HomeMy WebLinkAboutPark and Recreation Advisory Commission Packet 06-17-1999Regular Meeting of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission
June 17,1999, 7 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes
3. Visitor Presentations
a. Athletic Associations
b. Staff
c. Others
4. Report on Past Council Action
S. Unfinished Business
a. Comprehensive plan study session— Barry Warner
b.
C.
6. New Business
a. Review roposed fieldhouse rental rates — Rick Busch (will be distributed at
meetings
b.
C.
7. Commission Presentation
8. Staff Communication
9. Adjourn
Next regular meeting — July 8
n\parks\sbff\eric\prac\agendos\Jun.doc
Minutes of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
May 19, 1999
Page 20
Present: Chair Anderson, Commissioners Willegalle, Priebe, Musliner, Wahl, Fiemann,
Thompson; Planning Commissioner Stein; Councilmember Black; staff Bisek,
Blank and Sankey
Chair Anderson called the May meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Medicine Lake Room.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion was made by Commissioner Wahl and seconded by Commissioner Priebe to
approve the minutes of the April meeting as presented. The motion carried with all ayes.
3. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
a. Athletic Associations. None
b. Staff. Mary Bisek spoke about the work being done on the 2000 budgets for the
department and for the new Plymouth Creek Center. The Council has specified that it
will be a flat budget with no new increases over last year. Mary said that Primavera
went very well, and she congratulated Melissa Musliner on having two paintings in the
show. On Monday, there was a joint concert with the senior choir and the community
band. We will have a new staff person starting June 1: Dan Lauer will be taking over
the former duties of Rick Busch as Rick moves on to Activity Center Manager. We
will also have an intern with us who will be helping with research on facility rental
policies and also with the aquatic program. The fall brochure articles need to be
finished by mid June. Cindy Anderson is receiving an award from Hennepin Parks for
outdoor education.
4. PAST COUNCIL ACTION
a. The Council awarded the bids for the activity center, which came in at or under
budget.
b. Council approved the name "Plymouth Creek Center" for the new activity center.
c. Council approved giving the city portion of the Luce Line Trail to Hennepin Parks.
The County will be extending the trail to the east to connect up with their trail system.
Since the county will have over 40 miles of trail to the east, and the state has over 60
miles of trail to the west, it made sense to turn over the City's one mile portion of trail
to the county for more continuity and case in maintenance. They have agreed to keep
our trail interconnects and any future trail interconnects we may need. We will also
keep our easements. The County must get the City's permission before they can use
the land for any other purpose in the future.
d. Council approved the disc golf course at Plymouth Creek Park
e. Council took no action on the proposed skate park. The individual who had made the
presentation to the Council had no funding or equipment at this time. The mayor and
PRAC Minutes/May 1999
Page 21
other members of the community are discussing the possibility of using the Wayzata
Central Middle School ice arena during the summer for this purpose.
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Comprehensive Plan. Barry Warner from SRF presented the trail plan work which
they are working on. He said that if you poll the community you find that using the
trails is the number one activity. Trails are the laminate which pulls the park system
together. They provide recreation along with transportation. He spoke of the three
types of users of trails. Type A is the good biker. Type B is the more passive biker.
Type C includes children. A city's trail plan must plan for all of these types. The
Type A individuals prefer to use on -road bike lanes because they travel faster.
Commissioner Wahl agreed with this. He is a Type A, and he finds biking on off-road
trails can be dangerous at times because of the slower pedestrian traffic. Warner
showed the Commission the 1992 Trail Plan and discussed what had been completed.
He then presented the Trail Plan Analysis. This shows what the needs of the city seem
to be according to traffic patterns, recreational facilities, population location, road
usage, and dangerous crossings. He said that highways pose particular problems
because MNDOT focuses on cars. At -grade crossings are a real challenge. A good
example is the Highway 55 and Vicksburg Lane crossing. It is very wide and not very
non -motorized" friendly. Because of heavy traffic and faster speeds, some roads need
trails on both sides so that people don't have to cross the busy road so often in order to
use the trail. Vicksburg Lane and Northwest Boulevard are good examples of these.
Warner then presented the Typical Trail Cross Sections chart which shows types of
trails and how they are or are not offset from the road. He said that trail designs must
adhere to one of two guidelines: ASHTO or MNDOT. MNDOT is more conservative
than the national ASHTO guideline. There is an "Ice Tea" funding source available
for making trails crossing highways more "non -motorized" friendly. The pedestrian
bridge over Highway 494 at County Road 9 will be partially funded by Ice Tea funds.
Adam Arvinson from SRF presented the Proposed 1999 Trail Plan Update. He said
that the plan will continue to evolve as suggestions are made. He urged the
Commission to continue dialogue and suggestions. Director Blank noted that when the
roadway comprehensive plan is completed, the trail plan will need to be cross
referenced with it.
Commissioners discussed the pros and cons of on -road trails and off-road trails and
made suggestions for additional trail segments for the plan.
Barry Warner noted that often the completion of the trails is opportunity driven
according to when developers are working on projects and funds become available.
PRAC Minutes/May 1999
Page 22
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Commissioner Willegalle told the Commission that Carol Creehnan, the woman who
donated the money for the log cabin at Parkers Lake, passed away. Director Blank
said that a service was held for her at Parkers Lake.
b. Commissioner Thompson noted that even when the department closes the fields due to
poor weather or field conditions, several coaches violate the closing and hold practices
on both baseball and soccer fields. She suggested that if we are serious about
protecting the fields, we should probably send letters to the associations asking them to
cooperate. Director Blank agreed and made a note to do this.
7. COMMISSION PRESENTATION
None.
8. STAFF COMMUNICATION
None.
9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:56 p.m.
4.
Needs Analysis
4. ANALYSIS
06/14,99
INTRODUCTION
In order to plan for the future, Plymouth must assess its current recreational offerings. The
various recreational opportunities provided by the Plymouth park system should be meeting
residents' current needs and desires, including close -to -home neighborhood parks and play areas,
walking and bicycling trails within preserved open space, and high quality sports fields for
organized recreation. In addition, the park system should be prepared to meet future demands,
including increased population, changing demographics, changing trends in organized sports, and
increased desire for non -motorized transportation.
This analysis looks at several types of needs:
National Standards. Discussion of the applicability of national standards in determining
needed park acreage.
Park Acreage Establishment of park acreage standards based on current level of service, and
projections for future park acreage needs based on those standards.
Park Service. Determination of which, if any, neighborhoods are underserved by parks.
Organized Sports.. Determination of whether existing sports fields and facilities adequately
serve existing leagues, and what must be done to accommodate projected future changes in
participation.
Specific Facilities. A listing of new facilities which may be incorporated into the park system.
Resident Desires. A summary of regional data and public input relating what activities are
currently in high demand, and whether the park system addresses these desires.
Each analysis section offers recommendations as to how to plan for the future, remedy any
shortcomings, and offer diverse recreational opportunities within the current and future Plymouth
Park System. These recommendations will be covered in further detail in Chapter 7:
Recommendations for Land Acquisition and Facility Development.
NATIONAL STANDARDS
In recent years, the philosophy of national standards has changed significantly. Previously,
organizations such as the National Recreation and Parks Association have set forth specific
numerical values relating to needed park acreage, facilities per capita, and other recreation issues.
Currently, the focus is on each individual community to establish standards applicable to its
particular demographics, resident interests, geography, available land, and any other factors it
may see as necessary. This community driven approach will be discussed later (see "Park
Acreage"), but the previous, numerically based standards are useful as a point of reference
According to general national guidelines, park acreage is defined as those park acres that are
developed for active recreation. Whereas open space and other passive recreational space is
crucial within a park system, national recreation standards focus on active recreation. Table 4.2,
however considers both "active"and "total" acreage. In Chapter 2, each park is subdivided into
Active Acreage" and "Passive Acreage" to facilitate this analysis. Open space and other natural
areas are discussed in Chapter 3. Open Space and Natural Resources Tnventory .
Table 4.1 lists the number of acres per 1,000 persons as recommended by the national guidelines
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN -
4. ANALYSIS
06114.99
Table 4.1 Per Capita .acreage Standards
Park Type Acres per 1.000 persons
Acres
Minimum Desireable
Neighborhood Park 2.5 3.5
Community Playfield 2.0 2.5
City Park 5.0 8.0
Source: Denny, Charles H., Recreation Planning, Gwdelmes
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, Outdoor Recreation Standards
American Society of Planning Officials
For the purposes of this analysis, School Parks are considered to be Neighborhood Parks, as the
City of Plymouth recognizes their neighborhood value and has contributed funds to specific
elementary school site development. Regional Parks (French Park) are not included in the
analysis. Table 4.2 shows a detailed analysis of existing park lands in relation to current and
projected populations and national standards.
Table 4.2 Per Capita Park Acreage in Plymouth
1999
Park Type Acres Population Recommended Acreage Deficit Deficit
Current 1999 Minimum Desireable From
Min.
From
Desired
Neighborhood
Parks
Active 153 62,548 157 219 4 66
Total 388 none none
64,963
Community
Playfields
Active 173 62,548 7 125 157 none none
Total 182 none none
182
City Parks Active 139 62,548 313I 500 170 357
Total 375 none 125
2020
Park Type Acres Population Recommended Acreage. Deficit Deficit
Projected 2020 Minimum Desireable From
Min.
From
Desired
Neighborhood
Parks
Active 153 64,963 162 227 9 74
Total 388 none none
Community
Playfields
Active 173 64,963 130 162 none none
Total 182 none none
City Parks Active 139 64,963 325 520 182 377
Total 375 1 none 145
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN -
4. ANALYSIS
06/14,99
2040
Park Type Acres Population Recommended Acreage Deficit Deficit
Projected 2040 Minimum Desireable From
Min.
From
Desired
Neighborhood
Parks
Active 153 74,512 186 261 33 108
Total 388 none none
Community
Playfields
Active 173 74,512 130 162 none 9
Total 182 none none
City Parks Active 139 74,512 373 596 230 453
Total 375 none 221
Source for Standards: see Table 4.1
Source for Acreage: City of Plymouth, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Source for Population Projections: City of Plymouth
As can be seen from the above data, national standards must always be considered for their
applicability to a particular community. Plymouth does not have a lack of City parkland in 1999,
but the standards claim a severe deficiency, which grows as population increases.
This perceived deficit may come as a result of several qualities of Plymouth's park system that set
it apart from many similar park systems in the metro area and nationwide.
Plymouth's park system is relatively new. The Parks and Recreation Department was formed
in 1980, and, before that time, there were some subdivisions platted without the inclusion of
parkland. This becomes more obvious in the following section, Park Service.
Since its inception, Plymouth's Parks and Recreation Department has striven to purchase and
develop high quality park sites, as opposed to attempting to purchase any parkland that
becomes available. This results in a significant amount of natural areas which are
automatically protected by various city ordinances, but which are not officially designated as
parks. Often, these open spaces are still in private ownership (and on the tax rolls), but serve
certain open space needs of the community.
Much of Plymouth's development has resulted through the use of PUDs, or Planned Unit
Developments. These PUDs usually incorporate private parks into their designs. In a
development that is served by private recreational areas and preserved open space, there is
little need to establish a city or neighborhood park. These private parks and open spaces
private in the sense that they serve only the immediate neighborhood), are not considered in
city park or neighborhood park calculations.
Where PUDs are not employed, the typical lot size for Plymouth is 18,000 square feet,
significantly larger than the lots of most inner ring suburbs. This increased lot size allows
residents more "park land" within their own property.
Early on, the Plymouth Park and Recreation Department decided to keep all city and
neighborhood parks as natural as possible. The result is a great deal of "passive recreational"
area that is kept as forest or grassland. The reduction of maintenance, specifically the
reduction of mowing, puts more land into the "passive" category, and, though this could
easily become "active" by mowing it, the Parks Department has decided to keep as much of
its parkland in a natural state as possible.
The City of Plymouth has invested a greas deal of resources into the development of an
extensive trail system. The miles of trails in the city offer active recreational opportunities
within easy reach of every resident. Plymouth also is host to a very large Regional Park,
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN -4
4. ANALYSIS
06/14,99
operated by Hennepin Parks. Neither this park nor the extensive trail system are incorporated
into the "active recreation" figures described above, but they offer valuable recreational
opportunities for residents.
According to the national standards as described above, Plymouth's park acreage is low, but
numerous factors combine to increase the amount of parkland, open space, and passive and active
recreation within the city. As discussed, national standards have begun to move away from raw
numerical values, and communities like Plymouth are good examples of why this change is
taking place. Many would agree that Plymouth as a whole is not currently underserved by parks
and recreational opportunities. It is, therefore, important to discuss other means of planning for
the future of Plymouth's park system.
PARK ACREAGE
Based on the above discussion, Park Acreage analysis assumes that existing park service is at a
desireable level of service, and the understanding of future needs can be based upon it. Table 4.4
establishes a ratio of park acres per 1,000 people based on 1999 figures, and applies this to 2020
and 2040 to determine the additional amount of park acres (from 1999 acreage) which may be
required. This discussion of Park Acreage looks at the City of Plymouth as a whole. Specific
geographic analysis will be covered later in the Park Service section of this Chapter.
Table 4.4 Per Capita Park Acreage in Plymouth based on 1999 Conditions
1999
Park Type Acres Population
Current 1999
Acres/1000 Desired
Acres
Additional
Acres
Neighborhood
Parks
Active 153 62,548 2.4 153 none
Total 388 6.2 388 none
403
Community
Playfields
Active 173 62,548 2.8 174 none
Total 182
City Parks Active 139 62,548 2.2 139 none
Total 375 6.0 375 none
2020
Park Type Acres PopulationAcres/1000
Projected 2020 based on
1999)
Desired
Acres
Additional
Acres from
1999
Neighborhood
Parks
Active 153 64,963 2.4 156 1 3
Total 388 6.2 403 15
Community
Playfields
Active 173 64,963 2.8 182 9
Total 182
City Parks Active 1 139 64,963 2.2 143 4
Total 1 375 6.0 390 15
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-5
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
2040
Park Type Acres Population
Projected 2040
Acres/1000
based on
1999)
Desired
Acres
Additional
Acres from
1999
Neighborhood
Parks "
Active 153 74,512 2.4 179 26
Total 388 6.2 462 74
Community
Playfields
Active 173 74,512 2.8 209 36
Total 182
City Parks Active 139 74,512 2.2 164 25
Total 375 6.0 447 72
Source for Acreage: City of Plymouth, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Source for Population Projections: City of Plymouth
Since Community Playfields are specifically geared for active recreation, only active recreation should be
considered in future projections.
This table gives an accurate picture of how many acres need to be acquired iii each category in
order to preserve current levels of service in the face of a growing population.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Because Plymouth currently boasts an extensive and highly developed park and trail system,
which offers ample and varied recreation opportunities for its residents, it is best to look at the
data in Table 4.4. This data will guide Plymouth in acquiring needed amounts of parkland in the
future, in order to keep up to present level of service in the city. As the city grows, population
may shift within the community, and the above data acts only as a guideline for overall park
acreage. A more detailed look at specific Park Service Areas follows.
PARK SERVICE
Figure 4.1 shows a map of the Neighborhood Park Service Areas in Plymouth. A Neighborhood
Park Service Area is a small geographic area that can be served by one neighborhood park. It
must be free from barriers such as roadways and major bodies of water, and allow non -motorized
access to the park within it. Ideally, each resident should be within %4 mile of a park facility, but
realistically %2 mile is adequate. Figure 4.2 shows t/4 mile and %2 mile walking distances from
Plymouth's parks. This map was utilized in assessing each Park Service Area. Table 4.5 shows a
summary of the level of park service for each Park Service Area, and relates the following
information:
Park Service Area Number
General Location of Walking Neighborhood
Land Use Character
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-6
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Park Service, which is noted at the following levels
Excellent. The Service Area is served by multiple parks, the entire Area is within %z mile
of a park, and most of the area is within %4 mile of a developed park.
Adequate. The Service Area is served by a park, and most of the Area is within %z mile
of a developed park
Moderate. The Service Area is served by a park, but most of the Area is not within %z
mile of a developed park.
Inadequate. The Service Area is not served by a park, and almost all of the area is not
within 1.2 mile of a developed park.
In addition to walking distance and service by a park, as listed above, Park Service also takes
into account trail connections, dangerous crossings, size of park versus size of service area,
and other factors.
Recommendations may range from establishing better connections within neighborhoods,
perhaps through signage or minor trail connections, to actual acquisition and development of
new parks. The specific recommendation given depends several factors:
How well the park is currently served — Moderate vs. Inadequate
Availability of land for parks, trails, or greenways
Resident needs and desires
Where no recommendations are shown, the neighborhood is either adequately served by
parks, or is commercial or industrial in nature.
Priority Ratings are based on the level of park service, population, trail connections, and
land use of a neighborhood. These subjective ratings are intended to be used as a guide to
future projects.
Highest = 0 to 3 years
High = 4 to 6 years
Moderate= 7 to 10 years
Priority Ratings to be filled with staff and community input.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Figure 4.1 Neighborhood Park Service Areas
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-6
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Figure 4.2 Walking Distances from Parks
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-9
4. ANALYSIS
06/14,99
Table 4.5 Neighborhood Park Service Areas
Park Service General Land Use Park Recommendations Priority
Area/ Location Character Service
Parks
Serving Area
1 Northeast Suburban Inadequate E Work with Hennepin Parks
none in programming
undeveloped Eagle Lake
Park;
e Improve trail connection to
Timber Shores Park across
Bass Lake Rd. at Zachary
Lane;
Establish trail along
Nathan Lane to Three
Ponds Park, and improve
crossing of Bass Lake
Road
2 Northeast Commercial Inadequate
none
3 North Suburban/ Inadequate Develop Mud Lake Park as
none Central Rural neighborhood park (share
with neighborhoods 7 and
8);
Establish continuous trail
along south edge of Co.
