Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 02-09-1983CITY OF PYH.1 MNG O MI i9ai h - requldr meetlaqhPlymouth a -ring mls ic- was, I led to order at 74-35 P.M. WEVERS RS . ;»; d ZOma ` vas u., dod Wire. SlaIr Sir emer4 Communityyy Development rd . }gator sard Me Parks, and Reoreatloz Nrector Eric a Associate Planner Al (ottinaham City Fred Moore Altk Plijfkd to approve the Minutes of lanuary X61 1983 as submit- red. VOTE 6 Ave*. ('opnissioner SteloenvIaldabsent. 1* a g gJe gT POSLIC HEARING re ue'stChairwomanValiiouiaaatrotc y y ed h'to RAD ( ayy " fit`} y.¢^ S 1j ay g r p}rjt vyal {. y` a4Sndit+4`id1 a v`, » A. L E61.S ii.:; i'kr +.R a` Sf$ 3r i.iWW mow%. Ri.R A.3 da F' '4 +}'XA#°"°' b} 5 : # ,. i A Razt4doii Pioneero, 1,1505 36th Avenue North. 140,0 E-CMOIONAL USE ddia 1"he lanuary Z8, 1953 staff' report was aic »RM A WN j A [ ice" d" The Putilio Hearinq waS opeaed ana Chalmoinaa Va ..11ot rec o(i- itizedti;-. a an c l- a h of a loon Pioneer House, who stated h -it he hole n Cary Mttelbush r,. I.'i '17th Avenue Mc--th_j, sated that h ivanted to ccan-4. m that the proposal chid itNt anticipa-te all ao c% a A -ux North. and that the exis n trete woold be maLitained. He stated that the ay o u I compatiblewise the c lc eh csoc . Staff explatited the proposed garaae setback frwft 36th Avenue North and therenot directaccess,. t4r. It"Ittelbushee stated that his concerns were satisfied. poge 19 pldnidlaq Commission haste r bru zq*`1,51853, Chdirwomau Vlou closed than Publiv fleering. MOTION by Ouimmisstoner Pauba, seconded b'y Commissioner Plufkd to take ak KJon on this pet tt',tx 4 VOTE 6 Ayes. a issioner StAtjera td absent. MOTION carried. OTION by Ommissioner Raurhaj, sevonded by C,i.nker Wire to r com& rad approval of the- proposed Conditlivizial Ilse Permit i dole4t ,yet*t to those eonditilons as stated lea the draft Resolution. VOR. ai Ades. Comrriissioner Steicra d st . VOTE Chairwoman Vasiliou refevred to the request for a LaniIlse CRARL i MWM, O Guide Playa Amendmeat and RPUD Concept.a n requested FERNIAROOK CONSMIC- that Staff revieiv the 3anuary 51,1918'aff report. T. i O ' - LAS USE MIME PLS AWNP- Staff r v i as d the curreat and proposed quidian of the M041 AND RPOO CONCEPlr property . iA the ad gat l and u i . 9 It was explained gest the. requidlnq applleAMun required uhtto Hedring with fiormal Publie Hearjjjq Notice$etit to tete iegdl newsoaper and property owaers wit Aa 500 feet. The Puolto Hearing on the Coocep* Flee Is art informational hear- inq hear- into review e proposed developmeat -ou# The propo,$ed C oace t . 'Ptan decurately Identifies the t lei t d alignmeat for 34th Avenue,Horth. Staff reviewed tae , propos- ed , Coocept Ptari identifyliiq the various areas for thepro- posed pulde plana classAf1cations andhand to be dedicated for --).irk purposes. Mr. Rlaitkt Parks and Recreation 01reetur expl aa-d that the pi t t Kali cippears to meet the Citls, expeotations for park , -!eds and developmentIn this area. Chairwoman Vait tou r `coq at d 'Mr. 3ohn Man, IfowArd Dahl- grien & Associates, r r nt n the p t .1t ion r Mr* Ua in preseated graphlos and disoussed the location of ` the proper- ty with respect to the relattonshlo of adjacent, land uses the proposed r, uidiact As, It relates to tine existino. Quid - dad hoar the petitioner developed tae proposed Coticept, Further), Mr. Man reviewed tae site oharactrlsticsnclud- in that portion located withla the Floodplato Overlay Dis- trict. It was explained that development ar would be platted for developeat, by others, than ;,the petittoner. The other parties mould have to "execute" a manaf.jement and development " r work" for consistency aand control of the total 4evelopment. 