Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 06-09-2006w CITY OF PLYMOUI Dummy rp) COUNCIL INFO ME►.,o June 9, 2006 UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS Environmental Quality Committee (EQC) June 14 meeting agenda ...................................... Page 3 Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) June 15 meeting agenda ............................... Page 4 June, July, and August 2006 Official City Meeting Calendars .............................................. Page 5 Tentative list of agenda items for future City Council meetings ......................................... Page 11 INFORMATION News Articles, Releases, Publications, etc ... City news release announcing the Youth Service Awards winner ...................................... Page 13 Update on negotiations between Twin Cities hospital organizations and the hospital service employee union......................................................................................... Page 15 Proposed Cable Television Legislation and the effect on local programming .................... Page 17 STAFF REPORTS Engineering Department Public Improvement Projects List ............................................... Page 21 Medicine Lake City Council Meeting................................................................................. Page 23 Hennepin County Adult Correctional Facility Population Report ....................................... Page 36 Cold Climate Performance of Permeable Pavers................................................................. Page 37 MEETING MINUTES Youth Advisory Council May 8 meeting............................................................................. Page 43 CORRESPONDENCE Notice of the City's compliance with the Local Government Pay Equity Act .................... Page 45 Letter to residents regarding a request for preliminary plat and final plat for Dmitri Smirnov and Maria Kouznetsova for "Jirehel Addition" (2006029) ...................... Page 47 Letter to residents regarding a request for preliminary plat and planned unit development amendment for CSM Equities LLC (2006030) ............................................ Page 48 Letter to residents regarding a request for site plan amendment for Wayzata Public Schools (2006033)................................................................................................... Page 49 Letter to residents regarding a request for site plan amendment for Larson Engineering of Minnesota (2006034)................................................................................. Page 50 Letter to residents regarding a request for conditional use permit for T Mobile USA(2006036)................................................................................................................... Page 51 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE AGENDA Wednesday, June 14, 2006 WHERE: MEDICINE LAKE ROOM A Plymouth City Hall 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 CONSENT AGENDA All items listed on the consent agenda* are considered to be routine by the Environmental Quality Committee and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Committee member, or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. 2. PUBLIC FORUM — Individuals may address the Committee about any item not contained in the regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA - EQC Members may add items to the agenda including items contained in the EQC Info Memo for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The EQC will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda. 4. CONSENT AGENDA* A. Approve the April 10, 2006 Environmental Quality Committee Minutes 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. None 6. GENERAL BUSINESS A. Select Environmental Champions B. Energy conservation measures presented by Lifetime Fitness, Inc. C. Energy conservation measures: City of Plymouth 7. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS A. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission B. Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission C. Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission 8. FUTURE MEETINGS July 12, 2006, Annual Plants, Ponds and Practices Tour 9. ADJOURNMENT 3 AGENDA PLYMOUTH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THURSDAY, JUNE 15, 2006 7:00 p.m. WHERE: City Hall Meeting Rooms A and B 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. 2. CONSENT AGENDA* A. Approval of the May 18, 2006 HRA Minutes B. Plymouth Towne Square. Accept Monthly Housing Reports 3. NEW BUSINESS A. Plymouth Towne Square. Review Center for Energy and Environments recommendations for the roof repair and authorize staff to advertise for bids. B. Vicksburg Crossing. Approve acceptance criteria for market rate units. 4. ADJOURNMENT 11 0 OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS Mune 2006 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 May 2006 S M T W T F S 2 3 4 5 6 Ju12006 S M T W T F S 1 8:00 AM -4:30 PM CITY HALL CUSTOMER APPRECIATION DAYS, 8:00 AM '4:30 PM CITY HALL CUSTOMER APPRECIATION DAYS, 10:00 AM -2:00 PM POLICE AND FIRE 1 City Hall Public Spaces City Han Public Spaces DEPARTMENT 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GUIDED TOURS 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 7:00 PM HUMAN 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RIGHTS COMMISSION -Parkers Lake Room 30 31 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7:00 PM YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL, Medicine Lake Room A 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION, 7:00 PM PARK & REC ADVISORY COMMISSION Council Chambers (PRAC), Council Chambers 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 5:30 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING: DISCUSS GREENHOUSE GAS PROJECT; Mwkine Laka R 7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL OUALrIY COMMfrTEE (EOC). CaunCi 7:00 PM HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA)' Medicine Lake Room A --ABB ChambBrs 7:00 PM REGULAR Fla Da 9 y COUNCIL MEETING, Counol Chambem 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 7:00 PM 9:15 AM MUSIC PLANNING IN PLYMOUTH COMMISSION, 5k RUN Council Chambers 25 26 27 28 29 30 +1:,s AM PLTMOUTH 7:00 PM PLYMOUTH BUSINESS COUNCIL, I= R1tlp ��5.��. COMMITTEE ON /:eD PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING:2aCU89 "off REPORT;. Lala — A&B ]OS PN REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. C ICM TRANSIT (PACT) , Medicine Lake Room A modified on 6/7/2006 5 OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS July 2006 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Jun 2006 Aug 2006 1 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 INDEPENDENCE DAY 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION, 5:15 PM MUSIC IN PLYMOUTH, Hide Performance Center Council Chambers 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 7:00 PM YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL, Medicine Lake Room A 7:00 PM REauLAR COUNCIL MEETING, council chambers 7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE (EOC), Council Chambers 7:00 PM PARK & REC ADVISORY COMMISSION (PRAC), Council Chambers 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION, Council Chambers 7:00 PM HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA), Medicine Lake Room A 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1145 AM PLYMOUTH BUSINESS COUNCIL, 12201 Ridgedale Drive, Minnetonka 7:00 PM PLYMOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRANSIT (PACT) , Medicine Lake Room A 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, C_0 Ch mbma 30 31 modified on 6/8/2006 OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS August 2006 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Jul 2006 S M T W T F S 1 1 5:30 PM NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 2 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION, 3 4 S 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Council Chambers 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, Council mbsn 7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL OUALIT/ COMMITTEE (E—QC). Council Chambers 7:00 PM PARK & REC ADVISORY COMMISSION (PRAC), Council Chambers 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 7:00 PM YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL, Medicine Lake Room A 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION, Council Chambers 700 PM HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA) Medicine LaRoom A 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 11:45 AM PLYMOUTH BUSINESS COUNCIL, 12201 Ridasdale DrW, Mimsmnka 7:00 PM PLYMOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRANSIT (PACT) , Medicine Lake Room A 5:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING. BUDGET STUDY SESSION. Modi*. Lk. Rooms A E B 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, C._. Cnembon 27 28 7:00 PM YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL, Medicine Lake Room A 29 6:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING: BUDGET STUDY SESSION. Public Safety Twining Room 30 31 Sep 2006 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE FILING PERIOD OPENS 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 modified on 6/7/2006 I Tentative Schedule for City Council Agenda Items June 27, Special, 6:00 p.m., Medicine Lake Rooms A and B • Discuss Audit Report June 27, Regular, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers • Approve variances for redevelopment of a non -conforming lot for construction of a new home at 10720 15th Avenue North. Erin Daugherty. (200603 5) • Approve variance to increase impervious surface coverage from 30.8 percent to 31.6 percent to construct a 14 -foot by 19 -foot 9 -inch room addition for property located at 1065 Zanzibar Lane North. Skyline Design, Inc. (2006038) • Approve conditional use permit to allow accessory retail sales in the I-2 Zoning District for property located at 1775 Xenium Lane North. Tile By Design, Inc. (2006027) • Approve interim home occupation license to operate a chiropractic office out of the home located at 17235 12th Avenue North. Kyla Awes. (2006026) • Approve site plan amendment to allow for pavement rehabilitation and associated site improvements at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints. Larson Engineering of Minnesota. (2006034) • Establish electrical permit fees • Comp Plan • First Quarter Financial • Public Hearing on Park Dedication Ordinance • Approval of Hwy. 101 Agreement • Accept new energy management plan July 11, Regular, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers • Announcement of "National Night Out" on August 1 • Award bid for Zachary