Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 05-08-1985CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANN 4G C RINUTES Y a, 1955 The regular meetinq of the Plymouth planning Commission was called to order at 71:P.M. W-WERS PRESENT: Chairman St l er ald, Commissioners Wire, Still er , Magnus, lu a. _Mellen, and auz WMERs A TZ MOM STAFF ' PRESS NTo Community Development Coordinator Sara MbConn City Engineer Sherri Goldberg Public Works _Director Fred 'Moore Community Deva lopment Secretary Crag W xneman CONSENT ANDA MINUTES 4JTS - APRIL. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner 24,t 1985 Magnus to approve the Minutes of April 24, 1965 as submit- ted,, with a correction to page 95, paragraph 51 the state meat by Commissioner Wire should read: ". . . that some o the 14 Black Palls Spruce trees be moved to the south side VOTE,7 MOTION carried. HEARINGSPUBLIC ChairmanSte er vald 'Introduced `th a first public hearing IEYWELL, INC. and asked Coo-dinator McCann for an overviews of the PRELIMIK iY FLATtem, April a9l 1955 staff report. Coordinator McC'onn clarified 55025) that the plat is for one lot and is . being accomplished to simplify what has become. a very complex legal description for this property., No development or land, diva.aon is proposed at this time. Chairman Ste Ig erwa Id, Introduced Mr. Leonard Olson repre- senting Honeywell. Mr. Olson stated he would answer any questions. Chairman Stei erwald opened the Public Hearino. as here was no one present to spew on the item, he closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner auba, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO APPROVE Stulberg to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for Honeywell, subject to the conditions as stated In the draft, Resolutions. Roll Call, Vote. 6 Ayes, Commissioner Mellen abstained. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED ale 101 Planninq Commission 1,11nute.s, May , 198 halrTan St lgerwald introduced V, rnl ICation by Hans MS HAMEN HO S9 Hagen Hames, Inc.and reauest ed %,,ir a. o'v , Of the Apl-a L V, P' 'LIR 9955 staff report by Coordinator tleC€ foi. PLAT/PLAN Nle NT 79046 Chairman Stelgerwald Introduced Mr. Hans Haven, who stated he would answer any questions- uestions-` ca assioner Pauba inquired of the cortstruc;tiot*i entranceCommissioner would be at 46th Avenue and Vicksburg lane. lir. Hagen con- firmel that tete construction entrance would be on 46th Avenue and Juneau Lane where tete first ohas, of development wa 11 tate place, Commissioner Pauba inquired about the phasing of Lhe project. Mr. Hagen stated that they want to construct the townhomes and move the model home to Tvrel l". As the Am horst area continues to develop, the phases wall greet an the cental area. Commissioner Stulberg inquired about the name., change. Mr. Hagen stated it was for marketing ,reasons as they are c hang- iIng the product by the type of housing. Chairman Stel e wall opened the Public Hearing, as there was no orae present to speak ora this Itc;M, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION by Commissioner Wire$ seconded by Commissioner Pauba NOTION TO APPROVE to recommend approval for the Residential Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat[Pl.an ,Amendment for 'Hamas Hagen Homes, Inc. for "Tyrell", subJect to the conditions in the craft Resolution. Rall Call Vote. Ayes. MOM" carried. IEDVtlTO( A R Chairman Steigerwald introduced theapplication by Dave DAVE 3OHNSON Johnson and requested an overview of tlie- April 29t 9985 LAHD USE GUIDE PLAN staff report by Coordinator McConn. AMENDMENT,, REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Steagerwald introduced Mr. Dave ohnson$ re reser- AND VARIANCE (85020) tative, who introduced Iry 1 I.lstofte$ Architect, and Stephen Krause, consultant on the project. Mr. 3ohnson also intro- duced Mr. John Daily, representing North Memorial Hospital. tlr. Johnson explained that his father opened the business in 9931 and the strip Center was. acquired In the 1960's. Mr Johnson bought the business from has father along with a residence that ,will be removed at the time of development. He stated he wants to upgrade this corner and wants to ac complish this as a total parcel,., He stated he as sensitive to the neighborhood's concerns and as planning the <develop- ment to fit into the neighborhood. He discu used the con- cerns, _ regarding traffic noting that, he disagrees with staff in respect to entrances onto Highway 101 and 6 which e feels are aro- uir d for th s development. Paw 102 i'lanni g Commission Minutes May , 198 5 f,' r .h nson stated that a! I " t. of additional H f n`vaa is a aac swc sr for Highway 101 is required, a variance request is needed for setbacks in order to trees the proposal work. He stated that in his P.ontact with Hennepin County ana the State of Minnesota regardingHighway 101 and County Road l the County had two problemss with planned access and, the State has no concerns except for the access on thu> scuth. Mr. Johnson stated that the buildings NvIll'have "qLdet" tenants, o fast food r'estaura t , that North Memorial. Hospital proposes to have a clinic and base ambulances at the site. Mr. Johnson stated that their plans include siren areas and landscaping. Chairman St igerwald confirmed that the entrance in the cen- ter of the property at Highway 101 is right -in only, and that the proposal reflects Mr.Johnson's preference for a right- in -right -out. Chairman Stelgerwald mated his concern regarding .traffic circulation at peak times when vehicles would be waiting to purchase fuel., and waiting to get in an out of the site. Mr. Johnson commented on the traffic study estimaEcs for the number of vehicles, and noted that cars ould come out onto 14th Avenue Borth. it was his feeling that peak times constitute only an hour or so in the morning and afternoon which should cause no major problems. ChairmanStergerwaid inquired about the report prepared by Sugar- oscoe, and whether they had taken into consideration the development of the Minneapolis Property. Sherm Goldberg, City Engineer,,respoAed that with future 'develop- ment velaop- m nt, medians will be installed in Highway 101. Chairman Steigerwald clarified that the median split in Counter Food 6 whish f' is'ts now, is recommended to he closed per this study. Chairman Stei.gerwald Inquired about the Site -Through graphic for this property and transition to the residential area. r. Johnson pirated out that to the right of the the south- east corner of the property is multi -family housing, and at the building they will berm and screen frF, i 'the residential areas. Chairman Stnigerwald noted the (Ai i¢. building will be twn-stories, and inquired whether a, building this ,large can be properly screened. lir. 3ohnson stated thein plans are for a very attractive building with a peaked or mansard roof, brie and/or stucco construction, and, shrubbery, trees are planned and berms will be installed. Chairman S eigerwald opened the Public Hearing. Chairman Steigerwal.d introduced Ms. Aran Sch.riz, 935 E. Way- zata Blvd., representing the neighborhood group. She ex- plained that a petition had been submitted by 100 people who are in opposition to the proposal and she is representing this group Page 103 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 1985 kat]I ot'`& Itncreased rrff14 ,, Schulz sd TA safety for hikers, walker, ,and children* She stated that although she had received assurances to the contrary, they ar-e concerned abort problems with sewer capacity and elec- tricity. They are oon:erned about the aesthetics, with this type of development. els. Schulz stated it seems that the City would not gain much from an Increase In taxes and that it certainly would rho* offset the problems this development will cause. the stated tris development is: not good for the neighborhood; and, that the services it could provide are already provide[ in other areas close -by. She stated the neighborhood is, veryconcerned about the ambulances inoreas- inq noise and traffic problems. Ms. Schulz read a December 71 1983 memorandumndum from David Davenport to Clay Manager James Willis,, regarding develop- ment of this property. Chairman Steigerwald` explained that the'70mmission does not involve, itself in the economics (such` as revenue or taxes) ofdevelopmetitt this is strictly a consideration of the City Counoi1. The Commission will consider the other aspects of the concerns being aodre sed¢ Mr. Johnson responded to Ms. Schulz reading of the 1f3 let- ter, stating that the 1979, proposal was much different and was no a Mood proposal. Mr. 3ohnsoh also not d that 14 of the 38 addressors on the: petition submitted were within 500 f. of the <tl to Mr., John S. B -1t i l d, 17220 14th Avenue North stated his res- idence is behind Kimberly Meadows;and within 500 ft of the Johnson property, He recalled that he mot with Dave llavenoort and informed hire of tits concerns regarding the inadequacy of the buffering and screening of his property froin the limberly Meadows development. , Mr. Bata.ld stated he spent clot of .tits own money on screening materials for his property, ter. Batald is also concerned about the safety of the school children in; the area and i opposed to this development Mr. Johnson iooneurred with ter. Batald"s statements regarding Kimberly Meadows,, but ex lk°rned that their plans for bermi.ng and screening will 4-ribance. the property. Mr. Edwin L. Brunken, 17200 14th Avenue North, concurred with Mr. Batald's statements that the transition is inade- quatenate far both Kimberly Meadows and the proposed develop - meat. He stated it is important for the Commission to be aware of the er° or made with the Kimberly 'Meadows Develop- merit eve op - m rit so that it does not happen again. He is very concerned about the 'investments rade by the homeowners in the area, and believes the City of Plymouth Ordinances should mean something; that people bought their homes here based on the Planning inission Minutes delay 8 , 193 belief they were prcteptcd by the City. He commented that approving the change to t t land Use Guide Plan is no bene-- fit to the City and the t*t.-tmeowners should not have to pay for any improve ants needed because of this proposal. He commented that the petitioner's statement that h "is sensi- tive to the neighborhood needs" is questionable, as the petitioner has moved array from the neighborhood. Mr. Johnson stated that the development will offer conv n- lent services to the neighborhood and that, having the ambo-- lancas based here is a definite plus. He stated that he has moved to another residence, however he was born and raised on this corner and is concerned about the neighborhood. Mr. Bob Fein, 1330 Highway 1011, stated that he lives one hese away from the proposed development and ` agrees with Mr. Johnson that this corner should be upgraded. He noted there are traffic problems now,, but that the improvements called for with this development could help this situation. Ms., Dolores Lesson, 13501 Highway 101North, stated they built their home in 1967 and enjoy the neighborhood. She and her husband are nearing retirement and are looping for- ward to having time to enjoy, their home; they are not happy about having a glorified parking lot so near to their property, and in the process,. l Sing their privacy. She stated they can't afford to rove at thy.s stage in their lives. She is concerned about the safety, noise, and pollu- tion from increased vehicle traffic. She`expressed concern with snow removal as snore storage will 'destroy the landscap- ing and green areas and may impact the plantings on her property. Hr. Johnsen Mated he does not, intend to store snow on the berms but will haul it away. Ns. Leason summarized her concerns by noting that there is a reed for a play area for the Kimberly Meadows residences. Mr. John Chailey stated he works In medical staff development for North Memorial Hospital.. He, explained'that there 1. an ambulance based at Highwav 6 and 101 at the residence owned by Mr* Johnson's fattier. ` He stated that they want to estab- lish a permanent base because this location will enable them to serve southwest Plymouth and surrounding communities. He explained the plans are for a Family practice` Clinic with normal business hours. Chairman Steigerwald! in (Ared abort the ambulances and con- firmed they would not use sirens coming in but would use thea doing out on a calla e '105 Planning Commission Minutes, May 8, 1985 Mr. , ohn Prest, 104153 l"th avenue ; aaorth, f4aple Grove., stated he is a tenant and has had a conven,i.ence storey in this area since 1969. He agrees that ` they corner needs up- gradinq and is v ry concerned about access as it affects his business* He stated that custome s need convenient access to the 'hu lness,, and is concerned about they proposal far the eelan Mr. Richard earner, 17340 1 t% Avenue North, stated his family moved into the neiAbox-hood three and cine -half years ago; that they selected Plymouth because f the the Life- style. He stated the services proposed this develop- ment evel p - meant arae unnecessaryas there:- are convenient services witbia a ,mile of the neighborhood. He is concerned about the in- creased traffic since It Is very difficult to access Highway 101. He stated that it is realistic t*.a assume teat this cl ,,via to tent will draw more people and traffic into the neighborhood. He is also concerned about disabled vehicles parked on the property related to the service station. He s concerned that the property owner Baas no tangible plans for screening and buffering this development.. He noted that the ambulance servicee is a plus for the community, however, he is not in favor of the rest of the proposal. lir.. 3ohnson stated that he is not planning to develop <a Ri,dgedale or outhdale:", but does exoeet there will be customers driving through from ether areae. He em ha-ized her has always kept a "clean house" and will control vehicle storage* Chairman Steigerwald explained that the Commission is not reviewing site plans at this stage fhe land Use; Guide Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plat are the: basic "footprint" for development of the property. ' The petitioner is not expected to makes commitments on site planning at this time, Mr. George'Wi.lsnn, 17140 14th Avenue North stated his con- cern for the residential homeowners and inquired about' the zoning , for this, property. Coordinator MP.Conn explained that can the north side the houses are in a commercial zone (B-2 shoppinshopp,in center business) District, and the southern portion is -'l (single -family residential) zoning. 1Mr. Wilson stated he has lived in his home for 9 years and dur- Ing this time there has been a creat increase in traffic. Makin ; a turn onto Highway 101 is very hazardous*, his son was in a car accident at this intersection. He confirmed with City Engineer Coldberg that no trafr i- lights would be installed at 14th avenue with initial (tevel pment. Hr. Filson is concerned about the delivery trucks that would service the businesses in this development as 'children are always playing on the property. He concurred with Ms, Le ason that the children from Kimberly Meadows have no where Page 10 planning Commission !routes May 1985 tq p la He was also concerned about the impaot the liaht- In r'rcm this development could have on the residential neighbors. Mr. 3ohnson stated he agrees that, kids and parking lots don't , and, that there should be adequate play areas for the children living in Ximberly Meadows. He noted that file Kimberly Meadows ev lopment Is much closer to residential homes than hie proposed development. Mr. Don Pi.l rskil 171ZO 14th Avenue 0orth, stated he agrees with the concerns voiced.. fie did not realize that a medical building was proposed and Is concerried about adequate park - Ing for this type of use. Chairman Steigerwald reiterated that the Commission is revilpwinq only; the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment and ;preliminary plat. Coordinator McConn stated that if the Commission finds the 'Lard Use Guide Plan Amendment and rezoning appropriate, any permitteded land use for the B-2 7oning District could be. allowed for development. Mr. Jeff Glover, 17111 14th Avenue North, 'stated he moved from 'hicagoChicagoto Plymouth 6 years_ ago and was glad to get away from parking lots and high density. He, is in total agreementement with his neighbors who appose this development. Chairman Stelqerwald dosed the Public Hearing. The Commission renessed at 8* -53 P.M. RE Ss Chai.rmap Steigerwald, reconvened the meeting. Commissioner Magnus was concerned about the development intensity ,and guired if the trio -story building could be reauoed in size. Iry i ilstofte, Architect stated there is a low percentage of lot ooveraae and this would be normal development For the site; that the development meets the City's requirements and is economically feasible as rcpt e Commissioner Magnus stated a one-story biding would be more appropriate as i would require less parkins spaces Pir. Kilstofte stated they had considered a one-story building but It would make Oe development impractical. Chairman Ste.11gerwald Inquired about the percentage sof lot coverage and green space. Stephen Krause stated that 15 to 20of the, development area would be g een.5pace, the remain- der ema n - der would be building and parking area. MOTION by Commissioner Pllufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire HOTION TO DEQ' to recommend denial of tt e Land U e Guide Pian Amendment for Dale 3ohnson for th< reasons that development will severely impact this area and the City's systems, with increased traf- fie generation- poor traffic circulation and access at a major intersection; and., that expanding the B-2 Zoning w.oktld exacerbate the € xi,sting, problems in this area. sae `0 planning Commission t4inittes May , 198 Eommisslooer Mallen stated his concern about this hazardous road system; anu, vat approvali%al of t rV st 4s a r riate because it would be an opportunity to improve access md traffio circulation.. Commissioner Maqnus concurred that existing conditions may warrant re -development whi could hep solve some of the current problems. He emphasized that transition to residential property and the neighborhood's needs mast be carefully considered with any re -development plans, Commissioner die stated ,the 'plan is not reasonable and the rezoning is inappropriat j however, he agrees with ommis- sidner Mellen that corner is in bad shape and the traf- fic problem must be addressed and resolved. Commissioner Pauba agrees that the corner reedsto be upgraded but he cannot support the development plans` as proposed. Director of Public Works Fred Moore stated there is no question that there'' are problems at this lnterseotlo.w d traffic will continue to increase. Previous studies have Identif ied right-of-wav constraints. There Is a reed for control lanes for p,,open traffic flow, and, alignmentnt with 4th Avenue North to develop better traffic patterns. Commissioner Dellen confirmedofrmed that without the-ezoning and Guide Pian Amendment, here would be no access to Higbrvrv 101 aligned with 14th Avenwse forth. Commissioner Plufka stated he has reservations about resole- inq the guiding and zoni iq without lookinq ot the total development proposal:. Mr. Moore discussed the work that needs to o done' at this intersection and that it should be planned and 'accomplished at the time of development. Rail Call Vote, 5 Ayes. Commissioners Magnus and Mellen) VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Hay. MOTION carries. Chairman, Stelg rwuald stated that the Lana Use wide Flan Amendment is not appropriate,that the residential neighbor- hood shoved be not impacted by commercial devew.oprmeht which s not warranted; and, that the plans provide inadequate improvement to this site. MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Chairman Steiger- MOTION TO DENY Wald to recommend denial of the Rezoning and Preliminary Plat, and 'variance for Dax,e Johnson for the reasons as stated in the Motion to Deny the Land Use Guide plan Amendment.,' Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. NOT ON carries. vol ti- HO'Z CRIED Page 10 planning Commission !Minutes May 8, 1985 tc,w BUS _SS: Chairman Stelgerwald introduced the appl.itation by Banner BAMER CORPORATION ANDCorporationand 'requested ars overview tte SITE PLAN staff reportby Coordinator cConn. -' In response to the vartilice request, Engineer Guldberg eN l.ained that Benner Corporation could install the f irst yer df blacktop on the _parking lot this fli and, be allowed to put the finallayer on next spring. The Class V gravel. is temporary Ci easur . Commissioner Wire inquired if this would be long enough for the lot to settle. Mr. Tori Loaney representing Banner Corporation, stated that they are hoping settlement will be adequate. He explained that soils testing has beer, done and it is felt that adequate settlement ' will occur by this fail, but that the longer it settles the better it will be to obtain a lasting permanent surface. He noted they are doing the best they ' can with the condition of the soils. Coordinator McCenn stated that relative to the Variance re quest, the Commission and City Council need to address the uniqueness ` of the situation to prevent setting a precedent by allowing the temporary use of a parking ;area with a Class V gravel surface. The Commission, should, , cite the reasons for granting the Variance* Commissioner Plufka confirmed that Class V drovel provides adequate drainage. He asked the petitioner to assure there F will be dust control. Tom Loaney agreed. Dan Gallagher, con ultant, stated that Twin City Testing performed the soils ` testing showing svramp deposits and fill that has been placed through the yearsl complete removal and new fill for this area would be very costly. They will cut and fill to the lour areas and using 3 ft.' of granular fill that drains well, and on top of this will be a 6 -Inch stab- Ilized base of limestone mixture. When the elevation is attained they will put down a petronet if necessary. Chairman Stei.gorwald Inquired about the phasing for this expansion. lir. Loaney responded than they need to move the parkin area to start the audition on the building., They aunt o have the shell of the building up by December and finish the project in May or June, 1956. Be noted that, all site improvements will ba finished in the spring and sommerM months of 1'986.. Chairman Stei.gerwald inquired about instal ling curb and gutter. Mr. Loaney stated that if, the curb a yj getter were installed before the parking area has set-, t" , it could be noces ary to remove it and reinstall it at the proper elevation. Mr. Gallagher noted it is their Page 119 Planning Commission Minutes Na" intention to install curb and gutter and blacktop at Nathan Lane, the remainder will. be, Class V base, with f inishinq layer and delineators to be installed in ' the fall of the. year. Commissioner Wire stated he had no problem with their plans for the p rkang area. Chairman Steigerwald noted there could be a problem with run-off as confirmed by the Engineering Department, MOTION by Commissioner Plufkaj seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE; t lberq to recommend approval for the Site Plan and Variance for Banner Corporation subject to the first conditions as stated in the draft Resolution, changing Condition No. 7 to read= That the parking lot addition shall be covered by Class V base and that the initial layerof blacktop shall be installed by Novembers 1985 with the final lift of the permaneit 'surface in place at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the building addition. Condition No. 8 shall rea,f: That dust - control measures shall be undertaken by Banner Corporation as needed. Further discut-slon f possible problems that could occur with the parking surface ensuedi in response to an inquiry about administrative approval for any changes on the site that may be needed' due to soils conditions- Coordinator M Conn noted tN.,t administrative approval may be given if it concerns less than 10of the site. Commissioner Wire was concerned about the low areas and phased surfacing, Mr. Gallagher explained that because they will be able to watch the sub -base through the summer, they will get a good reading of what is happening before the final surface: is installed. VOTE. 7 eyes* MOTION carried.. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Chairman telq(.rwal<# introduced the application by LST LSI ('ORHMT10h Corporation and requested an overview of tile April 29, 1985 LOT CONSO IDATTON1 staff by Coor tinator McConn. SITEl'Lt}+N AND y q/ VAI% ES, 7{1850 1 Chairman Steigerwald Introduced Mr. Gerald Well ik acrd Dennis Walsh, representing LSI Corporation. lir. Wel.11k explained the variances requested and their desire to gain ddditrona.l parking. Chairman ateigerwal d Inquired about tho railroad spur, and whether it is acfitive. lir. Wellik stated !t is active but seldom used. Page 'ilii Manning Commission Minute May 67 1985 Coordinator McConn requested that Mr. Weil ik explain the production flow at LS1. Mr. WeUik stated their Ston age i In the south part of the bui idin # conveyors, are a ed to send the p odlict to ;holding ;areas where they are set Aside to ready for truck shipment.He commented that this is a very wnr ab e building for their operation. Chairman Stelqeinyald inquired about their request for a w i.ver from` installation of curbing. fir. Walsh stated that i is their opinion that the curbing is not necessary because the arca drainage is defined and there' is no sheet drainage from the site. Coordinator McConn explained that trt( curbing is needed for traffic control. Chairman Sty ige wall commented that without cure vehicles ould be parked too close to the railroad track. Mr.. Wellik stated that ti-f. narking area is away from the trach; that there is probably 50 Ft.; or more between the building and the spur. tie noted their concern abort rhe maintenance and snow removal problems with curbing, and that parking would be parallel. City Engineer ol:dberg commented tha* pre-cast curt) cculti he used and would be less expensive. MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner 140TION TO APPRO Z Stulberq to recommend approval for the Lot Con cl idationy Site Pl4n and Variances for LS1 Corporation subject to the conditions a listed in the draft Resolution. mmis ion r Stulberq stated that till' ommis ion`.- reasons for yaivin the-equiremer,t, `(jr curhing is reflected in the ` V TE 7 Ayes. 140TION c$ l r,1. VOTE MOTTO CARRIEP OTHER BUSINESS Chairman Stelgerwald explained that "Music InPlymouth" will necessitate a change in the meeting schedule for duly. The Commission will: -.)c,t on Tuesday, July 91 1965, ` Commissioneroner Wire noted he will be clone July J$t through the 15th; and, chairman Stelgerwald will he gone July 8th' through the 22nd. oord.i,nato McConn discussed the CummI signi> bus tours of developing areas of Plymcux h ,scheduled for May 15th. She reviewed the applications being readied for the next agenda. RNW- The meeting adjourned at 10:5 P,M. R "OMMFNDATION OR MAY , 1965 PLANNING COMNTSSION MEETING v 1» i" i1 ! t' R 1. it it R l i j' p i AND' +J'4 IAPPROVINGlVIVA .,. RRESIDENTIAL LV D NI _ USE PERMIT FOR HAUS N G 11 HOMES FOR "T R :LL" (7 046) 1 Compliance with the City Engin-er``s Memorandum. Removal of 'alt dead or dying f=rees from the property, at the owner's expense. No Building Permits "shall be issued until a Contract has been awar0 d` for sewer. and water. Payment of park dedication shall be 0onsistent with the Amherst 2nd Addition fees -in -lieu of dedication and shall be applied at the dime sof: further final platting. 5. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System. jplxance with Poliey Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum flour el vation$ for nou structures in subdivisions adjacent cit or containinq in open storm water drainage facility. 7. Ho1 wilding Permits shall b issued un r t final iiia filed arid recorded with Hennepin County. 8. All yard setbacks shall be, consistent with the Amhurst RPUD approvals for singl family units and per typical lot layout shown on the Preliminary Plat. Final Plat myl.ars shall refer to RPUD No. -19-2. 10. Appropriate legal documents reqarding Homeowner Association documents, covenants and restrictions is approved by ee City Attorney, shall, be filed with the Final. Plat. CITY OF PLY14OUTH 1P Pu rsuant to due call and notice there, e.,m t u of the City cif,plymnutht Hinnesotas, was hold on the clay o The following members were present;. fn Pollowing members were absent -- n Introduced the following Resolution and moved its addpt'LOA : ll aOLOTION NO.- DENYING. LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, RFZO ING, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND 'VARIAlim FOR DAVE JOHNSON ( 85020 ) WHERrAS, gave Johnsen hasrequested approval of a Viand Use Guide Man Amendment, Reusing, Preliminary Plat and Variance to _regu de apProxiiMatelY two aces from LA -1 low density single family residential) to G (neighborhood shopping center); to rezone the R -1A (1 -ow, density single family) t s epp; n€ este hus ness) [ i tri t Preliminary Plat for one commercial ldtf- and d Variance to allow more than one principal structure On a int, on property '.€g ate at the southeast Corner of Hlqhway 01 and County Road ; and, WHEREAS, the planning Commission has reviewed the request at o duly called Public Hearing, and has recommended denial NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT -RE Y RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF PL.YMOUTHI, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the and Use Guide plan Amendment; Rezoning, preliminary Mats and Variance for the following reason. l Increasing the area of B-2 Zoning is inappropriate and would severely impact this. major Intersection generating more traffic, causing poor traffic circulation and limited ae'Ces . The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded: by and upon vote being taken thereon7 the following voted'in favor thereof: The f11o.Ing voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adupteda RECOMMENDATIONS CR my 81 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR BANNER CORPORATION (A-311) 1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for completion oaf 51te Improvements. 1. Any siqnage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance. 4. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv- is per Ordinance provisions. als 5. All waste and waste containers hall be stored within the enclosure, and no outside storage is permitted. No Building Fermi o b issued until the Final Plat is filed <a,d recorded with Hennepin County. 7s The parking lot addition shall be covered ,by Class V base and the initial layer of blacktop shall be installed by November, 1985, and the final lift of permanent surface shall be in plica at the time of Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the building addition. 8. Cost control measures shall be undertaken by the Banner Corporation as needed and required. RECOMMENDATIONS O MAY 81 198' 4AMmING COMMISSION MEETItIG APPROVING SITE PLAN A i RIAN FOR L CORPORATION (8502" 1 Compliance with City; Engineer's Memorandum Payment of park dediratiort fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the Lip thea i.on policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance, based`upor the area of the parcel being consolidated. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for completion of site improvements. 4. Arty signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance, pprov- a Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject' to required reviews and approv- s per Ordinance provisions. als 6. Al:. waste and waste containers shall he stored within the structure, and no outside storage is permitted. 7, No Building Permit to he issued until: the Lot Division/Con oli,dati.on is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. Approved Variances include. a ft, setback from parking to the building b ft* setba=k to east property line for parking and drive aisle o. no cur ins the joa.kirl lot along the east Property line. x Appropriate le ad. documents establishing a covenant on the property shall be approved by the City Attorney and flied at Hennepin County, identifying that the future us° of the b-iIlding :may require the construction of a parking ramp to satisfy Ordinance parking requirements,. pr -*or to issuance of a Building Permit.