HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 11-23-1982CITY Of PLYMOUTH
PLA%-INQ COWISSiON MINUTES
NOVEMBER Z)j, 1962
The sp xai Or they Plymouth Planning ComtissioG was
Called to order ` ,it 7-430 Pjj.
MILMERS PRESENT Chairwoman Vaa k l iou
S
amma
y eige ictal , Ndgl7.tis, i-'} g^,+
ikdu* a, ba, -:
Wire artd Stutbe>ro
R ABSENT-. None
STAFF 'REQ ', Commun t OP xre , for
Blair Tr mvrf
Community Development Coordinator
Sara McfConn
SPECIAL PRLSEt4TAYjON
Commurtity Servi,e Officer Wrorlski introduced a slide and
tapes presentation which summ4rlzed and described the 911
m rcfency Telephone System S rvir.,e. It was explained that
the "I sire tete will be available nd ire operation beetinninoDecember1, I98,
MINUTS
MOTION by Comm issiort r P auba, eecond d by Commissioner,
Plufka to Approve the Minutes of they November 10 1952 pj n- i
stet CO(Ilm ssxutt Meeting as submitted. Vote. 5 ,dyes
Chairwoman Vdsiliou And Commiss.t 0 r St°u%b r , abstained. M TION carried.
PUBLIC HEMI
Chairwoman Vasxf xou introduced the reqA,,est by Mir. Janes, fckr VT t"I C 30NESC", NEaMotu *e*patiorl Co-nditiortai Use Permit t his re se.r e rt e, Wf ISM ONtogatedat5950GoldenrodLane. Readinq of the Novemberr 4, CONDITIONAL t)S' 1982 staff report was waived. PERMIT ( 055
Citaxrwc t a t asiliou openedd they public hearing and because
there'were no questions or comments, nt:s, stye closed tiles public
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded b, Commissionerfcratotakeactionoilthisptittort. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried.
NOTIOR by Commissioner Paubal.seconded by Commissioner Wire RECOMMENDATION AorecommendaproNaioftheyCondxt0nalUse: Permit dor a,
u x. Occupation for William C. Jones subject to they condit- ions as stated it, the staff" report .
Page
Planning Commission Minutes
November 25t 198
Staff tVlained that the p(-trti01Wr utilizes more floor area
at the baser erlt l eel than allowed Or 01 o -
issioner Pduba, indicated this was understood., but, dist riot
prez errt a con erij. Commissioner Plufkastated that the
ttrsation, resulted from the pet it i ortert' Ichcrtoe on how to
arrange the workarea and not: due to tete size or scope o
TileV,e occupation. otatmission deter irted that a variance
w44 not nveded since the work area could be rearranged to
rtd,° tile ,amount of floor aretr devoted to the Home
ccu", at ion.
Vote. 7 A es. MOTION, carried.. VOA;
har °trerrtar Vastliou introduced the request submitted by EDGEMONT ENTERPRI,5ESdgemontraterrr. -s for two Conjitilrial Use Permits: one to ICE CREAK CORRAL)
operate a restauranttaurant with carrori) service. and a second CONOITIONAL USEprarmrt crr the er~a t air r r mer exiter, earrro of PERMITS (57059)
the October , 1952 staff report was wan ed.
Mr. Reed Olson of Ldgemont Uliterarr.ses was introduced and
stated that he did not have any questions or ootirtvnts Ott the
staff report.
Commissioner Plufka requested that Mr, Olson rev new the pro-
posed floor layout.. r mmissiotter Pauba inquired why two
neighboring tenants d*d Riot sign the statement signed by the
m( rc,hants from the roar Seasons Shopping Center. Mr, Olson
noted gnat the apparel Grp r+ presentatiNe did sign the
ist, arid that the responsible pert -,on at tie medical ofltoe
was riot atidil.able. He stated that the Signature can be
obtained.
Commissioner Wire requester! that. Mr._ Olsen describe the
probablee mix of customers. Mr,, 01-5011 explar rWd tktat Fromt
P -M,- to c.lQst.rrc there would generally be a il'
ers:l and from .*00 P.M. to approxtmatel ".., chrl trprr
in the age group o 12 to 1 years, off` age would visit the
facility. Mr. Olson indicated that the type ofrestaurant
encourages family use* It was explained :that the erttir,
t
restaurant is brightly lighted.
I
li Chatrwnr art Vasiltou opened the public hearing.
