HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 02-07-1997FEBRUARY 7.) 1997
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS
1. COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE:
FEBRUARY 18 6:00 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
Topic: Goals and Objectives Session
Public Safety Training Room
FEBRUARY 19 7:00 P.M. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Council Chambers
MARCH 4 5:30 P.M. BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOGNITION
RECEPTION
Council Chambers
MARCH 5 7:00 P.M. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Council Chambers
2. PLANNING COMMISSION, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 7:00 P.M., Council Chambers.
Agenda is attached. (M-2)
3. PRAC, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 7:00 P.M., Council Chambers. Agenda is attached.
(M-3)
4. WAYZATA/PLYMOUTH AREA CHEMICAL HEALTH COMMISSION, FRIDAY,
FEBRUARY 14, 7:00 A.M., Wayzata Administration Building Conference Room, 210
County Road 101 N. Agenda is attached. (M-4)
5. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 7:00 P.M.,
Hadley Lake Room.
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO
February 7, 1997
Page 2
6. SUB -COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY POLICING, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 5:30
P.M., Medicine Lake Room.
7. HRA, THURSDAY, MARCH20, 7:00 P.M., Council Chambers.
8. MEETING CALENDARS — February and March meeting calendars are attached. (M-7)
1. STAFF REPORTS
a. Report from Assistant Manager Kathy Lueckert comparing license fees for tobacco and
liquor. This item was a directive from the January 22, 1997 regular council meeting.
2. MINUTES
a. Planning Commission meeting of January 28, 1997. (I -2a)
b. PRAC meeting of January 9, 1997. (I -2b)
c. Plymouth Human Rights Commission meeting of February 6, 1997. (I -2c)
d. Wayzata/Plymouth Area Chemical Health Commission meeting of January 10, 1997. (1-
2d)
3. NEWS ARTICLES, RELEASES, PUBLICATIONS, ETC.
a. Invitation to the Mayor and Council from CICC Coordinator Barbara Carlson to a
community meeting about skateboarders at Oakwood Elementary School on Monday,
February 10, at 7:00 a.m., at Oakwood Elementary. A continental breakfast will be
served. (I -3a)
b. Notice from the Minnesota Pollution. Control Agency of closure of the file on a
petroleum release at the Prudential site, 13001 County Road 10. (I -3b)
c. Notice to neighborhood residents from Park Director Eric Blank of a final review of the
West Medicine Lake Park project at the February 13 PRAC meeting. A copy of the plan
is attached. (I -3c)
d. Notice to neighborhood residents from Park Director Eric Blank of a final review of the
East Medicine Regional Trail project at the February 19 City Council meeting. (I -3d)
e. 1995-1996 Prism Biennial Report. (I -3e)
CNY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO
February 7, 1997
Page 3
f. Invitation to the Mayor and Council from Sue Johnson of the Wayzata School Nutrition
Program, to special breakfast at Wayzata West Jr. High School, 149 Barry Avenue N.,
Wayzata, on February 24, from 7:15-7:45 a.m. RSVP by February 21 to 478-9892. (I -3f)
g. Brochure on Environmentally wise yard and home care tips, produced by the University
of Wisconsin, and passed on by the Environmental Quality Committee. (I -3g)
4. CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONS POLICY- CORRESPONDENCE
a. Letter to Pete Jaroscak from Public Safety Director Craig Gerdes responding to
comments about speed bumps and street safety. Attached is Jaroscak's original letter. (I -
4a)
b. Letter to the Mayor from Robert Karon, regarding the January 28, 1997 Planning
Commission meeting. Attached is Community Development Director Anne Hurlburt's
response. (I -4b)
A status report on the most recent correspondence is attached.
5. CORRESPONDENCE
a. Letter to the Mayor from Plymouth area Hennepin County Commissioners about first-
time homebuyer programs. (I -5a)
b. Letter to Orrin Thompson Homes Development Manager Bruce Pankonin from
Community Development Director Anne Hurlburt responding to comments about
planning for northwest Plymouth during the February 18 Special Council Meeting. Also
attached is Pankonin's original letter. (I -b)
6. Friday Fax, the League of Minnesota City's weekly update on legislative activity. (I--6)
Regular Meeting of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission
February 13, 1997, 7 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Election of Chair and Vice Chair
3. Approval of Minutes
4. Visitor Presentations
a. Athletic Associations
b. Staff
c. Others
5. Report on Past Council Action
a. Approved dasher board advertising
b. Approved Zamboni advertising contract
c. Approved ice center behavior policies
d. Approved activity center sub -committee
6. Unfinished Business
a. West Medicine Lake Park phase 3 - approve final plan
b. Ice arena/Life Time Fitness update
c. Open spaces update
d. Elm Creek playfield update
e. Continue golf course discussion
f. East Medicine Lake regional trail update
g. Approve 1996 annual report and 1997 work plan
h.
7. New Business
a. Review and approve 1997 rental fees and policies
b. Skate board park grant update
C.
8. Commission Presentation
9. Staff Communication
10. Adjourn
Next regular meeting - March 13
parks\smft\eric\prac\agendas\feb97.doc
a
y
.WIPAC14C
WAYZATA/PLYMOUTH AREA CHEMICAL HEALTH COMMISSION
600 RICE STREET • WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 • 612/473-0234
Meeting Notice
Friday, February 14, 1997
7:00 A.M.
Wayzata School Administration Bldg.
Conference Room
210 County Road 101 North
Plymouth, MN
A. Introductions
B. Review Agenda
C. Review and Approve Minutes, Secretary's Report.
D. Treasurer Report
E. School Updates and Youth Leadership: , trategies
F. College Issues ;ry
G. Public Safety Update
H. District Chemical Health Position
I. Long Range Planning
J. Other Business
K. Future Agenda Items
L. ADJOURNMENT
NEXT WPCHC MEETING March 14, 1997, 7:00 a.m.
PLEASE DON'T DO NOTHING
m -g
00
ow>
N
N
C13
b
M
O
n
U
u �sn00v
�xZ�
o. O w
a
a
opi
�
o x
00
z
0�
y _s�
oz0
gdF
oz0
^ANN
1
V
�F
A��IwL�
0
MzzOU�
V'1
b
N
a
M
U
N
O
^O
U
'r
00
h
N
CN
iA
c�
t"
op
^+
N
N
H
=mg
4-
=MA
>
v Y
~
N
I
N
o
io•6
s
�s
=V
a.0
xU
roic 0
oU
joUO
>
'n
N
to .
u
V]
-
O
F
U
¢
UOg
n
5
h
raper
d d
ij
^°
N
U—
i
C
F$
F
�Lu
�
_
oWS,
a.-
rpt
m°�o•�
F o
`0
�'�
��w c
�2 c
OZV
0z
e•y
8=
°O
8�
o>,O o
I,haUV
°'O o
$u
c�
O
i
Li
L
v
=
a?
con
�J
N
O
^O
U
DATE: February 5, 1997
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Kathy Lueckert, Assistant City Manager �V
SUBJECT: Comparison of License Fees for Tobacco and Liquor
Councilmember Bildsoe requested a comparison of Plymouth's license fees for tobacco
and liquor and those charged by other cities. A spreadsheet is attached which shows
the license fees for the major liquor categories. Also attached is a copy of the
comparisons for tobacco licensing, completed in 1996 when the tobacco ordinance was
changed.
Councilmember Bildsoe also asked why the difference in licensing fees between on -sale
liquor and off -sale liquor. Minnesota Statutes dictates the maximum license fee for off -
sale liquor. Cities with populations over 10,000 (but not cities of the first class) may
charge a maximum of $200 for an off -sale liquor license. There are no such
restrictions for on -sale liquor.
All of the city's license fees are reviewed each fall, and the City Council adopts any
changes. The Council adopted license fee changes in December 1996; however, no
changes were made to liquor license fees. Although the Council may make changes
during the course of the year, the fee changes normally would not go into effect until
the next round of liquor license renewals, or if a new license were approved.
rl-'
to iL
to
to
a
;�
ppi
co
jtn
O
N
N
N
C
V
�
w
t�I
toO
O
_
Ml
rl-
ti
N
=
0
J
O
.i
N
tU
N
10D
I
00
I
cN
N
O
U')
co
I
I
i
—
O
11co
UJ
(
I
13
IO
O
IMS
O
O
co
Lo
al
I
I
I
I
n
10
0
'nl
YI
°ol
O
o
Into
c
N
lo
0
LO
0
00>
O
t4
'o`
IM
i
Lf)I
N
( o
al
iii
I
I
I
VIM
`
o
�.a
r)
O
i
to
co
18'
VIIcoo
E
c,
I
E
I :9
� cc
to
N
ai
p
I O
1
IN
O
m
LL
O
O
O
O
I 'C�
m
V)
Ci
C
0
I
I
r
ttOO
N
NCO
i
�
C
v
ISI
LU
i�l
I :
)
o
J
O
N
O
N
to
I'
L
691
0
I
N
O
n
Q
E
Go
3
I
N
I.�
.d
J
w.
aI
E
m
4)
c
to
c
O
NN
N
c
co
NO
N
_IU
O
fA
!n
L
m
E
.`
NI
O
c
O
CO)
Ic
#
�,
o
m
E
OI
pC
od
10
,
m4)
Of
!Co
4))
I
o
m'wN
I
O
0I
WAN
Ici'v)
IN
IM
cr
JI
i—
�I
64%IQ
N
s
JIB
m
rn
N
EL
ORDINANCE PROVISIONS:
Eden
Bloom
Plymouth
New Hope
Golden
Edina
Crystal
Mtka
Mpls
Prairie
inglon
Valley
License Fee
i2S0
$so
$150
x30
x20
sm
sm
$30
$ISO
1 st Offense
b be
b 5500 Gla
x200
ddetermne
euspd to
d
10 dys
2nd Offense
lo $750 Or
$400
Vendor Penalties
suspd to
20 dys
3rd Offense
a 51,000
30 dy
Wor suspd
suspension
lo 30 dys
4th Offense
revocation
1 sl Offense
to s50o
'rote 1
2nd Offense
a $750
Clerk Penalties
3rd Offense
a st,000
Vending Machine Prohibited
x
x
x
x
x
Vending Machine Restricted
x
wlttrin view
x
No Sell Service
x
sane
same
x
Self Service
Prohibitions
'restriction
restreban
a
No Single
Packs
x
x
No sett-service
less than a
carton
Seller 16 or Older
x
Random
x
x
Compliance Checks
Unannounced
Once Yearly
(by ordinance or city
policy)
Twice or More
x
x
x
x
per Year
Movable place of business prohibited
x
x
x
x
(mots vehicle
AN billboards
x
Moratorium
x
x
x
pmhl*ed
x
Bilboard Prohibitions
banned
on new bb
eseept an
hwY 100
Tobacco
billboards
banned
1. State law makes it a gross misdemeanor to sell tobacco to a minor. This law is applied only to the dark.
2. No licenses currently Issued to provable place of business.
3. Revocation can be imposed If cigarettes are sold during a susperWaL
4. Additional penalties for further violations
oaonrokT T6.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JANUARY 28, 1997
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Mike Stulberg, Commissioners Roger
Berkowitz, Kim Koehnen, John Stoebner, Jeffrey
Thompson, and Bob Stein
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Allen Ribbe
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Anne Hurlburt,
Planning Supervisor Barb Senness, Planners Shawn Drill,
and Kendra Lindahl, City Engineer Dan Faulkner, and
Clerical Supervisor Denise Hutt
1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
2. PUBLIC FORUM:
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
MOTION by Commissioner Koehnen, seconded by Commissioner Berkowitz to approve
the January 14, 1997 Planning Commission Minutes. Vote. 5 Ayes. (Commissioner
Thompson abstained.)
5. CONSENT AGENDA:
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (96181)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by the City of Plymouth to consider
reclassification of the commercial site located at the southeast corner of Highway 55 and
County Road 24 "Seven Ponds Commercial Site" from "C" (Commercial) to "CO"
(Commercial Office) on the City's land use guide plan; and, a concurrent rezoning of the
property to "O -R" (Office Residential).
Planning Supervisor Senness gave an overview of the January 22, 1997 staff report.
Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #8
Chairman Stulberg introduced Kelly Slavik of 3325 Everest Court. Ms. Slavik stated that
Hans Hagen met with residents concerning his proposal for the site. She stated that Mr.
Hagen is not willing to change any of his proposal, with the exception of agreeing to
place additional trees to buffer the residential from the commercial. Ms. Slavik stated
that she agrees with the City's proposal to reguide the site to Commercial Office and
rezone the site to Office/Residential. Ms. Slavik stated that the site is appropriate for the
Office -Residential Transition district, as it should provide for an orderly and progressive
transition and land use from business to residential development, and provide for
harmonious intermixing of such activities. She stated that commercial buildings under
office/residential zoning should feature businesses that have limited contact with the
general public. Ms. Slavik stated that there is not a neighborhood need for a gas station,
fast-food restaurants, grocery stores or convenience stores, as there is an adequate supply
of those establishments that meet the needs of the residents. Ms. Slavik stated that she
has a petition with over 80 signatures of residents in support of changing the zoning to
Office/Residential.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Scott Ford of 3270 Garland Lane North. Mr. Ford stated
the residents are concerned for the safety of the 24 children living in the area. He stated
that the residents are concerned with the children waiting for the bus on the corner of
Garland and Medina, which is already a bad situation. Mr. Ford stated that the residents
are concerned that there will be an increase in crime due to fast-food restaurants and a gas
station being proposed by Hans Hagen. Mr. Ford stated that if these uses are approved
for the site, it could be a potential hangout for high school kids when the new high school
is completed. Mr. Ford stated that when the traffic increases on Medina Road, it
increases traffic into their neighborhood.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Julie Johnson of 3345 Everest Court. Ms. Johnson stated
that she is concerned with additional traffic and the personal safety of the children. She
too was concerned that if fast-food restaurants and a gas station go in, it could be a
hangout for the high school kids. Ms. Johnson stated that the sidewalk is not being
plowed, so residents have to walk on Medina Road to get to the path to the neighborhood
park. Ms. Johnson stated that the fire station is in close proximity to the property, and
that they may have a hard time getting through the area in an emergency situation.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Mike Johnson of 3345 Everest Court. Mr. Johnson stated
that the area is not suitable for high levels of commercial traffic. The County will not
allow access from Highway 55 and County Road 24; therefore, access is now forced from
Medina Road. Mr. Johnson stated that the intersection at County Road 24 and Medina is
already a busy intersection and that there is discussion of putting a traffic light there. He
stated that if that occurs, a traffic light would then be needed at the intersection of Medina
and Garland Lane. He stated that the light would not be feasible because of the proximity
of a major intersection already. Mr. Johnson stated that residents will have difficulty
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #9
getting in and out of their properties. Mr. Johnson stated that Mr. Hagen stated that they
have a similar development in Woodbury that is adjacent to single family homes. Mr.
Johnson stated that the development in Woodbury would differ, as there is an access to
the development from a major highway, and traffic does not have to travel through a
residential area Mr. Johnson stated that other commercial properties in Plymouth such as
Cub Foods, Rainbow Foods, and Target have multiple accesses that do not go through a
residential area.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Paul Anderson of 3340 Everest Court. Mr. Johnson stated
his appreciation for work done in the past regarding planting, and buffering. He stated
that the Planning Commission should continue to see if they can minimize the impact of
this situation with the residential area. He stated that a commercial development should
blend in to the area, and encouraged the Commission to recommend the property be
zoned Office Residential.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Mark Capece of 3320 Garland Lane. Mr. Capece stated
his concern for odors that are attributed to fast-food and sit-down restaurants, gas/service
station, grocery stores, and increased traffic. Mr. Capece stated that additional trash and
litter would be created with a commercial area. Mr. Capece stated his preference to
rezone the property to Office Residential.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Sue McMorris of 3255 Garland Lane. Ms. McMorris
stated her concern of the noise problems that they are currently experiencing with the
Moen-Leuer property, such as trucks backing up, snow removal, delivery trucks, and
trucks running all night. Ms. McMorris stated that the Hans Hagen proposal would
increase the noise level from the proposed gas station, auto repair/service station, car
wash, and fast-food restaurants.
