HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 09-22-1987CITY CR PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMNISSIOR MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 221 1987
The Special Meeting -of the Plymouth Planning Commission was
7 3C PS, i:-1 ed to order mak. MF
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Ste gerwaltd and Commissioners
Wirel, Stul.berg (arrived at 8:30 P.M.),
Zylla, Marofsky, and Pauba
MEMBERS ABSENT. Commissioner < Fl.ufka
STAW PRESENT*. Planning Bisector Blair Tremere
Community Development Coordinator
Ray- Anderson
Assistant City Engineer Bohn Sweeny
Planning Secretary Crane Wineman.,
MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner W'.re, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Marofsky to approve the September 9) 1987 Planning Commis- ords-
stun'Minutession, 'Minutesas submitted with .a modification and correction
to page 212, MOTION to Amend should read, 'Fencing shall be
ins"'.'all:ed along the lot lines for Lots 16, and 17) Block z,
to the north line of Dutlot E,"
VOTE 4 Ayes, Commissioner Pa;uba. abstained. MOTION carried. VOTE -- MOTION CARRI
CONSENT. AGENDA
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioj er MQTXUN. TO APPROVE
Marofsky to approve tie Site Plan for Robert Worthington,
Opus Corporation for an office/warehouse located' east of
Niagara Lane and north of 28th Avenue North,, subject to the
conditions listed in 'the September 16, 1957 staff report.
VOTE 5 Ayes. MOTION carried; VOTE - MOTION' CARRIED
Chairman Steigem-ald stated that' the Lot Consolieation/Lot
Division and Variance application (Item G -B)' requested by
Robert and; McAuli. fie i s deferred a t the reques t o w the
petitioner.. Mr. McAuliffe was out of the country and had
not, had, sufficient time to respond to the staff report.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
j
Chairman Steigerwald introduced t`e -`equest by Craig CRAIG KIIERRER
Soherber for "Readows of Bass Lakoll . An overview, of the: RE I KING COW MEN-
Sep.tember 11, 1987 staffreport was provided by Coordinator SIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Anderson. He explained the requests and noted the require- AMD PRELIMINARY PLAT
ment for dedication of all rights-of-way with the initial 87059)
final plats.
r* Took' Loucks,
r1
v
Page 2Z2
Planning ,Commission Mi.nu.tes
September Ul 1987
Chairman Steigerwald closed the public Hearing.
40TIO.N , by Commissioner Zyll<a, seconded by Commissioner Fire MOTION TO ,APPROVE
to recommend approval of the Rezoning ompx ehensave Plan';
Amendment, and Preliminary Plat, subject to the conditions
listed in the ,September 11, 1987 staff report, modifying
Condition No,. 11 to grant variances, from theR-1A Zoning
District Ord..inance standards for lot width for Lots 9,. 10,
and 1 1, Block 1. The rea onz for the variances include
consistency with lot widths .in 'the area, and good planning.
of the. overall site
Roll, Call UaYe, 4 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky, abstained. VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
MOTION . carried,
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Ghe request by Trammell Crow JOHN iGFUFFITH,
Company. An overview of the September 9,. 198staff report TRAMMED CROW CO.
was provided by Coordinator Anderson,REZOKNGI, REVISED
PRELIMINARY PLAT,
Commissioner Nlarofsky inquired about the access drives to REVISED GF -Wk&
Cheshire Lane rather than to 1st Avenue North. Assistant, DEVELOPMENT PLAN
City Engineer Sweeney stated the Engineering Department had SITE PLANS
reviewed this issue -, here is a cul-de-sac at the encs of 'ist CONDITIONAL USE
Avenue North and, extension of 1st avenue North to the east PERMIT AND VARIANCE
is not proposed' now, so no problems are foreseen. FOR CARLSON TECH
r
FWA
P
annn o nues
e'p # m ' 2'x'1
x 87
Initial pia a were cute s having people Dying _and , rk
n deeve cxpr ent new .s, not V.eiv
n* a"ed ;
chairman, t e w 14 e; p a ned pro al has more
office la tzr wit..h-less of :an ' i,d ; 1et? , these un-
e-v e nt a and this r .4 w011, oneve
he e ar& c plans for wad k n ; paths w th thes, ;p !A ,, e cop
ffii,Ac ythe struts rhemss, e, 'ter advised 1'1 ,e lY o+ ?t . ,Y. --eview
the - .i -ow de p ans foa , perks . tai ails x
tits f Isher, explained that Carlson tenter is 328 aOt with ' a'
two e t es and thep de erlee. pedes,t n esi, andA
nif io
the C IMinnetonka- they, were not pinned ter t;h s,
lygre'
a, oa ogr. with: Bremer*'at men s 0nope ni"n-
a
M r
p"aany Y-e qItiV.
