Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPark and Recreation Advisory Commission Packet 09-12-1991Regular Meeting of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission September 12, 1991, 7:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes 3. Visitor Presentations a. Athletic Associations b. Staff c. Others 4. Report on Past Council Action a. b. 5. Unfinished Business a. Review 1992-96 C.I.P. b. Review of field rental policy C. d. 6. New Business a. b. C. d. 7. Commission Presentation 8. Staff Communication 9. Adjournment Next regular PRAC meeting - October 10 Minutes of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting July 11, 1991 Page 20 Present: Chair Freels, Commissioners Anderson, Johnson, Waage, Wahl, and Watson; staff Bisek, Blank and Sankey. Absent: Commissioner Gutzke 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Freels called the July meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. in the Council Chambers. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made by Commissioner Waage and seconded by Commissioner Wahl to approve the minutes of the May meeting as presented. The motion carried with all ayes. 3. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS a. Athletic Associations. None were present. b. Staff. Mary Bisek spoke on behalf of the June employees of the month. Harvey Sheffert and Ron Farley are senior umpires who have officiated over 150 games per year over the last four years. They head up what Rick Busch considers to be the top group of umpires in the state. They both consistently score on top of the list for the yearly rules test for all of the umpires in Minnesota. They handle the pressure of officiating well and can usually diffuse a difficult situation before it escalates into a game ejection. Plymouth is lucky to have them in our program. Mary also spoke on behalf of the July employees of the month. Julie Berg began working for the city in 1987 as a WSA. She is now our senior head guard and supervises 29 lifeguards at three beaches and two pools. She has recently been teaching the new Jr. Lifeguard program. She has excellent working knowledge of aquatic skills and is strongly dedicated. Tina Swanson grew up in our aquatic program. In 1984 she started as a WSA. She is now our Head WSI at Wayzata East Jr. High Pool. She daily teaches over 85 children along with supervising the staff. She also coaches swimming for Hopkins, which is a testimony to her dedication to aquatics. The certificates will be given to them at the pool, which will be enjoyed by the students. Mary gave an overview of the recreation division for the benefit of our new commissioners. The recreation division employees 3 3/4 full time staff and operates with a half million dollar budget, 70% of which is covered by program fees. We annually have over 40,000 participants in over 800 programs, and in addition are visited by over 78,000 people at the beaches and warming houses. We have 700 adult teams and 100 youth teams participating in our own leagues, and schedule and maintain fields for the youth athletic associations which have many additional teams. We schedule over 4,000 games per year on our fields, which keeps the maintenance staff busy. July 1991 PRAC Minutes Page 22 Outside agencies are contracted for programming for seniors and handicapped citizens. Senior Community Services covers western Hennepin county. Their expertise is concentrated on the seniors. They provide a staff person on Monday mornings and administrate a large volunteer program. West Hennepin Community Center specializes in programing for handicapped individuals. Seven communities contract to provide these services, which is more efficient because of combined resources and participants. Many special needs participants are integrated into regular programs, which is a good experience for them and also a good experience for the able-bodied participants because of the social contact. Commissioner Wahl asked if any of the programs make a profit. Mary replied that many do. In fact, the profit from some of the programs serves to help cover the expenses of the free programs such as beaches, warming houses, special events, and seniors. Director Blank said that about $130,000 is transferred from the General Fund. The rest of the expenses are covered by collected revenues. Plymouth probably ranks in the top 5% of local agencies in paying their own way. Chair Freels suggested that the department should publicize how well it does and show how most of the programs are self supporting. Mary Bisek agreed that good public relations are helpful and that she would look into it. Commissioner Johnson asked if a program is ever kept on even if registration is low. Mary replied that this is done occasionally, especially if the department feels that the program will grow in the future. "Seed" money is also budgeted to get new programs going. Scholarship money is also included in the budget and is available to help children participate in programs. The department will usually cover 50% of the fee for a scholarship, and occasionally higher if needed. 