Dave Burke, 4220 Matharr Lane, stated that he lives very
close to the site and has always be,n art tot.ts to .now what
is goirtg to happen to the shopping center... Mr# Aurke
e ,pl.arrred that he is concerned that the proposed Floor
layout suggests that the food portion, of the business is
incidental to the games.
Nagy}
Planning omm,`s for Minutes
November 23, 1962
Mari Burke, 4220 Lathan bane, inquired about supervision,
and IkOw many employees word.d be present durinO hours of
operation- Mr. Olson explained that the City requires that
erradult over 21 years of age be resent, at a 1. l t i es . The
hours of operation were identified and els. Burke expressed
concern that there was the potential for a "h out" atmos-
phere. qtr. Olson explained that one person can have visual
corrtset' W all areas of the facility.
Commissioner ,l l`k expressed concern about having only one
person supervising the entire facility from behind the food
counter. fit.,. Olsen explained that the business projections
o not wer*rant having more than one persona. However, f the
tisiness warrants it later as expected, at least two people
will be present
Chairwoman asi liou explained that the City does not norm al -
require a minimum' number of personnel, She stated that
It is slot the City's jurisdiction to dletate, how many
employees a business should have.
Roger Lgqen, 9905 41st Avenue North,. suggested that a hepar- 1
ate adult supervisor be provided for ,the game area, hires
Lggen ,stated that he represents the Biddle fast Homeowners
Association, and was present to describe the npighborhood's
concern, The neighborhood 'realizes the need to be suppor7
tine of businesses, especially con.siderino the current econ-
omic times, The neighborhood has over time expressed
concern about tete video game aspect of businesses in this
rgeneral area. i nese concerns were expressed with a previous
application or 4 bolding alley; and, to a similar amusement
center application* Mrs.. L99ea stated there areapproximate-
ly 1,000 children in the nes. hborhood, three schools, a
large number' of apartment build r^ s, and transient. traffic,,
The parents in the neighborhood want to convey a role model
to the children of not encouraging video games,. The neigh-
borhood is therefore reluctant td support this petition
because of the video game aspect. There is general support
for the ice ream parlor without video games«
Commissioner , to erg°aidoed if Mt.en had discussed
the neighborhood concerns with the petitioner and wheter he
had seers the petitioner's operation in Vhple Grove.. M .
Eg9A stated tae had not, and he had not seen the, information
describing the petition. He stated he came :to the Plannino
Commission Meeting for the presentation..
Page 310
PlarArting Commission Minutes
ovmh r 23, 1982
Chairwomen Vasiliou explaineded that the Commission reviews
each petition on their awry merits and she recalled; the
previous aanccrn of this neighborhood about amusement
centers in the area,,, She expressed c ncern that the
Association chid not visit the existing stare operated by
this petitioner In Maple Grave, or ret additional informa-
tion* Mr* Lqgen explained that the Association eBoard had
not been able to meet since the llat.i e of Hearing was
received.
Charley North, Ldgemont I;*t R ses, explained that theri
r Ciel was not for .a video -ir ade a seen in marry of the
shopping renters; but, was for a store more .like Baskin-
dhhin.,i 1'e dream stare with video, games. Seating is a,,ail- able for pPro imdtel.y 40 customers. Mr. North explained
that he and Mr. Olson hate ha\,.e children and want the
hdsirtess to be 4 family-oriented operation. It was explain-
ed that the amount of business generated will establish the
number of employees needed to run the operatioln. Ourinq the
s eai al birthday pr'tie, 3srojM-ted th-t at least two
employees will be present. Re explained he runs a drug tore
rid hos video games- about 501% of the users are adults.
hairwoman Vdsiliou rears a lt4t sr dated 'November 1 , 1982
from the City of hale Grape.
Mr, Burke noted that the Maple Grove facility has four
games,: and that the proposed facility ; in Plymouth would have
a total of 20 games with the kiddy rides. Charles North
explained that ` there is also a video are do two doors away
from their Maple: Grove stare,
Mr. Burke also noted that the neighborhood was not contaeti,
by the petitioner.
Chairwoman Va4iliou ;,closed the public, hearxinq.
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberq, seconded by Commissioner
t j.ger al.d to take action ori this petition. Vote,
Ayes. MOTION carried.
