HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 08-24-1983ciTy up, nvmoum
PLMNINC COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUSTZ41 19
rher ur meetijig of the Pty n * ! al led to
order at 700 P.M.
MENXRSPRIES1.44TZ ChalrwmmanVdstilloulCopmi."ioners
tolhe , kidgnus, Plufkaf dna? Patiba
MEMERS ABSEWT I Commissioners Wire nd -St I rwc;l4
STAFF REt Det mot CoordInator
Bare MCC611
Assistant Engineer John ivey
Comumup .ty Development t1roctor
11lair Tremere
NOTION oy Comrlissioner ; tulb rp- seconded by Comml sloner
lufkd to, dpprove the • inut s of the august 10, 1982 nesting
s submitted. Vote. 4 Ayes. Commissioner Maqnusabst4in-
Id. NOTION Barred.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairwoman Vasi lo(j .introduced the request submitted by f OR X -M PARTNER,"3NIP
Dl do Kn t s n $ K-14 Partnership, for approval of an RPUD PUD CONCEPT PLAN
Concept, Plan, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit and PRELIMINARY PLAWPLAT
Rezoning for the develo ent of $3, residential , unit -5 ' aREZONING
38.5, acre sat . She recognized Mr., Grec Frank,end wNkip CONDITIMM ;USE
f4cCombs, 'McCombs --Knutson Associates* A review of the Auqust PERMIT (83008
10, 1983 staff report was requested*
Staff summarized the previous ns r is ns ' by the ? annin
Commission, nd City Council -egardinq the development of
this property, and expidined the petitioner's request for an
approval of ilkD, Preliminary Pla : t, Rezoning and'Con; -
tuna se Permit s In addition tic the ,approval of aConcept
Olan whtdi has hese revised and returned t the Commission
per Council direction.
Mr. Greq Frank discussed the City Council directives r rd-
in 'Lhe Z d reg ourve d st rt of Coui ty Riad 61, utilization
of the remnant piece of property: onen space credits, ono,
density caloullations., Mr. Frank explained the revised ev
elopment Plan Proposes the assignment of two d n it bc-nus
olnt b, He discussed the proposed access from Pineview tans
rkt d s ihe the )v r l l site topography.
Rf,pa.Ardinq the staging of County Road 61, eonstructllonr.
Frank noted th- petitioner feels restricting th( phesinct o
development would place an economic h rd hip on the prof t,
and he reiterated the petitioner's on rn about the special
assessments.
Page
Planning Commission f4inutes
August 24, 1518
Mr. Frank sta,Led that it Is the Intent of the developer to
Petition the City for the construction of roue y Road I
but they want approval to proceed with the entire develop.
ient., rol5twithstanding the timino of the Co*Lnty Road Cl
isstr ac'"`t.
Connissioncr Pduba Inquired how the proposed lots differed
between Exhibit B and Exhibit ? Mr. Frank expla --ed that
the lots dlaqrammed in Exhibit I are .urger, and that less
r spwe ;Is provided. lie stated that either Development
Pian o)uld e cons tructed by the et .tion r$ bowever, the
etiti der prefers the Development Wan Identified as x -
h hit BA, Exhibit I consists of 80 ung,
Commissioner lufka Inquired how the petitioner anticipated
buffering the .lots located between Sycamore Lane and of nty
Road 1 lir. Frank state= there would be a "fantast tell
p de -cut, for d, buffer between County Road 61 and the reap
yards of those lots fronting Sycamore Large. He stated the
petitioner wouldd grade' County Road 61 if so desired by the
City.' Commissioner Plufka stated his concern about poten-
tial fence construction along the rear yards of those lots
abuttinq County, ,Road 61.
Chairwoman asi l ou openedened th , Public.Hearing.
onn Pelda, 5760Oa vilew Lane North, stated that the has
lived In this area for several years and is ready to see
this area develop. He stated he was supportive of the purr
In that there i ars attempt to retain the e i t n too -
y. He stated lie preferred the Concept Ptah identified
as Exhibit I because the proposal would be more In keepinq
with the size of existing .lots located east of l)tevlew
Lane.
Chairwoman Vasillou closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION lay Comm ssioner uf`ka, seeon ed by dm I slon r
tulber to take action on this petition.. ole 5 Ayes.,
VIOTION earried.
Commissioner luf a stated the Coa=Isslon should review the
Prlpoqed Pian In accordance with the PUD Standards of the
Zoning Ordinance.. He stated he questioned ihether any of
the Additional open space' provided in the revised plans is
use hle, to the proposed development area,, He stated the
proposed open space is remote from a large number of the
future residents. He stated that the Punning Commission. Is
not hound as to the timing of construction of County Road
1$ and should neer a recommendation based on planni a er-
spy; *t v s. He stated further that he would recommend that
only ;Phase I and a por-'-'qi of Phase Ii be cotvqtructed until
ars access to County Road 61 was constructed and useable_.
