HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 11-09-1983CITE' OF Pfd
PU M E
HOV g M1
The re ular irzoet n f the Planninq Commlss en vas 0Iled t
order at 7.05 P. H.
Magnus and etre 0-.40 P. i.
M MRS ABSENT:, None
SlMf PRE"Tz Director of P annii-I and . m1fl alit
Develonment 11.1alir Tremere,
Community Development Coordinator
Sard Mcort
Assistant City: "n .neer John Sweeney
I P11 by COMIssioner Steiqerwald, seconded by Com Issio er
a n s to recommend approgal of the October`Z6f 1983 mutes
as uiiAttte , 'dote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
PU13LIC WING$:
ha rktseman ' asillou Introduced the request submitted Mr. TIMERTON, i3OW.My
Them as HealeyTi mherten Gem rangy for preliminary plat, PREL1141MARY PLATt
final p atf variances, site pant and conditional use permit FINAL PLATt,, VARIANCES
for property located southwest of Z8th Avenue North and SITE PLAN ANR
Ranehview Une which will ecampl-te the deve,lep ens of the CINDITIONAL US
hent,ndoah ares She noted that she was a former resident P R141T (83054)
of thf, Shenandoah development,
re-ilew of the November 11 1983 staff report was
re ue,.ted. Staff spam ed the previous approvals for the
Shenandoah development,, and observed the proposal calls for
148 cod minium units In 19, buildings.Also* a recreation
building and outdoor swimmin pees are proposed. Staff
distinguished the proposed conventional development from a
Planner Unit Development.
Staff roilerved the requested variences, as noted In the staff
retort- It was explained haat the petitioner met with the
e-*1st1nq Shenandoah ome-owners Association to discuss the
Proposed reCreat anal amenities. Staff's concern is that
prinr to the development of the proposed -project, It should
be determined whether the Shenandoah Homeowners _: Association
Intends to partl "pate In the ownership: and malintenance of
the recreational amenities.
P141111ing Commission Minutes
Nuvvzber . 198,1
The proposQd trall located south of 26th venue north would
provide access for the proposed developmest residents to the
ad oluting property to the south whIch wilxl have a public
tral Bated along th irkn property 111ne, St
recormnends that it beconstructed to City standards..
thairwoman Vasillou stated that from her past involvement in
the Shenandoah developtae wt,, she did not recall whether an
esorow f and was created for the icomplet jon of the
recreational en * t l
Cha rww ail Va it otw recognized qtr. Rick Sathres
athre- erg ust who In, turn introduced Mr, Thomas Healey
TiMerton Company.. Mr. Jealey summarized his umvents
regarding the recreational amenities, noting that there Is no
leqdl restriction on the property requilrinq construction of
he amen tees, but his proposal d l"s , for the coristruotion
of a -,sol and recreation building for the residents o
Timbert nom. If the Shenandoah rtsi encs desire to utilize
the facilities they will he available and a , 'oInt
Association cou d he d voloped for the ownership an
anterwarwee
Mr. Healey requested that the processing of his applicat ra
not he held wap core to any nde son by henandoah
Ho eoWnert-s Associatlon. He s g est d that requiroments
could Ue incorporated into the Development Contract.
g° r Healey explained tha* Is development staFf reviewed all
of the files 'In the -crecords r gard nq the subject
prppert # and that tht. proposed de el.. pment elan was
designed to try and avoid previous design related problems
such as snow removal and lack of parking. It was explained
that the Intent was _ L.e d sIqn a layout that would preser,,e
the existing wooded ,areas and to provide a positive view to
the existing Shenandoah, residents.
