HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 09-08-1982CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLMNDC COMMISSION R, ES
SR S , 1982
The regular meeting of the Plymouth Pl.1nninqC miss cin w s
called to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT*: : Chaff rwo ar,, V as it i ou, , Commissioners
Wire, Maqrju,, Sttglb rqa P ufk , Padba,
4ndl.Commissioner St ig rwal d (arrived
at 8.00 PIM
WMBLRS AWENt None
TAFf PRESENT! Community DevelopMent Director
Blab Tremerei
CwmUnitY DeVelo Ment Coordinator
Said Moconn
1 11 a,MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, se or ded
by Commisssioner Plufka to approve the
Minutes of the August TS, 1982 meeting as submi t t d . VOTEAyes. Commissioner Steigerwald absent Commissioner
wus dbstained.
Ctxnmissionor Stulb rg inquired when thy' August , 198?
Minutes would be distributed to the l.anninq commission for
Tviow. Staff stated that the lnut z would be completed b
September 10, 1982.
PUBLIC HMIWS
Chairwoman Vasiliou introduced the request submitted bre
Frank Larsen for 'Car -Lar Properties, for
AR -LM, PROPERTIES
a r„.',,Jsod RP1J5
oro pt Plan for "Plymouth. Hill,-, Estates” located at the
R VISM RPUD CONCEPT PLAN
FOR "PLYMOUTH HILLS
southwest corner of Vicksburg Lane and County Road 9. The ESTATES" (801.13),
revised concept Plan calls for a r dvotion in the number of
residential. units (72 total units Q nsistirtg of 44 4 -unit
towrth m s, and 28 2 -unit townhomes) , and the inclusion of a
church s Reading of the August 30, 1952 staff report
vas waivEd.
Chairwoman V'as l lou opened the public h earinq.
Cry. Fr4nkt McCombs -Knutson Associates, representing rho
petitioner introduced Messrs. Frank Larsen, Al Cara son, Lee
e t, Reverend Bob ohn , and Sohn rano # Mr. Frank stat-
ed that the plant is similar to the original plan approved in
1980. the major revision to t1le concept plara is thenriy9 }, 7tFc,us o't ?1 "tytsf acrechurch site.
54
Page 255
Planning c rissi n Minutes
September 8,, V
Mr.. Frank stated the petitioner is concerned about: the
recommended traillocation,, which calls for tile, tram to belocatednorthoftheproposedquad €$nits in` the north sidef ,it Avenue. from tine west bov.ndary to the creek, then
follow the roadway of 41st Avenue.North on the r*,arflr sideeasttoVicksburgLane. Mr. Frank requested that the traillocationtothesouthbt° 3appr v d as on tile proposeded ctIn t
pl4n. The location of existing-trail its t ly th Ail IsAdditionwerereviewed, and Mr* Frank indicated that stat° fIs
safety c nceens are not impacted, and that the proposall
proNkdes a more aesthetically ple asing trail location,
WMissi ner Magnus inquired if the bike path located within
the southeast exception parcel, as identified on the propes-
cnr1ce t plan Mould be constructed at the same, time the
pr oj,c t develops. Greg Frank explained th,t the petit*.a n r
would de elup, only that portion of the trail that is locatedwithinth $ PUU boundaries.,
Frank Lai-.-. ;itat d that when the Downtown Pl Mout h -rea wascrll€ra.
a ranr etiI the petitioner dedicated parklandinclu-
ding a public trail corridor, The public corridor
separates the less dense 'residents a,"L areas ° and the more
dense areas,, and gener=ally follows the creek. The proposed
trail is vonsistent with the original plans and to relocate
the trail would b all sin" cessary duplication.