Mannino Commission minutes,
Auut 1 1983
Comissioner Pduba stated be concurred, and expressed
concern that the open specs Is ,located at one nd of the
de sln tent area. He indicated he would prefer atta^bed
housing along County_ Road 61 vilth the open space mor,,-,
Xr411y looalte. Hu stated he preferred Exhibit 1 for li—
8 40 n Of i -urger int, in the development.
Chairwoman Vasillou concurred, and stated she prafers
Exhibit 1.
Commissioner Magnus inquired If the proposed open space was
to be deft In Its natural states and, if a car eown r"
Association ` would al Mair, the proposed open sao , Cron
r nk *tated that the area would be left in its nat-ural
Stat—e. to offer a "opert area feellnqll to serve as a buffer to
the adjacent property, and be ;used as a lidinn bili in the
winter. r. o scion r Magnus confirmed that, the Homeowner's
Association would be responsible for taxes on the proposed
open,space. He stated because the proDosed opon space is
io atA_d at one end of the project,, he was concerned that the
proposed open space was not a bei bborhood amenity,,
Mr. McCombs stated the proposed development i Similar to
existiog, projects locatedyd around Bass Lake. He noted that
the p t,iti.on r would proceed w tt the development of either
pian id-entIf l d In Exhibit 8 or Exhibit 1, Fxhibit B I
PT*rr jrd --I would afford more effective. opensp e,
oiionr Stulberg stated he agreed wlb the previous
Comment$ regarding pba i and theconstruction o County
Road Glp Commissioner tib rc stated that while Exhibit'
may provide larger lots, 30– does not enhance the location of
the proposed nr;n space-. tie, stated that f theCommission
desires more useable" open space,,, it must teen direct a
revised piaci with more centrally locate"" open space. He,
stated he rold support Exhibit 8, as pr posed.
Commissioner Plufk,i noted that one bonus. point could br
awarded in accordance with the Ordinance Calculation prd-
vi ionst for Exhibit 1.
Chairwoman Vasiliou and Mr. Frank i d; the ri t and
differences, between a -convent dev lopmen and the
proposed PUD .layout; r. Frank stated that t p cost of
grading and the loss of op€ (raphy would be groat with a
conventional. development. He reviewed the 'proposed publ o
pare in the eneral area, and noted that the ad acent
property to the north would benefit from the proposed
location' of the openspace,
i)a e 164
PlanrInq Commission Minutes
uust
Mr. McCombs 5tated that the petitioner does not: sant to
h so the project with the construction of County toad 61
Which the CitY Council has no ` plant to build to the south,
and which may depend on development of lapd to the north.
le
I discussed the assessments which were levied for Pinoviec
Lane. COMMISSioner 0711)fkd stated l:*gat the Planning Commis-
ibn would offer a recommendation -sed upon 1. nni.n c n-
s:ideraCl ons. The Council gust wake the final decision as to
whether the City can oonstiuot the roadway.
Staff stated the proposed alignment- of cGuIlt,, Road 61 15
consistent with Hennepinin County pians, and matehe5 the pro-
posed: roadtl easements on the adjacent roe ° ty f „o the
north.
MOTION'Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner MATON
Magnus o recommend p c a.la of the proposersonoo t Plan,
Preliminary Pldn/Pldt, Rezoning, and Conditional Use Permit
bas Yid on exhibit t subject t the oondi:tton as recommended
l,r, the draft Res6lution, with the addition ` of a condition
number 12 to road-* "Development shall not exceed 50% "m -
lot ion `Until access ' is available to and front County Road
Commissioner Pl tc a tatod he Is Mill cored that the
proposal diol not Satisfy the -Ordinance PUD. Standards. 141s,
concerns relate to filo us a +i lity of the proposed open
spade. tie concurred with the otitiane is comments regard -
Ing the res rvation of the unique topography of the
sit
Com issi-,,, r Stulberg stated that Exhibit S`seems to gual i
notirto that Exhibit 1, the alternative len Liyout,
would provi e rr 4 open space.
Commissionel confirmed with Mr. Frank that relatively
Little qradlr,,required for the development of Exhibit
Exhibit I would require gr ing dor the cul-de-sac and a
oonv-:nti,lel development would require further, grading.
Mr. Frank compared the proposed plan to the original Concept
Flag and stated the Commission and Council concerns had been
4ddre,c%sed.
Staff Stated t3tai the Planning Commissicn should determine
whether the proposed open spade warrants bonus poirits for
density calculation purposes. If no bonus points were
awarded, the maximum num4er of units that could be con-
structed would be 76.
otam ssi nor Stulberq oon armed that the project provided
the required trail along County Road 61.
