Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPark and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes 05-11-1989Minutes of the Park and Recreation. Advisory Commission Meeting May U, 1989 Page 1.9 Present: Chair Edwards, Commissioners Andersson, Freels, LaTour, Beach, Rosen and, Hanson; staff Blank, Busch, Patterson and Pederson; Planning Commissioner Zylla, Counciimember Sisk 1. CkLL,TO ORDER Chair Edwards called! the May meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES' A motion was made by Cowmissioner Rosen ,and seconded by Commissioner Beach to approve the minutes of the April meeting with one correction noted by Commissioner Freels on the change of date from May 17 to May 24 for the park tour. The motion carried with all ayes. i i 3. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS a. Athletic Associations. Nonewerepresent at this meeting. b. Staff. Rick Busch discussed the adult men's softball leagues that are underway at this time, and women's, co-rec and church, leagues scheduled to begin the week of May 15. He stated that youth baseball and softball association leagues have begun their practices and games, as well as youth soccer. He indicated that summer part-time hiring has begun, as well as the, ordering of equipment, supplies and t-- shir.ts.. Park and recreation sponsored golf and tennis lessons begin the week of M.ry 15, and the rest of the summer recreation programs will all get underway the week of June 12. Zachary Playfield will be very busy this summer with softball tournaments scheduled at least two weekends every month. c. Qjhers. None were present at this meeting. 4 REPORT ON PAST COUNCIL ACTION a. The City Council approved a contract with; the community center architect and a contract with a construction manager. b. 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Mooney Lake pat. This item is, on the agenda for the City Council meeting of May 15. The Planning Commission is recomnending that Lot 20 of the proposed Lundgren Bros-. pkat be, preserved for open space. b. Comprehensive flan uQdate. Director Blank pointed out that the comprehensive plan was displayed on the wall in the chambers, and he briefly reviewed it for PRAC. Planning Commissioner Zylla also made a, few short statements about the hearings they have held with regard' to the comprehensive plan's proposed reguiding. PRAC Minutes/May 11, 1989 Page 20 c. West Medicine Lake Drive trail update. Director Blank stated that he had talked with Strgar-Roscoe and they are nearly finished with their preliminary design. It is expected to be submitted to City staff for review on May 19 d. Community centcr uRdate. A public hearing on the projected operating costs and fees/revenues is set for Tuesday, May 16. The architect and City staff have met several, times in the last few days to draw and re- draw the plans. The proposed schematic plan may be presented to the Council: on June 5. e. 1(ilmer Rlalground u2date. Pour, companies Will be, submitting bids for the new playground equipment on Friday, May 12. Staff has gone to the site and looked over the issues of the ditch, streets and culverts to determine what can be dine to: prevent flooding of the park. The street dept. may be able to help with these items later this year. f. Plymouth Creek _aarkina lot expansion. Contractor was scheduled to begin work on the parking lot Monday, May 8, but he was rained out, and according to Director Blank, still has not shown up there. g. Park tour - May 24. The bus will leave the City Center at 5:15 p.m.. Ail commissioners indicated they would attend'. 6., NEWS BUSINESS a. Slan Lake plat. Director Blank. stated that this proposed plat does not provide adequate park access for this neighborhood, and that staff Is in, disagreement with the developer on the size of the park and the issue of the trail on the west side of Swan Lake. It is staff's; recommendation that, the developer be directed to redesign the park with specific instructions to allow for more public land to front on a street and work towardeliminating the overcrowding, of houses and the trail going around the lake. As a second alternative, staff suggests that lots 1, 9 and 10 be included in the park property and that the trail corridor on the west side of the lake be at least 1.00' wide and. all of i,t above the high water mark. The developer should also be required to build the Quinwood Lane culdesac on property other than that which has been dedicated for park. Director Blank's reasons for wanting the trail corridor 100 feet wide is to help eliminate some of the problems that could be encountered by having trail too close to private back yards. Tom Loucks, project designer for this proposed plat, then addressed the Park Commission with the following remarks. He stated that the proposed plat is 34 acres in size approximately, and that they have dedicated a, total of 3.43 acres with park proposed on the north end of the plat and on the southeast corner of the lake. This meets the City's 105 park dedication ordinance. He stated, that his proposal also ,provides 2.10 Beet of park frontage on public streets, whish, although it does not meet the. 50% desired ratio, is much greater than the 99 feet and 50 feet provided by the developments on, the east and north sides of the park, and he feels that it would, be unfair to impose this policy on this development if it was not required of the FRAC Minutes/fty, Il, Ig89 Page 21 other developers. He also argued that the 100 foot wide trail corridor requirement would take too much land away from Lots 1 through 10, and they would become undesirable for development, He also stated that it was not, the responsibility of this developer to construct the Quinwood culdesac, since, it does not benefit the Swan Lake West plat. It should have been built by the townhouse development to the north,. In reference to why the plat wasn't designed to extend Quinwood south and then west to meet up with 44th Avenue, Mr. Loucks responded, that the City's engineering department