Playfield July 25, Regular, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers • Discuss Dial -a -Ride system August 8, Regular, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers August 22, Special, 5:00 p.m., Medicine Lake Rooms A and B • Budget August 22, Regular, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers August 29, Special, 6:00 p.m., Public Safety Training Room • Budget September 5, Special (If needed), 7:00 p.m., Medicine Lake Rooms A and B • Budget II Note: Special Meeting topics have been set by Council; all other topics are tentative. City of Plymouth News Release For Immediate Release June 7, 2006 Contact: Kurt Hoffman, (763) 509-5054 Plymouth Youth Council recognizes Armstrong senior with Plymouth Youth Service Award The Plymouth Youth Council has singled out an Armstrong High School senior for special recognition because of her outstanding community service. Anna Larson will be formally recognized with the Youth Council's Distinguished Service Award for 2005-2006 at the June 13 Plymouth City Council meeting. The meeting will be held at City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Blvd., at 7 p.m. Along with the award, Larson will receive a $500 cash prize courtesy of the Plymouth Lions. The Plymouth Youth Service Awards recognize the positive contributions of Plymouth's young people, ages 10-19. Larson is a member of the school's National Honor Society (NHS) chapter, and has performed in a variety of human service projects through the NHS, such as serving food at a homeless shelter and doing housework at a group home. She has also volunteered for human service organizations, including People Responding in Social Ministry (PRISM) and her church. She serves on her church's youth leadership team, planning youth events, organizing events for inner city youth, conducting mission Bible camp work, and teaching Sunday school. Along with recognizing Larson, the City Council will recognize the other eight young people who were nominated for Plymouth Youth Service. awards. The Plymouth Youth Council, City of Plymouth, and the Plymouth Lions sponsor the 13 Plymouth Youth Advisory Council The Plymouth Youth Advisory Council is a citizen advisory group to the Plymouth City Council. The Youth Council provides the City Council with a youth perspective on diverse city issues, and provides members with leadership opportunities, knowledge of local government and hands-on experience in municipal government. 0 MEMO TO: Mayor Judy Johnson FROM: David Cress, President and CEO, North Memorial Health Care Alan Goldbloom, M.D, President and CEO, Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota Tim Hanson, President and CEO, HealthEast Care System David Page, President and CEO, Fairview Health Services David Wessner, President and CEO, Park Nicollet Health Services DATE: June 6, 2006 SUBJECT: Twin Cities Hospital Negotiations with SEIU Local 113 Dear Mayor Johnson, As the CEOs of five local healthcare organizations, we want to update you on the ongoing progress of talks between our hospitals and Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 113. Our hospitals have had a relationship with SEIU Local 113 for more than 50 years. Over those 50 years, our employees and our hospitals have enjoyed a mutually beneficial relationship based on professionalism, trust and respect. Through this relationship, our hospitals have been recognized both locally and nationally for our ability to provide safe, high-quality health care for our patients at a reasonable cost. Unfortunately, these most recent Local 113 talks in the Twin Cities reflect the latest in a nationwide string of SEIU confrontations in which SEIU's national agenda takes precedence over local workplace issues. As you may recall from previous updates, contract talks between our hospitals and SEIU began in December 2005 and, after 15 face-to-face meetings, concluded on March 9 when our hospitals presented our best offer to SEIU. In building this offer, we listened to our local employees and presented an offer that met their needs. The offer includes an 11 percent wage increase over the three-year contract, a pension increase of 19 percent, increased ways for employees to provide input into the workplace, and increased family medical insurance premium contributions to 75 percent. This puts our workers among the top tier of employees in this market for health insurance coverage. This offer is reasonable and reflects our marketplace. Tragically, this offer and our employees are taking a backseat to SEIU's national agenda. SEIU's pattern across the country is simple: Threaten employers with high-priced corporate campaigns fueled by members' dues dollars if the employer doesn't agree with SEIU's national organizing agenda. The goal of a corporate campaign is to wage economic warfare and damage the reputation of anyone who does not give into SEIU's bullying tactics. As employers, we are concerned about addressing our employees' needs. We are not interested in SEIU's national agenda and have told Local 113 this many times over the past six months. This national agenda, which includes union organizing, is not a mandatory subject of bargaining. In short, SEIU's national agenda is to recruit more members and gain more dues dollars — no matter what the cost to local employees and hospitals. At the June 2 bargaining session, we again told SEIU its national agenda had no place in these talks and that SEIU should allow our employees a secret ballot vote on the contract offer. I5 Twin Cities Hospital Negotiations with SEIU Local 113 June 6, 2006 For nearly three months, SEIU has denied our employees the right to vote by secret ballot at their local work sites. Secret ballot votes are the norm in most unions. They are the practical way for unions to best determine whether a contract offer should be accepted. Our employees deserve a chance to decide for themselves on the offer. It appears that instead of holding a secret ballot vote for its members, SEIU national agents are moving forward with corporate campaigns against our local hospitals. SEIU has already spent tens of thousands of members' dues dollars on an advertising campaign, meetings, informational pickets and other tactics. We expect this to continue. We also expect to see an increase in informational picketing by SEIU and other tactics meant to discredit our hospitals. Our hospitals will continue to serve our patients and our communities during the informational picketing and the other disruptions SEIU will conduct. We will continue to be the safest place in America for health care. Last month, HealthGrades, an independent health care rating company, ranked Minnesota hospitals number one in the nation — the safest hospitals in the America for health care. If you have any questions about this issue, please contact one of the representatives listed below. Children's Hospitals and David Brumbaugh, Vice President, Human Resources Clinics of Minnesota Phone: (612) 813-6044 E-mail: david.brumbaugh@childrensmn.org General Phone: (612) 813-6100 Fairview Health Services Kent Eklund, Vice President Phone: (612) 672-7784 E-mail: keklund1@fairview.org General Phone: (612) 672-4000 HealthEast Care System Roger Green, Vice President, Strategy, Communications & Public Policy Phone: (651) 232-2310 E-mail: rgreen@healtheast.org General Phone: (651) 232-2300 North Memorial Health James White, Vice President, Human Resources Care Phone: (763) 520-5920 E-mail: james.white@northmemorial.com General phone: (763) 520-5200 Park Nicollet Health Arthur LaPoint, Vice President, Human Resources Services Phone: (952) 993-1630 E-mail: arthur.lapoint@parknicollet.com General Phone: 952 993-5000 1(n Proposed law could add cable choices but doom local programs Posted on Fri, Jun. 09, 2006 Page 1 of 3 Proposed law could add cable choices but doom local programs Congress aims to cut cable TV bills By MEGGEN LINDSAY and JASON HOPPIN Pioneer Press Watching your kids' sports games on television and tuning in to your local city council meeting could become a practice of the past. Twin Cities leaders warn that legislation wending through Congress guts funding for public access television and undermines local control of the most parochial of news outlets. The House of Representatives passed a version of the bill late Thursday, and the Senate could vote on a similar provision later this month. The biggest telecommunications legislation in a decade, the proposal would open the way for telephone companies to more easily enter the subscription television market. If it is signed into federal law, metro cable commissions say they no longer would receive enough money from cable television providers to deliver local programming and public access shows. Underpinning the controversy is the concept of public access TV as a right, as part of the promise of cable television, particularly for disenfranchised and underrepresented populations. "This (legislation) would do great harm to local communities and to the very concept of community," Eagan spokesman Tom Garrison said. "The impact especially would be felt in Minnesota, which has a prolific history of public -access television." Local officials have written council resolutions and launched letter -writing campaigns to area lawmakers. Aimed at spurring competition, the legislation would create a national system of video franchises in an effort to give consumers more choices among cable TV providers. Nontraditional cable pro-viders — such as telephone companies — are eager to crack the cable business through broadband services, and local cable franchises usually compete only with satellite cable providers such as the Dish Network. But Rep. Fred Upton, R -Mich, who heads the House telecommunications subcommittee, estimated that people could save $30 to $40 each month if given a choice of video services. Many Democrats, however, have said the measure did too little to ensure broadband services would be extended to lower-income and rural areas. Opponents of the proposal are unhappy because national franchises could void the local cable contracts through which public, educational and government programming is produced, according to community cable organizations. Under those contracts, local commissions negotiate who gets cable, funding for public programming and how a cable fiber network is deployed. Local cable commissions also worry about what they have labeled the "cherry -picking" factor, by which cable operators could compete to serve wealthy neighborhoods and skip over poorer areas. "My prediction is that the bills are so bad for many Twin Cities operations that the operations will just cease in many of those communities," said Mike Wassenaar, executive director of the St. Paul Neighborhood Network. SERVING NICHE AUDIENCES Beyond government meetings and public safety announcements, local community channels also broadcast religious and political shows and community events such as graduations, proms and parades. They also produce programs for underrepresented segments of the population. Minneapolis, for instance, broadcasts seven weekly shows in the Somali language. Pramod Mathur, of Eagan, has broadcast a South Asian show, Chai City, as a hobby for five years on three 1-7 http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/ 14774987.htm?template=contentModules/printsto... 