Commissioner Pa0a called the uestaon
Vote on calling the question# 4 Ayes , Commissioner Plu ka,
May hairwomon bass l ou called for vote on the lotion.
Page 165
PItinnitriq Commission routes
a ust 24. 196
Vote on t h e- Main MOTION. 4 Ayes. Chairwoman VdSHIOU,
May. MOTION carried. VOT
comMissioner Plufkd stated that the petitioner should oon-
andscapinq and hu f r hp along County Road 61, with
the Final Plat,
Commissioner Magnus stat ;d the Homeowner's Association docu-
ments should spOCIIfICdlIY add-ress the maintenance and o n r-
sh p of Outlot D.a
Chairwoman Vasillou stated that the larqer its would be
more appropriate for this area and the tisis for bonus
points was not clear.
haIN o ?an Vasillou introduced Mr. Pert r. d RWP RL
irsoht. Staff stated they were prepared to comment on the P IMINARY PLAT
recommendation as noted .in the Au ust 16, 1983 staff report, AND VARIMICES FM.
PAPKERS (8,3028)
Mr. Kirscht stated they proferred Plan A which would pre
serve additional trees, and proposed fewer lots than the
xil3ting plat.
Staff stated -they ecc ed Plan 8 and d not -- that
Plan B would remove .,iy additional trees. plan R provides a
shorter cul-de-sac with better access to I th Avenue and the
existing alley via 5uneau Lane. The petitioner has not sub- h -
mittedmittd °ad i n plan for Plan B.
Mr. Kirsoht stated that plan R would be more costly due to
storm drainage casts, and would reqdre a 12-ff t . cut for the
cul-de-sac than, would destroy many trees. He stated h
spoke with a neighbor. 'approximate.ly one, to one and one-half
ears ago, who commented at that time that fie did not want
Unedu Lane to he constructed,
Chairwoman Vdsillou opened the Public e,arIn .
Gary Sorensen, Uth Avenue forth, stated he did review
the submitted plan and that he ws in favor of plan A
because the proposed intersection of 3uneau Lane il;h lith
venue wouldld a difficult intersection, and that he pur-
chased his home because,of the private area .and the eu d -
do* The cul -d -Sao would he removed if 3uneau Lane is
oonstr oted to intersect with VVI Avenue.
Staff oldrified that 3uneau Lane would not he oonstruck ed to
intersect with Kingsvievy Lane, and reviewed the eleva."lons
involved in the proposed roadways.
6
August 241 1983
Duripq Further discussion Oe ext0n40tl of 3unet4,u Lane,
staff diagrammed the existinq conditlons, noting wherere
Oght-of-way has ' been 'dedt dted but where tho, i. wy., have
not been co r nuc ed.
Douglas Parker,, 14415 12th Avenue North, taled that when
17th Avenue North was constructed, It was his understandinq
it would remain as a cul-de-sac. - std t d tie Preferred the
retention of the c ul- e -sae wl b limilted access.
Dere Schmidt,. 1150 Xingsvlew Lane, stdted be Preferred Plan
due to the lesser grad 4, and that Plan 9 would involve very
steep grades near the , intersection o r qbt s -o -; ay for tb
Avenue, Kinqsview Lane and 3uneau Land. Staff diagrammed
where the connectiloh of VO Avenue and Juneau Lane would be
made.
ha rworlan Vasiliou requested staff Summarize their recom-
mendationsdations for Pan Lt. Staff noted reasons for eo eotI
12th Avenue to 3unedu Lane Including that Plan A provided art
extremely long cul-de-sac`; Plan B would,provide a.Lterna e
routes to access the area; the elevations of the cul -de -saes
for either Plan A or Plan 8 would be similar- and,, that Plan
would o cn the c1r ulatton for this property. Connection
f, 12th Avenue with 3uneau, Lane 1 -5 -Anticipated with elfo r
pfd% for Property area traffic cir ula ifon*
Mr. Sorensen stated that the b le`for there nqt beWz easy
access falls on the City whieh allowed the existinq p a -
t nq. He 4t.a ed he would not be happy to pay any additional
costs as a r s Itof b s, especially i e would be asses-
sed for road 'improvements,
Sherwood Pel stated he s.;r hosed 'the land to save the
treest and many would be lost due to the severe out required
with Plan B
Staff noted that a final q adi plan had ries been submitted
for Plan L3, but that.., from the Informationon provid d, It ap-
pears a ;12 -ft. out would not be required. Ed Kirscht stated
th At the - t. cut would be needed and that be had a grad=
ng Plan far Plan 8, but had left It at tomo*
paqe
August 24, 190
lf)T103 by Commissionpr Stulherq,senonond by (Vvmjsston MODAMN 6
to the joesditions reflected in the draft Resolution.
Co -m # s t lbiz, r expressed ooni~ern about future access
to thtsntire area.
P ,, stated he felt ddit ki! engineerinq
informat. v, was needed in order to make a final d is!1a.