MOTION by Commissioner ' tul erg, seconded by Commissioner
t uba to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Pei mi.t for REC%*CNDATjON 9
Ldgemont Laerprises for a.. Cldss 11 Restaurant in the B-2
Zoning District subJect to the conditions as stated in the
staff report, with the addition to condition number 6 that
the hours of operation shall not exceed 11-.00 P.M. sweat
to Citi Codes and Ordinances,
Page X111
Pancri.an C'ra aisirrrc
November 23, 1982
Commissioner mire inquired m -hat the hours o ( era lrn are
for tine Golden China Restaurant. St 4if f st ag k,,j the approver)
of sirnq time is 10-400 P.M. The hours of operation for ' the
other tenants at the Four Se4so ns Shop in . Center~ were
dieus ed
Commis if;, r Stujherg stated that the proposed, MOTION is
similar to, -hav which was forwarded for the previDus Class
11 Restaurdrtt and Amusement Center application and That he
did not feel it was appropriate to state specific hours
except to ssur- cot's istern .y with the Code curfew rfqui;re-
mrats, o mi.s ioner Wire stated, the hours of operation
arn itantaarned the neighborhood chdr°a ter.
MOTION y Comm ssioner Wire to Amernd the lain Motion bytaarrnrconditionnumber6read- "the hours of operation
sin it be until 2 };CC`., " The MOTION diad for lark of a
second.
Roll Call Vote oft tfn Bard Ma,t l f Ayes, MOTION ear°ri.ed. VO'COYW-M) TION'B
TION by Commissioner Stul.berq, seconded by Commissioner RECO NI)ATION C
pauba to recommend app-r'o-al of a Conditional. Use Permit for
Ldge ont, Lnterprises for an Amusement Center subject to the
onditioas as stated in the staff report with condition
nLob r
06
to read; "the hours of operation shall not exoeet;
11-00 P -M- subjV- t to Cray Codes and Ordinances
Commissioners Pluf a clarified haat. the Motions would al low
the facility ` to be open every day until 11:00 P„M,
Coc mis-cooperry Pluf a inquired of the Pian ninq Commission if
Vhe,y felt that the a?aanage Vlt Ulan as presented is ade-
quatie . fie stated it is his opi.niean that the plan is not
adequate . er tl>e: City Council referral of the previous
amusement center ; application. It was stated that the Maple
Grove facility.is not a Parallel situation, with respect to
the needed controls,. Commissioner Plufka stated the plan
did not 'address the co ntrol! of the games area.
Chairwoman Vasiliou tared Haat the Raple Crowe fad” ity is,
41ot referred to d5ldtl ideal" facility-,; and, that the Plan -
fling Commission should not let previous Council concerrns
di,etate Commission findings on this a plic tioll.Commis-
sioner Steigerwald made reference to ,page two of the submit-
ted matidgemernt plan acrd s :ted he believes ,this petitijn r
has addressed the earlier Council concerns. Commissioner
Wire agreed with Commissioner Plufka.
page 312
Planning Commission, minutes
TION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Comissioner Plufka NOTION TQ WtoamendtheMalaMotiontoaddconditionnumberIt ' to
require that ars adult supervisor would be dedicated to the
arae arvdo as well as the separate supervisor for the food
operation.,
M4TION by Commii3sioner Wires seconded by Commissionertufa MOTIF TOW -ND
to add 0ondition number 12 to require that the illumination
of the game 4rea be the same as the front entrance area.
MOTION by Commisslotier Wire to amend the gain Motion. by MOTION TO AWS
addingrl eortd t orr number 1 l imit inq the number of video
k games to ten. MOTION died for lack of a second.
Co t uss over Pauba stated he understands Commissioner Wire's
intent but he does riot feel it is appropriate for the Citytvdictatethenumberofemployeesforabusiness.
Chairwoman Vasiliouf Commi. ,sioner at,c lber , and Commissioner
Stier -ald agreed. onim sloner Stulberg recalled that the
previous 4mv5ement center applieation had the game area
physically separate from the restaurant area. Commissioner
lufkd .stated he supported the first proposed amendment ,as
proper supervision is needed for the es ahlishment#
E ial.ly during those tames where the restaurant counter is
f busy, as well as the game, area,
Chairwoman Vasiliou referred to Mr. North's .esume which
motes extensive experience in retail mandgemertt. The
previous appUoatxorl, was a different, type of operation.
