Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 04-23-1986CIS f PLYMOUTH PLANNING O IS T L 1986, Th e Regular Meeting ,of the PlYmnu h Planning Comission was called; 'to order a P.M* Yzcd Charman 'Pa,, Commissioners Wire, Magnust Plufka, and Mellen. HCWF_RSASSENT:, Chairman Steigerwald Commissioner Stulberg STAFF PRESENT-, Community Development Coordinator Sara Occnn Asslst4ntCity Enqineer,John Sweeney Planning Secretary Grace Winem n WNSENT AGENDA, MOTION by Commissioner , Pluf a, seconded by CommissloneT CONSENT ACENDA Mellen to recommend pproval for tete Consent ;agenda VOTE: ; eyes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIEft 141UTS 1I -IO fymm sl ner p u ka seconded Commissioner M—E O Mellen o recommend approval of the April , 1986 Planning APRIL 9 19$6 Commission Minutes as submitted, VOTE: 4 ayes. Commi abstained. 1TI MTTO CARRIEDTE carrled PUBLIC HEINC5 Vice Chairman 1 au a introduced the application by Hars ad HARSTAD, COd ANTES Companies and requ<sted ; an overview of the April. %1 1966 OHOEpT PLAN. staff report by Coordinator, conn.''ELIMINMY PLANIPLA` REZ%41NG AND, Commissioner M-agaus inquired if the plans had been sent to, COWTIONAL U$E the Minnz dta Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Co- PMOT (801114), ordinator McConn stated J-InDOT has reviewed the; plans' and nespermitsarerequiredto` do the work.Comm' ssioner Magnus stated his concern about noise problems for ' the proposed m famll an s clos c 1-04- and inquired about noise' abatement proe dure * He noted the ; plans did not include much inthe way of lands,,apxngl He is oonQerned about the n iso and visual impact* oordina or 4onn noted this iyll,l h vonala, re" du7*inq the review, of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet,eBO and detaileded plans will be submitted at the -time of site plan review* I Briogs Introduced Phyllis Hanson,, Landscape Ar bz t Page 78 Planning ommission Minutes April 1 CoqviiissIoner Ma0us inquired what buildings would be for each qrnup, Mr. P, iggs stated themulti-family units overlookingookin the pond w1th underground garages are, planned fir the older residenta without children. The remaining, units Mould be designated for singles and young cots l.es, They want to have a< gond, mix of rstd n s for the types 0i` musing proposed-, In response to theCommissioner Magnus' concern regarding older people not wanting to live where there are younq children; Mr. Briggs .stated they have read studies, ondu t d$ where It is shown that'the majority of alder citizens (10 want o live ` in areas where there are young people and children. f4s.. Hanson stated the units for the elderly residents wi l: have more, passive, un spaceand wlII not h ' developed with concentrated play areas. ` commissioner, t4lellen inquired''who will provide the mainten- mainten- anceand upkeep for the pl:a rou"d areas. ire Briggs stated4nce the pro oot will have a Homeowner's Association and, as Part of the o rants and bylaws the. residents will maintain these with fees assessed to the h )m owncrs* Commissioner Wire Inquired about the phasing of the project and the completion o the recreational ameAltz s.. Mr. Briggs stated that the upon space and play Melds will be ocnstr et d during the first phase, of d velo ent, u ceps those ,areas around the multi-amtl huildin .: ;At the end o the construction of the single family dw lungs, all parks_ and pia fi ids will he constructed.. He further explained that there is a City Park planned at Mud intake.. Ta r tan P u ka in .c -rod this land is being d d; a d In lieu of cash fees. Coordinator McConn on. 'irm d., th.1s would' he part of the , Park d d.ic;at ons ,the project willbe given credit for U acres whish is above the 100 -Year High beater Level. $he stated that the Park and Recreation Commission has considered this Proposal and supports developing the Citydark a Mud Lake. Ph Uls Manson explained theproject identification sign to Commissioner Plufka, Commissioner Wire inquired if Harr- tad Companies will hu ld on on -quarter of the lots , al l in one sectioa of, the devel- opment; ands inquired about the type of dwelling to he on- struct dd fir. Brigs sated they Will. buil d several cx cn- lqivo ho toss some inedlum prio id and some 'at a lower prig ra n ttirouchout the development. He noted h , unit hype Is similar to- the original plan