Staff explained that as the ori incl concept plan was
approved, the City anticipated the construction of ars under-
Pass at the southeast corner Of the e ,cepticn parcel and
Vicksburg Lane. That underpass is no longer anticipated,
ther fore$ staff feels for safety reasons,, the trail should
e luvat d on the north side of '41st Avenue North. Locating
Pail on the north; side of 41st Avenue North would pro-
crossing of Vicksburg Lane at, a road ir:tersr~ ticn
O arsen commented that h(# felt there was a greater
traffic hazard at the road intersect icon because of turningmoveWntstandthe: underpass had not been viewee. as feasibledue ?., e4 vat cans Arid soil conditions.
Commissioner Magnus inquired if the petition was reviewed byPRAC. Staff stated haat the pr}c est, iya5 reviewed by til
arks and Recreat ion Department ' wit ch informs PR of pe nd-
n applit:ations.. A recommend4nion has beer;{ Made by theParksandRecreationepartmeatandthepetitionerdisputesthergcommerlda't ion
page
lr lli1v Commission Minutes
September 8, 1482
Chairwoman Vasiliou closed the pablic hearing.
0 l fd by Commissi6ner Pa ha] seconded by Commissioner Wire,
to t *c action oa this petition. VOTt 6, Ayes. Commissioner
t iger ald absent.
il.qTJOH by Commissioner auba, seconded by Commissjonc Wire 'MOTION TO APPROVE
to recaomrid approval f the proposed revised Concept Playa O NOATIdor 'Plymouth Hills Estatsubject to, the conditions as
staters it, the, staff r jx)r : adding to condition number ) l
to read as. fill. sr "Provisions for buffering, and b rminp
along County Road 91, Vic burs Lane, 40d tete residential
units to the west".
MOTION to AMEND by Commissioner Wire,, seconded bym*s MOTION TO IkWNDione ° Plufka to delete ondition number 4 as recommended
and replace heondition to rad as fell ist "A 30-ft.
trail outlot shall be. provided for t1te trail location and
crossingas frropos d".
Commissioner Plufka i1quir d when the -trail would be con-
structed aeros& the exception pdroel.Staffxp aId that
facia the property is platted, the City can acquirt an ease-
ment across, the cxception parcel and on truce the trail, or
defer; ccnstr%ictls n' until the %:, ptidn pa e.e..1 develops.
Commissioner P ° crfka confirmed that t'ite. petitioner indicated
they would + unatr ct. a trail l ra a City' acquired casement
over the exception parcel if credit for paving was given
toward their 'Park Dedication.
Commissioner Pzuba stated he agreed with the. amendment, how-
ever, considering the -staff r omme.-Idation and Enqineerls
Pcpca-t he was reluctant to vary from that recommendation,*
He suggested that the issue be re-evaluate4 by the Parks and
Recreation Director and PRAC.
hairy Oman va illob stated that the Clay Council directs
r vi w of items by the various Commissions and that 4!
liaz.sdn, Commissioner. Magnus should discuss the issue- itt
the- parks . and Recreation Dire.0tor.,
Commisfsioner Wire stated that the proposed trail lot,
was identified and approved in 19,80.
5-9
Planning Commissilarl Minutes
Sept embe r 8 t 119
OMissio.4er Plufka stated thatCommission hauld review,
tile trail 10at j It ill terms of land Use. He stated he pre-
ferred the trail to be located along the oreek as proposed.
Commissioner 8tulberg observed the earlier approval address-
ed the traAl yrosslnq at Vdsbur x but it was not specific.
Staf !fated that meetings have been held with the petition-
er and church representativesto explain that, as s bse-
quest ,latining applinatz ns are submitted I s.pe :ral attention
should be given to, pr *:rding an adequate transrtr: rt between
the rt'srde t al units and the church. Frtvik Larsen also
stated that he had discussed this issue with the church
representatives. Mr. Larson vjggested that aeonCountyRod(', 5 at the northwest rnterseetion bermrng ;should be
minimal, in order to provide adequate sight _-,,isibility for
traf F ic. Chairwoman Vasiliou suggested that an overlay
graphic be utilized to diagrd the impact of the proposal
and transition, as site plans are subnwrtted.
