HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 08-10-1988CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING C044ISSION 1' INU :ES
MR -- UST lov, 19$8
The lRoe;ular Meetirvo of the Plymouth Pl.anni
Page 187,
Planning Commission Ninutes
August 101 198
The Second Addition shows Lot 61 Block 2; the Fifth Addition
shosys Lots 2, 3, 4, and 6 Block 2 and, Lot 13, Block 1
The remai.ninq 13 Lots would be within tete future., Tyrell
r.A ghth Addition
Mr, Hans Hagen stated they have selected to list the lots
and thvy' request that it not; be necessary to go through a
additional Public Hearing for the future Addition,
Commissioner Wire inquired about the number of lots for the -
future Eighth Addition. Mr Hagen stated there would be
approximately 36 single family lots
Commissionersinner Marofsky inquired about the square footage of
those lots l }ted for in -.ceased lot coverage. Mr. Hagen
stated he yea. aot sure, but believed they are all in eNcess,
of 131000 sq. .ft. Commissioner Harofsky inquired if the
lots would be the same ..i.xe, on average, as all lots in each
Addition. Mr. Hagen sta"d th y are slightly larger, but
close to the same size,
Commissioner Zylla inquired if Mr* Hastert would oppose the
Commission estraKishing an upper limit of lots coverage us
etandition of approval. Mr,, Hagen stated,, no, the request is
simply to allow the construction of decks. The problem has
arisen because people went to build larger homes and also
construct decks that are figured into that minimum lot
coverage,
MOTION by Commi,ssoner Zylla seconded by Commissioner Wire,140TION Tip tAJ)PHOii
to recommend approval for Amendment to the Planned Unit
Development Plan r)nditional U e Permit to exclude 'decks
from the 20% lot coverage for 19 lots within the Tyrell:
Planned Unit Development; and, to grant specific approval o
six lots within the Tyrell Second and f=ifth Additions (Lot
61 Block 2, Tyrell Fifth Addition and Lots 2, 31 4, and 6
Block 2,. and)Lot 13, Block 1, Tyrell Sixth Addition).
Cormrlssioner Marofsky stated he could not agree with this
method of granting approval for increased tot coverage He
concurs with staff that an amendment to the PUD standards of
the Zoning Ordinance should be considered
Commissioner Zylla noted that the Motion is still as recom-
mended by staff, on themerits for increased lot coverage on
a lot -by -lot basis; and, that the prlat conservation design
efforts must be demonstrated graphically prior to final
approval.
Mr.. Hagen confirmed this would be submitted to sia for
review by the Planning ommi ,cion and City Council.
C6missiaher Zylla noted that i.t is clear, considering prior
City ;Council action, approval is granted only for those
cases where there is proven preservation of natural,
resources and unique topography;
Page 188
1
l
Planning Co tml, ,s i.on Minutes
August 10, 19
Coordinator Dl,l.lerud confirmed 'tha L that lanquaoe concerning
the preservation of mature trees,, and. natural si to features,
1s a condition of final approval
Pu!,Jjc Works Director Moore stated that the lotswould be
reviewed after grading, so that a judgment can be m4d.e on
reservation throughout the :entire plat.
Vice Chairman Plufka stated that it would be a necessary
condition oj, the future Eighth Addition, which would b
closely reviewed in this, regard
Mr. Hans Hagen staled t a a r there has : been a distinct change
in the marketplace which has brought about the need to
accommodate the wishes of prospective home buyers and
citizens; > and, that customer preference cannot always be
reflected n the 0rdi.nance.. City staff'` ,requested they bri.nc
in the list of lots to be considered, and it was their
understanding. that they could gain approval on all those
lots listed, rather than having to goback through the
Public Hearing process.
Vice Chairman Plufka noted that; there is no informatign from
the developer saying where those 13 sots would be at this
time.* 114r Hagen stated they, would provide tht- .lot layout
with their` submittal for the Eighth Addition:
Vice Chairman Plufka stated that City Coin ,.la actions may
concede that it would not be ,necessary for Utz, approval
process for Lhe Eighth Addition to include proces=Ling those
Specific Lots thz.n a Public Hearing,,.ti
Roll Call Votes 4 Ayes, Commissi,over Marofsky, Nay VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MOTION carried.
