The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Commission Minutes 12-08-1982Page 320 Planning ^,ommission Minutes December 8 x 182 Mx Greg r nk$ MOCom s-Knutson Associates representing thepeiti,one ` explained That t4he 100-Year floodi q is now con.- tained within. the limits of Plymouth Creek, The zoninq map re resentatiOn of the floodway district ,does not accuratelyrepresenttheevrrentfloodlimits. 'there ores a separate application has been submi:te to the DepartmeAt of gousino and Urban Development to amend the Floed Insurance Study Map Co reflect the existing eondition:.. This application is submitted in order to fill. as -:xeavate soli materials with- in the Flood Plain Overlay District as currently represented on the Zoning Map. Mr, Prang explained that the submitted maps are ,intended to be used for construrtion and detailed revi ear..' Commissioner Pl.uf a inquired if the high around located in southwest area of the site is within the flood area. Mr. Frank explained that at one time a 100-Year flood storm would have occupied that area, however,, since the improve- ments have been made tO Plymouth Creek the flovdinq would no onger cover such a large area. Gam issi,oner Plufka-Inquir- ed ` as to what type of erosion Control ill e utilized.. Hr. Frank explained the proposed erosion control fence as r`' fi , ram ed on the final ; grading pian and erosion control tI* a pan s" llou closed the public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Pl of ka seconded by Commi ssi orter Steige wall to take action on this petition at this time. Vote 5 Ayes. Commissioners Stulberg and Magnus 'absent. MOTION carried. NOTION by Commissioner 'tuf a., seconded by Commissioner RROMMEHOATION A Steigerwald to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit sut ect to the condition in the staff report. Vote 5 VOTE Ayes. Commissioners Stulberg and M nus absent. MOTION, carried. NEWl'STN£SS Chairwoman ' asiliou deferred discussion, of this p t-i.tion MINNEAPOLIS AUTO until later in the meeting to .see if the eta boner or a Ai1,GTTt}N - SITE PIAN reptyesentative will be present.. Al NDWNT (52061) Chairwoman Vasiliou introduced the request submitted bi- WAYNE MacFARILAN Wayne MacFarlane for a dot Consol,idation/Divislon and LOT CONSOLIDATION[ Variaree application to consolidate two existing parcels and DIVISION AND VARIANCE divide the property lato tbyo mtew parcels. Fe 321 Planning commission l; flutes December 8, 1987 Reading o the voveiber 29, 198Z staff report was waived. Ch lrwdm..n V4sillou recognized Court NcFarlaaet nephew of the petitioner, who stated that Mr. MacFarlane was of the Understanding that he could sell the rr lot as it exists today. Mr. Mao arlane did not feel that his application o ld create any additional hats for development,, .l , is wlllln to restrict the development of the proposed l.o% to one !Pgl,e family detached bon. e. He is desirous to ; protect: his privacy and the low area located .youth of his existino residetaee. Court MacFarlane explained that Mr. MacFarlane dial not fe I his petition would pl ce any Further .impact on Uttlities at this time. Court MacFarlane explained that there is no grading proposed now and lnauired if utility easements and grading questions would be resolved wl.t Ruildinq Permit application. Staff explained that with platting applications and land division applications. overall grad inq of a given site I reviewed.' Athe time of applying for a Buildin.1 Permit the o . ".boner m-ist identify the location of the proposed resp denc*e and thtk proposed grades for that resideiic . Staff ex- plained that there is a concern for hb this overall area WW devel"Op. Commissioner Stelgerwal,d inquired if the Engineering Depart- ment h 6; completed their In esti atioi of ser° hf aq these parcels with utilities from Miti Seton a. Staff explained that In the 1960"s the City approved a seer project which incloded this property. However a portion of the<pro ect which irvo lyed this property was eliminated. `herefore, sewer was mover installed to these parcels. Mr. Mac"ar- large"s cum- nt residence could be serviced with utilities from the north, Staff explained further that the remaininglets 'n this general area Y,ou,lJ need to be served by a lift statlon The Engineering Department has suggested as _'an alternative, that the general area might be served from Pain,, etonk4. If adAtl opal data were available such as pz ovided In pl atting appll catl ns , these issues coulda be more thoroughly reviewed. The City Fnqineer hasv rifled that no other resident in this general area has petitioned for sewer or expressed Interest in the extension of;utlll- ties. Court MacFarlane conf l-Imed that his uncle was never aware haat a service'stub was l stalled and available. Commissioner Steigerwald inquired if this situation was unique for this area to be zoned urban residential and hot be serviced wIth utilities. Page 324 Planntim CoMm ss on Minutes December 81 1982 Commissioner Wire stated that the variance was approved because there are sPecial of rcumst ances and . conditions affeoting the specific property*, the variance i necessary forthe preservation ant enJOYm nt f the retitioner"s property rights- iandf that the proposal will not be detri- mental to the pubic welfare or injurious to other property NOTE in the territory,. f If Vote. 5 Ayes. Commissioners Stulberg, and Magnus absent. MOTION carried. Commis":'Iow r Steigerwald requested that the record reflect the p,ianntno Commission's comments that the entire area should be analyzed with respect to serv.1:1nq the property with utilities. MOTION by Commis' sio#ger toiWerwald, seconded by Commissioner MINNEAPOLIS ? pie a defer action i s ,petition unto the petitioner AUCTION.- SITF FLAN or a representatives present. Vote. 5 Ayes. Commission- AW,NOMENT (82069) ers Stulberq and Haanus absent. MOTION carried. OTHER BUSINESS The Commission discussed the Chairwoman's response to the submitted planninp Commission Review and Critique Discuss - on included the viability of the, Commission mov,ino to take act or, on petitions, orderly discussion, enforcement of Robert,, Rules of Order, social events, and reviewing infor- mation packets befort }PetIngs. Commissioner pl.uf a indicated that he would volunteer to be the Commission parllm.entarl.an. Chairwoman VaszlioQ request- ed that staff investigate the possibility of looatino a cab - net In the Council conference _room so that the Commissxon- ers could store their Comprehensive pl ins, rinances, etc, , Staff explained that for the December 2.2, 9982 meeting, a staff report will be submitted reviewing the General Devel- pment p aa asfer plan submitted b Hennepin County for the Adult Corrections Facility for the public hearino. The Com- mission should concentrate their disousslon on the land use aspect of the operation. ADJOURNMENT The meetinq adjourned at .10 P.M. RECOMME,hDATION A