HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 06-25-1986CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLMINIM COMIN MINUTES
etinq of the Plymouth planaltiq Comissiorl W4$,
alled to order at 7-
130-
PM.
t chat steiqerwalc Commissioners
mci, , c berg lijfk aid auba
Comissioner Mellen arrived : 34 P, M.
W.WItS,ABSENT-* Comilssioner Wire
Devel m- ; ,tai. CoordinatorSTAFF , RERT; ComV{e
k
pa
un/a,ty
R +, fiY 1u 4dP RF ikL#
City in term Goldberg
PlAnninq Secretaryract 1' inert r)
M0110 F Commissioner €o ib j oo ded by om 16 1 -r WONAPPROVEA
ulborq to approve e June Ii t 1,980 Minim ,is suboil ted,
VOTE. 5 Aye's, MOTION carried. MOTION CARRIM
MLIC WARN
Chalrman Stelgerwald introdwed the, application gay `.01M.B. f4. . Cts*
omp an and requested an, v r v jai° the 3une 1 , 1,986 Staff AL USE
Report byCoordinator MoConn. PERMIT : OUT_
SIDE STOWL (84060Y
T, stetwerw4UL 1_,fjqut'1*A _0t 10-Sate11ite 1-0-h AM J-11
a located* Coordinator MoCona sated it, would on the south.
side of the;bul Idinq. Chairman,Steigerwald Intro(juced Mrs.
Grant peq a rr4 representinq Company.
Mr. )t q rard stated the staff report cover -s all the
dotalt s, Fie pointed, wvthat theupkink, truck placement is
r c c rr flat-bed truck with an. antenna. They
haw a six month permlt from the, rederal ommunct. ions
mmi s n (FCC) , and can renew the permit for another six
months. They are oons4dering, a permanent tristallatioft on
the vooft p of their faallity and the truck, i. s M '
bahe f:i'k3- 'k,1..Cii3sta .i i 41,.G bri ).# :•i V !I,.
Fa t cannot ; aftswer on the wattage. Technictuts will w l l
the Fuipm nt n will b th '+ out with h F C
assure there are no p r lm ,
4r
Page I
fi rman Ste erwa d : o d the application by Truck" OLLIHS
Pats & Service,-, Inc. for ii Conditional Use Permit for re- TRUCK PARTS &` S`rm
tail sales in toe Industrial District. Readingof the dune CON TIONAL
1'6 1984 Staff Report was waived* PERMIT (86062)
Chairman telgenvald introduced Mr* Steve Kolllnsl. the
petitioner. r" Kollins had no questions or comments.
Chairman St igerwald opened the Public Rearm l there was
no one present to speak on this .Item, the Public Hearing was
olosed
omoisslon.er Pauba noted the petitioner, relates that there
w III be 1 retail _ sales and inquired how this equates
n the number of people and vehicles. Mr. K olllns stated
that 1 Is approximately $90¢000 In sales monthly. and
equites to- 1,18 persons per, day* He stated drop-in customers
would not be a common occurrence.
i
omids loner Mellen in uireiJ abotu. the possibility of oil
spillage. Mr., of fins stated the facility has a concrete'
floor, and a service picks up oil containersonce a week.
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, s,!oonded by Commissioner WTIO TO APPROVE
Magnus to recommend approval for the Conditional ase Permit
dor retail sales in the Industrial District for Truck ?arts
Service, Inc., subject to the conditions as listed In the
Juni- 16, 1986 Planning Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes* MOTION carried* OTE MOTION, CARRIED
nallr m n eigge«4.i i-3,.3.d introdue d the app -1»l.eatio A Rudolph ` ilL."€ MART
Marti, J & R Pizza, for a Goodin anal, Use Permrmit to operate 3 & R PIZZA
a Class It restaurant with delivery and p1ok-up service. CONDITIONAL USE
Reading oto dunes f8 to Report. was aved. PERMIT $606"
Chairman Stet erwald Introduced fir. Marti who had no,
questions or comments,*
Mr`,, Marti identified tete delivery area which is outlined *.n
his narrat ve
Chairman Steiger ald opened the Public Hearing, as "there was
no one present to speak on this = ,em, ,the Public Hearing was
closed.
1{ TIM by Commis, loner Pl f a, seconded by om issionex 4OT TO APPROVE`.
