HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 10-13-1982Page
October 11, 198,>
s+rrti.sicarr Izrterte*
She su e,st e-,d the p l anrt i rti exrttrti s iota de op ,a carte e nsu, Ort
the p x pcf,"C.t Ordinance provisions,,
e rtrr mssione: r Pdoba statcd it is his, opinion drat salts
sboold be ailol txi it, trite 1_I District Ott a limited basis.
Uommlls4l tier f (a rlut stated drat- if sales wt,ry c°o tplf-toy
rte p ttef l that more problems would be encounterecin rile jorio
run He suqgested allowing theysales or, a eery limit ed
basis, such as t4lWee times, every two veears.
the Impact of traffic ('In adjacent rrtAcibbo,ho,;ds. Cunmi ion r Stulberq stated ire° was riot~ in favor' of they
pr' tperse°d ami rtdMent ab tile prctpOSal led tO of la rrob e mss
s it culti"lists with tltt' existing Peddlerlt, License
e stand that his opinion is that ;the Sal o
riot btlonq_ i,rr Ott:- Indus trial District, however, he Would,
c.on:5 eeAr and l r tt rt to tlig cit iterm i . i,io r` s l t:lu€ts
ommissrorte r tulbe ret ifirrc=i reel about CiArlson Comparrle
letter Pertaining to pdrhriq on public ti l t-of.ra Otttie=ektm . al" explained that theOrdinance does cit al i ata
extended P&'ki rite Ott, pub l icy right-of-wav . t al f does not
support` allowing required parking Ort the'Public right-of- d
because of control uoncerrts. facia site should have
5uffici.ertt ptirkinq, oto—';orf, to handl la 3 esacir parki
rye:°cis
vMmxssioner Wirt, state if a compart lids a sueeess `ul sale
Cu tOmeKrs will park gars or, the rl;pht-af Yt if needed. He
stated that, it is riot reasortabIt., to prohibit l.arkinq on the
roadways.
Commissioner St'eige'rt al d sug(jestekef that they rdrndnc e
require the petitioner to hirt Police to voaorol` the traffic
for they duration of the This cast would be ah%p rj(#
beyond any administrativex` application ee..
Da e Kenrtedy, Carlson =Pdnies, explained that parking
should be allowed on they side streets but riot on ma,'e(Nr roads
or high vat's. Mr.. Kennedy eaeplaxrteu that `arl sort`wq,)art t. s
sales usually last four days, Thursday throu0b, unda. 14e
e= lllaitt d that merchandise from other Carlson facilities . i. s
brought to the Plymouth facility fur sale. The proposed
Ordirtartoe would meat allow this.
page 27
October 13, 1
Mr. Kennedy explained A.h t the Cars -Companies' sales are
liquidation saes of old'oetaloa items.
COmmilisiofler Wire stated that the City must be careful of
the potential abuse of the proposed Ordinance; espeo'ally
regard nq mer hand" se from other looatlop,;
ew.-niss oner xteigerwald, agreed with the `arlson Com panIes'
suggestion pertaining to item 4b of the proposeI Ordinance.
This item shouldread: 'per oodupant'l, rather than "per
property". Also, Cwnmis loner Steigerwald stated that atwo
dad: sale twice a year was a good idea.
Commissioner expressed concern about the reotil.arity of
hese sales Le.,,, o currl n on an anneal or seastnal basis.
He suggested the 1' ord." a "not regular In nature"., be added
to the Ordinance.
Howard Hunt, 17205 County Road 471 stated he was familiar
with one wholesale husl ess In the Cit,, which conducted a
sale at leash on an anneal basis which attractcd retailers
within the five :tate area. The planningCommission
confirmed that the en ° al public is not invited to"
sale and that it is intended for retailers and contrac to"T%,.
