
under the Rental Rehabilitation
Program: and
iii Familles that would have to pay
more than 30 peewit of adjusted Itsoome
for rent as a result of now
rehabilitation aetividaa
c to idatlfy!tiy the number of salla
under paregrsph (b) of this subsectior.
the Field Office will compare the HA .
aatlmate and the Field Ofilee/hdlsn
Aograme Office sedmato developed in
accordance with the proudurea
Identified in sacUms LCF) of this NOVA.
The Field Office/Indian Programa Office
estimate shall be used unless it is
clearly incorrect.
1. Reallocations of Aunds
Each Field Office shall make every
reasonable effort to use all available
funds. It may be necessary, however. to
reallocate funds from one Field Once to
another when the funds are not likely to
be used in the Field Office to which they
were Initially assigned. In such cameo.
the following procedures shall be
followed:
a) Reallocations within the some
stato, if the allocation of funds to a Field
Office cannot be used rnthin the Field
33610 Federal Register / Vol. 57. No. 140 / Wednesday. July 29. 1U92 / NGIices
Office jurisdiction during Fiscel Year
t992. the Regional Office must. If
possible. reallocate those funds to
another Fluid Office within the same
Sti4te where they can be usod during
Plical Year 1992. In making these
@allocations. priority must be given to
Field Offices where additional funds aro
needed for families affected by Rental
Rehabilitation Program activities.
b) Reallocations between states. If a
Regional Office cannot use funds within
the same State. the Reglonal Office may
request Headquarters approval to
reallocate funds to another State witEln
the jurisdiction of the Regional Office. In
approving such a reallocation.
Headquarters must consider whether
these funds are needed within the same
Region or other Regions for families
affected by Rental Rehabilitation
Program activities.
A request for Headquarters approval
of a reallocation'ietween States must
explain the reasons that funds cannot be
used in the original State, the amount
being withdrawn from the original Stats.
the program type. the metropolitan/ ,
nonmetropoiitan mix. and the amount to
be reallocated subsequently to each
State. These requests must be submitted
to Headquarters (ATTENTION: Budget
Division. Office of Management and
Policy. Office of Public and Indian
lfoustng) for approval.
c) Reallocations between
metropolitan and tlonmelmoolltan
arms. The Regional Office must follow
the original fund assignments for
metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas
when it reallocates unused budget
authority. if there are not enough
approvable applications for the
designated metropolitan or
nonmetropolltan budget authority. the
Regional Office may switch the budget
authority between a metropolitan and a
nonmetropolitan area within the same
State. provided that an offinetting switch
can be made In another State within the
some Region. if an offsetting switch
cannot be made and the metropolitan or
nonmetropolitan amounts require
changes to the regional fund
assignments. the Regional Office must
obtain the approval of the Budg61
Division. Office of Managemene end
Policy. Office of Public and Indian
Rousing, before switching budget
authority between a metropolitan and a
nonmetropoliten area.
Notification of Funds Awarded
1) After the Field Offices have
reviewed. ratvd. and ranked
noplications. and the Field Offices and
Offices of Indian Programs have
2ppruved the upplicailuns. Regional
Offires must submit to lteadquaners a
list of all approved applications. listed
by Field Office. The Regional Office
application approval list Is due In
Headquarters (ATfEN"nON: Budget
Division. Office'of Manngement and
Policy. Office of Public and indlnn
Itousing) on the tenth working day
following the data sot.by Headquarters
for completion of application ranking
and selections.
2) The Regional Offices must provide
the following Information for each
application approved:
a) The name and address ol.the HA:
b) The project number, and the
number of rental vouchers and the
number of rental certificates. as
applicable, approved for the HA:
c) The amount of contract authority
and budget authority. stated separately
for rental vouchers and rental
certificates: and
d) The number of rental vouchers and
the number of rental certificates for each
of the following: Rental rehabilitation.
the homeless. and other purposes.
7) Assistance provided under the
Section 8 Existing Housing Program is
generally categorically excluded from
anvUlinmental assessment under the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4772) (see 24 CFR ao2o(d)I•
However, where assistance provided
under this NOFA is used by the HA for
project -based certificate assistance
under 24 CFR part 882, subpart C. HUD
will perform an environmental review to
the extent required be 24 CFR 882.717
before the HA enters into an agreement
with the owner for the assistance.
K. Administrative fees
1) The administrative fees for units In
Fiscal Year 1992 appropriations aro
specified as follows:
stoned AeaW
VOurnwe eMa7
yo ry eee2Increaienlat tion t M.Ved W FY 1992
til Onyan6........... ... 62% 8.2%
I21 preewtery..••........ 6216 621's
131 Here -Whir rw._..... 645 646
101 FY toss OpromVPv6K emeieria Oemalisdn
AeptKenaras aro Aetdceeenl:.... _
t) 0x10.••—••_....... 6.5% 1.46%
221 heaanery.............. p16 6256
f21 neie•to•no.. ....... 646 MS
tel Aweeeel 01 AMY VOarnOee and Penal
craaasur
I il on -WV ......... -...... @.sew 7.66
121 Reany" Y ....... _.... so a0
171 eeerd-Wnaa4a......_ LS 646
121 For budget prepuretlon. submission
of requisitions. and approving year-end
Operating statements. HAS should use
the August 7. 1990. Housing Notice ifl-
pt}571. Administrative Pet:
Requiraments for the Housing Voucher
and Certificale Programa. to determine
the blended rate for all rental voucher or
rental certificate increments for a given
iIA.
L. Headquarters Reserve
The Department Is retaining
approximately SW million of the budget
authority available for Incremental
rental vouchers and rental certificates in
a Headquarters Reserve for use in
connection with natural disasters.
litigafion. desegregation. and other
housing emergencies. consistent with 24
CFR 791.407.
M. Other Allocations
in addition to the badger authority for
incremental rental vouchers and rental
certificates. S7.4 billion of additional
budget authority (Including carryover
budget authority) is available for
allocation In Fiscal Year 1982 for rental
vouchers and rental certificates for the
following purposes:
a) Opt -Outs and prepayments. Field
Office requests for funding under this
category will be approved on a first-
come. first-served basis. Field Office@
should indicate whether rental vouchers,
rental certificates, or both are needed
and should Include all necessary data.
Requests for funding to assist families
living In Ivan Management Set -Aside
Projects as described in paragraph (a)(il
below must be consistent with section
VIII(A) of HUD Notice H 91-M (dated
July 9. 1881). instructions for Section B
Loan Management Set -Aside Contract
Renewals. to determine the amount of
funds required. Funding under this
category is to aselst families this are
adversely affected by an owner's
decision to opt -out of a Section 8
contract or to prepay an FHA -Insured
mortgage. as follows:
i) Families living In a Section 0 Loan
Management Set -Aside ILMSA) Project
where the Section a Housing Assistance
Payments Contract ends.
ii) Families living In a Section 8 New
Construction, Substantial Rehabilitation.
or Loan Management Set -Aside project.
where the owner has sole discretion to.
and does. "opt -out" of an additional
term of assistance under the Section 8
Housing Assistance Payments Contract.
ill) Families living in a section 278 or
section 221(d)(7) Below Market interest
Rate project. where the owner propoyc
the mortgage.
b) public housing d0molition and
disposition /relocation and
replacement/. To anise families rhos aro
Irving in public housing projects that aro
being demolished or dii-posed of with
HUD approval. Relocation asuuance
07/30/1992 08:18 202-410-6867 MOD REHAB PAGE 08
Federal Roesler / Vol. Si. No. 148 / Wednes&y. July 20. 199? / Wices 530:
may be provided In the form of 3 -your
writul voucher or rental eortlDuls
funding. Replacement housing may be
rrovided in the form of 13 -year funding
or rental certificate assistance.
c) Rental certi/icote and rental
vaachorronewcls. Headquarters will
allocate funds directly to the Field
Offices to provide for 0.e renewal of
rental voucher and rental certificate
funding Increments expiring In Fiscal
Year 1662. Renewal fundi nngg will be
Fvided In-kind (i.e.. rental voucher
uding for expiring rental voucher
increments. and rental certificate
funding for expiring rental certificate
Increments).
d) Section 23 conversions.
Headquarters will allocate certifiests
funds directly to the Field Offices to
provide tenant -based rental assistance
to residents of section 23 leased housing
for which leases are expiring or have
been terminated. Field Office requests
for funding under this eatgary will be
approved on a firsl•coma Drst•served
basis. Field Offices should Include all
date aecessa:y to determine the amount
of funds required.
e) Section B otrendments. Rental
Certificate program east amendments
Provide budget authority Increases to
HA rental certificate programs to
support Increases In housinga assistance
payments to maintain the HA's program
at the number of units arisingllyy
approved bg HUD. Funds are allocated
on a needs bads based an actual
hawing costs end tenant caaMbuttons.
f) HOPE f and seet/on d(A)
homeownership pragrotru To provide
replacement housing for HOPE s end
section 5(h) projects. Field Office/ cc
of Indian Programs requests for rentel
Certificate or realal vouehof funding
under the category witba approved on
a first-come. firet•servad bases. FMid
Offimalindlan Programs OM :houall
Include all data perrimemt to determlalas
the amount of funds required.
g) ftmily uniJlcatian To assfal
Wo.ble families that the pubtio child
welfare agendas have cartfa aro
families for which the iack of adequate
housing to a primary to H either aha
Imminent placement of the families'
children In out -at-home can. or the
delayed discharge of children to the
families from out-al•home cars.
Appropriations were provided for a
demonstration program to be
administered by public housingagencies
In 11 States., Missouri. New York Now
Jersey. California. Maryland. Mlrhigan.
Ohio. Texas. Pennsylvania. Florida, and
Massachusetts. HUD recently published
a "parole NOFA describing the
spplleatlon and funding process for
family unification rantul certificates.
h)11OPE Jor elderly indepenairtmo.
Toassist frail elderly persona to Ilve
Independently. HUD Is conducting a
national competition for supportive
services grants. PI IAs selected In the
arena competition will be invited to
submit applications for rental vouchers.
The Department recently published a
SOFA describingthe application and
funding process or HOPE for Ederly
Independence lees 57 FR 23008. May 29.