Chairwoman Vasl l ou Stated that this petitioner's manaqement
e p ne ee would be beneficial. Commissioner Stelqerwald
expressed coot.errs that the parent:have the r'e ponsi.hj l its
to discipline their children and this should not be a Citi
resperr sbi . '
Roll call tote. First Amendment.. Commissioners Wire and
Plufka Aye 5 flays. M TI0f4 fails, VOTE. ON AWND NT
Roll call. Vote. second Amendment,, i Ayes. MOTION tarried. VOTE ON Af NO NT
Vote Da the Main MOTION once Amended. 6 Ayes Commzssioner. ON MAIN MOTION
Wlire Nay. MOTION carried. ONCE AWND D
Commis;ioaer Wire stated he did not support the petition
beeayse it involved too many ernes with minimal adult
supervision..
i
Rage 313
p.:41111in mmissiorr minutes
Chairwoman Vaslliou requested a revi-ew of the Noventer 171, 1 b, C. W LDMANstaffreport. COVI L PRU S
Staff lamed that thr° petition involves rezoning from
REZONING, PRELImINARy,
PLAI. SITE PLAN ANDFPDto -1- a prelir indry plat for three lots - a site plant R - 6Zwhich ,involves a dr frrrl parkinorequest; part lal construe -
tion of the total site plan# and, a varidnee t the cityCodefrolanaereurmfbnts. Staff recommenced that appr ov-
al of an ultimate site plan should b $Utiject to Ordinance
ext rrsion provisions 4nd chances to the p` -n -would hp 0,)(1-
sidered Plan Amendriterts. ' also, the Fire l atsr al ar rl tr Development Bedew Committee do not support the varfance
frorn the fire Code.
Chairwoman Vasr.l rou recognized Mr. David Weir :' Cramer -
Weir, representingsenting th petit ion r,# and, Mr, ark= Voqel,,
Architect.
Dave Weir stated he would like to thank arid, compliment the
Adf for the expeditiousous processing of the appl oat ion. Mr. Weir explained that at this time thepeti'r requests
approval Of a SitePlan for the entire development. For the
total construct gain, it is proposed that 05Z par* lxip spaces be
ttrrstru ted with deferral of 'construction of the remaining19pd -king, spaces. If the parking needs are warranted the
a t..; nal far"4n 'L Anstal e0. he explainedthese
numbtrs differ from the analysis in the staff report, but
are consistent with the overall Proof -of -parking calcula-
t rrs, Stat f concurred.
With respect to the requested variance for the fire lane,
Mr. Weir stated the petitioner dial riot feel the request
presented a life and safety unreal or risk. Fire :hydrants
would be provided to serve every 300 feet of arpa3 Mr.. Weir
stated that the risk or riot installing the fire lane is abusinessrisk," to the owner., lir. Weir noted that, until
the vaear=, 1 Bund adjacent to the west develops, there is a
topoyraptrr, difference between the two properties which
would make a fire lane difficult to construct,
Mr, Weir stated concern about the trail construction
requirements. it is felt that it will b a long,time before
the required trail along the south side of the new lots
would be used to any significant decree. The petitioner
proposes to dedica' te the easement along the eastern
boundary, but not to construct the trail until it is needed.
Page 314
Planning Commission i4i rru es
T
Mr. Weir noted that this concern had not been discussed with
st=aff previously-.
udy Herwig, 2645 Fernbrook Lane, inquired about the
proposed re ostinq request. fir. Weir stated that the
rezoning. is, subject to City, ` uricl.l approval and then
development. opment. Mrs. Herwig inquired about the vacation
request submitted by a Previous pel -itis er; for t:re o is inq
right-of-way located within the proposed plat boundaries.
Staff explained that the vacatiO0 request will be finalized
with- the final plat for this development. Staff confirmed
that the istinq structures would be removed with the
initial site development
Staff noted` that. the Fire Code requires that this buil.dinq
be sprinklered and that the Fire Marshal has found that the
Code staridardi for a variance have riot been met
Chairwoman Vasiliou ' inquired about Commissioner Pauba's
pirtion with respect= to the fire lane request. Commissioner
auba stated that insurance rues should not be impacted bythedeletionor, a fire lane However, Commissioner Pauba
stated that personally= he did not choose to question the
fire Marshalls recommendation. Commissioner Stolberq agreed
arra stated- that the Fire Marshal, in the past, has consider-
ed wvaivinu the requirements where a topographic concern
exists. Commissioner Pa ba observed that fare lane
variances hav been approved by the Council where buildings
were sprink ered Staff stated that the buildings wer often
sprinklered in oOmpensatior for, the fire lane variance which
wa . granted upon fir.:Anq' that the Code variance standards
were met,.