The, proposed Ordinance is dUeeted at those sales oriented
to the public,,
chairwoman, Vasiliou stated that thus far she Commission's
0000en us was to allow some sales, limiting, them to a
specific number and requl.rinq the petitioner to enforce
traffL; control. She inquired about the number of
applications the Cts receives for such: sales. Staff
explained that approximately, four to flee applications are
submitted per year, ' and approximately five to sax sales,
have been conducted without the appropz,iate approvals.
with reference to the letter submitted by Carlson Companies,
Commissioner Steiqerwald stated that i eiion 1) (a), she
ap licati.on should be submitted at least thirty calendar
days prior to the proposed event and not fifteen days as
suggested: Commissioner Stulberq concurred with the Carlson
Companies-, suggestion that in section ' (a), the wording
should read.- "evera,.-I "ever.-Ishall not exceed three c l ndar, days" t
and that- two of the days shall he aturday and unday".
Commissioner teig rwald suggested ad inq the word
llcor. ,ecutivezl hetore the ward :"calendar" in this item.
Pages 272
pla(in i €q C mmis i, n Minutes
October 13, 1982
The Cc rMis zura cone rred thdt in Se ct icrrt r b the events
shall riot ex ce ed two evtrts per eae€rdrr year per
ceup r€tt"t rather than "property". Commissioner 'etre
s €,s e,d (fdi nel the words.-, "not reqular in nature" to the
Daley Kennedy, Carlson Cctmparrle , inquired if sales to
errat)lQNees woUI d be VoUnted as part ()f tfle al lu ahle gale
days. The Commission exp wined that the rdinancc—, is
i r t nded to address sj t the h € ener uh l c and not
itr te°r alrt r pldye e ales.
Comms-3sione#r Stulberq concurred with the Carlson Companies`
su pcs lun for items e), which would delete the last
entet€ e Of the, paragraph and reword the second s ntenue -u
ead, "'only reretxarrdf.se which snormally €a€crf'attrref, sold,
crr° s tolc* d by t tae occupant on the shut premises sfv
old nd € r promoted".
m l otter Steigerwald stated that parking should be
Aluwe:d on the public; right-of-way and streets of minor or
weal roads during the eeend. They Ordinance should
pr oN id that "'traffic control by authorized law e?efor etnx nt
officers, as approved by they Director~' of public Safet be
r vide-ei % the petitioner",.
Conmis over Stulberg suggested that the proposed Ordinance
n r€dment arid Peddler's License code requirements be
utrurdin t e;d so as t0 pr errt conflict Between the
rtquiremerets.. C m€ isslotter t uiqPrw4d stated they
Cu mission could request theCl,t Council to also reNiew t
Peddler's 's Livens . Commissioner Stulberq sergge*s f rTM
Ordinance contain the requirement that the perMi
ail opl a dStaff suggested that a requirement shbu l d be
ail ed that thepetitioner show elvidenCe of State Sales T3jx
number. The Commission concurred..
Chairwoman Vasil ou inquired if Carlson Companies (dresse a
such sales in their lease agreetr nts with tenants. Mfr.
et ned indicated he did not think they leases addressed
this. tie stated he would ito e tiu to the lease lanquageL.
Chairwoman etas it uu V l used the PUb io Hearing.
MOTION b Ccs€ issXon r Stulberg, ,seconded by Commissioner
telger ral,d to take action On this item at this € eeting.
Vote ales. Commissioner Plufka absent.
i"273
Pl,--nni n.
t r 13, 1982
NOTION y ummissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner RUCOMWNDAT IONStfig(OWId to r enom end ddopt iura of the proposed Orth n4in€ e,
dnx-n i rpt as revised withfurther cgndat ion to
the 4mefldmetlt with the, Peddler's, License.
