HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 01-12-1983CITY OF r! YMOUTH
PLAMING COMISS100 MINUTE.
RV 12t
trot= retluldr meeti;14 of the Plymouth Planninqot t o was
clalled to order 4 P.M'.
rtt 'tc'tervmald . fldub . RIUMA. MW11AIS dill
i re
siooe
STAT 4 z Community DeNelotvientArrector
OTIONby -missi oner Pauhal, seconded, `)y Comitsstoner etre
to approve e Alautes of December tl'V' me(Ati ` q els ub-
itte VOW 5 Ayes. Plufka ;ibstaia'. Com-
PUBLICPUBLIC M:RNG
h l %i orqn Vasilliou Introduced the request submitted by rwar- GAR-LARPROPERTIFS
zr "" opertles for dot VhP00 Preliminary Pl t 'anj and ron- REVISED, RPU KIMTR-
ditA "'L Ne it € r a development noon a P . R/P. ` AMT
4eadows#% A review of eo m e 98,1 stdffreport was CONDITIONAL 11SE PUR81T
quested. 'Staff explained a related4ppli ati o for a FOR "WILLOW, WADOWS"
tat ot.oc o €a t, jon w1thin the 80013
U o tptala Overlay i3t xle is on the aqenda. It Deas noted
the approved Concept. elan*
Staff txplalned tthat tit accordance with the City Ordittances,
and Stdtelaw, t propoul was submitted to the Department,
of t t l Resotirces fore w.t l" Qorrespond-
eiMu from the Depdrtmejit of t4dturdl Resouroesn, this
date and spolke with Mr. Luethe of the MR staff who Ideati-
fted that there are certala subjects which, wdrrantfurther
isous i co for reqoired permits. From a Pldnatnq Comaission
stxi point , the dpplleatloo Is somewhat similar to the
Tipton Cnor t.to et t.-,keopt_ that this proposal cdjL
for builditigs to `v loedtcd within the ex till loco wa
District.
x
Paw
3atlu r , -18*
Charwoman vasi`'t nize ; Mr. Oreo IF'ra k, t i.,-Cum,3 -Knot *
soil noel ates `epres ` a ,int the)tkt tt *. wr «
stated eumpllanQe Nvith the City Council d4trections provided
with the oac _I 'approval, It was also explatoed.that
crtscr issoelxttes has enrrnin%vith the
Depdrtment of N"AtA ` ezouLice t 'amend uhf' f loodwaV
1*tr%, fraak explained thdte petiltionex, seeks approvalo
4eveothe at*ea out side cof the Floodplain zone priort,0
esu n the Issue of developlaq within, the Floodplain.
C trwomci it tinct-nqu r° what thc petitioner's response
iyo-tld be If the ropo ` is not approved MIR. Mr. Frank
sated that ;scoctton Nyould result lit tonly the eastern
irva of the site betaq developed.
dirwo n s pct questioned the effectiveness of the pro-
posed, open spavL-,t as entad ia the staff report
11.
1r. Frank
explalined t r is V1, is the petitioner's opliaton that thepro-
posal does qualify as 'a- Feta nit 'Develop -mega and that
les dn onen space amenity. The ponds art-.
loedted tit such a manner available within a recAsonable
ivalkinq distanceto the proposed residences.. The apse space
is viewed a passive recreation area.
fIrt, ria a s , Car -tar Py t l s exptal.ned that the
developer is not promising t i whteh will, not b
developed. Thi Intent )f the vet s srt is to provide
ao h1ousing within the City.
Commissionot, Pluf a, Inquired it they ,and east: of the. creek
Is desiqndted. within the floodway. Mr. f raokviewed the
limits oodpla n# strict. Commlss.'oner Plufka
expressed conte a about approyinq development prior ;t1o, the
issues beinq resolved the proposed plan mai he not be valid*
Staff ex pat that If the revise comments fromthe" a -
Wo ea y the Con
mendation, °testa would be, marllt in d rrilact action on the
request. If oot t the Commissloii could, proceed- with the
proposdl statl"q that the issue should resolved prior t
final plattinq. The 'car -mission sane -nthat
At In
plan belact revised u s u nt to the Public Rearinq. Staff
identified tit . an Environmental Assessment Worksheet 0,20
is required 'car_ this ojeet *
Chairwoman Vaslll a opened %the Public Hearing.
