Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 09-24-1986CITY OF:: -PLYMOUTH PWNING Cotiffs OINUTES R98$ The Regular Meeting o f the Plymouth Planning Commission was ea "ed to order at 7:30 POM PRE-SENT- Chairman Steigerwold, Commissioners' Stu t ergj 'Magnus, ; Mellen and Pauha WEIS ABSENT Commissio ers Wire and lu aMEP STAFF PRESENT-.- Community Development' Coordinator Sara onn City Engineer Sherm Goldberg C" Planning Secretary Grace Wineman I" MOTION by Commissioner Pauha, seconded by Commissioner HOTION TO APPROVE tulberg to approve the September 10, 1986 Minutes as submitted., VDT. Ayes, Commissioners f eliln 1.1agnu6 abstained. VOTE-,- MOTIORCARRIED I MOTION 'oarried. ISS WARINGS ha rm ] tergerwa d introduced the application by Perkins PERKINS FAMILY Family ftestaurants,,for expansion -of the restaurant at 2945 WSTAUI mpire ,ane. Read ng o the Sept mhos° 'r 9 Staf deport TTS USF was waived-I PERMIT,,$ITE PLS A VARIANCE 861,01 Chairman Steigerwald introduced Lanny M. Redden, repre ent - Wq the petitim. fir. Redden had questions regarding the need for traffic deliAeatorsCoordinator mcconn noted the intent is to direct traffic and break-up the ; parking ,'lot. She pointed out the areas where the delineators are to he Installed; where the tra f is enters the s te*1 and, .the area designated for partying sem--traller trucks. fir. Redden stated the delineators may cause confusion because of I vzss' tur rig radius for the semi-tragi. er trucks He, stated ,e Is concern that they will he detrimental to snow removal find maintenance during the winter "months. rhajrman tel.gerwa stated 'that contractors doing snow re- moval are familiar' with `these conditions and the delineators will help to control traffic on this site, Nr* redden inquired if si nage could be used in-lleu of the deli- ie,ator I s. Chairman Stleigerwald stated -that perhaps hath s gn -e :and delineators would, be appropriate for this parse Mot. Jfi km Page l Planning ` mmisslon Minutes Septeober 4, 1986 Coordinator McConn stated the delineators, will provide clear d- are ti er bath tr ri -automobiles. Commissioner Magnus inquired if the del, ineators will leave enough room for ;the semi-trailer trucks to turn In the drive aisles. Coordinator McConn stated tfe parking arre4, on the south nearthe transmission teaser is the area used for truck parking, the delineators are located primarily for automobile ic, arae will def lin the traffic circulation. Commissioner Inquired about the type of construction, Coo rdinater .it, #explained the delineators ;are concrete curb and gutter' ino could have plantings <to-'provide green areas. Pyr. Redden stats-ti they de net want to lose six parking spaces to the eensi ruction of delineators. Coordinator McCo to explained this would : net diminish,,the drive as sle I wWth and will : provide better circulation throughout the parking let. Chairman Steigerwald opened she Rubl io Hearing, as there was no one present to speak on the Iters, the Public Hearing was MOTION by ommisstoner Stolberg,, seconded by Commis-sioner, MOTION TO APPROVE Magnus to recommend approval for the Condit .onal Use Permit, Site Plan, , and VaL ianeo for Perkins Fare„ly estaur an s.y subject to the conditions as listed in thol September 10, 1986 Manning taff Report. Roll' Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED 84JSIN SS Chairman Stel.aerwal.d introduced the request by FrWIn Kevin KED' 1:tebbe and reqs-Psted an overview of the September Ut 1986 STOBBE annin Staff Rep6 t y, cord. rotor MoConn* LOT 3 +' yf> f 8pagypy hal.rsman telgerwald stated staff's concern about setting, a. precedent for similar lot divisions Ifn this area would be basis for denial of the application especially when. cons aering net endy at this areas but property around Medicine Lake. Commissioner Mellen , stated it is hzs opinion that precedent has already been set which makes it hard to any this- petitioner.` He stated, this, proposal could significantly improve the prdperty. Chairman, St it c wald stated the Commission. Mees not ocns d r ecdnomios, but wondered, i the land cost requires the construction of an cxpn-, yhome* Mr, St bbc answered affirmatively. Chairman Steigerwald stated that it is ` his opinion th a s a reasonab le use of the land,, -%eatin two of or anI 'm rather than for m the VOP rt Owner, # build one large expensive home.: Commissioner Stulberg Inquired if Mr. Stobbc is the property owner, Mr. St bbc stated they haVP- ars option on the property, Chairman Steigerw ld stated that anyone with an interest in the property would want to present the same proposal. Commissioner padba stated this Is a unique area, and there' are advantages in. allowing this request which far outweigh the negative aspects' Comm-ssiondt Mullen, asked Mr, Stob e if the owner of, adjoining property signed his petition? Mr. Stobbc answered MOTION, by Commissioner paub'a seconded by Chairman MTION TO APPROVE. Ste% erw.ald to recommend approval for the Lot Division, and Varianc-es. for Erwin and, Kevin Stobba,subject to the co it os s as listed its the September 11986 Planning Staff Report-, The proposal as submitted will be a` sig ift cant improvement to this property. Cote. 5 Ayes, MOTION carried. vt, , CARKIED, Page Planning Commission Minutes September,f 1986 Chairman Steig rwald introduced the request by Paul PAUL S01OHALA Suemaia. This application was considered at the August,1 , PRUI141WY PLAT 1956 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission 86076) deferred action and directed redesign for she private drive Reading o" the September 16,; 19 86 P! ing" Staff Reportwas waived* Chairman St i e waid introduced Greg Frank, McCombs -Knutson, As oolates, representing ; the petitioner. Mr. Frank discus- sed the topography On this property noting that°the ,? grade males it unfeasible to access both Lots `i and 2 to inewood aie as recommended for the redesign* He explained also, that snow removal and storage would be hindered by a nearby ` swimming pool; there would be loss of vegetation- ' and, Mr. Suoa ala's home would face the drive. Commissioner Pauba inquired about the grade to 6th Avenue Month. Mr,. Frank stated this area shows a less than de. graDiscussion included using a 'IT" drivew y tnth Avenue. Coordinator McCann explained that a ,simI r oortdition imas required for property on County Road 15, to prevent backing out onto the County load. Mrs Frani~ agreed this would be a reasonable solution. MOTION by Chairman Stei.gerwa.ld, seconded. by Commissioner MT10N TO APPROVE Stu1berg to recommend approval of the F'r liminary plat for Paul Suomajaj, subject; to the conditions listed in the September i , 1956 Planning Staff Report, adding the follow-. ing language to Condition Gln* 9-a; private drive access ,shall be a 'IT" layout to prevent vehicles from back- ing out onto 6th Avenue Nortb.. OTCAyes MOTION c rra d. HOTION CARRIEDiA O7 NF Coordinator 1 dCnnn discussed- the eight Grdi.nar oe Amendments to be reviewed at the October 81 1386 Planning Commission meeting. it w4js determined the October ZZs 1986 meeting would begin with business items being discussed at 6130 P#M, , ; with the d sousstonOf the Alpha Human Services commencing at 8 -.00 M.