Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 01-09-1985CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANNIN4 COM4ISSION MINUTES 3ANUARY 1985 The regular meeting of tr a PlymouthPlanning Commission was called to order at 7*430 P.M. HENWIS PRESENTz Acting Chairman SteigerwaldtCommis- sioners Wire, 'Magnus, Stulberg, plu ka and Pauba STAFF PRESENT-. Community Development Coordinator Sara MoConn City Engineer Sherm Gol&erg Community Development Secretary Grace Wineman, 705 P.M. A special presentation to former Chairwoman aria s i uwas given by the Commission. Chairwoman 'Vasiliou has been appointed to fill a vacancy on the Plymouth City Council. KNUTES MOTION by Commissioner Stulbergj,; seconded by Commissioner Magnus > to approve the Minutes of December 1 ,, 1984,, with a correction to page 2q,% 'nth paragraph,, "Commissioner teig ald withdrew the MOTION; Commissioner Wire concur- red" should ready "Chairwoman Vasillou ,concurred".. VOTE. Ayes. Commissioner pauba abstained. MOTION carried. OLIY KARINGS Acting Chairman Steigerwald, introduced the request by WALLACE FREE !t Freeman, ine. and requested that Coordinator McConn review FREEMAN2 INC. the staff report, dated January 21, 1985. REVISED PRELIKKARY PLAT y VARIANCES AND . Acting Chairman teigerwald .introduced Mr. John Klick, SITE, PLAN (8#i 9 9 Architect, representing the petitioner. Acting Chairman Stelgerwal.d Inquired if the 'buildings could be grouped closer together, to allow green areas on the perimeters. Mr. Klick thanked staff for their cooperation and consider- ation of this proposal., as office "ndow-Inium buildings are new concept with many questions concerning them, He presented drawings of the off condomInxums constructed in 15t. Louts park,. explaining that the buildings are clustered around courtyards. These courtyards are shared by the tenants owners and employees. He explained further that these are designed to be attrac ive open areas for relaxation, meeting: people, .and having lunch. The Willow Grove proposal is the same concept. .1r. B,l ck e ?la ned that if the buildings were moved closer together to achieve the 35 ft. perimeter setback, the buildings would encro ch and reduce courtyard space between the buildings. Page 2 l nniho Commission Minutes 3anuary T, 1955 Ne. Klick explained that :this design also gives the tenant/ owner individual access and Inientity that is very desirable and affords the buildings their marketing success. Acting Chairman Stelger ald Inquired if they had Investi- gated other design considerat tons and gave as an example, other office complexes of similar type, but different design. Mr. Kliek stated they do not feel these are as sue- cessful suc- cessfulas the provedbuildings- that the purchaser wants the exterior exposure to thein building area and the inter- ior courtyard amenities. Acting Chairman Steigerwald asked what type of businesses, would be interested in purchasing this office space. Mr. Mick stated they would be profes- sional -type businesses) such' s architects, CPA's attor- ro s,. insurance offices,; chiropractors and other medical office uses* Mr. Klic: commented regarding setback requirements in the 1 vs B-2 ni District; that since' the development Is a office use,, perhaps the 8-1 standards could be appiled oordinator McConn commented that the buildings are to be constructed in the 6-.2 Zoning District, and therefore the proposal should meet the Ordinance. requirements for that District Commissioner Magaus inquired if they would consider smaller buildings. qtr. Klick stated the , lot coverage is , and they are at only 2/ of that percentage. They have provided green area in the central areas of the complex, which they feel is a better use than providing green, area along the roadway or ` next` to the shared parking area, that would .not be used by the owners and employees of the office condo- miniums. Commissioner Pl f a inquired about the temporary read, and what would ' occur if it were abandoned. Mr. Kilok stated the temporary road will be replaced with a permanent road- way,, and they have included cross easements with their pro- posal for this purpose. Coordinator McCo n clarified the temporary road" is included as `,part of the Willow trove Development., Mr. Klick stated he is in basic a ree _nt with the planning staff report, and the c-nf'li t comes- from the, fact that the Zoninq Ordinance does Pot allow for, condominium of lele buildings that use interior lot lines*' A Acting Chairman Stelgerwald opened Public Hearing. There was no one to speak on the Vice Chairman t igerwal .to ed the Public Hearing. T 'Page Planning Commission Minutes January ', 1985 MOTION hy Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner ON A pauba to recommend approval