Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 04-27-1983CITY OF PLYNDUM PLMNINC COMMISSION " . T: APRIL 27t 1981 Q11 rejlar meeting o the y t n'n` * owas d il gid to ord(-r 4t 030 PJ1. HEMERS Cha rwo a , Vastlioul Commissioners P-auba$ Plufkaj Steri rix l agnus and Wire.; HM11S ABSLNT.- Commissioner Stulberq S ,M- ty Development Director Blair "re re CoMmunity Development Coordinator lqa a Mi..4, nn Assistant City Engineer BaaSweeney MINUTES MOTION by Commissioner f4aqnus, seconded by Commissioner Wire to r o$ nd approval of the Minutes of the April 13, 1983 eting as sub, Ated. ote= eyes. Commissioner to r absent. MOTIM carried. PUBLIC MARIAM dirwuman lasillou, opened . the kobl. is He in n Introduced PVDIgL INSURANCE, the petl0on submitted by PrudentialInsurance Company of COMPANY OF AMERICA America ` or an Amendment to tete approved PUD Plan for 14PUD FLAN. 4 T n-sruction of additional signaae within the, "Northwest 80,062) Buslaeapse development. Reading of the April 18, 1 8 staff report was walved. Chdirwonman VasillouIntroduced Mr. on Peitz, Prudential, Insurance Company. Commissioner Wire Inquired about individual 6u,*ildinqsigns which might be utilized discussed an page four of the submitted narrative dated Harch, 1983, Fir. Peau explained that the intent the Manual r t r* r Parlk Features is to limit the sionage so that It Ils not located ars the buildingsf teat it I t rdtlry¢ compdti with the inggs., Band ythat a rchi, gt y- {{ 41 F lyt+ fii udent 1n;,,-u"nee Com n grantsRa Fi, if h 4P 1. the R F G prior to its 4n, nto ke . The petlittioner nolted thaw City must issui a rin-It before construction could con n * The detallsand, specifies oIndividualndividua building slgriaqe,wout not be addressed until tete site, plan review, stage. 69i Page 7G Planning Connission Minutes Apra 2, 1983 Mr. PeatPeatz stated that he thought It would be more appropriate to address this at the site plan staw so that Ith the individual siteitcouldbecoordinatedvi development. MVasillou red whether the already approved Rotei d 11 S f Int d. t1r. PentzPentexplained that the blue lettertriq and landscaping Its yet to he finalized. Cornmissioner Wire Inquired Zf the proposed signage, would flormal ly be reviewedd at the final plat stdqe. Staff ep,ld that Ire r mmere Industrial v. business is typlcall not addressed until site Plan review. Chairwoman Vasitiou notedt however, that the Co-mmissioti cart revise projectt the f Inal plat Ga I Curran, IZ955 30thAvenue Borth, stated that are proposed sign is Ideated close to his reararid. Ani inquired why the slqn was proposed to be'' located ort the south side of Northwest Boulevard. It was confirmeo by the petitioner 4nd staff that the proposed sign tv--tion is on. the north side of the road. Mrs. Curran stated that he hopes the signage will be termed and landscaped so as not t impdot the adjacent properties. Mr, Curren inquired` the landsoaping was completed for the trail along. the east boundary line of the development. Mr. rt, explained that; 4ddsap has been Installed.. however,rother plantling Is planned at this time* An further afidsc p would addressed with the future development phases. Commissioner Steigerwald Inquired aboat the proposed sign message. PentPentz explained the SIQnage would Include the words "Northriest, Business Campus". The purpose the signagee o provide further Identity for` the development and to enhancethe 11sense o rI tato the proposed- Qna Is Important to tete petitioner in order to establish a "feeling, , a tri}een t- the € elopment. Commissioner Stelgerwald lnqutrwhat address the petitioner uses In