Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 04-13-1983CITY OF PLU400TH PLANNINC, COWISSIONNINUTES AL 13, 1983 The regular, l thy` P. `'th *`~l! k ' #€c a 3 "aa3 called to order At 7. 14EMBERS K d ' Chatr,woman Vast I ioul Comillsstoilers uta t ty rvmIdl, Stulberq, qn s f and Wilre. STAFF PRESENT. Community Develop, Director 814r Tremore Community Develop eifo 1. ort t r Sara t4econn ssistant City Engineer aohn Sweeney MINUTES NOTION try Commissioner Pauba.. secondedyCommissioner tol- berg to r mm pp° a . the M'Inu t s of the Parch , 19R,l as corrected on paxle '60 reqdrding remarks by' mms- s ion r Wire. VOTL 5 Ayes. Commissioners Maqnus and Plufkd abstained. NOTION carried. PUBLIC 14GS WAYZATA RAW TRUST Vhair v man Va-s-11111ou introduced she q 5; T s,-sbmitted by VVay- FOR, HcC0H8S-KNUTSO',N zata Beek & Trust for N Cc mhs-Knutson Asstxi4tes for an PPUDASSOCIATES RPUD Concept Plan for "Bass Lake l ht " located east of Pine- CONCEPT PLAN M8) view Lane, south of County Road 47, north of Soo Lies ail - ro 4nd e4st o-494. fe srs. Cres Frank and Dickman Kn t.son of HcCombs-rnutson Associatesits wer recognized by the Chairwoman, who requested review the April 4, 1983 staff report. t f explained the proposal was ars RPUR concept plan for 90 single family detached units and that density bonus po' is were requested for open space. Staff noted that the open area In the northe'A corner would be private common, area and not ;publi . park. Commissioner Wire inquired how many units would be d n the development proposal if the proposed net 2.7 acres o the 3 acre out . t were .i ',, included In the density ltoul - tl Staff explained 'hat a tot units would be possible), Kith !,fie prutw- ed two bonus points** whereas, 92 units art possible with the 2.4- ages* h rwom t Vasillou roq lazed Mr. Greq Fr nk$ McCombs-Knut- cCombs- n t- sonsonAssoc . aes who reviewed the history of the McCombs-Knut- cC mb -Knut- son, s n, w;%trshlp of the subject property, the top r phi t,,rtz andconstraints* and,, stated the petitioner's intent to r tda many of the natural h r t isti s. Planninq Commission Mlifmtes April , 198 1-Frank exp a n d that the open pcue In the northeast coritur of the site wotild be prIvAte open sjvkeControlled yHomewr * eases* tion Corlml5slotier 1-14uba requested an explanationo if the da cxi- t1oll of the proposed denslity bow,4s, points. &taff explainet,1 the Ordinanee pr;) on,-_ for d n#a t1 a (,1r1 C . sloner PauW expressed cern that the "openareas" would be included In the proposed lot slzes) and woull.d be ovined by individual eald nces. He stated that thie private homeown- fTS Could, enclose theFeareasi and prohibit their use by other residentsIn the developmpntw thus, the opef, space would not. be effecti ve within the Jnt(,-i-.t (),f th(,. t)rd1ndnce Bonus POI(If. criterion for'affairmative desiqn,, ami 'Loner Pauba, reamsted the expected erica range for the proposed units. Dickman Knutson was recoqnIzed and slated hey - selling -,he unit In a rdnge from upper Q'S to SIZ,000, Inoludinq the lot taste Commi&51oner Stutbergrequested confirmdtlIon that the av(-r,,iqe lot size proposed is 11,1 l with a minimum lot size .000 c , . Also Commissioner .. c c.wa con- Tirmed that khef-t loftex' Intent is to retairl the open spacen, the northeast corner of the site in a natural a ' curve for County Road 61f, rSitherthan the proposed eury $ provided additional open ,pace. Mr. Krmtwn n e - d concern that Comity Rodd 61 had limited benef1t toth subject o°t* Commissioner Plufka, Hated that 'tire . Road 61 providesaccess i) (!