Mr Healey revitewei the proposed platting procedure and
noted the request based upon a dt s re for ease In
aanoing, and sales. As each buil
dind is constructed., the
dot It is on would then be on o idated with they, dots of the
ether buildings, so that ultimately, the internal lot roves
are eliminated. The "real", variances lniolved the request
for e-sser setbacks to the streets. Mr. Pealey noted, that
the Plaaned Unit Development process and prod res were not
ava,l table when the orlglnal development pLin was, approved,
Pay} -1
lannin l "lean Minutes
November 199
Chairwoman Vasillou confirmed that the last meet lag the
petitioner had with ` the Shenandoah ll eowner' cla l,)n
vfas In O -t lr; andt 5n1c opened the Pubite Hearing.,
Oarbdra Solyst, '27012 Tor a evlew Lane. stated that she is
the President f the Shenandoah Homeowner's, Assoclad ny
00nSistinq of over 2100 usilt . The Association appreciates
Hedle ylsnd erati, = nd she stated the re ides t.t- were
ncereed about the prof --#o ed ' density and the retention of
the exlsttnqwoods. She recognized that the proposed
Onsitis lower than ori-q1tially approved.
T1s. '`,Zt stated that the Association was net f1rm on a
posit.lon regarding the recreational amenities. An informal
survey was taken which Identified that a prox1matel 55 to
of those surveyed desired both a swimmiraq pool and
teilais courts. The Association is willing to share In the
associated casts, h we er, they would tennis courts to,
e added to the clans.
Ns, Solyst stated she had questions regarding the creation
of a est°row account for the Poastructloti of the recreational
alrtenl l x ,- She read from 1978,,carreVn dd .e h, tie City
a s ger vhloh d. s d estimated _ cost e the
re r at ;ial facilities and that it would he ap roprtate for
an e erdw account to he created to assure the construction.
She also Gated that they developer of the `second addition
had ecm i t t ed to, depositing money In such art account.
c y , <At d that the Association also requests Cit
a to ace l h ' a room the existing storm sewer situation
In the northear-r oorner of the 13.1e a td aah area.
Mr. Rlok Sathre. ` ,,-A Mr. Healey reviewed the proposed storm
sewer improvement. l Bert n which would not resolve the
primary ext ting was noted that the new storm
sewer system could used by Shenandoah in other areas.
Mr. Healey ommente the request for tehnls courts, He
aid that). ; IA his '.!-Ipment experience, It# s' been show;
that tenals courts ha -v: 7 lk)vt useage rate. e stated there
Is a high n ea e fu, ;in Osacr pool and recreation
but n . ¢ h Intent z: e; A o present an amenity package to
the future residents, of It i while keepinct the o f to
the Purchasers reflective only hoe amenities that will
e ,used,, n order to <--1nct tennis e rt It acr id
require deletJnq another 3,°_;Adllnq or a portion of t to
existing, woods,.
Planalnq commissionMinutes
commented that she thought A proper 'Place for
tenalls courts wou1d he southerlofa ld n r e
the , Layoutt ' is for this area to e
retained as It exists t
Barry a o , 16005 Uth Avenue North, requested art
explanation o the difference between a townhouse. and a
condomtut r. Waley e lii lned that the owner of a
tdv rho se struicture would own the land underneath the
building, while a condominium owner only owns the space
within the unit*
Mr. Winston inquired if the trail located on the Property to
the south was to be paved.Plannerlannr T emere explained that
the trail would be a public. trail which would be. eon trud ed
to CityStandards, lhclud npaving:
c -bent Dolan, 15604 4 -17th Avenue ort r inquired o
practical t would be for 300 families to utilize one pool.
Chairwoman Vasiliou com en C ed that the Hom ownert s
Association needs o dotermine the pool will be
satisfactory, and If they desire to partlelpate.
Dr. Carolyn Ro7.&,f.,nberqf 15704 Z7th ,Avenue North, inquired if
the builder will Provide lower finaacinqadd Interest rates
to the ntbuyers of the proposed units. Mr., Healey
explained that they Plan to qualify for HA$ VA, or Fannie
Mae MU"'Oi - He also toMM(Mitedi that if the heed arises,
and if.,A' ey 'oao, they woul "by, d og' financlinq for .the new
buyers. Dry Rosenberg commented that this might mage It
more difficult for the existinq Shenandoah units to be
resold.
