Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 06-25-1986CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLMINIM COMIN MINUTES etinq of the Plymouth planaltiq Comissiorl W4$, alled to order at 7- 130- PM. t chat steiqerwalc Commissioners mci, , c berg lijfk aid auba Comissioner Mellen arrived : 34 P, M. W.WItS,ABSENT-* Comilssioner Wire Devel m- ; ,tai. CoordinatorSTAFF , RERT; ComV{e k pa un/a,ty R +, fiY 1u 4dP RF ikL# City in term Goldberg PlAnninq Secretaryract 1' inert r) M0110 F Commissioner €o ib j oo ded by om 16 1 -r WONAPPROVEA ulborq to approve e June Ii t 1,980 Minim ,is suboil ted, VOTE. 5 Aye's, MOTION carried. MOTION CARRIM MLIC WARN Chalrman Stelgerwald introdwed the, application gay `.01M.B. f4. . Cts* omp an and requested an, v r v jai° the 3une 1 , 1,986 Staff AL USE Report byCoordinator MoConn. PERMIT : OUT_ SIDE STOWL (84060Y T, stetwerw4UL 1_,fjqut'1*A _0t 10-Sate11ite 1-0-h AM J-11 a located* Coordinator MoCona sated it, would on the south. side of the;bul Idinq. Chairman,Steigerwald Intro(juced Mrs. Grant peq a rr4 representinq Company. Mr. )t q rard stated the staff report cover -s all the dotalt s, Fie pointed, wvthat theupkink, truck placement is r c c rr flat-bed truck with an. antenna. They haw a six month permlt from the, rederal ommunct. ions mmi s n (FCC) , and can renew the permit for another six months. They are oons4dering, a permanent tristallatioft on the vooft p of their faallity and the truck, i. s M ' bahe f:i'k3- 'k,1..Cii3sta .i i 41,.G bri ).# :•i V !I,. Fa t cannot ; aftswer on the wattage. Technictuts will w l l the Fuipm nt n will b th '+ out with h F C assure there are no p r lm , 4r Page I fi rman Ste erwa d : o d the application by Truck" OLLIHS Pats & Service,-, Inc. for ii Conditional Use Permit for re- TRUCK PARTS &` S`rm tail sales in toe Industrial District. Readingof the dune CON TIONAL 1'6 1984 Staff Report was waived* PERMIT (86062) Chairman telgenvald introduced Mr* Steve Kolllnsl. the petitioner. r" Kollins had no questions or comments. Chairman St igerwald opened the Public Rearm l there was no one present to speak on this .Item, the Public Hearing was olosed omoisslon.er Pauba noted the petitioner, relates that there w III be 1 retail _ sales and inquired how this equates n the number of people and vehicles. Mr. K olllns stated that 1 Is approximately $90¢000 In sales monthly. and equites to- 1,18 persons per, day* He stated drop-in customers would not be a common occurrence. i omids loner Mellen in uireiJ abotu. the possibility of oil spillage. Mr., of fins stated the facility has a concrete' floor, and a service picks up oil containersonce a week. MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, s,!oonded by Commissioner WTIO TO APPROVE Magnus to recommend approval for the Conditional ase Permit dor retail sales in the Industrial District for Truck ?arts Service, Inc., subject to the conditions as listed In the Juni- 16, 1986 Planning Staff Report. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes* MOTION carried* OTE MOTION, CARRIED nallr m n eigge«4.i i-3,.3.d introdue d the app -1»l.eatio A Rudolph ` ilL."€ MART Marti, J & R Pizza, for a Goodin anal, Use Permrmit to operate 3 & R PIZZA a Class It restaurant with delivery and p1ok-up service. CONDITIONAL USE Reading oto dunes f8 to Report. was aved. PERMIT $606" Chairman Stet erwald Introduced fir. Marti who had no, questions or comments,* Mr`,, Marti identified tete delivery area which is outlined *.n his narrat ve Chairman Steiger ald opened the Public Hearing, as "there was no one present to speak on this = ,em, ,the Public Hearing was closed. 1{ TIM by Commis, loner Pl f a, seconded by om issionex 4OT TO APPROVE`. Stu0erq to recommend approval for the onditional Ise Per- m*t for Dom roe's .Pizza for Rudolph Mart 11, 3 & RPizzas sub- ject to, the oonditi ns as l fisted lir the Jure 10, 1,986 Plan- ning Rta 7 jSego t a Roll Call Vote. 6, Ayes. MOTION carried, VOTE y- MQTT014 CARRIED 77 P -age 126 Planning Commission Minutes 3 June 251 1986 i OT 'by Commissioner auhal seconded by ommiss nerOX- r TO,APPROVE ulf a to- recommend • approval ; or d t I anal Use P rm t for Robert A, Schmiltt, subject to the conditions listed In a the u e 1 1986 Planning Staff Report and ap ron0 the maximum tower height for 48 ft.); maximum antenna, height for 1.5 ft.. for 4 total height of 4 . ft Commissioner Mellen stated he s