Rd. 47 to Mud Lake Park,
with crossings from
neighborhood;
Work with Hennepin Parks
in determining alignment
of future Elm Creek Trail
Segment
4 Northwest Rural Inadequate Develop city -owned Egan
none Park and improve crossing
of Co. Rd. 47;
Provide connections to
proposed Rural Greenway
Trail for access to more
distant parks
5 Northwest Rural Moderate Develop neighborhood
Elm Creek park amenities at Elm
Playfreld Creek Playfield
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-10
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Park Service General Land Use Park Recommendations Priority
Area/ Location Character Service
Parks
Serving Area
6 Northwest Rural Inadequate Develop city -owned Egan
Egan Park;
undev.) Establish alignment for
proposed Rural Greenway
Trail to provide access to
more distant parks;
Acquire any available
open space throughout
neighborhood for future
park development,
especially at south end
7 North Rural Inadequate Develop Mud Lake Park as
none Central neighborhood park (share
with neighborhoods 3 and
8);
Acquire any available
open space throughout
neighborhood for future
park development;
Provide connection to
Turtle Lake Park across
Schmidt Lake Rd. at
existing trail;
Work with Hennepin Parks
in determining alignment
of future Elm Creek Trail
Segment;
8 North Rural/ Inadequate Develop Mud Lake Park as
Mud Lake Central Suburban neighborhood park (share
undev.) with neighborhoods 3 and
7);
Work with Hennepin Parks
in determining alignment
of future Elm Creek Trail
Segment;
Establish alignment for
proposed Rural Greenway
Trail to provide access to
more distant parks;
9 North Suburban Moderate Improve crossing of
Bass Lake Central Northwest Blvd. and
Playfield Pineview Lane to Bass
Lake Playfield
10 Northeast Suburban Moderate Improve crossing of
Timber Schmidt Lake Rd. from
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4--11
YSIS
06/14,99
Park Service General Land Use Park Recommendations Priority
Area/ Location Character Service
Parks
Serving Area
Shores/ southern portion of
Schmidt Lake neighborhood to Schmidt
Lake Park
11 Northeast Suburban Moderate Improve crossing of
Three Ponds railroad from southern
portion of neighborhood to
Three Ponds Park
12 East Suburban Adequate
Rolling Hills Central
13 East Suburban Excellent
Schmidt Central
Lake/Zachary
Playfield
14 Central Suburban Moderate Improve crossing of
Swan Lake Northwest Blvd. from
western portion of
neighborhood to Swan
Lake Park, possibly
utilizing future Elm Creek
Trail
15 Central Suburban Moderate Improve existing
Environment connection across
Center Fembrook Road to Turtle
undev.) Lake Park
Develop environmental
center, including
neighborhood park
amenities
16 Central Suburban Adequate
Turtle Lake
17 West Suburban/ Inadequate Improve connections to
none Central Rural Turtle Lake Park across
Vicksburg Lane at 46`a
Avenue N.;
Improve connections to
Plymouth Creek Trail
across Old Rockford Road
at Dunkirk Lane;
E Acquire open space in
southeast portion of
neighborhood
18 West Suburban/ Inadequate Establish continuation of
none Central Rural Plymouth Creek Trail to
Wayzata High School
Work with Kimberly Lane
Elementary to establish
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN4-12
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Park Service General Land Use Park Recommendations Priority
Area/ Location Character Service
Parks
Serving Area
neighborhood park
facilities
19 West Rural/ Moderate Improve connections from
Greenwood Central Suburban within neighborhood to
Elem. School Greenwood Elementary
Park School Park
20 West Suburban Moderate Work in partnership with
Plymouth Central Wayzata School District to
Creek Elem. establish School Park type
School Park facilities at Kimberly Lane
Elementary School;
Establish continuation of
Plymouth Creek Trail
21 Central Suburban/ Excellent
Plymouth Commercial
Creek
22 Central Suburban Moderate Improve crossing of
Plymouth Fernbrook Road to
Creek Plymouth Creek Park
23 Central Suburban Adequate
Heritage
24 East Suburban Excellent
Mission Central
Hills/French
25 East Suburban Excellent
Four Seasons/ Central
Pilgrim Lane
26 East Suburban Adequate
Plymouth Central
Playfield/
Sunrise/
Kilmer
27 Southeast Suburban Moderate Extend Plymouth Creek
West Trail to West Medicine
Medicine Lake Park
Lake Park Establish mini -park in
central portion of
neighborhood
28 Central Commercial Inadequate
none
29 Central Suburban Adequate
Maple Creek
30 West Suburban Excellent
Shiloh/ Central
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN
YSIS
06/14/99
Park Service General Land Use Park Recommendations Priority
Area/ Location Character Service
Parks
Serving Area
Fazendin
31 West Suburban Adequate
Heather Central
Ponds.
32 West Suburban Adequate
Greenwood Central
Elem. School
Park
33 West Suburban Adequate
Green Oaks Central
34 Southwest Adequate
Imperial Hill
35 Southwest Suburban Adequate
Oakwood
Playfleld
36 Central Suburban Adequate
Parkers Lake
37 South Suburban Excellent
Parkers Lake/ Central
Lions
38 Southeast Suburban Adequate
Gleanloch
39 Southeast Suburban/ Moderate Improve connections from
South Shore Commercial within neighborhood to
West Medicine Lake Park
and Trail, South Shore
Park, and the Luce Line
40 Southeast Suburban/ Adequate
East Commercial
Medicine
Lake Park
41 Southeast Commercial Inadequate
none
42 Southeast Suburban Adequate
La Compte
Playfield
43 Southeast Suburban Adequate
St. Mary's/
Ridgemount
Playfield
44 South Suburban Adequate
Sunset Hills Central
Elem. School
45 South Suburban Moderate Improve crossing of
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-14
4. ANALYSIS
06/14;99
Park Service General Land Use Park Recommendations Priority
Area/ Location Character Service
Parks
Serving Area
Circle/ Central Vicksburg Lane from
Birchview western portion of
Elem. School neighborhood to Circle
Park Park and Birchview
Elementary School Parks
46 Southwest Suburban Inadequate Improve connections from
none within neighborhood to
Luce Line Trail and
Dunkirk Lane Trail
47 Southwest Suburban Moderate Develop minimal
Queensland neighborhood park
facilities within open space
parcel adjacent to Hadley
Lake;
Explore possibility of loop
trail around Hadley Lake
with Luce Line connection
Acquire and develop
neighborhood park on site
north of Hadley Lake
48 Southwest Suburban Inadequate Develop neighborhood
none park facilities within open
space parcel in center of
neighborhood;
Explore possibility of loop
trail around Hadley Lake
with Luce Line connection
49 Southwest Suburban Inadequate Work with Wayzata
none School District to establish
School Park type facilities
at Gleason Lake
Elementary;
Acquire and develop
Neighborhood Park on
Gleason Lake shoreline
adjacent to School;
Explore possibility of Luce
Line Spur Loop around
Gleason Lake
50 Southwest Suburban Moderate Improve connections from
none within neighborhood to
Circle and Birchview
Elementary School Parks
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Source: SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
In the next 20 to 40 years, some neighborhoods' population may change significantly. Where
neighborhood populations are growing, it is important to begin planning for their recreational
needs now. Table 4.6 shows the projected population change for each Park Service Area, along
with the number of additional neighborhood park acres that are recommended, as based on the
1999 acres/1000 ratio described in Table 4.4. The Park Service Areas that have projected growth
Significant enough to warrant additional park acreage are shown in bold. Figures 4.2 and 4.3
graphically depict the projected change in demographics for each Park Service Area.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-16
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Table 4.6 Projected Demographic Change in Park Service Areas
Park
Service
Area
1999
Pop.
2020
Pop.
Population
Increase
from 1999
Additional
Park Acres
2040
Population
Population
Increase
from 1999
Additional
Park Acres
1 497 506 9 0 506 9 0
2 0 162 162 0.4 324 324 0.8
3 1 1,040 1,527 487 1.2 1,527 487 1.2
4 42 38 4 0 1,089 1,047 2.5
5 110 98 12 0 2,903 2,793 6.7
6 328 1,258 930 2.2 4,795 4,467 10.7
7 428 2,702 2,274 5.5 2,702 2,274 5.5
8 6 1,495 1,489 3.6 1,495 1,489 3.6
9 2,489 1 2,218 271 0 2,218 271 0
10 962 856 106 0 856 106 0
11 1,342 1,398 74 0.2 1,536 212 0.5
12 2,908 2,535 373 0 2,535 373 0
13 1,997 1,794 203 0 1,794 203 0
14 1,626 1,567 59 0 1,637 11 0
15 593 687 94 0.2 687 94 0.2
16 3,623 3,275 348 0 3,275 348 0
17 663 688 25 0.1 688 25 0.1
18 265 793 528 1.3 815 550 1.3
19 438 602 164 0.4 1,832 1,394 3.3
20 1,622 1,700 78 0.2 1,700 78 0.2
21 3,352 2,873 479 0 2,873 479 0
22 453 411 42 0 410 43 0
23 1,420 1,305 115 0 1,305 115 0
24 2,175 2,029 146 0 2,029 146 0
25 3,503 3,054 449 0 3,054 449 0
26 2,919 2,612 307 0 2,612 307 0
27 2,198 2,019 179 0 2,019 179 0
28 3 3 0 0 3 0 0
29 911 821 90 0 821 90 0
30 1,409 1 1,267 142 0 1,267 142 0
31 596 1,102 506 1 1.2 1,102 506 1.2
32 1,747 1,595 152 0 1,595 152 0
33 1,333 1,205 128 0 1,205 128 0
34 1,376 1,267 109 0 1,267 109 0
35 2,098 1,870 228 0 1,870 228 0
36 3,346 2,964 382 0 2,964 382 0
37 936 829 107 0 829 107 0
38 1,119 1 1,076 43 0 1,129 10 0
39 1,601 1,833 232 0.6 1,897 296 0.7
40 79 360 281 0.7 1 649 570 1.4
41 1,101 1,300 199 0.5 1,300 199 0.5
42 358 403 45 0.1 524 1166 0.4
43 485 453 32 0 462 23 0
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-17
4. ANALYSIS
06/14,99
Park
Service
Area
1999
Pop.
2020
Pop.
Population
Increase
from 1999
Additional
Park Acres
2040
Population
Population
Increase
from 1999
Additional
Park Acres
44 628 575 53 0 575 53 0
45 2,032 1,847 185 0 1,847 185 0
46 1,811 1,603 208 0 1,603 208 0
47 1,617 1 1,518 1 -99 0 1 1,108 509 0
48 481 429 52 0 282 199 0
49 315 282 33 0 159 156 0
50 169 159 10 0 839 670 1.6
source for Population Projections: city of Plymoum
based on standards as in Table 4.4 for active recreation in Neighborhood Parks: 2.4 acres/ 1000 people
Figure 4.3 Projected Growth in Neighborhood Park Service Areas: 1999 to 2020
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN4-18
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Figure 4.4 Projected Growth in Neighborhood Park Service Areas: 1999 to 2040
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-19
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
As can be seen from the chart and figures, Park Service Areas in the northwest quadrant of the
City (Areas 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, 18, and 19) will be experiencing the most significant growth, both
in the next twenty and the next forty years. This grouping of Service Areas is closely followed by
those in the southeast comer of the City (Areas 39, 40, and 41). These two areas should be seen
as high priority for park acquisition and development. There are several opportunities for new
parks in these areas, but detailed strategies must be put in place before the areas begin to develop.
The following are a few recommendations for each Park Service Critical Area.
Southeast Corner (Areas 39 40and 41)
Increase land area of East Medicine Lake Park
Acquire and develop new neighborhood park south of LaCompte Playfield
Provide improved trail connections, including crossings of TH 55, to allow several
neighborhoods to share park amenities.
This area has some immediate urgency as it is already residential in nature, and these
neighborhoods tend to be underserved by parks at the present time.
Northwest Quadrant Areas 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18, and 19)
Develop Egan Park and Mud Lake Park
Implement the Rui•al Greenway, along with associated pocket parks and linear recreation
opportunities
Acquire and develop new neighborhood park within quadrant, possibly in association with
new development
Ensure adequate trail connections between parks and any future residential developments
Much of the projected change in demographics displayed in the above charts and tables is due to
a recent change in the comprehensive plan. Some areas in the City, primarily older commercial
zones, are ready for redevelopment sometime in the next 20 years. This redevelopment will most
likely continue a commercial presence in these areas, but will incorporate multi -family housing,
thereby increasing the population and the need for parks.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN4-20
4. ANALYSIS
06/14.99
ORGANIZED SPORTS
Youth and adult athletic programs are offered through the City of Plymouth and a variety of
athletic associations. The focus of this section is to examine the athletic facility needs of the
community based upon participation rates, variables that contribute to facility demand, and the
future implications for facility adequacy.
Sports and activities considered below include:
Activity Provider
Boy's Baseball Plymouth/Wayzata Baseball Association
Plymouth Park and Recreation
New Hope/Plymouth Athletic Association
Girl's Fastpitch Softball Wayzata and Golden Valley Softball
Adult Softball Plymouth/Wayzata Softball Association
Plymouth Park and Recreation
Youth Soccer 0 Wings Soccer Associtiation
Wayzata Soccer Club
Plymouth Soccer Association
Plymouth Park and Recreation
Adult Soccer Minnesota Recreational Soccer League
Youth Football New Hope/Plymouth Athletic Association
Plymouth/Wayzata Football Association
Adult Football Plymouth Park and Recreation
Sand Volleyball Plymouth Park and Recreation
Basketball — Youth and Adult New Hope/Plymouth Athletic Association
Plymouth/Wayzata Youth Basketball Association
Plymouth Park and Recreation
Indoor Soccer Plymouth Park and Recreation
Indoor Volleyball Plymouth Park and Recreation
Youth Hockey Armstrong Youth Hockey Association
Wayzata Youth Hockey
Acquatics New Hope/Crystal/Plymouth Swim Club
Classic Lake Acquatics
Source: City of Plymouth, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Leagues operated by the Park and Recreation Department and by other athletic associations play
their matches on fields that may be city -owned, operated by the school districts, or administered
cooperatively by the Parks Department and a School District. Table 4.7 inventories municipal
and school district facilities that contribute outdoor and indoor athletic facilities.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4--21
4. ANALYSIS
06/14199
T able 4.7 Indoor and Out--Io--r Athletic Facilities
Facility.
yR
7
y
y y
a y
w
Ow
w
R V
COpT
7 >
TN
x
City of Plymouth Facilities
Plymouth Ice Center 2 (indoor)
Plymouth Playfield 3 L 3 L 2
Zachary Playfield 4 L 1 L 2 L 2
Plymouth Creek Park 2 L 1 L 2 L 2
Parkers Lake Playfield 1 1 L 1 1 L 1
Oakwood Playfield 3 L 3 L 1
LaCompte Playfield 2 1
Bass Lake Playfield 1 1 1 L 1 1
Ridgemount Playfield 2 3 2
Elm Creek Playfield 4 5
Lions Park
Imperial Hill
1
1
Mission Hills Park 1
Robbinsdale School Facilities
Plymouth Middle School 2
Armstrong Sr. High 1 1 1 L (stadium) 3
Zachary Lane Elementary 2 1
Pilgrim Lane Elementary 1 1
Wayzata School Facilities
Wayzata East Jr. High 2
Wayzata Central Jr. High 2 1 1 3
Wayzata Sr. High 2 L 1 L 1
Kimberly Lane Elementary
1 1 1
Plymouth Creek Elementary
1
1
Oakwood Elementary 1 1
Birchview Elementary 2 1
Greenwood Elementary 3 1 1
Sunset Hills Elementary 1
Gleason Lake Elementary I 1
Private Facilities
West Lutheran H.S. 1 1 1
Lifetime Fitness 2
Medicine Lake Community Club
2
Totals 12 L 41 5 L 5 1 14 L 17---T-221 2 (indoor) 11
Note: Fields that are not progrartuned for organized atntette use are not mcmded in the mole.
Source: City of Plymouth, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
L = lighted field
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-22
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
PARTICIPATION IN ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
The purpose of this analysis is to anticipate the trends of organized athletics resulting from
changes in population, shifts in demographic characteristics, and movement in activity popularity.
To assist in understanding the trends impacting athletic activities within the City of Plymouth, a
summary is written for each organized athletic activity. The summary contains information
regarding the background of the activity, organizers of the activity, recent participation in the
activity, and future needs and recommendations.
The strength of this approach is that it relies primarily upon community data rather than national
norms or standards that may not be applicable to Plymouth's needs. However, these trend
evaluations are subject to a large number of external influences. The evaluation is intended
primarily to stimulate discussion rather than obtain specific conclusions.
Outside factors that affect the trend analysis include:
The accuracy of the City's population projections.
Changing community demographics as they affect age classifications.
Changing per capita participation rates for each activity or youth category.
Stability and leadership within Plymouth's various athletic associations.
Continued facility and programming support on the part of the City for both youth and adult
athletic activities.
Continued coordination and cooperation between the City and school districts in maintaining
adequate facilities.
The possibility of increased participation fees to offset operations and maintenance costs,
which may in turn alter or reduce participation rates.
Policy changes pertaining to resident/non-resident participation.
Popularity and success of professional sport franchises within the Twin Cities metropolitan
area.
Much of the information and recommendations contained within this section is based on the 1995
City of Plymouth Recreational Snorts Facility Report. This report was a project of the Parks and
Recreation Department, the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission and the Youth Sports
Task Force that was submitted to the Plymouth City Council in November of 1995. The report
outlines some athletic participation rates from 1991 to 1995, projects participation rates from
1995 to 2005, analyzes available facilities and facility demand, and offers strategies for meeting
future demand. This needs and demands chapter builds on the Recreational Sports Facility
Report by highlighting the athletic endeavors in which City residents and school district residents
participate, as well as projecting future participation rates. Additionally, information regarding
activity sponsors is included. This plan takes into account the development of Elm Creek
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN -
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Playfield, the Plymouth Ice Center, and other additions to Plymouth's recreation facility system
since the 1995 report.
For future planning purposes, it is suggested that the City of Plymouth track participation rates for
all organized athletic activities on an annual basis. These records should be retained so that
trends can be recognized and future planning of athletic facilities can occur.
Several factors regarding future demand and participation should be understood when evaluating
each of the activities described in this section. First, the City of Plymouth's population will
continue to increase over the next forty years. As a result of this increase, there were be
additional pressures to meet the recreational needs of the community. It should be noted,
however, that this increase in population does not automatically translate into a comparable
increase in the City's existing recreational facilities.