their marketlinct proc t. Pentz., expand that d general lovation deseription. of the northeast r Highway 5 and -494 is used. I t was confirmed that this approach would nxwith the proposed ddl t on .t para April 198 Nen V725 30th Avenue, cosif Irmed that the proposed naewind' have internal nat iced. He, requested that the Signage, riot be 11qhted as the nelqhborhood desire* Y a nta a the wildItfe habitat charj(-t(,,r of the, area an rete led previous d1t -e-$ ll'i-S, to the street fight In . durton, 12940 30th Avenue Nh,, stated that he wanted to compliment the petitioner on the design of the x ting nt `afte lqn, ;Mated he could riot envistion what the proposed signage would, took * especially the details, landscaping. M. Burton u t d that a more- detailedled plotortal the signage be reg°lew. also, Mr. Burton expressed °.*oncern about lighti.r.4 the tn. Plufka to take action on this petition. 6 Ayes. Stulberg absent. MOTION carried. MOTION d i eau al seconded by Commissioner Wilre MAIN MOTION:. toec omm. approval of the proposed ann Unit Development Amendment o the 000struction of additional signage, r Prudential InsuranoeCompany m ia for Northwest Business Campus", subject t -the, conditions the staff reportt with ' ars addition that the "internal tightshall not _ intenset but shall supply sufficient subdied lighting so the qn may be read". Commissloper Pauba stated he thouqht the proposed siqnam was tit good testa, and would be lowprofile* The Commission di e d previous applioations wh_-rt,-- lightinq standards were disoussed. Chairwoman Vasiliou, Inquired about the purpose proposed ndit n number n the draft Resolution. Staff explained that typically plantilnqs are not permitted In the drainage and utility easement or right- -g ay areas.Staff's Qoncern IS that, should the plantinqs Meed to he removed for Improvements rars,, rpt plantings should not be an, pens to the puhlic., The Commission, conourred. Commissioner .5telgerwald stated that he did riot feel the proposed s a was needed because the project Is a verb well marketed site, and that the signage is not needed for addressing the project. Page 741 April ,k1 Cormnissi.vaer Wire stated he felt the proposal Dial led for too t-,3nysions n at not reasonable have igni at gtrio dditIonal §§. e 1091(.1 or the proposed sign at thenorth end of the projePt on County Ro 1 due to the yap of traffi,( vita U use the roadway. He sugqestedthat, theprop(,ied qa bei moved further into the silo areajway frovA k-h read. Vastliou to amend the Main Noti on 'to recomimend approval of the PrOPOsal SUbJe0t,to deleting hproposed signs at ius Drava n enlumxj land relooatinq the proposed sign on County Road 61 further Into, the site areal, and that the signage be constructedivith subdued 111ghtlaq. um: s gnus stated that he die not feelie sititlage n COunty Road 0611 neen's to,be Ughted. Roll Cali. Vote on the Aiaendment. Aver... Commissioners VOTE-MOTION FAIL Haanus,, Pauba.,and Steloerivald Hay. Commissioner Awl Stulberg absent. MOTION failed. HaTION -b" COMMIssioner Magnus o 4mend the Hall#i Motion, MOTION TO AMM recommend ov,al of one additional sign to be located the north cud of the development un,uun o.1 ,k and the MOUGH FAILED int shall not be 111ghted. WTION f,; ,led for 11,avk of second., MOTION uMa ss ones Plufka to amend then ic-on by MOTION TO AMEW recommending approval of the proposalsubmitted Avith the direction that the signs shall be located further Into the site at all: terse proposed site locattonsi. NOTION failed MOTION FAILED for tack of second. VOTE on the Malt' Hoticq, One ayes Cowqlssloners Plufka,,, VOTE