HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 01-02-1998JANUARY 2, 1998
1. COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE.
NOTE: Ward 1 Councilmember Tim Bildsoe meets with residents and receives their
comments in the Administration Library, beginning at 6:00 PM before each
Regular Council meeting.
JANUARY 7, 6:30 PM
JANUARY 7, 7:00 PM
JANUARY 21, 7:00 PM
2. MONDAY, JANUARY 5, 5-7 PM
3. TUESDAY, JANUARY 6, 7: 00 PM
4. WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 7, 5:30 PM
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
Topics: Deputy Mayor; Council Coordinating
Representative (CCR). Memo calling meeting is
attached.
Medicine Lake Room
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Council Chambers
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Council Chambers
OPEN HOUS&INFORMATIONAL MEETING
ON 2ACHAR YLANE IMPROVEMENTS,
PROJECT NO. 5030
Council Chambers
PLANNING COMMISSION, Council Chambers.
Agenda is attached.
COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE ONACTIVITY
CENTER, Mooney Lake Room
5. THURSDAY, JANUARY 8, 7: 00 PM PRAC, Council Chambers
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO
January 2, 1998
6. THURSDAY, JANUARY 8, 7:30 PM
7. TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 7: 00 PM
8. THURSDAY, JANUARY 15, 7: 00 PM
9. THURSDAY, JANUARY 15, 7: 00 PM
Page 2
PLYMOUTH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION,
Medicine Lake Room
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE,
Hadley Lake Room
HRA, Medicine Lake Room
PUBLIC SAFETYAD VISOR Y BOARD, Public
Safety Training Room
b. Two December 28, 1997 Star Tribune news articles concerning the use of work
release program participants in the suburbs. (I -1b)
C. Public Safety Department news release regarding the December 28 barricaded
suspect incident in Plymouth. (I -1c)
d. Plymouth Community Development newsletter, Northwest Notes. (I -1d)
e. News release regarding the first anniversary performance of the Plymouth
Playhouse review, How to Talk Minnesotan: the Musical. (I -1e)
f. Invitation to the January 5 Hennepin County Commissioners' kick-off for the
1998 ant -tobacco campaign. (I -1j)
g. Agenda for Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission January 8
meeting. (1--1g)
h. Agenda for Minnesota Environmental Trust Fund Coalition January 12 meeting.
(I-1 h)
2. MEETING MINUTES
a. Planning Commission December 16, 1997 meeting. (I -2a)
b. Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission November 13 meeting. (1--2b)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO Page 3
January Z 1998
C. Minnesota Environmental Trust Fund Coalition November 4 meeting. (I -2c)
3. CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONS POLICY— CORRESPONDENCE
A status report on the most recent correspondence is attached. (1-3)
4. CORRESPONDENCE
a. Letter from Robert Hall regarding discussion at the December 10 Council study
session concerning the proposed revision to the City "all -way" stop sign policy.
(I -4a) ft
b. Letter from Plymouth Fine Arts Council President Georgann Bestler Wenisch
regarding the proposal to display art in City offices.(I-4b)
C. Correspondence from Sugar Hills Townhome Association Vice President Don
Butler regarding the proposed business development at 36' and Vicksburg Lane.
(1-4c)
d. Letter from Sugar Hills Townhome Association Vice President Don Butler to
Public Safety Director Craig Gerdes regarding traffic near the proposed business
development at 36' and Vicksburg Lane. (I -4d)
e. Letter from City Assessor Nancy Bye to Jerry Chmielewski regarding his property
valuation. Attached is Chmielewski's original letter. (1--4e)
f. Letter from Raymond Jorgensen regarding the DNR request for comments on the
Luce Line Trail. Also attached are copies of a Sun Sailor news story, and a Sun
Sailor editorial by Jorgensen on the topic.(I-4j)
g. Letter from the Minnesota Department of Health regarding bacteriological
monitoring requirements in Plymouth. (I -4g)
®ow.,,
/Vill
-i
December 30, 1997 CITU C
PLYMOUTR
I hereby call a special meeting of the Plymouth City Council to begin at 6:30 p.m. on
Wednesday, January 7, 1998. The meeting will be held in the Medicine Lake Conference
Room, 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Topics to be discussed are Deputy Mayor and Council
Coordinating Representative (CCI'.) appointments.
Joy ie ey, Mayor
PLYMOUTH A BeautifulP[ace To Live
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD • PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447-1482 • TELEPHONE (612) 509-5000
www.d.plymouth.mn.us
October 16, 1997
ciry of
PLYMOU?Et
«PIN»
OwnerName»
«HOA»
«Address»
-City-, ((St. «ZIP.
SUBJECT: ZACHARY LANE IMPROVEMENTS
36TH AVENUE TO BASS LAKE ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 10)
CITY PROJECT NO. 5030
Dear Resident:
This is to inform you that we will be having an open house on Monday, January 5, 1998,
between 5:00 and 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, to let
you review the preliminary plans, receive an update on the Zachary Lane Improvement Project,
and give any additional comments. We have taken the input received at the October 27 public
meeting and prepared the required Preliminary Engineering Report and Plan which the City
Council received at their December 3 meeting.
The report recommends that the improvement of Zachary Lane be a curvilinear two lane, 32 foot
wide roadway with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, with a 10 foot wide bituminous trail
from 36' Ave :ue to County Road 10 and medians with turn lanes at County Road 9 and Zachary
Lane School. Turn lanes without medians are proposed at Schmidt Lake Road and 36' Avenue.
If you are unable to attend the open house on January 5, a copy of the report will be available for
your review in the Engineering Department at the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth
Boulevard. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact me at 509-
5520 or Dan Campbell at 509-5522.
Sincerely,
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
City Engineer
cc: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
PLYMOUTH A Beau tijull'fai G!rRwltw eering\PROJECIS\530\LTRS\Zachary_frm 3.doc
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD - PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447-1482 • TELEPHONE (612) 509-5000
®:.b,.•Y7• www.d.plymouth.mn.us
® PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 6, 1998
WHERE: Plymouth City Center
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will
be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner,
citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in normal sequence on the agenda.
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. PUBLIC FORUM
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
5. *CONSENT AGENDA
A. Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District. Site Plan Amendment for construction of a 192
square foot storage shed for trail grooming equipment in French Regional Park. (97175)
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Homestead Village, Inc. Sketch Plan for a 122 -unit extended stay hotel located east of Nathan
Lane North, south of State Highway 55, and west of Highway 169. (97051)
B. Matthew McLeod and Leslie McLeod Jackson. Minor Variance to allow construction of a
three season porch onto an existing deck at 5267 Ximines Lane North. The proposed porch
would encroach 5.5 feet into the required 25 -foot front yard setback. (97174)
C. City of Plymouth. Amending the text of Chapter 21 of the Plymouth City Code, the Plymouth
Zoning Ordinance to permit radio receivers and transmitters in connection with essential
services, and wireless antennas and communication facilities in City rights-of-way. (97176)
7. NEW BUSINESS
8. ADJOURNMENT
i:� j , I 0
H
U
Q
SIN
COO
I
I
cis
I
II
M
z•�
O
I
T
79
O
V
If
p
ul
Y~.. �
I
Lo
h
Cd
,s
00
I'a]
b
zo
lZ0o
am
�Oz
O
02
U
pn�.
0U
``
tLz
a
Up
QExIm
33w
o
DU
o'
2U
c
v
U 0.8
a
v, —UIM
�o
a
�
j
r
j
I
N
j
i
Ci
LUv- o`MianosM/C
Cia" promoting e=ff""
December 19, 1997
To: Mayors of LMCIT member cities
From: LMCIT Board of Trustees
Jim Antonen, City Manager, Moorhead
Les Heitke, Mayor, Willmar
Jim Miller, LMC Executive Director
Re: 1997 LMCIT dividends
145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
Phone: (612) 281-1200 - (800) 925-1122
Fax: (612) 281-1299 - TDD (612) 281-1290
Karen Anderson, Mayor, Minnetonka
Todd Pra&e, City Administrator, St. Peter
As you know, the LMCIT property/casualty program is returning $12 million to member cities as
a dividend this year. Members of the LMCIT workers compensation program will also share in a
$4 million dividend to be distributed in April, 1998. We'd like to offer you our congratulations
on what you've accomplished by cooperating through LMCIT and by your commitment to
reducing claims and losses.
We've enclosed a chart showing your city's share of this year's LMCIT property/casualty
dividend, how that compares with your premiums, and what your city's past premiums and
dividends have been. The amount of each city's dividend depends on the city's total premiums
and losses for all the years you've been a member of LMCIT. The longer you've been a member
and the more successful you've been in avoiding losses, the greater your city's dividend.
This is the eleventh consecutive year the LMCIT property/casualty program has returned a
dividend to its members. This
year's dividend brings the total
to just under $91 million since
1987. That's equal to 31% of
the cities' property/casualty
premiums for that period.
LMCIT's work comp members
have also received substantial
dividends in the past few years:
$5.4 million in 1993 and $8.5
million in 1997, with another
$4 million to be distributed to
members next April.
Premiums and Dividends
LMCIT Property/casualty Program
$40
$30
0
$20
$10
$0
'87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97
pPremium GoDividend
-OVER-
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Work program sends prisoners to suburbs - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 2 of 3�
1
11 11 R o I 1610 R A List Next 0� ✓
Published Sunday, December 28. 1997
Work program sends prisoners to
startribune.com suburbs
l Metro Associated Press
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -- Convicted felons, including a few
murderers, work in two of the Twin Cities safest and most
affluent suburbs.
Plymouth and Eden Prairie, along with the Hennepin Parks
system, participate in a 2 -year-old state program that puts
inmates who have been convicted of more serious offenses to
work in local communities.
"A lot of these are long-term felony offenders," said Todd
Johnson, a state corrections supervisor. "They all get to get
released someday. This program helps them get started."
The state's Institution Community Work Crew program,
involving about two dozen prisoners, has drawn praise from
T� city and state officials, but criticism from some city workers.
In Plymouth, where city employees are negotiating a new
union contract, workers complain that inmates are taking their
`- jobs, are indistinguishable in appearance from city employees
and pose a safety concern as they work in parks and
community centers.
Sex offenders are not allowed to participate, corrections
officials said.
"You don't employ felons and prisoners in parks where kids
are playing," said Kurt Errickson, an Association of Federal,
State, County and Municipal Employees official representing
40 public works and parks employees in Plymouth.
The union's contract with the city expires Wednesday, and
union officials have tried to raise awareness of the issue at
City Council meetings and in letters to Plymouth's weekly
newspaper.
"We've seen minor incidents," said Errickson. "Oh, you know,
prisoners getting kids to try and buy them cigarettes or
whistling at girls as they walk by."
12/29/97 8:09:36 AM
Work program sends prisoners to suburbs - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 3 of 3
City officials denied there are problems -- or complaints from
residents -- and suggested that union representatives were
pushing the issue as a negotiating ploy. They added that many
of the jobs being done by inmates would not otherwise get
done, because the city lacked the necessary workers.
"I don't think we have a real safety issue here. Of course, that
is always a concern," said Joy Tierney, Plymouth's mayor.
"It's largely a union bargaining issue.
The program augments the more widely used Sentence to
Service project, which has 117 work crews around Minnesota
and uses inmates serving sentences in county jails. Inmates in
that program are normally serving time for lesser crimes,
usually involving jail terms of no more than a year.
While city parks and public works employees in Plymouth
average $16 an hour, the inmates are paid $1.60 an hour.
Plymouth last spring signed a two-year contract to participate
startribune.com in the program, which costs just under $30,000 a year.
Metro In Plymouth, the inmates have erected playground equipment,
painted the ceiling at a new ice arena and cleared timber and
brush in parks.
,& List Next
Copyright 1998 Associated Press. All rights reserved.
12/29/97 8:09:38 AM
Program uses convicted felons in Plymouth, Ed... - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 2 of 5
f�E1G0! EGI�� '4 Pre"io«s ALi5t ....
� ,•►" Published Sunday, December 28. 1997
, . r Program uses convicted felons in
startribune.com Plymouth, Eden Prairie
Metro Mike Kaszuba / Star Tribune
Twice every week, sometimes more often, state prison
inmates board a white van and head off to work in Hennepin
County. Many of the men in the van have felony drug
convictions. A few are convicted murderers.
Their primary destinations are Plymouth and Eden Prairie,
two of the Twin Cities' safest and most affluent suburbs.
Both cities, along with the Hennepin Parks system, are at the
forefront of a state program that's attempting to put inmates
who have been convicted of more serious offenses to work in
local communities.
In just the past few days, the inmates polished the plexiglass
at an indoor hockey arena in Eden Prairie and, on Christmas
Eve, chopped wood on city property next to Flying Cloud
Airport.