r .
t,e:s++'S! arid 1 , u.}1. d : lk, ., Q,.iC`. C. ..L`. r ,k i,f L! »S V+.? l+i SyY.EL h S#.R
gisyt» 'i rx:Ua,.,ade.i our of, ooh iso'`'..„ rL.c .
QY..
s-e wh ,ah..'ge l.d re to
e on e Teen h e', o er ;tine re c _
t.dnitilff h} TL*`ti Ca owily e c0lCen{d a e 3erats
v s t their offloe'to review the: master, pian and archi ee-
total rel'ldegs,
f.a{,t(E-tt ak. si +.:r,4. Zy i. i+SJ. ` At +7. }b 4 ,- Y C t.` i « +s
Y '[
7 .r Y,.e
the,berminq, on tae north ;,side ; of ,the
sit
to between, the res
t 3t J. _ . a:_cial re 5 ! E c iii S- df ;.the € t Cl
fron tat side s eenee n, Aeco °dt n to, thu gradin4 Calan
and proposed building, height) ° :the berms appear to be rela-
t v how or Ao,ra e tFertt because tat the _1 va ti s.. the
tib seea . buy dng,He epsSd'oa
tlr't- 1 aS`,IR;'tttT',,k' 'ii?t ld be, the saattr 't'iten
and materialss for the front and back of Bud.1ding A-,*-'
IQT C hI by'' anrm . nex Ma oi"sk se ended' y am a .s tinea~ qT1 TO l !?' t0`,i
Peak t re ommea 'a=pproval, fix --'Rezoning, Revd ed P elimt AU EVTlt, D
a PIa and Rev a sed e e ,e, opr n K for Tia e PW"K * T
r'x `0dmanYubt e ttsrti.tcardn thea:
etrr.a~ 1987 s tit rt JOE, SPLAW
commi, s on,er Wire, stated condom wvlth the tit
this area t it a es.de atial nei hbti , arid, ha t the, la
ti ntit t eet the-` original,nt nt of a Is h a parses .
n i'a,_ = °puns,
Page 2S
Plannir;g Commission Knutes,
eptember 2 1987
Roll Call Vote. 6 ryes. MOTION carried, VOTE -,MOTION CARRIED
HOTIG"N by Chair -man 1 -Berwald seconded by 'om s. onor„ MOTION TO APPROVE
Wire to recommend approval for the Site Plan .and Conditional SITE .PLAN AND
Use Permit for Building 'LI', subject ''to tate conditions CONOx,TIONAL USE
Listed in the September 9, 1987 staff ,report, stating; the PERMIT &DO 'BI
actual approved percentage of office space within: Building'
MOTION by: Commissioner Marofs y, seconded by Chairman; MOTION TO .AMEND
Stel.gerwal.dto Amend the Main Motion to change Condition
No. 14 to read: "Appropriate legal documents for shared
drives and access shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney r
Roll, Call Vete on Amendment. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE •-- MOTION` CARRIED
Roll Call: Vote ort Main ' Motion as once Amended. 6 Ayes. VOTE - MOTION CARRIm
MOTION carried
MOTION by Comni,ssion+er Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
I'auba to recommend approval for the Site Plan and. Variance'' SITE PLAN AND
for, Buildin 'A,} subject to the co-nditions listed ,in the VARIANCE FOR BUILDING
September 9, 1987 staff repot and citing that the Variance
Criteria, have been met,
nMOTIONbyCommissioner iarofsky,; seconded by ; Commissioner MOT'i-0N TO AMEND
Zyll.a to Amend the Main Motion by adding Condition No. 13.1
to read-, "The berm shall be 6 ft. above the floor l.eva<tion
of Building W."
