HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 05-04-1983CITE p
41r)"
PLAWING COMMISSIONIRM
MAY 41 1981
They Speciao, Meeting of ,the Plymoutnnjrjq.s $ 11 was
odI --d to order at 7 - 20 P. 14.
MEMRS 'RESENT-hdirvi ni an kfasi oue mm s e rs
Raub¢, , u ka elawrvial ,.. M
axqt
t..s, '
and Wire
MEMBLRS ABSE14T, None
STAFF PRESENT -t. Community D velopatfp t Direeor
Community evelom nt Coordinotor
Sara McCo nn
taut City Enginepr Sohnweeop
Parks and Recreation
L Svc aAX} IfF
Assistant City Manaqer Frank 'Boyles
Parks and Reareattion DirectorfErI Blank was present to O BE IR ITU
describethe national promotion and proqramfor " i ' $ Be In
t` .3e, stated that they v) ram originated 'in,, Australia and
has hear,carried over to theUnited Stat -s as a promotion
for am s r activities. Mr.
Blank explained that -i 4,j 1983 i_5 a national .ugn1tIo °
u ' tree ; . atilt reg r that special ev ants are
pldnne,d for the City of Plymouth Including the openin, of
40ary Lane Park., Mr, Blank distributed Informational
bookleis regarding they program and I'n ea mation explain nq
the specialciao vents planned for the City*
MINUTES
NOTION onnission r Steiqerwald, -wcorlded byCommis,- e tr
Magnus to recommend appr va. they Minutes of the April 27,
1983 meeting as submitted. of 1, 4 Ayes, Commissioner
tulb rg abstained. MOTION carried*.
ha rwo"art asi f to .e 1i ntroduc d they request submitted by ILDR
i h its h Builders for a Conditional Use: PermitCONDITIONAL USS.,.
construct a house closer to tile Ordinary High eater Leve I of P 1
Parkers, Lake than they m si mum setbacks ,required by they
Zoning rdinancReading of they April 27, 1963 staff
report was walved.
bac .r
tai 4.;
M r rn ?,fichitt.,*0 stated that hc had reviewed the staff
em -ort and has ro,ndc d t}isle' all € fe" ltems
nalmom- da Vasiliou closed the Public Hearinq as no, e was
r stlfnt who wished to ( k on t i tz- itev,.
NOTION Commissioner Knnnbr , seconded _ om issio e r W I r 0
t akv action n €, x.petition. Vote, 7 Ayes. MOTTO
g rr
MOTION `ommissiorer Panttbaj seconded by Commissioner R O _,EAT ON A
Stelgerwdid to recommend ?ipproval of tine; Conditional
rmlt request for Michlitsch Build , st4bject to the
Conditions tis sty tt d In they staff report. Vote. T Ayes. VOTE
T1001 carried.
hairw n cn l* u 7i,`oduc d ht_` 4" submittedby c# SERVICE
David Constnhl , (7ont #act ServicesAssociates) for d Site ASSOCIATES FOR
0, Variance,and Conditional Use Permit to ajjtjny EXEWT, INC. -
rn "lthn - Radisson Hotel Duc ted at the southeast CARLSON COMPANIES
corner of 1-494 and State 141ghwayedrrn of the April SITE -PLAN,, VARIAN
27, ` 9833, stafff report was waly dr She recoqn1ze4 the CONKTIONAL USE
petitioner and Mr. Dale %nrned, . PERMIT AW.NOMENT
Mr. Constable- stated 1. hat he had rev lewed the staff report
and had cnu que;stions.
Commis,51oner StexIgerviald confirmed that the addition
consists f rooms. He Inquired abjut the distance
between the southerly inidll of t e jjropolrud addition and the
I.-xisting sl9ndge on thte od'4cent lot. N*r# nstable stated
that is 42 l k. t. * e the property line, and .itdff estimated
that ItIs dppr'1o'Jrq4tely60 feet to the exis.`i n i# rto
yp} yj
t, dik4 a %dslliou closed the Public RL- riaq.
NOTION r m rn r ttrgl seceade%d by Com%na. enrt r RE -COMMENDATION
Plufka to taker action n t? 1.5 petition. Nate., 7 Ayes.
ION carried. ed.
11a)T ON by Commissioner Stulberqf f i and d by Commls,51oner
Pciuba to recommend apDrovdl of the Site Plan, Variance, and
Conditional Use Permit Amendment subject to the c o nditilo n
s stated in the staf f report. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION
carried.