said it wasn't necessary to do that. Dave Putnam, the project engineer, confirmed the statement about the road connection not being necessary an further indicated that they will not construct the culdesac either, since it does not benefit their development. Todd. Rapp, the developer's attorney, expressed his opinion that; the City is suggesting departure from their own policy by wanting to exceed the 10% park dedication. He stated that, if the City desires: to acquire land from the developer, they will have to pay based on the developed price rather than raw land cost. He indicated that this opinion was based on a recent decision by the Supreme Court that. a developer can ask for compensation based on developed cost, which I_ would substantially increase the City's expenses, Chair Edwards commented that her main concern with the Swan Lake West plat is the 50 foot corridor for trail not being wide enough. She alsca feels it could. lead to problems with park users trespassing onto the back yards of private residences as well as noise coming from loud radios being used by walkers and bikers on the trail. Craig Scherber, the developer, commented that the front yard setbacks required of this plat are only 35 feet, and that that puts people in closer proximity to the homes than the trail does. Commissioner Freels expressedhis concern with the limited access; to the park from. the north And wondered where people would park their cars. Commissioner Anderson was also concerned about this. Commissioner Beach stated, that it was likely more users would come down to the park from the north end., because of the townhouse development thews, and she was concernedabout the Quinwood, culdesac interfering with the privacy of the lot immediately west of the Quinwood extension. Commissioner Hanson commented that she was abstaining from any discussion on this item, because the project engineer is one of her clients. Commissioner LaTour was unclear as to why the, City desired a 100 foot trail corridor rather than the 50 foot easement proposed by the developer. Stuff explained that 100 feet will allow for more privacy between the homeorner's flack yards and the trail itself. It has been the City's experience in the past that when back yard lot lines extend right up to the edge of a grail, problems can occur with private FRAC Minutes/May 11 1989 Page22 residents encroaching on park property and that park noise may bother some home owners. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ;BEACH RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DENY THE PLAN AS PROPOSED AND ASK FOR RE -DESIGN. THE MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Mr. Loucks commented that the message .he was getting from the Commission: was to: deny the plat and ask for re -design. He suggested that if trails: cause so many problems, perhaps they should be; eliminated altogether, which would allow him to have larger lots in his plat. He also indicated he Was not pleased with PRAC;recommending denial of the plat without giving him a reason. Chair Edwards assured Mr. Loucks that the Commission would state their reasons for recommending denial.. A MOTION WAS MADE .BY COMMISSIONER BEACH RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL SEND THE PROPOSED PLAT 'BACK FOR REDESIGN BECAUSE PRAC FEELS THERE IS NOT ENOUGH PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE PARK AND BECAUSE THE TRAIL CORRIDOR OF 50 FEET IS NOT SUFFICIENT. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ANDERSON, Commissioner Freels asked if there was suppostd. to be trail proposed al,l the way around the lake? Director Blank stated that park was supposed to go all the way around the lake, not just trail.. Mr. Putnam responded that the City can acquire as much property as they want and can make the trail as wide as they want, if they're, willing to spend the money, Commissioner Rosen stated, he was not `comfortable with asking the developer to replat. He feels that enough park has been proposed and that what's necessary now is some type of. trail. He would also like to see more public access and open views into the park:. Chair Edwards suggested that the City should cdneider the purchase; of Lot 1, or 10 in order to gain more access into the park THE MOTION FAILED ON A 2-4 VOTE, WITH COMMISSIONERS =7REFLS, EDWARDS, ROSEN AND LATOUR VOTING NAY, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ROSEN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER. LATOUR TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITYCOUNCILACQUIRE MORE LAND ON. THE NORTH SI.DE OF THE PARK WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR MORE: VEHICULAR ACCESS AND TO CONSIDE( THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRAIL CORRIDOR AROUND THE LAKE. THE MOTION CARRIED WITH ALL AYES. GIP 1990-94. Because of the late hour, Director Blank only briefly reviewed the CIP. Commissioner Rosen wondered if the neighborhood park proposed. in 1994 for County Roads 24 and 101 had always been planned,. Director Blank indicated that it had been a part of the comprehensive plan all along. FRAC Minutes/Nay 11, 1989 Page 23 Planning, Commissioner Zylla asked if a pl.ayfield is beingplanned for south of Highway 55 and Director Blank stated that one is proposed for north of Highway 55. He stated, that the; Greenwood Elementary School has served as the playfield south of Highway 55, Councilmember Sisk suggested that when staff plans; for future playfields, they should meet with the various athletic associations and find out exactly what their needs are in terms of fields for games and pract des. He feels that perhaps more practice fields are needed than.game fields, Commis.aioner, Beach suggested that FRAC needs to hold a workshop on the future planning of City parks and playfields. T. COMMISSION PRESENTATION Chair Edwards indicated that she would not be at the June 8 FRAC mseting. Commissioner LaTour will act as Chair. 8. STAFF COMMUNICATION None 9. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at: 10:10 p.m, i