HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 02-09-1983CITY OF PYH.1
MNG O MI
i9ai
h - requldr meetlaqhPlymouth a -ring mls ic- was,
I led to order at 74-35 P.M.
WEVERS RS . ;»; d ZOma ` vas u.,
dod Wire.
SlaIr Sir emer4
Communityyy Development rd . }gator
sard Me
Parks, and Reoreatloz Nrector
Eric a
Associate Planner Al (ottinaham
City Fred Moore
Altk Plijfkd to approve the Minutes of lanuary X61 1983 as submit-
red. VOTE 6 Ave*. ('opnissioner SteloenvIaldabsent. 1* a
g
gJe gT
POSLIC HEARING
re ue'stChairwomanValiiouiaaatrotc
y y
ed h'to
RAD (
ayy "
fit`}
y.¢^ S 1j ay g
r
p}rjt vyal {.
y` a4Sndit+4`id1 a v`, » A. L E61.S ii.:; i'kr +.R a` Sf$ 3r i.iWW mow%. Ri.R A.3 da F' '4 +}'XA#°"°'
b}
5 : # ,. i
A Razt4doii Pioneero, 1,1505 36th Avenue North. 140,0 E-CMOIONAL USE
ddia 1"he lanuary Z8, 1953 staff' report was aic »RM A WN
j
A [ ice" d"
The Putilio Hearinq waS opeaed ana Chalmoinaa Va ..11ot rec o(i-
itizedti;-. a an c l- a h of a loon Pioneer House, who
stated h -it he hole n
Cary Mttelbush r,. I.'i '17th Avenue Mc--th_j, sated that h
ivanted to ccan-4. m that the proposal chid itNt anticipa-te all
ao c% a A -ux North. and that the exis n trete
woold be maLitained. He stated that the ay
o u I compatiblewise the c lc eh csoc .
Staff explatited the proposed garaae setback frwft 36th Avenue
North and therenot directaccess,.
t4r. It"Ittelbushee stated that his concerns were satisfied.
poge 19
pldnidlaq Commission haste
r bru zq*`1,51853,
Chdirwomau Vlou closed than Publiv fleering.
MOTION by Ouimmisstoner Pauba, seconded b'y Commissioner
Plufkd to take ak KJon on this pet tt',tx 4 VOTE 6 Ayes.
a issioner StAtjera td absent. MOTION carried.
OTION by Ommissioner Raurhaj, sevonded by C,i.nker Wire
to r com& rad approval of the- proposed Conditlivizial Ilse Permit
i dole4t ,yet*t to those eonditilons as stated lea the draft
Resolution. VOR. ai Ades. Comrriissioner Steicra d st . VOTE
Chairwoman Vasiliou refevred to the request for a LaniIlse CRARL i MWM, O
Guide Playa Amendmeat and RPUD Concept.a n requested FERNIAROOK CONSMIC-
that Staff revieiv the 3anuary 51,1918'aff report. T. i O ' - LAS
USE MIME PLS AWNP-
Staff r v i as d the curreat and proposed quidian of the M041 AND RPOO CONCEPlr
property . iA the ad gat l and u i . 9
It was explained gest the. requidlnq applleAMun required
uhtto Hedring with fiormal Publie Hearjjjq Notice$etit to tete
iegdl newsoaper and property owaers wit Aa 500 feet. The
Puolto Hearing on the Coocep* Flee Is art informational hear-
inq
hear-
into review e proposed developmeat -ou# The
propo,$ed C oace t . 'Ptan decurately Identifies the t lei t d
alignmeat for 34th Avenue,Horth. Staff reviewed tae , propos-
ed , Coocept Ptari identifyliiq the various areas for thepro-
posed pulde plana classAf1cations andhand to be dedicated
for --).irk purposes.
Mr. Rlaitkt Parks and Recreation 01reetur expl aa-d that the
pi t t Kali cippears to meet the Citls, expeotations for
park , -!eds and developmentIn this area.
Chairwoman Vait tou r `coq at d 'Mr. 3ohn Man, IfowArd Dahl-
grien & Associates, r r nt n the p t .1t ion r Mr* Ua in
preseated graphlos and disoussed the location of ` the proper-
ty with respect to the relattonshlo of adjacent, land uses
the proposed r, uidiact As, It relates to tine existino. Quid -
dad hoar the petitioner developed tae proposed Coticept,
Further), Mr. Man reviewed tae site oharactrlsticsnclud-
in that portion located withla the Floodplato Overlay Dis-
trict. It was explained that development ar would be
platted for developeat, by others, than ;,the petittoner. The
other parties mould have to "execute" a manaf.jement and
development " r work" for consistency aand control of the
total 4evelopment.