page
l anill aq ` n*lissl Baa Minutes
war "1?,, 1983
Kay t heft$ 4W5 Vlcksburq Urie North,, stated that she is
th. 'roperty towtaer or, the exception pareel as noted an the
submitted htcs. M'S. Stllvlaad stated she had questions
regdr taa the potentidl Impact of the Floodplata Di triot, on
the propcied roadwaya"e e Lane" and, the at' k d ae-
eess from Xene Lato her property),as a impact on hsv
14ad with respect to cut, and fillart-*as, and buFferlaq
the north to the e.tin si(fen r.rank- explained
h, t there are wire eut requirementsandfillorXeneLane
to, provide access to thea StIvIand parcel. Th (Iradino would
tie into the c t t t o qr h the t;1v t ay property. The
actin plan (toes aot call for any, pradinct south of the pro-
Imed buildinqst Kiorth of the StMand northproperty,,
thee. Mr. frdak explatited gest If for some teason a Condit-
loaal Use Pet alt were n tt° ar ,, that the thiole of
Xene Lane would. have to be t t to relocatethe roadway
ot-Atside they Floodplaln District howidaries..R .explained
that the Ordinance > t l t.,t the construction af structures
within th.ttoodpl laa Distrlieta however, In some areas,
ezotist r a e}t lon Of parkinqareas, streets, tl , , are s-
sable.
Mr. ran eXpIdined that his firm, has been In contact with
the nepartment of Hatural Resources with respect to this
application dfad he is confident that the,appHication will be
approved M.Niue tae Coadit!onal Use Permit is appro -
edl the petttioner would be ble to proceedwith the; itttaaq
dead grading of the site and suh,uently_proceed with the
necessary gat#aqchange.
h rrvo vw Vasiltou exptaiiied that theas at .t n, t
that a quaroatee izann t be vi that the
Merti*.- wuiald he approved1R and that up to this p ataat
final 'V-Itter ,_af approval has not bLe a submitted by the R*
airwo;aaaa Vasillou, otos d the Puthlio, tieartn .
MOTION by COMMSSIoner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner eine
to act on this petition tonight. VOTE 6 Ayes. as lssion-
r Stulberb bseat,. t-1,111-TOR carried.,
Commissioner Ure Inquiredthe ep a t int » o tunal
e urc, review of the Oplicdtion with respect to Shope-
land was due to ` the recently adopted OrdInaac !t af f ex-
plainedthat DNR revivived the petition with respect to the
Floodplain Dls"'-riot ii'nd Slvtoretaad requirements as stated !'i
ectlon the 7V-atria tea is e*
Page 4
The Depdrtm ent of Resources ul not necessartly
u t o.-s prxlor to the adoption of the t dlfadnce except that
DMI will be iovohed lit Une "eview (if the .,nvtronmentdl
Assessment Worksheet for thisoject. and Issuance of
permits for the work Involvinq weildnds aindthe plain.
Staff expldlaed furttherthat the review oommeats submitted
y the f ataDy artmel v isory-*
sem: g
wa
Yy„+
xReso
rces{
Stare
han" e' pat iz ii, 6 he 11 - vie ',3sf5zmt[ ,n NEV Ct Ld.i.#.".- .. e
Ah
s'h::,k.' -
In a tirdely. fasthloo -so that anv substantive ooncerns
could have been addressed, b the Commission tooitilit. Staff
calledalsoattentiontotheFj1qJaeer1stfemofortheat
Conditional Use- permit request. The Basset t' s; Creak Flood,
Contrut ummss on has yet to take na actio.-I oil the
ruv# s.
NMI 10H by Commission c, tieriv ttoad b Commissioner MOTION DEAR M
Mdcpus to defer action n this petitIIon unto the matters
Mv the Flood lain aad Shoreland 1114anaqeiftent have been
addressed , the agencies lavolvedt City staff*, t
determlite what, If day Impact there might be upon the pan
desig
Comiaxssllopier puna stated that he, agreed except, that i
Mine De Denefilcial to the petitioner to, expedites tbe, pro-
posdl.Al , items 16 and 17 of t t draft Resolutionseemed to
add,,oss the, ci s ' concerns,. Comrisstoner Plufka
stdied that slace the dest4a of the p uie t Is potentially
lmp4c-ted the. CommtssIoti should not proceed until all pertin- et .n-
ententreviews and ; of ton are available,.
Roll Call VOIL., Ayes. Commissioner Stulberg absent. fit :
NOTION cdrried.
Frank Larsen, Gar-Lar Peoperties expressed frustration In
t hdt he has proceeded In nood faith and p -v iced thenfor-
aat € requested b staff* The development is constrained
due to the time iovolved with publics Hearing publication
roquirementsi, and that the development finanoinq has eea
ina i e . Mr.. Larsen reiterated that the constiltinq
enviiieers have had discussions with DU and the Floud
Atss ua an are confident that the, permits ivy. t
e approved. r, Larsen .requested that the proposal he
passed subject to conditions..
tOf explaLied that the petition Nyould be placed on a, Plan-
n1ag Aqeada as "tem of Old Business, and that its. t v-
l4nd uould be noticed. Ur ga pu lleiLt on of notice was not
loll Vanuar, 121, 1981
Chdirwoman Vasiliou observed that all pr iairleaf iton
regardiAp this project have called out c aa r) t t ante ver t h Ord-
Liance flotidpiata requirements a4d that she inittal step: e1
do this lAdtrate the potential exists o plan redesini.