Cheirwonan Qviliou suggested that the Ccnmrnission recommend
rt',view or the Wdler's License code; requirements as part of
the dgenda for 1981.
dyes. Commiss, oner Plv ifka ahspnt . MOTION cirrr ed . VOTE
ouriv il tuber Threincyt confirmed that the City Council was
also concerned about the tramsient r ref --ant s .
chair womdrr as l iou introduced the proposed Shoreland SWRELAND, MET
Area Ordinance A t tWment aria oven d the Public AREA ORDIMNCE
i n(I eadin # of the Oct-ober 7, 1982 staff report was AWNDWNT:..
pedr
oyzard jkvit, 172W ourrty Road 47, stated that it is his
u irrr.urr the propos ,d Orrin rt rt imposed a burden on the
pr ezien4 Citizens of thy: City. The amendment dues not
pwovide a means for #opeas t ion for those people who wool d
not be tlydndfath red under the current Ordinance. ce. 1r. Hunt
plamd that his home in Wthin the Shoreland. ManagenNit
Ara and that e would be "prandfath red"; however, 'W,
01"sitt Wt.ry system must be cl ikoat ed within We years
d"d he does not have MOM on bin land where he could
r elo at ; the .Xyst (,,M.
Mr,- Hunt identified that his property is classified as
shurelahol within the neral Development Area of Elm r
He requested t.bdt the Cit, defer adoption of the propos d
t d" amendment until.. ef ter: 411 of : the f luwinq items :are
p$
1;
j
1. That at 1 affected properties are guar ~meed
Mrandfath r d" on- onfor inq status-
2. That the City receive fends from State revenues to
install cOmPlAnO sanitary services at no cost to
this property ownersz
31. That the State provide funds to acquire stior l and
properties wkich do not emply with the new
regulations similar to emmi ent domain procedurn
used for roadways;
1,390 274
rrr;mrs ierrr r.rrrat exs
ct($b r• µi ,
1982 4. That the prerp+a acd Shoreland ,eriay District
maps. be amended to exclude rrurt-con i 4 i n, e x i st i nti
us(,,., Mr. Hunt Oquired if Item (b) on page tour (
Interpretation Rourtdaripis) arta thijt tic. t)i!Aria berurreiar e!s could
be t""plailled that It dues not ft°-art the b urreiar` s curt
be ari;.`tust e butt ratheYr, it pray A d(-, for the par t
icti ete{te r rirrat rrarl f tshorelatid limits, e o
topographic sttudt iurrs for exdMPle. Suers Cases warred be re ivwcd or,
a ase. by case
basis* ir. Hurst stated this caa apply to his situation as his
holes z< located oil a
tri1i r. 14"Int inquired if Items 4 1 firo jgh () con
Iraq(- rre e onr "ist nt with they stat° staff e:drifi -
med this. He expressed Cearioerrr aboxrt It-e 4a( on rra
e' W- r'tair inq to substandard bats; and the lanctua,4e e ri:o i r{eak'.
f sir lot is in separate ownershi,p frm, ahut irret
Lands", Mr. Hutt stated this i.s4: i ser imin:. t q toward
theruWrt owxley)Vho anc-els, Staffexplained
y #{i g1
iArrte my of ttreri State t e u. t ion Lr to ixk1r ss
those situations where a lot is adjacent to a urstandard _ lot
and s oriacd by the same" 'Wope:rt o ne#ry and where they
lots stroma: be vonso l dated to el im rate they substandard
lot. Mr. {urrt O uireact if rer rene- i,rr 4a(4) to they Urban
Servicp Area rtsieTred to tht,: Metropolitan Urban Seer*vires Area.
Stafr stated this wool be er 'iedj as the irrt rpt. is to rkerer
to areas wh(-.ru trunk sanitary sewer service is avuilabl ,
qtr. 14aaV i explained that if referonce is to be made to the,,
s Called City Urban r,Ice:Area (''(JSA)) then they item is
riot Mr,, Hunt eh prvi ed concern, bout- Item rib on page 6t
arld tit ted that th1 larru.-ige ries scot address top etr phy
or
re le- dt.i n, but only refers, to a lineal setback
distance. Mr. Huntsuggestcd suggestthat instead reference should be rude
to a minimum basement eieviation above the high water
elevation. staff explained ,that if topo raphio consWerations are
in order, they can be addresssr throuqh the
interpretation par4i rah previously discussed. It was explained that
the Shortlaiid Mandq t*ifr1, requlations are not intended to
address they same items a3 Flood Plain requIations, but arein-
tended to protect publke
Page 27 55
l.arinin " mmilsi. r, minkI es
Octoberz 198
Mr , Hum $i at tact t hat it ear d , ,w : , epi tje
rTore e- ' to private ru dsl',: Also, It° 4(j(41) ')Fl pat Is
drwi ewa s from hparking arreta s reeninp rectul$atiots.