Administrative MOTIOR by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by ADMINISTRATIVE
Commissioner Wire that the recommer,daLion be made to the MOTION
City Council that an Ordinance amendment be considered` that
would °delete "decks" from the minimum lot coverage, up to a
certain percent-ige , to be addressed by the Council: and City
staff .
Vote. 5 Ages, MOT10 carried* VOTE ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION -MOTION CARRIED
Page 189
Planninq Commission Minutes
August 101, 1988
Vice Chairman Plufka introducedced tRhe request and an overview SUML OSTR£CT 28
of the August 11. 1988 Staff, report was provided by Coordinw PRELIMIMY PLAT AND
ator Dill.erud. Coordinator Dillerud explained that the tab CONDITIONAL USE
and Block shown on the preliminary plat across the road PE ST FRGLEASON
right-of-way to the southwest should be designated as ars RYLAKEELEMENTARY
outlot< K L (86036)
ice Chairman Pl vfka introduced ter.. Stan Tikkanen, Director
of Finance and Administration for school. Di3triot 284. Mr.
Tikkanen stated they have reva:ev ed the st=aff report and
would point out two ,issues'. Item No. 4 of the Engineer's
Memorandum dealing with assessment for sanitary sewer which
would be levied per acre. They ask for a revi=ew as to
whether this ,should be done on that basis in this case.
Vice Chairman Plufka explained that the City Council lis the
forum for di=scussing 4he financial considerations of
development such as assessments 'to by levied.
Mr. Tikkanen st=ated the other issue is on Item 24-8 and 24 -
df the Engineer's 1lemorandum , regarding realign"int and
construction of 1st Avenue North. It is the School Board's
position that this, is a public benefit and one which has
resulted from City development. They suggest that the cost
be shared by all public entities, the Cagy of Wayzata the
City of Plymouth, Hennepin Coun ty, and the School Di,str ctf
Commissioner Marofsky asked that it be verified that the
Site Plan dries not in fact show the landscaping .intended,
but that the Landscape Plan shows all landscaping that would
he provided.
Coordinator Dillerud and Stan Tikkanen verified that the
Landscape 'Plan is in compliance with the. City's Landscape
Policy, and that a tree count had been done.
tyofmoi.ssioner Marofsky noted thatvari-colored brick 1s shown
on the plans and asked' if, they would be showinq colored
prints.. Mr. Tikkanen stated they do not; have these avail- vailableablethiseveningandexplainedthdtthebuildingexterior
would be earth --tone and would blend in with the existing
administration building.
Vice Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearirng.
Mr. Robert Peterson, 335 Inland Lane, stated he is President
of the Kingswood Homeowners Association. He stated that the
Association. became concerned with the "rather arrogant
position" of the School Board, who met with the Association
and stated they proposed closing 1st Avenue North. Mr.
Peterson stated at tt at time, they had not been notified
I
1
j
9 i
P.lanni nq Commission Minutes,
Auqust 10, 19,818
by the City,, and subs_equeritly City. Manager 3ames Willis and
Public 'Works DIrec for `red Moore provided a briefi,nq where
the Association eam, away Lith the f elinq that ."this was a
reaso:.=ible compromise." He thanked City staff for explain- '
ng this prOPQ$AT, specifically personnelfrom Public
Forks who staked the i r a to prove to the residents that the
gar light: at the ``)lurve" would strike the berrri between the
roper Ly at Oewell and Kimberly Larges.
Mr. Peterson stated the Kingswood Homeowners Association
wa ts.to go on record with the remaining roneerns which ars
the City's ability to ` protect their investment in their
entrance and in the irrigation and electrical system that is
Located in the median of existinq First, Avenue North. The j
Association concurs with the plans as submitted by the J
School District, but they cid riot believe they should suffer
in any way monetarily from this development.
Mr. Peterson asked If the District will be required to fence
the pond? Vice Chairman Plufkanoted There did not appear
to be any fen .inq illustrated crz the plans.
Mr. Peterson stated that for public, safety, e ,pedally the
children, there should be fencing at the area Oere there Is
high grater he suggested a chain link fence be placed around
the property.
Mr. Peterson also inq}!ired about, the lift station that:
served the. 112 homes. Who would pay fo. the additional
burden? He noted that there have been on -street parking
problems in the past, and, that there may now be a greater
intruslon, of parking on 1st Avenue and Ki-i;r Lane He
noted the problems ;pith no .sanitary facilitiT.s at the play
fields du inq athletic events. He noted; at one time there
was a Satellite .in place.