Thimoms . "a should have, the full benefit of such infor-
at. ria
haa'wo a i Vasiliou latroducede request submittedy, r- CAR -LAR PROPERTIES.
Iar Properties for Con(ti i nal Use Permit ow fill CONDITIONAL IRSE PER"IT
aad tso4yation of soilsmaterials within the flooAplaja TO VHAND; X AVAT
Wain for "Willow Nba w ". RAW_ of theOverlay "INWITHINTire, FLOODPLA
December 17, 198? staff repot was waived. VILAY D S . '
y
Chairwomao VastliGu opened and olosed the Public Heariaq; a
no one submit to
MOTION )c Commtssioner Stetoerivaldt secoaded by Commissioner M 09 TO OFFER ACTIO
a a a to defer action on this petition unti the matters re-
qardi"q the f loodpl la have been addressed y the avaoles, volt.,
tiat0ra rnat 1A)TION carried.
hal avca a"a Vastliou Introducede the request submitted by Pro-
y'o s Amendmentrdmned.Land, Inc.,e Cloider d
M)CRAKED AXIS J1NQ
C D PLAN,
a Playa"acid n tv.op ent Concept plan. The Plannincl Qapi- AVNDIR*0i AND RR1
mission, considered an applteation fbr this property ir. CONCFPT PLANI
Mareh, 19V at which time the Commission referred action PLYMOOTH PONDS"(61074;
requesting furth r r nfor mat t o a. Readloq of theec ember 17t
9 staff report was t:aived.
chairivotman Vasillou introduced Mr. Greq Frank, -nut 00)r
Associates re ese at. l at the t it ione 9 t ,k Frank dts-
cussed the existino site coaditionsf present 0401, an
ocat r "a of a sanitary sewer easement. ter.. Ft ink stated
that the petitiv,ier requested the Land Use (Aide fluke Amend- A aad-
meateat in order to crake the property developable., qtr~. Frank
also noted. the playa Includes the existing platteded got to
tie north which are ontiev,, eloped**, that the site was used as a
gravel pert for several years; the tree locations; and the
payn iia€ . Mr. Frank submittedubtt} that the' property
y{
wou
fci#ryxistiniqlehod
area to, the east to than ladustrial . tri t to the avast. It
was reviewed that ther evio applicatton, involved improve - m rove -
meatsmeat to tt,*e ponding, the submitted revised application does
not propose any MR, or hyrovvey its to the paean
slide presentation was given by Mr. Frank r viewipct the site
chdreeteristics, View ahots from various angles, an artist's
pater rtAat on of the site after development, and examples,
of vaits similar to those which have been built by the
petitioner in other communities.
Noe
RexplaIned that the revised r os e oz ?, the
Plait E. -I Identifies street°ohne tloa to 1Avzi e Ooth
ead does oot provide, a road, conneet on with 11th -Aveliue
he soutiieast coraet -of the Theecond concept plan
is Identical to the concept planMv n} y thePlana ia.
Co-nt t o' i 114rch, 19 . Mr. Frank re -coon , tit the
zieeoiid coot plan Is preferredby staff. fir. Frank stated
that the traffic ecl r t it of the projiM quldlllaq ivouH
result ta less traffic than If the property developed under
the o rr at quidlaq.
Mr. Freak explained t the developer understood that 'the
ared of the total potid easement viould be u4eable for , density
purpores. Hewtiver, sUff recalls that 1.64 acres of lane
was to be available fornsli purposes and not the entire
poad died. Mr. Frank the Planning Commission's d r-
t.toit dad statedthat such directIca was followed tai revis-
last to muterials. It was noted, that approxi. -
Mately M
r -
M t . of the site Is open area.
11"'hairkyoman Vdsillou openedthe Plublic He4rinq.
William Cape, V840 11thAvemie Horth stated that; he re -pre
Beets d QrouP or. ,,,osldents., Mr. Upp stated he
dppreintated the t t o r' -forts la meetinq withthe
aetghb(-,,rhnod. tie !fit -€fit ` there w jeaer l aqreemeat o
approximately to INM of the neighborst that ` the c villin
should remain as it 1!_. It i s qtd that possibly th
ent ire site oould be Quided, LA -1.
Mr. t to that if the LA -2.1 quidinqIts tri ped to b
appropriate by the Planning CommisistortIr Che r6sidents wer e
of the opinioa that the density is still too .hiqh. Mr. Lapp
stated that the traffico r tt n rmt , is misle4dina
In that the analysis is based upon the current P ouldilaq.