# t1r., €utsond- dt f if the VrOPq5,11 este for a conventional plat, 4dditional,dollessesrimild ' e permitted onto County Read 1. The, proposed development Is responsive to sta oncern that there Should Drily be one aocess onto County oac ` 61. tOMISSIoner Magnus requested the petitioner to emment on the staging of he development. r. Knutson stated that the projelot must be able to. procced to full d'eveloomentf not wlthstandl"9 the timing of construction for County Read 61, Pace 63 Addhhel4nninq or Minutes April n development schedule. Mck Knutsonstated the project would d vel p from theeast to the west, and that a petitilon would submittedbetothepityfortheconstructionofCountyRoad 61. HoweverHowevert the construction this roadMy should tvt limit the proposed development. Commissioner Steigerwald confirmed that the petit sae ,' intent is to contintue building throughout the project wh(th r County Road 061 is construoted or riot. Chairwoman Vdsillou opened the public Hrtn%. Bayer Palmer, 5760 North Odkvlevi Lane, stated he owns land to, the east r. Piflmer inquIredf he soul i property into more and smaller lots similar to those propos- ed. r p - ed. Staff coirnment d that this would he unlikely since the property could not he developed as a PUD and the proposal t heed is a PUD. la order to accomplish r. Palmer's request variances fron, the Ordinance requirements would be o -1- sr" . Chairwoman V4siliou closed the public Hearing* MOTION by Commissioner Pauba! seconded by Commissioner i q us to take action on this petition. 7 Ayes. tIOTION carried. Cormkilssioner Pauba expressed concern that the second &4cess to County Rudd 61 3 is necessary for the development* He stated that he felt the dumber of lots, lot *zes and pro- posed devel m n layout is He st----Cod the layout should be re -designed to rov%d-I common opea space through- out roue h- o t' the development drefl# He questioned the benefit the City avo id receive through this proposed PUD layout. Covoissioner Wire stated concern related to the sanitary sewer system because a shift In the *,-ewer dtstri ts would be necessary o the project. Staff explained that the hlft Ing in the sewer` districts does not have a neqative impact 00 the City's system o u.se-, batit areas drain ince= the same overall system drid lift station. Commissioner t l orwald stated he concurs with Commissioner Pauba's concern about' open space, but he does not feel the development over uses the site. The Commission should con- sider the proposal as, : an to provide affordable hou inq within the range noted. edge, 64 Planning omsso 11,41nutes, April 13, 198) MOTION by Commi 55 loner Stelgerwalld2- seconded by Commissioner RECOM`J11fMT.1rVH A Stulberq to reconmend approval of the Concept ptao for Lake Heiqhtsll with the following addition to con ton ormber 3 of the draft resolution: and that the st - n dec-,opment shall be addressed dt the preliminary p affil p l at stdge vi t h readrd to CountCountv ft a ". Commissioner telle 5#m,4 staWd this would provide th,- pian- 110941 5SIOn Opportunity to receive farther ' y Council direction with respect to. this matter. MOTION to Amend the, Min Motion by t NOTION TO AWS secorided by Commissioner Vilre o€ clition i: that the development shall not -Ixceed 50%omp et n until MISS ts provided to County 'oad 11' Comi-irissioner Ndqnus uqqes"%-.