ON MAIN 140'TION St igerwa df Wire, Magnus, and Chairwomani u Nay. ComMissioner Stulberq,absent. MOTION faded. NOTION FAILED Stelgerwald to recommend denial, , the proposed P1,10 SiQndge Plan Am-admentAm-admenas submitted. Commissioner Wire stated that V . f. three additional signs are not warranted. Vote. 4 Ayes,, sion P .0 ,a and aub flay.,Commissioner CARRIED sen . MOTION carried ye.. Planning Commisston Minutes April 421 't 19183 Comanissioner Pauba stated that lie felt for a projethis Size the proposett simnage is reasonable,, Charpan aslltott stated trat she cuuld have approved one additional iqn. Comm Issioner Wire stated that the petitioner eoti d el 4 r 9. d$yt._ 3 83, 4" Xda8i. fYt:.addh" onal 3las d e p tc trs and a teed is dem. knistrated.. The Commission requested a review of the April 1 }x Oleo ENTERPRISES taf F report.. Staff sumatar ed the two primary Issues for PREILIHINARY d1so soon rt,,4at1nq to the preliminary Reel an(4 REGISTERED re and the CondItional Use Permit request for a free SURVEY AND standing i uild ng In an lodustrial(111strilot. ;!t CONDITIONAL USE staffsummarized re action n e it n reviewedPERM-ITummarie b the ty ul 11. I-hairwomian Vtisilliou Introduced Mr. Bruce . l ernes , 9616 Rubio Mt adf Met n a, whey is the local representative 1 t o nt ,rprise Chairwoai4n V'aslliou inquired if the rr,p RLS is submitted for purposese the sale of the property. Mr. Diaerness explainedthat Oakmdr Industries origindtly Intended to r ha e proposed Traci D, however, when the flinal sale time came$, they did not execute the required doemments. At this time, the tenant In the portion of ii uilding located on proposed Tract C has an option to ur a e both proposed Tracts B and C. If the option la not acted upon by this A t the option expires. Staffponfirmed that the Ryerson Steel Companyhas an Option on the proposed pdreei with the free standinq office building and proposed Trait C. Mr. Giqerness confirmed that this is corre tl and staked further that Moo Enterprises is requesting that Tract B be released from the current opt ton I agreement- w tn RyersonSteel Company. chairwoman Vasiliou opened the Public Hearing. Donna Flaherty, 9535 .18th Avenue Horthl, inquired if Triaet C would be able to use the parking, area to be, located on Tract 8. Staff explained that in order to propose a parcel I would eomply wit the size requirements for at industrial site. Tract B was de lq ed to he at "east two, acres In slze, Therefore, to be sure that adequate parkinq available for Tract j the petitioner proposes to file an easement for shared pdrkinq. lanninq Con, m isslon tunutes April Z7,195i 0.)mMasioner Stelgerwald sugtestedthat Traet R be d4vided into ar : c that. Tract C uoit nMde more o the related parking. Staff expLatned that UhAs oaft be do- oo-implished through the isom t " e involved if T-raot 3 wer O less - 11, le et Ma,:.- i n co urredtit Trdct 8 could be de ne-d to V, than t cies* that would,assume that he sizeof the bul*l d1so.- O ntaa Flaherty stated that she hopes overflow parking for t le exis0tig Idnd uses will not utiltzc, the adjoininq par Parkinq lot, Melvin St ub$ 9 30 Beath Shore Drive,, he Is toneer - vd about the existIng pdrktoqproblem on South Shorv, which, Increases during the summer months. He requestctt ,,nqj'tt the Clity Continue to enforce taer u t ons,, c, stated that motorized vehicles-, Includinq m toroyc e aro using the bike path and he expressed concern about overf low parkinq South go d'yyg e op !Vwe en ch f n Staff stated they would confirm whether the o-,,,erflow parking is,ocur n public land or private land,, Commissioner