Commissioner Tierney inquired if I
the entrance noted on the
Site Plan is the only access for Kingswood. Mr'. Peterson
answered affirmatively.
Mr. Peterson stated the Homeowners Association wants to know
that the .;oiDlstr'ct is developing plans that assure
they will. continue 'to be good neighbors. The 112 homes, In
Kingswood., also oontribvte to school taxes.
Nerrill. Stodgehill, Kingswood Resident,, inquired if there is
a right turn Lane proposed onto Highway 101, or will it
remain as it is today; and, will the x%ing wood entrance/exit
traffic yield to Vie school traffic on 1st. Avenue Norttx2
I
Planninq Commission
Auqtjst 10, 19,68
til - hair:?T t # ` tt:te t rd i " t rY
gars i a right -turn lees, and I t Avenue. North would h
the r 0ht*4O W x y t
Vice Chairman Plufk4 Inquired if it would ` be ory t
In re tz -f the ; t tt a rid parade the water
system,. 'uPublic Works Moore state would
the khat the costmould be a responsibility of the
Sia,hool Distlrict,,
harm '). ' inquired tf the i tr t ha,, agree
m ixt with the King.swood, ` A concerning the reto ca tIon Of'
th r tr (jol ment withinthe .stand ridr
the berm t oill t* . Tikka en stated that, r i
principle, the Distriet would be re o ibl'o for the Post Of
relocation.
r Tl r rth r pt that the ty f ,Plymouth
o d tne t l iter as seen by Mr., PeterSOnt during beir
athlete evert, this was tF a, s hoot fonct.lon.
Discustjort en$ued regardinqbus staokinq, sign, to ationj and
sltopt ht activation.
Public Work. Director moors stated tha t the C'mmi -s ion may
wt t rote the Kinqswood, Entranceire l do s Part O
theda try pprvt w thtr the tt tit this .
would -bo, nproblem for tafil. stated furtherthat the
traffic li ghts are fealty t vat d:
V j0 e Chairman Plufk , ptosed the: Public Hearing*.
I MOTION by Commt t r r r ' d d mr z t F r TE,
Wire 'to recon vfittm ry Plat id.%
it for ch 6l D t r * t b X64 rthe . Co nditional , Per t
w tea oto Lake, Elementary Sphooll subjoot to the '
co r dtt luted tri the Augustt ; t report and
t The developerlopr st relocate th- adding Condi,tion No, hu
r tr n,in for the. OngswoodHomeowners Association. t
the south side, of "newt, lt Avenue North -,and.,,. shall
Vcati n i:aRhllelwM4ricail sy, ' eYs
W pr.a1 yrTji 1,ygi ngswood i `ino t serve
ry
tial Planned Unit Qev loom j
IO day mmt nor 'tr , nd d by C mrnl on r NOTION "
Tierney t;` Amend the 'Motion to add Conditiori No. 141.Thi
developer shallpr vtd fenc g around the pond, € . rea
b
I
hind the school, shown o the Preliminary- Stan llswa mP t
Roti halt Voto, oq Amendment* 5 AyeMOTION carried. Ns.
x CITE
Page 19
Pla a;a.l g Cornmi,ssit tl.nutes
Au4ust 10, 1988
Coa lss cner Tierr:ey expressed ` ;concern regarding thybus
parking area, and whether they would pull in at an angle,, or
straight on, and, In any case would their' backing --up ma="eu-
vers be a saf (;y hazard. Mr. Tikkanen pointed out tl%at,
pulling in and backing out is efficient for bus maneuvers,
there will be n(, oars using that ,area, and the parking would
only be available for after-school activities
Roll Call Vote on Main MOTION as once amended. 5 Ayes. VOTE ON KAN WOTIO
MOTION rarrl ed NOTION CARRIED
Vl,ce Chairman nlufka. Balled an in-place Recess at 6-030 P.M.IN-PLACE RECESS
to .accommodate ,the clearing of the Chamber,
Vice Chairman Plufka called the meeting to order.
Vice Chairman Plufkd introduced the request and an overview SCHOOl. DISTRICT 284
of the August 11 1988 staff report was, provided by Coordin- CLITION& USE;
ator Coil 1 B ud# PEH?fET AND SITE PLAN
POR WAYZATA SENIOR
Voce Chairman P.lufkA introduced Mr. Stan TiN,anenr Director NIGU SC'L (88069)
of Finance and Adm nis t citi jn for the School District. , Mrs.