3
Ae evi :c r the coordluatton of the proposed
the it r i i a: lans or mark; ire this
mri the fraPf . laqullred what s,wki v the
onstruoted as Intended If vartous areas are sold
hers.: . bcin stated ha the'owner would have to adhere
to the tipproved PJI.D. aa With sulsequen "n, for Ow
itiiai site plan5 for each of the development are<<s Viso,
vir. Ubdn referred to the previously jo;je,,j manaqemejIt
fr4mevorkwhilch would bojaeorpordted t;ttol the purchase
a xr 1 was xplain teat' frpetitioner has enter-
edd a i* lrr with a possible buye for the ov -
ww;ft of the project.
Chairwoman Vdslllou expla acid the pii,a lon p es on
stages of the P.O.R. vii from m*ept Pl,ans through fi r i.
Chairwoma Vasilliou, openedthe Public fledriog.
Davv Cavanaugh, 3-105 Miaqdra Lees, inquired why Mtaoare Lane
yid be exteaded to, ; Aven,te North.
Stiff x .fr that he City l,q adopted Thomuqhfare
aFr ie a e the extension of 34thve North to
provide adequatc traffic circulation In this area, nd that
the extension of Ris a s Une 18 antle!'pated to offerbetter
i culdton to the existiog sinole family residential area
and trot -is a alternate access, for the hiqh density develop-
lent
evel p-
len Commi i nerPlufka and Pauba ` concurred with staff
that batten ci is : 0 is needed foxy(-, existiliq 5jjjqjv
family 4vlea to ''nhuuiothe acnessihillty for safety pt,
Mr. Cavanauqh expressed coir€ ern that vehicles are,
l i f.i
utilizioci the e connection of Miaqara Lane to Plymouth
Boulevard aero,,--s the r deat'lai yard. Also, concern was
e-xpressed that the e: t n o ii r*-i Une, would result in
dn I noreaw in traf1c"
Staff ;parr that the intensity of the subjectev i p-
Men is located ` north Of 34th Avenue, and generally on the
t portion of the property. the increase W traffic that
would occuronori Magara Lane should primarily be a result of
traffic from the existinqstagle family residential drea.
bro)v
Cavanaugh* , . awood doe, stated that he did not,
cell a Oop v of the Pa ti Rearinq otjc e aad is withla
the - ft-distance of the clb je(A property. Staff verifled
that d fleariilqotic; wa seat for tit re. ideno_,%
t av,tai r W. . P av a aa qua Iia I den 'ey who
wds listed es. fee owaer of the property.
Mr. Ciiv an aaa as inquired If the existinct s is q egam y. !
d aoi S, would be respo-Usible for le'vied as, a
result 'of the proposed road chart a t .caaa. Staff explained
that eaoh developer re ponslble for the goon tr cit on
toosts within the site.
Cavaviatiqh inquired If than exit,-tinq a as in the South
ceat _3 area a s the property woulda be dredqed to the
explained that the 1C011icept Pl<jvt atiticipates retention the
pondlinq areal.veee ,, some dredqlaa may take p l ace In order
to r-ov tea`~ existina weeds, The Intention Is to retd-*t)
the adtural ameattles In this area
a aaaaa hinquired if ala sits* bufferlogi Is pro osed for
the atigh densttarea*, Chairivoman Vasiltou explaj jed that
at the 'rell all ry plaolplat staqell, a preliminary 1endsoape
Plea 'is required. t t as tae final Plans are prepared,
the petitioner is required to addressuch Items as detailed
andscaptog-,
Ratricia, Hdbeckj Lanewood Esus, seated the present
r l as e pattern an xi aaqp a aat car t'.saes, eav
rai a . She AInquirei, If the proposal .W nc_j,
existinq drallnaqe problems. Staff' explai,ned the ` .t '
eu r aat; pulley Is that e c,a develt)ppleilt Is not allowed t
produce a re, drdIndqe onto Ajaeeat property without
appro, trate ponding desI44a and e ata >ats. Area draitidoe
iieeds would e ray lamed in more detail with the net statle
lazes..
Ddrlene Hesse, 3315 qa a Lane, obsevied that Kfaqara Lanae
was not at t t extended, to 4t Avenue North y
the ,idopted Citi Park la as_, She expre-is-edconcern -with the
tri lo aod stated there he ,a as or stop Sjqas alonq
these oad .:a ra a as-t Vasitiou revltevved the ` t
unc t I; o.'io that as a petition for a strap Sion is
r , the .iceD art eint ivould col a t c a tudy
to determine the level of tra 'e.