Dr. Rosenberg, Inquired If the Shenandoah residents could
participate in the recreational amenities optionall $ with
no increase to their Homeowner'--, Association dues. Barbara
cyst estimated the Increase to dues would be $ .Oo to
qQ per, month per unit for the pool and redreat ori
bu .idle . She stated that the entire Homeowner's
s oolat. on would have to he Ino ue as the Association
documents require that all the duebe the same for each
homeowner.,,
Dr. Rosenberg if1utred If the condominium development would
lower the property values of the existing townhouse
project Flattest Tremere stated that there Is no bass to
surmise 'that.,
age
Planntnq Co u
4r. H ey commented, that as c0 du lniunt developments are,
1lore a&. d$ their Wpdot on neiqhborlaq residential
y Winston Enquired show: the potential jarange-
uti . Mr. Heeley estlmated that the units would range
c V5,000-$!V5,000 dependinq on the development costs.
ChalrWOmdO VasillOu explained' :hat the estituate reflects the
market this :timet and that thc petitioner would not be
field to any givenprice range,
Rtger Benson, 15609 ?7-th AvenueNorth,. Inquired about,, and
Healed explained the potential locations for detached
qazaqe unitS. Mr,- &--igNson loquired. if the erupt"sed dwellings
would be painted the same shade of brown as the existinq
Shenandoah oa. * He-Aley explained thit the, units would
be ep Its a natural set but h would not. be painted
the, same shade of brown. tett. Benson -commented he, would,
prefer a simtlar development and build-linolor.
Chi1rWO 4(1 VaSAIJQU (: ()Sed the hlis hearing.
ow'.1U1 otter Stelaerwald l u red 50-Lu the quidin, h
property to the, south. Planner Trpierep and that the
property is Included in the Parkers Lake Ptanned
eveupmetA, and Is guided UA-21UA-21and A- -, further to the
southeast of the subjet-Asub-Aparcel,, the property Is guided
Industrial. hit approved Concept Plan n
development,of attached units ,`Ln the LA-2 and A- guided
areas, Rick Bathes, Sathre-Per*-julst. stated that the area
adjacent o the south was Idem; l1. ,d as Area; 'IF" on the
approved on p Plan.commentedthis t a higher
density area.
Commissioner d a d' asked about landscaping-a-td/or
herpt which would be aced along the Shenandoah
boundary* Mr. Sathre explained ha t In the northeast ar a
he Intent was to leave the area open for visual
app nofthe x . n ra
Mr. Mealey reviewed thendd--, pc Plan Me-atifyinq, proposed
ti itt areae
Cow- n t--iv % aid inquired about the setback
ui didNo. 11G t the olosest Shenandoah buildlaq,. Mr*
Healey stated the dicta€got, between the two. butldip,4s would
be, t , , and than Building , 10 oomplied with the
ordinanye setbackto the property .dine.
page
Com missionerInquired about the transition provided for
Butid ng 11 to the adjacent Indu tr .a . property to the o4st
1 0,0i 1,1 Ie ane . e I hre mm nt Ad- 1 i
platitAngs would he In tale and Lhat tete livIng, area; of
the a dt'n ars* oriented to the apart
areas. Commissioner Wire confirmed that , tri 110,,1 nn the
site plan Is to remain as It exists today. He questioned if
the vxistlnq vecletation Iva$ of reasonable quality.
ComnAsslkoner Wirerequested that the petitioner review the
iOrnal tr ,lt and lreu ation. Mr, Healed pointed out the
10C,4tlo"S of the two ` private Irit r n4,1 trdI l .
