Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPark and Recreation Advisory Commission Packet 06-12-1986Plymouth Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Regular Meeting of June 12, 1986, 7;30 p.m. Plymouth City Center Council Chambers AGENDA I. Call to Order 2 Approval of Minutes 3. Visitor Presentations a. Athletic Associations b. Staff c.. Others 4. Report on Past Council. Action a. Award Bid for Parkers LakeCityPark b. Approve Plans and. Budget for Queensland and Imperial Hills Neighborhood Parks c. Approve Guidelines for Requesting City Contributions to Playgrounds 5. Unfinished Business a. Play Equipment at Green Oaks Park b. Parkers Lake Update c. Zachary Playfield Update d. 1987 LAWCON Grant Parkers Lake Phase II e. 1987-91 CIP (no action necessary) f. 6. New Business a. New Plats - none b. Bass Lake Dock c. Plymouth Creek Park Planning 7. Commission Presentation 8. Staff Communication 9 Adjourn Next Meeting — July 10 R rl Minutes of the. Regular Meeting of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission.' May 8, 1986 Page 11 Present: Chair Edwards, Commissioners Anderson, Beach, LaTour, Mullan, Reed and Rosen; Councilmember Zitur; staff Blank, Busch and Pederson 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Edwards called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. in the Council: Chambers. 2. APPROVAL OF 'MINUTES A motion was made by Commissioner Reed and :seconded by Commissioner Anderson. approving the minutes of the April meeting as presented. 3. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS a. Athletic Associations. None were present at this meeting. b. Staff. Rick Busch gave a presentation on our adult softball program. which included showing the commissioners the various sizes of softballs used. in our leagues. He indicated that we have 153 adult teams registered this year divided into 20 leagues, and they will play a total of 1,000 games. He discussed the addition of four new electric score- boards at the Zachary Playfield and mentioned the softball tournaments that Plymouth will be hosting throughout the summer. - c. Others. None, 4. REPORT ON PAST COUNCIL ACTION a. Parkers Lake Plans, Specifications & Bid. The Council approved the Parkers Lake plans and specs at a recent meeting. Bids will bead- vertised in local newspapers for 21 days and then received and opened on May 28. b. The City Council approved the contribution to help improve the Sunset Hill Elementary playground. c. The 1986 trail projects were: approved. d;. The landscaping at Zachary Playfield was also approved. 5,. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Neighborhood Park Concept Plans - Queensland & Imperial Hills. Director Blank reviewed the concept plans for Imperial Hills park with the residents in attendance at the meeting. An informal question and answer session was then held between the residents and PRAC. Residents were concerned with what type of surface would be put in for the softball area, whether or not the jogging path could be moved farther north than its present location, consideration of play equipment for older children, tennis courts for the adults, ways to make the park active in order to dis- courage vandalism , extending the proposed path all the way to Troy Lane to give people who live 'south of Troy Lane access to the park. Director Blank responded that a typical neighborhood park is designed primarily for pre-school and elementary age children. He stated that tennis courts are not put in neighborhood parks, but rather are located in larger parks such as community playfields. He indicated that ball field surfaces are generally just grass and are meant for pick-up games DRAG Minutes :May 8, 1986 Page 12 and not formal games like the ones you'd find at Oakwood P Layfield for example. He also explained that there is usually a high level of maintenance on a neighborhood: park, with mowing scheduled weekly and trash picked up on Mondays and Fridays He stated that the budget for this park is approximately $30;000. Installation should run somewhere between $7,000 and $8,000`, and the BigToy play structure will cost approximately $15,000. If our own City crews install the trail running through the woods, that cost could be held down to around 500. The residents then concurred on Plan ##3 calling for the large climber, soccer goals, picnic tables, benches, bike rack, hard surface for basketball,, a backstop for softball, and extending the loopedtrail to Troy Lane. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MULLAN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ANDERSON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLAN #3, INCLUDING THE EXTENSION OF THE TRAIL TO TROY LANE, VOLLEYBALL STANDARDS AND SOCCER GOALS. AN AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ROSEN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BEACH TO EXPLORE THE ADDITION OF MONKEI BARS FOR THE ` OLDER CHILDREN IF MONEY ALLOWS AFTER THE BIDS ARE IN. THE AMENDMENT AND THE MOTION PASSED WITH ALL AYES. This item will be going to the City Council on June 2nd. If it is approved, the play equipment would be ordered and should arrive around mid-July. That work which can be done by City crews would be started as soon as possible after Council approval of the plan. Director Blank then reviewed the Queensland neighborhood park plans stating that two plans were eventually combined into a third "final" plan based on comments received; when the plans were first reviewed. by residents at an earlier meeting. The budget for this park. is approximately $30,000. Residents in attendance were concerned about the trail and how much of it would.be, paved. Director Blank recommended paving the entire length of the trail for easier maintenance. Residents also requested the dredging of the pond within the park to allow for more wildlife and waterfowl habitat, and to make the area more aesthetically pleasing for those jogging or biking on the path. Director Blank responded that before dredging can be considered, a survey must be done to determine if area to be dredged is on public or private property. Residents favored the: proposed plan #3 with the addition of volleyball standards and the requested po:-d dredging. Commissioner Rosen recommended that we do something for all ages in this park and he wondered if we would be setting a precedent if we approve dredging the pond.. He also stated he was not in favor of parking stalls for the park. It was then pointed out that the guidelines for neighborhood parks call for parking fox up to eight cars to accommodate the handicapped, elderly and mothers with .mall children,. Commissioner Beach favored the parking_stal?s and recommended putting the pond dredging in a separate motion. Commissioner LaTour suggested a turn. -around area so people dropping off park visitors would, not have to back in and out of residents' driveways. It was then pointed out that the Hadley Hills residents do not have walking access to this park, so a parking lot would be a nice addition. Commissioner Reed was in favor of the pond dredging, but stated that its location. PRAC Minutes - May 8, 1986 Page 13 will only benefit a few people_. He favors a parking lot for four cars. Commissioner Anderson stated that he is concerned with the cost of dredging the pond. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER BEACH AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MULLAN TO APPROVE PLAN 3, INCLUDING PAVING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE TRAIL AND ADDING PARKING FOR FOUR CARS, VOLLEYBALL STANDARDS NEAR THE SHELTER BUILDING AND BALLFIELD FENCING, AN AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MULL'AN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LATOUR TO ALLOCATE UP TO $2,000 FOR DREDGING THE POND IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. THE AMENDMENT PASSED WITH FIVE AYES. COMMISSIONERS REED .AND ANDERSON NOTED NAY. THE FIRST MOTION AS ONCE AMENDED PASSED WITH SIX AYES. COMMISSIONER ROSEN VOTED NAY.. This. item will go to the Council on June 2nd. b. Parkers Lake Park Update. The 'Parkers Lake bid opening will be May 28. Construction could begin as early as June 15. c. St. Mary's Land' Acquisitoi . The contract for deed is finalized and is being filed by the City's attorney. d. Zachary Playfield Update. The fitness court which was purchased with a donation from the Rotary Club will be installed Saturday, May 10, weather permitting. The landscape plans for the common area between fields 1, 2, 3 and 4 will be reviewed by staff on Thursday, May 15. e. 1987 LAWCON Grant. The Phase II Parkers Lake LAWCON grant was turned in on Friday, May 2. This is a preliminary application only. If it is viewed favorably, a final grant application will be written later. f. Parks Tour. All commissioners with the exception of Barb Edwards, and Councilmember Zitur will go on; a tour of the