Chairman Stulberg introduced David Slavik of 3325 Everest Court. Mr. Slavik stated
that the roads have changed since the property was originally zoned. Mr. Stlavik
presented a map depicting Mr. Hagen's proposal and pointed out the access points to the
site. He stated that to access the site you have to enter from Medina Road. Mr. Slavik
also pointed out the proposed berms. Mr. Slavik stated that. the developer's site line plan
only addresses properties that are immediately adjacent to Medina Road and neglects
other views from homes in the area. He stated that current berms are too small and
contain dips. The neighborhood is already experiencing water run-off problems, which
would be increased with the developer's proposal. Mr. Slavik stated that the Mr. Hagen
told the residents that they were aware that the property was commercial when they
brought their property. Mr. Slavik presented information that was given to him by Seven
Ponds when he purchased his home. The information from Seven Ponds depicted
approximately 90 parking spaces on the map, and on the new map there are
approximately 800 spaces.. Mr. Slavik stated that there is no way to build berms that
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #10
i
would adequately block signs from the developer's proposal. Mr. Slavik stated that he
concurred with the proposed Office Residential as proposed by the City.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Jerry Pietig of 3300 Garland Lane. Mr. Pietig stated his
concern that the Hans Hageri proposal could have a negative affect on property values.
He stated that three out of seven homes near the Moen-Leuer property have sold at a loss.
Mr. Peitig stated his preference for Office Residential zoning. He stated that it was a
mistake to zone the property commercial in the first place, and asked where else in the
City can you find intense commercial development allowed next to residential.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Kim Reaume of 3305 Garland Lane. Mr. Reaume stated
that the residents are not trying to take away the owner's rights, but that case law is on
their side. Mr. Reaume cited Parranto Bros. Vs. City of New Brighton. Mr. Reaume
stated he is in favor of changing the zoning to Office Residential. Mr. Reaume stated that
he enjoys living in Plymouth, and would not want to have to sell his home, but will have
to if it remains commercial.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Susan Schaefer of 3330 Everest Court. Ms. Schaefer
stated her support for the change to Office Residential.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Linda Fisher of 1500 Norwest Financial Center. Ms.
Fisher stated that she represents Hans Hagen Homes, the owner of the property. Ms.
Fisher stated her strong opposition of the reguiding to Office Residential. She stated that
this property is currently a Planned Unit Development. Ms. Fisher also strongly
requested that the hearing be continued to the February 11, 1997 Planning Commission
meeting, as the property notices indicated. She stated that the owner would like the
opportunity to review comments made at the meeting, and the staff report for the next
meeting. Ms. Fisher indicated that if the public hearing were to close, they would like to
make a presentation, but that if the hearing is continued, they would wait until the next
meeting.
Director Hurlburt stated that the hearing should be continued since the property notices
indicated that.
Chairman Stulberg introduced a letter dated January 28, 1997 from Greg Katchmark. In
his letter, Mr. Katchmark stated that he is in favor of the request for changing the
property to Office Residential, as it will improve the private enjoyment of his home and
property. Mr. Katchmark stated in his letter that poor planning would be the result of
allowing the property to be platted for uses such as a 24-hour consumer grocery store,
gas/convenience store, automotive repair shops, and restaurants.
Director Hurlburt stated that the hearing was initiated by the Planning Commission, and
that staff is not the petitioner. She stated that staff's role is just to make a
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997 .�
Page #11
recommendation. She stated that staff has not determined a recommendation, and will
not until they receive and review all the pertinent information. Director Hurlburt stated
that the staff report will be available to the public the Friday before the next Planning
Commission meeting.
Chairman Stulberg directed City Engineer Faulkner to forward Ms. Johnson's comments
pertaining to the sidewalk to the appropriate staff.
MOTION by Commissioner Thomspon, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner to
continue the item to the February 11, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. Vote. 6
Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
B. FOURTH BAPTIST CHURCH (96185)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by Fourth Baptist Church for a Land Use guide
Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan and Conditional Use Permits for
construction of a church, K-12 school, seminary, and radio station to be located on the
southeast quadrant of Forestview Lane and Old County Road 15.
Planner Lindahl gave an overview of the January 17, 1997 staff report.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Skip McCombs of 11705-54`h Avenue North, representing
the petitioner. Mr. McCombs introduced the people involved with the project.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Douglas McLoehlin of 6342 Edgemont Circle North,
representing the petitioner. Mr. McLoehlin stated that Fourth Baptist Church is located in
Minneapolis and was built in 1881. The christian school is 30 years old and has 300
students (Kindergarten through 12`h grade). Mr. McLoehlin stated that many members
live in the western suburbs and they anticipate a congregation size of 550. The seminary
is a graduate institution for masters and doctorate level, and classes are completed by
noon. The radio station signal is conveyed through telephone lines. Mr. McLoehlin
stated that they want to be good neighbors and to make a positive contribution.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Reverend Stephen Seidler, of 11725 -53rd Avenue North,
representing Fourth Baptist Church. Reverend Seidler stated that he is the administrator
of the christian school. He stated that they began their school operation in 1966 with 45
students. Their school is a college preparation program, and school hours are 8:30 a.m.
to 3:15 p.m. The school is a closed campus. Reverend Seidler stated that the elementary
students do go outside during the day for recess, but that there would not be any night
games activities.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Scott Crosby of Dennis Batty and Associates, representing
the petitioner. Mr. Crosby presented color drawings of the site. The seminary is one
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #12
level which leads into the Church, and then to the school which is two stories. One level
of the school is partially underground. The character of the church will have a colonial
theme, and the exterior will consist of a no -maintenance type material. Mr. Crosby stated
that it is 57 feet to the top of the church roof (excluding the steeple). Most of the building
falls below the 45 -foot requirement. Mr. Crosby presented the Site Plan pointing out the
maintenance building, outdoor trash enclosures, and accesses for deliveries. He indicated
where there is room for a future expansion of the sanctuary building if needed. Mr.
Crosby stated that they tried to preserve all trees near the wetlands.
Chairman Stulberg questioned whether their variance request for 49 feet was high enough
for the steeple. Planning Supervisor Senness replied that there is a particular formula in
the zoning ordinance for calculation of height, and the variance request of 49 feet is
accurate.
Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Greg Deckert of 3815 Alvarado Lane North. Mr. Deckert
stated that he has been a resident for years and is a member of the Fourth Baptist Church.
He stated that he is thrilled about the prospect of having the church and school in
Plymouth.
Chairman Stulberg introduced James Gieszler of 2610 Medicine Ridge Road. Mr.
Gieszler, stated that he has lived in Plymouth since 1975, and all three of his children
have graduated from Fourth Baptist Church school. Mr. Gieszler stated that he is excited
about the possibility of the church being located in Plymouth.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Bill Goldsmith of 725 Cottonwood Lane. Mr. Goldsmith
stated his concern with how the project will impact traffic because the traffic is already
heavy on Highway 55 and the service road. Mr. Goldsmith asked what the City is going
to do with the traffic on Highway 55 and the area in general. He asked if it is legal to run
the stop sign when the light is green. Mr. Goldsmith asked if there will be a traffic light
at Forestview Lane. Mr. Goldsmith also asked how close a service road can be to a
property line.
Chairman Stulberg introduced James Martin of 10603-32"d Avenue. Mr. Martin stated
that he has been a resident of Plymouth for 38 years and his six children have graduated
from Fourth Baptist Church school. Mr. Martin stated his desire for approval of the
request.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Beverly and Don Pfaffe of 14005-44`h Place North #2. Mr.
Pfaffe stated that he is happy with the prospect of the church coming to Plymouth.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #13
i
Chairman Stulberg introduced Steve Schmidt of 525 Evergreen Lane. Mr. Schmidt
thanked the representatives of Fourth Baptist for inviting the neighbors to a meeting to
explain their proposal. Mr. Schmidt stated that the building is attractive and well
designed, but is very large. Mr. Schmidt stated that there is not enough buffer around the
wetland area, especially where the soccer field is proposed to be. Mr. Schmidt was
concerned with the property values because of the loss of buffering and the noise from the
soccer field. Mr. Schmidt stated that a condition should be added that guarantees no
lights allowed on the playing field, and to require more buffering with full hedges, six to
ten feet high.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Mike Sisken of 530 Evergreen Lane. Mr. Sisken stated
that he concurred with Mr. Schmidt. Mr. Sisken stated that with a project this size, there
are couple of disadvantages. The facility will be used seven days a week, and it will be
loud at times with the kids and playing fields. He stated that extra berming would help.
Mr. Sisken stated that the steeple is a large structure that would tower over the normal
tree line. He asked if the loading zone could be relocated. He suggested that the
Commission require additional berms, reducing the steeple size, and using shared parking
spaces with Honneywell.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Karen Stenberg of 4910 Kirkwood Lane. Ms. 8tenberg
stated that she is grateful for the impact that the church has had on their children and
family, and is looking forward to the church moving to Plymouth.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Connie Seidler of 11725-53`d Avenue North. Ms. Seidler
stated that she is in favor of the proposal.
Chairman Stulberg introduced David Whiteford of 211 Saratoga Lane. Mr. Whiteford
stated that he looks forward to the church moving to Plymouth, and supports the
recommendation.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Diane Bornhorst of 11714 Sunset Trail. Ms. Bornhorst
stated her concern with major land use changes in her area over the years. She stated that
she is concerned with the removal of the trees and that the City should require
replacement of trees with a 4 inch caliper. She suggested that they replace with older
trees. Ms. Bornhorst stated that she would like a stipulation added that no radio
transmitter can be built on the site. Ms. Bornhorst asked if there would be parking of
vans and buses and if so, they should be screened. Ms. Bornhorst also wanted to know if
Oh Avenue would be extended.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Howard Milstein of 545 Evergreen Lane. Mr. Milstin
stated that he endorses the idea of the church, but is concerned with the height of the
steeple. He asked if the drawing accurately represents the height of the steeple. Director
Hurlburt responded that the distance is measured according to the ordinance.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #14
Chairman Stulberg closed the public hearing.
In response to questions, City Engineer Faulkner stated that if the Schiebe Hardware
shopping center is ever redeveloped, the frontage road would be redesigned at that time.
Pertaining to Highway 55, the City will not initiate that since it is controlled by the
County. He stated that no additional traffic signals are planned for the immediate area at
this time. City Engineer Faulkner commented that the proposed use would generate less
traffic than the existing guiding.
In response to Mr. Goldsmith's question, Planner Lindahl stated that a driveway is
required to be at least 20 feet from the side property line. She stated that the applicant's
plan shows 25 to 30 feet.
Mr. McCombs stated that the steeple needs to be high because of Highway 55, but they
can take another look at it to see if adjustments would be warranted. In response to other
questions/issues raised, Mr. McCombs stated that if an additional berm is put in and the
grade is raised, it would impact the wetland. The maintenance building is 20. feet by 20
feet and would be compatible with the church. There will be one large bus, four small
buses and two vans. The satellite dish will be completely screened on all sides.
Reverend Seidler stated that they have a garage in Minneapolis where the bus and vans
could be stored. There would be times that the vehicles would be on site. He stated that
there are seven vehicles total. Director Hurlburt asked if the there are spaces designated
on the Site Plan for van parking. McCombs replied negatively, but they could be put on
plan on the north side by Highway 55. Revered Seidler added that the school dismisses
classes at different times.
Planner Lindahl stated that the Ordinance allows the applicant to remove up to 75 percent
of the caliper inches of significant trees without reforestation. The applicant will remove
only 54 percent of the caliper inches, which complies with the Tree Preservation
Ordinance. In response to the suggestion to plant older trees, Director Hurlburt stated
that it would be appropriate to address that issue when the Landscape Policy is revised.
She stated that according to the City Forester, smaller trees stand a better chance of
survival. Commissioner Thompson concurred, stating that the Department of Natural
Resources suggests planting small trees, as the survival rate on large trees is relatively
low.
Planner Lindahl explained that the proposed plan shows 352 parking spaces. The
Ordinance requires 263 spaces for the church and an additional 280 spaces for the school,
seminary and radio station. However, because the church is a weekend use and the other
uses will be weekday uses, shared parking spaces seems appropriate. Based on the joint
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #15
use standards in the Zoning Ordinance, staff concluded that the 352 proposed parking
spaces would adequately serve this site.
Mr. McCombs stated that it is not their intention to build a radio tower on the site.
Chairman Stulberg asked if it would cause any problem, if a condition were added to the
approving resolution prohibiting the placement of a radio tower. Mr. McCombs replied
negatively.
Chairman Stulberg asked if the steeple represents a sign that draws people to the facility,
or an integral part of the church. Dennis Batty, the petitioner, stated that the steeple is
part of the architecture and overall composition of the facility. He stated that a building
this large should have an "exclamation mark". He added that it is part of the
congregation's worship space, and a road sign was not the intent.
In response to Ms. Bornhorst's question, Planner Drill replied that the City has no plans
to construct Oh Avenue at this time, but reserves the right as a possibility in the future.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked if a Conditional Use Permit would be required if the
applicant would want the playing field to be used at night. Planning Supervisor Senness
replied that the addition of lighting would require a Site Plan Amendment, and would
have to come before the Planning Commission, but not as a public hearing. Director
Hurlburt suggested that if it is a concern, a condition should be added to the approving
resolution.
Commissioner Koehnen asked Director Hurlburt to comment on wildlife and nature
issues. Director Hurlburt stated that the city has made a lot of progress by initiating a
Wetland Ordinance and a Tree Preservation Policy. The city has conducted an open
space inventory. She stated that they have found that wildlife is adaptable, and unless an
individual or the public is willing to acquire certain property, the city can't protect it all.
MOTION by Commissioner Stoebner, seconded by Commissioner Thompson
recommending approval of a Land Use Guide Plan Amendment for Fourth Baptist
Church for property located southeast of the intersection of Highway 55 and Forestview
Lane. Roll Call Vote. 6' Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously.
MOTION by Commissioner Stoebner seconded by Commissioner Thompson
recommending approval of Rezoning for Fourth Baptist Church for property located
southeast of the intersection of Highway 55 and Forestview Lane. Roll Call Vote. 6
Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously.
MOTION by Commissioner Stoebner, seconded by Commissioner Thompson
recommending approval of a Preliminary Plat and Site Plan for Fourth Baptist Church for
property located at the southeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Forestview Lane.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #16
C
MOTION to Amend by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Koehnen
to add a condition prohibiting placement of a radio transmitter tower; a condition
requiring an area be made available on the north side of the building for a bus/van corral;
and, a condition prohibiting lighting on the playfield.
Roll Call Vote on MOTION to Amend. 6 Ayes. MOTION to Amend carried on a
unanimous vote.
Roll Call Vote on Main MOTION. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried on a unanimous vote.
MOTION by Commissioner Stoebner, seconded by Commissioner Thompson
recommending approval of four Conditional Use Permits for Fourth Baptist Church for
property located at the southeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Forestview Lane.
Commissioner Berkowitz stated that he was concerned with the height of the steeple and
cited the other two Conditional Use Permits that were granted for Glory of Christ
Lutheran Church and Plymouth Presbyterian Church.
MOTION by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner Stein to delete the
height from Condition #2 of the approving Conditional Use Permits resolution.
Commissioner Berkowitz stated that by deleting the height, the applicant would have to
come back for a Conditional Use Permit for the steeple separately.
Commissioner Thompson stated that the size of the building dictates the need for a large
steeple and it is an inherent part of the church. He stated that the grounds for denying a
Conditional Use Permit is not justified.
