HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 03-09-1983N baa RU'
IF 1981
of tho- Plymouth Plannine.°} e ;t Was
y ,
oai ,,kit to order € t , .. 0 x t ,
4 RS PRr4Sf t4, Malwyi;Qw a'.'Ol 4.a j('om
y
s wrwald Wire,
MMERS ARSE N : None
re
kPpp,gg'KNN,yy
qqyy6}}.
pp?? '`
d
y yea -y.rDevelopment
VeConn
3ohak Sk&e ne$
WITION b,Fill% ,kri secondedY`R4=4# 4t,..$m73 Ta.`s '.''i. y %
P auba, to, approw the May t i ahe rebruary p 1, IpS3 meet -
Fist Wire MTO ON' arrted.
MOM VASSIOU
Ch,,ilrinomao Vasillou stated that Oie Nwuld step dowi from Vice COWDIT11MM_ U
C soon table a the ttem o theme Washer repue t for t HOS
d M (krupt ion C tit -r ,at Use Permit. Vice Chairman UPA ON - (83005)
At € Orw at t Mue t d a reV lew, of the February V
gaff Report.
Staff xplai9 1++.p$
gthatpropos
to
y
etit$^ apx
the
7
n{
yr3 aq
operate
y
4 "54,11tdnt business „M her c. -' t't.R 4.,.R 4A. a f,r" kg -2t8 "moi'venkie
North. Tile petitioner har gated that no special strue-
turns, stwlalnt aet~ - Into the rnce-t or special
W-PI-Ovelynts are ui ed s a tett of the tome Vocupa-
tion. ;also no el ts woul(t have t t & the
residence, and the only Perso, employed Is the petitioner.
th) IN,411 sales are twopuse t, Staff stated the proposal
compl es with the Ordinancepan provisions ' t r <a rontiltional ttse
r mit and dpproval Is reeoirumend,,d. '
ow t Ss toper Wire inquired.if any nigna, is reouested a
part of the otn t., The petitioner "plainthat n
spa. anage Is required and staff explattled thatrop( se t
con(jot, an of approval.
41-
001
ti
aotcc
W
Y'S.i s 3?F
was no one present to coniine; 00 th1em. V let, ,i i ry ,,d
Wirt,-
to 5 c ''e-tin On this jWtItIon. Voto-, akes." I(MO
e.
ry
m ()T IPM st %x'..i # e 8 '4. 8'h $ ,k (TWle y 9, o6ukmt.4ss lone Ri,.-M ON A
11th ional Use Permit f(i arta, Vasitiou subjeet. to the,
a$ stated In staff report.
Rol `-vill Vete. 6 Ayes. NIOV carried. VOW
Chat..Two.Mn Vasillou returned to the t1b 4
Chairwoman drill a requested a reviewthe` uar 212, ANNA ROS R '-
at i. .aexplainedthat e petitionerN AT, FIRIAL
quests approNat tib" t ;plat , PUT
arlan `e for propei ,, oc$a '10610 36th Avenue Moro.
requesteldrl,,...er by the s3me petlt and In Aucl. t, !
ouncl9 e ti tt ,11 ihs%% Ci!, approved
Cyt,*.
gg, *
y( y9igp}k
5 *K IR tarn tz$ .k ''
r ti' iG,•@i 1 i. Ee En 0.` i.* .X. 4 B.X4.. i '${, ... Szk '+n"#ukl
c.,t. mmendatlon that the'proposal eotfl.d tie
endorsed for the land division and related, va
Subj' A to .he property beintlplatted. Staff explained
hat i,e ` mnc 111 direkAion, there viould bc, a sharedOrlve-
y for proposedtl do 3* dAd the varitanct, calLs ft
Lots I and It"I t(,,,-. be 85 feet 1,rk width rather than 110 ftet.
tie propo wd houses would e,, expressed , h
jand
q$k
if
tiR,f3a j{, are t*c,, +. m.,i , $- 0 '4 iOtl kr tier fF k i:.t 1'4Property A.