proposed to December. The park and' open space Plan is much better witch this r;o osal. tie further explained that. the. apartment un ais will ho' sq* f e5` fit•, Planning Commission Minutes April , 1986 o l sszoner Wire, stated he has similar, concerns regardiog the sewer and storm eater drainaget but t is hard to com- ment on potential problems* I if they, occur, it'wilt,be the City's responsibility to solvethem* He stated that in- n - creasedcreasedtraf f Iol roadway Improvements and 'construction comp: with all development. Vice Chairman- Pauba stated development is premature because County Road 611 is not to be completed for some time, to offer further, c .rcul:aticn,. OTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded o ss on Mellen 140 ` O , TO APPRO o._ recommend approval -dor Preliminary Paan Plat, Rezcnzng l N P N andConditional Use ,Permit, subject to the condi ions listed PLATI, IRUONING in the April 101; 1986 staff report., AWCOND TQ. _: OSE 'RMT Commissioner Pluf ka Inquired about the 10% of lots for in- greased lot coverages Coordinator McCann explained that Condition No, 17 requires the 'petitioner to specify, hich lots are, to be Included,, and demonstrate why, it is appropriate* MOTION, by Commissioner ` lPlufka, se aonded by Commissioner MOTION O AMEND Magnus to Amend the Main Motion, to add to Condition No. 17 that no. lots will be considerd for lot coverage where the 25 ft. setback is. reouestea there will be no,lot cover- age in excess of % for any lot that, exceeds 15,000 sq. ft and, no two such lots shalt be adjacent to the other* Roll Call: Vote., 5 Ayes,, NOTION carried VOTE AMENOW TON, CAR UE0 In response to'Commissioner Magnus' concern regarding land - along the freeways the visual impact, noise ,and mags o f the multi -family bu ,ldi gs- Coordinator ' oConn s ta . u that a detailed site plan for the attached housing Is re* qu red by the Or2dlinance, however, design dir otron can h provided at this time. Vice Chairman ',`'auba inquired about the elevation of the buildings from 1-494. Mr. Briggs, stated they will be pro- pose extensive landscaping and will provide detailedled plans for rele He noted that the development will. be cnn- struct,ed In phases. the Qrst phase will be the single family residential area that will take 1 1 i to years, the attached housing will be the second phase acrd r l l take 1 to I Y years, and, the third phase ll he the , apartments that w 11 be constructed in apptoximatel l 1/2 years., ale stated they will Install landscaping with each phase. Rain 'Motion. 4 VOTE MAIN MOTION611CaltVote -`or ,as once Amended. Ayes, Vito Chairman Pauba, Nla -* MOTION, carried. 40 NN. Ail Planning Commission, Minutes April 13,1, 1 86 Vice Chairman u , introduced the appllo tl. n by 3'a ,s* C. PETERSON Peterson Associates for ': it low o adl and requested an ASSOCIATES overvilew of the A ril 7 1,98-6 staff report by Coordinator RUINING,; PRELIMINARY o onnPLAT AND VARIANCE Vice Chairman Paba introduced Mr. James Peterson who stated the main issue is saying the exlstln residenoe. He stated that because of the project size,.'. he cannot absorb the loss of houses He stated the Dlrlam development was con» struoted after thi-5 house and he cannot see any reason for them to lose It Vice, Chairman Pauba Inquired if he had considered mo-ving the home., Mr. Peterson, stated there still woulu be substantial costs involved. Vice Chairman Pauba inquired if it is assumed the residence would i -i, there 'a stipulation for remodeling and fixing up t 4o lie€NteCoordinator McConn stated the home 'a non-oonforming with respect odo c ' and summarized applicable Ordinance rout ion . The con- struct onof newhome would need to beet t w rd nanee standards. Commissioner Wire Inquired who >. coupies tht home* Mrs Peterson stated is the Ar. Raymond Severson. it Landowner, Vice Chairman Rauba opened the Publio earing , r and lrs. Rance a t 49th Avenue o r, Baker inquired about the temporary, cul -die -say; ori the prop- rop- er y and that Assistant City Engineer Sweeney 'had writtenerty t0he, -tlhat the deveflcper:is r pgnsible for removal. 