Linda Fisher stated' the bermi.ng as proposed is adequate.
They had considered a more substantial; berm with some of it
on the adjacent site to the north whi6i is owned by Carlson
Companies, City staff had advised that was inappropriate.
She showed a rendering of Ithat kerming
Director Tremere stated this would, involve a separate piece
of property, the site is neither within a Planned Una t.
Development, nor Is it being developed at this time. Direc-
tor Tremere stated there is no legal tie between theso
properties at this time and suggested that this tight be
resolved later through an amended pian that would include
draft covenants ar-4 the like, assuring pre servatior ana
maintenance of the berm by the owner of the adjacent site.,.
The Ordinance rc:gU'L.re, t he developer to 'bear the burden, of
transition on his site.
Roll Call Vote on Amendment. 5: Ayes, Commissioner ` VOTE ON AMENDMENT '
Still berg, Nay. MOTION carried. MOTION CARRIED
Motion by Commissioner ZyllA to add Condition No. 141 ` re-
quiring the. north 'Face and elevation of Building 'A' 'to be,
designed and finished with oomparaale and compatible mater-
Ia:is. The Motion .died for lack of second.
Flanning Commission =Minutes
September 244 1957
Sohn. ri g th -tated *-he des gr tl et :ea` ' c rrd n
ated" with like-oolors and like -Style and the buildings wrap
around, 15 f t* to the F acksi de with b ck; and, f Inayx : al
consideration,,.; make it infeasible to, have the entire north
face finished like the south face.
MOTION by, Co"niss;aoner Wire, seconded by Commissioner MOTION 1"OAMEND
Marofsky to Amend toe Min Motion to ehange Condition No.
12. as follows. "The rooftop equipment on Building A shall
be visually screened to effectively buffer noise so that it,
i, not t-eaasm;ttted beyond the boundaries of the property so"
to be perceptible in the abutting residential zoning;
district.- istri t.
RollRollCall Vote on Amendment. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Chairman Steigerwald called a Recess at 1000 P.M. RECESS
Chairman Steigexwald introducer the request by Hamel Build - VARIANCE 'fiRON THE
ing Center. Reading the hep Member 16, 1987 s taf f report AN. DEYE1 OPlNT
was waivedti POLICY AND TO EXPAND
A NON-CONFORMINC USE
Chairman Ste: gcrwald introduced Mr. Russel Bowley who state FOR HANEL BUILDING
he would answer any questions for the Commission. Mr COTTER (8705
Bbuley stated the building Will be for storage. of building
supplies only. There is no need for water or sewer to the
building, .
o -sided shedvCommissionerVireinquiredifthiswerean !nqp
Mr Bouley stated thv building is fully enclosed, there will
b some exposed storage area ender t1he overhang.,,
Comtssi.oner Marofsky, confirmed that the Commission would,
rer loy the site plan if this variance is ,approved;
Commissioner Stulberg confirmed that when this property was.
rezoned to. ERD (future: restricted development) €, om I-1
planned industrial), this business became a non -conforming,
use.
Director' Tremere stated that the zoning was changed to con-
form to the facet that the .site is not served by public Uivyer
and water.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner NOTION. TO APPROVE
Stulberg to recommend approval for the Variance from the- heUrbanUrbanpevelopmettPolicyand; Variance to ekpand a on-- on-
forminsg Uwe, subject to the conditions as listed in the
September "1, 1987 s°taff "report and on the basis as cited in,
Condition No, 1, striking the words.: "and the non -conforming
land use provisions as stated in Section U of .the Plymouth'
Zoning Ordinance" in- Condition No. 1,.
omnis iorv.:r Marof sky s to ted this plan is beneficial to the
City by ;improving the site.
