HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 04-27-1983CITY OF PLYNDUM
PLMNINC COMMISSION " . T:
APRIL 27t 1981
Q11 rejlar meeting o the y t n'n` * owas
d il gid to ord(-r 4t 030 PJ1.
HEMERS Cha rwo a , Vastlioul Commissioners
P-auba$ Plufkaj Steri rix l agnus
and Wire.;
HM11S ABSLNT.- Commissioner Stulberq
S ,M- ty Development Director
Blair "re re
CoMmunity Development Coordinator
lqa a Mi..4, nn
Assistant City Engineer BaaSweeney
MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner f4aqnus, seconded by Commissioner Wire
to r o$ nd approval of the Minutes of the April 13, 1983
eting as sub, Ated. ote= eyes. Commissioner to r
absent. MOTIM carried.
PUBLIC MARIAM
dirwuman lasillou, opened . the kobl. is He in n Introduced PVDIgL INSURANCE,
the petl0on submitted by PrudentialInsurance Company of COMPANY OF AMERICA
America ` or an Amendment to tete approved PUD Plan for 14PUD FLAN. 4 T
n-sruction of additional signaae within the, "Northwest 80,062)
Buslaeapse development. Reading of the April 18, 1 8
staff report was walved.
Chdirwonman VasillouIntroduced Mr. on Peitz, Prudential,
Insurance Company. Commissioner Wire Inquired about
individual 6u,*ildinqsigns which might be utilized
discussed an page four of the submitted narrative dated
Harch, 1983, Fir. Peau explained that the intent the
Manual r t r* r Parlk Features is to limit the sionage so
that It Ils not located ars the buildingsf teat it I
t rdtlry¢ compdti with the inggs.,
Band ythat
a rchi,
gt
y- {{
41 F
lyt+
fii udent 1n;,,-u"nee Com n grantsRa Fi, if h 4P 1. the R F G
prior to its 4n, nto ke . The petlittioner nolted thaw
City must issui a rin-It before construction could
con n * The detallsand, specifies oIndividualndividua
building slgriaqe,wout not be addressed until tete site, plan
review, stage.
69i
Page 7G
Planning Connission Minutes
Apra 2, 1983
Mr. PeatPeatz stated that he thought It would be more
appropriate to address this at the site plan staw so that
Ith the individual siteitcouldbecoordinatedvi
development.
MVasillou red whether the already approved
Rotei d
11
S f Int d. t1r. PentzPentexplained that the blue
lettertriq and landscaping Its yet to he finalized.
Cornmissioner Wire Inquired Zf the proposed signage, would
flormal ly be reviewedd at the final plat stdqe. Staff
ep,ld that Ire r mmere Industrial v.
business is typlcall not addressed until site Plan
review. Chairwoman Vasitiou notedt however, that the
Co-mmissioti cart revise projectt the f Inal plat
Ga I Curran, IZ955 30thAvenue Borth, stated that are
proposed sign is Ideated close to his reararid. Ani
inquired why the slqn was proposed to be'' located ort the
south side of Northwest Boulevard. It was confirmeo by the
petitioner 4nd staff that the proposed sign tv--tion is on.
the north side of the road. Mrs. Curran stated that he hopes
the signage will be termed and landscaped so as not t
impdot the adjacent properties.
Mr, Curren inquired` the landsoaping was completed for the
trail along. the east boundary line of the development. Mr.
rt, explained that; 4ddsap has been Installed..
however,rother plantling Is planned at this time* An
further afidsc p would addressed with the future
development phases.
Commissioner Steigerwald Inquired aboat the proposed sign
message. PentPentz explained the SIQnage would Include the
words "Northriest, Business Campus". The purpose the
signagee o provide further Identity for` the development
and to enhancethe 11sense o rI tato the
proposed- Qna Is Important to tete petitioner in order to
establish a "feeling, , a tri}een t- the € elopment.
