HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 12-27-1989CITY OF PLYMCTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
27'1989
The RegularMeeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was
call ed to order at 1-30 P a m
MEMBERS PRESENT* Cha' rnan R charP1 a Commissioners
John Wire; dal ivd at;4C
p.m1*Dennis, Z l la ` (ar=rived at 8:0
p -m,) , Joy Tierney, and Larry Marofsky.
MEMBERS ASSENT*. ommisslonen is ael Stulber .
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Chuck
Dillervd, Assistant Engineer john Sweeney,
and Sr., Clerk/Typist Demise Lanthi er,
MOTION by Cori m ssi oner Tierney, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TOAPPROVE
i m, to approve the Minutes for the December , 1.9$9,
Manning Comms ssion Meeting.
Vote4, All Ayes. MOTION carried; VOTE -.MOTION. CARRIED
Chairman Plu,fka introduced the request of Lowry Hill LO CRY HILL CONSTRUCTION
Constructs crr dor an RPtiD Pre - Con iminary Plan amendment,, 89105)
Conditional Use Permit amendment, and Esnal Plan/Plat
located at the southwest corner of 57th Avenue North and
Zachary Lane.
Comrr%lssioner Marofsky stated that he has doge work for Lowry
Nlll Constr coon in the past and askedarty member of the
Planning Commission,, staff, or Lowry Hill Construction would.
object to him acting on this Item..
Chairman luT,,a replied that, trio Planning Commission has
alsways operated under the assumption that each t ommssssoner
would be the best ,ludo of such a situation;, and if he/she
d]
7}
o^es' not the tj o'
y
step down 'ter conflict rreith:'er
f,
need
yy
Jfee
y1y j++ does the d aidning Commission.
Commissioner 14arofsky stated that he would (reel comfortable
serving on the Commission for this stem.`
Coordinator Dillerud gave an overview of the December
19 9, ad Lt l iepo t #
c c s asked aff if the final Plat of Oudot .
void be deviated fon)*
Planning Commission Minutes
December 271, 1989
Pace 285
Coordinator Dillerad responded that it is not the
controlling factor for setback#
Commissioner Wire asked staff if Unit 23 is 25 feet from t
t h -of w y 1 't'ne.
Coordinator- Wloud responded that the 25 feet shown is
measured front the lot, ine- not the building,
Commi s.s l over Tierney, asked s' aff ` what was the I all I al
benefi t of City for th 1 s...
Mr.. Barr stated that they have given 23 acres of land to the
City.
Coordinator Dillerud responded that the 23, acres was most
likely ono of'the primary attributes.-,but also the landscape
plan; innovative bui 1 dli ng de
i
gn t and woodl ands were al so
attributes.
axT'm Plufka Stated } believed the Planning
Commission choice is to make accommodations of some sort or
to end up with only three lots instead of four.
Commi ss i o er Wire stated that they should take i nto
consideration that this is the endof the project. He
further stated that the Intersection is more at a right
angle, which is different from the standard intersection;
therefore he feels they can get by with ;Less sight liner
Commissioner Marofsky stated that when a street curves as
this there are different setbacks all the way down the
street. He stated that: he does not feel this proposal will
affect the aesthetics of the pr'o jeet
MOTION,by Commi ssl oner Wire to recommend approval for Lowry
I
MOTION TO 'APPROVE 1
Ni 11 Construction of an RPUD Preliminary Plan amebdment,,
onditi oral ,Use Permit amendment, and Final Plan/Plat,
subject to a change in the body of the resolution to read
that the se°tbck shall be no closer than: t, from the
curb ling.
Motion failed for lack of a. second. ' MOTION FAILED
SECOND
MOTION by Commissioner Pierce, seconded by 11 Mmfl sioner MOTION TO APPROVE,
Zy11a: to recommend approval of the requost by Lowry Hi 11
onstructi on for an PIED rel imi nary Plan. a rrendment
Conditional Use Permit amendment, and Final Plan/Platt
subject to a change in the :body, of the resolution to read
that the setback shall be.no closer, -than ?5 `et from the
Commissioner y-l1a asked if it would be possible.to maintain
the square footage by 'picking it up in, other units,.
ChPlufka responded that Lowry Pill Construction
ullds according to the purchasers` specifications and that
the majority of the prospective `buyers• want single level
construction.
Commissioner Zylla, stated that his reason for secending tai's
trioti on, was because he thought the square footage cool d be
picked up; elsewhere*
Poll Call Vote. 2 Ayes, Commissioners. dire} Zylla, VOTE - MOTION FAILED
Tierney, and Maros s y flay. MOTION fa' l ed,
MOTION by Commissioner Ni re, seconded by Comms ss%i aver zyl l a t MOTION TO APPROVE
to recommend approval of the request by Lowry Hill
Construction for an PUO PrelIr nary Plan amendment,
Conditional Use Permit amendment, and FlInal Plan/Plat,
subject to the con.di.tions sed forth by staff.
Commissioner Wire stated that his reason for this motsort is
because the proposal me.;s C€ndItT?nal 3Ise Per it standards
and criteria.
8011 call tote, b Ayes,, MOTION -carried. VOTE .. MOTIO OAPPI D
Chairmanan P1 ufka * ntroduced the request b the C 1 of CITY OF PLYMOU'r 891I3
Plymouth. for the,division unplatted land by waiver of
Subdivision Ordinance located at the southeast corner of
Pineview Lane and County Road,47.
Oba1rmP1ofca waived oveof the December ,
1989, staff report.
Chairman Pl of ka opened the Public Heaving. There was no one
present to speak on the lissue..
Chairman ;Plofka closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Mai-ofsky asked staff if the City if paying full
Value for the property purchased from PrI dents al .
Coordinator Dillerua responded he did not know.
Comitti'ssi over arofsky stated that be feels: i f the City a s
jays n q full value, the City should get full use of tete
property.
oord i nater U l 1 entad sated that he has di sure phi's with
thety Attoney and he was told that this is a function of
the City Iright-of-way acquisition and not an issue for
discs ion with respect to this subdivision waiver. lie
further stated that this arrangement was entered into and