If the entire site was quided LA -11 the traffic Q eration
could be considerably less. Mr. Lapp stated that Concept
Plan . - t without, nnecti to 11th Aveatte t r; tit Is Pre,
e"ed.. He suqrjested that the developer requkde the JP land,
t ` LA-ItLA-It and sell the land to a single-family detached, 4
W9 reside cal developer. Mr. Lapp >stated the developer
purchased thc propertyn that the property c e
page
011a tfurphy`y t, 0 vie L a j t t a aat dto present
petition of mpt-Oximately 14 t` e fllanaino
Commission Upon receivinq the Public.,
tiedrtiiq Notice, ir.Murphy* and neiahbors determloedto N-
nul-at -ir pla of proposal e} )y "} jt wasssh +. in. r 'R Fi vs®i, F T6'e §.+..3'+*.."Ti' £4 .i7 FRii ".
deOlded that, Zheytheyare iiot in favor of the proposed Ltd -Z
gttid oq. Mr. Hurphy stated that the area Is an established
to $)bo hod of areola a;oily d t ch d develornments. The
aeiq'ibors are disturbed that the proposal call-for attached
dwe' lin units. ` explaiaed the qeaerall locatlon
of residences that vv r contacted to, sliqn, the petiltion. He.,
reque t d the Pidnniag CWS ; on accept the petitioal, and
deny the proposal. If the Commission appro%ves the proposal,,
the neighborhood would Like an opportunity to comment
ether.
Ne Ut Prio , 141. PloeviewCage, stated he was coneerned
h the traff*c-q-,iieratlon data and con(%-rae n th the pro-
posed 15th veaue entrance,,. qtr.' Pries stated that 15th
Av=enue North carriesconsiderablef and that h ount -
d the nuniber of vehicles ra elin the roadway h tW' ern
A.M. 4nd 8 30 Jt. this date. r. p .iky reported that k
vehtcles were counted. t t w t r a Fell company v h l e
have cu at need to use this roadway subseauent to h l (i
requested td use an alternate roapt . He stated that he was
of the oplition that the ff recommended ` c pt Playa vis
Chairwoman Vali to tinquired, of sir« F aaa . about the source
of the t Oflo.' e, I d t. a explained that
the prxAections were based on the, i "s Comprehensive play.
3ohn Seiler, V8,05 t. th Avenue North, stated that he did not
have addLtIondl contentsrom those that have already been
ubmtt d
3dhn Murphy stated that he disaqreed that there mould be
re duction as traf le ga t aa. « . a reiterated th t
the traffic iafomtitlon wasbased on the Comprehensive Plan.,
t hf: a3adevelop-eland today does gatenerate any traffic,
a T aXif thle a; ,d develops ist the future In a rd h"
nth the existinq quddiiiqof IP i ad LA -11 the traffic ner-
t d would be mute than If the laud is developod (I pl°000$-
ed.
Mr. Frank clarified that when the developer p rchased the,
p op . t i% t the property was pu d d for medium density
d v nt . h un the property wes, oAded -31
xd thea, requtded to LA -1 dyad p* Mr..Frank seated that the
lector, adway.
C a r Oman VdSMoki requested staff Is Input with respect t
e tr4fio generation Information. Staff explained tdrat
he data, are cMdlble and are based upon, the Comprehensiv
Pla;t. The existinq traffle.situation and concerns with 15th
4' iaae were recoo-tzed. Stalsostated that Or. dnlrc is
eorret't about his consents on the previous quidinqof .the
property* Staff coo- e d that the property could be devel-
oped today, within the currentu .d aq.
William Lapp stated that he was concerned i&ith the staff
con, . Qencyl t and Iaqutiedwhy the City did not Investioate
the proposal lit more detail for the nelohbors,, such as con-
ducting t
on—
du in raff c counts and moreIn-depth traffic, analysts,
Mr. Lapp sated that the atials .s should not be left to the
neighbors a they are not expertsi Mr. Lapp stated that the
facts should be analyzed rather than qetieral theories o
and use. He also stated that the developoer entered a busi-
nessns r sk- when the property was purohasedI as It relates to
ComiTtissioner PluffKa stated he did not acme pit r tap : s
o timens relating to the role of the Planningoms oa and
Cite. The !,11anning Cortmisslon's responsibility Is to re-.4iow
the proposal and It would be the City Couneills. responsIbIl-
Ity to address the ex!stinq traffic situation on
Y
arpi astated sufficient
laformation1has been provided, to the Commission.
Pat Brewlingtorif ,1030 Magriolla Lanestated she was contacted
by those person pr par c petition was submitted
earner to the s n,,, acid expressed conc rn with the
impact of the roads proposed to the development and ghat
the proposal should Include additional op -i sac„ aad the
existing neighborhood s hind be protected.