3 Ae evi :c r the coordluatton of the proposed the it r i i a: lans or mark; ire this mri the fraPf . laqullred what s,wki v the onstruoted as Intended If vartous areas are sold hers.: . bcin stated ha the'owner would have to adhere to the tipproved PJI.D. aa With sulsequen "n, for Ow itiiai site plan5 for each of the development are<<s Viso, vir. Ubdn referred to the previously jo;je,,j manaqemejIt fr4mevorkwhilch would bojaeorpordted t;ttol the purchase a xr 1 was xplain teat' frpetitioner has enter- edd a i* lrr with a possible buye for the ov - ww;ft of the project. Chairwoman Vdslllou expla acid the pii,a lon p es on stages of the P.O.R. vii from m*ept Pl,ans through fi r i. Chairwoma Vasilliou, openedthe Public fledriog. Davv Cavanaugh, 3-105 Miaqdra Lees, inquired why Mtaoare Lane yid be exteaded to, ; Aven,te North. Stiff x .fr that he City l,q adopted Thomuqhfare aFr ie a e the extension of 34thve North to provide adequatc traffic circulation In this area, nd that the extension of Ris a s Une 18 antle!'pated to offerbetter i culdton to the existiog sinole family residential area and trot -is a alternate access, for the hiqh density develop- lent evel p- len Commi i nerPlufka and Pauba ` concurred with staff that batten ci is : 0 is needed foxy(-, existiliq 5jjjqjv family 4vlea to ''nhuuiothe acnessihillty for safety pt, Mr. Cavanauqh expressed coir€ ern that vehicles are, l i f.i utilizioci the e connection of Miaqara Lane to Plymouth Boulevard aero,,--s the r deat'lai yard. Also, concern was e-xpressed that the e: t n o ii r*-i Une, would result in dn I noreaw in traf1c" Staff ;parr that the intensity of the subjectev i p- Men is located ` north Of 34th Avenue, and generally on the t portion of the property. the increase W traffic that would occuronori Magara Lane should primarily be a result of traffic from the existinqstagle family residential drea. bro)v Cavanaugh* , . awood doe, stated that he did not, cell a Oop v of the Pa ti Rearinq otjc e aad is withla the - ft-distance of the clb je(A property. Staff verifled that d fleariilqotic; wa seat for tit re. ideno_,% t av,tai r W. . P av a aa qua Iia I den 'ey who wds listed es. fee owaer of the property. Mr. Ciiv an aaa as inquired If the existinct s is q egam y. ! d aoi S, would be respo-Usible for le'vied as, a result 'of the proposed road chart a t .caaa. Staff explained that eaoh developer re ponslble for the goon tr cit on toosts within the site. Cavaviatiqh inquired If than exit,-tinq a as in the South ceat _3 area a s the property woulda be dredqed to the explained that the 1C011icept Pl<jvt atiticipates retention the pondlinq areal.veee ,, some dredqlaa may take p l ace In order to r-ov tea`~ existina weeds, The Intention Is to retd-*t) the adtural ameattles In this area a aaaaa hinquired if ala sits* bufferlogi Is pro osed for the atigh densttarea*, Chairivoman Vasiltou explaj jed that at the 'rell all ry plaolplat staqell, a preliminary 1endsoape Plea 'is required. t t as tae final Plans are prepared, the petitioner is required to addressuch Items as detailed andscaptog-, Ratricia, Hdbeckj Lanewood Esus, seated the present r l as e pattern an xi aaqp a aat car t'.saes, eav rai a . She AInquirei, If the proposal .W nc_j, existinq drallnaqe problems. Staff' explai,ned the ` .t ' eu r aat; pulley Is that e c,a develt)ppleilt Is not allowed t produce a re, drdIndqe onto Ajaeeat property without appro, trate ponding desI44a and e ata >ats. Area draitidoe iieeds would e ray lamed in more detail with the net statle lazes.. Ddrlene Hesse, 3315 qa a Lane, obsevied that Kfaqara Lanae was not at t t extended, to 4t Avenue North y the ,idopted Citi Park la as_, She expre-is-edconcern -with the tri lo aod stated there he ,a as or stop Sjqas alonq these oad .:a ra a as-t Vasitiou revltevved the ` t unc t I; o.'io that as a petition for a strap Sion is r , the .iceD art eint ivould col a t c a tudy to determine the level of tra 'e. Planning commission Feur19'miz Stof f explaiaed that , now that a de,,elojymeiit other thaa