Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 06-12-1985CITY OF PLYMOUTH JUNE 12 1985 The regular irteetlnq o the Plymouth PlanningCommission was 1. to 7:30 P.M. called order at PRESENT* Chairman S eigerwald Commissioners Wire, Magnus,, Plufka, and Paubat ERS ABSENT*- T* Commissioners Stulberc And f4ellen 1fAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator Sara llcConn City Engineer Shetrm Goldberg Community Development Secretary Grace l l neman CONSENT AGENDA MINUTES t4 Tli l by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner INUTES - MAY 22, Wire to approve the Hay 22, 1954 txlnutes as submitted. 1985 VOTE. 4 Ayes. Commissioner Pauba abstained,, MOTION IED arrred. carried. ir. ING* PUBLIC tiairman Step erwald introduced the first public hearing CORDON & EDITH item and asked Coordinator McConn, for an overview of the a - .. lune 3, 085 staff report. SIVE PLAN AMENDMENT RPUD CONCEPT PLAN Commissioner Plufka inquired about the dedicated area for PRELIMIWY, Pte/ private park and the additional lance for Storm Water [gain- T$ REZONI O AND age. Coordinator McConn answered: that there is 1.54 ages COWTIONAL USE below the High eater Elevation,with 3.ji acres remaining to PERMIT (8511 7) be credited to park dedication and the entire parcel will he deeded to the City. City Engineer Goldberg confirmed that the area is part of the Storm eater SysU,,iii up to the High Water Elevation. Chairman Stex erwald introduced Greg Kopi ch e, Westwood Planning & Engineeringt representing the application. Mr. Koprschke explained the location of Swan Lake and other , developments inthe a `e . He explained that :the land was used agriculturally and that their topographic* grading and drainage plans have, preserved the natural tee*rain andvege- tation. He discussed the access and -road .layout, he noted that Dutlot B is planned for parkland and Outlot A is desig- nated for private open space; he explained that part of this land is in the CUSA (City urban ServiceArea/Staged Growth Area);, and,: that they are demonstrating gray, Ly flow sewer. 123- Pace two Planning Commission Minutes June 1 $ 1985 Mr. Xopischke stated that in reference to Condition Flo. 1 concerning lot coverage,,. they are proposing the PUD with measures to preserve the natural features of the site and ar requesting Z5% lot coverage for those smaller lots located at the center of the development and at the south- east corner. These lots were reviewed on a plan haat had bon color ``coded. Regarding Condition ilo. 14t relative to signage, they are proposing an "entry feature" rather than an Area identification Sign defined b the Ordinance. They feel the variance request is appropriate because of the landscaping features proposed around the sign, and that ' it will consist of brick construction for footings and il- tars. It is their feeling that measurements should be only for the sign lettering rather than the total structure which yill exceed the Ordinance standards. Commissioner Magnus inquired about the berming and screening for Lot 11 and frontages for those lets that are above Larch Lane. He Inquired if %arch Lane would be a major collector with heavy traffic. City Engineer 'Goldberg stated t#tat Larch Lane is a minor collector. Commissioner Magnus stated tits concern that larch lane traffic may impact,these lots $o that more than adequate screening should be provided. Mfr. l c aisc hke explained the grade change along Larch Lane _ and th t ttv,-, existing vegetation would be Peserved. i.onelotia no his concerns regarding the magi the variance request for the entrance sign at 9 6 r. no is e re-emphasized their use of landscap- around,the sign, and that a reduction in size would not decomplish the desired appearance: for the entrance. Chairman tei.gerwalo inquired if this were the only reason for re- questing the variance and stated that other developments have attractive entrance' signage which meets the Ordinance standards, he Is concerned that this Variance request is for three times what the Ordinance allows. Chairman Steiqerwald opened the Public Hearing. Chairman eigerwald introduced Mr. Ed McConville, 310 Larch Mace. Mr. McConvillenville inqu red who would be assessed for the improvements to this property. Charman Steigerwald explained that