The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHousing & Redevelopment Authority Packet 11-25-1980AGENDA PLYMOUTH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Wembev 2S, 1980 7:00 pm I.: Roll Cali Ii. Approval of Minutes for September 22, 1980 III. Public Hearing for Year VII CDBG Program IV. AppoiotMent of Dick .tree to the Housing Rehabilitation Committee V. Report on the Section 8 Program V1. Adjournment CITY OF PLYMOUTH 34.00 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (012) 559-2800 OATS; November 20, 1980 MEMO TO: HRA Commissioners FROM: Milt Dale SUBJECT: Report on Section 8 Program Staff was directed by the Commissioners to respond to a letter from HUD and the financial audit by Moen and Pentilla requesting that the Plymouth HRA settle it's accounts for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1979. This has been done as the HUD Area Office received our check for $15,923.33 during mid-October. Attached is the letter responding to Mr. Feeney's letter of September 2, 1980. Recently HUD sent me a letter calling for my attendance at a Section 8 Housing Quality Standards training session. This 3 -day session would cost $270:00. Computing in my hourly rate as an associate planner for the three days I would be gone, the total cost to the taxpayer would be close to $500.00. The objective of the training session would be to train administrators in how to use a new federal housing inspection form. The attachments give more information on this matter. Incidentally, the only response we have received from the HUD Area. Office are two telephone calls --one from a Shawn Huckleby regarding the fact that the training session was mandated from the Chicago Regional Office and one from Nancy Bratrud regarding whether I would be in attendance. I said no. Last month a matter came to my attention which I want to pass on as a point of information. In October, I found out that one of our Section 8 tenants had not been living in her apartment from sometime in early June to late October, a period of about five months. During this time, the Plymouth HRA paid $905 of federal tax money for a vacant apartment. After investigating the matter, I found that c?ie tenant had been in St. Louis, Missouri for the five months. She then came up to Plymouth briefly, vacated her apartment (her lease had terminated) and moved down to St. Louis. Since she gave the apartment management a late notice, we were also obligated to pay another month's rent! Our recourse? None! In talking to the HUD Area Office's legal staff, I was told there would be no legal recourse in the matter as we would be "restricting a person's mobility" by requiring them to maintain residence in the apartment for which federal tax dollars are being spent. Fortunately, such incidents have happened only rarely in Plymouth. Attachments: 1. L tter to Nancy Bratrud HUD), 10/15/80 2. Letter to Thomas Feeney HUD), 11/10/80 3. Memo from Blair Tremere to James Willis, 11/7/80 4. Letter to Thomas Feeney HUD), 11/5/80 S. Brochure on Training Session MD/ba October 15, 1980 CITY OF Nancy Bratrud PLYMOU R Assisted Housing Management Branch HUD Area Office 6400 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Dear Nancy: In response to Mr. Feeney's letter of September 2, 1980 I am enclosing a check for $15,923.33. This complies with Finding No. 6 of the recent Plymouth HRA audit. Also enclosed is a listing of account code numbers to indicate that the City of Plymouth can provide the required accounting services. This complies with Finding No. 3. As you also know, I have submitted certain required items requested by your March Management Review and I will continue to do so in as speedy a fashion as is possible. However, the Housing Authority staff in Plymouth consists of only one (1) moulting middle-aged city planner --we are not in the same league as the Minneapolis, St. Paul, Metro or Dakota County HRA's with their specialists in every field. In June of this year, a reduction in City revenues forced the termination of one secretarial support person. (You see, the City of Plymouth and the HRA favors the rather strange fiscal policy of not spending any more money than it takes in!) Our Housing Authority has made it a primary goal to maintain qualified Section 8 tenants on the Program in Plymouth as indicated by our full utilization of the Program. This in itself takes time. As well, we are committed to operating a productive housing rehabilitation program. This takes time, especially in view of the fact HUD and Hennepin County continually escalate the reporting require- ments. The truth of the matter is we are delivering the services. However, we have not always provided your office w11W all the various documents attesting to this fact. As well, there have been certain computation errors made by myself that must be corrected. I assume full responsibility for any such errors. It is my sincere intention to make corrections and resolve all differences. May I state for the record that it is very unfortunate that programs like Section 8 and now the housing rehabilitation programs are becoming mired in red tape and bureaucracy. These programs have been reasonably helpful to a wide range of lower and moderate income persons. However, now the growing cost of administering these programs, due to the inordinate amount of required supporting documents is fast making these programs prohibitive in a community like Plymouth. As is often the case, the loser will be the person the program was designed to help. Your positive efforts in supporting less documentation would really be a help in keeping programs like this operating in communities like Plymouth. Sincerely, Milt Dale Attachments: Check Plymouth HRA List of Code Numbers 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3025 HARBOR LANE, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5.5441 TELEPHONE (812) 559.2800 DATE: October 20, 1900 MEMO . . TO: HRA Commissioners FROM: Wilt Dale, City staff SUBJECT: HRA meeting and Public Hearing for Year VII CDBG Program The City Manager and Planning Uirector have suggested that hereafter the Public Hearing for the CDBG Program be held before the Housing Authority rather than the Planning Commission due to the emphasis on housing matters in Plymouth's CDBG vrogr&n. This requires that there be a public hearing sometime in November to satisfy tederal requirements. City staff is suggesting that this public hearing be held on Tuesday, flovember 