perk ac(*ess to the s1nqU,, famlly residential area. Staff explalaed that Riagardne Is furthrotathe h densityy area, furthest froma nttt ipa ted. park sttrootures, and there are iwo,proposed residences to be lot,'atede later - Section a . - c on aq ars loan and 34th Avenue North. Ms. Hesse 1"quired if the City has $pe l f loot loos or oolde- lines for skok family detachedunits :which would h 10raUd Inv the north Side of the extstinq "Cavanaughnay Addition". n". Sh noted conceras with existing developments ` In the City which do not rwovide qaraqes* It was expIM-nd that the City teforres the Uni r; Phildtaq Oade and the City Ordladacy requiremeats for pdrktaq and e ac ks. The C does arca leqistate a particular desiqn or , alue requIrc=a etits, awid quirages-zre not requiredfor sinqle family homes. Chet Hukdasoal iM M-agara Lane, stated that he shartxd the expressed nc eraas about e endi nq Mlaq4ra, Lane, to the as r , a. He recalled that,,, with the "Fox Me-.idowsll development the pe itioaer did not dedicate the expected acres for drk purposes. Re indicated the City shouldhave some assura-aee that tae land- would e dedicated With thi proposal. Staffff ex a taaed aadevelopment ra<cee he Final Plat would not be MY without the load be nn dedicatedtec the City for pari, purposes, the previous second phose to the 'Fox Meadows" development did not r c ee therefore, the anticipated parkl4nd was not dedicated,, cap passibility of the existlaq siaqjean y resideares, belaq required pay for constrvetion of 14th Avenue North. Staff, explained that the actual constructiontion st anti details for 34th ANlaUe 'North will e reviewed with the prellmliiary plod: st4qe iiheat It edit be determioed what is actually t.ned for r is -of-w,4y and road purposes. Then,, the construction would e reviewed the City Council mad, the Assessment mmitt ae in Wer to determine who wodde Involved in the 06alstruction Payment. Staff explalaed that Mr. 3ehnson's, property Is ouided for com erodevelopment,, a.Rhouqh there Is .in exi tint e ora y residence on the property. Mra talAVIlvie,12*25,er-a re ae Lane,, expressed ' oncern that the, Fox eadovy "' development O e e d" o beaWful area. fIe stated .hat the neWhborhood Is verbaut.;erne with the potv;itidl impact e-vreamen of this property. Minutes ebrodry t Mr,. I%aesuqqested that the vatire site be donated to tile City for park. Lea Muehleisen, 12ad Avenue- W rtht stad he thou011t the It 'w wise to ujted = the aced as park, and expressed coix- rn that development would olminish the amount of lend for park* He requested that the City retain the exist Mr. tieh els6n expressed centern tith the extension of Nidgara Ldi.ej, diad the possibilityt that the h1qh density residentiat area residents ause the ` extensi,011 as e alternative access. Chdirkyom<ln east liou loquilred when improvements dre scheduled for the Hiqhway, ,and -494 'Intersection. ' a ' " explained t hat -1 3 It It ted that turn- ne rc v t s ivotild be cond, and W, 1964 the exi5ting bridoes should be wi4ened. Rick Raphael, 3320 Niagara- Lees$ stated that he shared the t oace i s expressed about the extension of NjapardLane iooasiderivq the proposed d us ty, existing traMe on Fern - brook L-3ne, and future. stgnalization of oath Blvd. He stated he thouWat res.' -dents %yo -d utilize the Hllaoara Lane extensloa as an alteraatt,,e access. rRaphael Inquired ir the residents would be notified o the. meetings with the Q.ontinued' review,, prwess. Staff explained that notices would be sent at the prelimilaary plat taqe,, as well as at the site plan staqe for the multiple reald nc s. Ar. Raphael inquir d shout the, design st ada ds for 34th, Avenuerth. He, also stated cacern with impacts f the development upon house values which have appreciated. As c ssth s s -ts for road construction.. t wto as s q st d that Mr. Raphael's q e t on be directed to the