4rm Petersen confirmed this is the case, Mrs Ranee Baker inquired about the berm -Ing planned at the back of his. property, and, whether this w.111 be completed with this development* Coordinator McConn stated the Improvements are to be undertaken as part of the '" ooddale" development, that the City holds financial guarantees For the completion of these improvements- arid, this developers note responsible for any wore to be completed in the ti ood(!ale development. Ass's ant 'City Engineer Sweeney oonfxrmed that the developer will restore the tempuraryt oul-de„--jao area Including the sod Vice Chairman pauba closed the Public Hearing. MOTIONI4 ld 3.rE.fmaJ-r++.x7,5„M" V:K#k414n. Commissioneraa'# lCi 1NOTION APPROVE,. to, recommend approval for the rezoning, preliminary -let, Page 62 Affikk Pl, annin Commi ss ion Hinutes April 21, 1966 the, residence can serve its purpose where, it ist and a nes horse would be constructed within Ordinance previsions, ommissioan r Wire concurred stating that the house appears o be a reasonable structure* Roll, Call Vote. yes. MOTION carried. Mr. Peterson Inquired about Condition No., 12, stating that bermin Is not advantageous and will serve no purpose. He Is willing to landscape along Vicksburg LaneA CoiTmissioner Pl fka stated he is comfortable with this lang- uage and that staff will r-eqqire no more than what is appro- priate and meets Ord nanoe minimums. Vice Chairman Pauba ,Introduced the PUD Amendment. for Parkers l,lf f fFEN BROTHERS U.,A e Development and requested an overview of the April ) CONSTRUCT ON CO. 1986 staff report by Coordinator ReConn., PUD ANEWHENTFOR PARKRS. LAKE V CKS- vice Chairman Paube introduced Michael, P flaum, Lundgren 13URG WEPROPERTY Brothers Construction Com -parry. 'Mr. pflaum stated their, 1aQ3 position is that they are not In control of adjacent land which Is owned by the City of Miineapol.is., they desire to continue devel epment n the Fox, flue area Cor < n evn s had to occur, before further platting of the property, noting the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and: agreements for aoguisAtion of parkland, The tlm .n . of, These events were I not under the control of Lundgren Brothers. They are see - ng to find a remedy within .their control, as the City )O Minneapolis does not wish to accept an obl' ate on dor public improvements_ to the Vicksburg West property: Waiting for the City of Minneapolis is untenable. He explained the ad acent land to the Fox Burr area is back up for sale They need to, construct homes in ;proposed `-'cox faun Mrd AddIition this year, I He explained they etre preparing to record the Fox faun 2nd Addition. They are faced with restrictions on Fox Pun, 3rd, and, the staffs recommendation explains tfrIt the alternate plan does not address 'publlc safety and the need for circulation in this area. It is their opinion the emergency access as pr000sed Is fcasabe. Vice f halrman Pauba opened the Pub -Ii c Hearing., Barry Winston, 16005 Uth avenue Norm inquired about the, location for the temporary t.oadway Mr. Pfl.aum expl.aained that t la a means for emergenoy Vehicles moo' access the Fox faun area from the north. Pauba Public Hearing,, Vie Chairman closed the Pale 83 Planning, 'Commission Minutes. April 5 1986 Coordinator McConn stated that this situation Is, no dif- f er nt than 'other property owners Wattling, for development of adjacent land In order to foster idevelopmen t of their prop- erty.- The temporary emergency access as proposed is not, viable and ;does not address, the area circulation and safety requirements. Commissioner Plufka stated this is not a viable alternat ve . as there would lie snow p o I and mai tena ce problems, it does not have to do with units served, but It the, distance involved. There would be tremendous risk in the advent of a tornado, or other disaster because of the distance these resI'dents would need to travel* Me noted that Lundgren Brothers are good developers and have contributed much to this oommunity* however, this goes beyond where the P1aonin Commission can offer a positive recommendation for approv- a . Vice Chairman Pauba concurred Commissioner Mellen inquired about the period of time It would- take for the City of Minneapolis to resolve th, s.,tu- ation allowing Lundgren Brothers to continue their develop- meat on the west. Commissioner Wire stated other devt4opers face similar problems* Commissioner Pl.ufka stated that the faot--emains that Lundgren Brothers cannot obtain aocsss to Vicksburg Lane with the property they control, and the speed: of development is a