Il Adowns to apporeuphy
demonstration. To assist families with
children to move out of areas with high
concentrations of persons living In
poverty through contract@ with nonprofit
orgenlsatlons. Appropriations were
provided for rental certificates to be
used in a demonstration Involving five
cities with populations over 400.000. In
metropolitan areas of over 1.500AW
pooppulalion. The Department plans to
publish a SOFA describing the
application and funding process in
summer 1692.
j) VeteronsAdministration
supportive housing. To assist homeless
veterans with rental housing after their
having received medical treatment from
the Veterans Administration (VA). The
VA has eoaducted a competition among
Its medical facilities. PHAs In the
localities of the selected VA facilities
were invited to apply for rental
vouchers. A separate announcement
describing the application and funding
process was published in the Federal
Roesler on March 206 1962 (see 57 PR
9959).
k) SL Loan dematsbvUon.
Appropriations were provided to replace
public bouslog units In St. Louis that ars
eligible for demolition or disposition
With five-year rental certificate
assistance.
0 PHA portability Jean To pay
special preliminary fees to HAs under
Rental Voucher and Rental Certificate
Program portability provisions. The
Department issued a HUD Notice PIH
W14 (PHAJ. dated April 22, 1992. that
describes administrative procedures for
requesting the special preliminary fees.
D. Application At
A. Obtaininif Application Materials
Form HUD -52515. Application for
Existing Housing, may be obtained from
the local HUD Field Offca/Indian
Programs Office. (Plteept as provided for
Indian Housing Authorities In Section
MD. Submitting Applications, of this
NOFA. only an original application
should be submitted: of to not necessary
to submit additional copies of the
applicatlon.) In addition, the basic
application. and other required
submisslone. are attached to this NOV'
as follows: Foran HUD.6!515
JAttachment 11: Certification for a Drug
Free Workplace ((Allachment 21: Text fc
the Certification Regarding Lobbying
jAttachment 31: and Standard Form Lit.
Disclosure of Lobbying ActiWtlps
Attachment a).
B.Submild gApplications
HA applications must be received to
the IRM Field Office/Indian Programs
Office by 3 p.m. local time (i.e.. the time
at the office where the application is to
be submitted) on August 26. 11162. The
Indian Programs Offing is the place of
off efel receipt for M applications. An
1HA also must submit. at the same time.
a copy of its application to the HUD
Paeld pffice that has jurisdiction over
the pardon of the State in which the WA
is located. Field Ofilces/lttdfan
Programa Offices will be responsible for
notifying their HAs of the exact address
and room number where applications
are to be submitted
Dl. Application Submission
Requirements
A. Generally
1) Applications must be submitted to
the local Field Office/Indian Programs
Office on Form HUD42515 in
accordance with the applicable program
regulations.
3) The application must Identity the
number of rental vouchers and rental
cerdlicales requested for fuNlips living
In rpnldl rehabilitation projects and for
the homeless. The application should
Include a narrative description of how
the application Waste. or will meet, the
application selection criteria. Failure to
submit a erretive description Is not
cause for application rejection: however.
the Field Office/Indlon Programs Office
cert only rete and rank the application
based an information the Office hes on
hand.
1) Attachment 5 at the and of this
notice lista the HUD Field Officer and
the number of units and budget
authority available for each Field Office.
FFAs should limit their applications to a
reaannabte number of rental vouehero
and NOW cartifieatee, based on'Jta
capacity of the FIA to lease all the smite
within 12 montkl of AGC execution. The
number of unite on the HA application
may not exceed the greeter of: (a) Ten
percent (10%) of the total rental
vouchers and rental certificates under
reservation for the HA: or (b) so unite.
An application may exceed this limit
only If the HA cannot. within that limit,
rueet the needs of fa idles affected by
rental rehabilitation activities.
Feder( P / Vol. 37, No. 140
nil HAs shell submit only on
application (Perm HIM421116) with the
CoHAI (seelionpreggdrr@ph
regional
his lection11.8 of the NCI A). If both rental
Certificates and rental vouchers are
requeated on the same application, than
the sppllcation will be given two
riiproJac
Program and one
fonumbers,
onp for r the
itnntal
t1 VouchColerProgram. The total number of unite
Epp ed for may not exceed the can
Percent or S&VIal limitatlon
6) ReSlenale and State-wide MAN
may Submit one application for
metropolitan arose and one appllcationfornonmetropoulanareae. and iarh
application dered
Eaachbreginal or Slate -wide1Aapplicati)on m.v request up to tenvouchersa0nd
rentof
al CSTUIntelAeat(aa the HAAa6underreservationformetropolitan
anal or nonmetropolltaa arfAs as
applicable, or so unit#, whichever ie
greater.
Offiaeewill reduce the numberProgram.
requested in any applicatioa Hat
exceeds the Ian percent or 50•unll limit10thefreeleroftenpercent (10%) of thetotalnumberofrentalvouchersand
rental Certificates under roservation or00units.
B. Corti Ycetivrr RgardiAs DruS•Fr vt14forkpace
requ ro granta# of FeWOthderal
glace
enciesto
certify that [hey willprovide a dwe.fmoworkplace. Thus, each HA must certifyeventhoughIthasdonesorerlously) that It will comply with the Sz-free
workplace requirements in accordanca
With 24 CFR part 24. Sub rt P. (SeeCffrIIflC4lion
Workplace Requirements. ardAttachment 2tothisNOPA.)
G Cordlicofion Regetdit Lobbying
Section 319 of the f theInteriorAppropriationActtPublenticLaw101-121, ap roved October 1.T. seat. (91U.S.C. 1302 (the Byrd Amendmsnt)
generally prohibits recipients of Federal
contracts, Staple, and loans from using9PPTCPEIAtheE"Cunvatof Leg8IaUva
Braed
funds for nches of the
28. 1892 / Notices
Federal Government in connection with
a specific contract Srant or loan. The
Departmenrestrictionstoregulation, Ibbyhy a codified at24CFRpert07. To comply with 26 CPR
67.110, any HA (other than an IHA Net
CPR
meets 05) ubmittln iaplicaintion
under this NOPA for mon than S100.000ofbudgetauthorityndeynesmust
submit a Certification and If warrsnte4DisclosureoflobbyinSAclvitlee. To
4111181 HAs, the texts for the
Certification Regarding lobbyingAttachment21andStandardForm LLL.
Dlloloeure Form to Report LobbyingAttachment4) am attached to thisNOFA.
D. 0whilot for7khnfcni
Regainrmenal
re The following checklist specifies the
on that must be
submitted
edtted III the HAA' appiu don. It Is
recommended. but not mgtdmd, that the
explication
contain a a
explaining how the application moe[sIkeselectioncriteria.
INITIAL SWESNINO C HMCxu6T
tAPpkew for A&" Yeah" airs Remy CrlaarelIArIeA701Iss
Yee ae Y» see ..
Tl14 Intense oarrne a 000416e1ee FTheappeassonmom,ane NLM 62111/.
fdfMMlleoon - flatImIMaI. b aairstr. Mai—" ' '"/a M" Wula a weuen" lo,WilmaW, 0, ,'yVA" by ceases a tra0repre0 eaa
HAT"N "Plasm
sasaria ft"M a was,
of
doomses
WAN. aro e• 010019eas nmrr el wale 4 learepa0 4 614 aa, an wows war, irea
erns M ne11111rg
arerraaw
plraer aaaen
IMab
fflowwwo
w~ "
M'M' a be"sed b r, arawU:p
aa0
Pose da llogo too" e a games at (oft r 614 owwai ay. s14 acedy, nenv MM arasi &P W.. areaowmnwwn
pneabata In wa an ass apple" Iwwre"a sae kne req &@rapt ane IN
01kM
w
aw (n Yw W & 17
ate.
11pa ." ar p9r--1*
ert eN6
1 ajieleaopla,w pppe"°MVNO shrews is be nk6 w" MO/aYr! ae pAwhrM abs In w. TM sp0araa6al tt14leeap s aA*"m 6141 614 naa%19 aarr wearer 14 be Was In ro a#ws"e a Sr prpam we be aSO4mItasCFR0611.109 ayor 24 CFR MT.20t a ear MNIw14 M Malsoaspeeaeby614atAMne/lrwfen Noptaaw Dlew. in wa racer JINWDW C#A% we pasaass a ha.s
T114 agpssusA 6saR slat 10e000ee WON OW be "wase ON
etli N p'a"°M' a"eML The ewp wwe hma r""ltber a "w'pa no pfarm aeae
as
INIft 61 So N
aapR
n
ofaawM6eanACCWHUD, pgi01 ~I»•o W alae Wave wl 'ata own mwawe a saan.r aw
p6"eewa "Nab" Aw a basow *a raellw a M Mlpe Goosedeawlme la
PlodIReoWeeara
11r DaapRwa Wappapp Car=6vy6e a Aly{,ppA'pa/ CMplass. sae aso" a suaw VIkADow
Yes
Tire ae#eawa arw Huse sure» .oraaFtaep apt, .-- 0onwo an "SOU"Carbeenwe feat a of oeff" wa wo JjA%sora
r6a !
a CtT pan 114. aaasMrl . (}ae aspens» T" eases» meas HYba fMW4
WOW
drq M 614 a N CSR DM ar. The ane'bp6pi naMarreaaseq10aw14ewa140146e
ft HA Moeaa#rermm 1146 awrrw» 0141 wAe »ww0wpeat M NO&A r" amiqp,a
fie
Ewer ywa fie. The
ams r.
lo' P-
0$08. 1i INA IioM16"a wwv Suae Iwe w np1 u6Maeae swats eOia Fww we
N0040"
a S) area, a1 low a a'w'l• To ee ft. tW a.r1Oaaw6aaeeatatf" ACIMar (Asa -Wd el.
97/30/1992 88.1.8 zuz-41u-b"f
Foderal Register / Vol. 57, No. 146 / Wednesduy. July 29. 1992 / Notices 3361•
IV. Currectlein's to Deficient
Applicaiiuns
To be eligible for processing. on
application must be received by the
appropriate Field Ofricelindian
Programs Office no later than the date
and time specified in section Ii of this
NOFA. The Field Office/lndion
progremi Office will Initially screen all
applications and notify HAS of technical
deficiencies by.!etter.