Commissioner Stelgerwald lnqutrwhat address the
petitioner uses In their marketlinct proc t. Pentz.,
expand that d general lovation deseription. of the
northeast r Highway 5 and -494 is used. I t was
confirmed that this approach would nxwith the
proposed ddl t on .t para
April 198
Nen V725 30th Avenue, cosif Irmed that the proposed
naewind' have internal nat iced. He, requested that
the Signage, riot be 11qhted as the nelqhborhood desire*
Y a nta a the wildItfe habitat charj(-t(,,r of the, area an
rete led previous d1t -e-$ ll'i-S, to the street
fight In .
durton, 12940 30th Avenue Nh,, stated that he wanted
to compliment the petitioner on the design of the x ting
nt `afte lqn, ;Mated he could riot envistion what the
proposed signage would, took * especially the details,
landscaping. M. Burton u t d that a more- detailedled
plotortal the signage be reg°lew. also, Mr. Burton
expressed °.*oncern about lighti.r.4 the tn.
Plufka to take action on this petition. 6 Ayes.
Stulberg absent. MOTION carried.
MOTION d i eau al seconded by Commissioner Wilre MAIN MOTION:.
toec omm. approval of the proposed ann Unit
Development Amendment o the 000struction of additional
signage, r Prudential InsuranoeCompany m ia for
Northwest Business Campus", subject t -the, conditions
the staff reportt with ' ars addition that the "internal
tightshall not _ intenset but shall supply sufficient
subdied lighting so the qn may be read".
Commissloper Pauba stated he thouqht the proposed siqnam
was tit good testa, and would be lowprofile*
The Commission di e d previous applioations wh_-rt,--
lightinq standards were disoussed.
Chairwoman Vasiliou, Inquired about the purpose proposed
ndit n number n the draft Resolution. Staff explained
that typically plantilnqs are not permitted In the drainage
and utility easement or right- -g ay areas.Staff's Qoncern
IS that, should the plantinqs Meed to he removed for
Improvements rars,, rpt plantings
should not be an, pens to the puhlic., The Commission,
conourred.
Commissioner .5telgerwald stated that he did riot feel the
proposed s a was needed because the project Is a verb
well marketed site, and that the signage is not needed for
addressing the project.
Page 741
April ,k1
Cormnissi.vaer Wire stated he felt the proposal Dial led for too
t-,3nysions n at not reasonable have igni at
gtrio dditIonal §§.
e 1091(.1 or the proposed sign at thenorth end of the
projePt on County Ro 1 due to the yap of traffi,( vita
U use the roadway. He sugqestedthat, theprop(,ied
qa bei moved further into the silo areajway frovA k-h
read.
Vastliou to amend the Main Noti on 'to recomimend approval of
the PrOPOsal SUbJe0t,to deleting hproposed signs at
ius Drava n enlumxj land relooatinq the proposed
sign on County Road 61 further Into, the site areal, and that
the signage be constructedivith subdued 111ghtlaq.
um: s gnus stated that he die not feelie sititlage
n COunty Road 0611 neen's to,be Ughted.
Roll Cali. Vote on the Aiaendment. Aver... Commissioners VOTE-MOTION FAIL
Haanus,, Pauba.,and Steloerivald Hay. Commissioner
Awl Stulberg absent. MOTION failed.
HaTION -b" COMMIssioner Magnus o 4mend the Hall#i Motion, MOTION TO AMM
recommend ov,al of one additional sign to be located
the north cud of the development un,uun o.1 ,k and the MOUGH FAILED
int shall not be 111ghted. WTION f,; ,led for 11,avk of
second.,
MOTION uMa ss ones Plufka to amend then ic-on by MOTION TO AMEW
recommending approval of the proposalsubmitted Avith the
direction that the signs shall be located further Into the
site at all: terse proposed site locattonsi. NOTION failed MOTION FAILED
for tack of second.
VOTE on the Malt' Hoticq, One ayes Cowqlssloners Plufka,,, VOTE ON MAIN 140'TION
St igerwa df Wire, Magnus, and Chairwomani u Nay.