4. REPORT ON PAST COUNCIL ACTION a. Plavfields. Bids were awarded to Shingobee Builders for Bass Lake and Parkers Lake Playfields. Preliminary grading has already begun on Bass Lake Playfield and will begin soon at Parkers Lake. Shingobee's goal is completion by the end of the year. Chair Freels encouraged the new members of the commission to contact staff and see the plans for the new playfields. b. Request for citizen survey. The old Park & Recreation Advisory Commission thought feed back was necessary before proceeding any further with consideration of special facilities such as pools and golf courses. Chair Freels and the mayor met to discuss the issue, and he subsequently sent a letter to the Council to request a citizen survey regarding wants and needs. The Council thought this should be a budget consideration item. 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. 1992-96 C.I.P. Director Blank stated that a problem has arisen in that the Council has passed a motion to take $500,000 out of park dedication fees to cover maintenance of the two new playfields. This greatly affects future projects. On July 22, the final specs on the July 1991 PRAC Minutes Page 23 new trail projects will go to the Council for approval. M.S.A. Road funds will pay for most of these projects. Funding for Shiloh and Gleanloch remodeling is in place, and the projects will be completed. Tennis courts at Plymouth Creek Park is a dead issue for this year, as there is no current funding. Chair Freels felt that the tennis court project should be moved to 1992. The 10th Avenue Park qualifies for federal money and will be covered by C.D.B.G funding. The playfields are being covered by the Public Improvement Revolving Fund. The Forster property west of Zachary Playfield is being negotiated and will likely cost approximately $400,000. Director Blank will meet with the Director of Finance to project revenue and expenses for the remainder of the year to determine the unallocated balance available for new projects. He will come back in September to the Commission with these figures. Director Blank stated that the 1991 C.I.P. should be approved by Council at the July 22 meeting. U.S. Homes may be coming in with a plat for the Dunkirk -County Road 9 area, and a decision will have to be made by District 284 and the city as to whether to purchase the land needed for a new school and a playfield. The school district has a need to build a new junior high or senior high. Nearly all of the current schools are in the southern part of the district. They would very much like to build in conjunction with a new city playfield, as less land is needed that way. In order for U.S. Homes to develop this land, it would have to be reguided. The money for the purchase could be borrowed from the other funds, and park dedication fees could pay it back. Director Blank felt that 1992 should be a slow year for building, which should allow the park dedication fees to replenish. Commissioner Waage asked about anticipated trails in 1992. Would a trail be constructed on County Road 47? Director Blank said that this was possible. Ditches along the road make a class 1 trail impossible, but a bike lane could be constructed by paving the shoulder. A trail in this area could become a priority with the construction of the new Bass Lake playfield. b. Review of field rental fees. Mary Bisek stated that when the playfields were opened nine years ago, the payment structure was set up to allow no charges for league play and end of season tournaments. A fee has been charged when the associations host an invitational tournament for which they charge fees. Additional charges are also collected if extra set up is involved, such as lining new fields, etc. We have allowed them to provide their own field attendants if they wish to save money on their fees. Tournaments do cause greater wear and tear on the fields, especially if the tournament directors let the play go on under wet conditions. Mary surveyed 17 communities and found that half charged fees for these tournaments, two others charged for maintenance costs, and that Burnsville is considering instituting fees. Mary also presented the bill for the Wayzata/Plymouth Soccer Club's tournament which was recently held in the city involving over 90 teams. They had gone to the Council