If an appllcatlln has technical
deficiencies, the.4A will have 14
calendar days from the dote of the
issuance of written notification to
submit the missing or corrected
information to the Field Office and/or
Indian Programs Office. Curable
technical daficWticies relate only to
items that do not Improve rhe
substantive quality of the application
relative to the rating factors.
All HAS must submit corrections
within 14 calendar days from the date of
HUD's letter notifying the applicant of
any such deficiency. Inforrhation
received after 3 p.m. local time (I.e., the
time In the appropriate Field Office/
Indian Program Offi:e). of the fourteenth
calendar day of the correction period
will not be accepted and the application
will be rejected as Incomplete. All HAS
are encouraged to review the initial
screening checklist provided in Section
iII of this notice. The checklist identifies
all technical requirements needed for
application processing. A HA
application that does not comply with
the requirements of 24 CFR 662.204(a) or
t167.35(b) and this notice, including the
drug-free workplace certification and
the anti -lobbying certification/
disclosure requirements, after the
expiation of the 14 -day cum period will
be rejected from processing.
V. Other Matteis
A. EnvimninentalImpact
A finding of no significant impact with
respect to the environment has been
made in accordance with the
Department's regulations at 24 CFR ppart
S0, which implement section to2(2)(C) Of
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (42 U.S.G. 43321. The finding at
no significant Impact is vs11 It for
public Inspection between 7:30 a.m. and
8:30 p.m. weekdays in the Office of the
Rules Docket Clerk. Office of Canerel
Counsel. Department of Housing and
Urban Development. Room 10270. 451
Seventh Street. SW.. Washington. DC
20410.
B. Federalism Impact
The General Counsel, as the
Designated Official under section 6(a) of
Executive Order 12812. Federalism. has
determined that the policies contained
in this notice will not have substantial
direct effects on states at their political
subdivisions. or the relationship
between the federal government and the
slates. or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. As a result the
notice is not subject to review under the
Order. This notice Is a funding notice
and does not substantially alter the
established rosea of the Department, the
Stales. and local governments, Including
HAS.
C. impact on the family
The General Counsel. as the
Designated Offic!.vl under Executive
Order 1200a. The Family, has
determined that this notice does not
have potential for signillcont Impact on
family formation. maintenance. and
general well-being within the meaning of
the Executive Order and. thus. IS not
subject to review under the Order. This
is a funding notice and does not alter
program requirements concerning family
eligibility.
D. Section 707 of tAe HUD Reform Act:
Documentation and Public Access
Requirements
HUD responsibilities. HUD will
ensure that documentation and other
information regarding each application
submitted pursuant to this NOFA are
sufficient to indicate the basis upon
which assistance was provided or
denied. This material. Including any
letters of support, will be made
available for public Inspection for a five-
year period beginning not less than 30
days after the award of the assistance.
Material wiU be made available In
accordance with the Freedom of
Infirma ton Act 15 U.S.C. 5521 and
HUD's implementing regulations at 24
CFR part in.. In addition. HUD will
include the recipients of assistance
Mpursuant to this NOFA In its quarterly
ered Regletar notice of SO recipients
of = assistance awarded on a
competitive basis. (See 24 CFR IL14(a)
and 12.16(b). and the notice published In
the Fedaral Register on )emery 1a. 3902
S7 FR 1942). for hirther Information an
these requirements.)
S. Section 794 of the HUD Reform Act
HUD's regulation Implementing
sectio4103 of the Department of
Housing and Urban Development
Reform Act of logo (42 U.S.C.3537e)
Reform Act) was published an May 17.
1.901 (S6 FR 22059), and became effective
on )one 12. 1901. That regulation,
codified as 24 CFR part 4, applies to the
funding competition announced today.
The requirements of the rule continue t,
Apply until the announcement of the
selection of successful applicants.
HUD employees Involved In the
review of applications and In the Makin;
of funding decisions are restrained by
part 4 from providing advance
information to any person (other then or
authorized employee of HUD)
concerning funding.decielons. or from
otherwise giving stay applicant an unfair
competitive advantage. Persons who
apply for assistance In this competition
should confine their inquiries to the
subject areae permitted under 24 CFR
part 4.
Applicants who have qusstloni
should contact the HUD Office of Ethics
202) 706 -eels (iDD/Voice). MIS is not
a toll-free number.) The Office of Ethics
can provide Information of a general
nature to HUD employees, as well.
However, a HUD employee who hes
specific program quesllons. such as
whether particular subject matter con be
discussed with persona outside the
Department should contact his or her
Regional or Field Office Counsel, or
Headquarters counsel for the program to
which the question pertains.
F Section 712 of the Reform Act
Section 112 of the HUD Reform Act
added a new Section 13 to the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3537b).
Section 13 contains two provisions
dealing with efforts to influence HUD's
decisions with respect to financial
aaalatattee. The first imposes disclosure
requirements on those who era typically
Involved in these efforts -1116841 who
assothers
to influence the
istance
ward of
istance or the [eking of a
management action by the Department
and those who an gold to provide the
ltafiuence. The second restricts the
pa ant of fees to those who are paid to
Influence the award of HIM assistance.
It the fees are tied to the number of
houaing units received or are based on
the amount of assistance received, or if
they are contingent upon the receipt of
assistance.
Section 13 was implemented by Mel
rule published In the Federal 111001er on
May 17. ION (56 FR 22912). If leaden
are Involved In any efforts to influence
the Department In these ways, they are
urged to road the final Wile, particularly
the examples tontalned In appendix A
of the rule.
Any questions about the rule snouiu
be directed to the Office of Ethics. room
2150. Department of Housing and Urban
Federal Register J Vul. 57, No. 1.70 / Wedno5d11y. duly 29. 1972 / Nolice9 - 336:
ATIACW.Crm 5
FY 92 SECTION 6 ALLOCATION FACTOIIS BY HUD OFFICE
i
164I_7!70 NONMETRO COMPOSITE
HUD OFrICE UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS
BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE 504 25.374 020 47 1.959.750
1,002.665'
551
166
27,333.770
10.90a.2Z5
NMTFORO.CONNECTICUT OFFICE 221 9.93S.S00 ZS
4.096,090MANCtIESTER. NEW HAMPSHIRE OFFICE a5 3542.620 117 00 1,.147.720
PROVIDENCE. RHODE ISLAND OFFICE Do 3.120 373 0
46a 14.363.710BUFFALO. NEW YORK OFFICE s! 99• coli 117 3.352.7`/
1028 00.026,860NEWYORK. NEW YORK OFFCE 4;::.t: S
3
903.00
Z4 20.972.470NEWARK. NEW JERSEY OFFCE
s
A'•
O 243 6.700,130
BALTIMORE. MARYLAND OF610E 776
121 1. m5,'i% CHARLESTON. WEBT WWC.~ OFFICi
PHILADELPHIA. PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE 494
s+... av
17.593.125 61
a,.a .trJ11
1.031.960 SSS 19.425.085
P17TCL'URGH, PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE 206 5.037.770 O1 1.767,255 209 7,605.025
RICHMOND. VIRGINIA OFFICE 164 5.661.715 114 2.914.050 298 0.576.665
VIASIIINGTON, O.C. OFFICE 242 12.574.955 0 0 242 12.574.055
ATLANTA, GEORGIA OFFICE 250 11.073.570 166 4,056.665 420 12.122.225
BIRMINGHAM. ALABAMA OFFICE lea 4.227.290 100 2.032.180 256 6.239.470
COLUMBIA. SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICE 110 2.912.595 92 2.012,635 202 4,923,730
GREENSBORO. NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE 199 5.406.415 200 4.785.045 3" 10,104.260
4,641,513JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI OFFICE 41 1.155.240 163 3.700.279 204
FLORIDA OFFICE 409 20,561.705 04 1.499,990 NO 22,001.765
JACKSONVILLE.
LOUISVILLE. KENTUCKY OFFICE 113 3.020.325 147 3.314,720 200 6.341.045
KNOXVILLE. TENNESSEE OFFICE 75 1.942.125 36 774,273 111 2.716.560
NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE OFFICE 135 3.902.990 67 1.449,415 202 5.352.400
CARIBEEAN OFFICE 161 4.364.700 52 1.125.120 213 5.509.680
CIIICAOO. ILLINOIS OFFICE 760 30.477.140 162 3.738.440 910 04.212.460
C:NCINNATI,OHIOOFPICE 155 4.406.270 25 08,075 100 5.014,/45
CLEVELAND. OHIO OFFICE 267 8,300.060 86 1.431.720 542 9.792.400
COLUMBUS. OHIO OFFICE Ila 3.342.090 67 1.632,990 16a 4.975.680
DETROIT, MICHIGAN OFFICE 332 10,085.395 23 050.490 557 11,33$.847
GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN OFFICE 106 3.181,020 75 1,976,210 163 5.108.136
INDIANAPOUB, INDIANA OFFICE 206 6,019,545 e/ 2.000,195 292 9.06x.740
MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN OFFICE 230 6,020,215 102 2.606.605 232 9.406.820
N
WORTH. 6.910 3.700.420 001 15.355.330
HOUSTON. TEXAS OFFICE 227 0.645,169 50 900.560 MO 7.5W,520
LITTLE ROC-,.. ARKAN7AS OFFICE 69 1.572.525 109 2290.470 IN 3.6/.906
NEW ORLEJA:46. LOUILIANA OFFICE 228 7,012,150 M 1,946.960 324 0./81,110
OKLAHOMA CITY. OKLL•IOMA OFFICE 96 2.763,035 90 1.010.600 Is: 4./06.615
BAN ANTONIO. TEXAS <7FFICE 194 4,147.415 54 1.245.340 962 7.390./5$
DEB MOINES. IOWA OFFICE 73 2.235.655 111 2,024.518 194 0.009.970
KANSAS CITY. M18g0U141 OFFICE ISO 4.366.145 112 2.519.885 115 9M.030
OMAHA, NEBRASKA OFFICE 40 1.300.570 86 1.214,9110 102 119101533
BT. LOUIS. MISSOURI OFFICE 124 31614.690 M 1.435.470 190 0.290.360
DENVER, COLORADO NEGIONAL OFFICE 260 7.900.290 107 0.393.203 457 12,758,495
6246.010HONOLULU, HAWAII OFFICE W a7 31549.560 1 1,877,230 102
LOS ANGELES. CAUFORNIA OFFICE 1.526 74.000.100 36 1,442.730 1.562 76.242.630
PHOENIX, ARIZONA OFFICE 121 4,240,660 40 1.191.800 tea 51440.800
SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA OFFICE 132 4.550.500 25 60.906 107 8.417,265
SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA OFFICE 720 S6A00.920 M 1.999.150 0 6.790,070
ANCHORAGE. ALAOKA OFFICE 0 0 29 1.107,395 25 1.107,395
PORTLAND. OREGON OFFICE 157 5.216.740 129 4,00i.696 as 9.291.65
SEATTLE. WASHINGTON OFFICE 227 a.177.160 71 106.405 298 10,773.505
iPe Dot 92-17637 Filed 7-28^92 MS AM
MlAW CON 01061{'
9•
MEND
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441
DATE: August 20, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting ofAugust25, 1992
TO: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director
FRON: Housing Specialist Milt Dale .4 k -
SUBJECT: RESCHEDULE HRA MEETING FOR SEPTEMBER
The normally scheduled HRA meeting of Tuesday, September 15 falls on the same
date as the date of the Primary Elections. State law will not allow a local
unit of government to hold meetings involving City Commissions or comittees
on the same date as any election until after the polls have closed. This
would require that the meeting be held after 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September15, or at some other date.