"A lot of these are long-term felony offenders," said Todd
Johnson, a state corrections supervisor, who watched as an
inmate powered up a chain saw. "They all get to get released
someday. This program helps them get started."
As a light snow fell, one inmate paused from work and said:
"[We're] not looking for any trouble. I think it's a good
program. It's a step toward getting out. Sure beats the hell out
of being inside."
The state's Institution Community Work Crew program,
involving about two dozen pris oners, has drawn praise from
city and state officials, but criticism from some city workers.
In Plymouth, for example, city workers complain that inmates
are taking their jobs.
Plymouth city workers also complain that inmates are
indistinguishable in appearance from city employees and that
they pose a safety concern.
12/29/97 8:10:06 AM
Program uses convicted felons in Plymouth, Ed... - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 3 of 5
Sex offenders are not allowed to participate, corrections L�
�b
officials said.
Surprisingly, the two-year-old program has found its greatest
success in communities where major crime is virtually
nonexistent but where public safety remains a concern.
So far, only Eden Prairie, Plymouth and the Hennepin Parks
system participate. Inmates working last week in Eden Prairie
were just a short distance from many large executive homes
with lawn signs warning of home security systems.
Unionscomplain
"You don't employ felons and prisoners in parks where kids
are playing," said Kurt Errickson, an Association of Federal,
State, County and Municipal Employees official representing
40 public works and parks employees in Plymouth. The
union's contract with the city expires New Year's Eve, and
union officials have tried to raise awareness of the issue at
City Council meetings and in letters to Plymouth's weekly
newspaper
"We've seen minor incidents," said Errickson. "Oh, you
know, prisoners getting kids to try and buy them cigarettes or
whistling at girls as they walk by."
City officials denied there are problems -- or complaints from
residents -- and suggested that union representatives were
pushing the issue as a negotiating ploy. They added that many
of the jobs being done by inmates would not otherwise get
done, because the city lacked the necessary workers.
"I don't think we have a real safety issue here. Of course, that
is always a concern," said Joy Tierney, Plymouth's mayor.
"It's largely a union bargaining issue.
"I had one call once because there was concern about some .
workers clearing some brush down by an elementary school,"
she said.
Though inmates long have been used on work crews across
Minnesota, the community work program uses state prison
inmates who generally have been convicted of more serious
offenses. Those who are chosen are usually within a year of
being eligible for work or supervised release.
"It can run the gamut," said Ron Solheid, a state corrections
official. "Typically, you'll have people there with theft
12/29/97 8:10:07 AM
Program uses convicted felons in Plymouth, Ed... - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 4 of,5
official. "Typically, you'll have people there with theft
[convictions], some felony -level driving offenders ... some
burglars."
The inmates in the program have sentences of at least a year
and a day, he said, and are serving time in a minimum
security compound next to Lino Lakes prison.
The program augments the more widely used Sentence to
Service project, which has 117 work crews around Minnesota
and uses inmates serving sentences in county jails. Inmates in
that program are normally serving time for lesser crimes,
usually involving jail terms of no more than a year.
'All workingtogether'
As he watched his crew of 12 inmates in Eden Prairie,
Johnson said he estimated that "75 percent of my people here
are on felony drug offenses. [There's] felony assaults,
vehicular homicide and homicide.
"I haven't experienced any problems with the men," he said.
"We all work together."
While city parks and public works employees in Plymouth
average $16 an hour, the inmates are paid $1.60 an hour.
Plymouth last spring signed a two-year contract to participate
in the program, which costs just under $30,000 a year.
"At times, these guys are indistinguishable from us," said
John Wenner, a city parks worker in Plymouth. "I'm not too
sure we want that as city workers.
startrihune.com "Some guys don't seem to have a huge problem [with it].
Other guys are uncomfortable," Wenner said of his
Metro colleagues. "I've seen the work they do. There's a lot of
baby-sitting that goes on."
In Plymouth, the inmates have erected playground equipment,
painted the ceiling at a new ice arena and cleared timber and
brush in parks.
"We haven't had any problems out here," said Wes
Dunsmore, an Eden Prairie maintenance supervisor. "That's
the first thing [people ask], 'What is it, murderers, rapists?'
They aren't sending high-risk people out here, or else we
wouldn't be participating."
44, Previous * List
12/29/97 8:10:07 AM
FAX MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
DATE: December 28, 1997
TO: Press
FROM: Lt. Saba, Plymouth Police Department
SUBJECT: Press Release Regarding Barricaded Suspect:
At 8:47 a.m. on Sunday morning, 12/28/97, the Plymouth Police Department received a radio
dispatch that there was a man with a gun in the produce section of Rainbow Foods. Rainbow
Foods is located in the Rockford Plaza Shopping Center on Rockford Road and Vinewood Lane
North in Plymouth. This location is two blocks northeast of Rockford Road and I 494 in
Plymouth.
The suspect ran out the back of the grocery store into a nearby residential neighborhood. He
forced his way into a house that was unoccupied. Officers determined that he was seen with a
knife and had unsuccessfully tried to commandeer a vehicle in the Rainbow Foods parking lot
before entering the store.
A perimeter was established and emergency response personnel were called from Plymouth,
Maple Grove and Champlin. Hennepin County Sheriff's Office and Plymouth Fire Dept.
provided command vehicle and communications equipment and support personnel. Officers
were able to negotiate with the suspect for a period of time. The suspect broke off
communications. After a period of over two hours, a decision was made to enter the house.
At 5:32 p.m. the same day, the ERU entry team along with Canine Officers arrested the suspect.
He was identified as follows:
Michael John Walker, DOB 01/27/68
There was an outstanding warrant for Walker's arrest from the Minnesota Correctional Facility at
Oak Park Heights. Walker had been committed in 1994 to the MSCF at Stillwater for terroristic
threats. He is now being held on probable cause for aggravated assault, burglary, criminal
damage to property, attempted car jacking and the outstanding warrant from Oak Park Heights.
The investigation continues. Additional information should be available on Monday, 12/29/97.
a*^W+�n--
i A!
• Planning Tactics report available • Call Community Development at 5095450 _ I
• Issues for northwest area Identified • Check the City Web Site at www.ci.plymouth.mn.us {j
• Community -wide planning issues • VOW us at AHurlbur0cci.plymouth.mn.us
A Newsletter for
ANResidents and
O west I° sue3
December 31,1997
rpITYC� Planning Tactics report available
PLYMOUTH Basic issues and objectives for plan update are identified
The first report prepared by
Northwest Associated Consultants
(NAC) for the Plymouth
Comprehensive Plan update is now
available. Planning Tactics
summarizes the consultant's individual
and group interviews with Plymouth's
elected and appointed officials and
senior staff, and with officials of
adjoining and affected units of
government. The report identifies the
basic issues and objectives that must be
addressed by the plan update for the
Northwest Plymouth area and for the
entire community. In addition to the
interviews, the consultants also
incorporated input received at the
May 14, 1997 forum for Northwest
Plymouth residents and landowners.
Interviewed for the report were the
Mayor and City Council members,
Planning Commissioners, Housing
and Redevelopment Authority, Park
and Recreation Advisory Committee
and Environmental Quality
Committee. Staff members from all
departments were interviewed for
their perspectives, as well as officials
from the school districts most affected
by the plan update (284/Wayzata and
279/Osseo) Contact was also made
with neighboring cities—Corcoran,
Maple Grove, Medina and Orono– to
determine how their planning relates
to Plymouth's.
Summary of PLANN/NG
TACTICS Findings
NAC found that City leaders and
staff recognize a broad and
encompassing list of issues and
opportunities which challenge
northwest Plymouth and the entire
community. While there are strong
opinions and a general consensus on
what concerns need to be addressed,
there is, however a lack of certainty as
to what the City's direction should be.
They are looking to the
comprehensive plan update to show
what options are available and what
they might mean for the City. They
agreed that besides being considered
on its own, the northwest area must
also be viewed from the perspective of
the overall community.
Northwest Plymouth Issues
Issues are listed in no particular
order or priority.
Gro-wtb/No Growth—Most
interview participants were uncertain
of what, if any, growth and
development is appropriate for
northwest Plymouth. There was a
general opinion that while some may
likely be acceptable, its extent is open
to question. Some commented that if
some development takes place it
should be phased and managed in an
orderly fashion. And preferably, it
should extend out from the existing
developed areas so that "islands"
isolated from the balance of the City
are not created
Horsing—Comments on housing
were wide-ranging. Many believe a
diversity of housing options should be
made available in the area. A general
consensus appears to exist that a
continuation and extension of
conventional single family
development is not preferred Several
suggested a "new urbanism" concept
in housing. Others stated that at least
a portion of the northwest area should
remain in large lot "rural"
development. The feeling was that
Plymouth should offer this housing
option, too, and that the northwest
area was the only location where such
a choice could exist.
Commercial/Industrial Uses– No
one seems to be looking toward the
northwest area for major commercial
activity, except perhaps some
convenience -type neighborhood
shopping. The feasibility of any
industrial development in the area was
questioned, unless there is an
interchange at Schmidt Lake Road and
I-494.
Public Uses—Participants said that
should development take place and
public facilities be needed, land needs
to be reserved in advance, and joint
and cooperative uses of facilities with
neighboring cities and school districts
should be explored.
Environmental Protection/
Amenities—A highly common theme
was the protection and preservation of
the area's natural features and
resources. A greenway paralleling
Elm Creek was suggested. The
preservation of wetland and tree stands
was noted as a critical element.
Recreational Facilities—The need
for trans for pedestrians and bicyclists
was noted, and some thought that a
limited set of horse trails might work
to preserve the existing and unique
rural characteristics of the area.
Copies of the complete
text of the Planning
Tactics report are
available from the
Community Development
Dept. (509-5400) or on the
City web site
(www.ci.plymouth.mn.us)
2 Northwest Notes December 1997
There is also concern that at least
one of the three existing golf courses
needs to be preserved.
Streets—Whether or not an
interchange at Schmidt Lake Road and
I-494 is needed is an important issue
that needs to be resolved in the plan
update. There is concern that
development in other areas, notably
Maple Grove, will create traffic
problems, regardless of the extent of
development in the northwest area.
Comment was common on problems
created by gravel roads in the area of
Wayzata High School.
Sanitary Sewer—There are a
number of known options for serving
the northwest area with public
sanitary sewer. Part of the area could
be serviced with extensions from the
south and the east. The proposed Elm
Creek Interceptor is also an option.
Most of the people interviewed are
highly uncertain as to what, if any,
options should be pursued. There is
also a concern that decisions made
now should not limit possibilities in
the long range future, as situations and
property owner interests may change.
There are reservations about the long
range viability of individual septic
systems. The need to monitor private
systems was mentioned, as well as the
need for education on the costs of
system replacement and
environmental and structural damage
which could result from failed septic
systems.
Financial Considerations—A
significant number of interviewees
commented on the financial
implications of possible development
in the northwest area. They felt that if
development takes place, it should be
self-sustaining in terms of taxes
generated versus services and facilities
provided, and should not be a financial
drain on the balance of the City. Most
City of Plymouth
Community Development Department
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
felt that a prime consideration should
be on how the area will positively
contribute to the financial stability and
enhancement of the rest of the City.
City Wide Planning Issues
In addition to the issues identified
for the northwest area, the following
issues affecting the entire City of
Plymouth were identified for the plan
update:
Environmental Concerns—
Preservation of wetlands, lake water
quality and tree preservation are issues
for the entire city.
Residential Uses—Creating life
cycle housing opportunities without
sacrificing quality, and dispersing
affordable housing throughout the
community were identified as issues.
Preserving the existing housing stock
will be important city-wide.
Commercial Activities—Continued
development of City Center,
increasing the range of retail and
services available, and redevelopment
of older commercial areas were
identified as issues to be addressed.
Industrial Development—The
dwindling supply of industrial land,
and the compatibility of industrial uses
with their neighbors are concerns.
Land Use Transitions and 7nfrll"
Development—Enhancing land use
compatibility and establishing orderly
transitions between varying activities
will be important considerations for
new land use policies.
Parks/Trails/Recreation—
Completing gaps in the trail system,
and continuing to maintain the high
level of satisfaction with the City's
recreational facilities and programs
will be the priority.
Citizen Participation—The need to
involve residents and property owners
to the extent possible was a clear
mandate. While most recognized that
the Plan Update may not resolve all
issues to the satisfaction of some, the
process needs to be open to insure that
all have an opportunity to voice their
opinions.
Other Issues and Concerns—Public
utilities, continued cooperation with
school districts, transportation and
financial concerns were also
mentioned as community -wide issues
for the Plan update.
What's Next?