rY
4dc `i d
a (I e L. -k
Commission 'Mtntfte,,,-
Chaa wml-an v x.e a A\
t (q _k,
Mit ?mm Square 4; o am for houses, exe-,-pt t j, v, : t
out that the house locatioat lycn.O.d itave U') with tAN-
Zloh , wdrzic , 16015 thilon T miee Lane, Inovirott w, tiie
Antent to develop the am"t 1vould the, reskien , -hl e, to
the propof-ed house € 11-s - andt, ohat mmiitrol does, the
alim -ins Vcis I I I ou 1,a ined that Suildino Permit a
tit aro processed dmi, iti ot
nc m, : on for property, to'the dv ei \ aq ownerdsuhs,-,-
qkterlt y developed b € }h.
p '
ltv ds <Ohtrol over
Ishes i! Set
IM .. 1avodakk expressedoern about the rieneral eleanti-
ness of the subject, prop*, e Stag there was brusht
car parts, dtid debris -m thk, and neta-hbors had com-n-
lain d to the City some time a(lo. -Comm.issioner StelvermmNI
explained that 4is the property is developed till dyino
Daae fres must be reamed at the developer's (exp
Chairwoman Vdslllou requesteda the CRY Inspect the sktlo
OMMI" ner NOW pE c that the Cjtv does have
onsj, however.. the.
4M)1Of SSIOn IS n0t Oe mforeer of these prowit
ons. Chairwoman V IM u stated that the mme wot
if the ptihile record as recorded to the t4inutes. becorne part
at e;, A<' the vdtidnce reoue--,t. Commissioner Pauba expl,ined
OW lot w1dith at the front setback line for o
proposed to be feet versus the ordifitance required
Pape 44
Mr. . te'u 5t,It.vd fit, it -lit there was nt ie ,,nt tdnd area, for
M 10ti, bot not three. t , t&l' s ` .()tf. &#`
created to maint.kjfl , tji , Ile.11t "== x hrI t was (-
qeSted that Q the proposal to to eall for three lots that
At R 'b a d. nO house be demolished, and ti At, jEStr, 'Gffi X .. K.fii (,
the SUN" PrPOMV One that: OPPIOSO d-iwd for tot
would th(v Very -lose t"o h1q, yard.
to St kT!J t!-.PreSqvd concern aoti (,, ifm) ntof OWN
100aNd On 010 Sujevt pwoperty. Ile noteti t hilt an, Aterq .
to clean the lot was made approx4latety ,) year
remAns on tlt site.
Chairwoman V001100 oxplained and confirmed that the Q-ty,
ordinance does notoqui that A oarape the construoted for
proposal and found that the proposed tot sizes ` are similar
to ;ter lots in the ,ireti, Soludinq the °oi d LotOdthlandhenotedtoottheproposedlotShesoxceedthearl-n-
Mr. Sterud expre d imone about the nariownessand deet
f the lets. He stated that he , felt: t,he rwoposalwool
reduce the neighh rbo property value.s.
Id "an e, 3410 Union Terrace Lane, inouired about the
maximum widt of a str"eture that would be allowed por the
Setback requirementro. . It Was nOtvd that a 55 foot wide
house could he lovate,(i otj tf-je lot.
Mr. Van Wes statedat the proposed three lots would
less rosLly than If only twn logyere proposed,, there o
A less WAVY Huse nould bo ccn t anted.. Mosiderin the
te19C tYd1 t MIAMI that the petitioner doeq not Inton utdevelopthelowMmissionerWirestatedthatthedevol-
tom
Ome"t could reSUlt Q helaq better than the existing are
13ge 45
Howard Coldf n e.., 3645 Uwton Temaee°tai ,t atod that tic,
c tt y tt It, iota to t,tw Cltd ppro° It: etv onw atid on,.X.:
subject property. The, Clity ropliedo the , etjtj(p j ,(
t 1ia t. ttht - SP,tMUOD lyould be Isgve t t't r. oldfl a "
exptawtt t tk t the site sttll has (tebris loetitedt t .
Cowern expressed that there am many ehi1drt,% In the
Vie. iri*a man ` astil it tjjt('d t i t ? coneerris vioittki he
re or od iAs part e lntjtLs, In that the residents
00010 disetv%s the "Atuat'lon with tho , v Cotmoll 'Ind staff
cis for its enforceettt t= Citv ci dws I S concerned.
t t
repre-
Petltlioner,; 4nd explained that she * j t
onq; time reside'>tit Of th y. Mr. CtIft expepi('-oncern
and p
efue st that the pe t i , loner expend money to cimu- her rvsi-
den(°e. It w Noted that the trtt to has been
Mr. ClUt explatned that If t. t, property were e div i
tit(' twolata, they tt c. eti be over X0 so. ft. The
firoperty has been cleaned tinct t4r. Cliftft assured that furttwr
measures could be taken. He noted that the hotises to be
onstruoted on t ul new, tots would probdhly have a vc ttte In
the nanqe t - $, fit 000.