Staff would recomend that Comissioners decide on a September meeting date attheirAugust25meeting. A September, 1992 City Center calendar is attached. Indicating dates when other meetings are held.
Attachment:
City Center Meeting Calendar
hra/mtg/8-25)
September 1992
crnr CEfM cnLMnnx
rm uemMW -M ALv e v MWIPM1/
r...._... ._...._...
1 2 3 4 6
7.QU
COMM]T BE
f
di 7 8 9 10 11 • 12
LAM DAY • Cky 7-.ftm BOARD OF 74!® FINM CUL 7 ftm PRAC Cotlo Ctl dw
018osa Qasad ZONIp1O
6iWW Vaot
Mon PIJ1l8 =
COMMSSION
19 14 16 18 17 18 19
0.0—%-67 STATEIhm.
llpl •••
rd.
FAIMMY
Q.E TiON
7avec
aalomol
20 21 22 23 24 25 28
G:wpm PLYMOUTH 6:45pm PLAN
FORUM FORUM
7 -.Wpm PLAN'
COMM.
27 28 29 30
RA16
AdPA
8 M T M T F 8
t
s a s s s s
t0 f1 1! 1a 14 t!
to 17 is1:0M as
na4 ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi
m 31
WNW
8 M T W T F 8
1 a a
4 s ! 7 0' ! 1!
11 18 to 14 16 1 117
1818ffi•M 2na
ffi ffi U-0 ffi a8 a1
8/5/1992
o •
mn
CITY OF PLYMOUTN
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYIN"H, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: August 20, 1992 For Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of
August 25, 1992
70: Charles E. Dillerud, Executive Director
FROM: Housing Specialist Milt Dale*5
SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS.
The following items are included for the Commissioners' attention:
it. Section 8 Statistical Report for July 31, 1992
b. Section 8 Financial Report for Period 7/1/9/1 - 6/30/92 (Balance
Sheet and Operating Statament)
c. Section 8 Waiting List Statistical Report
d. Letter from Kristin Larson Rieser of Stuart Corporation, 8/18/92
a.' Netr000litan Council's -Process to Revise its Housing Policies. Staff
attended a meeting in June on ON issue. A copy of the summery of
that meeting is attached as is a newsletter •Housing 1920, July 1992
issue on the sme topic.
f. °Standin U for Themselves' The Minnesota Women's Press Jul 5-26
s article was sent to me by aPlymouth on a a en .
article delves into the problems Section 8 tenants sometimes face'
when a landlord refuses to renew a Section 8 lease.
bra/info/8-25)
SUDSNARY STATISTICS REPORT • Q •
DATE-. 07/31/92
SELECTION CRITERIA: • ALL TBNANTB WERE INCLUDED
I. HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION. (8 OF ALL HEADS IS IN PAR8N7H8888)
A. THERE ARE 145 HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD. (DSIV 88 DDRB THAN 1 IN A UNIT.) THERE An 145 HOUSEHOLDS.
S. WE: UNDER 30 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80(+) NO: 55 62 11 2 4 5 6PCT: 37.9 42.8 7.6 1.4 2.8 3.4 4.1
AVERAGE AGB: 35.8
C. SEH: MRJA:. 16 ( 11.0) FEMALE: 129 ( 89.0)
D. SINGLE PARENT HEAD-OF-HOUSSHOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED:
MALE: 1 ( 0.7) FE MALE: 111 ( 76.6)
8. ELDERLY.v6AD-OF-HOUSEHOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED:
j8R 18R 2BR 38R 4SR
NO: 0 21 11 0 0
PCT: 0.0 14.5 7.6 0.0 1.0
F. NON -ELDERLY HEAD-OF-HOUSSHOLD FAMILIES ASSISTED:
OBR 18R 28R 3SR 48R
NO: 1 0 93 19 0
PCT: 0.7 0.0 64.1 13.1 0.0
G. RACE/BTHNICITr:
VHS: 118 ( 81.4)
BLACK: 22 ( 15.2)
AMER IND/ALASKAN NATIVE: 2.11ASIAN/PACIF ISLANDER: 0.7)
OTHER: i ( 0.7)
HISPANIC: 1 C 0.7) NON -HISPANIC: 144
H. MISCELLANEOUS:
62 YRS OR OLDER: 15 ( 10.3)
HANDICAPPED: 13 ( 9. -Cl
DISABLED: 3 ( 2.1)
FULL -TIM STUDENT (18 +): 1 ( 0.7)
NONE OF THE ASM.- 114 ( 78.6)
5+BR
0
0.0
5+8R
0
0.0
99.3)
PHA Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of FlymWtL
I ' SUMORY STATISTICS REPORT (Cont).: Date: 07/31/92 Page: 2
1 II. ALL MEMBERS COMPOSITION: (PCT IS PCT OF ALL MEMBERS)
A. THERE ARE 373 !HERS.
8. AGE:
0-12 13-17 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80(+)
190 17 66 69 12 2 4 6 7
50.9 4.6 17.7 18.5 3.2 0.5 1.1 1.6 1.9
AVERAGE AGE: 19.6
C. SEEN ALL - MALE: 130 ( 34.9) FEMALE: 243 ( 65.1)
ADULTS - MALE: 31 ( 8.3) FEMUR: 135 ( 36.2)
18 0 -
D. RACE/ETHNICITY:
WHITE:
BLACK:
AMER IND/ALASKAN NATIVE:
ASIAN/PACIF ISLANDER:
OTHER:
HISPANIC: 3 ( 0.8)
E. MISCELLANEOUS:
62 YRS OR OLDER:
HANDICAPPED:
DISABLED:
FULL-TZMS STUDENT (18 0:
NOMIB OF THE ABOVE:
284 76.1)
72 19.3)
11 2.9)
3 0.8)
3 0.8)
NON -HISPANIC: 370 ( 99.2)
17 ( 4.6)
14 ( 3.8)
3 ( 0.8)
1 ( 0.3)
339 ( 90.9)
F. FAMILY SIZE:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11(x) -
NO:. 22 50 48 19 5 1 0 0 0 0 0
PCT: 15.2 34.5 33.1 13.1 3.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE: 2.6
G.. RELRITIONSHIP CODE: (AVG IS AVG PER HOUSEHOLD)
HEAD SPOUSE ADULT DEPEN FOSTER LIVE-IN OTHER
NO: 145 9 it 203 0 1 4
AVG: 1.00 0.06 0.08 1.40 0.00 0.01 0.03
PEA Nanager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth
i
SWOMY STATISTICS REPORT (cont): Date: 07/31/92 Page: 3
III. INCOME/ 8XPffiQSES:
A. IROmlm BREAMMOM: (339CMM BEFORE ADJUSTMENTS)
UNDER .2500- 5000- 7500- 10000- 12500- 15000- 2500 4999 7499 9999 12499 14999 17499 17500(+) NO: 6 4 79 22 9 13 6 6PCT: 4..1 2.8 54.5 15.2 6.2 9.0 4.1 4.1AVSRMSM90OMO3: $ 8152
AVERAGE INCOI13 AFTER ADJU87 ONTS: $ 7002
8. INCMM SOURCES: (AVG IS AVERAGE FOR THAT rM)
EXCEPTIONS: LOWER XNC FAMILIES REQUIRING LI EXCEPTIONS: 0
D. RS<PPS (Averages per Eougehold, except for URD)
DOTAL T214M PAYMENT: 175.1
TERM RENT: 149.6
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENT: 379.8
UTILITY REiM®DRSON.NET PAYBUW:********* (Avg for only Eshlds with URASECURITYDEPOSIT: 121.9
E. BXPBIWRES: (AVG 18 AVG.PER HOUSEEOLD WITH THAT ITZN)
MODDICL CH CARE
PUBLIC
ELDERLY
DEDUC
WELF
17
WAGES ASSIST PENSION WSRM OTHER RENTHOLDSWITH: 34 91 24 19 25 0PERCENT: 23.4 62.8 16.6 13.1 •17.2 0.0AVGANDUMIT: 11069 5982 7293. 199 3300 0
C. IIiCONS CATEGORIES AT MVE-IN: INVIM CATEGORIES AT REEXAMM: VERY LOW IIMM: 76 52.4) VERY IAN INC0113: 94 64.6) LOITER XNCMM: 0 0.0) LONER IIWC01m: 5 3.4) OVER INCONS: 0 0.0) OVER : 0 0.0)
EXCEPTIONS: LOWER XNC FAMILIES REQUIRING LI EXCEPTIONS: 0
D. RS<PPS (Averages per Eougehold, except for URD)
DOTAL T214M PAYMENT: 175.1
TERM RENT: 149.6
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENT: 379.8
UTILITY REiM®DRSON.NET PAYBUW:********* (Avg for only Eshlds with URASECURITYDEPOSIT: 121.9
E. BXPBIWRES: (AVG 18 AVG.PER HOUSEEOLD WITH THAT ITZN)
MODDICL CH CARE
KANDCP DEPEN
OTHER ASSIST DEDUC
ELDERLY
DEDUCHOLDSWITH: 17 17 1 0 113 30PERCENT: 11.7 11.7 0.7 0.0 77.9 20.7AWGAMOUNT: 1069 2476 660 0 837 400
PER Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth
SU MARY STATISTICS REPORT (cont): • Date: 07/31/92 Page: 4
I IV. UNITS/CERTIFICATEB/VOUCHERS (PCT is from.units on file except where ..oted)
A. UNIT REPORT: (Calculated only if report includes a single project) UNITE ON FILE: 0
OSR 1BR 2BR 3SR 4SR 5+BR1. UNITS IN ACC: 0 0 O 0 0 0
0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( ,0.0)
2. LEASED: 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0)
3. OUTSTANDING 0 0 0 0 0 0ORQED: ( 0..0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) . ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0)