major control. He stated the city Cou oil should rove this si tuaticn # but that even an out- let from Yumato Vicksburg Lane would be very circuitous. fi ommi sinner Magnus:concurred and commented shat the Cour« it may know about ether .alternatives to work out a solution, MOTION by Commissioner Magnus,, seconded by Commissioner MCTTOM TO, DEN Plufka to recommend denial of the Planned Unit. Development, Amendment for "Parkers Lake Development - the Vicksburg West Property" for the reasons: as stated In the April 7, 1,956 staff report* The Planning Comm. ission is aware the develop- er, Is constrained due to the situat'ons discussed, but the alternative as presented is not viable and; the City Council should further review these circumstanoeS'* Roll Call Vote„ 4 Ayes. Commissioner Meller, flay. MOTTO! VOTE MOTION CARRIES Carrie , NEW BUSINESS Vice Chairman Pauba introduced the Lot Consolidation, Site KRAUS--ANWRSON TY tan and #ora anc es dor taus ndersc n e alty, o,. and re- FOR HONEYWELL,. MCS. dsya+.n of` the Apra:. '.7 1986 sta,f. report by o T` C .'.` yu9. os}ty /o[v er{view, SITLPLAN AND VARIA S '(8 41 . Commissioner Vire Inquired about the parking and landscap In,0, Coordinator McConn stated deferred parking, has been approved I for other deve.Lopments, but the question here is the insignificant number of parking ,spaces being deferred. V e C air tin pauba Introduced john Sagat, Architect, repre- senting -the pet" tion. MrSagat stated the variance for the canopy is necessary to attain an aesthetic d sign for h and the,oanopy is proportionate to the building; size. To reduce the canopy would weaken the benefit of the building design-. He noted they propose additional -la Instead; of installing, the parking stalls that are. not nodded t this tame) they have more than adequate park Ind for the tenants. tommissioner Plufka, was shown the graphics involving the I canopy designs Commissioner Plufka inquired If in order to meet the Ordinance s.tandardst would this out the canopy In. hlaifl Mrs Sagat st.ated they would lose or the Canopy and showed a diagram of this-- he farther stated the canopy Is, needed to prevent a bo -1 zke :strtlotttiea Commissioner Plufka discussed the building identification and signaqe with Mrs. Sa at. Commissioner Wire stated he I concurs with the canopy design, there are too mare "box s' being, onstritoted,. Commissioner Plufka stated the building plan is aesthetically pleasing, anal ininr esata, the ten ants and visitors will enjoy the protection. MOTIOR, by CommissioneIr Plufka, seoondecr by Vice ChairmaA MOTIONON TO APRPOV Pauba to recommend approval for the Lot Cortsolidationl . Sxte. Plan, and Variances for Kraus -Anderson: Realty Company for l one wel t osob' ct to the conditions as listed in the April. 7, 1986 staff report" with the deletion of Condition Mo, 8, and adding recommended approval for the setback for the canopy on the north side of the building to the adjacent parking area, as requested# for the reason that the uild*Ing will, be more aesthetically -pleasing artd does not inhabit. ng andpedestan ; traffic or their safety between the building the parking ,lot. VOTE # 4 .Ayes.:. Cimm i3sioner 4el .ea abstained., M0'rJOM VOTE - MOTION C.AWlED ROTICM by Commissioner Plufka,. seconded by Commissioner PAUL Sly MO Mellen to recommend approval of Lot Consol<ldation/DivisIon, TCORP", Site Planand, {ar aooe dor Paulormo, Artoc raph, Cor or LOT C SOLIDAT10 ation ;on the Consent Agendas subject to the oonditlons as. I JC D `, $ZTE. P-,LkR l.isted in the April: 71 1986' staff report* AND VAS.*; jT j'# NCF, y'(($ 6+1 8 HOTXO L l i .'1Y ! +. i L M. VOTE* 5, eyes. MOTION oarrIed. VOTE `f ONCWWIEV NOTION, by Comfftissao'ner Plufka seconded by Com;imissioner PN SIAL XNSURANCE Mellen, to recommend approval of the Site Plan or Prudential SITE PLAN FORPHASE insurance Company of Ar er oa on. the Cons; ,nt Agenda, sub eot T d.ACSMP (&6037 condition,.s ,as iSted in.. the Aprtl* . l S staff TION' TO APPROVE . ytyo' y` 5t+ h*e L StN.S:l.3t . VOTE. 5 Ayes. MOTION carr .ed. T TXON C ` ` 0 P1 '14 intesInningtor, 4oission o April 23, 86 BUSINESS Vice C h -at rma n Pauba introduced the application by Craig CRAIG SCHERBER Scherber for "FernbrovHeights" and requested .an overvilevy. P&ZONIN4, PREUMINARY of -the. Aalril 9- 1986 staff, report by Coot*dinatcrl, Mc_Cona,. PtA,.