of the Revised Preliminary ..Plt, and Site Plan for Wallace Freeman, Freeman, Inc., deleting Condition No. 12 of the draft Resolution; and recommending approval of all setback variances om- Commissioner pauba concurred with the recommendation. Com- miss o er p"lufka commented that the design is good for themissioner tenantlowners and employees. Commissioner Stul.berg agreed that the use of the .interior courtyards is very popular. Commissioner ire concurred with the recommendation- and Commissioner Magnus stated they have developed a goad land- Cape plan. Roll. ai l VOTE. 6 Ayes. NOTION carried. VOTE - MOTIONCARRIED Com%issa.oner Stulberg suggested that research be done re- garding Ordinance language and requirements for office condominium complexes, and that staff rake a report to the Cott s•,.on ; Acting Chairman Stelgerwald introduced the Iters and request- DON MYR NN ed a review of the December 28, 1984 staff report, which was PRZkii41NARY PLAT provided by Coordinator WcConn. AND VARIANCE p OAKDE WEST 3RD Aocing Chairman $teigerwald introduced lair. Mark Gronberg, ADDITION (8407) representative- and Don Myron, petitioner. Mr. Cronberg provided some history on, the property and the proposal}. He noted that they first investigated a 6 lut subdivision of the property, however, the fill, requirements for this property made It economically unfeasible, ;and led to the proposal for a fur lot subdivision. He 'addressed the correspondence received from the Director of Community De-elopment Blair Tremere, dated June 21, 1984, at which time, Mr. Tremere refers to a piece of property owned by the City :and purchased for street and utility purposes. It was their opinion that there was adequate frontage on the road- way, with access being maintained through the>outlot. He stated that, they felt a was, unfair for this petitioner to x ca to provide access for the northerly property, plus hav- Aq to put in the street and utilities. Flo mated that Don Myron provided utility service and easement for Nturn, ox- , tension to the Pribble property when Oakdale West was proposed. Coordinator McConn explained that, as Mr. Dronberg has andi- c ted, the City owns the triangle of land, but it is not deeded right-of-way for 19th Avenue north, it is only open property owned by the City. She stated, that the City's pol- icy) to prevent "land -locked" parcels, is to recommend that provisions be made forright-of-way as development occurs, as the City would have no rights in providing access in the future if f utlot D is retained. Page nq Comm; 11 anuary 9, 1985 Coordinator HaConn stated that, in reference to Mr. ronbergis accounting of the history of development for this area; tb t during the development of,Sunhyacres 3rd, the owner of the northerly property (Mr. Bill pribble) Yas approached by the City, and asked if the roadway could cross his property,, Mr. Dribble would not grant his permission for V,is to occur. The City has looked at other alternatives, but this is the last of the undeveloped land around the Pribbl.e property, and It is the City's policy to provide access ` for all property in the area of development. Acting Chairman Stet erwald opened the Pcibllc Hearing, and introduced Mr. Don Myron'. Mr. Myron requested that he be last to speak. Mr. Bill pribbl, 17330 '1"th Avenue Norte.) stated that he would 111te to request i t the City remove a "non-existent" bice path from the mApsf he po.nted out the location to staff )rd the Commission, as being on the east side of Klreatz _ake R He stated he ` has read the planning staff report, and concurs with the staff recommendations. He stated that the ` property is not owned '_ by Mro M ;iron $ but by Mrs. Copeland, and that he has made offers on this .property in the past, because of his need for access to his property,.- however, this was not accepted. He referred to the triangular piece of property discussed as owped by the Ci yr and stated that he and Mr. Copeland have easeAlents that encumbers ;this piece. He event on to say that the suer stub provided does not help his property as; it is too far away. He enjoys his property just a it, is,and plans to retire there. Mr. pr,ibbl.e stated that he could -incur with either approach (Cutl;ot M or right-of-way) to serve this lard, and that the staff recommendation should be endorsed by the Commission. He inquired about the street name of Kimberly Lane, and Inquired if he would have to change: his address's Coordinator McConn confirmed the street name, ` but had no knowledge of the need for his change of address at this Coordinator McConn stated, in response to Mr. Pribble' s comments on the bike path, that she does not have that information available to her at this time, but will check into it and report to the Commission