HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 05-11-1988CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PL. MIS C£ WISSIOWHIWT
MAY 111 '1988
he Requsarr Me -Onoe«of the Plymouth Plann ru, Commission -a- acalledcalledtoorderat7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRE&EHT: Chairman Pauba, Commissioners Wi,r:*,
Stulberg, Zyllar Plufka,, Marofsky and
Tierney
HUMMERS ABSENT a Novae
STA P RESEW: Community Development Coordinator
Chuck Di llerud
Community [development Director
Blair Tremere
City FnOneer Chet Harrison
Plannina Secretary Grace Winema.n
Chairman Paula introduced and welcomed Community Development
Coordinator Chuck Di l ]'Lerud The Commission also welcomed
Conni.ssioner Plufka who hatJ been in the hospital.
M1WT111
MC3'1':1ON ` by Commissioner Stul ez g, seconded by Commissioner
Marofsky , to approve the Minutes for April. 27, 1988 as NOTION TO DROVE
submitted.
Commissioner Zyl.la asked that zhe record shoe las clarifica-
tion of paragraph two on page 5$ he disagreed about the
need for sprinkler ng the owner --occupied living units and
not about. the Fire Lane Ordinance,
POBL CC HTARCS
Chairman Pauba Introduoed the request. Coordinator Dil.lerud LISA SC12REINER
provided an overview of I he May 2, 1585 staff report. H QCCI.IF'ATIO 1
Cid_TTIOrW L. USE
Chairman Paula opened tite Pabli Hearings POWT (8803,7)
amen Bruner* 5590, Rosewood Lane, inquired if this permit
is issued, would it allow the petitioner to have peoplve
comiraq into her home that could bring more traffic into the
n i4ghborhood. Chairman Pauba explained that any chane in
the scope of the permit would require a Public He ring and
review by the Plans ;nq Commission and City Council i Commis-,
sioner Pl.ufka explained that if Hr. Srutne:r was alluding, to
residential daycare, those are licensed by the State of
at _ a i..-, n le'e7W .ta.
Chairman Pauba closed the.Publicuolic Hearing,.
104
Page 105
I
Plannlbiq Coniftilssion Minutes
May 11, 1983
N-OTION by Commissioner Stulher , seconded by Corm tissioner POTION TO APPROVE
fAlufka to recommend approval for the Home occupation
I
Conditional Use. permit for Lisa Schreiner, subject to the
conditions as listed in the May Z, 1988 staff report, chanq, i
inq Condition No. 4 to read,. The permit shall. be ".--viewed" 3
rather than renewed in one year
Commissioner M rofsky stated he. would like clarification
regarding the petitioner's wish to have someone, on. w part- art-
timetimebasis, to assist her with the business, and wouldn't l
phis be nennsas-ten with the Ordinance definition of a; Home
Occupatl.onwhich states, the ,Rooeupation shall be carried on
only by mk m'>ers of a. family residing in the dw-1ling11
D scussion ensued reaarding the proposal, for a ; parttime
employee and whether this is a variance and should be
con;,idered tinder the variance crlit rla of the Ordinance.
Ms. Schreiner stated this proposal was part of her narrative
and she did r,,t see this as a problem.
usrther discussion ensued as to whether the proposed
arrangement was within the intent, of the _Ordinance
M0TION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO AMEND
IUfka to Amend- the Motion to add the following to Condition
No, ' The pexin* t -s subject to all aool icQ-ble codes,. req.uw
lation, and Ordinances with the exception that one parttime
person,, a non -family member, may be employed for the purpose
of assistiov. with bulk mailing, for a period not to exceed
C hours a week.
Roll tall, Vote on Amendment. 6, Ayes. Commas;id ner VOTE - TSO CARRIED
S=tulberq, May. MOTION c irr.ied.,
Roll Call Vote on Main Motion _ as once Amended. 7 Ayes., VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MOTION carried
Commissioner Stul.berq stated his vote is based on his opin-
ion that the amendment does not meet all. the Variance
Criteria as discussed..