Staff stated that there is more involved than the "business
risk" to contents referred to by} Mr. Weir and that good
access to a building is: essential to the safety of fire
fighters.
Chairwoman Vasiliou concurred with the petitioner's concern
about trail construction., he stated trails should not be
required where they would not be used, and she noted the
increasing costs' to the City for trail maintenance.' Staff
explained that the adjacentent trail connection would be
constructed as tyre area; develops. The Park Dedication
Policy requires that., as property develops the appropriate
trail improvements should be rade. ` The, trails in this area,
ar per the adopted Comprehcnsive Trail Platt and are part of
the City-wide pedestrian trai l system.
fit::= 314
ldnni tq Commission f f.nutes
Novemberr 2, t 1982
Mr. Weir su gClsted the City requi're cash 5 and Install
the trail later, when It wa;, needed. Commissionersioner Wire
suggested a subsequent owner could Install the, trail` car maks
UP the difference between thx, oasts fee paid now and ousts of
constructionion thr n. r. Weir stated doubts about that, since 1
h par d dz.o ion li tion world hate 1>rt ,atxsfi d
with tfie fees.
Clia V=EA n L 4si ,6„ri. o 3N€.6sed nV R,4 e Yb +ic hearing. :.
MOTION by Comftxssion r Steigerwaldt seconded by Coma's ioneratulber to ta.ei taction Ott the petition. voteAyes.
140TIO tarried*
MOTION by Commissioner atoigorwald, seconded by Commissioner- lufk4 to RECOMHL,NDATION,
recommend approval of the rezoninq request_ subject i
Page
1
3
Planning Commissiora minutes
November 23, 9
Staff clarified that tile prot)osed i mendment could also
1,act condition nuwbir 3 with respect to trail construction
ans.
Vote on Amendment to the Motion, Commissioner Pauha and
Chairwoman
AME- ND T FAILEr) Vasiliou Aye. 5 nays. MOTION failed.
Commissioner Wire requested; that further information and
details regarding trait constru'tiori deferral and the
r marc at xmpactsf be deeloped,
Vote on the, Main tot ,)n. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOA"
MOTION by Commissioner Steigerwald, seconded by RECOMMENDATIONStulberg, to recommend approval of the proposed Sits. f ars
adding to condition number 7 that "construction or 197 of
the required 259 parking spaces he deferred until needed".
oomissr.oner Steigerwald suggested that the ;Ct'ty , Council
re - ew the f jj'e hire varianc, request in light of the topo-
graphy to the west and the Commission's dlsQussr.on. ommts-
fke s onex Pl c, ari f ed that the act-on on th Site Plan does
not include- de ion On the fire large variance.
rote or the f .xrr Yt'Y'10H. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried.
0TIE
Commissioner Wire suggested at ro -1G cor sIider
the Option of deferring construction of the requAred tram
i{'
yqy
the trail is riot to be used for ars extended period of
time.
The Commission recessed from 9:45 to 9»55 P.M*
RECESS
NEW fAJSINESS
Chairwoma.i Vasiliou introduced the request for a final pat
for `'Bass Lake Plaza 2nd Addition"; reading of"the November WALTON JENTEPPRISES
47 1982 staff report was waived. INC. AN9 Ra Em WATLOV
FOR, "BASS LAKE PLAZA
Mr. ' atlolv, petitioner, and Mr., Lloyd Berantlan, Attorney for 2ND ADDITION"
tete petitioner were recognized. FINAL PLAT ; (A-449)
MOTION by ommtssIO"er Pluf at seconded by Ccmmissioner
t igerwald ; to re.commend approval of the Final Flat suhject RECOMMENDATION F
to the conditions as stated in the staff` report.
Page -317
larAtti.rtqoLL asion Minutes
November 23,* 15 8Z
Staf f confirmed that the petitioner and Cofnmission
adersto d the condition- to r v `se the pint so that proposed
rpt I would be at ted as aft out i of . The petitioner
concurred. d.
Vote,, A, MOTION carried.
Chairwoman Va4i icttr introduced the request submitted by ZACHMAN HOHEts, INC. Lachman Homes, Inc. for an RPD- Final #Marr and elat for "Fox RRUD Fi.NAL FLAN W) Glen third Addition0l. Reading of the Nod ,ember 10, 1982 LAT FOR "FOX, GLEN
staff report was waived. THIRD ADDITION"
rhn Anderson, Zachman Hames, . , stat f,- he concurred with
the submitted sr°aff report.