Tikkanen stated they have reviewed and concur with the staff
report. They do have concerns relating to Items 27--B and
27-C .of the Eingineer" s Memorandum. He said those items
should be considered over the "long --term" and have little
relativity to this proposal. -
Public Works Director Moore noted haat these are existing
conditions that require modification.
Stan Tikkainen stated they are upgrading the current media
center and Dat additional technology does not increase th
number of ` students, their student population has in'' fact
deol.ined and they view ,the traffic considerations as long-
term problems that are not related to this proposed
construction
Public Yorks Director Moore` explained the deficiencies with
current multiple access to Vicksburg Lane from the parkin
lot:. The City is asking for a plan to be prepared by
Traffic Engineer, to correct- those problems along with the
gonstruction.as proposed:
Vice Chairman Plufka noted that the Commission would not, it
any case, change the recommendation by the Engineer's Memor-
andum ..t will go forward, to the City Council as written.
Vice Chairman Pl.ufka opened the Public Hearing
f
Page 19
Planning, Commission Minutes
August 10. 1988
Russell Almquist, 1`5905 4th Avenue t4orth, stated that he
does not oppose the proposed plans for the media center,
howeverf he would like to see additional supervision of
students-, He noted that they baje had a problem from the
mess" created by students wandering In the neigh shornood.
Mr. Tikkanen inquired if ' this problem is because the
students are usi.nq riff- campus areas as ,a "smoking lounge?"
e noted that State law, prohibits smoking and the campus is
stet ke-free, however, once the students leave the campus
they are no longer under, the jurisdiction of the District.
Mr , lmaulst stated that it is not: only the smoking, but
litter and trash ,deft by the student's and the guards seem to
ignore- i t all
Vice Chairman Plufka stated the Commission are not: police
and this would be ;best discossed with the Department o
Public Safety.
Bill t4app, 240 slack Oaks Lane, stated his concern rega din
any possible problems with run-off (dra.-inage) caused by
construction. The plain was displayed and no .impact: was
t
noted:
Vice Chairman Plufka closed the Public flearl=-ig
MOTION by Commissioner Wire seconded by CRmmi.ssioner zylla MOTION TO APPROVE
to recommmc id approval for the Conditional Use Permit and
Site Plan for expansion to the Wayzata Senior high School,
subject to the conditions li-sted in the August 11 1988 staff
report.
Roll Call Vote.. S Ayes¢ 140TION carried. VOTS. MOTION, CMARRED
ice thairman Plufka introduced the .request end an overview RONALD Lw L I66Y
of the August 1, 1988 Planning .Staff Report was provided by COMPREW,1SIVE PLAN
Coordinator Dill.erud. AND. LAM USE GUIDE
PLAN A?CK)W T TO
Vice Chairman Plufka noted the comments as submitted by the RE-CLASSIFY LAND
petitioner's consvltant,, Sherman Goldberg,. 88€6-6)
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced ever. Sherman Gol:dberg,,' who
discussed the traffic study. He atoted that Hennepin County
has also stated that the traffic bevel would be acceptable
for traffic control,. Mr. Goldberg stated that the proposal
ould not be detrimental to other property owners. He noted
that Mr. Libby has owned this property for a number of
years* makes his living ;taere,, and wants to continue the use
Page 194
P a;Ining Cr)mmll scion Min-;"es
August 10, '198,,q
of his property by requi.di.ing a portion, of the property to
upgrade the existing development. He stated that, 4010'
this property is new guided as Oat proposed for the, balance
of the property owned by Mr Libby,
Commissioner Z l.l.a inquired if the Commission were to see =a
Site Flax., would tn-;s fl."OunvyR support signals at Qeerwood
Lane,- ' and whei-° '
Mr. Goldberg Mated that toe signals would be warranted for
the volume of-'traffic from the north. Commissioner Zylla
inquired if Mi. Goldberg would say, that at the tzme of a
Site plan proposal, the `.'ounty would install, those signals.
Mr. Goldberg stated they would at least install underground
conduits. The signals would be installed when the warrants
were actually realized,
Commissioner Tierney inquired about the plan for gas ;pumps
with C (neighborhood shopping) guiding. Mr. Goldberg
stat,-ed that this was only an indication, a Conditional Use
Mormi.tr would he required if such were proposed,
Commissioner Marofsky inquired wh ther at Level C a traffic
signal would be warranted? Mr. Goldberg read from: page 3 o
the study and discussed the forecasts.
i s" vll a , in aired i f there is traffic data thatCns q
would suggest: a hazardous situation in that area now.