City Counotl Asses-sment Committee,*, Mr. Raphael inquired if the pare areto be located within theop d quided area,wouldd be edieat d to, the Cl.. t was explained thAt the amide Plan tf 4thveourcc North. he parklarild proposed within the LA -1 ouidedLA-1o areas would be dedicated to the City for pari purpose,*. lRactc Z4 ha st expldlaed that the, ' the parkland N ith in the LAQ 4reas would suparRe the proposed slaqle family tach d lots from the roadway and add an d(lditionol buffer. eorge Watroos, 1030Ond, A,,e ue North, requested that dKeloper establi5h 4 Staimum square footage of floor space, for the proposed stngle family Stached esideo-, requested that as the City CoutteleonsIders the )rvpo riNuiremeat be established that the previo,.*s, landscape requtrements for the "Fox raQws " he completed ore this area develops. It was requested that the Sty reiiew the 1woposal, to 4ssure that the existlingg aqe problems would not be compoua o* it was rcquested that the total number ni he reduced by chanoloo the proposed LA -4 guldiaqto, eit L03 quide elseclass! fIca On. Mr; t t 'requested than an alternative.O.rculation route be utilized rather, Van exteadinq Waqata Lane. Cereld Zandeq 1310 Lanewood Lees, stated he did not like the pvoposed Weep! Flee; end preferred that the raved OR Plan be followed, He statedthat he lhouqht the park coot -, be -oo t uat o tified on the approved Perk Flee if o bond issue were pe ea d again.. Concern was expressed abo4it the draloatle areas. Mv Zander stated that develoO4 eat would increase the QkWage, andwould present more problems.Feels the exteasion of NlaqaraL,ane will lacrvase the ;wcessibility to the, restdential area, and possibly lett#rea the v rime rte which Is very jow. lie. suggested that the previous l ct tNa for Niagara tone be reopened € ve-w, entrance from y tBlvd, lie seq.- ge t d further, that Rlaqara ; ane be cu - ;old ' and an additional esidenc oould be constructed. t was rskits that the lot sites be a minimum of t to -half aces In size Scause of the low lead charActeristies. tie swoestedthat laindsoaping, And, berming be t i to Isolate the ftiqh nsit area. Concern was expressed, 'that this vel r did not complete the previous requirements of the "rox Meadows" development. aader also stated his A neera that the developer ralaht not pay for ;that on t not on of J4th Avenue North. Page Februam,,, 1983 00a Lasso, 25 Niagara La;%e., stated that lieu a r tt a for a secoad aeeess to the - Wqle rj ached ,resj' demi-il area, horever, his choice would be to have Mti Lane re'eannect- with Plymouth Blvd. I r . Hdbek expressed coot' a that ;she was previously, iaformed that the property to the north of the "Cavanaoqh Addition" ivould be developed as park, tad sheje(:A he prop ed apartm,eAts and I. -Atenst e k vel -7 tt Chairwoman Vasillou Oosed tete Public Hearinq. the Pikinalfig Commission recessed from 900 .0'. to 11.45 R.M. airwomaa Vasillou Li r -ed If Or. Bolgarde was present ohn Man, stated that he and Mfr. Hell Polstelfirt, Attomed repre,sented the petitioner. C 3mms lti tagnu inquired It the applicatioa nau beet., e Parks and Recreation Advisory C n, FRAO. Staff explaitned that the application was scheduled for review at PRAC'sThursday t February 10, 1983 meet t'n. At that time, .A ill develop a formal recommendation to be forwarded the i n 1. a nu$ Inquired if e Commission had discussed the development previotisly. Staff stated that in. lets 198,2 I ' informally discussed the petition and it was found not to t4 lit conf r aoce with the City's phos. Therefore, tete petitioner isc these plans with Staf f an 'this result- ed W the ro is -d Coneept Plan., Staff explained that would review the proposal to, determine if aldequate land area t i td be dedicatedtrwet the park steeds for this, dreams Commissioner Wire inquired about the elassificat.1oft 4th Avenue North. It was