and Mr. Pribble Page Planning Commission Minutes anuary 9-1 198 Acting Chairman teiVer ald introduced Mr. Don Myron, 2425 Me ri o ' ane, who discussed the problems of developing this property. It Is hi.sopinion that this property has ",given" too much with the zany ;requi s-ments placed on it by the City. He stated that the northern property owner,Mr* Pri.bbl, could have obtained permanent access to his property a number of times in the past, and it would have been more economical 'them as time has increased the cost o development. He emphasized that, their proposal will leave an: easement so that Mr. Pribble -rill always :have access to his property, but: they are asking for the right to retain Outiot B. He stated that if the triangular piece of property owned by the City, was owned ,oy this development$ there would be substantial lot frontage. Mr pri.bble stated that, in response to Mr. Byron, he couid have made an offer on property within $unnyacres,, but fie could not afford the property at that time.. He understands that 9 . Myron is desirous o retaining 0 tlot 8, but that City staff has madam the appropriate recommendation. Acting Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner, Stul.ber inquired about tie proposal for 6 lots, and, their reasoning for developing four lots:.; Mr. Gronbe g .stated that alone with requirements for fil,l, this proposal was undesirable due to the heed for soils correction which would be very costly.Commissioner Stulberg, noted that lake' shore property is mare valuable, and that if developed as such, they could vacate the easement and N,r. Pribbl,e could use a new pub,l. c roadway. Mr. 'Myron stated* there would need, to be a solid base for construction, which could necessitate going. down 50 ft. for firm footingt and the poor soil conditions could cause future ; problems. Commissioner Plufka concurred* and stated that a roadway could not be built without exceptionally high construction costs because,of the poor-svil,s,. Co lssianer pie inquired about the private drive easement and: proposal for Outlot B. Coordinator McCann stated that, all other land is new platted, and this is the last option for access from an adjacent developing parcel. Co i l.ssi.oner Plufka` stated teat the City must provide access, and cannot forever be assured that the property owner will retain all his property, and that at some point, the property may be proposed for a different; use. Page Planning Commission Minutes anuary 9t 1985 MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner RECO"HENDATION, tulberg to recommend approval for; tion Myron for Preliminary Plat and Variance with the, staff's recommendation for dedi- eated right of-way as stated in the draft Resolution. Commissioner Pauba stated a he ":is no n comp agree ment with the recommendations of approval, but there seems to be no ether choice. Mr. Don Myron stated that, he realizes the staffreoommenda- tion. is based on Ordinance standards and engineering reoom- mhdations, but ti. at there should be renumeration for this outright giving of land". The Commission advised Mr. Myron that, this matter is some- thing they cannot dlseuss, and could only be considered by City Council. Roll Call. Vote. 6,Ayes. MOTION carried, VOTE - ff3i10H CARRIED Acting Chairman Steigerwald called a 5 minute Recess a 5*00 RECESS P.M* The meeting reconvened at 8:55 P.M. Acting Chairman Stelgerwald introduced the Revised Prellinin- OCRM PROPERTIES ary 'plat for "Root'-ford Sguarell., the reading of the December PW-LMINARY 811984 Staff Report was waived. PLAT FOR "!ROCKF SWARE" 84103), Acting, Chairman tel-gerwald introduced fir. Rick Sathret Sathre Berquist Assoc., representing the petitioner. Mr. Sathre, provided a history on the projeett eomment ng the project has required al.ot of work over a long period of time, and they meant ;to bring It to a «ltastefull conellisi;on. He, advised the Commission that if this ,project is recommend- ecom mend_ ededfor approval., they want to process futureappl,ioati.ons in a timely manner. Commissioner d ire .inquired about the Analysis portion of the staff report, noting the 8-2 .Zoning w10 the CM (neighbor- hood shopping center) guiding, and his e%nuern that the pro- posals would not be neighborhood Services, and therefore the zoning is misleading for this guiding. Moor d nator MeConn, stated that this guiding is the basis for the B-2 Zoning District, and is corresponding, Commissioner }'dire question ed the Class IT restaurant use.. Coordinator McCann pointed out that, Item tb# 3 in the Analysis Section of the report states that Site Plan applications and Conditional Use Per- mits if applicable) will require approval. of Ordinance eviews. Mr. Sathre commented that they are not presupposing