Commissioner Wire Inquired If taste l ri.=x t *n problem
IL11 the Shenandoah d vel ent reqarditio, stormwater
drainage. Assistant Citi Frigineer Sweeney responded
affirmatively, at -Ad, rioted that the proposed storm drar:rraq
provisions will help alleviate some of the l t q
problems; hoary, the proposed improvements will 11t solve
all the problems., PlannerTravers noted that the exilstinq
problems were not generated by this d v In erg and that It
Is, not this developer's responsibility to 'resolve existing
probt its 'in the Shenandoah dev.o rpt.
onlflil s rarer ire Inquired how the Shenandoah residents
could onne t to a storm sewer system In the future., Mr.
Heatey explalned that if they Install their own lrrt rr a
storm sewer system, there is a place for them to tonnect to
the system through the TImh rt n development;,
Commissioner Plufka vxplalned`, that the Northeast corner of
the Shenandoah de,eelopment drains to the north and that the
Iz herton development area drains, th rwis . Commissioner
Wire clarified that the solution to the drainage problems
for the Shenandoah area would not be provided by this
developer.
ommzss.1on r Wire inquired how the City would confirm that
the two associations coordinated the sharing of ' maintenance
for the recreational amen tle . alri uman Vas lto stated
the City would assure that the proper association documents
are filed and recorded.
C'onnissioner Stelgerwaldconfirmed- that the free s annul
aragewot-Ad not be pr con tru t d. They would only b
built if sold to a reside€rt. Chairwoman Va;lllou nmmen4-ed
that this ootJd conceivably provide more open space.
Page 235
a1r r rrp Commission Minutes _
ve.eiiber 9 1981
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner
t tger a d to take action on the petition., Nate. 7 Ades.
Htcarrec.
01 by OMIS$10ner pauba, s m ss r T €
tt e g to recommend approval of the preliminary )lat and PRELIMINARY PLAT,
oind t rona use permit Subjectt to the conditions as stated
the draft to dyes, N parried. EMIT
Coit, issioner erre stated itie thought the variances were war-
ranted considering the buildit1q, Orlentation, and the proposed
esign
MIMIsSiolcer Pluf a concurred,- stating that the es an pro-
vides as muchoff-street open space as the typical Planned
Unlit pevelopme tto and 4dditlon4j off-street parking can he
provided.
Commissioner ire amer te that the proposed street is
public rather than pr vc1te.
MOTION by Commissioner Ra ba, seconded by Commissioner R C ° M)A` ION
Stulber'n to recommend apor val of the f inal plat subject to FINA-
the conditionst, as stated in the draft Resolfution.. Vote
ye, MOTION carried.
NOTION by Commissioner te.erwa d, seconded ompi ssioner CO DA ' (K A
StulberA to recommend apprevl of the site plan subject t SITE LAN
the eond tions as si ited Ire the draft Resolution girth the
addition of Condition No. 4 to state, "The tral. s shat: meet
City standards".
Mr Healey stated his concern that If the traits are
constructed t '*ty standards, and espeela ly that trail t
the south, the appearance may be that - 'hey are public
trails, He does not want to invite the general ; public
traffic through the Timberton development. ep€ ent.
MOTION t AMEND,by feat seconded by NOTION
ss nt r pauba, to delete proposed Condition No.' .
Contmissioner Pau as stated he concurred with the petitioner
that should be a distinction between the public aticther°e
pr...at.e.. tra .l.
Commissioner Wire inquired If there would be appropriate
signage to be used to distinguish the trails. He confirmed
with Mir. Sathre that there was adequate room and reasonable
grade to tonstruet the trail as proposed.
aIle 2*36
Plattaing Commission Minutes
November 91 1981
11011 Call ate* Z Ayes,, COIMIS$10ners Stolberaj, aqn s
Wiry, Steiqerwald, and Chair omdn V,asiliou, may. MOTIOR t AIL
1,41$,0 f 41 led.