VOTE 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE _ .NOTION CJIitRXED
Paw
an n omsIon nu.e
tember 24, 196
Lot onsol 1-dationlLot Derision and Variance for Robert'; -and JRT & HARD'
vary o f deferred the request the petitioner and ILIM!NP
m ensuv. rs , oi*_n op-at the.. -a
the meet Ing
request by Loma ne . ha r an gerwa . n oduoed the ` LOT CON MATI
Mayer, Reading ` of she eptemher 1 1987 staff report was LOT I)TV- M_ AND
waived. VARIAMM POR
L A ER'1
33 n a .e, 400 PL ev w Lane, ,s party to the o
o iso da n v s on and Inqu -ed aboutItem,- No V,- of
h,Engineer, s Memorandum chairman Steigerwa1d, sated his
s 'a question of safety Measures a-,, noted b. the nq°neer nq
apart t,
MOTION by Commitzsioner Paubaeconded by Commissioner, Wire MOTION, TO APPROVE
o 'recommend approval for the Lot Consolida ionCLot b vis on
and U wian e for Lorraine: E. layer s ab 0 :o the
conditions I zsted in :the September 91 1987 staff report.
oarr OE - MOTION EMOTION
ha"rman eig rwald Introduced- the oqu, by Be.: n GIS. DEVEOPMEW
e , lop ent o to Plan apd ar aanoe for Ber sh ;re Office SITE PSN
Park.. Reading of the September 91 1957 staff report. was VARI? E 7 39R
waived*
Mr, avid Peterson.4 introduced himself as the veidor o the .
property and the zeprosentarive for Hew-Lyn Ince
I,
reqBegin), petitlonor stated his concern regat 1n41 the,
additional 20 f t., of right-of-wady the City is requirioq,
since the plat has- already been approved..
nqi. eer° Sweeney s:abed. hat the p a d was . appr ve z a number
of yeas ago and -ti .t es wer. e par ia. y AStalle bud nc t
accepted by , the by', dor tt a n efYa toe rid e $r ee 'h4s' A t
begin con,' r:do d to pian., S4 nee the plat approval,.: the re-
q reme c r the additional W ft:. of right-of-way rias
dife y a traffic stud autoredr wh a re
guiding applica on from this property owner it ' was,
cdfrmd a tht tirio there,was, not suff.cntgh-of
w he ra: udy : on m + d the s` . e pari uses
jc
s
ng
The s`tdy wad, ae. ' rera erred aqc n traffic-,.
consu ta with anQ her development proposal* The proper
t developed as toned, would ma the improvements
necessary, and. fall r ht- o _-way Would, be requ`lred for- the
lnersector The aft c?3su anoed c c neoes '.
s that the id lanes` on Anna o Lar e south ofy ,ra
County Road' ',, align with traffzc 'lands north of County load
paners:re Lane
ss io M, 'lutes
Mar hrman reviewedthe,dee open` proposal T'h ,are
r"net -with, 'tete impac h a do
t 1 e ear n th .s regoxring,
p y"may p ry _ irte}s o in squaro-Tp C,Ti
min *y'.g gy
r+'.lj-
l.t .n zA"a'B+e RR S+ of d+ll ento +, to l.t i 4:Kr
4AL `f.;e "` i41.*Rx 4 4 %.F. L:rv},'; 4t h en 1.+ i;ji 't he pro r l' e,i<,
st ed. the property way pat cd 9 with, an va vatlon.
the tr f i o , w -° at ha time#. `here "wa - r
n r t o wa c red °for tshe not and south ides
c n y load The nc" r has p -ated out that there
wa.s ., varianc where `easeme s to p There
no.,, -faultbl to bettt la el he', proper, y c w n r
y
a}} l
ffyyy
r
ryA
from
citK` 4t t.` Y T r } t SF : cam a X p lataPd n, 4:n ,r^
then*t al.devc op n ac rce eats* Future d. elopers milst
be able to rely : on thosidns. There is a que'Stloft of
po, bhe c r t r.men s, CI he ty' , n
die ti g stod that w ` h t,h $e gnlfirant fes ur, issue
how the ;goad 11 he prcvi ed. should e `passed on to the
City -C )(ouru,41 with renst, f reo-ons - era ion by the
o ne develop r and Ut stat' .
stad r q t ted the . 0 n ition No be luod. le.c o
refledt 'tha cry emoranm an,
not, be ddr s ed r t o t ddlt o na r,view.,
44". ; r Be in said the petit .one, wood hove to ac 20,
tha h .tet f this:- ` ppc*d
yjj,.h'
r}}))
jrcoommejiMed fi.