Second, the composition of the City's demographics will change dramatically over the next forty
years. Across the country there will be an aging of the population as the baby boomers reach
retirement age and beyond. This shift in the composition of the community will have an impact
on the types of facilities and activities that the Park and Recreation Department will need to
provide. Instead of developing additional baseball, softball and soccer fields to meet the need of
a growing population, more passive facilities such as environmental learning centers, bocce ball
courts and golf courses may be needed.
Third, the City of Plymouth currently provides recreational opportunities for youth that live
outside of the City's corporate limits, but attend the Wayzata School District. In some of the
youth sports upwards of 30 percent of the participants are located outside of the City. Thus,
population increases and changing demographic characteristics are not sufficient by themselves in
evaluating recreational trends.
Source for all charts in this section: City of Plymouth, SRF Consulting Group, Inc
Youth Baseball and Softball
Historically, two of the most popular youth activities are baseball and softball. These sports
continue to draw new participants every year. Like all of the other youth programs that use
facilities located within the City of Plymouth, some of the teams are comprised of individuals that
live outside the corporate limits of the City. The use of City facilities by non-residents needs to
be taken into account when evaluating future facility needs.
Youth baseball is divided into two categories. The first category includes softball and baseball
teams that play on 60 and 75 -foot bases. The second category is comprised of those teams
playing on 90 -foot bases.
A number of organizations coordinate youth softball and baseball activities within the City.
BOY'S BASEBALL ORGANIZERS: Plymouth/Wayzata Baseball Association
Plymouth Park and Recreation
New Hope/Plymouth Athletic Association
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN - 4
YSIS
06/14/99
GIRL'S FASTPITCH ORGANIZER: Wayzata and Golden Valley Softball
PAST PARTICIPATION
Past participation numbers can indicate the popularity of a sport and can be used to project future
facility demand. When the City of Plymouth Recreational Sports Facility Report was published
in 1995, it was projected that youth baseball and softball would grow by 36 percent over the next
ten years. As part of those projections, the report indicated that 14 additional fields (2 lighted and
12 unlighted) would be needed by 2005.
Tables 4.8 and 4.9 indicate past participation rates for youth baseball and softball.
Table 4.8 Youth Baseball/Softball— 60-75 Foot Bases
Year Teams Fields Teams per Desired
Field Teams per
Field Teams per
Field
1995 38 9 (4 L) 4.2
Field
1995 146 34 (7 L) 4.3
1998 41 (12 L)
L=lighted fields
Table 4.9 Youth Baseball — 90 Foot Bases
Year Teams Fields Teams per Desired
Field Teams per
Field
1995 38 9 (4 L) 4.2 9
1998 ? 6 (5 L)
L=lighted fields
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Youth Baseball poses scheduling and facility development challenges, as baseline requirements
range from 50 foot to 90 foot configurations. In developing new facilities for youth baseball and
softball (along with adult softball) flexibility in design is key.
Girls' fastpitch softball has witnessed substantial since 1989. The growth in popularity of this
sport has outstripped the City's ability to provide adequate facilities for participants. Many of the
teams do not have a home field located within the City of Plymouth. Consideration for this sport
must be taken into account when developing new facilities or redeveloping older facilities.
Adult Softball
Unlike youth softball, adult softball is experiencing a decrease in popularity. Since the early
1990s the number of teams playing in the adult leagues has dropped on an annual basis. Part of
this decrease can be explained by the demographic changes within the City. As the baby boomers
have aged, their participation in organized athletic activity has decreased. The increasing aging
of the population within the City could have a significant impact on the continued demand for
adult softball facilities and leagues.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN
4. ANALYSIS
06/14i99
The organizations coordinating the adult softball activities are quite efficient. Games are timed,
double headers are played, and pitching machines are used in the fall. This efficiency allows for
a large number of teams per field.
There are two organizations that coordinate adult softball activities within the City.
ADULT SOFTBALL ORGANIZERS: PlymouthiWayzata Softball Association
Plymouth Park and Recreation
PAST PARTICIPATION
Past participation can indicate the popularity of a sport and can be used to project future facility
demand. When the City of Plymouth Recreational Sports Facility Report was published in 1995,
it was projected that adult softball would grow by 20 percent over the next ten years, this is the
lowest growth activity for the City of Plymouth. As part of the projections for the Report, it was
determined that two additional fields (1 lighted and 1 unlighted) were needed by 2005.
Table 4.10 indicates past participation rates for adult softball.
Table 4.10 Adult Softball
Year Teams Fields Teams per Desired
Field Teams per
Field
1995 238 37 4.5 ?
1998 160 37 ? ?
L=lighted fields
Note: Team numbers include both summer and fall leagues
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The demographic changes that are occurring throughout the country will impact the City of
Plymouth as well. As the City's population ages, participation in adult recreational activities will
be altered. Passive activities will become increasingly popular and active recreation will likely
decrease. These trends should be monitored so that facilities are not overbuilt.
Youth Soccer
Currently, the most popular organized youth activity is soccer. This sport has witnessed
continuous growth throughout the last decade. Like all of the other youth programs that use
facilities located within the City of Plymouth, some of the teams are comprised of individuals that
live outside the corporate limits of the City. The use of City facilities by non-residents should be
taken into account when evaluating facility needs.
The principal challenges for soccer facilities are the multi -seasonal use, the significant increase in
the number of participants, and the variety of field sizes required for various age groups. Some
leagues are beginning to field travel teams, which may cause a reduction in house league
participation, but will require higher quality fields in Plymouth. Currently, several soccer
organizations utilize field space in Plymouth, and these expanding leagues may conflict with one
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN4-26
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
another, especially in July, when almost every available field is occupied by the Wayzata Soccer
Club's annual tournament. Additional use by the school districts located within the City puts
added strain on the fields in the spring.
Youth soccer is divided into two categories. The first category is the summer soccer season, and
the second category is the fall soccer season.
There are a number of organizations which help coordinate youth soccer activities within the
City. -
YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZERS: Wings Soccer Club
Wayzata Soccer Club
Plymouth Soccer Association
Plymouth Park and Recreation
PAST PARTICIPATION
Past participation numbers can indicate the popularity of a sport and can be used to project future
facility demand. When the City of Plymouth Recreational Sports Facility Report was published
in 1995, it was projected that youth soccer would be one of the fastest growing sports within the
community. Summer soccer participation was expected to increase by 31 percent, and fall soccer
participation was expected to increase by 27 percent by the year 2005. In order to accommodate
this growth, it was anticipated that 15.5 additional fields (6.5 lighted and 9 unlighted) would be
needed by 2005.
Table 4.11 indicates past participation rates for summer and fall youth soccer.
Table 4.11 Youth Soccer
Year Teams Fields Teams per Desired
Field Teams per
Field
1995 287 14 (16 L) 9.6 ?
1998 ? 14 (17 L) ? ?
L=lighted fields
Note: Number of teams reflects both summer and fall youth soccer, thus resulting in a higher
number of teams per field/
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Growth in both boys' and girls' leagues of all age groups is about the same, calling for flexibility
in field size in any future design. Additionally, the City may wish to explore the construction of a
large soccer facility. A multi -field complex could serve the needs of the youth and adult soccer
programs as well as serve the two school districts located within the City. Further investigation
into a multi -field facility is suggested.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Adult Soccer
Although adult soccer is not programmed by any organizations within the City of Plymouth,
teams from leagues around the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area use fields located within the City.
The City of Plymouth requires that at least 50 percent of the members of these teams to either live
or work within the City.
ADULT SOCCER ORGANIZERS: Minnesota Recreational Soccer League
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Park and Recreation Department should consider tracking the number of adult leagues/teams
that are using City fields. As soccer continues to grow in popularity, scheduling fields for adult
and youth leagues could become difficult. Additionally, the Park and Recreation Department
may need to reevaluate its policy regarding outside organizations. As mentioned above,
development of a multi -field facility could be used to meet the field demands of the adult and
youth soccer leagues.
Youth Football
Youth football has shown slow but steady growth. The Plymouth/Wayzata Football Association,
which is comprised of about 70 percent Plymouth residents, plays less than half of their games in
Plymouth. This organization is looking for additional field space within the City.
There are two organizations that coordinate youth football activities within the City.
YOUTH FOOTBALL ORGANIZERS: New Hope/Plymouth Athletic Association
Plymoutb/Wayzata Football Association
PAST PARTICIPATION
Past participation numbers can indicate the popularity of a sport and can be used to project future
facility demand. When the City of Plymouth Recreational Sports Facility Report was published
in 1995, it was projected that youth football would grow by 28 percent over the next 10 years. As
part of those projections, the report indicated that 3 new fields (1 lit and 2 unlit) would be needed
by 2005.
Table 4.12 indicates past participation rates for youth football.
Table 4.12 Youth Football
Year Teams Fields Teams per Desired
Field Teams per
Field
1995 28 5 (2 L) 5.6
1998 ? ? ?
L=lighted fields
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN
4. ANALYSIS
06/14,99
Adult Football
Adult football has been played in Plymouth for a number of years. However, it has just recently
1996) been added to the Park and Recreation Department's officiated team sports. Because the
officiated sport is relatively new, there has been a low participation rate. The future of the sport
will be difficult to project. However, consideration must be given to the aging of the population.
As the baby boomers age, their participation in organized activities such as softball, football, and
soccer is likely to decrease.
There is only one organization that coordinates adult football activities within the City.
ADULT FOOTBALL ORGANIZER: Plymouth Park and Recreation
PAST PARTICIPATION
As mentioned above, officiated adult football did not begin until 1996. As such, the 1995 City of
Plymouth Recreational Sports Facility Report did not have any growth projections or future field
needs.
Table 4.13 indicates past participation for adult football.
Table 4.13 Adult Football
Year Teams Fields Teams per Desired
Field Teams per
Field
1996 14 ? ? 9
1998 16 ? ? ?
L=lighted fields
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Monitoring of this sport's participation rates will help to identify future needs and demands.
However, when predicting future participation rates, consideration must be given to the aging of
the City's population.
Sand Volleyball
Like adult softball, organized adult sand volleyball is experiencing a decrease in popularity. Part
of this decrease may be attributed to the fact that the games are not officiated. However, "pick-
up" games that are not scheduled through the Park and Recreation Department for organized play
are increasing. Thus, even though the participation numbers appear to be lower than they have in
the past, the courts are being used just as often if not more.
Currently, only one organization is coordinating sand volleyball activities within the City.
SAND VOLLEYBALL ORGANIZERS: Plymouth Park and Recreation
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN
4. ANAL
PAST PARTICIPATION
When the City of Plymouth Recreational Sports Facility Report was published in 1995, adult
sports, other than softball and basketball were, not evaluated. As such, future participation rates
and future facility needs were not projected.
Table 4.14 indicates past participation for sand volleyball.
Table 4.14 Sand Volleyball
Year Teams Courts Teams per Desired
Court Teams per
Court
1995 16 4 4
1998 8 5 1.6
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
When future facility studies are undertaken, all activities should be evaluated. Evaluating all
activities will provide a better framework for determining existing and future facility needs and
demands. Consideration of future facilities should also include the large number of "pick-up"
games that occur.
Basketball
Basketball, both at the adult and youth level, is continuing to grow steadily. The most important
concern with basketball leagues is their gym using conflict with indoor soccer, which is growing
more quickly. Currently, the city does not own any gyms for the use of its indoor recreational
leagues, and instead operates through partnerships with local school districts. For the purposes of
this report, youth and adult basketball have been combined.
There are three organizations coordinating adult and youth basketball.
BASKETBALL ORGANIZERS: New Hope/Plymouth Athletic Association
Plymouth/Wayzata Youth Basketball Associations
Plymouth Park and Recreation
PAST PARTICIPATION
Past participation numbers can indicate the popularity of a sport and can be used to project future
facility demand. When the City of Plymouth Recreational Sports Facility Report was published
in 1995, it was projected that basketball would increase by 25 percent over the next ten years. As
part of those projections, the report indicated that 4 additional courts were needed.
Table 4.15 indicates past participation rates for basketball.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-30
9
06/14/99
Table 4.15 Basketball
Year Teams Courts Current Desired
Teams per Teams per
Court Court
1995 157 17 9.2
1998 ? ?
Note: These figures include participation for both adult and youth leagues combined
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Indoor basketball facility use in relationship to indoor soccer and volleyball use needs to be
evaluated when looking at the number of future facilities that are needed. The 1995 Report did
not address indoor soccer or volleyball, and thus may give a skewed picture on the number of
hard surface courts that are needed to accommodate all three activities.
Indoor Soccer
Indoor soccer utilizes some of the same spaces as adult and youth basketball and adult volleyball.
This conflict of facility usage limits the number of teams that are allowed to compete for each
sport. Additionally, the rapid growth of the sport in both the adult and youth leagues has
contributed to an increase in demand for additional facilities.
INDOOR SOCCER ORGANIZERS: Plymouth Park and Recreation
PARTICIPATIONAND PROJECTIONS
When the City of Plymouth Recreational Sports Facility Report was published in 1995, adult
sports, other than softball and basketball were, not evaluated. As such, future participation rates
and future facility needs were not projected.
Table 4.16 indicates past participation rates for indoor soccer.
Table 4.16 Indoor Soccer
Year Teams Fields Teams per Desired
Field Teams per
Field
1995 ?
1998 ?
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
When future facility studies are undertaken, all activities should be evaluated. Evaluating all
activities will provide a better framework for determining existing and future facility needs and
demands. Additionally, indoor soccer facility use in relationship to indoor basketball and
volleyball needs to be evaluated when looking at the number of facilities that are needed.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 1
4. ANALYSIS
06/14,99
Indoor Volleyball
As mentioned previously, volleyball is competing for facility space with indoor basketball and
indoor soccer. All three sports are popular, and are putting significant pressure on facility space.
In addition, there is the possibility of youth volleyball leagues being organized in the future, if
this is the case, it will put a strain on already overworked facilities.
Currently, only one organization coordinates volleyball activities within the City.
INDOOR VOLLEYBALL ORGANIZERS: Plymouth Park and Recreation
PARTICIPATIONAND PROJECTIONS
When the City of Plymouth Recreational Sports Facility Report was published in 1995, adult
sports, other than softball and basketball were, not evaluated. As such, future participation rates
and future facility needs were not projected.
Table 4.17 indicates past participation rates for indoor volleyball.
Table 4.17 Volleyball
Year Teams Courts Teams per Desired
Court Teams per
Court
1995 70 ? ? ?
1998 45 ? ? ?
Note: Team total includes both the fall and winter seasons
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
When future facility studies are undertaken, all activities should be evaluated. Evaluating all
activities will provide a better framework for determining existing and future facility needs and
demands. Additionally, indoor volleyball facility use in relationship to indoor basketball and
indoor soccer needs to be evaluated when looking at the number of facilities that are needed.
Youth Hockey
Hockey is another rapidly growing youth sport that is targeted towards both boys and girls.
Every year the number of new hockey players increases, and creates additional demand for ice
facilities. Like all of the other youth programs that use facilities located within the City of
Plymouth, some of the teams are comprised of individuals that live outside the corporate limits of
the City. The use of City facilities by non-residents needs to be taken into account when
evaluating future facility needs.
There are two organizations which coordinate youth hockey within the City.
YOUTH HOCKEY ORGANIZERS: New Hope/Plymouth Athletic Association
Plymouth/Wayzata Youth Hockey
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN -
YSIS
06/14/99
PARTICIPATIONAND PROJECTIONS
Past participation numbers can indicate the popularity of a sport and can be used to project
facility demand. When the City of Plymouth Sports Facility Report was published in 1995, it was
projected that youth hockey would grow by 33 percent over then next ten years. As part of those
projections, the report indicated that 6 new rinks (4 outdoor and 2 indoor) would be needed by
2005.
Table 4.18 indicates past participation rates for youth hockey.
Table 4.18 Youth Hockey
Year Teams Rinks Current Desired
Teams per Teams per
Rink Rink
11 outdoor 4.3
1995 52 2 indoor
1998 11 outdoor
2 indoor
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The construction of the Plymouth Ice Center has alleviated some of the need for additional
hockey facilities. However, the projected growth in girls' hockey and an increasing number of
figure skaters in the community suggests that more ice is still needed.
Aquatics
Need background information
ORGANIZERS: New Hope/Crystal/Plymouth Swim Club
Classic Lake Aquatics
Pool with new High School? With Lifetime Fitness? What is current demand?
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
PLYMOUTH ATHLETIC FACILITY NEEDS BASED UPON STANDARDS
Plymouth facility needs based upon standards are summarized in Table 4.19. Standards are used
to generate the need for future year populations as a means of establishing surplus or deficit
facility levels. Similar to other standards approach, this method should not be employed as the
sole analysis too. Rather it is to provide one of a number of approaches in obtaining a balanced
analysis of facility adequacy.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-33
4. ANALYSIS
06114/99
Table 4.19 Athletic Facility Needs Based On Standards
Source for Standards: Denny, Charles H., Recreation Planning Guidelines
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, Outdoor Recreation Standards
American Society of Planning Officials
Source for Facilities: City of Plymouth, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
This denotes the number of park facilities with outdoor hard surface courts. Many of these
parks may have more than one court, so the number of courts is actually higher.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
As the Plymouth Park System evolves, demographic changes occur, and different sports become
popular, new types of recreational facilities are likely to be developed. These facilities will be
designed to serve the growing needs and diverse interests of the community. When considering
development of new recreational facilities, the City may wish to explore complexes that can
support activities such as disc golf, in line hockey, skateboarding, swimming, other water
activities, miniature golf, multi -field soccer, and bark parks. Other special facilities, including:
sliding hills, day camps, camping grounds, nature centers, community gardens, additional court
facilities, and golf courses are already provided by the City, Hennepin Parks, the County, or
private interests.
