HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 2003-045CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2003-045
APPROVING A PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT AND LOT DIVISION TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING LOT INTO TWO
PARCELS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO RESTAURANT BUILDINGS AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF STATE HIGHWAY 55 AND NORTHWEST BOULEVARD
(2002152)
WHEREAS, Frauenshuh Companies has requested a PUD (Planned Unit Development) General
Plan Amendment and Lot Division for the 2.66 -acre lot located at the northeast corner of State
Highway 55 and Northwest Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the existing lot arrangement for the subject property is legally described on
Attachment One, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, and
WHEREAS, the proposed lot arrangement for the subject property is legally described on
Attachment Two, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing
and recommends approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve this request of
Frauenshuh Companies, subject to the following conditions:
1. A PUD general plan amendment and lot division is approved to allow subdivision of an
existing 2.66 -acre lot (Lot 4, Block 1, Northwest Business Campus 14th Addition) into two
parcels for the development of two restaurant buildings, in accordance with the plans received
by the City on December 24, 2002, except as amended by this resolution.
2. Except for the physical lot arrangement and square footage of restaurant space assigned to
Lot 4, Block 1, Northwest Business Campus 14th Addition, this PUD amendment shall comply
with all of the standards and conditions of the PUD amendment adopted on February 5, 1997,
per City Council Resolution 97-78.
Resolution 2003-045
(2002152)
Page 2 of 5
3. The 1997 PUD amendment approved one restaurant building containing 12,000 square feet on
the subject lot (Lot 4, Block 1, Northwest Business Campus 14th Addition). This PUD
amendment allows subdivision of the subject lot into two separate parcels, with a 7,300 square
foot restaurant on Parcel A (the westernmost parcel) and a 3,800 square foot restaurant on
Parcel B.
4. Prior to issuance of the building permit for each parcel, the landowner shall obtain separate
approval of a PUD final plan for the respective restaurant building.
5. Prior to recording the lot division with Hennepin County, cross easements for access, parking,
and utilities for Parcels A and B shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer. Such
easements shall subsequently be recorded with the lot division.
6. This resolution allows on -sale liquor accessory to the restaurants planned for Parcel A (the
westernmost parcel) and Parcel B (the easternmost parcel), provided prior approval of the
required liquor license is granted by the City Council.
7. Prior to issuance of the building permit for each of the two proposed parcels, payment of the
park dedication fee in lieu of land dedication must be paid, based on the dedication ordinance
in effect at the time the building permit is applied for.
8. The locations of the fire hydrants, post -indicator valves, fire department connections, and fire
lane signage must be approved by the Fire Inspector.
9. Site drainage must be coordinated between the two proposed parcels.
10. With respect to the exterior building elevations for the planned Red Robin Restaurant on
Parcel A, the architectural details and color scheme shall be finalized with the PUD final plan.
The building materials will be required to match the existing building materials used in the
adjacent commercial portion of this PUD. Additionally, the horizontal banding features on the
columns shall be the same color as the columns, unless otherwise approved during review of
the PUD final plan.
11. The minimum building setbacks from interior side lot lines shall be pursuant to the plan
submitted on December 24, 2002, for the buildings on Parcels A and B.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 28, 2003.
Resolution 2003-045
(2002152)
Page 3 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on January 28, 2003, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the
same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
Resolution 2003-045
(2002152)
Page 4 of 5
ATTACHMENT ONE
(Existing Legal Description)
Lot 4, Block 1, Northwest Business Campus 14th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Resolution 2003-045
(2002152)
Page 5 of 5
ATTACHMENT TWO
(Proposed Legal Descriptions)
PARCEL A (westernmost parcel):
That part of Lot 4, Block 1, NORTHWEST BUSINESS CAMPUS 14TH ADDITION, according
to the recorded plat, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line described as
follows and its extension:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 4; thence on an assumed bearing of South 59
degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds East, along the north line of said Lot 4, a distance of 187.64 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 30 degrees 26 minutes 00
seconds West, a distance of 348.00 feet to the south line of said Lot 4, and said line there
terminating.
PARCEL B (easternmost parcel):
That part of Lot 4, Block 1, NORTHWEST BUSINESS CAMPUS 14TH ADDITION, according
to the recorded plat, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of the line described as
follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 4; thence on an assumed bearing of South 59
degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds East, along the north line of said Lot 4, a distance of 187.64 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 30 degrees 26 minutes 00
seconds West, a distance of 348.00 feet to the south line of said Lot 4, and said line there
terminating.
Note: The parcel designations used herein are for convenience only and do not represent an
integral part of the legal descriptions.