-ed the Cowittission consider se#entad 4toess to Pilkieview Lane, Commissioner Pauba stated e could not suriport a second access to Pin view bane dm ndm-rt would, e more appropriately addressed At the re- 1"i)* plat stage. tommiss finer Ure questioned whether County Road, 61 would be finished within two to five years. Hc suq sted tierdp s- V out County Road al I1 e d us the tieed for a better traffic design He s c eMte 'a loop street es klfr; to provide better circulation, as ,an "opts r °' if County Road 61 is not bUt. The Commission discussed the proposed improvements which. would be need, for Cot,, ty Road61* Staff explained the segment of County Road S1 which would be involved Is from County Road 47 to this site, not to County Road 9. There was further s s5lon regarding future County Road 61 Arid Item Noy12 In the Engineer's em(,,ran( m Commissioner to ery lreminded the Commission that the proposal Is for a eon ept p 4 , and that Item No. 1Z of the Engineler's Memardtidum Is a r2commendation. Greg Frank, McCombs-Kn tson stat- he reviewed the p ss.t `.e approaches to County Road 41 with staff, and he recalled staf'f's 0oncern of development proceeding wi o t at least portion of County Road -61 being co stro to . The Cenmlssion recalled, the 's r Bent experiences where right-of-way for A road was shown or, a final plat, and the adjolnincl residents said they were unaware of the road construction proposed. I Pik 65 Pn-InCommiton1-1 vu ; April 1983 Comunisslotier Plufka stated he could not 5agpport the p -op{) d amendment because it was too rigid# Alsot, fie Itleelt the main Notilml with the addition to oonditi*n number 5 needy forther C,!ri ` t lon to . be more specifit., Commissioner Stlegerwald c4l led .the question. V"E On the amendment to add a condition to the draft r - VOTE. ON. AMMMENT T lotion. €s.l r55 Plufkf Steloerivaldf Maqnus, HATH MOTION - MOTION Stulberg, and ChairWoman Vasiliou, 4ay. MOTION falls,, FAILED MOTIONrf-rid h Main Notion nen Wireoddanow- cd t yy ktX# to qd hat,loop filitdes*U SECONDMOTION be ncorpor t d ulth the Initial pleas of construction until. AMEND TION FAILFD o gnt Road i I net i led. The loop d i. n wouldid h mod fled, after County Road 61 Is 1. t i l d, to the oriqfnal concept pla:i proposed design r view d at the April 1 , 1983 nof acid i coed. Coy-wil on r Plufka stated he felt 'the o aioui t d opo $pace for density credit purposes was not within the spirit of the Ordinance, since most of It would not be romrt (t open , epees. Staff stated that the ommi ion could require a recalcula- ecalc l - tiontion of the open ,space for dens.1ty credit purposes* MOTION by Cownissioner Plifkat seconded by Commissioner Wire to modify condition number 7 in the drat resolution to MOTION TOMODIFY tdt} "density bonus point credit not be elven for the CONDITION NO. rivae backyard erase shown j)n Exhibit IFI -and, - that p d striiin access to the common, open space in the northeast corner be from the public street". Commissioner Stelgerivald recalled the -r port submitted b Mr. harry Larson which di co .cod the proposal of amendin the Ordinance to allow i silar lot sizes to those nropo c' in this concept pian Commis on r Wire stated that should the ope.n qp r, 4o e proposed as a common amenity or the entire project, 411owinq reduction of the Iotsizes for the - in,divi.du i oa n r t o could :support tete elan. TL on the to Condition Number Z. 5 Ayes* Co;=Issloners Stulbe7rq and Stez erwa.id, Nay. MOTION VOTE carried.,40 ION CARRIED P,aqe 66 Plau"111m Commission Minutes April , '4983 MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Maonus T NOTION