Table 4.20 identifies existing special facilities and their providers. Table 4.21 identifies special
facilities that should be considered in the future.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN - 4
bDG
C
h b
F
O
O
C v H m W
Facility
N
x
t00
w F
O
w° ria a7 rn°
Standard 1—per 1per 1 per 1 per 1 per 1 per 1 per 1 per 1 per I per
Number of 5,000 3,000 5,000 2,000 5,000 20,000 5,000 6,000 or 8,000 2,000
Units Per outdoor) Lighted
Population 1 per
15,000
Existing 29* 21 13 24 3 31 31 5 and 5 53 53
Facilities I shared) shared) lighted shared) shared)
1999 13 13 13 32 13 3 13 11 and 4 8 32
Population lighted
Needs
62,548)
Deficit in None 8 none 8 10 none none 6 non- none none
1999 lighted
2020 13 22 13 33 13 4 13 11 or 5 9 33
Population lighted
Needs
64,963)
2040 15 25 15 38 15 4 15 13 or 5 10 38
Population lighted
Needs
74,512)
Source for Standards: Denny, Charles H., Recreation Planning Guidelines
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, Outdoor Recreation Standards
American Society of Planning Officials
Source for Facilities: City of Plymouth, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
This denotes the number of park facilities with outdoor hard surface courts. Many of these
parks may have more than one court, so the number of courts is actually higher.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
As the Plymouth Park System evolves, demographic changes occur, and different sports become
popular, new types of recreational facilities are likely to be developed. These facilities will be
designed to serve the growing needs and diverse interests of the community. When considering
development of new recreational facilities, the City may wish to explore complexes that can
support activities such as disc golf, in line hockey, skateboarding, swimming, other water
activities, miniature golf, multi -field soccer, and bark parks. Other special facilities, including:
sliding hills, day camps, camping grounds, nature centers, community gardens, additional court
facilities, and golf courses are already provided by the City, Hennepin Parks, the County, or
private interests.
Table 4.20 identifies existing special facilities and their providers. Table 4.21 identifies special
facilities that should be considered in the future.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN - 4
C!
Table 4.20 Existing Special Facilities
06/14/99
Facility Type Provider
Day Camps Hennepin Parks (French Regional Park)
Golf Courses Private
Court Facilities (indoor basketball, volleyball,
and soccer)
City of Plymouth as part of the Plymouth
Creek Center
Community Gardens Hennepin County Workhouse and City of
Plymouth
Community Nursery Hennepin County
Sliding Hills City of Plymouth at Ridgemont Play Field
Group Picnic Facilities Hennepin Parks (French Regional Park)
Table 4.21 Future Special Facilities
Facility Type Potential Provider
Bark Park City of Plymouth
Disc Golf City of Plymouth
Fishing Piers City of Plymouth
In -Line Hockey City of Plymouth
Miniature Golf City of Plymouth
Multi -Field Soccer Complex City of Plymouth/School Districts
Municipal Water Park City of Plymouth
Skateboard Park City of Plymouth
Bark Parks" are relatively new phenomena in the metro area. Few communities provide
facilities where residents can let their canines run off their leash. However, demand for these
types of parks is high and the facilities that do exist are being used extensively. The City may
want to consider this type of facility in the future.
Disc golf or frisbee golf is another sport that is growing in popularity. A few years ago relatively
few people had heard about the sport, but that is changing. Disc golf will be a part of the
Plymouth Creek Center when it opens, however, increasing demand for this sport may necessitate
an additional facility. Because a large amount of space is needed to construct a disc course, areas
in the northwestern portion of the City should be considered if additional facilities are built.
Residents use the fishing piers located on Medicine Lake on a regular basis during the spring and
summer fishing seasons. Additional piers on Schmidt Lake or other lakes within the community
may also be warranted to offer fisherpersons a variety of locations to enjoy their sport.
Hockey is a popular sport within the State of Minnesota. Unfortunately, the season is limited to
mostly winter play because of a shortage of indoor facilities. One way that hockey players can
hone their skills during the summer months is to play in-line hockey. An in-line facility that
would accommodate league play could be used for hockey players and non -players alike.
Miniature golf is a family activity that almost anybody can participate in. The popularity of this
sport continues to be strong, however, the City of Plymouth has relatively few miniature golf
facilities located within its borders. A facility owned and operated by the Park and Recreation
Department could be used to meet the demands of the City's residents. A downtown location of
this facility could serve the City well.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-35
YSIS
06/14i99
A multi -field soccer complex consisting of ten or more fields is likely to be needed to
accommodate all of the soccer leagues and school programs. The explosion of soccer as a
recreational activity has put a strain on the City's existing facilities. Not only is it difficult to
schedule time on the fields due to a shortage, the quality of the fields also suffers. Many of the
fields experience so much use that they begin to wear out early in the season, as a result, field
quality decreases. A multi -field facility would increase the number of facilities and decrease the
wear on existing facilities that are overused.
Municipal water parks are becoming popular within the Twin Cities. Even though the City has
five swimming beaches, the City does not have a pool or water park. As a result, the City may
not be meeting the needs of Plymouth residents. Lake swimming can be a problem due to the
fluctuation in water quality, water level, and water temperature. A water park would take the
variability out of water activities.
Skateboarding is an activity that experiences a great deal of fluctuation in popularity. However,
there is a demand for facilities for those that participate in this activity. Because other facilities
trails, sidewalks, schools, businesses, etc) do not allow skateboarding, a location that can
accommodate these individuals may be warranted.
RESIDENT DESIRES
A high quality park system should not only serve the needs of its community, but also the desires
of its residents. Recreation trends change, residents' interests differ, new sports emerge, and old
sports fade in popularity. Keeping up with a population's desires is not an easy task, but the two
most effective ways of keeping abreast of current recreational desires are to consult interview -
based reports prepared by other regional agencies, and to speak with Plymouth residents
themselves through the use of on-site interviewing and public open houses.
TWIN CITIES REGIONAL PARKS 1998 SUMMER VISITOR STUDY
This report, prepared by the Metropolitan Council, focuses, for the most part, on improving the
seven -county regional park system. Numerous interviews were conducted with regional park
users throughout the summer, and responses were compiled and listed by each park facility.
Plymouth is host to one developed regional park, French Regional Park. According to the
report's data, 38% of park users discovered French Regional Park because of its proximity to
their home, while 78.2% of park users are resident of Hennepin County. Some data in this report,
therefore, may be an appropriate gauge of the desires of Plymouth residents. Please note that any
data or report that is regional in nature, as is this one, is merely a starting point for determining
more specific desire for the Plymouth Park System. Much more accurate data can be gleaned
from listening to Plymouth residents themselves.
Several tables included in the Regional Parks Summer Visitor Study offer useful information for
understanding recreation trends and desires. Table summaries, as they appear here, list only the
first five or so responses, and apply only to French Regional Park. The data in the tables are
interviewees' responses to the question listed above each table.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN -
4. ANALYSIS
06/14,99
What is/was your mail: activity at French Park today?
Playground use 29%
Swimming/wading 22%
Picnicking 10%
Walking/hiking 90/0
Biking 7%
Importance offacilities in the visitor's decision to visit French Park
Ranked in order of "very important" responses
Facility Not at all
Important
Somewhat
Important
Moderately
Important
Very Important
Playground 36% 2% 11% 51%
Swimming beach 47% 3% 8% 42%
Restrooms 46% 7% 10% 36%
Places to sit 47% 7% 15% 36%
Water quality 62% 3% 8% 27%
How could French Park be improved?
Fine/Don't know 29%
Trails 13%
Play areas 8%
Other pertinent data:
19% of people surveyed listed the accessibility of the park by bikeways as being a "very
important factor in [their] decision to visit the park."
12% of respondents entered the park by non -motorized means. This is well above the
regional percentage of trips by non -motorized travel (xxx%)
According to this report, a higher than usual number of users access the park without using their
car, indicating that trail connections to and within the park are a high priority for residents. This
is also indicated by the responses to the question "how could this park be improved." Other
highly desired amenities include play areas and swimming opportunities, while accociated
amenities such as restrooms and seating areas are also important.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN -
4. ANALYSIS
06/14;99
NORTHEAST HENNEPIN COUNTY RECREATIONAL FACILITIES INVENTORY,
RESIDENTS' DESIRES, AND PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PARKS AND
OPEN SPACES.
This report, also prepared by the Metropolitan Council, employed field inventories and mailed
interviews to assess park facilities and resident desires in the communities of Dayton, Champlin,
Brooklyn Park, Osseo, Maple Grove, Golden Valley, and Plymouth. From a data standpoint,
tables from this report will be summarized as above.
Residents indicating `I am interested in this activity and have participated about as often as I
wanted to in the last 12 months."
Outdoor based
Walking (around your neighborhood) 72%
Travel, sightseeing (outside Twin Cities) 65%
Picnicking 60%
Walking (in natural areas, large parks) 57%
Attending sports events (as spectator) 53%
Residents indicating `7 am interested in this activity and have NOTparticipated as often as I
would "aye liked to in the last 12 ;months."
Outdoor based
Visiting zoos 31%
Travel, sightseeing (outside Twin Cities) 27%
Biking on paved trails in large parks 26%
Fishing 22%
Nonpower boating (canoeing, sailing, etc.) 22%
Gardening 21%
Camping 20%
Biking, 3 miles or less 20%
Walking (in natural areas, large parks) 20%
Swimming/sunbathing at a beach 20%
Residents reasons for not participating as often as they would have liked in BIKING ON
PAYED TRAILS IN LARGE PARAS
Too busy — other responsibilities 35%
Too busy — other activities 22%
Facilities too far away 10%
Residents reasons for not participating as often as they would have
Too busy — other responsibilities 47%
rToo busy — other activities 27%
Do not feel safe 8%
iked in FISHING
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN4-38
4. ANALYSIS
06/14,99
Residents reasons for not participating as often as they would have liked in NONPOWER
BOATING
Too busy – other responsibilities 29%
Too busy – other activities 22%
Too expensive 13%
No one to do activity with 12%
Residents reasons for not participating as often as they would have
Do not know where to do activity 35%
Too busy – other responsibilities 28%
Too busy – other activities 13%
iked in GARDENING
Residents reasons for not participating as often as they would have liked in CAMPING
Too busy – other responsibilities 355/.— 5%
TooToobusy – other activities 24%
No one to do activity with 10%
Family/friends like to do other things 9%
Residents reasons for.not participating as often as they would have liked in BIKING, 3 MILES
OR LESS
Too busy – other responsibilities 45%
Too busy – other activities 21%
Family/friends like to do other things 9%
No one to do activity with 7%
Residents reasons for not participating as often as they would have liked in WALKING IN
NATURAL AREAS, LARGE PARKS
Too busy – other responsibilities 38%
Too busy – other activities 24%
No one to do it with 9%
Facilities too far away 7%
Residents reasons for not participating as often as they would have liked in
SWIMMING/SUNBATHING AT A BEACH
Too busy – other responsibilities 34%
Too busy – other activities 25%
Facilities too crowded 10%
Facilities too far away 7%
It is important to note that this data is a conglomerate of all Northeast Hennepin County
communities, and that Plymouth may adequately serve its population's needs, while other
communities do not. For instance, of the 7 lake beaches in the study area, 3 are operated by the
City of Plymouth, and one Regional Park facility is within Plymouth. For this data group, it is
likely that percentages are skewed by other communities not having as many lake beaches.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN4-39
YSIS
06/14,99
Residents' perceptions on the number of adequate facilities that are convenient to them and
their household. ranked by the percent saying "TOO M LYY"
Facility TOO MANY NST ENOUGH ITOOFEWof
of this facility of this facility this facility
Golf courses 18% 66% 16%
Snowmobile trails 17% 64% 19%
Residents' perceptions on the number of adequate facilities that are convenient to them and
their household. ranked by the percent saying "TOO FEW"
Facility TOO MANY
of this facility
NST ENOUGH
of this facility
TOO FEW of
this facility
Fishing docks 3% 64% 33%
Campgrounds 2% 67% 32%
Bike paths 3% 67% 30%
Natural areas 2% 68% 29%
The Northeast Hennepin County report goes on to make recommendations for park planners
throughout the study area, based on survey results. These recommendations include providing
canoe rentals, creating community garden plots, and creating clubs and groups. The
recommendations are based primarily on common responses of "friends/family do other things"
and "no one to do it with" as reasons for not participating in an activity. Boating seemed to be
important but too expensive, and over 1/3 of those interested in gardening did not know where to
obtain a plot. In general, these survey results reinforce the public's desire for active recreational
opportunities coupled with natural environments, such as camping, boating, swimming, biking,
and walking in natural areas.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH SURVEY
Approximately four years ago, the City of Plymouth conducted a residential survey. As part of
that survey, the Park and Recreation Department included questions regarding the City's park
system. At the time of the survey, residents indicated that one of the things that they liked most
about living in the City of Plymouth was the park system. In fact, 92 percent of the survey
respondents felt that the park and recreation facilities were either good or excellent. After having
expressed generally positive remarks about the park system, residents indicated that they would
like to see additional preservation of open space, protection of the existing golf courses, and the
construction of a community center.
In the future, as the City of Plymouth conducts more residential surveys, questions regarding the
park and trail system and Park and Recreation Department should be included. Additionally,
information obtained from the surveys should be cross-referenced with the Park and Recreation
chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Residential needs and wants can then easily be incorporated
into the long-term park planning vision.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-40
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/'99
ANALYSIS SUMMARY
NATIONAL STANDARDS
According to numerically based national standards for recommended active park acreage,
Plymouth's park system falls short. These numerical standards, however, have been recently
revised to encourage greater flexibility in park planning. The new standards encourage a
community based approach which takes into account more variables and less objective analysis
techniques. The perceived lack of parkland according to the national standards is primarily a
result of certain city and park board policies, which have actually been a benefit to the
community: obtaining high quality parkland while keeping general open space on the tax rolls,
encouraging PUDs and their development of private parks at no cost to the city, and preserving
natural land within city and neighborhood parks by curtailing mowing and other unnecessary
maintenance.
PARK ACREAGE
This analysis assumes that the current level of park service in Plymouth is adequate, and develops
a set of standards, in acres per 1,000 persons, for the various park types based on that level of
service. The standards are then applied to projected populations in 2020 and 2040 to determine
how many additional acres would be required to continue current levels of park service in
Plymouth. In general, the greatest increases in park acreage are recommended for total City Park
and Neighborhood Park area. This can be accomplished through the planned development and
acquisition of new parks, as long as only a portion of each park unit is developed for active
recreation. The numbers shown in Table 4.4 outline specific recommendations for additional park
acreage, but they, too are merely a guideline, as resident desires and development opportunities
should also drive the planning process.
PARK SERVICE
Park Service Area analysis is essentially a closer look at the geography of Plymouth to determine
specifically where parks are needed or will be needed. Table 4.5 outlines the level of park
service for each Park Service Area, and offers recommendations for improving service where it is
lacking. According to that Table, and to an analysis of Park Service Areas with changing
demographics (Table 4.6), there are two quadrants of the city that are or will be underserved in
the near future. The southeast corner of the city, between Golden Valley, Minnetonka, and
Medicine Lake, currently has residential uses and very little parkland. The northwest quadrant,
near the high school and CR 47, may experience population growth in the near future, and
currently offers no active recreation. These two areas are the most critical, but other Park Service
Areas throughout the City are in need of additional park acreage. Where new parks or
enlargement of existing parks is not possible, park service can be accomplished through trail
connections, including safe roadway crossings, to other parks.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 1
4. ANALYSIS
06/14i99
ORGANIZED SPORTS
Organized sports within the City will likely undergo a significant change over the next forty years
as the aging of the community occurs. Different types of passive recreation will emerge and have
higher demands than some of the organized sports. However, it is likely that organized athletics
will continue to play a significant role in the City. Future facilities, therefore, should not exclude
the more active types of recreation.
For the foreseeable future, it is likely that soccer is going to continue to grow and face facility
issues. When considering the development of future facilities the City should evaluate the need
for a multi -field soccer complex. The multi -field complex would be used to meet the demand
generated by the youth leagues, the adult leagues, and the schools. Other special facilities should
also be considered when developing complexes for organized sports. Facilities that can
accommodate disc golf, miniature golf, water activities, court games, in-line hockey, and
skateboarding are likely to be needed within the community.
The Park and Recreation Department should also track adult and youth sport participation.
Tracking the participation rates should give the Department the knowledge that it needs to
develop and redevelop facilities.
RESIDENT DESIRES
Two regional surveys confirm several assumptions about resident desires in park and trail
systems. Many users of outdoor recreation facilities enjoy pastimes that combine active
recreation with natural amenities, such as walking, biking on trails in large parks, camping,
boating, and swimming. In addition, residents express the desire to garden, but lack space to do
it. Plymouth's commitment to open space preservation, trails, and swimming beaches should be
continued and expanded. New facilities which would be appropriate according to resident desires
include camp grounds, community gardens, additional fishing piers, and nature education
opportunities.
CONCLUSION
Based on various types of needs analysis, there are several major issues which should be
considered high priority:
Southeast Plymouth. This area of the City is currently underserved by parkland and trails,
and an increase in population is projected as a result of planned changes in the comprehensive
plan. It is important to increase the amount of parkland in this area of the city, as well as
provide improved trail connections across TH 55 (See Chapter 5).
The Northwest Quadrant. Many different scenarios for development could take place for
this most rural area of the City. The Park Service Areas in this quadrant of Plymouth are
currently underserved by parks, but the properties here are large, and there is less need for
neighborhood parks. However, this land may eventually develop. There are already policies
in place to ensure that new developments, especially PUDs, make room for parkland and
trails. This policy should be continued, whatever happens in this quadrant, to ensure that new
residents have access to parks. In addition, the development of Mud Lake and Egan Parks
will be very beneficial to this area.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 4-42
4. ANALYSIS
06/14/99
Soccer. Soccer is the fastest growing sport in Plymouth, and there is increased demand for
high quality fields for tournaments and high school play. One artificial turf field will be in
place by November, 1999, and more may be needed. There is substantial need for an
additional Community Playfield, and this should be a primarily soccer complex, comprised of
at least 10 fields, some of which should be artificial turf.
School Parks. Cooperation with the various school districts in Plymouth has been a valuable
commodity, offering neighborhood parkland and school parkland at a lower cost to both
entities. This policy should be continued, and the number of school park facilities should be
increased, especially as a means of serving neighborhoods without neighborhood parks.
Underserved Neighborhoods. Several neighborhoods, though not projected to undergo
substantial growth, are currently without enough parkland. Table 4.5 outlines the degree of
park service throughout the city, and outlines recommendations, but some neighborhoods
aside from those in the southeast and northwest portions of the City) should be considered
high priority: 1, 27, 46, 47, 48, 49, and 50.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN4-43
5.