explatned that the road was classified as `a, collector street wh eh has ,i different desiqn than residential street. Commissioner . to r laquired of Mr. 11ban why LA -4 density wasdeemed r ria for the n r_ --east fir. Ob, a explained that seers are approximately 15 acres which are qi - eve m t . w .servo a an extensionfrom he high density area to tt smith. They propose to chains the oafiou atl t the, LA -4 tit area Ift order to separate* tete high, as areas from the single familydetTio'hed areas, s, a n coasiderdtion of thetype of adjacetit road* ernhr k Lane) and, internal roadways (34th venue , aulticipated de elopment of a larqe open park area, n PrOxIMIty to the Powatowa Plymouth art -a. le '1 e ruat , 19,053' Commlissioiter pada taquired what in, pact the development a h e Oft the AAticipated sewage flows. Staff expldlined that he developme,a . would r re a e the sewaqe i owever he 1aacrea e, shotriotpresent a capacity prohlemi, PaJ- rraaer Maqnus laquired If the de elopmenCwoutd require that the Its ids,*€a l `s antother area which could not developas result of the Increased savage `lows.. staff explained -that t he:, Ie Is physical, capaoity In this sewaqearea to s ecom— a a e the proposed develop1ment. lhe development should a t result in restriction of developmentof other farad wi hira tht,, vier . The ietr p li ar cuould review the 0-verall effect of the requidtnq apart of the romprehensive Plail,amendmeat Pr cx " Cvminiss oner Wire minded the members thatotherid' In petitions were deated or limited based upon ewa e flow a r a Staff explained that In those, pet IttI Otis, it Nyould have resulted in 11mittlaq developmeat In another area whi-ch wo-1111d have : b eta deelwpe. Staff Ide-ntifted that the Metropolitan Council ectad determine that the proposal would ascr(ase the sewage flows and request that com era n, be offered y limiting development in aaot aer area,, Chairwoman a ll y nlrme that the property Is located wit ,tare the r r a a Service Area. a. Commissioner a as inquired how,many additional ata would be co a rup et ds, the result f this development In comparl.1 cava Mth the previous approvals.Staff explained that approximately 15, acres is guided for h1qh era t -y Ovelop_ naen a d. range acre. e would result in approximately ` 150, to 300 homes* The current3 proposal oalls for a total of 50,0Y dwellinq units,but Involve& mQre laud for development. Commissioner este requested ddilti na Infornation on the oevelopment framework". ; Staff ' explained gest the City requires that .he pJ. , plan be filled ivith the Cityl and that arab subsequent development mtjst conform to the approved p ia: ilthought the City covld consider formal amendmerits to he approved plan. This developer has Indicated, khat beyond, the requirements of the approved platit they pr o e 't develop a framenvork that would he followed. Mr. Il tan expldined that it is intended the framework riot d estahlish provisions for landscaptaq rah irac other ar hl tontrols., ageR`7 PlanAlaq'on'.' Isstoll f-lioutes Cornmissl*oiier Wire asked Mr. Uhtan how the petitlooer would coatrel the remilataq development of the px*-oject once it is sole to lndi ldualdevelopers. Mr. Uban steed that the la;id woald be sold with the development frare ork. i or- h purchase emen 'a ss a i ar ar °- dif h( -a petitioner wouldo"sib the use of eovenan-t-soil the property. Mr. ,l arand c hE: w s Yz hatrviomda Vasillou -:tc1Zej1 that < was coocerned about enforceinent of the develooment framework, she stated there has been a level of d sc . expressed regardtoct the developor's failure to complete djaoeat evelopm, en r. n stated that ; < of the pros- ss he could riot make any furtherassuraaces, thanhe has It was explainedthat the petitioner does riot own FOX MOWS" now, -arid teas would riot be Involved ivith, an Improvements here, CWIRMUSSiOneT Igni s requester lChat staff