parks on Saturday, May 10, beginning at 8:30 a.m. 6. NEW BUSINESS a. New Plats. A preliminary application for the Mud Lake plat near the intersection of County Road 47 and I-494 has been received by the ` Planning Department. Dedication for a neighborhood park is included in this plat. b. 1987-1991 CIP. Director Blank reviewed a draft of the 1987-91 CIP. In 1987, three neighborhood parks (County Road 61 Amhurst, and Rolling Hills) are proposed for development. The Plymouth Creek pond dredging has not yet been approved by the DNR. In 1988, staff is proposing the acquisition of land for lest Medicine Lake City Park and the development of two more neighborhood parks. The addition of tennis courts in Plymouth Creek Park is also proposed. Phase I development of West Medicine Lake City Park has been pushed back to 1988 from the 1987 CIP* The proposed Community Center has been moved from;1988 to 1989, and Phase II development of West Medicine .Lake Citi* Park is propoFed for 1989, also. The first phase development of a playfield is proposed for 1990, along with trail construction, neighborhood park acquisition/development, and more Plymouth Creek. FRAC Minutes May 8, 1986 Page 14 pond dredging. The year 1991 calls for more trails, neighborhood. park acquisition/development, playf-+eld development, and pond dredging in Plymouth Creek Park. Director Blank indicated that a local landscaper has been approached about designing and donating a garden area in Parkers Lake. City Pare. Also, a local resident has indicated some interest in donating play round equipment for this park. Director Blank stated that no funds have been allocated in the 1987-91 CIP for the development of school playgrounds, Lions Park improvements or the removal. of the. house on Fernbrook Lane within Plymout"n Creek Park. Commissioner Mullan requested that staff and PRAC return to the original priority list established for the development of neighbor- hood parks which calls, for West Medicine Lake to be developed in 1987. He indicated that lie strongly supports developing this. park. before developing County Road 61, Amhurst and, Rolling Hills, since the Medicine Lake neighborhood has been in existence for many more years than these other areas c. Green Oaks Park. Director Blank indicated that the City Council has requested that PRAC hold a public meeting to discuss the relocation of the play equipment in this park at the request of some of the resi- dents closest to the; park who have complained of the excessive noise and other problems associated with the location of the play equipment. Chair Edwards reviewed the City Manager's recommendation on this item as well as the history of the development of this park, which was originally constructed in 1976-77. She also reviewed the minutes of the Council and PRAC meetings when this park was discussed. in 1985. Director Blank stated that the Council feels the playground is an. unfair intrusion on surrounding residents. They have suggested that PRAC review relocating the equipment.. Director Blank recommended' that FRAC visit the site before making any decisions. He stated that moving the entire play structure could cost somewhere between $20,000 and $30,000. If just a,portion of it were moved, using City crews, the cost could be reduced to around $5,000. Commissioner Mullan stated his concern that moving the equipment could set a precedent, resulting in the City being asked to move any number of other things that residents, find annoying.. Commissioner Rosen indicated that we set a precedent every time we hold a public meeting and make decisions based on only a few residents' comments. He stated that in the future, PRAC must be more conscious of how close they place equipment to people's homes. Commissioner Mullan pointed out that regardless of where equipment ends up, it will be a problem for someone. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER BEACH AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LATOUR TO HOLD A PUBLIC MEETING ON JUNE 12 REGARDING THE PLAY EQUIP- MENT IN GREEN OAKS PARK, THE MOTION CARRIED WITH ALL AYES. PRAG Minutes -- May 8, 198 Page 15 d. Guidelines for Requesting City Contributions to Playground Improvements on School Property. The Commission reviewed proposed guidelines for requesting City contributions to school playground improvements which had earlier been drafted by staff and submittedto the City Council. The City Council reviewed them and passed them back to PRAC for their review and comment. PRAC made two changes in the guidelines and. requested staff to re -submit them to the City Council for theist approval. 