approv- als of any use proposed for the property* Page Planning commission Minutes January 9, 1985 Commissioner Plufka inquired about the width of the build- able pads for Lots I end 2. Acting Chairman Ste gerwald and Coordinator McConn confirmed ' it would be 84 ft. minus 30 ft., leaving a perpendicular Width for buildable area at 54 ft. Coi-mnissioner Plufka inquired Why they -could not try to evenly distribute the area dor each lot, and would it tra;. possible to move the ` lot lines and; come up with more useabD.. lots. Mrs Cerhaoh stated he would like to be able to; do this, however, equal: division for the northernmost lot would er croach to the edge of the 'structure. It i's his hope to have two lots that meet the Ordinance standards as closely as possible. Commissioner Plufka inquired 'I ` lot lines could be adjusted to provide ,a 55 ft. width for Lot 3, ter. Cersbach stated the common lot line would then run through the middle of the house. Acting Chairman Steigerwald inquired if they had considered different lot configurations, such as pie -shaped lots, so new homes could be built further from: the lake. ter. Ge sbach stated they had considered many designs, but because he lives there, he wants privacy and space for the homes.. lie stated he i:5 ; open to ali suggestions, and feels that his proposal Is "haunted" by the previous plat; this is his home, and he is making a commitment to the property. Acting Charman Ste agerwald confirme that demolition is being considered only for Lot ?. Commissioner Plufka commented that the lot lines buld be moved north riy, to prevent the person buying Lot 3 from needing to make variance regd,sts Mr. Gerbach stated this would he feasible, but he is, concerned that the north lot lire net come up aga.'nst his residence Acting Chairman' Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing. As there ; was no one to speak, Acting Chairman Stelgerwald closed the Public Clearing. Acting Chairman Stei.gerwald sated the staff recommendations are appropriate. Commilssioner Plufka noted that the discus- sion on possible removal of trees is a. big concer.n,, as hese trees are "treasures" and should be retained as ter. Cersbach has stated. Commissioner dire stated that in regard to the 'Lynette Marie Addition"$ he understands the concern about the prop+ rty lines, ` but the City must look to the Future once the original structures are demolished. He :believes that redesign Is appropriate. Page Planning Commission minutes 1985 Acting chairman. tei er ald concurred, and offered that mere think time" is )ecessar 'nor this proposal He ,advised toe petitioner that this proposal could be passed vn to City Council and recommended for denial; however, the o mission could also recommend deferral > for redesignt and It could be reconsidered at a future meeting. Mr. Gersbach inquired if they would consider the proposal for approval If he moved the lot lines 10 ft.. Commissioner l uifka : stated the Commission would want staff to have the opportunity to review any new and/or revised plans, so that staff can respond to the new design and report to the Com- mission. Coordinator McConn concured Acting. _ hairman Steigerwald inquired, how much time would be involved before the proposal could be re -considered by the Commission. Coordinator McConn stated, that it could be scheduled tentatively for the first meeting in February., Mr., Gersbaoh commented that he had spoken to all his neigh- eighhorshorsabouthisproposal,, and no one had objections to the plans. MOTION, by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner RECOMMEMATION FOR: plufka to recommend deferral of the Preliminary Plat and DWERM Variance for Robert rs ach, with direction for redesign of the plans. Commissioner Stulberg confirmed that, the applicant is not under the impression there will be an automatic recommenda- tion for approval by his moving the lot lanes 10 ft..; and, that direction on square footage should be given. He is in agreement that redesign should provide the building pads that will be more practically useable for the future; that the natural vegetation should be preserved; and,, shared driveways could be considered for giving access.. CommIssioncr Wire concurred, stating he is not as concerned with lot width, as he would consider ,irregular shaped lots . and shared drives to 'Fork out an acceptable plan. Acting Chairman Steiqerwald explained the Motion and direc- tions for redesign to the pensioner. Roll Call Vote. 6 ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE- MOTION CARRIED Acting Chairman Steigerwal.d introduced the applioat=un, and PAUL W%SONt Jit* reading of the December 31, 1984 staff report was waived. WNTt LOT Chairman Stei.gerwald that Mr. Wilson has CONSOLIDATION/ DIVISION, (84108) Acting explained provided three alternatives in his narrative, but all would not be needed to achieve his request- and,- he reminded the Commission that the issue of lot coverage will he discussed ; with: the Development Council in the near future Page `1g Planning Commission Minutes anuary 9, 1985 ommAss over Stulberg suggested the Commissionon not deal with the elimination of decks and garages, but took at the Amend- ment to the Planned Unit V`_—*elopment. Coordinator Ro onn commented that the staff report identi- fied Items similar to those noted in the Harrison Hills report. Acting Chairman Steiger ald introduced Mr. Paul Wilson, and inquired why he was making application at this time, as dis- cussion is ongoing concerning the lot coverage. Mr. Wilson stated that, he is in the middle :of building his home fnd wants the deckand porch, He, stated' that he re- ceived ece ,ved calls from neighbors requesting ,an explanation of his application. He stated that because his property Is within the PUBt he is requesting the broad approvals so other prop- erty ownersi who might find themselves in he same circum- stance won't need to go through the ex sense, and time re- quired`for processing the application. He regoested that the Commission look at the development at,. a whole for future residents. Mr. Wilson explained that he selected the lot Because Its location, and lid net think about lot coverage problems. He stated that his builder has dune word in -East Plymouth over a long; period of time, and did not questlon, the design of the residence; however, at the time a. BuIlding permit was. requested, ;the bull,der was Informed the "footprint" was tee large. The removed tae garage and eliminated the deck, but he wants to be -able to add the deck and porel', He feels that the comment in the staff report stating that a planned unit development allows for reduced lot size to provide for more affordable housing,, prejudices his desire for an expen- sive home. In reviewing the background Information for this Planned Unit Development, 1.t was noted that the developec planned his development to tie in with. the Wellington 5ztb_ division; and, the let layout decision Was based on the opography of the property. He noted that the developer was asked what type of accusing he would see for this develop- ment, and his answer was that it would be "expensive homes". Mr., Wilsvi stated that, it is his opinion that the 'City of Plymouth PUD requirements are not "cowfion knowledge" to home buyers, builders,, or architects. He wonders It the City is better ofd"" because it was necessary for him to build a smaller garage. He : noted haat. -car garages are built be- cause families are acquiring snowmobiles) boatst etc. In his case, he plans on buying a boat, and because of the need to reduce the size of the garage, it will have to be stared outside. tie requested that) the Commission consider haat the request for increased lotcoverage and :lot division/con- solidation was undertaken by himself as a private property owner incurring the expense- and, the 'developer had no part in,. nor is profiting; From thi request, Iddl 116. Page I Planning Commission Minutes 1985 Conti Is stoner Pluf a stated that he concurs with Mr. Wilson's statements about the ho aeowrter's Saeed for storage which leads tea the construction of -oar garages. He commented t'aat, =1r. Wilson made a good point regarding the City's opinion of smaller lots trans ,a.tinglntca affordablehousing; and, that the City heeds: to deal with the factthat people are buying the smaller lots, and want ng to build larger, more expensive homes. Commissioner Stulberg ratted ' that developers request PUD, status to attain more lots that cast less thanlots within standard plats, where they coaxial rouble or triple in coat. Coordinator McConn added that, the statement made on "af- fordable housing" comes'from smaller lots costingng less be- cause of shorter utility lines; less lot frontage; and, that ca a% and do accommodate affordable housing. dice Chairman Stelg vial,d opened the Public Hearing. There was noone; present to speak on this item,, Vine ChaIr aan t igerwald; closed the Public' Hearing.' MOTION kay Commissioner Stulber9j, seconded' by Commissioner RECM-1ENDAT-10H E Wire to recommend approval for Paul. Wilson,, 3r., for an Amendment to the Residential Planned Unit Development to al;l-w lot coverage of up to 2 for Lot 3, Block 1, CORY A'S THIRD ADDITION. Comissioner tulbercg stated that, in his opinion, the Har- rison Hills PUD speaks to what a~ PUD shotAld be, with much more open space than the Gon ea PUD; and, that if they had proposed this lot coverage within the PUD Placa it would not have, been approved.. Novio-ver, his 'notion is for