The next report due in the Plan
Update process will be land use
options for the northwest area. Public
meetings will include a Planning
Commission workshop and two open
houses to review the options for the
Northwest area No dates have been
set for these sessions, but we expect
them to occur in February. We'll
announce the dates and times in the
next edition of Northwest Notes.
For More Information
For more information please
contact the Community Development
Department at 509-5400. Office
hours are 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday and Wednesday through
Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Tuesday.
Hsap►p►y New Yestri
Northwest Notes/ Mews on Planning for Northwest Plymouth
11/ JU/ 1 `1`1 / IQ: 5J b1 L333Q33 r I MUUV F_ i11. . . _lac vc
1
It's the first anniversary of How To Talk Minnesotan
The Musical... and -the show is still a heckuva deal!
Come help us celebrate.
This is your invitation. We hope you can join us.
How To Talk Minnesotan The Musical has been running
every week since it opened back in January of 1997. So, we
decided to have an anniversary show at Kpm, Sunday,
January 18,, 1998, at the Plymouth Playhouse. A reception
will follow.
It should be fun. Now To Talk Minnesotan The Musical has
made lots of people laugh (over 70,000 of them so far).
If it's not too much trouble, we'd like you to RSVP by
January 12,1998. Dress code is... whatever.
No ~d, Mohr & Th& Wholes CAO
Let us know by calling 612-333-3302 or fax us at 612-333-4337.
Or mail your invitation to:
Troupe America, Inc.
Hennepin Center for the Arts
Room 206
528 Hennepin Ave
Minneapolis, MN 55403
Your Name:
Your Phone Number:
Number Attending:
Plymouth Playhouse is located just at the intersection of Hwy SS
& 494 In Plymouth. We're under the same roof as the Best Western
Kelly Inn and the Green Mill Restaurant. 2408 Annapolis Ln,
Plymouth.
Hennepin County Board ofCommissioners
Hennepin County Government Center
300 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55487
S44 --i44.: i i
�O i
` sZ AL16AY c1
f _ _
USE ZIP
The Honorable Joy Tierney
Mayor, City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
III III,,, I,,, I I IIIfill „I I „4,11,,,11,, ,1„1,1
Yo -w ares cor iwwite& . .
We hope you can attend the New Year's Resolution kickoff event to keep tobacco
out of the hands of children on Monday, Jan. 5, 1998, 10 a.m. at the Hennepin County
Government Center. We'd dike to invite you to attend an informal reception with
other metro area mayors and your Hennepin County Board of Commissioners
immediately following the kickoff event.
Mike Opat, 1st District Peter McLaughlin, 4th District
Hennepin County $oard Mark Stenglein, 2nd District Mary Tambornino, 6th District
Mark Andrew' 3rd District Penny Steele, 7th District
Randy Johnson, 5th District, Chair
SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
3001 Harbor Lane • Suite 150 • Plymouth, MN 55447 ,
Telephone (612)553-1144 • FAX (612)553-9326
A regular meeting of the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission will be
held Thursday, January 8, 1998, at 12:45 p.m. at Lancer at Edinburgh, 8700
Edinbrook Crossing, Brooklyn Park, MN. An agenda for that meeting follows:
1. Call to order.
2. Roll call.
3. Minutes of December meeting.*
4. Reports from officers.
5. Approval of claims.
6. Consideration of communications.
a. Communications Log.*
7. Water Quality.
a. Letter to Met Council re CAMP.*
8. Project Reviews.
a. Application form.
9. Wetland Conservation Act.
10. Local Plans.
11. Other Business.
a. Education Program.
b. Accounting services.
12. Adjournment.
* in meeting packet.
BROOKLYN CENTER - BROOKLYN PARK - CRYSTAL - MAPLE GROVE - MINNEAPOLIS - NEW HOPE - OSSEO - PLYMOUTH - ROBBINSDALE
5ene e-w'riam, Chair
b6anor 6nw X a akrse,, 9ionora7 Co-chair
,%e 2erpich T folk, .7%norxy Co-chair
9mia 7lisse gaulhiu, awalive A"eclor
�O. 1r?ox x6532
cSl..Couis ark, c%�innesofa 55416
(612) 381-1261
-74= (612) 377-7942
The Minnesota Environmental Trust Fund Coalition
Dno t miss this important
kickoff meeting.
Senator Roger Moe will
be our special guest!
Come and bring a
Meeting Announcement
January 12, 1998
7:00-9:00 p.m.
Penthouse Suite, Science Museum
St. Paul, MN
AGENDA
1. Welcome and Introductions
2. Review minutes of November 4.
3. Organizational Report
* Financial Report
* Fundraising Report
4. Legislative Report:
Special Guest, Senate Majority Leader Roger Moe
* Legislative Strategy Report
5. Set next meeting date - Bring your calendars!
6. Adjourn
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DECEMBER 16, 1997
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Michael Stulberg, Commissioners Allen Ribbe,
Kim Koehnen, Jeff Thompson (left at 9:55 p.m.) and John
Stoebner
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners Bob Stein and Roger Berkowitz
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Anne Hurlburt,
Planning Supervisor Barb Senness, Planners Kendra
Lindahl and Shawn Drill, City Engineer Dan Faulkner,
and Clerical Supervisor Denise Hutt
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. PUBLIC FORUM:
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Correction to Page #261 - Commissioner Roger Berkowitz to be deleted from
"Members Present". Correction to Page #265, Paragraph 7, change "bus" to "but".
MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to approve
the December 9, 1997 Planning Commission Minutes. Vote. 4 Ayes. MOTION
approved unanimously. (Commissioner Stoebner abstained.)
5. CONSENT AGENDA: No Items.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST, INC. (97089)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Eagle Crest Northwest, Inc. for Rezoning
from FRD (Future Restricted Development) to RMF -1 (Multiple Family 1),
Preliminary Plat and Site Plan to allow construction of a 48 -unit townhome
development on a 9.7 acre site located southeast of Fernbrook Lane and 43'd Avenue.
Planner Drill gave an overview of the December 10, 1997 staff report.
Planning Commission Minutes
December 16, 1997
Page #268
Chairman Stulberg introduced Bill Gleason, 3030 Harbor Lane, the petitioner. Mr.
Gleason stated that because of the wetlands the majority of the units are set up as
ramblers, which are typically purchased by "empty nesters". They anticipate that the
two story units would be purchased by mainly young, working couples. Mr. Gleason
said that they would have extra ponding for water retention because of the wetlands.
Chairman Stulberg introduced John Gleason, 3030 Harbor Lane, the petitioner. Mr.
Gleason stated he would be available for questions.
Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Grant Heino, 4016 Harbor Lane. Mr. Heino stated he is
a board member for the Kingsview Heights Homeowners Association, although he does
not speak for everyone. He commented that their homeowners association has been
involved with community action regarding development of surrounding land. They
objected to the Goff Homes development because of the loss of trees and the Fernbrook
Townhome project. He asked if the City has released the funds from the financial
guarantee since the developer did not put up the brick trim on the Fernbrook
Townhome project as indicated in the approved plans. Mr. Heino stated that he wants
to ensure that the adjacent properties are built to be architecturally pleasing and fits in
with the surrounding neighborhoods. Mr. Heino asked what the distance is of the tree
buffer between Fernbrook Lane and the back elevation of the building. Mr. Heino
suggested that if there is a change in the scope of the development or developer, the
plans be resubmitted for approval and Kingsview Heights neighbors be notified. He
said that the City needs to ensure that the elements such as brick and maintenance free
exterior siding be installed on the buildings.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Scott Nelson of 4170 Empire Lane. Mr. Nelson stated
that he is the President of Plymouth Oaks Homeowners Association. He asked if there
is an established price range for the proposed homes. He stated he was confused on the
elevations that will face the ponds, and asked how the scale of those building heights
compare to the single family homes and the setbacks off of the water. Mr. Nelson
questioned if the Landscape Plan depicts the significant trees on the site currently, or if
it is how the project will look after completion. He asked if the existing oak trees will
survive the intensity of the development, and if it will comply with the tree ordinance.
Mr. Nelson stated that the City should require mitigation of wetlands off site and place
the townhomes closer together, as it has a "donut" affect now. He asked if there is any
way the medium quality area can be filled in to push the townhomes away from the
single family dwellings. He questioned where the storm sewer water run off will
drain. Mr. Nelson asked if there would be any possibility of the future homeowners of
the proposed project joining their homeowners association to ensure maintenance of the
wetlands.
Planning Commission Minutes
December 16, 1997
Page #269
Chairman Stulberg introduced Ronn Ponath of 14020 42' Avenue North. Mr. Ponath
asked if some of the townhomes will have a much higher elevation in the southeast
corner of the site than the other homes, and if it will it cause a problem. Mr. Ponath
wanted to why there has to be an emergency trail off of 42' Avenue and Dallas, when
there are two entrances off of 43rd Avenue onto the private road. Mr. Ponath stated his
concern regarding the removal of trees, and asked what will protect the significant
existing trees in the southeast corner of the site. He said that he was told no trees were
to be removed until the entire plan had been approved, but there have been trees
removed.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Ted Smetak of 14010 42' Avenue North. Mr. Smetak
stated the decision regarding preserving the wetland may impact the whole
development. He said that the wetland is not worth saving. He stated that the City
would be requiring a trade off for a wetland that serves no purpose for trees that serve
both. He suggested that the Commission have the applicant reconsider moving the
townhomes; excavate some of the southeast corner, which would allow the "donut" to
close up and create a larger buffer.
Chairman Stulberg closed the public hearing.
Planner Drill showed the Site Plan and pointed out the landscape buffer between
Fernbrook Lane to the back wall of the units, which is over 50 feet. Planner Drill
showed the elevation plans again and where the different types of units would be
located on the site. Director Hurlburt stated that the tuck -under units would appear as
two stories on the back side. Planner Drill explained that if there is a change in the
scope of the development, such as density, the proposal would need to come back to
the Commission as a new application. He stated that if the applicant were proposing a
minor change, such as moving a building over a few feet, it could be approved
administratively. Director Hurlburt noted when the City approves a development, it
does not approve a developer. She stated that as long as the applicant complies with all
City requirements, the City wouldn't dictate who the developer or contractor would be.
Planner Drill commented that if the elevation plans indicate maintenance -free siding
and brick trim, then that's what staff would expect to see on the building.
Chairman Stulberg asked to staff to investigate the Fernbrook Townhome issue raised
by Mr. Heino and get back to him with their findings.
Planner Drill stated the elevation would be a side view of the rambler from the south
wetland. From the southeast corner, it would be a two story elevation. He indicated
that the setback buffer is 45 feet from the edge of the wetland to the building on the
southern portion of the site.
Planning Commission Minutes
December 16, 1997
Page #270
Planner Drill stated that the Landscape Plan indicates how the project would look after
the project is completed. He said that the plan was reviewed and approved by the City
Forester. Planning Supervisor Senness said if the City Forester thinks trees will not
survive, staff requires the applicant to revise the plan accordingly.
Planner Drill stated that in order to fill the wetland, the applicant would have to show
why they need to fill, and then mitigate at a 2:1 ratio. There is a federal law protecting
the wetlands. Planning Supervisor Senness commented that staff has to determine
whether mitigation can be avoided. If mitigation can be avoided, as shown by this
plan, then they have no choice but to protect the wetland. She stated that staff tries to
balance trees and wetlands whiles considering each individual case. City Engineer
Faulkner commented that it doesn't matter if a wetland is low, medium or high quality,
as long as it is designated a wetland, it has to be protected.
City Engineer Faulkner stated that according to the Grading Plan, a storm water
retention pond will be provided in the southwest corner of the site. Storm water run-
off from the streets, drives, and other areas will be routed through this pond prior to
discharge into the adjacent wetland. He stated that there would be some run-off from
the center of the site, but it would be an insignificant amount that would drain toward
the northwest.
Planner Drill commented that the emergency access/trail is required by the fire
department because a second means of access (for emergency vehicles) is needed for
residential development on all roads over 750 feet long.
Mr. Gleason stated they anticipate the sale price of the ramblers to be $160,000 to
$180,000 or higher, and have not established pricing for the tuck -under homes yet. He
stated they would consider the possibility of joining the Plymouth Oaks Homeowners
Association with regards to maintenance of the wetlands. Mr. Gleason stated that he
was unaware of any removal of trees, but would look into it. He commented that they
have not taken possession of the property yet. Planner Drill stated that during a recent
site visit, he noticed that a large tree had been cut, but it was hollow on the inside.
Planner Drill said the current owner should not be removing any healthy trees since
there is a development application for the site.