The 02mi5ston discussed the overall eirculationinq that
iddhion t roat%dys could be constructed in the futuresince
the right — y 4,y haready bees dedicated.
Staff noted, in responseto the comments regardinq earlier
91,anning and plattinq efforts, that the previous Couiclis
did nt € 1p t( Wt re read needs. It was noted that the
roadways had not been constructed because the property ln
the area had not been nmrketod for development As the
continues to develops future rodwamys d be
constructed. Staff stated that the petitioner had indicated
he referred Plan A on the haus of the ahticipated o t$
for sterni sewer Improvements withlaq. ,
Commissioner Fqufka stilted he felt them was merit to
t.pqrading the exiskinq lot sees, and that he did not thintz
Plait A would limit access to the area. He stated that ,
Proposed Plea A addvassed the Watina tope raphy better
I
than Plan 8.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes MOTIOR earned. VOTE
Ch4trwoman Vasillou introduced the xTquest submitted by DEVRIESq INC.
D v B"Ilde s Inc. foY a Preliminary Plat and arl nce,-s PREURTRARY MAT AMID
for Devri s 3evond Addition, insist n A lets. Staff 11MIANCeS1' reg ltwed the August 12t 19883 Staff renort. Staff stated
there are lot width variancesrequested,, and that the
a, i t Me -e -t and exceed the. Ordinance r",uIrrri:ents for lot
e p de q
Staff explained the storm water drainage plan for the area,
and parttcularly the gate of the pondinarea north of this
site*
Aa.:7wruc,$d tvasillov opened t1r, -u'Aw lic
tvve Peterson, 9720 28thr'y rr t. stated that staff
rias responded t! his questions.
Page 169
Mist 7,4 , 1983
Pulth Plat ,e, P 740 - Avenue North,, Inquired rthat the
traf f I c pkittern would be like after eop4 of this pro-
POr t Y and she cited nel th rhexperlences with stop
SIOW,s- Staff Stated that the proposal 4oes provie.e. throri,h,
eircu . t ion tan(f that ,tie planned street In tf,,Is area
should thte netchborbood t fff
Cor-° Ier Plufka, inquired 110 there were any r 4r the
frontage road Nvest of County Rose V-5 to be extenvied t(i, the
north. . SuPeney. stated there are none at hls time,. and
teat suet, -, roposal was rev i ewed when the p tet ooplolex
was, proposed and It was determined Jqjt the frontacie road
hOuld Wt be extended.
Chdirwoman Vdsilloo closed thePublic,- fe1, .
MOTION y Commissioner -4uba, secoaded by Commissioner
PtufkdA tO t ie 40 -tion on t petition. Vete 5 #-Yes.
W.1110H carried.
IMOTION by Commissionere * seconded by ssl e RECO ND
Magnus to recowmendapproval of the p ejit'aia Plat and
dr# idnces r evrie uil er nc., sub ee tea the e -
stated the. n +r&4[s3.# 0.Li KE'lt % dr #
R ; j lEspsaas g1 ¢ N, e el d g
191.t."15bau`'1 ka Tin 9.k *4€k% hle. idnn n omml ss e , recessed from
Chairwoman k si l t u ed the reque4i. submitted by LAURENTDEVELOPWRT
Laurent Development for "Sl e the", '111'al Plan eald plat FOR .4:1VFR QW.-
for p ,pet located northeast of 47th avenue t1orth ani RPUD FINAL PLARPLAT
Vlt ksburq Lane. Readinq of the Aupust 9,t 19A3 staff report 1320517)
was acyl ,-41. Chairwoman VasIllou recognized Mr. Fran Kanen,
Westwood Planning and Engineerinof, representino the pet - woo
Mr. flat
gien
stated therc were three issues based upon the
staff report . The first Item related to the p ,titin e 's
request for ti-vo, developmei,.t signs whieh exceeded t -- Or ln-
dn e requirements. M # Hagen stated the, petitionere requests
approval for two, alqrist however, he would acIree Jtjjj
the t tal ombin (l size, of the signs tt 37 sq. ft.
Regardinq the staff *e -me t lon to proviele a min.
buildinq setback cit 25 f t. to the private reed, the ett-
tione e uest4- tipprovai 0,the proposed, t. set as .
Mr. Hagen xi tee some re o p t tion Feu.ld be needed on the
indi Plat The petitioner requests that concrete curb and
qu.ter not be required on d private roan, becu,je it <' sts
more e d would tend to make the private rued took more like
pubitc street and would Invite other traffi n. Mr.Haoen
s t »t tie vat road s -O e:jw should e abl °t ndl the
y
ulling p
m t
August,
Chairwoivin Vtaillptj stated that she recalted the neensu
Of Previous work sessions r (4ardln private. d,, that con-
rete curb -aid qutLer would,be nee(o ;f r dellneation pur-
POSes. It was Hated 'hat those areas which developed with
private r oaWs ritthout curb$Ll,'AQulred additional mai-titt-MMM"
5
The €. a seurrd that limitInq the total size of the
proposed slqns. ; would be appropriate and that
g+
e « t e curb and qutter, per My standar4s, should be
tom"ni ner Stulberq inquired which unit,% would be Impacted
bit requirloq the setbat., rather than V ft. fir.
