Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 04-12-1995CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANNING COMNIISSION MINUTES APRIL 12, 1995 The regular meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Acting Chair Barb Stimson. AIIII4BERS PRESENT: Acting Chair Barb Stimson, Commissioners SaundraSpigner, Linda Oja, Virginia Black, Allen Ribbe, and Christian Preus MEMBERS ABSENT: Chairman Mike Stulberg STAFF PRESENT: Director Anne Hurlburt, Planning Supervisor Barbara Senness, Senior Planner John Keho, Planner Shawn Drill, City Engineer Dan Faulkner, and Planning Secretary Denise Hutt MOTION by Commissioner Preus, seconded by Commissioner Spigner to approve the March 22, 1995 minutes. Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried (Commissioner Ribbe abstained.) Acting Chair Stinson introduced the request by Moen, Leuer• Construction for aPreliminaryPlan/Plat for property located at the northwest comer of County Road 24 and Highway 55: Senior Planner Keho reviewed the Manch 23, 1995 staff report, Senior Planner Keho stated that staff has received numerous questions and calls from the pubiic regarding truck traffic and safety concerns for children. Commissioner Preus queried where the loading docks are located on building #2. Senior Planner Keho responded that the loading docks for building //2 are on the westsidenearthesoutherncomerofMedinaRoadandCountyRoad24, Senior Planner Keho presented an elevation map. Commissioner Spigner staled that she had concerns about the additional traffic that this proposal will generate, a Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page #54 Senior Planner Keho stated that staff had received two letters from Hennepin County. The first le'_•^r stating that the curb cut along County Road 24 would not be allowed, and the subsequent letter stating that it would be allowed, but if it causes traffic congestion, it would be closed. Commissioner Preus asked where the anticipated entrance is located. Senior Planner Keho replied that Holly Lane will eventually extend to the west and connect with County Road 101 and the entrance can be on Holly Lane off Medina Road or the ingress on County Road 24. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Brad Moen, the petitioner. Mr. Moen stated that he was only granted one access to the site which makes it difficult, but Hennepin County has agreed to let them have an ingress access on County Road 24. Mr. Moen stated that the site will be enhanced by a berm and landscaping along the south side to screen from the residential area. 'Mr. Moen explained that after a few years with the dense tines you would not be able to see any trucks on the site from the residential area. Mr. Moen stated that the site distance from the first trick door to the residential neighborhood is 275 feet. The site will include seven ponds within the industrial park for wildlife. Mr. Moen stated that he anticipates that most traffic for the industrial site will consist of vans and small local truck traffic and the majority of the traffic would occur on weekdays between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Distance to first truck door is 275 feet. Commissioner Ribbe asked what type of landscaping is planned to screen from the corner of the site to the residential area. Mr. Moen replied that there will be 11 pine tines and a berm that is eight to ten feet tall. Mr. Moen added that the area is shielded by earth in all but six feet of the building height. Commissioner Preus asked if a traffic study had been done, Mr. Moen responded that most of the traffic will come in off County Road 24 during the morning hours. Commissioner Oja asked what would be the largest truck size using the site and is there sufficient turn around. a Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page #55 Mr. Moen replied there will be small vans to large semi -trucks and there is more than adequate space for the semi -trucks to tum around. Commissioner Preus questioned if this site was the only access for property to the west to go through. Mr. Moen replied affirmative at this time. Acting Chair Stimson opened the public hearing. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Monica Fethers of 3450 Holly lane North. Ms. Fethers stated her backyard faces Medina Road and the proposed development. She stated she was concerned with the number of loading docks and the potential traffic the site will generate. Ms. Fethers stated that City staff informed her it was zoned for light industrial and she did not think this was an appropriate use. Ms. Fethers requested that traffic study be done. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Tim Finley of 3425 Holly lane North. Mr. Finley presented pictures of children waiting at the bus stop on Holly lane in his residential neighborhood. He stated his concern of trucks having to veer off to make a left hand turn into the proposed industrial site with the children waiting to get on the school bus. Mr. Finley stated that this development would create significant noise pollution. Commissioner Oja asked what the sign on the picture stated, Mr. Finley stated that the sign indicates the road is a Dead End, Acting Chair Stinson introduced Stephen Frangier of 3445 Holly Lane North. Mr. Frangier voiced his concern about the traffic, noise and environment,thaf emissions from the trucks will cause. He asked if there was any other place in Plymouth where an industrial site shares a common access with a residential area. Mr. Frangier stated he was concerned that no one knows where and when Holly Lane will be extended. Acting Chair Stimson introduced John Helgen of 3420 Holly lane North. Mr. Helgen stated that he has very little solace from the developers proposed berming and screening, He stated he was concerned with the traffic this development will generate. Mr. Helgen added thatfuturebuilding #22 is probably within 150 feet from his home and that it should be important to satisfy the residents of the neighborhood. i Pluming Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page #56 Acting Chair Stimson introduced Sharon Hulback of 3415 Holly Lane North. Ms. Hulback stated that she was mislead when she built her house in that she was told that it is zoned for light industrial with the possibility of one or two story buildings with light traffic. Ms. Hulback stated that she fears for her children at the bus stop with heavy traffic occurring at the same time. Ms. Hulback stated the only access shehasouttoMedinaRoadisonHollyLane. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Laurie Jones of 3430 Jewel Lane North. Ms. Jones stated she did not feel a 10 -day notification from the City was adequate time for people to respond. She stated this proposal should be reevaluated as she was told is was zoned for light industrial and this development will have up to 440 trucks or cars per day. She stated the entire parcel should be looked at and that office/warehouse would be more' appropriate for this site. Ms. Jones stated that this development should not be aligned with a residential neighborhood that would share a common access. Acting Chat! Stimson introduced Greg Katchmark of 3475 Holly Lane North. Mr. Katchmark stated he was mislead by the City and the developer telling him that it was zoned for light industrial and that there would not be any retail ever. He stated that there could be fire sales for outdated goods and there would still be traffic in and out of the complex on weekends. Mr. Katchmark stated that the residents should have own informed sooner so that they could have worked with the developer to look at options of moving the heavy, industrial toward Highway 55 and the lower profile buildings along Medina Road, Mr. Katchmark stated that the Commission should table their decision until a traffic study can be done. Mr. Katchmark asked who the primary users would be for this site. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Harry Lindberg of 3435 Holly Lane North. Mr. Lindberg stated he was concerned for the safety of the children and traffic hazards. He stated that there should have been an entrance from Highway 55 instead of Medina Road. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Daniel McCarthy of 3455 Holly Lame North. Mr. McCarthy stated that the residents should have been informed sooner of the proposed development so that they could have involved. He stated that the City staffs' analysis and assessment of the proposal has been very generic since no Environment Assessment Worksheet or traffic evaluation was done. Mr. McCarthy stated he was Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page 76'57 concerned for the safety of the children, property values, noise and pollution, and theirqualityoflife. Mr. McCarthy urged the Commission to table their decision so that this proposal can have further review by staff. Mr. McCarthy wanted to know what criteria is used bystafftorecommendthisproposaltotheCityCouncil. Mr. McCarthy stated that everypotentialhomeownershouldhavearighttotheConceptPlanwhenpurchasinginPlymouth. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Jennifer Morozof3485 Holly Lane North. Ms. Moroz stated that she was not aware of this area being zoned for industrial when _ she built her home. She stated she did not feel comfortable with her family beingexposedtotheproposeddevelopment. Ms. Moroz stated that there is better transitional zoning throughout the City and this is not a good transition. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Bart Phillips of 3440 Holly lane North. Mr. Phillips stated he works for a distribution center that has two dock bays and theyreceiveabout70trucksperday. He added that the drivers do not shut off their engines while waiting at night and have a tendency to speed to stay on schedule. Mr. Phillips stated he was concerned for the children's safety and the added traffic this development will generate on Medina Road. Acting Chair Stimson introduced John Shaven of 3410 Holly Lane North. Mr. Slavens asked if an application had been submitted to Hennepin County for aningress/egress on County Road 24. He stated he was concerned for the safety of thechildren. in the neighborhood as there are approximately 25 children ages zero to seven. Director Hurlburt eyplained there could not be an access from Highway 55 as WDOThasrestrictedanynewaccessesanditwouldhavebeenfutiletoapply. She added that eventually all access on Highway 55 between County Road 101, and County koad 24willberemoved. Senior Planner Keho stated he did receive a verbal reply from the State that an access on Highway 55 would not be approved. Mr. Moen stated that the proposed buildings are 28 feet tall. He added that the densityisquitelowforthissiteanddoesnotexpecttohaveatruckateachloadingdocitdoor. He estimated that there will be between 40 to 50 trucks per day. Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page 1158 Commissioner Porus questioned if it would create a problem to have traffic exiting onlyrightonMedinaRoad. Director Hurlburt replied that staff could not approve that as it would cause too manyproblems. Commissioner Blackasked if there are 20 loading docks proposed for building 81. Mr. Moen replied that each building has the potential "knock our spaces for 20 docks, but that it would be more likely fora total of 40 dock doors with 20 being used at a given time. Mr. Moen stated that building #1 would not have heavy industrial use, rather using small vans. He added that each building will have three tenants. Commissioner Spigner asked if any of the tenants are known and what kind of business would be going in the site. Mr. Moen declined to name the tenants as no leases have been signed yet. He stated potential tenants could include distribution of laundry supplies for hospitals, manufacturer of CD roms and diskettes. Mr. Moen stated at least for the first 10 years it should remain small van,for tenants in building fit. Senior Planner Keho stated that if a tenant wanted to do any retail, it would require a Conditional Use Permit. Also, if a tenant were to have a "fire sale" or the like, it would require a Temporary Use Events Permit that allows two sales per Dear for a total not -to -exceed six days. Director Hurlburt explained the normal process for notifying residents is tea days prior to the public hearing. She stated that the public hearing can be continued to a future meeting or the Commission can close the public hearing and table the item. Director Hurlburt stated this proposal was not large enough to require a formal Environmental Assessment Worksheet and a traffic study was not warranted because it meets the City's Comprehensive Plan. Senior Planner Keho stated that the residential development of Plymouth Oaks shares'a common access with;Nebco Evans on Annapolis and also Nathan lane is a common access with the Cardinal Ridge development and ajacent industrial uses. Director Hurlbu.K stated that the City has only one classification for industrial use and when people purchase homes in Plymouth they may not always get information on proposed developments or zoning. a Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1.995 Page #59 Commissioner Black asked if the City has'a plan for the entice area. Director Huriburt responded that the City's Comprehensive Plan shows: the entire area as industrial but does not show local streets such as Holly lane. The streets are determined when the City receives proposed developments. i Commissioner Ribbe questioned if it was physically practical for Holly Lane to go intoCountyRoad101. Senior Planner Keho replied that there is a parcel that does not have any public access. City Engineer Faulkner stated that there could be a loop road coming back to MedinaRoad. Director Hurlburt stated that the City does not have wetland delineation for this area. Acting Chair Stimson asked if the plan shows the parking lot on Jewel Lane exiting ontoMedinaRoad. Senior Planner Keho replied that the developer is showing a parking lot around thebuildinganddrivewayontoMedinaRoad. He added that only cars would be allowed on this driveway and that it is located 200 feet from Holly Lane. Director Hurlburt stated there may be a possibility of adding a trail along the south side Of Medina Road, and staff would check out that possibility further. t City Engineer Faulkner stated that the driveway meets the minimum criteria for the location and the developer has paid for the trunk sewer and has some rights for a decent access. Commissioner Preus asked if there was any possibility of an ingress and egress on County Road 24. City Engineer; Faulkner stated that the County was not going to allow either egress or ingress, but they finally agreed to an ingress for County Road 24. He stated the onlyegressisonhollyLane. Director Hurlburt stated that the criteria used to recommend this to the City Council isbasedonthePUDCriteriathatisattachedtothestaffreportandtheCity'sComprehensivePlan. Commissioner Spigner asked if the bus stop could be moved. a Planning Commission Minutes Aprff 12, 1995 Dige #60 Commissioner Oja pointed out that it could not be moved because of the dead end streetandthatitwouldbetoofarforthechildrentowalkuptojewelLane. Mr. Phillips asked if the City has any persuasion with the County if the County decidestodisallowaccessfromCountyRoad24. City Engineer Faulkner replied that County Road 24 is a County mad, but the CountydoesconsiderinputfromtheCity. Mr. Frangier stated the City should require more information from the developer and that staff should conduct a study on Holly lane and a traffic study. He stated that theCountycouldcomebackandclosetheingressonCountyRoad24. Mr. Lindberg asked if there would be a traffic light at the intersection of County Road24andMedinaRoadandiftheingressforCountyRoad24couldbemovedclosertoMedinaRoad. City