the Planning Commission does not deal with a se $Sment 1 and this is a question that should be offered to the City Council. City Engineer Goldberg confirmed that the i mprovemants will he the d vc.l.o er' responsibility. Mr. McConville' rioted that the homeowner of the adjoining corner lot may be impacted by the roadway design and may have to change his driveway. flaqe V5 Planning Commission ltln tris Juni '17, 1 A)5 Mr. Kopischke iiaswered that it will not Involve a change to the property owner's lot lines and the roadway will not affect the driveway* fir. McConville inquired about Wb4t wi t i be used to fill the area of the road ohanges. Hr . 1 c jsol' kt answered that a grass boulevard will be installed gas part of the read construction. Mr. Mark ley ington r 12801 45th Avenue Horth; stated he is Ie roserif, Ing the least Medicine Lake To nho—,5coc;iatlon and inquired about the dedicated parkland and the plans for 45th Ave'nue flort . Mr. Kopischke 5tdted that park Is r jros d for Outlot 1.3, consisting orf 5.35 a r sand explained the ponding require merits. Coordinator `Boon noted that only a portion of Swan Lake is on this property,, the major portion of the lake Is on prorttrty to the West. She noted that .)s development occurs on the property to the we Wit, additional parkiand will, be dedicated., h noted_ that a neighborhood park is ptdflfled for the wan Lake area and that the "active" park area will be to the south and; west. She suq.-4eted that ter. Byin torr call Frio Bldnkj Diritotor of larks and Recreation for fur- ther information regarding parkland In this area. City Engineer 1 oldb rg stated teat future ' improvements for 45th Avenue North will not be borne by this development. DennisW s andor , 12515 45th Avenue North, stated his con- cerns regarding the north property boundary where the normal lino has dropped off becausea horse tral i., and that there is a barbed wire fence hero that should be removed. fie stated his concerns regarding drainage (runoff) and aesthetics of the area, Mr. Westendorp also stated his concern about lot sio, Mr. ko i.schko explained the design o the perimeter lots, f'ir. Westendorp Inquired about lot sjzos in adjacent and Abutting developments which were reviewed by Coordinator McConn. Mr* Westendorp, stated the commission nee& to a resider the tats in relation to lot silo. Mr. Kopischke confirmed that he would_ look into the concern regarding, th- fence and grade change at the property line. Commissioner Plufka inquired about the proO sions for storm water runoff. City Engineer Goldberg confirmed that this would be reviewed and any ,problems resolved when final, grad- trig plans are submitted. fir. W st ndor p reiterated the problem of pooling water in this area and if it is not laded and graded oorr otly, there will always be. severe runoff and drainage problems Planning Commission Minutes June 12, 11985 Chairman Steiqerwald stated that the developer is required to submit grading and drainage plans that are reviewed, by the Clay to see that there is compliance with and radherenoe to erosion control and proper drainage. He stated that in regard to concerns regarding lot size,, the developer is given the design flexibility for a Planned Unit Development, but the Planning Commission, and City Council Want to O: that lot sizes are comparable to ad aoent and abutting properties Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Comrisstoner Wire, seconded by Chairman HOT ON - Steigerwald to recommend approval for the Comprehensives Plan C "NS1VE PLAN Amendment for Gordon and. Edith Johnson subject to the AHENDWNT conditions as stated in the StaflReport dited June 31, 1985. Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION IED MOTION by Commi saloner Plufka, ,seconded by Commissioner Wire to recommend approval for the Residential Planned Unit Development Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan/Plat, Rezonlngt and Conditional Use Permit for Cordon and Edith Johnson suh- ect to the condit-Ilons as stated in the Staff Report dated June 11, 1985. Commissioner Plufka;, Chairman Steigerwald and Coordinator McConn confirmed that the difference in the plan was only the addition of the color coding,; (light green areas) $hvoly- inc the smaller lot sizes and defining them from the periph- ery lots. MOTION by Commissioner Wire., seconded by Commissioner 140TION TO AWN Magnus, to amend Condit"ton No. 14 to, read. Variance from the Ordinance standards for signage to install an :area Identification Sign,of 64 sq. ft. (vs 32 sq. ft.) as calcu- lated by the Ordinance provisions. Roll Call Vote. 4 Ayes. Chairman Stelgerwald# Nay. NOTION VOTE 11O CRIED carried. Commissioner Pauba stated Jt *is his opinion that the developer should be provided: the options for additional lot coverage succi as fU of 'the lots as has been, discussed and recommended with other Planned Unit Developments. Chairman Steigerwald stated that regarding Lots 2 through. 4 on Black 11 the U lot coverage should he retained. Page 1271 Planning Commission Ml.nutOls une 12-, 1985 Mr. Kopischke stated that the center lots are i' rrower so the corner lots < can be larger; and, that the lots to the east are larger because of the storm water p nd ng- ; Chaim man Stelgerwald corgi firmed that the proposal is for 0 lot coverage on the three .lots as proposed and % for the Interior lots. MOTIOtt by Commissioner l, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO AMEND Pauba to Amend the Motion by f*hanging Condition No, 13 to read: Maximum lot coverage for lit .lots shall be the OrO- lnance standard of 0 including dots 2t 31: and 41 Block. 11 the rematniog lots diagraCm ed on the graphic dated gune 14, 1 85 shall be allowed ,lot .covera4e. Roll, Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE -MOTION CARRIED Commissioner Wire ingu r d about the .increased selvage floe, City Engineer Goldberg reviewed the sewage flow data noting that there would be an zncr;ase for one sewer district against a decrease in another sewer district balancing out the capacity, andt that no trunk line extension is needed. Chairman teigerwald conf lrmted with Mrs 11'€'stlendoxp that; he Is. suggesting that the fence be removed. Coordinator McConn stated the Commission could direct that this be reflected on the final graJing plans. MOTION by Commission, Pluwka, seconded by Commissioner ire NOTION TO AMEND to Amend the Motz;. n by adding Condition No. 16. That the developer remove the barbed were fence ort the northern prop- erty line and that blading sand grading be accomplished to assure good dr<laiage and batanoe of elevations. Mr. Westendorp stated his co,:ue -n regarding the trees in this area, noting they are mostly scrub acrd should be remov- ed and replaced. Chaxrma, .lgorwal.d confirmed that berm- 1,ng and screening will. -' acoding to the Landscape Policy. Roll Call mote. 5 Ayes. M0 ON Qac. ried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Roll Call Vote on Main MOTION as Amended. 5 Ayes. MOTION VOTE - NOTION CARRIED carried. Page 128 Planninq Commission Minute's June 12, 19,5 Chairman Stelgerriald jr,jtroduced the next p"u lic Hearing for WRTHLAND R&AAGENEW Northland Managpment, Corporation and requeste6 in overview CORPORATION - SITE of the June 3, 1985 Staff Report by Coordinator McConn. P 9"ART- ` .a cam CONDITIONAL USE Chairman Sterqerwa .d introduced Mr. Leslie 1_orr (,4t, r r - 0 ent -no the pt , tionerA fir. Formell stated 'aie is the Proj- ect Coordinator 4nd that he would answer questions from the Commission. frig Mated that the Variance request is straight forward In that they property is difficult to develop, how- ever, they feel their plan wr_ff work well for thispropertyA Chairman Steigerwild, confirmed that Mr. Formell has read and hay* no concerns r e;ard inq the staff recon mC odat ions,, Chairman Stet errec.1d stated he has some concern regarding the bufferinq on the south side of the property and inquired about the plans for this area. Mr. Formell stated they plan to Install berm and plant trees, and that their plan meats the requirements of the Landscape policy. He noted they have only two entrances to the paving so feel this has been well addressed. Chairmaa %tei erwaLd confirmed that lamer trees vvill, be preserved. ommIs loner Pl fka Inquired if they intend to use scuiptdr edtrees on the berm to provide a solid screen* Cir. Formell stated' the trees would be 3 to 4 ft. in height from the tc,,) of the berm` to insure year rend screening. nmmis ionor Plof a Inquired about signage; confirming that