Hagen noted the Buildlogs 4) 5, 1,1, and I0 would reou re
substantial recalculation and redt-slqn In order to provide a
i'5 ftp. setback. iitdi"7 noted thiit the setback .1is s d
for reasons other, that) 'Yjst waft. removal; that, In previous
approvalsMIDthemin,*'n s h! permitted has been 25 ft.
to assure adequate space for ar.€t. Staff suqqested the
Co;rmlsslon consider, 2 * for specific, l d I 'Only,
rHa c confirmed at t
10 Mrd,
aMOTIONyc, yy' cin y 5}ioe ygy Chairwoman9» 5 '
mJE}
Fc iw.kG41 a dk# }-iz75Ani
y*\>#'
2..s¢
g'+,.. i i', /'ti Va-1 tr 5, :3HPLAD `. .3 Fii .iw. & Final y.ygy... a g
diRo &'c lk `
for Uurent Development ttx,rS."lverthorne,, subject to the
conditions as stated In the draf,. Resolution, rewordtnq con-
dition nwio r 9 to re4daa '' e,t shall he per approved lot
layout, provi4ing a mi"Imum buy di ck setback of 25 ft, from
the pavement edge of tPer-"ete ,)ad except for Suildings
51 y 10,$ and 15 which may be set, f
MOTION, i ner Plufka to strikecoed i t ion nwber,95
proposed and restate the o!0nditilon as noted In the draft
RCSOlutllon. NOTION died for lackcid.
Kell Gaal Vote. 4 Ayes*Cemissioner Plufka, 4ay, NOTION
drri d ., e WIR"" 0..
OMMISsi n r Plufka Mated he, couldnot siupport a, "12 ft.
setimok from the priv ite r d.
OLD WSINES
Staff reVieWedtherandom submitted by the Pares. and
Ret`:reaon Director, siammarlZing the proposed IM-1988 PARKS CLE T O
a
E
1984 - 196) CIP
Ptiq e 170
P1,7,10nlno Commission Mlnut s
i uqu ta ,
Naw1 s Informed the Planninq COMMisslon 1 r;
that the Perks and Recreation dvis rv" mss(PRACI
co.'Vsldered maintenanee In detalldur their discu,5slion,
MOUN by CUMss11 rier Stulbero, seconded by Commissioner R ' ATIOX
4Igrl is to recormmend dpproval of, the Parks Olor"onof he
and Re(veatton Director.
CoMmnssloner Plufka s dted hils, (-onc(-,-rn thdt the Heritatie
stns ares, has not been providea d pare within the Propos- r p s-
eded C 1P. fie stated ere are n small renn t '
developinq area.
CommissMorter Stull rq su gested thatt t of
SW4 Items. Include Re-evaluatinq the Parks Portion of the
Comprehonsive Plap
sugeg sted that s the st
stales area should attend the Citv Council Public ar
art the proposed C.P.
Vote 5 Ayes. MOTIM cdrried. VOTE
sof f stated that further infor, or, reqardit, this Itc:4m PRIVATF 'I: Jam IC
would be provided to the Commission for discussion at d sub- STREM
Sequent meet I nq,
ChalrwOmdn VasilIOU confirmed thdt discussion, of this Item COMWCATE HOUSIN,(
does nat rexate to dry Specific drtvelopment_ proposal.
COmMissioner Stulberq stated lie appreciated the staff
research which has been presvited in a clear and conalse
Me information rwr to the Comml$sjon identifies that
MultlPle dwe,11inqs similar to elderly houding are aJ lowed
the -4 qu'ded areas, and nursinct and conveAescent hDM. "
ire d1lowed In tht: CL quided dr as s,
heParma nq LORIMISSIO11 MnOensus Was 'to limit n r cjate
11OUSIng to t OsO rk s, dAd to Ant create "new" areas.
Comollssioner Plufka stated that such development must have
aq1enlities for the res. rets.
Age
Av , 198
tdff noted that development . c e contingt)nt upon such
dMen .t ies being avallable, which could apply to developrgent
hoth within the LA -4 and CL Districts.
Suggested criteriaIncluded ti-rams,hon q j 1
medical facilities and transportatioll, ?i eussion Included,
Identifying reasons why Oevelopment ka,% not occurred, such
as the tack of amnenitle,. Staff reviewed that them l
e" o -cif- gin" requirements.