Engineer Faunmer replied that thea is no traffic light planned at this time forCountyRoad24andMedinaRoad, but it could be warranted at some time. Director Huriburt stated that staff could look at the possibility of moving the CountyRoad24access. Ms. Jones wondered how the residents can be guaranteedthat all truck docks will notbeinconstantuse. Dan McCarthy stated he would like copies of the PUD Criteria. Mr- Katchmark suggested that staff consider having more than one industrial zoningclassificationandlookatthepossibilityofastoplightatCountyRoad24andMedinaRoad, Mr. Slavens stated there should be more ingress/egress possibilities for this site, Acting Chair Stimson introduced Dee McCarthy of 3455 Holly lane North. Ms. McCarthy stated Commissioners should consider the welfare of the children andthatthisproposalshouldnotbesoclosetoaresidentialneighborhood. Acting Chair Stimson introduced hick Frame of 17565 32nd Avenue North. Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page #61 Mr. Frame stated he lives in the Heather Run development and is concerned about the development of this tract of land and where Holly lane would be going. City Engineer Faulkner stated that the underground conduits are in place at CountyRoad24andMedinaRoad, but traffic would have to meet the proper warrants before a stop light can be installed. He added that there will be a,stop light placed at CountyRoad24andHighway55withinthenexttwomonths. Director Hurlburt stated that Commissioners can put reasonable limits on this proposal as part of the Planned Unit Development if shown to be warranted, but it needs to have a rational basis. Director Hurlburt stated that any one who -wants to see the Zoning Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan or PUD Criteria is welcome to stop in at City Hall and stab would answer any questions they may have. She added in order to add another zoningclassificationforindustrialwould ,take time and an extensive study, but would not overrule this proposal. MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Commissioner Oja to table this item to allow City staff to persuade Hennepin County for a p smanent ingresslegress on County Road 24 and for the developer to meet with the residents. Commissioner Preus stated that staff and the developer might need to be given some specific direction as to what the residents are looking for. Director Hurlburt stated the City can not require the applicant to meet with the residents regarding this proposal. Commissioner Oja commented that there are a lot of unfinished issues with the neighborhood and she is not Happy with what is proposed for this site. Roll Call Vote. 3 Ayes. MOTION failed on a 3-3 vote. (Commissioners Black Preus, and Acting Chair Stimson voted nay.) Commissioner Preus stated he did not think it would help to table this item for two weeks. Commissioner Black stated that some alternatives may have to be :considered :for the bus stop. Director Hurlburt stated that staff can check into the possibility of is trail along the south side of Medina Road and come up with better estimates for traffic. 0 Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page //62 MOTION by Actiug Chair Stimson, seconded by Commissioner Black to continue the public hearing to the April 26, 1995 Planning Commissioner Meeting for the request by Moen Leur Construction, Inc. for a Preliminary Plan/Plat for property located at the northwest comer of County Road 24 and Highway 55. MOTION to Amend by Commissioner Prous, seconded by Commissioner Spigner to direct staff to look for possible alternatives for ingress/egress options, look at where Holly Lanz may go in the future, the possibility of a stop light at 03unty Road 7A and Medina Road, and to consider possible alternatives for the bus stop. i t Roll Call Vote on MOTION to Amend. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. Roll Call Vote on Main MOTION:; L Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. i Acting Chair Stimson called it recess at 9:25 p.m. and the meeting was reconvened at 9:40 p.m. GLARY OF CHRIST LUTIiERAN CHURCH (95022) - Acting Chair Stimson introduced the request by Glory of Christ Lutheran Church for Rezoning from FRD to B-2 and 1-1 and a Conditional Use Permit for property located at 4040 County Road 101 North. Commissioner Preus stated he was a member of Glory of Christ Lutheran Church and would remove himself from consideration of the item if the Commission wanted. Consensus of the Commission was that it would not be a conflict of interest for Commissioner Preus. f Senior Planner Keho gave an overview of the March 24, 1995 staff report. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Michael Walijarvi, representing the petitioner. Mr. W atijarvi, architect for the petitioner stated that he concurred with the staff report. Acting Chair Stimson opened and closed the public hearing as there was no one present to speak on this issue. MOTION by Commissioner Slack, seconded by Commissioner Spigner to recommend approval of the request by Glory of Christ Lutheran: Church for an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance to classify certain lands iocated at 4040 County Road 101 from FRD to B-2 and I-1, 0 5 Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page x/63 Roll Call Vote. 6:Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Commissioner Black, seconded by Commissioner Spigner to recommend approval of the request by Glory of Christ Lutheran Church for a Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit for property located at 4040 County Road 101, subject to the conditions listed in the March 1.4, 1995 staff report. Roll Call Vote. 6,Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. Acting Chair Stimson introduced the request by Carlson Real Estate Company for a Lot Division, Variance, Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for The Tile Shop located at the northeast comer of Carlson Parkway and 1-494. Planner Drill gave an overview of the March 30, 1995 staff report. Commissioner Black questioned if this was a signalized access. Planner Drill replied affirmatively. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Miles Britz, architect representing the petitioner. Mr. Britz stated that the access is very limited to the site, but will be installing additional traffic lights for exiting the site will be installed. He stated that The Tile Shop is intended as a wholesale business for builders and contractors. He added that approximately five percent of their sates are retail and that they anticipate about two semi -trucks per week with one loading dock. Commissioner Black asked what the petitioner anticipates for landscaping. Mr. Britz replied that they will use maple trees and coniferous trees. Commissioner Black suggested the applicant consider crab tress for the wildlife in the area of the wetlands. Acting Chair Stimson opened the public hearing. Acting Chau Stimson introduced William LeValm of 450 Fall Hill Road, Wayzata. Mr. LeVahn stated he was the previous owner of Kate -Lo, Inc. which is located next to the proposed Tile Shop. He stated that when he proposed his business, he had to prove that there would be no retail sales. 0 m o Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page #64 Mr. LeVahn stated -that there ate currently four tile distributors within Plymouth that only sell to contractors. He presented a ,copy of an advertisement from the Yellow Pages for The Tile Shop and noted that it did not indicate that it is wholesale only, Acting Chair Stimson introduced Tim Beaupte of 701 Berkshire Lane North. Mr. Beaupre stated he is the representative for Kate -Lo, Inc. and took ever after Mr. Ii.Vahn left. He stated that if the Commission grants the Conditional Use Permit for The Tile Shop, Kate -Lo will also have to submit an application to compete with them and he would expect the Commission to approve it. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Ray Marron of 12445 66th Place, Maple Grove. Mr. Marron stated that he also works for Kate -Lo in the sales and marketing division. He stated that if the Conditional Use Permit for The Tile Shop is approved, Kate -Lo would have to change the way they am doing business and apply for a Conditional Use Permit. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Matt Van Slooten, representing the petitioner. Mr. Van Slooten stated that Kate-Lo's advertisement does not indicate that they are strictly a wholesale business and that all tile shops normally allow persons to come in and purchase. He stated he was told by City staff that this is the proper location for this type of business. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Rod Sill, owner of The Tile Shop. i Mr. Sill stated that he has never been denied approval to build one of his stores: He istatedthatthisfacilitywouldbeadesignerstudioandthenewcorporateheadquarters and distributor showcase. He added that the hours they stay open are to serve the contractor's clients to select merchandise and he wanted to locate in Plymouth because of the amount of development going on. Commissioner Spignerasked what the building would look like. Mr.. Sill presented a picture of the proposed building, Acting Chair Stimson asked if this application was denied, could customers go to the St. Louis Park facility. Mr. Sill replied that customers could be served in the St. Louis Park facility, but it would not be 'customer friendly". a Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page q65 Director Hurlburt asked what would be the anticipated number of customers. Mr. Sill respondcd +ti9t normally five to seven percent of their business is persons coming in off the street. He added that most are customers of the contractors to select colors. Mr. LeVahn stated The Tile Shop should not be allowed in the industrial park as they sell retail. Acting Chair Stimson closed the public hearing. Senior Planner Keho stated that there are other.ezamples of Conditional Use Permits for businesses located in an industrial district. He addedthat the Conditional Use Permit can be limited to certain hours or a percentage of sales for retail. Director Hurlburt stated that a condition can be added to limit the number of square feet of showroom for retail sales. Commissioner Preus asked what would happen if this changed to 95 % retail some time in the future: Director Hurlburt offered that a Conditional Use Permit can be revoked. Commissioner 5pigner asked how does limiting square feet prevent retail sales. Director Hurlburtstated