4. BALANCE (OVER 0 0 0 0 0 0UNDERACC: ( 0.0) ( 6.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0) ( 0.0)
S. PROGRAM UTILIZATION: (Includes ALL units. Use Rpt •13 for more detail.)
PCT OF NUMBER PERCENT
UNITS TOTAL ISSUED/ UTILI-
AVAIL. AVAIL. LEASED ZATIONSECTION8CERT: 10 83.3 144 93.5
SECTION 0 MR: 0 0.0 0 0.0VOUCH: 2 16.7 1 33.3PUBLIC8OUSINGO0.0 0 0.0
TOTAL: 12 100.0 145 92.4
C. GROSS RENT'
UNDER 200 200-299 300-399 400-499 500-599 600-699 7004NO: 5
PCT: 3.4
0
0.0
O
0.0
9
6.2
102
70.3
16
11.0
13
9.0AVERAGEGROSSRENT: 55.0
D. CONTRACT RENT
UNDER 200 200-299 300-399 400-499 500-599 600-699 700+ NO: 5
PCT: 3.4
0
0.0
0
0.0
19
13.1
105
72.4
6
4.1
10
6.9AVERMSCONTRACTRENT': 529.4
E. UTILITY ALLOWkNCZ
UNDER 25
NO:
25-49 50-74 75-99 100-124 125-149 150+ 85
PCT: 58.6
55
37.9
1
0.7
2
1.4
2
1.4
0
0.0
0
0.0AVERAGEUTILITYALLOWANCE.: 25.6
PER Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth
SUMSNARY STATISTICS REPORT (Cont)s
V.. LEASING INPOFMTION: .
DOTAL
A. LBASS-IN-PLACE FAMILIES: 1
Date: 07/31/92 Page: 5
ELDERLY NON-BLDERLY
1 (100.0) 0 ( 0.0)
B. CBRTIFICATB/VOUCHBR SIZE V8 ACTUAL UNr? SIBS: ACTUAL SIBS:
C. EXCEPTION RENTS FOR CERTIFICATES:
OSR 1SR 2BR 3BR 4BR 5+BR
OBR: 1 0 0 0 0 0
CBRTIF/ 18R: 0 21 0 0 0 0
VOUCHER 2BR: 1 0 103 0 0 0
SIZE: 3BR: 1 0 0 18 0 0
4BR: 0 0 0 0 0 0
S+BR: 0 0 0 0 0 0
C. EXCEPTION RENTS FOR CERTIFICATES:
D. COMPARISON OF GROSS REPT TO PM RS:
OBR IBR 2BR 3BR 48R 5+BR
100 EXCEPTION AUTHORISED: 0 0 0 0 0 0
200 EXCEPTION AUTHORISED: 0 0 0 0 0 0
ANNUAL. AW. FACTOR APPLIED: 0 0 2 1 0 0
CURRENT OR OVER FMR: 0 0 0 0 0 0
1-100 OVER Plat: 0 O 0 0 0 0
10-200 OVER Flet: 0 0 0 0 0 0
MORE THAN 200 OVER Flet: 0 0 0 0 0 0
D. COMPARISON OF GROSS REPT TO PM RS:
S. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHOSE GROSS RUNT EXCEEDS PAYlMOT STD:
OBR ISR 2BR 3BR 4BR 5+BR
VOUCHER: 0 0 1 0 0 0
AVBlWB f OVER P8: 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NMlBBR OF ASSIST® FAMILIES WHOSE GROSS RENT EXCEEDS PAYMENT STD: 1
F. 1NQN88R OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHO, BSCAUSS THEIR 0=8 REIT IS LESS
THAN PAM= STANDARD, RECEIVE A SAVINGS:
OBR in 28R 3BR 4BR 5+8R
VOUCHER: 0 0 0 0 - 0 0
AVBRAGB SAVINGS: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
lNU11BER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES RECEIVING SAVIHUS: 0
PHA Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth
i
OBR 2BR 28R 3BR 4BR 5+BR
CURRENT PMES (AVG) : 1 526 613 774 0 0
OR a 1. L%M: 0 0 1 0 0 0
OR a Plate 1.IxPlet: 0 0 0 0 0 0
OR - PMR: 0 11 22 9 0 0
OR a .9xPMR c Plat: 0 3 37 4 0 0
OR c .9xPMR: 1 7 43 6 0 0
TOTAL: 1 21 103 19 0 0
S. NUMBER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHOSE GROSS RUNT EXCEEDS PAYlMOT STD:
OBR ISR 2BR 3BR 4BR 5+BR
VOUCHER: 0 0 1 0 0 0
AVBlWB f OVER P8: 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NMlBBR OF ASSIST® FAMILIES WHOSE GROSS RENT EXCEEDS PAYMENT STD: 1
F. 1NQN88R OF ASSISTED FAMILIES WHO, BSCAUSS THEIR 0=8 REIT IS LESS
THAN PAM= STANDARD, RECEIVE A SAVINGS:
OBR in 28R 3BR 4BR 5+8R
VOUCHER: 0 0 0 0 - 0 0
AVBRAGB SAVINGS: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
lNU11BER OF ASSISTED FAMILIES RECEIVING SAVIHUS: 0
PHA Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth
i
SEMMY STATISTICS REPORT (cont):
G. UNIT TYPES:
Date: 07/31/92 Page: 6
SINGLE FAMILY: 5 ( 3.5)
DUPLEX: 3 ( 2.1)
GARDEN: 135 ( 93.8)
EIGHRISE: 1 ( 0.7)
TOI HOUSR. 0 ( 0.0)
H. HOUSING TYPES: LEASED NOT LEASED
IND GROUP RESIDENCE: 0 0
CONGREGATE: 0 0
MOBILE HOME PAD: 0 0
SINGLE ROOM OCCUP: 0 0
SEARED HOUSING: 0 0
RENTAL REHAB: 0 0
PROJ SELF SUFFIC: 0 O
OVERISSUED: 0 0
PLAGGED: 0 0
OTHER: 0 0
I. TURNOVER: CERT MOD REE VOUCHER PUB NOUS
AVG TINES USED/LEASED: 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00
J. CANCELLATIONS OF CERT/VOUCHER:
OVERINCOM: 0 ( 0.0)
HOUSING NOT LOCATED: 0 ( 0.0)
NO LONGER INTERESTED: 4 (100.0)
OTHER SUBSIDY: 0 ( 0.0)
OBLIGATION UNMET: 0 ( 0.0)
TSFJCMTED BEFORE 60 DAYS: 0 ( 0.0)
OTHER: 0 ( 0.0)
X. HAP/LEASE CANCELLATIONS:
ONNER UNCOOPERATIVE: 0 ( 0.0)
TENANT UNDESIRABLE: 0 ( 0.0)
TRUANT DECEASED: 0 ( 0.0)
NO LONGER IN JURISDICTION: 0 ( 0.0)
NO LONGER INTERESTED: 2 (100.0)
SUBSTANDARD HOUSING: 0 ( 0.0)
NO LONGER BLIGIBLE: 0 ( 0.0)
SALE OF PROPERTY: 0 ( 0.0)
PHA INITIATED: 0 ( 0.0)
OTHER: 0 ( 0.0)
L. M 'I ER DATA: THIS REPORT ALL ONNERS
ONNERS N/CONTRACTS: 24 27
FAMILIES UNDER LEASE: 145 143
AVG FAMILIES PER ONNER: 6.04 5.30
WHITS: 2 8.3) 2 ( 7.4)
BLACK: 0 0.0) 0 ( 0.0)
AMER IND/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0.0) 0 ( 0..0)
ASIAN/PACIF ISLANDER: 0 0.0) 0 ( 0.0)
OTHER: 2 8.3) 2 ( 7.4)
PHA Manager 3.40 (086-91 * City of Plymouth
i
be-
Soso3080 PLYMOUTH NRA SECTION 8 EX CO INDICATES CREDIT AMOUNT) PAGE 1
s
DESCRIPTION PERIOD AMT TO DATE ANT BUDGET.. ANT OVER
UNDER
BALANCE &MEET
CASH*':
1111.1 GENERAL FUND CASH
1117 PETTY CASH
TOTAL CASH
00
00
00
449719.35
00
44 719.3!
00
00
00
44019.3S
00
44 719.35
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
1125 ACCOUNTS REC. MUD 59878.70 9878.70 00 59878.70
1129 ACCOUNTS REC. OTHER
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
00
59876.70
00
59678.70'
00
00
00
9878.70
1162 GEN -FUND INVESTMENTS
DEFERRED CHARGES
00 _ 00 0
1211 PREPAID INSURANCE
1290 OTHER DEFERRED CHARD
TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGES
00.00
00
00
549305.94
549305.94
00
00
00
549305.94
549305.94
LAND@ STRUCTURES 9.EOUIP.
1475.1.;OFFICE FURN 6.E0.. 00 3.219.97 00 39219.91
1475.7 AUTOMOTIVE EQUIP'.
TOTAL LANG• STRUCT & E0.