6/9/2006 Proposed law could add cable choices but doom local programs Page 2 or s public -access stations. Mathur and his wife produce 13 episodes each year as an Indian news magazine, featuring local chefs, artists and performers. They have followed the federal debate with apprehension. "We've been able to do this show because there was this outlet and opportunity," he said. "We couldn't do this on a network. "(These channels) provide an opportunity for the underserved. To me, it's not about entertainment as much as it is about democracy." Broadcasts like the Mathurses are typically funded through fees negotiated with a cable operator. In St. Paul, for instance, the city gets 5 percent of Comcast's gross cable TV revenues and roughly $1 million in additional so- called PEG (public, educational and governmental) fees and other benefits. It's those PEG dollars that will be radically cut in the metro area, where local cable commissions had negotiated favorable agreements with the cable companies. For some other cities across the country, the new funding formula would be a boon, however. Wassenaar predicted an annual drop in St. Paul from $1 million to $361,000 and said the impact could reverberate even more in the suburbs, where cable revenue is not as high. The Burnsville Eagan Telecommunications Commission said it's looking at losing a third of its funding, from $648,000 to $423,000. The North Suburban Access Corp. — which represents 10 member cities, including Roseville, Mounds View and Shoreview — is facing a revenue loss of 80 percent, or nearly $1 million annually. The nonprofit organization's volunteer coordinator, Lori Pulkrabek, said there are about 350 people in the north suburbs producing their own shows or helping on another. "The cuts being discussed would dramatically change who we are and what we are able to do. We are the local, local outlet." LOCAL CONTROL For those involved in community programming, the concern revolves around local control. Under the current bills, the Federal Communications Commission would administer national franchises, which means local commissions could lose the ability to negotiate their contract agreements. Community cable producers believe customer complaints would be taken out of local hands. "Currently if there's an issue, people just come to our group to get whatever resolved. Whereas, under the proposal now, citizens would have to go before the FCC, which is just ridiculous," Pulkrabek said. House Committee on Energy and Commerce spokesman Terry Lane said complaints would still be handled through local authorities, however. Although St. Paul's franchise agreement with Comcast runs through 2013, observers believe the contract would be void once competition is introduced to the St. Paul market if the legislation became law. House Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton, R -Tex., wrote the House version of the bill. The Senate will consider similar legislation sponsored by Ted Stevens, R -Alaska, chairman of the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. Lane defended the bill, saying that having to negotiate individual service contracts across the nation is a barrier to competition. "The issue was the actual negotiations themselves," Lane said. "We think there's as many as 34,000 franchises across the country, and that's an enormous negotiating task" for the cable companies. Wassenaar dismisses that criticism, saying the ability to sit down with a cable provider benefits communities. So why is the government doing it7 "The first thing that we're talking about on this is cheaper cable TV," Lane said. "That is essentially what the motivator is, L http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/ 14774987.htm?template=contentModules/printsto... 6/9/2006 Proposed law could add cable choices but doom local programs the carrot." Meggen Lindsay can be reached at mlindsay@pioneerpress.com or 651-228-5260. Jason Hoppin can be reached at jhoppin@pioneerpress.com or 651-292-1892. what might be at stake Here's a sampling of local cable access shows in the Twin Cities that could lose funding if legislation passes: Page 3 of 3 "Totally Scrabble Tuesdays": Minneapolis Television Network, Channel 17, 11 p.m. Tuesdays. Viewers call in to play against Harrill Griffin -Cassidy in his weekly game of Scrabble. "Inside Insight": Ramsey/Washington Counties Suburban Cable Commission, Channel 15, 8:30 p.m. Wednesdays. Bob Zick hosts a controversial public affairs program that often takes aim at Maplewood City Hall. "Viva and Jerry's Country Music Videos": Minneapolis Television Network, Channel 17, 9 p.m. Wednesdays and Channel 6 metrowide, 11 p.m. Saturdays. Viva and Jerry Pearson's long-running variety show features hand puppets, country music tunes and camcorder interviews. "The Corn Lady Show": Suburban Community Channels, Channel 19. In production now, no reruns on air. The corny broadcast is devoted to Minnesota's favorite yellow crop. "Sports Rapp": St. Paul Neighborhood Network, Channel 19, 10 a.m., 4 p.m. and 11 p.m. Monday through Friday; 11 a.m. Saturdays and Sundays. Host Kwame McDonald talks sports every week, often with guests. Definitions Video franchise: A cable company's agreement to provide cable services to a fixed geographic area, such as St. Paul. Public access TV: A channel or group of channels available only to those living in the fixed geographic area of a video franchise. Community cable commissions: Groups funded through PEG fees that produce and air the shows on local access TV. si- 2006 St. Paul Pioneer Press and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved. littp://www.t,A-iiicit ics.crnn 19 http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/I 4774987.htm?template=contentModules/printsto... 6/9/2006 City of Plymouth Engineering Department Active and Pending Public Improvement Projects ..... . tij 1... M. .ro err 0"Ve 0 1013 S Fernbrook Ln. - 27th to 34th - DC/DMC SRF $3,500,000 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. designated as engineer. Design & ROW Engineering Agreement approved. Begin Preliminary Design. Public Information meeting held 4/27/06. Representatives of four properties in attendance. Staff exploring watermain 4141 S Petition Project - 47th Ave DC/BB SRF $215,000 City Council awarded contract to R.P. Utilities, Inc. 8/9/05. Street & Utilities Preconstruction meeting was held 8/10/05. Utilities are installed. Street to be built in Spring 2006. Contractor has be un street installation. 4143 S City Center Street Lighting - RB SEH $175,000 The conduit is installed. Killmer is awaiting the delivery of the Vicksburq Lane / 36th Ave. light poles which will be a few weeks. 5101 S 2005 Street Reconstruction - JR N/A $3,133,000 Sod is being installed in both Ranchview areas, wear coarse Dist 73 & 68 & Carlson asphalt expected within two weeks. Restoration and minor Parkway Overlay punchlist items remain on Resden and Ravenwood Road. 5102 S CR 101, CR 6 to CR 24 DC Henn. $17,000,000 Preliminary layout of CR 101 approved by City Council on Co. 10/11/05. 30% plan received. Met with Hennepin County 4/4/06. City staff will do engineering for watermain replacement. Meeting with Oakwood Elementary school 6/1/06. 5122 S CR 24, Olive Ln. to 32nd DC Henn. $2,500,000 Preliminary layout approved by City Council 6/14/05. Avenue Co. Construction scheduled for 2007. Design in progress. Received Draft Layout 2/21/06. Met with Hennepin County design staff on 5/2/06. City staff will do design engineering for watermain replacement. Met with utility companies on 5/24/06. 5126 S EVP Project RB SEH $129,000 Contract was awarded to Collins Electric. Project will include replacing signal bulbs with LED bulbs. Hardware has been ordered and construction to begin in mid July. 6101 S 2006 Reconstruction Project - JR N/A $4,370,000 Storm sewer installation has started in the South Bass Lake Bass Lake, Lost Lake, and area. Hemlock Lane 1 6104 S Replace Retaining Wall RB JURS $140,000 Awarded to TMS Construction, Inc. on 5/23/06. TMS is working on completing their contract documents. 6105 S Railroad Crossing Imp. - RB/JR $50,000 Awarded to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. on 5/23/06. Work to Pineview Ln. begin mid to late July. 6106 S Pineview Ln., and Schmidt RB/JR $440,000 Awarded to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. on 5/23/06. Work to Lake Road - Overlay be in mid to late July. 6108 S Intersection Imp. - CR 47 & RB $1,000,000 Recommendation will be made to City Council for Howard R. CR 61 Green to be the engineer. 6109 S Temporary Overlay Program RB/CA $300,000 Contract recommended to be awarded to FPI Paving at the (every yrt 6/13/06 City Council meeting. 5111 SS Sewer Capacity Imp. RB/SN $450,000 Public Works is currently televising upstream pipes for I & I Downstream from Lancaster JHRG prior to finalizing Preliminary Engineering Report. Lift Sta. 6121 SS Line Sanitary Sewer Main - RB/SN $300,000 Awarded to Terra Engineering and Construction on 5/23/06. Annual Pro ram Work to begin in mid July. 6133 SS 2006 Sanitary Sewer Lining RB Project - Phase 2 Project is currently out for bid. Bid opening is June 14, 2006, 3108 W Vicksburg Reservoir & DC BRA $5,600,000 Reservoir complete except for testing. Pumping Station 99% Pumping Station complete. Pumping station and reservoir expected to be in operation by late May. Site restoration yet to be completed. 4147 W Well Upgrade DC/GC $75,0001 Engineer submitted Supplemental Agreement for engineering IMIP I IBRA 1 services. Repairs proceeding on a time and materials basis. Updated 6/512006 12:44 PM 1` Page 1 EnqineeringXPmjeCts\Prqjeat Tracking\2005\ Act_Pndng_ProLRpt_A_2(SHORTFORM).xls City of Plymouth Engineering Department Active and Pending Public Improvement Projects 5110 W Water System Pressure RB HRG $100,000 per HRG working on Preliminary Engineering Report. Enhancements year for 5 years 5124 W Paint CR 6 Standpipe DC SEH $250,000 Inspection and cleaning completed by Liquid Engineering 5/28/05. Awarded contract 4/11/06. Preconstruction held on 5/1/06. Contractor be an work 5/15/06. 