Commissioner Berkowitz stated that he does not want a denial of the Conditional Use
Permit, and is not necessarily opposed to the 118 foot steeple, but would like to see
further analysis and consideration.
Chairman Stulberg stated that he couldn't support the motion, because he's not an expert
when it comes to what height is appropriate.
Planning Supervisor Senness stated that the Plymouth Presbyterian Church overall
proportion was much smaller that this proposal. Director Hurlburt explained that it is not
really possible to alter the applicant's plan, and cannot remove a Conditional Use Permit.
The Commission has to take action one way or another. She stated that if denied, it can't
be resubmitted for another six months. She stated that the Commission can add
conditions relative to it.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page # 17
Commissioner Berkowitz withdrew his Motion to Amend. Commissioner Stein stated
his concern for setting a precedent on steeple height. He concurred that the steeple does
fit the scale of the building, but is still concerned with setting a precedent. Commissioner
Thompson stated that the size of the building warrants the height. Commissioner
Stoebner commented that he was not concerned about setting a precedent, as each
property is unique and distinct. Commissioner Stein withdrew his second on the
Motion to Amend.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried on a unanimous vote.
Chairman Stulberg called a recess at 9:40 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 9:52 p.m.
C. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (96188)
Chairman Stulberg introduced the request by the City of Plymouth to consider a Land
Use Guide Plan Amendment to reguide the property located in the northwest quadrant of
Highway 55 and Dunkirk Lane from C (Commercial) and LA -1 (Living Area 1) to LA -2
(Living Area 2).
Planner Drill gave an overview of the January 23, 1997 staff report. Planner Drill
explained that when Town & Country's application for LA -3 guiding was submitted, staff
only looked at their specific request. Since that time, staff has conducted a thorough
analysis, and concluded that LA -2 guiding with additional buffering could be more
appropriate.
Chairman Stulberg opened the public hearing.
Chairman Stulberg read a letter dated January 28, 1997 from Marcia Blake of 3885
Comstock Lane supporting the request to reguide the property to LA -2.
Chairman Stulberg read a letter dated January 27, 1997 from Gangadhar B. Sohoni of
16640-39`h Place North supporting the request to reguide the property to LA -2.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Robert Karon of 16910-41' Avenue North. Mr. Karon
stated that he supports the recommendation for LA -2 guiding. He submitted a petition
with signatures from 24 of the 26 homesites requesting the guiding be changed to LA -2.
Mr. Karon stated that the land was guided LA -1 when Holly Creek and Westbranch
owners made their investments. LA -2 guiding could preserve the quality of investments
for residents of Holly Creek and Westbranch. LA -3 guiding would be too dense. Mr.
Karon stated that LA -2 guiding is more compatible with the surrounding area. Mr. Karon
presented pictures of homes in LA -1, LA -2 and LA -3 guided property. Mr. Karon stated
that there are as many as 40 children from the age of six months to 12 years. He stated
that there are no sidewalks in the area and children play in their driveways and on the
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #18
"Za
streets in the late afternoon when the weather is nice. He stated that any rezoning to
contiguous properties that would be high density would be a breach of trust with those
residents who bought lots and built homes based upon the guiding.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Richard Aadalen of 3890 Comstock Lane. Mr. Aadalen
stated that he fully supports the recommendation for LA -2 guiding.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Stephanie Brandmeyer of 3930 Black Oaks Lane. Ms.
Brandmeyer stated that she concurred with Mr. Karon's comments, and that she
purchased her home with the intent of the contiguous property being guided LA -1 and
Commercial.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Jean McConnach of 3880 Comstock Lane North. Ms.
McConnach stated that she concurred with all comments made and that LA -2 is the
appropriate guiding for the property.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Nancy Napier of 16520-39`h Avenue North. Ms. Napier
thanked the Commission for working toward an equitable solution, and stated that LA -2
is the appropriate and most acceptable guiding to the surrounding residents.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Randy Ridings of 16500-391h Avenue North. Mr. Ridings
thanked the Commission for the opportunity to speak. Mr. Ridings stated that the
residents want to protect their property investment and quality of life. He stated that the
issue can be debated forever, but the solution of LA -2 satisfies the issue.
Chairman Stulberg introduced David Rowe of 3975 Black Oaks Lane North. Mr. Rowe
concurred with Mr. Ridings, and stated that he moved in with the assumption that the
property in questioned was to remain LA -1 guiding.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Jerry Theis of 16800 Highway 55. Mr. Theis stated that
this is the third time in one year that his property has come up for reguiding. He stated
that he has been in operation since 1956, and purchased the additional 20 acres in
question in 1974. Mr. Theis stated that because of assessments on the property, it is no
longer economically feasible to grow the trees and plants anymore on the 20 acres. Mr.
Theis stated that it is reasonable to guide the property LA -3. He stated that LA -2 does
not fit with commercial land to the south and to the west. Mr. Theis stated that if the City
won't agree to the LA -3 guiding, Mike Gair has a new proposal to present.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Mike Gair of 15050-23`d Avenue North. Mr. Gair stated
that he is representing Mr. Theis and that they are opposed to the LA -2 guiding. He
stated that as the land owner, Mr. Theis' needs should be considered and addressed. Mr.
Gair stated that some of the concern from the Town and Country proposal for LA -3 came
from people living east of Dunkirk. The Comprehensive Plan provides transition from
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #19
LA -1 to LA -2 via Dunkirk Lane. He stated that the Holly Creek subdivision was
approved with full knowledge that the Dundee property was zoned Commercial. Mr.
Gair stated that it is an unreasonable directive for the Theis property to absorb the
transition solely on their own. He stated that the property could be appropriately guided
for Commercial, LA -1, LA -2 or LA -3. Mr. Gair asked the Commission to consider the
triangular portion that is currently guided LA -1, be reguided to LA -2 providing additional
transition from the north and east, and the remainder of the site be guided LA -3. He
stated that it would be more consistent with Mr. Theis' plans.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Tom Blanck of 16605-39`h Place North. Mr. Blanck stated
that he supports the request for LA -2 guiding, as it would be more consistent with the
surrounding area. He stated that he is concerned with a negative affect on property values
if the land was guided LA -3.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Vicky Duncan of 3850 Comstock Lane. Ms. Duncan
stated that the Commission needs to focus on what exists today and base their decision on
reality. She stated that the reality is that there is commercial property and homeowners
that have spent a great deal of money for their homes. She stated that there is already a
lack of buffering and that LA -2 guiding makes the most sense now.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Fred Hulting of 16630-39' Place North. Mr. Hulting
stated that he supports the LA -2 guiding proposal, and is concerned with traffic and
density of LA -3 guiding.
Chairman Stulberg introduced John Byers of 3895 Comstock Lane. Mr. Byers stated that
he agrees with the request for LA -2 guiding, and it is a good compromise for everyone.
He stated that there is not a hardship on the property. Mr. Byers asked how many units
per acre is allowed for LA -3 guiding. Director Hurlburt stated that six to 12 units are
allowed for LA -3 guiding and three to six units for LA -2 guiding. Mr. Byers stated that
this is like another Seven Ponds issue.
Chairman Stulberg introduced Jacki Haughey of 16900-41' Avenue North. Ms. Haughey
stated that the Dundee property value has increased because of the Holly Creek homes.
She stated that Garland Lane going through is not necessarily favorable.
Mr. Karon stated that Mr. Theis bought the parcel in 1974 and the value has increased.
He stated that it is balancing the interest of one individual versus hundreds of other
residents and their property values.
Mr. Ridings stated that the proposal Mr. Gair presented increases the LA -3 area and
would not be acceptable.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #20
Mr. Gair restated that they are proposing the northeast five acres be guided LA -2, and the
remainder of the subject property be changed from Commercial to LA -3. Mr. Gair asked
staff to clarify the history of the land guiding of the property. Mr. Gair stated that he
assumed that the Orrin Thompson property used to be guided Commercial. Planner Drill
stated that the Dundee property has not changed since the 1988 Comprehensive Plan. Mr.
Gair stated that the northeast portion is separated by a wetland area, and that the
triangular piece was created for a roadway to run parallel with Highway 55.
Chairman Stulberg closed the public hearing.
Director Hurlburt stated that the Commission is not holding a hearing on Rezoning. The
request if for a Land Use Guide Plan Amendment. If there were a development proposal,
then there would be a Rezoning application. She explained that several zoning
classifications could go with a particular guiding. Guiding does not say what kind of
structure, it pertains to density. Director Hurlburt stated that the City published a hearing
for property to reguide to LA -2, and that there was a previous hearing on all property to
LA -3. She stated that there a number of possibilities and alternatives for the property,
and the City has a great deal of discretion. She stated that the City has found support for
LA -2, LA -3 and to retain the current guiding.
MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Berkowitz
recommending the approval of a Land Use Guide Plan Amendment for property located
in the northwest quadrant of Highway 55 and Dunkirk Lane.
Commissioner Thompson stated that it seems clear from the testimony that LA -2 would
provide a much better transition than LA -3. He stated that he is concerned with LA -3 on
any portion that abuts Holly Creek, so the alternative would not be acceptable to him.
Commissioner Koehnen stated that based on the information presented she would support
the motion.
Commissioner Berkowitz stated that if the guiding is changed, it doesn't prevent the
owner from coming forward with a development plan. He stated that the guiding is
appropriate for the action.
Commissioner Thompson stated that he can sympathize with the owner on hardship, but
no proof has been presented to the contrary.
Commissioner Stulberg stated that he would not support the motion, as another
alternative has been suggested. He stated he would like to see the new proposal brought
forward. He stated that normally the Commission does not deal with the financial side of
the owner or the residents. He stated that the financial hardship that Mr. Theis alluded to
was for sewer and water assessments for new homes not on his property.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #21
Commissioner Stein stated that the alternate proposal would warrant further consideration
to see if a compromise can be reached.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked that if the motion carried, would it prevent the owner
from coming forward with another plan to reguide to LA -1 or LA -3. Director Hurlburt
replied that if the City Council approves the recommendation, it would not preclude
them. There is no limit on how many applications an owner can make. Town and
Country also has an application pending and the Commission will have to recommend
approval or denial. If both applications were disposed of, the owner can come back with
a new application.
Commissioner Berkowitz stated that this is similar to the Elim Care application. He
stated that it doesn't put a burden on the owner to come up with a new alternative.
Director Hurlburt stated that Elim Care withdrew their application and then submitted a
revised application. Had the City denied the application, the City may be faced with a
time line as to when the owner can submit something new.
Chairman Stulberg commented that since the City is the petitioner, he would like to see
all new information and alternatives before a decision is made.
Roll Call Vote. 3 Ayes. MOTION failed on a 3-3 Vote. (Commissioners Stoebner and
Stein and Chairman Stulberg voted nay.)
MOTION by Chairman Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner to table the item
in order to allow staff time to gather information on the proposed alternative.
Commissioner Berkowitz asked if it wouldn't be more appropriate to dispose of the
City's petition and put it back with the developer. Director Hurlburt stated that the City
has held a hearing on LA -2 or LA -3, and both are possibilities alone or as a combination.
Commissioner Thompson requested that the item be brought back at the same time as
Town and Country's proposal. Planning Supervisor Senness stated that Town and
Country requested a delay until after the City had decided on this application. Chairman
Stulberg stated that if Town and County decides not to follow through, they can withdraw
the application.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried on a unanimous vote.
Commissioner Stein stated he would like the buffer information included in the next
report.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 28, 1997
Page #22
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRPERSON AND VICE -CHAIRPERSON
MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner
recommending Mike Stulberg for Chairman. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner Thompson
recommending Allen Ribbe for Vice -Chairman. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried
unanimously.
Staff was directed to put the appointment to the Park and Recreation Advisory
Commission on the next agenda.
Commissioners Stein and Koehnen stated they would not be at the February 11, 1997
Planning Commission meeting.
MOTION by Commissioner Berkowitz, seconded by Commissioner Koehnen to
adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 11:25 p.m.
Minutes of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
January 9, 1997
Page 1
Present: Chair Anderson, Commissioners Wahl, Fiemann, Willegalle, Johnson,
Thompson, Priebe; Councilmember Wold; staff Bisek, Blank and Pederson
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Anderson called the January meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. in the Council
Chambers.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion was made by Commissioner Wahl and seconded by Commissioner
Fiemann to approve the minutes of the December meeting as presented. The
motion carried with all ayes.
3. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
a. Athletic Associations.
b. Staff. Mary handed out a sweatshirt order form for Fire and Ice. The logo location
has changed. It will be on the left chest instead of across the entire front. The
color will be the same royal blue with orange and white. Sweatshirts can be
ordered until January 15. We are advertising that there will be a softball
tournament at Fire and Ice. A new event at this year's Fire and Ice is a winter
camping demonstration. One of our soccer referees and his boy scout troop will
camp out in Parkers Lake Park over night before the Fire and Ice festival. They
will build some hollowed out snow caves for people to tour the day of the event.
Another new attraction is a pig roast that will be held for three or four hours
during the day, along with the regular concessions.
In 1997, our volunteer coordinator position was expanded to 32 hours per week
from 20. Another staffing change involves our part-time clerical position, which
has been a part-time position since its inception. It will go to full-time in March.
The person currently in the position is retiring, so we will be looking for someone
new.
Rinks opened on December 21, but have been closed a number of days since
then due to bad weather or poor ice conditions. The first day of outdoor skating
lessons had to be canceled, not because of cold, but because of rain and sleet.
Parkers Lake rink hasn't opened yet, because the ice is not safe enough for
equipment to drive on. There is a layer of water under the snow. Our Plymouth
Middle School's first ski trip of the season, planned for Friday, has been
canceled because of cold weather.
PRAC Minutes/January 1997
Page 2
Mary stated that for three days this week, staff was trained on new software for
registration. We will go live with that in February. We have over 300 facilities
where we hold programs.
Mary announced that Rick Busch is going to be inducted into the softball Hall of
Fame this month. Commissioner Wahl asked what that was. Director Blank said
it's USSSA affiliated. Rick has spent 17 years with the City involved in sports in
many different ways. He's been a referee, coach, teacher, participant and has
hosted numerous tournaments on both national and state levels at Zachary
Playfield, as well as scheduled thousands of fields and other facilities for many
different groups, agencies and organizations over the last 17 years.
c. Others. There were no others.
4. PAST COUNCIL ACTION
a. The Council approved new park dedication fees for 1997.
b. They approved not buying the Johnson Bros. open space parcel.
c. They approved the CIP as submitted for 1997-2001.
d. They approved policy changes on playground enhancements as recommended
by PRAC.
e. They approved a $700,000 contribution to Wayzata gym, and they also ratified
agreement with Armstrong on their gym.
f. They approved an agreement with Coca Cola to be the supplier of beverages at
the Plymouth Ice Center. Coke will give us $75,000 up front. They offered a
better deal than Pepsi. Bids for scoreboards were awarded also.
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. West Medicine Lake Park presentation by Barton Aschman. Director Blank
introduced staff from Barton Aschman. Kenny Horns gave an update on Phase I
and Phase 2 construction. Phase 1 work is substantially complete. It began in
late fall '95, when a surcharge was placed on the roadway due to the poor soils.
The roadway is now open, and that was one of the major elements of phase 1.
Utility work was another substantial part of phase 1. Previously, run-off flowed
directly into the lake. Now there are three small sediment basins where storm
water is routed prior to discharge into a creek/wetland complex. Remaining work
items include grading behind the curb, on-site wetland mitigation, removing the
old Forestview Lane roadbed, turf establishment, and new sidewalks along West
Medicine Lake Drive. The bridge needs to be stained. The parking lot needs to
be completed. The phase 2 contract has been awarded, and work will begin
when weather is appropriate. Tom Johnson asked if the pedestrian bridge will
have a flat surface, so skaters can use it. Director Blank said it will be a wood
surface. Commissioner Johnson asked about the trees on the point and the
grove of trees. Mr. Horns said it is planned to save as many of the trees as
possible. Phase 2 will be underway in the next week or two if weather improves.