conimtent ori the traffic circulation at Fernbrook Lave and Hioliway 55. Staff reviewed :h a era circulation t ins for the City and the aRtic1pdted Improvements to, "Kqhway 55. onal$$tone a oompiented 114hat there Is land alonta n - 1.'U0 Lane others than this property which will develop and increase raffll<" MOTIONssioner Haqaust seconded by Pommissioner Wiree to take lon oar h ' i ion. VOTE CN dies. Commissioner Stelgerwald absent. MOTION carried. Commissioner Wire stated that he htconcerns with the proposed guiding and densities. MOTION by CommissioaerWire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus to recommet-ld denialthe proposed requiding based on the MOTION TO DENY r s n -s that the development woulduinduly Increasethe demand upon the remalAingsewer capacity for the ly, before 1990, and that the proposed density is too high', for this area. SUBS111UTE MOTIOU ho s 'oar h , seconded by Ch i r wOmd r VasillQu to defer action on thee } i .oar pend: nq SUBSTITUTE ION redesign, decreasinq the amouat of LA -4 quidelarea, thus cutin the IMPaCt up0n Ute "wer f loivsl- and,,econslda- i a, of the proposed nsion of Niagara Lane. K" ed tha t JAs H011014 would allow the, petltloaer the}ait t -Ixeiv 'teathe proposed reociest a r:th the C"It Couilell, Chainyortian'Valitiou noted that should the Commission eiaction gra the ? h Public Hearin would be r nt cede Staff sumlested the sIon discuss the aw h t f the deferral with the pet It laae* Mr. Ubao stated that the deslign detaIll fair Nlaqa a as Couldl be further lavesti(pated In the next stage of ttle P.0.0. process. The proposed density LL iyever, is firm area the number nit has eeaecreas d dad the amount of cat ,a has been the aas , s ace the Initial ns a ere submitted t the t X ed for the purpose of reduclaq deas.' O ort shst tt I t i ` deaction `cera the Roll Cdll Vote. Coimm .ss oners Stullber,4 ANe,, Commissioners U1 (K rAIL3, 0'aqnus, aaa at: ,a. , t ca Commissioner Stelger at hsent . NOTIONO fay . Commissioiler pluft-a stdtAed that , the Conml4ston needs ` to idewntiflv specific e s n as to why the proposed ouidino, is riot appropriate aad ashy the density, Is too high stated that if t is, determined that the proposed : parkland td- t o a is satisfactory, the City will Saeed to determinewhat type of development €para occur on the rematninq larid., oraaaaa ssi otterWire stated, that his dance ras Involve the ver - all denslt v and the impact on the Citv sever capacity, the traffio geaerdtiontand the proposed loedtion, ti al position - Incl of proposed quided are4a. The. Commission discussed the -alternatives of reducinq the amount of LA-4and Itacreastog the amou at of LAIutile area Aa well as loeatinq the LA -4LA-4strictly adk° acent to the xist- development to than south. Chairwoman Vasillou stated she felt the taloreased sewacle raf Was too thigh. ommissl ares a #rus aqreedf and stated' cencicera with the proxlmiitof- to the park Staff explatned the amount or sewaqe flowIncreaseas between x 1,Ala q quidlaa ' and the proposed (juidi q. Roll Call VOTE on the mdla MOHOW,Ayes.mm ssion r VOTE ON MAIN MOTIM . P ufka Hay, Commissioner teIgerava 4 absent. MOTTOM TO DENY edrriMOTION CAMEO, NEW BUSUILSS Chairwomait V st t.uu i atrodueed the reqf,,w-t submitted 10vLUNMHER MOTHERS Lu adarea Brothers Cowatrkwftioa CaMp4any fow as -tial Pat aead M* LotChi- t rww a Vy isl rt,,ferre t o tie, FINAL PLAY AND O y.yip , uConsolidation. 33y + yF"uat ID rk' R -Addet '4 ati kF %. h KARiR,{i.S %, ^' ;. 