Planning commission
Feur19'miz
Stof f explaiaed that , now that a de,,elojymeiit other thaa perk
ac(*ess to the s1nqU,, famlly residential area. Staff
explalaed that Riagardne Is furthrotathe h
densityy area, furthest froma nttt ipa ted. park sttrootures, and
there are iwo,proposed residences to be lot,'atede later -
Section
a . -
c on aq ars loan and 34th Avenue North.
Ms. Hesse 1"quired if the City has $pe l f loot loos or oolde-
lines for skok family detachedunits :which would h
10raUd Inv the north Side of the extstinq "Cavanaughnay
Addition". n". Sh noted conceras with existing developments ` In
the City which do not rwovide qaraqes* It was expIM-nd
that the City teforres the Uni r; Phildtaq Oade and the
City Ordladacy requiremeats for pdrktaq and e ac ks. The
C does arca leqistate a particular desiqn or , alue
requIrc=a etits, awid quirages-zre not requiredfor sinqle family
homes.
Chet Hukdasoal iM M-agara Lane, stated that he shartxd the
expressed nc eraas about e endi nq Mlaq4ra, Lane, to the
as r , a. He recalled that,,, with the "Fox Me-.idowsll development
the pe itioaer did not dedicate the expected acres for
drk purposes. Re indicated the City shouldhave some
assura-aee that tae land- would e dedicated With thi
proposal. Staffff ex a taaed aadevelopment ra<cee
he Final Plat would not be MY without the load be nn
dedicatedtec the City for pari, purposes, the previous
second phose to the 'Fox Meadows" development did not
r c ee therefore, the anticipated parkl4nd was not
dedicated,, cap
passibility of the existlaq siaqjean y resideares, belaq
required pay for constrvetion of 14th Avenue North. Staff,
explained that the actual constructiontion st anti details for
34th ANlaUe 'North will e reviewed with the prellmliiary plod:
st4qe iiheat It edit be determioed what is actually t.ned for
r is -of-w,4y and road purposes. Then,, the construction
would e reviewed the City Council mad, the Assessment
mmitt ae in Wer to determine who wodde Involved in the
06alstruction Payment.
Staff explalaed that Mr. 3ehnson's, property Is ouided for
com erodevelopment,, a.Rhouqh there Is .in exi tint e
ora y residence on the property.
Mra talAVIlvie,12*25,er-a re ae Lane,, expressed ' oncern that the,
Fox eadovy "' development O e e d" o beaWful area. fIe
stated .hat the neWhborhood Is verbaut.;erne with the
potv;itidl impact e-vreamen of this property.
Minutes
ebrodry t
Mr,. I%aesuqqested that the vatire site be donated to tile
City for park.
Lea Muehleisen, 12ad Avenue- W rtht stad he thou011t
the It 'w wise to ujted = the aced as park, and expressed
coix- rn that development would olminish the amount of lend
for park* He requested that the City retain the exist
Mr. tieh els6n expressed centern tith the extension of
Nidgara Ldi.ej, diad the possibilityt that the h1qh density
residentiat area residents ause the ` extensi,011 as e
alternative access.
Chdirkyom<ln east liou loquilred when improvements dre scheduled
for the Hiqhway, ,and -494 'Intersection. ' a ' " explained
t hat -1 3 It It ted that turn- ne rc v t s
ivotild be cond, and W, 1964 the exi5ting bridoes should
be wi4ened.
Rick Raphael, 3320 Niagara- Lees$ stated that he shared the
t oace i s expressed about the extension of NjapardLane
iooasiderivq the proposed d us ty, existing traMe on Fern -
brook L-3ne, and future. stgnalization of oath Blvd. He
stated he thouWat res.' -dents %yo -d utilize the Hllaoara Lane
extensloa as an alteraatt,,e access.
rRaphael Inquired ir the residents would be notified o
the. meetings with the Q.ontinued' review,, prwess. Staff
explained that notices would be sent at the prelimilaary plat
taqe,, as well as at the site plan staqe for the multiple
reald nc s.
Ar. Raphael inquir d shout the, design st ada ds for 34th,
Avenuerth. He, also stated cacern with impacts f the
development upon house values which have appreciated.