25 at 7:00 p.m. .This would permit more time for public discussion than if the meeting were held on a Monday night prior to a Council meeting. Tuesday, Novem- ber 18 would also be a live option, however Council/Commissioners have a meeting on both the 17th and 19th of that week. This meeting would be held in place of the regularly scheduled HRA meeting for November. Staff will have to know of the ComiM ssioners' wishes in this matter prior to Friday, October 31 in order to meeting publishing deadlines. Early next month a memo will be mailed to Commissioners outlining the type of CDBG activities the federal government allows a community to use its CDBG funds for. Attachment: November calendar for City meetings AGENDA FOR CDBG PUBLIC HEARING November 25, 1980 1. Purpose of Meeting To provide the public an opportunity to hear a presentation of the proposed use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) monies anticipated for receipt by the City in 1981-82 (Year VII). Citizens will have an opportunity to address the HRA concerning questions regarding the proposed use of these funds. The City for several years has participated in the Community Development Block Grant Program which, in Hennepin County, involves a joint powers agreement with Hennepin County. Under the arrangement, the County, as an "urban county" applies for Community Development Block Grant Funds which are then appnrtioned among the communities which participate. As part of that arrangement, Plymouth has two citizen representatives who meet periodically with other community representatives to decide what projects would best meet individual community needs. This committee, called the Planning Area Citizens Advisory Committee, will be meeting during the next few months to advise the various City Councils in Hennepin County how they believe the CDBG money aiwu id ba spent. 2, The Meeting was Carefully and Thoroughly Announced as Follows: a. Notices were published in the New Hope -Plymouth POST, the official City newspaper. 3. Review of CDBG Receipts and Proposed Use. James G. Willis. Executive Director 4. CCBG Anticipated 1931-82 Allocation 98,000 - Land Write Down Assistance 40,000 •- Rehab 5. The Procedure for the Hearing Will Be as Follows: a. Write name, address and agenda number on blue card. b. Pass card to person collecting them, who will give them to the Chairman. C. When your name is called, come up to the microphone. d. Please speak clearly into the microphone so that all may benefit from your remarks. 3. No one may speak twice until all others who wish to speak have done so. Please gi%e your name and address each time you speak. 6. Closing Public Hearing 7. HRA Action tiwa spa 9 toe, me. mom I =IN "Uptm• moft ad at VIPO" 3100 Vuwft its 5M1 mw mr. RLLUtgmF mat= q=d ao mit of 00 MOdW and ArM - -- m t A-ulbomitr Ofr ++'.* amam t • h tds pq at ad BMW tbtbitIt at tb> tv pay A te cc awmbw 04 vAbm a -00* ow to the two of the omsmut th bYthe t. now In ow IWIMswat 421kbrd Ut Im. 3b ow 130 0 r +It x IIOOM c t OUR t eLi,00 8 rte%' ambobm 6- the icLos d ! 1!" "l 'w ' .ill oc#stit is a u cat that birw a !tr aoa %=w 10 -La ~low's bast lobwOt- a 6 *A* l • wommA t J&D. eg S CM& "W w tba Wqw"- F vacua to as "Loft tt t itY to w . #iL'E m to do a of TimawdoudH=dM S ym vmmbM tbft tatrw audift AbMM b* i t1i I In 41 tb*3y 3Q ilsiomtj-moi@ *Atb = 7475.1. VOWt mva tW rmdad Umwd 1gdp rlp amt wtby the VA actU y SinmMalye Itzinit T. F*UW AVM cc: ImsStevemor a&-.Rmdt nut Oaks HANG- Div. A IsIN.Mi7[ gm:CNM iirAslilR4C1i BILL VN94 6L Two 644 mm V&SN" "i"WPleei tem4 LA.aA do . em am i01.N"71 Congreso of tine aniteb Otateg ousts d Repreftwaabep 1natM NLP 20515 September 4, 1980 Mr. James G. Millis City Manager City of. Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Jim: a TneP6Pstes. wlre6ePr e11s1aest IN 1Ib Feed SAAM MWOMUMu SMI: N2-7234173 tale GAUNDe116oN 2001 PA= C Xr= 11OU M90 or. Lam PAM 04/16 ur6sswo g6789 p,! SEP 1980 PO moutb Thank you for your letter inviting my participation in a meeting with staff of our local HUD office on Monday, September S. I regret that I will not be in town that day but have asked my Field Director, Iris Saunderson, to join you at that time. Iris does nothandle my legislation. in the housing area, but I know: that she will try to be as helpful as possible. BP:pce Yours very truly, Bill Frenzel Member of Congress nus 9TATIONCRY PanNTIo oK OAMR MA49. WITH RMYCLED Pl=RS CITY OF PLYMOUTH 302.5 .HARBOR. LANE,, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 DATE: VmOrj I•FEMO To: lo.. PROW: 4luk SUBJECT- ` ® ' i 4 r CSRTIPI[ OPUSLICACCOUNTANTSLOS 80 WAVZATA RO.ULAWAQO SUIT& 102 VALL9V SOUTH BUIL INO YI.NNSAPOLIS, NINNCSOTA 99425 40121 940-3200 September 30. 1930 Plymouth H. R.A. Attn: Mr. jim Willis 3025 Harbor Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 PROPSSSIO.NAL SILRVIC89 RCNOSRSO: Audit authority andCity records prepare report 6/1/77 through 6/30/79; Research. HUD audit questions and recommencbtion and record to HUD Federal AuditStandards $ 2.107.00 BALANCE DUE $2.107.00 13"• PROUM GUMM Wrom Td..s o>...er.. reo.11111M lktAyum e/aus+or ea.mo.. a..mis NUR W" ~ 61043"1" 1 11" coreg0 of the altm Staten , con—e-0-10-0,. oage at pre rntaabcg 3501 °""` `°"'"". ° 44to ° 5lAl. NAWNSM16 IM =IS ,tio'° 3•/ w Ar! so I 1 October 2, 1980 Mr. Milt Dale HRA Director City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Mr. Date: As someone who works in the area of housing and/or community develop- ment, I thought you would be interested in the enclosed summary of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980. The summary briefly describes the bill's key points, but does not address all of the provisions In the legislation. The bill amends and extends all: of the major Federal programs in the areas of housing and community development. Included in the bill are the new mortgage limit requirements for FHA insured homes, as well as a 5 -year implementation of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. Several. changes in the HMDA are also included. Both the House and the Senate adopted the Conference Committee version of the bill on. Monday evening. It is expected that the President. will sign it into law sometime this week. If you have any specific questions or comments on this, or other matters, please let me know. BF: jb Enclosure Yours very truly, Bill Frenzel Member of Congress TNIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE WITm. RECYCLED PIBERS Congressman 81'r i . gze1' October. 