MOTION by OmmissiOner* Styigerwa d, c and d Commissioner RECWMATION
rNubato eoOMMM approval of the R'PUD FinalPan abed pat
fur "Fox Glen TiltirwdAddition" subject to the conditions as
stated in the staff report
Nate. 7 Ayes. NOTION ear,°ied VOTE,
QW -R BUSINESS
Chairwoman Vasiliou requested that the !Para inq Commission,
receive copies of general information art10,—, and CityCouncildirectiveswithrespect `' to the H4 ar 4 Rz, Waste
issue.
Staff" explained that all preliminary Plats will is i )rwarded
to the appropriate School District for ctenera review and
comment s.
Chairwoman Vasiliou confirmed that the December meet ,;ti
dates are scheduled for the 8th and Und of December.
For purposes of the Goals, Objectives,, and Criteria review,
it was requested that Commissioners auba, Magnus., and
Piuf a receive a copy of the'Residential Survey which xas
completed earlier this year*
Page 318
November
ssicot ' Plufka stated fit Ili met with Mr.. Daryl Clark
h)rt wet Area Chdmber 0 Commcree, 4nd discussed the
posy-"Aer input east the Chamber Could have in the
r Jf she Goalst Objectives, andCt. r t Of h;; Ol,ymo th om rel ensi'e Plan. He inouired if
t Xle COM t itfort agreed to irIWIN t'Q the Chamber and
Tjrwardincj a Q.os of the *tr t vee, 1,jd Criteria toMr. Clark. COm ri .Wn r Nluha stated he thought theC.Iwmber 4auld have v l ab l e ira - # Chairwoman Vasiliwj
ted t"' wOuld discuss this. Wi*-b Counci l a mb s Threinert
is Mayor Dawnport.
AD301)*RNWRT
me%'t irx Ajouraed at 10 40 'M10
PLANNING COHNISSION RUCOMMUMATEON FOR NOVEMBEA1982
RLCOMMMAT
PLMMIM COMMISSION WCOMWNDATION OR NOV R 2)1 198
RLCOMMLNDATION
TH. B-2 ZONING DISTRICT LOCATED 1N THL FOURSEASONS p NGG CENTER ( 820,5 ?
WHEREAS, Edgemont, Enterprises Aas requested apprm al of a Conditioeal Use Permit to
operate a Class 11 Restaurant in the B-2 ZoningDistrict located in the Four Seasons
Shopping Center sIstofcuety, Roads : 18- and,,
VHLRLASt the annCommission has reviewed said request at dull called, Public
Hearing dnd has recommended appso al
W, I THLKYORL , B IT HLRLBY RESOLVED by THE CITY COUNCIL 4THE 1.1TY OF PLYW0UTH1
MINNLSOTAI, ,that it should and hereby, does approve the request of .dclemQnt Enterprises
for a Conditional Use Permit to, operate a Class 'Restaurant in the B -Z Zoning
strict located in the dour Seasons Shopping Center southwest of County gad and 1
subject to the following conditions * -
1. The permit is subject to all applicable Codes Ordinances, and rc ulationss
ane violation hereof shall. be grounds for reNocatk ft,
2. All waste and waste ccnt;.aivt rs 4hall be store(. per Ordinance in designated
i {
Loading and unloading operations r leN ant to this operation shah be conducted
in the approved designated areas. No outside ora( `s permitt d.
4.
9
Siqnage shall be per the .v.j eovpd and adopted Four Seasons Shopping Center
Sign Criteria-,
5. The premises shall be maintained in a sanitary manner.
6. The hours of operation shall not exceed ..00 P.M. ,'subject t0 City Codes and
Ordinances.
7. The Permit is issued to the petion r tenant as operator of the facility and
shall not he transferable.