00
00
00
39119.97
00
00
00
39119.97
1690 UNDISTRIBUTED DEBITS
TOTAL ASSETS
00
59878.70
00
1089123.96
0
00 1089123.96
SD80 PLYMOUTH MRA SECTION 8 EX Co INDICATES CREDIT AMOUNT) PAGE 2
DESCRIPTION .PERIOD AMT TO DATE AMT BUDGET . ANT OVER
UNDER
9ALAUrg SHEET
LIABILITIES' 1 L SURPLUSyjeCOWiT
2111 VENDOR L CONTRACTORS 00 00 00 00
2117.1 FEDERAL INC TAX NN
SOCIAL SECURITY NN
00
00
00
00
00
Soo
00
000
2117:-3 STATE INC:TAX,NN. 00 00 00 00
211T.'4Nf ALTN.:.INS MND :: 00 00 00 00
s ..00 moo see Soo
2117.8 RETIREMENT NN 00 00 00 00
2118 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE HUD 00 00 00 00
ER ACCOUNTS PAY, 00 00 00 00
2;1,9 3.fACCT. PAT -- -CITY:: • 00 00 00 00
j A04000NTS'PATNBLE 00 00 • 00 00
I2210•PREPAIO ANNUAL CONTR 4139267.00 00 00 00
Rafin earn, 00 o s 8 640
2 90,-;UNDI3TRIBUTED=CREOIT 00 00 00 00
2700 INC t EXP CLEARING 4119929.29* 00 4309298.00 4309298.000
9...SURPLUS•
6281D3'UNREiERVEO.SURPLUS` 5499263.00 494479147.44 239157.00 4942399"0.44
22241-ttS ;SURPLUS-12PER - RES 74216.41* 183m325,35* moo 103,385,350
2827 RES SURPLUS -PROD ACC - 130.117.300 2989988.070 00 2969960.070
2840 CUM. HUD CONTRIB. 4199145.700 491519379.340 4539455.00* 396979924.34*
TOTAL SURPLUS* 0 * 4630m2gls2068
r•TOTAL•LiAB. 9 SURPj.US 59878.700 109.i23.9sa 00 1069IM 960
PROOF 00 00 00 00
000 ._.. •
5080 PLYMOUTH NRA SECTION-$ EX CO INDICATES.. CREDIT AMOUNT) PAGE 3
DESCRIPTION -------PERIOD------ ---YEAR TO OAT! ---- -------BUDGET------ CHANGE
PUN AMOUNT PUM AMOUNT PUN AMOUNT
OPERATING STATEMENT
471505•NAP-PORTABILITY 114.35 1199381.23 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
TOTAL'=HOUSING ASSIST. PAT355.50 3719137.870 .00 .00 369.44 3859692.00 '3859692.000
3000ST.INATEO.AONZW FEE 46.03 489059.340 00 00 00 00 00
3 O ii EM ?ACCT OFFSET, 46.03 48 OS .34 00 00 00 00 00
OPERATING INCOME
3300 INT RESERVED SURPLUS 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
3301;AOMIN FEE INCOME 11.55 129053.26 00 00' 00.00 00
3610"INT;6EN FUND INVEST 2.65 29980.31 00 00 00 00 00
3690•'OTNER'INCONE 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME 14.40 159033.57 00 00 00 00 ego
OPERATING -EXPENSES
ADMINISTRATION
4110;;AONIN...SALARIE3' 32.50 339932.250 00 00 42.0T 439926.00 439926.000
4130 E A eEXPEN ' 10 99.320 00 00 00 00 00
4140 STAFF TRAINING 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
4150.TRAVEL 06 60.000 00 00 00 00 00
4170 ACCOUNTING 1.25 1 311.750 00 00 00 00 00
4171.AUDIT 1.44 19500.000 00• 00 48 500.00 500.000
4180*:OFFICE RENT 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
4190,SUNORY ADMIN EXPENSE 2.94 3 064.800 00 00 iT 180.00 180.000
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 38.28 399946.120 00 00 42.73 449.606s90K96 6. 0
GENERAL EXPENSE
4510.•INSURANCE 00 00 00 000' 00 00 0
4S30;
5080 PLYMOUTH MRA SECTION 8 EX CS INDICATES CREDIT AMOUNT) PAGE 4
June
DESCRIPTION
OOC6a•T*YG lTATRYCYT
TEAR TO DATE ---- -------BUDGET - CHANGE
PUN AMOUNT PUN AMOUNT PUN AMOUNT
t:,SYRPL'US+AOJYSTNENTS'`'' '
Adidifftl8kiAAYEARAnji-Aaft. 1-21 321,60* 08 an
6120 GAIN/LOSS NONEXP EO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
TOTAL SURPLUS ADJUSTMENTS 1.27 1.9321.000 00 00 00 00 00
P,ROVISION•FOR RESERVES
70p6=•`PRow,001 OPER. RESERV 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
knif,pol PROj AccT 000 Soo 06 00 22012 23,157.00 5T' 076
TOTAL PROV. FOR RESERVES
I
00 00 00 00 22.18 23.157.00 23.1ST9000
e CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
17520 -REPLACE NONEXP',EQYIP 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
37530"?RECEIPT•.NONEXP EQUIP 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
s
37590 CONTRA FOR TS00S 0o 00 00 00 00 00 00
s TOTAL 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
s
410 4ANDALISN EXPEND: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
CONTRIBUTIONS EARNED
t@029 -ANNUAL CONTt-CUR IR 00 00 000 00 434.34 453.455.000 453.455.00
38021 ANNUAL CONTR-PR TR 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
TOTAL 00 0o 0o 00 434.34 453.455.000 453.455.00
s
IA
do
PLYMOUTH HOUSING AND REDWELOPMET AUTHORITY
STATISTICS REPORT - 08/20/92
1. TOTAL Nt8®SR OF APPLICANTS IN ALL PROGRAMSs 217
2. BREAKDOWr CERTIF/VOUCHERS: 216 99.51
mm. REHAB.: O 0.03
PUBLIC HOUSING: 0 0.01
NEN CONST..: 0 I 0.01
SUB. RUM. % 0 I 0.03
OTHER: 0 I 0.01
3.. AGES UNDER 30 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ NO: 67 56 27 16 26 16 6PCT: [ 30.81 [ 25.8) 112.4) 7.31 11.93 7.31 I 2.71
AVERAGE AGE IS: 41 *•
4.. SEX: NALE: 54 124.81
FEMALBs 163 75.11
S. SINGLE PARENT•FAMILIESs MALE: 15 I 6.91
6. ELDERLY FAMILI88 8Y 8EDR00lM SIZE:
FEMALE: 146 t 67.21
OBR IBR 2BR 3BR 4BR 5+9Rnot0368000
7. NON -ELDERLY FAMILIES BY BEDROUN SIZES
OBR 1BR 2BR 38R 4BR 5+BRnot09127000
S. RACE/ETHNICITY/MINORITY:
MHITEs 184 84.71
BLACK: 21 9.63
IND./ALASKAN: 6 t 2.71
ASIAN/PACIFIC: S I 2.31
OTHER: 1. 0.41
HISPANIC: 0 0.03
NON HISPANIC: 216 99.51
9. MISc. INFOEMATION:
62 YEARS OR OLDER: 45 20.71
HANDICAPPED: 5 t 2.31
DISABLED: 31 14.21FALLTIME8TUDENTs0I0.01
10. PRE88RSNCSS:
SUB -STANDARD NSG.% 1 [ 0.43 INV. DI8PLAC®s 8 I 3.61RENT > 509 INC.: 131 [ 60.31 LOCAL PREF.: 209 196.31NOPREFERENCE: 6 1 2.71
Suart
31111 She(wa arkk 011ie Center
s ® 2177 YowWw Avenue
EMSt. Paul. ftnems 551162676
612)69BffMFez:t"17
August 18, 1992
The City of Plymouth HRA
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
RE: Senior Housing Development
Dear Board Members:
AUG 19 Va.7
CITY fir.. p!YEPOUT! I
pottttuwii ... ... i..
Thank you for the opportunity to have been considered as the Project Consultant for
your proposed senior housing project. It was a pleasure following your progress this
past year which resulted in reaching your current status. Although we were not
selected, I believe my time spent at your meetings has been a very worthwhile
experience.
I remain confident that Stuart Corporation could provide you with the personal and
professional service you desire to complete this project, while maintaining a level
of community involvement, cost controls, and functional reporting mechanisms.
Working.for other outside owners and developers, we know first-hand that
communication and open bookkeeping policies are vital to each project's success.
Operating buildings owned by us, we have learned the value of resident satisfaction
and efficient management.
Stuart Corporation invites you to tour any of our wonderful rental communities as you
gather ideas for your building. As this building will be our new neighbor, we also
plan to remain abreast of your progress. Should things not work out with Walker, we
hope that you will consider us once again.
Thank you again for your consideration. If I may be of assistance, please feel free
to contact me.
Sincerely,
SMART C TIO
s 'fen Iamson r
Director of Develooment
KLJt:as
Teems •rnt.nvw. ea...... ..-.... ......_.__-'-- -- -----
DATES .
Tch
f FROM:
SUBJECPs
e•
IdmopoinAN COUNCQ.
Mean Park Centre, 230 Feat Fifth Servet, St. Paul, Minnesota
612 291-89 TDD 612 291-M
SIN !S Icy
June 24, IM
CITY OF PLYMOL
Attendee= at J2 and June 4 Meetings to Disam Housing PC MILOPWRT
Joanne Barron 4
SUMMMY OFY2 AND JUNE 4 MEETINGS ON HOUSING POLICY
Attached is a summary that combines commena horn the June 2 and June 4 meetiop on housing
inues :ad a Metropolitan Council role in housing.
These meetings have been a valuable way of brioft important ham and information to our
attention. Thank you for your 000tribuhon to the dams.
