HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 11-22-1983CITY OF PLYMMYN
PLPIRG COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEWR ZZI,1983
The S, e0lat meetinq of the Planning Commission was called to
order at : 0 P.M.
ME01*,RS PRESSE "« Chairwoman Vdslllou, Commissioners
Plufka, Stuib ru, Mdqnus,, and Wire.
NEW-RS ABSENT: Comm ssi ners Pauba and t itj(,'-rwatd
STAFF PRESENT.- Director of- Piannin -ind Community
Development Blah ` r m r
Community Development Coordlnator
Sara McConn
Assistant City Enqlneer 3ohn Sweeney;
MINUTES
IO by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner
Wire to recommend approval of the November 9, 1983 Minutes
as submitted. Vote 5 dyes. MOTION carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairwoman Vasillou introduced the request submitted byHis- MISSM PARTNERWIP
sloe, Partnership for an RPUD PreliminaryPlan/Plat, 'ondl— UPRELIMINARYPLAN
ti nal Use Permit and Site Plan for property located south PLAN`, CONDITIONAL USE
of County Read 9 and west of 41st Avenue North. A review of PERMIT AND SITE PLAN
the November 14, 1963 staff report was requested. A.,338)
Planning Director Tremere summarized the analysis provided
lit the staff report, hlqhlightinq the plat ing2 ;silaage and
ldtldSO4pinq proposals.
Chairwoman Vasillou recognizednized qtr. ` Gene Holderness, Mission
Partnership who commented that they had met with the Nxs-
s on omeotyner's Association, and wl"th the owner of the
adjacent sinqle familydetached dviellxn Mr Holdern ss
introduced Mr. Dennis Mulvey, Architect, who discussed the
s .te ohara t gist os acid proposed location, of the bui d nos.
Chairwoman Vastliou opened the Pubi Hear inq.
a es Rjorqwi, 121.15 County Road 9, stated he owns the
single family re ideate ad anent to the west, and he and his
W i e are not In 4qi*eem nt with the petitioner about the
evelop ent. He e la ned that he has, lived in this
residence for 17 years and is , onoernod about the p tont i a.
detriment to hils property. He, cited other attached housinq
developments int the area..
240
November 27, 1965
Mr. EUo gan requested the proposel ui dinq located to the
past of his residence b, moved Wrther south so that it
would be more removed from the sight lutes Of his 1house.
Dennis Mulvey explained a through-seetion demonstratinq the
proposed elevations of the building. He alsodiscussed the
proposed distances between the building and the propertyline, and the adjacent residence. The buildinqlayout was
revised in order to lower the hu idinq four feet, and to
increase the berming by A ft,, Additional plant Ings have
been added to the dn(isca e schedule along the east prop -tyIline.
Commissioner Wire * inquired about the height the trees
explained they are drawn to be 10 ft. in heloht, which Is
less that the meture height of the trees. Thi petitioner
proposes to purchase the trees at ZO ft.n height.
Commissioner Wlr . stated -that he would like to see a
perspective & the view from the adjacent single family
residence toward the proposed building,
Commissioner Plufka ex Assed concern about allowing a 10%
increase In the density without any provisions' being made
for elderly housing. Staff reviewed the approved densities
and explained the Council approval regarding the PUT)
revision and concept pian for the suhject property. y.
Commissioner Wire requested :Matt to read the Ordinancemance
provisions regarding; transition. He Inquired of the
petitioner whether the provisions were met,
Dennis Mulvey alai€red the use of the topography, existing
vegetation, and .landscape plantings. He noted that the
original building proposed on this site consisted of more
units and ' was higher that the one its the current plans.,
Also, Mr., Mulvey explained the or.i. nta ion and rpeni.nq w
the Proposed parking areas. We Holdernessexplained tov
anticipated architectural s yl inq of the Wildings ANA
would be more lfhousc t `p " 4rchitebture. qtr. Holderness
commented that the Mission ' Partnership Is a landowner
adjacent to the east, and 'north ast
Dennis Volvey oommentecl that the building would be
approximately M ft. from the ',single., -family r sidenc which
is consider-ably mor, than in a typical single family
residential development.
page 241
P1411ning C6MMISSiori Minutes
Nlovember V, 1983
Chairwoman 'asi i u cited other examples In the > y where
multi -family residential developments are located adjacentent
or across h street from ASIliq ,e f mi iy dei i p nIM.
r. 13jorgan stated That the Ordinance transition
re ui rements du apply and should be met. e reiterated h i s
request that the building he removed from his direct sight
I iae.