TL aft till'. AMEDMT S Ayes. Commissioner Pauba Nay. VOTE ON AWNDWNT
Commissioner 8t rgerwald abstained.
OTL vitt the MAIN OTIONN NVED. 6 ayes. Commissioner VOTE ON MOTION
Ke gs}rwal d abstained.
Chairwoman W14rlin introduced the request submitted by DYER PALMER AND
epi rs. Buyer Palmer and Rn n ald Libby to regnrde a 16.1 acre ROMLD L19BY - LAND WS
parcel locafted north of Bass Lake Road ata east of Hemlock GUTS p NOW T
arse r the -1 (low density residential) elassx i ation 82048)
to thv LA -4 high density residential) classification. Read-
ing of the September 1. 1982 staff report was ,waived.
mzssioner° fe A Biba stated that because the petitioner is a
R r end j, n ig1rib r , and elient httl would not deliberate on
th i petition. Commissioner PauN left the t ibie.
Chairwoman Vaniliou opened the public hearx ng .
Tr°i stam fidge, Attorney,, 'stated, he was reprt ent r ng Wesley8romda. wha has filed suit against' r. Boyer Palmer, dis-
puting the acquisition portionrr o this land by Mr.
Palmer from. Mr. 8rc lin, fir. Hage stated that Mr. Br(mlan, was
not opposing or endorsing the application, but wanted the
Planninglog Commission to be aware; of the lawsuit.
Rags'
Planning n Minutes
September ,
Hd9e distributed eopies the ` ecxnpjaint and, Net i.ec,, of
Suit.
Chairwoman VAsiliou inquired, how this itif rmatio worldiactthePlanningl:s Mr. Rage
explained that the 4141y e trsid rati(ni js if file t-`,It saeti cr
01 title for prat rty involved, in this regde q 4 idedtetitlewouldreturittoMr. (cagj,. If the rKhacl e n land
use is approved, ved, Mr. Bromlti would have t tea with a hich r
d ns, tY on tyre property.
n
Commissi ner l f a r° q es ;ed that the land i q€cest: n be
identifi d. Staff explained that if the Planning CommissionandCit 'Sloan it rtguide the lan(I ttrz the merits of the use
Of 00, 1411d, the Property would then he req ded no matter
Wowns the Property. Staff` e .la ned that h City Atter- fie has Wen nt eted$ and has determined that the a li s-
tion can be r(-"''ticwed om the merits of the 111rd ase. It was
confirmedthat the Hennepin County Ree vds show, that Mr.
almer does have fee ownershp, of the property today,, The
Issue at hard does no involve nirti rig, Site ` plan, or con-
ditional ease permit items. Mr.aq. confirmed staff,$
stat Nits.
terry Hei tland, 591 Goldenrod bane, D q r i `' th
Petitioner would be committed to constructing' sir home
if V e land is req ided. Commissioner Fluff^ -a explained, that
any allowabl.e laced use per the LA -4 'classification and tion-
reg ridin R-4 Zoning District would he allowed. Mrs. Heit
land inquired if that included apartmentent uses os i sion-r
t i erwald ,explained that ; apartments are an allowable use
in Lite LA -4/11-4 elassi i:eation-
hai wom Vl Vasiliou and Commissioner St i qer al d confirmed
that additional public hearings would be held on subsequeat
laflniclg 4PPlicdtiOns for dart reZoning and conditional use.
permits. Staff explained that the submitted concept plan
for the. requiding application provides an indication of
possibUt land use for the property; however, the props 3-
land use is not committed as part of the requrd7nq-.
r 9 F'r°dnkt McCombs-Xn is r Associates,rept, asevntjnq the
Pet i t i ner plai.ned that the application was`, r%r v. ewtW with
the Bass -Lake Homeowners Association, Resider t s *, r q net
overly positive, or negative about the proposal* and woer-
ally felt it was worthwhile, r. Frank reviewed tire- grope-
Sal with respect to the location criteria established,d in the
pl,dr ninq Commission minutes.