Bill cCor neyj.'975, Hademere Prigef staters; i residence is
located near the southeast corner of the site and that he
did not concur with the staff concern expressed aboutn-
n e*tln 12th Avenue North with the industrial: area. H
cited potential negative impacts of extendincl, 11th Avenue
due draia.o ands`ort
also sated- that additional 'roach upqradtaq =ray be needed
sometime in, the future c r the existing roads 10 the dov i-
opme proceeds
CarChristensen., M15 Oakview Lanae, stated he was concerned
about the potential impact of the proposed units on the
existing traffic st a ion, and that the., overall impactO
the project must be considered. Mr. thristeasen inquired
if tete value of the proposed homes was known. Chairwoman
Vasill a stated that the developer may offer arc op3ntlaft,
however, the City cannot require that homes be of a nor a n
value or sale price.
PIld"'lainq Co"o.15$10* Minutes
Mr. Woyae SachMdn,Programmedndj Inc* 1, stated that the
pries would be within the ed-lum mage.
Mr* Christensen suggested gest 15th Avenue Morth be cul -de -
Sao Id. t1e ex st I aq r road t r t she City ni1 I
policy nduct nq taddr studies In poo-*traf f i1c areas way
d cap.
Mr. h:hat the valvae of the existlaq, area homes
are in range $250,000.
Cha r aman Vasiltou, closed, e PubRearinct.
Mdqnus to Wke action on this it aaa,. VOTE 6 Ayes. Commis-
sioner Stulberq absent. MOTION cu r l
Com-missiorter Ste1qervyuAld; requested h staff review, the
r o,mmen of acctv aq, a conneotton, to -Avenue
North. Staff explained ` that with such a connection* it
could expected that silmilar traffic as to 15th Av v
would occur. n develops,, aaaa
wil 11 be Improved as n Interchanne., is scheduledfor -494
and Countycx 15- and, I Ith Avenueor extension, has
been dilticipated to be used for residential traffle circula-
tion. 11th Avenue North is temporarilydead ended. Staff
explaitted, further that support Is qiven to provid1inq a con-
aev,tlon with 11th Avenue. to Insureemerqeacy vehicle access,
residential raffle circuldtlon,, and accessfor maintenance
seryIces. Commissloaer Steloerwald cotifitmed that the up-
gradinq of Pineviewan s not anticipated In the current
Capital.Improvements rooram.
Cormissioner Wire stated he did not feel that bontus potnts
areappropriate,,,hd a a negative bonus point would e
applied dare to the size of the project. Commissioner Wir
stated that originally he thought a potential a neetton at
12th Avenue North was a good ideas but after further co-
erationfie` felt 11th Avenue North should be eytendeda
originally Intended. possible(,stion, Commissioner
Wit I r e a td t ev perhaps U- Ecul--sae could bie located ar. the
outh, eliminating :, coonettlon to 11th Avenue,, and still
not 00nnect 12-th AvenueN11or with the lodusirial area.
Chairwoman i s one rr d with Commissioner Wire" com-
ments regarding bonus p laa *
P- a e 10
OF` laa
1 o=lnlssiotier Plufkta suqqested that the existlaq ou d n wa
atenad d to allow 4n''extension of '147th Avenue the east in
order to txpand the todustrikil area and the remaininq
juided. drea, to develop,with one from the north
a x = — fro- thhe xsouth*C ft. y W Sre «Indlic"Idted that
here Is merit to Oianainq the ladustrIal qutdlinct t; ata
quld'7 q for providinq bufferinqn an flan* Com-
missioner u t is ed he did not exclude that possibill%y.
Greg nk-, representlaq the petitioner, stated that he
bonus palatcr were met dor afftrmattve east is and
open space. Al so* Mr. f gigk mented that the project
Ides d MiX of housinq, *fir., Frank doted that the Commission
should o a ode the, lm t nt-e of lincludtact the Mempsey
siagle fawtily platted lots to the north whieh allown af,-
vess to 15th Aveaue North. He stated` the proposed ouldinq
and density, were needed to assure, ti',e T)empsey land could he
batt of tills projeot. r. Fraak reviewed` theloic-ation of
the existinq quidinqIiiiie And jaee t -,ewer in which
11mi-ts the Levee area for residential user. on the east
side of the pond. Commissioner Wire 5uqqlalsted that the
quiding he expdnded, for the total'emm ler
Steiqerwald expressed concern about utilizinq a cul-de-sac
t the south end of the r e .yeca e It would limit and
revent (Arculation for the residential units to sated at the
southeast end (x# the project.
Wayine O'chm tk, ProgrammedLand*, ie,., stated that the 'Quid'-
ing of '
Quid'-
inthe property was, Intact prior to the lmpro,rem_ents t
t ce pond,. which now further constrains the site -'and, that
ke,, did tint uaderstand the concern expressed about throu h-
r t w1thia the development.
Dlscussioa eontlaue4 reqardlaq Commissioner ufka'
n that the property could be developed within the exist-
Om.r re xeed€ that the
existing uld n did ,` t 4,1low for adequate bufferlinq.