1004 WR Channel Stabilization - DT $100,000 Plans and Specifications approved at the 5/23/06 City Council Parkers Lake meetinq, and sent out for bids. 3105 WR Plymouth Creek Channel SM/DT $325,000 Survey and soil testing completed. Water quality model to evaluate options. Barr Engineering doing Feasibility Study. Discussed at recent watershed commission meeting. 4135 WR CR 61/CR 9 Erosion Site DC BRA $350,000 Options and estimated costs received 10/27/05. Met with Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County to discuss options 11/21/05. Three options considered. Draft report reviewed and revised. Additional concerns raised by Three Rivers staff. Consultant directed to investigate drainage concerns south of County Road 9. Engineering proposal being reviewed by Three Rivers staff. Three Rivers requesting City to proceed with additional investigations south of County Road9. 5115E WR Circle Park Pond Imp. DT/JR Project on hold. Will coordinate with Street Reconstruction Proiect. 6103 WR Repair Erosion - Wood Crk. DT/JR $100,000 Newsletter sent to area residents. Survey has been completed and preliminary design in progress 6113 WR Repair Erosion - Conor DT $45,000 Preliminary site inspections conducted. Work to start with Meadows (Design Only) improvement north of Schmidt Lake Road. Survey has been completed and preliminary design is in progress. 6114 WR Stream Bank Repair - DT/SN $75,000 Minnehaha Watershed 6115 WR Drainage Imp. - Between 38th SN $100,000 Work is 66% complete. Limited restoration will take place this & 39th - W of Harbor Ln. year and we will re -budget to finish in the winter of 2006-2007. 8019 WR Mooney Lake Pump Project DT/SM $15,742 Emergency pumping plan for 2006 is in place. ndiiI?tiFl...m ....4...etr>Rent.l'�r..................................................................................................................................:.....:..................................:........................... 9 ......................... P.........................................................................................-..........................................................................:....................................................... W-5 W Watermain - CR 47/Cheshire Dependent on development. to Vicksburg W-6 W Watermain - CR 47/Cheshire Dependent on development. Watermain, Vicksburg CR 47 to Schmidt Lk Rd WR -1 WR Lost Lake Outlet JR N/A $10,0001 Included with 2006 Street Reconstruction. Updated 6/5/2006 12:44 PM p,�-g Z� Engineedng\mLRpts\ProjeHct TRTFORM).)d\ AC Pndn�ProLRpI 6 2(SHORTFORM).xls DATE: June 9, 2006 TO: Anne Hurlburt, Community Development Director FROM: Kip Berglund, Associate Planner A i ,7� SUBJECT: Medicine Lake City Council Meeting On June 5, 2006, I attended the City of Medicine Lake City Council Meeting held at the Medicine Lake City Hall. This meeting was continued from the May 1, 2006 City Council meeting which focused on the proposed townhouse development on the east side along South Shore Drive. The meeting went from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Roughly 65-70 people attended the meeting, including the City Council, Medicine Lake consultants, the proposed development team and residents. The consultant gave a brief overview of the report and explained that the development team had again made a number of changes from the previous site plan based on City Council comments. The architect went through the specific changes including the reduction of the number of units to 26, the proposal to bury the power lines, a bike bath around the outside of the development along South Shore Drive connected to the Luce Line trail, a decrease in the size of the treatment pond and additional tree preservation. Roughly 10-15 people spoke with the majority again speaking in opposition of the proposed project. The main concerns were the opposition to multi -housing in Medicine Lake (density), the ability to explore other commercial opportunities for the site, and desire for open space. The City Council echoed the citizen concern and commented that the density may still be too high and questioned the potential loss of commercial space. They felt it should be more of a mixed use development as shown on the master plan. They pointed out that two-thirds of the citizens did not support the proposed development in the resident response survey. They commented that the City Council must listen to the citizens. They did say that the plan could possibly work in the future with additional changes. The comprehensive plan amendment, planned unit development, rezoning and preliminary plat was denied 3 votes to 2 votes. IZ3 mauri,J CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 DATE: June 2, 2006 TO: Plymouth City Council FROM: Barbara Senness, Planning Manager V7 [0,, SUBJECT: Proposed Townhome Development in Medicine Lake Attached is a copy of the staf report and site plan that the Medicine Lake City Council will consider on Monday, June 5. I did not include any of the resolutions or other attachments, but they are available if you are interested. Associate Planner Kip Berglund will attend the meeting on Monday night. He will prepare a memo on the outcome, which we will forward to you next week. 7-j WIN Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. MIN To: Mayor Young and City Council From: Brad Scheib, AICP, Consulting Planner Subject: Medicine Lake Townhomes—Staff Report for June S`h 2006 City Council Meeting Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, PUD Approval and Preliminary Plat Date: 1 June 2006 -'- Summary of Land Use Application Request The Medicine Lake Townhome project includes a proposal for redevelopment of the former Country House Restaurant site and the adjacent parcels along the east side of South Shore Drive referred to as the Johangten property. The project location is more formally described as follows: 1071S South Shore Drive and 1342 South Shore Drive legally described as Lots S through 14 and that part of lot IS, lying North of the South 100 feet thereof, block 13, Medicine Lake Park First Division, Hennepin County, Minnesota The total site is approximately S.38 acres. The proposal has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and recommended for approval with conditions. The proposal was also reviewed at the May 1" City Council meeting. No action was taken at that meeting. The proposal has been modified based on input received through the Planning Commission public hearing process and input from the City Council at its May 1" City Council Meeting. The modified proposal currently consists of 26 townhome units and includes a trail along south shore drive and the burial of the existing overhead utility lines located on the property adjacent to South Shore Drive. The proposal has gone through a number of.modifications since first presented to the City of Medicine Lake. These changes and concepts are summarized in' an attached chart and an accompanying narrative that describes the change to the plan. Previous concepts have been described and illustrated in the May 1" Council Meeting packet and accompanying staff report. The current concept is attached for your review. Included are a site plan labeled Sheet A200 and a colored rendering of the site plan overlain on an aerial photo of the site. The land use and zoning approvals required of this application have not changed since the original proposal. The approvals required include the following: 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Commercial and Mixed Use designations to Residential PUD 2. Rezoning from B-1 Neighborhood Business District to a Residential PUD Zoning District 3. Planned Unit Development approval 4. Preliminary and Final Plat approval 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 Ph (612) 338-0800 Fx (612) 338-6838 www.hkgi.com Direct (612) 252-7122 Email bscheib@iikgi.com hkgi.com 2-5- City Council Report on Medicine Lake Townhomes Project June 1, 2006 Page 1 Approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment requires approval of 2/3 of the City Council or 4 of S votes. All other approvals require a majority vote or 3 of S. The City has until June 9`h to take action on this project. Status of Project The Planning Commission has reviewed the project at meetings held February 16, March 16 and April 20. Detailed staff reports and attachments were prepared for these PC meetings and were made available to the community through the City web site. An additional staff report was prepared for a possible special PC meeting in late March that subsequently was not held. These staff reports and supporting materials were included in the pre -council meeting packet for the May 1" City Council meeting: Detailed minutes of each of these meetings were also taken by Chris Lentz and can provide a more detailed account of the planning commission's deliberations on the project as well as the public comment. A significant amount of public comment has been received relative to the project. The public comment generally focused on concerns over density, impacts on natural resources and impacts on community services. Staff has addressed the bulk of the public comments in a written response to questions from the February 16`h meeting. The applicant has also attempted to respond to community concerns by modifying the site plan and by conducting a series of open house meetings open to the public and held at French Lake Regional Park. The meetings were held over the last several weeks. The application has undergone a number of revisions since its original submittal. These revisions have reduced the magnitude of the development and the overall impact to the site. The nature of the modifications were in attempts to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission, the general public, the DNR and consulting staff. The changes are outlined in the attached chart and narrative submitted by the developer. DNR Review The project requires DNR approval as it is a PUD within the Shoreland District. The applicant has been working with the DNR area hydrologist to meet the standards of the State Shoreland district. A copy of the latest DNR correspondence dated May 26, 2006 is attached. The DNR has rendered conditional approval of the project based on a review of the most recent plan modifications representing a reduction in units to 26 and a reduction in impervious surface to 33.5%. The applicant reduced the density on the site and is utilizing pavers for driveways to achieve the 33.5%. The DNR has agreed to count 40% of the paver surfaces as impervious surface. The conditions of approval required by the DNR will also be required as part of the developer agreement to be drafted in preparation of the final plat. This will be done following approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, preliminary plat and PUD development plan. Review and consideration of the final plat and PUD Final Plan will include drafts