TO AMMD to amend the MainMotion add a seventh cin to reccA,mend that the 2.3 net acres, In the northwest corner of the site, not be included n the density calculation. Mr. Knutson stated that ' this portion of the property is s d d A- and is to be deeded to the fir. HA stated further that this land area has no use to the proposed development. Commissioner Stulberg clarified the density ii , an stated that, per the staff report, the Councilneeds to address < this Item. VOTE J Ayes. Pltlfkd, Steloerwald, Stulberq VOTE and Chairwoman Vasillou, Nay. W T ON, failed.. MOTION FAILED M' on tthe Main MT 4 as once. 41NDED. 7 Aves. MOTION VOTE ON MAIN- MOTIOM AS carried. ONEOW _ CARRIED W BUSINESS Chairwoman Vasiliou Introduced the next item and readinareads.refw W hMarch ` stafftof' report wasvial d. 6 ` W`:i. &PLANINAT na r nman asiliou recognized f r. Mikc Sieklochal and Mr. 2ND 109ITION111 79006) Dori Ca bte who represented t petitioner, and .who . stated they had nothing further to add to the staff rop r . Commls4foner- Pauba, asked staff to clarify, the requested ad us t ent:i to setback In four possible locations. Staff stated, that the petitioner had Identified four areis where uild n s could be W feet,, rather than Z5 feet from one another should a particular style of bui dinq be sold, in combination with certain other models. The petitioner was anticipating tat, this filight occur and .is seekin4 the flxl bIlItY to have the lesser setback. The Commission reViewed a slide Identifying the four areas. MOTION" gay Commissioner Wire., seconded fey Commissioner Pauba RECOMMENDATION to recommend approva of the final, RPLID Plantplat for Plymouth Creek Second Addition" for Tipton Corporation subject to the conditions to the -M-,irch 31, 1933 staff report.. Off' es. MOTION carried,VOTE V6 7 TLgAihS 13, ihairounan Vasil 11ou`ntrodw"td this v:end readin (,f the B -T t# F Iroil11tsl, WDICINE, rWW', vvho explatned that att additional out'lot would ADDITION" (80M8) - e viveded alowl w I th thw others proposeddoe to the dis- eo,ery thdtcjn.t tib to the north had n dV de i wto two p"'I'Vocels Some,time )Staff c*nfirmed that revIS- edb thegraphlesshaVdnMr. explainedy(t} r%ky yyp qn p - mitt y d s 'or U ,;. ujtpo '^1"0.: ixtji3$. jk l d3 R.y &@4. $ii R.*i d Arr xi l.K*jA.S 4. µ$•. YA e °eex - t from, c,11 tit the property owners to the north rt,tatltvu to the eq u,d consolidation of tho proposed t lot's rdth the existIfIl, tracts. MOTION by Chdirworz, n Vasilloti, t ondt- by Commissioner Itlif ka to rtmzjnnw end approval of the RPUD U,*nal lan'flat for R , WFMP, L114 Wert Me(Iolne Uakze Terrace 2nd Additlo n . , d Lot ConsO teat n r -T Land Company stibJect to the conditious listed In the staff report, noting the addItIon all (wtlo',represented ort the rwised final Ch4irwumda Vasitiou deferred i car the1 ion l l $ y Mr. Jdy Tobi# ° a and Mr. trioscheide nt l' . MSN -LOS . M he end of t1he agend4,1 pendlnq arrival he ou-titoner or a LOT DTVISIOR/ VARJAXCE representative. 