As c ssth s s -ts for road construction.. t wto as
s q st d that Mr. Raphael's q e t on be directed to the
City Counotl Asses-sment Committee,*,
Mr. Raphael inquired if the pare areto be located within
theop d quided area,wouldd be edieat d to, the
Cl.. t was explained thAt the amide Plan
tf 4thveourcc
North. he parklarild proposed within the LA -1 ouidedLA-1o areas
would be dedicated to the City for pari purpose,*.
lRactc Z4
ha st expldlaed that the, ' the parkland N ith
in the LAQ 4reas would suparRe the proposed slaqle family
tach d lots from the roadway and add an d(lditionol buffer.
eorge Watroos, 1030Ond, A,,e ue North, requested that
dKeloper establi5h 4 Staimum square footage of floor space,
for the proposed stngle family Stached esideo-,
requested that as the City CoutteleonsIders the )rvpo
riNuiremeat be established that the previo,.*s, landscape
requtrements for the "Fox raQws " he completed
ore this area develops. It was requested that the Sty
reiiew the 1woposal, to 4ssure that the existlingg aqe
problems would not be compoua o* it was rcquested
that the total number ni he reduced by chanoloo the
proposed LA -4 guldiaqto, eit L03 quide elseclass! fIca On.
Mr; t t 'requested than an alternative.O.rculation route
be utilized rather, Van exteadinq Waqata Lane.
Cereld Zandeq 1310 Lanewood Lees, stated he did not like
the pvoposed Weep! Flee; end preferred that the raved
OR Plan be followed, He statedthat he lhouqht the park
coot -, be -oo t uat o tified on the approved Perk Flee
if o bond issue were pe ea d again.. Concern was expressed
abo4it the draloatle areas. Mv Zander stated that develoO4
eat would increase the QkWage, andwould present more
problems.Feels the exteasion of NlaqaraL,ane will
lacrvase the ;wcessibility to the, restdential area, and
possibly lett#rea the v rime rte which Is very jow.
lie. suggested that the previous l ct tNa for Niagara tone be
reopened € ve-w, entrance from y tBlvd, lie seq.-
ge t d further, that Rlaqara ; ane be cu - ;old ' and an
additional esidenc oould be constructed. t was rskits
that the lot sites be a minimum of t to -half aces In size
Scause of the low lead charActeristies. tie swoestedthat
laindsoaping, And, berming be t i to Isolate the ftiqh
nsit area. Concern was expressed, 'that this vel r did
not complete the previous requirements of the "rox Meadows"
development.
aader also stated his A neera that the developer ralaht
not pay for ;that on t not on of J4th Avenue North.
Page
Februam,,, 1983
00a Lasso, 25 Niagara La;%e., stated that lieu a r
tt a for a secoad aeeess to the - Wqle rj ached ,resj'
demi-il area, horever, his choice would be to have Mti
Lane re'eannect- with Plymouth Blvd.
I r . Hdbek expressed coot' a that ;she was previously,
iaformed that the property to the north of the "Cavanaoqh
Addition" ivould be developed as park, tad sheje(:A he
prop ed apartm,eAts and I. -Atenst e k vel -7 tt
Chairwoman Vasillou Oosed tete Public Hearinq.
the Pikinalfig Commission recessed from 900 .0'. to 11.45 R.M.
airwomaa Vasillou Li r -ed If Or. Bolgarde was present
ohn Man, stated that he and Mfr. Hell Polstelfirt, Attomed
repre,sented the petitioner.
C 3mms lti tagnu inquired It the applicatioa nau beet.,
e Parks and Recreation Advisory C n,
FRAO. Staff explaitned that the application was scheduled
for review at PRAC'sThursday t February 10, 1983 meet t'n.
At that time, .A ill develop a formal recommendation to be
forwarded the i n 1.
a nu$ Inquired if e Commission had discussed
the development previotisly. Staff stated that in. lets 198,2
I ' informally discussed the petition and it was found not
to t4 lit conf r aoce with the City's phos. Therefore, tete
petitioner isc these plans with Staf f an 'this result-
ed W the ro is -d Coneept Plan., Staff explained that
would review the proposal to, determine if aldequate land area
t i td be dedicatedtrwet the park steeds for this, dreams
Commissioner Wire inquired about the elassificat.1oft 4th
Avenue North. It was explatned that the road was classified
as `a, collector street wh eh has ,i different desiqn than
residential street.