Mr. Clift, recalled, alle that tete Pldtinlna. tom Usslort diSC SSeO
the propiosed lot. ' lze and stat ,- had information reldt-
1nQtO t10 existN0110t, sizes of adjacent residencths. ('o m
missioner Pluftacoofi red that the petitioner doesriot,
d"tiollpAte developloo the property.
Clary Sterud st-,At.edrospe(Aed the petitioner and has
coneplrft for her,horkever, tie Is crtoern tt that of sideri t
himself., tits tjoi i t s nd t City In aeneral, he Is
oppP to t" b t .i s lion.
Chdirwon:yin ds lou closed the a .-ic Re-arI 4
OMIsslone Wire tat d olije tion to the proposed stta-ed
t >t (i l- notinq taut tete 11el(Illbors have Identified
concern that the t. t be attraetiv'e anal salcahlt-.
Paq(
Maret, 9 1983
fernm ssioner t ateiou(j trAstake to
tIlat J, fe-red dn additional curb cut to
sh
tx °e iv° swayi ttuatrionthat v worked well.
Cbmmisstoner WITe stated that considerinq tits arva Ile felt
shared driveway would nit be deals te, and that it vut
gtni-t from the ej :" ty of the !;e, stated thdthe
did not understand tie'r` ^ menel t Ju( the nu;giber
f drivewoays. Staff explained that the recommendation was
based on the Citv,s polley to kfep the ntimber of curb cuts
t , Plinimum on the i t ' t or qt1 . In coils xdrat I orl
of varlanc tot }.IIn proposediin, it
nds not 1W(NI une.,_,immon for shared driveways to J)e utilized in
M prop
1,10TION by Commissioner p 4t4bj, seconded by Commissioner RFCxff1kWNMATT0t1 P
rt € o recommends rovaj of t t orpliminary plat, *nal
at, iind varIdnee for :gips Romenrann subject t0 tie
conditiorts as stated In the s,(Ifs` report.
t t Nuha sLdted 'fit- supported the shared drtvw y,, versus llowi q d third euro cut,, and noted that Ithe omt _
ion previously dit'scussed the lot layout.
NOTION bmissil ne Wire, seconded bN, Oomml$slofler'a AWNDING NOTION
to dmend 6he t4din Potion to delete condition number 14*
Co0%'Plss.P)atr Wire stated he felt t(- proposed condition
t tr,,Letfrom t lots reate(t. The a t the Mi Ion
wds to for edch lot to have an individual driveway.
Commissioner a Mated, that If each dot is to have an
t riIveWdy,'the lots should he divided equal o
The Commission d us0 the at tlernat t e to recog,4pend re,
desion of the proposal to InCrease, the width Lots 4, anct 2
to 100tt, and lot 3 to 116feet in width. Staff explain-
ed that the proposed lot layout had to take Into cidem -
tt the pet'tioner's request. to retain the existinq house
i t i q'driveweNe. within Ordinance setbacks.
1dge 47
March V. ?S
the ": is 3..i prp'idandStaffrevi% she h r t&ry t . ``;
de-slqn layout.
omm.J sion r Stulbero stated that if the Commission, desir s
the 14yout to be esf § ,. the x int eheaxc&,mac a€.:E s r'i .. I,a3L.
de-al d. The Commission shoat.-' not be rp t-°erg "i r t- r. -
r o the tot 14outst the meetinq.
Vote rr the Amendment to deletet; o rhmbpr proll VOTF ON, AMIFMT
Cott _€te e; risner$ stolperal Plufka, Maonus, WHOM FAILS
a! led.
otv Irl X4411 otl= Poll Call V tp: 4 Ayr= Commissioners VOTE ON RAN MOMMI
Mre,, MuM,A. and Chatri mmriq Vasilioul, pay, IVOTT *' r jrrr . MUM CARRTf
MMMIssloner erre MOW& that he voted dgMnst the (.fieri
bevafrsee, Mels request nq the shard drtveway Is no
r *Somale and detracts, from the -valuo of the lot s*
sioner Stulbemi requested that staff Invesileaty the 06n-
terns xpr ss :d by the residents to determine, if the s&tbjeot
property is in violation of City (j s for clednlin s .