Miiy 4, 19,183'
NEW PRUM:
W. & vioma-a Hlou l n r.?duv'e e requt, # s tr€ Ily WARMEN KAY H„ i
r r v Kay C4pma a for Lot Consolidation I an Lbs' S{
e @
Y+ 'ligg aan y` $" E E7, ,k, F:.'L
gb },_
pt7pg ypqij+ ai E W ,A' t'ra A of $ tut A,
J -
N ' d -- em u, yt DIVISIONiuS3VA .M aM
Y - Vari t'nes from: l * Ordinanee lot size; 'Cind VARIA.4Ck-,#018)
width requiremt-nitare regpi- ted . Fo4iditiq of theApril
staff report was 4valve ..
f .1}} wr ( .. Ott a 9.
r
xr0 ..' 4. M+ ALW X??i *# istaq{n
sziy.,
k s $.§*.'
Jy ,
aNg„
k,
ti1 +
e'te {l.i'
n
y ,
pi
i"fy.
F,6
Moo $wtmibe 6: '(`. g*
ye ^
yY-yeun, t R - 4$ i t -t, asea 53,1414 k. i.##$ ,A #:A ,[
ecoirtaen that ,In east- w, rather than jro, !J) be
d iodted to the C t v `; I ral I purposes per the
Comprehensive Mans )-Ondiiiq finatizaton of the 14etirlepin
Coultty, Trall Plan,, for the Ple0onal, Trail System. If Ilt Is
found in the futut:,e that, thp ea t,q is not neededthen
It wOuld be vdcat d. Stt.ff sk-q e-4ted the following 1Baa ;a
r condition number t 0 -ft: easement along ds
NedL ine Lake Boulevard -Shall€gated t t City for
trait purposes pending (i to t meas of d final l day for
W-911WPItitt County. If the t (A t is 01aa: a not to be neededf
the easement would be vaedtvd. Park D(-,, Alon requirements
shall t- ert1ore be cash- lond dedictition",
Ri `,,rks and, rvitto ,-A ditscussee, this with
Vs- ChdPima a earlier an as er,,A Cod she conckirred.
W -ureas Chapman inquired it the setback would be mf astvv-ed
from x aro .y aat'4 or -Jie a,(s , interior line of the
edrea' ent Staff a ir dt setbacks are ensu from
e property line.. Mr. Chapman stated a'heis opposed t
dedictflo"ung the teasem,--at lit that lie Is tryInq to make efforts
o upqrade theneighbfrhood. Ifancisemen is required,
for. Chdpmaiv stated tat he would consider retatninq the
existing. s drid constructresidence on each.
Couvdssloner Wire: Inquired if the City 4nd/or Aennepin
CO"'ItY lids easements for the trail on theadjoinl*nq lots.
Staff explained that easements have n as obtaiped, on
4djacent lots.
a # t$ -11AA e
serif ,
the (ff
gg yy}} yy i`
v n
S@iia G"ndiat ion i+'u noted- Ra A he 4. astment Is nnoted
dedloated at thisz.mea noun ;ads the a to
rived with IMIn " a ani n In order tee_.v-NuI e than
a s ioner 6 ,. he felt it
was ,vareasona4le to dsk for easements at Utis time because
It 14.,Asnot been dote "m,1 tied where than trail ivi11 be located'.
a 4 ^. a
TIV
14ay 4 '
mzaisst nert l er atd inquired why a trail corridor would
tit- LoO,dtedlon these lots. Staff explained that tbe final
deter mlaAlon of the trait Itsat has not been'made bar
Hennepin County, however, the Comprehensive Plan calls for
trail v or mfo- In tMs, ed0on. The easement may also be
used as a buffer for the actual trall fromthe resilest; a
0t$. Staff stated, that requiring, the easement this time
is similar to requirinq right-of-way when propertv !s pro-
posedo be divided* Staff explained}Lat the Citi has a
agreeme,nt With Rene(-Pln COUAtY to ga t, easemrentandlor
right-of-way when the opportunity arises. It wags noted, that
arq f the 4djdcent lots ,would propose ` to dividetheir
property a similar ° u t v e t cnd.
com- eThMMIss; n tscu se €% meritspetitioner
Mining three tots a)ad dividing Into- two lots,, and the pos-
sibtlitles of l= at the easement In the future if it were
fid that It is not needed for tram purposes,
Commissioner 1#s a stated that there' would realty be ap-
Proximately .. from the edge of the pavement t the Iti-
terior edae ie ease ent for locatingthe trail.
stated this dizAance seemed excessive.
