The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Commission Minutes 03-12-1986i CIS Or PLYH UT f Itt T , TNI AWL Tlie regular Heettnq of the PlymouthPlanning CommIion Was ealled order at UP.M. W 'RS PWjWHeeraI.dd, Comm sinners uber Magnus, Plufka, *11 en, and Paub WMERS, ASSES* Commissioner -Wire STAFF .... # t t un De el pmCoordinator Sara McConn City Engineer Sherm Golherq Community Development Secretary Grace Wneman WT AGENDA MOTION Coar : s onerStutberqseconded by ommi s oner CONSENT. MI D auba to re :ommcnd approval of the Consent Agenda. ` VOTE. Ayes. MOTION carried VOTE NOTION CARRIED MOTION by Commissioner ulbergl seconded by CommIssioner' MINUTES -FEBRUARY auba to recommend approval of the Minutes ror" February 26,. 2,61 1986 1986 Nyitb one correct ion. 'nmmiisioner Stulberq stated he was not the seconder for the MOTION to AMENDU tie Main Motion regardinq the Housino Element of the Comprehensive Plan on page * The record will, be corrected to shoe the seconder, as Commissioner Mellen., VOTE. 5 Ayes. Chatrmaa el erwald abstained. MOTION COTE - MOTIOK CARR1ED carried, PUBLIC 14EARINGS ha r aSteigerwaW Introduced the request and an overview K iT . o the Nareh 3 X966 s aff r or was r#ovided by oordina- LT N s, for McConn CONCE PLAN AND AHENOWNT TO Chairman Steigerwald, inquired about the Department of atur-K AWD ;CROWT PLAN a 4oc ree . review of, County Road 61 and if here Ayere alternate rov es# and,,, if ripe, DAR- had indicated . rrye k r y `n neer oldber stated, the the DNR rather than su - gestxng any routes stated the City would need to bnw there are no better alternatives In order, for this roue to be a proved. Cloordintnor McConn stated the DNR has suggested the site provides an alternative tit ignment. In. response to Chairman Steiqerivaldl, Coordinator McCona, confirmed that Hennepin County does not: own ric bt-af-way In this Location. ha rman, Steigerwald states the Co iss.ion would in i lla ally discuss the Staged rnWt Plan endment. F. -I'M i I Pa€ e 40 I Planning Commission Minutes 19,86, Commissioner Meilen inquired about required ponding and'the 100 -Year High Later Elevation. Mr. Frdnk stated ` the westerly pond is within the stoat sewer system which includes the 100 -Year High later Elevation, but the easterly pond is not. Commissioner Mellen inquired if it is fear'11)le to have sewer .latec loutside the serviced areas. ire rank explained their proposal For sewer, Crater, and st recut . Commissioner Stutb rg questioned whether the Commission should be addressing the redirection of newer f lots, Chairman Stelgerwald stat --,d th4t as art advisory board to the C ; t v Council, they concept plan as presented must be 1ered ComDi siori r Plufka questioned she logic of draining this property and that it makes sense not to duplicate pipelines in the streets. City q:i.nee€ Goldberq stated there is a difference of opinion re(aa- ctinq the number of lots to be. diverted one way or the €.atter, He noted the City's consul'tant's report outlined in 18) h. of the Engineer's Memorandum, that the number of lots to be diverted increase from 30 to 42 based on the concept plan. Chairman Steigerwalci commented that the domino-eft°ect, of making service available for land in the Post -V90 area is a; concern. Coordinator McCortn concurred, that with development proposed for this area, the , lots to they south could develop.. Chairman Stelgerwald inquired. about the consultant's report. Coordinator McConn noted that all information provided by the Consulting En€ sneers is based on the Comprehensive Sevier Plan of the City. Further discussion ensued reyardinq the boundary line of the sanitary sewer district. Chairman Steigerwald requested that tiro Frank review the Planned Unit Development Concept flan. Mr. 7rank stated their request for waiver of the 40 aorta requirement for a PUD is based on the fact that their plan is In the public interest, ofand," because of ` Che unique features of property, a standard plat would not be feasible. . They are pruvidinc, parkland to the City and are conn; vinq the slopes, woodlands, and wetlands. He stated the 1)t .liras as proposed preserve the unique features of the s to and can only be accompl ashed under the PUD provision,& Paste 4 P110ariningCommissionMinutes rch 12, 198 Commissioner 111lufka Inquired about the part, dedication Mr, Frank mooed that the City will derive, 5.8 acres for parkland. Too Citywould lose the parkland if PUD ; Develop- moot ev lop - mere' does not occ= Coordinator McConn explained the re- quired de iloati.on under the PUD provisions would equal approximately 3 acres and anything over this is to be pur- chased by the City, Mr. Frank concurred there would be negotiation with the City on accluirincl the additional parkland. Vt. Frank staged the plan does meet the PUD