HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 09-24-1986CITY OF:: -PLYMOUTH
PWNING Cotiffs OINUTES
R98$
The Regular Meeting o f the Plymouth Planning Commission was
ea "ed to order at 7:30 POM
PRE-SENT- Chairman Steigerwold, Commissioners'
Stu t ergj 'Magnus, ; Mellen and Pauha
WEIS ABSENT Commissio ers Wire and lu aMEP
STAFF PRESENT-.- Community Development' Coordinator
Sara onn
City Engineer Sherm Goldberg
C" Planning Secretary Grace Wineman
I"
MOTION by Commissioner Pauha, seconded by Commissioner HOTION TO APPROVE
tulberg to approve the September 10, 1986 Minutes as
submitted.,
VDT. Ayes, Commissioners f eliln 1.1agnu6 abstained. VOTE-,- MOTIORCARRIED
I
MOTION 'oarried.
ISS WARINGS
ha rm ] tergerwa d introduced the application by Perkins PERKINS FAMILY
Family ftestaurants,,for expansion -of the restaurant at 2945 WSTAUI
mpire ,ane. Read ng o the Sept mhos° 'r 9 Staf deport TTS USF
was waived-I PERMIT,,$ITE PLS
A VARIANCE 861,01
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Lanny M. Redden, repre ent -
Wq the petitim. fir. Redden had questions regarding the
need for traffic deliAeatorsCoordinator mcconn noted the
intent is to direct traffic and break-up the ; parking ,'lot.
She pointed out the areas where the delineators are to he
Installed; where the tra f is enters the s te*1 and, .the area
designated for partying sem--traller trucks. fir. Redden
stated the delineators may cause confusion because of I vzss'
tur rig radius for the semi-tragi. er trucks He, stated ,e
Is concern that they will he detrimental to snow removal find
maintenance during the winter "months.
rhajrman tel.gerwa stated 'that contractors doing snow re-
moval are familiar' with `these conditions and the delineators
will help to control traffic on this site,
Nr* redden inquired if si nage could be used in-lleu of the
deli- ie,ator
I
s. Chairman Stleigerwald stated -that perhaps hath
s gn -e :and delineators would, be appropriate for this
parse Mot.
Jfi km
Page l
Planning ` mmisslon Minutes
Septeober 4, 1986
Coordinator McConn stated the delineators, will provide clear
d- are ti er bath tr ri -automobiles.
Commissioner Magnus inquired if the del, ineators will leave
enough room for ;the semi-trailer trucks to turn In the drive
aisles. Coordinator McConn stated tfe parking arre4, on the
south nearthe transmission teaser is the area used for
truck parking, the delineators are located primarily for
automobile ic, arae will def lin the traffic circulation.
Commissioner Inquired about the type of construction,
Coo rdinater .it, #explained the delineators ;are concrete
curb and gutter' ino could have plantings <to-'provide green
areas.
Pyr. Redden stats-ti they de net want to lose six parking
spaces to the eensi ruction of delineators. Coordinator
McCo to explained this would : net diminish,,the drive as sle
I
wWth and will : provide better circulation throughout the
parking let.
Chairman Steigerwald opened she Rubl io Hearing, as there was
no one present to speak on the Iters, the Public Hearing was
MOTION by ommisstoner Stolberg,, seconded by Commis-sioner, MOTION TO APPROVE
Magnus to recommend approval for the Condit .onal Use Permit,
Site Plan, , and VaL ianeo for Perkins Fare„ly estaur an s.y
subject to the conditions as listed in thol September 10,
1986 Manning taff Report.
Roll' Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
84JSIN SS
Chairman Stel.aerwal.d introduced the request by FrWIn Kevin KED'
1:tebbe and reqs-Psted an overview of the September Ut 1986 STOBBE
annin Staff Rep6 t y, cord. rotor MoConn* LOT 3 +'
yf> f 8pagypy
hal.rsman telgerwald stated staff's concern about setting, a.
precedent for similar lot divisions Ifn this area would be
basis for denial of the application especially when.
cons aering net endy at this areas but property around
Medicine Lake.
Commissioner Mellen , stated it is hzs opinion that precedent
has already been set which makes it hard to any this-
petitioner.` He stated, this, proposal could significantly
improve the prdperty.
Chairman, St it c wald stated the Commission. Mees not ocns d r
ecdnomios, but wondered, i the land cost requires the
construction of an cxpn-, yhome* Mr, St bbc answered
affirmatively. Chairman Steigerwald stated that it is ` his
opinion th a s a reasonab le use of the land,, -%eatin two
of or anI 'm rather than for m the VOP rt Owner, #
build one large expensive home.:
Commissioner Stulberg Inquired if Mr. Stobbc is the property
owner, Mr. St bbc stated they haVP- ars option on the
property, Chairman Steigerw ld stated that anyone with an
interest in the property would want to present the same
proposal.
Commissioner padba stated this Is a unique area, and there'
are advantages in. allowing this request which far outweigh
the negative aspects'
Comm-ssiondt Mullen, asked Mr, Stob e if the owner of,
adjoining property signed his petition? Mr. Stobbc answered
MOTION, by Commissioner paub'a seconded by Chairman MTION TO APPROVE.
Ste% erw.ald to recommend approval for the Lot Division, and
Varianc-es. for Erwin and, Kevin Stobba,subject to the
co it os s as listed its the September 11986 Planning
Staff Report-, The proposal as submitted will be a` sig
ift
cant improvement to this property.
Cote. 5 Ayes, MOTION carried. vt, , CARKIED,
Page
Planning Commission Minutes
September,f 1986
Chairman Steig rwald introduced the request by Paul PAUL S01OHALA
Suemaia. This application was considered at the August,1 , PRUI141WY PLAT
1956 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission 86076)
deferred action and directed redesign for she private
drive Reading o" the September 16,; 19 86 P! ing" Staff
Reportwas waived*
Chairman St i e waid introduced Greg Frank, McCombs -Knutson,
As oolates, representing ; the petitioner. Mr. Frank discus-
sed the topography On this property noting that°the ,?
grade males it unfeasible to access both Lots `i and 2 to
inewood aie as recommended for the redesign* He explained
also, that snow removal and storage would be hindered by a
nearby ` swimming pool; there would be loss of vegetation- '
and, Mr. Suoa ala's home would face the drive.
Commissioner Pauba inquired about the grade to 6th Avenue
Month. Mr,. Frank stated this area shows a less than
de. graDiscussion included using a 'IT" drivew y tnth
Avenue.
Coordinator McCann explained that a ,simI r oortdition imas
required for property on County Road 15, to prevent backing
out onto the County load.
Mrs Frani~ agreed this would be a reasonable solution.
MOTION by Chairman Stei.gerwa.ld, seconded. by Commissioner MT10N TO APPROVE
Stu1berg to recommend approval of the F'r liminary plat for
Paul Suomajaj, subject; to the conditions listed in the
September i , 1956 Planning Staff Report, adding the follow-.
ing language to Condition Gln* 9-a; private drive
access ,shall be a 'IT" layout to prevent vehicles from back-
ing out onto 6th Avenue Nortb..
OTCAyes MOTION c rra d. HOTION CARRIEDiA
O7 NF
Coordinator 1 dCnnn discussed- the eight Grdi.nar oe Amendments
to be reviewed at the October 81 1386 Planning Commission
meeting.
it w4js determined the October ZZs 1986 meeting would begin
with business items being discussed at 6130 P#M, , ; with the
d sousstonOf the Alpha Human Services commencing at 8 -.00
M.