'T'A'X: staffF gy yq }y iR#Yr b 7e' report for the propowd applivofkt' wtacias was written to WILLOW OEM" (-$2045) expo as,. to, cru respo ad qac: em. i? —efrom the pet t k .ae d t ed February % staff explotaed that staff coacerl Is the samt, as expressed at the preliminarynary ptaat stage reoVardtaq, Outlot A. Sherman ColdheroLundgren Brothers C. Cuz p n), j, stated that the petitioner is c o accrit d that the outlot is taro taroe aad t cau d become a lldbittt,, for uite property ut iaer. ter. Goldberq also commented, that with feren to number TO iia the t.;a la`s t em ndum., e petitionerhas re-eiv d a letter rom the Army0 r p s. of Unaiiieers ifnitch em is tes the steed for d p mlt. staf f stated 4 C00Y of tai letter should be submitted for theCity's fates. Mr. u d jJndte t d that the culvert referred to to item number Z*7-AZ-Aof the _niat "s memoraaduM is .)ot totally Within the petitioner's property. it Nvas suqqested that the petitioner fneet xvath st.Aff prior _ to this applickation beliaq forwarded to tit a_ C'uuncl t to address this item. st keit .a m d at Mr. (Ioldber(I's request that the drive -way referred to o i t m of theEaq iivi e ' Me orima u rata u Ot beyoad, the proposed '.474.0 contour. Tt eref are, the drive tt sit t c ons-tt+u ' app up te . Staff stated that if the Planta>acj Comm sstaan endorses the proposal to allow, Outlot A to, be owaed by the IS sitiqle. family r side ace oviaers,, that it require City Attornplt approval othe appropriate rest rtot,uas to a,, ssureO Cownissio-rier PIufka stated he did not support the proposed owner -ship, by 15 owners witless, there is a leae.1 assuci t uat formed, Commissioner p u a, aqreed. NOTION o m ssione tin g, secondedd omm $$I ogler REMMKNOATION, A lufka to reeommend approval of the proposed Findl plat and Lot its 'A'J t' on too 11111 w end" sub ect tit t conditions as stated lea the staff report with the addlition of item aumber 11 tr, ,rovide that, either the petitioner eret..',n Assoolatiba, with eppropriate duc:um acts to address the r trate aduc. t l of $ or ut of A shall be gads part of proposed Lot i, Block 11 as noted Int the Enqtaeerls Mema and Council prelimfadry plat approval. iqV, .' 11i'anaLig Commission 1,11ilutes Vis; br'k. ar t _ 5 aa on rt er "A - a absent . c"a -1 VOTE.. y M chdirwomikla Vdstllou tatrodijeed the request a tted b, Pla r - CAR -LAR PROPERTIES dr Properties, n _called that thistea was reviewed by MID PRELIMINARY the pla;IaLIQ at their 3anuary IZ, VS3 meetina. PLATIPLANI, e Co mmilissloa deferred atitlon caaat a t the matters reqardliv.1 AL USEPERMIT AIND the ood a a ,ad bear and Manaqemeat , had been NUN MOT1 ZONAL 0 addressed b t , atlenole a-, a,ol dj inclufta tv, t. .. t PERMIT PER SMI deter i ae whatI, tf animpactwhatthereHaatbeupontheplanO , design. Rtadia(i of the 'January 7% 19R, staff report was OROJH,*Cf(SM, 13) I''Va v e Chdirwon aaa Vast Hou r ),e, anized r. Creq Frank, t c o ehs--k- ut- as- -acat- stutstua Assoel4tes, reseft Ioq Gar-Ldr Properties.Mr., ° as explai a d that Subsequent to the Pt,,Anniaq a, X19 y t a the t t t n r, coy ts a Itants), r pr -lIt at Ives from. the Department of Nattiral, ResourQesand %sett Preek the f toodplativ requirements, the appropriate doicumentation was foriva,,ded to 1f- R whIc satisfied. &et concerns. a'•.. The buildLi t acs tioa for those whloh Impacted the or aaad ndoemegat Area have been relocated to comply with the n m 50 foot set-baok requirementestablished, by the DNR. The MIR has ub itt d a letter Wdioattrig that they recommend approval the plana* There remain, two unit.s which steed to be raised one foot In elevation In rde to comply%YIth the Bassett Creek Watershed nageme tt eavelope, • r. raaa stated this would be d000mp t I shed so that all of the unitst would be sdtisfActorilv loo to tor. Fraiik noted tbA condlition number TZ, of the proposed Resolution, hind be corrected to delete the reference, t tete development consistiag of 44 quddrdmifiiumsand 28 duplex units. ihe development chase consist of 7Z units,,, however, t v are townhouse unit -s* Staff Indicated this change would he completed prior to tbiss Item proceedliql to i' ty CoujAc,11. Commissioner Magnus ,nquir d what the maxitaaum size, of the le-oacwegat Ion of the churchrch wo d be. Mr, oh,n Far noi j Trt,sideat of the con regat.on Indicated tete church todd c o a i t , do emb r'. , lie, further irid,io ted that the future growth Could perhdps reach n approxlmdte of ?50 Members. ssl otter fvta uxus iii(julred if it would be tappiropriate to at 0.