Chairwoman Vasillou closedsed the Public flearinq.
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberq,; seconded by Chairwoman
Vasitiou to take action on the petition. Vote 5 Ayes..
TION carried.
OTIOM by Co missloner Stulbero, seconded ky (halrwoman ECO NDATIO t
Vali iidu to recommend approval of the RPUD Oreliminary
i n lat, C ftdi ie a i Use permit, , and Site Pla,i for Mission
i ar ne ship subject o the conditions as stated in the drift
Commissioner Wire stateded hit questioned the proposed` design
la out,; as it appeared to him that the developer >did not
meet thetransition rdinanc*; reIq firemen s, and therefore,
he could, riot agree with, or accept the- proposed plan. He
explained that the perception at, 'the property line would net
be of a siri l.e family neighborhood.
Commissioner die stated the north building should he
relocated as far east as possible Commissioner: P u `ka
stated that he did not think moving the but Iding to the east
would resolve the issue. He inquired of the petitioner how
far south the hui,l.dinq could he relocated. Dennis mul. ey
stated between, 10 to 20 f ,, south.
Gee Holderness, stated he would like to respond to the
implication that the building location was chosen due to
Itself -serving" motives, e stated that their intent was to
gala aiai the existinq trees hich` are located on the east
side e the pr per y . The huildinq could perhaps he
located approximately 0 ft. further to the south; however,, -
the adjacent property owner does not find that
satisfactory. He stated that they have increased the number
oz <oiantittgs along the 1yesl pr p *r` y lime.
The Planning Commission recessed cpm 83-32 P , :4 P.M. RECESS
Page 24,E
Planning Comm ss orr Minutes
November , 1983
Od rwom n Vasillou introduced the request submitted by K44 X-M TN P RPJJ
Pdrtnership for ars RKJO Preliminary Plan/Plat, RezonInq, and PRELIMINARYY PA /P
World t r Dyna J Use Permit for priolperty, l ocat t o y Pineview R TUT"W1 M)
Lane, south of Coun%'A Road 47, north of Soo Line Railroad., ad,.Cot4OTTION&
and east of .1-494, She stated that the lty Council recent- prRHIT (83008)
ly considered the petitioner's request that the minimum
floor area requirement for thr.project 6,* modt red, and
ef`,! =d the r dpproval as stated lit the J c,glutjo .
Also, the petitioner ha:s submitted art "Alteroate" Prellmin-
dry Plat for Commission considerdtion.
Ra# { w SkEaa Vas l' o nt roduc(d Mr* Crvq 9{ Lai kj Mi+°s A bs- _
Knutson Associates, representing the petitioner.. who sum-
marized the City Councrl approved Ccsnc °t Platt, wonsr t req
Of 80 lnr .J ,c family residential cats. He Identified
points of da.scussaon as requested by the petitioner. First,
Mr. Frank requested drs_cusst n o h petitioner' request
to reduce tragi minimum, t toor area for the f: rst flour:
Chairwoman Vaslll*ou road- the November 7, 1983 City Couno
Minutes which ref loct that the request wa, den Ied,, and that
the Council's original a pro a) was reaffIrmed. She stated
that It was Inappropriate for the Planning Commission to
dl*t uss ,t his request, again, strrc , the petitioner hadelect-
ed to o directlyto the Council with It,, prior to the ("oM-
mission hear nq and had received the a tn -llls reconsidered
r ul In t.. Pyr, frank apol,gized, and omm nti>d that: he was riot
at the City Council me tina where they reaffirmed their}
ItIlItra.J action, and b did not know what rias discussed with
his client oil ch.rsw
Mr. Frank stated that the City Councildirection requir d a
10 ft. side , yard setback. He recalled that some Council- ounc lmembersmembersseemedtoagreewittytheproposed6ft, side yard
setback car the garage side of they dwelling units, however,
tills was not refile tt d in the City counicil a tllon. He
stated that In arra side yard stuatrcari the minimum, yard ->et-
back between two dwe I I trig units Oncludinq qaraoe sJde F
together Mould he 16 f t.,
Mr* Frank explained the proposed "alternate" pr miner
plat which would elm nate the aced for aHomeowner's As -
socrat idn by ncorpor t ire they open space In the northeast
corner Into the several lots. He stated, however, that, If
the "open area" Is therefore not utilized in the bonus point
caa cu atr0rrs, the petitioner requests approval of the pre-
1101inary plat which complies with, theL approved concept plan«
halm.soman Vasillou stated that If the open space is not
platted in aec rdance with the a pro%ed concept plan (as an
outlot),, then'the bonus point consideration would no longer
be warranted. .