There shall bre no outside display, sales or storage of merchandise or rel ited
oatrals
9. The permit :shall be r N,, iew d it, (i) year to assure compliance with the
conditions.,
dskZ
1
PLANNING COWISS1014 MCWHOAT100 FOR NOVE.46LR 23, U
RLCOMMLWAT ON C
INPInROV IN R . 9 11 - i" T 4 T 1 -OR t'i - " it r +.d `A, i%E ,`''§i AMUSLMi" # CENWR : . ,
THL 11_2ZM-k, ISTRICT LOCA TW IN THL FOUR SEASONS, SHOPPING CLNTLR W059)
WHERLASt Ldgemont Utter*pristts has requested appr v l of a Conditionaltional se Permit'to
operate an Amu vmvnt Center ift the B -Z Zoning itr' e c t c ia the Four Seasons
Shopping Center southwest of County Roads 9 and 18.- ar ,
WHERLAS,7 the PlanningCofmllissiolt has reviewed sate' regw°st int a dkily called Pxtl,,l l
Flearing and has recommended ap prni,al ,
1t, Tll WCp ,, K„ IT HERL4Y RLSOLVED BY THE TY W-UNCIL OF T L CITY I LYMOU TH,
NNIc' oTA that it shoal.d and hereby dots approve the request or Etltlemrrt Enterprises
for a Conditional Use Permit to operate an Amust,meltt Center in the 6 -2 ZoningDistrict
located r.rt the Four "seasons Shopping Center southwest of County Roads 9 arid '11.4 subject
to the following conditions:
1. The permit is subject to all applieable Codes, Ordirtanpes, and regulat'lon ,
and -violation thereof shall be i9rounds for revocation.
All waste and lw,ste Containers %hall be stored per Ordinance in dAgnate
ar e a #
3. Loading Arid unloddinq operations rete, -art to this operation shall W conducted
in the approved designatedareas. No outside storage is permitted.
4. Signage shall be per the apparui t.d and adopted four easonti Shopping Ct°rttt r
tgn Criteria.
The,premisesremises spial 1 be maintained in a sanitary manner,
The hours of operation shall not exceed 11.-00 P.M. subject to City Codes and
Ordinances.
The Permit is issued to 'the petit ion r/tenant ati operatorr cep the facility trt
shall not be transferable.
f
There shall be no outside tlispla 3 sales or storage of merchandise or related
Yi
The pt xmit shall be reviewed in (1) years with the license, to assure
complianceiance with the conditions and Ordinance requir ments$
T cjtewa.} of this Permit is . also contingent upon renewal of the Amuselment Center
license. per City Code Section 1101, the license not renewed, this- hisPermitShould
Permitshall be null and void.
11, Illumination of tete video game area steal, l be the same as the restaurant area.
FLAMING COMISSION RECO ATION HOVEMER 251, 1!0V
RLHF,ilOff
APPROVING P&LIFNARY PLAT FOR DONALD C. WILMINN FOR "SCOVILLE BUS 1 H :l'ARK" AT THS.
SWUTHWKST CORNLRF 27TH AVENUL NORTH AND ERff l a LANE ( 52062 )
WHLRLAS, Donald C. Wildman has requested approval of rezoning from FRD (future
restricted development) District to 1-1 (planned 0dustr . al). DiDistrict, ` end a
preliminary plat fui three industrial lots at the southwest c rnar of 27th Avenue North
WHLRLAS, the P nni ( Commission has considered the, tquest following a duty,called
Public Hearing and has recommended aper , al f
NOW, 1 Rf Rlr.a 8, 11 HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CIS COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF #PLYHOUTUt
MINNESOTA, that It should and hereby dots approve a preliminary plat for three
indust -ial lots at ` the southwest corner of 27th Avenue North and fernbrook Lane,
subject to the following condition.51
Compliance with the Citi. Engineer' Memorandum.
2. Removal of all dead or ding trees from the property at the owner's expense,
3. Provisions for a, 30 -ft. oxide trail easement per the Comprehensive Park Plan,
as verified by the Parks and Engineering Departments, with submittal of
detailed plans as to construction of the trail per City Standards,
4. Payment of park dedication fees -int -lied of dedication with appropriate credits
In an amount determined according to verified acreage and paving costs, and
according to the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of uildLng Permit
issuance. The ev.tire trail length shall be constructed with the initial site
dtvelopme it
S. Re n-4nq shall be finalized with filing of the Final ,Pl t }
C No Building Permits shall be .issued until the Final slat las filed and recorded
With Hennepin County.
No yard setbacks are ;granted or implied.
S. Appropriate legal documentsis regarding the shared private drive easement for
Lots 2 acid I be submitted as part of the Final Plat Applications.