MOTION. by Commissioner Koehnen, seconded by Commissioner Thompson
recommending approval of an Ordinance amending Chapter 21 of the City Code to
classify certain lands located southeast of Fernbrook Lane and 43rd Avenue from FRD
(Future Restricted Development) to RMF -1 (Multiple Family 1); Findings of Fact for
Rezoning of land located southeast of Fernbrook Lane and 43rd Avenue; and
Preliminary Plat and Site Plan for Eagle Crest Northwest, Inc. for property located
southeast of Fernbrook Lane and 43' Avenue.
Planning Commission Minutes
December 16, 1997
Page #271
Commissioner Thompson stated his concurrence with the comments made by Mr.
Smetak regarding the wetlands and destruction of trees. He said that the Commission
is not the body that can change the state laws; the Commission can only address
whether the Preliminary Plat complies with the ordinance standards. Commissioner
Koehnen stated her appreciation for the work the neighbors are doing to improve the
wetland, and that the new owners of the townhomes will appreciate space between their
homes and the wetlands.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously.
B. UNITED PROPERTIES (97160)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by United Properties for a Preliminary Plat,
Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance for an office development located at
the southeast corner of Fernbrook Lane and 43`d Avenue.
Planner Drill gave an overview of the December 10, 1997 staff report.
Chairman Stulberg introduced David Thorsen, the petitioner. Mr. Thorsen stated that
St. Paul Companies and St. Paul Properties hired United Properties for this project.
He said that Goff construction has been selected as the contractor for the project. Mr.
Thorsen said that this is the first phase of a two phase project. The intention is to build
as soon as possible, and when the market demands, they will build Phase II. Mr.
Thorsen commented that they are cognizant that they are cutting down a lot of trees,
but they worked with staff for the best solution and mitigation. Mr. Thorsen presented
an exterior colored rendering of the building.
Chairman Stulberg opened and closed the public hearing as no one present to speak on
the issue.
MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner
recommending approval of a Preliminary Plat, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and
Variance for United Properties for property located southeast of Fernbrook Lane and
34' Avenue, subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions.
Commissioner Thompson noted that, if staff brings forth an amendment to increase
compact parking for office developments, he would like to see more up-to-date
information pertaining to the percentage of cars sold in the United States that are
considered to be small cars. There are many more mini -vans and sport utility vehicles
being sold now that could change the figures used two years ago.
Roll Call Vote. 4 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. (Commissioner Thompson
abstained.)
Planning Commission Minutes
December 16, 1997
Page #272
Chairman Stulberg called a recess at 8:16 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:31
p.m.
C. MOEN LEUER CONSTRUCTION (97170)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Moen Leuer Construction for a
Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow up to 40 percent of the total building area
for assembly, manufacturing and warehousing as accessory uses in the B -C (Business
Campus) Zoning District for their office/showroom building to be located north of
Highway 55, south of 36' Avenue and east of Rockford Road.
Planner Lindahl gave an overview of the December 11, 1997 staff report. Planner
Lindahl commented that there was a mistake in the legal notice that was published and
the property notice that was sent out, but a revised property notice was sent. She
stated that the legal description and map were correct; there was a typo in the general
description.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Brad Moen, the petitioner. Mr. Moen presented a
proposed layout of the building. He stated that they have a prospective client,
MotivAction that would like to go into the building. MotivAction is currently located
in Plymouth on Highway 169 and Betty Crocker Dive. MotivAction would have no
docks or trucks, but because of current restrictions on the site, Moen Leuer can't sign a
lease with them.
Commissioner Stoebner asked the applicant what he meant by the project design
doesn't work because of the bay depths, referred to in the applicant's narrative. Mr.
Moen stated that the proposal was created under the Business Campus guidelines, and
the design of the building doesn't make sense for 25 percent limitation. They should
have done long, straight buildings, but there is no market for it. Mr. Moen stated that
they need flexibility for expansion of accessory use.
Commissioner Thompson questioned how the applicant became out of compliance on
the fill issue, and asked if they are now in compliance. Mr. Moen explained that he
thought he had the permit, but in the approving resolutions from the City, it said that a
grading permit would be required. Mr. Moen assumed the contractor checked with the
City to see if a permit was needed. He said the permit is with the Engineering
Department now for approval.
Commissioner Koehnen asked how much of space is office and how much is warehouse
on the proposed floor plan the applicant submitted, and if the parking is considered
separately. Mr. Moen replied that for this particular tenant,, the warehouse is 23.18
percent and the parking is 7.34 percent. He said the proposed tenant would like more
Planning Commission Minutes
December 16, 1997
Page #273
space for expansion later. Director Hurlburt said that city staff would interpret that the
indoor parking area would not be included in the 25 percent allowed. She stated that
-the warehouse is just under 25 percent.
Chairman introduced letters from Don Butler of 3640 Black Oaks Lane dated
December 8, 1997, Dr. & Mrs. Burton Schwartz of 3650 Black Oaks Lane received
December 9, 1997, Jill & Stephen Wolpert of 3625 Zanzibar Lane North dated
December 8, 1997, John Casey of 3620 Archer Lane dated December 9, 1997 and
Bruce Overlid of 3605 Zanzibar Lane dated December 10, 1997 which were included
in the staff report. Chairman Stulberg also introduced a letter dated December 15,
1997 from John & Carol Siefert of 3620 Black Oaks Lane.
Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Jackie Brenner of 3665 Black Oaks Lane. Ms. Brenner
stated she was concerned about safety with only one entrance to the site. She said if
you allow 40 percent manufacturing, it could be detrimental to the neighbors. She
asked what the procedure is if staff finds out the applicant exceeds the 40 percent. Ms.
Brenner asked why she was not notified of the public hearing since she had filled out a
blue card at a previous meeting.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Don Butler of 3640 Black Oaks Lane. Mr. Butler
presented pictures of the area depicting the access and surrounding neighborhood. Mr.
Butler stated his main concern is the site only having one access, which causes a
problem with traffic and safety. He still questions the legality of the access and who
owns the outlot. He commented that they should have the access off of Highway 55.
Mr. Butler thought the property should be limited to residential vehicle type traffic
until another access is secured. He asked why they are not required to have an
emergency access. Mr. Butler commented that he was glad to see the limitation of 40
percent for each tenant in the resolution. He stated he is concerned with what would
happen if there was a sale of the building.
Mr. Butler presented a letter dated December 16, 1997, from Clark Tyler. Mr. Tyler's
letter stated his concern regarding no sidewalks and safety issues from children at bus
stops and the amount of traffic this proposal would generate.
Mr. Butler asked about the status of the "no parking" issue on 34' Avenue. Mr.
Butler questioned why he was told that staff would not be making a recommendation,
but rather just passing it along to the City Council.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Marlin Sjaarda of 11720 38' Avenue North. Mr.
Sjaarda stated he represents MotivAction. He commented that they would like to move
their company into a building like this, as it would allow flexibility that their current
Planning Commission Minutes
December 16, 1997
Page #274
facility does not. He explained that MotivAction is a performance improvement
company, which helps clients determine their business needs and come up with
incentives and monitor performance. They do not warehouse any catalog items, only
process orders. Mr. Sjaarda said there is no warehouse staff, only professional office
staff. They put together travel packets, which includes schedules, tickets, and travel
wallets. They only receive deliveries from U.P.S. or FedEx trucks. They may have a
delivery every two or three weeks from the printer. Mr. Sjaarda stated the would like
to have an expansion option of 10,000 square feet for future office use.
Commissioner Ribbe asked if their operation is similar to Gage Marketing. Mr.
Sjaarda replied negatively, as Gage Marketing deals more with consumer promotions.
Chairman Stulberg introduced John Wirig of 3635 Zanzibar Lane. Mr. Wirig stated he
is concerned about only one entrance to the property. He said that there is no
guarantee if, and when the property to the east will develop for a future entrance. Mr.
Wirig said that the Commission should consider an emergency access. Mr. Wirig
commented that this particular tenant indicates no truck traffic or bays, but asked about
future tenants.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Jill Wolpert of 3625 Zanzibar Lane. Ms. Wolpert asked
who the residents can trust. She stated that the general description was wrong in the
legal notice and the property notice. She said just re -mailing the notice doesn't cover
everyone that lives outside 500 feet. Ms. Wolpert stated that staff told her the only
thing that has changed is the request to allow up to 40 percent of the gross building
floor area for accessory use. She said she was told that staff's recommendation had not
changed. Ms. Wolpert asked how conditional use permits are monitored, and how
nonconformance issues are addressed. Ms. Wolpert referenced Resolution 97-343
asking how the city can give property to a developer for private use and economical
gain. She asked if MotivAction would exceed the 40 percent if they _ expand. Ms.
Wolpert wanted to know why a fire lane isn't required on the site.' Ms. Wolpert
presented a letter dated December 9, 1997 from Roger Handberg of 3630 Zanzibar
Lane.
Chairman Stulberg introduced John Dixon 3605 Black Oaks Lane. Mr. Dixon stated
his primary concern is safety.
Chairman Stulberg closed the public hearing.
In response to issues raised, Planner Lindahl stated that the site only has one access
over the outlot. The State would not allow access onto Highway 55, and wetlands
prevent access off of Rockford Road. A condition of the Site Plan that was approved is
that they look into the possibility of securing access over the property to the east. City
Engineer Faulkner commented that it is not unusual for developments to go in with
Planning Commission Minutes
December 16, 1997
Page #275
only one access with the possibility of future accesses. Director Hurlburt stated that
the city has not received any current development plans to the east. She said that
depending upon what may be proposed for the Harstad property, they may not be able
to have access from that site. The only access to that property is off of Vicksburg
Lane, and the traffic studies indicate that it may be more dangerous to have added
traffic onto Vicksburg Lane. She indicated that there may be a possibility of seeing
something proposed for the Harstad property by early spring. Commissioner
Thompson asked if the current access is safe, given the assumption for no other access.
Director Hurlburt replied affirmatively. Director Hurlburt stated' that staff did discuss
emergency access and where they would be responding from. Staff concluded they
would be coming from Fire Station III on Dunkirk with 36' Avenue as the most likely
route. She said that there are representatives from fire and public safety that reviewed
the plans for this project.
Planner Lindahl explained that there is a process for any ordinance violation. If there
is a violation, staff notifies the property owner in order to obtain compliance. If they
refuse to comply, there is legal action that can be taken, but it is a lengthy process.
The percentage for accessory use will be monitored through the building permit review
for tenant finishes. Director Hurlburt noted that building inspectors would also be
reviewing it as they are inspecting the tenant finishes. She stated that if there is a
condition for monitoring as part of the Conditional Use Permit, staff would go out and
inspect at certain times. Commissioner Thompson asked what would be involved in the
annual review of the Conditional Use Permit. Director Hurlburt responded that staff
would look at all of the permits that were issued, talk to the owner, and go to the site if
needed.
Planner Lindahl stated that the issues related to ownership of Outlot B were discussed
as part of the Site Plan and are not part of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment.
She said that the City Attorney has opined that the City owns Outlot B.
Planner Lindahl stated that the sidewalk plan does not show a sidewalk in this area, but
the City Council decided that the issue should be addressed when the Sidewalk Plan is
updated.
Director Hurlburt stated that the City Council did discuss the issue of posting "no
parking" signs along 360' Avenue, but some of the residents were concerned that they
might be short of guest area parking thus, needing the street for extra parking. The
City Council referred the issue to the Public Safety Sub -Committee, and to her
knowledge they have not talked about it yet.
Mr. Moen commented that his current plan is to build both buildings at the same time
to try to minimize the cost and the disruption to the neighborhood.
Planning Commission Minutes —,
December 16, 1997 ,
Page #276
Planner Lindahl presented the Landscape Plan that was previously approved.
Planner Lindahl commented that when errors are made in notices staff addresses those
when they are brought to their attention. She explained that there is no official staff
recommendation until the final copy of the staff report is ready for distribution, as
information may come in that changes a position. She said that there is no change to
the Site Plan or Preliminary Plat as a result of this request. Planner Lindahl stated that
no tenant can have more than 40 percent gross floor area for accessory warehouse,
assembly, etc. She said that MotivAction intends to build out some office space and
use the remainder as warehouse.
Commissioner Ribbe commented that the one tangible thing that has changed is there is
a proposed tenant, which should answer many of the concerns. He asked if there a
method to add to the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment that relates
it to the type of tenant that MotivAction represents. Director Hurlburt replied
negatively, as it is too difficult to cast definitions to one use, as you have to encompass
a whole district for uses.
Commissioner Thompson thanked the neighborhood for using a spokesperson and
keeping the comments to a minimum. He said that the City Council didn't agree with
the Planning Commission and changed the percentage of accessory manufacturing,
assembly and warehouse uses to 40 percent allowed. He stated that in order for the
Planning Commission to deny the Conditional Use Permit Amendment, the City would
have to prove that the project will negatively impact the neighborhood. Commissioner
Thompson stated that he is convinced the safety issue is handled. He said he would
like staff to take a serious look at the annual review process if the project is approved
so the truck traffic does not become overwhelming. Commissioner Thompson
concluded, stating he is in favor of the proposal.