the Commission could limit the retail sales to a certain area of the building or to a percentage of sales, however, we would need access to the fmancial records to base any limitation on retail sales. Commissioner Preus stated that we can designate a portion retail, but they could store supplies for the showroom in the storage area. Mr. Van Slooten stated it would very difficult to set a square footage for this building as the upper right comer is offices and the main body is the contractor selection warehouse open to the ceiling. Director Hurlburt cautioned that if a standard is imposed for this application, the Commission may be setting a pro6edent for future applications. Commissioner Spigner commented that this proposal looks like a corporate office headquarters and would be limited retail sales. a Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page #66 MOTION by Commissioner Black, seconded by Commissioner Spigner to recommend approval of the request by Carlson Real Estate Company for a Lot Division andVarianceforMinneapolisIndustrialParkSite45, located northeast of CarlsonParkwayandI-494. Commissioner Oja commented that she would not support the MOTION as it would create a land -looked parcel requiring easements through another property. Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried on a 5-1 Vote. (Commissioner Oja votedNay.) MOTION by Commissioner Black; seconded by Commissioner Spigner to recommend approval of the request by Carlson Real Estate Company for a Site Plan andConditionalUsePermitforMinneapolisIndustrialParkSite45, located northeast of Carlson Parkway and I.494 subject to the conditions listed in the March 30, 1995 staffreport: Commissioner Preus voiced his concern for granting a Conditional Use Permit thatcouldresultinabuse, but does not want to prohibit the proposal. Acting Chair Stimson stated she would have a problem limiting the square footage for retail sales. Planning Supervisor Senness offered that the Conditional Use Permit for AcrylicDesigndidincludearestrictiononsquarefootageandthehoursofoperation. Acting Chair Stimson asked if the City could do anything if the there was a problemwithretailsales. Director Hurlburt stated that you would have to prove that the retail sales are notincidentalandsecondaryuse. Commissioner Spigner stated it would be difficult to try and figure out how much ofthebuildingisdesignatedforretail. Commissioner Preus asked what the source was for retail sales being incidental andsecondary, Senior Planner Keho replied that the Zoning Ordinance allows retail sales that areincidentalandsecondary, He added that the City could set conditions of the use toregulateorlimitretailsales. a Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 Page 067 Director Hurlburt stated it would be too difficult to monitor the percentage, but could safeguard it by adding a condition. Commissioner Spigner commented that the building is designed for persons to walk through and she would prefer a condition on percentage of sales. Acting Chair Stimson asked if it was feasible for the applicant to provide documentation on percentage of sales. Mr.. Sill replied that they do not keep retail and wholesale separate and their current computer program would not be able to produce that information. Commissioner Pleus stated whatever type of limitation placed on this Conditional Use Permit would create more problems than help and it would not be fair to impose that on the applicant. Commissioner Oja stated you could limit the hours of operation. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (9503 Acting Chair Stimson introduced the request by the City of Plymouth for Rezoning from FRD (Future Restricted Development) to R-2 (Low Density Multiple Residence District) for property located at 3704, 3708, 3712 and 3716 Rosewood Lane North and 12810 37th Avenue. North. Planner Drill gave an overview of the March 27, 1995 staff report. Acting Chair Stimson opened public hearing, Acting Chair Stimson introduced John Clifford of 3630 Rosewood Lane North. Mr. Clifford stated that the notice he received from the City of Plymouth informing him of the public hearing was confusing, He suggested that staff provide more detailed information in the notices. He stated that the notice he received should have indicated that there was no planned use change and should have hada better map of the area. Acting Chair Stimson introduced Chuck Ulmer of 3716 Rosewood Lane North. Mr. Ulmer asked if the zoning change will have any impact on the assessment for his property, a n Planning Commission Minutes April 12, 1995 1 Page #68 Director Hurlburt responded that the zoning classification change will not have an impact on the assessment of the property. i Acting Chair Stimson closed the public hearing. MOTION by Acting Chair Stimson, seconded by Commissioner Pmus'to recommend approval of the request by the City of Plymouth for Rezoning from FRD '(Future Restricted Development)' to R-2 (Low Density Multiple Residence District) for property located at 3704, 3708, 3712 and 3716 Rosewood. Lane North and 12810 37th Avenue North. i Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Commissioner Ribbe, seconded by Commissioner Black to adjourn.. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:05 pm. 0