this appli— cAnt's property only. Mr. Gonyea was not present, nor any other property owner within the Gonyea's Third Addition, so It affects only Mfr. Wilson's property. Commissioner Pau ba concurs, but falls to see the "magic" of lot coverage. Hopefully these recent concerns of lot coverage wathin PUD's can be resolved. Acting Chairman Steigerkald inquired about storm drainage,. Engineer Goldberg stated; haat for every increase in lot coverage, there is a 5increase in runoff, however deck additions ua not have as much Impact. Rill Call Vote.. 5 Ayes, Acting Chairman Stelgerwald Nay. VOTE MOTION CARRIED: MOTION carried. Acting Chairman `Stei erwald explained his nay vote was based on the fact that the lot coverage concern is sander discussion PLANNING COMMISSION RECOKIENDATION JANUARY 91 1985 RECOMMENDATION A APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCESt AND GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLhN FOR WALLANCE FRl*F1lAR FOR FREEMAN, INC. -(81-400-51184-090 WHEREAS, Wallace Freeman, F'reemant Inc.,, has requested approval of a Preliminary Plat, Variances and General Development Plan for Wallacelace Freeman for "reeman,. Ino« for four commercial lots and two outlots for Phase l`of the development at the northeast corner of Nathan Lane and Betty Crocker Drive and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has ,reviewed the request at a dull called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, TH :REFOR , BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA* that it should and hereby does ,approve the Preliminary Plat, Variances,' and General Development Plan for Wallace Freeman, Freeman., Inc. for four doommerolal lots and two outlots for Phase l of the developmentopment to be located at the northeast corner of Nathan Lane and Betty Crocker Drive, subject to the following' conditions: Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum, 2.. Removal of all dead or dying trees fz%om the property at the owner's expense. 3. He Building Permits shall he !°d, until a Contract has been awarded for sewer and water, Payment of park dedication fees-in-Lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedication Policy ire effect at the time of Issuance of Building Permit. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-60 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures. in subdivisions ad acey t to, or containing shy open storm water drainage facility. 6. ` No Building Permits shall be issued , intil. the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 7. Approved variances are for loot size requirements; lot dimen ions and, lack of frontage to a public roadway as diagrammed on plans staff dated December 20,' 1984, S. Appropriate legal documents regarding the Cendotinium Association, covenants and restrictions as approved by the City Attorney, shall: be filed with the Final Plat. 9. Goss easement dicumen.ts as approved by the City Attorney shall be filed with the final Plat allowing for shared drives, parking, and open space common areas. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMIMENDATION JANUARY 91 1985 RECOMMENDATION A APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR WALLACE ` E MANN FREEMAN, INC. (84096) WHEREAS, Wallace Freeman, Freeman,. Inc. has requested approval: of a Site Paan for the construction of ,a phased office condominium development to be located at the north- east rth- east, corner of Nathan Lane and Betty Crocker thrive, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval., NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does apr rove the re u ,st fir Wallace Freeman, Freeman Inc. for a Site 'Plan for the construction of a ph. sed office condominium development to be located at the northeast cornt:r of Nathan Lane and ;Betty Crocker Drive, subject the fv. lowi€ q conditions 1. Compliance with City Engineer'sn.eer's Memorandum Payment of pare dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of Iluilding Permit issuance. 3ffi Compliance with Policy Resolution No.: 79-80 regarding minimun floor elevations for new, structures on sites adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage facility. 4. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for completion of site Improvements. Any signage shall be in compliance with thea proved Sign Program and City Ord- inance, with a vas lance from the setback requirements for the tenant identifi- cation signage to internal property lines. 6. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv,. a s per Ordinance provisl;ons. 7. Compliance with 'the Ordinance regarding the location of fire hydrants. A`t=ire Lane variance is approved per December, 27, 1984 'memorandum from te Fire Chief. 