Staff c:.lar•if"ied heat Item b urj pj S reffl,rs to propdsc°
Plats Whip',h are not. exvmptedl, per lte n 4j(5) out Vacle
Mr,, Hunt .red to pa 10$ item 1h: ar d to pa e 131 t c-
loc., + , sewage isPP>dl and referred to his
prt,;y rul u , v tnax-ndaat iorts wh i.eh should bt, Considered by, the
r t It propos 4-ifendment were adopted, hii *- sarjitar'
fair: rIit aes it, ould `= if' i0ldt W re O . the €li dinance
requir ments. St,'.f4 confirmed for f4r. Hurst, r .at the
sWttdat for srst t s, lasted on page 11 are consistetiv with
the ONR rvquiryents.
M,r., Ha rt inquired wr;d wuc l d submit a variance a plie t * as
tl4ined on page 13 of the proposed ar errdrr nt . Staf
vxplai.rted that tht, n r l * 4rzance procedure would be usedr
the' dre initiated b pr , t owners r. Runt; s este'
that the public he gi ra should he recessed and an i nv ert r yforallvarx1(c'e sit*:rat1Wns be prepared and that all persons
irivu,lved be notified of the potential impacts. He expressed
Cone'°rrt ah .rt Item 10 ti on page 13, indicatinthat `this
would revertt homecwr er rrc%-n improv inn heir xistinq
dwelling. fe r°ei.terati:d that the amendment needs to ;. address
rniti a ri sand d per*ation at no cost to owners,. Overall,
fie
indii.
c°at d, " his concern is that the reu: a°tions will
hinder the future title, transfer,` and sale 0 property.
Ommissi ner Stiqerwald stated that fit! is personally amo re
Of the impact of t,h ri Shoreland Mandctemx-nt re a ataiotis,, and
explaairted that -.these re dations are needed in order to
address the way public waters are polluted due to improper
Sh rel and development.
Cham .YUMa", Vdiiliou inctuired if Mr. Hunt has discussed the
atilt(, rcguldtM4 with the elected State Representati%es.
Mr. ur4t indicated he had not;,hair e ar Vas"Iiou stated
abuses -u th uh.liL-vvilE r have occurred in the last
decade, but t,rat those pt, -o l.e in place should not he
required to move, She statedthat art earlier discussion
indicated that the substandard lets existing ursec ficine
Lake would be, qrandratheri3O intoto the regulations. Staff
explained that the existing lots on the east side of
Nis itte Lake are already restricted h the Zoninq Ordinance,
acrd t rr t the proposed amendment would not, i tvtens i fy the
res ti Ct'ions.
Noe 1
anrlifo, Commission Miltut ko3
October 13, 1982
St al t MA ett thot the ubstandard of do not conform to the,
revrlatiotts wWlrespect to area ;and setbacks. Th
rcVulatious wuurcuip1y to Ortlyr those 'I -As fl yh abet the
pubUQ water. The int rit of the regWations is not t
render 'a £- useless, but to require corrfefitjorj to existirlq
a,irwt ,,Art dtr ilibct inctui tie about thy, ant icipat d t iminq of
review Of t t, opo!sa ,, Staff explained that the CWmission
evuld consi c r° the information at h,jr 11ext *j-fqular meetine
ill November. The `t " Is for adoptions per DNRINuvetbr13, 1982.