OLD BUSILMESS
Chairman Pauba introduced the request. Coordinator Dillerud ROBERT WACHTER
provided an overview of the May 21 1.988 staff report, noting DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT
that the Planning Commission reviewed the application tit RR11D C{3NMIT ALAN
their ,March 23, 1988 meeting recommending approval by a 3 , 00183
1 vote; and the City Council at the April. 41 1988 meeting
deferred action and referred the application bask to. the
Planning Commission. with direction for redesigns He also
explained the extended length of the curl-de-sac(70C ftp).
vexuar%iroa
Pace 104
Planning Commission Minutes
hiay 11 , 10, `
Chairman Pauba introd iced Oreo Frank, McCombs, Roos, Frank,
representing, the petitioner. Mrs. Frank introduced Mfr.
j Wachter and Mr. Wusack.
Mr. Prank discussed the revisions made to the plans in
response to City Council concerns-.
Development of three open space areas for siagte
family detached homes as directed
The corridor for the dra.inageway is delineated;
The tot ldt ties into the trail system to the City
Park
Exist ng treesand natural vecletation have been pre..
served in the outl.ot, the northeast corner, and south
and west sides of the property
Reta i ing, walls will be installed and existing hills
and unique topography have been retained;
The, site design milnimizes the impact on the uniq=ute
topography.
Cross sections of the site were shown. Transition 'to the
single far11v homes has been provided. Mr. Frank explained
that elevations and road grades will be detailed with the
next stage of development. He, noted that 39th Avenue North
will go through as ;proposed and as confirmed 'by City Coun,
oil.. These plans reflect two less units than the original
proposal
Commissioner Elarofsky stated that even thoui)h; the topic o
d scusgion is the concept plan, ' he is concerned about the C
ft, minimum setbacks as .shown and will ask for details with
the next state of development planning,
Coordinator pillerud confirmed thaC those who spoke at the
Public Hearing were notified of the continuance this
evening.
Commissioner Marcfsky stated concern about the area desig-
nated
esig-
nated for the tot lot. Dai l l erud sta ted + hat the
City Council's direction was< or concentration of open space
to gain more use for the residents.
Commissioner Marofsky stated that it appears the only use-
able active opera space is within the area for attached hous-
Ing. Greg. Frank pointed out there are two areas for active
opera space Haat are linked by tae trail, system and pond.
Commissioner Marcafsky reiterated his concerns `rega'r4'ng the
concentration and ;size of'the open space for recreation
Page 1:C7
pl.ann nq commission Minutes
May 11 1 1988
which ; seems more prevalent irr the area of attached hous.ing,.
not far from the City park, so that the northeasir portion of
the site does not have adequate area for its use. Mr. Frank
stated they could provide an additional tot lot at the, pond
to provide more active open space to the northeas=t portion
nf the site..
Comissioner Marois y and Mr, Frank discussed the layout for
Minnesota Lang k qtr, ` Frank noted the curves that would tee?
to slow traffic in this residential neighborhood
Commission er Zyl.la inquired about 39th, ,Avenue North, Mr.
rank explained that the City Council direction was for this
street to go through and to be laid. out in a somewhat
circuitous fashion so to not make it attractive as a short
cut to Fernbrook Lane.
Comm
41.
ssionez Zylla confirmed with staff that City Council
discussion was primarily focused upon thu open space issues.
MOTION by Commissioner Zylla onded b Corwr-•-5ionerlire NCTIOR TO APPROVE
to recommend apProxal for the. Res,ident.ial Planned Unit
Development Concept Plan for Parkview Ridge, subject to the
cont t^Ona as listed ire; :the May 1988 staff' report.
tf-%. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky, Way. MOTIO14 MITE - MOT -TON CARRIED
arr Fed
OTHER BUSINESS-.-
Director
USINESS<
Director Tremere rioted that coriti.nuation of the Hearlrq on
the Parking Studer had been set back and the developers who
had particular interest in this: study, Ryan Construction,,
Ron Clark Construction, and Prudential had been notified ul
the continuance, A report on the parking study is 'Forth-
coming along with a proposal of action, The parties o
reoord will be notified. Mr Al Sohackman of Ryan Conn ruo-
ti:on was present,
Further discussion ensued reg,ardi.ng the Parking Study.
Director Tremere explained that staff w-11 provide analysis
and conr'7usions regardl'nq this study which was prepared by
professional consultants as an objective view of the City's
rdinance parkirrt standards.
Commissioner Zy:lla inquired about the position of till
development comMunity on parking standards- what is their
concern? will the staff report be more specifi.e what '" trlg
gered" this process`' Will, staff provide background"?,
ireotor Tremere explained that the parking standards, are
considered "too high" by some development interests who re-
quested aril contracted the study. They are also concerned
ADJOURNMENT -
The