Ptiblic Works Director Moore stated yes, the Public Safety
Departmenthas discussed this problem. There isl paving
across the entire front of the existing store with no
defined curb, and this is something that would not be
permittisd today. There is a problem with treffi,c a!:cxderts
and this would be corrected when the County , pgrades County
Road 1(lam
Commissioner Marofsky inquired if a proposed access at Dee. -
w od lane 'would be the superior access po.irtt, even without
t :e increase in apse? Public Works Director Moore stated,
ye-,, it would be for the existing use in that protected left
i turn lanes could, be provided, However, with; the existing
usea and quiding , t1h o traffic signal would not be
warranted.
Comt ilssioner Marofksy astquired if the proposal for the
congregate housing generated the same traff.io volumes,
Public Works Director Moore stated, no,.this use would have
much different peak hours. Irdffic to and from a
convenlence center would coincide with the peakrush=-hour
traffic period$.
I
Fags 195
Planning Commission flin :te
August 10, 11088
vice Ctrairman Plufka opened the Public Nearing,
l aryA,nn Dealles, 11610 57th Avenue North,-.tated she opposes
the r, quest. She stated that there are ample shopping areas
within easy driving distance of ,these neighborhoods. This
is a lovely area in which residents here mo,inq to enjoy the
1'peac e and quiet" of residential life. This would be
diminishedby, further commercial developmef+t in the area,
especially with respect to noise, light andand traf,
fic. She stated that realtors- have told ter that there
would be a reduction in the value of homes irg an area where
commercial, development takes place
Vice Chairman Plufka closed thePvbll.e Hearing,
Commissioner Zy1la inquired what the net increase in square
footage would be with the new construction* Coordinator
Dil.lerud stated that the pet,ltaoner ' has noted the present
facility is approx*mately 6,000 sq ft. with a possible
30,000 sq. ft. for the proposed- facility. ,
Mr. Sherman Goldberg reiterated that %1, Libby has done
business in this area for many years and believes this
location to be appropriate for the use proposed and desires
to upgr<de his property.
Comimiz,,-ioner Zyl.la skated that this seems to be a logical
extension of the -existing Land use# however, there are traf
fic safety matters to tate into account. A 4 -way stop at
the Deerwood Lane/County Rand 10 intersection would improve
thetraffic h izard conditions that now exist.
MCT104 by Commissioner xylla seconded by Commissioner 14UTIDKTO APPROVE
Marofsky to rectripend approval of the Cnt- p ,hens ive Plan and
Land Use guide Plan Amendment to reclassify approximately
4.27 acres from LA -i. (low density reslde;nt.,.al) to CN (neigh--
oorhoo4k shopping center), located at the rorthwes t quadrant
of Country Read 10 and Deerwood Lane # -)rth, adding the ,.
folLo i.nq conditions:
1. The developer shall submit and,.. gain approval. for
Landscape and Site Pl Nns within one year of City
Council approval of the Land' Use Guide Plan
kmendment, or the guiding shall revert to LA -1.
2. The developer shall submit;, along with the Sit<
Plan,.' a timetable for the removal of the existing
structures, to be aporoyed by the City Council,
The development plans; are subject to, Hennepin
County approvals and permits for the Deerwood Lane
access to County Road 10.
P
Page 19
Planning Comms ssloo flinuter
August 10, 19s$
Discussion ensued regarding specifto direction for the Site
Flat).
I
Commissioner by la noted that Site Plan_ submittal
would oi_.ur within one year, subject to this approval, and
au.ld need to comply with all tlydi.narroe standards.
Con lss. on r Marof:-ky stated that he seconded the Motion
leased- c i. what he believes to be a reasonable alternative.
The s0je t. property 1,-ould develop with six single family
homes °:hat~ would also need aecess to Bass Lake Road; how-
ever, .his may not be the highest and lest use for the
property. Si nal, zation of the Deerwood Lane/County Road 10
intersecti
Page 197
Planning Commission Minutes
August: 10, 1988
Vice Chairman P111A.1fka requested that Coordinator Dillerud
provide an overview of the August 41 1988 staff report,
Coordinator Dillerud showed graphics of the existing
conditions on the site and explained that, the decision to
request deferral for this application was-` made during staff
whichhch detected a, flaw in the appli
Page 199
Planning commission. Minutes
August 10, 196
Comp issioner t14r i_lky inquired i this woutd anticipate tak-
ing half the right-oi -w'ay for 'West ''Medicine Lake Road from
the :.esidentlal property.