Commissioner . to r laquired of Mr. 11ban why LA -4 density
wasdeemed r ria for the n r_ --east fir. Ob, a
explained that seers are approximately 15 acres which are
qi - eve m t . w .servo a an extensionfrom he
high density area to tt smith. They propose to chains the
oafiou atl t the, LA -4 tit area Ift order to separate*
tete high, as areas from the single familydetTio'hed
areas, s, a n coasiderdtion of thetype of adjacetit road*
ernhr k Lane) and, internal roadways (34th venue ,
aulticipated de elopment of a larqe open park area, n
PrOxIMIty to the Powatowa Plymouth art -a.
le '1
e ruat , 19,053'
Commlissioiter pada taquired what in, pact the development a
h e Oft the AAticipated sewage flows. Staff expldlined that
he developme,a . would r re a e the sewaqe i owever
he 1aacrea e, shotriotpresent a capacity prohlemi, PaJ-
rraaer Maqnus laquired If the de elopmenCwoutd require that
the Its ids,*€a l `s antother area which could not developas
result of the Increased savage `lows.. staff explained -that
t he:, Ie Is physical, capaoity In this sewaqearea to s ecom—
a a e the proposed develop1ment. lhe development should a t
result in restriction of developmentof other farad wi hira
tht,, vier . The ietr p li ar cuould review the
0-verall effect of the requidtnq apart of the romprehensive
Plail,amendmeat Pr cx "
Cvminiss oner Wire minded the members thatotherid' In
petitions were deated or limited based upon ewa e flow
a r a Staff explained that In those, pet IttI Otis, it Nyould
have resulted in 11mittlaq developmeat In another area whi-ch
wo-1111d have : b eta deelwpe. Staff Ide-ntifted that the
Metropolitan Council ectad determine that the proposal would
ascr(ase the sewage flows and request that com era n, be
offered y limiting development in aaot aer area,, Chairwoman
a ll y nlrme that the property Is located wit ,tare the
r r a a Service Area. a.
Commissioner a as inquired how,many additional ata would
be co a rup et ds, the result f this development In comparl.1
cava Mth the previous approvals.Staff explained that
approximately 15, acres is guided for h1qh era t -y Ovelop_
naen a d. range acre. e
would result in approximately ` 150, to 300 homes* The current3
proposal oalls for a total of 50,0Y dwellinq units,but
Involve& mQre laud for development.
Commissioner este requested ddilti na Infornation on the
oevelopment framework". ; Staff ' explained gest the City
requires that .he pJ. , plan be filled ivith the Cityl and
that arab subsequent development mtjst conform to the approved
p ia: ilthought the City covld consider formal amendmerits to
he approved plan. This developer has Indicated, khat beyond,
the requirements of the approved platit they pr o e 't
develop a framenvork that would he followed. Mr. Il tan
expldined that it is intended the framework riot d estahlish
provisions for landscaptaq rah irac other ar hl
tontrols.,
ageR`7
PlanAlaq'on'.' Isstoll f-lioutes
Cornmissl*oiier Wire asked Mr. Uhtan how the petitlooer would
coatrel the remilataq development of the px*-oject once it is
sole to lndi ldualdevelopers. Mr. Uban steed that the
la;id woald be sold with the development frare ork. i or-
h purchase emen 'a ss a i ar ar °-
dif h( -a petitioner wouldo"sib the use of eovenan-t-soil
the property. Mr. ,l arand c hE: w s Yz
hatrviomda Vasillou -:tc1Zej1 that < was coocerned about
enforceinent of the develooment framework, she stated there
has been a level of d sc . expressed regardtoct the
developor's failure to complete djaoeat
evelopm, en r. n stated that ; < of the
pros- ss he could riot make any furtherassuraaces, thanhe has
It was explainedthat the petitioner does riot own
FOX MOWS" now, -arid teas would riot be Involved ivith, an
Improvements here,
CWIRMUSSiOneT Igni s requester lChat staff conimtent ori the
traffic circulation at Fernbrook Lave and Hioliway 55. Staff
reviewed :h a era circulation t ins for the City and
the aRtic1pdted Improvements to, "Kqhway 55.
onal$$tone a oompiented 114hat there Is land alonta n -
1.'U0 Lane others than this property which will develop and
increase raffll<"
MOTIONssioner Haqaust seconded by Pommissioner Wiree
to take lon oar h ' i ion. VOTE CN dies. Commissioner
Stelgerwald absent. MOTION carried.
Commissioner Wire stated that he htconcerns with the
proposed guiding and densities.
MOTION by CommissioaerWire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus
to recommet-ld denialthe proposed requiding based on the MOTION TO DENY
r s n -s that the development woulduinduly Increasethe
demand upon the remalAingsewer capacity for the ly, before
1990, and that the proposed density is too high', for this
area.