Ki AsMent with her, rr v r OuS actions. She . feels that
three 1(4ts, are Inapproorlate.,
COmmissioner PIS t& state' he voted a(lijhist the Motion
because he concurs rilth Commissioner Wirel.,s, concern and
feels the lot, I - crt v"an e modifled.
Chairwoman Vass lu ,r t.h adored the r ire t submitted by
Laurent Devetopmect for'ut RPUD Preliminary ttit.!Ptan,
Rewknq, and Conditional Me Permit for pr000rty located LAMENT t)FVFIPPVFNT
vorthen t. of 47th avenue W.ab and Vieksburo Lane. Rearm 1151LVFRTHORWU Bair
tib the M rc-h c : 1983 stil t' report, was ivaived. PRFLIMINARY PLAT/P A
170MIN ;, O ', T M'sk . Commissionermmisinner Mawss r;nquir as to the width of ywoposed USF FERMI" 020
rehlrt gene. Staff explainedthe Rpt rust would he d standard
residential treet rjjth 50 reet" f r1qht-of-rj y.e expres- r s-
edsed continue Ponverrr that Phases I and 11 ars to be
serve with the Orchtd Lane wore t:tnn to 4th venue North.
only. HIS , Concerns inv t saft-ty considerations, d
general traffic, eirculation.
Plant t m, €
with 000 dMess Point wh1oh has proved to be It
nY.}. light that the ow ,A4i:m-1..d* nc ix IMI In, 2 $ iahbc -
hood, Is a result of alltrat lhein(i eircuUted throwt on(-on(-
Stdff thi t the proposal was reviewed{ the- con-
sultina traffie engineer inti the inty rnaineer no staff wh,
t1 t te- e* that th ; Pr0-i1osdl Ts s t1 torV'
Mr. Dice fir f,'rl. Westwood plannin and Fnaineerinal r°. " -
w petitioner, Stated that they have reviewed the
eonc§ares expressed bommissioner t4aonuls and feet that the
propv,w will not he pmol oatte
Pr ct..t,, ` ,IWO 5000 V'Icksbura Lane inqu— reed when. Mame .
Ad will he construeted, and w esti ear e ueauld be issessed.
Staff suggested JI t VS. V11talo Si0hedule d meet i -with
t'a f so tis construction etre schipOule anfi City Policie'sn
asssessments wad be revierved.
Gary Ldtiret , Laurent Development, statedie' e e t
With the staff `epo,, and confirmed that, in response* to
condition number 4 of they eig-aft. € they deact and
tart rues would beem consistent with the final lM
ting n ete to e t of construction a seStaff cone,ur"
reef.
Chairwoman Vasilifou c1losed the Pt.1blic pe'aring.
MOTION by Commissioner Stulbero, secondeti by Comin
ald ak i
n chis .o E g ; s.
NOTION edrried.
MOTION Commissioner Stutherg, secondcdl by Coir t rjer
St t e?rwal to etro n approval t ( RPIM real MincAry
t a i tRezonjnq,, and Conditional Use Pej,,itilt for Laurent
Development eizA to the conditions z tr d in tf.e strati
recommendal ton notinqthat Condit un raj v' howl rasa,
f all dead or (tie trees in uaeh devetopment
Phdse at the owner's
Nexpensel%
k=rw Assi)nerWire reaptle,5ted that the la Commission
rev I ew ge final Qradinnand landscapinqplans, Staff
exPldtfled the o flinal plat approvalsl and explained
th t for atet eslid tt. t plats, detailed , *
PIdAs drP, n0ireqjulret . Ho ear Since the appll^at
wives 4" PUD which ' .t, a conditional t1he Comptssion
can reo,,omniend that the final development plans tie r vle w
bv the commission. Staff sucigestedthat they Commission
nicer e specified sincethe submitted prellr4inary plans
0rdtrt(Anc(,,, Mud policy reoutrements and i espond to
direction t n at V e Concept Plan approval.