Page X44
planalog Comm Issioll Minutes
November , 1983
Mr. Frank reiterated that, If the open space Is not to be
on.s-,ld red In the bonus polpt eiilcu laiinrl they would not
J * S t"h i'erk' e plat lkr concurred with the
Cowumission, that the "alternate" plat U001d TIGt,411OW USLIa0e
of the "openarea" by the of -her esidiv! qonly those w1ha
own, the specific lata.
Mr. Franx explained the concern reclardivq A ` Homeowner's
Association was the m nnc- of the open ar n
potential for tax forfelture of the outlot.nmm sl n xr
lei fka questioned who would want to own the los as deslgned
on the "a L 'rt 4 tell plat for the swine re4isn>is of maintenance
and 114bility,
Chairwoman Vastliou closed the Public Harinq.
MOTION by Commissiloner f4a9nu$, seconded h mmissionr
Plc fka take ac i t z this p i ton.,Ayes.
Nif carried.
Commissioner Magnus Inquired hnca the reasoning behind thy*
request for ft. side yard setback4i lir* drank stated I
Nyn ld allow,more flexibility In the size aced location of the
house oft the lot.
NOTION by m s l h( -T Magnus, seconded by CommIssioner BECOMWNDATION
tulherq to recommend approval of the -proposed P1)D
Preliminary Plan/Plat, Rezoning, acid Conditional Lse Permit,
e0iibisting of 80 los as dlagram r d in Exhil It B, subj(ect to
he conditions a . stated In the draft Rest,; I inrj
MOTION by Commissioner P l fk, seconded y Commissioner Wire MOTIF TO AMEND
to amend Condition No. 9 allow a 6 t. side- yard that*k
on the gari qe side of the dwellinging units; if: any case, the
side yard setback between two dwelltnq units 'shall be a
minimum of 16 ft.
Commissioner Pl fka commented that this Could a low for an
Increase in she a chi ral, diversity of the units.
orra ss one r' l berconfirmed that the proposed lc 10 11
wouln ledledve Condition No. 12 as stated In the draft
Resolution.
Commissioner Wire stated he did not felly understand the
dls ss n and c; nc rc regarding the MIT11m m mein floor area
f 1,100 sq. ft
Pegs 245
Planning
Ha'Cmab r 22V 1983
Mr. Frdnk explained that developers might desire to
0'Jlstru kt split >level houses which would not previus 1,1 l
sq ft. on the first floor levcl,, hutwould ln the total
square footdge.,
11r frank stated this r qulrement could preclude certain
house designs such as split foyers, split entries, and
Director of Pa n: n Tx-emere confirmed that the petitioner
had stated to the City Council that he did not have a
problem W -ti, the City Council r uirf.,m nt, h y v r other
custom builders who might construct units within the
development apparent lir were concerned. The City Cou.noij
listened to the petltlon r, Brad reaffirmed their, original
position, rtequir nq a minimum 1,100 sq. ft. finished main
floor areas He disagreed that ert.:ain hdusinq lesions world
be precluded.