PRAC Minutes/January 1997
Page 3
el
Beach excavation should be complete by April. Phase 3 work is subject to
approval by the Council. The intent is to have phase 3 underway in the summer.
The next part of the presentation was given by Scott. He explained that board 1
detailed the design constraints. Some critical things include the area between
the wetland delineation and the floodway. We are required to do a one for one
volume mitigation. Where ever we filled in a wetland, we had to create an equal
amount of wetland in another area. Another issue is the 50 foot setback from the
shoreline, where no construction is permitted to take place. Phase 3 is a limited
area to work in. The second board he explained was the relationship diagram.
This displayed all the vehicular entrances and showed how the various
recreational components of the park are related to each other and how you get
from one place to the next. Commissioner Priebe asked about the boat access
shown in the concept plan. Director Blank explained that the City maintained an
access on the west side for many years, but when French Park opened, the City
closed the access, so now all boat access is controlled by French Park. The
access at French Park is shallow, and deep hulled boats cannot use it. Because
of that, we have allowed these boats to use the west beach as a place to get on
and off the lake. Commissioner Priebe asked how we control the access where
we allow the deep hulled boats? Director Blank said we have a steel gate that
we staff on one or two Saturdays in the spring and again in the fall.
Scott then displayed the Concept A and Concept B designs which contain phase
3 elements. These designs are almost identical, except that the play area is
shaped somewhat differently. In concept A, all of the smaller picnic shelters are
located near the beach/swimming area, and there is no tennis court or sand
volleyball. In concept B, one of the small picnic shelters has been moved to the
northern end of the park, near the boat access, and a tennis court and sand
volleyball court are shown down near the playground area.
Commissioner Fiemann asked about boardwalk comers? Worried about little
kids taking off running and falling into the wetland. Scott said the boardwalk has
curbs. Commissioner Wahl asked if there are areas where you can just throw a
frisbee, etc. Scott explained that the area around the play equipment would be
more casual and unplanned, approximately 150 x 200 feet. Commissioner
Johnson commented that where third parking lot is proposed is the nicest piece
of land. He thinks we're over building park. He wondered if that lot had to take up
the entire area there? Director Blank said we have been downsizing parking lots
as we go along. Our long range concern is that we have enough parking. We
don't want park visitors to end up parking in surrounding neighborhoods.
Director Blank explained that he needs direction from the Commission on how to
proceed now. There are no tennis courts west of Medicine Lake, until you get to
Parkers Lake, so we wanted to get two courts in at this location. Director Blank
displayed an aerial of West Medicine Lake Community Club. He said that one
PRAC Minutes/January 1997
Page 4
option is to explore putting a court on the West Medicine Lake Community Club
property. We have two ballfields there now, but only one is being used. It might
be possible that the other field could be turned into a tennis court. Director Blank
stated that other options include not installing tennis courts, building them where
shown on Concept B, or finding another location near the park. Director Blank
said there is time to go back to community and show them this plan before
making a final decision. Tennis was in the bottom third of the list of wants.
Commissioner Johnson stated that he was concerned that Concept B showing
the tennis courts was too crowded in that area. He also commented that there is
no place for a basketball court. He would like to see it in the north parking lot
someplace. Director Blank said he thought it would be possible to place a
hardcourt in the north parking lot, however, the consultant commented that that
might no be the safest place for it. Other commissioners felt that tennis might
have to be sacrificed in order to get in a sand volleyball court and a hard court.
They commented that the really serious tennis players go to Northwest Racquet
Club. The consultant will research a place in the park for a hard court. Director
Blank said he needs a decision in February, so that the plan can go to the
Council at their second meeting in February if possible. The Commission
suggested that staff send out to the residents'a letter inviting them to the
February meeting, along with a description/graphic of Concept B, taking out the
tennis courts, leaving in sand volleyball, moving the playground to where it is in
plan A, and adding a hard court somewhere.
b. Ice arena/pool complex. Director Blank stated that crews are working everyday.
The roofer is scheduled to begin soon. The inside of the arena is being heated
now. Crews are laying block walls in the rinks. Director Blank stated that we are
getting a nice upgrade on the bleachers because of a donation by the Wayzata
Hockey Assoc. Director Blank did not have a projected opening date.
c. Open space update. Director Blank said the City will continue to negotiate with
property owners. The City will not be buying the Johnson Bros. property. Director
Blank said he will soon reconvene the Open Space committee to start looking at
operational policies.
d. Elm Creek Playfield update. Director Blank announced that the school district will
go out in two weeks with a re -bid on the building, fencing, football stadium, etc.
Classroom wing of the building will be done by September. The cafeteria and
auditorium will not be done when school starts.
e. Golf course discussion. A development north of the railroad tracks, north and
west of Hollydale golf course, has been proposed. Because they submitted a
plat, the City had to look at the alignment of Holly Lane. The City worked
cooperatively with the owners of Hollydale on this project.
f. East Medicine Lake regional trail. There was nothing new to report on this item.
PRAC Minutes/January 1997
Page 5
g. Ice center behavior policies. Director Blank explained that the behavior policies
need to be approved. Changes have been made as suggested by PRAC. A
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER THOMPSON AND SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER FIEMANN TO RECOMMEND APPROVING THE RULES AND
REGULATIONS AT THE PLYMOUTH ICE CENTER AS PROPOSED BY
STAFF. Commissioner Johnson noticed a place where rollerblading did not get
changed to in-line skating. Commissioner Priebe said that an apostrophe needed
to be added to no. 6 after the "s" in players. The motion carried with all ayes.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Review draft copy of annual report. Director Blank explained that PRAC needed
to come up with some topics for their 1997 work plan. Commissioner Priebe
asked about the Dutch Elm Disease program? He thinks it's very costly, and
doesn't know if we are saving any elms. Director Blank said it's an aggressive
program and is prolonging the life of the City's elm trees, and allowing the City to
build up other tree species at the same time. Commissioner Thompson asked
about the youth sports task force report? Does it need to be updated? Director
Blank said within a year he thinks a consultant will be on board to do a new
overall system plan. Some suggestions for the work plan include making the ice
arena operational, Greenwood Elementary field improvements and upgrading the
old high school site, issues related to the field house at the new high school,
planning for the activity center that will be added to the Life Time Fitness
complex, a golf course, and open space. Commissioners asked about future in-
line skating rinks? Director Blank said that further research is also needed on
skateboard parks. A draft work plan will be put together and sent to
Commissioners within a week.
b. Senior citizen needs. Director Blank explained that the City Council disbanded
many of the subcommittees from 1996 and may form a new subcommittee to
study the future activity center. Henry Willegalle, Ron Fiemann and Don
Anderson will volunteer from PRAC. Councilmember Wold said that the Council
needs to make a decision about the senior citizen needs report. The activity
center will be a multi -generational facility. Councilmember Wold said that one of
the challenges will be narrowing the activity center down to just one building.
c. Advertising at the ice arena. Eric explained where all the scoreboards will be, the
message boards, clocks, etc. Within the contract awarded to Coca-Cola, they are
allowed to have two advertising panels. The hockey rink boards are set up to
allow advertising. There will be room for 31 advertisements. There is potential
net revenue of $25,000 to $35,000 per year from this program. Staffs
recommendation is to allow an advertising program at the new ice arena. A
medical group wants to pay us $45,000 to advertise on the Zamboni. This is
intended to be a revenue producing facility. Commissioner Priebe said that he
PRAC Minutes/January 1997
Page 6
hates to see it commercialized, but realizes it's good revenue. Graphics would be
done under our control. We will keep it simple, uniform, etc. The groups that
would likely advertise include local banks, restaurants, motels, hotels, sporting
goods stores, etc. Panels are 10 feet long, 36 inches high. Graphics would be
covered by plexiglass to protect them from scuffing, etc. The Commission was
okay with the idea of board advertisement.
7. COMMISSION PRESENTATION
None.
8. STAFF COMMUNICATION
Director Blank congratulated re -appointees, and reminded the Commission that they
will need to elect a chair and vice chair at next month's meeting.
9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
Plymouth Human Rights Commission
February 6, 1997
Minutes
Present: Jeff Richards, Jackie Fraedrich, Harvey Guttmann, Mitzi Heath,
Laurie Levi, Claudelle Carruthers, Assistant City Manager Kathy Lueckert
Excused: Howard Sigal
Guests: Sheri Bezdicek, SHARC; Sherry Shelquist, Legal Aid Center,
Christie Snow and Ms. Springlemeyer, Fair Housing Center.
Housing Supervisor Ed Goldsmith
Call to Order
Jeff Richards called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM.
Approval of Agenda
Mitzi Heath asked for time for information items. Jeff Richards added a
discussion about student involvement with the Human Rights Commission. The agenda
was approved with that addition.
Approval of Minutes
. The minutes of the January meeting were approved as presented.
Order of the Day—Fair Housing Initiatives
Sherry Shelquist of the Legal Aid Center reviewed the Housing Discrimination
Project. She said that Legal Aid pursues housing discrimination cases throughout the
Twin Cities area. She reviewed the federal and state laws which protect individuals from
housing discrimination. Discriminatory practices can be found in the application process,
in different treatment while a tenant, and harassment. Ms. Shelquist stated that race and
familial status are the most common form of housing discrimination. Under the Housing
Discrimination project, "testers" go to visit apartments and see how they are treated. This
is generally done after a client of the Legal Aid Center has indicated a discriminatory
housing practice. If evidence of discrimination is found, legal action may be initiated.
Christie Snow of the Fair Housing Center spoke about survey testing to determine
the nature and extent of discrimination. Testers are used in this process as well.
Extensive testing was done in two Minneapolis neighborhoods. The survey looked only
at racial discrimination, and found that 50-60% of tester who were of color were treated
unfavorably. Ms. Snow noted that the overall vacancy rate for rental housing in the Twin
Cities area is around 2%, and the vacancy rate for affordable rental housing is 1%. She
noted that housing is more than just a roof, it is access to opportunities.
Sheri Bezdicek from Suburban Hennepin Anti -Racism Coalition (SHARC) stated
that SHARC hopes to involve suburban human rights commissions in fair housing
education efforts. She said that education and outreach efforts can make a tremendous
difference. She said that there have been housing discrimination complaints in Plymouth,
and that testing has been done in the city and has uncovered discriminatory practices.
Ed Goldsmith suggested that SHARC become involved with the Plymouth
apartment managers group. He also reviewed affordable housing options and programs
in Plymouth.
Discussion followed about the Holman case. Under a settlement in this case,
much of the concentration of public housing in the Near North section of Minneapolis
will be dispersed throughout the region, included the suburbs. Plymouth likely will get
some of these scattered site units. Ms. Bezdicek stated that the city should consider how
it will welcome these folks.
The Human Rights Commission indicated its strong interest in becoming involved
in fair housing issues, and in knowing more about affordable housing issues in Plymouth,
in particular those that come before the Planning Commission and City Council.
Old Business
Calendar of Events. Jeff Richards noted the HRC's calendar of events for the
coming year.
Random Acts o Kindness. Jeff Richards distributed information from Howard
Sigal on the program, and asked that members review it prior to the March meeting.
Report on Vandalism. Mitzi Heath reported that she had spoken to the
complainant at "At the Lake" apartments, who was the apartment manager. The manager
said that the racist graffiti was not aimed at any one family; however, the incident was
very distressing to many residents. Mitzi Heath stated that she had asked Kathy Lueckert
to send some HRC brochures to the complex. Claudelle Carruthers suggested that the
HRC develop and use some kind of report form for incidents such as these, so that the
HRC has a record. Mitzi Heath agreed to follow up with the apartment manager one
more time. Kathy Lueckert will develop a report form.
New Business
Student Involvement. Kathy Lueckert indicated that there is nothing in the by-
laws or the City Code which would prohibit student involvement in the HRC. The
Commission agreed to have more discussion on this topic at the March meeting.
The Commission agreed to postpone the discussion of the community education
plan and the speaker's bureau until the March meeting.
Mitzi Heath asked Kathy Lueckert to bring a list of individuals who applied for
the HRC but were not appointed, so that these individuals can be asked to volunteer for
some of the HRC's efforts.
The meeting adjourned at 9:15 PM.
/_Yt'Exfx: 1 -4 a �Tlsl 4 t:><T:
Minutes
Members Qresent: Donna Marget, Tim McCarthy, Martha Anderson, Barbara
Hickok, Craig Gerdes, Bill Nelson, Mandy Little. Jeyn Hofacker,
Gary Swedberg
Introduction
Agenda - approved.
Treasurer's Report - $2,588.76 less $250.00 leaves a balance of $2.338.76.
Steal Report - FDA regulations regarding tobacco. Federal
regulations/incorporate message consistent nationally. Full
implementation by 8/28/98.
Schgol Update:
- Transition to middle school preparation continues.
- 235 kids in group.
- Leadership training with 7th graders.
- Retreats continue.
- West instituted mentor program.
- Eight candidates Interviewed; no final decision.
- Barbara Hickok presented tapes.
College Issues: Barbara Hickock reported on video and its acceptance among
the broader community.
Public Saf t�v:
- Craig Gerdes reported on an article in the Sun Sailor on "69" bust.
- All cited.
- Eleven under 18 years of age.
- DWI costs a convicted person about $6,000.00.
- Tim to research changes in 691 regarding reporting to school for
Incidents such as theft with victims.
- Gary will contact media people regarding developing PSA aimed at
ATOD prevention. The students could attend the commission to
show PSA's. A donation could be made to school for service as a
possibility.
Long Range.,
- Data collection meeting on January 29 at the Administration Building
from 4:00 - 6:00 p.m.
- Communities in Collaboration (Barb Carlson), Mary Bier, Lind �i y
will be Included.
Ail
Future Aaend : Bay Center material/purpose needs to be review ~
,��'
FEB 0 6 ,�
Z -,3a
CICCCommunities In Collaboration Council
February 1, 1997
Dear Mayor Tierney: -s c { •
There has been much concern and discussion around the issue of our
skateboarders at Oakwood School. I know that many of you have had direct
and indirect interaction with this phenomenon.
I believe, as a community working together, we can find a solution that will
be good for all those involved.
I would like to invite you, as an important partner in this community, to join
us for an informational, idea gathering meeting on:
Monday, February 10th
Oakwood School
County Road 6 and 101
7:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast
Please leave a message at 476-3243 so we know if you will be joining us. We
are looking forward to some lively discussion!
Sincerely,
Barbara Carlson
Coordinator
February 3, 1997
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Mr. Roger Ryant
Prudential Property Management
3033 Campus Drive
Plymouth, Minnesota 55427
RE: Petroleum Tank Release Site File Closure
Site: Prudential Insurance, 13001 County Road 10, Plymouth
Site ID#: LEAK00007449
Dear Mr. Ryant:
We are pleased to let you know that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Tanks and
Emergency Response Section (TERS) staff has determined that your investigation and/or cleanup
has adequately addressed the petroleum tank release at the site listed above. Based on the
information provided, the TERS staff has closed the release site file.
Closure of the file means that the TERS staff does not require any additional investigation and/or
cleanup work at this time or in the foreseeable future. Please be aware that file closure does not
necessarily mean that all petroleum contamination has been removed from this site. However,
the TERS staff has concluded that any remaining contamination, if present, does not appear to
pose a threat to public health or the environment.
The MPCA reserves the right to reopen this file and to require additional investigation and/or
cleanup work if new information or changing regulatory requirements make additional work
necessary. If you or other parties discover additional contamination (either petroleum or
nonpetroleum) that was not previously reported to the MPCA, Minnesota law requires that the
MPCA be immediately notified.