xte 49
tn n-:
hirc 4
V1 ON by mumIS,;I ` v_Ire, gond d y t` lner MOTIOR TO
lat (,O Msslon review
the fill I orddinq landscapino pldns.111y, tile
i about Internal tr it = between
2 g
ftim ixt €: st'a@'te .r. ` ti,. aaP,a Y L„ c.- '[ 86 i li i..a t3 $s $ tit, it `.,'+' !
or°w tneWire stated hufferino of ftiture,mel Road
houlO also be addressed with liermina.,
Vote TE ON THF AMMI)WRT
Vote 01.1, 'Main Motion as once 'imended. Rcll Call Vote 7 VOTF ON- TW 14AIN
MOT ION ONCE AMMOVI)
he COM xc from 9.06 t -t7? V.tt. RFCFSS
MEW BUSINESS
ha— MMan n .R I nt r uce t r ti t< '. ti Sitt, Plap MARLYS ASOWCK t3 1kI ;
d0 Variance ihml f t ed by h r ps Ashbeck ' and Robert Guth ROFIM CUT" S T
for preportlocated In the scut w,t atiadrant, of 34th and PLAN AND VARIANCF
1 t It Avenues North. The .site Is within the "P actit Hill- 03Q 1)
Downtown ut " M-NjD area. Reddino of Che March. ,
953 staffreport was waived.
theofnr. ll discussed ther posed development Avith the
ettitloner notinq that the pet,111.li er has conducted market
studies on, regularabasis
gyyyin
t. order to determine the approp-
riate 'S.'#, °+. time, .on:s,tr ct llo .
by C mmls,Al ne SttulhertTj. secondedm io r RECO . NDAT
P(1;
1(,,14
a,, rcctvwit a r y l the Site Plan and Variance
fok Charles < htx 3nd Robert Guth subject to the c ndi-
tlonF, kis stated In t staff report.
Chairwoman dSHIOU Introduced the req=uest submitted try pro PRO, w 141
n, Inc. for a il tv, Plan or artoff- Icle, /pro duction/ware— IS ITE PLAN U
onsc— foci lity he Io-lated northh o rd Avn ie Nort (,ri
the `at sale of NlAqara-Lane.adi f he Februdry
1?83 st,offreport a wdived.,
The, di curse the roposed uildina des;(i ,v*tl,
W* .ei.tlon r, ter. Cry Pluem, dnd .11'r. Glenn Burnet of ' olp
a
sr • td clr' r , < skd the petitioner tea explain the type
of ttils'liess. rdrs toner Wire discussed with' the p, t, t
or the n oral to use the or(tenhouse window Ire,,l for a -
a
siva solar heat.
MOTION by Cowzl st, toner Pluft'd,, secOndt-d.
lhv
Coirmliss loner Wire RROMMMATION F
to recommend zppro ad of the Site Plan for Pro Destan,
Dle*J. subjcvt to the condttions as stated In the Stall~
report.
Vote 7 ryes. NOTION carried.VOTF
OLD ws
htArviomdn V4siliou Introduced the request submittee fry SCOVI LF PPF
Mris Engert for Scoville erase for a revised landscape plaaa, RMSM tMO)SC d":
dor 'Scoville Business Ri '1. Remina of therebrktary "'A, PLAN. (82067)
1 tad'f report was w vett,
h is# forret St Nierwat -l Inouired if there este similar
V q ; t . Staff explained that thear;nm t Crow Co.rnpany
I l approval from the 'its ' .. adt oat
1,indscape p1an which allowed a, portion of the requiredoveer-
trees in, oohs d ;rc .cin of a mixture of ender-story
a and other landscape element .
Comraissio r.- Wire Inquired i ° Enop. r what the economic
differences were between the- two oleins.,_ Mr. Enoer indicated
taut the proposed plan is treats td, hwe e , 41-,ho pet-
Moller eel that qualitatively the planis ctn ra r. td*
d.'rtqer, discussedthe han(tinq -Ailt ne toward l,,attds(,*apIna as
it relates to a h1gh qua itv wareho$ise. He t&.e d that she
petitioner would proceed with the appioved plan is the
alternate plan is riot viewed as appropriate. Howey , the
pet tI n r feels the alter nate plan provides a better
product.
Staff Comm me that theplan bou rov i d a more mature
yy pp}} Lnq site.
dO ION byCommissionermmisr Paua, seconded,by or er td N ?