and asked for it to be reduced. The Council approved that it be reduced by half. Director Blank said that PRAC needed to look at this issue. July 1991 PRAC Minutes Page 24 Chair Freels opened discussion by asking if the fee had ever been waived or reduced before. Director Blank said that the Wayzata/Plymouth Soccer Club had gone before the council three time's before and had been turned down. Commissioner Waage asked if PRAC was to discuss giving approval for fee reductions for years to come. She couldn't understand why the soccer club received approval for this. Commissioner Anderson also asked why this was done. Director Blank said that the association told the Council that the fee was so high they couldn't make a profit. Commissioner Johnson said it could be a good reason if field rental was competitive and the tournaments could go somewhere else. Commissioner Wahl asked how many tournaments are held in a year. Director Blank replied that only one this major is held. He also said that the associations couldn't go to a different community because the other cities wouldn't want to incur the wear and tear on their fields for the profit of a different city's youth association. Commissioner Watson agreed that extra charges should be paid for extraordinary maintenance. Chair Freels felt uncomfortable with the fee reduction, because if you give it to one group, all of them will want it. Since the association covered the $2,600 charged last year, a fee of $3,080 for this year was not much more. Commissioner Waage felt a 50i reduction was excessive. Commissioner Johnson asked if the associations had sponsors to help cover their expenses. Director Blank thought that they did. Commissioner Johnson asked if $1000 per day for the tournament was high - are we out of line compared to the other communities? Mary Bisek pointed out that this involved 13 fields, and Director Blank noted that there was extra set up to paint extra fields. Commissioner Waage felt that the fee was in line with the other cities. Chair Freels asked if the fees were fair and equitable. Mary said that Plymouth is not at the top of the fees list for comparable communities, and that our fields are top quality. She feels comfortable with the fee structure. Commissioner Anderson suggested that PRAC talk to the associations. Chair Freels asked that PRAC invite the youth athletic associations to the next meeting in September to discuss this issue. 6. NEW BUSINESS None 7. COMMISSION PRESENTATION Chair Freels issued a welcome to all the new members of the commission. 8. STAFF COMMUNICATION none. 9. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Minutes of the Special Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting July 23, 1991 Page 25 Present: Chair Freels, Commissioners Anderson, Waage, Wahl, Gutzke, Johnson; staff Blank and Pederson Absent: Commissioner Watson 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Freels called the special meeting to order at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Director Blank briefly updated the residents in attendance on the planning process regarding the three parks on the agenda. Two were planned improvements and the third was new construction. All three began as a result of residents petitioning the City, and the improvements proposed for Shiloh and Gleanloch were placed in the 1991 CIP. The request to build the 10th Avenue Park was received after the CIP had been approved by the Council, but the Council agreed that a neighborhood park was needed in this area. Surveys were sent to residents asking for their opinion on how the parks should be improved. After the design consultant had reviewed all the surveys, preliminary plans were sketched and presented at neighborhood meetings. Based on resident input at those meetings, the plans were refined to reflect the needs of the neighborhood residents. Director Blank further explained that this evening's park commission meeting would be another opportunity for residents to voice their concerns before the plans are forwarded to the City Council. He also stated that the Park Commission had three options at this point, and those were to approve the concept plans, approve the concept plans with amendments, or defer action for further study. He stated that no further notices would be sent to residents, and that if the plans were recommended for approval at this meeting, they would be on the City Council's August 5 agenda. 2. 