1u .,rwm .ldber', ; LundgrenBrothers trr struet. icrtt Ct trtpan,w,
ttted On dif " rettc'c;s betweett tttc# s ittdars (I (It i fid`
aqt` 5 and M ems a 1 through (3), and t he DN
r (VJu lat io I 1!i Ht,expressed c 0n eet It dbout exist i n approved
prelimittiry plats and the impart Of the rtcjulations i
ado t -ed -confirmed that, per itcm, 5 b brr page Pj those
thew pIdts which ar° nconsist. fit with the horelar,€t
Md(t r c.=tri; ttt regulations would be forwarded to t h > Departmt,rit
of Natural Resources. Staff explained that the rod clo
r egfula.t roars 'were, in some eds s# more restrictive than DMP
criteria,. but were con x t <- t with aria no more restrictive
than existing Ordinance standards.
Mr. Goldberg inquired how the rcegtilet karts address Planned
lri tevelopment , Staff referred to paae 6,1 Item 4a(5a),
and paue 9, It em 6. Planned Unit, Dei l ooment s are
exc c t ions to the miulation.5 cr dr1 approval b WIR. The
r cT rildtion5 take into account tf use of Planned ifnit
Devel pmetit provisions and enck ura e clusterinq of homes grid
preservation of open space.
Mr. Goldberg ex r i- s ed concern about ttti s representino
d"Ot,htr agency that would be re uirfd to review proposals
Mr. Goldberg inquired if" the 110 fta lot, width requirement
state on paqe 5 is applicable to those lots which are
located on cul -de -,sacs. Staff explainO that the lot width
s rt .asur d at the building line,,and the cardiriar, high
water mark, tirid riot the front lot lute where the current
Ordinancecul-de-soy lot width provisions apply'. Mt..
Goldberg m1firmed that the minimcmlot size would include
larks area within, the water. Staff explained that i the
property, line extends into the water, the grass area would
Include : that portion. '1*'t:bacs would be from the ordinaryhighwatermark,,,
Page 277
f lann ngmmissionMinutes
October 3 1982
MOTION b Chairwoman a lllov, seconded b.V Commissioner RECO A0 P, f_
Pa ba defer action on the Proposed Ordinance amendments TO W. R11 4 , 4 (IN
Reeding responses to the oucestions submitted during this
Public hearing. The Public Hearing shall be continu ed and
notices be seat to those present and to the
tp q{{yy pM' {{
f*ul#dg
i[\aeloi$xn'6C. `ouC"..
Staff explained that a list of Pr j rtie with potential
variances and with non -complying sanitary facilities has not
been prepared. Staff explained that all the property owners
within, the shore and areas were got notified, in that . the
regulation . were not a re oninp of lana. Extensive
discussion ensued. Howard Hunt suogested the inventory of
non -complying sanitary facilities should be done now, with
funds prolded by the DNR.
Commissioner tul berg stated that st,.ff response to the
issues ral ed should be reviewed by the Commission before
an -r further action Is con idereo.
Iou tc lmember fhrellnen suggested that the`ommi on couf dl
recommend. inventory f" and notice t impacted prof)ernes
tyan
l.
VOTE 6 ayes. Coftimissinner Plufka absent. MOTION carred.VOTE
hna CbMM SSiOn took a five minute recess.