6sto
Piuf a to ciai n approval the- ne ised latiQ#jpe plja
for "Sooville Rtrslnes.4,Park", used upon the f n ltno that
f1he plan is within the intent of the Landscape Polle-
Standards.
Vote 7 Sys NOT IM earried. VOTE
4..114`s#CSF t 4roC"19.. '''+,`"'F'-+,
r
a; !
SOWL, un.r PYRf-ITT FOR x Ea 2, A Sn U4F'044 5 ,
53MkNH„'. LOCATED A, 183?5 31ST AVHV,,WF MWRTH (83005)
UPFASt Maria vdslllou has requested a Nome Pecupation ("OrlditionalTree Prv4t to
conaki t -I vof,-,u.tdnt busint>sts frf)m her re sidle c at 31st (,qt (), North.- arid,
iipprova
HE FORT, " IT 14URION PESOLVI.11, PY TH'i-,C C(NINCIL OF TK CITY Of' fi tl°
N 33M, that I. ,),zr re(l hreg l .d; r vthe r eee t, car a *me
t
locu at ion
Cl-tieution Use Permit for >.arl a Vasll ou to eor40110t a consultant business fromher
rosiden e cit 1 325 31st enue Vorth, subJe t'to tute foj ojqtja conditions:
a_ C00 reoulatlons.,, avd Ordinances,,
and vies . r n, thereof shal e tirounds for r v ation.
The perue, to t Pet" .ioner s operator f the aol:it, inti t kAI `
not be t. an fezabl ,,
The rp13estiki t fie maIntalned,sanitary manner.
4. Any slon,iw shilt conform rdith Mhe lAy Ordinance St Itultir
5. The permit shat), be rev evveri 111 eine to rare- compliance with t-.
conditions*
SETTING We 1 T I ONS PRIOR age , U1C OF FINAL PLAT 1709 44M P01MV,1441 r0R
i; t1w City CoTirle t 11'.1% approved the Preliminary Plat, Finial Mit anti itContractfor4nnaforthreesInovtots1, ea to ,,, t tb A. NO.-th €
NOW, THERIFFORUt 1, H REMtff`WLVFD art" "O NCIL or TPFMY OF Yt-101 TH
tit It Should and hereby (cies d Ire -,t the f llowinn Prior to filipoan
recordinq of said pint
IMPIL nce With 91e City ploper's Memorandum.
2. Payment of Park Dedleation fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance w1th City
P011CY In effeet. at the tilme ofIssucince of 11tu lin r ; t (.
3. Ho bitUdintj permits shalt t)- sscle t tlntl l munfel at sewer and water are
h s'ic!t y available to, the site .
ReiWV l Of all dedd or dyinq trees from the property cit theowner's expense.
No yard setback varlances are granted orpl ie .
Approved var n€ PS Include: Lot width variance for Cats I and,?Stock 1
Rowse ann" s Addition" to alloW q5 foot wide I-ots rather than 110 -foot Trifle
yygg
7. Submittal of required, tility and drainane easements as approved by the cityfn(jineer prior to filino of ,the Final 0.di.
S. ncyt er s t e I,s le ;t t o f Plat is filed and recorded
y try yg g y County.
t
eoor ab e easement do ents as approved ty Attorney, for the shared use
of the driveway access to 36th Avenue tiorth for Lots and t tl l ()(' c tRoe;n nnks Addition" be file concurrent-.1yr tfr the int Plat.. rVjdenr:e cif
filinq be_submitted prior to xssuaAce of buil inn et:mfts.
The drive to, Lot 11 Block It 1,R ee nn"s Acta en" shalt, e located at the
westerly side.
AOL APPROVING RUSI l tt° l t LAW -10 1411T DlVl"L(N) FNT PRIF .`lVIN( thyPlAWP 1, MIMPITTIONAL tow
4W I R ', . AND 111 ARDIN l 1p It l t -t GARY 1.3 t l l l tit LAWK-1 -
H FAS, Card Laurent, Laur not 'Development, ;hasequested approval n ResidentialPlarinedUnitDevelopmentPreliminaryPlan/Pli-it, and C00ditiondlt1se Permit for 103
xl'Vrt to consistst f 56 single family residential units and 434 sin(ll, f m.l.ly at,t jc`beunitsandout. l,nt s located northeast of 47th Avenue North n ,40shu,and,
EHLASt the W4nrifnq Commisslon has reviewer. the request t a duly called otA) U.