Cha *1 I ' recognized r. = ,Laurel
Avenue, who stated m, is Ivith the N r (if ARK Housing and
D s epnenInc.,,, and he rerresents Mr. Pover Patmert4r.
RI c ne sugoested that as the' " a eta revioris t1ilp, al oca_
t'On Of lane ease thOY Shouldalso consider the marked, to
types of projects avatiableda such as cooperative,von-
dominium
projects e more solvent today,and 4 :% a
n r such develonntent. pecautsey are more solvent.
It diffuses she need, fo-_CW-x"proof - - r n " requirement.
Staff stated that the Ordinance should very e in e-
n "elderly",, and difforeAtiatinoemonq oonqreo.cte ous -
IdahL in . nursing homes, and the various types of olOorly housing
developments. It was determined that eventually, 0City
Attorrtey sthouldoffer an t-pinign oil hog ' he i tv can, control
ownershIp, andoc upancy" ' terlst . for the differ'er: ,n
Zypes of development.
The Cowamlsslon directed thaZ'draft in -ince lancluage be
prepdred for the September 14, 1965 meeting, and that. don -
t i Hea %rig ° e sc fog e e e ° ,
stefff requested that the Plannina Coamilssion tiefinethe M O1R0Jt4,21Wrf
r `crns about signs so staff octald cue
a nn. `ince ra df 4e en o e en the n
ordinancel, 11censIng sloa contractors, iin.d beinqmore def In-
ItIve about too porarystone. Staff noted that "_r_(*'%WentS
a c submitted J ncer s rega ding hillboards and conatrol
dev lopment and real estale signs.
I
SSIOTle. MOgnus e ie , that theComr4sa on c 1 Alder
standardizing file sltzes and types of sflqf),, 'fret ars atlow,ed
within the City. Feeli,,ied the tla e uhich is permitted
in MUSsion Viejo,,, Callforn-1a. P stated he would forward
additional information to staff forurthnvtat on.
io- ,
M431 ner Plufka requested ' that staff consider sho
center .gin requirements, 'pan Chairwoman Vosillou requested
that bannors be IncIAided * the Investjcjatjon,
WOURNW14T, .
The mvetirq adjourned P,M
WCOMMTION : ""IST 7 1981
104 AAwlikJN7CRESIDDITIALPLANNEDUNITDf,`VFMPMMT ef)MCMPT PLAN FOR DU V! 10111JTSMI V-14APPROk
sStANE fit,' ICHTC45,301'.90
dnne hn't VOnCept Plan gas prop6sed ,iI'F xh % 1P ,tetj ,I v pj1, 80 side tt" jets o sues .located West of PInevi(m Lane, sauth of r6wtv Road
471 oorth i f Sooro a n e,,,A of 1-494; o-4 *
NOW
IFSOT I 111,at it should n nereby doe- atp r v a ° $ . el owien
Heiah-. , c .lov *el g. , sit f Co Rod 7
1(vt o she wlconditions-
Densiq shallrealize 1th Pro tiarNyan,/P . for l units, for
4above h established VVtv-r FlevatJonver the adopCityStormrDrainaaePlanasS"erlf l t -th(-- City. fnalnet',r,* One bonwq p(Ant
c€ 41IMDO a '& s- k, . One _ pol t. $?kts ac the 3t, ' o.? ' T eFrr
space.
6
9YE IS f 7u.t ii A)z^'i'
WtT AL;INS, Dickman Knutson,, K -M Pdrtnership., has requested approval of j Residential
1,inned Unit Development Concept plan, Preliminary Plan/101,at, Rezonino and Conditional
Use Permit or 13 residential lots on 343 acres located west of ineview Lanet sonoofCountyRoad47, noruh of Saoinn- f1dilroadi, end east of 1-4:94; and, -
W*`,.HFAS, the Fltan jnQ COMMISsi has v ieie the requestadulye ub- bear- .
apil.
MIQTHEREFORE, PE IT HEIRFM i N, 1 11 VED A' Teff. CITY UN l Off- THS N,'1TV OF, L 1,1 IT ` TV-
14t,SOTA, that it; Mould tact here0y does approve the -Residential PlatAned Ifnit Development
0x npt Plan* Preliminary la at,, Rezoning and Conditional t. s Permit for Dickman
nuts , art Partnership, fog Basslake Heiqhts,, property lOcAeff Ivy st of Pitieview Lane,
south of CountRoad 47, north of Soo Line Railroad and eaqt of 1 - *4, subject the
conditionst
complidnee With e- City EnO*' s Memorandtim.
Removal of al- dead r dyz trees from the erty at the owned, expense..
4 Ho Wildinq Permits shall be Mued until a contract has been € unrJed for
sewer and eater.
Provision, for a 30 -ft. vv1de trail el-ent /out lot per Comorehensive
Plan, as veWled by the Parks and tnolneeriGr,, with submittal o
detailed pW5 as to construction of the tran net* City standards.