September 61 1982
W state=d that she most important c skiers to should be
Oven tO the natural ch racteri tics of t ? site. file site's
terrain makes, the lard difficult for devulcp nt of low den-
iq residential units. Mr. Frank reviewed he topography
Of the site indicatinq thatapproximate.1y 70% of the site
consists of grades gra excess of 12%1, and a ravine.
Mr. Frank reviewed e ne in, County's observation for access
Mrd t0f's t)nc-r rs. Re stated that lit as not feasible td
m e s the site Ff a. Manner to align the access with ` r-
orae Lane,, or to acnes t0 gi-il enrod Lane, Staff e a' ed
that ,as d concept playa t 'tdetaj , d access concerns are. not
tYPiCdl ly> di 5cuss . The detailed 'reviews would occur a
that'tiubsequent Pldtti"4 and site Plan stages should' the
requ dl rq he approNed,,
t ran addressed tai' issue f sewage flows,, stating the
Petitioner understood starvs concerns with resect to the
LA-4 clas ificatiorl, Mr. Frank req e,ste.d that the Commis-
Sion consider that the proposed concept of land use is close
to the c lassl floatio for anti l a e ewacc
flows.
Commissioner Steigerwald conf Rrmed that the lane west of
Hemlock dnd north of County Road' 10, was ruzded LA-1,
l,s * ssl to intAude , c merit about previous storm, drainaq
problems in that area.
Sue.} New, 11705 Bass Lake Road, inquired about r aliqnr rat
for CountY Road 10 Staff explained that the road would no
h. realigned, however, there were plans for widening and up-
gradingng the road. s. New commented that approximately1/2 years ago, she saw "Wo proposed layouts for County Raaf0. One of the layout,-, cal. led for the roadway' to be
realigned, through this si,16 which would, gVeatly, impact the
propose( land use. Staff confirmed that there are
approved purrs f(jr Hennepin a unty to reaI'lra the rc,a
through this site.
Boyer Palmer, 5780 Oakview Lane North,, the petit' or;akrl,
explained that he presented the proposal to the mass " %e
Homeowners Assoczaijon ,and there was no opposition. Pl
concern oaf the ' re idea s was that the existirlo trees and
screening, re a ;-,
ar r Cpm r s rrminutes,
et.emer 8,1, 198
Chairwoman Vasjj;,,)Lj closed the Public bearing.
MOTION b Commissioner tr, rQ. c l'.01 Commissioner
Plafka to tar ar:t r rr 011 this petition. C, AyCommissionerrha (,.,',id not - del c er ate.
G T I Ottby C Oris over atul er , seconded by C minis i-Iner` MOT TO DENStrerwadtr° arc-rid denial f the proposed Lard Use
Guldw Plart knendiwznt with referenceence tri theEngineer's Merwr"-
andum re9drding the imPde-t j n sewageows- tete .unite
t'V reviewed with the ; Gz° h Nan; and
noting the action is on tie issue of purdrrip, and nqt on the
merits of a specific land use.
Commissiotter Wire Q,011curred with the cone 'r(I of the puterrt -
stwer flowifterease, aW reguiding wwild.'u,)t be good
idn'l rip- Commissioner Stelgerwald (%pr sed mi ern about
locating aa LA-4LA-4guided area if- the - st of a developed low
vn*ity neighborhood. Commissioner 'Fire stated that this
dr° It- V r 4 nq us traffic conditions and that a hiqher
r.fttefisr.tY ute W)uld not to appropriate,
OTE on tho TION- 6 A.Ves. Commissioner Pauba d.i d not V'OC'Edeliberate. MOTION carried.