of the developer agreement stipulating the requirements outlined in the DNR letter dated May 26, 2006, Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission at its April 20'h meeting recommended the City Council approve the requests for comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning and that these actions be contingent on required reviews by adjacent communities and on approval of a final PUD agreement. The recommendation was passed on a vote of 4 in favor and 2 opposed. The Planning Commission also recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development/ Preliminary Plat with the noted conditions as stated in the April 20 PC staff report. This approval was also passed on a vote of 4 in favor and 2 opposed. Vp City Council Report on jVledicine Lake Townhomes Project June 1, 2006 Page 3 The Planning Commission discussed at length the planning process and community involvement. A recommendation was made that a public meeting be coordinated to enable a more productive dialogue regarding the project to be held with the community and not at a structured public City Council or Planning Commission meeting. This effort should be coordinated with the City Council and the meeting should be facilitated to ensure a meaningful dialogue. Background . In July of 2005, the City completed a master plan for the area around South Shore Drive from the Luce Line Trail to the City limits on both sides of South Shore Drive. The Master Plan called for an attached residential - land use pattern along with limited retail services for the site at 10715 South Shore Drive also known as the Country House site. The Master Plan was accepted by the City Council as a guide for future redevelopment of the South Shore Drive Area. The Comprehensive Plan was not amended at the time the South Shore Drive Master Plan was accepted by the City Council. Implementation of the master plan land use concepts require amending the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the City because the current land use designations call for commercial uses on the northern portion of the site and mixed use on the southern portion of the site. In late 2005, the applicant approached the City to begin exploring redevelopment of the site. The original concept presented to the City focused on the Country House site and included attached "greathouse" type structures and a 3 story condo structure. The original application included roughly 32 units on 2.68 acres or roughly 12 units per acre. In the early discussions with the applicant, it was noted that a density of 12 units per acre exceeded what was envisioned in the master plan. Over the winter the applicant revised the plans and incorporated the Johangten property into the development. The result was the reduction in density but a preservation of a similar number of units than originally proposed. The condo component also was taken out of the mix. The submission in February of 2006 included 33 units of townhomes. After additional discussion and deliberation, the plan was further reduced to its current status. An accounting of the various plan renditions and subsequent changes is provided in the attached chart and narrative as provided by the applicant. Staff Comments A number of key areas were addressed in the review of the application by consulting staff. These points are as follows: Density The project in its current condition includes 26 units proposed on 5.38 acres for a gross density of 4.8 units per acre. This density is consistent with the density assumed in the Master Plan. Hard Surface Cover The plan that was recommended for approval from the Planning Commission had roughly 39.6% hard surface coverage (land cover that does not allow water to infiltrate into the ground.) The Planning City Council Report on Medicine Lake Torvnhomes Project June 1, 2006 Page 4 Commission's recommendation, however, is conditioned on the project receiving approval from the DNR. The DNR state shoreland regulations provide guidelines for regulating shoreland development through the PUD process. The DNR's most recent correspondence indicates that the project has reached significant consistency with DNR guidelines for cluster and planned unit developments. Open Space The project preserves the southern portion of the site as the most natural open space area. Total open space and green space on the site plan is estimated at 66.5% of the site or roughly 3.58 acres. This area represents a portion of the driveway area that is proposed to be done with pavers which allows for infiltration of storm water. Park Dedication and Trails The project does not include a public park component, however it is Iodated within close proximity to a regional trail which makes it accessible to nearby park facilities. Staff is recommending a park dedication amount for this project that has yet to be determined. This park dedication could be used towards fulfilling the master plan and comprehensive plan objective of preserving lands along the west side of South Shore Drive as permanent open space. Park dedication remains a condition of approval and shall be established and paid for at time of final plat. The application has added a trail along the east side of south shore drive. We will be coordinating with Three Rivers Park District for direction as to connections of this trail segment to the Luce Line and for suggestion as to trail surface material. This directive is added as a condition of approval. Landscaping The landscape plan has been modified in concept to coincide with the modified site plan (see color rendering). The landscape plan holds to the similar planting types and patterns as originally proposed, preserves a greater percentage of existing trees and provides for a greater ratio of replacement trees. Grading and site Drainage Drainage patterns remain generally the same as illustrated in the original proposal with the exception that less hard surface coverage will result -in less runoff from the site. Drainage from this site will be held to less than or equal to pre -development runoff conditions. The drainage will be enhanced on this site because the improvements will provide for a holding area to treat the stormwater runoff. Detailed drainage plans will be modified and submitted with the final plans to the Consulting Engineering Eberhard for the City. Mr. Eberhard has reviewed the original plan set and provided a report that is included as an attachment. The modifications to the site plan do not significantly alter the grading and drainage patterns on the site. Some questions were raised regarding the grade of the proposed drive and the walkout units. It has been suggested that any fill required from off site be trucked into the site via the southerly drive on South Shore Drive. The original grading plan was reviewed by the City Engineer. Modifications to the site plan do not significantly alter the grading plan originally reviewed. Utilities Utility plans have been reviewed by Chuck Eberhard, consulting engineer. A report on the original application from Mr. Eberhard is attached for your review. The Planning Commission requested additional information on the issue of connecting this site to the City of Medicine Lake's existing system. A MF • City Council Report on Medicine Lake Townhomes Project June 1, 2006 Page S memorandum dated March 14`" from Mr. Eberhard explaining the capacity and other items was prepared. Essentially, adequate capacity with the system exists for this project. Improvements to the distribution system are recommended in Mr. Eberhard's correspondence and will be incorporated into the final development agreement. On-site overhead utility lines extending from the southern portion of the site northerly along South Shore Drive are proposed to be buried at the developers cost. Final utility plans will be modified to coincide with the revised site plan and will be submitted with the final plans for approval by the City Consulting Engineer. Traffic A detailed traffic study was conducted by the applicant and included in the original set of exhibits prepared for the February planning commission meeting. The traffic study indicated that adequate capacity exists - within the system for the proposed development. The study further identified site triangles that need to be preserved for safe ingress and egress from the site. Landscaping in these areas have been modified accordingly. Issues were raised by members of the community regarding the narrowness of the internal driveway and its ability to provide guest parking while adequately accommodating maintenance and emergency needs. The private drive would be maintained by the association and has been widened to 24 feet which would accommodate parking on one side of the street. Comprehensive Plan Amendment The Comprehensive Plan provides the vision for the future of the community and guides land uses within the community. The Comprehensive Plan guidance for this project includes Commercial land use on the Country House site and Mixed Use on the Johangten parcel. As proposed, the project requires a re -guiding of land use for the Country House site from commercial to Residential PUD. The Johangten parcel could be left as is because Mixed Use includes residential development. However, Staff is recommending_ re -guiding both parcels for consistency sake to Residential PUD. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment process requires a public hearing which was held at the Planning Commission meeting on March 16d' and a report and recommendation from the planning commission prior to City Council consideration. The report and recommendation is summarized above and was presented at the May 1 City Council meeting. The Comprehensive Plan amendment also requires review by adjacent Cities (City of Plymouth) the Wayzata School District and the Metropolitan Council. Following the review of the amendment by these entities, the City may adopt the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Alternatively, the City may adopt the Comprehensive Plan prior to submitting it to the Metropolitan Council contingent upon the review of the Metropolitan Council. The City will be required to update its comprehensive plan by 2008 as part of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. Staff recommends that as part of the 2008 update, a thorough updating of the text within the Comprehensive Plan be completed. For this amendment, the existing description of Residential PUD in the land use chapter provides the connection to the future land use map amendment. Therefore the comprehensive plan amendment is only reflecting a mapping amendment. The map amendment was illustrated in an attachment as part of the May 1 City Council packet. Zoning Amendment to Residential PUD District The entire project site is currently zoned B-1 Neighborhood Business District. In order for any component of this Z9 City Council Report on Medicine Lake Townhomes Project June 1, 2006 Page 6 project to occur, rezoning is necessary. The proposed amendment is to rezone the site to the Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) district. The PUD district is established to allow flexibility in the development of neighborhoods by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Chapter related to setbacks, height, lot area, width and depth, yards, etc. The PUD zoning is intended to encourage: (a) Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and siting of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. (b) Higher standards of site and building design through the use of trained and experienced land planners, architects and landscape architects. (c) More convenience in location and design of development for service facilities. (d) The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics.such as natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. (e) A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of land. (f) An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. (g) A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) (h) A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application of zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. Given the character of the site, directions established through the South Shore Drive Master Plan, and the complexities associated with redevelopment planning, this site is well suited to a PUD zoning process. A map representing the boundaries of the rezoning was included in the May 1" City Council packet. Approval of the rezoning request would be contingent upon the acceptance of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the Metropolitan Council and would be contingent upon the City's approval of the Planned Unit Development Agreement for the development project. PUD and Preliminary Plat The Planned Unit Development process requires a developers agreement. The developers agreement stipulates the required improvements that are necessary for the project to proceed. These improvements and the site plan submitted formulate the zoning for the project as a "residential PUD. When construction projects are proposed on the site, the building official and zoning official will issue permits based on the site plan and resolution stipulating the agreed upon conditions. If any deviations exist, the PUD Agreement would have to be amended following the normal zoning amendment procedures prior to issuance of any building permit. The Preliminary Plat is required because the project involves combing a number of parcels and re -platting the parcels. The Preliminary Plat includes the same set of exhibits as the PUD agreement but will follow platting procedures as required by the Hennepin County surveyor. These two work hand in hand to some extent. ME City Council Report on jVfedicine Lake Townhomes Projecl June 1, 2006 Page 7 The project is seeking preliminary approval of both the PUD and Preliminary Plat. A final developers agreement will prepared after the preliminary approvals in conjunction with the final plat and final PUD plan. A detailed list of conditions is included below. Staff Recommendations There are four separate applications that need consideration. Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Recommendation: The project is consistent with the adopted master plan and is consistent with the general goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment with conditions. Conditions: 1. That the school district, City f Plymouth, Metropolitan Council and all other state, regional and local agencies required to review and comment on the Comprehensive Plan amendment find no significant` flaws with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment that prohibit the City Council from approving it. 2. That the City of Medicine Lake City Council approve the Planned Unit Development application and enter into a developer's agreement. Rezoning: Recommendation: The project is consistent with the adopted master plan and is consistent with the general goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the Zoning Amendment with conditions. Conditions: 1. That the City of Medicine Lake City Council approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the Planned Unit Development application and enter into a developer's agreement. Planned Emit Development and Preliminary Plat: Recommendation: The project is consistent with the adopted master plan and is consistent with the general goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development and the Preliminary Plat with the following conditions. That a park, trail and open space dedication amount be agreed upon and included as part of a developer agreement and that these funds be reserved for construction of a trail along South Shore Drive at some point in the future when South Shore Drive is reconstructed and /or acquiring additional park and open space lands in the City of Medicine Lake. That the encroachment of the City Parking lot on the northeast comer of the site and subsequently shown as Outlot A on the preliminary plat dated 2/6/06 be dedicated to the City. That the preliminary plat be redrawn to illustrate ROW for South Shore Drive at a minimum of 5' setback from the existing edge of pavement and that the overlapping land area be dedicated as public ROW. a City Council Report on Medicine Lake Townhomes Project June 1, 2006 Page 8 4. A joint powers agreement with the City of Plymouth be entered into for the provision and maintenance of public water through the City of Plymouth (this agreement will be drafted in preparation for the City Council consideration off nal plat). S. That overhead utility lines along the east side of South Shore Drive be placed underground at the developers cost. 6. That all utility boxes (telephone boxes, gas meters, water meters, etc...) be adequately screened from the public ROW with landscaping or be located in a structure with architecture compatible with the main structures on the lot and that thesefeatures be illustrated on the utility plan, landscape plan and site plan exhibits. 7. That a street lighting plan be presented and approved by the city prior to installation. 8. That the location of mailboxes be established consistent with US postal service requirements and if clustered along South Shore Drive, be illustrated on the site plan. 9. A full set of revised plans r f ecting the revisions recommended in this approval and additional relevant information as included in the February 9`" and all other subsequent stallY reporfs be submitted and approved by the consultant sta , Building Oficial and Fire Chief prior to City Council consideration of the final PUD and developers agreement. 10. The applicant and City enter into a developers, agreement that stipulates among other items thefollowing: a. Park, trial and open space dedication requirements b. Establishment of a public improvement budget and escrow/line of credit c. Establishing the site plan and preliminary plat as the applicable PUD zoning standards d. All easements identified on the Preliminary Plat shall be provided to the appropriate jurisdiction at not cost to the City e. Provision of public water service and ongoing maintenance through a joint powers agreement with the City of Plymouth J Provision of a homeowners association establishing restrictive covenants and that specifically address maintenance of rainwater gardens and on-site storm water pond and maintenance of the private driveway 11. The project shall receive final DNR approval of the PUD application including satisfaction of all identified conditions for approval 12. The project shall receive review and approvalsfrom the Bassett Creek Watershed District (it is the policy of the BCYVD to review development applicationsfollowing preliminary approval by the governing body.) 13. That all applicable state, regional and local permits are secured prior to construction including any approvals for connection of the trail to the Luce Line. 14. All consultant fees and legal fees incurred as part of the review and approvals of the project are paid for by the de velo per /applicant. The City Council may add or remove the above conditions based on the discussion to be had at the public hearing. A Final plat will be prepared following the City Council approval (or preliminary approval) of the above mentioned items. A developer's agreement will be finalized and submitted at the time the final plat is prepared. The final plat will be presented to the Planning Commission for recommendation to the City Council. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning and PUD agreement. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the application is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan must be amended or the City may deny the rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the regulatory tools used to implement the goals and policies established by the Comprehensive Plan. ,3a. City Council Report on Uedicine Lake Townhomes Project June 1, 2006 Page 9 Staff was also requested to prepare a discussion on the findings that would support denial of the project. A key factor in the approval of this project is an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The current Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the project area (the Country House Site) as a commercial node. Furthermore, the South Shore Drive Master Plan reinforced the vision and desire to retain the ability to have . neighborhood commercial services more convenient to the community of Medicine Lake. The development as it stands does not retain any neighborhood commercial services as a possible land use. The viability of such a use was questioned during the master planning process and continues to be questioned by the development community: however, this is one of the last remaining locations in Medicine Lake that is available for commercial services. Because the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan support such use and the application as it stands is inconsistent with this policy position a finding for denial can be supported. Additional findings may result from the City Council deliberations and should be noted in the minutes of the meeting. Consultant staff and the applicant will be available at the meeting to answer any questions. This report along with all the listed attachments is provided for your review prior to the meeting on June 5. If there are any items you feel have not been adequately addressed through the process thus far, please let me know so that I can be prepared to address any concerns at the meeting. Attachments: 1. DNR Correspondence from May 26 2. Modified Site Plan Dated 5.22.06 3. Chart documenting history of plan submittals and variations 4. Narrative Description of plan variations 5. Resolution Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment 6. Ordinance Approving Rezoning from B-1 to Residential PUD 7. Resolution Approving Findings of Fact supporting the Rezoning 8. Resolution Approving PLID Development Plan and Preliminary Plat 33 I 07, H ---I ---- — -- -----------L— I I ,I kill r— 7 i l I ---1 L ------------------ -------I 1 / I o ���ia;voao:aa�,aa�a�"_ �a;aa•ay�"��� aiw la e n 9:y H0 diq w ^ q: G ee^CoS o a 'G o ���ia;voao:aa�,aa�a�"_ �a;aa•ay�"��� aiw la e n 9:y N+ °': diq w ^ q: o a Io3''n¢ 0'o8,"aloo g'E68o Ir 8 8 Si8!8 8!8 8l S 8ISiS SIS S1S 8$ 8 SIS S;8 8 alb 8 08.818. r 88'0 :08�" N 88ISo 0888 8$'i88 �� m"smNEUKE fjPj TOWNHOMES 3[71/MAKE! OiP/E MESIICWE ULE. MMNGiIIu TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Ay FROM: Anne Hurlburt, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Hennepin County Adult Correctional Facility (HCACF) Population Report Hennepin County Community Corrections staff has submitted their monthly report on average daily population for the month of May, 2006. The average daily population reported for the Plymouth facility was 528, less than the occupancy limit of 601 set by the Conditional Use Permit. The chart below shows the average monthly population since we began receiving reports in June of 1998. 