Coordinator Dillerud and Public Works Director Moore stated
this would .be the case.
Comini.ssio'ner Tierney inquired if the petitioner find, ii
more satisfactory to move the proposed facility,. rather than
petitioning for a rezoning.
Mr. Ron Erickson stated that revising the Site Plan would be
best,; as it is a very minor revision and would have no
impact on the parking or building
Vice Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Len Undeloe, 620 Cottonwood Lane, stated he is a 30 -year
residr-At and lie would ask that the City protect the resi-
dential property and not "give -in" to commercial property
interestso He is concerned that the installation of sever,
allowing the filling of ponding areas, and removal of trees
Is not conduol:ve to protecting residential_ property.. He
stated he is, speaking for the residents of Cottonwood Lane
ono they ate asking for the City's protection.
Mr. Marlow Risber 1 C Co ttonwabd Lane stated he is 30- g, :
year resilient arvI that 25% of his property would coo for the
proposed road extension and he is ` opposed `to the City's
plans
Bruce Thompson, 11018 Old 'aunty Roan 157 stated he lives at
the southeast corner of the property proposed for develop
ment.> He stated he had talked with the Corps of Engineers
and that development would need oto meet 'their requirements
He stated concern about fill that has already been brought;
in, and that the City could give no information concerning
those persons who Dave been workinq in the area and bringing,
in the fill. He stated there are wetlands, wildlife, mature
vegetation, and the area, is unique and sh iul.d, iprotected. He
noted §ie would: like to have `speci:fio information relating to
t_he tr,iff Ic and road construction,
i
Vice Chairman` Plufka pointed out. the Location of the B-
Zoning that allows the re -development of the shopping
center.
Mr. Thompson stated his concern regarding noise and lighting
froom the center that would impact the residents whose
property abuts the proposed area; of development. He stated
he has al„o talked with the Department of Natural Resources.
Their opinion was that filling and construction could cause
I
f
Page 199
lanninq Commission Hinut_-s
As qust 10, 198
sub tantial run-off and: would i.mpact the "wetlands". He
does not believe that the natural areas could be reLained
with the plans for excavation for 6th Avenue North
construction. He stated that he has been told he would lose
25% of the value of his property.
Dr. 3esse ,Yapp 610 Cottonwood Lane) , stated he i,s upset .t
the proposed road construction and development underway near
his home. ` He believes the exoavation dwork is beina
performed by th-o same developer.
Mice Chairman Pluf'ka Iriqui.red wher the work was taking
place. Director ,Madre confirmed' that 'the work is beinq done
for the plat known as "Wood Poi,n e.". which was recently
approved for residential homes. The developer is Schoell
Madsor
De, Yapp stated he and his family selected Plymouth because
of the private nature of the ar-aa where they bought their
home, now the wildlife, wetlands4 and -N oodlands are d sap-
pearl g a He believes there should be a value placed on
humanity and 'nature versus `than placed on profit-making
commercial ventures
ViceChaim ar'z P t ufka and Publicc Works Director Moore
reviewed the City's Thoroughfare Guide Plan, _ and explainer
to tar. Yap, that this plan has been in place. for 16 years,
since 1972.
Dr. Yap reiterated his concerns regarding the loss of priv-
acy and property values- and, stated his opposition to the
road" construction and the development proposal under
consIderation..
MOTION by Commissioner Marof ksyo seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO DEFER
Wire to defer this item based on the staff recommendation
that pian revisions be made to reflect the zoning district
boundary and any changes necessitated by the Strgar-Roscoe
Report= and, any alternative road alignments that could
impact this development proposal be reviewed by the Planning
Commission x -
Coramissi.oner Marofsky rci.terated his concern- regarding, the
amr .I. t.s to residential pruper y' by Ljjj$r proposal and the
City's plans for road constructions
Vice Chairman Plufka stated that it' would be logical that
staff would pursue any action which would :ensure minimal
dis-turbanoe in the re<;ddentia:i areas relating' to grading and
fill.