SUBS111UTE MOTIOU ho s 'oar h , seconded by
Ch i r wOmd r VasillQu to defer action on thee } i .oar pend: nq SUBSTITUTE ION
redesign, decreasinq the amouat of LA -4 quidelarea, thus
cutin the IMPaCt up0n Ute "wer f loivsl- and,,econslda-
i a, of the proposed nsion of Niagara Lane.
K" ed tha t JAs H011014 would allow the,
petltloaer the}ait t -Ixeiv 'teathe proposed reociest
a r:th the C"It Couilell, Chainyortian'Valitiou noted that
should the Commission eiaction gra the ? h
Public Hearin would be r nt cede Staff sumlested the
sIon discuss the aw h t f the deferral with the
pet It laae*
Mr. Ubao stated that the deslign detaIll fair Nlaqa a as
Couldl be further lavesti(pated In the next stage of ttle
P.0.0. process. The proposed density LL iyever, is firm area
the number nit has eeaecreas d dad the amount of
cat ,a has been the aas , s ace the Initial ns
a ere submitted t the t X ed
for the purpose of reduclaq deas.'
O ort shst tt I t i ` deaction `cera the
Roll Cdll Vote. Coimm .ss oners Stullber,4 ANe,, Commissioners U1 (K rAIL3,
0'aqnus, aaa at: ,a. , t ca
Commissioner Stelger at hsent . NOTIONO fay .
Commissioiler pluft-a stdtAed that , the Conml4ston needs ` to
idewntiflv specific e s n as to why the proposed ouidino, is
riot appropriate aad ashy the density, Is too high stated
that if t is, determined that the proposed : parkland td-
t o a is satisfactory, the City will Saeed to determinewhat
type of development €para occur on the rematninq larid.,
oraaaaa ssi otterWire stated, that his dance ras Involve the ver -
all denslt v and the impact on the Citv sever capacity, the
traffio geaerdtiontand the proposed loedtion, ti al position -
Incl of proposed quided are4a.
The. Commission discussed the -alternatives of reducinq the
amount of LA-4and Itacreastog the amou at of LAIutile area
Aa well as loeatinq the LA -4LA-4strictly adk° acent to the xist-
development to than south.
Chairwoman Vasillou stated she felt the taloreased sewacle
raf Was too thigh. ommissl ares a #rus aqreedf and stated'
cencicera with the proxlmiitof- to the park
Staff explatned the amount or sewaqe flowIncreaseas between
x 1,Ala q quidlaa ' and the proposed (juidi q.
Roll Call VOTE on the mdla MOHOW,Ayes.mm ssion r VOTE ON MAIN MOTIM .
P ufka Hay, Commissioner teIgerava 4 absent. MOTTOM TO DENY
edrriMOTION CAMEO,
NEW BUSUILSS
Chairwomait V st t.uu i atrodueed the reqf,,w-t submitted 10vLUNMHER MOTHERS
Lu adarea Brothers Cowatrkwftioa CaMp4any fow as -tial Pat aead M*
LotChi- t rww a Vy isl rt,,ferre t o tie, FINAL PLAY AND O
y.yip ,
uConsolidation.
33y + yF"uat ID rk' R -Addet '4 ati kF %. h KARiR,{i.S %, ^' ;. 'T'A'X: staffF
gy
yq }y
iR#Yr b 7e'
report for the propowd applivofkt' wtacias was written to WILLOW OEM" (-$2045)
expo as,. to, cru respo ad qac: em. i? —efrom the pet t k .ae
d t ed February %
staff explotaed that staff coacerl Is the samt, as expressed
at the preliminarynary ptaat stage reoVardtaq, Outlot A.
Sherman ColdheroLundgren Brothers C. Cuz p n), j,
stated that the petitioner is c o accrit d that the outlot is
taro taroe aad t cau d become a lldbittt,, for uite property
ut iaer. ter. Goldberq also commented, that with feren to
number TO iia the t.;a la`s t em ndum., e petitionerhas
re-eiv d a letter rom the Army0 r p s. of Unaiiieers ifnitch
em is tes the steed for d p mlt. staf f stated 4 C00Y of
tai letter should be submitted for theCity's fates.
Mr. u d jJndte t d that the culvert referred to to item
number Z*7-AZ-Aof the _niat "s memoraaduM is .)ot totally
Within the petitioner's property. it Nvas suqqested that the
petitioner fneet xvath st.Aff prior _ to this applickation beliaq
forwarded to tit a_ C'uuncl t to address this item. st
keit .a m d at Mr. (Ioldber(I's request that the drive -way
referred to o i t m of theEaq iivi e ' Me orima u
rata u Ot beyoad, the proposed '.474.0 contour. Tt eref are, the
drive tt sit t c ons-tt+u ' app up te .