Commissioner Koehnen asked if Condition #5 of the resolution is enough to ensure
compliance. Director Hurlburt replied affirmatively. The staff has to review all
conditions of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment. If staff find that the project
doesn't meet the conditions, the City can take action by either revocation or
modification of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment. Planning Supervisor Senness
added that planning staff reviews all building permit applications for commercial sites.
MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Chairman Stulberg recommending
approval of a Conditional Use Permit Amendment for Moen Leuer Construction for
property located south of 36' Avenue, north of Highway 55 and east of Rockford
Road.
Commissioner Koehnen commented that she would support the motion, as the concerns
have been outlined and she has faith that staff will follow through and check for
Planning Commission Minutes
December 16, 1997
Page #277
compliance. Commissioner Ribbe stated he would like to be able to separate and
identify functions to eliminate heavy truck traffic. Director Hurlburt responded that
the commission would need a basis of fact for doing so. Chairman Stulberg stated that
if the truck docks are glassed in, it would be hard to conduct a business for
manufacturing. Commissioner Stoebner stated that there is no assurance that the
developer would do that. Planner Lindahl stated that the applicant has to show they
can provide a loading dock for each space - glassing them in is a minor Site Plan
Amendment and can be done as part of the building permit. Director Hurlburt
commented that there is no assurance that MotivAction will be the tenant for the
building.
Roll Call Vote. 4 ayes. MOTION approved unanimously.
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
David Licht of Northwest Associated Consultants gave an overview of the Tactics
Report. He stated that the Tactics Report is an attempt to set the direction of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Licht stated that they are underway with the inventory document to be largely
completed by the first of the year. He hopes to have draft planning documents by the
first of February, along with schedule of public meetings.
Commissioner Stulberg asked for the Commission to be notified as soon as feasible
with possible dates for the public meetings.
Commissioner Ribbe stated he could not attend the January 6' Planning Commission
Meeting. Commissioners Koehnen and Thompson were unsure if they could attend
either.
MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner to adjourn.
Vote. 4 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at
10:23 p.m.
SHINGLE CREEK WRTEZSHED MFNFiGEMENT COMMISSION
3001 Harbor Lane • Suite 150 • Plymouth, MN 55447
Telephone (612)553-1144 • FAX (612)553-9326
MINUTES
November 13, 1997
A meeting of the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission was called to order by Chair Maria D'Andrea
on Thursday, November 13, 1997, at 12:45 p.m. at Lancer at Edinburgh, 8700 Edinbrook Crossing, Brooklyn Park,
MN.
Present were: Diane Spector, Brooklyn Center; Kevin Larson, Brooklyn Park; Tom Mathisen, Crystal; Craig
Cooper, Minneapolis; Ron Quanbeck, Plymouth; Maria D'Andrea, Robbinsdale; Eric Thompson,
Montgomery Watson; Curt Pearson, Kennedy & Graven; and Judie Anderson, Recording
Secretary.
I. Minutes. Motion by Cooper, second by Mathisen to approve the minutes of the October meeting of the
Commission. Motion carried.
II. Treasurer's Report. Motion by Spector, second by Mathisen to approve the Treasurer's Report. Motion
carried.
III. Approval of Claims. Motion by Spector, second by Cooper to approve claims totaling $13,092.73.
Claims were approved by roll call vote: ayes - Spector, Larson, Mathisen, Cooper, Quanbeck and D'Andrea; nays -
none; absent - Maple Grove, New Hope and Osseo.
IV. Correspondence. The Commissioners reviewed the following:
A. Communications Log. No action was required.
B. 1995 and 1996 Water Year Data Summary, from MNDNR.
C. RCM-MPCA Citizen Monitoring Questionnaire. Thompson completed the questionnaire on
behalf of the Commission.
D. Call for papers, Minnesota Water 198.
E. MASWCD Convention Registration.
V. Water Quality. Data from the 1997 program is being tabulated and analyzed.
VI. Project Reviews.
A. SC97-19 Shingle Creek Regional Pond, Brooklyn Center. This is a joint project with the City
of Minneapolis and involves construction of additional ponding areas on the Centerbrook Golf Course, storm sewer
piping from Brookdale Shopping Mall, and storm sewer to Minneapolis -Shingle Creek Regional Pond for the
purpose of creating a regional water quality treatment system for the Brookdale drainage system. This system will
allow redevelopment of most of the watershed area (670 acres) without creating onsite ponding for each individual
development. A complete project review application was received on November 6, 1997.
BROOKLYN CENTER • BROOKLYN PARK • CRYSTAL • MAPLE GROVE • MINNEAPOLIS • NEW HOPE • OSSEO • PLYMOUTH • ROBBINSDALE
Minutes
November 13, 1997
page 2
a
Under the plan, stormwater from Brookdale and the surrounding area will be collected in a series
of five ponds which will provide treatment in accordance with NURP guidelines. During high flows stormwater
from the ponds, which normally outlets to the Regional Pond located in the City of Minneapolis, will partially divert
to Shingle Creek. During these times, flows will still be treated in excess of Commission standards. An erosion
control plan has been specified and there will be no floodplain fill associated with the project.
The proposed project will fill 12,500 SF of wetland. It is eligible for exemption no. 25 which
entitles the applicant to 2000 SF of fill without replacement. At a ratio of 2:1 the remaining .24 acres requires
replacement of .48 acres. Construction of the southern cell of the South Pond and East Pond will result in .49 acres
of Type III wetland habitat. These two ponds are proposed to fulfill the replacement requirements of WCA. The
Commission is the LGU and a complete replacement plan application has been received.
Motion by Cooper, second by Mathisen directing the consultant to advise the City of Brooklyn
Center that approval of SC97-19 is hereby granted, pending successful completion of the WCA public notification
period and receipt in the office of the Commission's engineer of the above -listed items. Motion carried.
VII. Other Business.
A. Twin Lakes/Ryan Lake Agreement. Pearson reported that the agreement is in the process of
execution. Under the terms of the agreement, the Commission's share of remuneration to the City of Robbinsdale
is $8,000. Motion by Cooper, second by Quanbeck to pay to the City of Robbinsdale the sum of $8,000 following
execution of the agreement by all parties. Motion carried. Funds will be taken from the "Reserve" line item of the
Commission's budget.
B. Education Mission. Spector and D'Andrea are continuing to gather information with which to
develop a draft water quality education program for the Commission's consideration.
C. Project Review Application Form. Thompson distributed copies of the revised form.
Commissioners are asked to review and comment at the December meeting.
There being no further business before the Commission, motion by Mathisen, second by Quanbeck to adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 1:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Judie A. Anderson
Recording Secretary
JAA:tim
The Minnesota Environmental Trust Fund Coalition
Gene Merriam, Chair
Governor Elmer Andersen, Honorary Co -Chair
Sue Perpich Bifulk, Honorary Co -Chair
November 4, 1997
Penthouse, Science Museum of Minnesota
Welcome and Introductions: Chair Gene Merriam called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.m. He asked
everyone to introduce themselves. Mr. Merriam also thanked Patrick Hamilton and the Science Museum
for hosting the meeting.
Minutes: Mr. Merriam asked if there were any corrections to the May 28, 1997 minutes as distributed.
Barbara Toren questioned the statement about giving flowers to Betty Goihl. It was agreed to delete the
statement. The minutes will stand with that correction.
Organizational Report:
Financial Report: Mr. Merriam explained that Ms. Hesse Gauthier, our Executive Director, is not at this
meeting because of illness. Copies of the Financial Report were distributed (attached).
Fundraising Report: Bill Heaney, Co-chair of the Fundraising Committee, announced that Gary Botzek
and the Fish and Wildlife Legislative Association have sent requests for donations to their mailing list. He
encouraged other organizations to do the same thing.
Mr. Heaney also explained the fundraising strategy that has been developed. Highlights for Coalition
members include asking their organizations and supporters to make donations, and to also make in-kind
contributions as they are able. He also reported that they are approaching corporations for donations, but
they need help finding contacts for various potential donors. If anyone has any names of potential donors,
please contact Greta Hesse -Gauthier, Bill Heaney, or Kathy Draeger.
Legislative Report:
Mr. Merriam explained about some issues that have arisen. He reported that he had been approached
about getting involved in the stadium issue, but that he said we wanted no part of that. He communicated
to the members of the legislature that the Coalition is made up of a wide range of organizations, and that
they are together for one purpose: to pass the re -dedication of the net lottery proceeds to the
Environmental Trust Fund. Mr. Merriam was commended for his adroit handling of this issue. Nancy
Gibson reported on one possible good thing from the stadium discussion: all legislators now seem to
understand that only 40% of the net proceeds go to the Environmental Trust Fund, rather than 50% as
many assumed.
Nancy Gibson asked if there were any suggestions for passing the bill in the Senate. Some discussion
followed on how to get a hearing in Senator Lessard's committee, including how the Senate leadership
plans to handle it. Mr. Merriam cautioned that the Senate leadership is currently too involved in the
stadium debate to be contacted about this issue now.
The position of the constitutional amendment on the ballot was discussed. Craig Johnson urged the
Coalation to work to insure that our amendment is first on the ballot.
Judy Erickson reported that the Coalition was approached by Mark Dayton to endorse him for Governor.
Ray Bohn moved that this Coalition does not endorse any candidates for political office, but that we ask all
major candidates to endorse our position. Seconded and approved. The Chair announced that the motion
carried and was so ordered.
Bob Clouse asked if the Coalation has a web site. Nelson French suggested this would be a good thing for
someone to donate. Mr. Clouse offered to include it on his site. It would be important to have the site by
the time the brochure is printed. Several members offered to check on possibilities. Any information
should be given to Nancy Gibson.
Ms. Gibson asked what the level of involvement of the DNR is currently. It was reported that they, and
other state agencies, are able to provide information, but not actively participate.''.-�
Next Meeting Date: Mr. Merriam announced that Monday January 12, 1998 is scheduled for the next
Coalition meeting at 7:00 p.m. Patrick Hamilton will check to see if the Penthouse of the Science Museum
of Minnesota is available.
Adjournment: Gene Merriam thanked everyone for attending and adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Dorothy Waltz.
Registered Attendees
November 4. 1997 Trust Fund Coalition meeting
Craig Andresen
Minnesota Audubon Council
Ray Bohn
MN Association of Watershed Districts
Martin Book
MN Conservatiod Officers Association
Judy Bellairs
Sierra Club
Robert Clouse
Minneapolis
Kathy Draeger
Sustainability International
Joe Duggan
Pheasants Forever
Judy Erickson
Parks & Trails Council
Nelson French
Friends of the Minnsota Valley
Nancy Gibson
Citizen's Advisory Committee, Chair
Patrick Hamilton
Science Museum of Minnesota
Bill Heaney
Northern States Power
Gabe Horner
The Nature Conservancy
Craig Johnson
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy
Gene Merriam
Chair
Rick Meierotto
Parks & Trails Council
Lance Ness
Fish & Wild Legislative Alliance
Cordelia Pierson
The Trust for Public Land
Barbara Toren
Izaak Walton League
Dorothy Waltz
Minnesota Audubon Council
Fred Waltz
Saint Paul Audubon Society
ETF Coalition -11/4/97 — 2 —
h
h
h
h
h
O1
C-
O\
O1
O\
h
O\
h
h
O\
r-
a\
a`r-
ONa`
00
o,
c1
i
O,
O,
ON
,
,
,
,
-
,
a\
'
;
_ ,
O\
'
O\
'
u;
,
O's
,
O\
,
�
O,
---
0�
i
O\
N
N
N
O
4
'
N
N
D,
N
N
N
h
O�
N
N
M
O
NC�
^'
C�
..
O'
cl,
cl,
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
r
N
t
h
h
h
h
h
O1
C-
O\
O1
O\
h
O\
h
h
O\
r-
O\
00
00
00
C�O\
c1
i
O,
O,
ON
,
,
,
,
-
,
a\
'
;
_ ,
O\
'
O\
'
u;
,
O's
,
O\
,
�
O,
---
0�
i
O\
N
N
N
O
p
--
N
N
N
N
N
h
O�
N
N
M
O
^'
.-.
..
O'
N
0
0
O
t
-�
N
_'_
N
N
N
t
r.
