Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 06-27-1984CITY OF PLYMOUTR PLANNINC COMMISSION MINUTES UNE 27t 1984 gular meeting of the Plymouth Planning ' called to order at 705 P. WEM"S PRESENT: Chairwoman Vasil lou, Commissioners Magnus, Plufkaj Pauha, Stulherg, and Steigernald ABSENT: Commissioner Wire STAFF PRESEAATW Community Development Coordinator SaraMcconn Co unjty Deve 1-opm nt Director Blair Tremere City Engineer Sherm Goldh"rg MINUTESW MOTION by Commissioner Magnus, ;, oonded _ by Comm,i ssioner S° ulherg to repo ° end approval of he June 13. 1954 Minutes as submitted. Vote 5 Ayes. Commissioner 'Stelgerwaid abstained. Commissioner Wire absent. MOTIOR carried{ PUBLICHEARINGS; ou introduced the request submitted by Johnna,'11t ittan as,l, . 3 OS PM taros for a Residential, Planned unit evelopment Concept C VLANI, Plan, Preliminary Paan/Plat, Conditional Use Permit and e- PRE F Y y ening for 'Heritage West". Reading of the June 16, 1954 PLAT, CONDITIONAL staff report was waived. Commissioner P,l.uf a stated that USE PERMIT AND ; his home is located in the d ve.lopment to the ` east of the REZONING (84OU), pt apo ed "Heritage West" his intent was to deliberate on the proposed request for approvals. asillou ntroditoed Mr. R1 S: three con ultinghairwoman . engineer, and John Karos. Rick Sathre explained the Land Use ji.de Paan designation for the subject property as wf ll as abutting propert..es. He described the topography of the site,nut1ng *hat here is a low area in the middle portions of the, property* The proposed development teas, described by identifying the types and numbers of proposed i4nits, phas-, ing, and open soave areas. Mr. Satre indicates that the traffic and pay.: needs have been re%i-aweded i detail, and the proposed development complies with the Comprehensive Kin* Commissioner Pluf a noted that if the proposed single family detached area is reviewed separately from: the mvltI-famiiy attached area, the eastern portion would ' develop at approximately 2 units per acre, The multi -family attached area would develop at approximately 4 units per acre. 1 Page 140 Planninq Commission Minutes June 27, 19,54 Commissioner Steelgerwa d requested the petitioner review the assignment, of bonus points as requested. Mr. Sathre elid that due to the size -,)f the project, ;bonus, points gut be deducted; and, that it is requested that points be awarded for the mix of, housing and ;.11#cera of private open arca, , Commissioner Plufka eoixpxrmed that units would be alloyed, and that the peti.tioner proposes 92 units.. Chairwoman Vasi 'lou opened the public hearing. Arlene Johnsont 3535 Rosewood Lane, inquired if there would be any fencing separating the multi. -family attached area from the single family detached area. Pick Sathre explained that some plantings may be utilized to provide an additional transit -ion between the different types of snits,, however$ no physi--al, barriers or fencing would be constructed. Mr. John Naros explained further, that he intended that a seating rink or tennis court be constructed in the m iti_fa ml y attached area, and that he was not preolu- inq an agreement between the single family detached drtellinq residents and the multi -family area, for shared use of the amenities Ms., Johnson confirmed ;that thea; Is no proposed path or access from the single family detached lots to the multi-Maw.multi-fawl.1y attached area.. In response to Ms. aohnson, Mr,. ears explained that he anticipates constructing two and three bedroom units In the condominium structures. Coinvissioner Magnus inquired of tis. Johnson if the Heritage Estates Development has common amenities run by a Homeowner's Assoolation, or -a park. She stated there- is stat a' Home,>wnerl s :association open ; area or pare, and described that, in her yard, there is a private skatnq rink in the ri ter months that is used by the neighborhood children.. She stated her concern ii: that the increase in residents may Increase the use of the rink that they have provided in the past. The discussion concluded wi Page 1110 lune Z f 1984 Mr i . be In the same mar -ie' as the Heritage ote$ DeVelOPment, ranging from $150,000 to 275tOOO. Mr. ergenson inquired as to the autos of the development OT Heritage 1 states it- dir. K'are a stated that he hoped m- plete e Heritage Estates within months, Rolfu hl h. u l, 13045 38th Avenue North', inquired what potential impact the development viould have on existing property values. t_. hoes sated that his Intentwas to construct housing of oomoarable quality of to the Heritage Estates area. Ur. l u hlenhaus inqul red about the proposed traffilcz Ireu a - on for construction traffic Ja the first phase. Mr. Karos stated that during initial,grading' and v4tllzty construction, the heavier construction vehicles could ace from Xen um Lane,. At the request of Ir. luehlenhaust Rick Sathre explained the proposed storm eater drainage system Commissioner Plufka inquired If the Ment was to not oon- s° ruet ,any one bedroom units. Mr. J aros stated he wanta to keep his options open, however, It Is probable he will con- struct' only two and three-bedroom units. 