We will send you mthly HOUSING 92 updates to beep you informed of the Cound's housing
Fft :avisionPEOCUL
i
SUbla LARY OF CObgd3ffM
b=MGS MM LOCAL GOVERWDrr STAFF, JUNE 3 & JUNE 46 IM
Two of a Sella of Mamp m Dbaa ha
far do MabapolMm Camdrm Romft Faft Ro hl= Peooesa
lbiety4 M city mMWM ph== sad mamuoity &wdopmeert staff atamded two moetibp bdd
ea June Z and June 4,199% to dbaa Ewa b their ddee, and wgpsdoa for IVW to b dude
In the Couodlti mvimd homing Polido.
C mmmb from both meetiop ml
v - into sae wmmey, blas. M& wm dada l le
there was aamidaa b ova ep to do a mmmb from the two meadw pa dculub io do areae
of homing and odghbodmod mvkd adoa. tm polby sad dw she tons wSpOW fsr a•
bWraP itaa t7wodl rob.
A CDNi=4MTI'= Tt
Botb pmp ntd iib impntaot to vice boo ft in two wap
homing Is a major pet of as gq;km% boamumnr
homing k a P umd mead moons
L Hmeft and adgh wbnd eodbbmdm
With aarmt eaoraaa. wen hl ipg behind the aced.
Ndghbod oW mvkdkmbn b a brood sem
bduda iofras<euc- mpboeamk a wA m bombg
eonOw eeevbm bla tcamportatioo sad dry are (And, an a mmo sob.
Iidraga btwem OempuNdm bmS nd ida In IM mg1m).
CWH CA it "MadioalW redtalirob@6 refereiog to h da tng serAm
Gm bWty, ditfm mt appeaacha to suit the duadoa b bay. ag In the aster
deb; file eaoee R* teemed radeMelopmeat. ant rew2dhatim. to deadoped dttet,
podoet' mbwopmoot b aged for.
Revkdbad= as Mdm or ebmgiag aetdbvtae of the bomiog mit (dao of
on% eta.) or the moborbood (ddevdhs, chip fntaa)
We sad peag m to do rehabfitadaa oa a bj r- a k bwb. Doiog 67 boma a year
b sot eaoolL URAP b a good approach for ddL The WWA aogWddm and mbab
pwpam world bdp if broiled at oo adoquata In&
L Prima" of the homft sloe
and ea* cafe enbraemmt of A boudog is ieapoetmt
Mmamaooe cods eco be amtrownK ohm beause poputy oNraea do oat here
the money to do mww mdotm mm or, sometime people prder to buy a mm bonne,
weber than spend money oa Me OM one whm tape mpdo loom; they thick of homlog aamay ==Oft. CM poiot mushum a aooBiet beusem bonsiog asbtisti+tepae and boudag s pmoW no==)
Most awaea of a smdl number of mnW uoW don't keww her to nwmpe at =bode
popaty. This is a problem.
Rmuft pesavatioo bdWm mekigt a hft bw toS aompadbk % th today's aeede„ e; dee Of amts.
BuNd tied WMIN in do Bae PbwL Both poop.mmdoaed that as reduced basicsstandardsofthe197gb;-sm uw house dam, bt aim btiateu me moditieaeionr-.res abon.
dt6ted sad rsdted b dtuattom the dda ars not bappy with. Soma d lie lens
drosdy need todavdopmad, uptirediob Don't kraer hm dat gwft and tense
naodards m popb em afford to buy a house d: months or a ym aoosbes, and and upwithaoeysom
we and m mmktdo mbd upgrade bmft and aeVboehoob oat a* due to am butdnatoeebdandstaodaeds (al abose), and housiot that uram't bust to ImL Chdm
aparemma bush b the lM were built s a way to poww rermna they were aotMeanttolastmorstheaZoyam
L Tae reft
The 1986 to im mW high reatd poputy ta: eats work ogdmbt =job== and
PUMMUM Of MOW .fig stodgy Rdudsg aural tris b stay to prsaviottheboudogsupplyTYrFA* la @mama the mbosity d housing faits can base the
effod d bdpisg the bousiot stock s a whole.
The Pomata aaeoor (gid honabt own ).need bomtiss to tieginle hoabt stoleimpr'oaemmt-mot just martoet bomdmL
For the b=Wk of horns 9 ata, tbers should bs pslids m inure--- peoperty team
bvwmamem ars Mata Houee+er, °here coda be sde+pse amesegaeaos
3. Bmaiw adnad bws repnft housing ped mm cm um adturdly-ptetiased houmbgm* is baud an irob mi
4 Need to addrem pemavtog boudog with espieiog n ddbL
PROCEDURAL ISSUES
L Lek of dhadw st federal and stde larch nom mu ft bomioS VWL
2 Lai of load amadlllaflueme over yps and kmdm of bom & and the tervioss mod
tohmauaure provided. Developer aren't t00ova ka
Lek of aomdbmwon sm0nm vadnm haoiu bareicrs.
4 Lek of flmM4 in Iramt for load creativity.
OTEIER CORGEM
L Timms a condo between the reality of people mad* to the urban hinp chid and the
amkmmentd aorta it creates. We can't mfEmd urban arpsome mymae–in tamp of
tramportadoa croft6 eavkoameaW aosa. The aeomad Bond phoning moma om skim to
create a vilimge envhoameat that provtda humor needs ami setvioes
I
I
On the other hea4 many people prefer to live in a rddeadd area with no servion when they
have to travd long digamea to work shoppM eta people and o-
ii
Many people more to
the:— of suburb became of mpacqdm of safety and better schools in the suburb. We mad to
address the satiety 9 – w t v W , and the nd y -o people Oft fo War near fed
afs, md.odm wi l avant to move theca
COUNCIL ROLE
The Council's bom[og poli y plan daM defioe a role that unladen the &UowbS to a
Pvft local Fgamoscom
1. Regload amddhmdn sob
mdst i0 temovft regulatory Tier; belp sat out tuna lems
help crate aero funding ini- y and fadttaae coopendon among -artom aetoo
nombse proper bgWkdm."b,. :y dntgmd to address a paedoolar problem ia•a given
locality) for its llmger. tegion4vide imiucls
a mpfic a umilled waitiag life for Se tim 8 aetif cesas; soma people get as shorter Ihts
le aha jmhadom
Resumb sad bibol ol mI I sob
serve as deadogbome for i06mmmetoa and ideas
phaft by mM sectom
m4mluuae. redelbe modor bomdarisk use smaller wad
do alloadoas by seam
track booelog mobility patinas foam erloomtoBa
provide loaadvn to Olde t0 work whh ssemr Iosmsr e.g.. atria 000111 apply for
psopam funding n a seam
assemble data, by mmbapaliy soil by snow. In a •metro madw sheet•
collect and analyse k&nmgiom to Oamprehaasive Affordable Homing Strategic
OL4n)
aoablis of I aionectiom.
technical assigance roe is very bdpft erpedally for smell Cities wdtb limited gaff
rcouroes
3. Camdtaaden of kmft pollry wM aD other rqlnd plaaa—trsmpostedon (a* 35W
impadsN newer egemiom
A 11c to ARISk witb a goal to better utilise the invegmeats wen made (for sample. Egg
metro is wait end southwest) and concentrate an faM. sad redevelopment.
I M allocad mgpe Phu tar dlN&Odam of atwMled hamming (ioduding YnlicEmed and bond
poop bme& h melts sbellea)
IL Emmodve iephowasodw mmana
need arrots end gide
requite einem that don't provide needod•bousioa to pool dollars to a bomsiog food.
Oder comtomtor alsmt. Afsompmfl ins Cb mu own
Don't follow federal pdL7 as a model or guide.
Uta all Semon 8 doHm received by the Cm and for both not for indirect comm.
b the Coamdl willing to tate a leadership role in homW b it pointless to bavm maatiogs lie
this und we know the reaWWdecMans in the Council's vidomiog process? We don't know what
the Councd aril dad& about a tale for bouft at lack of amen in its pdesitic.
HOUSING. 9
JUL ,:
µ, An Update on the Me4+opolltan'coondrs CITY .
P Process to Revise Its Housing
polldes July
1992 In June the Metropolitan Council's Housing Program continued to hold meeting with various groups to help
lay the groundwork for revising the housing chapter of the Mevopuban Develapsnau Guide. Five meetings
took place to discuss bousing isves and concerns that affect local governments, loan -income persons and persons
who suffer from mental glans. The meetings also helped in getba ft ideas about the roles and responsibilities
of various levels of Inernment in
housing. Judging by the attendance, the interest in the process for re.%*ft the Council's bousiog guide chapter bas
been high. About 100 people representing state, county and local government, public housing spacies
bong nonprofits, service providers and consumers attended the June
meetings. With 14 of 17 planned meetings completed, the initial assessment of the comments made during the
group discu awns seem to fall into two main categoric: a) major regional housing problem or Issues; and b)
dw Metropolitan Council's rob In
homing. The following list summarizes the major points raised most often during the meetmp bald to date. (Some
of these were mentioned in the June
update). The need for more affordable boudog and for additional funding to produce affordable
housing Housing choice both in terms of geographic location and in terms of bousiog type
to accommodate special
needs. The importsnoe of desrgoing housing and housing programs to promote independence and
self-
sulflCienxy. The need to build flability into housing fuodmg and programs (to acknowledge
cultural differences, special needs, local needs, community
dnfferenccs} The complexity and fragmentation of the 'housing systema The need to break down barriers
that make access to housing programs and housing funding difficult for individuals and
organizations. The need to link housing and transportation (this was discmed n an love in itself and
in connection with
choice} The integration of horsing planning with planning for other metrepolitao systems and the need
to aosess impact of regional systems plans on the horsing market and
neighborhoods. The need for neighborbood revitalization and preservation of the housing
stock. The need to reform federal and state tax policy, particularly n it affects rental
In tome d the meedgp the d6aneiea mores 6om Weathl bg eyload hoaatgg tbweb m de8olog the publielbattheCmmclOfftbowfo& ' was p.tdeafa ewWeat at she June 23
olieft w dd wnb cmraned m dim the cols dwaSi m gobemmeot lerdrb 6ovttot
Ike Couoegb appapbbte bob b bwAbg wwa viewed s diet d nOnd bribe sod aowdhmmr. Ma Cwmd
ws sot memo d haft a wle b v impdommoadm or bombg had* bd goreeammdtr RM6
aoopoBdb and so an d=M be d o implem oom meedog 9 .. % at. sW, Mw fdhmb g sedWdeb was
ideotiBed s opptopdabe sad impottaat aedirideb icor de Ckmed to be iarolre I b:
t'°Od h011 w m admen ptedemb. Mem to
a000mpW6 ddb betide bseaee6 and podwd n of topoete that 6outtgp me" tnem
1m6:
d
and p ip ptooma 1 thn bdei people topuhar m asdre s
held o CM mtmidpal botmdmteb. Emovicno oeed m dawebp atrategbb m enbute
dbkbudm ri d barb a W=bd b do .
cbsovioabs brmm Rdbbg a aeembeAdbgmdhoadoptmuabandadumbgrarbabcoawitueedati
dwk b uema
of nPiffly
m*dim dm aeadr
i aubuebe and
Pmwi ng bombg bfi madoo Bad 1iapde Me dial b. impabhet to bed p oommem and
bomtoj poor dem but wrhM shay cam dawdop an dteir ow L B=pic ofialft and
Edi
Wbdog b xmadon =bad to to and howbS bola km hautgp ameloet aoatytlrr mbmdm
RPM Mo.
