HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1999-526CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 99-526
APPROVING A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT FOR WAYNE A. JESKE ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR WEST LUTHERAN
HIGH SCHOOL LOCATED AT 3350 HARBOR LANE NORTH (99107)
WHEREAS, Wayne A. Jeske Associates, Inc. has requested a site plan amendment and
conditional use permit amendment to allow a building addition and parking lot expansion at West
Lutheran High School, for the property legally described as follows:
That part of Lot 3, Block 2, lying north of the south 166.00 feet thereof, Fox Meadows
First Addition; and,
Lot 4, Block 2, Fox Meadows First Addition; and,
Lots 5 and 6, Block 2, Fox Meadows First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing
and recommends approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Wayne
A. Jeske Associates, Inc. for a site plan amendment and conditional use permit amendment to
allow a building addition and parking lot expansion at West Lutheran High School, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The amendment to the site plan amendment and conditional use permit amendment allow
construction of an approximately 16,372 -square foot building addition and parking lot
expansion at West Lutheran High School, as shown on the plans and revisions received by the
City on October 11, 1999, and November 19, 1999, except as amended by this resolution.
2. The conditional use permit standards are met for the building addition and parking lot
expansion, as follows:
Resolution 99-526
(99107)
Page 2 of 3
a. The use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and other City policies and plans. The
Comprehensive Plan states that O -R uses are consistent with the CO (Commercial Office)
guiding. In 1999, the City Council specifically amended the ordinance to allow schools in
the O -R district.
b. Approval of the amended conditional use permit for the building addition and parking lot
improvements would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or comfort,
because all the applicable Zoning Ordinance standards would be met.
c. The building addition and parking lot improvements would not be injurious to the
immediately surrounding properties. All minimum building and parking setbacks specified
under the Zoning Ordinance would be met.
d. The surrounding properties are developed and the building addition and parking lot
improvements would not impede improvement of the surrounding properties.
e. The site is adequately served by public facilities.
f. The proposed site plan meets all setback, height and coverage regulations of the O -R
zoning district.
g. The proposed building addition and parking lot improvements comply with all the
performance standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The applicant must obtain the appropriate permits from the Building Division prior to
commencing any work on the building.
4. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide
two additional trees for total of 17 new trees in compliance with Section 21130.03 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
5. The applicant must comply with the Sign Regulations in effect at the time of building permit
issuance.
6. Standard Conditions:
a. The applicant shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer's Memorandum.
b. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the required Site
Improvement Performance Agreement (SIPA) and Financial Guarantee for completion of
site improvements within twelve months of the date of this Resolution.
c. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per
Ordinance provisions.
d. The applicant shall comply with the Ordinance regarding the location of fire lanes and fire
lane signage.
Resolution 99-526
(99107)
Page 3 of 3
e. The approval is subject to all applicable codes, regulations and ordinances, and violation
thereof shall be grounds for revocation.
f. This approval shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner
or applicant has substantially started construction of the project, or unless the landowner
or applicant has received prior approval from the City to extend the expiration date for up
to one additional year, as regulated under Sections 21015.07 and 21045.09 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
ADOPTED by the City Council this 21st day of December, 1999.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on December 21, 1999, with the original thereof on file in my office, and
the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk