Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 01-23-1985PLANNING CONNISSION RFCOMHENDATION JANUARY 23, IM x'O*rF NDATI APPROVING SITE PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCEADVANCE HA INF (A-519) WHEREAS, advance Machiae has requested approval of a SlIte Platl Conditional Use Permit and Variance for the construction of a ; xpanslon to their building located north of 21st. Avenue between Fernbrook Lane and Niagara Lane; and WWERR'AS the Planning Commission has reviewed ai,ld request at a duly called public H,-ariqg and recommends approval of the e,..ansion to the building., I THEREFOREt ` BE IT HM BY RESOLVED BY THE 'STY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ' PLYMOUTH,, II N a TAA that it should and hereby does approve the request for Advance, Machine for a Site plan. Conditional Use permitaM Variance for the expansion to the faellity located ori the north of 11=t Avenge between Fernbrook lane and Niagara Lane,, subject to the following o(,ixd1t1*o sz 1Compliance with It Engineer's Vemorandum. t Payment of park dedication fees,ln- lieu of dedication in accordance withDedi- cation Policy in effect at the time of i.ailding permit issu4nee. 3. Submission of required financial guarantee .and performanee agreement for comple- tion o pl.e- tion of site improvements. Any subsequent phases of expansions are suhjject .to required reviews and approvals per Ordinance provision -i. 5 All waste and waste oontainers shell, be stored within the approved enclosure. 6. The Conditional Use Permit for temporary > outside storage, is subject to all applicable codes, regulations anJ ordinan est and violation thereof' shall be grounds for revocation-, 74 The Conditional Use permit is issued to the petitioner/tenant as operator of the facility and shall net be transferable* PLEASE SEEPAGE: TWO CITY OF 11C40"ITH PLAMIM COW41!SSWN MINUTES 3ANUARY 23,.. 1985 The re u ar moeting of the Plymouth PLanntag Commission w"As called to order at 700 P.M* WIMS PRESENT- Chairman tel(,ter ald,, Commissioner Wire, " Magnusj alfa and tRauba tom` . ABSENT: Commi Ener Stult erg, STAfT PRESENT-. Community elopm n ` ordinetor Sara, M C nnCity4qty) m o yer Community Development Secretary Grace Win man, Chalrmafi Stenger a d ` explainedained t e us(- and purpose of the Consent Agenda. MOTION by, Commissioner Pauba, seconded b Co9tuissicner Wire to adopt the Consent Agenda, adding Tt m . and 4-D to the Consent Agenda. air a-, St 1q rivald nquired x there were question$ or comments t'r,;the repre- ntative of these petitions., qtr. David Volker stated fie wished to discuss 64i Lot Consolidation, Lot I lei l un and Variance for David Volker and Thomas Betz with the COMB - un. The representative for _A, Alfred berlej 3r4, Lot I)Ivision and Variance, stated he had no (iiestions or oeom ent4t and n aqr m nt/ 1 withp the t ldnn.n p to f l gg y y l 1985. dktflepJanuar the addIt on of Item 6-R. VO > Ayes. MOTION carried. M.s NUTS by Commissioner Pau , seconded b cmm c`£.. r Wiret1tn MI , „ to, approve theF Minutes of January 91 1985 as a mitt(,- 1985 VOTE. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. PUMLIC NGS Chairman t g rwa .d introduced the request by Advance ADVANCE HA Hf1W Maehine and requested that Coordinator M,,«Conn review the LOT CONSOLD T10N January 11 1985 .Staff Report. CWrman Steilgerivald C XTX USE e Fir E parking, at landscaping variances were requested. AND VARIANCE (A-519) Commissioner Pduba requested an explanation of the phasing and building looations on the. graphie. Chairman Steigerwald Introduced t"fir. Ron flay,, 560 Weston ;wane, representing Advance Rac into Page 14 P ann ing Commission Wnutes 46 C January i A 7 Mr. pay reviewed the graphic and provided background on the development. He explained that, the land was purchased In 1971, and some of their assemble operations were moved from their Sprang Park location to Plymouth. They expanded into both existing buildings; brought all their assembly operations to Plymouth; and, have purchased an additional 1 acres, No explained that In 1974; when they purchased the addit",dnal acreage, the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance permitted a axlc um of coverage in the Industrial District. He stated that upon their decision to further expand their operations; and at the time of submission of initial plays-, they were ;informed by the City, that the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance now allows a maximum lot coverage of in the Industrial District. He plaaned that they have three locations In the metres area.; southeast. Minneapolis, Spring, Park, and Plymouth, they don't want to face the need to find nes sites in six to 7 years, and, they need the lot coverage for their expansion plans. He stated that to reduce the lot coverage they require, would mean a large reducticin of the building ; floor space needed.. Mr. Pay stated his concern about landscaping requirements, and questioned the importance of Increasing the landscaping because of a mezzanine area they are proposing. He stated that the need fo:r incre,-sed screening in an area where there is nothing but warehousing and manufacturing operations such as Toro Corp.,. does not seem plausible. Mr. Pay explained that, in reference to the parking requirements, their operations will consist of two to three s ifts so that the total number of employees roll across tree shifts, and the parking plan as. submitted would be more than sufficient for their needs. He stated Advance Machine does not want any parking on the streets, and If additional parking is needed, they will provide for it. Chairman Steigewald stated that, the City's concerns about adequate parking in the Industrial District comes from past experiences with companies that face the need for expansion and do not have adequate parking ori-site, or where new tenants/owners of industrial buildings require a higher use of the propertyt and the parking is not rj fflci nt for their needs.; ff .clay stated haat.Advance is aware of these problems, and is hopeful that with the phased' development, the parking required will be provided, He stated they are 'committed to continue doing business in this area, and even though it is e pen ive to operate in Minnesota, their work force is dere and they don't want to move their operations out of State.. Page Plannity omm i ssion Janoary ?3, 1916, Commissioner Magnus -d abocit locatioti of the drkitk„, ramp. Mr, Ray explained their "proof of-parking” pan and stated that construction of a ramp is probably ;lost poi- tje, fie stated their surface parking for stalls. Chairman Stelgerwald. inquired about tete staff commentsfa how compliance. can be a h .eyed, and how employee levels could be regulated. Coordinator McConn stated that the City has out ,oned Advance td be real i it i Aboat her future parking needs- and, that actual experOnce has shown that problems do occur whe=a deve .opmers gauge and obtain approval for a lower use thea when a new owner/tenant, . who needs a xno sten e use of the facility, has to apply for variances because the parking required has not been provided. Mr. tray stated they understand that) because they have this problem at their Spring Park facility. They willl take any and all a0ton necessary to provide the parking theyy will require. Coordinator Mc nn added that utilltizinr.z more than one shift of employeos will help control the need for parking, at any divan time. Commissioner Pluf a *°onf rmed that Phase T does not exceed the 3 maximum -A Coordinator McConn answered affirmatively, hast added that the issue of lot coverage is Import ri-U to (114SOUSS now before there Is further development. Mr tray exp .aint-d that they wadi to move the, Corporate} offices, from Spring flark to the Plymouth` location. They plan to move their corporate offices 'sato Phase IT of the r1ev( lopment and Ph4se III will ,b : ani ex ansion of their MMANCtUring OperdtIOPS- Commitssioner Pa tau Inquired If they could salve the var anoe request by the cora -uct on of a multi-story office build- Ino. ui d- In . Mr. pay confirmed they have a 3-story office building In tale plans. (Alis oner paub a inquired if they could construct other multi-,story buildings elsewhere on ache prop. er y to coat down on ` the lot coverage,, Mr, day stated they could not do this with the existing bullrings, but ;trey, do have plans for a mezzanine to provide office space. Co=ilssioner Wire inquired about the outside s orae e. tar. flay st t ct that there will he some outside storage in phase wh ch will be - ere ned with plantings and 'fencing* He ad- vised d-< v ed there is some outside storage in use at the facility now, with occasional short term storage of truck trtil ers which are moved in axt out. He confirmed they would not Page 16 Planning o piss on Minute's Ja uary store components in the trailers, as they have adequate warehouse space. Commissioner lire inquired if the new area wi I l have paved storagee area; M.r. Hay answered affirmatively. Commissionerr d ire confirmed that trailers will not be parked In this storage area, and: that the s-,tora e of materials would be on , a temporary basis; Mr. Ray stated trailers would not be parked in the area; that this area is for storage of waste steed:.. etc.; and, , collection containers tru+ h like Iedampst rs" will be provided. The area will be screened and paved Chairman Steigerwald'opened the Public Hearing There was no one present I to speak on the item. Chairman Stelgerwald closed the public Hearing. Chairman Steigerwaild stated be cannot remember the reason for the Ordinance chance from 0 o lot ooverae in the Tndustr al District. Coordinator McConn stated she does not know the history of the Ordinance amendment but at one time there was l- Zoning that allowed for more intense industrial. use. Mr. Ray concurred, stating that the 1-2 Zoning District had a maximum €l lot coverage. Commissioner Wire stated that these changes were made to re- duce the u V di nq "footprint", He is concerned that the petitioner purchased the additional land under the assump- tion, that they could; have 5lot coverage, and he is in- clined to recommend that the variance be approved because they acquired the hand before the Ordinance was changed. He confirmed that the parking is covered by Condition No. 1 of the draft Resolution. Coordinator McConn answered affirmatively. She stated that standard language is used, and the Commission may reiemher that a covenant was prepared for a similar appl.icati.on, (Stevens -Lee ddition!3) . Commissioner Plufka stated that, the parking requirements and, lot coveragerage variance work against each other, and that it is agreed that constructing a .ramp could be very costly. He; stated that if the application is recommended for approval,, the petitioner must look very carefully at their plans for phases li and Tll, to determine what the ultimate use will be for the -property. if AtIvance leaves, and the building is used by a new owner for a more intense use, there could be too few parking stalls for a very large facility. Mr. Ray stated that, of course, they cannot foresee th it course in 20 years, but they assure the City they are very sensitive to their long-range ,seeds# and are totally commit.. ted to this development. He stated that :once' Phase i is complete, tete City will understand more of their operation. Page 17 Planninq Commission Minutess a ar , 1985 MOTION by Commissioner W it r , seconded by Commissioner Ri a ka RECOWENDATION to recommend approval of the Loi: Consolidation for Advance Viachin,subject to the, conditionsion as stated in th draft i olutiont. to recommend approval of the Haster Plans Site Plan, Conditional Usefi> i.t and Variances subjec, to the first five conditions of the draftResolution; modify nq Condition No. 6 to state, "The Conditional ase Permit for temporary du AsIde storage is subject to all applicable codes, regulations and ordinances, and violation thereof shall be q*-ounds for revocation; subject to Condition Nes throughh 0- delete Condition Nos. II; delete #yup to, , but not exceeding Ordinance allowed lot coverage" of Condition flo. It subject to Condition No. 13 as stated; and, adding Condition No. 14 a "a) Lot coverage as per the has r Plan at 46.2%. rather than 1 'Landscape Plan to allow for 1 over --store plantings as proposed". Commissioner Wire stated that he, agrees with the pe itioneT re ardino the landscape plan, and that a variance requestst° for increased lot e vera i would not have been required` i development had taken place at the brae -Advance purchased the land. Commissioner Paula stated his agreement, except that the lot coverage variance request is "too much" and he opposes granting, the variance. Commissioner Magnus stated that he could recommend approval for the lot coverage and agrees with the covenant for park- Ino,requirements, but: that it is appropriate for thea, to meet the landscaping requirements of the City to hu l*er this large facility. Mr. Ray :Mated that plantings> evil, be placed I In the area to the svostt and they, will add some smaller trees dor future growth. He inquired if putting in the ' 172 over -story trees, with an addition of the 35 plantings at a smaller size than Policy requires, could he recommended by the Commission. MOTION to AMEND the NAIR MOTION by Commissioner Magnus, NOTION TiaW, seconded by Commissioner Pluf a that the Landscape Plan hall contain 3,14 additional plantings at `l inch 'minimum size, to nr fi ittu, for screening of the east and west perimeters of tood-Volza men and fu re phases. VOTE. 6 Ayes. MOTION TO, AH[WD carried. VOTE HOTIORCARRIED Ca mmi,s ioner Plu ka commented that Advance Machine is a highly desirable corporate citizen or Plymouth; their plans exhibit 'their oresi hta in phasing their development; and, the City is not dissimilar in regard to eeon nmim considerations of'mature planning. page 18 ANIL Planning Comm. linn Rin s January 21. 1985 Commissioner pa ha con orred, ' but he is concerned that an recommending approval o n *Increased lot coverage,, eaves it open for someone eLi , to come forward to ask for increased lotcoverage- for similar reasons. Commissioner Wire stated that, the; precedent has been set In the past with other requests. < Coordinator RcCoiin clarified that tears have been : requests for .p to 40%o coverage. ncom r - nor lger aldonm_-, nd that he is not uncomfor- a a with the approval for locreased lot coveragel, in that, table the factlity Is not close to res d n t are -as, and is not a highly vitihlsite. Coordinator M C nn stated ttriat staf-l" has similar concerns to those e Commissioner to tus, and recommend cnmpl a wit', h the Landscape Policy to reiluothe impact of the buildings. Mr. Ray commented that thoir development overlooks other in- dustrial buildtngst, and that they are sensitive to the pub- licts view, however, they feel they are providing ad",nate bufferingand sx°reeninq for their development., Commissioner Plufka .inquired if the City Engineer had any on ern r aardina storm Nyater rust off. En inn r Goldberq stated they have no special concerns. Rtill Cali Vote on the tMA `N MOTION as ONCE AMENDED. 5 ;Ayes. VOTE -- MOTTO C.ARRTED Comis,sio er Poubal, May. MOTION carried. Chairman Soaq rwald Introduced the request by Hennepin NEWPIN CUMTY PARK County Park Reserve District, and requested a review of theRESERVE DISTRICT January 11, 11085 Staff Report. Coordinator McConn explained REVMD COHOTIJONAL the revision to the approved plan as a relocation of the PERMIT AMEWWW parking lot, because of dental by the Minnesota Depa tmentM SITE PEM (840657 of Natural Resources (DNR) for a permit to odn truot the parking lot as originally proposed. She explained that the parking lots as initially pr +pos d was ton close to the High eater Elevation. Chairman Steigerwald introduced fir., Don King,, Hennepin County park Reserve istriotj who further explained that the parking area as initially proposed would have required extensive fill. n ro- Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing,, and Intro- d o d Mrs. Arlene J hnsont Rosewood Laney who inquiredduced how many trees would be out down as the result of this pro- posal. She was conenei,ned that applications seem to be a:• approved so, quickly, and they are not advised of these hear - ar- In . Chairman Stelgerwald explained the City's legalIngs. page 19 P"'lanning Commission minutes January 21$,1985 notice procedures, and advised Mrs, 3ohnson, that: if she would call City Center, they, would be glad to answer any of her questions, at any time. tlrs. 3ohnson stated she is very concerned about the removal of trees; that 30 trees have already been removed; and, she wants to know how many more zre to be removed. Coordinator McCenn : pl -a ,ned that the plan calls ' for 16 deciduous and 5 conifer trees to be removed- that new trees III be pl.antedt and existing trees will be retained. She noted that they ar,.., l,ndreasinq the number of over -story trees b13, and meet all, requirements of the Policy. Mr. ding ,explained that the orxiginal plan would have made it necessary to remove four more trees,which are now retained. Mrs. 3ohns n stated she .was not a resident when the Park Reserve District purchased the land, but she is sivrfh the tax payers were unaware that "part of the park land iased by the County rould be used for offices and p rkinT I, t. Com- missioner Plufkand Coordinator : cConn explained that the Hennepin Couuty Park District received City approval of a Master Plan, and they; proposals for the District Headquarters complies blah Ordinance standards. Mr. !(In, ilated that thi: use of park land for district head - quarter* is not unique, and that out of the 300 katal.: acres, their complex esus approximately 3 acres, :less than 1 of the total park area. Mrs. 3ohnson inquired that percentage of the park is useable land. Mr. King stated that 3 of the total area is marsh. land. Chairman Steigerwald closed tate Public Hearing. Commissioner Wire inquired about the waiver of construction of a °dire lane. Coordinator McConn stated that tate Else Chief took the topography and physical characteristics of the property into consideration, in his determination to MCOMmerld granting the wa ve ; that the. City Council found the recommendation appropriate- and, approval has been car- ried forward with this application. TION by 'Chairman Steigerwald, seconded by Commissioner R.0 MATION Padba to recommend approval, of the Revised Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan for the Hennepin County 'ark Reserve District subject to the conditions: as stated in 'the draft Resolution Roll Call. Vote. 6 Ayes MOTION carried. VOTE 14ni cN CARRIED Page ZO lanningommis io z s January j 1985 BUSINESS TION by commissioner Rauba, seconded by Commissioner Wire REC0'14EWATION C TO to recommend approval of Lot Division and Variance for APPROVE LOT DIVISION Alfred Eberle, Jr., subject to the conditions as stated In AND VARIANCE FOR the draft Resolution (planning Staff Report (11ated 3anuary AURED EBERL , JR. 84104) VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Vote. 6 Ayes. MO€ carried. DAVID VOLKER AND Chairman Steigerwald introduced the application,, and Mr. THOMAS DET David Voliker, 2830 Brockton Lane. Reading of the , anuary LOT CONSOLIDATION i1', 1985 Staff Report was waived. LOT DIVISION AND VARIANCE (84109) Commissioner pauba stated he agrees with; the staff recom rendat or to provide the minimum 6 ft. setback to the garage. Charman telge!iyald commented that the problem beg4n with a surveyor's error, and that on behalf of the present proper- ty owners, the•--ity should be flexible in this case. Mr. Volker: explained that this requesIt. is made after a series of compromises between himself and f1r. Betz. Now that ter. Betz is selling his home, he is allo ing this prob- lem to be resolved by giving land to lr. Volker so that his garage will be on his land. The lot adjustment of 5 ft. I$ equitable to both he and Mr. Betz. ommssioner Plufka stated he is concerned about not having the required setback. Further discussion ensured regarding location of utilities. Clity Esigincer Goldberg stated that the setback variance ecoid not impact overhead utility Bic . service. y+ 4 I 1 MOTION by Chairman Steiqerwald, seconded by _Commissioner Magnus to recommend approval for the Lot Consolidation,, Lot Division and Variance for David Volker and. Thomas Meet'* sub- eet to the conditions as stated in the draft Resolution, with a change to Condition No. 5 to state. "The common property line shall ue adjusted o the south appy ops h ely to provide a minimum 3 ft, setback to the garage". VOTE -MOTION CARRIED Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. Commissioner plufka, Nay., MOTION carried. Mr. Volker coat cnted that the average citizen has a diffi- cult time understanding the procedures involved with appli- cation's to the City, and that perhaps the City of Plymouth could put together information for th ;si. Chairman telger- wa.d stated that this could be lengthy, but the City staff is available and ready to help all cltI ens witf, questions concerning their property. Page lannng Commission Minutes anuary , 1985 Coninis ion r R ufka Inquired if there Mould be a" problem with any odd -shaped lot that could require varlar oe re- questst or could have a problem of poor traffic circilatlon for a fast food restaurant, Mr. Sathre stated thei - plans show that the us,,s. now proposed would fit the configuration o the lots within Ordinance requirements. Actnq Chairman Stegeald opened the Publle Hearingf as there was no one to speak on this Item, he closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Paubal seconded by Commissioner RECOHMENDATION C Magnus to recommend approval for Orn Properties for Revis- ed Preliminary Plat for "Rockford Square's subject to the staff ;recommendations in the draft staff report. Roll. Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Acting Chairman Steigerwald introduced the Item and request- ROOERT GERSBACH ed background on the application. Coordinator lcConn intro- PRELIMINARY PLAT duced correspondence received from the: Department of Natural VARIANCES (84107 Resources (DOR) received this date, and: reviewed that their comments reflect the recommendation of Clay staff for defer- ral, of the item for redesign. A review of the december 1.* E 198k staff report was provided, Commissioner pl.tufka requested clarification of lot line locations. Acting; Chairman Steigerwald introduced lr, forest Anderson, Attorney, 7501 60th St. So., representing the petitioner. Mr. .Anderson submitted a letter to the Commission, from the former owner of the property, Mr. Raymond C. Zurek, who up- hol.ds the petitioner's variance request, s1 He stated that, the former "L.ynnette Marie Addition". plat approved In 1982, provided for the demolition of the exist- ing structu*e;,, however, these tomes are year-round dwel- lings, with a total valuation of 20G, Q0,Q» CC.. He commented that as with the statement from the former owner, no one can economica tl,y develop this property t a the or ginal. prolim- ary plat, and with the additional cost of demolition.` Another concern is the potential need to remove trees at the northerly edge of the property. If the original pl=at were used, a roedway would need to be constructedy which would require removal of trees. He explained that Mr. Gersbach has male improvements to the property, and the northerly structure. It was felt that any purchaser of Lot 2, would probably demolish the existing structure and rebuild, which is why they request the setback variance for this lot. He feels this proposal, lessens ..he existing variance problem, xid will result In Improvement of the entire area. Lot 2 as a buildable lot, makes the plat economically, feasible, for the applicant, and enhances the area. Page two Planning Recommen aton January ,, 1985 8. The site shall he mdlnt,ined in a sanitary maiul -xr, 9. All waste and w } containers shall: he ;Mored Nvi han approved designated areas a diagraom d on It, i4 nls. dated August 2-4. 1084. fit?. The permit shall be renewed in one 1) year to assure compliance with the conditions. 11. Future development of this site shall, be consistent with the approved taster Plan. l Appropriate legal: documents establishing a covenant on the property shall be approved by ths City Attorney, and filed at Hennepin County identifying that the Future use of, the building may require the construction of a parking ramp to satisfy Ordinance parking requirements. 13. Approved Variances include a. trot Coverage as per the submitted Master plata at 46.2%; and, h*. landscape pan aha contain provision for 91 plantings plus 1 additionallcnal plantings at I inch minimum size to provide screening of the east and gest perars. Ot lENATION FOR JANUARY 2 19 RECOMMENDATION B APPROVTNG A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AME"31.4rNTs, SITE PLAN, AND VARIANCE FOR , HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT C 406 WHEREAS, the Hennepin C=ity Park Reserve District has requested approval of a Conditional Use permit Amendment$ Site Plans and Variance for relocating the parking lot area for the istrldt Headquarters within the Clifton E. French Regional ark'- and, 4 A , the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, and Variance for the location of 'the District Headquarters within the Clifton E. Preach Regional, Park on September 24t 1984 throuqh Resolution No. 4- *1 and, WHEREASs the Planning Commission, has reg, ewed said request at a duly called public fleang and recommends approval OW2 THEREFORE, BF 1T HFREBY RESOLVEDBY THE CT.TY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for relocating the parking lot area for the District Headquarters, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with City nqIr -_ergs Memorandum. 2. Conp.rian e with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minlmu flour Bleu"tions for new structures on sates adjacent to or containing any open storm. water drainage faoil l ty 3. Submission of requare, financial guarantee and per.*forma oe agreement for es mpleti n of sate Improvements* 4. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per Ordinance provisions. All waste and ease containers shall he stored within the enclosure and no outside storage Is permitted. Compliance with Resolutlon.No. 82-235. 7. Waiver of the fare lane requirements. 8. Prior to issdanee of a Building Permit, e structural analysis prepared by a structural engineer who Is registered in the State of Minnesota shall be provided to the Building Official, confirming that the use of the existing building for purposes ether than residential meet and/or exceed the Uniform Blui iding Cede requirements. 9. Resolution 'N . 4-669 is hereby reg-inded. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ,'Ai da -MY 23, 1985 RECOMMENDATION C SETTING CONDITIONS TO `'8L ME1 PRIOR TO FILING AND REG-ARDINO LOT DIVISION FOR ALFRED FM RL , JR. ( 8410 WH RAS$ the City Coup .11 has approveda taut Division for Alfred Eberle, Jr. for property located Orth of Ridgemount Avenge and East of Zachary Lane ander Resolution No., 85 - NOW, THEREFORE, HF IT HEREBY RESOLE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY or PLYMOUTH,, MIi MESOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the following conditions to be met prior to filing of and regarding said Lot giv.siont 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum, No yard setback variances are granted or implied. Payment ` of park 'dedication fees -in -lieu of: dedioatlon for Parcel A prior t filing of the Division in aecordilnue with City Policyy i effect at the time of filing of the ivislo o, Parcel B is subject to park dedication requirements a the time of further division,. 4. 'Mo Building Permit to be issued until. the Lot Division is filed with Hennepin County for Parcel. A. 5. Appropriate documents `shall be filed on all parcels indicating that in conjunction with this division, conceptual' documents have been placed on file with the City for future reference, 6*1 Submittal of all necessary utility easements prior to filing Lot Division with Hennepin County. 7. Approved Variances: : dot width of 100 ft. rather than 110 ft. for Parcel R. The driveway for Parcel A shall be constructed with a wra so that traffic onto Zachary Lane shall be in a forward motion. 9. No further division of Parcel H, by means other than lotting. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AWARY; ,, 1985 RECOMMENDATION SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MFT PRIOR TO FILING AND REGARDING LOT CMISM IDATIONIDIVISTON OR, A,,IID VOLKER AND T 10 A BETS "'.84109) Ra REA t the City 'Council has approved a Leat Consolidation/Lot Division, for David Volker and Thomas Rett for property att*3 Brockton Lane and 815 Alvarado Lane under Resolution NQ* W t THEREFOREt. HE IT HEREBY RESOLVEDLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PL Y a9Q TR MNNESOT - that it should and hereby does direct the following conditions to be met prior to filing of andregarding said Lot Consolidation/Lot, Division* 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum Submittal of all necpssary utility easements: prior to fit -In (Lot Division) (Lot Consolidation)with Hennepin County. Approved Variances-* To divide property by metes and bounds description rather that platting. 4. Parcel shall be deeded to the City for Right- Of-1Way purpn:ts.. The common property line shah, be adjusted to the south appropriai'-,ely to provide a inlmum 3 ft. I -at aok to the garage.