3ack 3ohnson, 35 5 flcse oud Lane, inquired 'as to the poten- tial price range for the condominium units. Mr., :arcs stated' that the units would range In price from $602000 to Mr. ' nhn on stated he was basically In favor of the plan and found It positive toseea continuation of the existing neighborhood. Mr. o hlehhaus confirmed that the assessments involved with the o nstruetI ri o the proposed project would not be applied to the Heritage Estates, ; development.. Mfr.. Kares stated that all assessments would be borne by the proposed development. llo Freund, X510 niu-m lanes stated he was she o-Iner of- the. fthepropertytnesouthandinquirediffinalaction would be taken on the proposal at the Commission meeting., C'hairwoman'' asiliou,explained that the Planning Commission is advisory to the City Council, and th t their recommenda- tion would he forwarded for consideration by the Council r Planning Co misslow: 01"nutes dune a, 1984 Commissioner Plufka stated he, felt it Aas important to have limited access for construction vehicles. Rolf Call Vote. 5 Rays.. Commissioner P. a ka, Aye. MOT O4 VOTE - MT OH FAILED a fat q. MOTION to AMEND by Coma ssioner P u ka, seconded by Commis- MOTION TO. AMEND sioner Pauba to add to condition number 14, that the assign- cent of beaus points is based upon the mix of housing and the private cape area; and, natural vegetationon amenities ,-- to be preserved as much as possible. during construction. VOTE. 6 Ayes. MOTION to AMEND carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED MOTION to AMEND by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commis- MOTIF TO AMEND si.oner to bers to add condition numberst'.' n thc"itq during - street and utility construction related heavy vehicle tral fie shall acoess the site from Xenium .ane. Hr,.. Karos confirmed that this Is a feasible recomiendat.xon. VOTE. 6 Ayes. MOTION to AMEND carried, VOTE - MOTION CARRIED VOTE on MAIN MOTION as TWICE AMENDED. 6 Ayes.. NOTION VOTE — MAIN MOTION carried. TWICE A u ED - MOTION CARRIED Rick Sathre confirmed that the RPUD Final Plan/Plat for the single family detached area would not have to be reviewed by the Planning Commission, consistent with Resolution No. 63- Chairwoman Vasiliou ,introduced the request submitted by CARLSON PROP TTES Carlson Properties, ,.Inc. for `Carlson Center 4th Addition", USE GUIDE PLAN end Carlson Center -Office Building, to be located west of A ENT,, REZONI% 1-494 and south of County Read 15, She noted that the City FINAL PLAT, SITE had received a letter from the City of Minnetonka,,indioa,t- FLAN AND CONDITION& ing, that the proposed Planned Development was consistent USE PERMIT Owe/ with their requirements. Raadinq of the June 19, 1984 staff 4049) report was waived. Mr. Dale Kennedy, Carlson Properties, Linda Fisher, Attorney; Mark Lumr , Architect., and, Bob Roscoe, Engineer were Introduced. Lunda Fishee summarized the request. The proposed Land Use Guide Pian Amendment was explained, and she stated Haat the pz tztroner fefls they meet. the, Comprehensive Plan re- qui.rem tents A h &tory of the Carlson Center Development was provided* Page 145 Planning Commission Minutes une 27 984 The proposed rezoning request was explained, noting that a multi -t nantl, professional office facUlty was consistent 1 Zoning. Slides of the building el vation$ and site perspectives Nyere provided. Ms Fisher rooted that all trash enclosures would be .inter to that o utside storage o -i' d be prohibited and that the developer concurred with the saffeoommendatloh related to the re. est: for a "blanket" Conditional Use Permit. Ms 4 Fisher mated, that the petitioner has already satisfied proposed condition number 4 of the draft Resolution, and they requested that the word "substantlall " be inserted: to proposed pond' tion number 14. Commissioner Steigerwald confirmed that no changes are an- tl 3.patod to the development areas located to the asst and north of the subject property. Also., he confirmed that the smaller area south of the accessroad on the lot to the north was -a pro lr lat ly two to three acre He inquired that measures were to be provided for storm eater quality and safety of the proposed pond. Mr. Roscoe explained that the pond is approximately 4 to 5 ft. deep$ and that i t would be pumped onto the deck area which would be approximately t Inches dep Waterfall could be created back Into the pond from the deckarea. Commissioner ateiger al,d Inquired If there had been dlsous- sion about fencing to keep children out of the pond. Mr. Roscoe explained; that fencing was not proposed at this tiger but a band rail could be provided alonq. the edge of the pond dear the office complex. Commissioner Steigerwald .inquired about the proposed concen- tration of parking lot In comparison to the beauty of the building. He stated he thought the proposed layout lacked creativity In the parking lot design. Mr.Kennedy expla .ned the site perspective from 1-434 and Carlson Parkway, noting that consideration had to be given to the soil eanditllons of the southern area; of the site Chairwoman Vasil:lou opened the public hearing. Steve Rutz, 110 Kings -viewKings-viewLone,, stated that he was a new resident in the community, and questioned,`the sight lines due to the height of the proposed complex. Linda Fisher explained that ber ing was required, as part: of the previous approvals for the development, In order to provide a trans- I.tion to the ,land to the west. Aso, at was explai ad that the sight perspective from the hand to the vest 'Included the future construction of the berm areae required through the Environmental, Review. age 147 Plinninq Commission Minutes June 27 1984 os ¢ss oner tel.gerwald confirmed, with City Engineer Gol. _ berg than: the City would want all of the major roadways open traffic prior to Certificates of Occupancy being issu- ed Also, Commissioner Stelgerwald confirmed that necessary traffic light Improvements would be incorporated into the Development Contract, VOTE. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried VOTE -- MOTION C, IED Chairwoman aslllou introduced the request submitted by R CONCEPT PLAN Westwood Planning Engineering. for Parklands ' Development PARKLANDS DE OP - for a Residential Planned Unit Development Concept Plan to HENT (84054) be known as "Deers ood Estates 5th Addition". A reading of the June 18, 1984 staff report was waived. Chairwoman as1.- liou recogni edk Vessl s« Jack Lynch and Fran Hagen from West- wood Planning 3: t..ngineera.nq, representing the petitioner. Chairwoman Basil=ou opened the Public Mearinq. 1-1r. Patrick Kraft, 4715 Quaker Lane, eIxpressed an Interest that the eastern portion of the development be dedicated to the City as park, and Inquired as to the proposed road circulation and access, Mr, Sack Lynch reviewed the proposed Concept Plan, noting that the eastern third of the property would .be devoted to storm water drainage ponding, public park, and private open space. Mr. Lynch reviewed the proposed tr0fic circulation system as It coordinates with the approved RPUD to the north, and anticipated development to the south. Mr. Kraft stated he hoped the construction traffic would not utilize 413th Avenue North from the east* Mr. Fran Hagen noted that the proposed development would not commence until Parklands Development has completed their approved develop- ment areas west of Zachary Lane. Commissioner Plufka confirmed that the private open .space would be owned and, maintained by a Homeowner's Association. Mr. Hagen reviewed the park dedication requirements. The prposal earls for 4 acre of land to be deeded' to the City fox- park purposes, while the "irk Dedicatlon Policy requires 4.4 acres The ;remaining deo oatldn requirements, as recom- mended by staff, would be satisfied with a cash fee pay- ment. Mr. Haden suggested that the City Council consider requiring an outlot for the public trail to be located In the eastern portion of the property, rather than an ease- ment, In order to satisfy, the .4 acre balance of dedication., Coordinator MoConn stated,that the proposal would be review- ed with the Parks- and Recreation Director,. so, It could be finalized with the City Council consideration. Page 148 Planning commission Minutes June ), 1954 Chairwoman Va siiiou closed the Pub tc Hearing. MOTION Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner RECOMMENDATIONNDATiON C Steiger rald to recommend approval of the proposed Resi.den- tial Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for "Deer-wood Estates nth Addition" subject to the conditions as reflected in the draft Resolution with further direction that Parks and. Recreation Director Olank consider the petitioner's pro- posal relating to the Parte Dedication requirements. VOTE. 6 Ayes. Commiss one- dire absent, MOTION carried VOTE - , MOTION CARRIED NEW MSINESS: Chairwoman Vasi llou introduced the request submitted by Benchmark Graphics for Site Plan and Variances °a or property GRAPHICS located north of 34th Avenue and East of Kilmer Lane. She SITE PLAN AND, introduced Mr. Dick DeLapp, representative for the petition- VARLANCES (84035 er who stated he had no questions regarding the staff re- port, and staff recommendations. Reading of the June 18, 1954 staff report was waived. MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner Stulberg to recommend approval of the proposed Site Plan and RE0VATION Variances for menchmark Craphics subject to the conditions as stated in the draft Resolution. VOTE. 6 Ayes, MOTION carried, D'O`E - MOTION CARRIED Chairwoman Vasiliou'introduced tate request submitted by Graybow-Daniels for a Site Plan Amendment, and reading of YBO -A IELS the Jane 20t 1954 ,staff report was waived. She introduced SITE PLAN Al ER0- r. Steve Graybow who stated he had no questions relating to WNT (5d) the s4.,aff report or recommendation. qtr. Graybow also coa- fi,rmed that he has made provisions for providing the re- gvired addittonal. plantings. MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Pi fka to recom ead approval of the Site Plan Amendment sub- R + 'iATION E sect to the ,onditions, as'stated in the drat Resolution. VOTE. 6 Ayes.MOTION carried. MOTE -- MOTION CARRIED OTHER MSINESS: The Planning Commission confirmed the schedule for review of the Capital Improvements Program (C1P) noting that Public Works Director Fred Moore will be present at -the July 10, 1984 meeting to discuss the Anticipated projects#