ComMissioner Stulberq,absent. MOTION faded. NOTION FAILED
Stelgerwald to recommend denial, , the proposed P1,10 SiQndge
Plan Am-admentAm-admenas submitted. Commissioner Wire stated that V . f.
three additional signs are not warranted. Vote. 4 Ayes,,
sion P .0 ,a and aub flay.,Commissioner CARRIED
sen . MOTION carried
ye..
Planning Commisston Minutes
April 421 't 19183
Comanissioner Pauba stated that lie felt for a projethis
Size the proposett simnage is reasonable,, Charpan
aslltott stated trat she cuuld have approved one additional
iqn. Comm Issioner Wire stated that the petitioner eoti d
el 4 r 9. d$yt._ 3 83, 4" Xda8i. fYt:.addh"
onal 3las
d e p tc trs and a teed is dem. knistrated..
The Commission requested a review of the April 1 }x Oleo ENTERPRISES
taf F report.. Staff sumatar ed the two primary Issues for PREILIHINARY
d1so soon rt,,4at1nq to the preliminary Reel an(4 REGISTERED
re and the CondItional Use Permit request for a free SURVEY AND
standing i uild ng In an lodustrial(111strilot. ;!t CONDITIONAL USE
staffsummarized re action n e it n reviewedPERM-ITummarie
b the ty ul 11.
I-hairwomian Vtisilliou Introduced Mr. Bruce . l ernes , 9616
Rubio Mt adf Met n a, whey is the local representative
1 t o nt ,rprise Chairwoai4n V'aslliou inquired if the
rr,p RLS is submitted for purposese the sale of the
property. Mr. Diaerness explainedthat Oakmdr Industries
origindtly Intended to r ha e proposed Traci D, however,
when the flinal sale time came$, they did not execute the
required doemments. At this time, the tenant In the portion
of ii uilding located on proposed Tract C has an option to
ur a e both proposed Tracts B and C. If the option la not
acted upon by this A t the option expires.
Staffponfirmed that the Ryerson Steel Companyhas an Option
on the proposed pdreei with the free standinq office
building and proposed Trait C. Mr. Giqerness confirmed that
this is corre tl and staked further that Moo Enterprises is
requesting that Tract B be released from the current opt ton
I
agreement- w tn RyersonSteel Company.
chairwoman Vasiliou opened the Public Hearing.
Donna Flaherty, 9535 .18th Avenue Horthl, inquired if Triaet C
would be able to use the parking, area to be, located on
Tract 8. Staff explained that in order to propose a parcel
I would eomply wit the size requirements for at
industrial site. Tract B was de lq ed to he at "east two,
acres In slze, Therefore, to be sure that adequate parkinq
available for Tract j the petitioner proposes to file an
easement for shared pdrkinq.
lanninq Con, m isslon tunutes
April Z7,195i
0.)mMasioner Stelgerwald sugtestedthat Traet R be d4vided
into ar : c that. Tract C uoit nMde more o
the related parking. Staff expLatned that UhAs oaft be do-
oo-implished through the isom t "
e involved if T-raot 3 wer O less - 11, le et Ma,:.-
i n co urredtit Trdct 8 could be de ne-d to V,
than t cies* that would,assume that he sizeof the bul*l
d1so.-
O ntaa Flaherty stated that she hopes overflow parking for
t le exis0tig Idnd uses will not utiltzc, the adjoininq par
Parkinq lot,
Melvin St ub$ 9 30 Beath Shore Drive,, he Is toneer -
vd about the existIng pdrktoqproblem on South Shorv,
which, Increases during the summer months. He requestctt ,,nqj'tt
the Clity Continue to enforce taer u t ons,, c,
stated that motorized vehicles-, Includinq m toroyc e aro
using the bike path and he expressed concern about overf low
parkinq
South
go
d'yyg
e op !Vwe en ch f n
Staff stated they would confirm whether the o-,,,erflow parking
is,ocur n public land or private land,,
Commissioner Wire confirmed that the Ordinance ni aximumlot
over4qe would periftit `a 101485 sq. ft. building on thepro-
posed 2 aces Tract 8. Staff not that lot coveragee o -
v o n the Ordinance assumes that the, assodated required
parking 'could be provided oft the -same lot.