HIM* ' TA' thatat it s oula and hereby does pprov the p, x untl l pl aa n c 1tn11, Devc'lopmept Prelim.inciry Plan/11-l.at. < Condlt,l.cr 1. fir `° .l.lv rtharn 't
development or 10c-rQs to aas a of sinole family residential units and 414 sinat
family attached writs and 3 otitlots, located nort east. of 47th Avenue Vorth and
1Ctil-Ir LJ110, sUbjeOt to t h -e f l lnwl nn conditions:
1 COMI)Ildfl-IC with the City fnqineer's Memorandum.
The Orditidnee rezoninq the property south of Kjmej Vijcr Shall ire prrY l.l:shed
upon evidence, t.lficrt the Fittal plat has been filed `and recorded` i th c nh ail
County.
3. Provisions for a 30 - ft*' W'de trail easement/ out lot per the Park
Pl4nj as verified y the Parks and Un(lineer'ncl Departments, 11i th submittal of
detalted pltins as to construction of the trail Per City Standard'."'.*
4. Payment of Park Dedication fees -in -lieu of 00dication, with dpproarlate
credits In an krmotint, determined <aucurcllnp to verified acreaae and pavin
eosts, .and acrdlnca to theDedl atl n Pol lc,.y In effect, at the timrx of filina
lacy l}ln".rl plat.
5. tin Bul, Wing Permits sh.a:. l be itsued until tile City has awarded a Contract for
the nst uctxion of municipal sever and. eater.
6. Removal of all,ad or ctyi o trays in each development phase gat hire owners
xp nse#
7* Remov l of existing structures 'at the developers expense, prior to
tile development of phase, 2.
80 Complianceaarg Itis policy RPS011ution No. 79-8, req. ardin m1n'mtr'v tour elevations
for ntzry structures in subdivislons adviricent. to or writ inInq any open storm
eater drainage facility.
No yard setback v rl, nv s are granted or i mpIIed. SPIllacks shaI I he per
approved, lot l dvout.
ltd. No f3u .l cling hermits to be issued aaaat t l the l"z - i l plat Is f 11, ed -and recordedorded
with Hennepin cotsr'mc.y.
l L Appropr10f leeal documents roaarrl l nq Homeowner Association conv n nt;s and
restrictions ds, approved by ' the City °attorney$ and shall be filed Ivith theFilialPlat*
dt"Vp, '-- C'
g { g
p pn 044 i
qf$ @' m 'G '!'V''Ar` Y@'4 uY"d 6F+i.. #'yF s. i F 1pti?41"f4 '124.. 'S.`bkx'M. sheet&
e`'" .
shall he
rd f.'FAW
MIA VMS 1t, 5hdt l be .- t, t ver r' r tjiltid It , " above le
U tv":` MNI 'A the 5.t T- flWI M10r. Plensity °orms voints rt, t s,,e tom-0 as
ti. Four paints hased cmj the slzizof tine projeet,,
b., (1110 POITA based ost tht proposal provlidmo a vdrf,tyof housinq types.
so loe r, are a ail ab1o, an hai he platted outInt.
11 1 trail eorri ors _shiill be gust ewe as outtots to be deeded
7 Final P1,1111plat,appl lCat lort shall lnc4tideconstruction etal l fk)r they v
m flumaber o ilme t. for the tot lot/play area.
conourrent1v with they "Si Ivert borne"Finallate , Stich plat shall be filed inti
reeorded i 1th f!ennepin Countv 'prior or <-one. r entl with the "S'Ilvf-rthornell
P.t a.
4 €Aq##yy
w l V d %
yj
d per Plan,/Platnlesy j
dequ toerefitil
rm^.
nq ar
q
gshu'
y
yo
p,
e
y
ylan,/
Pla
theisoord6.3''L.0-0.on 'an, i'1'M' 1,E F.T &: iCe tvlt 1h,h Amki N.i^. }. !avelo FYi ent o >-v,#4.p gtjOt
per the approved "oneept Pj,.,jn.
N'. Ai I streets whiv , dead-endn e syea eor at cl J)otjnddrN Of 0 ex P11Pshallh(-
prox.-Ided tomporary ewept 47th Avenue west of firchlO Lane I
ph<A e one.