Commissioners lire and Plufka commented that the 11,10 q,
ftp 4nInimum s s unrealistic, and would' not allow for
diversity In design of the units., Cr q Frank referred to
the discussion lit the project narrative re ardiaq the
request. ommi s.i ner Plofi<a stated he dues not fully
concur with the petitioner's ,figu€ $- however, the Council
should re-examine this question.,
VOTE on the Amendm nt r , ardinq set&aces. 5 Ayes, ilTt Alm : 't
carried.
140TION by Commissioner plufka to amend Condition No, 16 t
read "all ranhl s shall have minimum sof 1 1 Cr sq. ft. for
the main floor area. split level houses shall have a-aini.m m
Of X960 sq- ft. for the ' main floof area, ands turd -s=tory
houses si.all have a minimum of $60 sq, ft. Train floor area
with all other above grade finished levels to be at least
one-half the ma nflodr area'#. MOTION died for lack of
second
The Coirsitissloa concurred that the City Counell, should
i n lder this matter again, to clarify their Intent.
VOTE On the air ut ur s onemended. 5 Area. MOTION VOTE O MAIN MOTION
carried.
hair, ar, Vasiliou iatr duo d the request s omitted by ENTERPRISE PROPERTIES,
tnterprise properties -for an HPUD Concept plan for prrperty RPUD CONT PLAN
located east and adjacent =t he Lan and 4 kathofO (83059)
AvenueNorth. ,: r Vie of the 1Ovember 10, 1983 staff
report was requested*
Paqe246
PLanning, Minutes
19
Planning Director Tremere summarized the proposed Concept
i itin for the development cr parcel consistinq of
units,. The petitioner='s proposal for park d dic t n Was
expWined. Also, the petitioner's request for .4 o si y bonus
glut % rids 41swssed.
Chairwomanman iiia questioned whether the proposed "net
en areall would be useable, Specifically, the north pondinki
dr.Vd Planning 'Dire-to Trema explained op to
govern the north ponding area by oovertants rather than the
ponding fired to be pldtt-ed as d separate outiot.
Chal."Womall Vas i i Iou Introduoed Mr. Greg Frank,.
McComb,,,,-Knutson Associates, representing the petitioner* He
reviewed the vartious aspects of the pro,osaland, denf led
he petItIoner does not desire, t .: develop the tr, i i access
to`the fic r h from the most eastern cul-de-sac. lid ` of
the property were shown.,
Comolssionez Magnusres um riz the o v id gator, of the
dppliedtion by the Parks and Recreation AdAsory Commission,
He stated they recommend that the, trail to the
north from the most eastern. cul d -r ®; bepro,- r&d In order
to provide access from the north arzl,,lu to the proposed public
park.
ha*rwom n Vasillou opened the Puhiio Hearing.
Bart Oartelsmarq 4750 Quaker Lane, stated R was concerned
With the Patentidl, traffic -.irculat on from this development
thuough the Nathan Tralls development to the ease # He
rW that the development not be allowed to commence
uratic another egress is provided, SpecIfIcally, the second
phase of tai developmetit sbouid not cotmiience until a
north/south egress z provided. Orel, Frank discussed the
possibitities of a temporary access t "old" Zachary carte
for the second and third phases.
Sri Segal OT hiterprise Properties, t.- Petitioner,,
explained s _f ' that the first ,phase could
develop the proposed north/south road, Development could
not Continue arctic an alternataccess Is available.
hit Spitzley, 10M 488th Avenue- north:, requested the
petitioner e lain what Is proposed to occur to the i stinq
trees, foliage, and hili located near. his property. Mr..
Frank explained the intent as to preserve the existinq
v ge a icrrt and topography.
Pdoe 247
Ir. Spllltzlerequested a,t explanation the procedure for
extending, aallta rer, Assistant My Fnqjn(,er Sweeney
e p a ned he antlo,1pated a public hearing would e conducted
In r lid-,Ianu r tor the extension or trunk san!tary seri r.
He Indicated -that the Skyline Hillsarea residents
riot 1* f led. He also, noted, that the pr llmli ar a eriqlneerinct
reportrt rren being prepared.