Page 7
Planning Commis -ion 140utes
August. 10, 198
Commiissiooer Marocfsky stated his main ,concern is with the
extension of the road through the wetland, (such as the
problems seen with County Road 61) and, if it can be
avoided, now is the time to do it.
Mr. Ron Erickson stated they understand the City's plans for
street and road construction; however, they don't believe
this would affect their plant
Commissioner Marofsky read from the St:rgar-Roscoe Report,
page #., No.. 7, that lists their recommendations and
alterrA, tives relatAve to the proposed site; and, that .it; is
important for tate Commission to see what they have in mind,
Mr. Ron Erickson inquired if the Commission would want a
representativefrom tr ar-Roscoe present at the time the
revised plans for this proposal are reviewed.
Vice Chairman Plufka stated that the record is clear on the
concerns expressed regarding the roadway construction and
of
residentialresidential, and naturalpr.ctpQrtthe{.}
ul. e
Yp
re.servation
7.ea tss.
Public Works Director Moore stated there are no additional
studies underway. These comments are in conjunction wi ttt
the City's Thoroughfare Guide Plan and this proposal would
not affect the alignment. He noted that the read would
skirt the wetlands.
MOTION by Vice Chairman Pl vfka f seconded by. Commissioner I40TION TO AMENVi
T!l en r. o - zffgs
yt
l/
yt(
he Motion by deleting, reference to the
y{{/
yt
y
Commissioner Marofsky stated, that without knowing whatIStrgar-Roscoe may rzoommend., ,he believes it eould :impact the
proposed site, however, he does not avant to hold up the re-
view of Prime Development Corporation revised plans. He
would want to see any further information available from
S tyrgar-
y+
Roscoe or the City pertaining to road construction In
is
Roll Call Vote on the Amendment. 3 Ayes. Commissioners VOTE - AWNOMENT
Wire and Marof ky, Nays MOTION CARRIED
Roll. Call Vote on Main Motion as once Amended, S dyes. MOTE - CHAIN MOTIOIN
MOTION carried. MOTION CARRIED
r
Vicr, Chairman Plufka stated that those who spoke on this
agenda itt tn, will be notified when it returns for Planning
Commission review.,
Vice Chairman Plufka called a Recess at 10130 P.M. SCM_
Page 201
Planning Commission 141nutes
August 10,._ 1988
Vice Chairman Pl+ufka introduced the proposed Amendment re ZON100.. ORDINNXE
gardi.ng the Home Occupation Conditional Use Permits as AM N-DNT
defined In the Zonitixq Ordir:nce It was the consensus of HOME OCCUPATIONS
the. tiom mzasion to deletf_ t;he examples as shown with ea-c1
definition,
Vice Chairman Plufka opened the Public'Hearing,
Sherman Goldberg, 12115 45th Avenin; Horth, inquired about
the language in these definition. These were read by. Vick
Chairman Plufka,
Vice Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearinax
Commissioner Zylla stated that he does not zee the need for
the "Conditional" Hone Occupation definition; he would like
to .see these melded together. Where there would be
employees, eeluipment parking areas, et al, constitutes a
business and would be disruptive to a residential neighbor- eict bor-
hood,, hood,,lie oistri.buted c )Ios, of the language he has drafted
fur Commission review.
7t was the consensus of the Commission to Table the item to
the end f. this ewe Unq .
1Y 1 7 Jb7i",w7
Vice Charman Pluf,ka introduced the request and reading of RICHARD NESS UND
the July 7 1988Staff Report was: waived. SITE PLAN FOR
1113 CSIT
Cotxlm SS over Wire itiCju red if this site was approved for LANE 1401RD1
outside storage. Coordinator a llerud answered that ' this 88081)
was not the case,
Corwmissioner Marofsky inquired if the: developer would be
cutting dawn the berm along Vicksburg Lam.
Fray Carlson, Centurion Companies, statod that it 'had been
designed to be removed.
Commissioner Marofsky inquired if additional ,berm.inq would
be installed on the north property line Greg Frank,
McCombs, Frank.,, Roos, Associates, stated berming was not
planned, but they would be installing trees.