8. All waste and waste containers shall, be stored within the enclosure, and no outside storage is permitted. 9.. No Building Permit to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 10Approved Variances anclode-. Building setbacks to interior property lanes (17 ft.)- and, sign setbacks for tenant identification signage C ft) to interior lot lines; and, building setbacks to perimeter lot lanes ( 20 ft. yrs 35 ft, 11`, dip to 20 spares of the parking area for the adjacent shopping center may be credited toward this development, subject to submittal of a proof -of --parking plan which' Identifies the location of the stalls, and such st ills have been constructed. PLANNING Cg i la lM RECOMMENDATION JANUARY 91 1985 R COKTE14DATION APPRCvI C PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DEIN MY ON FOR OA DALE WEST 3RD ADDITION (84097) WHEREAS, Don Myron has requested approval of a Preliminary Plat for Oakdale I --Vest 3rd Addition for Baur single family resident.'al lots and two outl ats located east of Highway 101 and north of 49th Avenue lorth and, RIAS, the Planning. Commission hr s reviewed the request at a duly; called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLY!mTN 7 MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Preliminary Plat for Dan Myron n for Oakdale West 3rd Addition for four single family residential lots and two odt.lots located east of Highway 101 and north of 19th Avenue North, subject to the following conditions t 1. Compliance with, the City Engineer's Memorandum. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense. 3. Payment of park dedication fees -In -,lieu of dedication In accordance with the Dedication Policy In effect at the time of issuance of Building Permit. 4 Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79--80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures in subdivisions. adjacent to, or containing any ripen; storm water drainage facility.. 3. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Play .is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 4. No yard setbacks are granted or Implied. 5 Appropriate legal documents regarding covenants and restrictions as approved by the Clay Attorney,,_ shall be filed with the Final Plat, addressing the sharers o nership of Outlot A and maintaining the private drive access to property to the north 6. All existing structures shall be removed at the developer's expen-se at initial development. 7. All existing wells shall be capped and sealed in accordance with Hennepin County Health Department regulations. 8. The Final Plat shall include dedication of right-of-way, and construction of a publi PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM?4ENDATION 3ANUARY 9t 1985 RECOMMENDATION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR OGR N PROPERTIES FOR ROCKFORD SOUARE (84103) EREA ., Ogren Properties has requested approval of a Revised Preliminary Plat and General Development Plan for Rockford Square for four commercial lots located on the east side of Nathan Lane and north of Rockford Road; and, WHEREAS, tido planning Commission has .reviewed - the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HERMY RESOLVED' Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Revised Preliminary fiat for Ogren properties for Rockford Square for four commercial lots located on the oast side of Nathan Lane and north; of Rockford Road, subject to the following ondlt ons* 1> Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum, Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense. Payment of park dedication fees-'n-lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedication ''Policy In effect at the time of Issuance.of wilding Permit. 4. compliance with Policy Resolution No 5-U regarding minimum floor >elev tion$ for new structures in subdivisions adjacent to,, or containing any open storm water drainage facility. s No Building Permits shall be Issued until the Final Mat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. No yard setbacks are granted or Implied. 7 Development of lots is subject to approval of the Ordinance required site plans. Appropriate legal dooum nts, as approved by the City attorney, allowing for the shared use and maintenance of an access drive for bots 2 and 3 shall be filed with the final Play,, 9. Prior to submission of the Final Flat application, the City Atterney's concerns regarding the Title shall be 'addressed. 10* All existing structures shall be removed at thedeveloper's expense with initial development* 11. All existing wells shall be capped and sealed in accordance with Hennepin County Health Department regulations. 12. The Final Plat application shall include a revised General Development plan conibrminq with the recommendations for access points to Nathan Lane.