William Nes, °Programmed, and, Inc., commented on the
prooess that was utilized to ; obtdin the ponding easement.,
tee$ rMC411-ed that he thovqhtthe compensdtlan for sel-
110ahf My the pandinn. e emie t,culd 'ao*- thy- entire
oind Sao areA o he utilized for density purposes. Ne refer-
r-,, d to the "ca a ce n the project booklet. r,,, Files
tt ated he did not feel that the property dead e developed
x I t h I a the existing quiding blecatise of the "strIWI layout.
If the development Is restricted to the LA- if e
Mr. Ldes,, stated that the ecotiomIcs,,of development were not
W
11audry 1,212 .
Chairwoman Vasillou confIrmed that staff's interpretation of
the eased ent. ;cad density situiltion is that thek 1,64 acres o
acquirel tend would bin allonedfor density ealt,,uldt tons.
Staff stated t eat the City Nuntil will have to c ermin
the Mal Utterpretattoin of the density isvae., is was y0j-
firmed teat in no, way did the emeat transaction dad
related d0rust as Involve n urancof requidino.
Commissloaer Psuba stiat"d that he t n t feet that two cul-
de-sacssacs co o ided -adequatelyl and that a ru-
a m! ,,toner Plu a ec oade by ComoissionerNoire MUM, TO DAY
to recommeitd denial of e ' owopos' an ' Wide Alan
mm aer Wire stated that tho ty could e v t -
A within the existlig OvidineIts and LAAO With
proper annin the LA -1 area nould be developed utilizino
the pond as an n t- The` pada t i area could develop
with smaller ne .mmisko r Namits voncaged.
Commissioner Stelgerwald stated that there wb;ld still he d
queation of bufferingthe residential ared frvm theIndustr-
Al uses. Chdirwoman Vasillou stated she felt the site is
i oastrAnedj, and that quads, or a almilaruse would,
appropriate.,
Wayne, c3hm, Proqrammed Land, stated, he felt the
proposed plan pro -* ides a buffer and transition aim the
adjacent 410qle familyresidential area to the industrial
developrtient. Williamt Programmed Land, Ine., coneur-
red, and stated that the proposed development is the buffer
between the Sm deosity residential area and Industrial
Ared.
Rall 011 VOIL. " eyes. Commissioners PAubaj, tejqerwald VOTE
And hai rwo is Vasillou May. MOTIOP f a i led.t Toner HO 04
Pauba stated he felt the LAQ quiding wou14 be loqleal in
ceder to t rovis the needed transition. 'Commissioner Maqnus
stated he thougNt, + e propertyshould develop entir ywith
pe develop ment.
thOrwaman Vasiliout swoonded by flommassionerMO104
Steigirwald to recommend that the application be redestqned
o order to lowi-r the densityf design the street layout with
two, and, incorporate thetae hairdoss as prev-
Ously
prev-
Odiscussed by the Commission.
r-
lu (As
3aarIZ*, 1951
po a forther d1smssilon of the they v;mlskm 4et e' MOTIONWITHIDRAWN
miard t1hat the MOTION was aot In order,, Le., ecitio *W( re
Va;'Moea WITHORM the t- *
MM 10M Ivy comi'sSioner Stolqerwaldt seoomled by rommissloner NOT OW,
Paubat to retiommend, approvalthe proposed Land riul e , VOTE
Man Aeadme .-A, re quidina the prcilvrty from IIS a d LN -1 to HOTIMIMLS
Roll Call FOIL. i A es. `eammiss onfrMa€ja us,
kind, "I Ma ay.'NOTHT4 foal
halmovian ou stated the -sees were quAllaq an
t o asity, trinsitton,n t,rdfrie (`e)m as -
sto a Should aoton i ree:eam:a e adat ioia and ;'Om rei the petitIOR
av the CouivzAL,
M01 JOH 1) y ea itssionr W * rej, s oaded by toner a) as ,a NOtION To M
to re e~omaie ae. deniala of Lha Land Use ulde P iaaa Ameodment 'and
o ace pt Plan As presented. mese .# o a: `lean r Plafka statedt.
wh I I t- the e eant i .1d ,' ci functton of the oold.int1j, the
types with dde Mon aaa1,e.y- detachedtache dwelliflos, used
needed further designsgn eeat
tea ` eaqeaes ed that theemes be vit4mA as, a La . i.e
e proposed concept plan and e e nsI areseenden € it the
proposed aaa< aaaq..