5. Palment of pari: dedication fees—in- lieu, of c icki ;ion with aprropriate credits
in an amount d nev! .; ccor inj to verified acreotae an aa, costs and ac-
cordinq to the Dedication Policyin effect at t4v time f filina the finalPlat,
16. Street names shall = mply with the CitytEr t System.
7, Revflinq shall be findlized with ili the Final plat:.
No qu ldinq O r its shall be Issued untilit tr Final Flat is filed an r c rd d
with Hennepinn County.
No yard setbacks are qranted or implied. OWNS shall be per ate ,#d a
noting that the side yard setback shall be six foot io ;€j *
Z
l0'. Appropriate legal documents reqardinq tbawowner Association covenants and
r st.ric tic tris as approved by e 'i . Attorney, .. shall b filed with e Final
P a t . Plat.
ecia? rn, nd m
est4bUlshed
11. Va X I0km overa der-sityder-sitshad itts fOr the lend
fligh Viater r'levation,per the City Storm
at or ai`vvethe
i't.,Ater T)r e PIis
ver e, by the v and as described to the Ione jqm.4, pi noteo
the City Counel I. Two bones points are asslonec as followz- A.1 Two points
Development a I I, not exceed 0 Completion n l access Is available to and
rom CountyRoad 61.
EM IN't '11 1 CMI a SIM-1 REM-IMDANDATIONS FOR UG ?4, MR11
W CO MkIEVDATION -13
Ait' r ' .t; t a ..= R t r ,A - . "INS
lith 'HF S.. Sherwooda Pert has r,"uested approval o Prelim. tarp• f1at,, Plan "All aind
Variances_ for` ParkerPdrkers Viloodsa re at v Inde: IrvNzoily lots Ott$ At
PAWx-- ^"< into 7 sic
i
a tty residential lets pr p(!rt t
K q v z erg do , and ' o : n ; and,
south of
WHEREAS, t h . annitna Ccnlmisslopw has reviewed the request at a duly Bel ted puhlto, hedr- inq
Wlsr 3,E ExO E Vit, ' H BY E Y E) BY E UNC THS T' 4 OF LYMO , — 1EthattshouldandherebvdoesloprveethePro,IL,Inarl,gat, lays "All and
Vdrldnees for Sherwood erl for'Parkers .,t E.e00at south of Ki (vgvlew Lane and east
of 3uneau Lane, ;est to the,v #i-, onst
omplIvA ce ivith the City Emineer's Vemorandum.
Removal o at ea r y tease from the - pr, . ,rte# at ,t * expense.
3. No Bi t inq Permits sgat : be Issued until a contract h s been awarded € r
sewer and eater.
Payment of p -u,k- i,1,, tlone s-1 t- leu of dedication I =wx r c *t the
Dec at o Polo in effect at Ohl , tinqp
4f ..
i n ti Final Etat
5. Street names gat with the City Street Naminq System.
Complianoe with PoiResolution Mo 79-80 regar inq m*tnimuzi floor elevations
for new structuresIn subdivisions adjacent to or containing any open
w at r draindge facility.
No Building emit call be Lssued kIntit the F10,47, Plat filed, an r crdek4
w Ith Henty,
8. Npproveo Varianciesr 48 followsl
Minimum .dot size of 12,400. ft. vitth Jveraoe tot sil14,100 so. ft.
versus,18,500 sq. ft* minimum requirement.
Lot depth of Ito ft. versus 120 ft. Ordinanv-,e minimum
Front yard setback, of ?5 , `t. rather than: 35 ft.
Vial Plat APNICation to include a vacation re4quest for K n v ew Lane
rlqht-of-way and a petition for utility improvements, v l dent to be
submitted prior tO the Final Plat' dpplIcation that: the petitioner has
purchdsed the accretion area t r ooh Henhtapin County,
dsWA I
P ` NINVNI .s COMIMISSION RfM M0OAU 4 19, 31
Ra,.
FOR VURIES 2ND AWNT1011 (830M
HIREAS . 3ohn Devries, Devries Builders Inc., has requested amproval For Preliminary
in/Plat di' arr n cis for A° ND, N. a plat for X, simile fam",v lots
ocoted west of County a ' east of 29th A. -m3A'.lto S: t,C in. t -h- so`4uA r x$_T o Section
4 €d
rffff, AS t vPlanni c,, Commission uis revIMOd stied request t a duly cailed Pubite,.
flearltiq and recommends dpprovdh
NGNI THFREFORES BE it VEREBY RESOLVED BY TIV CITY COUNCIL Or, T ('1TY OF PLYM T",
MINNESOTA) that it shouidt trod hereby does approve the request, of Sohn Devries, Devrifes
Mlle s, Inc. for Preliminary Plan/Plat d Variances for ORRIES ; DDIT10ti locatptl
west County ,,1, of Avenue or 10 thy* Uth of ;lection t
4i
yy:gg} ,,y, subjeigt g8 ° ##
ye
gt4eollokVRnqR,ron(f tAontsw
OmPlidnee with the CityEnqllneer's Memorandism.