10TH AVENUE PARK Design consultant, Barry Warner, presented the concept plan for 10th Avenue Park and described the facilities. He explained that the house that exists on the site at this time will be removed and the garage may be redone to accommodate a shelter of some kind, whether it be for skating or picnicking. He stated that although parking is shown on the plan, it is not being recommended for inclusion at this time. When asked about the cost to remove the house, Mr. Warner stated that a salvage company would be taking care of it at no cost to the City. Wayne Enos, 10850 So. Shore Drive, stated that he had just recently moved to this area and felt the situation here was deplorable in terms of the safety of the children. He stated that he has witnessed on many occasions children playing in the street, and he feels the park is needed and should be built immediately. He wholeheartedly approved the proposed concept plan. Chair Freels inquired about the cost to make the garage into a picnic shelter as opposed to turning it into a warming house. Director Blank stated that a picnic shelter would cost about $5,000 and a warming house would run about $20,000. Special PRAC Meeting July 23, 1991 Page 26 Some of the residents stated that they would prefer a warming house and felt confident they could get the neighborhood to volunteer to staff it in the winter. Commissioners concurred in their support of the overall concept plan for the 10th Avenue park. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MARLENE WAAGE AND SECONDED BY TOM JOHNSON TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONCEPT PLAN WITH AN OPEN AIR PICNIC SHELTER INSTEAD OF A WARMING HOUSE, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT A WARMING HOUSE WOULD BE CONSIDERED IF THE COST ESTIMATE COULD BE REDUCED AND IF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD VOLUNTEER TO STAFF IT. THE MOTION CARRIED WITH ALL AYES. 3. GLEANLOCH PARK Mr. Warner described the layout of this park and stated that the trail would have a new 750 foot section added to it to link it to the existing trail and that it would wind around the wetlands. Wyatt Gutzke asked about trees and was told they would be added at the forester's discretion. Tom Johnson wondered if the new trail segment would be underwater since its location in the park is in rather a low area. Mr. Warner responded that wherever possible, it will be placed on higher ground and it will have a new type of fabric underlayment to help prevent it eroding away. Residents asked if the basketball court would have two baskets to accommodate different age levels. Mr. Warner stated that it could have two hoops, one on either and of the hard court area. No residents from the Gleanloch area spoke on behalf of this park. The Park Commission was unanimous in its support of the proposed concept plan. A MOTION WAS MADE BY DONALD ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY MARK WAHL TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE GLEANLOCH CONCEPT PLAN AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED WITH ALL AYES. 4. SHILOH PARK In response to a resident's question regarding where the funding is coming from to improve these parks, Director Blank explained park dedication fees. No tax dollars will be used to build these parks, but it is necessary to use tax dollars to maintain them. Barry Warner described the improvements to Shiloh Park and explained that a 100 foot section of trail will be added leading to the Shiloh Pond, which will make it easier for maintenance to get in and flood in the winter. The play structure area will be relocated to higher ground to prevent flooding of that area. The informal ball field in the northeast corner of the open area is set back 120 feet from residents' lot lines, and there will be a one -section backstop. A double tennis court is proposed for the upper part of the park. No lighting is proposed for the tennis courts and no parking is planned. Benches will be located near the play structure and near the tennis court. The park with tennis courts is estimated at $100,000. Brad Barks, 2600 Jewel Lane, feels it's a good plan, very usable, is glad about no parking lot and feels there is a safe distance between home plate and the play structure. Special PRAC Meeting July 23, 1991 Page 27 Melissa Barks, 2600 Jewel Lane, likes the park plan also. Joanne Dunnigan, 17330 28th Ave., objects to the backstop, but likes the plan otherwise. She feels the backstop identifies it as a ballfield and will attract power hitters and baseball. She is also concerned about the grading and flooding of the park. Mr. Warner explained that the grading will not change the drainage areas, but will channel it elsewhere. Tim Dunnigan, 17330 28th Ave., believes baseball will be played there and he does not want the backstop. He is afraid that some power hitters will knock the ball 300 or more feet, which will result in balls coming into his yard. Although his yard is fenced, because