Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 05-11-1988CITY OF PLYMOUTH PL. MIS C£ WISSIOWHIWT MAY 111 '1988 he Requsarr Me -Onoe«of the Plymouth Plann ru, Commission -a- acalledcalledtoorderat7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRE&EHT: Chairman Pauba, Commissioners Wi,r:*, Stulberg, Zyllar Plufka,, Marofsky and Tierney HUMMERS ABSENT a Novae STA P RESEW: Community Development Coordinator Chuck Di llerud Community [development Director Blair Tremere City FnOneer Chet Harrison Plannina Secretary Grace Winema.n Chairman Paula introduced and welcomed Community Development Coordinator Chuck Di l ]'Lerud The Commission also welcomed Conni.ssioner Plufka who hatJ been in the hospital. M1WT111 MC3'1':1ON ` by Commissioner Stul ez g, seconded by Commissioner Marofsky , to approve the Minutes for April. 27, 1988 as NOTION TO DROVE submitted. Commissioner Zyl.la asked that zhe record shoe las clarifica- tion of paragraph two on page 5$ he disagreed about the need for sprinkler ng the owner --occupied living units and not about. the Fire Lane Ordinance, POBL CC HTARCS Chairman Pauba Introduoed the request. Coordinator Dil.lerud LISA SC12REINER provided an overview of I he May 2, 1585 staff report. H QCCI.IF'ATIO 1 Cid_TTIOrW L. USE Chairman Paula opened tite Pabli Hearings POWT (8803,7) amen Bruner* 5590, Rosewood Lane, inquired if this permit is issued, would it allow the petitioner to have peoplve comiraq into her home that could bring more traffic into the n i4ghborhood. Chairman Pauba explained that any chane in the scope of the permit would require a Public He ring and review by the Plans ;nq Commission and City Council i Commis-, sioner Pl.ufka explained that if Hr. Srutne:r was alluding, to residential daycare, those are licensed by the State of at _ a i..-, n le'e7W .ta. Chairman Pauba closed the.Publicuolic Hearing,. 104 Page 105 I Plannlbiq Coniftilssion Minutes May 11, 1983 N-OTION by Commissioner Stulher , seconded by Corm tissioner POTION TO APPROVE fAlufka to recommend approval for the Home occupation I Conditional Use. permit for Lisa Schreiner, subject to the conditions as listed in the May Z, 1988 staff report, chanq, i inq Condition No. 4 to read,. The permit shall. be ".--viewed" 3 rather than renewed in one year Commissioner M rofsky stated he. would like clarification regarding the petitioner's wish to have someone, on. w part- art- timetimebasis, to assist her with the business, and wouldn't l phis be nennsas-ten with the Ordinance definition of a; Home Occupatl.onwhich states, the ,Rooeupation shall be carried on only by mk m'>ers of a. family residing in the dw-1ling11 D scussion ensued reaarding the proposal, for a ; parttime employee and whether this is a variance and should be con;,idered tinder the variance crlit rla of the Ordinance. Ms. Schreiner stated this proposal was part of her narrative and she did r,,t see this as a problem. usrther discussion ensued as to whether the proposed arrangement was within the intent, of the _Ordinance M0TION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO AMEND IUfka to Amend- the Motion to add the following to Condition No, ' The pexin* t -s subject to all aool icQ-ble codes,. req.uw lation, and Ordinances with the exception that one parttime person,, a non -family member, may be employed for the purpose of assistiov. with bulk mailing, for a period not to exceed C hours a week. Roll tall, Vote on Amendment. 6, Ayes. Commas;id ner VOTE - TSO CARRIED S=tulberq, May. MOTION c irr.ied., Roll Call Vote on Main Motion _ as once Amended. 7 Ayes., VOTE - MOTION CARRIED MOTION carried Commissioner Stul.berq stated his vote is based on his opin- ion that the amendment does not meet all. the Variance Criteria as discussed.. OLD BUSILMESS Chairman Pauba introduced the request. Coordinator Dillerud ROBERT WACHTER provided an overview of the May 21 1.988 staff report, noting DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT that the Planning Commission reviewed the application tit RR11D C{3NMIT ALAN their ,March 23, 1988 meeting recommending approval by a 3 , 00183 1 vote; and the City Council at the April. 