Staff stated that if the Planta>acj Comm sstaan endorses the
proposal to allow, Outlot A to, be owaed by the IS sitiqle.
family r side ace oviaers,, that it require City Attornplt
approval othe appropriate rest rtot,uas to a,,
ssureO
Cownissio-rier PIufka stated he did not support the proposed
owner -ship, by 15 owners witless, there is a leae.1 assuci t uat
formed, Commissioner p u a, aqreed.
NOTION o m ssione tin g, secondedd omm $$I ogler REMMKNOATION, A
lufka to reeommend approval of the proposed Findl plat and
Lot its 'A'J t' on too 11111 w end" sub ect tit t
conditions as stated lea the staff report with the addlition
of item aumber 11 tr, ,rovide that, either the petitioner
eret..',n Assoolatiba, with eppropriate duc:um acts to address
the r trate aduc. t l of $ or ut of A shall be gads part
of proposed Lot i, Block 11 as noted Int the Enqtaeerls Mema
and Council prelimfadry plat approval.
iqV, .'
11i'anaLig Commission 1,11ilutes
Vis; br'k. ar t _ 5
aa on rt er "A - a absent . c"a -1 VOTE..
y
M
chdirwomikla Vdstllou tatrodijeed the request a tted b, Pla r - CAR -LAR PROPERTIES
dr Properties, n _called that thistea was reviewed by MID PRELIMINARY
the pla;IaLIQ at their 3anuary IZ, VS3 meetina. PLATIPLANI,
e Co mmilissloa deferred atitlon caaat a t the matters reqardliv.1 AL USEPERMIT AIND
the ood a a ,ad bear and Manaqemeat , had been NUN MOT1 ZONAL 0
addressed b t , atlenole a-, a,ol dj inclufta tv, t. .. t PERMIT PER SMI
deter i ae whatI, tf animpactwhatthereHaatbeupontheplanO ,
design. Rtadia(i of the 'January 7% 19R, staff report was OROJH,*Cf(SM, 13)
I''Va v e
Chdirwon aaa Vast Hou r ),e, anized r. Creq Frank, t c o ehs--k- ut- as- -acat-
stutstua Assoel4tes, reseft Ioq Gar-Ldr Properties.Mr., ° as
explai a d that Subsequent to the Pt,,Anniaq a, X19
y t a the t t t n r, coy ts a Itants), r pr -lIt at Ives from.
the Department of Nattiral, ResourQesand %sett Preek
the f toodplativ requirements, the appropriate doicumentation
was foriva,,ded to 1f- R whIc satisfied. &et concerns. a'•..
The buildLi t acs tioa for those whloh Impacted the or aaad
ndoemegat Area have been relocated to comply with the n
m 50 foot set-baok requirementestablished, by the DNR. The
MIR has ub itt d a letter Wdioattrig that they recommend
approval the plana* There remain, two unit.s which steed to
be raised one foot In elevation In rde to comply%YIth the
Bassett Creek Watershed nageme tt eavelope, • r. raaa
stated this would be d000mp t I shed so that all of the unitst
would be sdtisfActorilv loo to
tor. Fraiik noted tbA condlition number TZ, of the proposed
Resolution, hind be corrected to delete the reference, t
tete development consistiag of 44 quddrdmifiiumsand 28 duplex
units. ihe development chase consist of 7Z units,,, however,
t v are townhouse unit -s* Staff Indicated this change would
he completed prior to tbiss Item proceedliql to i' ty CoujAc,11.
Commissioner Magnus ,nquir d what the maxitaaum size, of the
le-oacwegat Ion of the churchrch wo d be. Mr, oh,n Far noi j
Trt,sideat of the con regat.on Indicated tete church todd
c o a i t , do emb r'. , lie, further irid,io ted that the
future growth Could perhdps reach n approxlmdte of ?50
Members.
ssl otter fvta uxus iii(julred if it would be tappiropriate to
at 0.&N# $ 6,,
gg#
454 % #1i4 CSA6. .Ss.,.cd f &;" - .b. Y $ i kw 'tu4. tomn nd V
ed. iStiff.. 'xpla Y ed, a detailed r g (n..o cess o 'o
4ttorodl streets would he onside tip i t)f t form,11
ia## . lc¢ L
y ' $} " ;
y'*
i44tpk##'`+ gyYpps
iy'ig`
galso {
yy,'
pqupa
Fg
ya;} }§
ky$ ggsyyjg'
yyyy
g Iq'g}g qRI t 8#,M D4{l ml,tri+$: he (+„TRR R. 94i.R a4. A. w.ti i. kM betwoe; ak -3.. 8^r l#.-i x'44 .. ad- the
rl-sidentlal ualts to the west.