Mr. Spitzley, inquired If the Oonnection to utilities for the
Skyline development was mandatory because of the proposed
development. The Plan-linp Commission andPanning DirectOY4
temere eonfirmed that, the extension )f UtejI Ie to ,
Skyline Hills area had already been under ! derati on by
1 -he City, and wcis not a result o this development proposal.
t4r... pitzle it qu red Ilf the petitioner was qoIng to conduct
neighborhood meetings In the futute.
Cnalrivoman Vasillou explained that neighborhood meetings, are
riot mandatory, but are r c rr ed, 'in order to familiarize,
t,ht,' rrephbor ng residents with the proposed development.,
3he also expl4lned t 2 .t a required public hearing world be
erutdu ted wtth the preliminary plan plat stageofreN .
Mr. Bartel*mat corfirmed the proposed trail locations.
Richard i l le , 10120 48th venue Northexpre ed noern
about the Circulation through Hathan Tr4lt t and suggested
that the prpo tec rust/west public street be oral -de -scald on
the east so as not to allowow arty t r uQF traffic,
Planninq Dirciotor Trcmere explained the future area read
ex enr tis to the do t.h and south, and limited access tn
Zachary .acre. Also, , discussion Included a temporary access
for construction purposes to Zacharyhar Lane so that all of the
ar tru t* vehicles world riot circulate. through the Nathan
Trails t rpment
Mlch4e4l Sel 1, 4745 01jaker Lane, ru t +.> when Hamel Road 4
wotlid be e rrr.eeted to tacharyLague.. planninq -rector
lr mer g' pl r e that the road oonneotion is not included
In the clirreat Capital Imprdwem-ent program C , and
therefore woula not he scheduled for construction until the
land area surroundinq,the future rod location develoos. `
John Connor, 4810 Quaker Lane, expressed con ern about
potential traffic -.Iro at on through Nathan ' Trams b
resideots seeking access to the Holiday Warehouse facility,
He suggested; a "dead-end" e edit trust d at Oluaker Lane.
Nov249
ir1nicM COMMacan Mint 10
No c t b e r 11983
Planning Director r m rt* explained tb 'it the ct.,trrent
prellmindry putting processt thel Would take these
conce n into aceount., stated that rhe Io inq of 48th
Avenue florth Is not feaMble, acid that It has 4livays been
Intended to be utilized for access to the subject property.
The Or ui tin through Mithan TrailIs not Intended to be
the exclusive eircullatton ca e las u circulation N ". 1
he providied to the north and south. fie r-n d that
should be feasible to provide n icat r Qia -access for
vonstructilon vehicles.
ohn Coonor reiterated his: concerti circulation to the
Haliddy Wdreiinut" i °t * PlatitAng,Olrector Tremere
showed the h oh, re GAde Plarif and explained the
vartous area road He noted roads which
were yet to be constructed,, penditiq further,dev(iJo? giant in
this drew
Chairwoman Vasilloi closedd t«•he Public Her ire *
MORON by tommissionertire, seconded ky Cbmmi sinnej Plufka
to t act ioul on this pet i t i cy:Y , i i i
oarried.
MOTION, by Commissi,,%ier VVIirel, seconded by Commissioner; Magnus RECOWNOATI(1i C
o recommend approval of the prGposed RPUD CoriceptFlee
subject to the conditions, as i i "tW d in the draft Resolution,
with the addition of c hit do to re-qu-Ire that all
construction traffic access the property from Zachary Lane,
4ind` that circulation to the east be limited o' redid pttal
traff i o.
om i n r Plofka expressed concern with the south and
north pond ,, end sitated that he Was, not, on in d they
qualify, a omen space* within the meanitiq of the Ordinance
or bonus points. The Commission discussed the comments by
the developer that t!ie ponding areas could be filled since,
they are not required for .storm eater dralnaq >.
Mr. i stdted, that he thouqht the ` ponds w;: Uici further
eahtinc e the developmentt Lut he could fill the ponds if so
desired.
He stated that fie thauqht it unreasonable and riot feasible
o require that cement trucks enter the site from Zachary
Lang during the f ' rst phase of development when the, would
have cross untW;eloped property. e requested t;ha they
be a h,i e t o acoe8s the protect fromthe t* The Commission
discussed this exin ern wlth the p t i t ion r.