You should understand that this letter does not release any party from liability for the petroleum
contamination under Minn. Stat. ch. 115C (Supp. 1995) or any other applicable state or federal
law. In addition, this letter does not release any party from liability for nonpetroleum
contamination, if present, under Minn. Stat. ch. I I 5 (1994), the Minnesota Superfund Law.
520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (612) 296-6300 (Voice); (612) 282-5332 (TTY)
Regional Offices: Duluth • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Marshall • Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on recycled paper containing at least 20% fibers from paper recycled by consumers.
Mr. Roger Ryant
February 3, 1997
Page 2
Because you performed the requested work, the state may reimburse you for a major portion of
your costs. The Petroleum Tank Release Cleanup Act establishes a fund which may provide
partial reimbursement for petroleum tank release cleanup costs. This fund is administered by the
Department of Commerce Petro Board. Specific eligibility rules are available from the Petro
Board at 612/297-1119 or 612/297-4203.
If future development of this property or the surrounding area is planned, it should be assumed
that petroleum contamination may still be present. If petroleum contamination is encountered
during future development work, the MPCA staff should be notified.immediately.
For specific information regarding petroleum contamination that may remain at this leak site,
please call the TERS File Request Program at 612/297-8499. The "Leak/Spill and Underground
Storage Tank File Request Form" (TERS Fact Sheet #35) must be completed prior to arranging a
time for file review.
Thank you for your response to this petroleum tank release and for your cooperation with the
MPCA to protect public health and the environment. If you have any questions regarding this
letter, please call me at 612/297-8582.
Sincerely,
R
�� Otw o-;-,.
Kathryn Serier
Project Manager
Cleanup Unit II
Tanks and Emergency Response Section
cc: Laurie Ahrens, Plymouth City Clerk
Richard Kline, Plymouth Fire Chief
Bill Storm, Agassiz Environmental Systems
Minnesota Department of Commerce Petrofund Staff
2) 1�1 � t,
rR
February 3, 1997 1 CITY
PLYMOUTR
Dear Resident,
Although we are in the midst of a long, snowy, cold winter, I'd like to update you on the beautiful new
West Medicine Lake Park project. I'm sure most of you are aware by now that in mid-November, the
new West Medicine Lake Drive was opened to traffic. The bridge and roadway were the majority of
the work under contract in Phase 1. This spring the contractor will finish paving the final lift on the
roadway, complete the staining of the bridge, pave the parking lot and pave the sidewalk/trail on the
east side of the road.
A few weeks ago, the City awarded contracts for Phase 2 work. Under Phase 2, a water line that runs
under the existing road will be relocated to allow for the dredging of the new beach area. At the same
time, the contractor will commence work on building a new pedestrian foot bridge over the creek on
the same alignment as the old West Medicine Lake Drive. This work will commence in a few weeks,
and hopefully will be completed by early April.
Phase 3 is about to be given final approval and engineering design work will begin shortly. In order to
have this project completely wrapped up by the end of the year, it is important that we get construction
underway by May or June. The final phase of the work will include such items as: new trails,
children's playground, open air picnic shelters, additional parking on the north end, lake access for
seasonal boats and ice fishing, basketball court, sand volleyball court, and landscaping.
The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission will be doing a final review of the project at their
February 13 meeting, before forwarding the final plans and their recommendation to the City Council.
Enclosed you will find a drawing of the Phase 3 portion of the work, along the lakeshore. If you have
any questions about the plan or . suggestions, you may call me anytime at 509-5201, or you are also
welcome to attend the Park Commission meeting on February 13, at 7 p.m., in the Plymouth Council
Chambers. Please note when looking at the overall master plan that there is no funding currently
identified for the construction of the proposed park buildings. Future capital budgets of the City will
determine when and if any buildings are undertaken as permanent structures at this park site.
I hope this brings you'up to date with the park project. We look forward to a successful completion of
the project this summer.
Thank you for your interest in this matter.
Sincerely,
Eric J. Blank, Director
Parks and Recreation
EB/np
cc: PRAC
City Council
Parks and Recreation Department
3400 Plymouth Boulevard • Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 • Telephone (612) 509-5200
February 10, 1997 CITY OF
PLYMOUTR
Dear Resident:
Because of the keen interest you have expressed in the past with regard to the East Medicine Lake
Regional Trail, I'd like to take this opportunity to bring you up to date on the latest information.
We began work on this project a little less than a year ago with a large kick-off meeting at Armstrong
High School. Since that time, city staff, Hennepin Park District staff and our consultant, SRF, have
been busy identifying and studying issues and planning for the construction of the regional trail and the
upgrade of East Medicine Lake Boulevard between 36th Avenue and Medicine Ridge Road. Along the
way we discovered issues which needed further study and review in order to arrive at a plan meeting
the needs of as many of our residents as possible. I have enclosed for your information a map and a
segment by segment description of the proposed master plan. In order to accomplish our goal of having
trail and road work under construction in 1997, it is necessary for both the City of Plymouth and the
Hennepin Parks Board to adopt a comprehensive plan for this regional trail segment. To that end, we
have scheduled this item for City Council review on Wednesday, February 19, at 7 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers. The Hennepin Parks Board will review the comprehensive trail plan on Thursday,
February 20, at the French Park Headquarters building. Their meeting will convene at 5 p.m., and it is
anticipated that the Board will begin discussion of this item at 6 p.m. We would encourage as many of
you as possible to attend both meetings, but if you can only do one, we think attending the City Council
meeting on the 19th would be most helpful to the planning process. You are welcome to speak at both
meetings with regard to the proposal. Barry Warner of SRF will make a presentation before both the
City Council and the Park Board with regard to the overall master plan.
As with all major projects, compromises have been necessary along the way to keep the project moving
forward in a timely fashion. Although there may be a few aspects of the plan which you would like to
see modified, I think you will find that the overall master plan is a giant step forward to providing a
safe, and fun environment for pedestrians, bikers, in-line skaters, etc. If you are unable to attend the
meetings, please feel free to give me a call at 509-5201, or you may send your comments to the City
Council, or the Hennepin Parks Board. If both the City Council and the Hennepin Parks Board approve
the master plan, we anticipate that they will give further direction to have the consultants begin
preparing the trail plans and specifications, along with the feasibility study for the road upgrade, in
order to get this project under construction in this year.
This letter is being sent to people that have attended a meeting on this subject and/or have contacted us.
Please pass this information on to other interested parties in your neighborhood. Thank you for your
time, patience and assistance with this project. I look forward to seeing you on the 19th and 20th.
Sincerely,
Eric J. Blank, Director
Parks and Recreation
EB/np
Parks and Recreation Department
3400 Plymouth Boulevard • Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 • Telephone (612) 509-5200
m
80409 cmrnnMfee
''irfor a ewe�a�°r'°dosar,;
. a"fe'�a"sae eoaa,
lrm% T'1 .'T /'1 7 r .
PRISM:
Our Purpose
The purpose
Of PRISM is
to provide
social and
emergency
services to
our northwest
community,
and to
encourage
self-sufficiency.
A MESSAGE
from PRISM's President and the Executive Director
Times are difficult for small nonprofits. And times will get tougher, particularly, for
those of us who work with low income families. The welfare system, that dinosaur
of red tape and bureaucracy for so many years, is changing. Many, many people
will be losing their bene-
fits, and will have to
become more self-suffi-
cient. That's where we
come in, In keeping with
its Statement of
Purpose, to offer emer-
gency and supportive
services, and to encour- ,
age self sufficiency,
PRISM is striving to
continually enhance
and refine its supportive
services.
Judy Cooper Lyle, Executive Director (left) and Alice Sviget
In the fall of 1996, Board President
the clothes closet program became a thrift shop, with minimal prices being
charged for clothes and small household goods, but helping to encourage people
learn to budget, learn to shop, and stand on their own. Clients who are in
desperate.and emergency need may still get free clothing upon referral. PRISM
also began offering an administrative internship program, which helps people
learn ogre -learn office skills to enable them to return to the work force. We held
an initial "brainstorming" session for clients' input as to how we can further
enhance what we do to provide what is needed. We will continue to get input like
this, and keep our programming relevant to the needs of those who utilize our
services.
That need for what we do in the community continues to remain strong, and we
will continue to be responsive to that need. Because we do not recieve United Way
funding, we depend on the community for its support in making this a better
place to live, by assisting its residents toward a better lifestyle.
Judy Cooper Lyle, Executive Director
Alice Svigel, Board President
,"We will continue to get
input .. and keep our
programming relevant
to the needs of those
who utilize our services."
SUPPORT SERVICES i je
HANDS UP FOR EDUCATION (HUFE)
Single parents who desire a 'return to post -secondary education may
apply for scholarship assistance through HUFE. Funded by area com-
panes and civicorganizations, this unique program provides schol-
arships annually -for 4 - 6 individuals. The financial assistance
amounts to $200.00 per quarter,•and.covers extra expenses not tra-
ditionally paid by scholarships, but -related to school attendance.
These expenses include child care, insurance, car repairs, uniforms
and books.
In 1996, four women participated in. scholarships through HUFF.
SUPPORT PROGRAM_
This one-on-one individualized assistance provides ongoing help to
families working to stabilize their living situations. These individuals
and families work with Carol Oawster, the Case Manager and a
s , licensed social worker, to set goals, objectives and methods for
achieving them. The program provides emotional support, communi-
ty-zesources, and referrals. Many of the, individuals who work with
this program are taking advantage of other ser�ces PRISM offers,
? and can use all these resources tb improve their living situation.
PRISM's Statement of Purpose makes this an integral and. extremely
important part of the agency's programming. -
:
Carol Oawster.Cose Manages helps PRISM clients set goals and make plans toward a
more self sufficient future.. -
THRIFT SHOP
The community is very generous in.donating quality clothing to PRISM. PRISM prides itself in this
programming area as offering good clothing, in season, in good condition. The program is entirely volunteer
run, and serves an average of 150 families a month. In 1996, .the clothes closet became a thrift shop, offering
an opportunity for clients. to
leain to budget, thus encour-
aging -.self sufficiency; and
helping with PRISM'sI rM
operating ekpenses. - 11
SUPPQRT GROUPS
Support groups at PRISM
provide an opportunity for
families and individuals to
share ideas and support one
another. PRISM staff and
guest speakers provide 6 to
8 -week seminars that deal
with both daily problems
and ongoing social issues.
Topics covered include self
esteem, budgeting, inter-
viewing techniques,.
job search, nutrition, and
many other topics. .
Cindy Dunn coordinates Thrift Shop voluntee s. Area residents visit the Thrift Shop for
well organized, donated clothing that is in season and good condition.
EXCEL
This unique program is designed to help stabilize food needs. Individuals and families who anticipate a long
term budget crunch can, through this service, receive a 1-2 day supply of food on a weekly basis. Participants
are referred to this service by staff, and work to set goals to reduce their ongoing food crisis.'As a part of
this program, monthly food demonstrations are conducted to advise how best to use the food received.
996
7n
it was
3W
xyli
ajor
xissr,•
g over
r
�
EMERGENCY SERVICES
EMERGENCY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE '
PRISM has limited funds available to assist in crisis situations such. as. utility shutoffs, rent, or mortgage
payments. Non -AFDC recipients receive this assistance through a re -granting program from Northwest
Hennepin Human Services. AFDC recipients may receive assistance directly from PRISM, as funds become
available.
The funding requests are screened by committee, and individuals may receive assistance only once during
the year.
(top left) Liz Johnson Food Shelf Coordinator Inventories and
organizes food donations and supervises volunteers.
deft) Tom Unman, Progrom'Monoger at his desk
(next page, upper right) Betty Watson, Transportation Coordinator
manages the Elder Express Program which operates two vans fifty
hours per week.
(next page, left) Judith Myrick one of several volunteer
receptionists.
(next page, for right) Marion Butkovich• Chair of Friends of PRISM
and Board President Alice Svigel at Autumn Benefit.
EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF
PRISM is a member of the Emergency Food
Shelf Network, and participates in the annual
MN Food Share Drive in the Sommunity.
Churches, organizations, and businesses in the"
area are very supportive of the food shelf.
The food shelf is available to residents in the
community on an emergency need basis, and
PRISM encourages no more than One monthly
visit per family. The supply given is, apprwd-
mately a 2-3 day supply of food.
The food shelf operates under the
coordina-tion of one half-time staff person, with nearly
SO volunteers contributing hours throughout
the month.
SPECIAL SERVICES
r�
ELDER EXPRESS
A partnership blend of PRISM, North Memorial, and West Metro Coordinated, Transportation cooperate to form
Elder Express, a transportation program for senior citizens and disabled persons. Two vans run SO hours per
week, providing rides for medical, dental, and other appoint-
ments. Advance requests for errands are provided on a space -
available basis. Volunteer drivers help provide trips that cannot
be accommodated by the regular van service. An average of 650
rides per month are provided by Elder Express.
BLOOD PRESSURE -
Volunteer firefighters visit PRISM twice monthly to offer blood
pressure checks and answer health-related questions. This pro-
gram is very enthusiastically received and utilized.
HOLIDAY, DISTRIBUTION
Holiday times are big at PRISM. Over 2500 individuals benefitted in 1995-1996 from the distribution of gro-
cery bags over the Thanksgiving -and Christmas holidays. The December distribution includes a Santa shop
with free toys and gifts for the children. PRISM participates_ with Santa Anonymous in this endeavor.
VOLUNTEERISM
Volunteers are the heart and soul of PRISM. They provide a wealth of years of experience, knowledge, extra
hands, and caring from the community PRISM serves. Volunteers manage the clothes closet, and contribute
endless hours to the operation of the food shelf. Volunteers drive for PRISM, perform receptionist duties,
prepare taxes, do intake, staff the "Toy" sbo p over the holidays, prepare bulk mailings, and a myriad of other
services.
PRISM's volunteers include student interns from area colleges and high schools, professionals, retired per-
sons, and community residents, as well as representatives of some service clubs.
A new program this year is the administrative internship, a six-week program to assist office workers hoping
to enter the work force. i -
February 3, 1997
Honorable Mayor and r
Members of the City Council
City of Plymouth t
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55441
Ladies and Gentlemen:
My name is Sue Johnson. I am an employee of the Wayzata School Nutrition Program
and work at Wayzata West Jr. High School. In addition, I am the advisor to the Nutrition
Advisory Council, which is made up of 13 students at West.
Nutrition Advisory Councils are a part of the American School Food Service Association
and were formed in 1973 based on the idea that students should have an active role in their
school meals programs.
The Nutrition Advisory Council at Wayzata West has been very active this school year.
We are serving breakfast each school day to students and staff. We took a field trip to the
Great Harvest Bakery in Minnetonka- We planned a Iunch menu that was served on
January 9 in our cafeteria. In addition, we have given demonstrations on "Prime Time",
West's in-house news show, on how far someone must walk to burn off the calories in just
one M&M candy, and on "Label -Ease", which is a simple system of calculating from food
labels if those foods are nutrition.
On behalf of the Nutrition Advisory Council, I would like to invite you to join us for
breakfast on February 24. We serve from 7:15 to 7:45 am.
Please RSVP to me at 478-9892 by February 21. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Sue Johnson
YARD CARE AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Practical Tips for Home and Yard _
A SERIES OF WATER QUALITY FACT SHEETS FOR RESIDENTIAL AREAS
It's an unfortunate fact of urban life—many of
our streams and lakes have been polluted. It may
be a surprise, however, to learn that water
pollution often starts right where you live.
In the community. Urban water pollution begins when
development alters natural processes. Removing vege-
tation and replacing it with streets, rooftops and drive-
ways greatly decreases the amount of water soaking
into the soil. As a consequence, the amount of water
running off to streams and lakes increases dramatically.