Cam ssiomr= P-luft'd, inquired i t there was any way to approve
a Land Use Guide plan nd nt cont rigent upol a specific..
acrid, ute?Stafr explained that qenerally counts tavv vjewel
such a t nns negatively as "spot," p i d. rlPho i n and that
once land is Vuideld or coned, any use allowed by p art and
rdir anees are eligi l .
I
NEW BUSINESS
i
1
Chairwoman t,a l u introduced tie request submitted by
9
RMERT " IDDLEMIT
Robert Middlemist for a Site plan apd Variance, t.at Consols- SITE PLAN_, VARIANCE
dation/DiNlsion for a two-story n #`.pe building of approxi- LOTIVIS ON/CON.SO IOATIO i
mately 15,184t. Chairwoman vasfl . u also 'noted for 8'1070) ithepanniiiC` r m ss rr that the x.019 'h > f` time involved
with this petitie=t was due to the petitio ter requesting that
44 Original application not proceed to allow farther' site
layout r starch. Reading f the eptt,mherk 1. 1982 stafr
report was waived.
Robert M ddb ,,n t stated that he r,?quested a delay in the,
processing so that he could further analyze the site layout
with- respect to parking. Nr. N ddlemr t explained that f e
did not create th,° par"-y and has attempted to work with
the ex,,, t irrq piece of aground, to develop a race bur d.r req
page 226
September 8, 1
lit 1976., Mr. Donald StOttti'(PCevious landowner) din receive
approval for ` a Nariarrice frm the setback to H'ig w v 5. . Mr. -Idd cmist stated char a building which would k at
the Ordindricereel ri remer is would riot be economicallyeaSt) le
Mr. Middlemist r vie `ed that t be, variance l r, nt i ; It
Vtaff report as "Alt exists because of new Ordinance re ui.
k r is since the original approval Abe varianoe identified
exs sts at onlY One ptrNpt, ar d not the full len th of
the building setba(*tc the east. prof*,rty lire.
he*rlars arrce ident r 'r. d by "E"* is Proposed in order to s$j,, e
additional, green area. Mr. Mrddlemi t pointed out that ,.'
Parking stall w,1,5lost for t .a eof `ire hydrant ac cest-
e idClit ied tbat the staffreport's efierence to trash
nclosure design standards should refer tc inches ratter
th<+ n feet,
Ccitimissioner Wire suggested that the building be L,)cat d in
such a m lntaer that it would have ttc a4me settack to HighwayasChcadc( --int Dura uprc-rte building, Commi,sjoijer Wire
inquired if the Petitioner tad considered sharing parking
Witt' the 4JUJa ent site. Mr. Middlertist explai.ted that the w
adjacent property owner agrees to sell `sliver" of land
and that the "siiNier" is really the only land available,.
adckrtroprt ,e'ds not nodadditional
parking, therefore, was riot interested in shared, parkin(j.
Mr. Middle -mist requested Of' Commission consider the parcel
design) and that there are going to be ',ariatices i nvol vt d
with the idevelopmentlof this site.
Staff" noted that the buildings approved for Mr. Stotts
sites werc, for ` buildings with smaller areas.
r m ssior T Steigerwald inquired about the lard to the east
of this site. Staff explained that therm is a vacantparcel, Mr. Middlemist stage that he spoke, with the
property owrierand the *aeent lot to the east was not
for sale. CMmissioner Steiqerwald inquired what tete
etitl neOs reaction would be it the parcel to ttae east
develops with a building of a .similar desi rr and s tb cks.