Comi-aissioner Wire expressed ooncern aboutt the possibility of
the existing office buildling expandinq In t f fetors..
Thereforef 0 mmissioner Wire concurred that the proposed
parkingcasement area should be divided with 'bract C In art
attempt to limit .'the future development of Tract R.
Mr. Digerness statedthat he did riot aqree with this ap-
proach in that the facillitles, could not be expanded without
Flees -inn Commintission and City c approval,, and that the
site could not, support further d'veo t
Donna Fleherty stated that she Nyould be concerned If the
existing uses Nvere expanded because thie, lives on the north
side of the site andhas a, solar house. A larger buildinq
mai'-interfere with t -u. at of rt t sq,. also, Ms.
Flahertystated thatat the existing office` din
bufferto the main industrialbuild.
Page
April ?7,, 1981
chairwomdo vasilloosed the Public Hearinq.
R041041, by Commissioner Plufka, seconded y
t action on t Petition. a Vote Avec.
Stulberq absevit, MOTLON carr algid.
kran=lssio'S r 4. to 1pe 7 ' MIR- .v ciP d that Tract should he
expanded to invlude more of the perking proposed on Tract 3.
1,440TION y CComumissloner $tf,-1Qerxvd1dt seconded by Commissioner
Wire to defer Act toga on - the petitton for redesiqn, wl< DEFER ACTION
provildes, for site dimensions on Tract 9 which are kid qu t
to aeconnmodate the parking required by the Ordinance r the
existtnti, office building; and for a physical letineation
etweea proposed rets, B and C, The layout should not
Include olapt access or shared driveways between Tracts R
and C. Although, ov :.sn should be made for adcNuate
eent,y eo, The Bract B should be speciftoally
designed t support the existing € ui di
Vote, 6 Ayes. Commissioner Stulberg absent.. OTION VOTE
cirried. MOTION CARRIED
Commissioner Plufka stated his Intent is not to severely,
tsolate I k so as, to preclude some
flexib.11ty for future parking,
BUNS
Chairwoman Vasiliou Introduced the Final. Plat and Variance. JOM L. HENNING
request for "Hennink First Addition" located in Section ) f INAL PLAT AND
north and south of CountyRad 15. Readingof the Aprill 15, VARIANCE FOR
1943 staf f report was waived. She asked shout the t ,,i uss of HINNINGS FIRST,
the City's negotiations on parkland for t ! area. ADDITION"- (79034)
Commissioner Ragnust, 11,alson to the Parks and Reereatilon
Advisory rW3l n, stated that the City *6 ContinUinq4
negotiate with the adjacent church.
Chairwoman, illou Introduced Mr. 3ac BRWIC who was
p ent with the petitioner,'- stated that the e istin
garage 4nd outday ld, be taken down art of the
development. 1 _ d t d a s
cni the t o-k to the house.
Pae 76
April Z7, 1983
Staff reported that a is have been recelved expressing con-
cern about the neatness of the es ntrm area.
Staff suggested that as the development prooekds the proper -
V e kept clear of debrist and of oonstrueti"On nat r a s as
it Is outside of the = tr etion, sites.
Sohn Henn nq stated thdt they, have been waitinq to beqtfo
Cleallinqj the site untill after approval of the pr ail Pli-
eation. The contractor for the addition to the residence
has p m at , to re ly the situation. Mr. Henninq stated
that once approval Is
loranted,
they, Intend to clean the, pro-
pertand rased the ,area around the existinq residence.
This should be accomplished within the \t month.
JTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Comm, issionor Pauba,
to reoomMend approval the final plat for " Henri qs First RE W: A ` ON B
Addition" as submitted subject to the conditions stated In
the staff report.
t ,6 Ades# Cootmissioner Stulberg, absent. t. MPTrON ar-
rid* IVOU
Chairwoman Vasillou introduced the requested submitted by
r r , Stone Stone Masonry, for Roger Heine for a Site Plan STONE MASONRY
and Variance application for a office buildtnq t oat_ SITE RLN
ed t 3415 Kilmer .ane. Reading n , the April 6, staff VCE 83011
report was waived. . airwoman#a i llount reduce r Stone
who stated that they would like to retain the existing a -
pr€ximattc 20 ft, wide driveway for the proposed development
which requires a 4 ft, sar an *
Commissioner Plufka Inquired the public r sales persons
would visit the proposed p ollilt to view the merchandise.