1980 Summary of Major Points: Conference Report on the-Housing and Community Development Act I. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT n tw eve 5—mer1t'Block Grants the CDBG program is granted authorization for the next 3 years, beginning. with3.81 billion for F.Y. 1981 Eligible activities under the CDBG program are expanded:, especially in the area of-- energy conservation A new provision is added that allows the inclusion of certain independent cities in determining CDBG amounts for urban counties B. Urban Development Action Grants ' The UDAG program is authorized for the next 3 years at a level of $675 million por'%y tr Several changes are made to eliminate delays that have been encountered by communities using a•UDAG in correlation with a historic preservation project Several amendments are made to provide greater flexibillty for Indian tribes who wfsW.-' to utilize the WAS program C. Section 31, 'Rehabilitation Loan Program Maxiimm Apaq,,amount for residential ;property is increased from $27,000 to $33,504 " The definition of the hypes of buildings that can he rehabilitated under the„programIsexpanded Authorization levels are increased, set at $144 million for F.Y. 1981 and not to ex- ceed $12.9 million for F.Y. 1982 II, HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS A. Public Housing _. rehensive Improvement Assistar ce Program Purpose of the program as defined in the bill is: JI) to improve the physical condition of existing public housing projects and21to!upgrade tht management and operation -of such projects, in order to assure that such projects continue be available to serve low-income families Limits are established for the amount of assistance that is available to public housingprojectsforassistance, and application conditions are established B. Sec,,,; sti_ on_8 . . The Section 8 existing, new and substantially.rehabilitated programs are extended under current guidelines For moderate rehabilitation units the Secretary of HUD may -establish i.maximum'monthly rent wnircn exceeds the Fair Market Rent by not more than 305 if such unfits are locatedinanareawheretheSecretaryfindscostlevelssorequire For new and Substantiall rehabilitated units, the maximum monthly rent may notexceedymorethan101theF.R.R. esublished for an area it. B. Sec ion 8 -grogram, cont. III. Financial assistance for the benefit of any non-immigrant student alien is prohibited Income mix for elderly projects: Projects.(Section 8) that.are spoWically designedorelderlyamesareeexemptfrailtherequirementthattenantselection -criteria be destgred to assure that projects include families with a broad range of incomes. C. Section 235: S1nale.Family Homeownership Initiative The bill"establishes a one year Section 235 Mousing stimulus program, to allow higher eligibility incomes and higher mortgage limits than currently allowed undertheSection235program Eligibility intone would be 1.30% of median intone for the area Kor489e limits would be up to 82% of the new FHA mortgage limits for the area Q. New Proft_sa_ls dropped in Conference: A. House proposal to establish a subsidized and a Senate proposal to establish minimum tion were dropped from the bill. middle income multi -family housing-progrem Federal standards for Candominium rggula- New FHA limits, Other Program Amendments and Extensions A. Extension of FNA Mortgage Insurance Program Authority of the Secretary is extended for one year to insure mortgages and loans under programs contained in the National Housing Act Norte limits, FHA insured: The current ceilings of $679500 for a single-family; $76,000 for a two family; $92,000forsthreefamilyand $1.07,000 for a four family home would remain in effect. However, In high cost areas as determined by HUD,. the Secretary could increase the maximum mort- gage limit up to $90,000, but in no event could the maximum exceed 95% of me4ian home sales price for the area. The same limits would apply to the Section 220(d)(3) rehabilitation and neighborhood conservation and Section 222 servicemen's programs, except that the Sec. 222 program is restricted to one family homes or condominium units. FNA Interest Rate The bill includes a provtsion for a der-ionstration program that would purmit the FHAinterestratetobenegotiatedfreelybetweenthebuyerandlender, with respect to10% of the FHA Sec. 203 volume of business, or 50,000 mortgages, whichever is greater. A 30 day commitment period, during which the lender would be bound by the negotiatedinterestrate, as well as the negotiated number of points, would be requtred. HUD regulations will determine the administration and allocation of the program. ggrte, rly review of FNA rate by HUD The HUD Secretary is called on to review thoroughly the relationship between the FHAinterestrateandtheyieldsonconventionalmortgagesfrequently, in order to mini- mize discount points, uncertainty, and speculation in transaction in insured mortgage. The Secretary is expected to make this review at least quarterly f Oil VbFrenzel, p. 3 October 1980 I1I. 6. Emergency HomPurchase Assistance Act Amendments The bill revises and updates the "Brooke -Cranston" program, and extends the Secretary's authority under the Act for one year. The bill. Increases the mortgage limits and the purchase price limits for the program. No funding for the grogram is included in the bill appropriating funds for housing and community development C. Temporary Nortgage Assistance Program New program designed as an alternative to acquisition under the existing assignment program. Authorizes the Secretary, in order to avoid foreclosure, to make all or part of the monthly payments on behalf of a borrower who has defaulted on mortgage payments where the default was beyond the borrower's control.. D. Building Energy Performance Standard's. Under the bill, the BEPS are delayed until 1983. DOE is called upon to con- duct a demonstration project in two different climatic regions and submit a report -to Congress on its findings E. 5 gear Rome Mortgage Disclosure Act The original Conference.Report contained a provision that would have made the H.MeD.A. permanent. A resolution was passed by both the House and the Senate, however, which sunsets the Act after 5 years. Changes made 1n the Act include: SMSA's would be defined by the Commerce Department instead of OMB Census tract reporting would be required in any county within a SMSA or with a population of 30,000 or more Reporting would be on a calendar year basis the Examination Council would be required to compile data for each SMSA and HUD would be required to comply with FLMDA for loans they make which are net otherwise reported IY. elannift'Mststance Amends the Section 701 program to redirect it toKard encouraging states, local government, and area -wide planning organizations to develop comprehensive plans V. Rural housing Amends and extends Farmer's Hone Administration authority for one year vv... ...... ....... . . . 