The Minninq „1 3i}". ma r..*. e.YtC ha Ll review 5h- final arddina anO Idndscap1ml a)-is
i lie§.tt rftt. l Plat.
gg
FCykn y^,
1` F V$ °; 8 ;$.'
xx
VI( S! J S l
RO IMM,. SITU L.AV! -0R PAa4 S 11. ExM ROVL. Xi1 1T14
WHEREAS, Charles 11. AsInbeek ,jnd Ronert L. Cuth have reouestpd aporm al of <i Si t- plan
for he eonstruction of a 5,400 sq. ft. retail i1quorstore to be located t 15500 35thAvenueNorth; LoT. , Slook Si, 'Tl mmth " fl,"PIP 78),-. and,
is* eF N J5,6 4x E, lx 'R K l+r
e
KRU € ,A11,V# A M<";ia CIT MITIL or N C(TN 01' U,,V VTf' MUNSOTA, that it Should and hereby o argi ove the reouest, of Chdrks'. -k (tRobertL. Cluth for Sits_ Plan Ippr v l for the con t Wion of a 5,400 se. ft. retailliquorstoretobeloeatpdat1550035thVenueNorth; Lot 11, Sloi lk 51'llf')!-rroutb
oirp,t lame with top Cj t Ffolirteer's Memos nam.
remilred Site Performance Aoreement &10 reoulreo f1anpl al
tmra tee or ,ompl t ton of site improv", erl :
An! WPM" shvl! he in eompliance with the Ordinance Fw? standarv.'s a.s to,
helqht, area, and sethacks.
t}s}e s or expansions are suh ieo t. u t re reviews cmc
3 I0}} 4y
lilt 5- QMPI.Ianee With Ordinance 9. ean i-s wn_...-arviT„a-G.'v.#4.Sdi '4.k @ ivo ya:-ai#Sn an fire
ne
Al I waste and waste containers shalt he Stored with the ,Amicture and no
outside stoPaoe is permitted,.
7. An S 1 11 Inch "As- 111to FIrO -r tect'i V-1,01n shalt he suhm Mart prior to
the releasr, or reduction of any site mprov menf bends per City Pojjcy.
Park Dedication e ui e ent h eve J eell S t t; -*est per€ osolu n 04 0-s l..
9— 1017 tole usew Is approved forthis tii ldinx cludi val, liquor # harber
olek-tqp/drop-off service..
0, Resolution fl . 80-830 is hereby, rescinded.
it. Approval & setbavk varian frox 'it, ft.. Q 7.5ft. for the f Ire lane on the
W-14to side of the bull(Uml.
At¢
P; $ 'A +§fix;Vt # ? ' ; "* 3t j ls r'-4 'S i a "" & ..
suvrl HIP PPA VFSI(tn AMPPOVING STTV PL 1,
W f i F 1,40, A S , Gary 1"eorporat(-0, has ropuested approval of a Site plan
for a 1,%350 iq. ft. off iveipi-oduet tont iycweh a _' WHOM to be located
RF AS', tile panni n I " " SS 1eila has revinWA Said resup st d"domm-ome^nth', to prova :.a,
tit. o Y , TY COUNCIL("i" THF , Y PLW-1011T iM, OTA; thak it hind jod hereby does approve the request for flary Mue a, Pro
bulidin to n, tneated north of AM Avnue and east Njaaga `e i,.aany, ubyet to thaw'
NINVI' t. of park 0edin aat ion fews-A-. e,11 Of . Vd,'diOa llwn In a oordlanee ri-ithe11Nx-dication Policy in effeCt at the time of Ruildino Permit lo.,suance.
3. Submission of roquired Site
th
tt4. ; Avy or expansions are suaJect to reviows anti
appro,ve l a perIrd iri ce provisions.
5.. An S It x V inch "As -1101V, Fire ro.to .Plan$ a S b Cbi.ittt—M
jors-
or t o..
he rolease or reduction of any site Imorovement bonds Per City i0ol i y.
S
s Yo Pl€fie for "oo-v . e3his C' dark" os.'e ',od at One ,soot w-st (xm— of 4' 7,t
uv
1. The plan is with ,ii, ;q*Jjt ,f the Landseapw .ollwv scuidard .