Roger Heine stated that he Is a manufacturer',,,, representa- e r senta-
tivetv for the five state area and that approximatk4y
his clients would not visit is facility. fie said no sales,
are; made and shippinq a t v t ' only involves periodic turn -
ver samples and literature,
Chairwoman Vaslllou.coAfillrmed that the petitioner would riot
conduct sample sales.
MOTION Commissioner Steige wa . , seconded by Commissioner RECOMMENDATION C
Pauha to recommend approval of the proposal subject to the
conditilons stated in the draft Resolution*
Staff expressed, concern, about the present condition of the
tAr h cert arab, apronf which would e required to meet the City
minimum construction standards, 'If the driveway requires
modification, it should be expanded to the -Ordinanoe minimuni
requirement f r a4 ft. Discussion ensued, and the omm .s-
s on concluded the 20 ft. width should be allowed.
Patie 77
Planning Comi'm Is$ tort Minutes
April t
VOTE 6 _dyes. `c ner t eabsent. _ MOTION earr F -T4
red$uce Mr. Rob tipkeVa{s l
j++`pp ''
rwomd
iyn+ eeyy
q
o
proposea a, Lot D v s.l3 n/kI w i ve of proprt l.c ted west
qg
4
k P' a' ION1
of Dunkirk Lane between 1,?th and 1nth Avenues North. .. VARIANCE. (83012
ReMtnq of the April 16, MA st,4ff report ivas, Ivalvel.
1&tr. Leupke 'Inquired If the Southwesterly shed on Pareet< A
c td be retained. In that he NvIll be cont ting the new,
resi'dence on Iyarcel A.
ronamtsaloner Pauba, confirmed that the proposed division
would not Impede the mall storm, wat.er drainaqe pondinq area
located on the east side of P -arc°
MOTION by Commissioner Stelgerwald,, seconded by 1 ont--r RFCOMWNDATION
PluMa to recommiendpp at of the variance and got
d .v t l a subject to the conditions as stated to the draft
Rest) lult-lon, with the followingddi.ti to conditionnumber
t "the northelst seed shall be removed, from the site prior
to ls5udnoeul din e.t at>d the southivest shed
shall be relo dt d to comply with the Ordinance mtnimum
a °
t 4 ". The va-ldnee Is based on the fi din t4at the
Code Varldnce Criteria are meta_
Vote* 4 dyes.n tutb c, dbSttllt. MOT IONx VOTE -NOTION CARRIED
carried.
Chairwoman Vasliou Introduced 14r. Erwin Stobbe, who requests,R S O E
Lot to redlvidparcel - -to two lots LOT DIVIMNI
locatPd In the "Elmhurst t ay" development. Re din of VARXANCE (83015)
the April 18 198.E staff report way watved. Mr. St obbe
Mated that he proposes to remove the existinq basement
structure rid that thep •c pc cit nfor to the
neiqhborhoodo therefore he dues not concur with, the
recommendation for denial.
Commissioner Wire. inquired the proposed lots ars: sballar
to the those In the area* Staff stated that t je -_ dry
several lots in this areawhich have rtet" at their
originalnal latte(, e, similart the proposed of
PLANNING COMMRECOMMM" ' APRIL 01 1983
trxgark c ,: .mss saa
L ITS V D I FINAL PLAN FOR PRUDENTIAL LIVE, INSURANCE COMPANYER t FOR
14MORTHIVEST BUSIMSS CAMPUS" M -' (80062)
WI S, Prudential We InsuranceCompany of America, has requested approval 0
Revtsea MPUD FinalPlan for "Northwest u ' , " WKID 81-1l which proposes
quadrdat of the Highway 55 and 494 ` ectloo; and,,
WHiALAS, the City CouncJl underet Hca* 91-846 i -A rov d a FinalMPUP Plan for
Prudential Insur nany AmerAca for the development know., "Northwest
Business imp " ; arid,.