Page 249
Commission Niflutes
November 22t 19833
Commissioner Pa stated his conceras reqarding constr o -
tion relate to the hours of o ratlonjr and dirt and mod be-
ing tracked by the trucks onto thex t nq roadways, Mr.
Segal litdioated that In a previous development in thev
fig r uesu the text ea!' the streets And charge the st
back to hl*s dv -nit,.. Hte polated out that the hours of
Construction would be dictated by the builderi, Planninq
Director Tremere stated the petitioner could return with a
proposal addressinq these concernr> at the preliminary plat
stage.
ba rwomda Vasillou concurred and suqqested th petitioner
conduct neighborhood meetings, prior to Plannino Commission
considerdtion of the _pretimInary plat.
Planning Director Tremere commented that this development
could be viewed as a 1°thlr #' pease_ of the Nathan Trail d -
eblies tt t And should not be. unduly c oms- ra rx because Ilt Is,
a 3epdrate parcelwith a dlffert . developer.
MOTION to Amendthe Main Motion by coinjisslorier "Vire,
seconded by Co.%nissioner Maq u to reword proposed Condition
MOTION T AMEN
t1 requilre tfhav an entranee off Zachary Lam be-
provided f ronstruc,,C n vehicles such as graders. Vote 5 VOXT -M T ED
Arles.. MOTION ,irrl .
OTO to -Amend the taxn Motion by Commissioner Stulberq, MTI AHED
seconded by Commissioner Pxutxa,, to add Condition Nor
directing the petitioner that, If tht 4evelopment proceeds
tst of the proposed north and south roads, An alternate
temporary ngress res route, shall. berovt6ed .: ,
that the dehrl s from the oonstruction shall be oleaned and
removed from 48th r iti N rth as needed- a proper turn- rn-
aroundarand an to in area for constrvct on vebiclest shall b
provided within the site and be Identified the- prelimin- r i n-
ary par ,fat application; and$ that all oonstructlon parkinq
including epto esj shall occur within the site boundaries.
COTE. 5 Ayes. MOTION Carried.
VOTE ON AWRLWNT
OTE the Main loci 4-s, twice Amended. 5 Ayes. Motion
pn
T O U HANYI)TION:
AS TWICE AMENDCD
COM-11t$5110ner r a nUs suggested the petitioner g sss further
de AjJs of the rax . access to the north with the pares and
Recreation Department.
0 WNT_
The meeting adjourned at 10:45 P#,M.
d k -
PLANNING COMMISSSION RM11 Q FOR NOVEftwo 2?1 198
ON A
USL PERMIT tffi MISSION PARTHMSHIP FOR PARKVIEW APARTMEWS (RPUR 76-1) (A-,,A)
WHAS, Mis ion partnership has requested approval of a R,,-stdentlal Planned rpt De-
eloprue tr liminy Plan/Pldt and Condi'lonal Use Permit for rkvlew partmenj
development consistiniq of Mt dwelli-n(I units it's threeuild no e lo ated a
County Road 9 and 41st -4ue North; an
W A theA.a n n# Commission s revilewed the request at a duly called PulbIi
Hearing Arid reends approval-
TH[,RUF0Kt E IT HEREBY RESOLVED . CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITE` OF PLYMOUTH.,
MINNESOTA, that it should arra. hereby- does a rn-v t v Rf-,sidt',*ntlal Planned Unit Pe l-'
op,ment Pr =t m"nar° tarp/Plat and ondit oa Uc Permit for Mission Partnershlo for
Pirko icw Apartments evelo e5it consisvinq of 211 dwellinq unlits In three bulldinqs
located at `ouat Roast 9 and 41st Avenue earth, subject to the followinconditions-,
Compliance with the City Englineer's Memorandum.
Removal of all(lead or d inn treesfrom the property- at the tong's
expense.
3. Payment of park dedlc.at 0:1 fixes-111-11eu of dedication ire eveordarr e with
the th at .nn Policy in ffe t the time ` f ispa e S t I i it,
ui din Permits shallt he issued until the Final Plat Is filed and
recorded vilth Hennepin County.