Real CallVOW. ea . a ea ae r t ea ae re a a e a . VOIE = W Ra
Carre vcl
NEW
h airwom,&a Vasillou lateoduced the request subm1ttedMEMPIN WNWK
He imea °' a County `*.aers ery Mstrl.,ct for a ..eat avisio z 4 RE'TERVE 01SIRM
ar gasses or property located the Inortheast corner of OT 01VISION, AN
Count,,- Rodd Oe dadyea e d* e aae Lake D rxvReadloa, o the A
Decet ear . 1, ' 'pi'Pc ' " *
Ma T 1014 by Commissionter Aombat secoaded b'V Chairwoman R `R
VaSHU"OU, to r x e m 'approval the Proposed phot
Div
MrChuck Paye as "dry, 'r'e' r 111
rl;lerred to. the:aa# x ae e a° e # n nd ona'cmandu
gegY
e,omme
that 1the Poad be eAed to the
be a Countyaada , Staff expl 'aed that the rity, has acquir- cgea reyeedthe , r is -ea -ay, . .
Page 13
2
Y,in, Issioner Wirk, expressed eoivern that prevlokis Lot
requirement have iy;t beea, supported.
3 Ayes. WHIe eat . $ 04 jc,S L4:ied. Stulbero IRTE
chdirwomaa Us;llou lilt coed reauest submitted fly ENTERPRISE PROPERTIES
Schmidt Lakya Woods Ah Aad ica. dl of the December 11S , IDT LAKE WMPS
04 0 staff report as waived. AM AUDITION111 to -681)
n0110IN h,, Commlisloaer elqerwald, s ooad d by Commissioner REC041ENDAtION,
otha to recommend dppooval subjectto the condttions In the VOTE
staff report, ME, Z AINes.. Commissioner t e r absent.
NOT N oarri
k s.
The Commission discussed the upconang meetingschedule n
deterNaed Mat the second met-timl In Fehruary would
de -voted e , . c, Hearing (itiformational)for the devel-
opiiie coat,%)t and requidinq of City o Rinne pol sthe
prope pr of o t 3 ' mmeacemenL the C 4'i.ar 1 19S
s s3s .op"a discuss the Goals, Objectivesl aid Criteria, at
Commissioner 14dqaus reported on the ltfedi,Ane Lake Task
Wree .
ADJOURMENT
Vie meetiog adjourned P.M.
PLANNING CCIRRISSION RUM-13*14MTION, JANUARY Vt
PV M! 4 1" INZI COMMISSION RECOMMUMATtOM JAMIJARY 19$ 19,85
R MMEN Intl
APPROVAt AND PLAT' FOR SAt
LAXE t' -
t wit. ° rise Properties,, al: 'r u tt!d approval of a Final pian and
flat for -ioods 4th addition" I -} for 3lata located south o
49th Ak r, nue $t west of Zachary tune; and,
WHEREAS, the lannirr mi ion teas recommended approval fo,'lowlna a regularly
MOW THLREf ORL ,, 13L 11, 14FREflY RLSOLVED BY THE iii COUNCIL Of' THE CITE` OF P Y 0I 1TH t
14INN i ) teat It should dad herebv does approve the request of -Saul t, nterprtse
Properties for Final Plan and Plat - for ''11 c idt lake Woods 4thdd tt nll PtI 6-
located south of 49th AvniueHorth n west of Zachary Lane,, sublect to the "lovi n
ca rdit t,r,
1. Complidncle with the City Umin r's, Memorandum.
Ho, Rvildiaq,r a,ii tie issued until municipal sewer and water are
availahle, to, the sites.
ftemoval of all, dad or dying trp.es fromthe property at the oviner's expense.
Submittal of required utility and drainaqe easements as approved b'the City
ngln er art y° to filinq the Final Pkat.
5. No Building , rgaits to he issued until the Final Past Is filed and recorded
with Hennepin ouat
No, privatedrive dMesS is permitted to,Hdmel Road,
Compliance with the Development `ont et.t for "Schmidthmidt Lak Woods".
All yard setbacks oto ry,it nt with the "Schro dt Lake Woods Second, arid,
Third Additions".
d'
V t- ON A ., II F R IOR ,,'ARa''-:'9 1PRO..C 1,8y S O- gt9 ,&
a .»