Mr. Middlemist explained this would no e a problem a
there ars s-,*zed4le trees to tt(;: udzitl) and that drainage
q r lat pareel.
oMmiss%otter Steigerwald stated fie could appreciate: the pet.-
tioner's concerns and saw reasons for the Nariances consid-
ering, the situation. COmmissioner Wirer contaur red . The
iris iur d` =:Cussed rekcat rig tic.building further to the
ricrt r to ,nerease the set ck "to Covrity'. oatl 15. It Was
determined that such a reloc t iurt could eliminate as maty as
rout ptirking spaces
Page NK
Pan ne maces
82CormissiorterPliiastatedthatthiswkudnotaccomplish
and the u x was wheth(pr this site (oulj sjpport the
pi opo ed building. Ctxnmilonvr Paubd aqreed that the
was , Q04strairied andthe. buildiriq was og
yproperty }
yy-
CIY
I N byOMW, 5? ober Pauha, secondvd by CommissionerStelqerwaldto K'ITION, TO APPROVE
yetwend approval of the Site Plan, ari ane- R COHW*.NDAT IO
t Lot un aT,xuat, r f for Robert Middle -mist subject
o tx n( t„4 ri stat 'i. tin , a7a report. ..
VOTL 7 Ayes. MOTION ' rried. VOTL
D RUSINLSS-
Chairwoman Vag.*a introduced the rt,quest and reading of ZACHHAM HiW-*S, INC. e August 301, 1982 staf f report was wa=ved PRELIMItARY
Chfairwo, man Va o a co n d -i§mapetitioner 1, who
PLAT/PLANT CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AMEtOZNT
Indicated that) irt adds t ion to t"ie dated REZONING AND ARL, NCE1,1 u t 26 t 19641 which explajvs. the basil r the reg x xnn FOR "FOX CLEN THIRD
the ifiterit way also to eliminate- requiring 1,andsclapinq to ADDITION" (A-814)
the adjacent residential units to the suut j.
MOT104 by Commissioner Wire, seconded, her Commissioner stul- MOTION TO APPROVEberq. to recommend approval Of the revised PPUD Preliminary RECOMWNDATION CatPian, Conditional Ust,Permit Amendment,, Rezoning and
Variance for "Fox Oleui 3,rd Addition" subject to the condit-
ions as stated in the, staff report.
VOTE. on the M ft lots. ? Aes. 1140"ITOR earried. VOTE
ThE COmMission r d from 9-.OSP. to +: P fi RECESS
OTHER"INESS
The atixt item, of bosiness was review Of the proposed Land P ,YM TH PARKS ANDTrust, as r u ,ytd h it Council. . gaff reviewed the RECREATION TRUSTT' ypther0} me -m ra€':d r FoC si n r WIre JI`lquir
about the reason for thy, proposed Sand Tust & Commissioner
Ma nu explained that the Land ,Trust oncept was developed
it) r spon4'v to the Mayor's Agenda 'for the City. The Pare
and Recreation Advisory Commission suggested that the P ,an-
nifI cx Bassi n r vieky the concept. Chairwoman Vasiliou
suggested that the item be discussed with the Parkt, and
Reerea` ion Advisory Comtvission at'the upoominq Joint Meet- ing, and also at the =hee;iled loint Meeting with the City, Council. Cmmissioner Wire requested additional background
information.
Ptige 263
Planning minutes
September 8, 3
Cortmissioner Wire (-:x ess d concern that the City Coutiell
is considering glvicq land back which was origln?lly plattedinthenortheastar(wa or the City as public parkland, to
idjacfunt property .)wners due to maintenancenee Costs* Commis_
stoner Wire stated that It is not reasonable t be in onsl -
tent hx now proposing a Land Trust whIcItIt .implies addit ojial
maint.enanee or additional public, park and,
f)(01 lssioner'Steigerwald Inquired if the intent i S toL makeitppealinpforadevelopertodonateland 'or publ ic
PUrPoses taf F explained that the e ser. e of the handTrustistoprovideamechanismforpropertyorrjrstodonate .hand out j of developmenZl, proposals and park
dedication requirements which would remain in force.,
Commissioner Stul erg noted that a landowner can apparentlydeduOtsuchdonationsfromtaxes.
Chairwoman Vasiliou requested that this item be placed ort
the ager das for the joint m etFn s with PRAC and CityCouncil.