77. ocry U. DEPARTAENT OF HOUSING AND URSA'*- DEVELOPMENT RO-9 Out."A." 11, 0,30 TO: ilawiia ik.vftej r-ciercirr: Eccbm r, nFivtil:g nnjmrll!} SLI Zr Mirirzation cia" rZent. r.ri% Alcll T"C-clAd%t: ti.c iv. -,t ik.,clucUon lrumtive endit is Tbro xcvi&;m'. 24 (PA! P.-Ltt 882.3 15 as statca Ix-3er.. XV Srcdual "c*)t of this incentive for i e fur; Ur;r".y the rX,-A('r&-J.t: r -.s vCcta-,,-.r 9, 3980# 1.-0 Rrdly cir-tclljy; thr-- 1P'CSrMl C!r y 2y Jy rt -C.- ZV.4ncrt; tliinjtv, C',t j?.-. Fo.dly CmIriloulzim I c w. L Y u clo..,.,.. Rrillu. lelmr: fl. - tlle, by MJD urKI, CV.10641) (3), c:•.ajryrm-" rcitt rc-&-.o0(is v.01 W! eli"4111- krd at t1cl V. Of t -l-.(? cr vi'u, t!.-" imlly liaic;r; to frot-Jc.- ur-'.'-,, 1. llt?-P HUP-21is Q.,7 r,, i-ijx-,r1 in e-! v.-ml,"Aic.n. if jrc---i bovo 1%. thL ripe.. office at. (C12) 725-41,02E. 1. llt?-P HUP-21is Q.,7 MOEN AND PENTTILA, LTD: CCRTI/IED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS SUITE 203 VALLEY SOUTH GUILDING 1160666 or Y1I[IIICIIN INSTITNTi OF CRIITI)IEO PUIPLIC ACCOUNTANTS City of PIymouth Plymouth, Minnesota Attn: LloydRicker, Finance Director Dear Mr. Ricker, 0900 WAT2ATA SOULEVARO 16121 016.3208 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55420 October IS.. 1980 In response to your request of October 9, 1980, concerning the amounts due to or due from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Of the City of Plymouth by the City of Plymouth, as of June 30, 1979 we submit the following summary: I. Accounts receivable -City of Plymouth General Fund $5,201.00 HRA (Agency) Fund 702 . 7,797.00 T $1299800 The $5,201.00 due from the General Fund as of June 30, 1979, has been paid as of this writing. This represents one-half of the collectible in 1979 taxes of $10,402.00. The procedure for handling the HRA tax levies, as you are aware, to for the General Fund to transfer annually to the HRAtheentiretaxlevyascertifiedforcollection. The General Fund then retains all collections made for this levy and accounts for all receivables.. On March 11, 1980, a wire transfer of $10,466.36 was made to the HRA Authority) f om the City's general checking account. Of this transfer, 10,402.00 was in payment of the collectible in 1979 taxes.. The $7.797.00 owing from the HRA (Agency) Fund 702 is still outstanding (see item #2below). 2. Accounts payable -City of Plymouth HRA (Agency) Fund 702 $ 7,932.96 This payable to the HRA (Agency) Fund as of June 30, 1979, can be offset by the receivable of $7.797.00 as stated in item #1 above which Will resultin a net liability to the City Agency Fund 702 as follows: Receivable from Fund 702. $7,797.00 Payable to Fund 702 7.932.96 Net Payable to Fund. 702 W 3. Note payable -City of Plymouth Investment Trust Fund 701 $15.000.00 This note is evidtnced by a signed demand note dated December 1, 1978, due to the Investment Trust Fund. The note as of this writing has notbeenrepaid. October 15. 1980 Page 2 The above information is submitted so as to expedite your work in setting up a separate set of books for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority completely independent of the City's accounting. system. We. recommendthat, within the MRA accounting system separate funds be main- tained for the Section 8 and Home Improvement programs. Should you. wish to discuss any of the above information or have any other questions relating to our report dated July 22, 1980, please fsel fee to contact us. Respectfully, A Ct - -eavv`yhw-- MOEN t PENTTILA. LTD. . 16 • October 15.- 1980 Nancy Bratrud t Gr? OF PLYMOUTH Assisted Housing Management Branch HUD Area Office 6400 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Dear Nancy: In response to Mr. Feeney's letter of September 2, 1980 I am enclosing a check for $15,923.33. This complies with Finding No. 6 of the recent Plymouth HRA audit. Also enclosed is a listing of account code numbers to indicate that the City of Plymouth can provide the required accounting. services. This complies with Finding No. 3. As you also know, I have submitted certain required items requested by your parch Management Review and I will continue to do so in as speedy a fashion as is possible. However, the Housing Authority staff in Plymouth consists of only one (1) rtoulti.ng.middle-aged city planner --we are not in the same league as the Minneapolis, St. Paul,. Metro or Dakota County MRA's with their specialists in every field. In June of this year, a reduction in City revenues forced the termination of one secretarial support person. (You see, the City of Plymouth and the HRA favors the rather strange fiscal policy of not spending any more money than it takes in!) Our Housing Authority has made it a primary goal to maintain qualified Section 8 tenants on the Program in Plymouth as indicated by our full utilization of the Program. This in itself takes time.. As well, we are committed to operating a. productive housing rehabilitation program. This takes time, especially in view of the fact HUD and Hennepin County continually escalate the reporting require- ments. The truth of the matter is we are delivering the services. However, we have not always provided your office w tai all the various documents attesting to this fact. As well, there have been certain computation errors made by myself that must be corrected. I assume full responsibility for any such errors. It is my sincere intention to make corrections and resolve all differences. May I state for the record that it is very unfortunate that programs like Section 8 and now the housing rehabilitation programs are becoming mired in red tape and bureaucracy. These programs have been reasonably helpful to a wide range of lower and moderate income persons. However, now the growing cost of administering these programs, due to the inordinate amount of required supporting documents is fast making these programs prohibitive in a community like Plymouth. As is often the case, the loser will be the person the program was designed to help. Vour positive efforts in supporting less documentation would really be a help in keeping programs like this operating in communities like Plymouth. Sincerely,. Milt Dale Plymouth NRA Attachments: Check List of Code Numbers 3000 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD; PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441, TELEPHONE (812) 559-26W kra[• c/o Nancy Bratrud HUD Area, Office 6400 i rance Ave. South tdina, K104 55435 CITY HALL *KYMOuTH, MINNESOTA 5S441 TK FOLLOI.WiG ARE CMAFGES TO YOUR 131i'v"AT Oct.1S Oct_ 15, 1980 . w _ - ACCOYMS 11 AS.I. C.,L RI '_ an1[.. 