he has a dog, he is afraid that kids will try to climb into his yard to retrieve balls, and the family dog is very protective of their property. He does not want to be responsible for injuries as a result of someone crawling over his fence. He also believes the tennis court should be moved closer to the "active" area of the park. He suggested that basketball be designed for adults and kids, with two hoops at different heights. Mr. Warner stated that the tennis courts could be moved to an area near the play structure, but that would require soil improvements in that location. Right now, the tennis courts are on the best soils in the park. Jean Halvorson, 2620 Holly Lane, is looking forward to the improvements and is glad about the backstop. She states that pitching to small children is very tedious and now the backstop will stop all those missed balls. She would like more benches located along the open field area. She also approves of the tennis courts where they are proposed. Marianne Hartshorn, 17125 30th Ave., likes the tennis courts and wants a bench placed near the pond for putting on her ice skates in the winter. She also likes the sledding area and wants the tennis courts located in such a way so as not to disturb this area. She feels the tennis courts should be fenced in. She also favors the backstop. Mr. Warner claimed that the tennis courts could be moved slightly to accommodate sledding and at least two sides of the courts would be fenced. Margaret Hurst, 2625 Holly Lane, likes the concept plan and feels it appeals to all ages. Would like a picnic table placed somewhere near the play structure. Curt Hustad, 17200 27th Ave., lives on the larger pond and is pleased about the path going to the pond, would like a bench located there, likes the placement of the ballfield and approves of the tennis courts but wants them moved slightly to accommodate the sledding hill. He does not think the tennis courts should be moved down to the active play area, because it might require the removal of too many trees. Director Blank, in response to a question about winter flooding of the pond, said that our park maintenance crews cannot drive onto the ponds until the ice is at least 10 to 12 inches thick. The kids who want to get out there and play hockey and general skating can walk out on the ice much sooner than the crews can drive on it, so they go ahead and start shoveling an area and in the process berms of ice get built up, which prohibit the maintenance crews from doing the best job possible. So, in Special PRAC Meeting July 23, 1991 Page 28 order to get the best ice surface, Director Blank suggested that people stay off the ice until maintenance can get there, or else shovel the entire pond rather than small areas. The pond will also be signed with no snowmobiling," in response to a resident who said they've had problems with that in the past. Mary Hustad, 17200 27th Ave., likes the plan, wants the backstop, and thanked the commissioners and staff for designing a plan based on what the residents wanted. Rick Graft (no address given), sent in written comments which were read at the meeting. He is interested in having trees and shrubbery cleared in the pond area, a low backstop, and modernization and relocation to higher ground of the play structure. If demand exists, he thinks tennis courts would be a great improvement. He does not want parking or any additional lighting. Fran Jack, 2640 Jewel Lane, is concerned about the landscaping around the play structure. In addition to canopy trees, she recommends low and high trees to screen the area. She believes that the relocation of the play structure closer to the pond is a bad idea and fears that children will wander too close to the water. Mr. Warner explained that its proposed location is 130 feet from the pond but it could be placed so that it is 150-175 feet from the pond. W. Rayford Johnson, 3010 Holly Lane, is pleased overall with the plan. His teenage daughters will especially enjoy the tennis courts. He thinks it would be a good idea to light the tennis courts and have coin operated meters. He would like the park to have a building for social gatherings and a wading pool for smaller children to use. He thinks the basketball court should have two tiers for different age levels and should have the cushioned, more modern surface. He would like the basketball court moved over toward the pond and the play structure moved to where the hard court is proposed. He believes the playground structure should have some features that will be challenging to the handicapped. He supports the backstop and would like the pond to be stocked with fish. Mr. Warner responded that it was not cost effective to move the basketball