41 1988 meeting deferred action and referred the application bask to. the Planning Commission. with direction for redesigns He also explained the extended length of the curl-de-sac(70C ftp). vexuar%iroa Pace 104 Planning Commission Minutes hiay 11 , 10, ` Chairman Pauba introd iced Oreo Frank, McCombs, Roos, Frank, representing, the petitioner. Mrs. Frank introduced Mfr. j Wachter and Mr. Wusack. Mr. Prank discussed the revisions made to the plans in response to City Council concerns-. Development of three open space areas for siagte family detached homes as directed The corridor for the dra.inageway is delineated; The tot ldt ties into the trail system to the City Park Exist ng treesand natural vecletation have been pre.. served in the outl.ot, the northeast corner, and south and west sides of the property Reta i ing, walls will be installed and existing hills and unique topography have been retained; The, site design milnimizes the impact on the uniq=ute topography. Cross sections of the site were shown. Transition 'to the single far11v homes has been provided. Mr. Frank explained that elevations and road grades will be detailed with the next stage of development. He, noted that 39th Avenue North will go through as ;proposed and as confirmed 'by City Coun, oil.. These plans reflect two less units than the original proposal Commissioner Elarofsky stated that even thoui)h; the topic o d scusgion is the concept plan, ' he is concerned about the C ft, minimum setbacks as .shown and will ask for details with the next state of development planning, Coordinator pillerud confirmed thaC those who spoke at the Public Hearing were notified of the continuance this evening. Commissioner Marcfsky stated concern about the area desig- nated esig- nated for the tot lot. Dai l l erud sta ted + hat the City Council's direction was< or concentration of open space to gain more use for the residents. Commissioner Marofsky stated that it appears the only use- able active opera space is within the area for attached hous- Ing. Greg. Frank pointed out there are two areas for active opera space Haat are linked by tae trail, system and pond. Commissioner Marcafsky reiterated his concerns `rega'r4'ng the concentration and ;size of'the open space for recreation Page 1:C7 pl.ann nq commission Minutes May 11 1 1988 which ; seems more prevalent irr the area of attached hous.ing,. not far from the City park, so that the northeasir portion of the site does not have adequate area for its use. Mr. Frank stated they could provide an additional tot lot at the, pond to provide more active open space to the northeas=t portion nf the site.. Comissioner Marois y and Mr, Frank discussed the layout for Minnesota Lang k qtr, ` Frank noted the curves that would tee? to slow traffic in this residential neighborhood Commission er Zyl.la inquired about 39th, ,Avenue North, Mr. rank explained that the City Council direction was for this street to go through and to be laid. out in a somewhat circuitous fashion so to not make it attractive as a short cut to Fernbrook Lane. Comm 41. ssionez Zylla confirmed with staff that City Council discussion was primarily focused upon thu open space issues. MOTION by Commissioner Zylla onded b Corwr-•-5ionerlire NCTIOR TO APPROVE to recommend apProxal for the. Res,ident.ial Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for Parkview Ridge, subject to the cont t^Ona as listed ire; :the May 1988 staff' report. tf-%. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky, Way. MOTIO14 MITE - MOT -TON CARRIED arr Fed OTHER BUSINESS-.- Director USINESS< Director Tremere rioted that coriti.nuation of the Hearlrq on the Parking Studer had been set back and the developers who had particular interest in this: study, Ryan Construction,, Ron Clark Construction, and Prudential had been notified ul the continuance, A report on the parking study is 'Forth- coming along with a proposal of action, The parties o reoord will be notified. Mr Al Sohackman of Ryan Conn ruo- ti:on was present, Further discussion ensued reg,ardi.ng the Parking Study. Director Tremere explained that staff w-11 provide analysis and conr'7usions regardl'nq this study which was prepared by professional consultants as an objective view of the City's rdinance parkirrt standards. Commissioner Zy:lla inquired about the position of till development comMunity on parking standards- what is their concern? will the staff report be more specifi.e what '" trlg gered" this process`' Will, staff provide background"?, ireotor Tremere explained that the parking standards, are considered "too high" by some development interests who re- quested aril contracted the study. They are also concerned ADJOURNMENT - The