The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Commission Minutes 01-22-1986CITY O ' YMOUTH PLANNINGCOMISSXON Mlle' 3MOARY ZZ 1986 T ehregular Meeting of the Plymouth 'Plannilnq Commission eI lied to order At x;30 P,M. ME . PRESENT- Chairmen n . ( t Commissioners W- rei Magnus Pl fka. titel en, and Pa h< WMER$ ABSENT CommIssioner St lherg STAFF PRESENT, Community L",e opment foordinat -)r Sara mcc nn City 'n _ neer, Sherm Goldberg Community De elopment "Se eL CMSENT AGM, A AND 0E ,. w MOTI N by 'Commissioner Magn.s. seconded by Commissioner UT - MARY Pluf ka to recommend approval January , 1986 Mit utas 81, 1984 as submitted. TE. 4 Ayes, Commissioners Pauba and ,,Are abstained. VOTE - HOTION, NOTION carried. Pumle .-... "' haxrman to er ald Introduced Fie application try Thomas MA as er a . Reading, of the January 17' 1986 Staff'Report was CONDITIONAL USE waived Chairman StelgetM41d introduced Mr, Thomas PMMIT AMENDMENT as er al-,, ,who steed he is the contractor for the home- 8151,39) wrier, V r. James, Sonnery, 4850 Orleans ,ane* ChairMan s see. vv,"}'" JS'l9qtt d 2 li Yf-e`{ 4 - r 1s`YE'tr, "-,t d Yf] ft Y L r d a`An4.a° el A. Iia lT{.W' 3i.FlC VA t,lX 461 R f ta. ik aThQ V%, Arc A'i. '44" A .t a Fx+.i. c i` i}s sY a erna i e designs as. recommended by staff. Mr. Kasperzak stated there are not many alternatives because of the reed for, accessibility withi the home for the family. tie explained that this is a ha,d situation to, work Yvith heirman Stelgerwald inquired about the petitioner's basis. r a t ti ueness and hardship. noting that the is, not, odd -shaped, but the hardship comes from the originalplace- ment of the house oa the ot. Fir, hennery conf irr ed this and stated the original home was a. ease plan that no longer fits their family needs. Mr. Kasperzak presented two alternate des ns one of which ma atain the m n m ard areas ha r an to er ald inquired M Connery would, he will - Ing to hu.ld an alternative design.. Mr. Connery stated that. if they qo to 11 ft,., it would, for the most part, be n se- able spa a and the request for the 14 ft. x 14 frt. expansion P ann nc Commission Hinutes ary 2 , 1986 is reasonable. They need the space for their two children and the increased kitchen area we ult teem a qathering place -for the family, and the -ability to supery i 6e the, h; - t ren . Commissioner Plufka Inquired Which rooms are on that site o the house. Ptr. cnery a,ated they ave ekltihr n dining room on this level, up one Hight of stairs to the livinn room, and down one flight to the 'family roe Mr. Kasperzak explainel the watt -paoe and planned exten- sions. The addition %,1 1 be desiqned to took tete same as the original home with the sae siding, windows). etc * I Chairman SteligerweUd that chanqlnq the setback standard set =§ :nt within ars approved panned 1, it Development, which in t4-irn would qualify other homeowners With this same protea to apply for Amendments. Commissioner. Pluf a o pLalned that the type of development. would not matter, but that, the homes are built close to the ot lfies. e stated e aderstands 'that a . 's steeds' change but the Commission must a,` rens the Ordinance standards. Chairman Steigerwald opene;; the Public Heartnq., as there was, no one present to speak on the item,. the Putil ie Hearing Iva$ H TION by Commissioner Iauba,. seconded by Chairman MOTION TODENY tei erwald to recommend &nial based on the reasons as stated n the an a ry :, staff ,report, 'o tiss ones pauba started that petitions such as this made It difficult for the Commission to move for dental, but approval -would setprecedent andano theygust Mase their recommendation ora' the Ordinance standards. Roll Call VOTE., 6 Ayes, MOTION carried* MOTION CARRIJED ChaIrman Steigerwald Introduced ` she application. ; by 36hn J", W LDRON Waldron and requested an overview o the Januar , 1 RELI . lY PLAT Planninq Staff deport hy Coordinator Mc on, ANUFINAL PLA Lj LE 4 `' Chairman, Steigerwald introduced Mr* ohh Waldrondron and it uJr- QUINN ADDITION, ed about the proposed design fora building on Lot 3 In red- 85-127) erence to the Shoreland, Manaagement Criteria. r* Waldron. e pla red the building footprint 'for Lot 3 will wordy within A annift Commission note Chairman itelgervyald Inquired abbut common al teary 22, 1986 and that i Sr:l i ,=strain.development of ttA. ab property. : `. ' assumed.. frustrating tor dr v rs taking htherewouldhetinexp=dean e dor dcc to 34th Avenue which turas and cr faf rr they don t hilve. able to get; .n the build on rrrrrera:,ot afc Chairman Ste b ald opened the. Public Hearing, a there was r$r), one.pr n4 to speak on thii item, the PublicHear Inwas closed. Commi, ssiloner Mellen Inquired if they'were not goinj to Con- cede ttia easoment would this b an inoomplete centra-e' hairmant igerwa d, stated that Mr,. Relers or not e- t nc kind on rm d that fir., R rs nrd i all:ow - y tis V, r rtetg,e; +. #r.t _ $^ "', n t t - fo nvt r withN } 4ss€-k:P ,t Sa l., *rt , \FSK Lr siY' •e Iv a€sbx l F . L Z tna t;s- rke i Fxa S.•Sii:' easement a 'Hewn. Mr, Relersgord added that he wrote At letter to make it olear lie does not agree w tii th . r q xr - m rit fir easements- hoAeverl they have not made a decision on what they will do regarding Vie storm sewer easemetit a there Is otter represented ownership. Coordinator M, cCo n noted the Fnqirleering Memorandum calls or tt, 6torm,wo,. easement die dedicated. Ire' resp n n to a comment from r- yrs rd r and nthe Norwe.ilt Bajlkasan interested p4rty, oma i-t>ion r Pluf a stated that he was unaivare of the, baRk '*Wt re t, dant as an tm my cad Noriv st ankti l he would rout k, t on the Ti.. MOTION y `nmmi ioii r Wire,, seconded y m s on r d n MOTION TO APPROVE to r d aper val of the rot Imin ry Plat and `ina a for 3ohn Waldron for Elwell,, it , Quinn Addlftlon,. sub- ject to, t he c3riditionsas, stated in the Janu4ry 6.. 1986 staff report. Nall Call VOTE. 5 Ayes. Commissioner Plufka, abt-,t In d. VOTE - NOTION CARRIED MOTION carried. Chairman Ste1qerwatd introduced the a)p.tl ation by Jeer CONOTTIONAL U SE rn rack— First Fdition Corporatton, .ind regve t d an over- ERKTMD SITE view of -the 'an ary 61, 1966 Planning, .Staff Report by.. PLAN, (8 $) CooipGor cConf3 dr. d omora i stated he on .r il h the.sta O report and x q` y[ y ' C{ r qUestions., Chairman Steigerwald if theroshould not be a flow-through I r m this, development toy Lot 5. City, friqineer G ld I stated ' t r u1 l ,,:,t.r et` could not be desiqned t roe rl Lot Chairman itelgervyald Inquired abbut common 11*1 and that it co d be frustrating tor dr v rs taking a right turas and cr faf rr not belln j able to get; .n the build on rrrrrera:,ot afc Lot 3. Rol- Call VOTE., 6 Ayes MOTION carried. MOTION CARORD OTHER MISINESS AWOMWENT The meeting adjoutned at 0:00 P.M.,