1 , 9 OIRIC,O q/ /U+4wCi wt _19--_ L 1. t;TRlJ., TAt CCPV Co"kit" I cc CUNT i M OYN*IPROJICtjgYDiit Sect. 8 HUD contributions 207 1 207 ° 837 for Program year ending. June 30, 1979 t s t t 1 1 1 t' 1 1 t 1 t t 1 I I 1 1 i t I iI i`^L •*irr..ars•.rs .f3ra'a.sca:4C s:`>: -rte' os: ow•.a w 7K iSC i.¢1L L'titE+ w _ - ACCOYMS 11 AS.I. C.,L RI '_ an1[.. 1 , 9 OIRIC,O q/ /U+4wCi wt _19--_ L 1. t;TRlJ., TAt CCPV ml r yrs `• - .-' •,.. { • i - • 1/10 FOR VAYMkNr 002 128 14OUSING* ADEVELOPMEN r. AUTHORITY 0 J 10U- f" 0012.281 lfwh-w N - Me 1=0 I NW.MWAY 53• 17, JqLVlM0UTPLMUM%HA:MW t,' "4t - 910 PAY IMCTLY 10/16/ .41580P2.2h 923.33Ji 7ia3i 4 0 0 o HUD Ai6ix bffice Attention:; Mah- B 4'rcy. ratrud 6400.Francc,.AVenue South Edina, Wnnesoti'SS435' W St 400 EXEC ME DIRECTOR T 0 yrs `• - .-' •,.. { • i - • 1/10 FOR VAYMkNr 002 128 14OUSING* ADEVELOPMEN r. AUTHORITY 0 J 10U- f" 0012.281 lfwh-w N - Me 1=0 I NW.MWAY 53• 17, JqLVlM0UTPLMUM%HA:MW t,' "4t - 910 PAY IMCTLY 10/16/ .41580P2.2h 923.33Ji 7ia3i 4 0 0 o HUD Ai6ix bffice Attention:; Mah- B 4'rcy. ratrud 6400.Francc,.AVenue South Edina, Wnnesoti'SS435' W St 400 EXEC ME DIRECTOR T 0 a . DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MINNEAPOLI"T. PAUL APIA OFFICE SW FRANCS AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS.. MINNESOTA 5035 REGO* v Mr. Hilt Dale, AssoCiate Planner Housing and 0 1 Authority of Plymouth U0.0 Plymouth Boulevard. Plymouth, Hirmsota 55441 Dear We Dale: Subject: Sdxdosign of Secti n'$ Year End Finmwiai Statements M46 -E170-002 lel REPLY RIVIR TO: HMA:DC The year end financial statements listed below for the Sections 8 Program have not been received by our office and we overdue for fiscal year ending Jule 30, 1980. HUD 52681 - lbudW, for PaymWt of Annual Cnntrfbuti ss Original - Regianal A000unt3ng Division Dopy - Area Office HUD 52682 - Operating Statement, housing Assistance Payments Program Original - Office of Finance and Accounting Copies - Regional Accounting Division and Area Office HUD 52595 - ealancae Sheet - Lew Income Rousing Program original - Office of Finance and Aeeosnting Copies - Regieasal, Accounting Division an' Area office The reports are to be submitted not later than 20 days after the end of the fiscal year. If Line 23 an the HUD 52681 indicates that an. is due HUD, the overpayment is to be submitted with. the 52681 to the Regional A000unting Division. Supporting cloc m—itation must be attached to the 52681 if column 2 figures exceed column 1 figures before the overrun can be approved by our -office. Refer to the Rowing Assistance Payments Program Addountfng HHancmook 7420.6 dated February 9, 1978 and Findbook 7420.3, REV -2, CH 6-2 dated Novecber 9, 1979 for additional 3n61orasa1 regarding the submission of these fornix. Please submit the reports to our office immedfatrely. These reports must be received by our office before we can. approve payment of the next requisition for the quarter ending March 311 1981 (due in our office by Deomber 5, 1980) . Please inform us why the statements were not st bmlitted at the required time. The forms are enclosed for your =ndenienee. rely. I I AU S 0 i& Thomas T. Pee W ft Area Massager 0. U. S. 96PARTMENTOF MOUSING A -ND URBAN DIVEIOPM04T NOTICE E:9 Ageru.iea and Owners - Section R tbufi;-tg ASSistance Payments program includi:m Existing dousing, Moderate P-ehdbilitation, New Construction, To.: slubc,tanti. babilitation, State Agencies, Far.wwrs Hama A4kninistration, motion 2C2, tr*A Pmperty Disposition -i d Loon ManaqOmmt Set -Abide Programs SUBJECT: interim Rule ):.Sgardi ng Changes in Colnwputation of Gross Fatly Contra bUtAon Attachment A to tiihs notice is a c -xv of an interim ride and supp'c„nritMY nformatior regarding computation of dross family contributicn piib isbed in the Federal Register, Volune 45, "Unbez 176, Tue-sday, SeptedW 9, 980. jjj,e3 intzerim rule changes the oampu tion :f gross faint ly ta nrx ik r i•7• for fainiiies whose gross family c ontrihution MV bp 15% of monthly gross ince: rather than 25% of monthly irneme after a11cFw&.~ s. Attachment D ins a dhart, developed by the Area Cf iO), which may be Of assistan" t,o you in clarifying the ctw4ca made by this # nt er. r rule. 19A) is roqu45ting cxtrmwa.ts3 On this interim rule, parti.ew-'ar-ly in regard :o any rwquit:ies you fw%l may runiult From imp,QnWjta#ior' or suggestiorw for reducirrl any hart abips. This office plata -to Wtv t= cufmymts anw3 we strongly urge you to :submit your axmmmt.s as we11 to the Ru,.es [krket Clerk, Of Fide of General Coun.Sel, Roam 5218, tx1mrt:m>ont of Housing and Briar, Developnent, 41-11 Seventh Street Southwumt, Washingtort, D.C., 20410. Convents are due in Washington by bvadber 10, 1980. 4.ea Marm. or At, taclIMMt s 9v HUD -2101:1117-P HUD-ftsh-. D. C, 6-F7 Federal Regloterr / Vol. 45, No. 178 / Tuesday. September 9, 2080 / Rules and Regulations 58309 rent crodlt 40 i ss the ranula to thalr present wttts'!bs 1 epartnaeat has determlasi , for consistency. that there should be a point in time when this aspect of I% program Is mmpletaly eliminated. and public Housing Agencies (PHM) are no longer bold accountable for thls roce l»te,. At the same tfaw vre feel to credit should be phased oatggrradually rather than so at onm Therefore, the final eine states that thereat credit wW be eliminated from the prooraft within three years. since lasses for a nUs under the program rrsuant to Seaton 882.!07 "... shoo for not lesii than one year not more an Weir yeah.. Six of the 59 co;n.nreats opposed eliminating tits Rent Credit tam the Existing Housing Phigram regulations. nne comment. Indicated that. Ifthis Incentive wars removed there would be no motivation for tenants to select units with rents below exhting FM?s. In considerintg these comments, the Department observed that one basis for CAD's recommendation for eliminating the Rent Credit was that It appeared to ha -,-e a usgllole effect on the number