attributes. He stated they would plat and sell the .Lots to individual builders, anc. though it is diff feuk to demonstrate it at this stage, it is their opinion that the guilders wz.rl introduce now technology such as energy efficient and sola homes; that the plans have been prepared by trained profes- sionals, and the firm has a good record in the Citi. of Plymouth, that the Layout will yield a high quality develop- ment; and, that the residents will he able to walk to the park system and reasonable use of public areas. He stated that under standard platting procedures 35 lots could be attained. They are proposing 41 lots with the PUD flan. Under standard platting procedures the City would not re- ceive the right-of-way or parkland. A standard plat would not preserve the trees and topography. Commissioner Plufka inquires about the range of lots sizes. Mr. Frank stated this is difficult to answer at this stage, but 15,000 sq, ft would be the average. Mr, Dickman Autson stated thelotsaround the pond would be 90 ft. in width, ranging to 80 ft. in width. Mr. Frank seated the smallest lots would be approximately 10,080 sq. ft ` Mr. Frank discussed the layout for Northwest Boulevard County Road 61), noting it could be moved further to the east. However, it would reduce the number of lots and.: dim - Wish the value of the property. He stated that in deter- mining their design, they used the 1982 report prepared by the Traffic Consultants 'which was adapted' by the City Coun oal and Hennepin County* He stated the alignment shown in this report is from Maple Grove to Minnetonka and they had to rely on this information for their project. He stated that the road alignment is not a basis for denial; _ that the sewer flees do not impact the City's Comprehensive Plan,- that lan, that they have addressed and met the attributes For a PUD Plan; and, requested that approval be given to the request for the County Road 61 alignment. Chairman Stelgerwald opened the Publics Hearing. Chairman Ste-l-tieriyald., commented that the timing for 'this Page Planning Co m n Minn Mar0 12t 1986 o iss oyer Plufa concurred, addinq that it is his opinion the developer cannot take credit for PUD statin f rom, the parkland required to be, purchasedthe City*, that attempts mai be made, builders o provide new t hno oq eve - cppand inn vative hour f3types, the devel- op r cannot make phis assun pt om and, that the ' easterly` oper pond would not be, an amenity for the internl project'. 10` 0M by Commissioner Pa ha, seconded by Commissioner NOTION, TO DENY Plufki to ;recommend denial of the Planned Unit Development Concept Plan and Amendment to the Staqed Growth :). based on those rea o-is cited in the March ,1986, staf report MOTIONK to AMEND the mein Motion by Chairman Stelgerw4ld,; NOTION TO AMEND Seconded by Commissioner Paoha to add the concerns eypre ed by -the Department of Natural Resources and CIty staff, re- and nq the extension and a it at ent of County Road 61 in this area of proposed development Commissioner Stul erg stated that the concerns expressed on County k 6>1 aliqnmeat would not apply as the Proposal for the Planned Unit- Development Is recommended or denial. Roll fall on i1t nd n Go -the Ma! 4 to.q. 4 ` VO : R t Commissioner Stutherg, May. MOTION carr ied. M011ON CARRIED Roll Call Vote on MAIM Motion as once Amended.. 4, Ayes., VOTE MOTION CARRIED Motion carried. Chairman te.iger-Wald introduced the request by Rie;hard PlICHA BORDEN Borden, reading of the March 5, 1986 staff report Way CONDITIONAL USE a s oared. PE15) RMIT FORHEyj p(*ry}{{# jyyyyM+}}}}+ j DI Chairman Stelgerwald inquired if Mr. Borden had any ques- tions or commexs-°s. Mr. Borden answered he tuid novae:. ha rma a to erg a > opened the Public: Hearing,, a there was no one present to speak on this ttemhe Public flearinq was Closed. MOTION by Magnus, seconded by, nmotissioner NOTIO4 TO APPROVE to herq to e o tmend approval for the Conditional Use Per- mit for met0handl, sing fcr tchard Borden, .object to, the 06nditioill1q, a$ alta d in thel March 51 1988 staff,report# RO-11 Call, Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION cart-led* VOTE - NOTION', CARRIE0, 2; ini3[Minutes L ChaIrman Stelqerwald, introduced the r uOl' by Wayne n W WE H NC` Hancy Menge for a Conditional for a n d amen- n . Reading f the erah 41 staff report wtj$ e Ved. U115 . FO ij: Coordlinator McConn made one correction to Item No tai" the i nalysis, norti n of the, f reorti that the tower would he 28 ft. from the lot 1n n coo Id, -'all o extend t. be on the e dot 'be nk of t. Mir. Menqe stated,the distance betwleen. the tower and the lea Itne is, greater than the re ort shows,- he added that 10 the ears he has worked with these towers they seldom fd from their baset but will fold over., Chairman ei riff lstated that