WNLRLASf, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public`
wring dad re(( ds Its denials
NOW, THERVORL, BE IT U ULD BY THE CITY COUNCIL HV CITY OF P1.YMOU
llMdLSOTAf, that it should and hereby does deny the. request of I-1rudential Insurance
Company America for revision to the MPUD FlnA Plan for "Northwest usin s a s"
for three additional project identification signs located in the northeast quadrant of
the Highway 55 and Interstate 494 intersection based on the reason that the additional
9f^3 4.aYl. in
E x - F M r l t 4t z t PRIOR .NO REGARDING FINAL PLAT 1000
F IR
WK- ? the City Council has approved the Final Plan/Plan and Development ('botract for
ItHennings First Addition" as reque.t d tvy 3ohn L. Henninoz
mow, a. ORE 1, B .l :M S S0 Y THE IY MUNCIE a
a
a TPLYMOUTH, U
INNUUT that it should and hereby, d s approve the followi dt-tions to be met
ri r to r=cordfnq and readrdinq said plat-
roa c with the City L is l- murindu .
BuIldinq Permitsshall be Issued until a contract has been awa led for the
constructionio f t,. l w al sewer and wat
Removal of all diad or dyIn f e, s from the property at the viper's (-,,xpense,
4. Romovdl Of exIstinq a cessor„¢ str etur s at the developer's. expense and
cessation of all agriculturai hcz ld qs and activities with the initial
development, cif Hcc s lrst Addition, , ire.. prior to Issuance of buildinq
per £
5. Compliance with Policy Resolution o«944 r irdii lricc poor le atlon
for new structums in subdivisions adjacent to or oontainting ,wy open torm
water drainage facility.
6. Approved variances c chid * 26.7 ft setback for existlnq residence to future
road In Out, lot B.,
7. Submittdl of tequired utility 4nd dea . j e ea,,Wments as approved by the City
Engineer prior to fli
ti a of, the ° l al Flat"
No Building Permits to b'Issued until the Final Plilt is filed and recorded
with Hennepin County.
9. Park dl ation requirements for "Hennings First Addition" $ball be sat*$ l d
with the future platting of Outlot Ct as set forth 'in the Development
Contract.
sM:
LAMNI MMISSIO._ O#ENDAT, FOR P-71APRIL,
iC
M11
Ikt"
SOISE
NS:
G4 S E, PLAN 4 AR AM. fR 1V NE I, STONE MASONRY HIN
830
WHEREAS,rr y Stone, Stone Masonry has requested ap r vai V 4 Site Platt and Variances
for Roger Heineo construct ars i lra(w, buil(ftna to be located at 3415K1 Imer
setts; and.
the Planning Commissiort has reviewed said request dindl recommends appr va -
and
NOW, THER11FORL BE if HURURY 4,513LVED BY THE CITY COUNI-11. OF T11LCITY PLYMOUTH, TH,
MINNESOTA,.. that it should a'id hereby noes approve the re3t f 3erry Stone, Stone
Masonry for a Site Plda artc Variance s forc, r Hein -Onstruct ars ice raq
building o hc located at 140 Kilmer Lane, subject to the .iinwng conditions.
mpi.ia with the City Engineer's
Payment, pdrk dedication fees-In-li of dedleation xn accordance with
Dedication Policy in effect at the time of M-1111dIng Pet-lit issuane.
Subm's-ion of c inan lai performance uaran forcompletion site
Improvements.
4. Any signage shalt. be Incomp Itance with the Ordinance.
5. t ey4yduponApprovalincludesconstructionoportion.: e prk . nq based
proposed, uldI useaqe, the "future par inq," plan would not be installed
until .such time a reed for such parkinq is demonstrated.
0 All waste and waste containers shall be stoned w1th, the structure Ind no
outside ;ate is permitted.