Mr. Chapman ex nesse concern that the ' e seet dedi-
cated to they,, he would be In, *eo ar str tin a
ouse t the t. 'setback : ,- in that ere a
e s ll t j that the trait CoOld be as close as 5 feet from
the e *. He , ate€ i s Is ars dextra e ssituation.
CoMmils-151oner Wire stated that he felt a 30 f t. easement was
x ssive
Commissioner ga s noted that the trail cotAid be located oil
the other side of the read.
Commissioner Wire confirmed that the right-of-way for gest
Medicine Z dke l u 100 feet f although the lake nar-
rows the roadway lit the vleInity of this property.
C .sslo- e t lbe.r sta e tat the CumAssion should
a ss whether easement e t s t t
Involve themselves with the Otture tragi.l design.
o ss..e er' Wire stated that lie .*ou d agree with requirinq
an, ease gent but a 30 -ft. ea ment seems ex ss VO. Staff
ex .and that this is a standard east ent wildth and the
setbacks of tete new homes would be established knowing the
easement represented i potential trail corridor. The depth
of the lots and the setbacks of adjacent omen w re noted,
Page -
yF 4, 11,
548-4
Cs over Steigerwald inquired kyhein nn,In Countv lyttl
f1ti ean adopted '{`ra l .gip. Staff thatit s -6ri ookv
p_y '# i Wire stated ra that
om= s's owould t on this *tem without the t j -
s on the Trail Plan.
f 0 . ON by Commissioner Stetclerivald, seconded- aamission RECOWIN0:1111TION C
Plufka to recommend a# the %ind consoltdation, Land
division sand variance for WaK a, Kay Chapman subject
the conditions, s e In the staff rk-port jvjtjjjerev s -
lost to cundition nt.LIO)er 61 as noted, requirinq an easement
raf.er than a parcel.
Commaissioner Stelgeritald added that the Plenninq Commiss n,
has deep concern about reqtlirinq, a )O -ft.
filldlized plans from Hennepin County.
MOTION hY CoMissioneLr Stulberg, seconded Comm LssIoiler f4OTION` O
Wire to dmend the MOTION by deletion hrequire-ment for
as easement In condition -Umber 4 as revised.
Commissioner ** stated that he did not feel the ease -
merit should be requiredthis tjtae, and that if It were
determined o be as in the future,. Hennepin Cousity could
obtain the tra,11 corrid(yr through eminent domaia-
Vete on the Amendment to the t - of Jotjop.. 5 kv a. ` aera s- VOTE OR AHMNFNT
sloners Steliger'wdld and Plufka, Ndy. MOTION cr 4e . MOTIF CARRIED
Vote on the Rain Motion as once amended... 5 Ayes.ear mis- VO -OR MAIN MOTIM
s overs Stelgerwald and Plufka, May. MOTION, carried. ONCE ARMED MOTION
CARRIED
Commissioner Wir stated that he felt that in that future the
n4v ss n should have Information fromfannepin County
reqdrdinq the timing of the installation of the regional
latrail.
Coriumissioner Plofka stated baat the Planninq Commission
sDould have respected the existing agreement with Hennepin,
and acted to consideratil
Commlsslonc!rexpressed on about "Spot" plan-
aing by obtaining its and pleces of easements for trall
Mr-apaa an stated be via$ 41yarO of prevIous planninq for
trails In this area arae consideration had, bten overt fey
of Medicine I 'ake Roadr g - -way for development4,if the
qtrail.h jesuggested f%sgesg1swasstill b. e n de5irable
approach which would not require any easxqnnentsfrom the r
djjacent lots v
Page 41
ldy 4, 1951
OTHER BUSINESS
M f .
the gropos d co t r -act f n near 'tthe PARK A RIDF LOT
Intersection of Zounty Roild 73 4nd Highway 55t -s part of
the "O regr a ., Mr. lioylesi 3tatedThat the appl I(a-
has been approved by the Metropolitiln `%tntqj arae that
the fWal approvkil from theVppdrtmeat of Trans-
portatioa Is pndtigl. Mr. Royles reviewedthe ai tvry of
the dpjfleation katid funds which have been allocated to he
used for this proqram.
