Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 05-09-1984CITY OF PLS Y 91, 1984 The regular; meeting of the Planning Commission, was called to order at **35 P.M. M. S PRESENTw Chairwoman Vasillous Commissioners Plufka, Paubal Steigerwald, Stulberq and , Magnust Commissioner it (7**37' STAFF PKSENT-*Community Development Coordinator Sari McConn o Development Director Blair Tremere Assistant City Engineer Jahn Sweeney City Engineer aherm Godber MINUTES TION by Gonnissioner Stelgerwa d seconded by Commissioner Pauba to recommend approval of the April 7-51 1984 Minutes as submitted, Vote 4 AyesCommissioner tulberg and Magnus abstained. Commissioner Wire absent. MOTION carried. Chairwoman Vasillou introduced the request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a earry-out service from h KN Y ENR TALW` restaurant located at 1G ?-G State Highway 55. Chairwoman INTERNATIONAL Vasil iou stated that the petitioner had clarifed the hours CONDITIONAL USE or operation which differ from those the staff report. r a WT 8 Chairwoman 'as%llou recognized the petitioner, and opened and, chased the public hearing as no ore was present to spear on this item,. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Stelgerwald to take action, on this petition. Vote. Ayes. MOTION carried. MOTION by Commisslot,ar Plufka, seconded by Commissioner RECOMMENDATION A 5teigerwald to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Lot Cons€alidat°.' -a subject to the conditions re- fleoted In the;draft Res.M Lit ion. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION VOTE - NOTION CARRIED iya$+k 4 +4 iM S+S Chairwoman, "as llou introduced the request submitted by CENTEX 14OWS MIDWEST Centex Hames Midwest, Inc., for a revised Residential Plan- REVISED RES T ned Unit Development Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan/Pkat, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP - and Conditional. Use Permit for property located at the MLNT CONCEPT PLANt southwest darner of Zachary Lane and Hamel Road.: PRELIMINARY PLS/PLAX CONDITIONAL €l; PERMIT (84024-) n Page 103 Planning Cor ission Minutes May Commissioner dire stated that the Commission should review a pian shoeing the trees to be planted for each unit. The Commission determined that ' plan diagramming the =miniAum standards and quantities for each unit should be submitted.. Commissioner Steigerwald inquired about the pro.: =A sign- age. Coordinator MtConn referred to paragraph wzimber 7 of the Planning Staff Report. Mr.. Boyce explained that two signs are required to adequately identify both entrances in- to the project. Commissioner Pluta stated he thought this was appropriate. Cortissioner Stelgerwald suggestedthat the final plan and plat application include two, signs, but at a smaller sire, Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayos. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Planniog Director Tremere confirmed that the Planning Com- m ssien will review the details regarding the landscaping for the Awelling units, and a revised sign' plan containing two signs, each less than 25 sq. ft. in area prior to ap- proval of the final olat. The Planning Commission recessed from 805 P.M. to 9400, P.M. RECES" MOTION by Commissioner Stei.gerwald,, seconded by Chairwoman NDTIQN TO NOVF ITEN Vasillou "to review item No. -At request for reaffirmak. ON, AGENDA of Site Pian, Conditional Use Parm3t and Variances for VOTE - T100 CARRIED Donald Poupard. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Chairwoman. Vasil lou introdtuoed the request submitted by DONALD POUPARD Donald Poupard for reaffirmation of Site, Plan, , Conditional SITE PLAN Use Permit and Variance approval fo. a restaurant to be lo- CONDIT11ONAL USE oated at the southeast corner of 27th Avenue North and Anna- PERNIT AND VARIANCES polls Lane.., She also explained the Ordinance provisions re- 82,050 gard ng the approval of Site Plans. Mr. Poupard stated there had been a misunderstanding as to whether he was within the one-year time frame of requesting an extension, he explained that. he Its requesting the icent' oal project as originally approved. He expressed concern with, and objected to having to pay the ,full; application fee. Ntl`iION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Stul- RECO NWMATION C berg; to recommend approval of the Site Plan, Conditional. Use Permit and Variances subject to the Conditions anis require- ments reflected in the draft R solution. CommissionerPaubasuggested that the City Council consider reducing the fees associated: with this type of application, it the review procedural, is minimal.. Page 104 Planning Commission Minutes. May 9, 198 14 Planning Director Tremere explained the analysis re"uired for such applications, Nate. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTIF CARRIED, Chairwoman V si iu introduced the request submitted by L t 13ROT Lundgren Brothers Construction Company for the Casty of Min- STRUCTION CO. eapolis for RPUD Preliminary Ple—,/Plat, Conditional Use FOR TW CITY OF Permit and Re oningt for Parkers lake Development _ Stage Bz EAI RPUD The Parkers sake North Property. P MIARY PL /PLAT CONDITION& U. Chairwoman Vasil lou opened the public hearing. PERMff AM REZONIN 82066) Mr. Mike Pfilaum, Lundgren Brothers Construction Company, reviewed the proposed development explaining that a neigh- borhood meeting was not held due to the alacrity by staff in the review of the applicatip-T Mr. Pflaum reviewed slides showing anaerial view of the site. He reviewed the a p- proved Concept Pian, proposed preliminary plan plat, phas- ingf and utility availability. nnin€g Director Tremere reviewed the Planning Staff Com- ats contained In the April 30# 1984 Staff Report. Commissioner Magnus Inquired if the Wayzata School District had responded relative to future school needs. Mr. Pfl;aum explained that the proposed PUD Plan does not include a specific site for the School District.* however, there should be sufficient area If the School, District determines that a site is needed. The School District has not indicated a sp'ca.f'c need for a , school site,. or any problem In meeting the needs of the future population in this development. Planning Director Tremere expanded on Mr. Pflaum's comments noting, that per, the City's policies,: the School District was forwarded copies of the information for their review and comment. Earlier, school officials had been approached with the concept plans, and had indicated a school site was not needed in this development. Co Issioner Stelgerwald Inquired about the ,proposed street layout :(Polaris Lane(s) within the 'Industrial area, and the potential interefrculation with the residential area. He Inquired alf the industrials uses could be clustered. Plan- ntn{ Director Tr mere explained they eould, but that has not been proposed to date., There was discussion as to wh ther a cul-de-sac could be utilized in this area, though it would exceed Ordinance length standards. Commissioner telgerwa commented that the Cat haul oon- Page '108 Planning Commission Minutes " May,, , 1984 IOTION to 4MEND by Commissionert i e Wald . se nded ,by MOTION TO- AMEND THE Commissioner Wire to add a cond,tidn number ' 18, directing MIN MOTION, re-evaluation of the road alignments Consideration should be given -to the concern regarding the circulation of, lndu3- trial trafflothroogh the residential areas. Vote 7 Ayes. OTION earried VOTE MOTION CARRIED The Commissior, discussed the potential for beating and fence location along Vicksburg Lane a!id Niagara Lanes. MOTION to AMEND by Commissioner Plufka,,seconded by Commis- sioner Stulberg directing that Area S be redesigned so that NOON TO, THE there would not be substantial variances heeded to develop MAIN MOTIF the proposed Ins and, so that the area is more compatible tothe adjacent nelaghb rheud ommisluner Wire suggested that Area S should not be viewed as a PUD for lot size and setback purposes, It should be treated as a conventional plat* Kok Sathre, Consulting Engineer, explained that the exter- ior lots were designed to be similar to the adjacent areas, with the interior lots being smaller. C€nglredthessn should re-view4 the final plat. He stated that he wants to see the final plan and plat for Area S, at a minimum. 1.4 was explained by Mr,, Pflausn, that they anticipate submit- ting , a final; plat of otitlot.s for the ,entire area Which could go directly to the City Council. The Commission concurred. When Area S is r eplatted, it should then be reviewed -6y the Planning Commission. Vote` on the Amendments. 7 Ayes. NOTION carried, VOTE - NOTION CARRIED VOTE on the MAIN MOTION as twice AMENDED. ' Ayes. MOTION VOTE ON INEMAIN carried. MOT1014 AS TWICE VOTE MOTION CARRIED AD30URNMENT The meetinq adjof irned at 11:05 P.M.