O�
ON
O
O
--
i
--
--
i
--
i
N
N
N
N
N
N
CA
'O
a,
(2,
'�
O
y^
O
C
C
O*1
cs
a1
ON
Q1
as
ON
d1
O*,
CN
ON
ON
ON
N
to
kn
NN
h
M
h
M
4
00
b
NA
h
O
-
O
O
O
C�
C�
d
O�
O�
�O
h
O
--
O
--
--
--
--
N
N
N
N
N
N
ON
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
w
00
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
Q,
O�
O�
T
O�
T
T
91
T
O�
T
T
C1
T
N
V1
tn
O
O
Men
�O
N
h
O�
-�
vl
r-
O
.-.
..
N
N
N
t
t
t
t
r.
O�
ON
O
O
--
i
--
--
i
--
i
N
N
N
N
N
N
CA
'O
a,
(2,
'�
O
y^
O
C
C
N
cz
a
x
t
t
t
t
r.
CA
'O
'�
O
y^
O
C
C
d
O
G
O
�x
�GQGCIxx
�
�
xGOC7x
x�C.7�C7W
NM
d
V�
�O
h
00
O\
O
-4N
M4
N�
h
00
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
w
00
N
cz
a
The Honorable oy Tierney
Mayer of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, Mn. 55447--1482
Dear Mayor Tierney:
As a member of GLDA
I wish to respond to both
the manor in which it was
December 29 , 1997
15815 Gleason Lake Drive
Plymouth, NIn. 55447
Re: Council Meeting 12--17-97
Traffic on Gleason Lake
Drive with GLDA
(Gleason Lake Drive.Association),
the contents of the meeting and
conducted.
Fred floor` gave a fine det--ailE:d report. I saw the
report � �n the 16th and disagreed with each of his five
c,:,nclusions. Which brings lip my :second poini,. There was
r_o time allotted for me to respond. To give my information
you did not Have thougi-i I did share the door by door report
a` ,o location of children and S`�I2 ori; on this one mile
Stretch of dan gorous .road. Dwight Johnson had the
infor,,Oat.ion on the 1Eth but did not place it in your }lands
Prior to the Council Meeting on the 17th.
But in this particular case, your limit of five
minutes for those of us from GLDA totally misconstrued the
situation to the members of theCouncil as i1 Fred's report
was gospel, period, paragraph.. The mechanics of the
riiF'eting slanted the whole dialogue to the Stafi side
dealing with our problem and so you did riot hear our side.
We need to be heard! Not by staff-, but by our elected
represcnt,atives. As I told you at that meeting when you
graciously gave rile six minutes, our councilman does not
answer our phone calls. We would like a meeting- in J-anu ary
with yi ,u , Ginny Black, L7udy Johnson, or Christian Preis .
Any or all of you.
Fred's report can't tell you just liow danger_uS oi_:r
road has become. I would like to know hov�, much stats slid
the city is receiving for our one mile stretch of road':
Could that amount be forfeited for the cause of safety? To
get the through trucks off and to reduce the speed limit so
the cross walks can be implemented where we say they .should
be. Marked by flashing yellow lights on signs which say,
GLOW". I heard you talk about education needed in corp --
junction with safe pedestrian crossings implementation. We
want you to do something now about it! Not talk about int 1pl-, ---: ,
-..,, .
but do it! And on our street now! At least Ginny Blaak-ti.",
�,•
procured one pedestrian crossing for us at kanchview iri the
iassed re2olution involving the stop sign at Niagara,
rlcither of which has been installed as of this date.
My phone number is 476--8+708. Thank yogi!
Sincerely,
�w
4
December 29, 1997
Mr. Dwight Johnson
City Manager, City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Fine
D«„
t
PLYMOUTH
Thank you for your letter of December 5, 1997 indicating the support of City staff for our
proposal to display artwork in City Hall and for the installation of limited trackwork in selected
hallways.
To confirm our recent telephone conversation, the Plymouth Fine Arts Council proposal
letter dated November 11, 1997 along with the supporting materials (exhibit guidelines, artist
agreement/waiver form and local public building survey results) will be distributed along with
your letter of December 5, 1997 to the City Council in preparation for their January 7, 1998
meeting. By cover of this letter please find a copy of the survey results from the Primavera event
held in April 1997. As we discussed, PFAC would appreciate your adding this additional piece of
information to our previously submitted proposal.
We value the support and guidance City staff provides to our organization. We look
forward to opportunity of contributing ideas to Mary Bisek and Karol Greupner as plans develop
for the future Activity Center in Plymouth.
Artistically yours,
/'2 -
Georgann Bestler Wenisch, President
Plymouth Fine Arts Council
Enclosure
cc: Eric Blank (with enclosure)
Kathy Lueckert (with enclosure)
Karol Greupner (with enclosure)
3400 PL`/MOUTH BOULEVARD PLYMOUTH MINNESOTA SS447-1482
u
PRIMA VERA 1997 SUR VEY COMMENTS
WHAT DID YOU L= ABOUT THIS EVENT?
The desire to attempt an event like this and
the fortitude to see its completion with a
bright future in view. Congrats Board ! !
Thanks, nice show.
Wonderful pictures/art work, a chance to see
what locals can do!
Variety of talent.
Great variety. Good Job!
Fresh flowers, good variety of art,
refreshments great, music good.
Its art about our city and local artists.
Nice mix of artists work. Thank you for all
the work you have put into this event.
It was well displayed with music --delightful.
Well organized.
I enjoyed the exposure to artwork that
would otherwise never be appreciated by the
public. Wonderful stuff!
Nice presentation and environment. Very
enjoyable.
The pieces are very well presented and there
is a lot of variety in style and mediums.
The range from students to adult work.
Beautiful- art work.
The beautiful pieces of art mingled with the
friendliness and the musical contributions.
You have a nice collection of art; medium
and styles are varied. Some good artwork
here. I like that fact that you've given high
school artists a place to show their work --
they are our future artists.
The idea that Plymouth cares about the
"arts" and wants to organize in for the
public.
The variety. Have it at the Health & Fitness
Center.
Local artists.
The variety of artwork. It was nice to see
the student work.
The variety of media used in the art. The
fact that the high school students' works
were displayed also.
Well organized, full of life. Nice facility.
Beautiful art. I liked the idea of including
high school artists in the show. Pleasant
surprise! Enjoyed!
The comments on the artwork that won
awards.
Very nice presentation of art.
The wide range of arts. Nice to include
people from other than the Twin Cities.
The variety of work displayed.
Well done --appreciate hearing the critiques
of the winners by the judges. Keep up the
good work.
4§
a
Good idea! Nice event!
The variety in medium; types of art (e.g.
watercolor, pottery, etc.). We enjoyed the
artwork, the food, the people watching, the
facilities. Great way to spend a Friday
evening. Thank you!
The quality of the art exhibited was very
good. An excellent job was done in the
selection.
Everything!
Great to see local artists work.
Nice informal event to stop by at your leisure
to view the art.
A very wide variety of art forms, mediums,
and artist levels.
A lovely event --lots of talent, and the
Plymouth singers were very enjoyable.
A wide assortment of art --different mediums.
Entertainment on Saturday was excellent.
0A
A nice variety of art pieces.
The art display.
It was really fun seeing what the other artists
submitted! There were a lot of great pieces.
Good food too!
The music and variety of art.
Very nice selection of art, especially for a
first year elent.
Good lighting.
The variety of artists and great helping
volunteers.
Pictures, food and music.
Fun to look at art and listen to music.
Variety of artists --high school and elders,
known and unknown. I loved the music!
Very diverse kinds of art. Wonderful!
Nice community building, nicely displayed.
is y
December 27, 1997
Mr. Rick Kline, Fire Chief
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN. 55447-1482
RE: MOEN-LEDER/West Glen Corporate Center
Files 97170 and 97012
Dear Mr. Kline:
The above referenced proposed business development is located on
36th Street between Vicksburg Ln. and County Road 9, Plymouth.
As currently proposed, this site will have two buildings, with
400 parking spaces, and 25% manufacturing space. This would
generate some additional truck traffic.
On December 16, 1997, at a meeting of the Planning Commission,
the developer requested an increase in the amount of manufacturing
from 25% to 40%. We believe this would generate even more truck
traffic.
During the meeting, a question was raised regarding the fact
that the proposed development will have only one-ingress/egress
point, to be located at 36th and Zanzibar streets.
The residents of Zanzibar Lane, who are within 40 feet of the
proposed access, visualize a major problem should a fire occur
in a manufacturing facility and 400 workers try to vacate at one
time, thus blocking the only exit and preventing fire and emergency
vehicles from entering the property.
It was stated during the meeting on December 16, 1997, that the Fire
Chief has approved this project,'as proposed, although all other
facilities of this nature have required by law to have more than
one entrance/exit for obvious safety reasons. If the zoning
ordinance does require buildings of this size to have two points
of entry, would like to know, (a) if you have approved of this
proposed project having only one point of entry, and (b) upon what
basis you based this approval.
It should be noted that during the past 18 months, various residents
in our town home development of 34 homes have made at least four
"911" calls for help that we are personally aware oo�yeral
residents are senior citizens and others with heal F.p 151enCs.
December 27, 1997
Page Two
Fire Chief
The congestion that is proposed for this street which borders on
both single family residences and town homes, is of grave concern
to all of us. We are told that at least 800 csrs a day will use
36th Street, in addition to our own trips, and adding more
truck traffic will further congest the street traffic. Fire trucks,
or ambulances could experience difficulty in gaining access not
only to the proposed buildings but to our homes.
We would like you to review this matter and advise us in writing
as to why the decision was made to allow this building project
to have only one entrance.
By copy of this letter to our insurance carrier, we are asking
him to also review our insurance coverage under the proposed
building.
Thank you for your attention tbithis request.
Sincerely,
SUGAR HILLS TOWN HOME ASSOCIATION
B Y : l 21
DONALD BUTLER, Vice -President
3640 Black Oaks Lane North
Plymouth, MN. 55446
cc: STATE FARM INSURANCE
I ERIC RHODES
A
December 29, 1997
Mayor Joy Tierney
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN. 55447-1482
-c-�
RE: January 21, 1998, City Council Meeting 9'71,
MOEN/LEUER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT File 97012
Pronosed easement over Outlot "B"
Dear Mayor Tierney:
Since the inception of the above project, there has been an issue
of the ownership of Outlot "B", which is the only access to
the Moen/Leuer property.
The issue has been raised at each meeting of both the Planning
Commission and the City Council. The answer is always the same,
by City personnel stating that they have been advised by the
City Attorney that there is no problem as the City owns the land.
It is the position of the Sugar Hills Town Home Association,
supported by documents recorded, that the issue has not been
resolved.
Since the meeting on January 21, 1998 is very important to
all parties, and the vote is critical, we wish to clarify the
issue so that each council member will understand our position.
Attached are copies of letters which set forth the facts as we
maintain are supported by the records on file. All of the pertinent
documentation supporting our contention have been provided to
the City Attorney, and additionally copies have been provided to
Representative H.Todd Van Dellen.
We believe there are a variety of legal issues at stake in this
matter, including real estate, civil law, State law and possibly
even civil rights, for failure.to grant the residents affected
by the transfer of the property, the right to be heard.
We would believe it would be in the best interests of everyone
concerned to attempt to resolve these issues prior to January 21,
1998, and would be happy to meet with interested parties to
attempt to do this.
Very truly yours,
DONALD BUTLER
Vice -President
Sugar Hills Town Home Association
CC: Harstad: Moen-Leuer: HomeOwners.
Land Title File A 6428 (Jon) & File TF52493
September 25, 1997
Office of the Attorney General
of the State of Minnesota
State Capitol Building
St. Paul, Minneapolis 55155
ATTENTION: HUBERT HUMPHREY, ESQ.
RE: SUGAR HILLS TOWN HOUSE ASSOCIATION/CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Dear Mr. Humphrey:
Earlier this year, the president of our town house association
directed a letter to your.office regarding a dispute between
the City of Plymouth and our members. It was our feeling that
the matter could be resolved by your office.
Several months elapsed with no response, and we then called
your office. We were advised that the attorney general's office
did net have jurisdiction in this matter and would not be taking
any action.
At this time, we would ask that this matter be reviewed one more
time, and that a formal response in writing be made to complete
our records. we would like to present this matter to our
membership for possible referral toa private attorney as soon
as possible.
Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
���7 /_ ,,-� 0 4��
DONALD E. BUTLER, Vice -President
Sugar Hills Town House Association
3640 Black Oaks Lane North
Plymouth, MN. 55446
April 14, 1997
Attorney General of the State of Minnesota T'~
State Capitol Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF POSSIBLE VIOLATION
OF THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW, SPECIFICALLY:
MINNESOTA COMMON INTEREST OWNERSHIP ACT,
MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTIONS 515 B.1-101 THROUGH
515 B. 4-118 (The Act) , as amended.
Dear Sir:
The enclosed information is being submitted for your consideration
and advice, to determine if there has been a violation of State
Law, and, if so, your assistance in providing a remedy.