Wire confirmed that the Ordinance ni aximumlot over4qe would periftit `a 101485 sq. ft. building on thepro- posed 2 aces Tract 8. Staff not that lot coveragee o - v o n the Ordinance assumes that the, assodated required parking 'could be provided oft the -same lot. Comi-aissioner Wire expressed ooncern aboutt the possibility of the existing office buildling expandinq In t f fetors.. Thereforef 0 mmissioner Wire concurred that the proposed parkingcasement area should be divided with 'bract C In art attempt to limit .'the future development of Tract R. Mr. Digerness statedthat he did riot aqree with this ap- proach in that the facillitles, could not be expanded without Flees -inn Commintission and City c approval,, and that the site could not, support further d'veo t Donna Fleherty stated that she Nyould be concerned If the existing uses Nvere expanded because thie, lives on the north side of the site andhas a, solar house. A larger buildinq mai'-interfere with t -u. at of rt t sq,. also, Ms. Flahertystated thatat the existing office` din bufferto the main industrialbuild. Page April ?7,, 1981 chairwomdo vasilloosed the Public Hearinq. R041041, by Commissioner Plufka, seconded y t action on t Petition. a Vote Avec. Stulberq absevit, MOTLON carr algid. kran=lssio'S r 4. to 1pe 7 ' MIR- .v ciP d that Tract should he expanded to invlude more of the perking proposed on Tract 3. 1,440TION y CComumissloner $tf,-1Qerxvd1dt seconded by Commissioner Wire to defer Act toga on - the petitton for redesiqn, wl< DEFER ACTION provildes, for site dimensions on Tract 9 which are kid qu t to aeconnmodate the parking required by the Ordinance r the existtnti, office building; and for a physical letineation etweea proposed rets, B and C, The layout should not Include olapt access or shared driveways between Tracts R and C. Although, ov :.sn should be made for adcNuate eent,y eo, The Bract B should be speciftoally designed t support the existing € ui di Vote, 6 Ayes. Commissioner Stulberg absent.. OTION VOTE cirried. MOTION CARRIED Commissioner Plufka stated his Intent is not to severely, tsolate I k so as, to preclude some flexib.11ty for future parking, BUNS Chairwoman Vasiliou Introduced the Final. Plat and Variance. JOM L. HENNING request for "Hennink First Addition" located in Section ) f INAL PLAT AND north and south of CountyRad 15. Readingof the Aprill 15, VARIANCE FOR 1943 staf f report was waived. She asked shout the t ,,i uss of HINNINGS FIRST, the City's negotiations on parkland for t ! area. ADDITION"- (79034) Commissioner Ragnust, 11,alson to the Parks and Reereatilon Advisory rW3l n, stated that the City *6 ContinUinq4 negotiate with the adjacent church. Chairwoman, illou Introduced Mr. 3ac BRWIC who was p ent with the petitioner,'- stated that the e istin garage 4nd outday ld, be taken down art of the development. 1 _ d t d a s cni the t o-k to the house. Pae 76 April Z7, 1983 Staff reported that a is have been recelved expressing con- cern about the neatness of the es ntrm area. Staff suggested that as the development prooekds the proper - V e kept clear of debrist and of oonstrueti"On nat r a s as it Is outside of the = tr etion, sites. Sohn Henn nq stated thdt they, have been waitinq to beqtfo Cleallinqj the site untill after approval of the pr ail Pli- eation. The contractor for the addition to the residence has p m at , to re ly the situation. Mr. Henninq stated that once approval Is loranted, they, Intend to clean the, pro- pertand rased the ,area around the existinq residence. This should be accomplished within the \t month. JTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Comm, issionor Pauba, to reoomMend approval the final plat for " Henri qs First RE W: A ` ON B Addition" as submitted subject to the conditions stated In the staff report. t ,6 Ades# Cootmissioner Stulberg, absent. t. MPTrON ar- rid* IVOU Chairwoman Vasillou introduced the requested submitted by r r , Stone Stone Masonry, for Roger Heine for a Site Plan STONE MASONRY and Variance application for a office buildtnq t oat_ SITE RLN ed t 3415 Kilmer .ane. Reading n , the April 6, staff VCE 83011 report was waived. . airwoman#a i llount reduce r Stone who stated that they would like to retain the existing a - pr€ximattc 20 ft, wide driveway for the proposed development which requires a 4 ft, sar an * Commissioner Plufka Inquired the public r sales persons would visit the proposed p ollilt to view the merchandise. Roger Heine stated that he Is a manufacturer',,,, representa- e r senta- tivetv for the five state area and that approximatk4y his clients would not visit is facility. fie said no sales, are; made and shippinq a t v t ' only involves periodic turn - ver samples and literature, Chairwoman Vaslllou.coAfillrmed that the petitioner would riot conduct sample sales. MOTION Commissioner Steige wa . , seconded by Commissioner RECOMMENDATION C Pauha to recommend approval of the proposal subject to the conditilons stated in the draft Resolution* Staff expressed, concern, about the present condition of the tAr h cert arab, apronf which would e required to meet the City minimum construction standards, 'If the driveway requires modification, it should be expanded to the -Ordinanoe minimuni requirement f r a4 ft. Discussion ensued, and the omm .s- s on concluded the 20 ft. width should be allowed. Patie 77 Planning Comi'm Is$ tort Minutes April t VOTE 6 _dyes. `c ner t eabsent. _ MOTION earr F -T4 red$uce Mr. Rob tipkeVa{s l j++`pp '' rwomd iyn+ eeyy q o proposea a, Lot D v s.l3 n/kI w i ve of proprt l.c ted west qg 4 k P' a' ION1 of Dunkirk Lane between 1,?th and 1nth Avenues North. .. VARIANCE. (83012 ReMtnq of the April 16, MA st,4ff report ivas, Ivalvel. 1&tr. Leupke 'Inquired If the Southwesterly shed on Pareet< A c td be retained. In that he NvIll be cont ting the new, resi'dence on Iyarcel A. ronamtsaloner Pauba, confirmed that the proposed division would not Impede the mall storm, wat.er drainaqe pondinq area located on the east side of P -arc° MOTION by Commissioner Stelgerwald,, seconded by 1 ont--r RFCOMWNDATION PluMa to recommiendpp at of the variance and got d .v t l a subject to the conditions as stated to the draft Rest) lult-lon, with the followingddi.ti to conditionnumber t "the northelst seed shall be removed, from the site prior to ls5udnoeul din e.t at>d the southivest shed shall be relo dt d to comply with the Ordinance mtnimum a ° t 4 ". The va-ldnee Is based on the fi din t4at the Code Varldnce Criteria are meta_ Vote* 4 dyes.n tutb c, dbSttllt. MOT IONx VOTE -NOTION CARRIED carried. Chairwoman Vasliou Introduced 14r. Erwin Stobbe, who requests,R S O E Lot to redlvidparcel - -to two lots LOT DIVIMNI locatPd In the "Elmhurst t ay" development. Re din of VARXANCE (83015) the April 18 198.E staff report way watved. Mr. St obbe Mated that he proposes to remove the existinq basement structure rid that thep •c pc cit nfor to the neiqhborhoodo therefore he dues not concur with, the recommendation for denial. Commissioner Wire. inquired the proposed lots ars: sballar to the those In the area* Staff stated that t je -_ dry several lots in this areawhich have rtet" at their originalnal latte(, e, similart the proposed of PLANNING