Di.5cussion ensued regarding the retaining wall and site
ele;vat ins. Mr. Carlson staters that tine retaining wall
would be approximately 3 ft. in height along Vicksburg Lane;
and, that the parking lot would be realigned.,
commissiono.r Marofsky inquired about the sign plan and ,if
the Commission is asked to approve it with this applica- ppli.ca-
t onCoordinator Di.11erud stated that any proposed signagetion
which would exceed the Ordinance standards would require a
variance and would net be pari: of hi.s approval,
t
t
yr .rr:rc 'rrwaz;,e ,
Page 202
Planning Commission 'Minutes
August 10, 1988
M TION erZ llalor MOTION T APPROVE
o recommend approval for the Site Plan for Richard Neslund,
sut,Ject to the 11- conditions listed in the 0ul.y 7,1, 1988
staff report.
Commissioner 14arofs y stated that he :is concerned about the
existing outside storage that is not justified -dor this
property.
Mr. Ray Carlson stated that the materials stored outside are
from only one tenant who is vacating the premises.
Vote Ayes., MOTION carried, VOTE - MOTION CA. -^"D
OYwM1D u... . 4 SS ; ...
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced the request an -1 reading of OT NSI ASSOCIATES
the August_ 2, 1988 staff report was waived. PUD PRELIMINARY PLA` I
PLAN AND CONDI M Nom_
Vice Chairman Plufka confirmed that the proposal. complies USE PERMIT (88018)
with the conditions in Resolution No. 88-299 as directed b
the, City Council.
MOTION by C — issioner Wire, seconded by Vice Chairman MOTION FOR APPROVAL
Plufka to recon -.,.,-tend the application be forwarded to the City
Council; and, that it conforms to the Council direction
rega rclinc satisfaction of Condition Nos. 9, 10, 11, and 13
of Resolution No. 88-299 that approves the Residential
Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for Dimension
Associates.
Vote. 5 Ayes. , MOTION carried.. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Vice Chairman Plufka placed the Ordinance Amendment back on CONTINUATION -ZONING
tree Table for further discussion. ORDINANCE AHENDMIENT
MOTION by Commiss,icner Wire,seconded by Commissioner Plufka MOTION TO APPROVE
to recomaend .he approval for the Ordinance Amendment re-
gardinG Home Occupation Conditional Use Permits, deleting:
the 116(ampl.es" glyen, and to delete the word "service" or
level o'I a language change, since a "service" 'active tyis
part of such Home Occupations as, beauty stop, piano
teacher, or bookkeeping/secretarial.
Commissioner Marofsky noted a correction, changing the word
or" to 'of not more than one person who is a non-resident
of the premises-"
Vice Chairman. Plufka noted tete review and approv.=,,,, i process
for Conditional. Use Permits for Home Occup itions nave been
and would be reviewed on the :merits of the applica> ton and
meeting the Conditional Use Permit criteria,
aqe 203
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1968
A.
vote. Cotu is-ssioner Zylla reite"aat d h2 s _concern that the
adoptUn of the language for the Home Occupation Conditional.
Use would allow for s3 more intense business use in a
residential. neighborhood.
Commissionerr Marofsky stated that Commissioner 2ylla' s pro -
peed: lay uage for the Home Occupation definitie)n should bP
orward,W to the City Council for their review,
Roll Call Vote, 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. NOTION CARRIEDZED
OTHER llUSXNESS
Publ.J:c 1,1#orks Director LFred Moore reviewed the proposed REVIEW OF
Capital Improvements Program scheduled for Public Hearing on 1989-1993 CAPITAL
August 24,' ` IM4 IMPROVEWNTSPROGRAM ,
CIP
The stet.us of seal. coating streets in the City was discus-
sed. P:iblic drks Director Moore explained the study done a
year ago. -soca that c orstruction standards for instalii.nq
streets and vads has f han ed to lengthen the life of the
street ._in(;. r,-ad surfaces.
Comm. i ssioner Wire x :qu, red about ass't;ssment,s for resurfacing
and reeunstructio -of streets arse roads, Director Moore
stated that the Ciro Cooticil h 4dopted a financing plan
where 20% would be charged to tt!e abutting property owners.
Furth r discussion regarding the sanitary; sewer::, theensued
problems with srii..poips,, Director Moore explained the
Citfy r 5 actions la titi. s regard and that residents have been
very cooperatives
C"onoilssioner Marofsky I equees'.,Pd the ` Di ector Moore bring
raps to the hearing . on August 24t 1988 to point out the
ureas under consi.deratioi within this ':''P
AiDJOOR.+ :STT
the meeting adjourned at 11.-42 P.M,
f,
l
f
V