0 *a
developmal of thm phow bj the apptopdate commudds m ammo do mgbod bo ft bard
and pab pt mUmm.A
Nat moadh'a update vA amt aepobdog = Bodhop am the jWft ndp b at hombg oemm data. b the
mmadme. these 4 am abate dibeumioa meedgg mbodded liar J*.
Pdrab houft hwWa7 raw ( Vb m)
wwwooft Jut 3% le am.naan
u wM be bdd leQoo6eb000e Room 2A d me Meuopoiimo Cowed aMM Mbom pack Ontm 230 Fart Mh
Sda % SL pauL
Nyco hese my 9mdm m the bo macho b ddb update at aro ho m od b atteadbg the Jdy 22 mooftplaneGommanyofthefidbwbgon
An Motoao (2916601) Ovide teddon coobdbadm
Joame Banos (291) Imed bmkwyhek.
Nnq Ream (M -4W) Ho sbg aedb d OmW PoPdwm
tta....0 w.anYllaaa VOULPILa a*ra-I&IM rnarr..d AnimmaLPrywss,u
THE MINNESOTA
MEN'S
F•
j ,
q
i aw amr i"iia ..$•.
LI(r ar t •' i 'S.:r,`f:X:t1fC-' f `O e:l
Standing up
fiar themselves
by Rebecca Sisco
Chalk up v1eMry for some low-income
resident. .86 rooklyn park—at least Tornow.
For Nne montlu Diana Walker had been on
a waiting list. She was hoFing to move with
her three cI.lkiren hom a two-bedroom
spa tmcnt at Willow Brook Apartments in
Brooklyn Center to a threebodroom unit in
the same mmples. In fad, she had already
started packing.
Sometime around the middle of May—just
twoweeksbeforeshepplannedromova -she
g taphonecallfromtheapartmentmanager,
Ginger Schlueter. According to Walker,
Schfuetersuggesoed shestayput,eaplaining
that
Contthe
rtapament management company,
Mid inent ManagementCorperationof
Brook" Park rastdems amu Walker
left) and CyMhta Buford (right)
lough1 for their homes and wan.
AAflteiss kat 1
R p d, woad no renew her base
tlr fauewlogyeer'
Walwam awwas Noberin(ornwd
that mI'sand RobaMUMbn
Au hadtyQ IAIbmekashashem
would be rarered and that Be naw
MIA low wem being amepted.
0W (the known as Section se)
a.nt4mb@idycrtl(Imta tssund by
h,hdoWWwommmiobw4nomw
people ThaewboqualfY
wlra dim an take thew eta
ever bdlding frrn"Pts will aoorpt
ant
Mm
immhlyp
tthenpcyspart
At Brat, Walker -orprd the dtua-
tion and decided not to cerin the 3-
bedwomt unt Agteaing with what
Sed fussir apparently hod old bar,
dadmwl chink It mould make @ams
o mow Into the larger unit only to
have to trove agdn in another year.
Balder, wouldbeeapenalve,
and she ale should save
ailowby staying in the smaller.
But eomrehbg didn't seem o square.
U elk had never daemRed any prop
ah' or anti caatyty offer problems,
she, adaadcould the mwgmnaht
d -
y lcyauy mk- to renew her
To gad out what herwhat bar dots
was, she tmrhnded Homrunr, a pro
Rmn of the Commnmfty Action (or
nty (CASED
amency and wwaasrpI oo uz john -
am CA%rs two agaamat She
also talked to Erk Cowpenedu with
the LMd Ald and Helen
Cbtllos d the MaRp ihn Coundl
Walker Maenad dist although ac -
4111111011111111 HU Mew Is voluntary on
the penal landlords,oawea Mndlod
amepis an HRA, the landlord cannot
aurid the wldacb n mhm to fmww
tlrtr Maw without Just cause'
So Walker talked to other residents
and found other who were Sedbn
g loin" Mat were single mo&
e, erand a few ware differently abled.
They too apparently had bass told
their Masa wouldn't be Rrwed.
Willow Brook ha 42 MRA Msw out
of 40"br u aw
Lur bw their wanted to sty st Wil.
lowflawk irapatmuerkr•,we adma
and wall nrintshnd
Mea Important cold reeldau Kim
Wilson awes maters have children
standing nearby Oreherd Lock El-
smennry School whichis a gpod
school. an. because the achoo>-dts-
W Is Small with low apartment
eampleaa, she and other residents
would have little dhance of keeping
their ehlldtan b theschool if t by had
to law willow Brook
llenr Walker M9 with dnrghlar AM W and bw Mand.
About theonlyotheroptbn was Wil-
low park Apartment, also managed
by Mid Continent but those apad-
mmmts are not sNtabk, according to
residents.
During the two few wake, the HRA
residents got to know each other,
gathered more Information and con-
tacted others who could help,lndud-
InggHni apinCountyCommissloner
jots Dents lid SUISenstn sou Wm
Luther.
Bm,ratherthanRlyone —ayomelse
to take care of theta, said Ede
Coopentaln, • offatomey with the
LelplAklSocidy thetenants'dldanawfullotoftheworkthenadves.'
By eartyjar, residentshod met twice
as a group and organized a matting
forjune 17. They Invited represenn
tivee of Mid Condrant b attend the
vmdmjgand seat out pna Rhea o
8"MI now organizations, Incl d -
Ing theMinnrwn Women's PML
Twenty -Nor out d 49 HRA MUM
showedupp.. DuklaHa adon whole
acting Of moor of tFe Hennepin
CountyHousingad Redevtbpment
Authority and who wee caked o go
o n thebehalf of Commission Deno,
was also there.
Observed Hogedom,'I've seen a lot
of residents, groups, and this was not
a dlzoeganlud bunch of angry ppesoopple
whojmtwantialto maodhoiler.
They wen people who had their ad
a-. Thy wemdlsdphnod,abn
forthright and to the poRNand they
managed o any nontTuils.'
But wrinafromhMidContinerdamms
lmsaA, thecorrtpenys vies pendent
Susan Selmer, sent a statement say-
lrtg chi comparay never Intended o
evkt any ;C .=rats and that
management makes no distinction
hued on who pays the rent.
Wo haveproblem wldents wbo as
hit theHRA progmn,as wella prob-
hm wldents that are not In the pW
grammard, our policy Is to handleall
aaalndlvfduelly%aldthelatemeaL
This was good raw@ to Walker and
other residents, who saw the bum
Cbacking down from what they
believed to bean attempt to get rid of
ItsHRARnten. Had they not banded
ogetherand lamed what theirrights
were, tly might b., looking for new
homes, said tenants
And, come August 1, Walker will fi.
nally get the thme•bedroc m apart-
ment ala ladggbeeeen prwNsed.
htwedbepaaivepeople,'
ars
at Mid aid
Walker. 'But! know how o standup
krmhyseffaod how toaskquauons.'
Irbledemonstntesthat, just bemuse
someone is poor doesn't mean they
can't defend themselves,' said
Coope stain of the Legal Aid S-10 Y*
flhae Ie are poor, but they.
net stupid
Yet mie Coope• pour people
usually heveedra stress in theirlira,
soo(ren they don't have Ote energy o
battle sash problem..
Charlie Warner, who Is the housing
ptog ens manager for CASH, said
the situation also demonstrates the
power tenants have whim they work
together. 'Usually nobody beleves
theyhove any power at all untilthey
agaNtnthemadvasatdwla Thera'
power In member.'
Btu the raddmW work Isn't ova
Walker Yid renters are plonfil r
snylnomdh wlthaaehdherod tits
a eommltRe has been bemhad a
mrNeorthe diu ti n.
Some residents behm the compar
will be wriatiniting their beluvlon s
wag sethat oftheirchibla ,bokin
fosanyeadusethey anfind otluoh
them out As a precaution, Wallis
approached on-site manage
Schlueter with a plan for parents e
take turns monitoring the play
round.
She said she's still waking for a n
sponse.
Also, Mid Continent hes said It wll
tntaoRptany new HRA leaw. Whoa
asked why,Schnsrtmid shecouldn'
say, that It was simply a 'busines
dedsbn.'
Walkerand Hagedornof the tdenm
pin County Housing and Develop
ment Authority expressed coram
that Mid Continent's tefual o scoop
new lases Is pert of a broader pic
tum.
As the poverty rate dses in suburb
like Brooklyn Park property owner
often worry that their ppoopedy vel
urs will go down and themica mr
try to keep HRA residents out of *M
neighborhood. -ILelong-termeffee
of not taking Section B Ia+a Is W
event ally you won't have Section i
people," aid Hagedorn.
For the time being, however, nest
dents are pleased with therm-alve
and the wults of their adkm -W-
want Wwaitbeyondwhetthemsmgarms
impacted us to do,' said Walker.
Every time we get a count groul
togdher% said Warner, 'one of th
feel cleUghts to to ace the ledenhil
emerge find they hoveinnas
talent and mpabWtise when give
theoppoduNtytoexhmltthern It's,
feet o sae them comm brwaed.'
1 WZ :10