V01L €1 the MatR l t t(ln, as orilginaliv stated. Vote, 7 Aye, CdA } T 0
NOTION, t*, 1
Planning Director Tremere stated C!," ve les
would be researched regardlilIq a pot-,
prior to the City Council's review ah
The Pldnninq Cool-lission recessed fromn to, 9-.00 P.M.
ha rwoMan Vas.111ou Introduced the request submitted byCARLSON PROPERTIES
Carlson Properties, Inc. for approval of site pans _for, two 114C. - SITE PLAN ,
Off icelwd `0u0u e dQ It ies : variaies, and a lot VARIANCES AND LGT
consolidation* eadin of the October . 1 jr IM staff report CONSOLIDATIW (81056/
gas walved. 3057
Commissioner Wxre requested petitioner, com-ment s mi the
reviewsubmitteda the Department turd
y+ jµ
ent
h9'4aRoure .'"s (DNR) 4
Mr. Date X aaedy t, ar sonr cit i ,, Inc., stated his
C(Ulsultafrt has proposed mitigative measures and that the
design, will comply with DHR requirements.
tr. Kennedy stated that, regardanq the staff report comments
of the exist inq landscapinq between Bulldinqs I and 4t, the
Pet -t --tier will relocate or replace any ldndscapinq which is
required to he removed because of the proposed seared
access. Also) regardI q the discussion of additional
lands 4pin north of BuildingNo's 5, r* Kennedy, - stated that
the slope Nyould he too steep for additional plantinqs,
Co I loner Wire Inq tred a t the llght n which would he
t *111 ied fir, Kennedy stated that ldent eat 1 t.q t* q to,
e tstlg, Building' 3, would, he utilized h ildlnq mounted
l fight inq only).
Commissioner Stetoerviatid request t d staff to explain the
eon ern of the shared drive
VOTF. 7 Aym, MOTION, Oarrjed. VOTE
Page
Pl"In"Inq Commission Minutes
PLAT -x119 rector P-,6-0rf rme the CoMali s in members e `INIU "
that the Clt, Coune l did not take ate.on on the proposed STUDY ITEMS
OrdInance Amendment regardinq oonore t' p u ri , a they
fiavu requested a more concise i t ion.
The, Commisslon members thanked and commendedthe P dnnft
staff for the siqn Information which was forwarded to them.
Commissioner Wire stated he felt I wa important that the
PlannIng Commission determine what type; of attitude the City
should have toward spa.
Chairwoman as l u discussed enforcement of ordinance
Provisions spec'i a in "banners". the suq
that the `ommiss er$ inform staff of areas where
violations are noted. She requested the Commissioners,
consider enforcement of any proposed provisions, when
discussing the ordinance.
Commissioner t $r a observed that the smell p rte h e,
reader hoard signs should e addressed, as should banners..
Commissio4cr Stulberg supported the licensinq of SICIA
ontra tors Commissioner Wire reiterated his concern that
the Commission adopt an overall phi l osophy toward s t ea d
The mmss on %concurred that the ordinance review, must
Include disoussion, and thoughts' regarding nforc m t,
statements of purpose, attitude, cohtro , and equitable
applicat5on ; of the sign p v%s ons
Chairwoman Vasillou suggested the , Commission Invite
residents and business representatives from the community t o
discuss sign matters. Businesses such as fast food
restaurants, grocery stores, warehouses, and service
stations should be contacted.
oi a suggested that residential developers
have separate, m eting to discuss sign attrsth the
Commission.
It was determined that, .at the November , 1985 dinner
a t fl% the Commission will formulate questions that, would
be asked of the business representatIv.