Trail Plan
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
INTRODUCTION
Plymouth's current trail system is an established network of city, county, and state trails that
connect most of the city's neighborhoods to parks, schools, and commercial areas. Such a multi
use trail system is a key amenity to many residents, especially those who regularly use non -
motorized transportation. In addition, connecting neighborhoods to parks with trails reduces the
need for extensive parking in the midst of recreational or natural areas, and contributes to the
community's transportation systems.
Trail planning in Plymouth began in ???? with a system of bridle trails connecting local stables.
The plan has been updated significantly since then, most recently in 1992. The 1992 plan has
subsequently guided trail construction and project selection for several years.
This 1999 plan update will accomplish several goals:
Establishment of overarching goals and policies to guide the creation and implementation of
this trails plan
Analysis of regional connections to State Trails, the Hennepin Parks system, and existing
trails in adjacent communities
Description of various trail types and recommendations for where they should be used
Assessment of the 1992 Trail Plan Update, including degree of completion
Establishment of criteria for determining what improvements should be made to the current
trail plan
Detailed description of improvements to the trail plan
Establishment of criteria for prioritizing trail projects
Through this Trail Plan Update, Plymouth will be equipped to continue to effectively implement
a high quality multi use trail system. This work has already begun. Plymouth currently boasts
over 40 miles of trails, and is planning to add many more. This plan continues the framework that
has already been put in place, and ensures that the next phase of trail implementation in Plymouth
meets the transportation and recreation needs of the community.
GOALS AND POLICIES
By setting forth well-established, well -articulated goals for the trail system, Plymouth can more
easily recognize needed trail improvements, prioritize trail projects, and undertake future trail
plan updates. These goals outline the purpose of the trail system, and formulate the backbone of
the planning effort.
Goals....
Policies deal with the actual construction efforts surrounding the trail system. Plymouth, for
example, often secures trail easements in new developments, to better connect new residents to
their neighborhood parks and their trail system. By establishing specific policies for trail
location, trail type, choice of projects, and other topics, Plymouth can implement its trail system
in a resident friendly and fiscally responsible manner.
Policies...
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-2
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
REGIONAL CONTEXT
STATE TRAILS
The Luce Line State Trail is a multi -use, long distance trail that begins at Vicksburg Lane in
Plymouth and runs westward for over 60 miles. For most of the trail's length, it is a two track
facility consisting of a crushed limestone path for bikers and walkers, and a parallel equestrian
path. The Luce Line State Trail connects with a paved trail recently acquired from Plymouth by
Hennepin Parks. This Luce Line Extension runs eastward to West Medicine Lake Road.
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has recently completed a master plan for the
Luce Line State Trail (1999). Whereas this master plan does not call for much change within the
City of Plymouth, there are proposed improvements west of town, which could bring increased
usage into Plymouth. Figure 5.1 shows portions of the Luce Line Trail within and immediately
adjacent to Plymouth, including neighborhood connections.
Figure 5.1 Luce Line State Trail
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-3
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
HENNEPIN PARKS TRAILS
Hennepin Parks has developed a comprehensive trails plan, which will eventually link numerous
west metro parks, commercial centers, and communities. These trails are intended to be used for
both recreation and transportation, and all of them are hard -surfaced trails for biking, walking,
and roller-blading. The major trail corridors running through Plymouth include the East Medicine
Lake Trail, which connects French Regional Park with the Golden Valley Trail near 13" Ave and
US 169; the Luce Line Trail Extension, which connects the Luce Line State Trail to West
viedicine Lake Road; the proposed North Hennepin Regional Trail, which will connect French
Regional Park to Elm Creek Park Preserve; and the proposed South Medicine Lake Trail, which
will connect the Luce Line Trail Extension with the East Medicine Lake Trail. Figure 5.2 shows
the Hennepin Parks Trail Plan as it relates to Plymouth.
Figure 5.2 Hennepin Parks Trails
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-4
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
HENNEPIN COUNTY BICYCLE PLAN
Published in 1997, the Bicycle Transportation Plan for Hennepin County relates design guidelines
for on- and off-road trails, suggests crossing improvements, and shows a plan of the ultimate
proposed bicycle transportation system for the County. The bikeways proposed by this plan are
intended primarily for transportation, and may range in complexion from "share the road" lanes
on existing roadways to "full accommodation," which includes dedicated bike lanes and off-road
paved trails. All of the bikeways identified on the County system plan for the City of Plymouth
are considered in the Plymouth Trail System Plan, and most of them have not yet been
constructed. Figure 5.3 shows this plan as it relates to the City of Plymouth and adjacent
communities.
Figure 5.3 Hennepin County Bicycle Plan
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-5
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
TRAILS IN SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES
Some communities adjacent to Plymouth have begun to implement their own trail systems.
Connecting into these neighbor systems will allow access to additional commercial and
employment opportunities for residents who work outside of Plymouth, to sports facilities for
residents who play in inter -city leagues, and to longer distance recreational opportunities for
residents who desire them.
Golden Valley will soon benefit from Hennepin Parks trails initiatives in the form or the Golder,
Valley Trail, which will connect to the East Medicine Lake Trail at the Plymouth Avenue bridge
under US 169. In addition, the city offers a concrete sidewalk along the south side of Medicine
Lake Road (26" Avenue in Plymouth) which offers connections to other trails and parks within
Golden Valley.
New Hope currently has no trail system or sidewalk inventory.
Maple Grove will be connected to Plymouth by the proposed North Hennepin Regional Trail.
This community also has a comprehensive system of Park Trails and City Walkways, the latter of
which connect to Plymouth at Vicksburg Lane, Bass Lake Road, Sycamore Lane running north
from Bass Lake Road, and Quinnwood Lane.
Medina has recently produced a preliminary parks, trails, and open space plan, which shows
proposed trails running into Plymouth just north of Wazata High School and along the railroad
line just south of the High School. The plan also shows the proposed county bike route on CR
24.
Wayzaya has a connection to Plymouth on the Luce Line trail, but otherwise lacks a
comprehensive trail system.
Minnetonka has an established system of bike lanes, walkways, and loop trails. The city has
continuations of Plymouth's trail facilities on Carlson Parkway, Gleason Lake Road, Cheshire
Lane, Xenium Lane, Ridgemount Avenue, and Zachary Lane (Hopkins Crossroad). These trails
connect to the longer distance Southwest LRT Trails.
St. Louis Park is in the process of completing a Trail and Sidewalk Plan, and is proposing a trail
along Shelard Parkway, which will connect to Nathan Lane in Plymouth.
Figure 5.4 shows the various existing and proposed trails in the communities surrounding
Plymouth.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-6
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
Figure 5.4 Trails in Surrounding Communities
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-7
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
TRAIL DESIGN
Trail Corridors can take many forms. From paved roadway shoulders to hard surface trails in
independent corridors, there are many ways to implement a trail project. The design of the trail
within the corridor is directly related to the corridor's use, and each corridor must be analyzed in
relation to type of use, skill level of users, purpose for use, and existing conditions.
The Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan is an invaluable resource for trail design. It
sets forth standards for trails on various types of roadways, and relates compliance issues with
certain types of funding, namely State Aid. It is also important to consult the appropriate Design
Standards and Guidelines, including the following.
Guidelines for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials (AASTHO)
Bikeway Design Manual, Mn/DOT
Mn/DOT Operations Rules
The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD)
Design Standards for Off -Road Bike Paths, Mn/DOT
Minnesota State Aid Design Manual, Mn/DOT State Aid Office
Minnesota Bicycle Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines, Mn/DOT Bicycle
Planning Section
Recommended Urban Landscape/Streetscape Guidelines, Hennepin County
Park, Recreation, Open Space, and Greenway Guidelines, National Recreation and Parks
Association
TRAIL TYPES
Choosing a trail type for a particular corridor or portion of a corridor should be based on several
factors:
Existing conditions.
Roadway or independent corridor.
Type of roadway.
Traffic volumes on roadway.
Type of natural environment in independent corridor — wetland, woodland, or river
Feasibility of trail construction.
Level of hazardousness of existing conditions.
Type of connection.
Regional corridor or local connector.
Transportation, recreation, or both.
Anticipated travel distance.
Use of corridor.
Anticipated traffic volume on trail.
User types (bikers, walkers, inline skating, equestrians).
User skill (highly skilled bike commuters, families with small children).
User desires.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-8
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12199
In Plymouth, several basic trail types are or could be employed, with only minor variations within
each type.
Independent Trail Single Track
SURFACE: bituminous pavement
LOCATION: railroad rights-of-way, natural corridors, other non -roadway corridors
WIDTH: _ 10' minimum, maximum depends on trail use and corridor constraints
USE: multiple
ADVANTAGES: no vehicular traffic
often highly scenic
linear corridor allows for easy way -finding
DISADVANTAGES: possible user conflicts
APPROPRIATE USE
IN PLYMOUTH: longer distance corridors, for both recreation and transportation
within parks
EXAMPLES
IN PLYMOUTH: trails within Four Seasons Meadow
Plymouth Creek Trail
Figure 5.5 Independent Trail
o -1zGrass _ BAumino . 2' Grass
SShoulder Trail —Shoulder
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-9
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
Nature Trail
SURFACE: woodchip, crushed limestone, or class 5 aggregate
LOCATION: within existine parks or sensitive corridors
WIDTH: 6-10'
USE: pedestrian
ADVANTAGES: no vehicular traffic
often highly scenic
no user conflict
opportunities for interpretation
DISADVANTAGES: not a transportation corridor
APPROPRIATE USE
IN PLYMOUTH: interpretive loops within existing parks
EXAMPLES
IN PLYMOUTH: West Medicine Lake Park
Figure 5.6 Nature Trail
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-10
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
Boulevard Trail
SURFACE: bituminous pavement
LOCATION: within roadway right-of-way —
runs parallel to but separated from roadway by 5-10' boulevard
WIDTH: preferably 10-12', though some 3' trails exist in Plymouth
USE: multiple uses on same track
ADVANTAGES: safe separation from vehicular traffic
follows existing transportation routes
easily connects parks, commercial areas. and neighborhoods
DISADVANTAGES: breaks in continuity at every driveway or street crossing
potential user conflict
potential conflict with utilities or boulevard plantings
APPROPRIATE USE
IN PLYMOUTH: major roadways
EXAMPLES
IN PLYMOUTH: Vicksburg Lane south of Th 55
Northwest Boulevard
Figure 5.7 Boulevard Trail
2- Gats
sh..Id'
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-11
Roadside Trail
SURFACE:
LOCATION:
WIDTH:
USE:
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
APPROPRIATE USE
IN PLYMOUTH:
EXAMPLES
IN PLYMOUTH:
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
bituminous pavement
within roadway right-of-way at back of curb
12' minimum, including striped shy zone I %z feet from back of curb
multiple uses on same track
follows existing transportation routes
easily connects parks. commercial areas, and neighborhoods
can be constructed in narrow road right-of-way
breaks in continuity at every driveway or street crossing
potential user conflict
potential conflict with utilities and roadside plantings
minimal separation from roadway
major roadways with limited right-of-way
CR 6 west of Vicksburg Lane
Figure 5.8 Roadside Trail
9'3S:
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-12
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
On -road Bike Route
SURFACE: paved as roadway
LOCATION: on existin- roadway, denoted by signage and striping
WIDTH: 4-6 feet from edge of drive lane to edge of -utter
y
USE: bievclists, most likely of high skill level
ADVANTAGES: lowest construction cost
DISADVANTAGES: not feasible for pedestrian use
bicvcles dangerously near traffic
only applicable for skill level A bicyclists
APPROPRIATE USE
IN PLYMOUTH: major roadways with narrow rights-of-way
county bicycle routes
loop trails that utilize local roads for part of their distance
non -motorized transportation routes
EXAMPLES
IN PLYMOUTH: Parkers Lake Trail
County Road 6
Figure 5.9 On -road Bike Route
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-13
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
Sidewalk in Boulevard
SURFACE: concrete
LOCATION: adjacent to roadway, at back of curb or separated b% 5-10' boulevard
WIDTH: 6-12' depending on projected volume of use
USE: pedestrians
ADVANTAGES: provides pedestrian routes without other, faster uses
DISADVANTAGES: not feasible for other uses
APPROPRIATE USE
IN PLYMOUTH: pedestrian links along minor roadways
City Center area
EXAMPLES
IN PLYMOUTH: 36" and 37" Avenues in the City Center
Pilerim Lane
Figure 5.10 Sidewalk in Boulevard
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-14
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
1999 TRAIL PLAN UPDATE
The 1999 Trail Plan Update is based in part on the Trail Plan Update undertaken in 1992. Some
of the trails proposed in 1992 have been built, and this is reflected in the 1999 Plan.
Improvement to the existing trail system fall into one of 7 categories:
1992 Proposals. There are some trails that were proposed by the 1992 Trail Plan Update which
have not yet been constructed. These proposed trails are incorporated into the 1999 Plan.
Corridor gap closures. Some established linear routes may not be well connected along their
entire length. These gaps should be filled, in order to offer a continuous transportation or
recreation opportunity.
Trail extensions. An existing trail may be extended to a point of interest currently beyond its
service.
Connections between corridors. When trail corridors connect with each other, the
opportunities available to users are multiplied. Some trail corridors may closely approach
connection, and the last -step should be taken to bring them together.
Trail upgrades. Certain bike routes or sidewalks are seeing great enough use that they should be
upgraded to roadside trails.
Two-sided trails. On major roads, it is important to construct roadside trails on both sides of the
roadway, to allow access to and from neighborhoods, schools, and commercial areas that may be
on either side of the road. Two-sided trails effectively reduce unsafe mid -block crossings by
pedestrians, and allow loop trails to exist without major roadway crossings. Most major roads in
Plymouth have trails on at least one side, and many of them should be upgraded to two-sided
trails.
New Corridors. In some places, trails are being considered in areas where no trails currently
exist. Here, it is possible to establish new trails within new corridors, providing that they connect
into the greater system.
Figure 5.11 on the following page shows the 1999 Trail Plan Update
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-15
5. TRAIL PLAN
06112/99
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-16
4
e
PLYMOUTH
TRAIL SYSTEM
PROPOSED 1999
TRAIL PLAN UPDATE
LEGEND
Existing Trails
City Trail
City Sidewalk
On Road Bike Route
o Hennepin Parks
Regional Trail
Minnesota DNRo
State Trail
Proposed Trails
e w
City Trail
City Sidewalk
On Road Bike Route
Hennepin Parks
Regional Trail
Minnesota DNR
State Trail (None Shown)
Lakes
Public Lands
I N
n+Cavev. rives C,nuvr, Ivs. -
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
ROADWAY CROSSINGS
Plymouth is cut into quadrants by two major thoroughfares, TH 55 and Interstate 494. It is also
separated from communities to the east by US Highway 169. These obstacles prove to be
breaking points in the trail system, as bridges are often not pedestrian or bicycle friendly,
underpasses do not impart a feeling of safety, and at -grade crossings put recreators in contact with
heavy and fast-moving traffic. Crossings of these major barriers are of primary concern, as they
may not allow easy access from certain neighborhoods to city parks, ball fields, junior and senior
high schools, and the City Center.
There are several other roadway crossings in Plymouth that may also prove hazardous for
pedestrians. These occur where two high volume local roadways intersect.
There are a number options for overcoming barriers created by high volume roadways and
dangerous intersections:
Grade Separation
Pedestrian/bicycle bridges
Pedestrian/bicycle underpasses
Expansion of vehicular bridge or underpass to accommodate bicycles/pedestrians
Improved Signalization
Stoplights or stop signs for pedestrianibicycle crossings
Pedestrian only phase at major intersections
Advanced pedestrian signals (the pedestrian "jump" signal)
Pedestrian push buttons in the median (two step crossing)
Warning signage or lights to alert vehicles of pedestrian crossing
Intersection/Roadway Reconstruction
Removal of free right turns
Widened medians for pedestrian safety
Reconstruction of roadways in commercial areas to create more predictable traffic
patterns
Raised crosswalks
Crosswalks with varied pavement
Traffic calming measures, such as neckdowns and bumpouts
Figure 5.12 shows an analysis of the barriers described above, and places where safe crossings
exist, could be improved, or should be implemented. Table 5.1 describes each unsafe crossing
and makes recommendations for improvement.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-19
5. TRAIL PLAN
06112/99
Figure 5.12 Roadway Crossings and Intersections
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-20
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
Table 5.1 Roadway Crossings and Intersections
Crossing Location Problem Recommendations
Schmidt Lake Road and I-494 Existing underpass not Grade separation: improve
pedestrian friendly pedestrian underpass
Rockford Road and I-494 Existing overpass not Grade separation: Pedestrian
pedestrian friendly bridge being constructed by
MN DOT
Planned Plymouth Creek Trail No existing crossing Grade separation: Expand
and I-494 creek culvert to allow
pedestrian and bike travel
Planned Plymouth Creek Trail No existing crossing Grade separation: Expand
and Fernbrook Lane creek culvert to allow
pedestrian and bike travel
Improved Signalization:
Route trail to existing 4 way
stop at 34" Avenue
CR 101/Peony Lane at TH 55 Unsafe crossing of high Improved Signalization
volume roadway Intersection Reconstruction
CR 24 at TH 55 Unsafe crossing of high Improved Signalization
volume roadway Intersection Reconstruction
Vicksburg Lane at TH 55 Unsafe crossing of high Grade separation: Explore
volume roadway possibility of pedestrian
underpass
Improved Signalization
Intersection Reconstruction
Plymouth Boulevard at TH 55 Unsafe crossing of high Improved Signalization
volume roadway Intersection Reconstruction
Fernbrook Lane at TH 55 Unsafe crossing of high e Improved Signalization
volume roadway Intersection Reconstruction
Xenium Lane/Northwest Blvd. Unsafe crossing of high Improved Signalization
at Th 55 volume roadway Intersection Reconstruction
South Shore Drive/Zachary Unsafe crossing of high Improved Signalization
Lane at TH 55 volume roadway Intersection Reconstruction
Roadway Reconstruction:
Improve crossing during
planned reconstruction of
Zachary Lane.
Rockford Road at Xenium Lane Unsafe crossing of high Improved Signalization
volume roadway, Intersection Reconstruction
unpredictable circulation
Rockford Road at Northwest Unsafe crossing of high Improved Signalization
Blvd. volume roadway Intersection Reconstruction
CR 101 at CR 6 Unsafe crossing of high a Improved Signalization
volume roadway, Intersection Reconstruction:
unpredictable circulation Regularize access to
commercial areas.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-21
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
PRIORITIES
In order to property decide which of the numerous trail projects warrant immediate attention,
versus which projects may take place at a much later date, prioritization criteria must be set forth.