court because of the soils in that area, and that the cushioned surface Mr. Johnson referred to is very costly. Lights over the tennis courts are a possibility but are also costly. Staff explained that a wading pool was also very costly to install and maintain and that it was not likely the DNR would stock the pond with fish. The pond is not deep enough, and the fish would die over the winter. Si Matthies, 17220 27th Ave., lives between the two ponds. He feels that the plan addresses all levels and ages. He wondered what the play structure would be like, and it was suggested by staff that he visit Swan Lake or St. Mary's neighborhood parks, because the play equipment will be similar to those. He was concerned about the runoff into the ponds and wondered if the ponds had drainage. Staff indicated that they did. Vicki Menne, 17320 28th Ave., supports the plan but doesn't want the backstop. She lives close to it and does not want her yard to become an extension of the park. She asked what the backstop would look like. Mr. Warner stated it would be wire mesh and cage like, about 10-12 feet high and 30 feet long. Special PRAC Meeting July 23, 1991 Page 29 Diane McClelland, 2720 Garland Lane, agrees with the idea of an informal ballfield, and she likes the playground. She wondered if anything could be done about the goose droppings, to which staff replied "not much." Sara Olsen, 17110 28th Place, likes the plan and wants the tennis courts, but no lights. She also supports the backstop and requested picnic tables. Kate Kane, 17115 28th Place, thanked the Commission and staff for inviting residents to comment. She is happy with the plan and likes the informal playfield. She was informed the playground area would include two sand diggers. She requested a domed play structure. She asked if the ballfield would be reserved by organized teams and was informed by staff that we do not schedule or reserve neighborhood parks. It is possible that youth athletic coaches may organize practices at that site. Cindy Nidetz, 17135 29th Ave., likes the tennis courts and the overall park plan. She supports the backstop. Erin O'Neill, 2630 Jewel Lane, lives on the pond and also feels that the playground is going to be too close to the water. Marlene Waage commented that she has a playground in her neighborhood that is only 60 feet from a pond, and they have never had any problems with the children wandering over to the water. Joan Schwarze, 2640 Holly Lane, appreciated the planning process and wants the Commission to approve the plan. Charles Smith, 17125 28th Place, approves the plan as proposed and feels that a one sided backstop would be sufficient. Kathy Kelly, 2735 Jewel Lane, would like "no parking" signs placed along Jewel. Staff indicated they would have the Public Safety department look into this. Wayne Stevens, 2635 Holly Lane, used to live in Brooklyn Park near a park that had a backstop and it did not attract power hitters. He thinks the plan is workable. Brian Younger, 2695 Jewel Lane, stated that the backstop seemed to be a major concern, so he kept a tally of those in favor of the backstop and reported that so far, 15 out of 18 support it. Nancy Younger, 2695 Jewel Lane, approves the park and likes the plan. Mark Utter, 17130 29th Ave., does not want the tennis court and feels they do not belong in neighborhood parks. He would like the sliding hill left as is. He is concerned that if a tennis court is installed, it may some day be lighted. He would prefer to have a second play structure installed in the spot proposed for the tennis courts. Upon inquiring on the price for another play structure, he was told it would be approximately $35,000, which is the same as the cost for the tennis courts. Special PRAC Meeting July 23, 1991 Page 30 Kathy Burns, 2425 Olive Lane, is in favor of the plan. She loves baseball and tennis and wants picnic tables. She lives four blocks away from the park and usually bikes there, but would be upset if "no parking" signs were installed as she sometimes drives her car to the park. Mary Lou Wallach, 2810 Holly Lane, supports the overall park plan, and she requests picnic tables. She doesn't think the playground/pond proximity will be a problem. Lou Bolwahnn, 2910 Jewel Lane, feels the park plan is excellent and he wants the tennis court. If tennis is not approved for the park, he requests that the turf in that location be improved, so more activities can be played there. John Frees, 2900 Jewel Lane, favors the tennis courts. His teenagers will use it a lot. Prior to Chair Freels closing the public meeting, residents stated they would try to keep the kids off the pond in the winter so maintenance can get in and make the skating area larger