How does the water get from street to stream? Nearly
every city street has storm sewer inlets, which open into
a network of underground pipes. Leaves, litter, pet
wastes, and other materials dumped or washed into
storm sewer inlets do not go to a sewage treatment
plant but flow directly to streams and lakes. Also,
most storm sewer systems are designed to remove water
from developed areas quickly during a storm. This
allows pollutants to reach streams. and lakes at a
"rapid transit" pace.
LVUMQ %.cul vv w1.mvali .
Fertilizing the lawn, working on the car,
walking the dog and other home activities might seem
far removed from water quality. But with gutters and storm
sewers, it's as if we all live on a streambank.
Around the home. Our actions around home can
either help or harm water quality. For example, rain
can wash improperly applied lawn fertilizer and pesti-
cides into lakes and streams. On the other hand, careful
landscaping and sound lawn care practices can reduce
the need for chemicals and protect water quality.
Similarly, good auto maintenance pays in the long run,
but poor auto maintenance can seriously harm our waters.
Anything that drips from a motor vehicle—oil, gas,
antifreeze—can wash into storm sewers. These materials
are toxic to aquatic life. Dumping them into a storm
sewer has almost unthinkable consequences. Just
five quarts of oil in a stream or lake can create
a slick as large as two football fields.
� I i
® Clearly, there is a need to rethink what we're
doing at home if urban waters are to be
clean and usable. Fortunately, by follow-
ing the tips inside, we can all contribute
to cleaner water while making our
homes and communities more
i
attractive and liveable.
, J It all adds up. Pollutants washed into
storm sewers from dozens of streets and
hundreds of homes can become major problems
for streams and lakes in a community.
SIMPLE TIPS FOR CLEANER WATER -
It really doesn't matter whether you live in the city or the country ... whether your home is
large or small ... whether you have a lot of time and money to invest in your yard or just a
little. There is something you can do to improve water quality. The following suggestions are
ways that you can make a contribution to clean water and a healthy environment.
Around your home
• Mow often enough to leave grass clippings on the
lawn. Alternatively, use clippings as a mulch or
compost them along with leaves that might other-
wise "fertilize" local waters.
• Keep fallen leaves out of the streetside gutter or
ditch, using them around the yard as practical.
Properly place the remainder near the curb (not
in the street) just before municipal collection.
• Plant an extra tree for multiple environmental
benefits, especially where it becomes part of a
planting bed or "naturalized" landscape area that
recycles leaves, twigs, and other yard "wastes."
• Seed bare soil and cover it with a mulch as soon
as possible to minimize erosion. Disturb no more
ground than necessary for a project, while pre-
serving existing vegetation.
• Direct roof downspouts away from foundations
and driveways to planting beds or lawns where
water can safely soak into the ground. Consider
using a rain barrel if practical.
• Use lawn and garden chemicals carefully and spar-
ingly. Pesticides, including weed killers, should be
considered a last resort—other controls come first.
• Limit the use of toxic or hazardous products in
general. Keep them away from storm sewers, lakes,
and streams.
• Collect oil and other automotive products preferably
for recycling, or tightly seal and wrap them for
proper disposal.
• Wash cars on the lawn, where soapy water can't
quickly run toward the nearest storm sewer, picking
up other pollutants as it goes.
• Keep cars tuned up and in good operating condi-
tion. Check especially for drips and repair leaks
immediately to keep nuisance oils off pavement.
Better yet, walk, bike or take the bus.
• For waterfront property, grow a "buffer strip"
of dense, natural vegetation along the water's edge
to filter pollutants and stabilize the shoreline.
• If using a septic tank system, maintain it properly
through regular inspections and licensed pumping
every two to three years.
• Monitor fuel use from any underground gas and
oil tanks to make sure they are not leaking.
..
water soak
• Plan your landscape with
environmental health in mind,
reducing the area that is heavily
maintained.
• Clean up pet wastes, from which nutrients and
bacteria could be washed toward lakes and streams.
• Conservatively use salt in winter. Use sand or chip
the ice off pavement when possible.
Home Hot Spots for Water Quality
Around every yard are spots where your activities affect water quality. The illustration shows a few of them. Take
a look around your own home with an eye toward water quality.
• Good for water quality • Bad for water quality
• Could be good or bad, depending on your actions
N
�`''�;��
i-
0
a
RM
runoff to streams
and lakes
In your community
• Support and follow ordinances that limit soil
• Support the preservation of wetlands as natural
erosion from construction sites.
filters that protect water quality, prevent flooding,
and provide vital open space.
• Encourage stormwater management practices that
reduce runoff pollution by temporarily holding
• Promote "environmental or parkway corridors"
water in ponds or letting it soak into the ground.
adjacent to streams and waterways for water
quality, wildlife, and multiple -use benefits alike.
• Encourage the safe but conservative use of salt on
roads and limit application to critical areas.
• Participate in groups, projects, and events that
promote conservation, waterfront recreation, or
• Tell public officials about your interest in cleaning
shoreline clean-ups.
up local waters and about their value to recreation
and the economy.
Home Hot Spots for Water Quality
Around every yard are spots where your activities affect water quality. The illustration shows a few of them. Take
a look around your own home with an eye toward water quality.
• Good for water quality • Bad for water quality
• Could be good or bad, depending on your actions
N
�`''�;��
i-
0
a
RM
runoff to streams
and lakes
PRINCIPLES OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND YARD CARE
This publication describes an approach to yard care that is both practical and
environmentally sound. As a shorter version of the compan-
ion piece, Rethinking Yard Care, it offers down-
to-earth tips for protecting water quality around
your home and in your community. Look A '
inside for information on home "hot spots"
for water quality..;
As stressed throughout the Yard Care and the Environment r'
series, environmentally sound yard care means:
• Thinking of environmental consequences in addition to
conveniences.
• Planning for greater harmony with natural surroundings.
,
• Being conservative and resourceful, rather than wasteful. o
• Believing that small changes collectively make a big difference.
• Capitalizing on the time and cost -savings that rethinking yard care can bring
0
Fact sheets in the Yard Care and the Environment series are designed to illustrate principles of environmentally
sound yard care. They provide specific information about pesticides, fertilizers, landscaping, watering and related
topics. These and other publications can be obtained from your local UW -Extension office, usually located in the
county courthouse or another public building. Help is also available there regarding soil testing, pest identification,
plant selection and other important items related to yard care and water quality.
A publication of the University of Wisconsin—Extension, in cooperation
with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources under funding
from the Wisconsin Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Abatement Pro-
gram, Gary K. Korb, Water Quality Education Coordinator, Southeast
Area UWEX. Editorial and design assistance from Bruce Webendorfer,
Environmental Resources Center, UWEX. Illustrations by Carol Watkins.
University of Wisconsin -Extension is an EEO/Affirmative Action employer and
provides equal opportunities in employment and programming, including Title
IX requirements.
This publication is available from your Wisconsin county Extension
office or from Cooperative Extension Publications, Room 245, 30 N.
Murray Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53715. Phone 608/262-3346.
W Printed on recycled paper
GWO007 Practical Tips for Home and Yard 1 -05 -93 -IOM -25-S
A Professional
Association
CERTIFIED
P U B L I C
ACCOUNTANTS
1400 TCF Tower
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612. 339.7811
FAX 612. 339. 9845
Stanley H. Schweitzer, C.P. A
Robert I. Karon, C.P.A.
Jerry A. Bremer, C.P.A.
MalcolmW McDermid, C.P.A.
Paul L. Martinucci, C.P.A.
Howard D. Kaminsky, C.P A
David R. Levi, C.P.A., P.F.S.
Edmund Gottlieb (retired)
Joseph R. Hayden, C.P.A.
Thomas J. LaQua, C.P. A.
Joseph R. Seifert, C.RA.
Steven R. Wright, C.P.A-
Mary
.P.AMary St. Martin, C.P. A.
Anne M. Ledwein, C.P. A
Julie P. Stroh, C.P.A.
David B. Campbell, C.P. A
Brian Bergmann, C.P.A.
Stephen R. Hagstrom, C.P. A.
Sherry B. Gunclson, C.P. A
Michael J. Steblay, C.P.A.
Daz V. Stoner, C.P.A.
Amy L. Libertoski, C.P.A.
Kari E. Dokken, C.P.A.
Mark E. Agranoff, C.P. A
Darlene A. Cradit
Lisa A. Swanstrom
Penny J. Bates
Nancie R. Theissen
K c r i L. S p r a u
Peggy A.Schutrop
Kimberly J. Cook
Scott L. Lane
Carolyn M. Suiter
Krista B. Lund
Scott A. Rauch
Margaret T. Wunderlich
V i s h a I D u t t
Tim L. Jensen
Member of Independent
Accountants International
with Correspondent Offices
in Principal Cities of the
World
S(HRIMPUBIH�APOMPEP
Writer's Direct
Dial Number:
January 31, 1997
The Honorable Joy Tierney
Mayor
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447-1482
Re: Northern Portion of the Dundee Nursery Site
NW Quadrant of Highway 55 and Dunkirk Lane
Planning Commission Meeting of January 28, 1997
Dear Mayor Tierney:
My name is Robert Karon. I live at 16910 41" Avenue North, Plymouth,
Minnesota.
I was a bit disturbed and miffed at the process that took place at the planning
commission meeting on January 28, 1997.
I did leave you a voice mail about it but I thought it would be helpful for me to
clarify in writing my feelings.
A. Facts and Background.
1. The site in question, file number 96188, has been reguided (or rezoned) a
number of times in the last year or so.
2. I only became aware of all these activities on Friday, January 24, 1997.
3. I was fortune enough to obtain a copy of the planning and zoning
application staff report on the sight, the afternoon of January 24, 1997.
4. The staff report recommended that the site in question be reguided LA -2
(living area 2).
5. I was able to obtain signaturesi names, addresses, and phone numbers of
24 of the 26 residents who live in the Holly Creek Addition 2 and the
Holly Creek Addition 3 areas supporting the staff s recommendation to
reguide the property LA -2.
376-1279
The Honorable Joy Tierney
Mayor
City of Plymouth
January 31, 1997
Page 2
6. I spoke at the public hearing on Tuesday evening, January 28, 1997 in
support of the staff s recommendations.
a. Many other residents of the West Branch Estates Additions,
contiguous to the property to be reguided, all spoke in favor of
supporting the staffs recommendations.
7. And of course the staff representative, Shawn Drill, spoke, explaining the
staff's recommendation of reguiding to LA -2.
8. That meeting, Tuesday evening, January 28, 1997, was a very lengthy
meeting.
a. It started at 7:00 p.m.
b. This issue did not come up until after 10:00 p.m.
c. The meeting lasted until around 11:30 p.m., a long time.
B. The Property Owner.
1. The property owner spoke.
a. He indicated he purchased the original property on which he has
operated his Dundee Nursery business in 1956.
b. He purchased the site in question in 1974.
c. The purpose for whish he bought that sight, growing trees, was no
longer economically feasible to grow trees on, he stated, because of
the advancement of the city towards his property and the increased
costs that he was being assessed for sewers and other improvements
to support the other structures in the area.
d. So essentially his 19.8 Acre sight, it sounded to me like, had
increased substantially in value because of the building in the area,
so it was not economically feasible for him to use it for growing
trees.
2. The property owner had a land use architect speak on his behalf.
The Honorable Joy Tierney
Mayor
City of Plymouth
January 31, 1997
Page 3
a. That individual briefly mentioned in several minutes that there
might be a compromise alternative for reguiding the site in
question.
b. There were no plans shown, no drawings, no reports, just a casual
suggestion that there might be an alternative to what had been
proposed by the staffs recommendations.
3. The property owner has owned the property for some 22 plus years.
a. The property owner commented that the property had been reguided
or rezoned at least 3 times in the last 12 months.
b. Therefore, the property owner certainly had ample opportunity to do
any type of in-depth study or write up a recommendation that the
property owner might have regarding the site in question.
c. Of all people the property owner had a lot of lead time in which to
think about what he would like to have done to or with that property.
d. My concerns will be expressed below, in terms of timing.
C. Two Concerns About the Commission: Meeting Process at January 28,
1997.
1. The Chairperson of the City Planning Commission spoke against the
staff recommendation report.
a. The staff prepared an excellent report, with a lot of thought.
b. The recommendation was clear and well thought out.
c. Three of the commissioners voted in favor of supporting the staff
report and reguiding LA -2.
d. The Chairperson spoke against the staffs report.
e. The gist of what I got for his reason for voting against the staff
report was that the spokesman for the landowner in several minutes
had suggested orally an alternative or compromise for that sight.
The Honorable Joy Tierney
Mayor _'•`
City of Plymouth
January 31, 1997
Page 4
f. So the Chairperson commented that the staff should prepare a new
report, taking into consideration this new orally expressed
alternativelcompromise and any other alternatives that might be
available.
g. So in the last minute or two of the meeting, after some 4 V2 hours,
the commissioners voted 3 for and 3 against; so the motion to
reguide to LA -2 was not passed.
h. There were commissioners who suggested that following the staff s
recommendation would not hinder the property owner from
subsequently submitting an application to have the property
reguided to whatever the property owner would like.
But that the staff had spent considerable time and effort and had
prepared an excellent report and there were no other reports present
at the time to contradict the staff s report, so that it would be proper
to vote yes on the motion to reguide the property LA -2.
i. My concern is that all of the time and effort spent by the staff, and
residents in the surrounding area all are ignored in light of a "casual
comment" by the property owner's spokesman about a possible
alternative/compromise.
j. Does this suggest that if I have an opportunity to speak at the next
hearing and the staff prepares an excellent report and I casually
mention another alternative or compromise I think is appropriate,
that the staff's report should be ignored so that the staff can go back
and review my alternative/compromise.
I would hope not.
k. I would hope that the process would be better managed than that.
2. The next step for this site was not known by the commissioners.
a. They did not know when another staff report might be ready.
b. I was told to call periodically to find out when the staff report would
be ready.
The Honorable Joy Tierney
Mayor
City of Plymouth
January 31, 1997
Page 5
c. The next hearing on this site was not known.
I was to call periodically to find out when the next hearing would be
or to read the Sun Sailor for public notification of the next hearing
on this sight.
d. I was unclear as to what the staff was going to look at for review the
next time.
Were they going to look at the alternative/compromise mentioned by
the spokesperson for the property owner, were they going to look at
an LA -3 proposal which I have heard has been recommended by
some out of town land developer, were they going to relook at
reguiding all of that property commercially, etc.
In that last 60 seconds, I don't know what happened regarding the
motion to reguide to LA -2
A Notification.
1. If I understand it property owners who live within 500 feet of a reguided
or rezoned parcel of property get a written notice.
2. I don't live within 500 feet but I have deep concerns and so do hundreds
of other residents who would affected by any reguiding.
3. I don't know how I can get on a list so that I can be:
a. Notified in writing of a staff report and the next meeting where there
is a public hearing so that I may express for myself my feelings.
b. Receive a telephone call or some other method of notification in
advance, so that I might be able to obtain a copy of the staff report
and be prepared to express my feelings at the next public hearing.
4. Sometimes I'm out of town and travel for business and if I'm out of town
for a five day period of time I might completely miss the staff report and
the public hearing (as I would have if I had been out of town from
Friday, January 24, 1997 through Tuesday, January 28, 1997).
The Honorable Joy Tierney �'
Mayor •1..�: -,
City of Plymouth
January 31, 1997
Page 6
5. There must be some method for a concerned citizen who feels they
would be affected by a rezoning or reguiding to obtain sufficient notice
in advance to express their feelings and protect their property rights.
I know this is a long letter. I did want to express my feelings clearly to you. I did
leave you a voice mail message. I hope this letter is helpful for you.
I would also welcome the opportunity to sit down and talk to you about the
procedures. I'm concerned about the outcome, but I'm more concerned about the
procedures that are used to reach the outcome.
Respectfully,
Robert I. Karon
Citizen of The City of Plymouth
RIK:lcp
February 7, 1997
Robert Karon
16910 41" Avenue N.