of families aelactlol cheaper housing. This is because half ai the families receiving the Rent Credit did not move from the unit they lived in before applying to the pmgram. Alm are discussed in the Proposed rola current studies and other evidence suggests that assisted families had a negligible role In negotiating the terms of the Section a lepse, Including the amount ofrent. Three comments suggested that eliminating the Rent Credit from the program would be detrimental to elderly, handicapped, and working f.mmJies as those families would more likely sutler rent increases as s result. to response to these comments, tbt Department fasts that the Increased etnounts that any family would have to pay uivn the elimination of the Rent Credit would be minimal and. at any rate. the family would pay no more than between is afro. 2s percent of thelr income for lwuaing as required under Program regulations. As web noted in the proposed rule, the Senate Appropriations Committee Report on the 1978 HUD Appropriations 1),11 directed tiro Department to elimNc rets the Rent Credit far families who do not r"0038 to move. However, many of the Comments which favored the elimination til the Rent Credit expressed the concern that if it Is to be eliminated for applicants who tepee sn place, it must be ehrn;nated for all In order to prevent on unf Ar situation. We agree with thio Position since there are no compelling r^asc!rs, given the nature of the Rent C:t-:411, to euminste it for certain families w011e continuing It for others. Given the complexity of the current formula for real reduction. and iSe recommendations of the Senate Appropriations Committee, GAO and others, the Department believe$ that tl-o present teat reduction credit sbo..dd be phased out. This does not preclude fuhure consideration of other methods of cost cental mens. NEPA. A Fin&,& of roopplicahility with respect to environmental impact has been prepared In accordance with HIUD procedures. A copy of this finding of inepplicobility will be available for public Irspectin during regular buslnees hours at the Office of Rules D.vket Clerk, Office of General CounsrL Roost 5218, Department of HOU$°ng and Urban Development. 451 fth Street. S.W. Washington. D.C. 2NIM This rule it not hated in the Department's semiannual agenda of significant rules. published pursuant to Executive Order 12221. Accordingly, 24 CFR Fart 882 Is amended as follows: 1. Amend i Burns by adding a 601111? paragraph (d) to read: 88tt is Rent reduetlon tneantive. d) As of (insert effeciive date of these regulatfonL no family entering the pnogrsnn may receive a Rent Credit For any family currently trecel ft a reduction In its Cross Family Contribution because the unit selected by the family has a Cross Rent less than the Fair Market Rent or bigner rent approved by HUD under; 8$2.106(a)(3), the rent reduction will be eliminated. at the end of the stated lease term or when the faintly moves to another unit, whlchave-• is earlier. Section 7(d). Department of Housing and Urban Development Act, 42 U.S.C.3s3s(d)) Issued at Washington, OZ. Oeptember 4, loom Lawrom 8. Buns=*, Aselstatml8@cretory jorH#wi4y—Fedewl 10118108 CommisotOner. Ira Coe. senses Mild sena 90 so 911461" coos 4e1M1411 . a. 24 CFR. Part 869 IDodret too. 04044311 Seetlon 8 Mousing Assistance Payments Program --Computation Gross Fondly Contribution Aaa 4m. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing•-.>rederal. Housing Commissioner. HUD. AC OM interimtn tuts. sUMNAM HUD is issuing this Interim rule to revise Its regulations for datermiNng how much of Its Income a Family pays towards rent under the Section 8 Housing Assistance Psyments Program This Interim revision reflects recent statuttaffne e PAI* - 980} Comments due: Comments should be filed on or before November 1o.1980 AODWAS: File comments with the Rules Docket Clerk. Office of Ceneral Counsel, Room 52.18: Department of Ho"84V and Urban Development. 462 Seventh 51teet. S.W.. Werhlaliton. D.C. 204:0. row FURT fur tNFOAtaAT1oN co1RAcr. Emiward Whipple, Chief, Public Housing Rental and Occupancy Branch (2112) 765- 1,942, jaures Tehash. Director. Meld amilP am Phan Division 202)428-8730 Stephanle Gtddinge. Existing Housing Division (202) 70- 8598. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street. S.W.. Washington. D.C. 20ti0 None of the above telephone numbers is to!1--free. 3NPftAMaMARY 111/OONAT101% Section 202(b) of the Hou§inrtgg and Communis Development Amsndments of 1979 (PL 93-153) amends Section 0(c) (3) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 by establishing new rules for computing the Cross Family Contributions required of some Eligible Families. RpeciRcally, the Amendments raise the Cross Family Contribution required of Vol Large Lower-income Families (Without Exceptional Medical or Other Expenses) from 25 to 20 perceal of family income, and raise the minimum Cross Fancily Contribution limits applicable to certain other Lower -Income Families from 13 to 20 percent of family Income. These amendments also permit the Departmant to raise the maximum from 25 to 30 percent of family Income. Section 202(c) a id st the ntthorzebySection202(b) ee not to be applied to "families whose occupancy of housing units assisted under the United States Hoeing Act of 1037 commenced prior to (January 1. 1980) ... so long as such occupancy is continuous thereafter." In order to Implement the statutory requirements as expeditiously as possible, and to facilitate the orderly tronsillon to Ehe new requirements for program administrators. the Department flas decided to make the fewest possible changes at tds time, consistent with the statute. In addition. the Department has d ermined to minimize the financial hardship to certain families. consistent with the statute. Accordingly. allhoagh the required change in the minimum f 5016 Federal Register / VOL 41k Na 276 / Tuesday. September 9, 1980 Mr .Rules and Reputations family contribution fiea#e tom pea^eeat Of fad Income for an" Is te Increm the maxlmwa conlributlnn for eetrtalm other families fran.2s to 80 percent of fam ilr incomes To avoid the hardshipwhidrwould result if affected families were rc-etfroil to make retroactive payments be& to January I. low (theaffeLeve"ot the azmwmenbi HUD co=M= it necessary to lima theimmediats affect of the statutory chamtgsatahmilitewho- brgin occupancy eo dgre atlas publication of this cola. HUD has daterminedthat a retroactivepsyment;requle+sm mt, would, impose