63007) Gram an Roch for a Lot onf i t , Lot USA GRM GUSTAFW. M 19,J Staff report a lye d. CON -LB, ATION10 LOQ` DIVII&A AND isa, Gram. st'I on Stated, that$he h4dreviewed the staff VARIANCES ( 83009) ePurt and M * * , -' 4 $ ---11.60 $tdttfd that the Bin Creek Watershed endorsed the proposed di,visjorl at their meotlii of April, 1, 48 rl'o o reccvmrynd dppr d of the Lot C insol id "tlol -$ Lot ECO MA ON fort oe ubje ° tow c , refleo in APPROVINC RPVD CONCEPT,44 FOR DAVIP 1,30M., WAYZATA Y THIN l'N` FOR OCOMR -10itI SON ASSOCIATES FOR, -PROPERTYOCATED i%ST OF PINEVIUV LAN !xIVTIH OF COUNTYA 14 1" SOO Llt* RAILROADI, AND EASTINTERSTATE, 494 3(vq ; W"MASS, 80,13ei, VVd.y7dta Bankand Trust for MeCor` Assoclatesj, has equestet approval of ar, RVUD Concept Plan op ap proxiniateiv ez* agj, M&RE- , the nntnq Ct)w,,,qj s,$1on has revileived the prpi ,.j du atllc Informationait Hearing and has recommended approval; NOW. THEREFOREI RL 1117 HIM,AY RESOLVED BY T14F CITY COUNCIL OF TME. Mkr ("IF PLYMOUTH,, 1` "1 • O" t that It should and hereby does dMrOve the RPUD Concept an for David o Wayz t Dank a Trus for " b - n Associates oe em, Nve ,f ,,iflev, yew Lane,, South of CountyRoad 47, north of Soo Line Railroad, rt east o subject to the followinq eondi,,Z1 1ns., CofmollAnce with the City Lnqtneerls, Memorandum., Final density shall be for the land at or above the established filch Avater elev4tllon per the adopted City Storm Water Drainage Plan as verified, by the City Enqlneer. The final riumberunit,-,, to'- be determined with the Preliminary Pldn/Plat state per CityOrdinance. flensIty bonus paints mai be asslAned2, except that density bonus paint credit shall not ' i en for the private backyard reas shown on Exhibit IF'- viether two zeas based upon affirmatlye de8igni,are feasible,as proposedw111 be determined -based upon ref.Nalculation of the opea, she The 40cess to the )-ft space In the northeast corner be from the public street The priEJitdloary plan/plat shall comply with Hennepit, County Road 61 lesion IdYoutt 4fld the staqlnq of the development shall be addressed ai the limleplan/plat aqe withretard to County Road 61, a St reet n ames,shall comply with the City Street n Policy. Perk Dedloati,,n shall be per Comprehensive Park Plan. Compliance with lle ate -d Aottons Environmentalmen Warksheet for Bass L-ike-SchmldtLake Ar-ea.. dsk?8 LANNUN' ,1 1MI a . OM!'IEND T10 MPIR" ,4t, 9 CORPORATION FOR "PLYMMITH CMI"M N1111) AF)PUMN" (790116) YMERFAS, the '. Council g= ad the RPVD Final Flet aril Developjent Nntrat o Plymouth Creeik end Addition" s reottested by Tipton Cbrporatton. aWn K MrREVY MOM* FW W, CITYMUNCIL OF TMF CITY OF PTYPOUN'tNIHM-S-OTA, thAtshould andy does direct the follcminq prier to Mn aod A6 C$:: gffl *t1E 4i*9'r v t h le City, EjIq B S T + +'orandtlm. Vaymnent of Park Vedtodtionfees- - Heu of dedication iiaccorda c i t= j ty Policy ,SII effect at the time of filinqhe Final Plat subject "? %00' credit from "Plymouth Creek est Addition". NouI ld a Permits shell he issued until, the City Baas awarded a Contractjo the constrVA&I of runitelpaladv atid water. 4. Removal of all :dedd or dytaq,treesm the property the vv " 4 xpense. S. compliance with bjilvy Resolution No. 74MO reqardtnq mdniwum floor elevations or new structures In subdivisonsj ae to or containina any open ston water; 'l a'ol ley 6* 'iard setbacks shall tie pler aPProved typical lot layout dated April 13, '119,8J. 7. SuiNmittal ( required site emacs aqreement and quaranteeassure g NSCFORND "IO `1 QE DIET PROR TO FILING AND RMARD IN ID - FINAL PLAN/PLAT VHM AIS' e elty, Counciltea; appv"ed they F r l '*1aA/ 14t i"'d Pekelo!)ment Contract for 84 Land Ct ay for "W" t ger ,*rye Lake Terroce.71nd adit io 'l RE 1 V 140FRY RESNAff) M THE,CITY COUNCIL OF THF CITY ttMOOTH MINME-SOTA, a that It should and I'tereby, floes approve the followina e endit tni t(, tip* et With MY t, olfleerl ' efl :4.Irand im. he; Ordinince rezoninqhe pron rty shall be published upon evtdenethat the Final Pl it has been, frllend ind recorded with Hennepin t - , .. 