Plymouth, MN 55446
Dear Mr. Karon:
Mayor Tierney has asked me to respond to your letter of January 31 regarding the
property north of Dundee Nursery and the January 28, 1997 Planning Commission
meeting.
Your letter did a good job of recapping the events of the meeting. You expressed two
concerns about the meeting process which I will address.
The Chairperson of the City Planning Commission spoke against the staff
recommendation report-- I appreciate that you felt that the staff report was excellent
and well thought-out. However, it is important to note that our reports are
recommendations. The Commission is free to consider any additional information,
including testimony given at a public hearing by any landowner or citizen, when they
make their recommendations to the City Council. It is not unusual, if new information
is brought forward during a meeting, for the Commission to table or continue an item
for further investigation or discussion. In the end, if for any reason the Planning
Commission and Staff's recommendations are different, the City Council will be so
informed at the time they consider the issue.
The next step for this site was not known by the Commissioners-- The reason that the
Commission could not give an exact date for further consideration of the issue is that
we were unable at that late hour to promise exactly when the further information
requested by the Commission would be available. The Commissioners were simply
recognizing that staff needs to balance workload and agendas. After every agenda
item, the practice of the Commission is to give tentative dates for further action, either
by the Commission or the Council, and to tell interested parties to keep in contact with
staff regarding the schedule. This is because our experience shows that many factors
can change meeting agendas. So we urge people to keep in contact with us to make
sure they do not assume an item will or will not be on an agenda and perhaps miss a
meeting.
PLYMOUTH A Bcauttf it(P ace 'ro Live
:'?n PL`".'OUl'H BOULEVARD • PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447-1482 • TELEPHONE (612) 509-5r)nn
The Commission made no recommendation to the Council regarding the proposed LA -2
reguiding at the January 28 meeting. They will consider the issue again at their
February 11 meeting. A copy of the staff report we have prepared for that meeting is
enclosed for your information.
You also asked how you could make sure you are notified of upcoming reguidings or
rezonings. We do mail notices to property owners within 500 feet, and post signs on
the property to let others know of pending actions in addition to formal published
notices in the Sun Sailor. We also find that word of mouth among neighbors also helps
to get the word out on development issues when these other methods fail. However, if
you want to be certain to be informed about all matters coming before the Planning
Commission, I recommend that you subscribe to their agenda. An annual subscription
($15.78) covers the cost of copying and mailing the agenda to your home. Then, if
there are items that interest you, you may contact staff for further information, attend
the meeting or watch on cable channel 37. Please contact Denise Hutt of my staff
(509-5408) if you wish to arrange for a subscription.
I hope that this will address your questions regarding the Planning Commission's
process for addressing this issue. Please feel free to call me at 509-5401 if you have
questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Anne W. Hurlburt, AICP
Community Development Director
cc: Mayor and City Council
Dwight Johnson, City Manager
enc.
bow
OF
PLYMOUTf+
February 5, 1997
Mr. Pete Jaroscak, Director
Safety and Security
North Memorial Health Care
3300 Oakdale Avenue North
Robbinsdale, MN 55422-2900
Dear Mr. Jaroscak:
Fire Chief Kline and I have both reviewed the Article, "Things That Go Bump in the
Night," which is an excerpt from the report, The Impact of Traffic Management Programs
on the Delivery of Fire Suppression and Emergency Medical Services This study was
conducted by the Austin, Texas Fire Department.
Any traffic control device can have an impact on total response tune of fire department
apparatus. Chief Kline and I believe the most significant impact is created when
roadways are closed to responding units totally and that overall traffic safety concerns
must strike a balance with response concerns. We will continue to work on traffic
management partnerships between Engineering, Community Development, Emergency
Services, and citizens to develop strategies and plans to address traffic management
concerns within the City.
Thank you for passing along your information and concerns.
Sincerely,
�* f
Craig/C. Gerdes
Director of Public Safety
PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
be
PLYMOUTH A BeautifurPla"TO Live
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD • PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447-1482 • TELEPHONE (812) 509.5000
North ,North
�Memorial
Memorial Health Care.
Health Care® An 0gan&aalon oJNro/l* C1reWkwoni*
An Organization of Health Care Professionals Pete Jaroscak
DirectorofSafery & Security
3300 Oakdale Avenue North • Robbinsdale. MN 55422-2900
Date: January 22, 1997 (612)520-5642 • fax (612)520-7113
To: Mayor Joy Tierney
City of Plymouth �.
From: Pete Jaroscak, Director
Safety and Security
Subject: Speed Bumps f
It was a pleasure meeting you at Joy Robb's retirement party. My wife Gloria and
I are both employees of North Memorial and residents of Medicine Lake.
Enclosed is an article out of the January/February issue of National Fire
Protection Journal. As a retired Fire Marshal for the City of Robbinsdale I am
concerned about the safety of the speed bumps on South Shore Drive. The article
touches on various studies that have been done re the safety of speed bumps as
they relate to response times for emergency vehicles. I thought you may find this
article interesting.
I would appreciate your passing this on to Fire Chief Kline if he has not seen it.
Anything you can do to eliminate these bumps surrounding our community would
be greatly appreciated by all concerned. Thank you for your interest in this and if I
as a citizen or safety official can be of any help, please contact me.
document2
'� .i4Y 1 ��/ '� ?'. � _�—_..4 �� � �--�7�� �.� wars � I ",
/r 4 f \ �- • ��J �r
i t,�n�4 y i1' � o � � � r � �, �y "`
is t �.c/( f �` �'-.x> 1
.".� • - //�(. � 1,��`-s .._ .. ,-' IIS Ilii c� ��r� • .may A rl/�i ./% +'_ .'f
� r1
_ , � �� , .
�•:�� _
I//
Cities all over the United States are busy building
speed humps to cut down on theflow of traffic through
residential neighborhoods. And they seem to work—
cm•s have to slow down to get over thein in one piece.
But so do fire trucks.
H over the United States today, communities are
implementing neighborhood traffic management
programs to provide a safer, more livable envi-
ronment. Physical barriers, such as cul-de-sacs, and . traffic
diverters, such as speed humps, have spring up natiomvide. Street
closures are being approved by many city councils, and many
newer subdivisions are installing entrance gates and cutting down
on the number of streets into the developments --all to limit
access to neighborhoods.
Austin, Texas, like at least 47 other cities around the country,
has chosen to deal with its problem traffic by implementing a
speed hump program. And it's been happy with the results: In
the two years the program's been in existence, the Public
Works and Transportation Department has been asked to, .
�`. y Rr f�
�•
.I N
I//
Cities all over the United States are busy building
speed humps to cut down on theflow of traffic through
residential neighborhoods. And they seem to work—
cm•s have to slow down to get over thein in one piece.
But so do fire trucks.
H over the United States today, communities are
implementing neighborhood traffic management
programs to provide a safer, more livable envi-
ronment. Physical barriers, such as cul-de-sacs, and . traffic
diverters, such as speed humps, have spring up natiomvide. Street
closures are being approved by many city councils, and many
newer subdivisions are installing entrance gates and cutting down
on the number of streets into the developments --all to limit
access to neighborhoods.
Austin, Texas, like at least 47 other cities around the country,
has chosen to deal with its problem traffic by implementing a
speed hump program. And it's been happy with the results: In
the two years the program's been in existence, the Public
Works and Transportation Department has been asked to, .
down on unwanted traffic in residential neighborhods. But they also
reduce the fire department's response times.
Neighborhood traffic management strategies
Traffic management programs often focus entirely on installing one or
two types of control devices, with little or no areawide planning. A
neighborhood group complains, and a speed hump, stop sign, or some
other device is installed—and that's the end of it. Occasionally, this
strategy is successful. Residents on streets where the devices were
installed are happy, and any complaints other residents and drivers
might have soon die down.
However, the literature seems to suggest that the more successful
traffic calming initiatives are broader in scope, using more than one
strategy and a varier• of control devices. These broader initiatives focus
on transportation improvements using passive strategies, active strate-
gies, or a combination of both. Passive strategies use subtle or
psychological means to influence drivers to behave in a desired fash-
ion, while active strategies prevent or reduce traffic movement by
changing street configurations or putting up physical barriers.
Passive traffic control devices include tragic signs and signals, brush
trims, textured pavements, markings at pedestrian crosswalks, educa-
tional programs, and traffic enforcement. These devices arc meant to
improve safety and reduce accidents by making drivers more a%vare of
their actions. Educational programs and enforcement efforts are gen-
erally accepted as the more effective passive techniques for dealing
with issues related to speeding, and, to a lesser degree, traffic volume.
Active traffic control devices include speed humps, traffic circles,
cul-de-sacs, chokers or curb extensions, gates across roadways, medi-
ans, and street closures. These "hard" control devices are largely
self -enforcing and create a visual impression, real or imagined, that a
street isat intended for through traffic.
The most common hard control device is the speed hump. The two
most common speed humps are the 12 -foot -long circular hump 3 to 4
inches high and the 22 -foot -long flat-topped hump with a plateau 10
feet long and 3 to 4 inches high and a circular arc approach 6 feet lona.
The recommended spacing for speed humps is 200 to 250 feet apart.
Speed humps are relatively inexpensive to install—usually between
51,000 and 51,500 per hump—and they successfully slow traffic.
However, they can also increase noise pollution and block the paths
and hinder the mobility of emergency apparatus. They can damage
vehicles and cause trauma to patients being transported to hospitals.
They may affect how fire departments respond to calls, and they may
interfere with firefighting operations. Traffic control devices may even
affect ho%v the locations of new stations are determined. Their bias;est
disadvantage? They reduce emergency response times.
The impact of traffic management on emergency response
Response time is a key emergency- service performance indicator, and
tragic management plans, especially those that incorporate traffic barri-
ers, adversely affect it. According to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, such devices may force apparatus to use longer, less direct
routes and confine them to the busier streets, possibly exposing them to
significant delays and even collisions. Apparatus may also end up on the
%%Tong side of a barrier from a fire, or they may have to slo%v down sia-
nificantly to maneuver through or around barriers. Traffic barrier may
also preclude the practice of routing apparatus from the same station
along parallel streets to prevent a single traffic accident from delaying
them all. Finally; traffic barriers may make an entire area temporarily
inaccessible to fire apparatus. This occurs when the barriers close several
residential streets, and one or more unanticipated problems, such as street
repair, force traffic from the blocked streets to jam the remaining open
streets.
In addition to having an impact on response time and capability,
traffic management barriers may affect operations at a fire scene by
interfering with the appartus' ability to maneuver; hampering the
effective deployment of apparatus and equipment, particularly tillered
aerial ladder apparatus; impeding access to the water supply; and mak-
ing it difficult to divert traffic from the fire scene.
Obviously; many emergency agencies in cities around the country
are alarmed by these dc%clopmcnts. For example, the city of Berkeley,
California, recently put its speed hump program on hold because the
fire department was worried that most, if not all, of their primary
response routes would have traffic devices that would delay fire depart-
ment response.
"The Fire Bureau wanted to know where it would all end," said.
Susan Sanderson, a transportation planner. "Hovv long would it be
before there were speed humps on every street? I thought the question
was ridiculous at first, until, on closer inspection, I realized that speed-
ing was so ubiquitous that speed humps probably would be needed on
every street if that was our only solution to speeding."
Austin Fire Chief Robin Paulsgrove and Austiris Director for the
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Department voiced similar con-
cerns when they learned that the city's Public N-'orks and
Transportation Department had received requests for speed humps on
more than 600 streets in the IS months the speed hump program had
been in place. By comparison, Dallas had approved only, about 210
NFPAJournal January/February 1997 0
speed humps on a third as many streets. And Dallas, at approximately
400 square miles, is considerably larger than Austin, which covers about
220 square miles.
The speed humps -30 of them, both curved and flat-topped --- lvere
installed in March 1995 in six Austin neighborhoods to test their effec-
tiveness in reducing vehicle speed. They did the job. Data collected
before and after the speed humps were installed indicate that the curved
speed humps reduced vehicle speeds by 5 to 15 miles per hour, while
the flat-topped humps reduced speeds by 7 to 10 miles per hour.
According to surveys conducted in the first four pilot neighbor-
hoods, to which an average of 57 percent of the recipients responded,
87.5 percent of the residents felt that traffic speeds had slowed on their
streets. The majorit}-74 percent -of residents in two neighborhoods
also felt that traffic volume had decreased, while 59 percent of resi-
dents in the other nvo neighborhoods noticed a change in traffic
volume. Overall, 70 percent of the residents had a favorable opinion of
speed humps as a speed reduction measure, and 55.5 percent felt that
the speed humps had improved the quality of life in the neighborhood.
However, both the Austin Fire and E'N IS Departments worried that
would humps ould decrease response and patient transport times
and that they'd subject paramedics in the back of ENIS units to injury
if they lost their balance when crossing one.
In March 1996, the city manager, Jesus Garza, asked the Fire and
ENIS Departments to measure the delay in response times for emer-
gency vehicles responding over speed humps. A fire engine, a fire truck:,
and an EMS ambulance were used to conduct the tests on a residential
street with a posted z peed limit of 30 miles per hour. The street con-
tained five curved speed humps spaced between 358 and 433 feet apart.
A similar street of about the same length containing no speed humps
NVas used for comparison. The roads were closed to traffic during the
at a speed decided by the driver, with ENIS medics in the back simu-
lating care to a critical patient. Stop watches were used to time each
run, and radar guns measured the vehicles' speeds. Videos were made
to show how crossing the humps affected the vehicles.
For the various combinations of tests, the time needed to travel a
length of street that had no speed hump %vas compared to the time
needed to travel a length of street with the speed humps. The difference
between the two travel times equaled the total delay. The total delay time
divided by the number of humps equaled the delay per speed hump.
The tests revealed that 20 miles per hour was close to, or more than,
the reasonable safe speed to cross a speed hump. None of the drivers
felt that they could maintain good control of their vehicles at 20 miles
per hour, and they feared that the jolts would damage the vehicles.
The drivers individual performances didn't appear to influence the
outcome significantly. Their choices of speed in the runs during which
they used their own discretion were relatively consistent.
The time delay for each speed hump was found to vary between 2.3
and 9.7 seconds. The shortest delay of 2.3 seconds occurred with an
empty ambulance traveling at an average discretionary speed of 16.8
miles per hour. The greatest delay also occurred with the ambulance.
when transporting a patient, the ambulance's average speed slowed to
6.6 miles per hour, and the average delay per hump rose to 9.7 seconds.
In the runs with the fire engine and truck, the average delays per Hump
were in the 3- to 5 -second range.
The significance of the delay is apparent when you consider that most
streets with speed humps have more than one. In the case of an ambu-
lance transporting a patient, this can mean a delay on the w•ay to the
hospital of close to one minute for every street with multiple humps.
tests.
Each vehicle made two runs on each of three tests, using a different
driver for each run. The vehicles crossed each hump at 15 miles per
Hour, at 20 miles per hour, and at a speed chosen by the drivers. A
fourth test was conducted using an FNIS unit that crossed the humps
,W
Resolving the conflicts
So how does a cit}• solve its traffic problems without jeopardizing its
emergency serices?
Solving neighborhood traffic problems is as much a political problem
as a technical one. INIany attempts to resolve traffic issues fail because
well-meaning elected officials, engineers, or planners listen to a small,
vocal group from the community and implement a traffic plan, only to
face resentment from affected parties who weredt involved in the
process. To avoid this problem, communities must include all affected
parties, including emergency service providers, in the planning process.
Because traffic management programs appear to increase neighbor-
hood livability, there will be a great deal of pressure on elected officials
to approve such programs in their communities. It's critical that they
not react hastily and pressure city officials to come up with a quick fix.