Stu0erq to recommend approval for the onditional Ise Per-
m*t for Dom roe's .Pizza for Rudolph Mart 11, 3 & RPizzas sub-
ject to, the oonditi ns as l fisted lir the Jure 10, 1,986 Plan-
ning Rta 7 jSego t a
Roll Call Vote. 6, Ayes. MOTION carried, VOTE y- MQTT014 CARRIED
77
P -age 126
Planning Commission Minutes 3
June 251 1986 i
OT 'by Commissioner auhal seconded by ommiss nerOX-
r
TO,APPROVE
ulf a to- recommend • approval ; or d t
I anal Use P rm t
for Robert A, Schmiltt, subject to the conditions listed In a
the u e 1 1986 Planning Staff Report and ap ron0 the
maximum tower height for 48 ft.); maximum antenna, height for
1.5 ft.. for 4 total height of 4 . ft
Commissioner Mellen stated he s opposed to the installation
of the tower because of the density in the area,, and, that
t will be trim`l to the nolghorhd because of, its j
h l ht I
Ro ll Call Vote. eyes, Commissioner Mellen, Nay. MOTION OTE TIOCARRIED
carried.,
Chairman to alLLQ al:d tntroduced 'th application by Craig CRAIC SCHERSER
So herb r ,-zoning and ' re,lim0 r plat n s' CO P ,
d ~th r x td n n r ,i n h n 0,, 1986 staff REZONING N
report by Coordinator Mc onn. HI RT
660&8)
Chairman ttA e-rwd1d introduced Iir. Tom Loucks, re reser-ting
the pe'itid ier. Mr . Loucks had no questions but stated he
had read the staff" report and agrees that the application
complies, with the City's requirements and standards'.
Chairman Steigerwaldopened the Public Hearing.
rry Fischer, 4630 FernbroukI stated hC4 is concerned with
tt ,, Improvements -to e nbro k Lane and potential ; assessed
cost, .. Cit Engineer Goldberg ex laitied F rnbrook Lane will
stop- It the south ?ropers line of this ; proposed; develop -
went s part of the [Qnc s 't. w Heights development.. Mr.
Fischer stated he plans to live on , is property for many
Rears to come. He has a greenhouse and wants to roma. rt n
rural setting. He stated the roadway assessments woula, he
n unfair burden.
Ch airman to .c er pald explained that the City Council, is the
forum to discuss assessments and Mr.. Fischer siiould make the
Council aware of his. concerns.
Citi Engineer Goldberg,explained the assessments are based
on tete f and the .Land use guiding.
hair an tei erwal (,Idsed the Public Heir n
Page 127
panning Commission Minutes
2) "966
MOTION, by Commissioner, Stulberg, seconded by CommissionerPPR W
Magnus recommend approvall, for the Rezoning, antirali n-'
ary Plat for' r h r r for King's North, b to n ;
conditionsas listen In the 3une 1% 1986 Planning Staff
Report.
Roll s. " Barr ec CARRIES
Chairman Steigerwald called a 5 minute, reel at 6.43 P.M. RECESS
Charman ig rwa °a l d the meeting o order and -ntr0 RR St 0
dared the app a on y Terry Schmid, Aeon Lumber for a UMBER
Zoning: Ordinan Amendment* An overview, of the lies 16, ZONING ORDINANCE,
Planning Staff Report provided bar Coordinator W - W (84041)
McCo fi n .R
om s- Chairman Steigerwald tntroduoed,Mr. DaleHamilton.,- McCombs-
Kn son Associates representing the pet,Ltiotler. Knutson
Chairman Steigerwald pointed out that the only thing being;
discussed by theommiss on,, is, the ordinance amendment, net
particular site,
Page 130
j
i
i
planninq commis,31,04 ut s
Juni Z,
i
Commisslon r Plufkoa concurred that this is a unique parcel,
and the proposed development would be an,
l
appropriate
transition o the industriat land that abuts AIs rop rtY%
However, t accomplish this by, rdInano amend ent N ou d
eliminate unit styles that may be desired ; by potential hum
buyers andfuture. residents. Chalrm n Stetgerwa .d roper-
t d. that th Plan would be a better presentation for.
ia- andt th onin Ordinance Amendment oml '
missioners` lu ka and Pauba, don urred
Greg Frank McCombs-Knutson Assootates, stated, their cone rn`
is they would be.. .iced into a "'cook io-cut ter" design under
the ,- er r art- prd talons Amending the -on-Ing
Ordinance could give the developer a better )ohoice and the
City would have mord to work ,with as well.
Chalrmar. Stolgera ,d opened the- Public f a inn as th r was
no, one present to speak on this st mt the Public Nearing was
closed.
b Com iss onor Mag-nus, seconded by ; Commissioneroner T TCS EN
Paul-a, o r com end denial of the Zoning Ordinance. Andmen't
in the 'Jun 1986 staff report* for Tne, reasons, cited )
Roll Coil mote. Ayes. MOTION ~ids IT - CARRIED,
WW SUISI-WE'l-St
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the a pIt"Cation by R.1,,Ryan RYAN CONSTik Co*
dnst uotion for Natha i Cabe 5 ociates- Reading of the VARIWEFOR
ne 1) Planning Staff' Report N as waived,* HAT LANE TATES
8,607-4)
Mr. Tom Ryanf representing the 'petitioner.. explained the
variance request that came from an error discovered when,
workinq with the survey of the property*
MOTION by Comm.s loner ,tulbor , seconded b Commissioner TTON 1 PROVE
l.u° ka to reoom6end approval for the Variance for R.3. Ryan
Construction for Nathan Lane Associates,,subject to the
conditions as sated, in the lane 1,01 1986, staff report.
The Cormlission. ooacurred there would he no, other wav other
thangranting she arianee request.
VOTE. 6 Ayes, NOTION carried,,,,VOTE TION, IE
ADJ"NMENTIO
The,meeting adjourned at 9143 P.M.