3. aN e nt l' arke dloal ft,fees-in-1 iek: of dedication n with Otte Polivy In Mllct axt they time of f*ln(,l the rjn jj Plat witb f4entij-p a 4. No Hulldln,t P,-Mjtz shall tine tints l a oontract has been awarded for the e onstrwt to of pwnclpalserver and eater* 5. mv of A' deadyinq trees froim the property t. they owner's expense, e , 6. Roigovdl of eX t o accessoryy st tate es dt the developer's xpe-n e* Compliance 10thoticv 79-80 reeardinq min"mAa floor elv Ar ions for new structures 41 subdivistons adjacentor contafninq, any open, storm water d1raMaqe &wHiltd 8. Ydrd setbacks shall be per approved KID Plan. 9 Outlots A through shall be con o d t ed they adjo1ninq lest ($) to the north uport consent of they adjoininq pro -pert,., fee owner(s), Such consolidat tons shall be filed concurrently With UleFind! Plat. If they tot ronsolidatlons c ,fin ot be aehiev d with, they adjoin nq property feo owner(s) consent, the proposedFinal-Plat shall be revised to comply with they approved preliminary 10. No Buildinq Permlitsto be Issued until the Final Plat i reed d recorded with On e County. 11% Evidence that the outlo s have been deeded to )e respective adloinine property fee owners prior totgsUdn ,;e of Rrci , dr a Permits for Lot 1 41 511 4f Block West Mtedielne Lake TerracInd Redd r t oft w The exist',Aq aOeSSexist',to the existexistinq house shall be removed and relocted t 46th Avenue North as part of they developmentlopment -o the second addition. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOHMt MAT IONS APRIL tl 10.8 3 SETTING CONDTHONS. 10 OF MU PRIOR 10 FILLNd AM REGARNNG LOT LOT IDIVISION, AND; ARD M, ANCt-AND t , WC. : Or R LISA ; 94 GUSTAUSON FOR STAN 0CH wH[J1E,AS,,j the City f%iun€ l! Ilds dPPr0'V'eV1 t tic Lot CW idati n, Lt 0lvtsi,'1on and drll nces ftxna ttK! subdivislon eode and tirba"-ve"O men , Potley for Lisa Gram Railroad- ined, WHEREAS. e Plan in mrs r -evlewed said request and has ended pp r ov al MINNESOTA, thdt it does approve the tlowinnd tions to be met prior to _, a _ . Consol itton Mt.„, an'reqrina the issuance° of But,14dinq Perm its. complidnee wtt'he City Lnc.ineerls R*e r dwn- for nery structures on sites adtaveot to or wen storm water drain l ti Payment of Pdrk Ded,Z_-atlon, -H4"Iedication prior to iz,*>su.Ince of Building Permit In e, ,- rBanc tic eiot at the t m Build- AlPermit iSSUdnC . Buildirip,Permit to be Issued unit t the Lot Consolidation, Lot DIVISIon, Variance and, Dee rf'strictions regardinq the private roadway are filed With Hennepin County. Appropriate documentsal' c filed n all parcels Indicatingthan in con- junction with this division$vonceptual documents have been Placed on file with the City for future reference,, 6. Submittal of allnecessdry easeinestsprior to llil arc Lot llloa) ..ot Division, Varl ivnce and Deed restrietions wilth f ;iaepl <)tjrrt $ 7. Deed restrietionsappro ed by the City Attorney shall be filet with the Lot Consolidation,, Lot and Varfanstablishing the requirementsement n responsibilty for, the privets road con strtict Lori and maintenance. 8. The future IT4-ubdivision ; plan. be r d i -neck to r ompl ° with the R - TA ' District standards for lot sizes ' and dimeosionsk P* The private road alignment (toes not consttt, rt e approval as an, approved 4j"P!, At for future public street. 10. Appr vW variaieesx ar,e dividinq the property by metes and bounds tather thaft pr rttino; andt( d1low the issuance oF three buildina permits for lots w5a 'ar "..« not abut road.