COMPLAINT:
The City of Plymouth obtained a parcel of land from the
subdivider, (Harstad, et.al.,) subsequent to the formation
of the Community Interest Community No. 696 (known as
The Townhomes of Sugar Hills) without benefit of condemnation
proceedings and without consideration to the Common Interest
Cortununi ty .
Further, the parcel'of land, known as "Outlot 'B"' to the
subdivision, was obtained by the City of Plymouth for the
express purpose of financial gain to the adjacent property
owner as a right of way, or access, to his property.
STATEMENT OF FACTS IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER:
6/1/94 State Law. Minnesota Common Interest Act Amended;
applies to all common interest communities created
within the State on and after June 1, 1994.
Paragraph 515 B. 1-102,'Section (4), and other
provisions appear to restrain and restrict the giving
of rights of the Association, except as provided under
the law.
4/14/97
To: Attorney General
Page 2
6/17/94 Community Interest Community No. 696 was recorded as
document No. 6302343. This created the Townhomes of
Sugar Hills as a common interest community. (Exhibit 1,
attached).
As part of, and included therein, CIC Plat No. 696
Sugar Hills Third Addition was recorded as document
No. 6302342. Specifically, paragraph 6.00 "Boundaries",
states..."The unit boundaries shall be the boundary lines
as designated on the CIC Plat. (Exhibit 2, attached)
Included within the boundaries,•as set forth in the CIC
Plat, was a piece of real property designated as
"Outlot ' B "' .
ISSUES CONCERNING COMMUNITY INTEREST COMMUNITY 696
Written Document and the CIC Plat 696:
1. The CIC Plat as recorded included Outlot 'B' within
its boundaries.
2. The written document includes the CIC Plat as the document
describing boundaries, but does not specifically state, in
writing, "Outlot 'B"'.
QUESTION: IS IT NECESSARY FOR THE TWO DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSISTENT,
AND IF THEY ARE NOT, WHICH PREVAILS? SINCE THE CIC
PLAT WAS THE FIRST DOCUMENT CREATED AND RECORDED,
SHOULD IT PREVAIL?
During the 1994-1996 periojs,.the subdivider sold 34 of the town -
homes, and, as part of the disclosure information distributed to
each purchaser, the Community Interest Community Document 696
and a copy of the CIC Plat 696 showing "Outlot 'B" was included
in the Association boundaries. (Exhibit 3)
NOTE: Initially, each purchaser received a preliminary
CIC Plat, which designated the outlot as "A". '
This document was later revised and recorded (Exhibit 1)
with "Outlot 'A"' changed to "B".
It is our understanding that the laws governing subdivisions require
that outlots be identified alphabetically, in sequence.
4/1-4/97
To: Attorney General
Paye 3
QUES'T'ION: CAN IT BE ASSUMED THAT OUTLOT 'B' WAS PLANNED
TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION
BOUNDARIES?
7/15/94 Quit Claim Deed was recorded, No. 6308635, (Exhibit 4).
Martin Harstad, developer, gave a Quit Claim to Outlot
'B', Sugar Hills Addition, CIC 696 to the City of Plymouth.
ISSUES:
1. There was no outlot 'B' to the Sugar Hills Addition.
Outlot 'B' was in the Sugar Hills 3rd Addition.
2. The CIC 696 referenced in the description on the Deed
was the document that created the Common Interest Community
on June 17, 1994. Was "Outlot 'B" therefore, a part of
the Common Interest Community?
3. The Townhomes Association was not a party to the trans-
action. The individual lots had not been sold at this
time, however, since "Outlot 'B" was included in the Plat,
the transfer to the City should have been in the name of
the Community, not the subdivider as an individual.
QUESTION: SINCE THE QUIT CLAIM DEED IN QUESTION WAS ISSUED
BY THE SUBDIVIDER AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND NOT THE
ASSOCIATION, IS IT INVALID?
May 1995 The first lot in the Sugar Hills Townhomes 3rd Addition
closed escrow. Lots were sold prior to construction for
several months prior to this date.
5/15/96 Quit Claim Deed recorded, No. 6574561, (Exhibit 5),
"...correcting Document No. 6308635..•':"
The purpose was to correct the description to:
"...Sugar Hills 3rd Addition."
ISSUES:
The same issues are here as are stated with the initial
Quit Claim Deed regarding ownership of "Outlot 'B".
3/28/97 The City of Plymouth advised the owners of Townhomes
that property located approximately sixty feet south and
adjacent to the Townhoke properties was to be rezoned and
developed. (Exhibit 6)
4/14/97 ) �'
To: Attorney General
Page 4
4/4/97 City of Plymouth, Planning and Zoning Application
Staff Report issued. (:Exhibit 7)
Pages 4 and 5. "Traffic"...references the use of
"Outlot 'B"'.
QUESTION: CAN IT BE CONCLUDED THAT THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH OBTAINED
OUTLOT 'B' FROM THE SUGAR HILLS 3rd ADDITION FOR THE
SPECIFIC USE AND FINANCIAL GAIN OF A THIRD PARTY,
WITHOUT BENEFIT OF THE CONDEMNATION PROCEDURES OR
CONSIDERATION OF THE TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION?
We have provided the City of Plymouth with all of the above
documentation, plus oral presentations at the Planning Commission
hearing on 4/8/97, however, there has been no satisfactory response
to this matter.
We respectfully suggest that the following actions would be
proper:
1. The City of Plymouth should vacate the Quit Claim Deeds
issued to them for "Outlot 'B";
2. The Community Interest Document 696 and the CIC Plat
696 be corrected to be consistent with respect to
"Outlot 'B";
3. If appropriate, the City be instructed, by the State,
to initiate proper proceedings with regard to their
need for "Outlot 1B."' and that reasonable consideration
be given to the Townhomes Association.
Tile following is a list of interested parties to the within matter
that are known to the undersigned:
MARTIN HARSTAD, subdivider
Harstad Homes, Inc.
2195 Silver Lake Road
New Brighton, MN., 55112
636-9991
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 Plymouth Blvd.,
Plymouth, MN. 55447
590-5000
SUGAR HILLS TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION
Terence R. Moriarity, President
3630 Black Oaks Lane No.
Plymouth, MN. 55446-2600
509-9181
Donald E. Butler, Vice -President
3640 Black Oaks Lane No.
Plymouth, MN. 55446-2600
557-6876
4/14/97
To: Attorney General
Page 5
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Very truly yours,
SUGAR HILLS TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION
D Y
TERENCE R. MORIARITY, Prbsident
DONALD E. SUTLER, Vice -President
DEB/hw
cc: Roger Knutson, City Attorney With Enc.
0
January 3, 1998
Mayor Joy Tierney
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN. 55447-1482
SUBJECT: January 21, 1998, City Council Meeting
Action on file 97012
Moen-Leuer Construction Project
Request for 40% Conditional Use for Manufacturing
Dear Mayor Tierney:
During the past several months, we have been attempting to work
with the City to achieve a reasonable resolution to problems
we believe will be caused by the above proposed project.
The Planning Commission and City Council votes of last summer,
for limitations of 25% on Conditional use prior to construction,
and the possibility of increasing that percentage on an
individual tenant basis, had, we hoped, resolved some of the
issues.
It is our understanding that the City Council vote last fall
to establish 40% or less for accessory conditional use was
intended to set limits for individual projects, and not as a
signal to open the door for the Moen-Leuer project to increase
the previously approved rate of 25%.
At the December 16, 1997 meeting of the Planning Commission,
it was discovered that both the Planning Department and the
Planning Commission were in favor of the increase in use. In
fact, Mr. Thompson made the -comment that the City Council
apparently did not agree with their previous vote!
It became apparent during the meeting on December 16th, that
we had not presented sufficient evidence to allow the Planning
Commission to vote against the increase in rate. Accordingly,
we plan to comply with their request for more specific data
and will present that in the form of submittals to all of the
City Council members, prior to the meeting on January 21, 1998.
It has come to our attention that, subsequent to the earlier
City Council meeting and vote on the 25% issue, negative comments
were made to council members by some individuals. We cannot
control the opinions of individual members, but as a group, we
Page 2
1/3/98
To: Mayor Tierney
strive to hold to professional standards and have always tried
to present our case in a business -like manner.
Finally, we would like to renew our request that our association
be advised of all meetings held by the City, or any of the City
representatives, with regard to this matter.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
SUGAR HILLS TOWN HOME ASSOCIATION
3640 Black Oaks Lane North
Plymouth, MN. 55446
Phone: 612-557-6876
TER NCE MO IARITY, President
DONALD E. BUTLER, Vice -President
AW6AW 4,1
CHARLES PRESCOTT, Secretary
i
ICHARD KENNY Treasurer
DEBORAH DYBDAHL, ember
-C_4a
December 30, 1997
Craig Gertes, Public Safety Director
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN. 55447
Dear Mr. Gertes
We live at 3640 Black Oaks Lane No., Plymouth.
During the past several months, we, along with out neighbors, have
witnessed several automobile accidents at the intersections of
36th and County Road 9 and 36th and Vicksburg Lane.
We would like to have a letter from you, setting forth the known
accidents at the above intersections, during the period of January
1, 1997 to and including December 30, 1997.
It would be appreciated if we could have this information at
your earliest convenience, and prior to January 7, 1998.
If you have any questions, you may contact me at 557-6876.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
SUGAR HILLS TOWN HOME ASSOCIATION
By 7
nald E. Butler, Vice -President
3640 Black Oaks Lan. No.
Plymouth, MN. 55446
DEB/mb
December 30, 1997
Jerry Chmielewski
12410 26' Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dear Mr. Chmielewski:
a1v OF
PLYMOUTFF
This letter is in response to your letter dated December 13'h.
Jan Olsson was the appraiser at your home on December 19, 1995 and again on May 6,
1997 to do an appraisal and determine your property value. Jan is a resident of
Plymouth. She observed the condition of your home and additional physical
depreciation was applied when establishing the valuation.
If you have any questions about the valuation of your property I would invite you to
give our office a call and/or come into our office so you could review the data used to
determine your property value.
The Local Board of Review is a public meeting and is scheduled to be held on April 8,
1998 in the City Hall Council Chambers at 7:00 P.M. Any 1998 valuation and
classification issues will be addressed at that time.
Yours truly,
4".0 �' ) ?:! �r
Nancy Bye, CAE
City Assessor
PLYMOUTH :1'Bcuutiluf lare'Iu Live
'1A nr. 0I Vn An ITU DrlIII cv1�on - nl \/A Af-II ITf 1 — -- _-- r --nn
Jerry Chmielewski
12410 26th Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55441
December 13, 1997
Mayor Joy Tierney
Plymouth City Hall
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 5544'1-14 $ �
Dear Mayor Tierney:
I just received my explanation for the rise in my property value and its sounds like the
classical canned pitch. I asked why my property value went up when there is this boom
in development and I get an explanation that goes -
"This is 31.4 % ($20,100) in ten years or approximately 3% per year. The
residential market in Plymouth has been strong and property values are appreciating in
value. The average home sales price has increased in value over 31% just since 1991
(six years)."
What this tells me is that your assessors (in this case Nancy Bye) takes an average of
what homes sell for and figures her increases from that.
(1)1 would wager she doesn't even live in Plymouth. She would find more a
logical reason like " Your home has been improved ----, not that the homes in
a large area have. When did you ever see somebody buy a home for money
because the home down five miles away sold for an increase of 31% over the
last six years. Did you buy your home in Plymouth because you could expect
to pay more every year in property taxes or because my home would increase
in value. If you did your reasoning needs to be looked at.
(2) Homes are sold for more because taxes stay low and services are good.
Plymouth taxes are increasing and the services are substandard. When I
moved into Plymouth, it took me five minutes to get to Highway 55 and twenty
minutes to get to work. Now I take a longer route to Highway 55 (West
Medicine Road has been made into a parkway so going that way takes
twenty minutes because of traffic jams at the stop sign by the beach and the
light at 55 has always got at least thirty or more cars waiting) where I go west
and tum east on 55 for the same twenty minute drive. I prefer not to share my
secret route which only takes ten minutes because if city planners got a hold
of it they could make improvements that would cost me money and make me
look for a route to the north to keep my drive time down. Other improvements
like the great community health spa don't make buyers want to buy my home.
It might help rent the apartments over by it, but it should be the apartment
owner who pays for the increases because he can charge more rent or the
person who rents but doesn't pay taxes.