7. COKIIISSION PRESENTATION Commissioner Beach indicated a desire to purchase a gift for Ruth Brown's baby. Other commissioners approved and asked her to buy something and bill them individually. 8. STAFF COMMIJNl`CATION None, 9. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at p.m. DATE: TO, FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF R)WOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 June 5 1986 MEMO PRAC Eric Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation GREEN OAKS PARK On June 12, the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission will conduct a public meeting to discuss problems associated with the play equipment at Green Oaks Park. We have sent notices to residents in this area informing them of the meeting. The City Council wants PRAC to make recommendations to the Council on the best course of ,action to address the noise problems at Green Oaks Park which have been brought to their attention. Below I have briefly outlined for your review the pro's and con's of four different courses of action the Commission may want to consider. There may be other pro's and con's associated with these issues that I have not addressed. I'm sure you can share these with your fellow commissioners at the meeting. I have also attached for your review a memorandum from Mark Peterson, and Steve Cook to me outlining the cost associated with trying to develop noise barrier options (Exhibit A). Exhibit B is a park map showing possible locations for relocating some or all of the ploy equipment within Green Oaks Park. Bid Option 1 - Total Removal/Relocate in Park $15,000 Pro's :quick fix spreads noise more equally Con's :high cost sets precedent digs up park equipment will be unusable for some time we will never know if "newness" wears off Option 2 - Partial Removal/Relocate $ 6,500 Pro's :quick fix spreads noise more equally not so costly as No. 1 above some equipment will be usable during the summer if it does not solve problem, rest of equipment could be moved later Con's :cost sets precedent uses more park area FRAC Re; Green Oaks Park Page 2 Option 3 Try Noise Barrier/Four Options Pro's :may solve problem inexpensively buys time to see if use tapers ofd no disruption in park use can be moved later Con's :walls provide hiding place may turnout to be useless Option 4 _,Do Nothing Pro's :saves money does not set any precedent use may taper off Con's :does not solve: today's noise problem for the three adjacent residents My recommendation is to use Option 2. This would relocate the swings and large climber on the upper level over to the hill in the center of the park. We would remove and reuse the pea gravel and sod over this top level. This will put approximately half the equipment at each location. nP Attachments CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINS ESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE, May 15, 1986 TO: Eric :Blank:, Parks and Recreation Director FROM, Mark S. Peterson, Park & Forestry Supervisor SUBJECT NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS FOR GREENOAKS PLAT' AREA I have listed the four (4) noise barrier options which included wood barrier walls, fences, and plant materials. Materials costs are provided for each option. It should also be noted, that noise barriers should be placed as near as possible to the actual; source to be the most effective. Diagrams are included for each option. In all optior-s the park bench will be: removed northwest of play area. OPTION 1 WOOD ,'ALL 1. 151' x 8', 6 x 6 posts, 2 x 10 plank, brown or green treated. $1,800_. 10' 2,250. 2 Plant cost PLANT MATERIALS $4,850. pi 8, $6,650. F It $7,100. Th,~ :- i of 151' of barrier wa?.l will be in two sections A total of 76' -iil be located on the north and west corner and a 75' wall will run, the total length of the east side of the play area. A landscaped plant- ing (12' x 28'`) would be created on the inside of the play area in the northwest corner. Additional plantings both for screening and noise abatement would be proposed around the outer, perimeter of the play area and north of the open air shelter, OPTION II Option II would contain both items I & 2 in Opts.,, I but 'would also contain a taller replacement fence (cedar) for the prop, immediately north of the play area. CEDAR FENCE 8' x 8' high sect. 60.00/sect. x 13 $780. 