3(p HCACF Monthly Population Report 700 600 .- 500 c v 400 0 CUP Limit d 2 300 ■A\erage Count m a 200 100 M O O O O O O O O O — N N M O O OO O M d O O It L0 O O 0 O O O 6.6 O-6 m .fl m-6 m-6 m.6 cm Q 6)-a Q U Q U- Q LL Q u- Q u- Q V- Q LL Q U- I Month/Ye a r 3(p DATE: June 8, 2006 TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager FROM:P&?Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works SUBJECT: PERMEABLE PAVERS Attached please find an article entitled "Cold Climate Performance of Permeable Pavers". The article and pending study results document the stormwater treatment performance of permeable pavers versus traditional asphalt pavement in a parking lot environment. The permeable pavers appear to produce very good results. Please note, however, the article is from the paver industry and the permeable paver parking lot subgrade is constructed quite differently than the traditional parking lot with a three to four foot deep drained sub -base and a one foot deep gravel subgrade. Also, the study will continue until 2009 as maintenance of the pavers will be explored. You may wish to pass this article on to the City Council as I understand many are interested in this type of Best Management Practice (BMP). attachment 37 0:\Engineering\GENERAL\MEMOS\DORAN\2006\Ahrens_Pavers.doc The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority evaluates permeable interlocking concrete pavements in an effort to reduce runoff and water pollutants from development. Cold Climate Performance of Permeable Pavers n an effort to advance cold -climate performance information, Seneca College, King Campus near Toronto, Ontario and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) are tak- ing permeable interlocking concrete pavement (PICP) on an extended road test. Overseen by the TRCA, the four year study of parking lot runoff assesses PICP's long-term performance including the migration and treatment of runoff pollutants through the soil subgrade. Completed in late 2004, the pavement test facility includes 3,150 sf (315 m2) of PICP with surface and sub- surface water collection. Adjacent to this area are two equally sized areas in asphalt. Runoff is col- lected directly from the surface of the middle asphalt area and runoff from the remaining third of asphalt drains into a bio -retention swale in an effort to assess its pollution reduction capabilities. This article focuses on performance com- 10 3 Interlocking Concrete Pavement Magazine I May 2006 parisons between asphalt and PICP. Figure 1 shows the monitoring site plan and Figure 2 illustrates the asphalt areas in the foreground and PICP in the background. Asphalt curbs separate the runoff from each of the three areas. While the photo shows an empty parking lot, the entire test area is filled with cars that introduce pollutants during weekdays. While the data gathered to date is preliminary, rainfall and runoff data from monitoring of nine storms between August and December 2005 demonstrated no surface runoff from the PICP and delayed flows from the under drains. While these results were expected from ordinary commonly occurring rainstorms, the PICP infiltrated all rainfall during large (> 25 mm) high-intensity storms. Not surprisingly, peak runoff flows from the subsurface were significantly lower and occurred later than those from the asphalt parking surface. Concerning ci.a n a: m �d 28.3 it .... Impermeable Plastic I — • * — • • — • • • Pemreable Filter Cictt ........... 8" diem. Pipe M1 = 10 -12" diem. Pipe water quality, average total suspended solids generated by the PICP were less than half of that from the asphalt. The same can be said for reduction of zinc. Bacteria, hydrocarbons, oils and grease were significantly lower coming from the PICP and bio -retention swale compared to the asphalt. All of these reinforce the benefits of improved runoff water quality by PICP before it enters lakes and streams. Subsurface infiltration and surface runoff drain from the PICP, asphalt and bioswale into an underground utility vault with sophisticated equipment that measures flows and samples water pollutants during rainfall from each area. Water samples are analyzed for nutrients, metals, oils and conventional variables such as total sus- pended solids and hydrocarbons. The PICP cross section includes 6 in. (150 Infiltration Basin andndOverflow 10.0 it Continued on p. 12 L" �I Study Area 2" drainage cells undersubgrsdes Figure 1. The Seneca College test site evaluates runoff directly from asphalt, from asphalt into a bio- swale as well as surface and subsurface runoff from permeable interlocking concrete pavement. Interlocking Concrete Pavement Magazine I May 2006 ✓ `1 11 12 Figure 2. The test area is subdivided in two asphalt areas and one PICP area in the background. The asphalt curbs separate the runoff from each area. mm) of open -graded aggregate supporting 31/8 in. (80 mm) thick permeable interlocking concrete pavers. Beneath this base is a subbase of 12 in. (300 mm) thick compacted, dense -graded aggre- gate, Ontario Granular A, a base material typically used under asphalt roads and parking lots. Figure 3 shows the PICP cross section. While PICP construc- tion typically uses thicker open -graded aggregate bases without compacted, dense -graded bases under them, this experiment was designed to cap- ture and analyze much of the runoff in the open - graded layer in order to assess its pollution reduc- tion effectiveness. Below the PICP base is about 3 ft (1 m) of soil Aluminum Grate r- 1j- .5 R 1 4-- Al' _q^ - -: �I m 1 6" diem..' Surface 4, Pipe Runoff Trough 3 Subsurlace i RunoR Trough I .i i ............... .. Impermeable plastic liner - - , , - Permeable Filter Cloth t-- 1 MONO 2" drainage calls encased in an impermeable liner. Water seeping through the soil is captured and piped at the bot- tom and directed to the utility vault along with sur- face runoff. Like the surface and subsurface water, flows and water quality are sampled during rainfalls from the soil layer within the vault. Runoff from the asphalt and bio-swale is cap- tured at the same end as the permeable pavement and channeled to the utility structure for flow and water quality sampling. A sustainable power sup- ply for the monitoring equipment completed in summer 2005 includes a wind turbine and solar panels adjacent to the site. Rain gauges measure Continued on page 14 Grovel Subgrade Porous Pavement 107.5 R �— Mixed Native Soil m b 3 a" Dill Figure 3. The PICP test area includes subsurface monitoring at the bottom of the open -graded base and further down within the soil subgrade. Water is sampled inside the troughs or utility vaults. 46 Interlocking Concrete Pavement Magazine I May 2006 Cold Climate Performance of Permeable Pavers Continued from page 12 rainfall so there is a complete accounting of the rainfall from evaporation, runoff and infiltration. Soil samples were taken and analyzed to provide baseline chemical information to compare against any changes brought by infiltrating runoff. After samples are taken inside the utility vault, the water is directed to an infiltration trench to ensure reintro- duction into the soil. The study also includes mea- suring the radiometric temperatures of the PICP and asphalt surfaces. TRCA has released a 40 -page, preliminary report with detailed data and construction infor- mation. A copy of the report can be found at www.icpi.org in the Design Professionals sec- tion. According to Derek Smith, Sustainable Technologies Monitoring Coordinator for TRCA, "The study will continue until September 2009. The next interim report will be released in March 2007. With more rainfall events, we expect to see trends that will more clearly indicate the effective- ness of PICP and bioswales for reducing runoff and pollutants. We'll also be exploring maintenance of the PICP surface. Our hope is to show the effective- ness of these technologies so that they become the norm for sustainable site design in the Toronto region and Ontario. If proven effective, the TRCA will work toward making permeable pavement and bioswales a key component of site design in Toronto and Ontario." This project, organized under TRCA's Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program, includes funding from federal, provincial and municipal government agencies, private founda- tions, the Cement Association of Canada and Wal- Mart Canada. The Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute supports the project and the permeable pavers were donated by one of its members. The research is being conducted as an independent third parry study. An update on the monitor- ing results will be provided by Derek Smith and Tim Van Seters, TRCA's Manager of Sustainable Technologies at the 8th International Conference on Concrete Block Paving, November 6-8, 2006. Future issues of this magazine will report on this important research. 