(3) As you can tell, I not a big Plymouth City Council fan. I find the Council an f
embarrassment to read about, responsive only to those who voted them in
and not considerate of all the people. I have lived in Plymouth for seventeen
years and never seen a council member come to my home for an opinion on
what they're doing or what should be done. I have been to Council meetings,
but find the ones in recent years not worth going to because they don't want
to hear what the public has to say. Instead, Council members use it as a
platform to express their preconceived ideas and agendas to the public that
chooses to attend. I do not chose to talk to walls, but people who are
considerate of my opinion. I have met Hennepin County office seekers, office
seekers for state senate and house, and even met one seeking election to
the governor's mansion and U. S. Senate. Of course, they represent the
people (all the people) in their district and try to at least make it seem that
they care. I'm sure they are other communities where the city government
does have concern for how their vote effects all the people or finds a way to
pay for projects by taxing those who use the project. I can ramble on for
hours about the short sightedness of projects like the world class health spa
where no expense is spared, but city planners forget to put in things as
simple as street lights because of their need to get more money for their poor
planning. Our streets by the city center were a hazard to drive on in the
recent fog because city planners didn't have the foresight to install street
lights in this area (or are they waiting until everything is finished before
tearing it all up). It's a lot easier and cheaper to do things like lights when
you're building the road, but doing it a second time will cost more and that
seems to be a benefit to securing a position at Plymouth City Hall. Don't do it
once when it can be done twice or more. Job securityl
Back to my property value increase, my home doesn't even have air conditioning. I know
I couldn't sell it for what the city values it at. The reasoning the assessor uses is that the
properties on my block all would sell for more, so my home would sell for more. 1 don't
have the right to sell all the homes on my block or maybe somebody would buy the
cheap one because it was a package deal.
Let me list the repairs necessary to my home, and then tell me my value has increased
and I could sell it for more than I could last year.
1. Roof in bad need of repair
2. Air conditioning hasn't worked in six or seven years.
3. driveway needs work.
4. Furnace needs improvement because city inspectors didn't do their job when
the new fumace was installed. They took the Building permit money, but never
inspected the work and now the chimney needs repair because it was done
right by the fumace installers. I thought part of the building permit money was
for the city inspectors to do their job?
5. Windows need replacing.
6. carpeting needs to be replaced throughout the house (over twenty years old
and worn).
7. Basement leaks
8. garage door is out of alignment so automatic garage door doesn't work.
9. front yard so small it hardly useable for anything but a flower bed
10. trees on lot need trimming because of old limbs.
11. etc.,etc. ,etc.
Of course, now I can expect the city assessors to come out and condemn the property
out of revenge for their exposure of being incompetent assessors. Go ahead, The news
channels will have a field day when I call them.
I guess what I'm trying to say in a nutshell is, if a person is going to determine my
property value, let him or her live in the community so their decisions can affect
themselves. They wouldn't be so driven to find more money driving up the taxes of the
poor in the community. (Unless that Is what the plan is to do, drive the poor out of
the area so only the rich can afford to live here).
Closing to see what your response will be.
Jerry Chmielewski
12410 26' Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55441
559-5609
16010 5th Ave. N
Plymouth, MN 55447
Jan. 1, 1998 -,
Dear Friends of the Minn. DNR Luce Line Trail,
Please find enclosed copies of articles in the Dec. 31, 1997 "Plymouth Sun
Sailor Newspaper". The DNR is requesting public comments on their Draft
Plan to upgrade the 20+ year old Luce Line Trail before the DNR plan becomes
FINAL. Please read the articles from Barbara Burgum of the DNR and myself.
I believe the Luce Line Trail is a very important resource to the west metro
area. The Luce Line Trail needs yaur and your friends support.
The Luce Line Trail is a STATE trail, not a local trail. The west metro. area
should have the right to a first class trail like the Gateway Trail in north St.
Paul and the rest of the STATE Trails. The Luce Line is the only DNR trail
that is limestone, a I I of the other nine or ten multiple use DNR state trails
are asphalt. The Luce Line trail should be the best in the west metro.
The Luce Line should be asphalt to allow in-line skaters, wheelchair and
bikers other than mountain bikes to share the trail with other users.
What I am asking you to do are a) call, write, fax or e-mail your comments to
the DNR, b) make copies for your friends and c) interested parties. Mail
comments to Barbara Burgum, DNR Trails & Waterways Unit, Box 52, 500
Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4052. Fax to 297-5475, e-mailed to
laurie,young@dnr.state.mn.us or telephoned to 296-6693.
The 20+ year old Luce Line State Trail is well worth our support for our
children and grandchildren. It will be another 20 years before we of the west
metro has another chance tell the DNR what we want.
The DNR responds to the public they are serving, if you don't comment, the
other interests have already made their comments know.
Thank you for your help, it is worth a little of your time!! We need to be
timely, so do it soon.
4CS,i
cerel ours,
mond . Jorgensen
473-5539
Comments
sought on
Luce Line
Official deadline for input
is Jan. 2
By Sally Thompson
Minnesota Sun Publications
If you use the Luce Line, you
probably have an opinion on
how it could be improved. Well,
now is the time to express your
opinion by telephone, fax, e-mail
or letter.
Barbara Burgum, a member
of the Luce Line State Trail
planning team for the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources, said
the deadline for comments ends
on .Ian. 2.
But, if you miss the deadline
and if you have an opinion, don't
hesitate to let the DNR know.
While your comments may not
be part of the formal paperwork,
your views may still help plan-
ners as they work on the propos-
al, she said.
"We want people to comment,"
Burgum said.
Three open house meetings in
December -- in Plymouth,
Hutchinson and Watertown —
gave people a chance to talk
about DNR plans for the Luce
Line, she said.
Only 30 people attended the
Dec. 9 meeting in Plymouth, but
about 100 people attended each
of the other meetings, Burgum
said.
Because these were open
house meetings, not formal hear-
ings, Burgum said legal notices to
the public were not required.
Rather, the department relied on
press releases to promote the
public planning process, she said.
Most of the discussion at the
LUCE: To Page 11
PLYMOUTH
C/]
December 31,1997
�cOpyo
O
O
P�to� r cd
C�
r=ENCS
coo
i ,00 04 P, 4U � � c0
P° N �G
O M c� Q �,'L2 O 5p CSI
ODS ow -da°
y
U d? a)�r��
4
Ua
.n °; .a z v ° .°�'
°y .-o x 0) 4a •oda)0 i
Cd W
d d A. ya o � o� ° � 0.av~ � C
ami Cd
M4� a> 54 .ti 0 > •0.0
° o :3a� o d
vo
°1o°o 4) bo
oti�dGNd G7-.a�
dr.03to�
—.0 —�
C�
00 0- (1) c�°a'yC acv°'
aU, 00 wo`�Ca�0 �°ca;vion 4 o
�!�bn
cc eu,vz
4)0ama =F
E-
k a3dcC.�
cb4
.[ a03.zo a). C: .- 4 -
En � —
'.% 0. CCScts y O A .�-, ca y
.-, Q)
ul
CO Cd m Ow
+� o o > C 0+� c,°. C >i as 0obi
Ois y 'aa y y A. a) +.)
o ^O o +� +� > y b0
co o V C:bq �' +a
rA
+acd
y p w� q �� y )bD r. Y4
o
G >' w -0o vi d " +. � c°n 0 a~i 3
0 o n� ��,c.r• c, a ° o CO $. o
o o a Z U c. " o N '� y co. y c
0 0 3 0 a> iC z d'co m 'n �
Q a a) �w w aoEn:d CL (D coo cU. u cd
O d p ." 41 Ey O U a c .� a°
a>Ei c v Z ^O o
a ' ate �'" � �a � ���41 Q
+;' o co d .a 3
aj o E � 0 �- 0a ani a'� cos
°°'bCd 40'oE"a U -a
w
PSI 3wr- E-4� 903000
• ° � j 41 0 •o Q. R c°n •-bz
V co v cp coo o a [y X -0 UC) 0,
o U G o
3 cn-o c~oi1. NP.x o n aL
?+ C Co Q
brjjc o CO
coo 0� aca,;^o a o s ^ "n.o�l�� y
o a,
CA G.0W Q a.�csc.cl cca�'o
0c°Fa
3•� a o.m>w3 s �4a�
'ti q
„ nc O ° os c.0
M>,q� nGo'”"
> �o o.(L) ►n a m
co d 0 >>. ;,
3 3
aa) o R a Q, v ° [ ti > o y ,n c. +� •"
�C ai O m d v o �' , u V1 y" Q. 0. 0 •" m as a a a> � O. N 0 p 0
® .o Cd U o � o R' by o a d ° ayi .moi � C) E-4
o.'�X� t a C'►� o a FO+Z - vii f" i0+ y..�'. ° d rn b Llo �.F•� N �� y
ocs cd
.o " r. F —0 Q� cC +a � O �� F iy
ya - — +' o - a� aq o c o °."x o G. -tOLO 0 a W
oox.,,� o 41ona�o.o oc.-Uurdco 0�tico,`oE"41cd :3 w
CO cn ,� p N ai o �0 � 4) H w y ani F eu � p, a> ,0 a o
oap, > d u, d-rs " d d oop.v o d $n o Ob c. cd cd m �; .n+, d p,
> E as d D,•...., q o � o � .sr c. 4' y �s. as •" a> as o as � c. c. as o •b as
d qx y m to -4 cC 0.0.0 E;^. m 4) C: C: +' �.. c.A >,c. o a
y +' d o^. d� as a) o� w 0 C u c, a 's4 vi s. cd a o R +� as A +J rE W> w q m
d .0 aoi +� '� q � 4,20 m 64
p c0 y �,,� m � R d ai � sr O 'd d d � +' r. aoi o d ° °
a dx �� C Ar. C.'�-0 m•o cry a) ioF.o tU. � m cow �Ig � w a� d � � o ti�E aFi � o ami
.0 cn .4 •p '� •.. •" a3 o M c. . o x .� ." .� A m aS „q d A ,� o c.
+5 ad."a 3 oof1. d .0 -0 9,:) Q. v am.� v, a u ., N.� �AA4 w a.." .,b a
�rop
4 0
c�y'a•i+ayiy3� dm dw >i o'.Wa. 1y" d
W
C�°eoae"+,o
�°A cd b�
Q).0
�
c. a>v� m�.+OLa0'.>,cOS,w ^ti .yP. ll! I
'a "C LO 11 a1 U�c i cdE.co
�'O c. N 6 y
Owb0
4) Ca +'
4J 0 .0 a)0 a3
n° a, �' 5y '.a.0dc 0, Co
co o ap
o >1ro � � •[ ca � .}3 q 7 e,>" C p 'C Q. y yr d � �>' 6 '40 c. o y >, 0 Cd4J.s
�x
cioo+-+-P.
d J S.4 -4cd oa'oc p. .5zX Zd•-r
as
O .4 ., CZX WA
E Ea4b `ooE-A q au o �.boOm� c.� -o .d —>1.adZa ou'
b
ino
cc Tm FRE-4j
4�o3U�vEE�-Yco t.: E -'o°' �owo0>:3Ud0co•"c,
mci _0 E c., 4s W s •�vE
.� E•� U
Minnesota Department of Health
121 East Seventh Place
P.O. Box 64975
St. Paul, MN 55164-0975
December 31, 1997
Plymouth City Council
c/o Ms. Laurie Ahrens, Clerk
Plymouth City Hall
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Council Members:
1270044
Plymouth
Hennepin County
SUBJECT: WARNING: Failure to Meet Bacteriological Monitoring Requirements, Plymouth
According to our records, we did not receive the required number of monthly bacteriological
water samples for the month of November 1997. United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) rules under 40 CFR 141.21 as implemented by Minnesota Rules 4720.0350, require your
system to have 60 water samples analyzed each month. We have only received the results for 59
samples.
Please note that all samples must be taken from representative sites on your distribution
system. Any two samples taken at the same site at the same time can only count as one sample.
Furthermore, raw water samples cannot be used to satisfy the bacteriological monitoring
requirements.
Your system is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the Minnesota Department of Health
(MDH) is receiving a copy of your bacteriological results. Some laboratories do not mail
results to the MDH. It is your responsibility to send a copy by the tenth day of the following
month, or verify that your laboratory is aware of this policy.
If a community repeatedly fails to submit samples, formal enforcement action will be taken by
either the USEPA or the MDH, which may include fines.
If the required sampling has been done, please notify us immediately and submit a copy of your
laboratory results to this department.
Any questions can be directed to Pat McKasy at 612/215-0759.
RDC: PM: 1mw
cc: Water Operator
William Anderl.
Sincerely.
r
Richard D. Clark, P.E.. Supervisor.
Public Water Supply Unit
Section of Drinking Water Protection
Metropolitan District Office, St. Paul
TDD: (612) 623-5522 (Twin Cities) 1-800-627-3529 (Greater Minnesota)
An Equal Opportunity Employer
/ r -c /I—
Minnesota
L