These criteria will aid in the development of an implementation plan for the Plymouth trail
system.
Consistency with trail plan. Any trail constructed should be one that is described in this trail
plan.
Safety. A new trail project should increase the safety of commuters and recreators.
Opportunity. Many trails may be constructed in conjunction with roadway reconstruction or
within new developments. It is sometimes impossible to forsee exactly where or when these
opportunities may arise, but it is important to take advantage of them when they do.
Use of trail. Some trails are designed to be short distance recreational links, whereas some will
be designed to carry non -motorized commuter traffic. What is most important?
Usaee volume. Trails that will be heavily used should be placed at a high priority. This is
especially true of trail upgrades.
Ease of implementation. Trails that are more challenging due to right-of-way constraints,
property ownership, sensitive natural areas, or other reasons, should be undertaken, but
implementation, by nature, will be years away. Highest priority must be given to trails than can
be built immediately and easily.
Cost. Yearly budget constraints may require certain trails to be built in certain years. This does
not necessarily mean that the most expensive trails are to be built last, it simply means that
budget must be reflected in prioritization.
Resident Demand. Trails which are requested specifically by residents should be considered as
high priority trails.
Others....
With a proper understanding of trail project prioritization criteria, trail segments can be analyzed
for their feasibility and suitability for implementation. The prioritization process is an ongoing
one, and may fluctuate with resident desires, available funding, and opportunities to "piggy -back"
trail projects onto other construction efforts. The above prioritization criteria are for reference
only, and every trail project should be considered in each funding phase or construction season.
TRAIL CORRIDOR CONCEPTS
Two trail corridors in Plymouth are emerging as high priority recreational amenities. The
Plymouth Creek Trail and the Rural Greenway will connect current and potential population
centers, the City Center, numerous parks, other community and regional trails, and commercial
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-22
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
areas. These two trail corridors warrant further analysis at this point, in order to begin the
planning process for their implementation.
PLYMOUTH CREEK TRAIL
The Plymouth Creek Trail will eventually connect the West Medicine Lake Trail and West Medicine Lake
Park with Elm Creek Playfield and Wayzata Senior High School. On its route, the trail will pass through
two parks, a community playfield, two elementary schools, the city center, and several residential
neighborhoods. It will also connect with existing and proposed trails along Northwest Boulevard,
Fernbrook Road, Rockford Road, Vicksburg Lane, and Peony Lane. This trail is about 75% complete, and
only several gaps remain. For most of its length, the Plymouth Creek Trail is an independent trail with
grade separated crossings of major roadways, and this complexion should be continued for the remainder of
the trail. Figure 5.13 shows the Plymouth Creek Trail Corridor and its relationship with other trails, parks,
and neighborhoods, and describes possible routes for the completion of the corridor.
Figure 5.13 Plymouth Creek Trail
This map will show a portion of the existing trial plan with topography and labels corresponding to the
below issues.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-23
5. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
Issues:
Way -finding. As The Plymouth Creek Trail becomes a major city connector, it will need directional, and
possibly interpretive. signage. This signage should help users navigate the trail where it intersects with
other trails and where is crosses major roadways. Signage could also be installed at major "trail
intersections" to direct users to other sites of interest, such as parks, commercial areas, the city hall,
and schools.
1. West Medicine Lake Park. The trail should connect to West Medicine Lake Trail, and exit the park
near the northwest corner, generally following Plymouth Creek. Exact location can be determined by
the Parks Department, as the parcel is city owned. The spur trail running southward to the Luce Line
should also be connected to the Plymouth Creek Trail
2. Northwest of the Park. Alignment here should generally follow the creek, but the exact location of
the trail must be coordinated with local property owners. It could be possible to obtain trail or
conservation easements in the vicinity of the creek.
3. Creek Right-of-way. The city owns a strip of land here which includes the creek. Placement of the
trail would most likely take place on the eastern side of the creek, as the topography is more conducive
and access up to 26' Ave would be easier.
4. 26" Ave Crossing. It would be easiest to run the trail along (or on) the south side of 26" Ave. over the
existing creek culvert. Pedestrian crossings could be installed for the crossing of Teakwood and of 26'°
Ave. to connect to the existing trail segment running north. There is very little space on the north side
of 26' Ave. due to forest and steep grades, so a trail on the south side of the street would be easier to
construct. 26' Ave. is a very wide street, and a two-way trail with a boulevard could be implemented
by relocating the curb and narrowing the roadway.
5. Northwest Boulevard Crossing. At this point, several trails converge, including one that continues
up the east side of Northwest Boulevard and several that diverge through Heritage Park. Way -finding
signage is crucial here. A crossing of Northwest Boulevard should be signed and striped, and
directional arrows should be installed to show the user that the Plymouth Creek Trail continues across
the road and through Heritage Park.
6. I-494 Underpass/Ramada Hotel Area. The existing trail falls into disrepair as it approaches I-494.
Coordination with the Ramada Hotel is cricual here, as the trail passes directly through their property.
The existing creek underpass could be expanded to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic, but
careful design is necessary. This underpass could be the most costly element of the completion of the
Plymouth Creek Trail, but it is crucial to bridge the I-494 barrier.
7. I-494 to Fernbrook Road. This segment of trail passes through an office park area, and it could, once
again, generally follow the creek. Owners and renters of offices in this area may be interested in
having such an amenity to offer to their employees, but they may be concerned about liability.
Therefore, a good understanding of property ownership is important. Trail or conservation easements
are a possible means of securing land for the trail.
S. Fernbrook Road Crossing. There are three options for this area: expansion of the Plymouth Creek
culvert under Fernbrook Road to allow pedestrian travel, routing the trail southward to an existing
four-way stop at 34" Ave, or routing the trail northward to the entrance of Plymouth Creek Park. The
existing Plymouth Creek Trail continues westward further north of the creek, near the park entrance, so
the underpass option would still have to run up out of the valley to connect to the existing trail. This
could be very scenic, but also very difficult and expensive. Routing the trail southward to 34' Ave.
would provide the safest at grade crossing of Fernbrook, but may be too circuitous. Routing the trail
northward to the park entrance is the most direct route, but safety considerations must be taken into
account.
9. Kimberly Lane Elementary to Wayzata Senior High. There are several options for the completion
of the trail to the high school:
Option A: Construct a trail along the south side of Old Rockford Road to connect with an existing
trail along Peony Lane, which runs northward to the high school. This option would
require the least amount of construction of new trail, but building a trail adjacent to Old
Rockford Road could be very difficult due to narrow right-of-way and a rural section. This
route is also not particularly scenic.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-24
S. TRAIL PLAN
06/12/99
Option B: Construct a trail northward to and alone Holly Lane, cross the railroad tracks, and follow
Schmidt Lake Road directly to the high school. The greatest problem with this route is the
crossing of the railroad, which would likely have to be grade separated (trail below tracks).
Schmidt Lake Road, however, is conducive to trail construction, and the segment along
Holly Lane could effectively serve future residential growth in this area, if it occurs.
Option C: Construct a trail northward from Kimberly Lane Elementary School through an
undeveloped rural area. Then cross the railroad tracks (preferably with an underpass) and
use local streets within the adjacent subdivision to gain access to Schmidt Lake Road,
which leads directly to the high school. This option has all of the positive and negative
aspects of Option B, with the addition that it is the most scenic of the three corridor
options. A switch, however, from off-road trail to an on road facility within the
subdivision could break the continuity of the trail.
For this portion of the corridor it is important to consider the development that may happen in this
quadrant of the city. For example, a new development in the area west of the golf course could
dedicate a trail easement, therefore making Option C very attractive. These options may also be
considered as short term and long term approaches. As Option A requires the construction of very
little trail, it may be a stop -gap until opportunities arise to construct an independent trail.
RURAL GREENWAY
The Rural Greenway is a trail or system of trails proposed on the northwest quadrant of the City. The
Greenway could connect Wayzata senior High School, Egan Park, Pomerleau Lake, Mud Lake Park, the
proposed North Hennepin Regional Trail, the Plymouth Creek Trail, golf courses, and any residential
developments that may take place in the area. The main spine of the Greenway should generally follow
Elm Creek, and side trails could be placed to connect to various other uses and sites. There are several
possible routes for the greenway and its side trails, and Figure 5.14 describes these in the context of the
existing trail systems in Plymouth and surrounding communities.
Figure 5.14 Rural Greenway
This map will likely incorporate an aerial map, to describe open spaces and natural areas which may be
used as trail corridors.
Trail alignment concepts will be described after further analysis
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-25
5. TRAIL FLAN
06/12/99
CONCLUSION
With this 1999 Trail Plan Update, Plymouth can continue to improve its extensive trail system, building
upon what has been done and implementing new corridors for resident use.
Plymouth's trail system is designed for multiple uses. By following major roadways, the trail system
achieves a simple and effective transportation component. By following independent corridors and
traversing existing parks, the trail system offers a pleasant and scenic recreation component. The strength
of the system lies in the fact that it is a multi-purpose system, and the continuation and improvement of this
idea should be a primary goal.
Plymouth has been blessed with a variety of regional trails, and has added to this network significantly. By
furthering the implementation of corridor trails within the city, such as the Plymouth Creek Trail, Plymouth
will offer to its residents the opportunity to take a short stroll as well as a longer walk or ride.
During the process of implementing the various trail segments shown on the 1999 Trail Plan Update and
improving the dangerous roadway crossings within the community, Plymouth residents should always be
included. This Plan offers a framework to guide that public process, resulting in a trail system that can be
enjoyed by all residents.
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. PLYMOUTH PARK SYSTEM PLAN 5-26
Plymouth Fieldhouse User Priority List
Class I: Plymouth Park & Recreation programs,
Class II: Plymouth youth groups including athletic
associations serving Plymouth residents
Priority within this group will be determined by
the number of Plymouth residents being
served. At least 50% of the participants in the
groups must be Plymouth residents.)
Class III: Plymouth adult groups
This includes Plymouth civic organizations,
churches, and businesses. (At least 50% must
be Plymouth residents or work full time for a
Plymouth company.)
Class IV: Non -Plymouth Groups
We will begin accepting usage requests on August 1,
1999.
3400 PL
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
TH BOULEVARD, PLYM(
DATE: June 15, 1999
TO: Eric Blank
FROM: Rick Busch
SUBJECT: Survey of Fieldhouse Rental Rates
1UTH, MN 55447
Half Field
155
140
130
100
80 ($50 N.P.)
70
N.P. = Non -prime hours
Woodbury field is about 2/3 the size of the others, which are all about 50-70 yards wide
and 90-120 yards long. (Our field will be 60 x 100 yards.)
Full Field
Holy Angels 310
Eden Prairie 280
Augsburg 260
Blaine 200
Stillwater 150 (90 N.P.)
Woodbury* 90 ($70 N.P.)
1UTH, MN 55447
Half Field
155
140
130
100
80 ($50 N.P.)
70
N.P. = Non -prime hours
Woodbury field is about 2/3 the size of the others, which are all about 50-70 yards wide
and 90-120 yards long. (Our field will be 60 x 100 yards.)
2000 Budget
FIELD HOUSE
507-1344
1999 2000
PERSONNEL SERVICES 18,605
20% Split Rick 14,000
60% Split Dan 29,000
25% split Sec. 9,200
9.00/hr. Part Time 14,000
MATERIAL & SUPPLIES
6101 Office Supplies 200 200
6108 Bank Service Charges 500
6109 Materials & Supplies 463
6110 Cash Over/Short
6203 Janitorial Supplies 500
6204 Uniforms 300
6213 Park & Rec. Supplies 1,000
6323 Recharges 300
6402 Minor Equipment (under $2,000)
6501 Items for Resale
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
7010 Medical Fees 150
7013 Other Professional Services
7101 Postage 213 250
7103 Telephone 600
7104 Mobile Phone & Paging 250
7201 Printing & Publishing 75 500
7209 Advertising & Promotion 2,000
7401 Electricity 20,000
7404 Natural Gas 45,000
7405 Water & Sewer 2,000
7406 Refuse Service 1,000
7505 Electrical Repair 1,000
7506 Plumbing 500
7532 Fire Alarm Cleaning 250
7535 Equipment Maint. — Contracts 1,500
7546 Building Maintenance
7601 Mileage 75 150
7603 Rental Private Equipment
7604 Rental Private Property
7605 Rental City Equipment 3,000
7701 Employee Training 100 250
7703 Conferences & Seminars 500
7704 Registrations 100
7705 Subscriptions & Membership 100 150
7707 Scholarships
7717 Contribution to Other Org.
7719 Loss on Sale of Equipment
7746 Contractual Services -Lawn Service 5,000
7747 Licenses & Permits
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
8004 Machinery & Equipment 1,000
ALLOCATIONS
8301 Photocopy Allocation 350 500
8302 Data Processing Allocation 2,625 3,000
8304 Facilities Management 9,581 750
8305 Insurance 2,000
TRANSFER
9999 Transfer for Building Reserve 64,000
TOTAL 227,400
REVENUE
50 Hours/week P, $200/hr. 10,000/week
200/hr. 240,000
180/hr. 216,000
160/hr. 192,000
Other —Vending/Programs/Adv. 6,000
BUILDING RESERVE
Bubble $444,000 - 15 yr. = $29,000/yr.
Astro Play $350,000 - 10 yr. = $35,000/yr.
Total = $64,000/ r.
40% in Ree. Fund
Share van with Rec. Fund
o-' PlyrnoL444
Ni 'My nae,a iS kyle A414
and /o c -to :r rmIly b'Ke Ao
b,v x Jlaf Sfand s -For- bl loe 1 11c)44o cro35.
1 S L,. .0like- mine oo C}-P
o Jurhpg ofid raMAS, -f-hey also go
o4v o F d %r.- Jurn p and bumf, Tf 15
4up b}0 c6,al l;r ha,P
8one i f dei' 3 and a % 1-C ear'S
tnJk ,x- ani I Y,1,4; Ag 4 l 15 lr e' 5
bee 5 e Today -T L,,a5 ? elWi my dace
I,,,r A yard 6/4en we A-nf$Ae4
b, -e eoy 9 s+- over +6 f 1+e
dr Vr ciSf arecL . Ry 4k- P/
racer/,•n_ y r Psfers. kA en we Lver'e
21' yn9 ou kod; er ; S' Jee.
b flake o- w,2/e.. 412er? Z eaf -o Ae
e114, o -F I -he. yanJ "Jk grP4 1004-e4
o•er behind
1+
he- mamfenence b wAI oq. -
Sac- Li,a% bLcht)7 ,OOP /Q,unCh romp-
and . Tu»p5, ,Tc.cs- !;`i' Ar- ah+e$ Z' go
L ng +1,u+ puZalPs me 5 -i',4,04- trey
are in gea-I- Sl cope a/1a +1 cy am -J , -
Si Wny f1,e,r 'T1,en aT r.,.o,deke -C you
L,,outd 1,'Wc fo sell me one o -P
herrn or 9 ive ori +0 Pr, iT you
do -At vi5 -Por mon-el, Tien-+t'r' r'5
Oh -- y,e more P55 r'}l, OLA, . I%y Pri'end5
and -z- alt 6, bud k,e have Alo
Place cJG, b u-- L;na L.akeS aril
54- /k,'e e ll s . =7 have -ri eA k-) r,k a+
ca? 54 " fiby? .51 -rJ &,orKer3
c ,5 dr a-s ra %a . 3 der,
bumps, Tccm^ ancY +urI25
all oucle ou4- o-F 6,r4. fyJWDLdti 12L-L5
a- !of- d f +hi ng5. , bu+ c bm r --
4-rad.- :Zr- __*kmk_ . a yrmoW43` . fe,ens--.Uourd -
be owe—'oyecL -6 See a- bm i( fra;1 - - -
be -made here, in PlvAow
r
vou [ic"e rncri Jf6u r
1-e+4er, and a-1, nro. o b* u+ tt_ /II/
u"Or s o` I S. - So [C-Pr, -sem ---
k/OrJfS - -dor _ _ CCY)7,Owt• Qre, - is a-ManCVrr`
call mc, or cm-r,12Q,'/
Ryy,,-ie-pruneh --
UcUrM-5: N-Gto Tuneacc In.
pvly v44 1M . lV. 5 yl/6
55?- q<3 6
PLYM`
OT14
ICF C
PRESENT
MAY
14915&16
1999 j
TV f '
TUNES
ON ICE oh
ood Luck To All SkaterGs
mouth's 2nd Annual Ice Sho
e<` w
we Are Proud Of Your Hard Work!
Love From All Of The Coaches,
Sally Rech * Michelle Lacey * Sue Hockstein * Mary Lucke
7 Lynn McMullen 'i r Char Martin * Leah Nelson
Kristy Harris * Melissa Johnson * JeneU Green
Stephanie Marschel * Amy Gregoire * Meghan Hornig
Sally Rech
Figure Skating Director
A Note From the Director
Welcome to our Second Annual Ice Show, "TV
Tunes on Ice". I hope all of you enjoy it. The skaters,
coaches and parents have worked really hard to make it a
great show.
I'd like to give you a little background about our
program. The program started in June of 1997 with about
100 skating school participants and about 25 competitive
skaters. Since then things have really changed. We now
have over 500 skating school participants and about 60
competitors. The skating school has grown faster than
had ever expected. All of you parents should be very
proud of your children's accomplishments. They deserve
a big round of applause.
Our competitive skating team, "The Plymouth Pandas", have been participating
in many local competitions, as well as, traveling to St. Louis, Missouri, last summer
for the ISI Worlds. If you take a look in the main office window, you can see how
many team trophies the skaters have won in only two short. years. Way to go,
Plymouth Pandas"I
The skaters have been busy. They preformed at the Fire & Ice Festival and at
various hockey games. We also had a Holiday Show and our first inter -rink
competition. I hope they can do more guest skating in the near future.
would like to make one last note to Bill Abel, Steve Lewis, Barb Ackerson,
Kathy Tyler, all other arena staff and my fabulous coaches who do a wonderful job all
year long. Thank you, thank you for all your support and hard work. My final big
thanks goes to all you parents who support your kids by getting them to lessons,
encouraging them and making them feel good about what they do. You also have
helped me out immensely and I couldn't run the program without you. Thank you!