Commissioner tol berg provided an update of discussion whioh DEVELOPERS, ;COMIL UPDATEoccurredattheSeptember $1, 198,E Plymouth -Developers
Council etinq. It was re+ ues ed that copy of the ugus
1982 Planning, Cott mission Minutes be made ; available
regarding the St aged Growth Flirt discussion. Commissioner
tu.l erg stated that at the meeting comments were rade that
a Watershed District mai} riot have control oyer development
proposals ' if the City has an adapted Storm Water DrainagePlatt
Staff explained the difference between Watershed Districts
and COLImi Ssioils, with reference to the Minnehaha WatershedDistrict, Bas ett`s Creek Flood Control Commission, and Elm
Creed; Conservation Commission.
Staff explained teat since the August 25t, 1582 Planning STAGED GROWTH . UPDATECommissionfttin , staf has met with the Metronolitan
nUroil staff and dlscusbed the possibility V, 1-iialudinq 58-5
aures In the "potential development" area category. This
would eliminate, the need to prioriti e within the developing
area.
The City Court. i l would then +deal specifically with the, pro
Posed "post -1990 service" areas. '-t4aff stated that the
etropol.itan Council staff reaction seemed positive,, and
Con irmation should be recvd o their position prior to
this iss-,je being discussed Lite City Council,
AMOURINKf The meeting adjourned at 9:45 P.M.
ING -COMMISSION P 'C K-NDAi TONS FOR SEPTMER 8v 1982
R CO WNDAT i I
P RqJiliC RL ISvD R*0111D CUDINCLPTPIM4 C f1 AV LARSERf M -LAR PROPERTIES, FOR " LYMMANHILLSESTATES11R - 001
AHL S, „rank Larseril, Car—Lar 'Properties has requf"std approval of a Revised RPUDCG'lata for "Plymouth Hills :st,.)t sll (RP -3) %Mch will r uce the number ofreidenti.al,`units for a total of.72 ftlelling units (forty -fou -unit and Twenty-t4ahtunittowrtcomes) and to include the de velom ynt Of 4 Chklrell-k lovas d at the southwestcortierofVicksburg.arse grid County Road ; arad
IMRLA , the C` i ty Council under Rt so lu ion fjo. C- approved a COno f t Plan andV4riancefo14vit;- For Frank rser ! Car -far Poopertiv-s for thee,ei pnx&rpt knowil aPlymouth, Hills .sta s" ioua ed on Z5.2 acres dt the southwest corner of eksb r(iLataeavidCotyRoad9* and,
H A , the City C"neil under Resolution no. 0-684 approved, a Prelmi try Plat andCcdiialhermitConsistingofZduplexes (4 u,i.ts) and ll quiodrdminiums (44) waits for a total units X6.8 acres at the southwest corner of County Road 9aidVicksbu : Lane for frank tarsen/Gar-tar Propertiesfor the d
r
oint f "Plymouthtt Hills tats I arid!
HLRLA , frnik Larsen/Gar-Lar =Pro rti s re u t a revision tae sal d a ov € Co aoeq t. l.an and,.,
WHL ,A , the Pjannin ' . "mission has reviewed said request at 4 duly gal led Ptib "t iHearingandregian its approval;
C' y THMI 'ORI , lT i CRESOLAED By THL; CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMO(JTH,
MI NL OTAt ;bat, it should and hereby does approve tile reddest of frank Larson, Car -LarProWrtiesforrevisiontotea+ RPU Concept Flan for "P0-, Mouth Hills Estates" (RPUD60-3), located at the southwest oortler of Vicksburg Lane and County Roaxl 9t su€)$sect tohefollowingooraditions.
1. Compliance with the City Engirleer's Memorandum.
M COmPlia"ue with ReWlutio'a Nos., 80-M acid 80-04.