&N# $ 6,, gg# 454 % #1i4 CSA6. .Ss.,.cd f &;" - .b. Y $ i kw 'tu4. tomn nd V ed. iStiff.. 'xpla Y ed, a detailed r g (n..o cess o 'o 4ttorodl streets would he onside tip i t)f t form,11 ia## . lc¢ L y ' $} " ; y'* i44tpk##'`+ gyYpps iy'ig` galso { yy,' pqupa Fg ya;} }§ ky$ ggsyyjg' yyyy g Iq'g}g qRI t 8#,M D4{l ml,tri+$: he (+„TRR R. 94i.R a4. A. w.ti i. kM betwoe; ak -3.. 8^r l#.-i x'44 .. ad- the rl-sidentlal ualts to the west. re w as al of the MMIR Pldai'Plotj, Conditionai Use Permit, and the Couditloaal Ilse t9 i 5.lad.lto na.,f.4cFbe s and `qr e ROMP OF MING serve ho resect.1tty n. the floard of Aminqjust- APKALS meats Me Gummi oa reviewed the meettaq, schedulet r u wee The meet aq 4itUo xrne 4 - .fit. R[COMMENDAT 10H PPI CONDITIONAL PERMIT ANEUMMEN7FOR BRAD CNAPH FORARAM 1MJ1 HOW - 6 HH`WASS the City CowicAlpro -,A Coitditlonal t1se Permit and Site throuci.4 Resolu-tion No. 75-67,19; aad WNFRENSj, Chazin has roquested appro al ofnditio kil tlse Permit Amndmeat to coastruct a douthle garaw at the Hazeldon Ploaeev llouloceed.. 15 #5 36th Avenue North; 4nd, H. . a missiotj has re-v,le-wed, said renuest at a duty odlleOPublic HC drtaj 3;td3;thas ~ tonne de approval; NOW, THLREIMEj HE 11 MALAY R-L'SOLWO BY THE MY COUNCIL OF THE: CITY OF PLYllouTt4t MINHUSOTA, that It shouldndhereh y does 4pprove the reouest of Brad Chazin for tuidit i n Permit Ainendment for 14azeldon Pioneer House to ronstmor a dou qdrdQe at 11505 36th AveLnup florth whjec o the followlsia conditions. 1. the permit is sobject,o all applicable eodes, reaulations andOrdinances. G4 The 5iteshall be maiatalaed la a saalltary manaer,. Copli-arlee with orlqinal Covditional Ilse Permitand 51te Plait approved stated,in Resolution No. '75-678. COMMISSION -0014ME ND ION MR FORU, 1983 it St-JTING CONDITIONS I0 OL MF.-T PRIORF11-1141a AND ARt WA PLAT "WILLOW ND" OR LUNDGREN 13ROlHERS ONSIRUCTION COMPANY, W. ?045) WHOLAS, , the Citi Couooltl ties „;lonroved the Ffnat Mat and Development ` nt scat for OWt 1HEREFt.RL, 83L 11 HEREBY RLSOLVED fly Im- IV-Iv A cotjwxu. OF - `T Y Of PLYM6111141 MINIMLS01A, that it should and hereby does elirectthe folowlaoto b met or'or t Compliance with the City nilaerl s Memorandum. 41 kttr Qf park4edLeation fees-i - " of dedication n -$-4 .°'.1anc * with City Policy ta effect at the time of °i llaq the Final Plat. Ho Butldiiig Permitsshall be tssued, untilni,(I sewer and water ars t h tally. to the sites. Removal of aH dead or dyinqtrees`rm, the property at the, owner's h tts . hard setbdck 'iarlaaces are greeted or implied. Submittal of require(:, utZlllty and dra-Aiaqe easementsapproved by the City, Lnqlaeer prior to fillaqthe, in Mat. 1-1 , a q Issue until the incl Flet I filed and c ct d street name, shalt comply with city Street Haminct q_ tem and be named,' 1123rd A"venue, North". i ae existing (, 'to the existinq, sinaley dwellincr, shall be elim1ndted oad a new access Thall be pro,.Jded to the proposed public !)ad. - 10, the existinq eecessory struiAure to be used is lieu of construction t eiler shall be used until the property is developedt or tares years which ever occurs first. 11. Approval of the variance frota the d1A.,u ,-1t maxima cut-de-sao lenoth of 500 feet n ptib is f 6feet, 111. t shall h ,t d with Lot 5t hock It'Sunny Acres 31rd Ad it; ton When t , fWal Plat ts-Filed. Prov-ode nat * anther the pet'itioner oreate aa Association wit., oppropriate o#,im,b at to address tate maintenance, oF Outlot A,. or that Out t A he made airt of proposed Lot It Alock 1, as aoted in the fnqlaeer's MemorAndtim and City Council Preliminary Plat approval.