OUR Z
The meetinq ad .jure d' at 9*450 P.M.
ds-
RECOMMENDATION A
APPROVING ' V*1ii1iiW R' PLAT AND CONDITIONAL t : tip' FOR THOMAS HFA1 ,,Yj,
C%tnANY FOR TIMBERTON (S3054)
Wi{ it . sho—a air i her-1kn Company TW,, reque,5ted approvalof a
r llvulnar.),'Flet 4ad Conditional Use Permit for Timberton a plat, for ?a lets an
one outlot on ?1.4 acres located Southwest of Mthenv "orth ano Hanchview
La et and,
WHUILAS1, the Planninq has reviewed the reqtjost at a duly cal e A
Public flearing and reeommends approval-
Holy, ` RUV't %ij fli IT F,Rf i RtS0L ` f) BY THE.CITY CAUNOU OF THE CITY ar
PLYMOU1141, NINNLSGTA,,. that it should find hereby does dpprove the Prellminary Plat
and Condit i ai Use Permit for Thomas € eaaleyTtmherton, Ompany for TWwrton, a
fiat for I0 lots and, one coal t: on ? 1,,4 acres locatt d sow hivest of t veritte
North nd, Ranchview Lane, subject to the followinq con itic"n
I- Oiii nefc With the City fwilneer'sMemorandum.
Remurval of ail dead or vz t trees from the property <It the own rt
expense
Payment ; park- dedication fees-In-lieu of tc t'
with the, Dedication Policy in effect: at the time the Final
fiat
6. Street names shall, icomply with the City Street, 114,, em.
7. No Buildinq Permits shall, be Issued until the I Inal Fiat Is i led dnd
recorded vilth Hennepin Cotinty.
Yard setback varlarices dreqrdated as Identifiedii In the project
rl rrat ve dated October IA.,, 1913, and lot wldflt and a :,ttr ariaticc**
Identified ` in October 15, 1 correspondenceponder from,
Appropriate legal documents r gardin Homewyr.- r Assoclatitv
covenants and restrictions as approved h,, the City : ttornvyj shall ine,
le wi,t: the it ir1ai Plat.
PLANNING COMM
ING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT FOR TIMBMTONSETTINGCONKTIONSTO, BE VET PRIOR TO FIL
FOR THOMAS HLALEYt. TIMBERTON COMPANY
UHIJILAS, the Citi. Counc4l has approved the Final Plat and Development Contract for
TiMberton as requested ky Thomas Healeyt TimbertonCompaw,
TVR i I HE T H RESOLVED COUNCIL Off" T T ti T #,
MINKS :t that It should and hereby does dpproveapprovethe followinq to be Mit ' prior t .
Ia n. Qt r , and related to said platy
OMP.tancWith the 't-y' Fimineer's Memorandum.
Z. Payment park dedleation fees-In-Ileu of dedicationIn accordance with V i typolicyneffe,vt at the time of Tiling the Final Plat or at Issuance of
Buildinq Permlt.
Removal of all dead or dyinq tr;Nes from tete property at the`owner's n .
proved Vdriances Include,lot wildth and lot depth variances,- as Id. entz In
October 1 ` ., 1983 correspondence from athr - kr4qui tt Anda buildinq setback
Variances as identified In prot narrative dated October 18, 198 .
Submittal of required utility and drainaqe easements as approved y the CitEngineerpriertofilinqtheFinalPlea
No, Buitdinq Permits to be !',s-sved uattl
with Hennepin County-,
7. Appropriate legal documents reqardInq Homeowner ton covendrits an
restrictionsas approved by the City Attorney, shall be filen with the Final
Plat.
Any ap a not ,ons approval. from Prior plat and plan : approvals for
ShelldP a Shat. e ought forward and incorporated with the e In ent
Cont t
I
PLANNING € RM` 1**. D XTLON M('.MR 91 1981
yy gg^q[.
APPROVINC SITE PLAN AND "MANCES FOR 0111JSMI PROPFRTIF51. INC.0(30-56)
WHEREAS. Cdrlson Propertl!sf ttiv. has requested approval of a plat, and
Varldtlees for an offleehydrehouse facility (Sut1ding 4) to, be located at the
scut e st corner of Hl way nd Industri,&I Park Boulevard,, and,
WHER. -t
thel ng1,x1M COM-mission has r vI wed said request ,rid recommends
pr val"
HOW, , ., BF IT H0EBY RE-SOLVID BY THETY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH,, R that tt should and hereby does approve the request for
CArlson Properties, Itto, for Site Plea approval for an office/warehouse fdollitv
B i d n O to be located at the southeast corner of Rtghway 5.5, and Industrial
Park Boulevard, subject to the followinq conditions-.
kCOmPlldnce with I ty ,1191 n is Memorandum.