opposed to the installation of the tower because of the density in the area,, and, that t will be trim`l to the nolghorhd because of, its j h l ht I Ro ll Call Vote. eyes, Commissioner Mellen, Nay. MOTION OTE TIOCARRIED carried., Chairman to alLLQ al:d tntroduced 'th application by Craig CRAIC SCHERSER So herb r ,-zoning and ' re,lim0 r plat n s' CO P , d ~th r x td n n r ,i n h n 0,, 1986 staff REZONING N report by Coordinator Mc onn. HI RT 660&8) Chairman ttA e-rwd1d introduced Iir. Tom Loucks, re reser-ting the pe'itid ier. Mr . Loucks had no questions but stated he had read the staff" report and agrees that the application complies, with the City's requirements and standards'. Chairman Steigerwaldopened the Public Hearing. rry Fischer, 4630 FernbroukI stated hC4 is concerned with tt ,, Improvements -to e nbro k Lane and potential ; assessed cost, .. Cit Engineer Goldberg ex laitied F rnbrook Lane will stop- It the south ?ropers line of this ; proposed; develop - went s part of the [Qnc s 't. w Heights development.. Mr. Fischer stated he plans to live on , is property for many Rears to come. He has a greenhouse and wants to roma. rt n rural setting. He stated the roadway assessments woula, he n unfair burden. Ch airman to .c er pald explained that the City Council, is the forum to discuss assessments and Mr.. Fischer siiould make the Council aware of his. concerns. Citi Engineer Goldberg,explained the assessments are based on tete f and the .Land use guiding. hair an tei erwal (,Idsed the Public Heir n Page 127 panning Commission Minutes 2) "966 MOTION, by Commissioner, Stulberg, seconded by CommissionerPPR W Magnus recommend approvall, for the Rezoning, antirali n-' ary Plat for' r h r r for King's North, b to n ; conditionsas listen In the 3une 1% 1986 Planning Staff Report. Roll s. " Barr ec CARRIES Chairman Steigerwald called a 5 minute, reel at 6.43 P.M. RECESS Charman ig rwa °a l d the meeting o order and -ntr0 RR St 0 dared the app a on y Terry Schmid, Aeon Lumber for a UMBER Zoning: Ordinan Amendment* An overview, of the lies 16, ZONING ORDINANCE, Planning Staff Report provided bar Coordinator W - W (84041) McCo fi n .R om s- Chairman Steigerwald tntroduoed,Mr. DaleHamilton.,- McCombs- Kn son Associates representing the pet,Ltiotler. Knutson Chairman Steigerwald pointed out that the only thing being; discussed by theommiss on,, is, the ordinance amendment, net particular site, Page 130 j i i planninq commis,31,04 ut s Juni Z, i Commisslon r Plufkoa concurred that this is a unique parcel, and the proposed development would be an, l appropriate transition o the industriat land that abuts AIs rop rtY% However, t accomplish this by, rdInano amend ent N ou d eliminate unit styles that may be desired ; by potential hum buyers andfuture. residents. Chalrm n Stetgerwa .d roper- t d. that th Plan would be a better presentation for. ia- andt th onin Ordinance Amendment oml ' missioners` lu ka and Pauba, don urred Greg Frank McCombs-Knutson Assootates, stated, their cone rn` is they would be.. .iced into a "'cook io-cut ter" design under the ,- er r art- prd talons Amending the -on-Ing Ordinance could give the developer a better )ohoice and the City would have mord to work ,with as well. Chalrmar. Stolgera ,d opened the- Public f a inn as th r was no, one present to speak on this st mt the Public Nearing was closed. b Com iss onor Mag-nus, seconded by ; Commissioneroner T TCS EN Paul-a, o r com end denial of the Zoning Ordinance. Andmen't in the 'Jun 1986 staff report* for Tne, reasons, cited ) Roll Coil mote. Ayes. MOTION ~ids IT - CARRIED, WW SUISI-WE'l-St Chairman Steigerwald introduced the a pIt"Cation by R.1,,Ryan RYAN CONSTik Co* dnst uotion for Natha i Cabe 5 ociates- Reading of the VARIWEFOR ne 1) Planning Staff' Report N as waived,* HAT LANE TATES 8,607-4) Mr. Tom Ryanf representing the 'petitioner.. explained the variance request that came from an error discovered when, workinq with the survey of the property* MOTION by Comm.s loner ,tulbor , seconded b Commissioner TTON 1 PROVE l.u° ka to reoom6end approval for the Variance for R.3. Ryan Construction for Nathan Lane Associates,,subject to the conditions as sated, in the lane 1,01 1986, staff report. The Cormlission. ooacurred there would he no, other wav other thangranting she arianee request. VOTE. 6 Ayes, NOTION carried,,,,VOTE TION, IE ADJ"NMENTIO The,meeting adjourned at 9143 P.M.