umrdua administrative burdens os, Public Housing Agenda CH>!tG) and Section 6 owners and wouldlmpose tinandsi burdens on,manyotiha . affected Families. Altering.do teases of such Families to reflect Intodas< increases is Gross Family Canhibutiaas for ibis reason could also be incoo-ostent with, soma Stats Iowa relating to tettanpa tigbW thereby potentially axposing owners and HUD to litigation. Section 8t!s.100 it being revised to indicate that ths,Grow Familp- Contribution required of certain Very Large LoweFandlies (Without Exceptional Medical orOthwExpenses} and otherlawar &icoms Families not covered to otherc3tegorlesfadependent upon the time at whf& the Family establishes occupency in a PHA's Existing Housing program or in the same Section 8 assisted project. Under the revised regulation, a Family will be subject;* the now Gross Fondly Contribution requirements if it eases a Sections unit on or after the effective dote of this interim nils. but will not be affected by the cdt commenced occupancy prior :.r Januaryl.200and 9mtei..w occupancy in the rare PHNs, Eaclsting Housi ag Programa or In the same Section 8 ass+ated project on a cc,--inuou! :tests. A ea.milywhfch initially leased a unit is a program or prolectonor afterlamwary 1.1984 but phot to the affective date of this interim rule. win notbe affe..ed by thaehanges until its current lease expires oruntli its next income reexamination (asyrovided in the lease) whichever occeaex VOL In as Interee. of implementing promptly the amendments o[SectlmrM which were tc• havetmmediately affected famf!ies entering thepmagram on or after January 2.1984t Rae determined that good cause exists for making these revised regulations effective on an interim besis. Althougb the Department beano definitive knowledge at this time of the effects of the statutory changes (Ley the absolute or relative payment level of various families in telattoa to iarooma. eines and other factorst HUD halsAolennfned to implement that --MM"- L eonsistant witir the statute ias, mmtanues which would cause the leastamountaf discretion of cement practices, The Departmeul W hewer interestedin receiving, and invites commentsragardit sar peeeeived inequities and suggestionit for redw ft any hardships. Suit comments will be given full consideration before the Final Ruta is adopted. This regulation implements the mandatory peovisiuns cf the 1s79 amendments onlyfor.the Secti'on,& Housing Assistance Payments Program Including Edst[ctgHousing„Moderate Rehabilitation. Now Cortstruetiom Substantial Rebabditatfoma State Farmer`s Hoare Administration. Section 20L and Ptu" Disposition and Lona Management Set -Aside Programs) In addition; the Department expects to publish an AdveneeNotice of Ptoposed Rule solici . public comment& on other dumps to achieve the maximum consistency In astabiishimy tenant maw between *,i Section 8 and thepublia ho la.na prcm,,e•ams. Nl?.1}A The Department has determined that these regulation do not constitute a mejorFederal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environmeft Arvardingly. a Finding of no Significant impact under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1989has been made and is available. for public resection durlrtgregular business hours, in a OEilce of thhe Butes Deicer Clerk at the address specified above. This is not listed in HUD's semiannual agenda of significant-.tles, published pe-ivant to Executive Order IMM Accordingly. 24 CFR Part888 is amended by revising: J 889105 to read. as follows: I 889.105 Computation of Wass, MOW rear! wtion on • 1 M MY fess%. If a hunily qualifiedfor more then one category, select the category resulting in the inwest monthly gross family contribution. a) Very Low -Income Family. The monthly grass family contribution abaft be 25 percent of the family's monthly Income after allowances but In no event less than 25 percent of the family's Montt. income. b) La:ear Very Low•lncoma Family or Any Lower -Income Family with Exception' 'Medical or Other Expenses. Its mouthti gross fe pily con dbutton shall be 15 percent of the family's monthly income. c) Very flange Lower4ocome Family. The menthly, plops family contribution shall be Mpercent of tha faWs monthly incomewmpt that: 1) For a family who began occupancy of an assisted unit prior to JannaryI- 2980 and whavontinuer to participate Im the game Section a Existing program or who continues to live Is, tho same Section s assisted project the montblr gross family contribution anall be 25 percent of the family's monthly income and 2) For a family whose occupancy commencedon or after lanumyri.IWO but prior to the effective date of this, rule. the monthly gross family contributioasW be computed Is accordance wtthparagrapb (cl(Q until the tine of the family's next lease expiration, (as provided in the lease) or Income reexominattan6 whichever is sooner.. At that time t:•a family will be, required to begin paying 20 percent of the family's montaty income. d) Other Lower -Income Fanzi)y(witb incomeabovebOpercent of median.bnt not exeeeding80pe mie The monthly gross family contributioo shall be 23, percent of the family's monthly income after allowances. but Irmo event tees than ao percent of the family's monfty- income except thea 1) For a family whose participation In the some Section 8 Existing program or whose residency in the same Sectiun 6 assisted project commenced prior to January L 3980. the monthly gross family contribution shall be 25 percent of the family's monthly income after allowances. but in .no event less then iS percent of the family's mor thly income. and 2) For a Family whose c:cupancy commenced oa or after January 1. IM but prior to the effective dateof this rote. the monthly gross family contribution etalkbe computed In, accordancewith parogroph(d)(i) until• the time. of the family's next least expiration (as provided In the lease) or Income reexamination. whichever comes Gret. At that time. the family will be required topey25 percent of the family's monthly tncom after allowaa n. t Jas 7{+'s, not ac7(s, I. ' JM Act (42 U,S C a ss(dl)l issued at Washington. D.C. July, 23.ISM Lawrence 9. Simons. slant SecrMiy forhoushW—Federal mousing cammissioner. IMaspnamePTMAs 44FLOW.1 Mauro Coos ueoaacr C OMMIM OP GROSS PRWX C!FOR SUMCN 8 Pi S - Effective Nw3ber 10r 1980 1. VERY IN DMM MaLM (Ulxier 50% of median inoon e) : a* with kno' mediml eVense in exw3s of 25% of anneal * *Yme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 of monthLy inocme (gross) ID b. with six or more minors . . . .. .. .. . 