Payment of park dedication ` es- n-lieu, of dedlgatton In c rd jlcxe
y1th dlOdtlore olicy I effect at the time of BuIldlinq Permit
3. Submilssion of required Site Performance Agreement and financial ;
guarantee for completion of site improvements.
4. Any siqn,aqe oil the saes shall he in oompltance withthe Ordinance
5. Any subsequent Phase*s or expansions areubjelcfi to required reytplys
and approvals per Ordloatice poovisllons* f
6. All wdste end waste nt itiers shall be stored Nvithtil the structure
and no outside storage Is permItted.
71* roved variances ne-1 de waiver o the "proof -o - parkln l
requirements sub cit to the filing of appropriate _le.,qal documents as
approved kv the Citly- Attorney relative to the limitations as to use o
the structures, whl*c,t _ do not provide for maximum parking as required by
the ordinatice.
Appropriate lecial doctments as approved by the City Attorneyshall be
d rx r `1`0 iSSAid'100 i .di i ; Permit establitshinq the use o
shared arkin rid drive d1sles.
Lot Consotidatton of Lots 5 and 6,, Block t, Minneapolis Industrial
Park 3rd Addition be filed kind recorded at Pennepin, County priort
issuance of a Buildinq Permit.
s
PLANNING COM"ISSIO:COO m °tm"ATIOm NOvt ']t ' 1, A
RECOMWNDATION
PR NC, SITE PLA4, AND VARIANCESt' FOR CARLSON PROPERTIVS
Carlson s requested andropert
4r antes for an offleelwarehotise facility a dt to be, located at the
southeast corner wav 55 and' Industrial ar Boulevard* arid,,
4 EAS, the a4 4 ga@ at '"iTt? ends11
NOW, i E « , fBE IT Y RESOLVED BY THE ll COUNCIL OFTHE` CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA,that Ilt should and here4y does approve the quest for
Carlson Properties, In(*,. for Site Plan approval for ars offb efwarehouse faeItityBuildingtobelocatedatthesouthtist, corner of 14Nhway 5S and Industrial
Parc Boulevard, s -t to the following edit ons*
Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum.
Pdyment of Park dedication fees-Iri-lieu of dedication In accordance
with edzcat *0r1 Policy In effect, at the- time of Building Permitit
Issuance,,
4 Compliance with , Polley Resolution No, 79-80 relaardina minimum floor,
elevations for new structures on sites adideevt to. tar containifta, an
open storm eater dral'naqe facility,
4. Submission o 4., .red xt;x Performance Aqr em nt and f inancial
guarantee for ° r,V t xt tri of i rove—e '.t s"
5. Any signage shall be in compliance with the, Ordiflatice
Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews
and approvals per Ordinance- pr ,s r s
7. All waste and waste containers spat be stored within the. structure
and no outside storage Is permitted.
8. Approved variances*.
a. , a -ex. of the ll r -n - ark ll requirements subject to the
fili-nQ of appropriate l al doe umentsas a g rnv d the Cit
ttnr a r ative to the limitations as to use of the structures
which not ProvideProvde maximum parking as uilred thepyo
rdin4nce- and..
Variance from Section 6 r ard'na the per-cent o 'm erv*IOUs
surface and setback ZO ft. res., 50 t. 01e parkinct lot
ns d the mitigative measures o additional storm s iv r
yrinq
being kD ,. provided.
Appropriate legal documents as approved by the City Attorney shall b
filed Prior to issuance of a Building Fermat establishing the use o
shared parking and dive aisles,
ds