NEW BUSINESS
Chairwoman Vasilf oar introduced the request submitted by RPUD FINAL PLANIPLATRobertMiddlemistforanRPUDFinalPlanandPkatforaHERRYMIDDLFMIST"
development to be known a "Nerry Midd .emist" for property 81055)
located at 31st Avenue North and Pilgrim Lane. She iniuxred
if the petitioner had any questions. Mr, Midd:l:'-mist
indicated he had no questions regarding the staff report
however, he would be sending a letter to the Council
discussing, concerns, with the Engineer's recommendations
Reading of the September , 1982' staff report was waived
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner RECOMMENDATION A
Pauba to recommend approval of the proposed RPiP Eisai Plan
and Plat,for "Perry Middlemi t" subject to the c edit-; ons in
the :staff report recommendation
VOTE 6 ayes. Commissioner Plufa absent, MTI(w carr. ed. VOTE
Page 2 TIA
anninq Commission Misjjlts
Chairwoman Vasiliott introduced the request subroittc.d byCeceliaDrazekOr4totMvIsIon/Variance aPIRation for
CUR 1 A `K
property located at the n rt ww st corner of Ridtlemount
LOT DIVT51(ml, ;
VARIAM (87015) Ave and tac n ilia Lane. Readinq of the %tob r 19441:
staff report t -'as waived.
Commisv,,ioner Wire Inquired why the petitioner chose
divioe the property by, metes and nllnol$1 rather than
Plat t 1 n . Ms. OWN explain& that ween she initial1y
considered dividing theproperty she was unaware a variance
was involved. Un notification f the requIr n*n st she
InNesti ata d V& cOsts O latt} in(l versus dividim the
property by metes and bounds and determined pidttinq was to,o
costly. tly. t'amm ssioner WI -re Inquired what the ccists fop
Platting would be. FIs. Drazek stated tiv,t an estimate was
submitted for 514000.00. , Staff confirmed that dependina on
the aunt of field work ; required, a preliminary and final
Plat could om teat. AmOMIt Staff explained that this
IrOPerty was origl ; y patted many a n, and was
subsequently Ji v ide b k! mites and bounds description.
Now the petitioner requ sts to divide the property again
metes and u!ds description.
CSA.{misbTi&.#ne Stu—I L-.-rg c -'c of im. d -. 'thatt A&,T, <8 ,R o ss dews
require _ ci vc,,:- ance.
OTT y Commissioner Wire, seconded, by Qmissioner RFCOMWNDATTON A
t l rwald commend tLy tytom[ DIv¢o 1
COCOAapproval
subjectazek
conditions in the staff report, due to platting heinq cast
rVi Itivt for division Of a int into two lots which were
r end y platted.
VM ales. 00mmissioner NO& absent. MOTIOArrled. VOTF
CtMSSIOnell Wiry.* su sledthat the Plat,an ng Commissloo
review the rdinan requirements which establish that
variances are needed in order to divide property by antes
and bounds description. Tt appears that, considering the
co'st, 1-: May, e reasOnkle Q KIM Such lot divisions,
Chairwoman Vasiliou stated' this would be added to the
recommended a nd for qhi Staff supgested that the
entire aubdiVlsion Ordinance be re-evaluated and updated.
October 15" 19sZ
Chizirwomao Vasiliou irttroduced the request 'ttva b. GARDIM-MATWOKGardinq-Ntuzuk Properticfor Florell Class flt ou r n<t., Inc. PRVERTIES FOR, for the Pit"'artrr;crl-m is"si o•r arra ' counci t err cc. FMIL # B Ithetrmtnrtloft :. ° t o u e for por I oc;A t ed a t
1440 Kil ,r° Ldne. Rc-,,adinq c,,f t eetAvoth ,,'staf r
v dltur for herr rt -Lync h—Burnet, w[l
c-Prest1rtt'' tile etit i n > . f= ',ain that V%e landownersers
x
1-31-r t. r of a &nt:11 IAboratory rrr tile Cit.., ¢.r
r~etr t iel ct* The , trer pecat i, , r bu erg of tile'proper Opt- rt(,s it
t r r rtt r; .e'Ac h CWO)st,, - Mr. "endrickson stated ojt
The pub t c d0t-4 rrcrt dt t i tnui sir. e t c f--,rr the tvse .