It tads t$,p tal tied t. t t the rogr, at wu-p `ase -d prOleet
With the f irst'phase be-Tnqimplemented over Ain- h
period. e first e Ivill Devolve t e Ponstruction of a
Park 4 Ride LoL with a turn -around. The second phase would
11"Yolve, Impr vina the ar lot _trdinae-e st andardst
includinq eur n + a tt tt 11e'
ettet program falls, that tt,,e Jjtjea
Department of Triat t to is z* r te k o
of the parkinq lot to i t~ ltgat condition. If t pro
9rdmi is stlMessfult the Minnesota part . n Tti -
t 4W on is responsMie for eum, t t tjjm.provementsthe
tpark t Bance standards.
Th(~ Cxxwaissiort dj%-+;sse j tete proposed site deLsilqn for tbt,,
f aide . t ineleJlnq the nualbe ; of spacest the x. t f t
draindqe ditch, tete schedule and loc atjajj of droit -or
tett: the hoursst rdapttt
ship, of theAWOURNiii
Aa',
f
PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 4. WSi
A
PVILDERSt FOR
JOHN AND ft'XM,' WNIXRS FOR A RESIMNICE AT 1415 KINGSUM LANE 03019)
requested approval for a Use Permit to allow the t)f d
rt,sidt-we at less than teequir d setback, distant from the. h*d, I nary M Water
d at 1415
HERE AS, the Pidrin act 11as reviewed said request at a ul called P-011-
MHLSO `A. that it should n hereby does, approve Conditional serc,,i . o o she
t°onst uctlof a reee pit a setback diStanefeed from the Ordinary Wah
Inance On property located at
1415 1n(j!M Q ane stAbject to thefoj.Ikg;lnq--
1. The eIts sub je,*t to all appi ii able codes,. requlationsc a t
The adjostmen eon5istent with the setback of existina adjacent rtwtures.
01 11"M%1(4114 fit C011113 -S, HI T 101111 MAY 41
APPI VAI., FOR Sift, PLAN, * ,. Atli (70NID INAI IJSI- P141Mf V41411D IT FOR nufv)
RAIDISSON 11011,1 02'064)
roum, c4cre4ise or the 1etdi Vi c') p(qpj..
t1w Ptaffninq conlumtOtt has ev ielved said re(plest .It a duly ealled Nh l o
on't, ul.1.F01a; , Pit, IT HHO BY 145(XV10 Bow
W1 clryount-m or mv cury ov m,YM0TJTRt
teat it SItOli d and lledoesapprove the request by avid
dv1,V% Ic- iuld Condttiotial Chse Permit' @'rm Amendment or expansion o
DM,%nve with the Cltv
Subje(A to the follolvintv
F
q. subsequent. pxpaaOori is Subjec-t to ' `#.'qt red - revivivis and per
4. All , n wastois k
i ositalotsh e for in the lrtv.ture n 11
outst-&- q,&&
5. AppNwed varitinces, Inclu*
I side yard et kk W, parkitiq of 5 ft. rathev than M ftp,
6. ('0R) *Atlee with all app(a hlle f i x(* 410 buildinq cQde equi einent's t,
1* 'fir em(nqeney at,'. `eso shill io pvwlded Ua. the ea itsl d(` ( lif rjew I& t ()
tirea sinntlar to vhf- tjc, , , provided orA Ow wcst side oir the bln.
6. fitirce addltiotuij 4,indicipped -arki q 5tallshae provided notir the
dpi
PLAMI- 1C COMMISSIONRECOMM,N TION
SUTING CONDITZONS To BE Mt PRINK TO FILIM AND KAMM A LVD CONSOLIDATIONt LAND
01VISW AIND VARIANCE M MAP Earl iSAY CHASMAR (0301
WHLRVASt the City Council has° end Qnsolidation, do iioavid Varlatuu
Or AM= avid Ray Chapman or property located sooth of Ath 4wenue North i Fort
Medicine Lake Tkulevard under Resolutloa i No., $0-
NOW,
TU5 ,;.
SL IT ARM RLSOLVED M ThL CITY COUNCIL OF M ' CITY OF LY! S LI
HINNESOTAI, that it. should and hereby does direct the followinq conditionsto be awt
1- CAMAIIdtice with the City Engineer's Neworandun-.1.
2. No, yard setback ,,ir an are qrantedr implied.
with, Policy Resolution No. , 711-0 tirdi (I t ti mfloor ele-Vat I
or now Aructurns on s1tes adjacentto nt. rx pen storm witter
HuAlSaq FOrmit to be issued until the Lot Consolidation and Lot Division
Is fited Nvith Hennepin County.
5. Submittal all necessary uttlity asemon prJor to filinq swot
Consoliddtiont Lot Division with Hennepin jnt *, .
6. The two new lots shatt not be further s d.
dsk