COMMRECOMMM" ' APRIL 01 1983 trxgark c ,: .mss saa L ITS V D I FINAL PLAN FOR PRUDENTIAL LIVE, INSURANCE COMPANYER t FOR 14MORTHIVEST BUSIMSS CAMPUS" M -' (80062) WI S, Prudential We InsuranceCompany of America, has requested approval 0 Revtsea MPUD FinalPlan for "Northwest u ' , " WKID 81-1l which proposes quadrdat of the Highway 55 and 494 ` ectloo; and,, WHiALAS, the City CouncJl underet Hca* 91-846 i -A rov d a FinalMPUP Plan for Prudential Insur nany AmerAca for the development know., "Northwest Business imp " ; arid,. WNLRLASf, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public` wring dad re(( ds Its denials NOW, THERVORL, BE IT U ULD BY THE CITY COUNCIL HV CITY OF P1.YMOU llMdLSOTAf, that it should and hereby does deny the. request of I-1rudential Insurance Company America for revision to the MPUD FlnA Plan for "Northwest usin s a s" for three additional project identification signs located in the northeast quadrant of the Highway 55 and Interstate 494 intersection based on the reason that the additional 9f^3 4.aYl. in E x - F M r l t 4t z t PRIOR .NO REGARDING FINAL PLAT 1000 F IR WK- ? the City Council has approved the Final Plan/Plan and Development ('botract for ItHennings First Addition" as reque.t d tvy 3ohn L. Henninoz mow, a. ORE 1, B .l :M S S0 Y THE IY MUNCIE a a a TPLYMOUTH, U INNUUT that it should and hereby, d s approve the followi dt-tions to be met ri r to r=cordfnq and readrdinq said plat- roa c with the City L is l- murindu . BuIldinq Permitsshall be Issued until a contract has been awa led for the constructionio f t,. l w al sewer and wat Removal of all diad or dyIn f e, s from the property at the viper's (-,,xpense, 4. Romovdl Of exIstinq a cessor„¢ str etur s at the developer's. expense and cessation of all agriculturai hcz ld qs and activities with the initial development, cif Hcc s lrst Addition, , ire.. prior to Issuance of buildinq per £ 5. Compliance with Policy Resolution o«944 r irdii lricc poor le atlon for new structums in subdivisions adjacent to or oontainting ,wy open torm water drainage facility. 6. Approved variances c chid * 26.7 ft setback for existlnq residence to future road In Out, lot B., 7. Submittdl of tequired utility 4nd dea . j e ea,,Wments as approved by the City Engineer prior to fli ti a of, the ° l al Flat" No Building Permits to b'Issued until the Final Plilt is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 9. Park dl ation requirements for "Hennings First Addition" $ball be sat*$ l d with the future platting of Outlot Ct as set forth 'in the Development Contract. sM: LAMNI MMISSIO._ O#ENDAT, FOR P-71APRIL, iC M11 Ikt" SOISE NS: G4 S E, PLAN 4 AR AM. fR 1V NE I, STONE MASONRY HIN 830 WHEREAS,rr y Stone, Stone Masonry has requested ap r vai V 4 Site Platt and Variances for Roger Heineo construct ars i lra(w, buil(ftna to be located at 3415K1 Imer setts; and. the Planning Commissiort has reviewed said request dindl recommends appr va - and NOW, THER11FORL BE if HURURY 4,513LVED BY THE CITY COUNI-11. OF T11LCITY PLYMOUTH, TH, MINNESOTA,.. that it should a'id hereby noes approve the re3t f 3erry Stone, Stone Masonry for a Site Plda artc Variance s forc, r Hein -Onstruct ars ice raq building o hc located at 140 Kilmer Lane, subject to the .iinwng conditions. mpi.ia with the City Engineer's Payment, pdrk dedication fees-In-li of dedleation xn accordance with Dedication Policy in effect at the time of M-1111dIng Pet-lit issuane. Subm's-ion of c inan lai performance uaran forcompletion site Improvements. 4. Any signage shalt. be Incomp Itance with the Ordinance. 