F q ,`'°kca
IR ISO -p(80OW
Ah, Car w ,s - PronerIttes has eqU d approval of a Conditional Ilse Permit to fill
x-1, S+Ex -v alk e' s ;
I'lood tilsur-miceStudy for the city of 011,vraouth and awcor wthe of
iv
mv, llovfo -., B IKSOLVED BY THE CITY €QOM("'M OF THU MY Of PLYM0 1THI
MlNNLS T that t should *wd herebydoe approvethe- request of Car -Lar Properties
o . and twid 'Vt , r fill cine €x R fA a e a vra e loodp .at
Ovex*IayL ;f- ,ts defiaed Wv the f-lood Tasaranceto for the , of Pjymouth gid,
aocordiaq to J; 4 provistolls of (, jo;j 6 Of the P ymottt a Zonjaq ordinance, on Ou . o
propertv _locateu a . the southwest corner of Vicksburq Lane and County Podd 91 subject;
dsk-,!B
PLANNINGG COMMIS',—U041, RE MMILL f AT T Off
111ANUIA-
MV 121
n
APPROVIM REVISM MPUD P1411MMARY PLAT/PENN, C NKT ONAL IlSf PERMIT ANAqRlw
RHORM4 WR R- . R PROPERTIES FOR, "W11LOW t,. %DO " LOCATM, SOLITHWEST': .T t Rt Pt1
LAW AND COUNTY ROAD 9 00013)
WTfLREV # THE i ouft l Reso ut logs ? . and app -rove aoac- t Plan, an
PreNita y, P aii/P at and Conditional Use Permit respeotively for R U "Plymouth f4i T
fir. t4iie"f and
WHLK-ASt the City`ouvei Resolution -496 apprwes a revision to said Concept P an-
andj
IVHER AW` Car- .ar Properties has requested approval for rezonitia 26,A acres from R
future restricted development) District to R-, w density multiple ru Td )
District, and for a revised Conditional tls:-. Permit, Preliminary Place and P !,Ainary
Plat for a Mixed Planned Uait Development of 72 dive linq units (forty-four4-unit and
eaty- iqh unit, townhomes) and a site for a church, h, located southivest of Vtckshjr
Lane and ity Road 9, andj
WHL-R1ASt he- Planninq Commission has considered the -'eauest following a duly called
public heKirinq and has recommended aPProvi f
tIOWIr TER URL, ft- IT H-'P,.BY R OLMD BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,,
f f f fifT, that it shou"d and hereby does approve a Preliminary P14t* Preliminary € I t,l
and Coedit ion Use Pe m'A for ar r Properties fir "' l T _+ " Tai of k
follo*lnq conditions-.
T. Complidiwe with the City En neer ' Memorandum.
Z. Removal of all dead or dying re from the property at the owner's expense.
Ifo Building Permits shall` be issued until > municipal sewer and eater are
physically a < f au yto the sures.
4. Provisionsfor a 30 -ft. wide tral, eas("Imentloutlot per Comprehensive Park
Plan, a verified h Parks ad T r r t Parr t,; pu m a
detailed plans as to construction of the trail` per City standards.
a, n of` Pari d a !on foes -'v- . ou of de4iloation with appropriate credits
iii an amount determined aceor tnq to v rifLeo, acreaqe and pavinq costs,
and aectwding to the, Dedication Policyy ire effect t the time of fitina the
final Plat. Park d -gat ion fees for churchdev opine ha,l f. P d at
time of Pan PPr va".
Street names. shall comply with the Cite Street Tfam nq System.
Rage trio,
7 aaa aaace with Poltq Resolution No. 79-80 reqardiaq saaintirvAm 71oor elevations,
for n structures .a #.. a vasf # ic ac rac . , af alaa any Baa or
water drdiiiaoe facility.
R oaaiaaq. , stuill ho l-na ._ ea with iMani of the F inal p l- .
9. Bud. ldl as Perms is shat I f; , of i e Baa Ifiled and recorded
withHcnnep n County.
No yard setbacks dre ordated, or Implied.
Appropriate letgaldueu ents reqardino Homeowner ii n covemants € n
restrictions a approved hy, the City, Attorney, and shallbe filed with the
1a Plat.
mord ensity, .3 waits p r acre..-. based va 1.7 aures not Includi act .
acre church site) the total. ,aaamber-to seventy-two ua lts cuaas std a ; 44of
qUddramlitiums and
I tiverity-el4it duplex Final density is excluslive o
Mat land determinedin y the City taqineer +u be at or below t h- h4th wdter
elevation per , the City, is Adopted Storm Wtiter Drama pan.
11. Utility :{.iia r' v .>mea is lea aocor ancwith the it 's Comprehensive Sewer an
W"t r 1-'laaas, mus t)e exteilded by private development and not her Public
lmpr4,vement s.
14* Complidace with Lite provisions of Section 6 of the 7opinq Ordinance reIata.v
o subdivision Ar-id developmentlin the aaer-a Flood iii District prior to
Fugal Platt nq.
Ct-mpletiolt of , nviro ame tal Assessment Worksheett I) process prior to Final
16. Written approval by the Department of Natural Resources as to the alteration
of desiqnated, wetlands, on this slite prior to Final- PlattlAq.
17. Final Site Plans shall lnkk lu e a detailed laaa suape plaa Includiniq analysis of
existinq v, c tat ioa t be used ds pari, of than laaaafsccaroqr a ent *
18. Provisions for bufferinq and br aia q along County Road 9.,,, Vicksburo 11.dne,arid
the residential units to that west
19- . There shall be no private driveway accuss to 4lstAV-ntaelOrth east rl of
proposed %est as Uine.
41). onditions ,and requ. ret t-", a s reflected Ias Resolutions '50493 an O-684 are
hereby rescinded. inded.