Ch-aintan St or..ST4ld stat the lUt+.a..+N' ii-kd would',make 4 i.a':,43.
reci}t rqq riy;r[
ytdy
t{
yensa
t} the
7 i-
c tnca l who wou.d determine tihe
t{
a'
Ls ldel AJ ;S 'Y R. {x .fit i tw o R -wa It
MOT T K by Charman tc er ra d, seconded.by Commis ioiner j(M, TO MPMI 1
e to r end approv fdr the to 3 an and Varl. nce
forecn Dvccpment uecty to the condlcns fisted In
he September: staff reportsang` be 00noerns and
ob eat-dns o the Ea ine r's' te.orandum; ands rtin' ha -
re lardl ' . Condition .. the City' clUn Mould de c`r
ml e 'the,necessity for adoitlorol right -df -way, for Perk hi>~e
Vt T `. DTT ea ried , 07 CAR iI D .
Che r iah :rwal d Introddced , the regoes't auk a 1<A1 tE i_AUfC3 A
t lopmf . cad ri of° the ,,Sep- emb 1, 9 sCaff ,report LA WA Ui 1,ELOPl.NT
f:. was wa., ad K P
ASU SART FOR
Chairman ex, wald In -d ed Peter .rvls, retar:esent n t LAC` MtlitT.
the pet..onerTTI moi.
sir*rvs staffed hb.;ctzsns t th`e .tndnxrs`: PAWS LARGEi
t
7,03
Page- MI
Pianning Commission invtes
September ZZ 1
Mr Javvis- a Sevils e,d tail Si Ia can show all
7 y v(_y g/ {rysyy d/Y
ytated
t.
D rentor Tremere oonfirmed hoz Chairman tei erwa d that]
xegardLeig the 3rd Addition* CondI tion, NP1.1 19 of` the pre iro
unary plat approval required the add tion o private open
space aid the Citi Council" s, Intent was than .
would be located east of the pondnj area. There is land
that tbar the t o c ;L land area for the tot dot
Mr, larvas disagreed, with Director Tremerots statements that
Chas was :the intent of tKe Couna-1 as regia is It.
He a ssioner Marofsk r stated has concern about relocating
the tot lob. closer to County Road 6(on the `east side of the
drag nage ponds that seem to be as dangerous 4 stting it .
a :the end C? the eu d - a Relocating :she cn lot
further,to the south, does not rake art central or safer
MOTION ,by Comm ssloner Maro sky seconded key oMmIssionler T i T 3' t€Rt V
P, p. to repo ne d ap. rova for the PUD Final Plat for PUP RIM, PIAT
Laukka Devolopment for barkers Lake North- 3rd Addlt .nnl WERE LAKE 30
subject to the conch tions related to the final Plat zth the TTON 036)
delet on of, nd,tio 3 0, U.
I
d., ifTt, Ayes,10TI N carried.,
Discussion ,ensued about the 4th Addition regard'xn the yard
setbacks and draAna.e utility easements. Concern was
expressed that the final plat and ,pian as submitted were not.
totally; consisten` with the approved prey €a nark plat mater M
Diteotor. TreMere explained that the In4ineering Department's
oonoer s` ` and the reason. for Cond ition No. 14- Approval: of
the proposed plat wlOi the lot lines will ere -ate multiple
parcels and entirely newtelationships concerning structural ,
setbacks and easetnents
Mr.. Lary aukstated they could work with staff.o
resolve these concerns b developing largtaace n theome-
owl.nrger ,of'a a{tion, dofou}ery nty{s. that would assure the coon
eRI
Sh rs?, l_v-, V '1 pave#Rd.. k[I-i.+ x/a
MOTION by UI`t11fiM saFQner
da11
re, seconded by Commissioner MTTON Til; AP ROVIE..
to ber to: reeor rttend approval for the FUD Firia. Plat dor I.AT FOR
Lanka Development for Parkers _{Lake Porth th , Addition OR _L C P.WM;
subject tcthe o nd , ons n the sta report- there shoed 4THADDITION 0710