5. t ey4yduponApprovalincludesconstructionoportion.: e prk . nq based proposed, uldI useaqe, the "future par inq," plan would not be installed until .such time a reed for such parkinq is demonstrated. 0 All waste and waste containers shall be stoned w1th, the structure Ind no outside ;ate is permitted. Approved variances Include-. a) ars entrance drive . vs. 2 * ato h a ft* building rear yardbac° v 5 ft. Ordinance requireitent.. a 6.5 fit. setback v dinance requirementor the Po- of-Parkin . Platt. SE"'I'TING CONDITIONSj RL MU PRIOR- AND REGARDING FILIMG OF tate" DIVISION ANO VARUNNCLS FOR ROMRT LEUPKE 1 MiLwAS, the city Council h:s aixo%,e , ., Division and Variances for Robert Leupke for an existinq patted lot coo t d irk 3t l Lane between h a d 1.4th Avenues l rth -I. Lot 3t Black lt CITY VIEW A11ILS urwer k,s l t iotl- Mft,j THIJILFOREt BE 1T HEREBY RL'SIOLVED BY THL CITY COUNCIL OF TM, CITY OF Pt.W.IOUTH, MINNESOTA, that It h td and hereby does dir i;t the followina conditionso he met prlor to filingiid Lot Division and Variances and Issuance of permit I. Complidnee with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. tto yard setback varidn es are qranteO or implied, Compliance with Policy esolutio No. -AO req4trdinq mialmum o -Aev i for new structures on sites adjacent to or containinq openstorm water drainage f4cilitile. Payment of Park Dedication fees- -lieu of dedication prior t tinct of Lot Division aceordance with My Policy 'in effect at the time f filing. No Building permit to be tssued until the Lot Division/variance's are filed with Hennepin courityv Submittal of all necessary utilityeasements orior to ftlinq Lot 011vision/Vatiances with Rennepirl, County. 7. Approved variances ncl d : Lot sizes of 15,360 . ft., and 16,4?"5- sq. ft. 18,500 q f t t and lot width of 96 ft. vs. 'k 't based on the finding that; the Code Variance rit r -la are met. Removal of accessory structures at owner's. ;expense prior "Eo iss-tance of BuildIng Permits; th --rte a t shed shall be removed from the s1te prior to IsS ante of aBuild.-itcl Permit and the southwost shed shall he relocated t comply with the Ordinance minlIA-rnsetbacks. d "S y SIN" CONDITIONS TO 13F 'M T PRIOR To N REiGARDTHC FMIM'l OF ROT DlVlsi : AN VARIAN,VARIANCtS FOR Mltl STORM,(83015) WMVMASI the City Couricjj hs approved Lot Divisloa tired Variance,o r Vn in Sto for existingplatted lotslocolted at Lots 10 aril 11* Mock 71 FLMHURST CAMMY rtide Resolution No. 84- d [ IT ME,BUY ffOLVED BY THE CITE` C,)UNCIL OF THE CITY (IF PLVOUT t141"IMISOtAt, that it should tin N't'reby doses direct the follcivinq conditions, to he met' prior to filInq of said Lot Divislon and Vdi-Itinces andIssuance of perwits: sap 1 110o With the Cit. . i ° ,k' s Memorandum. i` I ldnMk "Vi th POUCY Resolfxt,ion No. -180 re(jarfig" minimum oor elevations or now stM t e!, on sites adjacent to r contaffiltia open storm water Payment of ParkDeNationfees-gin-t c, of _eAe tion pricr to fill of Lot vi in in aocorddWke With City Policy In, effect: at i (> Permit t issued until the Lot vis rsnNar nce$ drf file with Hennepin coonty. Submittal of all necessary utility (° s ments prior to ftlinq Lot 91vislort lVdriances with Hennepin County* 6. Approved variances include. - List sizes of 10,15,98 sq. ft.rid 101, so. ft.,s Ordinanceminimum sq. ft.; Lot widths of 413 and 54 ft. s. Ordinance minimum: of 110 ft. arid, Side ytird s tis s ri '13 n ft. vs Ordinance minimum of 15 ft. 7. No further division of Lists 10 and 11y 111oc ,? ELM.RST GATEWAY shall h tlr.wed Removal of existing basement structure prior t Issuance of f3,tr dInPermits for Lot 14f Block j, ELMHURST GATEWAY.