Approved yard setbacks are per the RPUft Site Pldti.
6. Appropriate Waal documents r ardinq Homeowner Association documents, c ov-
etidnt,,, and restrictions, as approvvd by the Fitly Attorney, tlhdll he filed
with the Final Plat.
7. The fInai plat application shall Inclu,,lo written verificationion fr m Hennepin
County Park ; Reserve Distri.et that a loeation for private trail access to
Wdicine lake Regional Park and maintenance terms, for the trail and adjoin-
laq fence ttav-e been dt,,terralned. The trdi.1 shall he Constructed to City
st-tndards;
8. The f11nal peat a oticat on shall t-ielude a revised lands" -ape pan demon - 4
s°tratinli .-om is with the ,.and cape- Policyt. the Plan shall. specify tete
icy at ion, s"-icst and size of any trees to be, dlted.
Totaaximun,number of units shall be Z11, yes d sionate.td on the dp rovedplan-
0. Submission of required tpro min s Performance Aqreement aril financ-
1al,
financ-
ial,guarantee for completion of site improvements.
lend $ha i be *In compliance with the Ordlnarr e'
9. All waste.* 4-4d waste 0ontainers, shall bestored within the structures,
Building located on J.nt J to be relocated to the south,,` a minimum- of 10
ft* to a maximum of 20 ft.,; and additiondl, plantings shall he located
dsk
alo the west s ° d of the-
lbuilldinq to shield the recreational area.
RHOMiTorflDINTION 1-1
APPROVI.M1 RUSIDIJITIAL. fKAWD UNIT i i',0PHV i ` PRELIMINARY 'LANIPL , l ON ` N .
UISL 1111110111T HAI DICT t it NVUBON1 IWI P-ARTIVISHIff HIRE BASS LAIZE HVIGHTS. WPUD No..
10 08)
WKREASI Dinkman Mason, K -fit Fortnership, has requested approval o Resident 1,11
1"Idtined Unit Preliminary an/ Rozoninq and Conditional Use Permit for
89th residential lots on 38.3 acres jocated west of PineviewWe so"th of County goad
7,1 vurth of Sup Line Railroad and east of 1-494; andt
15HL141,AS, the Planning mmi ion has reviewed the requestt 4 duty called ue
Itio and recommends approval;
HOWL ` EREFOR fit T Biuavny R SOLVIJI Q 10 My COUNCIL OF THf CITY Of K"YW ;ITH, 141W
MOM, , that it should and! Wreby does approve the Residential Mnned Unit Development
Prel imin Pl aniPi t , and C n it iWi Use Permit foto Dickmda Knutson, X -M, Iart,vrshipj,
or B&Ss Lake hNig t f ;ni property located west of 1"Ineview Lane, South o "o: u` .jRoad
tiorth f Soo Line Rat i odd and east of WITOx a;bJ€Tt to the fol lowin nolo ions:
CoMplidnele with the City Vnqineer's filemorandum,
Removal of 011, (lead or dyinq trees om the property at the owner' p*nel'
3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a contract h& been awarded for
sewer and water.
Previsions ox- a 30 -ft. wide trail. outlot per Comprehensive Park Plam,a :
verified by the Peke and huglu e in 'Departments, with submittal of detailed
pluvs as to con t u t s to of the t.M per City standards,,
5. Payment of parkdedicationfees—laMe of dedication with appropriate credita
In an amount determined accordi n to verified eaa and pavlaq, sta is and ac
cordino to the Dedication Polity In effect at the time of filinothe Final
Plat.
6. Street namenaimes shall taomplv with the City Street ` Hamin : atem
the rezoninq ordtttance shall be published when the Final Plat has 1wea filed,
No B ildi.nq Permits, shall be issued unt i i the final iii t Is filed, and recd de
with Hennepin County.
9« Setbacks shall be pet approved plan,, notinq that the side yard setback on the
t°aqe side of the dweliin t 'units all 6y 6 ft. minimt1m gni in any case, the
aide yard setback between two d1wellinq units shall be 4 minimun, of i6,ft.;
rant yard setback shall be 0 ft* Or the "Wp d" dweillow all ethers
hall be t*
iApproprtate legal documents reqdrdinq covenants, h5meowner Assoeiation
restrictions and bylaws, as approvedy the City At torpe , shdl i be -fit led- with
the Final Fiat.