if this tower would h iatilar o commercial t ret h lid, r r n €n AerolajBowker n over. ori. on r n inquired i Mrs Menge h kk n h neigh6ors about erectint the owr. ir. hi n stated he has talked} informally with € J ne.jqhborS L 'and they have no r Page 45 Planninq Commission Minutes March 12, prohlemi and lie felt if there were, .they woutd be present tonight. Commissioner Pauba notedtKit neighbors Iyant Ing to as relations may not t o say anything ne dt.e+ Mr or e discussed the area to the o In and the tower foundation with, ommiss "on r . tulber , Coord I natorMcConn responded neqatively to Cotro-aisstoner tulberg's Inquiry if any of till' neighbors had called the City re ard; n this . MOTION by Commissioner tulbera seconded by hair an ' IR O APIRO tei erwald toz recommend approval for the Conditionai Use Permit for W4yne Manqe subject to the oohdi dons as stated in, the Maroh 1 19'86 staff report F#}of.` ss honer Paubt to Wield the Rain)tion, recommend the tower be relocated to the northwest -'de o the garage. ; The Motion,- died for lack of sec and .. Roll Cali Vote. 6,Ayes.40TIOV carried,, VOTE - NOTION CARRIED, Chairman tei erwa.d introduced, the request by Thelma tee hepperd for a Home OccupationConditional',Use Permit. CONDITIONAL USE Reading of the March 4, 1986 staff report was ria ivied. PERMIT FOR BEALITY SHOP ( 8601 o l ss oner Plu ka inquired about the re uiat ion, of hemi- oa-I storage and State licensing. Coordinator McConn stated Ms hepperd will provide a copy of her "State ;license. Ms. h peed oo me lted that t l ate nsp gots the, nremi 3es and tyle license Is also required dor' her Insurance. Commissioner Plufka Inquired if she would be the only operator and there could be no employees, s. Shepperd. stated this was the oases TIO to recommend approval for the, Home Occupation Con- MOTION TO APPROVE, d1ttonai Use Permit subject to theconditioAs, as staged in the March 4, 1986 stafff report. MOTION,by Commissioner Plufkaj, seconded by Commissioner 00T OR TO AMEN pa nus to Amend the. to ort by adding a condition that only the petttioner is al.towevj to operate the business and there: sh lI no no other o ployees^ Rolf:zl dote n Amendment.Ayes f ?T oax ed, VOA O AW OWNT NOTION CARRIED Roil Call lute on Ralit Motion as one Amended. Ayes{ rOi - HAIL MOT O MOTION carried* MOTION CARRIC11 Page 4 Planning Commission Minutes Marcor 12, 1986 Wil BUSIWSS MOTION try Commissioner ; tulberc, seconded by Commissioner TURCK MWLTIPROX,, Pauba to recommend approval for Turck Multiprox,, Inc. Site INC,* SITE PLAN AND Plan, and Variance on the, Consent Agenda VARIANCE (860 2) Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried, VOTE MOTION CARRIED OTHER BUSINESS City Manager James G. Willis discussed the Tax Increment Finance District expansion with the Commission. He reviewed the district boundaries and noted the uporadving of the Interchange at County Road `15 and 1-494. The inter- change for County Road 6 and 1.494 is contemplated in the current Caroit,J Improvements Project (CIP).. He explained that highway access permits have been acquired:. The problem is who, pays for it -- and this probably would be the City. He rioted there is riot the option of assigning benefit beyond' the. adjacent land) so the TIF `l -- 2 through i , - 5 were created to provide the funding mechani,sm,5 for the County I Rod 6/1.494 interchange. A Public Hearing will be held at the next City Council meeting to consider including additional parcels in TIF 1 - 3. Tir 1 - 3 includes four parcels with dev=elopmentproposals For reed D l/Welsh Co,9struction a distribution center by Hance Distributing; and, the. existing Scoville Press facil- aci - i.ty+. ity.He explained chat taxes generated will floe into the district 'to pay for the interchange at County Road and T-494. Manager Willis explained this does not affect the fiscal disparity, the money is captured for a period of time not longer than 10 years, but can be up ' to 25 years for redevelopme.nt. Commissioner P,lufka ` inquired abort Hennepin County and the School`' Districts. Manager Wallis stated the County has riot been concerned with the 'P'lymuuth; project because the inter:.: changed roadway development will also benefit them. He noted the road improvements will spin, development. Manager Willis ex +la.ined the background regarding the devel- opment of the Northwest Business, Campus and the ongot,v, development of the Minneapolis property; and,; that In both cesc-,s the PCA cited concern; of traffic generated at 1-494 and Highway 55. The Indirect Source Permit for these devel- opments are conditioned on the County Read 6 interchange Traffic studies for the area shoved the need,, and the City is now developing_ the financing mechanism` to complete construction. 30URNME The meeting: adjourned at 5, P, P11