Thank you!
hope you all enjoy the show.
Sincerely,
Sally Rech
SportQuest Skating Academy
Training program for Skaters
Edison Civic Arena, 1306 Central Ave. NE, Minneapolis, MN 55413
Providing quality, comprehensive training in an
inspiring competitive atmosphere. Offering
training in FreeStyle/Moves, Ice Dance, and
Style/Presentation. Group training and technique
classes on and off ice in jumps, spins,
edges/footwork, conditioning and flexibility,
ballet basics, choreography, interpretive theory,
performance skills training and nutrition
counseling.
SQSA staff includes: Page Lips, Matt Smith, Ari
Lisa, Deidre Kellogg, Sue Olson, Karen Heng, and
Gailene Norwood.
Skating specific conditioning by the staff of
Innovative Sports Training. Asthma Consultant on
Staff.
Hosted World/Olympic Coaches Doug Leigh,
Robert Tebby, and Neil Carpenter!
Seminar was Saturday, May 1° and Sunday May 2"
Summer intensive Artistry & Style Workshop
with Deidre Kellogg and Ari Lieb
Monday, June 14'" to Friday, June 18"'
Ca/1612-305-1394 to be put on the mailing list,
1999 Summer Session will be held from June 210 to
August 13t', beginning at 8:00cm through 4:00pm on
Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday; 9:30am to 4:00pm
on Thursday and 8:00am to 2:00pm on Friday.
Programming includes High, Low and Open Freestyles; on -
ice classes include: Skills, Jump, Spin, Ice Barre, Power,
and Interpretive Theory. Off -ice classes include Beginers'
Basics, Ballet, Stretch, Conditioning, and seminars on such
topics as Goal Setting, Nutrition, and Injury Prevention/
Principles of Body Mechanics and Choreographic Theory.
THE SUMMER SCHEDULE APPEARS BELOW. THIS SCHEDULE IS TENTATIVE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE
M O N D A Y T H U R S D A Y
8:00am Skills (on ice)/Beginners' Basics (off Ice) 9:30- 1 0 : 3 0 a m Off ice Seminar
8 : 3 0 - 9 : 1 5 a m High Freestyle 10:30-11:30am High Bollet/Low Jump Class (off Ice)
9:15-10:00am Low Freestyle 11:45-12:30pm High Freestyle
R e s u r f a c e 12:30-1:15pm Low Freestyle
10:10-10:30am Jump/Spin Class (on ice) R e s u r f a c e
10:30-11:15am High Freestyle 1:30-2:15pm High Freestyle
R e s u r f a c e 2:15-3:00pm Open Freestyle
11:30-12: 15pm Open Freestyle W E D N E S D A YR e s u r f a c e
1 2: 1 5- 1: 0 0 p m Open Freestyle 8:00am Skills (on ice)/Beginners' Basics (off ice)3 1 5- 4: 0 0 p m Open F r e e s t y l e
R e s u r f a c e 8:30-9:15am High Freestyle
1 :15-1 : 4 5 p m Ice Barre 9:15-10:00am Low Freestyle
1:45-2:30pm Open Freestyle R e s u r f a c e
3:00-4:00pm Low Ballet/High Conditioning 10:10-10:30am Jump/Spin Class (on ice)
10:30-11 :15am High freestyle
R e s u r f a c e
11:30-12:15pm Open Freestyle
T U E s D A Y 12:15-1:00pm Open Freestyle
8:00am Skills (on icel/Beginners' Basics (off ice) R e s u r f a c e
8 : 3 0 - 9 : 1 5 a m High Freestyle 1:15-1:45pm Interpretive Theory (on ice)
9:15-10:00am Low Freestyle 1:45-2:30pm Open Freestyle
R e s u r f a c e 3:00-4:00pm Low Ballet/High Conditioning
10:10-10:30am Jump/Spin Class (on Ice) F R r D A Y
10:30-11:15am High Freestyle 8:00-8:45am Open Freestyle
R e s u r f a c e 8:45-9:30am Open Freestyle
11:30-12:15pm Open Freestyle R e s u r f a c e
12:15-1:00pm Open Freestyle 9:45-10:45am Open Freestyle
R e s u r f a c e R e s u r f a c e
1: 1 5- 1 : 4 5 p m P o w e r 11:00-12:00noon Exhibitlon/Program Ice
1 :45-2:30pm Open Freestyle 12:15-1 :15pm Open Freestyle
3:00-4:00pm High Ballet/Low Conditioning 1:30-.2:00pm Stretch class. off Ice)
For more information contact SQSA, at (612)824-2375
Matt Smith
Former junior National Champion of Canada
Training partner of Elvis Stojko under the direction of Doug Leigh
Taught and demonstrated in numerous seminars across Canada
Canadian National Team Member for four years
Competed Internationally for Canada
Competed at the National level .in Senior Men's as well as Senior
Pairs simultaneously
Coaching since 1994
Presently coaching at SportsQuest Skating Academy, Minneapolis, MN
STARS OF TV TUNES ON ICE STARS OF TV TUNES ON ICE
The Plymouth Pandas Senior
Precision Line skated their
second year together with
perseverance. The skaters
practiced forty-five minutes each
week for about twenty weeks
with a few off ice practices. They
competed in three competitions
and participated in the Plymouth
Ice Center's Holiday Show and
Plymouth's Fire and Ice
Celebration at Parkers Lake. With
each performance, their abilities
improved and their talents were
enhanced. Now that we are at the
end of the second year, we hope
to build on the current
perseverance and success. We are
very proud of what the skaters
have accomplished!
The Plymouth Pandas Junior
Precision Line skated their first
year together with style and
dedication. The ages range from
eight to eleven years old. The
junior line practiced one-half hour
each week for about twenty
weeks with a few off ice practices.
They competed in two
competitions and participated in
the Plymouth Ice Center's Holiday
Show and Plymouth's Fire and Ice
Celebration at Parkers Lake. With
the first year coming to an end,
we hope to build on this year's
successes and have an even more
wonderful second year.
Members of the Plymouth Pandas Senior Precision Line
Laurel Anderson, Megan Casey, Kristina DeMuth, Kelley Duffey,
Julie Erickson, Marti Griwac, Megan Griwac, Courtney Heim, Erin Heim,
Tyne Hovda, Amy Johannsen, Holly Johnston, Nicole Johnston,
Laura Komarek, Kari Kurenitz, Adrienne Law, Erin Mullen, Heather Mullen,
Alissa Nelson, Kaitlyn Silbaugh, Jamie Skoglund, Mollie Stemper,
Tamara Tomask
Members of the Plymouth Pandas Junior Precision Line
Heidi Anderson, Grace Brown, Jennifer Bushek, Christine Cullen,
Katherine Dickinson, Amanda Hildebrandt, Whitney Kirchner, Sally Komarek,
Mackenzie Mahoney, Kalla McEachern, Brianna Schoen, Kristin Skoglund,
Joanna Thielen, Emily Vold
Three's Company
Chelsea Sjelin Julie Erickson Amy Johannsen
t 9
r
k•
18
Laverne & Shirley
Kari Kurenitz Alissa Nelson
Inspector Gadget
Nicole Hayden Kristina DeMuth Laura Komarek
Mission Impossible
Erin Heim Amanda Hildebrandt Tyne Hovda
Fame
Megan Casey Susan Bushek Courtney Heim
Full House
Kristin Skoglund Grace Brown Kristen Eastman
pi U,
H'A
Fame
Megan Casey Susan Bushek Courtney Heim
Full House
Kristin Skoglund Grace Brown Kristen Eastman
pi U,
My Favorite Martian
Nicole Urspringer Katie Berner Holly Urspringer
Happy Days
Friday Night Performance)
Dana VanBruggen Heidi Anderson Adrienne Law
Hey, Hey, We're the Monkees
Kristen Wood Melissa Hildebrandt
Vicki Broeckert Ashley Cook
Happy Days
Saturday Night Performance)
Kaitlyn Silbaugh Mollie Stemper Holly Johnston
Pink Panther
Whitney Kirchner Sally Komarek Kyle Kohns
I Spy
Cartoon Characters
Baby -Sitters Club
Lost in Space
Petticoat junction
1 Dream of Jeannie
Late, Late Show
Hogan's Heroes
The Brady Bunch The Addams Family
Hawaii Five -O
Sesame Street
Flintstones
Gilligan's Island
American Bandstand
M.D. Melodies
Green Acres/
Fathers & Daughters
Little House on the Prairie /
Walton's
A beautiful smile is a work of art.
I I
IMeet the t.
I 1
I 1
Dir®pro I
IDon't let age stop you from having the straight teeth you've
I dreamed of. Braces aren't just for kids anymore. I
Nearly one million U.S. adults are wearing braces. Advances in
1 color, size and shapes have made braces less noticeable, less painful
1 and even less time consuming.
I Dr. D. — Delia Dall'Arancio and her staff are specialists in the
I most advanced orthodontic solutions, as well as treatment of
temporomandibular (TMJ) disorders for children and adults.
I Our Plymouth office, in addition to our practice in Eden Prairie,
is located at 9800 Rockford Road near Cub and Wendy's. We offer
both weekday and Saturday appointments and initial exams are
I always complimentary. We invite you to stop in or call for more
I information.
1 Because the brightest smiles start with Dr. D.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I I
I I
I Delia Dall'Arancio DDS, MS
Dr. Specialists in Orthodontics
9800 Rockford Road • Plymouth, MN 55442
Tel: 612-559-0559 • Fax: 612-559-0001
8785 Columbine Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Tel: 612-942-0434 • Fax: 612-942-0406
1- ......
o 0 s o
5 No hero ever stood up to a 5
5 Davanni's Hot Hoagy. 5
Mi
5 Directions:
5 pizza Turn left lot
5
5
out of parking
onto Plymouth Boulevard.
I5
5
s ,
Hot Hoagies Left on 34th. r5J
5 Right on Harbor Lane. 5
55 Lasagna * You're just three minutes
g
5
5 away from a GREAT meal! 5
5 You think hero hard to beat 5
5
5 may sandwiches arey ,
but with a Davanni's Hot Hoagy, they can't compete. 5
5 I)tAMINI T Pff
5
5
5 PIZZA& HOT HOAGIFS
Everyone Leaves Happy"
5
J
D rJ sl-r: 11:111lrJ:z 1111111111111111ill PPUn11:!: 1l:l: 1rMEMPERPUM.EMU MrPrPPLPLrr3 r cJ P rJ JPLPr n o
CAST OF TV TUNES ON ICE
Cartoon Characters Lost in Space Late, Late Show Hawaii Five -0 American Bandstand
Jenna Cappellin Vicki Broeckert Jessica Drill Jenell Green Tara Avery
Madeline Dickinson Katelyn Campbell Melissa Hildebrandt Amy Gregoire Jamie Green
Katelyn Duffey Nicole Craig Kyle Kohns Margot Gustafson Erin Heitkamp
Amanda Entringer Laura Dresse Sally Komarek Katie Jo Johnson Emily Novak
Jenna Gove Rachel Indihar Kelsey Paustis Lindsay Johnston Kristen Petruzzi
Jack Hendrix Katie Metzger Michelle Richards Stephanie Marschel Betsy Rech
Katherine Law Meredith Mrachek Allyssa Schik Samantha Tollefson Jamie Skoglund
Taylor Offerman Maureen O'Connor Katie Wichman
Marie -Eve Picard Mattea Schuett Jackie Winnekins Flintstones Gilligan's Island
Julie Smelyansky Kristen Wood Melanie Carlson Kristina DeMuth
Nicholas Yearous I Dream of Jeannie Ashley Cook Nichole Hayden
Sarah Brooker Hogan's Heros Kelly Eck Courtney Heim
I Spy Grace Brown Samson Den Lepcha Ashley Entringer Nicole Johnston
Susan Bushek Jennifer Bushek Jimmy Dresse Ann Goding Laura Komarek
Cara Meyer Claire Drawe Jason Johnston Tess Hayes Heather Mullen
Erin Mullen Kristen Eastman Brandon Law Kristen Indihar Joanna Thielen
Teresa Thielen Jessica Hendrix Grant McEachern Michaela Schik
Rachel Tollefson Mackenzie Mahoney Erica Slough M.D. Melodies
Nicole Myslajek The Brady Bunch Alexandria Wald Megan Casey
Baby -Sitters Club Erin Schwartz Amanda Berglove Ashlee Freshwater
Kelly Duffey Kristin Skoglund Katie Casey Sesame Street Angela Kopp
Julie Erickson Mandy Hulke Kimberly Anja Kroll
Sarah Hayes
Petticoat Junction Andrea Lima Logan Blum Ashford Kroll
Amy Johannsen Christine Cullen Jennifer Maiers Ashlyn Bunning Jennifer Lawson
Kari Kurenitz Amanda Hildebrandt Laura Wacker Mikayla Griwac
Kayla Langhans Lauren Holiday Jasmine Kirchner
Alissa Nelson Tyne Hovda The Addams Family Samantha Kruse
Chelsea Sjelin Sara ensenJ Heidi Anderson Sherrida Rasmussen
Whitney Kirchner Katie Berner Kylie Schwartz
Kailey Kreatz Erin Heim Anirudh Srivatsa
Adrienne Law Holly Johnston Laura Wichman
Kalla McEachern Kaitlyn Silbaugh Sarah Wichman
Brianna Schoen Mollie Stemper
Dana VanBruggen Holly Urspringer
Nicole Urspringer
Green Acres /
Fathers & Daughters
Dan & Heidi Anderson
Robert & Grace Brown
Don & Susan Bushek
Tim & Kristina DeMuth
Duane & Jamie Green
Todd, Amanda & Melissa
Hildebrandt
Bob & Tyne Hovda
Ron, Holly & Nicole
Johnston
Russ & Lindsay Johnston
Dan & Whitney Kirchner
Steve & Kari Kurenitz
Kurt & Alissa Nelson
Dave & Betsy Rech
Pete & Kaitlyn Silbaugh
John & Mollie Stemper
Dale & Samantha
Tollefson
Little House on the
Prairie / Walton's
Alexa Buckingham
Jenna Carroll
Abbi Christensen
Elizabeth Dorn
Carolyn Mahoney
Karine Picard
Carly Rasmussen
Taylor Sellers
HARMON
AUTOGLASS
Convenience
At Every Turn
Quality Windshield
Replacement& Repair
f°SERVING YOU SINCE 1949"
When The Unexpected Hits...
In -Shop Service, or Free
Vehicle Pickup and Delivery
No Paperwork! We Direct Bill
Your Insurance Company!
Your Insurance Coverage May
Qualify You for Free or Low -Cost
Windshield Repair! ;
Insurance Company Approved
NGA CertifiectTechnicians
Ask About Our Nationwide,
Lifetime Guarantee
Our Mobile Units Come to You
at No Extra Charge
Good Luck
Skaters'.
For the best in custom framing.
Helpful, experienced designers
Unique classic & imported mouldings
Needlework & memory boxes
Fine art prints & posters
Maple Grove
Q AA
Plymouth
mouth Sation
1-94 &
rove Square
Weaver Lk. Rd. f R ( { Tic Hwy. 55 & Cot Rd. 24
420-7368 383-0525
PIERCE SKATE &SKI
arJest RIEDELL dealerin
Minnesota
John Wilson
Mitchel & King NEWLY EXPANDED FIGURE
Blades SKATE CLOTHING DEPARTMENT
Pierce Skate & SM
208 W. 98th Stree
Bloomington, MN
612) 884-1990
888) ski -1996
MONDOR
JERRY'S
ADULT & JUNIOR SIZES
FRIDAY NIGHT BROADCAST SCHEDULE - Act I
On With The Show, This Is It !!!
SAMANTHA TOLLEFSON
Jr. Drill Team
Cartoon Characters
I Spy
Baby -Sitters Club
Lost in Space
I Dream of Jeannie
TARA AVERY
Petticoat Junction
Late, Late Show
JAMIE GREEN`
Hogan's Heroes
The Brady Bunch
BETSY RECH`
The Addams Family
Hawaii Five -O
Friends / Coaches
OUR SPECIAL GUEST SKATER, MATT SMITH
Intermission
FRIDAY NIGHT BROADCAST SCHEDULE - Act II
Sr. Drill Team
KRISTEN PETRUZZI
Flintstones
Sesame Street
STEPHANIE MARSCHEL
Happy Days
American Bandstand
AMY GREGOIRE
Gilligan's Island
LINDSAY JOHNSTON
M.D. Melodies
JENELL GREEN
Green Acres / Fathers & Daughters
Little House on the Prairie / Walton's
OUR SPECIAL GUEST SKATER, MATT SMITH
T.V. Workouts
The Grand Finale
Our Commitment
A home -like environment that is secure but not confining.
Dignified indivudualized care, now and as needs change.
Staff trained to understand the chanllenges of memory impairments.
Our Goal
To enhance the quality of life for the memory impaired.
elCLARE BRIDGE
Alternative Living Services
15855 22nd Avenue North, Plymouth
612/476-8200
A Memory Care Residence
Creative Co ntaming for a Captivating Performance
Quality Pratrice
and Campetdtiona P
Skann A arel y
F ,
r
yy" Any SrockON.- $t,.+'^s, PYelec7 dittoavf
Va[idaOmgb Sla-99
Custom Costumes, Design Services, Fabric and Supplies
Visit our Sbotoroom Monday -Friday 165, Samrday 11.2 or by Appointmem
DesiI Your Own costamd
Call 612.829-7819 eapolis Area) or Toll free 1-888-0 LINE UP
rf t m...L:«.....,. A—— ..L w FA:.... if:__.n., TTJIQ
Boger lnentafis proud
to Support the Pfymouth 2'andas!
Tuff Service :Practice Offering a Spectal:Program for
Children including Orthodontics 3Z Cosmetics
Conveniently locatedat the intersection of
7fwy169e 36tbAve.7V 546-7707
BODER el DENTAL
ENHANCING LIVES
LommEN, NELSON, COLE & STAGEBERG, P.A.