4- 14 14 ! I Interlocking Concrete Pavement Magazine I May 2006 YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES May 8, 2006 7:00 PM PLYMOUTH CITY HALL Council Members Present Absent Kristen Letich X Mark McKee X Patrick Heffner X Anne Gottwalt X Christopher Fei X Heather Gaudette X Aneesh Sohoni X Lindsey Beste X Anna Berg X Trevor Haag X Neha Singh X Deputy City Clerk Kurt Hoffinan was also present. Aneesh called the meeting to order at 7:05 PM. Presentations: There were no presentations. Approvals: a) Heather made a motion, seconded by Anna, to approve the agenda. The motion passed in a unanimous voice vote. b) Patrick made a motion, seconded by Neha, to adopt the minutes of the April 10 meeting. The motion passed in a unanimous voice vote. Council Update: Kurt gave a brief update on issues under discussion by the City Council. Special Items: a) Service Awards program plans Kristen reported that she was still working with members of the Lions Club to arrange a time to meet and review the nominations and applications. She said she had gone through the forms and made some initial notes, but did not want to move on without outside judging. Adjournment Heather made a motion, seconded by Anna, to adjourn the meeting at 7:15 PM. The motion passed in a unanimous voice vote. q3 Pt� Department p of Employee Q Relations Ir June 5, 2006 Jeanette Sobania Human Resources Manager Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Ms. Sobania: 200 Centennial Office Building 658 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55155 651.259.3637 TTY 651.282.2699 www.doer.state.mn.us Congratulations! I am very pleased to send you the enclosed notification of compliance with the Local Government Pay Equity Act. Since the law was passed in 1984, jurisdictions have worked diligently to meet compliance requirements and your work is to be commended. As you know, Minnesota Rules Chapter 3920 specifies the procedure and criteria for measuring compliance and information about your situation is enclosed. In an effort to conserve resources, we are no longer enclosing the "Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance and Computer Reports." Instead, we are directing you to our web site www.doer.state.mn.us for this publication or we will send you a copy in the mail upon request. If you have any questions about the materials or about pay equity in general, please contact me at (651) 259-3761. Also, this notice and results of the compliance review are public information and must be.supplied upon request to any interested party. Again, congratulations on your achievement! Sincerely, Faith Zwemke Pay Equity Coordinator Attachments Equal Opportunity Employer Minnesota Department of Employee Relations 4S ctS U cz O Q4. -O N CN E 4� O L U C °- N 'N _ N p 'O N (U o O co .U) O C J .- u u o O JMU > KI � W -J O °an a + M : u C 1 O= N O V) u v Q) L c � m a� �rn oLr CL i Q) N — O N 0 - un icu Q- V r-- O c� V V V '� o d' O a) Al q(p r�ity Plymouth Adding Quality to Life June 9, 2006 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT FOR DMITRI SMIRNOV AND MARIA KOUZNETSOVA FOR "JIREHEL ADDITION" (2006029) 'Dear Property_ Owner: Pursuant to the provisions of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance, this letter is to inform you of a request by Dmitri Smirnov and Maria Kouznetsova, under File No. 2006029, for a preliminary plat and final plat to create two lots to be called "Jirehel Addition" for property located at 755 Windemere Drive. Hennepin County records indicate your property is within 750 feet of the site of this proposal. You are hereby notified of, and cordially invited to attend a Public Hearing to be held by the Plymouth Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m., on Wednesday, June 21, 2006, in the Council Chambers at the Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. The public will be invited to offer questions and comments concerning this application at that time, or feel free to call the City Planning Department at (763) 509-5450 for more information. INFORMATION relating to this request may be examined at the Community Development Information Counter, at Plymouth City Hall on Mondays and Wednesday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Tuesdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except holidays. If you have any questions about the specifics of this proposal, please contact the Community Development Department at (763) 509-5400. Sincerely, Barbara G. Senness, AICP Planning Manager 2006029propnotice 3400 Plymouth Blvd • Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482 • Tel: 763-509-5000 • www.ci.plymouth.mn.us H7 Adding Quality to Life June 9, 2006 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR CSM EQUITIES LLC (2006030) Dear Property Owner: Pursuant to the provisions of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance, this letter is to inform you of a request by CSM Equities, LLC., under File No. 2006030, for a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Amendment to allow a 39,000 square foot commercial development on the 4.9 acre site located at the northwest corner of Highway 55 and Northwest Boulevard. Hennepin County records indicate your property is within 750 feet of the site of this proposal. You are hereby notified of, and cordially invited to attend a Public Hearing to be held by the Plymouth Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m., on Wednesday, June 21, 2006, in the Council Chambers at the Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. The public will be invited to offer questions and comments concerning this application at that time, or feel free to call the City Planning Department at (763) 509-5450 for more information. INFORMATION relating to this request may be examined at the Community Development Information Counter, at Plymouth City Hall on Mondays and Wednesday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Tuesdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except holidays. If you have any questions about the specifics of this proposal, please contact the Community Development Department at (763) 509-5400. Sincerely, Barbara G. Senness, AICP Planning Manager 2006030propnotice 3400 Plymouth Blvd • Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482 • Tel: 763-509-5000 • www.ci.plymouth.mn.us �-D Plymouth�� Adding Quality to Life June 9, 2006 SUBJECT: SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR WAYZATA PUBLIC SCHOOLS (2006033) Dear Owner/Occupant: Pursuant to the provisions of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance, this letter is to inform you of a request by Wayzata Public Schools, under File No. 2006033, for a site plan amendment to allow a parking lot expansion at Plymouth Creek Christian Church located at 16000 41s` Avenue North. The parking expansion would be used as a joint parking area for Plymouth Creek Christian Church and Plymouth Creek Elementary School. While a formal Public Hearing is not required, it is the City's policy to inform adjacent property owners/occupants of such applications. Hennepin County records indicate your property is within 200 feet of the site of this proposal. You are hereby notified of and cordially invited to attend a meeting to be held by the Plymouth Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 21, 2006 in the Council Chambers at the Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. INFORMATION relating to this request may be examined at the Community Development Information Counter, at Plymouth City Hall on Mondays and Wednesday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Tuesdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except holidays. If you have any questions about the specifics of this proposal, please contact the Community Development Department at (763) 509-5400. Sincerely, W)gm 41DNu � Barbara G. Senness, AICP Planning Manager 2006033propnotice 3400 Plymouth Blvd • Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482 • Tel: 763-509-5000 • www.ci.plymouth.mn.us 1 /l Plymouth1'0.p Adding Quality to Life June 9, 2006 SUBJECT: SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR LARSON ENGINEERING OF MINNESOTA (2006034) Dear Owner/Occupant: Pursuant to the provisions of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance, this letter is to inform you of a request by Larson Engineering of Minnesota, under File No. 2006034, for a site plan amendment to allow for pavement rehabilitation and associated site improvements at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints for property located at 330 Vicksburg Lane North. While a formal Public Hearing is not required, it is the City's policy to inform adjacent property owners/occupants of such applications. Hennepin County records indicate your property is within 200 feet of the site of this proposal. You are hereby notified of and cordially invited to attend a meeting to be held by the Plymouth Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 21, 2006 in the Council Chambers at the Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard: INFORMATION relating to this request may be examined at the Community Development. Information Counter, at Plymouth. City Hall on Mondays and Wednesday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Tuesdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except holidays. If you have any questions about the specifics of this proposal, please contact the Community Development Department at (763) 509-5400. Sincerely, Wli qnNA Barbara G. Senness, AICP Planning Manager 2006034propnotice 3400 Plymouth Blvd • Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482 • Tel: 763-509-5000 • www.ci.plymouth.mn.us rp) City of Plymouth Adding Quality to Life June 9, 2006 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR T -MOBILE USA (2006036) Dear Property Owner: Pursuant to the provisions of the Plymouth -Zoning Ordinance, this letter is to inform you of a request by T -Mobile USA, under File No. 2006036, for a conditional use permit to construct a 100 -foot monopole tower and related equipment at 15605 32nd Avenue North. Hennepin County records indicate your property is within 500 feet of the site of this proposal. You are hereby notified of, and cordially invited to attend a Public Hearing to be held by the Plymouth Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m., on Wednesday, June 21, 2006, in the Council Chambers at the Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. The public will be invited to offer questions and comments concerning this application at that time, or feel free to call the City Planning Department at (763) 509-5450 for more information. INFORMATION relating to this request may be examined at the Community Development Information Counter, at Plymouth City Hall on Mondays and Wednesday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Tuesdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except holidays. If you have any questions about the specifics of this proposal, please contact the Community Development Department at (763) 509-5400. Sincerely, %�Vp,4 QIVI Barbara G. Senness, AICP Planning Manager 2006036propnotice 3400 Plymouth Blvd • Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482 • Tel: 763-509-5000 • www.ci.plymouth.mn.us