8 x 10' high sect. 75.60/sect, a 13 $982.00 tTOTAL 8,. $7,430. TOTAL 10' $8,,082. 2- I i OPTION III This would: consist of a 1.52' cedar fence running the full length of the property immediately north of the play area for 110' then angling 42' 1 in a southwesterly direction for additional buffering to neighboring homes, This would also be supplemented by plantings throughout the play- and shelter areas. CEDAR PENCE 1. 8 x 3" high $60,00/sect. x 19 sects. $1,140. x 101 W.—,$75:,50/sect. x 19 sects, $1,436.40 PLANT ]MATERIALS i Plant costs $3,870. TOTAL 81 $51010 TOTAI 10'~ $5,306. OPTION IV Plant materials only $3,960, s. II Existing Site t ' cedar fence split rail fence -- -- ° 1) 0C e0QC Otf,c N • r. tn 0 Grove# May Lot Me Or oftbvi shelter FRS_ m w. a..a Plow Lot yti 11and Tel Lot F 6.46 Species CGS Colorado Green Spruce AA American Arbovitae BHS Black Hills Spruce CSL Greenspire Linden HB Hackberry HS Honeysuckle LAll Amur Maple Option T N Fence 1.51 ft, x 8 ft. 1,800.00 (Cedar could be used for either fence size, However, it would cost $ 1,000.00 Fence 151 ft. x 8 ft. 2,Z50..00 more and would not last as long.. split rail fence cedar fence 10 saf O0:0'0'00:000 --.. Shrub SIMS lir tr4 R#u section fi G rS / 1 i 0 Yr..*t Ploy Lot f+' y t 1)y. •a wM S q Shelter _Plev, 101, JE1' Rt good 'rot Lei E01 C60S 7 Species CGS Colorado Green Spruce AA American Arbovitae BHS Black Hills Spruce GSL Clreenspire Linden HB Hackberry HS Honeysuckle At! Amur Maple L Lilac Shruh!Section would contain: 4 Chiri-se Lilac 7 Red Osier Dogwood 9 Dwarf Fuonymus Ivy used would be Engelman Ivy. Option 11 optionI1 is the same as Option I,, but includes replacing the existing 100 ft. fence with a cedar fence 8 ft or 10 ft. high. 8 ft, high :. 780.00: 10 ft. hinh S 9 2.8q Fence 151 ft. x 8 ft,, $ 1,800.00 (Ced'ar, could: be used for either fence size, hoviever, it would cost $ 1,000.00 Fence 151 ft. x 8 ft $ 2,250,00 more and would not last as long.) r • cedar fence a 90000( @A sir` _ Ali (::) '.J0 coa0 E --,shrub a S kyr I"S Section 6$ 4i u irerei !'ieY o1 3-1 R` p shelter ice— nai TN Let w Species CGS Colorado Green Spruce AA American A'rbovitae Shruht-Section world contain; BHS Black Hills Spruce GSL Greenspire Linden 4 Chinese. Lilac HB Hackb.rry 7 Red Osier Dogwood HS Honeysuckle a Dwarfuonymus AM Lilac Maple LIvy/ used would be Lngalman Ivy. Option III Option ILII includes constructing a cedar fence 152 ft. Iona, and either 8 ft, or 10 ft. high cedar fence off Spll't rail fe= Poseooeeeoo it's seFlpS. f QRS O rCfrS j 0r.•.1 r{.y i.i 1.N M• .Iiwl. f,Gs a t n f shelter is=.,. v • - *.to h•Y 1.1 f; a u 9 Tot Lot r f'! too4l Species CGS Colorado Green Spruce AA American Arbovi'tae BHS Black Hills Spruce CSL Greenspire Linden He Hackberry HS Honeysuckle Amur Maple y Option IN Plant materials only. N fceda r fence r. split rail fence t--- /00- CG 1 C6g chs •!,» - - ... CCI&S R G.6s G j JR LD 1 0t.l.1 ruy Lot Tc ' 1 Os J O cC \•.» @-! f7 shelter] .,. o..!« Plot Lt w Lot El 4" Species CGS Colorado GreenSpruce AA American Ar.bovitae BHS Black Hills Spruce GSL Greenspire Linden HB Hackberry HS HoneysucH e; LA« Amur Maple May 170 1986 Councilmembers Crain, Sisk, Vasiliou & Zitur City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth MN 55447 Dear Counnciimembers: I was interested when my neighbor brought my attention vo the SAILOR article regarding three families "under siege" due to the Green Oaks, park as a result of the new equipment installed last year. I was then appalled at how easily the council members were swayed to accommodate three families by denying numerous families the enjoyment, learnng experience and shar- ing that has been evident each time Y have taken my two young daughters to the park. We: are half way into the month of May which means that most older children have not yet organized their activities.; It is also my understanding that the Imperial Hills playground is to be improved which should help to cut down,on the traffic at the Green Oaks park. Perhaps a periodic patrol of the park by the police would help eliminate those kids that are using foul language. Perhaps fencing might out down on the recess noise pollution. There have to be options -- not total. el m ination of a playground that means, so m' ucH to the many pre sc oo ers; that eat that extra spoonful of cereal each morning before departing on a very exciting adventure going to the park. Sincerely, Marsha Beard 2315 Walnut Grove lane Plymouth, MN 55447 P. S. that the m would raise be ch have e purchased our home in Plymouth, we had no idea oney would leak into our basement, no idea that s, would drive us inside on summer days that we o enjoy, but we were sure it was a good place to ildren we should have; a place where they could and do the crazy things that children do. We the good with the bad - no place is perfect. 