6 . . . . . . . . . 15% of monthly iw me (gross).. c. with five or fewer minors . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 251 of monthly income after allowances, but not less than 15% of monthly income (gross). 2. tOM 003CM PAMZM (Xh=n a above 508 but not emeeding 80%): a.. with medical ewe in excess of 259$ of annual incgme . . , . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . in of monthly !nacre, (gross).. b. with eight- or more minors: if leased on or after 11-10-80. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 20% of monthly income (gross). if leased prior to 1-1-80 and continues to lease in same Section 8}-E pr+ogran or assisted project . . . . 15% of monthly income (gross). if leased an or after 1-1-80, but prior to 11-10-80. 20W of monthly income (gross)- not effective until next lease eviration or reexamination, wrrichever comes first. c.. all other loner inomie families: if leased on or after 11 -10 -Po . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25% of mthly income after allowances, but not less than 2.08 of monthly irname (gross). if leasE d prior to 1-1-80 and continues to lease in same. Section 8 E program or assisted project 25% of monthly income after allowances, but not less than 158 of monthly income (gross). if leased an or aftez 1-1-80, but prior to 11-10-80 . . . 25% of monthly income after allowances but not less than 20% of monthly income (gross). - not effectix: until next lease expiration or ninaticn, whichever OCMS first. ND F : If a famulyy qualifies for yore than one category, select the category resultirq ir the low-st monthlygrossfardlycontribuLion. November 5, 1980 Mr. Thomas Feeney HUD Area Office 6400 France. Ave. So. Edina, NN Dear Nr. Feeney: CITYOF PIYMOUTfF This letter is a request that the HUD Area Office not require. that Plymouth: send a representative to the upcoming Section 8 Existing Housing Quality Standards TrainingsessiontobeheldDecember3-5, 1980 for the following reasons: 1. Over 99Z of the rental housing stock in Plymouth is under 15 years old. 2. Staff assigned to make inspections has had class work in inspections and rehabilitation of housing within the last three years. (Previous to this, this staff person had built his own house piece by piece.) 3. Removing the sole. administrative person from his. day-to-day responsibilities for threee days is a heavy administrative burden to impose on a small housing author- ity. (We have one part-timee staff person.) 4. The cost for the session, $270.00, is.a high price for a housing authority of our size to absorb. S. Previously, in August of 1979= HUD had its own inspector check out several rental units in Plymouth and he discovered the following significant(V) deficiencies: a. Living room screens needing repair, b. Broken glass In a rear common door, c. Large crack in a sidewalk, d. A crack in a window and no screen, e. Collapsed garage that needed rebuilding. When I see the public shame of "housing" (if it can be called that) for raigratory workers in other parts of our country with nothing really being done, I -do believe HUD is failing grievously in using its resources and personnel effectively. It is a!Y opinion that seminars of this nature may well be necessary --but only in those areas where true f)ross disregard of housing quality standards exist.. This is not the case in Plyw,.—h. Unless wise discretion is used in the expenditure of public monies --soon there may be very little public monies for even essential needs. This type of "training" is a case in point. It points up the folly of a "cookie -cutter" approach to solving what may be a problem in one part of the country and forcing everyone everywhere to adoptthe exactsame policies. (In this regard, I would like to quote Abraham Lincoln who said,"I never had a policy. that I could always apply. I've simply attempted to do what made the greatest amount of sense at the moment.") i cerely le Plymouth HRA 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 sIF %%1(7 November 10, 1980 . CITY OF PLYMOUTR Mr. Thomas Feeney HUD Area Office 6400 France Avenue South Edina. M Dear Mr., Feeney: I note with some concern that you are requiring all local PHA's operating in the Section 8 existing housing program to send one staff person to a seminar scheduled for December 3-S. It seems to me that your office should a"t Ahe responsibility of providing such training as may be required for local housing officials in order that they can comply with Section 8 requirements. Instead, it appears that you are suggesting that this function be delegated to private consultants with the local officials having to pay the costs. I would appreciate hearing from you personally as to the basis of the require- ments set forth in the Housing Quality Standards Seminar brochure requiring local. attendance. In addition, it would be helpful to know why the local HUD office is unable to provide the required training in order to meet its own requirements. Yours truly, aures G. Millis ity Manager J(N: jm 3100 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD,. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55047, TELEPHONE (812) SNOW 221]17-P U. S. DEPARTMENT Of HOUSING AND ORGAN DEYELOPUNT NpY Q NOTICE 81-2 - a_ TO: All PMs Administering the Section 8 Using Assistal Program aoeAeT. Year Ind Settlement Fawn M 52681 The Vwc her far Payment of Annnal Contributions ilcusing Assistance Payments Progxamn, i aD 52661, detOmdnes the year-emd settlemnt of an urlderpapent due a. PmA or an. Overpayment clue. HIS. If in arriving at the mmut of the settle - Mont your request for funds inaoluma two (2) emeeds the apWoved amaount of any figure in ooltmM one. (1) budgeter' amount, you ave required bo 8%*'Lt docu- mei tation showing hoer the various amounts were caYmulated. You may include. any dlpl,anaticns that will assisc you in justifying the overr m. "t* AcSministrative Fee re.*mted is to be a=mmmted on a monthly basis whether or Mot there is an ova as follows: Units Allowable Total Mnth UnOW Lease X r_i X PWmt "fie 1ltis procedure foes not infer that. Budgets no longer need to be revised When an overrun is anticipated . It is intended far those inslanoes where t3:ere is insufficient time to process a revised budget. If you have arW questions, please contact. Your- Fimncial Analyst in the Assisted Bolusing 163nagement Branch.. A44w"" ea =armW llv mmb-. a G HUD -216 W