REPRESENTING
INDIVIDUALS ANO BUSINESSES
IN THE AREAS OF
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE,
ESTATE PLANNING, WILLS, PROBATE,
TRUSTS, DISSOLUTIONS, ADOPTIONS,
LIABILITY DEFENSE, EMPLOYMENT & LABOR LAW
PROPERTY TAXES, LNIXIME TAXES,
BusmsS TRANSACTIONS, CONSTRUCTION LITIGATION
AND
GENERAL NEGLIGENCE
CONGRATULATES THE PLYMOUTH
SKATERS ON A SPECTACULAR PRODUCTION OF
T.V. AND TOONS ON ICE.
CONTACT STACEY A. DEKALB AT (612) 336-9310
PUT YOUR PARTY ON WBEELS1
I
n
I•
i
HAVE A ROLLER SKATING
BIRTHDAY PARTY!
Let us help to plan THE PERFECT PARTY
for your child's special day! We take care
of everything: food, decorating, skates,
entertainment and, of course, the clean up!
FAMILY OWNED AND OPERATED"
9295518
5622 Weil Lskis SlrvsrdSd.Leul. PsrM.
SuhEighth OMMENO,dI-, DS .hS .z0m,, S1sei1BBSt
hli. °ODe. MIS 55902 NELSON Bud—, WI W16
612)339-8131 715)386821]
Mit-1. WAIS (800) 7524297 LAW FIRM T1,w Goy . (615) 936-8085
FAX (612) 33940M FAX (715) 3068219
PUT YOUR PARTY ON WBEELS1
I
n
I•
i
HAVE A ROLLER SKATING
BIRTHDAY PARTY!
Let us help to plan THE PERFECT PARTY
for your child's special day! We take care
of everything: food, decorating, skates,
entertainment and, of course, the clean up!
FAMILY OWNED AND OPERATED"
9295518
5622 Weil Lskis SlrvsrdSd.Leul. PsrM.
SATURDAY MATINEE BROADCAST SCHEDULE — Act II
Sr. Drill Team
KRISTEN PETRUZZI
Flintstones
Sesame Street
AMY GREGOIRE 2.(
American Bandstand
Gilligan's Island
LINDSAY JOHNSTON
M.D. Melodies
JENELL GREEN
Green Acres / Fathers & Daughters
Little House on the Prairie / Walton's
OUR SPECIAL GUEST SKATER, MATT SMITH
T.V. Workouts
The Grand Finale
SATURDAY MATINEE BROADCAST SCHEDULE — Act I
On With The Show, This Is It!!!
EMILY NOVAK
Jr. Drill Team
Cartoon Characters
I Spy
Baby -Sitters Club
Lost in Space
Dream of Jeannie
TARA AVERY
Petticoat Junction
Late, Late Show
CARA MEYER
Hogan's Heroes
The Brady Bunch
The Addams Family
Hawaii Five -O
Friends / Coaches
OUR SPECIAL GUEST SKATER, MATT SMITH
Intermission
SATURDAY MATINEE BROADCAST SCHEDULE — Act II
Sr. Drill Team
KRISTEN PETRUZZI
Flintstones
Sesame Street
AMY GREGOIRE 2.(
American Bandstand
Gilligan's Island
LINDSAY JOHNSTON
M.D. Melodies
JENELL GREEN
Green Acres / Fathers & Daughters
Little House on the Prairie / Walton's
OUR SPECIAL GUEST SKATER, MATT SMITH
T.V. Workouts
The Grand Finale
FORE
g
DER ON
Postal Services
tfrri, •.
fit
Document
Services
a
OfficeSupplies
I
III
Packing &
Shipping
Fax Sending &
Receiving
How convenient. Mail Boxes Etc° is right in your neighborhood.
We're your one-stop business support center with dozens of
ways to make your business and life easier.
So, how can we help you?
Plymouth Town Center
3500 Vicksburg Lane N.
Plymouth, MN 55447
559-9330 Fax 559-9329 MAIL BOXES ETC:
MAKING BUSINESS EASIER. WORLDWIDE.
1-800-789.4MBE WWW.mbe.com
MBE [enters are owned and operated by licensed hanchisees of Mail Boxes Etc. USA, Inc. in the USA, and by its master licensees or their franchisees outside of the USA.
PAYING TOO MUCH
FOR CAR INSURANCE?
CALL US FOR A FREE QUOTE
HALL INSURANCE AGENCY
SERVING MINNESOTA SINCE 1963
612) 925-2484
TEXACO
SERVICE
CENTER
S NDE°
e
V/SA' Aoa"Oro W AeloApproved
l
9950 County Road 9, Plymouth
NW corner of Hwy. 169 & Cty Rd. 9
HOURS:
Mon - Fri lam - 9pm
Saturday 7am - 7pm
Sunday 9am - 5pm
can g
FOODS
FOUR
Z BVFGERY.ING SEASDNs waNE
AUTOMOTIVE RRwRSx
x
FRONTAGE ROAD
ROCKFORD ROAUrcry RG R
SATURDAY NIGHT BROADCAST SCHEDULE - Act 1
On With The Show, This Is It !!!
SAMANTHA TOLLEFSON '
Jr. Drill Team
Cartoon Characters
Hey, Hey, We're the Monkees
I Spy
Baby -Sitters Club
Fame
Lost in Space
I Dream of Jeannie
MARGOT GUSTAFSON
Petticoat Junction
Late, Late Show
ERIN HEITKAMP
Hogan's Heroes
The Brady Bunch
The Addams Family
Hawaii Five -O
Friends / Coaches
OUR SPECIAL GUEST SKATER, MATT SMITH
Intermission
0
SATURDAY NIGHT BROADCAST SCHEDULE - Act 11
Sr. Drill Team
KATIE JO JOHNSON
Flintstones
Sesame Street
EMILY NOVAK
0
Happy Days
American Bandstand
Gilligan's Island
Mission Impossible
M.D. Melodies
Green Acres / Fathers & Daughters
Little House on the Prairie / Walton's
OUR SPECIAL GUEST SKATER, MATT SMITH
T.V. Workouts
The Grand Finale
The Magic of Jonathan Campbell
All Types of Magic
1ForAllOccasions
Balloon Animals - Juggling Acts
Plymouth, MN
Reasonable Rates 612-557-7236
@R
All Brands at Low, Low Prices
Fast Free Metro Delivery
Convenient Maple Grove Location
The
To
GuySpecializinginDiscountTires &Custom Wheels"
Greg Norberg me
Hours: li 6-5:30 pm Sat (call)
9664 85th Ave. No., Suite B Try 1 at w TOW: (612) 425.7603
Maple Grove, MN 55369 Call: (612) 599-5005
W A Y Z A T A
Breakfast • Lunch
Dinner • Sunday Brunch
700 East Lake Street
Wayzata, MN 55391
6 12 / 4 7 3 -LAKE
Quality Gymnastics Instruction
For boys & girls
fit Ages 18 mos. -18 years
GWIW Summer Flex Schedule
A S S 0 r I A T 1 e X Session Dates:
197a 1999 June 14 - August 20
Call for Summer Brochure
473-5514
T PRIMERICA
jgM I+inancial Services
Robert Thomas Brown
Personal Financial Analyst
6690 Park Trail Rd. • Hamel, MN 55340
Res. (612) 478-6265 • Bus. (612) 295-0070
License# 20103752 A Member of TrmvelersGreyp>j
An independent representative of Primerica Financial Services
Representing: Primerica Life Insurance Company/Executive Offices: nuluth, Georgia
BEST IN ATHLETIC SUPPLIES & TEAM SALES
UNIFORMS • SPECIAL ORDERS • CUSTOM LETTERING 9 BUSINESS INCENTIVES
LOCALLY OWNED
SINCE 1973
The Show Must
GoOn.••
HAVE FUN111
7321- 42nd Ave. N. - (Co. Rd. 9)
New Hope, MN 55427
612) 535-3312
FAX: (612) 535-4984
WILLIAM J. KOTTEMANN, D.D.S., M.S., P.A.
Member
American Association of
Orthodontists
M nr
W • • am J. Kottemann
Orthodontics For Adults
and
Adolescents
Your Choice - Clear Ceramic or Metal Braces.
No Charge for Initial Exam.
Lakeview Dental Center
445 Lake Street
Wayzata, MN 55391
612-420-6834
DIPLOMATE
AMERICAN BOARD
OF ORTHODONTICS
Maple Grove Professional Center
13998 Maple Knoll Way
Maple Grove, MN 55369
612-420-6834
N
Contemporary 5katin6
Apparel
Cheri Craig
612) 946-9552
FAX(612)946-9553
8220 Commonwealth Or. 5ulte 103
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
BEST IN ATHLETIC SUPPLIES & TEAM SALES
UNIFORMS • SPECIAL ORDERS • CUSTOM LETTERING 9 BUSINESS INCENTIVES
LOCALLY OWNED
SINCE 1973
The Show Must
GoOn.••
HAVE FUN111
7321- 42nd Ave. N. - (Co. Rd. 9)
New Hope, MN 55427
612) 535-3312
FAX: (612) 535-4984
WILLIAM J. KOTTEMANN, D.D.S., M.S., P.A.
Member
American Association of
Orthodontists
Mnr
W • • am J. Kottemann
Orthodontics For Adults
and
Adolescents
Your Choice - Clear Ceramic or Metal Braces.
No Charge for Initial Exam.
Lakeview Dental Center
445 Lake Street
Wayzata, MN 55391
612-420-6834
DIPLOMATE
AMERICAN BOARD
OF ORTHODONTICS
Maple Grove Professional Center
13998 Maple Knoll Way
Maple Grove, MN 55369
612-420-6834
SUNDAY MATINEE BROADCAST SCHEDULE — Act 1
On With The Show, This Is It!!!
SARAH HAYES
Jr. Drill Team
Cartoon Characters
JAMIE SKOGLUND tZ
I Spy
Baby -Sitters Club
Lost in Space
Pink Panther
I Dream of Jeannie
ERIN HEITKAMP
Petticoat Junction
Late, Late Show
Hogan's Heroes
The Brady Bunch
BETSY RECH
Inspector Gadget
The Addams Family
Hawaii Five -O
Friends / Coaches
Tt OUR SPECIAL GUEST SKATER, MATT SMITH
Intermission
0
SUNDAY MATINEE BROADCAST SCHEDULE — Act 11
Sr. Drill Team
KATIE JO JOHNSON
Flintstones
Sesame Street
Three's Company
American Bandstand
Full House
Gilligan's Island
M.D. Melodies
Laverne & Shirley
STEPHANIE MARSCHEL
My Favorite Martian
Green Acres / Fathers & Daughters
Little House on the Prairie / Walton's
OUR SPECIAL GUEST SKATER, MATT SMITH
T.V. Workouts
The Grand Finale
Dad, TLan6 for
th I e
dI
ance.
Youi
re
tke kest!!
6e Vicole
VA0114
We're. SO
Yr oa d 04 IOU
lot
pFFb
n n.
fh
a
698
Plymouth Pandas Figure Skating Team Trophies
1St
place Summer Sizzle 7-98
17th place ISI Worlds in St. Louis MO 8-98
1St
place New Ulm 11-98
1St
place White Bear 12-98
3rd
place Apple Valley 1-99
2nd place Frosty Blades 2-99
2nd place Blades of March 3-99
Dad, TLan6 for
thI e
dI
ance.
Youi
re
tke kest!!
6e Vicole
VA0114
We're. SO
Yr oa d 04 IOU
lot
pFFb
n n.
fh
a
698
SKS ORO
MOLUE41
JOHN c
CINDY
SiEMPSR
MELT
HE IC
CAR #1
DAD, MOM
KYLE
0000
RAC
lilt
000
Wel rre/ sla
PVO,/Wd at c 0/w
Zzally!
j o'nv, , qc wlv,
Tinel, Wad
9eirvokel&
Kari,
You're Our
Skater]
Smile/
ove Mom,
Dad&
Ran
We're so
Proud Of
You Amyl
14
Jenni Maiers,
Weare
so proud
of you!!
Mom & Dad
We're s7;4,
proud of. e
you
Chelsea
S 'elfin!
We ove You!
Mom
Awsome
Luta
H011VIII
Way tW Go.
Love, Dad,
Mom & Nicole
K41e, You re
our No.i
6ter
ove, MOM
DJ
WE azz io
loud o f
you a¢inE
dad and mom
We're so
Proud of
You
Amanda!!
Mom and
Dad
Tie Love
You Kyle!
The Kohn's
Kids Alex,
Kaly, Aric &
Kara
Sarah,
Greatest
American
Skating)
Hero.!
Betsy,
You're
Our No. 1
Skater!!
Love, Mom14-11
Dad
MaM, i At
L/NDA, LaGAIU G
ove I un Sovak!
Ve LoveYoul
L om Mom
DoJ
We oC o u e You
J I le 'X 4 n j
grandma Su3ie
gran jr a
rlenne,
You're Our
No.1 Skater!
Mom and Dad
To all my skaters:
Thanks for
working so hard
lately. You are all
my shining stars!!
Lynn
40
Smile
LindsayM'
It's Your
Time To
Shine
Tie Love
You Kyle!
The Kohn's
Kids Alex,
Kaly, Aric &
Kara
Sarah,
Greatest
American
Skating)
Hero.!
Betsy,
You're
Our No. 1
Skater!!
Love, Mom14-11
Dad
MaM, i At
L/NDA, LaGAIU G
ove I un Sovak!
Ve LoveYoul
L om Mom
DoJ
We oC o u e You
J I le 'X 4 n j
grandma Su3ie
gran jr a
rlenne,
You're Our
No.1 Skater!
Mom and Dad
To all my skaters:
Thanks for
working so hard
lately. You are all
my shining stars!!
Lynn
40
Smile
Chelsea
S,Jelin /
You're in the
spotlight tonight!
Love, Grandma
der a/z/e/ spa
FVO/Wdi Olt
Q
acv
l i/a/vi e/- lel!
Break a
Blade
Holly a
Nicole
Irspri nger:
Love,
Mom &
Dad
We're So
Proud
Of You
krrstenij
ove, Mom. U
n
Smile
Vicki /
Broeckert!
ou're in th
spotlight
tonight!
Mom & Dad
I'M SO
PROUD
OF YOU
DADY
LOVA,
T h4nkj
Best
Am /Vico/¢ A aiollf
SKS CTR8
JENNY
BUSNFK
a;
MOM 6
DAD
WE'RE sa
PROUD OF YOU
A88/
SM/Lf
JIMMY
C LAURA
YOU'RE IN THE
SPOTLIGHT TONIGHT!!
ADRIENNE BRANDON &
KATkERINE
757w r f ref,
KRISTEM41
WEARE
VERY PROUD
OF YOU:
LOVA, MOM,
DAD AND
LADY
Ashley &
Amanda
You're both in
the spotlight
tonight!
Love, Mom, Dad &
Coleman
Thank you for
asking me to
skate with you in
the
father/daughter
skate! I Love You
Grace Brown!l
tL,Dad
Wa* to
446,te
ig
31,40! t!
Lave, Dad.
4' Maya %
HaU
Congradulations
Katiel
H'e're so proud o
you!
We Love
You!!
Mom & Dad
We are very
rood of you
MATTER!
Way f to,[
Love, Mom, Dad, Jessie,
Peteraad Sophie
and
Dad,
Don't forget
to do your
chores!
Thanks for
skating with
me!
Love, Kaitlyn
We Love You
Grace! W¢
are So Proub
of You!
Love, Mown,
Dab, Na""aI1
faJA
Todd
Hildebrandt,
You area
great dad &
a great
skaters #` § §
x ,'
Love, Your Girls
A»Of er f""
ryeAV,> L5AII {I
a`G'oll, eN«ol e 8v
CAt e
Do,J, YoAl
oilWoiys ke ou-r
I s cite-rl
Love y of
mIO1 } D-{ Dason
Have fun
kating, Tess;
We LOVE
You!
SMILE!!!
Mom &
I,•
WEARS SO
PROUD OF Y
BRANDON.
140M AND W
wafca OUT
saa pass...
IE F caMFs
THE vista
411y, #04'10`4
tlhasQ A J41011
SKS ORS
JAMIE fr
JANFLL
LOVA, MOM
of
vile Susa
Bushek!!
You're. in the
spotlight tonight!
Mom & Dad
Smile C61-"14
oinJ Skerioloid
YouIre both in
the spot igkt
tlonieWl
Daddy, M
Zama,
Mafia
y-+sha i na
Samantha,
1 6ove
Tom
SK8
R8 Erin
Heim
Love,
Good Luck
Mackenzie
Mahoney!!
Mom &
Dad
You are my
favorme zambov
river. 1f011 driv
me razy.
Smile Diol
IYOu re i nII
tk e spot i q ht
tonight.
Love, Letsy
ffiQ ,PQ SD
A19X4
SacklifeA40folt
141sia, 'DO A C4101V
We're very
proud of
you, Sara»
Enjoo
Mom, Dad
Tom
SK8 GR8
Courtney»
1
Love, Mom
Dad
Smile
Nichole!
You're 101i the
spotli lit
tONlghtll
fro "i, NIcholAs
Letter of Endorsement
The Ice Skating Institute does hereby endorse the
Spring Ice Show TV Tunes On Ice
Name of Show/Exhibition
to be held on
05/14/1999 - 05/16/1999
Date
at
Plymouth Ice Center
Name of Rink
Plymouth MN
City/State
as an event held in the interest of recreational ice skating.
Sally Rech
Name of Show/Exhibition Director
authorized r resentative of
Plymouth Ice Center City Of Plymouth
Name of Rink
a member in good standing of the Ice Skating Institute, has stated knowledge of ISI
requirements and has affirmed that this event shall, in no way, place in jeopardy any
skater's eligibility status as defined by the Ice Skating Institute.
The following professionals will appear in this show:
Any deviations from the above listed names shall render this endorsement null and void.
The Ice Skating Institute does hereby declare the above described event an activity held
in the interest of ice skating and for the recrea 'onal foKncnt of its participants.
4-3822-1999
03/30/1999 ISI D' etor of Member Progr o r—,
ISI Skating Program Coor nrdtor
M AND R PRODUCTS
14310 47TH AVENUE NORTH
Pi YmnUTH- MN SS446
Representing the
Electronics, Circuit Board, Graphic Arts,
and Machining Industries.
We are PROUD to support the
Plymouth Pandas Figure Skating Team!
Have a GREAT show!!!
Russ Johnston
Phone: 612-509-9323
Fax: 612-509-9370