than they've been able to in the past. Another resident indicated she didn't think the pond would pose a problem. with the playground as the kids who use this park have to walk around, over, or near the water every time they are in the park. Some residents asked that "no golfing" signs be posted. Director Blank did encourage residents to call the police when activities like golfing or snowmobiling were taking place as they are prohibited, and the police are sensitive to this. Staff informed the residents that the playground equipment is chosen after the Council approves the concept plan and that four criteria are considered: safety, is it fun, it must be usable by multi -ages, and ease of maintenance. Staff further stated that if the plan is approved by the Council, building could begin in the fall. A residentwondered if a second playground would be considered if the Council did not approve the tennis courts. Chair Freels explained that the funds available for this park were determined in the 1991 CIP and although it might not be possible to construct a second playground this year, residents could petition for one at a later time. Commissioner Mark Wahl favors only one tennis court in this park and is concerned that it could cause parking problems. He does not support off- street parking. Commissioner Wyatt Gutzke also feels one court would be ample but wants it turned north -south and moved farther away from residents' homes. He supports the addition of picnic tables and believes an eight foot high backstop would be sufficient and would not block the residents' view of the pond. Commissioner Tom Johnson supports two tennis courts but wants them placed so they do not interfere with the sliding hill. He wants adjustable basketball or two hoops, and picnic tables. He asked if the old playground location would be a feasible site for a future parking lot and was told it would require significant grading and tree removal. Special PRAC Meeting July 23, 1991 Page 31 Commissioner Marlene Waage favors two tennis courts because two are more economical and she feels the backstop is a necessity. Commissioner Don Anderson likes the concept plan but believes that parking could be a problem. Chair Freels approves of the plan with two tennis courts, no lights, backstop, picnic tables, additional benches, and improved drainage. Commissioner Mary Kay Watson was not able to attend but sent in written comments stating she supports moving the playground to higher ground, thinks the backstop is a good idea, supports tennis courts but does not want them to interfere with the sledding area. She favors clearing an area around the pond for better view but not so much to invite late night revelers and inappropriate play. She supports added benches and picnic tables. A MOTION WAS MADE BY DON ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY WYATT GUTZKE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SHILOH PARK CONCEPT PLAN AS PRESENTED, WITH SOME ADDITIONAL BENCHES AND PICNIC TABLES. THE MOTION CARRIED WITH FIVE AYES. MARK WAHL SUPPORTED THE OVERALL PARK PLAN BUT FELT THAT ONLY ONE TENNIS COURT WAS NEEDED, THEREFORE, HE VOTED NAY. Chair Freels thanked the residents for attending and reminded them this item would be on the City Council's August 5 agenda. 5. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:05 p.m. MAP PROGRAM NO. YEAR 1991- 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM PARKS DESCRIPTION 1 1991 Shiloh Park Redevelopment 2 1991 Gleanloch Park Playground 3 1993 Iia Plymouth Creek Park - Tennis Courts 4 1991 Fazendin Neighborhood Park - Bridge 5 1991 Four Seasons Park - Bridge 6 1991 Ridgemount Playfield - Irrigation 7 1991 10th Avenue Neighborhood Park Development 1991 Trail Improvements 8 1991 Parkers Lake and Bass Lake Playfields 9 1991 Zachary Playfield Land Acquisition 10 1992 County Road 9 and Fernbrook Lane Neighborhood Park Acquisition/Development 11 19'42 (43 West Medicine Lake Park Development - Phase I 12 194,- qy Trail - Zachary Lane from Old County Road 9 to County Road 10 1992 Trail Improvements 13 1993 Mud Lake Neighborhood Park Development 14 1943 q4 West Medicine Lake Park Development - Phase II 15 1993 Ridgemount Playfield Shelter Building 1993 Trail Improvements 16 1994 County Road 101 and County Road 24 Neighborhood Park 17 1994 Plymouth Creek Park - Dredging of Pond 1994 Trail Improvements 18 199-5 Vicksburg Lane and 22nd Avenue Neighborhood Park Development 1995 Trail Improvements RpN W E CIT1`/ L 1 OF SCALE OF PILES PLYMOUTH- t Y 6 t S j F E Sxii 9I:iQ3.i LI PPI [yi 9?xPS,• {Y•l IP L. }_@.@§!@T @P•: %Y.i@6:@: Li. L 9 yf S[lQ pp e1.l Sk x!'Lt'L YIL SSxL :pYL( [I tYtLY Y y3C ^P::L:'633 :.t='3tYF!Eii Q 3firs.r5 !P[..!