When asked to make decisions about traffic management programs,
elected officialsmust clearly understand the tradeoffs that will occur in
emergency response times and capabilities. Citizens «ill inevitably
complain when response times are slowed, and elected officials will have
to support their city's emergency agencies against these complaints.
Emergency response prodders will never come to consensus on traffic
management projects if they fear that the resulting reductions in
response times will be blamed on their incompetence or lack of opera-
tional efficiency.
Planning professionals should also take into account the negative
effects such a plan NeillHave cn emergency agencies.The} mustn't leap
January/February 1997 NFPAlournal
ergency
response times in
Austin i
p route
Fdiscreflon
on Hump/1
3.22
02 i3I4
13.27 25.80
36.4847.61
;5 Average
2.26
3.56
3.83
13.89 25.13
15.60 28.67
39.69
40.77.
60.22 2.83
51.14 2.99
15 MPH Hump it
3.18
/2 43
15.84 '43.69
E4
41.14
i5 Average
53.29 3.69
Engine
15 MPH Hump tt
Ambulance 3.85
1172 #3
16.33 :0.54
14
42.65
E5 Average
57.41 4.56
.to
With patient Human
Ambulance 4.79
02 i3
20.96 41.27
59.60
i�rage
78.80 9.67
,W
Resolving the conflicts
So how does a cit}• solve its traffic problems without jeopardizing its
emergency serices?
Solving neighborhood traffic problems is as much a political problem
as a technical one. INIany attempts to resolve traffic issues fail because
well-meaning elected officials, engineers, or planners listen to a small,
vocal group from the community and implement a traffic plan, only to
face resentment from affected parties who weredt involved in the
process. To avoid this problem, communities must include all affected
parties, including emergency service providers, in the planning process.
Because traffic management programs appear to increase neighbor-
hood livability, there will be a great deal of pressure on elected officials
to approve such programs in their communities. It's critical that they
not react hastily and pressure city officials to come up with a quick fix.
When asked to make decisions about traffic management programs,
elected officialsmust clearly understand the tradeoffs that will occur in
emergency response times and capabilities. Citizens «ill inevitably
complain when response times are slowed, and elected officials will have
to support their city's emergency agencies against these complaints.
Emergency response prodders will never come to consensus on traffic
management projects if they fear that the resulting reductions in
response times will be blamed on their incompetence or lack of opera-
tional efficiency.
Planning professionals should also take into account the negative
effects such a plan NeillHave cn emergency agencies.The} mustn't leap
January/February 1997 NFPAlournal
to obvious solutions. Solutions that may seem obvious often have hid-
den problems that arent discovered until the programs have been
implemented.
It's essential that planning professionals include the city's emergency
service agencies in the planning process. Tragic management plans
should minimize any adverse effects traffic -calming devices might have
on response time and firefighting operations by making barriers tra-
versable, designing barriers so that they don't block primary access
routes in the vicinity of potential multiple -alarm fire sites, and provid-
ing additional fire hydrants where barriers block existing hydrants.
Each plan should be designed so that no portion of a neighborhood
becomes isolated from emergency service.
Planning professionals should incorporate a variety of mitigation
tools and strategies in their plans, and tailor control devices to the
specific situation. No active control devices of any kind should be
considered on primary emergency response routes, and horizontal
devices, such as one-way streets, rather than vertical devices, such as
speed humps, should be considered on secondary emergency response
routes. Emergency vehicles have more difficulty with vertical mitiga-
tion devices than they do with horizontal mitigation devices.
Planners should try passive strategies first and phase in more active
strategies only if necessary: One example is the three-phase Neighbor-
hood Traffic Safety Program in King Count%, Washington. In Phase I,
passive, less restrictive measures are used to educate the residents on
traffic safety issues. Phase II focuses on physical traffic control devices,
such as speed humps and traffic circles, which may be considered only
after Phase I measures prove ineffective. Phase III includes the devel-
opment of major projects that require special funding, such as a capital
improvement program.
Planners may also want to develop a new street classification for pri-
mary emergency response routes, as the city of Portland, Oregon, is in
the process of doing. The new classification will restrict the apes of
traffic -calming devices that can be placed on streets that have been
identified as emergency response routes.
Finally; planners must develop reliable methods to assess accurately
the costs and benefits to the different interest groups that will result
from the traffic changes.
\tthat planners don't %vant to do is give individual neighborhoods
carte blanche to pay for any type of traffic control device then want
themselves. Just because a neighborhood is willing to fund a project
shouldn't mean that it can install a device that fails to meet the com-
munity's criteria for traffic mitigation.
What emergenryresponse agencies can do
It's understandably difficult for emergency service providers to accept
that many people value livability more than rapid emergency response
or the efficient movement of traffic. When given the choice between a
quick response time by emergency service providers or a reduction in
the speed and volume of cars on their neighborhood streets, residents
will invariably place a greater value on the latter. Regardless of whether
the danger to children from speeding automobiles is really a greater
risk than a slow emergency response time, residents' fears for their chil-
dren's safety is greater than their fear of fire and medical emergencies,
and that must be respected.
If firefighters understand that the community is willing to accept a
slower emergency response time and that city officials won't blame
them when traffic control devices cause their response times to drop,
they'll more Basil• accept the operational changes that must be imple-
mented to give the customers what they want.
To help citizens create the kind of communities they want to live
in, emergency service provider may have to work with their public
works departments to help design traffic management programs. To
do this, fire and ELIS departments can set up a committee that meets
regularly with the planning or public works department to review and
approve such projects. Committee members can be the first point of
contact for the departments on transportation issues and can provide
the public safety departments with a consistent review and approval
process when implementing traffic management projects.
In areas where traffic management initiatives reduce response
time, emergency service providers can implement mitigation strate-
gies. They can create maps that clearly indicate the most efficient
routes into and through neighborhoods, as well as the location of
traffic management devices. They can practice getting through 911
gates quickly and plan routes that bypass gates. And they can buy
hardware that permits emergency vehicles to pre-empt traffic signals
so that the%• can.clear intersections and stop cross -traffic.
Taking this advice to heart, the Austin Fire, E\IS, and Public
Works and Transportation Departments recently met to discuss how
to move forward together %with the city's speed hump program. As a
result, speed humps woiA be approved for all the Austin streets on
which they're being requested. Current funding levels will limit the
number of humps that can be installed to approximately 65 to 100
annually, depending on which design is used. And Austin's Public
Works and Transportation Department recently revised the approval.
criteria to include only those streets where average vehicle speeds
exceed the speed limit by five miles per hour.
In addition, the Austin Fire and E\IS Departments will more clearly
define what they consider to be emergency response routes and will
approve speed humps requested on streets that don't fall into this cate-
gon: The Public VNtorks Department will seek additional funding for
traffic management and explore the use of other devices. Most impor-
tant, the departments have agreed to work together to find a balance
between the neighborhoods' need for increased liability and the fire and
E\VIS departments' need to provide effective and efficient response.
To implement a traffic management program that benefits both the
community and those who provide emergency services successfully;
cities must evaluate the different strategies and devices available and
incorporate them into a comprehensive plan to deal with traffic prob-
lems. All affected parties, including the emergency service agencies,
trust participate in the planning process from the very beginning, and
they must all make a commitment to work together, serving the inter-
ests of their community.*
_.....
An}a.1 tAtlhshrf in receiving n ropj of `Thi Impact oJTro�Cd7annSlmint Pr, --
grants at the Delivery ofFir• Strppressim and Emergency Medical Services,"the
complete r port from zchieh this article is taken, ntar write tc McGin is at the
Austin Fire Department,101 Festival beach R,ad, Austin, TV 7870! Pierse
enclose a chick,r nnney onler ,r S5 to cover copl:ng and postage mts.
ATFPAJournal Januarys/February 1997
y. F.
4O� Ok c� M 46
r+ N N N N N N
ON
as
ON
O\
ON
ON
a,
91
O�
v
17,
to
ON
4
N
as
oo
N
,�
M
Os
4
O
0
0
>0
N
0
Irl
-
3\O
r-
t-
r-
rl-
r-
1.6
Cq
N
,O
�,O
\O
t
O
N
4O� Ok c� M 46
r+ N N N N N N
ON
as
ON
O\
ON
ON
a,
91
O�
v
17,
to
ON
4
N
as
oo
N
,�
M
Os
4
O
0
0
>0
N
0
Irl
-
3\O
1.6
Cq
bA
a
b
Cd
I
c7
ON
N
all
00
C*,
M
CNM
O
0
0
>0
N
0
Irl
-
3\O
1.6
Cq
bA
a
b
Cd
I
c7
a
0
3
0
0
0
>0
N
0
Irl
-
3\O
1.6
bA
a
b
-2
-R
bA
a
HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
A-2308 Government Center Minneapolis. Minnesota 55487-0238 612-348-6497
February 3, 1997
Joy Tierney
Mayor
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mayor Tierney:
Last January the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners met with suburban officials to discuss the
County's role in housing. One request, made by suburban officials, was for Hennepin County to seek funding
under the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) first-time homebuyers mortgage program in order to
maximize funds available to suburban Hennepin County residents.
On January 16, the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HCHRA) authorized staff to
submit an application for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) Minnesota City Participation
Program. The HCHRA application will be on behalf of all communities interested in the program that do not
wish to submit an individual application for the mortgage funds.
Under the Minnesota City Participation Program, the MHFA sells mortgage revenue bonds on behalf of city
and county housing authorities. The proceeds of these bonds provide below-market interest rate, mortgage
loans for low and moderate -income first-time homebuyers. The maximum purchase price for single-family
homes under this program is $95,000. The loans are originated and processed by participating area lenders.
The MHFA allocates mortgage funds under this program on a per capita basis. We estimate that a County
application could result in an additional $3 million in mortgage funds available to residents in Hennepin
County.
Metropolitan Council staff has informed Hennepin County that a community's participation in the County
first-time homebuyer mortgage application will be viewed as an effort to advance affordable housing,
regardless if the mortgages are utilized within the city borders. This will assist cities in the implementation of
the Livable Communities Act.
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mike Opat Mark Stenglein Mark Andrew Peter McLaughlin Randy Johnson Mary Tambornino Penny Steele
Mayor Tierney
Page 2
We recognize the importance of homeownership for maintaining viable communities and urge all suburban
communities to fully participate in this program, either through an individual municipal application or the
HCHRA application. By doing so, the resources available for first-time homebuyers will be significantly
expanded for suburban Hennepin County residents.
Information on the County's Minnesota City Participation Program application has been sent to all suburban
county municipal staff. Please contact staff in the County's Office of Planning and Development (541-7080)
if you have any questions.
Penny Steele, Chair
Hennepin County HRA
Mary Tamb ino
Sixth District Commissioner
cc: City Manager
Mark Stenglein
Second District Commissioner
February 7, 1997
Bruce Pankonin
Development Manager
Orrin Thompson Homes
8421 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 300
Golden Valley, MN 55426
Dear Mr. Pankonin:
; PoT. CO�
PLYMOUTR
Thank you for your letter concerning planning for Northwest Plymouth. I have
forwarded to the Mayor and City Council.
I look forward to working with you and Mr. Bernardi when we begin our update of the
Comprehensive Plan. We will be in contact with you about specifics of the planning
process soon.
Please feel free to call me at 509-5401 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Anne W. Hurlburt, AICP
Community Development Director
cc: Mayor and City Council
Dwight Johnson, City Manager
PLYMOUTH A Betz u til'uf Pface To Live
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD • PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447-1482 • TELEPHONE (612) 509-5000
i
ORRIN THOMPSON
HOMES
Minnesota Calls Us Home
February 5, 1997
Plymouth City Council
c/o Anne W. Hurlburt
Community Development Director
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Re:
Planning Northwest Plymouth
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Plymouth City Council,
ECS:-..`
FE
li[:B 61997
Eu
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
"nuwiuITV nFVFI INFANT OEP"DT AEN
Orrin Thompson Homes, as contract purchaser of the 124 acre Bernardi Property, respectfully requests the
Plymouth City Council begin the comprehensive planning process to bring the northwest area of the city into
the Metropolitan Urban Service Area.
For your information, the Bernardi Property is located on the west side of FAI 494 and north of the Soo
Line Rail Road. We intend to develop the land as a Planned Unit Development containing a variety of single
family attached and single family detached housing units. Our planning effort will be consistent with your
stated objectives in your Livable Communities agreement with the Metropolitan Council.
As you start to formulate your work goals on February 18, 1997, we, as an integral member of your
community, encourage you to make the planning of the northwest part of the city a high priority.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Bruce Pankonin
Development Manager
ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES
cc: Tony Bernardi
8421 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 300 • Golden Valley, MN 55426.544 7333
FEB 07 '97 04:02PM LEAGUE OF MN CITIES P.1
r,..pwojJ� not.
LMCV FRIDAYFAx Vol. 2 No. 5
Crt�.r Prowwr;"e 1i arowe A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities February 7, 1997
Snow removal bills plow
through committee
The proposal to provide state
aid to local governments for snow
removal expenses moved out of
the Senate Transportation Finance
Committee, and will come before
the House Judiciary Finance
Committee next Thursday. The
League testified before the Senate
Committee in support of state
financial assistance, as did the
Township and County
associations.
The bill (authored by Senator
Jim Vickerman) continues to
evolve and grow. The original
concept was to provide state
supplemental assistance to the 40
counties covered by the Presiden-
tial disaster declaration, and any
other eligible areas added to the
declaration through subsequent
developments. Governor Arne
Carlson proposed $20 million in
his budget. It was believed that
amount would be more than
sufficient to meet those costs,
with the excess set aside for the
"contingencies" of spring flooding
or early snowfall next winter.
In light of survey information
provided by local governments to
the Division of Emergency Man-
agement (DEM) showing signifi-
cant costs in 1996 as well as in
January 1997, the bill was
amended in three ways. First,
there would be a 1996 element.
Second, a January 1997 disaster
supplement would expand beyond
the initial 40 counties. Third, an
unspecified amount would be held
as a ready reserve for spring
flooding and end of 1997
emergencies.
While the program details
continue to be worked out, it is
already clear that more than $20
million will be needed. As of
February 4, 552 cities had re-
sponded to the DEM survey (64
percent) indicating an $18 million
shortfall for 1996, and a large
portion of an estimated $28 million
disaster total. The total program
costs now are estimated to
exceed $60 million in addition to
the federal disaster aid.
We'll provide more information on
the survey results in next week's
Bulletin.
Cities that haven't returned
their survey should do so Monday.
Without a survey response, the
state will assume that aid for your
city is unnecessary.
Committees to
look at TIF
Committees in both the Sen-
ate and House will take up the
subject of tax increment financing
next week. The Senate Property
Tax & Local Government Budget
Committee will meet on Monday,
February 10. at 2 p.m. The House
Property Tax & Tax Increment
Financing Committee meeting is
scheduled for Wednesday, Febru-
ary 12, at 8 a.m. Both committees
will hear from the Legislative
Auditor's office on TIF.
House committee members
have asked city and county groups
to present their positions on tax
increment financing. Anyone who
is interested in learning more
about how the TIF issue will play in
the 1997 session is welcome and
encouraged to attend these
meetings. Please contact Andrea
Atherton at (612) 281-1258 if you
have any questions.
House passes youth access bill
The House passed HF 117 (Rest) on Thursday evening which re-
quires licensure of all tobacco vendors in Minnesota. The House Com-
merce Committee had amended the original bill last week. Additional
amendments were approved on the floor yesterday. In committee,
Representative Rest amended the bill at our request to remove the
mandate that cities license city vendors, and counties license non -city
vendors. As amended, counties will license all vendors that cities or
towns don't. In short, there will be no city mandate but, if we choose to
license vendors, the county won't.
The retailers did well on the floor. They were successful in removing
the proposed ban on self-service displays (70-64) and the mandatory
annual sting or compliance check. All that remains is the basic require-
ment for every vendor to have a local license. The Senate has yet to
begin working on its version of the bill.