4 N._i. l/ D dT (1 1• (Y/ f /'^i4sLE Lac i w... , fi . '" . a 1 S we.: t N . > .A we a w ,v .... J wx 400 LAA Joe4. 1. 41 x u, ., '+. ., m a ,. Vr_ . ... 1".. 1. I .. ..w, w r Yom. t 1 ` i 5, r! 1 .a mow+ t 1 ` i 5, r! 1 .a mow+ t 14lt C_/l._.._L G.L f ir i c i writ U.__ _. cQ'`i_. .G _zee.. G. /_1 __ . A Ms. Audrey Johnson 16635 34th Avenue N. Plymouth, NTS 55447 Dear Ms. Johnson: Thank you for your letter of June 9 regarding your concerns with the play equipment in the Green Oaks neighborhood park. I as forwarding your letter to Mr. 'Eric 'Blank, the City's Park and Recreation Director, Inorderthat he may in turn, share it with the members of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission. The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission will be holding a public Information meeting on this subject Thursday evening, following their review and discussion of this topic, I an confident they will make a recommendation to the City Council. Your letter, as noted above, will .be shared with the members of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission prior to their public meeting and will likewise be forwarded to the members of the City Council for their review. Thank you for your interest and concern regarding neighborhood parks in the community. Yours truly, 3 s G. Willis t Manager JN:dma cc: 64C (Blank, Director of,Park and Recreation, 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 r c, 1 I A i.,-;; zp, L._.. . d r 1 C,Tyc June 4, 19815 ftyx 1 1 1 Patti Richardson President, Plymouth Women of Today PO: "Box 41064 Plymouth, W, 55447 Dear Ms. Richardson: On behalf of the City of Plymouth. I would like to thank you for your generous contribution of $50 from the Plymouth Women of Today for the purchase of two trees to be plaited in Parkers Lake City Parka As'soon ;as the trees are purchased; and placed in the park, I will inform you. of .their locstion. Again, thank you kindly for your charitable donation. Sincerely. P Eric J. Blank, Director Parks and Recreation np cc; Janes G. Willis, City Manager K Park and Recreation AcAsory Comeission Steve Cook, City Forester 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARA, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.28M i1 f Kay 21, 1986 CITY CY- Kymouil+ Connie Lillibxidge 4825 Trenton LaneN Plymouth, MIS 55442 Dear Mrs. Lllibridge Mayor Schneider has forwarded your petition to me for distribution. to the: Park, and Recreation Advisory Commission. The Commission is currently studying the capital improvements program for the years 1987-1991. Your request for proceeding as quickly as possible on the Rolling Hills parte will be reviewed and discussed by, the Commission at their June 12 and July 10 meetings. At this tir , I can tell you that the draft CIP distributed. to the: Park and Recreation Advisory Commission on May 8 shows the development of the Rolling Hills park taking; puce in 1987. The City Council will be taking final action on.approving the capital improve ments budget on or before October 6, 1986, On behalf of the City Council, the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission and stvff, let me thank you for your time and interest in,the Plymouth park system.Let me assure you that we will endeavor to do everything we, cdn to meet your neighborhood park needs at the earliest possible time. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please don't hesitate to give me a call at 559-2.800 x 265, Sincerely, Eris J. Blank, Director Parks and Recreation inp cc: City Manager X Park and Recreation Advisory Commission 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 i to 0L C(t. ' l V—LL iJt t 4 . f 1•L: v`K.IC.ell. c- •Lc•«.,•t/C.. L G C.' ii-i..0-c'c, c"L (GLC, rfi:- LG, !!LJ`G c'i.s Q-c.¢. aua— e. , c ` GrtrlTY ,4 f •. . ?ti.tf r'ri..cTc L,. L C`.Lc..CCC.R.E, J.+ v -LQ/L. , ycrt•, v...c.cc.•:1 Cs Lc.za c:c-,i l iu i ~ C-t`t,c ;t: Lty, i`vZ-1,E G ti f a,.•`ct al-f. ta tC?'<xfi tt t "4t`?t' lye r IYA (L(411111 10110 f E. T f 5 S t t