re w as
al of the MMIR
Pldai'Plotj, Conditionai Use Permit, and the Couditloaal Ilse
t9 i 5.lad.lto na.,f.4cFbe s and `qr e
ROMP OF MING
serve ho resect.1tty n. the floard of Aminqjust- APKALS
meats
Me Gummi oa reviewed the meettaq, schedulet r u wee
The meet aq 4itUo xrne 4 - .fit.
R[COMMENDAT 10H
PPI CONDITIONAL PERMIT ANEUMMEN7FOR BRAD CNAPH FORARAM 1MJ1 HOW -
6
HH`WASS the City CowicAlpro -,A Coitditlonal t1se Permit and Site throuci.4
Resolu-tion No. 75-67,19; aad
WNFRENSj, Chazin has roquested appro al ofnditio kil tlse Permit Amndmeat to
coastruct a douthle garaw at the Hazeldon Ploaeev llouloceed.. 15 #5 36th Avenue
North; 4nd,
H. . a missiotj has re-v,le-wed, said renuest at a duty odlleOPublic
HC drtaj 3;td3;thas ~ tonne de approval;
NOW, THLREIMEj HE 11 MALAY R-L'SOLWO BY THE MY COUNCIL OF THE: CITY OF PLYllouTt4t
MINHUSOTA, that It shouldndhereh y does 4pprove the reouest of Brad Chazin for
tuidit i n Permit Ainendment for 14azeldon Pioneer House to ronstmor a dou
qdrdQe at 11505 36th AveLnup florth whjec o the followlsia conditions.
1. the permit is sobject,o all applicable eodes, reaulations andOrdinances.
G4 The 5iteshall be maiatalaed la a saalltary manaer,.
Copli-arlee with orlqinal Covditional Ilse Permitand 51te Plait approved
stated,in Resolution No. '75-678.
COMMISSION -0014ME ND ION MR FORU, 1983
it
St-JTING CONDITIONS I0 OL MF.-T PRIORF11-1141a AND ARt WA PLAT "WILLOW ND"
OR LUNDGREN 13ROlHERS ONSIRUCTION COMPANY, W. ?045)
WHOLAS, , the Citi Couooltl ties „;lonroved the Ffnat Mat and Development ` nt scat for
OWt 1HEREFt.RL, 83L 11 HEREBY RLSOLVED fly Im- IV-Iv A cotjwxu. OF - `T Y Of PLYM6111141
MINIMLS01A, that it should and hereby does elirectthe folowlaoto b met or'or t
Compliance with the City nilaerl s Memorandum.
41 kttr Qf park4edLeation fees-i - " of dedication n -$-4 .°'.1anc * with City
Policy ta effect at the time of °i llaq the Final Plat.
Ho Butldiiig Permitsshall be tssued, untilni,(I sewer and water ars
t h tally. to the sites.
Removal of aH dead or dyinqtrees`rm, the property at the, owner's h tts .
hard setbdck 'iarlaaces are greeted or implied.
Submittal of require(:, utZlllty and dra-Aiaqe easementsapproved by the City,
Lnqlaeer prior to fillaqthe, in Mat.
1-1 ,
a q Issue until the incl Flet I filed and c ct d
street name, shalt comply with city Street Haminct q_ tem and be named,' 1123rd
A"venue, North".
i ae existing (, 'to the existinq, sinaley dwellincr, shall be elim1ndted
oad a new access Thall be pro,.Jded to the proposed public !)ad. -
10, the existinq eecessory struiAure to be used is lieu of construction t eiler
shall be used until the property is developedt or tares years which
ever occurs first.
11. Approval of the variance frota the d1A.,u ,-1t maxima cut-de-sao lenoth of 500
feet n ptib is f 6feet,
111. t shall h ,t d with Lot 5t hock It'Sunny Acres 31rd Ad it; ton
When t , fWal Plat ts-Filed.
Prov-ode nat * anther the pet'itioner oreate aa Association wit., oppropriate
o#,im,b at to address tate maintenance, oF Outlot A,. or that Out t A he made
airt of proposed Lot It Alock 1, as aoted in the fnqlaeer's MemorAndtim and
City Council Preliminary Plat approval.