Approved variances Include-.
a) ars entrance drive . vs. 2 * ato
h a ft* building rear yardbac° v 5 ft. Ordinance requireitent..
a 6.5 fit. setback v dinance requirementor the Po-
of-Parkin . Platt.
SE"'I'TING CONDITIONSj RL MU PRIOR- AND REGARDING FILIMG OF tate" DIVISION ANO
VARUNNCLS FOR ROMRT LEUPKE 1
MiLwAS, the city Council h:s aixo%,e , ., Division and Variances for Robert Leupke
for an existinq patted lot coo t d irk 3t l Lane between h a d 1.4th Avenues
l rth -I. Lot 3t Black lt CITY VIEW A11ILS urwer k,s l t iotl-
Mft,j THIJILFOREt BE 1T HEREBY RL'SIOLVED BY THL CITY COUNCIL OF TM, CITY OF Pt.W.IOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that It h td and hereby does dir i;t the followina conditionso he met
prlor to filingiid Lot Division and Variances and Issuance of permit
I. Complidnee with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. tto yard setback varidn es are qranteO or implied,
Compliance with Policy esolutio No. -AO req4trdinq mialmum o -Aev i
for new structures on sites adjacent to or containinq openstorm water
drainage f4cilitile.
Payment of Park Dedication fees- -lieu of dedication prior t tinct of Lot
Division aceordance with My Policy 'in effect at the time f filing.
No Building permit to be tssued until the Lot Division/variance's are filed
with Hennepin courityv
Submittal of all necessary utilityeasements orior to ftlinq Lot
011vision/Vatiances with Rennepirl, County.
7. Approved variances ncl d : Lot sizes of 15,360 . ft., and 16,4?"5- sq. ft.
18,500 q f t t and lot width of 96 ft. vs. 'k 't based on the finding
that; the Code Variance rit r -la are met.
Removal of accessory structures at owner's. ;expense prior "Eo iss-tance of
BuildIng Permits; th --rte a t shed shall be removed from the s1te prior to
IsS ante of aBuild.-itcl Permit and the southwost shed shall he relocated t
comply with the Ordinance minlIA-rnsetbacks.
d "S
y
SIN" CONDITIONS TO 13F 'M T PRIOR To N REiGARDTHC FMIM'l OF ROT DlVlsi : AN
VARIAN,VARIANCtS FOR Mltl STORM,(83015)
WMVMASI the City Couricjj hs approved Lot Divisloa tired Variance,o r Vn in Sto
for existingplatted lotslocolted at Lots 10 aril 11* Mock 71 FLMHURST CAMMY rtide
Resolution No. 84-
d [ IT ME,BUY ffOLVED BY THE CITE` C,)UNCIL OF THE CITY (IF PLVOUT t141"IMISOtAt,
that it should tin N't'reby doses direct the follcivinq conditions, to he met'
prior to filInq of said Lot Divislon and Vdi-Itinces andIssuance of perwits:
sap 1 110o With the Cit. . i ° ,k' s Memorandum.
i` I ldnMk "Vi th POUCY Resolfxt,ion No. -180 re(jarfig" minimum oor elevations
or now stM t e!, on sites adjacent to r contaffiltia open storm water
Payment of ParkDeNationfees-gin-t c, of _eAe tion pricr to fill of Lot
vi in in aocorddWke With City Policy In, effect: at i (>
Permit t issued until the Lot vis rsnNar nce$ drf file
with Hennepin coonty.
Submittal of all necessary utility (° s ments prior to ftlinq Lot
91vislort lVdriances with Hennepin County*
6. Approved variances include. -
List sizes of 10,15,98 sq. ft.rid 101, so. ft.,s Ordinanceminimum
sq. ft.;
Lot widths of 413 and 54 ft. s. Ordinance minimum: of 110 ft. arid,
Side ytird s tis s ri '13 n ft. vs Ordinance minimum of 15 ft.
7. No further division of Lists 10 and 11y 111oc ,? ELM.RST GATEWAY shall h
tlr.wed
Removal of existing basement structure prior t Issuance of f3,tr dInPermits
for Lot 14f Block j, ELMHURST GATEWAY.