-'AN -, COINDIT10.3ALT0R 1on f 1 rst con - Coordinator McCona stated the 'Planning OommiW USE PERKIT (85097) cider the application on February Uo 1986 and forwar0ed a recommt-ndation for dental*, The C Covaetl cansidered the pent lion:' and referred it back to the Planning Commi ston,. She oented on the Commissionls previous on ern that thecmmI developer be responsible for, transition; and, that the dev- elopment could, become a "small single family residential island", wit'hin, an area guided for higher ,deersity. Vice Chairman,Pauba Introduced 804 Smith, Hedlund Engineer- ith. explained: theng, representing the petitioner. Mr, Smi development proposal,, and$; that the plan saves existing trees and vegetation and provides transition. Ho described development iii the area from lowdensity to the west; the higherproposedsinolefamilydetaohed,and attacned housing1j, her density and oommoroial to the east. Co mmissioner Plufka confitimed the guiding of the area as shown by Coordinator moconn. Commissioner Mellen Inqvired where the ingress and egress Would to located dor this dev= el.)PMentL if the property to the east is not developed. Kr. Smith explained the fvture roadway design and improve- 11jentS as he sees them.. Commissioner PlUfka stated that it seems this development is I - suggesting, the Guide Plan Is Wrong; is LA -3 quidin' (amol phaus; Is the designation for too Wide. Strip zoning I doo5 not lend itself to: the Gultde, Plan, and compatibleL land uses,should maintained. Concern Was expresses about estab- lishing a roly" of detached housing between the road and attached housing: to the east. Coordinator McConn stated the concern regarding transition to, and north and east of this, development.. Oommissioner, Plufka concurred, Mrmit, h stated, that in looking at the topography to the nort0r, there are poor soilsand nothing will be built there;,. the double homes wall also provide transition. Commissioner Magnus , -stated, he continues to he concerned about creating art llis1and-ll of detached single f amily if - the, guiding Is not changed. Commissioner Plufka: agreed$ rio:1ng Wtvn law -i Page 86 Planninq tcbmission Minutes April 23,, 1986 ing at a xcier question of the guiding In this entire area inquired Fern an lII be , r four lanes. Assistant City Engineer e ;, stated teat Fern- brook will be 44 ft. wide with four lanes. Commissioner Wire stated that: what ;develops first can be uye development. A situationlike- i can jmayybyy Commissioner Plufkastated the Land 'se Guideplan oontem- pl'ates planning of large areas for specif to .hand uses which provide transition to each other. These, areas cannot all develop at the same time, but the land use should remain consistent. here gas Further discussion on "spot" zoning and qu 'din . Coordinator t Connexplained this request is not inclusive of a Guide plan Amendment, she suggested the Commission, re- view the Conditional Use Permik -`terra. Comidssioner Wire feels this is a unique situation and ques- ues- to ns Whether this developer should be responsible for thetions transition with his ,request for lYower, density i- Coordinator MeConn ,discussed the Conditional Use permit Criteria,, noting that compliance has not been demonstrated She stated :this developer is responsible for providintl transition- within' this development to adjacent land uses. o ss, oner Mellen stated tht developer wants to oonstruot single family residential homes that will; not require the amount of services or sewer capacity needed for higher density development. om s ones 'luf a reiterated the concern f gin, -ming a neighborhood island surrounded by high density ;; jpmentj_ and that this plan Is tens attractive. Vice ChammAn ,: iia concurred, noting the Commission, lr> charged with a responsi- bility for the highest. and best use of the land. MOTION by Vice Chairman Pauba, seconded by Commissioner _Wrloff, FOR DENIAL Mellen to recommend denial of the Rezoning Preleixnar Plat and Conditional. Use Permit for Craig, ScKerberlfur the rea- sons that this development plan Is not in compliance with the Conditional Use ,Permit Criteria. Roll Call. Vote. 5 Ares:. MOTION carried. 'SOT - MOTION -`AP.RK QTWER W,81NESS Coordinator NaConn advised the f missston there will be three meetings in lays the 14th, lst$ and 28th. wwtiwrrvww+www4w4 The r eetin adjourned at 1 ..tl R. w.