Removal of existing -ructures at 'developer's expense concurrent with initial
site qr dini, ...
r
NIS '
AI 1Old ` C ILLE BUSIM rkr
IL T E Al HL
SOUTHWESTRMLR 27TH`AVENULNORT14 AND fERi18ROOK LA 88462
HEREA , Donald C. 'Wildman has, requested approval of a site plan for "Scoville Busi n ss
Pdrk-' to be located at the southwest 'corner of 27th Avenue North and, f ernbrook Lane. -
and,
WHVREA , the 'Platining Coma,ssion has reviewed said request and re omme n& lt:i 4ppr v al t
NOW, THERLFORE, B. IT MERELY RLSOLVLD BY THE CITY `COUNCIL OF THE CITY CC PLYMOIJTH,
MINNLpSGTA, that, it should and hereby does approve the request of Donald C Wildman fotlx
site plan approval of "Scoville Businesss a k" to be Located ar, the sod hwe t corner, of
27th Avenue North and Fernbrook Latae, subject to the following conditions. -
1. Compliance with tlux City n ineer's Memordndum.
9. Submission of required firnarncial performance agreement for completion of site
improvements. ment
3. Approval of monti ent signape at, Vtb Avenue North' and f ernbrook Lane: al 1
other signage per Olrd'Jaance standards,
44 o pi L hoe ; thCity F irr Cade regarding the location of fire hydrants and
fire lanes,
All: waste and waste oco tamers shall be stored with the structure and, n
Outside storages is permitted.
Removal of existing structures at developer's expense.
AppruvalL of defvxred Parking Pian which provides that construction of 19
of tete required 289 parkinq spaces be deferred until needed.
Approval is for a '101,056 square foot bdzl.dInq to be constructed ` in two
phases. The i nit i t construction shall consist of a 691,696 quar foot
building., If tine second prase of tonstructicri dues not occur within carne,, year
of tite'; date, of approval' of the site pl.an,; tine petitioner shall submit a
written r ,qut`st for extension of such approval., t tate time of actual
cQ nt trur t iia of the second picas , the buI l d n4 ,hall be constructed in
compla.fiee with the then current 6uil.dznq Codes. An„, r vis'io ns or
m rlif a.dations t they appro\-ed plana shall require approval of planes pex the
Ordinance.
9. payment of park dedi ati rn fees -in -lieu of deviation with appropriate credits
in an amount determ ned accord -Ing, to verified acreage and paving CoStSL and
according to the Dedication Policy in effect at the ting of Building Permit
issuance
l4. A second .Lands tarsae shall be submitted aspp pact ' of .the Final flat
application demonstrating compl uncork with the Landscape Policy for the
ultimate development of Evert Z.
PLANNING, COMMLSSION WCOMMUMVION FOR NOVEMBER >7 1982
SL"TTING CM01TIONS TO 13L ttT PRIOR, ; TO FILING AND RUMA w RPUD Wo, 7A_-1 FINAL
PL 14 P T FOR "FOX 01.94 THIM ADDITION" t'OR ANDERSON, HMAN HOMLS, INC. (A 1
1 l""LAS, the City Council: has eppro ved the Final; larl/Plat and Development Contratn for
fox Glen ThirdAddition" as rvqvested by ZachmanHomes, Inc.-
8LT LBB LVE Y ' L CITY it CIL (f THE CITY LM}UTH
IMLSO , that it should ant: hereby doe, approve the following Conditions to be stet
prior to recording and regarding said plat*-.
1.. Compliance with arty .npincer's Memorandum.
2. The Ordinance rel. ona tag the property shall bo published upon ev i4ence that the
Final Plat ham been, filed and recorded with Hennepin County.
Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dr.dieation in accordance with Cate
pol is*- it, effect at the time o filing flee Final Plat car at issuance o1,,
Building Permit.
No Building Permits shall be issued until municipal sewer_ and water* arc - rcphysphysicallycallavailableto. the site.
Removal of all dead or dying rrom the property at the owner's expense..
f . hard setbacks per approved PUD Plan.
7. Submittal of re u! wed utility and drainage easements as Vproved by
Engineer prior to, filing the Final Plat,
1
No Buil lino Permits to be issue=d until` the Final Plat. is filed and recorded
With Hennepin County.'
9. Appropriate legal documents regarding Homeowner kosoeiation covenants and
restrictions as approved by the City Attorney, shall be fi led with the Finalal
Plat.
10. Signage approved per PUD plan.
1.. Approval shall include the lot, divisions for the two -unit dwellings subject to
approval by the pity ' Engineer who shall review submitted "as -built" surveys of
the constructed unity which indicate the legal descriptions; and w"io shall
determine what, if allyw, adjustments and, levies are necessary relative to
assessments prior to 'filing the divisions with the Count
1 Approval is subject to applicable conditiwrls of the Resolutions and
Development Contracts for the "Criterion MPUD 78:-l".
P A NIM COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR NOVO4MIR , 1962
RECOMMENDATION