Page- two
Plall"Inq=11 SS ton Recolftmiendat tossemib
V1dx11.MUm num fwellin tjalts shill be 80, with a densunits per
acre for tete land at or above the established,41 eaterElevation- per the
Clay Storm eater Dralfiaqe Plan as ,ety,,Ifled by the Citi- fivqineer. Otte bonus
Point is dssioned as follows: . Data point sed on tete provisions, for open
space.
V'.i nimu t I t size steal I be 91.500 sq.
Double Pronted lots on,Plnt-vlew Lanestall have a minimum,depth of 150 ft.
Double fronted lots for sloqle fam.11y., dwee lin s on Couatty Road 41
shall ave a minimungpia of 145 ft* If t ' er than, single famljy detached
lots ars proposed, the m4nimum lotdepth all be VO ft. alona proposed.,
cautt y Roa4 61. All on propos vitt %*oad All shall she buffered by art
earthen noise barrier.
No phasing ei t tt s are ,fit,,nided :.tti" t mp,I! e d.
The omt- t tt 's Associationco,enants, restrictions shall tae submitted with
e fiflal plat application, and stall be approved by theCiti t o rYt,- y j And
such tt , ports, covenants, and restri tIons steal r :v iez There, shall he no
more than 20 modular homes in the dee piment - there stall be no modular homes
ct Pinevi tr .ane all torts shall avet a t tr t car
attached qarates:and* all homes shall have a minimum 1,100` sq,, ft. finished
main floorarea*
PL ANNIN MMSI ll RECOMMIENRAT104 NOVEMBE 198
RECOMMENDATION C
APPROVING SIOLNTIAL PLANNED UNIT VLOM ll; NT CON(M.-PT PLAN FOP, SOL SMkt, INTERPRISE PROPERTIES (W59)
Wlll° RE A , Sol Segall Enterprise Properties Lias requested approval of a'
PtaxUied Ulfilteveeat Concept Plan for tK development 1
411nqlth ` family residential lots on approximately 40 acres located east and:
dojacent to Zachary Lane and south of 4Rth Avenue North- and,
WHLREASy the Pidrining Commission has reviewed e request tcalled Public
Informational Rearing and has recommended a prnv It
l l ,,H ORE1 ill.= IT, HLREBYE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O
PLW40U` H MINMES TA: ' that It shot ld and hereby does approve the Residential
Planned Unit Development Cnn p flan fl4r Sol Seal,, Enterprise properties for a
development be known as "l l dden Valley" onsa l° inc of 83 -.,11nWe family
residelitic,l, leas n approximately 40 acres located cast and adjaoent to 7achari,
Lane and south of 48th Avenue North, subject t-;), the l,ln'lnq on(lition.
o pItance wath the Citi Enqlneerls Memorandum.
11nq of the evlopm n shall be In accordance with utility and
avallability as approved by the City Etiqlneer.
Maxlmum density shall be 2.1 units per acre for the land at or above
he established high water elevation per the adopted City Storm- Mater
Drainage Plan as verified by the CityFngineer. Density bonus points
are assessed as followst.
a.One point based on affirmative desliqn.
4. The preliminary la la dop1toation,shall Include explanation of the,
request for, a 6 ft. side yard setback.
5. Draft restrictive coveilents for the private open areas shall b
submitted with preliminary plat/plan a 1Icatio t!.
64 A entrance; off Zachary:. Lane .shall be provided for ..construction.:
vehicles.
A A ' the time development proceeds west of the proposed north and south
rodds, an a.l r a p r, r In r ss x ss r shall b ar e$
All debris from the conru l n shall be cleaned and r m of from
48th Avenue North as tip eded ; a proper tura-around and --*taktnq avfor
construction, vehicles shall be provided, within the s-tte` and scall be
Identified in the preliminary plat application,* and, all_ coast-S# ctJ()n
pa ; In In lu lnq employeeat, gall occur %vi hin the development site
boundaries.
sk