there is a directional sin only onto County Round 'S; and, the freestanding sign is ,Located toward the Highway ' 55 frontage. qtr. Formell stated that the signage meets the Ordinance requirements. MOTION by Commissioner Magnus, seconded by Commissioner 140TION pauba to recommend ipproval for the Site Paan, Variance, and Conditional Use Permit `for northland Management Corporation subject 'to the recommendations as .fated in the Jane` 3, 1985 staff report. Roll Call Vote. MOTION carried. VOTE - , OTION CARRIED Chairman Stex erwa.ld Introduced the Conditional Use Permit McDONALDIS Amendment forMcDonald's Corporation to install a second CORPORATION v,rndow on the west sine at the building that will be ars CONDITIONAL USE ancillary use to the main drive-through window. Reading of PERMIT AMENDMENT the June 31 1945 staff report was waived. 850 38) Commissioner Plufka inquired if this is a new. concept. Kay Kassinger, representing McDonald's Corporation, stated this was developed for existing restaurants and has been added, li page '1 pl nninq Commission Minutes June 1 1985 for example, to the Unit at flicollet and Lake. She stated It al lovi, tes the traffic congestion and has worked very well. Chairman Stelcierwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was no one present, to speak on this item, the Public Hearinu was closed. MOTION by Commissioner Paubdy seconded by Commissioner Wire HOTION to recommend approval for the Conditional Use Permit • mead- menta for McDonald's "Corporation subject to the staff recom-- moodat ions as stated in the une , 1985 Staff Report. Roll Call Nate. 5 Ayes MOTION carried. VOTE _. MOT1014 CARRIES Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request for a Nome Gcou- CLI T01 O G NE potion Conditional Use hermit for Clifton and Coorgene 1O Perkins at 12409 State Highway 55, reading of whe June 3, OCCUPATION 1119stafareportwaswaived. C III USE ER141T (85042) Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Clifton Perkins who stated he has read the staff report and will answer any questions from the Commission. He re-emph,#si ed his request for a sign. Commissioner p`lufk« noted his concern with the Ordinance in that it does not address location such as It this residence, located on Highway 55. A sign here may be appropr dte, whereas .at another location it would not be appropriate. He stated, however, that to alloiv signage for this location would set an undesirable prei, .Ld- k . Commissioner mire could n-)t support the request as the i o mmmrmission in approving other home Occupations has not allowed signage, fpr. Perkins inquired if a rail box-efleoting. the name of the husinoss could be allowed. Commissioner Wire s, aced It would not u appxropriat;- for the Commission °-o maks! a recom- mendation on this. Mr. Perkins stated he ooes not want his request for signage to interfere with the Commission's recommendation for his Home occupation Conditional Use Permit. Chairman Steigerwald advised that fir. Perkins could address has questions on signage to the City Council.. Core stoner Wire inquired if the truck lettering part of the business would require that vans or trucks he left out- side waiting for pickup's fir. Perkins stated he .lettered. 7 trucks/vantrucks/vanS, last ye r and that this is a very small portion of tits business. He does the lettering inside his garage and the work is accomplished 'the same day. COMMIssi rler Plufka confir c d that if a truck or van were kept overnight It would be parked inside his gamete. Page 130 l anfling Commission 11 notes une 1 1985 Co imxssl,oner Plaffza i Page 151 planning Commission Hinutes urge 12, 1985 that proper planning for this area take Into consideration that his property is now surrounded by development. H wants to maintain his private and peaceful home site., lie= requests that the staff recommendation which reflects the City Council action be upheld. He stated that Mr. Myron has not adequately addressed the issue except for the price he wants for the property; and, that Mr. Myron should accept the Council action or a fair and equitable amount for the land. Mr. Crathwr l stated that 1,e has not suggested that Mr. Myron and fir, pribble are unreasonable people. The fact that there is a private easement shows that an agreement is pos- sible. However, at.this time, the City could approve aplat which reflects the intent of right-of-way on the out3ot and gives evidence of the City's intentions. Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. Commission Wire rioted that generally there are no private easements for access: to p heels that are landlocked by other development. City Engineer Goldberg noted that generally Ir: cases like this, there is no access at all so the: City must provide they street.. Coordinator McConn confirmed that in the case of a private easement the City has no ,right to use it as a public roadway. Commissioner V*ire stated that as Mr. Fribbl e has no immediate development plans, perhaps the private., easement could always suffice such as in the case of land near Black Oaks Lane. Commissioner Plufka noted that there has been a Multitude of meetings and much discussion, regarding this application, however, this is a land planning matter and providing access for all property is good planning. He stated that the staff recommendation ,arced Council act'on should be upheld,: MOTION by Commissioner plufka, seconded by Commissioner NOTION FOR DENTAL Magnus to recommend denial of the preliminary plat Amendment for Don Myron and reaffirmation of the City Council action of March 18, 1 985 . Roll Call. Vote. 5 Aye.. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Chairman 8teigerwald introduced the petition by Trammell TRLL CROW CO. Crow Company, reading of the 3una 3, 1985 staff report was LAND USE GUIDE PLAN waived. ANDMPUD PLAN AMEND- MENT, AW REZONING Commissioner Wire} stated that he would like assurance that 85 the same type of construction will he maintained and the proposal: will remain oonsistent with the; rest of the devel- opment in this area. Planninq C`ommjs son t1inutes une 1, 1985 Chairman Stelflerwald introduced lir. Don Jordan, representing Trammell Crow Company. Hr. Gordan stated that the origindi concep reflected a hotel/restaurant use for the property; however, they Are requesting; the am(n n dent to continue the uses now constructed (ffive sho'Wroom/warehous facilities) within the Plymouth Business Center. He noted they are sensitive to the concerns of the adjacent nolghborhdods and want to continue the goad relationship,, He feels they have constructed well designed buildings which they will carry through into this phase of their development. Coordinator McCona suggested that the regui,ding.and rezoning should be oonditionali ed with the execution of the Develop- ment Contract and filing, the Final Plot, such as with the recent-appli.c:a*,i,on made for congree ate housing. Commissioner Wire stated he is concernvd _ about transition And that the plan reflectz development into are area of mature, trees. Mr. Uordan stated this would not be the erase as the tree,: Are on adjacent residential, land. He noted that they staff recommendation was to reduce or eliminate they drive al, 1P on the west side. Chairman Steigerwald ope ed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wes Perish ,. 13980 39th Avenue North, stated that there aro existing trees on the residential property, but only one tree is left standing on the subject. property. He noted that he is in favor of the sane typo of buildings, but he i concerned about transition to the residential neighbor- hoods. Coordinator McCann explained the phased review for PUD's noting the next phase will be for Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit which have more detailed plans ; re- gardiiiq landscaping and transition. She advised that the property owners will be notified of this meeting date. f4s. Donna haus, 14130 40th Avenue North, stated that the neighborhood agrees they would prefer a similar development and would be opposed to a hotel site. She _ inquired if there* would be a written tipula.inn that it would be developed as proposed. She also is concerned that 40th avenue remain as a cul-de-sac and that proper buffering and screening cue installed at the end of 40th Avenue. Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Wire$ seconded by Commissioner Magnus MOTION to recommend approval for the Land Use Cuidi; Plan and Mixed Planned Unit D vetopment Plan Amendment and Rezoning for Trammel Crow subject to the four conditions as stated in the 3dne 1 1985 staff report and adding Condition No that age 133 Planning Commission Minutes June 1, 1985 the ie kiln a td r F r c nt Age 1;,0 appro'alof the 1p1 Final. ,an/Plat and execution of the Development Contract Rol! Cell Vote, 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. NOTION CARRIED Chairman Steigerwald called a Recess at * £1 P.M. The meet- RECESS Ing reconvened at 9:30, P.N. Chairman Steigerwald introduced the Ordinance Amendments ORDINANCE AWNUMENTS relative to "Sports and ".fitness Clubs" and opened the Public RECARDING"SPORTS ear nq. FITNESSa CLUBS" Mr. David Akradi, 4601 West, 81st Street, stated that as rep- resentata.vp for Nautilus Fitness Centers, Inc.,_ he had been looking at property In Plymouth that has -1 Zoning. They were interested an making application to construct a2 -story building that would contain a Nautilus Fitness Center and offices) however, the fitness center would neat be for just the tenants of , that building. fie is roncern d that this could not be allowed in Plymouth, where in other areas this would be allowed by Conditional Use permit. Comoissioner lire stated fie doesn't feel that Plymouth is much different from surrounding communities; and, Coordin- c r laCon noted tit t staff research has shown that the majority of communities of stoilar size and development would not allow sports and fitness clubs in areas zoned for office; use. Some communities, did allow the sports and fit- ness centers In free standing buildings in the retail dis- tricts by Conditional lyse Permit; and, some saw merit In allowing this use in ether commercial districts rather than pure office uses. However, it was rioted that most intended this use for retail and service distracts $uoh as the B- and B-3. She noted some allow the sports 4nd fitness centers by, conditional use permit an the industrial zone $o long as at 2s serving the people who are employed In the distract# Mr. Arida reiterated that she sports and fatness club should be allowed in the -1 District as it would be pri- marily used by business people an the district. Coordinator McCann reviewed the definition of the B-1Dis- trict and the proposed definition which includes the para- meters for a sports and fitness center, haat would be used by the tenants and employees of the facility only, and would not be marketed by membership 'to the public. She noted the facilities' provided by Honeywell: and prudential that are examples of Sports: and fitness facilities available to employees only, Page 134 planning Commission inute5 Urine 1, 21 Mr. Akradi maintained that this Is not the sa e s as the -,e are field sports such as soft boil, l basebalt and the like, Coordinator 1lolas nn noted ; that the Ordinance provisions look to traffic concerns and hours of operation within file -1 Zoning District. fir. Akrddi stated he saw no problem with the type of traffie, generated by the spirts and fitness chit), that It would be no different from the, regular traffic flow to and from an office building. ng. The Commission main- taRnnd_ that traffic circulation is different in retail areas than in the office limited business district. Mr. Akradi reiterated this Is the first time he his had these problems when looking at property for th .0 * and, that he has many clubs , opening all over the United States. He noted that the clubs cater to businessmen haat that they do not necessarily all come from the s*erne building. Chairman t i.ge waled stated that their development of Ordin- ance language comes From the fact that , these sports and fit- ness, centers have become so popular. lie stated; they do not look at Jost one particular development but the overall planning and lend use. He stated that it is theCommis- sion's feeing that this use would riot fit into the -1 classification as noted by the definition of the B-1 Zoning District. €fie furtherr stated that fir. A rads had not given adequate reasons why Plymouth should consider this b, Ines - as appropriate for the -i District. fir. A rad! stated #1e doesn't thine the City knows what they are eliminating, and he doesn't see where the Nautilus Fitness Center as proposed would not be appropriate for the -1 Zoning ` District. Commissioner Magnus requested # an overviaw of Mr. A radi' ba sin s. lir. Akrddl explained that the Nautilus is differ- ent from RdCgar t and Tennis ` labs* that it is part of an office building with workout equipment, pool, and analysis of the proper type of fitness program for those visiting the facility. He noted they do not sell products, but do pro- vide analyses that include nutrition and exercise programs,, Commissioner Plufka inquired if they were restricted' on hours of operation, 14r. Akradi stated they operate 24 hours, 7 days a week, and noted that each person would visit approximately two hours. Commissioner Pluftca noted that the use as explained by Mr,, Akradi is a retail use and would be more approprie -ly located in the B -Z and B Zoning, Districts. Commissioner Nuba stated that the staff report is well documented and staff has done !,food job on the Ordinance amendments. Page 155 Planning Commission Minutes June 12, 1985 Chairman Steigerwald thanked Fir. A radi for his input and edcommentsregardingthesportsandfitnesselutesandclosed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Chairman Stelgerwald, seconded by Commissioner 14ION ufra to recommend approval of the draft Ordinance Amendments as submitted with the June 41 1985 Staff Report VOTE 5 Ayes* MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIrD W BUSINESS Chairman Steigerwald Introduced the request by Hans Hagen N$ IGEN H ,INC`, Homes, Inc#, reading of the June 3t 1,985 staff report was RPUD FINAL PLAN/PLAT a;Ived FOR TYRE lL ADDITION 8503%) Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Howard Hunt, representing the petitioner.' t r.. Hunt stated he id` no e r ns and would answer questions from the ommiss or MOTION ;by Commissioner Sire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus o recommend approval for the Residential Planned Unit eveloment Final Paan/Plat for Tyrell Addition subject to the conditions as stated in the June 31 1985 staff report. Vote. 5 Ayes, MOTION carried. OTHER BUSINESS Coordinator McConn reviewed business items for upcoming Planning Commission agendas, AD3MNWNT1 she meeting ad 9ursred at 10**00 P.M. RECOMMENDED CONDITION FOR N" 1985 PANNING COMMISSION EE't'I 1C FOR RESIDENTIAL JOHNSON FOR SWAN LAE HICHLANDS (85027) 1 Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for sever and eater. 4. Park dedication is satisfied with the dedication of C tlot 8 in accordance with the Dedication Policy in effent at the time of filing the Firal Plat. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm ter drainage facility. 7 Rezoning shall be finalized with filing of the Proal Plat. No Building Permits shall. be Issued until the Fi.nal. Mat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. Yard setbacks aret 35 ft. front yard; 10 ft. side yard to living area: and 6 ft. to garage; and, ZO ft. rear yard.- 1g. Transitional screening and bermxng shall be provided along the east property line of Lot 1, Block 3. 11. Final Plat mylar s shall refer to RPUD Nom 85-2. U. Appropriate legal documents regarding Homeowner Association documents, covenants and restrictions as approved by the City attorney, shall be filed with the Final Plat. 13. Maximum lot coverage for all lots shall be the Ordinance standard of 0 including lots , 3, ,and: 4, Block 1. Those lots diagrammed on the June 149 1985 graphic shall be alloted % lot coverage. 14. Variance from the Crdinanco standards forAreaIdentification Sign to allow the installation of a shin 64 sq. ft (vs. 3Z sq. ft.) per Ordinance calculations# 15. Approval is contingent upon, and subject to the required review and response by the Metropolitan Council of the Staged Growth Plan Amendment$ and the Final Plan/Plat shall not be submitted until. the Amendment Is approved. 16. The developer shall remove the barbed hire fence located on the northern property line- bladinq and grading shall be accomplished to assure good drainage and balance of elevations. respnre( Johnson MENDED CONDITIONS FOR JUNE 12,t, 1955 PLANNING COtVISSl gi MEETING FOR SITE PLANt CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES FOR NORTHLAND 9 1 AC NT CORPORATION (85030) 11. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum Payment of pari dedication i+ee,$ -;in-also of dedication In accordance with the edio ion policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Submissionsalon ` of required i i -an a al guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for completion of site improvements. 4. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv- alss per Ordinance provisions. 5. Waiver of the locataoi, of fire lane on the north side of the building. All waste and ira-.te ev tain rs shall be stored within the structure, and n outside storage is permitted. 7. No Building Permit to he issued until the Lot Di.vi.sfion/ConsG,idation is `filed and recorded with Hennepin County. Approved Variances include.- front yard setback to County Road 15 of 60 ft. vs 75 ftand to Highway 55 of 40 ft vs. 50 ft. 9 Appropriate legal documents, as approved by the City Attorney, shall he filed and recorded at Hennepin County, allowing for shared parking and drive areasp also restricting the future use of the buildings to those for which Crdin mo- qui d parking can o provided; and speoifipallye the easterly sit g i.i be jncumer,d so that 29 parking staff l are available to the adjacent site which i 1 propos`, d for development 0. The Conditional` Use Permit allows a building height of 46 ft.,,6 in and waive the l Ordinance maximum of 45 ft, heigh.. 11. Six parking ,,Daces are deferred for future construction, for the retention of existing pantins. Should the City determine the spaces aro needed, they shall b constructed, in accordance with plans dated June` ,'1955. r sljunc (northland RECOMMENDATION FO PLANlil COMMISSION ME1JING 3UNEla,, 3985 t .,moi rf, - 13 t4r FOR A t APPROVINGV1 A CONDITIONALL USS E OCCUPATION T 1?40.9 STATE HIGHWAY 55 (8504?) 1, They permit is $ubjeot to all applicable codes, regulationsions and Ordinances, and violation thereof stall be arounds for revocation* The permit is issued to. Clifton and Georgene Perkins as operators <ind shall not be transferable. 3. The site shalt be maintained in a sanitary manner. 4. There shall be no signage on the property relative. to ,the use. 5-. There shall be no outsides display, sales, or storage of merchandise or related ateriais, Including trucks or,vehicles brought in for lettering. 6 They permit shall be renewed in one year to assure cum ,Dance -with they conditions. 7, All parking shall be cuff-street in designated areas which complv with the Zoning Ordinance+ 8. All nn-satertr,4- lettering shall be accomplished inside the para e re3 june : 'k rki % l RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR JUNEV, 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR FINAL PLAN Ali FILING; O AND RELATE T F NAL PLAT FO TYREL ADDITION FCR HAN A iO1C 65037) (POD # 9- Compliance with the Clay Engineer's Memorandum. Park dedication requirements in accordance with City Policy have been satisfied with previous land dedication in accordance with the Amhurst ` 2nd A,Jditl,an Development Contract. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for the con- struction of municipal server and water, except those approved by the City Council through Resolution No. -409. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense. 5 Yard setbacks for the attached units shall be 35 ft. front yard from public roads; 12 ft. rear yard and 10 ft. side yard*5Jr1qle Bally detached units shall be 35 t. front yard, 25 ft rear yard, 10 ft, side yard to dwelling and 6 ft. side yard to a garrle. 4. Sub,aittal of r0quired utility and drainage easements as approved by the City Engineer prior to filing the Final flat. 7. No, Building Permitq to e issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County, ex el,)t those approved by the City ' Council for models throuclh Resolut os No. 5-409,. 8. Appropriate te al dcaou. en is regarding Homeowner Association ogvenants and restric- tions- do s as approved by the City Attorney, `shall be filed with the F.In l Plat. The Fin&I Plat mylars shall contain a statement noting that ;he plat is pert o the appy #d PPCF 79--2 per Section 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. Submission of required finan ial guarantee' and Site Performance Agreement for N.,a;mpletjnn of site improvements. 11. Subsequent phases (ire subject to required reviews and approvals per Ordinance provisions and in compliance with the approved RPUD Preliminary Plan/Plat. res/ june (ty rel.l )'l