3. Approved density of 3*3 units per acres't ae t( ;al number to be seventy --twounits- consisting of 44 quadvamin ums ani twenty-eight duplex units$ final
density i.s e olus`isive f that land determined by the City Engineer to be at or
bedow the high water elevation per tate City's Adopted Sturm Water DrainagePlata
C, "t , trail outlot shall be provlded for the trail location and eros i.no
I
as Proposed.
5. Utility improvements in aocorda nce with the City's Comprehensive Sewer andWaterPlans, must be extended by private development and 4-lbt by. public,
improvements.
COM liadee with the provisions 'of 'S otidra 6 of the Zoning Ordinance relative
to subdivision and development in the General flood Plein District prior toFinalPlatting.
PLANNING MMISSION REC04W.NDATIONS FOR EW 98Z
RECOMMENWITION
APPROVING LOT CONSOLIUATfgN/DIVISl N FOR EXISTING PLAT `M_ UTS FOR WERT MIDDLEMIST
131E1 E S, Robert Middlemist o - requested consolidation and dl.vi lon of existino p a,ttparcel.5 within the City of -Plymouth,-
NOW, lymouthNW, THEREFORE, M 1T HEREBY RESOLVED BY ' THE CITYCOUNCIL OF TIHE Cl7.
1Y OF PLYIUT
11NLS T , that it should and hereby does approve the 'f0110win Consolidation and divi- sion, and that the City Manager b uthorized to make the necessary speciiji assessment
corrections based upon City Policyy when the Consolidation and nivi.sldn are approved byHennepinCoupyr
PAR1rtLL A#
Lot EXCEPT the northwesterly 36 feet thereof as measured! at right angles to andParallelwiththe ;northwest rl; line of said Lot' all of Lot 131 and the northwest-
erly 32..30 feet of Lot 14 as measured at right angles to and parallel with the north-
westerly 'line of said Lost- 14, All. in Bleck 62 "Schieb ,,s Highland View Addition,"
According to the recordM pkat there. Area,- 20,678 sq. ft.
PARCEL t
Lott 14 EXCEPT the northwesterly '42.30 feet thereof as measured at right angles to and
Parallel with tht , *thwesterly line of said Lot 141 all of Lot 151 and that part of
adjoining vacated tord Atie°ue lying between the extension of the so lthwest Orly lineofBl.on and the southwesterly right-of-w,3y line of Truck Highway 55, as described in
eook 2142of Deeds, page 427, Doc*unlent No. 3064114 of Deeds, all in "Schivbelv Hzahh 4View 'Additionjl accordlIng to the recorded plat thereof. Area, 20,7138. ft.
To be efi,, ided as follows-,
ARUL A--
Lot rLot1EXCEPTthenortf'westerly 36 feet thereof as measured at right angles to and
parallel with the p ort-hwesterl y bine of said Lot 121 '1 of Lot '131 and that part of A
Lot 14 lying northwesterly of a line drawn from a pointy in the southwesterly line ofadLeat14, distant 32".59 feet southeasterly of the most westerly oornez of said Leat
141 to a point in the c i,lrth asterly .line of said Leat 14 distant 28.59 feet southeaster- ly of the most northerly corner of said Leat 14, all in Plock 6, "Schiebe's Highland
View Ado1i tion," according to. t °te reo ord,, d r1
at thereof. Area ?O,318 sq ft.
PARCEL Br
That part of Lot 14 Dying southeasterly of a line drawn from a point in the sozuthw st'
rly Brae of said Lot 14 -distant- 32-59 feet southeaster' o he sterly of the most westerly cornerd ,said Logit 1 to a point in the northeasterly line of said Lot 14 distant 25.59, feet
southeasterly of the most northerly corner of said Lot: 141 ll of LIe 151 artd that partofadjoiningvacatedGaylord; Atvenoe lying `between ha extension of the southwesterlylineofBlock61andtheso-zthwesterl.y right-of-way line of Trunk Highway 55, as des-
cri