Reinoval of d1l d 4d or dying trees from, the property at the owner's ease.
Issued urall Contracts for Munletpal sewer 4nd
water are awarded.
4. Provisions for a 40 -ft. Mrd trail ement/ cit lot per Comprehensive Park
Plant as verified by thW Parks acrdc incerlDepartment,.xvith submittalo
ff,-4,111ed Plansas to construction of the tray.l per it t nd rd .
e t of Park Dedication fees -in -lieu of deoWatonwith appropriate icredtts
amount determined accordinp, to verif led acreage and v.r, c costst andan
ec rdr t the ? d. t c r s c ;t t the time of i len theFinal
e.c
6 stmvt names shallVOmPly with the fi.ty Street Nim System.
7. NO ,. t c, *ter t shall aced until the Final Plat is filed and recorded
with Hmanepin County.
8. No yard setbacks are 4ranted or implled.
0. roved Va laoc s r 6Sfi njww uqj CF R.t width f 90,.:. feet.
d -
5 4 M*. COQ IDITIO S TO Bt- VET PaleR TO FILING FI LATUSFINAL PLAT t N
STLVERTHORNE__ GARY LiMMENTt LAMUNT DUVRORAFR
HREAS, the "" tY, Oxinoil has approved thy* Final P141t,'kind reXeloret Contract for
SUAIERTHOIRi"IE d r i wted by teary, Uur t * Las -r tt Develop,t
MINMESOTA.that It shouldand, hereby does approve the ` %'v to t't oto prior to
coral -no of and--ekdtedl to s j l-
4 The Orden,,ince Rezur : ft the prop.evty sotith of Hamel shall th { d
upon -videwthat the Flinal Plat has been, flltd and recorded wlth RennepIn
3. Provisions for a 30 -ft. wil de t ra risme t it t per Vomprehenstve Park
Plan, as verifited by the Parks and Vn(Itneerina De rt t o with submittat
et,alted is to c tru t I of the treat per , City to d rd .
Pt-iyment of perk de aIon (ledi nt o 1"filthpro rl,o or it
11, amount determined according 0 ver.ifled acreage and peeing costs and
to tiie Dedleaton Polley In effectt t t t1OW of filina,the Final
ydecordino,
e issued &:
xF&
Y
4wyly y.
l a t+t L iSY ct tw 44>8fi +.L 4~t i i et 4P kai-....
k l.i.. `.bo-
7itayp ktk rm 3
shall
r+,pconstructionEiFjn'e pa sew .f. n water. 4
4. Removal all d.x d r dv'nq trees from. the property a `t } .
7. Removaxlistlnq ,e. s qv structures 4A the developer's expense Prior t
development of Phase 11.
omol n'('w tt, Pol"Icy, Resolution N -8-t recardtnq vAnImLim floor elev4tjons
tioi eg 7§$3
structures subdivisions d,ac t to or con'tainipo anyn storm
p#
iet a s sholl be pfir cipproved lot layout, providinq a mi aut,"I buildina
setbdOk of Z,ft. from the pavement wigs of the privatevat rood t for
uildling 10', and 15 wh1,(,,-h may be set back V ft.
No Bu d g#," vmvl t to b-% Issued unt.,11 the 1 1m.t Play Me" and recorfd
with Vennepip county.
restrictiOAs as aMroved by the City Attorney shall 1"e fill -d with the nal
Plat.
P(e` w
e. taq1nq Of the ev ° opment ihall be In amordance with gal j t : a1 ila, bli'ltv a
approved by the City Unglfieer.
J. 1"Inai densItY shall be Z-5 units per m for the Jand at or ihovethe
I ' Shed h1 %iter FlOvation per the adopted C-ity StormWater nrainane
Plan as vt r Sped by thd Ck.= noinee . -flaky irl in re ai nGpoint1w5at .. Four eased an t;ie sit j( project Z and,One
point based on the proposal providinq ,, variety of housinq tyc'e'"
The 14nd lmmtedor u Hameltea 4llt r It an Urban Service :area
MU oundw Ia he Rural ServiQeArea Oall not develoo unt'lIurban
services are available.
15. Amhurst 7th itio 't Findl Flet shall be filcl and reeirded with Hennepin
County r. r to or concurrently rifth the "Sl i%vr r rne- rf ,. ,-
AS Subraission of required f Inanclial Quarantee and per aoreement for
Mpletion of site i r vae..
7. Signd4e shalJ per approved elan with the twolqn,< AUAlin ? sqt ft.
C :«