§..;..YQSr.YE3.::.Q_P v STREET MAP 1991-1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PARKS mN , rN"S. 1r3 Icy 2- A\\ 149 012 Q't°t( tl 1$ 11'ta 4--af I l_\ ffil I VIM STREET MAP 1991-1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PARKS mN , rN"S. 1r3 Icy 2- A\\ 149 012 Q't°t( tl 1$ 11'ta 0 MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: September 9, 1991 TO: PRAC FROM: Mary Bisek, Superintendent of Recreation /%1A SUBJECT: TOURNAMENT CHARGES SURVEY The attached tournament charges survey compares the costs (in seven different communities) of running the exact tournament that was put on by the Wayzata Soccer Association in 1991 . (Most of these communities would not be able to host the tournament since they do not have sufficient fields.) It should be noted that two of the communities require the association to carry $600,000 worth of co-insurance. The cost of the insurance is not included in the tournament cost figures. Also, the amount of assistance provided in field maintenance varies, because some communities do not have field attendants. If you have any questions regarding the survey information, please feel free to call me at 550-5132. np attachment TOURNAMENT CHARGES SURVEY 100 REFUNDABLE DAMAGE DEPOSIT FOR TOURNAMENTS. CO-INSURANCE OF $600,000 REQUIRED. CO-INSURANCE OF $600,000 REQUIRED. I ANOKA I BLAINE I COON RAP. I EAGAN I FRIDLEY I MAPLE GRV I PLYMOUTH FIELD RENTAL I $100/day/ I $75/field/I 1 per I $35/field/I 159 hours I $30/field 1 106 gms. 106 games I complex. I day. I person. I day (youthl x $10/hr I /day. I x 1.5 hr 159 hours I Most 2 fldl 10 flds x I I rate). I I I /gm = 10 fields I at locat'n 3 days x I Approx. I I 1 10 fields 1 $159 hrs 3 days I x 51= $500 75 1 15 x 90 1 10 fields I I x 3 days x $15/hr I x 3d= 15001 1 teams = I x 3 days I I x $30 = 1= 1 $25 ea. I I I x $35 = site for I I restrooms I I I x51=$1251 1 1 1 1 1 1 x 3d= $3751 1 1 1 1 1 1 = $1,875 2,250 1 $1,350 1,050 81,590 1 $ 900 1 $2,385 FIELD ATTENDANT NA Full time NA. Attendant I NA I Field att.1 6 hrs. 6 hours Must clean staff on All labor included I Do not I required I x $8/hr. restrooms overtime provided in rental I have field for 3 1 1 after 1 pay. by Ath. of bldg. 1 attend. sites @ 1 1 event, or 1 6 hrs. x l Assoc. 1 2 cmplx x 1 1 $7/hr. 1 1 charged. 1 $20/hr. 1 50 ea. = 100. 5 1 sat. x $161 1 cleaning x1 y 1 $ 240s 120 1 $340. 8519 48 LIGHTS Included 7 hrs. x I No charge.) 7 hrs. x NA 7 hrs. x 7 hrs. 7 hours in rental 15/hr. I $25/hr. 15/hr: x $20/hr. I fee. I I (not availl able but would chrgllifhad lights) 105 175 105 TOTAL I 1,875 I 2,475* I 1,350 I 1,565** I 1,590 I 1,524 5140 2,573 100 REFUNDABLE DAMAGE DEPOSIT FOR TOURNAMENTS. CO-INSURANCE OF $600,000 REQUIRED. CO-INSURANCE OF $600,000 REQUIRED. Soccer Times q Z: 1991 Minnesota Youth Soccer" aAssociation'l Vit ti I' n HOST CLUB AGE LEVELS May2-5 Champlin-Dayton.0*,;Boys &Girls U12-14 Open 16 9 But May 17-19 BI ;as e ne Elite Boys & Girls U6-10 Open;Boys & Girls dl-19,Div i-3 Edi Boys & Girls U12-16 Open un cMay24-26 Roc -ster Boys & Girls uib 6p6j;;Boy& Girls U1244, Divs.. 2_ May. 30.June 2 Bla, 19, Divs. 24Boys & Girls U10 - Steve May 31 -June Valley Boys& Girls U16-11 Divs. 2-4 c CMay31 -June 2 "'Mai iebrook Boys & Girls 12-17 Open dufie (TBA) Stat, Cup Play,49wris Boys & Girls U12-19, Div. 2 John MoraJunel=2NESA Boys & Girls U10 Open, , chinJune7-9 ,Apple Valley,_.. Boys & Girls U10-14, Divs. 2-4 JoyceJune7-9 River Falls Boys U10 Open; Boys U12-191 Div. 3 elJune13-16 Burnsville Boys U10 Open; Boys U12-19, Divs. 2-4 June 14 Champlin Boys & Girls U10 Open; Boys & Girls U12-19, Divs.'3 June 14-16 'Star of the North Boys & Girls U10 Open; Boys & Girls U12-19, Divi. June 21-23 Burnsville Girls UIO-19 Open Jud Theijune,21- 23Rosemount Boys&Girls U10&170pen;Boy U12-4s&Girls, VS. une2123 4&ar of the North. -Boys & Girls U12-19, Div. 2 Barb Bis4o 30 'Bloomington Boys U12,16,17, Divs. 3-4; Boys U14, Div 2 -4 - Phil Gilm, Girls U12, Div. 3; Girls U14-17, Divs. 3 4June28-30 'Coon Rapids Boys & Girls U12-19, Divs. 3-4 Sh aren LeItifie28-30 Lakeville Boys & Girls U10 Open; Boys U12, Divs. 3-4; -Josie K1et Boys U14, Div. 3; Boys U16, Divs. 2-3; Boys U19 n; Girls U12-14, Div. 3; Girls U17'& 19 Open 28-30 Moorhead Boys U16 Divs. 2-3; Girls U16 Open Jim Hes sen" c,unW18-30 '-Wayzata/Plymouth Boys & Girls U12-19, Divs. 2-4 John Danii Eden Prairie Boys U10 Open; Boys U12-16, Divs. 2-3; Steve h, 31 Boys U19, Div. 3; Girls UIO-19 Open Minneapolis United Boys& Girls UIO-19 Open John. I. 41 USA Cup wtml A.july 7-13 Boys & Girls U 12-19 Open N. 41442-14 Rochester Boys & Girls U16-19, Divs. 2-4; :Ricer-;;MN World Cup Boys & Girls U14, Divs. 2-4 1,-F n. ItITIM,T'7.'1, o i ti.(612) ere; son; (715) 612). April,! g9v