He rrtit. e that ch rit, gat .t arbor-Aor v s art dt t ' tri use air the
ife t xplirrned flat ttre two a e"s are
simil tar t,rr that bt h fill ec.rst m sra mt t eco byctierttthetrrrmberofe € loNevs is low and are tr t,
i . ec t.tnrr..t ry tools art, c('41* and the,;pr-Ocess t.rry toe ,
trr t or r is ko, ex* n' t ex t ht-, (Ilas5 blowiliq cr klcr
intvd the Btaff tr: the staff rewits is nt.t t c xrrr*x tyt.- f firm os thc proposed land use. Tire_ ti, ted business
ct !> it's a w4 0.1t the qlass is meltled dorm*
cast Ot tiro Ulrrt,xr companies are located on ttre east codst
rrttr tamttecfrYv vt,, k rtdb e, eino lo r ier companies wfio
service their wn needs.
Mr. ertdvic ksu!t st,dtvd that the 1,ridowrtvr.,4' dental business
would emplvy approximatelv 5 veoj)j, anti is tocated in q r
dppr,,.ximdte 4,00 . t"t4 br ttd,rn ., The use rrry tves ,eryIOWtrdltWandctm. - c.rr*c,d tvr4 *e r4 tree t q ls
ldbtor,, c-n(,rate tiro amv type of trditic n
gMyor
p y$
ould
rrt mht r Gf, -MP 4 mX'4 es.'
mr trar Steigerwald Inquired if an art t t Kq, Jss
blowinq studiois amr ar use. qtr. Moret t ex ta,.net that
the t.wfa uses dre different .rfr that an artist reforms tete
qla,54 trr MUlten_ state trrr u(th a gape. The err opo er.
1au-r rr%€ e ls!, ' c.)r %. a small scale
MOtIOU by Commissioner Steiqerwald, seconded by Commissioner RECOtWNDAT 10114
Stulberq to, recommend tete determination that a qlasst trrq
laboratory be considered, a substantiallsimilar Use to a
ental la crret r which is art al lowilbte use to the 9-3
Zoning District,,.
Pape
Planninq Co rms u,On lnute
toter 13, 1982
Commissioner Magnus Inquired if such class gif leat Ion was
definitive en u h to prevent a qla s anu aoturin
business from locating in the 6-3 District. Staff exnjajgtt d
th t the rdl nanee wouldhe elarl 'led to reach,
laboratories -medical, dent -A, glass hlo a.n ". This
approach is reasonable enoucth to distxn usi sh between the
glass 11bo.ratory and a Qlassware manufaefurinq
VOTE 4, ayes.Comm! ssl.uner pl ufka absent. MOTION carried. i
HER BOSt .5S
Chairwoman Vasrliou explail ed that the rommisslon and PROPOSE LAND TRUSTCouncilhadr-aVI'levved., this matter at the Joint meeting on
Monday October 11, 1962 and thansic hadn rmed the
Council the matt-er would he retijrned to the Commission, ,for
final r evaew anz# action.
MOTION mm ss over Ste1qerwald seconded by Commissioner. FCOMW.NDATION
Magnus , to, endorse the establishment of a Plymouth Park and
Recreatloo Land Trust as, set forth In the August 18$1982
Assistant City Uana er's emor«aodum n ludi n tete draft
e4fResolution dated June 7
f
Mt ,'4,10 d by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner
i
AWNDWMT TO MOTIONtelerwal, d to amend the Motion by recommendiriq the x
following changes to the draft Resolutions
1. Modify paragraph a (purpose), to specify th t j
donation o land shall he held for a reasonai)le
time (perpetually) or until it is spec l'aoal.ly
determined tbat the lard is not needed- and,
Add to Item d the ele mant o malntena'nee costs.
Lxtensive discussion ensued, and Chalrwoman Vasilioti
commented that hex concerns with this proposal include the
observation : that the Parks and Retreat ion Advisory
Crxnmission1has some reservations about tUs and that it is
not possible dor one1t ounell to obligate future City
Councils with respec;tR, to "perpetual" cc"mitment<s on parkland
and the like.
P N G COMISSION RROMW14D ION A
PUNNING COMMISSION, RECOMWNDATION 9